Intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction for diaphyseal bone tumours

An algorithm for surgical treatment of children with bone sarcomas of the extremities

INTRODUCTION

Limb salvage surgery in children following bone sarcoma resection is a challenging problem because of the small size of the bones, the lack of appropriate size-matched implants, and the risk of limb-length discrepancy once skeletal growth is complete, secondary to the loss of the epiphyseal plate. Although several reconstruction options are available in children with bone sarcomas, such as vascularized fibula, massive bone allograft, extracorporeal devitalized autograft, endoprosthesis, and allograft-prosthesis composite, a consensus has not been reached on the best reconstruction method. The purpose of the present study is to propose an algorithm for reconstruction after resection of bone sarcomas in children.

METHODS

In this review, we analyzed reports on limb reconstruction in children following treatment for bone sarcoma, to provide a comprehensive overview of the different reconstruction options in children with bone sarcomas, the outcomes, and the risks and benefits of the different surgical approaches.

RESULTS

Despite a high risk of complications and the necessity for limb-lengthening procedures, prosthetic or biological reconstructions seem to achieve good functional outcomes in children with bone sarcoma. The use of massive bone graft seems to be recommended for intercalary reconstructions, with a free vascularized fibular graft for long defects, while for osteoarticular reconstruction a modular or expandable prosthesis or an allograft-prosthesis composite seems to have good results. For reconstruction of the proximal humerus, modular prosthesis or allograft-prosthesis composite are more commonly used than expandable prosthesis since there are fewer functional constraints related to possible limb-length discrepancy on the upper limb compared to the lower limb.

DISCUSSION

We discuss the advantages and limitations of the different available surgical options for bone reconstruction following tumor resection in children and propose an algorithm of potential surgical treatments for children with bone sarcomas of the extremities.

Surgical Outcomes and Complications of Custom-Made Prostheses in Upper Limb Oncological Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Bone tumors of the upper limb are a common cause of bone pain and pathological fractures in both old and young populations. Surgical reconstruction and limb salvage have become valid options for these patients despite this kind of surgery being challenging due to the need for wide bone resection and the involvement of surrounding soft tissues. Computer-assisted technology helps the surgeon in pre-operative planning and in designing customized implants. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical outcomes and complications of custom-made prostheses in oncologic reconstruction of the upper limb and if they are reliable options for patients suffering from aggressive tumors. An electronic search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Knowledge was conducted to identify all available articles on the use of custom-made prostheses in oncological resections of the upper limb. Twenty-one studies were included in the review, comprising a total of 145 patients with a mean age of 33.68 years. The bone involved was the humerus in 93 patients, and the radius was involved in 36 patients. There were only six cases involving proximal ulna, three cases involving the scapula, and seven cases involving the elbow as well as soft tissues around it. The most frequent primary tumor was the giant cell tumor, with 36 cases, followed by osteosarcoma with 25 cases, Ewing Sarcoma with 17 cases, and Chondrosarcoma with 7 total cases. Forty patients were affected by bone metastases (such as renal cell cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and rectal cancer) or hematologic diseases involving bone (lymphoma, myeloma, or non-Hodgkin disease). Custom-made prostheses are a viable option for patients who suffer from malignant tumors in their upper limbs. They are a reliable aid for surgeons in cases of extensive resections.

Reconstruction of the proximal radius with 3D-printed personalized prosthesis after tumor resection: case series

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) (Campanacci III) or malignant tumors extend to the epiphyseal region of the proximal radius, and intra-articular resection of the proximal radius is often needed. In the present study, we present the patients who underwent reconstruction of the proximal radius with 3D-printed personalized prosthesis after tumor resection, aiming to describe the prosthesis design and surgical technique and evaluate the clinical outcomes of this method.

METHODS

Between November 2018 and January 2021, 9 patients received radial hemiarthroplasty with 3D-printed personalized prostheses after tumor resection. The pathologic diagnosis was GCTB (Campanacci III) in 7 patients, osteosarcoma (IIB) in 1 patient, and synovial sarcoma (IIB) in 1 patient. The range of motion (ROM) and strength in terms of elbow flexion/extension and forearm supination/pronation were evaluated. Pain was assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively and at each follow-up visit. To evaluate the functional outcome, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) system and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system were administered at each follow-up visit. Complications and oncological outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

The patients were followed from 24 to 51 months, with a median follow-up of 35 months. No patients were lost to follow-up. During the follow-up, local recurrence and metastasis were not observed. The VAS score improved from a median of 5 points (range 4-7) preoperatively to 1 point (range 0-2) at the last follow-up visit. The mean MEPS score was 88.5% (83-93), and the mean MSTS score was 25.3 (24-27) at the last follow-up visit. No complications such as infection and aseptic loosening were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of a 3D-printed personalized prosthesis after proximal radial resection showed excellent oncologic outcomes and postoperative function at short-term follow-up and is a viable alternative method for reconstruction of the proximal radius bone defect after tumor resection.

What Is the Prosthetic Survival After Resection and Intercalary Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Diaphyseal Bone Metastases of the Humerus and Femur?

BACKGROUND

Large metastatic lesions of the diaphysis can cause considerable pain and result in difficult surgical challenges. Resection and cemented intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction offer one solution to the problem, but it is an extensive operation that might not be tolerated well by a debilitated patient. The risk of aseptic loosening and revision after intercalary endoprosthetic replacement has varied in previous reports, which have not examined the risk of revision in the context of patient survival.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) In a small case series from one institution, what is the survivorship of patients after cemented intercalary endoprosthetic replacement for diaphyseal metastasis, and what is the cumulative incidence of revision for any reason? (2) What are the complications associated with cemented intercalary reconstruction? (3) What is the functional outcome after the procedure as assessed by the MSTS93 score?

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 19 patients with diaphyseal long bone metastases who were treated with resection and cemented intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction by five participating surgeons at one referral center from 2006 to 2017. There were 11 men and eight women with a median age of 59 years (range 46 to 80 years). The minimum follow-up required for this series was 12 months; however, patients who reached an endpoint (death, radiographic loosening, or implant revision) before that time were included. One of these 19 patients was lost to follow-up but was not known to have died. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 0 to 116 months). Eight of the 19 patients presented with pathologic fractures. Ten of 19 lesions involved the femur, and nine of 19 were in the humerus. The most common pathologic finding was renal cell carcinoma (in 10 of 19). Survival estimates of the patients were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A competing risks estimator was used to evaluate implant survival, using death of the patient as the competing risk. We also estimated the cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening in a competing risk analysis. Radiographs were analyzed for radiolucency at the bone-cement-implant interfaces, fracture, integrity of the cement mantle, and component position stability. Complications were assessed using record review that was performed by an individual who was not involved in the initial care of the patients. Functional outcomes were assessed using the MSTS93 scoring system.

RESULTS

Patient survivorship was 68% (95% CI 50% to 93%) at 1 year, 53% (95% CI 34% to 81%) at 2 years, and 14% (95% CI 4% to 49%) at 5 years; the median patient survival time after reconstruction was 25 months (range 0 to 116 months). In the competing risk analysis, using death as the competing risk, the cumulative incidence of implant revision was 11% (95% CI 2% to 29%) at 1 year and 16% (95% CI 4% to 36%) at 5 years after surgery; however, the cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening (with death as a competing risk) was 22% (95% CI 6% to 43%) at 1 year and 33% (95% CI 13% to 55%) at 5 years after surgery. Other complications included one patient who died postoperatively of cardiac arrest, one patient with delayed wound healing, two patients with bone recurrence, and one patient who experienced local soft tissue recurrence that was excised without implant revision. Total MSTS93 scores improved from a mean of 12.6 ± 8.1 (42% ± 27%) preoperatively to 21.5 ± 5.0 (72% ± 17%) at 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.001) and 21.6 ± 8.5 (72% ± 28%) at 2 years postoperatively (p = 0.98; 3 months versus 2 years).

CONCLUSION

Resection of diaphyseal metastases with intercalary reconstruction can provide stability and short-term improvement in function for patients with advanced metastatic disease and extensive cortical destruction. Aseptic loosening is a concern, particularly in the humerus; however, the competing risk analysis suggests the procedure is adequate for most patients, because many in this series died of disease without undergoing revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study .

