Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of synovial fluid demonstrates high accuracy in prosthetic joint infection diagnostics: mNGS for diagnosing PJI

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Improves the Diagnosis Efficiency of Mixed Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Purpose

To explore the clinical significance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the diagnosis of mixed periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Methods

The data pertaining to patients suspected of PJI who underwent arthroplasty at our hospital between January 2020 and June 2024 were analyzed. Patients included in the study were subjected to microbial culture and mNGS analyses to evaluate the efficacy of mNGS in diagnosing mixed PJIs.

Results

Among the 44 PJI patients included, 20 (45.45%) were culture-positive, and 35 (79.55%) were mNGS-positive. Compared to microbial culture, mNGS demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy (79.55% vs 45.45%, 55.00% vs 35.14%, and 80.70% vs 57.89%, respectively; all P<0.05). However, the specificity of mNGS was significantly lower than culture (84.62% vs 100.00%, P<0.05). For mixed PJIs, the sensitivity of mNGS was notably higher, albeit with lower specificity and positive predictive value compared to microbial culture (72.23% vs 27.27%, 85.19% vs 100.00%, 66.67% vs 100.00%, respectively; all P<0.05). mNGS enables more sensitive detection of co-pathogens in mixed PJI, accelerating targeted therapy and reducing inappropriate broad-spectrum therapy. While its lower specificity requires clinical integration, it clarifies complex diagnoses and streamlines stewardship for improved outcomes.

Conclusion

mNGS is a promising technique for rapidly and accurately detecting co-pathogens in mixed PJI.

Diagnosis and surgical treatment of chronic destructive septic hip arthritis

Septic hip arthritis (SHA) is a relatively rare but hazardous disease. Much controversy exists regarding the definition, diagnosis and treatment of chronic destructive SHAs. This review aims to provide an overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for chronic, destructive SHA and suggest possible research directions for this disease's future diagnosis and treatment. There is no unified naming or classification standard for SHAs. Chronic destructive SHA still requires a comprehensive diagnosis combining history, signs, bacterial culture, histopathological examination, inflammation and other indicators, of which metagenomic next-generation sequencing is a promising diagnostic tool. Previous treatment options for this disease include debridement, debridement + Girdlestone femoral head and neck resection, and debridement + Girdlestone femoral head and neck resection + two-stage arthroplasty. Among them, one-stage spacer implantation + two-stage arthroplasty is the current standard surgical option with a high success rate and low reinfection rate, while one-stage arthroplasty is a new treatment option proposed in recent years with unique advantages but limitations in terms of surgical indications. In the future, more high-quality studies are needed to provide the latest evidence to support clinical decision-making.

Role of plasma and blood-cell co-metagenomic sequencing in precise diagnosis and severity evaluation of sepsis, a prospective cohort study in sepsis patients

PURPOSES

Sepsis caused great clinical burden all over the world. This study clarified the value of plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing (p-mNGS) and blood cell mNGS (bc-mNGS) in sepsis diagnosis and evaluation.

METHODS

One hundred and fourty-seven blood samples were collected from sepsis patients who met sepsis 3.0 criteria. Blood culture (BC), qPCR, p-mNGS, bc-mNGS and necessary routine assays were conducted. Taking BC and qPCR as reference, diagnosis performance of p-mNGS and bc-mNGS was analyzed. Blood transcriptome was conducted to evaluate the immunological response of patients in groups with different p/bc-mNGS results. Impact of antibiotic use on different methods was also analyzed.

RESULTS

The p-mNGS demonstrated a sensitivity of 100% for bacteria/fungi and 97% for viruses, which was higher than bc-mNGS (88% for bacteria and fungi, 71% for viruses). However, bc-mNGS showed higher concordance with BC results, which indicated that co-mNGS (p-mNGS plus bc-mNGS) protocol increased sensitivity and was helpful to justify viable blood pathogens in sepsis patients. This study showed that p-mNGS(+) & bc-mNGS(+) samples represented more activated immunity response (low expression of interferon-induced genes and high expression of JAK-STAT pathway genes), poorer clinical laboratory indicators (higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, higher procalcitonin and higher C-reactive protein) and lower survival rate. This study also proved that the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics affected much less on p/bc-mNGS diagnostic ability than on BC.

CONCLUSIONS

This research highlighted the potential value of plasma and blood-cell co-metagenomic sequencing in precise diagnosis and severity evaluation of sepsis patients, which will benefit the management of sepsis patients.

Diagnostic accuracy of 16S rDNA PCR, multiplex PCR and metagenomic next-generation sequencing in periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic accuracy of 16S rDNA PCR, multiplex PCR (mPCR), and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 16S rDNA PCR, mPCR, and mNGS in PJI.

METHODS

Data sources: Data sources included PubMed and Embase (January 1, 2000-March 1, 2024), with no language restrictions.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies containing sufficient data to construct a 2 × 2 contingency table allowing for sensitivity and specificity calculation were considered.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included adults (≥18 years) with PJI and appropriate control groups.

TESTS

Tests included 16S rDNA PCR, mPCR, and mNGS.

REFERENCE STANDARD

Diagnosis required adherence to Musculoskeletal Infection Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Consensus Meeting, European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria. Studies employing alternative author-defined criteria were included only if they did not rely solely on positive cultures to define PJI.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

A bivariate model calculated pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs), sensitivities, and specificities, each with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine studies were included, comprising 3940 PJI cases and 4700 uninfected controls. Pooled sensitivity/specificity were 80.0% (95% CI, 75.4-84.3%)/94.0% (95% CI, 91-96%) for 16S rDNA PCR; 62.2% (52.5-70.9%)/96.2% (93.2-97.9%) for mPCR; and 88.6% (83.3-92.4%)/93.2% (89.5-95.6%) for mNGS. Notably, mNGS had the highest DOR (105.9; 95% CI, 60-186.9). A sensitivity analysis excluding lower-quality studies resulted in increased DORs for all methods.

