Atypical femoral fractures in elderly women

Examination of Risk Factors and Expression Patterns of Atypical Femoral Fractures Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database: A Retrospective Pharmacovigilance Study

Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) is a rare complication related to the use of bisphosphonates (BPs). Herein, we analyzed the risk factors and onset patterns of AFF using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database and reported the findings. First, the independent risk factors for AFF were gender (female), high body mass index, and medical history of osteoporosis, arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Drug-related risk factors for AFF included BPs (i.e., alendronic acid, ibandronic acid, etidronic acid, zoledronic acid, minodronic acid, risedronic acid), denosumab, prednisolone, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, exemestane, letrozole, eldecalcitol, and menatetrenone. Therefore, it appears that AFF is influenced by a combination of patient backgrounds and drugs, and that the risk of developing AFF is particularly high in patients with fragile bones (e.g., osteoporosis, arthritis, and SLE). Second, in the analysis of AFF onset patterns, the onset of AFF from BPs and denosumab took a long time (>1 year) to develop. Analysis using a Weibull distribution showed wear-out failure-type AFF onset for BPs and denosumab, and both osteoporosis and cancer patients with long-term administration of these drugs showed a tendency to have an increased risk of onset. AFF developed earlier in osteoporosis patients with long-term administration of BPs and denosumab than in cancer patients.

Acetabular and sacral insufficiency fractures in a patient with a long-term history of Alendronate consumption; a case report

BACKGROUND

Long-term Bisphosphonate consumption has been reported to be associated with the incidence of atypical or insufficiency fracture, particularly in the proximal femur. We observed a case of acetabular and sacral insufficiency fractures in a patient with a long-term history of Alendronate consumption.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 62-year-old woman was admitted with a complaint of pain in right lower limb following low-energy trauma. The patient had a history of Alendronate consumption for more than 10 years. The bone scan revealed increased radiotracer uptake in the right side of the pelvic, proximal right femur, and sacroiliac joint. The radiographs showed type 1 sacrum fracture, acetabulum fracture with femur head protrusion into the pelvis, quadrilateral surface fracture, fracture of the right anterior column, and right superior and inferior pubic fracture. The patient was treated with total hip arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the concerns regarding long-term bisphosphonate therapy and its potential complications.

Mid-term outcomes after the surgical treatment of atypical femoral fractures : minimum three-year follow-up

AIMS

The incidence of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) continues to increase. However, there are currently few long-term studies on the complications of AFFs and factors affecting them. Therefore, we attempted to investigate the outcomes, complications, and risk factors for complication through mid-term follow-up of more than three years.

METHODS

From January 2003 to January 2016, 305 patients who underwent surgery for AFFs at six hospitals were enrolled. After exclusion, a total of 147 patients were included with a mean age of 71.6 years (48 to 89) and 146 of whom were female. We retrospectively evaluated medical records, and reviewed radiographs to investigate the fracture site, femur bowing angle, presence of delayed union or nonunion, contralateral AFFs, and peri-implant fracture. A statistical analysis was performed to identify the significance of associated factors.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 70.2 months (36 to 191). There were 146 AFFs (99.3%) in female patients and the mean age was 71.6 years (48 to 89). The AFFs were located in the subtrochanter and shaft in 52 cases (35.4%) and 95 (64.6%), respectively. The preoperative mean anterior/lateral femoral bowing angles were 10.5° (SD 5.7°)/6.1° (SD 6.2°). The postoperative mean anterior/lateral bowing values were changed by 8.7° (SD 5.4°)/4.6° (SD 5.9°). Bisphosphonates had been used contemporarily in 115 AFFs (78.2%) for a mean of 52.4 months (1 to 204; SD 45.5) preoperatively. Nailing was performed in 133 AFFs (90.5%), and union was obtained at a mean of 23.6 weeks (7 to 85). Delayed union occurred in 41 (27.9%), and nonunion occurred in 13 (8.8%). Contralateral AFF occurred in 79 patients (53.7%), and the use of a bisphosphonate significantly influenced the occurrence of contralateral AFFs (p = 0.019). Peri-implant fractures occurred in a total of 13 patients (8.8%), and a significant increase was observed in cases with plating (p = 0.021) and high grade of postoperative anterolateral bowing (p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

The use of a bisphosphonate was found to be a risk factor for contralateral AFF, and high-grade postoperative anterolateral bowing and plate fixation significantly increased the occurrence of peri-implant fractures. Long-term follow-up studies on the bilaterality of AFFs and peri-implant fractures are warranted. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(11):1648-1655.

