Endoprosthetic replacement after extra-articular resection of bone and soft-tissue tumours around the knee

Surgical Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Hip and Knee Megaprostheses

Periprosthetic joint infection is a feared complication after the megaprosthetic reconstruction of oncologic and non-oncologic bone defects of including the knee or hip joint. Due to the relative rarity of these procedures, however, optimal management is debatable. Considering the expanding use of megaprostheses in revision arthroplasty and the high revision burden in orthopedic oncology, the risk of PJI is likely to increase over the coming years. In this non-systematic review article, we present and discuss current management options and the associated results focusing on studies from the last 15 years and studies from dedicated centers or study groups. The indication, surgical details and results in controlling infection are presented for debridement, antibiotics, irrigation and retention (DAIR) procedure with an exchange of the modular components, single-stage implant exchange, two-stage exchanges and ablative procedures.

Recovery of leg strength based on isokinetic testing after tumor resection and reconstruction with a modular rotating hinge knee system: Prospective cross-sectional study with a minimum follow-up of 24 months

BACKGROUND

While modular reconstruction implants can be used to replace the bone lost after bone tumor resection, tumor excision from the neighboring soft tissues can lead to loss of strength and joint range of motion (ROM), which results in worse knee function. Functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis has been extensively documented. But few studies have evaluated the recovery after total knee reconstruction following tumor excision despite the fact that most of these patients are young and have high functional demands. We did a prospective cross-sectional study to: 1) compare muscle strength recovery around the knee with an isokinetic dynamometer after tumor excision and reconstruction with a modular implant to the healthy contralateral knee; 2) determine if the differences in peak torque (PT) in the knee extensors and flexors had a clinical impact.

HYPOTHESIS

Resection of soft tissues during tumor excision around the knee causes strength loss that cannot be fully recovered.

METHODS

The 36 patients who underwent extra- or intra-articular resection of a primary or secondary bone tumor in the knee area followed by reconstruction with a rotating hinge knee system between 2009 and 2021 were eligible for this study. The primary outcome was the ability to actively lock the operated knee. The secondary outcomes were the concentric PT during isokinetic testing at slow (90°/sec) and fast (180°/sec) speeds, flexion-extension ROM, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, the IKS, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and KOOS.

RESULTS

Nine patients agreed to participate in the study, all of whom had regained the ability to lock their knee postoperatively. PT in flexion and extension on the operated knee was less than the healthy knee. The PT ratio for the operated/healthy knee at 60°/sec and 180°/sec in flexion was 56.3%±16.2 [23.2-80.1] and 57.8%±12.3 [37.7-77.4], respectively, which corresponded to a slow-speed strength deficit of 43.7% in the knee flexors. The PT ratio for the operated/healthy knee at 60°/sec and 180°/sec in extension was 34.3%±24.6 [8.6-76.5] and 43%±27.2 [13.1-93.4], respectively, which corresponded to a slow-speed strength deficit of 65.7% in the knee extensors. The mean MSTS was 70%±20 [63-86]. The OKS was 29.9/48±11 [15-45], the mean IKS knee was 149.6±36 [80-178] and the mean KOOS was 67.43±18.5 [35-88.7].

DISCUSSION

Despite all patients having the ability to lock out their knee, there was an imbalance in the strength between opposite muscle groups: 43.7% strength deficit at slow-speed and 42.2% at fast speed for the hamstring muscles, and 65.7% at slow-speed and 57% at fast speed for the quadriceps muscles. This difference is considered pathological with an increased risk of knee injury. Despite this strength deficit, this joint replacement technique, which is free of complications, can preserve good knee function with acceptable knee joint ROM and satisfactory quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; prospective cross-sectional case-control study.

Functional and Oncological Outcome of Patients with Distal Femoral Osteosarcoma Managed by Limb Salvage Using Modular Endoprosthesis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to assess the functional and oncological outcomes of patients with distal femoral osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage using modular endoprosthesis as well as to assess related complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 82 patients were included in our study. Functional outcome was assessed using MSTS score and knee range of motion. Oncological outcome was assessed regarding local recurrence, chest metastasis, and patient survivorship. Complications were classified according to Henderson et al. RESULTS: The mean MSTS score was 26.21 (87.4%) (range 8-30 points) with 70.7% of patients having more than 90° of flexion. The incidence of local recurrence was 3.7% (3 patients), while the incidence of chest metastasis was 14.6% (12 patients). Aseptic loosening (type 2 failure) was the commonest complication (19.5%), followed by infection (15.9%). The 5- and 10-year survivorships of the limb were 98.8%, while the 5- and 10-year survivorships of the prosthesis were 67.7% and 52.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that patients with osteosarcoma distal femur who are treated by chemotherapy and limb salvage have an excellent long-term prognosis in terms of patient as well as limb survivorship. The use of modular endoprosthesis in these patients offer an acceptable function, with two-thirds of the patients retaining their prosthesis after 5 years and more than half retaining them after 10 years.

Accuracy of MRI scans in predicting intra-articular joint involvement in high-grade sarcomas around the knee

Aims

Intra-articular (IA) tumours around the knee are treated with extra-articular (EA) resection, which is associated with poor functional outcomes. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in predicting IA involvement around the knee.

Methods

We identified 63 cases of high-grade sarcomas in or around the distal femur that underwent an EA resection from a prospectively maintained database (January 1996 to April 2020). Suspicion of IA disease was noted in 52 cases, six had IA pathological fracture, two had an effusion, two had prior surgical intervention (curettage/IA intervention), and one had an osseous metastasis in the proximal tibia. To ascertain validity, two musculoskeletal radiologists (R1, R2) reviewed the preoperative imaging (MRI) of 63 consecutive cases on two occasions six weeks apart. The radiological criteria for IA disease comprised evidence of tumour extension within the suprapatellar pouch, intercondylar notch, extension along medial/lateral retinaculum, and presence of IA fracture. The radiological predictions were then confirmed with the final histopathology of the resected specimens.

Results

The resection histology revealed 23 cases (36.5%) showing IA disease involvement compared with 40 cases without (62%). The intraobserver variability of R1 was 0.85 (p < 0.001) compared to R2 with κ = 0.21 (p = 0.007). The interobserver variability was κ = 0.264 (p = 0.003). Knee effusion was found to be the most sensitive indicator of IA involvement, with a sensitivity of 91.3% but specificity of only 35%. However, when combined with a pathological fracture, this rose to 97.5% and 100% when disease was visible in Hoffa's fat pad.

Conclusion

MRI imaging can sometimes overestimate IA joint involvement and needs to be correlated with clinical signs. In the light of our findings, we would recommend EA resections when imaging shows effusion combined with either disease in Hoffa's fat pad or retinaculum, or pathological fractures.

Blood-saving dissection with monopolar tungsten needle electrodes and Teflon-coated spatula electrodes in tumor orthopedics

INTRODUCTION

Resection of musculoskeletal tumors and reconstruction with tumor endoprostheses often results in blood loss requiring transfusion of blood products. We assessed the blood-saving potential of using monopolar tungsten needle electrodes and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated spatula electrodes (intervention) compared with conventional dissection with sharp instruments and coagulation with uncoated steel electrodes (control).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 132 patients (79 interventions, 53 controls) undergoing surgery by one single experienced surgeon in our tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2021.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss in the intervention group was reduced by 29% [median (IQR): 700 (400-1200) vs 500 (200-700) ml; p = 0.0043]. Postoperative wound drainage decreased by 41% [median (IQR): 1230 (668-2041) vs 730 (450-1354) ml; p = 0.0080]. Additionally, patients in need of PRBCs during surgery declined from 43% to 15% (23/53 vs 12/79; p = 0.0005), while the transfusion rate after surgery did not change notably. The number of patients in need of revision surgery due to wound healing disorders was low in both groups (control group: 4/53 vs intervention group: 4/79). Only one patient in the control group and two patients in the intervention group underwent revision surgery due to hemorrhage. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (sex, Charlson Comorbidity score, tumor entity).

CONCLUSION

Dissection with tungsten needle electrodes and PTFE-coated spatula electrodes appears an effective surgical blood-saving measure without increased risk of wound healing disorders.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05164809.

