Septic arthritis following arthroscopy and intra-articular steroids

Intra-articular steroid injection at the time of knee arthroscopy increases risk of post-operative infection

PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of post-operative infection after intra-articular steroid injection at the time of knee arthroscopy at a single institution high-volume sports medicine practice.

METHODS

The electronic medical record at a single institution was queried for all patients who underwent knee arthroscopy from 2011 to 2019. Patients were included if they underwent more simple arthroscopic procedures: diagnostic arthroscopy, meniscectomy, loose body removal, synovectomy, or microfracture. Patients were excluded if they underwent more complex procedures, such as ligament reconstruction, meniscus repair, or any open procedures. These patients' medical records were then queried for current procedural terminology and international classification of disease codes indicating post-operative infection. Individual chart review was performed on this group of patients to determine if a true postoperative infection occurred within 6 months of the index arthroscopy. Patients were then categorized into "intra-operative steroid injection" versus "no steroid" based on each surgeon's preferred intra-operative analgesic injection cocktail.

RESULTS

A total of 6889 patients were identified, including 2416 (35.1%) who were given intra-articular steroid at the time of knee arthroscopy. Post-operative infection occurred in 10 patients (0.15%) at a median of 18 days (range 9-42 days), 7 who received intra-operative steroid injection (0.29%) and 3 who did not (0.067%), p = 0.040. The relative risk of infection for those who received intra-operative steroid injection was 4.32 times higher than those who did not, with a number needed to harm of 448. There were no significant differences in age, body mass index, smoking status, or the prevalence of diabetes between those who got infected and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee infection following arthroscopic surgery is rare. Intra-operative steroid injection during arthroscopic knee surgery is associated with a 4.3-fold increased risk of subsequent knee infection. While the overall risk remains low, the use of intra-operative steroids is expected to result in one additional knee infection for every 448 arthroscopic procedures performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Risk of Infection in Knee Arthroscopy Patients Undergoing Corticosteroid Injections in the Perioperative Period

Background:

Recent evidence suggests that there may be an increased risk of infection for patients undergoing a corticosteroid injection before, during, or after knee arthroscopy.

Purpose:

To systematically review the literature to evaluate the risk of postoperative infection in patients undergoing intra-articular corticosteroid injections (CSI) before, during, or after knee arthroscopy.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to identify studies that evaluated the rate of postoperative infection in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy who received an intra-articular CSI during the perioperative period. The search phrase used was “knee AND arthroscopy AND injection AND (infection OR revision).” A subanalysis was also performed to analyze infection rates based on the timing of the corticosteroid injection in relation to arthroscopy.

Results:

Four studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 11,925 patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with an intra-articular CSI administered during the perioperative period (mean follow-up, 5.3 months) and 247,329 patients without a corticosteroid injection during the perioperative period (mean follow-up, 5.9 months). Patients who received an injection experienced a statistically significantly higher rate of postoperative infection (2.2%) when compared with patients who did not receive an injection (1.1%; P < .001). When analyzed by the timing of the injection, patients receiving an injection preoperatively or intraoperatively experienced a statistically significantly higher rate of postoperative infection (3% and 2.6%, respectively) when compared with patients receiving an injection postoperatively (1.4%; P = .001 for both).

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing knee arthroscopy who receive an intra-articular CSI during the perioperative period can be expected to experience significantly higher postoperative infection rates when compared with patients not receiving an injection. Furthermore, patients receiving a corticosteroid injection pre- or intraoperatively may experience significantly higher rates of postoperative infection when compared with patients receiving an injection postoperatively.

Delayed onset bioabsorbable screw reaction, intact screw extrusion and Pseudomonas aeruginosa tibial tunnel osteomyelitis years after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring graft

Postoperative reaction and infection after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a rare complication. We report two cases of bioabsorbable screw extrusion and Pseudomonas aeruginosa tibial tunnel infection in 17/18-year-old men, 2 and 4 years after ACL reconstruction, respectively. They underwent tibial tunnel debridement, removal of the still intact poly-L-D-lactic acid bioabsorbable screw and subsequent wound closure. Physical examination findings confirmed patency of the hamstring graft. Culture guided antibiotics were completed, and wounds healed unremarkably. Both returned to previous level of activity. Successful treatment is achieved through a logical sequence of management, as well as a multidisciplinary approach to prevent unnecessary secondary procedures and morbidity.

Effect of Methylprednisolone in Periarticular Infiltration for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty on Pain and Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Optimal pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is important to ensure timely rehabilitation and patient satisfaction. This study examines the efficacy of adding corticosteroid in periarticular infiltration cocktail with relation to postoperative pain management and rehabilitation in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA.