Evaluation and management of atypical femoral fractures: an update of current knowledge

Atypical femoral fractures are often attributed to the use of anti-resorptive medications such as bisphosphonates (BP). Whilst they have proven effects on fragility fracture prevention, clinical and laboratory evidence is evolving linking BP-related suppression of bone remodelling to the development of atypical stress-related sub-trochanteric fractures (Shane et al. in JBMR 29:1-23, 2014; Odvina et al. in JCEM 90:1294-301, 2005; Durchschlag et al. in JBMR 21(10):1581-1590, 2006; Donnelly et al. in JBMR 27:672-678, 2012; Mashiba et al. in Bone 28(5):524-531, 2001; Dell et al. in JBMR 27(12):2544-2550, 2012; Black et al. in Lancet 348:1535-1541, 1996; Black et al. in NEJM 356:1809-1822, 2007; Black et al. in JAMA 296:2927-2938, 2006; Schwartz et al. in JBMR 25:976-82, 2010). Injuries may present asymptomatically or with prodromal thigh pain and most can be successfully managed with cephalomedullary nailing and discontinuation of BP therapy. Such injuries exhibit a prolonged time to fracture union with high rates of non-union and metal-work failure when compared to typical subtrochanteric osteoporotic femoral fractures. Despite emerging literature on AFFs, their management continues to pose a challenge to the orthopaedic and extended multi-disciplinary team. The purpose of this review includes evaluation of the current evidence supporting the management of AFFs, clinical and radiological features associated with their presentation and a review of reported surgical strategies to treat and prevent these devastating injures.

Treatment of Atypical Fracture of the Ulnar Diaphysis by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with Teriparatide

Atypical fractures commonly arise in the subtrochanteric region or the femoral shaft, whereas those of the upper extremities are rare. Only 15 fractures in 13 patients have been described in the English literature. The management of such fractures has not been established. We describe a patient with an atypical fracture of the ulnar diaphysis, which required revision surgery to achieve the union of the fracture site. Teriparatide together with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound contributed to bone healing. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal strategy for treating atypical fractures of the ulna.

Bisphosphonates Use and Risk of Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femur Fractures in Korea: Results from the National Claim Registry

Although Asian with bisphosphonate has been considered to have higher risk of subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femur (ST/DF) fractures, the occurrence of those fractures has been still unclear in Asia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence rate of ST/DF fractures among bisphosphonate users from nationwide database in South Korea. Using national health insurance claim database, we only included the bisphosphonate users who took bisphosphonate for the first time in 2008 and evaluated the incidence rate of ST/DF fracture from 2008 to 2013. Non-user controls were matched to bisphosphonate users by propensity score matching with age and gender. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios of ST/DF fracture with and without adjustment for comorbidity. A total of 682 ST/DF fractures were observed among 348,311 bisphosphonate users. The incidence rate of ST/DF fracture among bisphosphonate users (37.75/100,000 person years, 95% CI 35.02-40.70) was higher compared with non-users (24.41/100,000 person years, 95% CI 22.31-26.71). The risk of ST/DF fracture was greater in bisphosphonate users compared with non-users (hazard ratio 1.541, 1.370-1.734; p < 0.001). The incidence rate of ST/DF fracture after bisphosphonate use could be determined in Korean patients, which can provide basal information for further studies on risk and benefit of continuing bisphosphonate.

Current Understanding of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management of Atypical Femur Fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize reports published since the 2013 American Society of Bone and Mineral Research Task Force Report on atypical femoral fractures (AFF).

RECENT FINDINGS

The absolute incidence of AFFs remains low. AFFs are primarily associated with prolonged bisphosphonate (BP) exposure, but have also been reported in unexposed patients and those receiving denosumab for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease. Asians may be more susceptible to AFFs. Lateral femoral bowing and varus hip geometry, which increase loading forces on the lateral femoral cortex, may increase AFF risk. Altered bone material properties associated with BP therapy may predispose to AFFs by permitting initiation and increasing propagation of micro-cracks. Relevant genetic mutations have been reported in patients with AFFs. Single X-ray absorptiometry femur scans permit early detection of incomplete and/or asymptomatic AFFs. Orthopedists recommend intramedullary rods for complete AFFs and for incomplete, radiologically advanced AFFs associated with pain and/or marrow edema on MRI. Teriparatide may advance AFF healing but few data support its efficacy. Greater understanding of biological and genetic predisposition to AFF may allow characterization of individual risk prior to initiating osteoporosis therapy and help allay fear in those at low risk for this complication, which remains rare in comparison to the osteoporotic fractures prevented by antiresorptive therapy.