Three-dimensional-printed porous prosthesis for the joint-sparing reconstruction of the proximal humeral tumorous defect

Background: Tumorous bone defect reconstructions of the proximal humerus with joint sparing is a challenge. Numerous reconstruction methods have been proposed but the proximal residual humerus is commonly sacrificed because of its extremely short length. To preserve the proximal humerus and improve clinical outcomes, we designed a three-dimensional (3D) printed uncemented prosthesis with a porous structure to treat tumorous bone defects of the proximal humerus. Methods: Our analysis included seven patients treated between March 2018 and July 2019. A 3D model was established, and related data were obtained, including the diameter of the humeral head, the resection length, and the residual length. A prosthesis was designed and fabricated based on these data. Functional and oncologic outcomes were recorded, and complications and osseointegration were evaluated. Results: The mean age of the patients was 20.3 years, and the median follow-up period was 26 months. The lengths of the residual proximal humerus were 17.9 mm on average. All the patients had preserved humeral heads and most of the rotator cuff was intact. The average postoperative range of motion (ROM) of the affected shoulder was 83.8°; flexion was 82.5°, extension was 43.8°, and adduction was 16.3°. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS) was 94.3%. Good osseointegration was observed on the interface between the bone and prosthesis. Conclusion: A 3D printed porous prosthesis with cone-like structures successfully achieved joint-sparing reconstruction of proximal humeral tumorous defects with satisfying functional outcomes. The preservation of the rotator cuff and humeral head plays an essential role in the function of the shoulder joint.

Postoperative Functional Assessment in Patients with Tumors Around the Knee Treated with Endoprosthetic Reconstruction: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

The restoration of as much normal function as possible has become an important goal following the endoprosthetic reconstruction. The objective of this study was to assess the functional outcome after endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumors around the knee and to explore prognostic factors of functional outcome.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent tumor prosthetic replacements consecutively. Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score were used to assess the functional outcome at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. The logistic model was used to select factors that had potential predictive value for postoperative function. Potential prognostic factors included age, gender, tumor site, type of tumor, length of bone resection, type of prosthesis, length of prosthetic stem, chemotherapy, pathological fracture, and body mass index.

RESULTS

At the 24 months after surgery, the mean musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score was 81.4% and the mean Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) was 83.6%. At the last follow-up, 68% of patients and 73% of patients received perfect or good MSTS score and TESS score, respectively. The multivariate analysis according to ordered-logit model showed that age < 35 years, distal femoral prosthesis, and length of bone resection < 14 cm were independent prognostic factors of better functional outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoprosthetic reconstruction may provide good functional results for most patients. Younger patients with distal femoral prosthesis and shorter resection of bone (on the premise of complete resection of tumor) are more likely to obtain satisfactory functional results after surgery.

Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis

Objective

This study proposes a system for classifying the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discusses reconstruction methods for revision surgery, based on different classification types.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received revision surgery for aseptic loosening in distal femoral tumor endoprosthesis from January 2008 to December 2020 at 3 bone tumor treatment centers in China. Based on the patient imaging data, we proposed a classification system for the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discussed its revision surgery strategy for various bone defects.

Results

A total of 31 patients were included in this study, including 21 males and 10 females aged 15–75 y (average: 44.3 y). First-revision surgery was performed on 24 patients, whereas second-revision surgery was conducted on 7 patients. The 31 patients were classified into different types based on the degree of aseptic loosening: Type I, 12 patients (38.7%); Type IIa, 7 patients (22.5%); Type IIb, 7 patients (22.5%); Type III, 4 patient (12.9%); and Type IV, 1 patient (3.2%). For type I, 11 patients underwent revisions with standard longer-stem prostheses (one with the original prosthesis), and one patient had the original prosthesis plus cortical allograft strut. For type II (a and b), 10 patients underwent revisions with original prosthesis or longer-stem prosthesis and 4 patients combined with cortical allograft strut. For type III, one patient underwent revision with a longer-stem prosthesis and the other 3 patients with a custom short-stem prosthesis. For type IV, only one patient underwent revision with a custom short-stem prosthesis.

Conclusions

Aseptic loosening of the distal femoral prosthesis can be divided into 4 types: type I, type II (a, b), type III and type IV. The reconstruction methods of our centers for different types of bone defects can offer some reference value in the revision of aseptic loosening.

Surgical Treatment of Bone Sarcoma

Bone sarcomas are rare primary malignant mesenchymal bone tumors. The three main entities are osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing sarcoma. While prognosis has improved for affected patients over the past decades, bone sarcomas are still critical conditions that require an interdisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach. While radiotherapy plays a role especially in Ewing sarcoma and chemotherapy in Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma, surgery remains the main pillar of treatment in all three entities. After complete tumor resection, the created bone defects need to be reconstructed. Possible strategies are implantation of allografts or autografts including vascularized bone grafts (e.g., of the fibula). Around the knee joint, rotationplasty can be performed or, as an alternative, the implantation of (expandable) megaprostheses can be performed. Challenges still associated with the implantation of foreign materials are aseptic loosening and infection. Future improvements may come with advances in 3D printing of individualized resection blades/implants, thus also securing safe tumor resection margins while at the same time shortening the required surgical time. Faster osseointegration and lower infection rates may possibly be achieved through more elaborate implant surface structures.

Patellar dislocation following distal femoral replacement after extra-articular knee resection for bone sarcoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of bone sarcoma in the distal femur, wide-margin resection and knee reconstruction with tumor endoprosthesis are standard therapies. Extra-articular knee resection is required in cases of tumor invasion of the knee joint; however, the incidence of complications, such as aseptic loosening, prosthesis infection, and implant failure, is higher than that following intra-articular knee resection. To the best of our knowledge, there are three reports of patellar dislocations after replacement of a tumor endoprosthesis.

CASE SUMMARY

A 36-year-old man with no significant past medical history was admitted to our institution with continuous pain in his left knee for 4 mo. An open biopsy was performed, and the patient was diagnosed with a left distal femoral malignant bone tumor. Extra-articular knee resection and knee reconstruction with a tumor endoprosthesis were performed. Although the alignment of the tumor prosthesis was acceptable, knee instability was noticed postoperatively. The axial radiographic view of the patellar and computed tomography showed lateral patellar dislocation at 4 wk postoperatively. The patient had to undergo a lateral release and proximal realignment. He could perform his daily activities at 9 mo postoperatively. Radiography revealed no patellar re-dislocation.

CONCLUSION

Proximal realignment may be considered during primary surgery if there is an imbalance in the forces controlling the patellar tracking.

Implant Survival, Clinical Outcome and Complications of Megaprosthetic Reconstructions Following Sarcoma Resection

Simple Summary

Malignant bone and soft tissue tumors are usually surgically removed with an envelope of healthy tissue as a barrier. If located in the long bones of the upper and lower extremity, this approach leads to a large bone defect commonly affecting a joint. One way to rebuild the bone defect and the neighboring joint is the use of a megaprosthesis that is anchored in the remaining bone comparable to a conventional joint replacement. In general this approach is popular as it provides early stability and allows the affected patient to begin rehabilitation early on. However, complications leading to long-term unplanned reoperation are common. This article provides an overview of current implant survival, types of complication and long-term outcomes of megaprostheses used following tumor resection.

Abstract

Megaprosthetic reconstruction of segmental bone defects following sarcoma resection is a frequently chosen surgical approach in orthopedic oncology. While the use of megaprostheses has gained popularity over the last decades and such implants are increasingly used for metastatic reconstructions and in non-tumor cases, there still is a high risk of long-term complications leading to revision surgery. This article investigates current implant survivorship, frequency and types of complications as well as functional outcomes of upper and lower limb megaprosthetic reconstructions.

Application and Development of Megaprostheses in Limb Salvage for Bone Tumors Around the Knee Joint

In recent decades, limb-salvage surgery has replaced amputation as the first choice for the treatment of bone tumors around knee. After tumor resection, there are a variety of reconstruction methods for us to choose, including autograft or allograft, inactivation and reimplantation, artificial prosthesis replacement, and allograft-prosthesis compound reconstruction. Compared with other reconstruction methods, artificial prosthesis reconstruction has some advantages: relatively simple, early weight bearing, fewer early complications, and good function in the early and mid-term follow-up. After decades of continuous improvements, the design of tumor prosthesis has reached a relatively mature stage, and the failure rate of prosthesis has also been declining year by year. However, artificial prostheses also have multiple complications such as infection, aseptic loosening, prosthetic breakage, and patients sometimes face the risk of revision or amputation. Therefore, clinicians need to deeply understand the characteristics of related complications and the principles of treatment.

Extra-articular resection of the hip joint for pelvic sarcomas: Are there any oncological and functional risks compared with intra-articular resection?

BACKGROUND

While extra-articular resection (EAR) of the knee and shoulder joint is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, the oncological and functional risks of EAR of the hip joint are unknown. We aimed to compare these risks between EAR of the hip joint and intra-articular resection (IAR).

METHODS

We conducted a comparative study of 75 patients who underwent en-bloc tumour resection and limb-salvage reconstruction for bone sarcomas of the peri-acetabulum between 1996 and 2016. We divided patients into two groups for analyses; EAR (n = 21) and IAR (n = 54).