METHODS

Fifty patients with symptomatic end-stage bilateral knee osteoarthritis undergoing bilateral TKA under the same anesthetic were recruited. More painful knee was operated first, and the study solution containing ropivacaine, clonidine, epinephrine, and ketorolac with methylprednisolone was infiltrated in one knee and an identical mixture but without methylprednisolone was infiltrated in the second knee. Outcome measures included comparison of visual analogue scale on movement of each knee and range of motion achieved during the first three days after surgery.

RESULTS

Differences in visual analogue scale score and range of motion at day one and three between the two groups of knees were significant (P < .05). Postoperative inflammation and the ability to straight leg raise showed better trends in the knees receiving prednisolone although this did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Addition of methylprednisolone to periarticular infiltration cocktail for patients undergoing TKA has significant influence on reduction of pain in the early postoperative period and patients are able to regain knee flexion more quickly.

Validating the Role of Steroid in Analgesic Cocktail Preparation for Local Infiltration in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Pain control after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) through local analgesic cocktail preparation has gained widespread popularity in recent times. Local steroids have potent anti-inflammatory effect leading to reduced postoperative swelling and pain which might increase the efficacy and duration of local infiltration analgesia.

AIM

The aim is to evaluate whether the addition of local steroid to an injectable analgesic cocktail for periarticular infiltration leads to better pain control and knee range of motion (ROM) in the immediate postoperative period compared to patients who do not receive steroid in their cocktail.

SETTINGS AND DESIGNS

A prospective study was conducted in a group of 140 patients undergoing unilateral TKA between June 2017 and December 2017.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All the patients in the study group received either periarticular infiltration with an analgesic cocktail (Group I, n = 70) or analgesic cocktail with 100 mg methylprednisolone (Group II, n = 70) for postoperative pain with ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB). Patients were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at 8, 24, and 48 h postoperatively and ROM at 48 h after surgery.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Student t-test has been used to find the pairwise significance.

RESULTS

Group II had a statistically significant decrease in VAS scores at 8 h (P = 0.096), first postoperative day (P = 0.0001) and second postoperative day (P = 0.0001) as compared to Group I. However, there was no statistically significant difference seen with early ROM in both the groups at 48 h (P < 0.361).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received steroid cocktail infiltration plus ACB had an improved and better postoperative analgesia in an early postoperative period of 24-48 h; however, there was no significant difference in clinical ROM and functional outcome when compared to the study group.

Knee Septic Arthritis after Arthroscopy: Incidence, Risk Factors, Functional Outcome, and Infection Eradication Rate

Purpose  Septic knee arthritis following arthroscopy is a rare but dreaded complication. Definition and management of knee deep infections are quite discussed in literature. In this review, literature regarding infections after knee arthroscopy is analyzed highlighting the incidence, causative bacteria, risk factors as well as clinical outcomes.

Methods  We performed a review of the literature matching the following key words: “septic arthritis” OR “infection” AND “arthroscopy” AND “knee.” Knee arthroscopic procedures, such as debridement, meniscectomy, meniscus repair, synovectomy, microfracture, and lateral release, were considered. Complex procedures, such as ligament reconstruction, fractures, or complex cartilage repair techniques, were not included.

Results  Thirteen studies were included in this review. Incidence of infection ranged from 0.009 to 1.1% in patients undergoing simple arthroscopic procedures. Staphylococci are the most commonly isolated organisms from postarthroscopy infection. Use of intraoperative intra-articular steroids, smoking, obesity, male sex, diabetes, number of procedures performed during surgery, time of surgery, and tourniquet time of more than 60 minutes have been certified as risk factors for knee infection.

Conclusion  Postarthroscopy septic arthritis of the knee causes significant morbidity, usually requiring readmission to the hospital, at least one additional operation, and prolonged antibiotic therapy, both intravenous and oral. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are associated with a high success rate.

Level of Evidence  Level IV, systematic review of I-IV studies.

Risk of Infection After Intra-articular Steroid Injection at the Time of Ankle Arthroscopy in a Medicare Population

PURPOSE

To employ a national database to evaluate the association between intraoperative corticosteroid injection at the time of ankle arthroscopy and postoperative infection rates in Medicare patients.