Low Positive Predictive Value of Bone Scan to Predict Impending Complete Fracture among Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fracture

BACKGROUND

Although bone scan might be useful to detect incomplete atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) earlier than radiographs, there is no study on predicting further progression to a complete fracture among incomplete AFFs. Our purposes are to determine whether bone scan detects impending complete fracture among incomplete AFFs.

METHODS

We reviewed 18 patients (20 AFFs) who underwent bone scan at the diagnosis of incomplete AFF and were not treated with prophylactic fixation. A diagnosis of impending complete fracture was made, when the femur completely fractured within 6 months after the scan. We correlated radioisotope uptake with the impending complete fracture to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of bone scan.

RESULTS

Thirteen AFFs (65%, 13/20) showed a positive uptake in bone scan. Among the 13, only one femur was completely fractured within 6 months. None of the 7 femurs without uptake in bone scan fractured. In diagnosing impending complete fracture, the sensitivity of bone scan was 100% and negative predictive value was 100%. However, the specificity (36.8%) and positive predictive value (7.7%) were quite low.

CONCLUSION

Bone scan has no significant role in detecting the impending complete fracture, and a positive uptake does not mean the necessity of prophylactic fixation of incomplete AFF.

Treatment status and radiographic features of patients with atypical femoral fractures

BACKGROUND

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) has been surveying approximately 3000 orthopedic surgery hospitals and clinics with inpatient facilities nationwide to collect information on atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) and patient characteristics since 2010. The present study aims to examine radiographic images and clarify the relationship between radiographic and patient characteristics of patients with AFF and treatment status.

METHODS

The study involved 1996 facilities certified as clinical training sites by the JOA and 912 clinics with inpatient facilities affiliated with the Japanese Clinical Orthopaedic Association (JCOA). Additional clinical data collection and radiographic image review were performed in patients aged 35 years or older who met the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) case definition for AFF and received treatment at participating facilities registered with JOA in 2013. Radiographic images were evaluated in accordance with the ASBMR case definition.

RESULTS

Radiographic images of 304 fractures in 304 patients were collected. Among them, 230 fractures were determined to be AFFs. The fracture site was the proximal third in 70 AFFs (30.4%), middle third in 157 AFFs (68.3%), and distal third in 3 AFFs (1.3%). Among patients with AFFs, 173 (75.2%) were treated with bisphosphonates (BPs) and 45 patients (19.6%) were not (unknown in 12 patients). Duration of use was three years or longer in 103 patients (59.5%) and between one and three years in 24 patients (13.9%). Radiographic beaking was observed in 149 fractures (86.1%) in patients treated with BPs and 17 fractures (37.8%) in patients who were not treated with BPs (odds ratio 11.3, 95% CI 5.7-22.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic beaking was observed more frequently in patients treated with BPs than in patients not treated with BPs.

Incidence Rate of Atypical Femoral Fracture after Bisphosphonates Treatment in Korea

BACKGROUND

Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) has been high-lightened, because it was associated with the long-term use of bisphosphonate. Comparing western countries, the incidence rate of AFF was unclear in East Asian patients. Our purposes were to estimate the incidence rate of radiologically defined AFF in Korea, and to determine the association between occurrence of AFF and long-term use of bisphosphonate.

METHODS

We conducted a hospital-based, retrospective cohort study in patients aged ≥ 45 years, who took bisphosphonate. The occurrence of AFF was estimated by using incidence rate, and the age-adjusted incidence rate to U.S. 2010 Census data. The association between occurrence of AFF and the duration of bisphosphonate use was examined. The cumulative probability of AFF was plotted per each duration of bisphosphonate use.