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in oncological outcomes; the 5-year cumulative incidence of disease-specific death was 34% and 35% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.943), and the 5-year cumulative incidence of LR was 26% and 34%, respectively (p = 0.482). The most common complications were dislocation (28%) and deep infection (28%); there was equally no difference between the groups. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 66% and 65% in the EAR and IAR groups, respectively (p = 0.795), and were significantly lower in patients with deep infection (52% vs. 69%; p = 0.013). In a sub-analysis on the outcomes in patients who underwent PI-uninvolved PII-resection for chondrosarcoma, no major differences in oncologic and functional outcomes were confirmed.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing EAR and limb-salvage reconstructions of the hip joint have undistinguishable oncological, clinical and functional outcomes compared to those undergoing IAR and reconstructions. If preoperative imaging suggests articular tumour involvement, there appears to be no detrimental effect of undertaking EAR to optimise local control.

Is magnetic resonance imaging reliable for assessing osteosarcoma of the knee joint in children?

INTRODUCTION

The study of tumor extension in knee osteosarcomas is an essential diagnostic tool that helps determine the surgical approach. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the key component in this decision-making process, but the interpretation of signals can be difficult because peritumoral edema and inflammation may be mistaken for the tumor.

HYPOTHESIS

There is a discrepancy between MRI and histopathology findings in the assessment of joint involvement in pediatric osteosarcomas of the knee.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All children who underwent an extra-articular resection for an osteosarcoma of the knee between 2007 and 2016 were included. This was indicated if there was at least one of the following MRI signs: presence of articular effusion, involvement of either the peripheral capsuloligamentous structures, central pivot or patella, or lesion abutting the articular cartilage.

RESULTS

Nine patients were operated on with a mean age of 13±2.7 years. There were at least two of the described signs, mainly the involvement of the peripheral capsuloligamentous structures (78%) and central pivot (56%). The histopathology confirmed that the resection margins were healthy in all cases, but the indication for extra-articular resection could have been avoided in 89% of them.

DISCUSSION

MRI is the current gold standard for assessing tumor extension, but the signs contraindicating the transarticular approach remain poorly defined. Joint effusion detected by clinical or radiological assessment is the least reliable one. It seems that the tumor's proximity to the articular cartilage, as long as there is no loss of continuity in the latter, or its extension into the central pivot should no longer be considered as relevant signs. The involvement of the peripheral capsuloligamentous structure remains an indication criterion because oncologic resection is otherwise impossible, and the risk of false-negative histopathologic diagnoses is higher. Other MRI sequences could better assess the true extension into the joint space.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective study.

Metaphyseal Stem Tip Location is a Risk Factor for Aseptic Loosening of Cemented Distal Femoral Replacements

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of aseptic loosening (AL) of cemented stem distal femoral replacements (DFR) and to identify modifiable risk factors for its development.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 245 consecutive primary, cemented stem DFRs implanted at a single institution over a 40-year period. The primary outcome was revision surgery for AL. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for AL. Radiographs were reviewed to identify stem tip location, which was defined as diaphyseal or metaphyseal. Implant survival to AL was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

AL and structural failure were the most common causes of implant failure (incidence 11.8%, 29/245). Younger age (P = .002), male sex (P = .01), longer resection length (P = .04), and nonmodular implants (P = .002) were all significantly associated with AL. After 1:1 matching, stem tip location in metaphyseal bone was independently associated with AL (P = .04). 36% (9/25) of implants that loosened had a stem tip located in the metaphysis vs only 8% (2/25) of implants that did not fail. 30-year survival to AL was lower for implants with a metaphyseal stem tip than implants with a diaphyseal stem tip (22.7% vs 47.6%; P = .11).

CONCLUSION

A stem tip location in metaphyseal bone is associated with diminished survival to AL. When templating before DFR, stem tip location can assist in identifying high-risk reconstructions that may benefit from alternative or supplemental fixation techniques to prevent the development of AL.

What Is the Implant Survivorship and Functional Outcome After Total Humeral Replacement in Patients with Primary Bone Tumors?

BACKGROUND

Total humeral replacement is an option to reconstruct massive bone defects after resection of locally advanced bone tumors of the humerus. However, implant survivorship, potential risk factors for implant revision surgery, and functional results of total humeral replacement are poorly elucidated because of the rarity of the procedure.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) What is the revision-free implant and overall limb survivorship after total humerus replacement? (2) What factors are associated with implant revision surgery? (3) What is the functional outcome of the procedure as determined by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score?

METHODS

Between August 1999 and December 2018, 666 patients underwent megaprosthetic reconstruction after resection of a primary malignant or locally aggressive/rarely metastasizing tumor of the long bones at our department. In all, 23% (154) of these patients had a primary tumor located in the humerus. During the study, we performed total humeral replacement in all patients with a locally advanced sarcoma, in patients with pathological fractures, in patients with skip metastases, or in patients with previous intralesional contaminating surgery, who would have no sufficient bone stock for a stable implant fixation for a single joint megaprosthetic replacement of the proximal or distal humerus. We performed no biological reconstructions or reconstructions with allograft-prosthetic composites. As a result, 5% (33 of 666) of patients underwent total humerus replacement. Six percent (2 of 33) of patients were excluded because they received a custom-made, three-dimensionally (3-D) printed hemiprosthesis, leaving 5% (31) of the initial 666 patients for inclusion in our retrospective analysis. Of these, 6% (2 of 31) had surgery more than 5 years ago, but they had not been seen in the last 5 years. Median (interquartile range) age at the time of surgery was 15 years (14 to 25 years), and indications for total humeral replacement were primary malignant bone tumors (n = 30) and a recurring, rarely metastasizing bone tumor (n = 1). All megaprosthetic reconstructions were performed with a single modular system. The implanted prostheses were silver-coated beginning in 2006, and beginning in 2010, a reverse proximal humerus component was used when appropriate. We analyzed endoprosthetic complications descriptively and assessed the functional outcome of all surviving patients who did not undergo secondary amputation using the 1993 MSTS score and the ASES score. The median (IQR) follow-up in all survivors was 75 months (50 to 122 months), with a minimum follow-up period of 25 months. We evaluated the following factors for possible association with implant revision surgery: age, BMI, reconstruction length, duration of surgery, extraarticular resection, pathological fracture, previous intralesional surgery, (neo-)adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy, and metastatic disease.

RESULTS

The revision-free implant survivorship at 1 year was 77% (95% confidence interval 58% to 89%) and 74% (95% CI 55% to 86%) at 5 years. The overall limb survivorship was 93% (95% CI 75% to 98%) after 1 and after 5 years. We found revision-free survivorship to be lower in patients with extraarticular shoulder resection compared with intraarticular resections (50% [95% CI 21% to 74%] versus 89% [95% CI 64% to 97%]) after 5 years (subhazard ratios for extraarticular resections 4.4 [95% CI 1.2 to 16.5]; p = 0.03). With the number of patients available for our analysis, we could not detect a difference in revision-free survivorship at 5 years between patients who underwent postoperative radiotherapy (40% [95% CI 5% to 75%]) and patients who did not (81% [95% CI 60% to 92%]; p = 0.09). The median (IQR) MSTS score in 9 of 13 surviving patients after a median follow-up of 75 months (51 to 148 months) was 87% (67% to 92%), and the median ASES score was 83 (63 to 89) of 100 points, with higher scores representing better function.

CONCLUSION

Total humeral replacement after resection of locally advanced bone tumors appears to be associated with a good functional outcome in patients who do not die of their tumors, which in our study was approximately one- third of those who were treated with a resection and total humerus prosthesis. However, the probability of early prosthetic revision surgery is high, especially in patients undergoing extraarticular resections, who should be counseled accordingly. Still, our results suggest that if the prosthesis survives the first year, further risk for revision appears to be low. Future studies should reexamine the effect of postoperative radiotherapy on implant survival in a larger cohort and evaluate whether the use of soft tissue coverage with plastic reconstructive surgery might decrease the risk of early revisions, especially in patients undergoing extraarticular resections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Non-oncological outcomes following limb salvage surgery in patients with knee sarcoma: a scoping review

Purpose: Limb salvage surgery is a surgical procedure for tumour resection in bone and soft-tissue cancers. Guidelines aim to preserve as much function and tissue of the limb as possible. Surgical outcome data is routinely available as part of surgical reporting processes. What is less known are important non-oncological outcomes throughout recovery from both clinical and patient perspectives. The objective of this review was to explore non-oncological outcomes in patients diagnosed with sarcoma around the knee following limb salvage surgery. Materials and Methods: A scoping review methodology was used, and results analysed using CASP checklists. Results: Thirteen studies were included and following appraisal and synthesis, three themes emerged as providing important measures intrinsic to successful patient recovery: (1) physical function, (2) quality of life and, (3) gait and knee goniometry. Specifically, patients develop range of motion complications that alter gait patterns and patients often limit their post-operative participation in sport and leisure activities. Conclusions: This study has shown the importance of exploring confounding factors, adopting a holistic view of patient recovery beyond surgical outcomes, proposing evidence-based guidance to support and inform healthcare providers with clinical decision-making. This review highlights the paucity and lack of quality of research available, emphasising how under-represented this population is in the research literature.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONPatients having undergone LSS often have limited participation in sport and leisure activities.Patients can develop range of motion complications, such as flexion contracture or extension lag, which may affect the pattern of gait.Clinical consideration should be given to walking ability and gait patterns during the rehabilitation phase to prevent poor functional outcomes during recovery.Variation of treatment protocols, outcome measurement and rehabilitative care has been identified as important in predicting the outcomes in recovery from LSS procedures.