METHODS

A national insurance database was queried for Medicare patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy, including arthroscopic removal of loose body, synovectomy, and limited or extensive debridement. Two groups were created: ankle arthroscopy with concomitant local steroid injection (n = 459) and a control group of patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy without intraoperative local steroid injection (n = 9,327). The demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index of each group were compared. Infection rates within 6 months postoperatively were assessed using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes and compared between groups using χ(2)-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 9,786 unique patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy were included in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the steroid injection study group and controls for the assessed infection-related variables, including gender, age group, obesity, smoking, and average Charlson Comorbidity Index. The infection rate for patients who had a local steroid injection at the time of surgery was 3.9% (18/459 patients), compared with 1.8% (168/9,327 patients) in the control group (odds ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 3.7; P = .002.) The majority of this difference was noted between the 65 and 79 years age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intraoperative intraarticular corticosteroid injection at the time of ankle arthroscopy in Medicare patients is associated with significantly increased rates of postoperative infection compared with controls without intraoperative steroid injections.

Intraoperative Corticosteroid Injection at the Time of Knee Arthroscopy Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Infection Rates in a Large Medicare Population

PURPOSE

To employ a national database of Medicare patients to evaluate the association of ipsilateral intra-articular knee corticosteroid injections at the time of knee arthroscopy with the incidence of postoperative infection.

METHODS

A national Medicare insurance database was queried for patients who underwent ipsilateral intra-articular corticosteroid injection of the knee at the time of knee arthroscopy from 2005 to 2012. Patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted open procedures, those who underwent more complex arthroscopic procedures, and those for whom laterality were not coded were excluded. This study group was compared to a control cohort of patients without intraoperative steroid injections that was matched to the study group for age, gender, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and smoking status. Infection rates within 3 and 6 months postoperatively were assessed using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative infection rates after knee arthroscopy was significantly higher at 3 months (0.66%; odds ratio [OR], 2.6; P < .0001) and 6 months (1.92%; OR, 3.6; P < .0001) in patients who underwent ipsilateral intra-articular knee steroid injection at the time of knee arthroscopy (n = 2,866) compared with matched controls without intraoperative injections (n = 170,350) at 3 months (0.25%) and 6 months (0.54%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates a significant increase in postoperative infection in Medicare patients who underwent ipsilateral intra-articular knee corticosteroid injections at the time of knee arthroscopy compared with a matched control group without intraoperative injection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Periarticular injection with corticosteroid has an additional pain management effect in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Although the analgesic effects of corticosteroids have been well documented, little information is available on periarticular injection (PI) containing corticosteroids for early postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We performed a prospective double-blind randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an intraoperative corticosteroid PI in patients undergoing TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-six consecutive female patients undergoing bilateral staged TKA were randomized to receive steroid or non-steroid PI, with 3 months separating the procedures. The steroid group received PI with a mixture containing triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg). The non-steroid group received the same injection mixture without corticosteroid. During the postoperative period, nighttime pain, functional recovery [straight leg raising (SLR) ability and maximal flexion], patient satisfaction, and complications were recorded. Short-term postoperative clinical scores and patient satisfaction were evaluated at 6 months.

RESULTS

The pain level was significantly lower in the PI steroid than the non-steroid group on the night of the operation (VAS, 1.2 vs. 2.3; p=0.021). Rebound pain was observed in both groups at POD1 (VAS, 3.2 vs. 3.8; p=0.248), but pain remained at a low level thereafter. No significant differences were seen in maximal flexion, frequency of acute rescuer, clinical scores, and patient satisfaction. The steroid group was able to perform SLR earlier than the non-steroid group (p=0.013). The incidence of complications was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

PI containing a corticosteroid provided an additional pain-relieving effect on the night of the operation. In addition, corticosteroid PI did not increase the perioperative complications of TKA.

Quantifying the excess cost and resource utilisation for patients with complications associated with elective knee arthroscopy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have demonstrated morbidity associated with elective knee arthroscopy. The objective of the current study was to quantify resource utilisation and costs associated with postoperative complications following an elective knee arthroscopy.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study using routinely collected hospital data from Victorian public hospitals during the period from 1 July 2000 to 30 June 2009. A generalised linear model was used to examine relative cost and length of stay for venous thromboembolism, joint complications and infections. Log-transformed multiple linear regression and retransformation were used to determine the excess cost after adjustment.

RESULTS

We identified 166,770 episodes involving an elective knee arthroscopy. There were a total of 976(0.6%) complications, including 573 patients who had a venous thromboembolism (VTE) (0.3%), 227 patients with a joint complication (0.1%) and 141 patients with infections (0.1%). After adjustment, the excess 30-day cost per patient for venous thromboembolism was $USD +3227 (95% CI: $3211-3244), for joint complications it was $USD +2247 (95% CI: $2216-2280) and for infections it was $USD +4364 (95% CI: $4331-4397).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to quantify resource utilisation for complications associated with elective knee arthroscopy. With growing attention focused on improving patient outcomes and containing costs, understanding the nature and impact of complications on resource utilisation is important.