DISCUSSION

These molecular techniques display strong diagnostic accuracy for identifying PJI. Although mNGS yielded the highest DOR, numerous technical and practical challenges preclude its routine use for PJI diagnosis. Significant heterogeneity across studies warrants cautious interpretation and underscores the need for future comparative research.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the clinical identification of spinal infection-associated pathogens

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology for identifying pathogens associated with spinal infection (SI).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data from 193 patients with suspected SI between August 2020 and September 2024. Based on histopathological results, the patients were divided into the SI group (n=162) and the non-SI group (n=31). The diagnostic performance of mNGS technology was compared with that of laboratory examination, imaging examination, and microbial culture.

Results

Among SI group, mNGS detected 135 pathogens in 77.78% (126/162) of the cases, including nine cases of multiple infections. One or more pathogens were detected using mNGS in 86 patients with SI and negative microbial cultures. Staphylococcus aureus (22.22%, n=30) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis (22.22%, n=30) were the major pathogens, while various rare pathogens such as anaerobes, Brucella, and Coxiella burnetii were also detected. For the 40 cases with positive results for both culture- and mNGS-based identification, high consistency (77.50%) was observed. Antibiotic use did not significantly affect the mNGS detection rate (P = 0.45). There was no significant difference in the positivity rate of mNGS between CT-guided needle biopsy (80.00%) and surgical sampling (77.17%) (P = 0.72). The sensitivity of mNGS (77.78%) was significantly higher than that of traditional microbial culture (27.16%), and the specificity was similar (90.32% vs. 96.77%). Although the sensitivities of erythrocyte sedimentation rate-based assay (91.36%), magnetic resonance imaging (88.27%), and C-reactive protein-based assay (87.65%) were better than those of mNGS, their specificities were generally low (20%-40%).

Conclusion

The pathogens responsible for SI are complex and diverse. As a novel diagnostic method, mNGS exhibits a high sensitivity and extensive pathogen coverage for SI diagnosis. When combined with imaging and laboratory indicators, mNGS can significantly improve the accuracy of SI diagnosis and provide strong support for clinical treatment.

State-of-the-Art Metagenomic Sequencing and Its Role in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is increasingly being recognized as a valuable diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). This study reviews the diagnostic utility of mNGS, highlighting its improved sensitivity in detecting pathogens, particularly in culture-negative and polymicrobial infections. However, the clinical application of this method is hindered by challenges such as the prevalence of host DNA, the necessity for extensive bioinformatic analysis, and the potential for contamination, which can lead to misinterpretation of results. As mNGS continues to evolve, it holds significant potential to improve the management of PJI and enhance the application of precision medicine in orthopedic infections.

Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of infectious diseases

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a transformative approach in the diagnosis of infectious diseases, utilizing unbiased high-throughput sequencing to directly detect and characterize microbial genomes from clinical samples. This review comprehensively outlines the fundamental principles, sequencing workflow, and platforms utilized in mNGS technology. The methodological backbone involves shotgun sequencing of total nucleic acids extracted from diverse sample types, enabling simultaneous detection of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites without prior knowledge of the infectious agent. Key advantages of mNGS include its capability to identify rare, novel, or unculturable pathogens, providing a more comprehensive view of microbial communities compared to traditional culture-based methods. Despite these strengths, challenges such as data analysis complexity, high cost, and the need for optimized sample preparation protocols remain significant hurdles. The application of mNGS across various systemic infections highlights its clinical utility. Case studies discussed in this review illustrate its efficacy in diagnosing respiratory tract infections, bloodstream infections, central nervous system infections, gastrointestinal infections, and others. By rapidly identifying pathogens and their genomic characteristics, mNGS facilitates timely and targeted therapeutic interventions, thereby improving patient outcomes and infection control measures. Looking ahead, the future of mNGS in infectious disease diagnostics appears promising. Advances in bioinformatics tools and sequencing technologies are anticipated to streamline data analysis, enhance sensitivity and specificity, and reduce turnaround times. Integration with clinical decision support systems promises to further optimize mNGS utilization in routine clinical practice. In conclusion, mNGS represents a paradigm shift in the field of infectious disease diagnostics, offering unparalleled insights into microbial diversity and pathogenesis. While challenges persist, ongoing technological advancements hold immense potential to consolidate mNGS as a pivotal tool in the armamentarium of modern medicine, empowering clinicians with precise, rapid, and comprehensive pathogen detection capabilities.

Application of a metatranscriptomics technology, CSI-Dx, for the detection of pathogens associated with prosthetic joint infections

Preoperative identification of causal organism(s) is crucial for effective prosthetic joint infection treatment. Herein, we explore the clinical application of a novel metatranscriptomic (MT) workflow, CSI-Dx, to detect pathogens associated with prosthetic joint infection. MT provides insight into transcriptionally active microbes, overcoming limitations of culture-based and available molecular methods. This study included 340 human synovial fluid specimens subjected to CSI-Dx and traditional culture-based methods. Exploratory analyses were conducted to determine sensitivity and specificity of CSI-Dx for detecting clinically-relevant taxa. Our findings provide insights into the active microbial community composition of synovial fluid from arthroplasty patients and demonstrate the potential clinical utility of CSI-Dx for aiding prosthetic joint infection diagnosis. This approach offers potential for improved sensitivity and acceptable specificity compared to synovial fluid culture, enabling detection of culturable and non-culturable microorganisms. Furthermore, CSI-Dx provides valuable information on antimicrobial resistance gene expression. While further optimization is needed, integrating metatranscriptomic technologies like CSI-Dx into routine clinical practice can revolutionize prosthetic joint infection diagnosis by offering a comprehensive and active snapshot of associated pathogens.