What Is the 10-year Survivorship of Cemented Distal Femoral Endoprostheses for Tumor Reconstructions and What Radiographic Features Are Associated with Survival?

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is one of the most common causes of revision of distal femoral endoprostheses and is considered a mid- to long-term complication. There are not many reports of 10-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening and all-cause survivorship in cemented stems. To our knowledge, there are no reports on radiographic features that are associated with aseptic loosening of these implants.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the 5- and 10-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening in patients undergoing reconstruction with a cemented distal femoral endoprosthesis after a tumor resection? (2) What is the all-cause 5- and 10-year survivorship at in these patients? (3) What radiographic features are associated with aseptic loosening at long-term follow-up?

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective study reviewing aseptic loosening in cemented prostheses to determine radiographic features associated with long-term implant survivorship. Patients who underwent a cemented distal femoral reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis after resection of a musculoskeletal tumor between 1997 and 2017 were reviewed. A total of 246 patients were identified from five institutions and met initial inclusion criteria. Of those, 21% (51) were lost to follow-up before 2 years, leaving 195 patients available for us to evaluate and analyze the survivorship and radiologic features associated with long-term implant survival. The mean (range) follow-up was 78 months (22 to 257). At the time of this analysis, 69% (135 of 195) of the patients were alive. Osteosarcoma was the most common diagnosis in 43% of patients (83 of 195), followed by metastatic carcinoma 13% (25 of 195). Fifty-six percent (110 of 195) of patients received chemotherapy; 15% (30 of 195) had radiation therapy. Aseptic loosening was diagnosed radiographically and was defined as a circumferential radiolucent line on all views, or subsidence around the stem in the absence of infection. We present 5- and 10-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from aseptic loosening, 5- and 10-year all-cause survivorship, and a qualitative assessment of radiographic features potentially associated with aseptic loosening (including the junctional radiolucent area, and cortical expansion remodeling). The junctional radiolucent area was defined as a radiolucent area of the bone starting at the bone-endoprosthesis junction to the tip of the femoral stem, and cortical expansion remodeling was defined as an increased cortical thickness at the stem tip. Although we wished to statistically analyze radiographic factors potentially associated with aseptic loosening, we did not have enough clinical material to do so (only nine patients developed loosening). Instead, we will report a few preliminary qualitative observations, which necessarily are preliminary, and which will need to be confirmed or refuted by future studies. We urge caution in interpreting these findings because of the very small numbers involved.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from aseptic loosening of the femoral component at 5 and 10 years were 95% (95% CI 89 to 98) and 93% (95% CI 86 to 97), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from revision for any cause at 5 and 10 years were 74% (95% CI 65 to 79) and 64% (95% CI 49 to 70), respectively. Although the numbers were too small to analyze statistically, all patients with aseptic loosening had a junctional radiolucent area more than 20% of the total length of the stem without cortical expansion remodeling at the stem tip. No aseptic loosening was observed if there was cortical ex remodeling, a junctional radiolucent area less than 20%, or curved stems that were 13 mm or greater in diameter. The numbers of patients with aseptic loosening in this series were too small to analyze statistically.

CONCLUSIONS

Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses have a relatively low rate of aseptic loosening and acceptable projected first-decade survivorship. The presence of a radiolucent area more than 20% without cortical expansion remodeling at the stem tip may lead to aseptic loosening in patients with these implants. Close radiographic surveillance and revision surgery may be considered for progressive lucencies and clinical symptoms of pain. If revision is contemplated, we recommend using larger diameter curved cemented stems. These are preliminary and provisional observations based on a low number of patients with aseptic loosening; future studies with greater numbers of patients are needed to validate or refute these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Establishment and validation of a nomogram model for periprosthetic infection after megaprosthetic replacement around the knee following bone tumor resection: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to the particularity of patients with bone tumors, the risk of periprosthetic infection following megaprosthetic replacement is much higher than that of traditional total knee arthroplasty. Unfortunately, few studies specifically reported the risk factors for periprosthetic infection following megaprosthetic replacement. The purposes of the study were to (1) establish a nomogram model, which can provide a reference for clinicians, and patients to reduce the occurrence of periprosthetic infection (2) explore the risk factors for deep infection of megaprosthesis.

HYPOTHESIS

A prediction model can be established and has favorable predictive accuracy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and seventy-seven megaprostheses were identified. There were 61 female patients and 116 male patients with a mean age of 35 years. The following risk factors were analyzed: tumor site, sex, age, material for prosthetic stem, tumor type, smoking, diabetes, length of bone resection, operation time, chemotherapy, BMI, malignant tumor staging and hematoma formation. Finally, based on the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors were used to develop a nomogram model.

RESULTS

Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that the chemotherapy, longer operation time and hematoma formation were risk factors for periprosthetic infection. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the chemotherapy, longer operation time and hematoma formation were significant risk factors for periprosthetic infection. The nomogram model was established using these significant risk factors, with a C-index of 0.766 and an acceptable consistency according to the internal validation, indicating that the prediction model had favorable predictive accuracy.

DISCUSSION

This study has important implications for the future investigations of prevention of periprosthetic infection. The nomogram model identifies high-risk patients for whom attached prophylaxis measures are required. Future studies regarding reduction of incidence of periprosthetic infection should pay close attention to these high-risk patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective, cohort study.

Intercalary Reconstruction of the "Ultra-Critical Sized Bone Defect" by 3D-Printed Porous Prosthesis After Resection of Tibial Malignant Tumor

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the early stability, limb function, and mechanical complications of 3D-printed porous prosthetic reconstruction for "ultra-critical sized bone defects" following intercalary tibial tumor resections.

Methods

This study defined an "ultra-critical sized bone defect" in the tibia when the length of segmental defect in the tibia was >15.0 cm or >60% of the full tibia and the length of the residual fragment in proximal or distal tibia was between 0.5 cm and 4.0 cm. Thus, five patients with "ultra-critical sized bone defects" following an intercalary tibial malignant tumor resection treated with 3D-printed porous prosthesis between June 2014 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient information, implants design and fabrication, surgical procedures, and early clinical outcome data were collected and evaluated.

Results

Among the five patients, three were male and two were female, with an average age of 30.2 years. Pathological diagnoses were two osteosarcomas, one Ewing sarcoma, one pseudo-myogenic hemangioendothelioma, and one undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma . The average length of the bone defects following tumor resection was 22.8cm, and the average length of ultra-short residual bone was 2.65cm (range=0.6cm-3.8cm). The mean follow-up time was 27.6 months (range=14.0-62.0 months). Early biological fixation was achieved in all five patients. The average time of clinical osseointegration at the bone-porous interface was 3.2 months. All patients were reported to be pain free and have no limitations in their walking distance. No prosthetic mechanical complications were observed.

Conclusion

Reconstruction of the "ultra-critical sized bone defect" after an intercalary tibial tumor resection using 3D-printed porous prosthesis achieved satisfactory overall early biological fixation and limb function. Excellent primary stability and the following rigid biological fixation were key factors for success. The outcomes of this study were supposed to support further clinical application and evaluation of 3D-printed porous prosthetic reconstruction for "ultra-critical sized bone defects" in the tibia.

Extra-articular resection for bone sarcomas involving the hip joint

AIM

The aim of this study was to determine the oncologic, functional, and clinical outcomes after the extra-articular resection and limb-salvage reconstruction of the hip joint.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 34 patients who underwent extra-articular resection of the hip joint for bone sarcomas between 1996 and 2016 was conducted. The primary tumor site was pelvis in 26 patients (76%) and femur in eight (24%).

RESULTS

The surgical margins achieved were clear in 31 (91%) patients, and seven (21%) patients developed local recurrence; mostly occurring in pelvic tumors (n = 6). The 3-year overall survival was 63% with a median follow-up of 38 months (range, 5-219), which showed no statistical difference in tumor location. The most common complication was deep infection (n = 7) and dislocation (n = 7), mostly seen in pelvic tumors. Implant failure was seen in two patients with pelvic tumors, while no failure was noted in patients with femoral tumors. The median Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 69%; 67% for pelvic tumors and 73% for femoral tumors (P = .535).

CONCLUSION

Despite complex surgery, extra-articular resection of the hip joint can achieve oncologically and functionally acceptable outcomes. While tumors of the pelvis are associated with a higher incidence of infection and local recurrence after resection, resection of tumors involving the femur are well tolerated.