Ewing's sarcoma of proximal femur: case report of extreme osteotomy with 3D-printed prosthesis for the reconstruction

Background: Resection and reconstruction of malignant bone tumors at the proximal femur in adolescent patients has remained a clinical challenge. Considering the growth and development requirements of adolescents, there is no unified standard for the reconstruction of bone defects at the proximal femur. Here, we report a case of 3D-printed titanium alloy customized prosthesis for the construction of proximal femoral bone defects in an adolescent patient with Ewing's sarcoma of the proximal femur. Case presentation: A 7-year-old female patient presented to a local hospital with left hip pain, and was diagnosed with Ewing's sarcoma on the proximal left femur. The patient received two courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery according to the standard protocol. Considering growth and development problems associated with adolescents, we adopted a customized 3D-printed prosthesis of proximal femur for preservation of the femoral head and part of the femoral neck in the affected limb. Clinical outcomes, recorded after 12 months of follow-up, revealed excellent functional recovery and satisfactory functional scores of the affected limb, with no immediate complications. Conclusion: 3D-printed prosthesis is a feasible method for preserving femoral head and reconstruction of bone defects in adolescents' proximal femur.

Clinical efficacy of customized modular prosthesis in the treatment of femoral shaft metastases

Purpose

To examine clinical outcomes of a specialized modular prosthesis used to fill a bone deficiency following removal of femoral shaft metastases.

Methods

Eighteen patients with femoral shaft metastases who underwent en bloc resection and implantation of a personalized modular prosthesis between December 2014 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Pain, limb function, and quality of life were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS), Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scale, International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) scoring system, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale, and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) scale. The Kaplan–Meier technique was used to analyze patient survival.

Results

The operation duration was 90–150 min (mean, 115 min), and the osteotomy length was 9–16 cm (mean, 11.72 cm). The patients were followed for 12–62 months (mean, 25.28 months). The VAS and NHP ratings were lower at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery than before surgery, while the MSTS, ISOLS, and KPS scores were higher after surgery than they had been before. These differences were statistically significant (P&lt;0.05). The survival period was between 7 and 62 months (mean, 20.89 months), and the rates of survival at 1-year and 2-year were 72.22% and 27.78%, respectively. Except for two patients with aseptic prosthesis loosening during the follow-up period, there were no problems.

Conclusion

En bloc excision and implantation of a personalized modular prosthesis can reduce pain and improve the ability of patients with femoral shaft metastases to perform daily activities, thereby improving their quality of life.

Reconstruction of massive bone defects after femoral tumor resection using two new-designed 3D-printed intercalary prostheses: a clinical analytic study with the cooperative utilization of multiple technologies

BACKGROUND

To reconstruct massive bone defects of the femoral diaphysis and proximal end with limited bilateral cortical bone after joint-preserving musculoskeletal tumor resections, two novel 3D-printed customized intercalary femoral prostheses were applied.

METHODS

A series of nine patients with malignancies who received these novel 3D-printed prostheses were retrospectively studied between July 2018 and November 2021. The proximal and diaphyseal femur was divided into three regions of interest (ROIs) according to anatomic landmarks, and anatomic measurements were conducted on 50 computed tomography images showing normal femurs. Based on the individual implant-involved ROIs, osteotomy level, and anatomical and biomechanical features, two alternative 3D-printed prostheses were designed. In each patient, Hounsfield Unit (HU) value thresholding and finite element analysis were conducted to identify the bone trabecula and calcar femorale and to determine the stress distribution, respectively. We described the characteristics of each prosthesis and surgical procedure and recorded the intraoperative data. All patients underwent regular postoperative follow-up, in which the clinical, functional and radiographical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

With the ROI division and radiographic measurements, insufficient bilateral cortical bones for anchoring the traditional stem were verified in the normal proximal femur. Therefore, two 3D-printed intercalary endoprostheses, a Type A prosthesis with a proximal curved stem and a Type B prosthesis with a proximal anchorage-slot and corresponding locking screws, were designed. Based on HU value thresholding and finite element analysis, the 3D-printed proximal stems in all prostheses maximally preserved the trabecular bone and calcar femorale and optimized the biomechanical distribution, as did the proximal screws. With the 3D-printed osteotomy guide plates and reaming guide plates, all patients underwent the operation uneventfully with a satisfactory duration (325.00 ± 62.60 min) and bleeding volume (922.22 ± 222.36 ml). In the follow-up, Harris Hip and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores were ameliorated after surgery (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), reliable bone ingrowth was observed, and no major complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Two novel 3D-printed femoral intercalary prostheses, which achieved acceptable overall postoperative outcomes, were used as appropriate alternatives for oncologic patients with massive bone defects and limited residual bone and increased the opportunities for joint-preserving tumor resection. Several scientific methodologies utilized in this study may promote the clinical design proposals of 3D-printed implants.

Effect of implant length variations on stress shielding in proximal humeral replacement after tumor excision under torsion: Finite element study

The proximal humerus is the most common site of occurrence of primary bone tumors in the upper limb. Endoprosthetic replacement is deemed as the preferred reconstructive option following primary resection of bone tumors. However, it has been also associated with complications such as stress shielding and aseptic loosening compromising prosthetic survival. Our objective was to conduct a finite element (FE) study to investigate the effect of varying endoprosthesis length on bone stresses as well as to quantify the extent of stress shielding across the bone length (BL) in a humerus-prosthesis assembly for proximal humeral replacement after tumor excision thereby allowing us to identify the optimal implant length with best biomechanical performance. FE models of the intact humerus and humerus-prosthesis assemblies were established where they were loaded at the elbow joint under torsion with the glenohumeral joint fixed to represent twisting. After dividing the bone into individual slices consisting of 5% BL, the maximum cortical and cancellous principal, von Mises and shear bone stresses were calculated. To measure the level of stress shielding, the percentage stress change from the intact state was evaluated across each slice. Similar stress patterns were observed between the intact state and shorter endoprosthesis compared to the longer endoprostheses. Our findings illustrated the possibility of stress shielding occurring under torsional forces with its effect increasing with implant lengthening. To conclude, we believe that using a shorter prosthesis may substantially diminish the risk of potential implant failure due to stress shielding.

Intercalary allograft reconstruction following femoral tumour resection: mid- and long-term results and benefits of adding a vascularised fibula autograft

Purpose

Bone healing in femoral reconstructions using intercalary allografts can be compromised in a tumour context. There is also a high revision rate for non-union, infection, and fractures in this context. The advantages and disadvantages of an associated vascularised fibula graft (VFG) are still a matter of debate.

Methods

In a multicentre study, we retrospectively analysed 46 allograft reconstructions, operated on between 1984 and 2017, of which 18 were associated with a VFG (VFG+) and 28 without (VFG−), with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We determined the cumulative probability of bone union as well as the mid- and long-term revision risks for both categories by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and a multivariate Cox model. We also compared the MSTS scores.

Results

Significant differences in favour of VFG+ reconstruction were observed in the survival analyses for the probability of bone union (log-rank, p = 0.017) and in mid- and long-term revisions (log-rank, p = 0.032). No significant difference was observed for the MSTS, with a mean MSTS of 27.6 in our overall cohort (p = 0.060). The multivariate Cox model confirmed that VFG+ was the main positive factor for bone union, and it identified irradiated allografts as a major risk factor for the occurrence of mid- and long-term revisions.

Conclusion

Bone union was achieved earlier in both survival and Cox model analyses for the VFG+ group. It also reduced the mid- and long-term revision risk, except when an irradiated allograft was used. In case of a tumour, we thus recommend using VFG+ from a fresh-frozen allograft, as it appears to be a more reliable long-term option.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02650-x.