Higher diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing versus culture in periprosthetic joint infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The next-generation sequencing (NGS) has developed rapidly in the past decade and is becoming a promising diagnostic tool for periprosthetic infection (PJI). However, its diagnostic value for PJI is still uncertain. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic value of NGS compared to culture.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for studies from inception to 12 November 2023. Diagnostic parameters, such as sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic (SROC) curve (AUC), were calculated for the included studies. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies with 2461 patients were included in our study. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio of NGS were 87% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83-90), 94% (95% CI: 91-96) and 111 (95% CI: 70-177), respectively. On the other hand, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio of culture were 63% (95% CI: 58-67), 98% (95% CI: 96-99) and 93 (95% CI: 40-212), respectively. The SROC curve for NGS and culture showed that the AUCs are 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.98) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.86), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis found NGS had higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy but slightly lower specificity than culture. Based on the pooled results, we suggested NGS may have the potential to be a new tool for the diagnosis of PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing promotes pathogen detection over culture in joint infections with previous antibiotic exposure

Objective

To investigate the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting pathogens from joint infection (JI) synovial fluid (SF) samples with previous antibiotic exposure.

Methods

From January 2019 to January 2022, 59 cases with suspected JI were enrolled. All cases had antibiotic exposure within 2 weeks before sample collection. mNGS and conventional culture were performed on SF samples. JI was diagnosed based on history and clinical symptoms in conjunction with MSIS criteria. The diagnostic values, including sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values (PPV/NPV), and accuracy, were in comparison with mNGS and culture.

Results

There were 47 of the 59 cases diagnosed with JI, while the remaining 12 were diagnosed with non-infectious diseases. The sensitivity of mNGS was 68.1%, which was significantly higher than that of culture (25.5%, p<0.01). The accuracy of mNGS was significantly higher at 71.2% compared to the culture at 39.0% (p <0.01). Eleven pathogenic strains were detected by mNGS but not by microbiological culture, which included Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Staphylococcus cohnii, Finegoldia magna, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus saprophytics, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter pittii, Brucella ovis, andCoxiella burnetii. Antibiotic therapy was adjusted based on the mNGS results in 32 (68.1%) patients, including 12 (25.5%) and 20 (42.6%) patients, in whom treatment was upgraded and changed, respectively. All JI patients underwent surgery and received subsequent antibiotic therapy. They were followed up for an average of 23 months (20-27 months), and the success rate of treatment was 89.4%. Out of the 33 patients who had positive results for pathogens, reoperation was performed in 1 case (3.03%), while out of the 14 cases with negative results for both mNGS and cultures, reoperation was performed in 4 cases (28.6%).

Conclusions

mNGS has advantages over conventional culture in detecting pathogens in SF samples from JI patients previously treated with antibiotics, potentially improving clinical outcomes.

Advancements in treatment strategies for periprosthetic joint infections: A comprehensive review

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents a critical challenge in orthopedic care, contributing to significant patient morbidity and healthcare costs. This burden is expected to increase secondary to growing demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Despite the profound significance of PJI, there is currently no universally accepted "gold standard" diagnostic criteria using serum biomarker thresholds; latest criteria fail to differentiate acute infections from chronic or consider time since initial surgery. Furthermore, contemporary PJI treatment, which conventionally requires 2-stage revision surgery in conjunction with rigorous antibiotic treatment, can be particularly taxing on patients. Fortunately, recent years have seen marked evolution in both PJI diagnosis and treatment methods. Contemporary research supports time-dependent serum biomarker thresholds with greater sensitivity and specificity than previously reported, as well as alternative surgical options which may be more suitable for certain patients. The following narrative review aims to describe the significance and pathogenesis of PJI before characterizing current challenges, novel innovations, and the future landscape of PJI diagnosis and management. Here, we spotlight the emerging utility of novel biomarkers and metagenomic next-generation sequencing for diagnosis, advancements in patient-centered surgical outcome prediction tools for PJI risk assessment and prevention, and evolving surgical techniques including 1-stage and a "hybrid" 1.5-stage revision surgeries. Additionally, we explore cutting-edge therapeutic modalities including peptide and bacteriophage-based treatments, intraoperative anti-biofilm gel, the VT-X7 antibiotic pump, and promising immune-based interventions. Ultimately, these advancements hold the potential to revolutionize PJI management, offering hope for improved outcomes and reduced burdens on healthcare systems.

Peking University First Hospital Procedure for Culturing Pathogenic Microorganisms for Bone and Joint Infection

Background

This retrospective cohort study explores a practical approach to acquiring pathogenic microorganisms in patients with bone and joint infections.

Methods

From Aug 2018 to Mar 2022, 68 consecutive patients (87 cultures) with bone and joint infection were recruited in this study. All cultures followed the Peking University First Hospital Procedure of Culturing Pathogenic microorganisms for bone and joint infection. Tissue samples were obtained through fluoroscopy-guided biopsy or open debridement. Tissue samples were divided into manual homogenization (MH), manual mixture (MM), and pathological examination. The baseline, antibiotic exposure, laboratory, surgical, and microbial data were reviewed. Independent sample T-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Chi-square test were used to detect the difference between patients who received different processing measures.

Results

The average age was 55.8±2.4 years old. Thirty-nine patients were male. The total positive culture rate of the manual homogenization group was 80.5% (70/87). Thirty-five patients had mixed infections with more than one microorganism cultured. Staphylococci accounted for 60.23% of all microorganisms. Staphylococcus aureus (18.2%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (15.9%) were the two most common bacteria cultured in this study. Patients with positive culture in the manual mixture group had significantly higher WBC (p = 0.006), NE% (p = 0.024), ESR (p = 0.003), CRP (p = 0.020) and IL6 (0.050) compared to patients with negative culture. After tissue homogenization, only ESR is still statistically different. Patients without SIRS had a low positive culture rate (59.4%). Tissue homogenization could significantly increase the positive culture rate of patients without SIRS. Pre-culture antibiotic exposure was not an independent risk factor for culture results.

Conclusion

Peking University First Hospital Procedure for Culturing Pathogenic microorganisms for Bone and Joint Infections was a practical approach for obtaining pathogenic microorganisms.