Infections in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Context:

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a safe, common, and effective method of restoring stability to the knee after injury, but evolving techniques of reconstruction carry inherent risk. Infection after ACL reconstruction, while rare, carries a high morbidity, potentially resulting in a poor clinical outcome.

Evidence Acquisition:

Data were obtained from previously published peer-reviewed literature through a search of the entire PubMed database (up to December 2012) as well as from textbook chapters.

Results:

Treatment with culture-specific antibiotics and debridement with graft retention is recommended as initial treatment, but with persistent infection, consideration should be given to graft removal. Graft type likely has no effect on infection rates.

Conclusion:

The early diagnosis of infection and appropriate treatment are necessary to avoid the complications of articular cartilage damage and arthrofibrosis.

Septic knee arthritis following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review

Although postoperative septic arthritis is rare after ACL reconstruction, it carries a high morbidity that results in poor clinical outcome. Despite low incidence, it is important to recognize that infection and treat it without delay because of devastating consequences, such as loss of hyaline cartilage and arthrofibrosis, in order to avoid osteoarthritis development and near full range of motion achieved. Herein we discuss the pathogenesis, risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, treatment protocols and complications of septic knee arthritis after ACL reconstruction.

Joint infection after knee arthroscopy: medicolegal aspects

INTRODUCTION

Septic knee arthritis following arthroscopy is a rare but dreaded complication: it might compromise patients' functional prognosis and engage surgeon's liability. This study analyzes the context of such infection occurrences, their management as well as their medicolegal consequences.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two cases of knee septic arthritis following arthroscopy were examined during the medicolegal litigation process and collected for assessment from a medical liability specialised insurer. Half of the patients were manual workers who worked on their knees, and seven knees had a previous surgical history. The procedures performed at arthroscopy included seven ligamentoplasties, nine meniscotomies, three arthroscopic lavages, one arthrolysis, one chondroma removal and one plica resection. Seven patients, to some point, received corticosteroids: three preoperative joint injections, three intraoperative injections, and one oral corticotherapy.

RESULTS

Clinical signs of septic arthritis appeared after a median interval of 8 days (0-37), twice after a hemarthrosis and once after an articular burn. The median delay before treatment initiation was 4.2 days, and in 10 cases this therapeutic delay exceeded 3 days. On average, 3.5 additional procedures (1-9) were required to treat the infection and its residual sequels. Two total knee prostheses were implanted. Only two patients were free of disabling sequellae, and in five patients these sequels affected their livelihood. The medicolegal consequences were a partially permanent disability averaging 5% (0-20), a total temporary work incapacity of 120 days (40-790), a suffering burden averaging 3 out of 7 (0-4.5) points on the scale conventionally used in France. Twelve of these legal claims led to court ordered patient compensation.

DISCUSSION

Some risk factors of articular infection are known and well-identified. They can be linked to the patient's condition (addiction to smoking, surgical history, professional activity) or to medical management (intra-articular corticoid injections, interventions under oral anticoagulants, inadvertently overheated irrigation fluid). When infection is suspected, it is often the needle-aspirated fluid's inappropriate handling (such as absence of bacteriological testing or defective waiting time for the results), which delays the diagnostic or therapeutic management of this complication. All failures of infection diagnosis or treatment heavily contribute to malpractice claims against the surgeon. Early and appropriate management of postoperative infections helps limiting the risk of functional sequellae for the patient and reduces the risk of malpractice litigation for the practitioner.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; economic and decision analysis, retrospective study.

Prolonged implantation of an antibiotic cement spacer for management of shoulder sepsis in compromised patients

The purpose of this report is to present the preliminary results after treatment of shoulder sepsis with prolonged implantation of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer in a selected group of compromised patients. The current study included 11 patients (9 men and 2 women) with a mean age of 64 years (range, 36-79 years). All patients were treated with radical débridement, implantation of an antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate spacer, and 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy. The subjective complaints, range of motion of the shoulder, functional outcome (mini-Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score), and radiographic findings were evaluated. At a mean follow-up of 22 months (range, 15-26 months), 9 patients were free of infection, with pain relief and adequate shoulder function for activities of daily living. Radiographic evaluation revealed no loosening or fracture of the spacer and no progressive degenerative changes involving the glenoid. Prolonged implantation of the spacer may be a useful alternative in selected patients with poor general condition.

Risk and outcome of infection after different arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques

PURPOSE

Infection after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is reported to be rare but can cause significant morbidity. The purpose of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there is no difference in infection rates between techniques and no difference in outcome of different techniques after treatment of this complication.