Union, complication, reintervention and failure rates of surgical techniques for large diaphyseal defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To understand the potential and limitations of the different available surgical techniques used to treat large, long-bone diaphyseal defects by focusing on union, complication, re-intervention, and failure rates, summarizing the pros and cons of each technique. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases up to March 16th, 2022; Inclusion criteria were clinical studies written in English, of any level of evidence, with more than five patients, describing the treatment of diaphyseal bone defects. The primary outcome was the analysis of results in terms of primary union, complication, reintervention, and failure rate of the four major groups of techniques: bone allograft and autograft, bone transport, vascularized and non-vascularized fibular graft, and endoprosthesis. The statistical analysis was carried out according to Neyeloff et al., and the Mantel–Haenszel method was used to provide pooled rates across the studies. The influence of the various techniques on union rates, complication rates, and reintervention rates was assessed by a z test on the pooled rates with their corresponding 95% CIs. Assessment of risk of bias and quality of evidence was based on Downs and Black’s “Checklist for Measuring Quality” and Rob 2.0 tool. Certainty of yielded evidence was evaluated with the GRADE system. Seventy-four articles were included on 1781 patients treated for the reconstruction of diaphyseal bone defects, 1496 cases in the inferior limb, and 285 in the upper limb, with trauma being the main cause of bone defect. The meta-analysis identified different outcomes in terms of results and risks. Primary union, complications, and reinterventions were 75%, 26% and 23% for bone allografts and autografts, 91%, 62% and 19% for the bone transport group, and 78%, 38% and 23% for fibular grafts; mean time to union was between 7.8 and 8.9 months in all these groups. Results varied according to the different aetiologies, endoprosthesis was the best solution for tumour, although with a 22% failure rate, while trauma presented a more composite outcome, with fibular grafts providing a faster time to union (6.9 months), while cancellous and cortical-cancellous grafts caused less complications, reinterventions, and failures. The literature about this topic has overall limited quality. However, important conclusions can be made: Many options are available to treat critical-size defects of the diaphysis, but no one appears to be an optimal solution in terms of a safe, satisfactory, and long-lasting outcome. Regardless of the bone defect cause, bone transport techniques showed a better primary union rate, but bone allograft and autograft had fewer complication, reintervention, and failure rates than the other techniques. The specific lesion aetiology represents a critical aspect influencing potential and limitations and therefore the choice of the most suitable technique to address the challenging large diaphyseal defects.

Case Report: 3D-Printed Prosthesis for Limb Salvage and Joint Preservation After Tibial Sarcoma Resection

Introduction

Reconstruction of massive tibial defects in ankle joint-preserving surgery remains challenging though biological and prosthetic methods have been attempted. We surgically treated a patient with only 18-mm distal tibia remaining and reconstructed with a unique three-dimensional printed prosthesis.

Case Presentation, Intervention, and Outcomes

A 36-year-old male presented to our clinic with complaints of gradually swelling left calf and palpable painless mass for five months. Imageological exam indicated a lesion spanning the entire length of the tibia and surrounding the vascular plexus. Diagnosis of chondrosarcoma was confirmed by biopsy. Amputation was initially recommended but rejected, thus a novel one-step limb-salvage procedure was performed. After en-bloc tumor resection and blood supply rebuilding, a customized, three-dimensional printed prosthesis with porous interface was fixed that connected the tumor knee prosthesis and distal ultra-small bone segment. During a 16-month follow-up, no soft tissue or prosthesis-related complications occurred. The patient was alive with no sign of recurrence or metastasis. Walking ability and full tibiotalar range of motion were preserved.

Conclusions

Custom-made, three-dimensional printed prosthesis manifested excellent mechanical stability during the follow-up in this joint-preserving surgery. Further investigation of the durability and rate of long-term complications is needed to introduce to routine clinical practice.

Outcomes of Intercalary Endoprostheses as a Treatment for Metastases in the Femoral and Humeral Diaphysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implant survival, functional score and complications of intercalary endoprostheses implanted for metastatic involvement of the femoral and humeral diaphysis.

METHODS

The selected group covered patients with bone metastasis who were surgically treated with an intercalary endoprosthesis between 2012 and 2021. The functional outcome was evaluated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system, and complications were evaluated by using the failure classification for prosthetics designed by Henderson.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 29.8 months. In our group of 25 patients with 27 intercalary endoprostheses (18 femurs, 9 humeri), there were 7 implant-related complications (25.9%), which were more common on the humerus (4 cases, 44.4%) than on the femur (3 cases, 16.7%). Only type II failure-aseptic loosening (5 cases, 18.5%)-and type III failure-structural failure (2 cases, 7.4%)-occurred. There was a significantly higher risk of aseptic loosening of the endoprosthesis in the humerus compared with that in the femur (odds ratio 13.79, 95% confidence interval 1.22-151.05, p = 0.0297). The overall cumulative implant survival was 92% 1 year after surgery and 72% 5 years after surgery. The average MSTS score was 82%. The MSTS score was significantly lower (p = 0.008) in the humerus (75.9%) than in the femur (84.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The resection of bone metastases and replacement with intercalary endoprosthesis has excellent immediate functional results with an acceptable level of complications in prognostically favourable patients.

Reconstruction survival of segmental megaendoprostheses: a retrospective analysis of 28 patients treated for intercalary bone defects after musculoskeletal tumor resections

INTRODUCTION

Intercalary endoprosthetic reconstructions have been reserved for patients with a limited life expectancy due to reports of high rates of early mechanical and reconstruction failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 28 patients who underwent intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction of the femur (n = 17) or tibia (n = 11) regarding reconstruction survival and causes of complications and reconstruction failure.

RESULTS

A total of 56 stems were implanted in this collective, 67.9% of which were implanted using cementation. Eight different stem designs were implanted. The mean patient age at the time of operation was 42.3 years. The mean bone defect needing reconstruction measured 18.5 cm. Resection margins were clear in 96.4% of patients. Of twenty-six complications, five were not implant-associated. We observed infection in 10.7% (n = 3) and traumatic periprosthetic fracture in 3.6% (n = 1) of cases. The most frequent complication was aseptic stem loosening (ASL) (53.8%; n = 14) occurring in eight patients (28.6%). The metaphyseal and meta-diaphyseal regions of femur and tibia were most susceptible to ASL with a rate of 39.1% and 31.3% respectively. No ASLs occurred in epiphyseal or diaphyseal location. Overall reconstruction survival was 43.9% and 64.3% including patients who died of disease with their implant intact. Overall limb survival was 72.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Proper planning of segmental reconstructions including stem design with regard to unique anatomical and biomechanical properties is mandatory to address the high rates of ASL in metaphyseal and metadiaphyseal stem sites. With continued efforts of improving stem design in these implantation sites and decreasing rates of mechanical failure, indications for segmental megaendoprostheses may also extend to younger patients with the localized disease for their advantages of early weight bearing and a lack of donor-site morbidity.

How the Choice of Osteosynthesis Affects the Complication Rate of Intercalary Allograft Reconstruction? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no clear consensus on the optimal type of fixation in intercalary allograft reconstruction. In this study, we aimed to compare the rate of most common complications following the plate and nail fixation of the intercalary allograft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. Studies in which the complication rate of the single bridging plate and intramedullary nail fixation was extractable were included. Studies that used extra procedures such as cementation and fibular vascular graft augmentation were excluded. The primary outcome was the fixation-specific rate of nonunion. Secondary outcomes were the fixation-specific rate of fracture, infection, and local recurrence.

RESULTS

In total, 13 studies with 431 reconstructions (352 reconstructions in the plate group and 79 reconstructions in the intramedullary nailing group) were included in this study. In the plate fixation, the rate of nonunion, fracture, infection and local recurrence was 12%, 11%, 11%, and 3%, respectively. In the intramedullary nail fixation, the rate of nonunion, fracture, infection, and local recurrence was 37%, 5%, 4%, and 0%, respectively. The rate of nonunion was significantly higher in the intramedullary nail group (OR = 6.34; 95% CI 2.98-13.49, P < 0.001). The rate of fracture, infection, and local recurrence was not significantly different between the two fixation methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramedullary nail is associated with a significantly higher rate of nonunion. Since the rate of other complications was not significantly different between the two osteosynthesis types, plate fixation could be considered as a better type of fixation.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00563-7.

Is three-dimensional-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure an acceptable reconstructive alternative in peri-knee metaphysis for the tumorous bone defect?

Background

Long-lasting reconstruction after extensive resection involving peri-knee metaphysis is a challenging problem in orthopedic oncology. Various reconstruction methods have been proposed, but they are characterized by a high complication rate. The purposes of this study were to (1) assess osseointegration at the bone implant interface and correlated incidence of aseptic loosening; (2) identify complications including infection, endoprosthesis fracture, periprosthetic fracture, leg length discrepancy, and wound healing problem in this case series; and (3) evaluate the short-term function of the patient who received this personalized reconstruction system.

Methods

Between September 2016 and June 2018, our center treated 15 patients with malignancies arising in the femur or tibia shaft using endoprosthesis with a 3D-printed custom-made stem. Osseointegration and aseptic loosening were assessed with digital tomosynthesis. Complications were recorded by reviewing the patients’ records. The function was evaluated with the 1993 version of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS-93) score at a median of 42 (range, 34 to 54) months after reconstruction.

Results

One patient who experienced early aseptic loosening was managed with immobilization and bisphosphonates infusion. All implants were well osseointegrated at the final follow-up examination. There are two periprosthetic fractures intraoperatively. The wire was applied to assist fixation, and the fracture healed at the latest follow-up. Two patients experienced significant leg length discrepancies. The median MSTS-93 score was 26 (range, 23 to 30).