Early Mechanical Failure of a Tumoral Endoprosthesic Rotating Hinge in the Knee: Does Bumper Wear Contribute to Hyperextension Failure?

BACKGROUND

Tumor surgeons use a variety of endoprosthetic designs for reconstruction after bone tumor resection. However, functional results and implant survival have not been evaluated for each design. Because the outcomes and failure modes (for example, implant breakage, loosening) may differ between prosthetic design types, it is important to examine the problems associated with different designs. Because of experiences in our practice, we became concerned about a surprisingly high frequency of device breakage with one particular design, and we wished to report on that experience. QUESTION/PURPOSES: (1) In a small series of patients, what proportion of a particular design (Zimmer® Segmental [Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA]) of rotating-hinge endoprosthesis experienced implant breakage at short-term follow-up? (2) What patient symptoms were associated with this finding? (3) What is the function as assessed by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score with the use of this implant before and after revision?

METHODS

We treated 87 patients in our tertiary center from 1987 to 2014 who had sarcomas around the knee with wide resection and reconstruction with tumoral endoprosthesis; five patients were lost to follow-up. In all, 33 of the remanining 82 prostheses, treated from 1987 to 2006, were reconstructed with fixed-hinge designs. From 2006 to 2014, 49 patients were reconstructed with a knee endoprosthesis, and 48 of them had a rotating-hinge prosthesis. In our center, we mostly used four designs: 16 of 49 patients were reconstructed with GMRS (Stryker Howmedica, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), seven received the LPS™ (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA), 20 of 49 had the METS (Stanmore, Hertfordshire, UK), and six of 49 received the Zimmer Segmental. The focus of this report is on the six patients with the Segmental. We retrospectively gathered clinical and radiologic data from these six patients' records and we assessed radiographic images. We evaluated function with the MSTS score of the 49 patients. The median follow-up duration of the Segmental prosthesis reconstruction was 65 months (range 24 to 85).

RESULTS

Three of the six patients had posterior instability and recurrent joint effusion on physical examination. Three patients who did not have hyperextension presented with restricted knee ROM. Six revision procedures were performed in three patients. The median MSTS score at 6 months for the Segmental® prosthesis was 15 of 30 (range 6 to 24). The score in the three patients who had posterior instability was 9 of 30 (range 6 to 15) and it improved to median 25 of 30 (range 19 to 30) 6 months after revision. The patients with the Segmental® prosthesis who did not undergo revision had a median MSTS score of 20 (range 16 to 24).

CONCLUSIONS

The Zimmer Segmental rotating-hinge tumoral prosthesis underwent revision for implant breakage at short term in three of six patients after tumor resection and reconstruction of the knee. Bumper breakage was associated with posterior instability that was related to wear of the bushing blocking system. We are unaware of reports of these issues by other observers or in other prosthetic designs, but we feel larger registries should be created to see if this failure mechanism has been observed by others. If so, this design needs to be improved or the blocking system should be avoided.Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.

Establishment and validation of a nomogram model for aseptic loosening after tumor prosthetic replacement around the knee: a retrospective analysis

Background

Aseptic loosening has become the main cause of prosthetic failure in medium- to long-term follow-up. The objective of this study was to establish and validate a nomogram model for aseptic loosening after tumor prosthetic replacement around knee.

Methods

We collected data on patients who underwent tumor prosthetic replacements. The following risk factors were analyzed: tumor site, stem length, resection length, prosthetic motion mode, sex, age, extra-cortical grafting, custom or modular, stem diameter, stem material, tumor type, activity intensity, and BMI. We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression for analysis. Finally, the significant risk factors were used to establish the nomogram model.

Results

The stem length, resection length, tumor site, and prosthetic motion mode showed a tendency to be related to aseptic loosening, according to the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that the tumor site, stem length, and prosthetic motion mode were independent risk factors. The internal validation indicated that the nomogram model had acceptable predictive accuracy.

Conclusions

A nomogram model was developed for predicting the prosthetic survival rate without aseptic loosening. Patients with distal femoral tumors and those who are applied with fixed hinge and short-stem prostheses are more likely to be exposed to aseptic loosening.

Effect of Game Based Balance Exercises on Rehabilitation After Knee Surgery: A Controlled Observational Study

Does a rehabilitation protocol based on balance exercises using Serious Game improve walk performance in patients undergoing knee resection and reconstruction for bone primary tumor?. 30 patients undergoing modular prosthetic replacement, following a primary bone tumor, were consecutively enrolled. During each hospitalization a physiotherapy treatment was activated, included 25 min training phase aimed postural and proprioceptive control. In order to better evaluate the walking speed at one-year post surgery in the study group, data were compared with a group of 22 patients treated in a previous period, called the control group, collected retrospectively. The control group differed only for the type of physiotherapy treatment offered. No statistically significant differences emerged from the two groups, regarding baseline characteristics. Walking speed in the study group was improved compared to the control group with a median difference of 0.22 m/s (p = 0.022). A difference was also measured in the speed of centre mass, with a median reduction of 4.5 mm/s (p = 0.005) in the study group, showing an improvement in postural control in stand-up position. Exercises aimed at recovering balance and Serious Game should be proposed in order to improve motor performance and postural control in the medium and long term.

Causes and Frequencies of Reoperations After Endoprosthetic Reconstructions for Extremity Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Excision of bone tumors and endoprosthetic reconstruction allow patients early weightbearing and a potential functional advantage compared with amputation. These reconstructions do not restore the limb to normal status, however, and patients are subject to complications that may result in revision or loss of the limb. Because better understanding of these complications based on current information might help the patient and surgeon in decision-making, we undertook a systematic review of studies published on this topic.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What are the primary modes and proportion of failure of tumor endoprostheses in patients undergoing reconstruction after excision of primary extremity bone sarcomas?

METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for all studies published from April 15, 1998, to April 15, 2018. Three reviewers independently reviewed studies reporting endoprosthetic reconstruction survival and events requiring revision for primary extremity bone tumors treated with endoprosthetic reconstruction for inclusion and performed independent data extraction. We excluded all studies with fewer than five patients, any systematic review/meta-analyses, and any study not reporting on primary extremity bone tumors. All discrepancies were resolved by the study's senior author. Data extracted from included studies were any reoperation event for wound dehiscence, any operative fixation for a pathologic fracture, and any revision of the primary endoprosthesis for implant wear or breakage, deep infection not amenable to prosthesis retention, or for local recurrence. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence with the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) approach with a higher MINORS score representative of a more methodologically rigorous study with a total possible score of 16 points for noncomparative and 24 points for comparative studies. Forty-nine studies met criteria for inclusion from an initial search return of 904 studies, of which no studies were randomized controlled trials. From a total patient population of 2721, there was a mean followup of 93 months (range, 1-516 months) with loss to followup or death occurring in 447 of 2118 (21%) patients with six studies not providing loss to followup data. The mean MINORS score was 14 for prospective studies and 11 for retrospective studies.

RESULTS

Overall, there were 1283 reoperations among the 2721 (47%) patients. Reoperation for mechanical endoprosthetic events (soft tissue dehiscence or periarticular soft tissue instability, aseptic loosening, or implant wear/fracture) occurred in 907 of 2721 (33%) patients. Aseptic loosening occurred at a mean of 75 months (range, 1-376 months) in 212 of 315 patients (67%). Deep infection requiring removal of the initial prosthesis occurred in 247 of 2721 (9%) patients with deep infection occurring at a mean of 24 months (range, 1-372 months) in the 190 infections (77%) with time to infection data available. Local recurrence rates requiring revision or amputation occurred in 129 (5%) of all patients. There was an overall primary endoprosthesis survival rate without any surgical reintervention of 63% among reporting studies at a mean of 79 months followup.

CONCLUSIONS

Failures of endoprosthetic reconstructions after extremity tumor surgery are common, most often resulting from implant wear or fracture, aseptic loosening, and infection. Importantly, the aggregated data are the first to attempt to quantify the time to specific complication types within this patient population. Deep infection not amenable to endoprosthesis retention appears to occur approximately 2 years postoperatively in most patients, with aseptic loosening occurring most commonly at 75 months. Although endoprosthetic reconstruction is one of the most common forms of reconstruction after bone tumor resection, the quality of published evidence regarding this procedure is of low quality with high loss to followup and data quality limiting interstudy analysis. The quality of the evidence is low with high loss to followup and inconsistent reporting of times to reintervention events. Although the most common modes of endoprosthetic failure in this population are well known, creation of quality prospective, collaborative databases would assist in clarifying and informing important elements of the followup process for these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Intra-articular soft-tissue sarcoma of the knee: Is extra-articular resection and tumor endoprosthetic reconstruction the solution? A retrospective report on eight cases

Intra-articular sarcoma of the knee joint is a very rare condition. Extra-articular resection and reconstruction with a tumor prosthesis is usually performed. This report describes the results with this rare surgical procedure. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical and functional results after extra-articular resection of the knee joint in eight patients with soft-tissue sarcomas of the knee that were reconstructed using a tumor endoprosthesis. Five of the eight patients (62.5%) ultimately had to undergo amputation, mainly due to periprosthetic infection. In addition, two patients experienced periprosthetic fractures. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 18 (range 10-22), as function was impaired due to a weak extensor mechanism. These results suggest that in patients with intraarticular soft-tissue sarcomas, limb salvage procedures with tumor prostheses after extra-articular resection are associated with very high complication rates. In most cases, long-term limb salvage was not possible. When limb salvage is successful, function is also poor due to a weak extensor mechanism in the knee joint. The indication for this procedure should therefore be considered critically.