METHODS

From a consecutive case series of 1,231 patients who underwent ACL reconstructions with 3 different techniques from 1988 through 2006, we report 6 patients who developed postoperative infection. Time to presentation, clinical symptoms, patient demographics, and surgical and management details were obtained from patient charts. All 6 patients were re-examined with physical and radiographic evaluation, functional testing, KT-1000 (Medmetric, San Diego, CA), and Lysholm scales.

RESULTS

Six patients (0.49%) were identified including 2 infections for each technique with incidence of 0.86%, 0.29%, and 0.64%, respectively. The graft was retained in all 6 patients and treated with debridement and continuous antibiotics. Metallic implant was removed in 5 cases. Patients were followed up for an average of 102.5 months. The average modified Lysholm score was 81.1. The average maximum manual KT-1000 value was 2.7 mm. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis, and no significant differences were noted in incidence, mean Lysholm scores, or KT-1000 difference (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive surgical debridement, hardware removal, and appropriate antibiotic therapy have proven effective in eliminating postsurgical infection along with graft retention and preservation of knee stability after ACL reconstruction performed with 3 different techniques. Although it was a small case series, the incidence and outcome after treatment of ACL infection in our study is similar, supporting the hypothesis that treatment outcomes were similar by using different surgical methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Hip arthroscopy: indications and technical pearls

Our purpose is to describe the evolving indications, technical pearls and contraindications for hip arthroscopy. Although traditional clinical and radiographic measures may identify structural abnormalities or fracture or the hip, recently developed arthroscopic access to the joint has provided new ways of viewing lesions of the labrum, chondral surfaces, and synovium that previously were unrecognized. Development of hip-specific distraction equipment and instruments has allowed treatment of many conditions, especially loose bodies and labral and chondral injuries. In the senior author's experience of more than 2000 hip arthroscopies, several key issues have been resolved. The procedure can be done safely and reproducibly. It can be done with minimal morbidity, and it can be accomplished in a cost-efficient manner as outpatient surgery. Symptom relief and functional improvement can be achieved. Further research is necessary to determine long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V (expert opinion). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparisons of analgesic effects of different doses of morphine and morphine plus methylprednisolone after knee surgery

BACKGROUND

In this double-blind randomized study, the analgesic effects of morphine alone and with methylprednisolone were examined in 72 patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery.

METHODS

At the end of arthroscopy, patients were allocated randomly to one of four groups to receive intra-articular administrations of saline, morphine 1 mg, morphine 5 mg or morphine 1 mg with methylprednisolone 40 mg. Preoperative and postoperative pain levels at rest and during movement (active flexion of the knee) were measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS). Postoperative analgesic requirements to alleviate pain were evaluated.

RESULTS

Pain scores were significantly lower for the patients who received 5 mg morphine and 1 mg morphine with 40 mg methylprednisolone than for those who received saline or 1 mg morphine. This was accompanied by a decrease in the postoperative consumption of analgesics and prolongation of the duration of pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that the analgesic effect of morphine given intra-articularly is dose dependent and that combination of methylprednisolone with morphine has an additive effect on analgesia.

Perceived efficacy and risks of infection following intra-articular injections: a survey of orthopaedic surgeons

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of intra-articular injections is controversial and published studies on efficacy and risks are few.

AIMS

We sought the opinion of practicing orthopaedic consultants in order to establish the perceived benefits and risks of infection following intra-articular steroids.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all the orthopaedic consultants in the UK and Ireland on the use of intra-articular steroids.

RESULTS

A total of 853 completed questionnaires (response rate 57.4%) were analysed. The perceived risk of infection was 1:1000 in almost half of the surgeons polled and 1:10,000 in one third. The 759 consultants who administer intra-articular steroids recalled sixty-eight cases of infection; 85.2 % of the surgeons rated efficacy 5 or above on a visual analog score of 1-10.

CONCLUSIONS

Correct patient selection, proper indications for use, and a limited number of appropriately spaced injections were all perceived to be important to achieve maximum benefit without serious side-effects.

[Acute joint infection--diagnosis and treatment]

The acute joint infection is a rare condition; the delayed diagnosis may lead to significant joint destruction. Diagnostic tools are the c-reactive protein and joint aspiration. Today arthroscopic treatment options are suitable tools for the treatment of such conditions. Arthroscopic lavage and debridement with additional systemic antibiotic treatment proofed to be very effective in an infected joint. If there are continuous signs of infection even with antibiotic treatment, rearthroscopy within few days is indicated. The number of rearthroscopies is related to the initial stage of the infection. With a shaver thorough debridement of all necrotic tissue as well as resection of adhesions is performed without complete resection of the intact and noninfected synovial membrane. The use of intraarticular resorbable antibiotic fleece is possible, but not generally recommended. Suction irrigation systems are only rarely indicated. If there is bony involvement, open arthrotomy still is the golden standard.