Detection value of third-generation sequencing to identify the pathogenic organisms in prosthetic joint infection

To compare the detection value of third-generation sequencing (TGS) with pathogenic microbial culture in prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Arthrocentesis was performed on 29 patients who underwent hip and knee revision surgeries. In the PJI group, TGS detected 85.71 % of positive cases, while pathogenic microbial culture detected only 42.85 %. TGS identified 17 different pathogenic microorganisms, including Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus lactis, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. In the loosening group, TGS was positive in one patient, while microbial culture was negative in all cases. TGS showed higher sensitivity (85.71 % vs. 42.85 %), comparable specificity (93.33 % vs. 100 %), and similar positive predictive value (92.31 % vs. 100 %) compared to culture.However, TGS had a higher negative predictive value (87.5 % vs. 65.22 %).Additionally, TGS provided faster results (mean time 23.8±3.6 h) compared to microbial culture (mean time 108.0±9.4 h).These findings suggest that TGS holds promise for detecting pathogenic microorganisms in PJI and has potential for clinical application.

Improved cure rate of periprosthetic joint infection through targeted antibiotic therapy based on integrated pathogen diagnosis strategy

Objectives

This study aimed to determine whether combined of pathogen detection strategies, including specimen acquisition, culture conditions, and molecular diagnostics, can improve treatment outcomes in patients with periprosthetic joint infections (PJI).

Methods

This retrospective study included suspected PJI cases from three sequential stages at our institution: Stage A (July 2012 to June 2015), Stage B (July 2015 to June 2018), and Stage C (July 2018 to June 2021). Cases were categorized into PJI and aseptic failure (AF) groups based on European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Utilization of pathogen diagnostic strategies, pathogen detection rates, targeted antibiotic prescription rates, and treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared across the three stages.

Results

A total of 165 PJI cases and 38 AF cases were included in this study. With the progressive implementation of the three optimization approaches across stages A, B and C, pathogen detection rates exhibited a gradual increase (χ2 = 8.282, P=0.016). Similarly, utilization of targeted antibiotic therapy increased stepwise from 57.1% in Stage A, to 82.3% in Stage B, and to 84% in Stage C (χ2 = 9.515, P=0.009). The 2-year infection control rate exceeded 90% in both stages B and C, surpassing stage A (71.4%) (χ2 = 8.317, P=0.011). Combined application of all three optimized protocols yielded the highest sensitivity of 91.21% for pathogen detection, while retaining higher specificity of 92.11%.

Conclusion

The utilization of combined pathogen diagnostic strategies in PJI can increase pathogen detection rates, improve targeted antibiotic prescription, reduce the occurrence of antibiotic complications, and achieve better treatment outcomes.

Diagnostic Role of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in Tubercular Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infection

Objective

The diagnosis of tubercular orthopedic implant-associated infection (TB-IAI) is challenging. This study evaluated the value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for the diagnosis of TB-IAI and developed a standardized diagnostic procedure for TB-IAI.

Methods

The records of all patients with TB-IAI diagnosed and treated at our institution between December 2018 and September 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic characteristics, medical history, laboratory test, microbial culture, histopathology, and mNGS results, and time to diagnosis were recorded. The diagnostic efficiency of mNGS for TB-IAI was assessed by comparing the results and diagnostic time with that of other diagnostic modalities.

Results

Ten patients were included in the analysis, including eight with prosthetic joint infections and two with fracture-related infections. The mNGS positivity rate was 100% (10/10), which was higher than that of TB-antibody (11%, 1/9), real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (22%, 2/9), T-SPOT.TB (25%, 2/8), purified protein derivative (50%, 4/8), microbial culture (50%, 5/10), and histopathology (20%, 2/10). mNGS shortened the time to diagnosis of TB-IAI. A standardized diagnostic procedure for TB-IAI was developed based on the findings.

Conclusion

mNGS is useful for the diagnosis of TB-IAI. mNGS is recommended in cases where it is difficult to identify a pathogen using routine diagnostic tests. The standardized diagnostic procedure might improve TB-IAI diagnosis.

Importance

TB-IAI is a rare infection, which occurs after orthopedic surgery and hard to diagnose microbiologically. mNGS is a new detection technique not yet discussed in current literature as a means for TB-IAI diagnostics. Here we describe a cohort of patients with TB-IAI diagnosed by mNGS show high efficiency of mNGS for detection of this pathology and present a clinical algorithm supplementing conventional methods for TB-IAI assessment.

Clinical applications of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the identification of pathogens in periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) technology to identify pathogens in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients suspected of having PJI between April 2020 and July 2023. The patients were categorized into PJI (46 patients) and non-PJI (19 patients) groups based on the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. Clinical data were collected, and both conventional bacterial culture and mNGS were performed. The diagnostic performance of the two methods was compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

mNGS exhibited a sensitivity of 89.13%, a specificity of 94.74%, a positive predictive value of 97.62%, a negative predictive value of 78.26%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 90.77%. Compared to microbial culture, mNGS demonstrated superior diagnostic sensitivity while maintaining similar specificity. A total of 48 pathogens were successfully identified using mNGS, with Coagulase-negative staphylococci, Streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Cutibacterium acnes being the most common infectious agents. Notably, mNGS was used to identify 17 potential pathogens in 14 culture-negative PJI samples, highlighting its ability to detect rare infectious agents, including Cutibacterium acnes (n = 5), Granulicatella adiacens (n = 1), Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (n = 1), and Coxiella burnetii (n = 1), among others, which are not detectable by routine culture methods. However, mNGS failed to detect the pathogen in 4 culture-positive PJI patients, indicating its limitations. Among the 46 PJI patients, 27 had positive culture and mNGS results. The results of mNGS were concordant with those of culture at the genus level in 6 patients with PJI and at the species level in 18 patients. Furthermore, the present study revealed a significantly greater proportion of Staphylococcus aureus in the sinus tract group (45.45%) than in the non-sinus tract group (14.29%), indicating the association of this pathogen with sinus formation in PJI (P = 0.03). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the occurrence of polymicrobial infections between the sinus tract group (27.27%) and the non-sinus tract group (33.33%) (P = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing can serve as a valuable screening tool in addition to traditional culture methods to improve diagnostic accuracy through optimized culture strategies.

Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing for Pathogen Detection and Quantification in Children With Musculoskeletal Infections

BACKGROUND

Nearly half of all pediatric musculoskeletal infections (MSKIs) are culture negative. Plasma microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) sequencing is noninvasive and not prone to the barriers of culture. We evaluated the performance of plasma mcfDNA sequencing in identifying a pathogen, and examined the duration of pathogen detection in children with MSKIs.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study of children, aged 6 months to 18 years, hospitalized from July 2019 to May 2022 with MSKIs, in whom we obtained serial plasma mcfDNA sequencing samples and compared the results with cultures.

RESULTS

A pathogen was recovered by culture in 23 of 34 (68%) participants, and by initial mcfDNA sequencing in 25 of 31 (81%) participants. Multiple pathogens were detected in the majority (56%) of positive initial samples. Complete concordance with culture (all organisms accounted for by both methods) was 32%, partial concordance (at least one of the same organism(s) identified by both methods) was 36%, and discordance was 32%. mcfDNA sequencing was more likely to show concordance (complete or partial) if obtained prior to a surgical procedure (82%), compared with after (20%), (RR 4.12 [95% CI 1.25, 22.93], p = .02). There was no difference in concordance based on timing of antibiotics (presample antibiotics 60% vs no antibiotics 75%, RR 0.8 [95% CI 0.40, 1.46], p = .65]). mcfDNA sequencing was positive in 67% of culture-negative infections and detected a pathogen for a longer interval than blood culture (median 2 days [IQR 1, 6 days] vs 1 day [1, 1 day], p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma mcfDNA sequencing may be useful in culture-negative pediatric MSKIs if the sample is obtained prior to surgery. However, results must be interpreted in the appropriate clinical context as multiple pathogens are frequently detected supporting the need for diagnostic stewardship.

Optimal selection of specimens for metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections

Objective

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) across synovial fluid, prosthetic sonicate fluid, and periprosthetic tissues among patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), intending to optimize specimen selection for mNGS in these patients.

Methods

This prospective study involved 61 patients undergoing revision arthroplasty between September 2021 and September 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Among them, 43 cases were diagnosed as PJI, and 18 as aseptic loosening (AL) based on the American Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Preoperative or intraoperative synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissues, and prosthetic sonicate fluid were collected, each divided into two portions for mNGS and culture. Comparative analyses were conducted between the microbiological results and diagnostic efficacy derived from mNGS and culture tests. Furthermore, the variability in mNGS diagnostic efficacy for PJI across different specimen types was assessed.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of mNGS diagnosis was 93% and 94.4% for all types of PJI specimens; the sensitivity and specificity of culture diagnosis was 72.1% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of mNGS was significantly higher than that of culture (X2 = 6.541, P=0.011), with no statistically significant difference in specificity (X2 = 1.029, P=0.310). The sensitivity of the synovial fluid was 83.7% and the specificity was 94.4%; the sensitivity of the prosthetic sonicate fluid was 90.7% and the specificity was 94.4%; and the sensitivity of the periprosthetic tissue was 81.4% and the specificity was 100%. Notably, the mNGS of prosthetic sonicate fluid displayed a superior pathogen detection rate compared to other specimen types.

Conclusion

mNGS can function as a precise diagnostic tool for identifying pathogens in PJI patients using three types of specimens. Due to its superior ability in pathogen identification, prosthetic sonicate fluid can replace synovial fluid and periprosthetic tissue as the optimal sample choice for mNGS.

Clinical application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in patients with different organ system infection: A retrospective observational study

Microbiological identification is essential for appropriate treatment, but conventional methods are time-consuming and have a low sensitivity. In contrast, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a culture-free and hypothesis-free technique that can detect a wide array of potential pathogens. This study aimed to reveal the overall diagnostic value of mNGS for infectious diseases of different organ systems and compare the sensitivity and specificity of mNGS with conventional methods. In a retrospective cohort study, 94 patients with mNGS results were enrolled, and clinical data were recorded and analyzed to compare the positive rate of mNGS with traditional methods including as smears, serological tests, and traditional PCR, etc. In this study, mNGS and culture were both positive in 12.77% cases and were both negative in 23.4% cases. There were positive results in 56 cases (54.26%) only by mNGS and 4 cases (4.26%) were positive only by culture. There were significant differences in sensitivity of pathogen detection between of ID and NID group for mNGS (χ2 = 10.461, P = .001)and conventional methods(χ2 = 7.963, P = .005). The positive predictive values and negative predictive values of diagnosing infectious disease by mNGS were 94.12% and 30.77%, respectively. mNGS increased the sensitivity rate by approximately 53.66% compared with that of culture (78.05% vs24.39%; χ2 = 47.248, P < .001) and decreased the specificity rate by 12.5% compared with that of culture (66.67% vs 100.0%; χ2 = 4.8, P = .028). mNGS can identify emerging or rare pathogen and further guide treatment regimens. mNGS has advantages in identifying overall pathogens and bacteria, however, there was no obvious advantage in identifying fungi, virus and tuberculosis. mNGS has higher specificity than conventional methods in identifying pathogens and advantages in detecting emerging or rare pathogens.

Evaluation of the diagnostic utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing testing for pathogen identification in infected hosts: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) testing identifies thousands of potential pathogens in a single blood test, though data on its real-world diagnostic utility are lacking.

Objectives

Determine the diagnostic utility of mNGS testing in practice and factors associated with high clinical utility.

Design

Retrospective cohort study of mNGS tests ordered from June 2018 through May 2020 at a community teaching hospital.

Methods

Tests were included if ordered for diagnostic purposes in patients with probable or high clinical suspicion of infection. Exclusions included patient expiration, hospice care, or transfer outside of the institution. Utility criteria were established a priori by the research team. Two investigators independently reviewed each test and categorized it to either high or low diagnostic utility. Reviewer discordance was referred to a third investigator. The stepwise multiple regression method was used to identify clinical factors associated with high diagnostic utility.