Which factors are associated with the functional recovery in patients undergoing endoprosthetic knee reconstruction following bone tumour resection? - A observational study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to explore whether control of balance and other factors were associated with functional recovery and walking performance in the short term in a group of patients receiving modular knee endoprosthetic reconstruction following bone tumour resection in order to provide effective suggestions for a new rehabilitation protocol.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out in the chemotherapy ward of an Italian hospital specialized in bone cancer. All patients consecutively treated using a modular knee endoprosthetic between January 2013 and February 2014 were included in the study. One year after surgery, various measuring instruments were used to assess the functional outcome achieved: Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating scale, Toronto Extremity Salvage Score and specific motor tests of gait, such as gait speed and resistance. Data concerning the variables involved are as follows: bone resection, knee joint range of motion, quadriceps muscle strength and posture control. Statistical tests included correlation analysis (Pearson and Spearman correlation).

RESULTS

Balance control was significantly correlated to all the gait tests performed. Age, duration of chemotherapy and strength of the knee extensor muscles also showed a correlation. Conversely, joint range of motion and resection percentage did not show a significant correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Rehabilitation in patients undergoing knee joint reconstruction due to cancer should include balance control exercises, which involve not only the treated limb but address the entire sensory and motor system. This extends beyond the concept of treatment aimed at improving individual functions such as joint range of motion and muscular strength.

Feasibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Monitoring of Postoperative Total Knee Arthroplasty without Metal Artifacts: A Preliminary Study of a Novel Implant Model

Background

Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can provide superior detailed images of tissues without ionizing radiation, the imaging evaluation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) complications and posttherapy changes can be limited because of abundant artifacts on MRI scans due to metallic implants and endoprosthesis in limb salvage and fracture fixation. This study aimed to develop a novel model of TKA using a polyetheretherketone- (PEEK-) on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) implant and to investigate its feasibility for MRI monitoring of peri-implant bone formation, the healing process, signs of infection, and tumor recurrence after TKA.

Methods

Three skeletally mature goats underwent TKA with the PEEK-on-HXLPE implant. Radiographic and MRI examinations were performed at 4 weeks postoperatively. Images were analyzed for the existence of artifact interruption and postoperative changes in the bone and peripheral soft tissue.

Results

The results showed that PEEK and HXLPE were invisible, but the metal wires were clearly visualized on X-rays. On MRI scans, PEEK and HXLPE materials showed a low signal intensity, fine metal wires generated no obvious metal artifacts on MRI scans, and the marrow and soft tissue showed a continuous signal intensity without artifact interruption.

Conclusions

This preliminary study introduced a novel model using PEEK-on-HXLPE knee implant for in vivo MRI monitoring of the region around the implant without metal artifacts. This novel model may be used to apply MRI to observe bone formation and the healing process around the prosthesis and the signs of infection and tumor recurrence after TKA. This model may be used to improve the diagnostic accuracy of postoperative complications of TKA clinically.

Implant Survival and Complication Profiles of Endoprostheses for Treating Tumor Around the Knee in Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature Over the Past 30 Years

BACKGROUND

Endoprosthetic replacement has become the mainstream method of reconstruction after tumor resection around the knee for decades, but there is a lack of comprehensive review evaluating the implant outcomes. We performed a systematic review to analyze the implant survival and complication profiles of distal femoral replacement (DFR) and proximal tibial replacement (PTR) in adults, and to evaluate the effects of different fixation methods and hinge mechanisms.

METHODS

A systematic review of 40 studies with 4748 DFR cases and 1713 PTR cases was performed after searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases. Results of the implant longevity, complications, and other relevant data were extracted, recategorized, and analyzed. An additional review of 227 cases of Compress DFR from 6 studies was also performed.

RESULTS

The mean 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year implant survival rates of DFR were 78.3%, 70.1%, 61.6%, and 38.3%, slightly higher than those of PTR (75%, 60%, 55.3%, and 25.1%). Aseptic loosening (8.8%) and infection (8.5%) were the most devastating complications in DFR, while in PTR it was infection (16.8%). Cemented or cementless fixation did not significantly affect implant survival or aseptic loosening rate. Rotating-hinge mechanism might improve long-term implant survival and reduce bushing wear, but not necessarily prevented aseptic loosening. The series Kotz modular femur and tibia replacement system/Howmedica modular replacement system/global modular replacement system was one of the most durable implants. The Compress DFR showed no superiority in implant survival and complication profiles over other brands of endoprostheses.

CONCLUSION

Short-term to mid-term implant survival of adult tumor endoprostheses around the knee is acceptable but long-term outcome remains unsatisfactory. Efforts should be made in reducing loosening and infection.

Survival, complications and functional outcomes of cemented megaprostheses for high-grade osteosarcoma around the knee

PURPOSE

We initiated a retrospective study on the long-term survival of cemented endoprostheses for bone tumours around the knee to answer the following questions: (1) What was the survival of these patients? (2) What was the overall survival of cemented prostheses around the knee? (3) What types of failures were observed in these reconstructions? (4) Did the survival and complications vary according to the site of the implant? (5) What was the functional result after cemented prosthesis replacement around the knee?

METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2013, 108 consecutive patients with an average age of 25 years, who had mature bone development as evidenced by imaging examinations, underwent 108 cemented endoprosthetic knee replacements for osteosarcoma resection. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy using a multi-drug protocol consisting of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX), doxorubicin (ADM), cisplatin (DDP) and high dose ifosfamide (HDIFO). When extensor mechanism reconstruction was required, we ran nonabsorbable sutures through designated holes in the tibial component to fix detached hamstrings and the remaining ligaments in an imbricated fashion as well as reinforced the reconstruction with a medial gastrocnemius flap. Seventy-two (72/108, 66.7%) lesions were located in the distal femur and 36 (36/108, 33.3%) lesions at the proximal tibias. Nineteen patients were staged as IIA and 89 as IIB according to the Enneking staging system. The average follow-up was 53.3 months (range 12-125 months), with a minimum oncological follow-up of one year. Survival, prosthetic failure, complications and functional outcomes were recorded and reassessed at every visit after the primary operation.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, the oncologic results showed that 33 patients died from metastases, and local recurrence occurred in ten patients. The estimated overall five-year and eight-year survival rates were 71% (95% CI: 62.4-79.65%) and 67.2% (95% CI: 58-76.4%), respectively. In this study, a total of 51 complications occurred in 45 patients, and at the end of follow-up, 59 patients had prostheses in situ. The estimated overall five-year and eight-year implant survival rates were 77.7% (95% CI: 67.9-87.5%) and 54.5% (95% CI: 31.4-77.6%), respectively, when patients who died with their original prostheses were censored. In total, 21 (21/108, 19.4%) implants failed, five due to infections (5/21), eight due to aseptic loosening (8/21), four due to local recurrence (4/21), three due to structural failure (3/21) and one due to soft tissue failure (1/21). The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS) at the most recent follow-up was 22.9 (9-30) points on a 30-point scale, which indicated an excellent or good functional outcome. Analysis of the results based on implant site revealed a slight difference of the estimated five-year prosthesis survival between implants located in the distal femur and those located in the proximal tibia [86.1% (95% CI: 75.5-97%) versus 66.9% (95% CI: 49.8-83.9%); P = 0.09]. However, the functional outcomes and complication rates of prostheses located in the distal femur were both better than those located in the proximal tibia.

CONCLUSIONS

With effective management strategies for complications, cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal tibia and distal femur using an extensor mechanism reconstruction technique provides a reliable method of reconstruction following tumour resection around the knee. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study.

Ultra-short stem anchorage in the proximal tibial epiphysis after intercalary tumor resections: analysis of reconstruction survival in four patients at a mean follow-up of 56 months

INTRODUCTION

Tumors localized in the proximal tibial meta-diaphysis often lead to osteoarticular resections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we retrospectively reviewed four patients who underwent intercalary tumor resection and reconstruction using an ultra-short stem in the proximal tibial epiphysis, a procedure that to our knowledge has not been reported in literature so far.