Conclusions

A 3D-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure provides acceptable early outcomes in patients who received peri-knee metaphyseal reconstruction. With detailed preoperative design and precise intraoperative techniques, the reasonable initial stability benefits osseointegration to osteoconductive porous titanium, and therefore ensures short- and possibly long-term durability. Personalized adaptive endoprosthesis, careful intraoperative operation, and strict follow-up management enable effective prevention and treatment of complications. The functional results in our series were acceptable thanks to reliable fixation in the bone-endoprosthesis interface and an individualized rehabilitation program. These positive results indicate this device series can be a feasible alternative for critical bone defect reconstruction. Nevertheless, longer follow-up is required to determine whether this technique is superior to other forms of fixation.

Imaging following surgery for primary appendicular bone tumours

Primary bone tumours are uncommon, with sarcomas accounting for < 0.2% of all malignancies. The survival rate of primary bone sarcomas has significantly improved due to (neo)adjuvant therapy, while improved surgical techniques and development of new prostheses have shifted the surgical focus from amputation to limb preservation in the vast majority of patients. A wide variety of surgical options are available for the treatment of primary bone tumours which depend upon histological diagnosis, their appearance at the time of presentation and response to any (neo)adjuvant therapy as required. This review is intended to help radiologists familiarise themselves with the management of primary appendicular bone tumours and expected normal postoperative appearances for the various surgical techniques, and to recognise potential complications.

Osteofibrous dysplasia and adamantinoma: A summary of diagnostic challenges and surgical techniques

Osteofibrous dysplasia is an indolent benign fibro-osseous tumor, while adamantinoma is a locally aggressive biphasic malignancy with epithelial and fibro-osseous components. Predominantly arising in the tibial diaphysis of children and young adults, both tumors are resistant to chemotherapy and radiation. Wide surgical resection is regarded as the mainstay of therapy for adamantinoma, and limb-salvage reconstructive procedures can achieve good functional outcomes, albeit with non-negligible rates of complications. This review discusses emerging advances in the pathogenesis, histogenesis, and diagnosis of these entities and presents advantages and limitations of the most common surgical techniques used for their management.

Osteoid Tumors of Bone

We present a review of several bone (osteoid)-forming tumors including enostosis, osteoid osteoma, osteoblastoma, and osteosarcoma. These entities were chosen because they are reasonably common-neither seen every day nor rare. When applicable, recent information about the lesions is included.

En bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal bone metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and complications of en bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal bone metastases.

METHODS

A total of 21 patients with humeral diaphyseal bone metastases treated with en bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation from August 2014 to August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scale, International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) scoring system, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale, and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) scale were used to assess pain, limb function, and quality of life. Survival of the patients was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for 12-57 months (mean: 22 months); the operative time was 68-114 minutes (mean: 76.24 min); the osteotomy length was 6.5-10 cm (mean: 8.02 cm); and the intra-operative blood loss was 95-125 ml (mean: 104.71 ml). At three, six and 12 months after surgery, the VAS and NHP scores were lower, whereas the MSTS, ISOLS, and KPS scores were higher than those before surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The survival time was four to 24 months (mean: 19.46 months). Thesix month and one year survival rates were 80.95% and 52.38%, respectively. During the follow-up period, no complications occurred except for aseptic prosthesis loosening in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation can reduce pain, improve limb function, prolong survival time, and improve quality of life in patients with humeral diaphyseal bone metastases.

3D Finite Element Analysis of the Modular Prosthesis with Tooth Mechanism of the Femoral Shaft

Objectives

To evaluate the mechanical properties and provide a theoretical basis of a diaphyseal prosthesis with tooth mechanism using the finite element analysis method from the point of view of biomechanics.

Methods

A 3D digital femur model was generated based on a 28‐year‐old healthy man's femoral computed tomography (CT) data in Mimics 17.0 and the customized diaphyseal prostheses with/without tooth mechanism were designed in SolidWorks 2016. The 3D femur model after 8 cm osteotomy in the middle of its shaft and the prostheses with/without tooth mechanism was imported into Abaqus 2016 and the finite element analysis models were established. Three biomechanical tests (compression test, torsion test, and 3P‐bending test) under broken load were simulated in FEA to evaluate the performance of the prostheses.

Results

The stress distributions of the two prostheses were similar and the maximum von Mises stresses placed on them were very close in each test. The maximum von Mises stresses on the prosthesis with tooth mechanism were 31.55, 319.7, and 447.4 MPa, respectively, and those on the prosthesis without tooth mechanism were 26.26, 300.4, and 455.2 MPa, respectively, in the compression, torsion, and 3P‐bending tests. The maximum von Mises stresses on them were far below the ultimate tensile strength or ultimate compressive strength of the titanium alloy.

Conclusions

The diaphyseal prosthesis with tooth mechanism is helpful to adjust the rotation of the long bone during operation. Compared with the conventional diaphyseal prosthesis (without tooth mechanism), the diaphyseal prosthesis with tooth mechanism also has a good biomechanical performance and does not increase the risk of prosthetic failure.

Intercalary Reconstruction of the "Ultra-Critical Sized Bone Defect" by 3D-Printed Porous Prosthesis After Resection of Tibial Malignant Tumor

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the early stability, limb function, and mechanical complications of 3D-printed porous prosthetic reconstruction for "ultra-critical sized bone defects" following intercalary tibial tumor resections.

Methods

This study defined an "ultra-critical sized bone defect" in the tibia when the length of segmental defect in the tibia was >15.0 cm or >60% of the full tibia and the length of the residual fragment in proximal or distal tibia was between 0.5 cm and 4.0 cm. Thus, five patients with "ultra-critical sized bone defects" following an intercalary tibial malignant tumor resection treated with 3D-printed porous prosthesis between June 2014 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient information, implants design and fabrication, surgical procedures, and early clinical outcome data were collected and evaluated.

Results

Among the five patients, three were male and two were female, with an average age of 30.2 years. Pathological diagnoses were two osteosarcomas, one Ewing sarcoma, one pseudo-myogenic hemangioendothelioma, and one undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma . The average length of the bone defects following tumor resection was 22.8cm, and the average length of ultra-short residual bone was 2.65cm (range=0.6cm-3.8cm). The mean follow-up time was 27.6 months (range=14.0-62.0 months). Early biological fixation was achieved in all five patients. The average time of clinical osseointegration at the bone-porous interface was 3.2 months. All patients were reported to be pain free and have no limitations in their walking distance. No prosthetic mechanical complications were observed.

Conclusion

Reconstruction of the "ultra-critical sized bone defect" after an intercalary tibial tumor resection using 3D-printed porous prosthesis achieved satisfactory overall early biological fixation and limb function. Excellent primary stability and the following rigid biological fixation were key factors for success. The outcomes of this study were supposed to support further clinical application and evaluation of 3D-printed porous prosthetic reconstruction for "ultra-critical sized bone defects" in the tibia.

Reconstruction with biological methods following intercalary excision of femoral diaphyseal tumors

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of biological (nonvascularized fibula grafts and extracorporeal irradiated autologous bone grafts) methods used for reconstruction of intercalary defects after resection of femoral diaphyseal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 28 patients who had undergone intercalary resection in femoral diaphyseal tumors between 2011 and 2016. The mean follow-up period was 24 months (range 12-57 months).

RESULTS

The mean union time for diaphyseo-diaphyseal union was 10.5 and 11 months in nonvascularized fibula group and extracorporeal radiotherapy (ECRT) group, respectively. The mean union time for metaphyseo-diaphyseal union was 6.5 months in both nonvascularized fibula and ECRT groups. Six patients had distant metastasis, and one patient had local recurrence. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 28 at the last follow-up. Two patients had surgical site infection in the nonvascularized fibula group. Implant failure was found in one patient of the ECRT group requiring revision surgery. Three patients had nonunion (two from the nonvascularized fibula group and one from the ECRT group).

CONCLUSION

The present study indicates that the biological reconstruction modalities provide good functional outcomes in diaphyseal tumors of femur. Nonvasularized fibula and ECRT-treated autografts reconstruction provides good results, and union timing is comparable. The outcomes of the current study are promising as compared to the results in the reviewed literature. The reconstruction method depends on the resources available at the oncological center and the conversance with the method of the treating surgeon.