Analgesic Effects of Intraarticular Sufentanil and Sufentanil Plus Methylprednisolone After Arthroscopic Knee Surgery

We studied the effect of intraarticular saline, sufentanil, or sufentanil plus methylprednisolone after knee arthroscopic meniscectomy. In a double-blind randomized study, 60 patients undergoing knee arthroscopic meniscectomy were allocated to groups receiving intraarticular saline, intraarticular sufentanil 10 microg, or sufentanil 10 microg plus methylprednisolone 40 mg at the end of arthroscopy during general anesthesia. Postoperatively, pain levels at rest and during movement (i.e., active flexion of the knee) were measured by a visual analog scale and were significantly decreased in the sufentanil and sufentanil plus methylprednisolone groups compared with the control group. Moreover, we found that there was a significant reduction in intraarticular sufentanil and sufentanil plus methylprednisolone in the postoperative consumption of analgesics. We also found that the use of intraarticular sufentanil or sufentanil plus methylprednisolone after knee arthroscopic meniscectomy decreases the amount of supplementary analgesic needed for pain relief during the early postoperative period. In addition, we detected that sufentanil provided prolonged pain relief up to 24 h when compared with control, whereas when we combined sufentanil plus methylprednisolone, we found that it further reduced pain and use of analgesics when compared with sufentanil.

IMPLICATIONS

The combined use of intraarticular sufentanil (10 microg) and methylprednisolone (40 mg) in arthroscopic meniscectomy surgery reduced both postoperative pain scores and the use of additional analgesics.

Presentation, outcome, and cause of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case control study

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to examine clinical presentation and medium-term outcome of patients with septic arthritis of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

TYPE OF STUDY

Matched case control study.

METHODS

From a consecutive case series of 575 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction from 1996 through 1999, we report on 10 patients (1.7%) with postoperative septic arthritis. These patients were compared with individually matched patients without infection, on average, 3 years after surgery. The examination included physical and radiographic evaluation, functional testing, KT-1000, Lysholm and Tegner scales, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) form.

RESULTS

The predominant clinical presentation among patients with septic arthritis was modest classic signs of local infection. However, all had fever and elevated sedimentation rate or high C-reactive protein. Bacterial cultures showed coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species in 6, Staphylococcus aureus in 1, and Propionibacteriaceae species in 1 patient. The diagnosis was established with a delay of approximately 5 days. All patients underwent arthroscopic debridement and lavage (2 cases) or continuous irrigation (8 cases), as well as antibiotic treatment. One experienced graft rupture caused by the infection. At the end of the follow-up evaluation, the infected patients reported significantly lower activity levels than the control subjects (mean Tegner score, 5.3 v 7.2, P =.03). No statistically significant differences were noted in mean Lysholm, IKDC, or KOOS scores, or in KT-1000 difference. Two infected patients scored lower on the Tegner and Lysholm scales postoperatively than they did preoperatively. When examining the causes of infection, we found contamination by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus on supposedly sterile suture clamps on 3 graft preparation boards.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of suspected septic arthritis after ACL reconstruction, laboratory studies and aspiration followed by culture testing should be performed liberally to avoid the otherwise frequently delayed diagnosis. The inferior postoperative activity level noted in infected patients appeared not to be secondary to graft failure but may be related to arthrofibrosis, cartilage damage, or recurring postinfectious meniscal tears.

Combined intra-articular glucocorticoid, bupivacaine and morphine reduces pain and convalescence after diagnostic knee arthroscopy

We studied the effect of intra-articullar saline vs. bupivacaine + morphine or bupivacaine morphine + methylprednisolone after diagnostic knee arthroscopy. In a double-blind randomized study, 60 patients undergoing diagnostic knee arthroscopy without a therapeutic procedure were allocated to groups receiving intra-articular saline, intra-articular bupivacaine 150 mg + morphine 4 mg or the same dose of bupivacaine + morphine + intra-articular methylprednisolone 40 mg at the end of arthroscopy during general anesthesia. All patients were instructed to resume normal activities immediately after the procedure. Pain during movement and walking, leg muscle force and joint effusion, use of crutches and duration of sick leave were assessed. A combination of bupivacaine and morphine reduced pain, duration of immobilization and of convalescence. The addition of methylprednisolone further reduced pain, use of more analgesics, joint swelling and convalescence.

Infection following knee arthroscopy

Arthroscopy of the knee is not a risk-free procedure. Although rare, numerous complications have been reported in the literature. Fortunately, infection is a rare complication following arthroscopy, which, when treated, usually results in a benign outcome. We present the first reported case of Candida albicans infection following routine arthroscopy of the knee, which eventually resulted in a knee fusion. A review of infections that can occur after knee arthroscopy and their treatment is also presented. This and other potential complications should be considered when performing knee arthroscopy.