Results

Among 96 individual tests from 82 unique patients, 80 tests met the inclusion criteria for analysis. At least one potential pathogen was identified in 58% of tests. Among 112 pathogens identified, there were 74 bacteria, 25 viruses, 12 fungi, and 1 protozoon. In all, 46 tests (57.5%) were determined to be of high diagnostic utility. Positive mNGS tests were identified in 36 (78.3%) and 11 (32.4%) of high and low diagnostic utility tests, respectively (p < 0.001). Antimicrobials were changed after receiving test results in 31 (67.4%) of high utility tests and 4 (11.8%) of low utility tests (p < 0.0001). In the multiple regression model, a positive test [odds ratio (OR) = 10.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.2-44.4] and consultation with the company medical director (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-13.7) remained significantly associated with high diagnostic utility.

Conclusion

mNGS testing resulted in high clinical utility in most cases. Positive mNGS tests were associated with high diagnostic utility. Consultation with the Karius® medical director is recommended to maximize utility.

Establishment of a consensus protocol to explore the brain pathobiome in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: Research outline and call for collaboration

Microbial infections of the brain can lead to dementia, and for many decades microbial infections have been implicated in Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, a causal role for infection in AD remains contentious, and the lack of standardized detection methodologies has led to inconsistent detection/identification of microbes in AD brains. There is a need for a consensus methodology; the Alzheimer's Pathobiome Initiative aims to perform comparative molecular analyses of microbes in post mortem brains versus cerebrospinal fluid, blood, olfactory neuroepithelium, oral/nasopharyngeal tissue, bronchoalveolar, urinary, and gut/stool samples. Diverse extraction methodologies, polymerase chain reaction and sequencing techniques, and bioinformatic tools will be evaluated, in addition to direct microbial culture and metabolomic techniques. The goal is to provide a roadmap for detecting infectious agents in patients with mild cognitive impairment or AD. Positive findings would then prompt tailoring of antimicrobial treatments that might attenuate or remit mounting clinical deficits in a subset of patients.

The Clinical Impact of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Synovial fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing was introduced into the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in recent years. However, the clinical impact of mNGS remains unknown. Therefore, we performed a prospective cohort study to evaluate the clinical impact of mNGS for PJI diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between April 2019 and April 2021, a total of 201 patients with suspected PJI were recruited in a high-volume PJI revision center. All patients underwent joint aspiration before surgeries and the obtained synovial fluids were sent to tests for the diagnosis of PJI. Based on the clinical evaluation of these patients, the patients were categorized into three groups: Group A: the mNGS reports were not acted upon. Group B: mNGS confirmed the standard diagnostic tests of PJI and generated identical clinical impact compared to standard diagnostic tests. Group C: mNGS results guided clinical therapy. Then, the concordance between synovial mNGS and cultures was analyzed. After that, multivariate regressions were performed to explore the "targeted populations" of mNGS tests.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were diagnosed with PJI based on the 2014 MSIS criteria and there were 33, 123, 45 patients in the group A, B, C respectively. The predictive factors of mNGS inducing clinical impact compared to standard diagnostic tests were negative culture results (adjusted OR: 5.88), previous history of joint infection (adjusted OR: 5.97), polymicrobial PJI revealed by culture (adjusted OR: 4.39) and PJI identified by MSIS criteria (adjusted OR: 17.06).

CONCLUSION

When standard diagnostic tests for PJI were performed, about 22% of synovial fluid mNGS tests can change the treatment protocols built on standard diagnostic tests and affect the clinical practice. Thus, the use of synovial fluid mNGS in some "target" populations is more valuable compared to others such as patients with previous joint infection, polymicrobial PJI, and culture-negative PJI.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

Level I.

Comparison of microbial detection rates in microbial culture methods versus next-generation sequencing in patients with prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) enables early and effective treatment. However, there is currently no gold standard test for microbial detection of PJI and traditional synovial fluid culture is relatively insensitive. Recently, it has been reported that sonicating fluid culture and next-generation sequencing (NGS) improve microbial detection rates. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare microbial detection rates in microbial culture methods with and without sonication versus NGS.

METHODS

We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases and other sources (previous reviews) until August 2022. We evaluated the detection rates of pathogens in NGS and microbial cultures using samples of synovial or sonicated fluid.

RESULTS

Of the 170 citations identified for screening, nine studies were included. Pooled analysis indicated that NGS had the highest detection rate among the microbial detection methods (NGS vs. sonicated, odds ratios [OR] 5.09, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.67-15.50; NGS vs. synovial, OR 4.52, 95% CI 2.86-7.16). Sonicated fluid culture showed a higher detection rate than synovial fluid culture (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.23-3.62).

CONCLUSION

NGS might be useful as a screening tool for culture-negative patients. In clinical settings, sonicated fluid culture is a practical method for diagnosing PJI.

Characterization of periprosthetic environment microbiome in patients after total joint arthroplasty and its potential correlation with inflammation

AIMS

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) but the characterization of the periprosthetic environment microbiome after TJA remains unknown. Here, we performed a prospective study based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing to explore the periprosthetic microbiota in patients with suspected PJI.

METHODS

We recruited 28 patients with culture-positive PJI, 14 patients with culture-negative PJI, and 35 patients without PJI, which was followed by joint aspiration, untargeted metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and bioinformatics analysis. Our results showed that the periprosthetic environment microbiome was significantly different between the PJI group and the non-PJI group. Then, we built a "typing system" for the periprosthetic microbiota based on the RandomForest Model. After that, the 'typing system' was verified externally.