Reconstruction of intercalary bone defect after resection of malignant bone tumor

Due to accurate preoperative imaging techniques, early diagnosis and effective chemotherapy, many tumors arising in the metaphyseo-diaphyseal regions of long bones can be segmentally resected with joint preservation. The intercalary resection of malignant bone tumor results in a bone defect which can represent a challenging reconstructive problem. The most commonly used surgical reconstructive options for these defects include biologic reconstructions such as allografts, vascularized fibular grafts, autogenous extracorporeally devitalized tumor bearing bone graft, combination of allografts or devitalized autografts with vascularized fibular grafts, segmental bone transport, or induced membrane technique. Nonbiologic reconstructions, on the other hand, use intercalary endoprostheses. Every patient should be carefully evaluated and the reconstructive option should be individually selected. The aim of this article is to discuss the surgical options of reconstruction of bone defects after intercalary resection of malignant bone tumors with reviewing of their indications, advantages, disadvantages and complications.

Three-dimensional-printed intercalary prosthesis for the reconstruction of large bone defect after joint-preserving tumor resection

BACKGROUND

Joint-preserving intercalary tumor resection can result in better proprioception and a more normal joint function after reconstruction. However, most reported reconstruction techniques are usually associated with frequent complications. Therefore, the approach of reconstruction following joint-preserving tumor resection warrants further study.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and October 2018, 12 patients with metaphyseal malignant bone tumors around the knee joint were treated by joint-preserving intercalary resections with the aid of three-dimensional (3D)-printed osteotomy guide plates and reconstructions using 3D-printed intercalary prostheses. We assessed the accuracy of the resection by comparing the cross sections at the resection plane with 3D-printed matching surface of the prostheses. The functional outcomes, complications and oncological status were also evaluated.

RESULTS

All patients were observed for 7 to 32 months with an average follow-up of 22.5 months. The achieved resection was accurate, with accurate matching between the residual bone and prosthesis. The mean MSTS score was 28 (range, 26-30). Superficial infection occurred in two patients. Local recurrence was observed in one patient, while pulmonary metastasis was identified in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The personalized osteotomy guide plate and prosthesis based on 3D printing technique facilitate joint-preserving tumor resection and functional reconstruction. However, longer follow-up and larger sample size are required to clarify its long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Limb salvage surgery with joint preservation for malignant humeral bone tumors: operative procedures and clinical application

BACKGROUND

However, the application of limb salvage with joint preservation is controversial. The purpose of this study is to propose a selection strategy of joint-sparing operative procedures for humeral malignancies based on tumor origin, site and bone strength.

METHODS

The medical data of 28 patients with humeral malignancies treated at our institute from January 2010 to December 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients had a median age of 51 years (range, 8-82 years). Bone strength scoring system was utilized to evaluated bone strength of the tumor. Four joint-sparing surgical methods were performed on selected patients. Evaluation of limb function was based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system. Two-sample t-test was used to compare patient group data such as bone strength score and postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period for the 7 patients with primary malignancies was 45 months (range, 15-66 months). One patient died due to recurrence and lung metastasis, while the remaining 6 patients (6/7, 85.7%) survived without recurrence. For the 21 patients with metastases, 5 survived with tumors, with an average survival time of 25.8 months (range, 9-48 months). The rest died from progression of the primary tumors. The mean bone strength score for the biological reconstruction group and non-biological reconstruction group was respectively 9.7 ± 1.3 and 12.9 ± 1.2. A significant difference between the 2 groups (p < 0.05) was found. Mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was respectively 27.2 ± 1.8 and 26.1 ± 1.7 for the 2 groups. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Non-oncological complications included fracture (1), aseptic loosening (1) and radial nerve injury (1).

CONCLUSIONS

Alcohol devitalized autograft replantation is applicable for diaphyseal humeral primary malignancies, with a good response to chemotherapy and a low bone strength score (≤10). In situ microwave ablation is suitable for diaphyseal and (or) metaphyseal low-grade malignant bone tumors or metastases with a low bone strength score (≤10). Intercalary prosthetic reconstruction is preferred for diaphyseal metastases with a high bone strength score (> 10).

Complications following allograft reconstruction for primary bone tumors: Considerations for management

Introduction

The aim of this study was to investigate complication rates and types following allograft reconstruction and discuss unique considerations for management.

Methods

Seventy-four consecutive patients underwent large segment allograft reconstruction following resection of primary musculoskeletal tumors from 1991 to 2016. Mean patient age was 32 ± 20 years (range, 5-71 years). Minimum follow-up was 2 years unless patients were lost to disease prior. Mean follow-up was 105 months.

Results

Thirty-five patients had complications requiring subsequent surgery at a mean of 30 months (range, 1-146 months) post-operatively. Individual complication rates were 29%, 50%, and 42% for Allograft Prosthetic Composite, Intercalary, and Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction, respectively. Risk factors for complication included age less than 30 (OR 4.5; p = 0.002), male gender (OR 2.8; p = 0.031), chemotherapy (OR 4.4; p = 0.003), lower extremity disease (OR 3.4; p = 0.025). In patients with complications, limb-retention rate was 91% and mean MSTS scores were 23.6.

Conclusion

Despite considerable complication rates, management with a systematic approach results in successful outcomes with limb-retention greater than 90% and mean MSTS scores of 79%. In carefully selected patients, allografts provide a reliable method of reconstruction with treatable complications occurring at a mean of 30 months.

Intercalary prosthetic reconstruction for pathologic diaphyseal humeral fractures due to metastatic tumors: outcomes and improvements

BACKGROUND

There is a high aseptic loosening rate for intercalary prosthetic reconstruction for malignant tumors. We evaluated outcomes and complications of intercalary prosthetic reconstruction for pathologic diaphyseal humeral fractures and report the application of an extracortical plate that can prevent early loosening.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 9 patients who underwent intercalary prosthetic reconstruction for pathologic diaphyseal humeral fractures secondary to metastatic diseases between March 2011 and September 2017. Procedures were intercalary prosthetic reconstruction in 4 patients (group A) and an implanted intercalary prosthesis with a plate in 5 patients (group B). Operative time, blood loss, complications, and functional score were noted.

RESULTS

Mean operative time for group A and B was 80 ± 14 and 94 ± 5 minutes, respectively; blood loss was 115 ± 26 and 120 ± 31 mL respectively; and follow-up was 11.5 ± 10.1 and 6.2 ± 4.4 months, respectively. At final follow-up, all patients in group A had died, and 3 patients in group B had died; mean survival was 11.5 ± 10.1 and 9.3 ± 1.2 months, respectively. The mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24.5 ± 2.4 and 26.2 ± 0.8, respectively. The mean postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 85.5 ± 4.20 and 87 ± 2.6, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (P > .05). There was 1 aseptic loosening and 1 radial nerve injury in group A; there were no complications in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

The intercalary prosthesis yielded satisfactory outcomes in patients with pathologic diaphyseal humeral fractures, and an extracortical plate can prevent early aseptic loosening.

[Progress in repair and reconstruction of large segmental bone tumor defect in distal tibia]

Objective

To review the methods of repair and reconstruction of the large segmental bone tumor defect in distal tibia.

Methods

The related literature of repair and reconstruction of the large segmental bone tumor defect in disatal tibia were reviewed and analyzed from the aspects of the reserved ankle joint and the non-reserved ankle joint.

Results

The large segmental bone tumor defect in distak tibia is not rare in clinical. In addition to conventional allograft bone transplantation, vascularized autologous fibular transplantation, vascularized fibular allograft, inactivated tumor regeneration, distraction osteogenesis, and bone transport techniques; membrane-induced osteogenesis, artificial tumor stem prosthesis, three-dimensional printed metal trabecular prosthesis, ankle arthrodesis, artificial tumor ankle joint placement surgery are now gradually applied to the repair and reconstruction of large segmental bone defects in the distal tibia. Moreover, due to its long survival time, the function of reconstruction of the bone tumor defect in the distal tibia has also received increasing attention.

Conclusion

Although the ideal methods of repair and reconstruction of the large segmental bone tumor defect in the distal tibia has not yet been developed, great progress has been achieved. Recently, with the appearance of three-dimensional printing and various preoperative simulation techniques, personalized and precise therapy could become ture, but therapies for the large segmental bone tumor defect in the distal tibia still need to be further explored.

Biomechanical Analysis of a Novel Intercalary Prosthesis for Humeral Diaphyseal Segmental Defect Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To study the biomechanical properties of a novel modular intercalary prosthesis for humeral diaphyseal segmental defect reconstruction, to establish valid finite element humerus and prosthesis models, and to analyze the biomechanical differences in modular intercalary prostheses with or without plate fixation.