Septic arthritis following arthroscopic meniscus repair: a cluster of three cases

Three cases of Staphylococcus epidermidis septic arthritis following inside-out arthroscopic meniscus repair within a 4-day period at the same facility are described. All three patients responded to surgical debridement and 4 to 6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics. In each instance, the meniscus and repair sutures were left intact; 12- to 38-month follow-up revealed no evidence of infection or meniscal symptoms. Epidemiological investigation implicated the meniscus repair cannulas as one of the few factors common to all three cases. Molecular typing of bacterial DNA revealed that two of the three isolated organisms showed identical pulsed-field gel electrophoretic patterns, implying a common source of inoculation. Experimental contamination of the cannulas revealed that only sterilization involving ultrasonification, lumen washing by water jet, and steam sterilization resulted in clean and sterile cannulas.

Septic arthritis of the glenohumeral joint. A report of 11 cases and review of the literature

Eleven cases (6 adults and 5 pediatrics) of shoulder septic arthritis are described, and the English literature from 1960 to 1997 reviewed, for a total of 168 cases. Shoulder septic arthritis is an uncommon and difficult diagnosis requiring a high index of suspicion and early evaluation of the affected shoulder by the clinician. The disease usually involves very young infants or elderly patients (65-75 years old). Associated medical conditions were identified in 60% of the patients and include systemic disorders such as liver diseases, alcoholism, and malignancies in 46%; preceding chronic arthritic disorders in 24%; and associated infectious focus in 13% of the patients. Associated infections were more prevalent in the pediatric population. Intravenous drug abuse appears not to constitute a major risk factor; it was identified in less than 5% of patients. All patients presented with acute shoulder ache or with exacerbation of existing chronic pain in joints previously damaged. Elevated body temperature (over 38 degrees C) appeared in 67% of the adult patients and in over 90% of the pediatric patients. Shoulder arthritis was frequently accompanied by an accelerated erythrocyte sedimentation rate that may rise above 100 mm/hr. Increased white blood cell count was found in approximately 40% of patients. The initial X-rays were frequently normal, while ultrasonography supported the diagnosis in some cases by demonstrating accumulation of fluid inside the joint space. Aspiration of synovial fluid from the affected glenohumeral joint was necessary to evaluate the offending pathogen. False-negative Gram stain appeared in approximately 90% of the patients, whereas synovial fluid cultures demonstrated the pathogen in 88% of patients. Blood cultures were positive in 50% of adult patients and 90% of pediatric patients. The most common isolated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus, which accounted for 41% of infections. Gram-negative bacilli, which accounted for about 20% of infections, are more prevalent in the pediatric population, especially the neonates. Pyogenic shoulder arthritis should first be treated with intravenous antibiotics, effective at least against staphylococcal infections, until the organisms and sensitivities are identified. Duration of antibiotic therapy should be 3-6 weeks. Unfortunately, our experience in addition to the literature summary does not allow statistical analysis and firm conclusions concerning the best therapeutic approach. However, it appears that in the adult population an operative draining procedure is preferred, whereas in the pediatric population, a closed needle aspiration, if needed at all, is the optimal treatment. With prompt antibiotic therapy and drainage of the shoulder, the patient can be expected to improve clinically, with no serious long-term debilitating effects from the disease.

Septic arthritis of the shoulder: treating an atypical case

A wrestler developed septic arthritis in his glenohumeral joint. His case is unusual because septic arthritis most commonly affects weight-bearing joints and is usually seen in the very young, the very old, and people who are immunocompromised. Other risk factors include concurrent infection, endocarditis, invasive procedures, and intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Disease onset is usually insidious. Nonspecific findings include restricted motion, mild pain, and joint effusions; systemic signs of toxicity are often mild or absent. Diagnosis is confirmed with joint aspiration and analysis and culture of synovial fluids; definitive treatment often involves arthroscopic debridement followed by 2 to 6 weeks of antibiotics.

Septic Arthritis of the Shoulder

In brief A wrestler developed septic arthritis in his glenohumeral joint. His case is unusual because septic arthritis most commonly affects weight-bearing joints and is usually seen in the very young, the very old, and people who are immunocompromised. Other risk factors include concurrent infection, endocarditis, invasive procedures, and intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Disease onset is usually insidious. Nonspecific findings include restricted motion, mild pain, and joint effusions; systemic signs of toxicity are often mild or absent. Diagnosis is confirmed with joint aspiration and analysis and culture of synovial fluids; definitive treatment often involves arthroscopic debridement followed by 2 to 6 weeks of antibiotics.