RESULTS

We found the periprosthetic microbiota can be classified into four types generally: "Staphylococcus type," "Pseudomonas type," "Escherichia type," and "Cutibacterium type." Importantly, these four types of microbiotas had different clinical signatures, and the patients with the former two microbiota types showed obvious inflammatory responses compared to the latter ones. Based on the 2014 Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, clinical PJI was more likely to be confirmed when the former two types were encountered. In addition, the Staphylococcus spp. with compositional changes were correlated with C-reactive protein levels, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and the synovial fluid white blood cell count and granulocyte percentage.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shed light on the characterization of the periprosthetic environment microbiome in patients after TJA. Based on the RandomForest model, we established a basic "typing system" for the microbiota in the periprosthetic environment. This work can provide a reference for future studies about the characterization of periprosthetic microbiota in periprosthetic joint infection patients.

Multiplex PCR-based next generation sequencing as a novel, targeted and accurate molecular approach for periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis

Objectives

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis remains challenging, and the identification of the causative microorganism is, by far, the most important aspect. Here, we use multiple PCR-based targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) to detect pathogens in PJI. To explore 1. the ability of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) to detect pathogens in PJI; 2. the consistency of tNGS, metagenomic NGS (mNGS), and culture results; and 3. the ability of tNGS to detect drug resistance genes in PJI.

Methods

PJI was diagnosed according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. The microorganisms were detected by culture, mNGS and tNGS to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of the three methods for PJI and to compare their consistency in detecting microorganisms. Drug resistance genes were detected using tNGS. The costs and turnaround times of mNGS and tNGS were compared.

Results

Forty-three patients with PJI, 21 patients without PJI and 10 negative control cases were included. The culture, tNGS, and mNGS sensitivities for PJI diagnosis were 74.41%, 88.37%, and 93.02%, respectively, with no significant differences. The specificities were 90.48%, 95.24%, and 95.24%, respectively, with no significant differences. tNGS detected drug resistance genes in 37.5% of culture-positive PJIs. tNGS was superior to mNGS for turnaround time (14.5 h vs. 28 h) and cost ($150 vs. $260).

Conclusions

tNGS can effectively identify PJI pathogens and may provide drug resistance information, while tNGS is superior to mNGS regarding cost and turnaround time. A multidisciplinary, multi-technology based algorithm to diagnose PJI is appropriate.

Highlights

298 microorganisms and 86 drug resistance genes were included in the tNGS panel.Diagnostic efficacy of tNGS is not inferior to that of commonly used indicators.tNGS is superior to mNGS in cost and turnaround time.

Shotgun sequencing of sonication fluid for the diagnosis of orthopaedic implant-associated infections with Cutibacterium acnes as suspected causative agent

Orthopaedic implant-associated infections (OIAIs) due to Cutibacterium acnes can be difficult to diagnose. The aim of this pilot study was to determine if metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) can provide additional information to improve the diagnosis of C. acnes OIAIs. mNGS was performed on sonication fluid (SF) specimens derived from 24 implants. These were divided into three groups, based on culture results: group I, culture-negative (n = 4); group II, culture-positive for C. acnes (n = 10); and group III, culture-positive for other bacteria (n = 10). In group I, sequence reads from C. acnes were detected in only one SF sample, originating from a suspected case of OIAIs, which was SF and tissue culture-negative. In group II, C. acnes sequences were detected in 7/10 samples. In group III, C. acnes sequence reads were found in 5/10 samples, in addition to sequence reads that matched the bacterial species identified by culture. These samples could represent polymicrobial infections that were missed by culture. Taken together, mNGS was able to detect C. acnes DNA in more samples compared to culture and could be used to identify cases of suspected C. acnes OIAIs, in particular regarding possible polymicrobial infections, where the growth of C. acnes might be compromised due to a fast-growing bacterial species. However, since SF specimens are usually low-biomass samples, mNGS is prone to DNA contamination, possibly introduced during DNA extraction or sequencing procedures. Thus, it is advisable to set a sequence read count threshold, taking into account project- and NGS-specific criteria.

Mortality and re-revision following single-stage and two-stage revision surgery for the management of infected primary hip arthroplasty in England and Wales

We compared the risks of re-revision and mortality between two-stage and single-stage revision surgeries among patients with infected primary hip arthroplasty. Patients with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of their primary arthroplasty revised with single-stage or two-stage procedure in England and Wales between 2003 and 2014 were identified from the National Joint Registry. We used Poisson regression with restricted cubic splines to compute hazard ratios (HRs) at different postoperative periods. The total number of revisions and re-revisions undergone by patients was compared between the two strategies. In total, 535 primary hip arthroplasties were revised with single-stage procedure (1,525 person-years) and 1,605 with two-stage procedure (5,885 person-years). All-cause re-revision was higher following single-stage revision, especially in the first three months (HR at 3 months = 1.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14 to 3.43), p = 0.009). The risks were comparable thereafter. Re-revision for PJI was higher in the first three postoperative months for single-stage revision and waned with time (HR at 3 months = 1.81 (95% CI 1.22 to 2.68), p = 0.003; HR at 6 months = 1.25 (95% CI 0.71 to 2.21), p = 0.441; HR at 12 months = 0.94 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.63), p = 0.819). Patients initially managed with a single-stage revision received fewer revision operations (mean 1.3 (SD 0.7) vs 2.2 (SD 0.6), p < 0.001). Mortality rates were comparable between these two procedures (29/10,000 person-years vs 33/10,000). The risk of unplanned re-revision was lower following two-stage revision, but only in the early postoperative period. The lower overall number of revision procedures associated with a single-stage revision strategy and the equivalent mortality rates to two-stage revision are reassuring. With appropriate counselling, single-stage revision is a viable option for the treatment of hip PJI.

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after arthroplasty is a major complication, which requires significant resources, resulting in high costs for the medical system. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic infections, the identification of the pathogen being the central element in the establishment of targeted antibiotic therapy. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) or metagenomic NGS (mNGS) represents a promising, fast alternative, with increased specificity and sensitivity compared to identification methods using conventional culture media, thus enabling an increased rate of identification of pathogenic microorganisms and antibiotic resistance genes (ARG). The purpose of this article was to highlight new molecular diagnostic methods for periprosthetic joint infections and their involvement in treatment efficiency. NGS technologies are cutting-edge techniques that may challenge the PJI diagnostic model.