METHODS

Three groups were set up to compare the performance of the prosthesis: intact humerus, humerus-prosthesis and humerus-prosthesis-plate. The models of the three groups were transferred to finite element software. Boundary conditions, material properties, and mesh generation were set up for both the prosthesis and the humerus. In addition, 100 N or 2 N.m torsion was loaded to the elbow joint surface with the glenohumeral joint surface fixed. Humeral finite element models were established according to CT scans of the cadaveric bone; reverse engineering software Geomagic was used in this procedure. Components of prosthetic models were established using 3-D modeling software Solidworks. To verify the finite element models, the in vitro tests were simulated using a mechanical testing machine (Bionix; MTS Systems Corporation, USA). Starting with a 50 N preload, the specimen was subjected to 5 times tensile (300 N) and torsional (5 N.m) strength; interval time was 30 min to allow full recovery for the next specimen load. Axial tensile and torsional loads were applied to the elbow joint surface to simulate lifting heavy objects or twisting something, with the glenohumeral joint surface fixed.

RESULTS

Stress distribution on the humerus did not change its tendency notably after reconstruction by intercalary prosthesis whether with or without a plate. The special design which included a plate and prosthesis effectively diminished stress on the stem where aseptic loosening often takes place. Stress distribution major concentrate upon two stems without plate addition, maximum stress on proximal and distal stem respectively diminish 27.37% and 13.23% under tension, 10.66% and 11.16% under torsion after plate allied.

CONCLUSION

The novel intercalary prosthesis has excellent ability to reconstruct humeral diaphyseal defects. The accessory fixation system, which included a plate and prosthesis, improved the rigidity of anti-tension and anti-torsion, and diminished the risk of prosthetic loosening and dislocation. A finite element analysis is a kind of convenient and practicable method to be used as the confirmation of experimental biomechanics study.

Reconstruction of Humeral Shaft Defect with an Intercalary Endoprosthesis Following Resection of Tumor

Diaphyseal defects in long bones of extremities following segmental resection are very common in the clinic, and reconstruction remains a great challenge. Although there are many treatments for diaphyseal defects at present, reconstruction with an intercalary endoprosthesis may be an optimal method. We demonstrate a surgical technique for reconstruction of a humeral shaft defect with an intercalary endoprosthesis following tumor resection, and achieve a good clinical outcome. We conclude that in comparison with other methods, reconstruction with an intercalary endoprosthesis is simple, effective, and allows for earlier weight bearing and more rapid restoration of function.

Short-term outcomes of reconstruction subsequent to intercalary resection of femoral diaphyseal metastatic tumor with pathological fracture: Comparison between segmental allograft and intercalary prosthesis

Reconstruction of bone defects following femoral diaphyseal tumor resection is challenging. Segmental allograft (SA) and intercalary prosthesis (IP) are the most common reconstruction methods for femoral diaphyseal metastatic tumors with pathological fracture. However, whether the complications and functional outcomes differ between SA and IP remains unclear. To compare the clinical outcomes and complications for patients treated with SA reconstruction or IP replacement for femoral shaft tumors, 34 patients who had undergone intercalary resection for metastatic tumor with pathological fracture in the femoral diaphysis were evaluated. Of these, 18 had received SA and 16 IP. There were 11 males, and 24 females, with a mean age of 64.5±11.3 years. The most common sites of primary metastases were lung (26.5%), breast (17.6%) and liver (14.7%). The visual analog scale (VAS), implant-related complications and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores for each patient were collected. The follow-up period for patients ranged from 2 to 27 months. At the most recent follow-up, 28 patients had succumbed to mortality, with a mean survival time of 6.9±3.7 months for the IP group and 7.4±3.0 months for the SA group. Patients with IP had a significantly shorter time to full weight bearing and hospitalization time than those who received SA (P=0.003 and P=0.002, respectively). The rates of overall complications and implant-related complications were significantly lower for IP as compared with SA (18.8 vs. 66.7%, P=0.007; 12.5 vs. 55.6%, P=0.013). The reoperation rate of the SA group was higher than that of the IP group (38.9 vs. 12.5%), however the difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P=0.125). MSTS scores were significantly higher for the IP group as compared with the SA group at one month after surgery (IP, 26.7±1.6 vs. SA, 20.3±1.5; P<0.05), without a significant difference at the final follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, length of resection, follow-up time, operative time or blood loss between the two groups. In summary, IP reconstruction may provide improved early functional outcomes and fewer early complications, particularly for patients with a shorter life expectancy due to femoral metastatic tumors with pathological fracture.

Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects

Massive skeletal defects are encountered in the setting of tumors necessitating excision, failed total hip arthroplasty with periprosthetic bone loss, periprosthetic fracture, complex trauma, multiple failed osteosynthesis and infection. Reconstruction of the segmental defects poses a tremendous challenge to the orthopaedic surgeons. The goal of osseous reconstruction of these defects is to restore the bone length and function. Currently the most commonly employed methods for reconstruction are either a megaprosthesis or an Allograft Prosthesis Composite (APC). Megaprosthesis, initially created for the treatment in neoplastic pathologies are being used for the non-neoplastic pathologies as well. The longevity of these implants is an issue as majority of the patients receiving them are the survivors of oncologic issue or elderly population, both in which the life expectancy is limited. However, the early complications like instability, infection, prosthetic breakage and fixation failure have been extensively reported in several literatures. Moreover, the megaprostheses are non-biological options preventing secure fixation of the soft tissue around the implant. The Allograft Prosthesis Composites were introduced to overcome the complications of megaprosthesis. APC is made of a revision-type prosthesis cemented into the skeletal allograft to which the remaining soft tissue sleeve can be biologically fixed. APCs are preferred in young and low risk patients. Though the incidence of instability is relatively low with the composites as compared to the megaprosthesis, apart from infection, the newer complications pertaining to APCs are inevitable that includes non-union, allograft resorption, periprosthetic fracture and potential risk of disease transmission. The current review aims to give an overview on the treatment outcomes, complications and survival of both the megaprostheses and APCs at different anatomic sites in both the upper and lower limbs.

Long-term Results of Intercalary Endoprosthetic Short Segment Fixation Following Extended Diaphysectomy

Intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction following diaphyseal resection of osseous tumors offers functional advantages through preservation of native joints adjacent to the resected defect. Use of such implants is restricted by the amount of bone available for stem fixation adjacent to the defect. This study aimed to determine whether short osseous segment fixation with acceptable outcomes and complication rate can be reliably achieved with a customized intercalary endoprosthesis following extended diaphysectomy. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on 6 patients receiving customized anchor plugs for short segment fixation with a double compressive osseointegration intercalary implant to reconstruct segmental defects. Five of the implants were augmented with cement to support fixation in metaphyseal bone. Patient age at surgery ranged from 12 to 86 years. At mean follow-up of 39 months, mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional score was 26.3, with 5 of 6 patients achieving scores of 27 or greater. Stable fixation was achieved in all patients, with the shortest segment of bone 3.7 cm in length. Three mechanical implant failures requiring revision surgery occurred. No patient required revision of the entire implant, secondary adjacent joint replacement, or secondary amputation. No patient exhibited aseptic loosening, and no case was complicated by infection. Excellent functional outcomes were seen with follow-up out to 9 years. This suggests that cement-augmented double compressive osseointegration intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction can extend the benefits of intercalary replacement to many patients who otherwise might require adjacent joint or physeal sacrifice. However, patients should be counseled on the high risk of implant failure with subsequent need for revision surgery. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e964-e970.].

Outcomes of Intercalary Prosthetic Reconstruction for Pathological Diaphyseal Femoral Fractures Secondary to Metastatic Tumors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of segmental prosthetic reconstruction for pathological diaphyseal femoral fractures secondary to metastatic tumors.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2015, we retrospectively evaluated 16 patients (6 men and 10 women; 64.5 ± 11.4 years old at diagnosis) who underwent prosthetic reconstruction after segmental resection of diaphyseal femoral fractures due to metastatic lesions. Visual analog scale (VAS), functional outcomes, implant-related complications, and Mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score for each patient were collected.