Septic conditions of the shoulder--an up-dating of treatment strategies

We report the cases of 28 patients with bacterial infections of the shoulder treated between 1979 and 1991. There were ten cases of septic arthritis, ten cases of simple osteomyelitis of the proximal humerus, four cases of septic arthritis and concomitant osteomyelitis of the proximal humerus and four cases of periarticular soft-tissue infection. The infections, except for the cases of osteomyelitis, were staged by a "Classification of Exogenic Bacterial Infections" (CEBI). In septic arthritis and in periarticular soft-tissue infection, the time between the initial symptoms of infection and diagnosis was about 20 days. In the cases with osteomyelitis, there was an average delay of 9 months, which was partly due to the slow evolution of plasmacellular osteomyelitis. Treatment was based on operative debridement and arthrotomy, the insertion of drains, the implantation of gentamicin-polymethylmethacrylate beads and the application of high-dose parenteral antibiotics. In the postoperative period physiotherapy with early active and/or passive range-of-motion exercises favoured the draining of secretions and therefore gave better results than complete immobilisation. Treatment was evaluated using a modification of the shoulder score of Wülker et al. [17]. This study demonstrated that favourable results could only be obtained if the diagnosis was made early. This is particularly true for infections with Staphylococcus aureus (found in 19 patients). The overall result of the treatment of osteomyelitis and periarticular soft-tissue infection was good or satisfactory, while unsatisfactory results were noted for the patients with septic arthritis, particularly those with both septic arthritis and osteomyelitis.

Septic arthritis after arthroscopy: the contributing roles of intraarticular steroids and environmental factors

During a 9-month period at a small surgical center, seven cases of postarthroscopic septic arthritis occurred after 352 arthroscopic procedures, for an infection rate of 2.0%. Electrocardiographic cables contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa from an unsterile cleaning solution probably led to two shoulder infections. Five other infections (one definite Staphylococcus aureus and three definite and one possible coagulase-negative staphylococci) were attributed to inadequate arthroscope disinfection. In the initial phase of the outbreak, use of intraoperative intraarticular corticosteroids correlated with the occurrence of infection.

Septic arthritis of the knee: a 10-year review and long-term follow-up using a new scoring system

The case records of 64 patients with 65 episodes of infectious gonarthritis during 1979-88 were reviewed regarding epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data of possible relevance to the course and outcome of the disease. Long-term healing results were evaluated by means of a new scoring system 2-11 years after the acute disease in 46 patients. The infection was acquired by inoculation in 37% and by the hematogenous route in 55%. The major risk factors were trauma to the joint and arthrosis. Staphylococcus aureus was the causative agent in 58% and Streptococci in 15%. Treatment consisted of suction irrigation (86%) or intermittent aspiration (5%) combined with systemic antibiotic treatment. At follow-up, the pain and ache scores of the arthritic joint had decreased by 21% and 16% respectively, compared with the scores of the contralateral control joints. Anatomy and motility were reduced by 9% and 8% respectively. Age < 45 was associated with a greater score loss than in older patients. Treatment delayed by > 5 days was associated with increased loss of motility. We estimate that 79% of the patients had excellent or good long-term results following treatment of infectious arthritis of the knee. Evaluation of healing after infectious gonarthritis by use of a scoring system is quite feasible and allows comparison of different treatment regimes with improved accuracy.

Septic arthritis following arthroscopy: clinical syndromes and analysis of risk factors

During a 4-year study of 4,256 knee arthroscopies, eighteen patients became infected (infection rate 0.42%). Occurrence of infection was strongly associated with use of long-acting intraarticular intraoperative corticosteroids. Infection was more common among patients with longer surgery operating times, increased numbers of procedures during surgery, prior procedures, and performance of chondroplasty or soft tissue debridement. Subsequent to the study, the infection rate fell to 0.1%. Twenty-four infections were studied (our eighteen plus six other concurrent community cases); twelve were due to Staphylococcus aureus, eleven to coagulase-negative staphylococci, and one to Enterobacter cloacae. Seventy percent of the patients had onset of symptoms within 3 days of surgery. Most patients with coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections had fevers less than 38.3 degrees C (101 degrees F), negative Gram stains on synovial fluid, normal peripheral leukocyte counts, and somewhat indolent, mild clinical syndromes, while most patients with S. aureus infections had higher fevers, positive synovial Gram stains, peripheral leukocytosis, and more acute and severe clinical syndromes. Knee pain, swelling, and warmth always occurred, but erythema was noted in only 30% of patients. Treatment with 2 weeks of intravenous antibiotics was successful in all but one patient. Long-term results were excellent in sixteen of twenty-two patients.