RESULTS

Among 10,338 individuals who took bisphosphonate, 13 patients with AFF following use of bisphosphonate were identified. The incidence rate was 85.9/100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 50.2-146.9), and age-adjusted incidence rate was 72.7/100,000 person-years (95% CI, 29.1-175.8). In Poisson regression analysis, higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with an increased risk of AFF (relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.004-1.359). The cumulative probability of AFF increased abruptly when the duration of bisphosphonate use was 4 years or more.

CONCLUSION

Among Korean patients, the incidence rate of AFF was on a par with those of western countries, and this can provide basic information to conduct further studies by evaluating risk and benefit of continuing bisphosphonate.

Subtrochanteric femoral stress fracture with features of atypical femoral fracture in patient with Paget's disease: a case report

Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) has been widely issued since the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) taskforce stated a possible association with long-term use of bisphosphonate in 2010. ASBMR taskforce recommended to include Paget's disease as one of variables to investigate the AFF in 2010. On the other hand, the ASBMR taskforce in 2014 excluded Paget's disease in the definition of AFF. Still, any rationale has been barely documented about this change. We described the rationale by reporting an 85-year-old man who had a subtrochanteric fracture with features of atypical femoral fracture which turned out to be Paget's disease of bone in the pathology.

Atypical subtrochanteric fractures in Korean hip fracture study

In Korean, atypical subtrochanteric fractures (ASF) were rare. Higher BMI and use of bisphosphonate were significant risk factors of ASF.

INTRODUCTION

Recently, ASF have been reported to increase among patients on bisphosphonate. However, the incidence of ASF and the association between ASF and bisphosphonate use have not been well defined in Asian population. Our purposes are (1) to estimate the proportion of ASF among Korean patients with proximal femur fracture and (2) to determine the associated risk factors of ASF in the Korean patients.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter (16 academic hospitals), prospective Korean hip fracture study on hip fracture in a cohort of patients aged 50 years or older from South Korea between July 2014 and May 2016. As a part of Korean hip fracture study, primary analysis examined the proportion of ASF among proximal femur fracture. To identify ASF, according to the definition by ASBMR task force, all radiographs of subtrochanteric fracture were reviewed. Associated risk factors for occurrence of ASF were also evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 1361 patients with proximal femoral fractures due to low-energy trauma, 17 fractures (1.2%) were identified as ASF. Higher BMI and use of bisphosphonate before injury were independent risk factors of ASF.

CONCLUSION

In Korean, ASF were rare. Higher BMI and use of bisphosphonate were significant risk factors of ASF.

Retrospective review of patients with atypical bisphosphonate related proximal femoral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Patients may be at an increased risk of atypical proximal femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients who sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur in our department between April 2009 and March 2014. The radiographs were reviewed for features of atypical femoral fractures as described by the American Society of Bone Mineral Research.

RESULTS

185 patients were coded according to the National Hip Fracture Database as having sustained a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Of these, 26 patients had radiographic findings consistent with an atypical subtrochanteric fracture. 5 patients were excluded as their histology confirmed malignancy. 12 patients were taking bisphosphonates on admission. All 12 patients were females taking alendronic acid on admission, who sustained the fracture as the result of minimal or no trauma and underwent long gamma nail fixation. The mean age was 71.6 years (range 62-79 years). The mean length of time on bisphosphonates prior to admission was 8.33 years (range 3-25 years). 9/12 patients had pre-existing symptoms for between 5days and 2 years prior to admission. 1 patient sustained a broken gamma nail 14 weeks post-operatively requiring revision. The mean time to discharge from theatre was 16days (range 5-57days). The mean time to radiological union in the patients in whom there was evidence was 24 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small group of patients, management of this fracture pattern can be complex with the potential for delayed or non-union and prodromal symptoms are common.

Atypical femoral fractures related to bisphosphonate treatment: issues and controversies related to their surgical management

AIMS

Treatment guidelines for atypical femoral fractures associated with bisphosphonates have not been established. We conducted a systematic review of the treatment of atypical femoral fractures first, to evaluate the outcomes of surgical fixation of complete atypical fractures and secondly, to assess whether prophylactic surgery is necessary for incomplete atypical fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Case reports and series were identified from the PubMed database and were included if they described the treatment of atypical femoral fractures. In total, 77 publications met our inclusion criteria and 733 patients with 834 atypical complete or incomplete femoral fractures were identified.