RESULTS

The mean length of bone defect was 10.2 ± 2.6 cm (range, 8-16 cm); follow-up was 9 ± 6.8 months (range, 2-25 months) for all patients, and 24 months (23 and 25 months) for the 2 patients still alive. At final follow-up, 14 patients were dead, indicating a mean survival of 6.9 ± 3.6 months (range, 2-14 months). Mean preoperative VAS score was 8.5 ± 1.0, which decreased to 2.5 ± 1.3 at day 2 postoperatively, indicating significant pain relief (P < 0.05). The MSTS score for lower extremities was 84.6% (range, 73%-90%). The range of motion and function of adjacent joints was within the normal limits in all cases. Three patients (33%) developed complications, including aseptic loosening because of disease progression (1), infection (1), and peri-prosthesis fracture (1).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrated that this approach greatly relieves pain, and yields satisfactory functional outcomes with fewer complications in patients with pathological femoral fractures secondary to metastatic tumors; however, survival was not significantly improved.

Intercalary reconstructions after bone tumor resections: a review of treatments

An intercalary reconstruction is defined as replacement of the diaphyseal portion of a long bone after segmental skeletal resection (diaphysectomy). Intercalary reconstructions typically result in superior function compared to other limb-sparing procedures as the patient's native joints above and below the reconstruction are left undisturbed. The most popular reconstructive options after segmental resection of a bone sarcoma include allografts, vascularized fibula graft, combined allograft and vascularized fibula, segmental endoprostheses, extracorporeal devitalized autograft, and segmental transport using the principles of distraction osteogenesis. This article aims to review the indications, techniques, limitations, pros and cons, and complications of the aforementioned methods of intercalary bone tumor resections and reconstructions in the context of the ever-growing, brave new field of limb-salvage surgery.

Use of Compressive Osseointegration Endoprostheses for Massive Bone Loss From Tumor and Failed Arthroplasty: A Viable Option in the Upper Extremity

BACKGROUND

Endoprostheses using principles of compressive osseointegration have shown good survivorship in several studies involving the lower extremity; however, no series to our knowledge have documented the use of this technology in the management of massive bone loss in the upper limb.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of upper extremity implants using compressive osseointegration fixation principles achieved durable short-term fixation, and what were the modes of failure? (2) What surgical complications resulted from reconstruction using this technique?

METHODS

A multiinstitutional retrospective review identified nine patients (five women; four men) who underwent 13 endoprosthetic replacements between 2003 and 2014 using compressive osseointegration (Compliant^® Pre-stress Device [CPS]; Biomet Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA) in the upper extremity, including two proximal humeri, two humeral diaphyses, seven distal humeri, and two proximal ulna. During the early part of that period, the indication for use of a compressive prosthesis in our centers was revision of a previous tumor reconstruction (allograft-prosthetic composite or stemmed endoprosthetic reconstruction) (three patients; five implants), or revision arthroplasty with massive bone loss (three patients, four implants); more recently, indications became somewhat more permissive and included posttraumatic bone loss (one patient, one implant), primary bone sarcoma, and resections with very short remaining end segments after diaphyseal resections (two patients, three implants). Minimum followup was 24 months; one patient (one implant) was lost to followup before that time with the implant intact at 14 months and no patients have died. The mean age of the patients was 45 years (range, 21-62 years). Mean followup was 68 months (range, 24-141 months). Implant revision for any cause and for failure of the CPS mechanism was recorded. Modes of failure were categorized as soft tissue, aseptic loosening, structural, infection, and tumor progression; CPS modes of failure were defined as lack of fixation, with or without bone or implant fracture.

RESULTS

Of the 12 implants accounted for beyond 2 years, six had undergone revision of any kind. Only two revisions in two patients were attributable to lack of CPS fixation at the bone-implant interface; one of the patients also had periprosthetic and implant fracture develop through the traction bar. Other modes of failure were aseptic loosening of the standard ulnar component (two patients, two implants), bushing wear (one patient; one implant) and infection resulting in two-stage exchange and free soft tissue transfer with retention of the CPS spindle (one patient, one implant). Complications for all nine patients included one transient radial nerve palsy, one ulnar nerve sensory neurapraxia, one superficial infection, and two glenohumeral subluxations, one underwent revision surgery with implantation of a constrained liner.

CONCLUSIONS

A compressive osseointegration endoprosthesis is an option for very difficult revisions or sarcoma resection in the upper extremity in which the remaining segment of host bone is too short for a conventional prosthesis. However, surgeons must inform patients that these are salvage operations, and revision surgery is common. Long-term followup of more patients is necessary to further document the survivorship of these implants in the upper extremity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Vascularized fibular medialization for reconstruction of the tibial defects following tumour excision

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and oncologic results of fibular medialization when used alone as a single-stage reconstructive technique after wide excision of malignant tumours of the proximal, middle, or distal tibia.

METHODS

Between December 2010 and May 2015, 14 patients (six males and eight females) with primary malignant tumours of the tibia (eight proximal, four diaphyseal, two distal) were treated by wide excision. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 23.2 years (11-38). The fibula was mobilized medially with its vascular pedicle to fill the defect and was fixed by a long plate and screws bypassing the graft. The average size of the defects reconstructed was 19.5 cm (18-22). Patients were evaluated functionally using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scoring system.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 31.3 months (range, 17-54). The average time for complete union was 7.6 months (range, 6-9). At final follow-up all patients had fully united grafts; 11 walked without aids. Chest metastases developed in one patient, superficial wound infection in two patients and leg length discrepancy in four patients; one case had LLD of more than 3 cm. The mean MSTS score was 23/30 points (76.5%). The minimum score was 40% (12/30) and the maximum was 90% (27/30).

CONCLUSIONS

Ipsilateral pedicled vascularized fibular centralisation or medialization is a durable reconstruction for tibial defects after wide excision of bone tumours with an acceptable functional outcome. Stable osteosynthesis is the key to union.

Ultra-short stem anchorage in the proximal tibial epiphysis after intercalary tumor resections: analysis of reconstruction survival in four patients at a mean follow-up of 56 months

INTRODUCTION

Tumors localized in the proximal tibial meta-diaphysis often lead to osteoarticular resections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed four patients who underwent intercalary tumor resection and reconstruction using an ultra-short stem in the proximal tibial epiphysis, a procedure that to our knowledge has not been reported in literature so far.

RESULTS

At the time of operation, the mean patient age was 26.2 years. Three patients were male and one was female. Patients were diagnosed with osteosarcoma in two cases, Ewing's sarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone in one case each. In all cases, wide tumor resections were achieved (osteotomy 3-3.5 cm below the tibia plateau joint surface, mean resection length of tibial bone 18 cm) at a mean time of operation of 198.8 min. Two superficial wound-healing disorders occurred, leading to one surgical revision in each case. One local tumor recurrence occurred 12 months after operation in a patient who discontinued his adjuvant chemotherapy. This patient died of disease, 31 months after operation. Three patients are alive with no evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 56 months. Walking is not impaired and light sports activities have been reported in all cases. The mean MSTS score is 28/30.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, we report this reconstruction technique to be considered for special indications where the functional outcome can be improved by preservation of the knee joint in tumors of the proximal meta-diaphyseal tibial region.

Treatment of pathological fractures of the long bones

Bone metastases of the long bones often lead to pain and pathological fractures. Local treatment consists of radiotherapy or surgery. Treatment strategies are strongly based on the risk of the fracture and expected survival.

Diagnostic work-up consists of CT and biopsy for diagnosis of the primary tumour, bone scan or PET-CT for dissemination status, patient history and blood test for evaluation of general health, and biplanar radiograph or CT for evaluation of the involved bone.

A bone lesion with an axial cortical involvement of >30 mm has a high risk of fracturing and should be stabilised surgically.

Expected survival should be based on primary tumour type, performance score, and presence of visceral and cerebral metastases.

Radiotherapy is the primary treatment for symptomatic lesions without risk of fracturing. The role of post-operative radiotherapy remains unclear.

Main surgical treatment options consist of plate fixation, intramedullary nails and (endo) prosthesis. The choice of modality depends on the localisation, extent of involved bone, and expected survival. Adjuvant cement should be considered in large lesions for better stabilisation.

Cite this article: Willeumier JJ, van der Linden YM, van de Sande MAJ, Dijkstra PDS. Treatment of pathological fractures of the long bones. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:136–145. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000008.