RESULTS

At the time of operation, the mean patient age was 26.2 years. Three patients were male and one was female. Patients were diagnosed with osteosarcoma in two cases, Ewing's sarcoma and malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone in one case each. In all cases, wide tumor resections were achieved (osteotomy 3-3.5 cm below the tibia plateau joint surface, mean resection length of tibial bone 18 cm) at a mean time of operation of 198.8 min. Two superficial wound-healing disorders occurred, leading to one surgical revision in each case. One local tumor recurrence occurred 12 months after operation in a patient who discontinued his adjuvant chemotherapy. This patient died of disease, 31 months after operation. Three patients are alive with no evidence of disease at a mean follow-up of 56 months. Walking is not impaired and light sports activities have been reported in all cases. The mean MSTS score is 28/30.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, we report this reconstruction technique to be considered for special indications where the functional outcome can be improved by preservation of the knee joint in tumors of the proximal meta-diaphyseal tibial region.

What Are the Long-term Results of MUTARS® Modular Endoprostheses for Reconstruction of Tumor Resection of the Distal Femur and Proximal Tibia?

BACKGROUND

Modular endoprostheses are commonly used to reconstruct defects of the distal femur and proximal tibia after bone tumor resection. Because limb salvage surgery for bone sarcomas is relatively new, becoming more frequently used since the 1980s, studies focusing on the long-term results of such prostheses in treatment of primary tumors are scarce.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of patients experience a mechanical complication with the MUTARS^® modular endoprosthesis when used for tumor reconstruction around the knee, and what factors may be associated with mechanical failure? (2) What are the nonmechanical complications? (3) What are the implant failure rates at 5, 10, and 15 years? (4) How often is limb salvage achieved using this prosthesis?

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2010, endoprostheses were the preferred method of reconstruction after resection of the knee in adolescents and adults in our centers. During that period, we performed 114 MUTARS^® knee replacements in 105 patients; no other endoprosthetic systems were used. Four patients (four of 105 [4%]) were lost to followup, leaving 110 reconstructions in 101 patients for review. The reverse Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate median followup, which was equal to 8.9 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.0-9.7). Mean age at surgery was 36 years (range, 13-82 years). Predominant diagnoses were osteosarcoma (n = 56 [55%]), leiomyosarcoma of bone (n = 10 [10%]), and chondrosarcoma (n = 9 [9%]). In the early period of our study, we routinely used uncemented uncoated implants for primary reconstructions. Later, hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants were the standard. Eighty-nine reconstructions (89 of 110 [81%]) were distal femoral replacements (78 uncemented [78 of 89 {88%}, 42 of which were HA-coated [42 of 78 {54%}]) and 21 (21 of 110 [19%]) were proximal tibial replacements. In 26 reconstructions (26 of 110 [24%]), the reconstruction was performed for a failed previous reconstruction. We used a competing risk model to estimate the cumulative incidence of implant failure.

RESULTS

Complications of soft tissue or instability occurred in seven reconstructions (seven of 110 [6%]). With the numbers we had, for uncemented distal femoral replacements, we could not detect a difference in loosening between revision (five of 17 [29%]) and primary reconstructions (eight of 61 [13%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.72; 95% CI, 0.55-5.38; p = 0.354). Hydroxyapatite-coated uncemented implants had a lower risk of loosening (two of 42 [5%]) than uncoated uncemented implants (11 of 36 [31%]) (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.05-1.06; p = 0.060). Structural complications occurred in 15 reconstructions (15 of 110 [14%]). Infections occurred in 14 reconstructions (14 of 110 [13%]). Ten patients had a local recurrence (10 of 101 [10%]). With failure for mechanical reasons as the endpoint, the cumulative incidences of implant failure at 5, 10, and 15 years were 16.9% (95% CI, 9.6-24.2), 20.7% (95% CI, 12.5-28.8%), and 37.9% (95% CI, 16.1-59.7), respectively. We were able to salvage some of the failures so that at followup, 90 patients (90 of 101 [89%]) had a MUTARS^® in situ.

CONCLUSIONS

Although no system has yet proved ideal to restore normal function and demonstrate long-term retention of the implant, MUTARS^® modular endoprostheses represent a reliable long-term option for knee replacement after tumor resection, which seems to be comparable to other modular implants available to surgeons. Although the number of patients is relatively small, we could demonstrate that with this prosthesis, an uncemented HA-coated implant is useful in achieving durable fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Survival, failure modes and function of combined distal femur and proximal tibia reconstruction following tumor resection

BACKGROUND

Tumor spread to the knee joint or skip metastasis to the adjacent bones of the knee require reconstruction with combined distal femur and proximal tibia replacements. The literature on implant survival and failure modes with this type of reconstruction is sparse. The goals of this study were to determine the implant survival, the different failure modes and the functional outcome of this megaendoprosthetic reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with combined distal femur and proximal tibia reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Median follow-up was 8.8 years (quartiles 4.7-15.5 years). Twenty-one patients received combined distal femur and proximal tibia reconstruction as a primary mode of reconstruction, 18 patients as revision surgery after failed tumor prosthesis. For survival estimations, competing risk analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The revision-free survival at five years was 42% (95% CI 22%-56%) and implant survival with exchange of the original implant was 54% (95% CI 35%-68%). Five-year revision-free survival for soft tissue failure was 72% (95% CI 52%-84%), for infection 67% (95% CI 48%-80%), for structural failure 82% (95% CI 63%-91%), for aseptic loosening and tumor progression 97% (95% CI 82%-99%), respectively. Patients with revision surgery had higher risk for infection (p < 0.001), structural failure (p = 0.037) and shorter revision-free- (p = 0.025) and implant-survival (p = 0.006). Limb survival at 20 years was 94%. Mean musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 76%.

CONCLUSION

Despite high failure rates with short revision-free survivals, combined distal femur and proximal tibia reconstruction achieved longtime limb survival in the majority of patients with satisfying function.

Management of sarcomas possibly involving the knee joint when to perform extra-articular resection of the knee joint and is it safe?

We reviewed the oncological and functional outcomes of patients treated for a primary sarcoma possibly involving the knee joint and present an algorithm to guide treatment. The records of 76 patients who had a primary bone or soft tissue sarcoma possibly invading the knee between 1996 and 2012 were identified. Mean age and follow-up was 32 years (9-74) and 64 months (12-195), respectively. Patients were grouped according to the resection (Intra-articular [IAR] vs. Extra-articular [EAR] vs. Amputation/rotationplasty) for survival and functional outcomes. Overall 5 and 10 year survival was 61% and 53%, respectively. No differences in survival were found between the 3 groups (p = 0.55). Sixteen patients developed local recurrence with no difference between the groups. Mean MSTS score was 24.5 (12-30). Mean flexion at final follow-up was 106° (70-130°). We conclude that EAR of the knee allows for good oncologic and functional outcomes but with an increased risk of complications compared to IAR. Intra-operative assessment of joint involvement can be done in patients where joint infiltration by the tumour is not clear to avoid an unnecessary EAR. For chondrosarcoma patients with joint involvement, an EAR should be carefully considered because they present a significantly higher local recurrence risk.

Is superior tibiofibular joint resection necessary in extraarticular knee resection for sarcomas? A systematic review

Background

Sarcomas infiltrating the knee joint require extraarticular resection to achieve wide margins. Opinions differ as to whether the superior tibiofibular joint (STFJ) is part of the knee joint and should be removed in the course of extraarticular resection. Thus, we investigated the frequency of communication between the tibiofemoral joint (TFJ) and the STFJ, and the reported local recurrence rates (LRR) following extraarticular knee resection.

Methods

A systematic literature review on STFJ and TFJ communication and local recurrence rates following extraarticular knee resections was undertaken.

Results

Cadaver studies detected communication between the TFJ and STFJ in 10–64 % of the cases. Direct arthrography with physical loading verified a 100 % communication rate. Regarding the extent of extraarticular knee resection, two institutions where the STFJ was resected had a LRR of 4–8 %, while studies from another three where the STFJ was not routinely resected reported a LRR of 0–21 %.

Conclusions

Since the literature reports about a 100 % communication rate between the TFJ and the STFJ, resection of the STFJ in patients with sarcomas involving the knee joint would seem to be indicated, although it is not clear whether resection of the STFJ reduces local recurrence rates.

Long term outcomes of cemented endoprosthetic reconstruction for periarticular tumors of the distal femur

BACKGROUND

In order to achieve an oncological margin during limb salvage surgery for tumors of the distal femur, part or the entire knee joint is frequently sacrificed. Endoprosthetics make limb salvage possible through restoration of a functional extremity. Currently there remains a paucity of data concerning their long-term outcomes and associated risk factors for failure.