RESULTS

For complete fractures, internal fixation was predominantly achieved by intramedullary nailing. The mean time to healing post-operatively was 7.3 months (2 to 31). Revision surgery for nonunion or implant failure was needed in 77 fractures (12.6%). A greater percentage of fractures treated with plate fixation (31.3%) required revision surgery than those treated with intramedullary nailing (12.9%) (p < 0.01). Non-operative treatment of incomplete fractures failed and surgery was eventually needed in nearly half of the patients (47%), whereas prophylactic surgery was successful and achieved a 97% rate of healing.

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary nailing is the first-line treatment for a complete fracture, although the risk of delayed healing and revision surgery seems to be higher than with a typical femoral fracture. Non-operative treatment does not appear to be a reliable way of treating an incomplete fracture: prophylactic intramedullary nailing should be considered if the patient is in intractable pain. Radiographs of the opposite side should be obtained routinely looking for an asymptomatic fracture. Bisphosphonates must be discontinued but ongoing metabolic management in the form of calcium and/or vitamin D supplements is advisable. Teriparatide therapy can be considered as an alternative treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:295-302.

Efficacy of teriparatide in the treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective comparative study with alendronate

Background

Collapse of the femoral head associated with nontraumatic osteonecrosis (NOFH) is one of the most common causes of disability in young adult patients. Excessive bone resorption by osteoclast coincident with the suppression of osteogenesis are believed to be responsible for collapse progression. Alendronate that inhibits bone resorption by inducing osteoclast apoptosis has been traditionally used for treating NOFH; however, several reports documented serious complications by the use of this drug. On the other hand, teriparatide activates osteoblasts leading to an overall increase in bone volume, and is expected to reduce the progression of femoral head collapse in NOFH. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to examine pharmacological effects of teriparatide on collapse progression of NOFH and to compare these effects with alendronate.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study in our facility for comparing the pharmacological effects of teriparatide and alendronate on 32 NOFH patients diagnosed with osteoporosis. Between 2007 and 2013, patients were treated with daily administration of 20 μg teriparatide (15 patients: 18 hips), or with 35 mg of alendronate once a week (17 patients: 22 hips). The mean period of follow-up was 18.7 months. The progression of collapse was evaluated prior to the administration and later every three months by anteroposterior radiographs. Collapse progression with > 1 mm was defined as advanced collapse, while with < 1 mm was defined as stable radiologic disease. Student’s t-test and the chi-square test was used to do compare the pharmacological effects of the two groups.

Results

Treatment with terparatide had a tendency to reduce the rate of advanced collapse as compared to that with alendronate (p = 0.105). Kaplan-Meier curves related to stable radiologic disease showed that teriparatide-treated patients had better stable states than these treated with alendronate (p = 0.08, log-rank test). Moreover, treatment with teriparatide resulted in a significant reduction in collapse progression as compared to that with alendronate, noted at the end of follow-up period (p = 0.049).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that teriparatide has greater pharmacological effects than alendronate for treating NOFH and preventing the collapse of femoral head.

Trial registration

The registration number in UMIN Clinical Trial Registry is UMIN000017582. The date of registration is May 5, 2015.

Epidemiology and Postoperative Outcomes of Atypical Femoral Fractures in Older Adults: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on epidemiology and postoperative outcomes particularly surgical, functional and quality of life of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) in the older population (aged ≥65 years) using the first and second American Society of Bone Mineral Research (ASBMR) Task Force consensus definition.

METHODS

Electronic search for articles on AFFs and bisphosphonates published in English was performed. Eligible studies were reviewed systematically in relation to (a) the epidemiology of AFFs in older people and (b) postoperative outcomes of AFFs.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies on AFFs were included: 14 on epidemiology and 11 on treatment outcomes (two articles reported on both aspects). The epidemiological studies showed that the incidence of AFFs is low (3.0-9.8 per 100,000 person-years) but relative risk increased with longer duration of bisphosphonates use, especially after more than three years. Most cases of AFFs occurred in older people aged 65 years and above. However, in six studies, the mean age of patients with bisphosphonate-related AFFs is younger than those with typical proximal femoral fractures (mean age range of 66-75 years versus 75-89 years respectively). Varying postoperative and functional outcomes have been reported but differences in study population, management approaches and endpoints may account for these variations. For incomplete AFFs, prophylactic surgical intervention is potentially beneficial.