Radial Shaft Reconstruction With an Intercalary Endoprosthesis Following Resection of Metastatic Tumor

Improvements in imaging and treatment of musculoskeletal tumors have increased the variety of options for reconstruction following joint-sparing diaphyseal resection. The purpose of this case series was to show that reconstruction of malignant tumors of the radial shaft with an intercalary prosthesis may be an option for patients with segmental bone loss. Three consecutive patients underwent wide resection of the radial diaphysis followed by reconstruction with a custom intercalary prosthesis. A custom intercalary prosthesis with lap joint design was used in all 3 cases. Mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 9-25 months). All patients were weight bearing as tolerated 1 week postoperatively. At the most recent follow-up, patients' mean elbow flexion and extension arc was 137° (range, 130°-140°). At the forearm, mean supination was 60° (range, 30°-90°) and mean pronation was 70° (range, 60°-90°). At the wrist, mean palmar flexion was 80° (range, 70°-90°) and mean dorsiflexion was 80° (range, 70°-90°). All patients reported minimal to no pain and no significant functional limitations. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 26/30 (87%). Reconstruction with an intercalary prosthesis is a viable option for patients with metastatic disease of the radial shaft. All patients had satisfactory results and early return to function; none required return to the operating room. Possible advantages of reconstruction with an intercalary prosthesis compared with reconstruction with a bone graft or polymethylmethacrylate osteosynthesis include early return to function and minimal weight-bearing restrictions postoperatively. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(2):e242-e247.].

Metastatic fractures of long limb bones

The diagnosis of pathological fracture should be considered routinely in patients with long limb-bone fractures. Investigations must be performed to establish the diagnosis of pathological fracture then to determine that the bone lesion is a metastasis. In over 85% of cases, the clinical evaluation combined with a detailed analysis of the radiographs is sufficient to determine that the fracture occurred at a tumour site. Aetiological investigations establish that the tumour is a metastasis. In some patients, the diagnosis of metastatic cancer antedates the fracture. When this is not the case, a diagnostic strategy should be devised, with first- to third-line investigations. When these fail to provide the definitive diagnosis, a surgical biopsy should be performed. The primaries most often responsible for metastatic bone disease are those of the breast, lung, kidney, prostate, and thyroid gland. However, the survival gains provided by newly introduced treatments translate into an increased frequency of bone metastases from other cancers. The optimal treatment of a pathological fracture is preventive. The Mirels score is helpful for determining whether preventive measures are indicated. When selecting a treatment for a pathological fracture, important considerations are the type of tumour, availability of effective adjuvant treatments, and general health of the patient. Metastatic fractures are best managed by a multidisciplinary team. The emergent treatment should start with optimisation of the patient's general condition, in particular by identifying and treating metabolic disorders (e.g., hypercalcaemia) and haematological disorders. Treatment decisions also depend on the above-listed general factors, location of the tumour, and size of the bony defect. Prosthetic reconstruction is preferred for epiphyseal fractures and internal fixation for diaphyseal fractures.

[Metastatic disease in long bones : Review of surgical treatment options]

Surgery in metastatic bone disease is currently the most frequent type of surgery in orthopedic oncology. Improved survival rates and an increasing incidence of bone metastasis have led to an increase in complications caused by metastatic disease, such as pathological fractures or hardware failure after operative treatment. Although surgery of metastatic lesions remains a palliative therapy concept, because of sufficient therapy for the primary carcinomas, tumor-specific-oriented follow-up protocols and a variation in the prognosis for the individual entities, an individually adapted treatment strategy is necessary. Depending on the life expectancy, more aggressive surgical procedures with the goal of adequate local tumor control have come into focus. Therefore, prognosis-tailored treatment requires an experienced team and should be performed in a multidisciplinary tumor center. The current article provides an overview of recent therapy concepts for the surgical treatment including endoprosthetic reconstruction, internal fixation with either intramedullary nailing or plate fixation devices, often augmented with bone cement.

Outcomes of a Modular Intercalary Endoprosthesis as Treatment for Segmental Defects of the Femur, Tibia, and Humerus

BACKGROUND

Resection of diaphyseal bone tumors for local tumor control and stabilization often results in an intercalary skeletal defect and presents a reconstructive challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Although many options for reconstruction have been described, relatively few studies report on the functional outcomes and complications of patients treated with modular intercalary endoprostheses.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The objectives of this study were to examine clinical outcomes after reconstruction with a modular intercalary endoprosthesis with a specific focus on (1) the rate of complication or failure; (2) differences in complication rates by anatomic site; (3) functional results as assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society System (MSTS); and (4) differences in complication rate between patients treated with cemented versus noncemented fixation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated with a modular intercalary endoprosthesis from three musculoskeletal oncology centers from 2008 to 2013. The indication for use of this intercalary endoprosthesis was segmental bone loss from aggressive or malignant tumor with sparing of the joint above and below and deemed unsuitable for biologic reconstruction. No other implant was used for this indication during this period. During this period, 41 patients received a total of 44 intercalary implants, which included 18 (40%) humeri, 5 (11%) tibiae, and 21 (48%) femora. There were 27 (66%) men and 14 (34%) women with a mean age of 63 years (range, 18–91 years). Eight patients (20%) had primary bone tumors and 33 (80%) had metastatic lesions. Thirty-five (85%) patients were being operated on as an initial treatment and six (15%) for revision of a previous reconstruction. Twenty-nine (66%) procedures had cemented stem fixation and 15 (34%) were treated with noncemented fixation. The overall mean followup was 14 months (range, 1–51 months). Patients with primary tumors had a mean followup of 19 months (range, 4–48 months) and patients with metastatic disease had a mean followup of 11 months (range, 1–51 months). Causes of implant failure were categorized according to Henderson et al. [19] into five types as follows: Type I (soft tissue failure), Type II (aseptic loosening), Type III (structural failure), Type IV (infection), and Type V (tumor progression). At 2 years of followup, 38 (93%) of these patients were accounted for with three (7%) lost to followup. MSTS functional assessment was available for 39 of 41 patients (95%).

RESULTS

At latest followup of these 41 patients, 14 (34%) patients were dead of disease, two patients (5%) dead of other causes, seven (17%) are continuously disease-free, one (2%) shows no evidence of disease, and 17 (41%) are alive with disease. There were 12 (27%) nononcologic complications. Five (11%) of these were Type II failures occurring in noncemented implants between the stem and bone, and six (14%) were Type III failures occurring in cemented implants at the clamp-rod implant interface. One patient developed a deep infection (2%, Type IV failure) and underwent removal of the implant. Additionally, one patient (2%, Type V failure) was treated by amputation after local progression of his metastatic disease. Complications were more common in femoral reconstructions than in tibial or humeral reconstructions. Twelve of 21 patients (57%) with femoral reconstructions had complications versus 0% of tibial or humeral reconstructions (0 of 23; odds ratio [OR], 62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3–1154; p < 0.0001). The mean overall MSTS score was 77%. Implants with cemented fixation (29) had higher mean MSTS scores when compared with implants with noncemented (15) fixation (84% versus 66%, p = 0.0017). The complication rate was 33% in noncemented cases and 21% in cemented cases (p = 0.39); however, Type II failure at the bone-stem interface was associated with noncemented fixation and Type III failure at the clamp-rod interface was associated with cemented fixation (OR, 143; 95% CI, 2.413–8476; p = 0.0022).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that this modular intercalary endoprosthesis yields equivalent results to other studies of intercalary endoprostheses in terms of MSTS scores. We found that patients treated with intercalary endoprostheses in the femur experienced more frequent complications than those treated for lesions in either the humerus or tibia and that the femoral complication rate of this endoprosthesis is higher when compared with other studies of intercalary endoprostheses for femoral reconstruction. Further studies are still needed to determine the long-term outcomes of this endoprosthesis in patients with primary tumors where longevity of the implant is of more importance than in the metastatic setting. We recommend cemented fixation for this intercalary modular endoprostheses because this provides improved MSTS scores and allows immediate return to weightbearing, which is of advantage to metastatic patients with limited lifespans. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Custom-made intercalary endoprosthetic reconstruction for a parosteal osteosarcoma of the femoral diaphysis: A case report

The present report describes a case of a 44-year-old female patient who presented with a palpable mass of the left thigh. A diagnosis of parosteal osteosarcoma (POS) at the femoral diaphysis was made following a diagnostic workup. Previous reports of long bone diaphyseal POS are rare. A long diaphyseal segment of the femur containing the tumor was resected along with a healthy margin of soft tissues, and the damaged bone was reconstructed with a custom-made intercalary endoprosthesis. Subsequent pathological examination of the surgical sample confirmed the diagnosis of POS. No local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed, and the patient had a positive Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 28/30 (93.3%) at the 28-month post-surgery follow-up. The present study describes the clinical, radiological, and pathological features of this rare type of osteosarcoma.