METHODS

We identified 152 patients who underwent an endoprosthetic reconstruction for an oncological process of the distal femur between 1972 and 2013. The mean follow-up was 10years. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 39years and 25.8 respectively. The most common pathology was osteosarcoma (n=78, 48%). Outcomes were compared to a control group of 20,643 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for degenerative joint disease (DJD) during the same time period.

RESULTS

The mean five-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-year revision-free survival for an endoprosthesis was 76%, 63%, 51%, 36%, and 28%. Compared to the five-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-year survival of 95%, 90%, 82%, 74%, and 67% for control TKAs (p<0.0001 at all-time points). Overall limb survival was 93%, with 11 patients undergoing amputation. There was no difference in implant survival comparing modular and custom endoprostheses.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show that given the complexity of these operations, the rate of revision surgery following endoprosthetic replacement is high. Nevertheless, the use of these modular reconstructions leads to a high rate of limb salvage (93%) over a 25-year period at our institution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The long-term outcomes following the use of inactivated autograft in the treatment of primary malignant musculoskeletal tumor

Background

Biological reconstruction surgery is a tough but alluring option for treating primary malignant musculoskeletal tumors. In this article, we evaluate the clinical outcomes of primary malignant musculoskeletal tumors treated with inactivated autograft using alcohol.

Method

In this article, we include 58 patients who had primary malignant bone tumors treated with wide resection and recycling autograft reconstruction using alcohol between January 2003 and January 2013. The outcomes were measured by recurrence, functional status, and complications. Functional status was assessed according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTSS). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to evaluate the survival rate of the patient.

Result

The most common tumor was osteosarcoma (31 cases) followed by chondrosarcoma (10 cases). The tibia was the most frequently involved skeletal site (27 cases) followed by femur (26 cases). The median follow-up period was 54 months, ranging from 18 to 96 months. In 58 patients, 12 were with local recurrence (20.7 %), 16 with lung metastasis (27.6 %), and 13 with complications (22.4 %). The main complication was infection (8 cases). The autografts survived in 49 patients (84.5 %). The mean MSTSS score was 78.5 %, ranging from 47 to 98 %.

Conclusion

Recycling autograft reconstruction using alcohol had favorable clinical outcomes to some degree; however, the recurrence and complication rates seem to be high. Thus, we should apply this method with caution and choose the patients with strict surgical indication.

Cortical strut bone grafting and long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction following massive bone tumour resection in the lower limb

We determined the efficacy of a devitalised autograft (n = 13) and allograft (n = 16) cortical strut bone graft combined with long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction in the treatment of massive tumours of the lower limb. A total of 29 patients (18 men:11 women, mean age 20.1 years (12 to 45) with a ratio of length of resection to that of the whole prosthesis of > 50% were treated between May 2003 and May 2012. The mean follow-up was 47 months (15 to 132). The stem of the prosthesis was introduced through bone graft struts filled with cement, then cemented into the residual bone. Bone healing was achieved in 23 patients (86%). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society functional score was 85% (57 to 97). The five-year survival rate of the endoprostheses was 81% (95% confidence intervals 67.3 to 92.3). The mean length of devitalised autografts and allografts was 8.6 cm (5 to 15), which increased the ratio of the the length of the stem of the prosthesis to that of the whole length of the prosthesis from a theoretical 35% to an actual 55%. Cortical strut bone grafting and long-stem endoprosthetic reconstruction is an option for treating massive segmental defects following resection of a tumour in the lower limb. Patients can regain good function with a low incidence of aseptic loosening. The strut graft and the residual bone together serve as a satisfactory bony environment for a revision prosthesis, if required, once union is achieved.

[Resection margins in bone tumors: what is adequate?]

BACKGROUND

In multimodal therapy concepts for bone sarcomas, tumor resection is a deciding factor. Modern imaging techniques have made preoperative resection planning much easier and precisely allow tumor boundaries to be defined.

OBJECTIVES

There is recent data clearly showing that compartmental resections have no significant advantages compared to wide resections in terms of local recurrence or overall survival. But it remains unclear, how "wide" a "wide resection" should be done.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review of the last 15 years, discussion of review articles and multidisciplinary expert opinions as published in major multinational studies.

RESULTS

Intralesional resection (R1) is feasible in highly differentiated (G1) chondrosarcoma (atypical cartilaginous tumor) of the extremity. In both osteosarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma, R0 resection is mandatory. If these fails, there is evidence that in selected cases of osteosarcoma, adjuvant radiotherapy is justified if a second resection is not possible. Expecting contaminated (R1) margins in patients with Ewing's sarcoma (e.g., in critical locations such as the pelvis), radiotherapy only is better than hoping for the "cure" of insufficient resections margins with a combination of both methods. With regard to the necessary safety distances for a R0 resection, recommendations from the literature are heterogeneous. In addition to the distance measurement, the quality of the anatomic resection margins (e.g., fascia) is of great importance. A distinct recommendation of at least x millimeters or centimeters cannot be given based on the currently available data.

CONCLUSION

The aim of the resection of a bone sarcoma should be a wide margin with the exception of chondrosarcoma (G1). Ultraradical resections which sacrifice vital structures in order to extend an already wide (R0) resection margin showed no significant benefits. In patients with osteosarcoma, adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered if resection or re-resection is not in sound tissue (R1). Patients with Ewing's sarcoma should not undergo resection if a contaminated margin is expected. In patients with chondrosarcoma, the available data as for example from pelvic tumors are contradictory and do not allow a clear recommendation.

What was the survival of megaprostheses in lower limb reconstructions after tumor resections?

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic replacement is the most commonly used option for reconstruction of osteoarticular bone loss resulting from bone neoplasm resection or prosthetic failure. Starting in late 2001, we began exclusively using a single system for large-segment osteoarticular reconstruction after tumor resection; to our knowledge, there are no published series from one center evaluating the use of this implant.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We investigated the following issues: (1) What is the overall survival, excluding local tumor recurrence, for these endoprostheses used for tumor reconstructions of the lower extremities (knee and hip)? (2) What types of failure were observed in these reconstructions? (3) Do the survival and complications vary according to site of implant?

METHODS

Between September 2001 and March 2012, we exclusively used this implant for tumor reconstructions. During that time, 278 patients underwent tumor reconstructions of the hip or knee, of whom 200 (72%) were available at a minimum 2 years followup. Seventy-eight patients were excluded from the study for insufficient followup as a result of early death (42) or loss at followup (36). The reconstruction types were the following: proximal femur (69 cases), distal femur (87), proximal tibia (32), and total knee (12). Failures were classified according to the Henderson classification. Nine patients among those with followup shorter than 2 years had presented one or more failures and they were included in our analysis but separately evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall survival (no further surgical procedures of any type after primary surgery), excluding Type 5 failure (tumor recurrence), was 75.9% at 5 years and 66.2% at 10 years. Seventy-one failures occurred in 58 implants (29%). Mechanical failures accounted for 59.2% and nonmechanical failures for 40.8%. The first causes of failure of the implants were the result of soft tissue failure in 6%, aseptic loosening in 3%, structural failure in 7%, infection in 8.5%, and tumor recurrence in 4.5% of the whole series. Nine implants sustained two or more failures. Overall incidence of infection was 9.5%. No statistically significant differences were observed according to anatomical site.

CONCLUSIONS

Like in the case with many such complex oncologic reconstructions, the failure rate at short- to midterm in this group was over 20%. Comparative trials are called for to ascertain whether one implant is superior to another. Infection and structural failure were the most frequent modes of failure in our experience.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The long-term outcome following the use of frozen autograft treated with liquid nitrogen in the management of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas

In 1999, we developed a technique for biological reconstruction after excision of a bone tumour, which involved using autografts of the bone containing the tumour treated with liquid nitrogen. We have previously reported the use of this technique in 28 patients at a mean follow up of 27 months (10 to 54).

In this study, we included 72 patients who underwent reconstruction using this technique. A total of 33 patients died and three were lost to follow-up, at a mean of 23 months (2 to 56) post-operatively, leaving 36 patients available for a assessment at a mean of 101 months 16 to 163) post-operatively. The methods of reconstruction included an osteo-articular graft in 16, an intercalary in 13 and, a composite graft with prosthesis in seven.

Post-operative function was excellent in 26 patients (72.2%), good in seven (19.4%), and fair in three (8.3%) according to the functional evaluation system of Enneking. No recurrent tumour occurred within the grafts. The autografts survived in 29 patients (80.6%), and the rates of survival at five and ten years were 86.1% and 80.6 %, respectively. Seven of 16 osteo-articular grafts (44%) failed because of fracture or infection, but all the composite and intercalary grafts survived.

The long-term outcomes of frozen autografting, particularly using composite and intercalary grafts, are satisfactory and thus represent a good method of treatment for patients with a sarcoma of bone or soft tissue.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:555–61.