CONCLUSION

The benefits of bisphosphonates in reducing osteoporotic fractures still outweigh the risk of AFFs in view of its low absolute risk, when the ASBMR Task Force criteria for this type of fracture were applied. The risk of AFFs in different age groups is not well defined but tends to affect the younger patients more (aged <65 years) as compared to the older population (aged ≥65 years). Evidence supporting different types of treatment in AFFs such as intramedullary or extramedullary surgical devices and the use of teriparatide, a parathyroid hormone analogue, is not yet well established.

Bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis: a review of skeletal safety concerns

The use of bisphosphonates in treatment of osteoporosis declined significantly over the past decade. There is currently great concern, among patients and physicians, about two potential skeletal adverse effects associated with bisphosphonates- jaw osteonecrosis and atypical femur fractures. This has become a major public health issue since untreated osteoporosis carries a significant burden in terms of fracture-related morbidity and mortality, and bisphosphonates, considered first-line therapy for osteoporosis, have established efficacy in fracture and mortality reduction. Areas covered: In this review we discuss current literature on osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femur fractures in patients with osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates, including case definition, pathogenesis, epidemiology, risk factors, clinical presentation, management and prevention. We conducted a literature search using PubMed and PubMed Central, using the search terms 'bisphosphonates', 'osteonecrosis of the jaw', and 'atypical fractures'. We selected relevant articles including meta-analyses, clinical trials, observational studies, and major society guidelines published between 2010 and 2016, to be included in this review. A few articles published prior to 2010 were also included as references. Expert commentary: The rare skeletal side effects of bisphosphonates should not preclude their use in patients with osteoporosis and high fracture risk, as benefits significantly outweigh the risks.

New anti-resorptives and antibody mediated anti-resorptive therapy

The ageing population and an increase in both the incidence and prevalence of cancer pose a healthcare challenge, some of which is borne by the orthopaedic community in the form of osteoporotic fractures and metastatic bone disease. In recent years there has been an increasing understanding of the pathways involved in bone metabolism relevant to osteoporosis and metastases in bone. Newer therapies may aid the management of these problems. One group of drugs, the antibody mediated anti-resorptive therapies (AMARTs) use antibodies to block bone resorption pathways. This review seeks to present a synopsis of the guidelines, pharmacology and potential pathophysiology of AMARTs and other new anti-resorptive drugs. We evaluate the literature relating to AMARTs and new anti-resorptives with special attention on those approved for use in clinical practice. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody against Receptor Activator for Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand. It is the first AMART approved by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and the US Food and Drug Administration. Other novel anti-resorptives awaiting approval for clinical use include Odanacatib. Denosumab is indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of the complications of bone metastases. Recent evidence suggests, however, that denosumab may have an adverse event profile similar to bisphosphonates, including atypical femoral fractures. It is, therefore, essential that orthopaedic surgeons are conversant with these medications and their safe usage.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Denosumab has important orthopaedic indications and has been shown to significantly reduce patient morbidity in osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease.

Management of atypical femoral fracture: a scoping review and comprehensive algorithm

BACKGROUND

Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) are a rare type of femoral stress fracture recently described, potentially associated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. Evidence-based recommendations regarding diagnosis and management of these fractures are scarce. The purpose of this study is to propose an algorithm for the diagnosis and management of AFF.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search of the last ten years using the keywords "atypical femoral fractures" and identified further articles through an evaluation of the publications cited in these articles. Relevant studies were included by agreement between researchers, depending on their specialization. Pertinent points of debate were discussed based on the available literature, allowing for consensus regarding the proposed management algorithm.

RESULTS

Using a systematic approach we performed a scoping review that included a total of 137 articles.

CONCLUSIONS

A practical guide for diagnosis and management of AFF based on the current concepts is proposed. In spite of the impressive large volume of published literature available since AFF were initially identified, the level of evidence is mostly poor, in particular regarding treatment choice. Therefore, further studies are required.

Pathological pelvic fracture following long-term bisphosphonate use in a 63-year-old woman

A 63-year-old woman presented with a low energy pelvic fracture, which showed no signs of healing. Initial fractures were to the right hemipelvis, later followed by a right fractured neck of femur. We present a complicated patient journey, management dilemmas and highlight the growing concern with long-term bisphosphonate treatment.