The diagnostic value of blood sample NGS in patients with early periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

The diagnostic value of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of blood samples from patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was evaluated by comparing it with drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The study was designed as a retrospective diagnostic test. Thirty-six infected patients were diagnosed with PJI according to the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and 57 volunteers were included in our study. NGS and bacterial culture were chosen to detect PJI after THA. Blood samples and drainage fluid were collected for NGS, and the drainage fluid, which was collected at the same time as the NGS drainage fluid sample, was used for bacterial culture. The primary outcomes of interest were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. In the infection group, 31 patients showed positive results by blood sample NGS, 33 patients showed positive results by drainage fluid NGS, and 17 patients showed positive bacterial culture results. In the control group, the results of 2 blood sample NGS, 16 drainage fluid NGS, and 3 bacterial cultures were positive. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the blood sample were 0.86, 0.96, and 0.92, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the drainage fluid samples were 0.92, 0.72, and 0.80, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of bacterial culture were 0.47, 0.95, and 0.79, respectively. The study demonstrated that both the sensitivity and specificity of NGS were higher than those of bacterial culture, regardless of the kind of sample. Compared with drainage fluid NGS, the sensitivity of blood sample NGS was slightly lower (0.86 vs 0.92), but blood sample NGS showed higher specificity (0.96 vs 0.72). In total, the diagnostic value of blood sample NGS was superior to that of drainage fluid NGS and bacterial culture. The majority of infected patients could be identified by blood sample NGS. Moreover, because of its high specificity, blood sample NGS can not only detect infectious bacteria but also distinguish infectious from non-infectious bacteria, which is dramatically different from using drainage fluid NGS.

Diagnostic Role of mNGS in Polymicrobial Periprosthetic Joint Infection

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the diagnosis of polymicrobial periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

Patients with complete data who underwent surgery at our hospital between July 2017 and January 2021 for suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), according to the 2018 ICE diagnostic criteria, were enrolled, and all patients underwent microbial culture and mNGS detection, which were performed on the BGISEQ-500 platform. Microbial cultures were performed on two samples of synovial fluid, six samples of tissue, and two samples of prosthetic sonicate fluid for each patient. The mNGS was performed on 10 tissues, 64 synovial fluid samples, and 17 prosthetic sonicate fluid samples. The results of mNGS testing were based on the interpretation of mNGS results in the previous literature and the assertions of microbiologists and orthopedic surgeons. The diagnostic efficacy of mNGS in polymicrobial PJI was assessed by comparing the results of conventional microbial cultures and mNGS.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were finally enrolled in this study. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional culture for the diagnosis of PJI were 71.0%, 95.4%, and 76.9%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of mNGS for the diagnosis of PJI were 91.3%, 86.3%, and 90.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of conventional culture for the diagnosis of polymicrobial PJI were 57.1%, 100%, and 91.3%, respectively. mNGS had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.7%, 60.0%, and 65.2%, respectively, for the diagnosis of polymicrobial PJI.

CONCLUSIONS

mNGS can improve the diagnosis efficiency of polymicrobial PJI, and the combination of culture and mNGS is a promising method to diagnose polymicrobial PJI.

Infections of Tumor Prostheses: An Updated Review on Risk Factors, Microbiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment Strategies

Several causes contribute to the high infection rate in tumor prostheses, including extensive tissue dissection and patients' immunosuppression due to the neoplastic disease. Most of these infections develop within the first 2 years following surgery with 70% of them occurring during the first year, while they are often associated with a low pathogen burden. The pathogenesis of infections in tumor prostheses is linked to bacteria developing in biofilms. Approximately half of them are caused by Staphylococcus spp., followed by Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Enterobacteriaceae spp., while multiple pathogens may be isolated in up to 25% of the cases, with coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) and Enterococccus spp. being the most frequent pair. Although early detection and timely management are essential for complete resolution of these challenging infections, prompt diagnosis is problematic due to the highly varying clinical symptoms and the lack of specific preoperative and intraoperative diagnostic tests. Surgical management with one- or two-stage revision surgery is the mainstay for successful eradication of these infections. The recent advances in laboratory diagnostics and the development of biofilm-resistant prostheses over the past years have been areas of great interest, as research is now focused on prevention strategies. The aim of this study is to review and consolidate the current knowledge regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, microbiology, and diagnosis of infections of tumor prostheses, and to review the current concepts for their treatment and outcomes.

Synovial fluid neutrophil extracellular traps could improve the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

AIMS

This study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of synovial fluid neutrophil extracellular traps (SF-NETs) in periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis, and compare it with that of microbial culture, serum ESR and CRP, synovial white blood cell (WBC) count, and polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%).

METHODS

In a single health centre, patients with suspected PJI were enrolled from January 2013 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were: 1) patients who were suspected to have PJI; 2) patients with complete medical records; and 3) patients from whom sufficient synovial fluid was obtained for microbial culture and NET test. Patients who received revision surgeries due to aseptic failure (AF) were selected as controls. Synovial fluid was collected for microbial culture and SF-WBC, SF-PNM%, and SF-NET detection. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of synovial NET, WBC, PMN%, and area under the curve (AUC) were obtained; the diagnostic efficacies of these diagnostic indexes were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

The levels of SF-NETs in the PJI group were significantly higher than those of the AF group. The AUC of SF-NET was 0.971 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.903 to 0.996), the sensitivity was 93.48% (95% CI 82.10% to 98.63%), the specificity was 96.43% (95% CI 81.65% to 99.91%), the accuracy was 94.60% (95% CI 86.73% to 98.50%), the positive predictive value was 97.73%, and the negative predictive value was 90%. Further analysis showed that SF-NET could improve the diagnosis of culture-negative PJI, patients with PJI who received antibiotic treatment preoperatively, and fungal PJI.

CONCLUSION

SF-NET is a novel and ideal synovial fluid biomarker for PJI diagnosis, which could improve PJI diagnosis greatly.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(2):113-120.

Cellular analysis and metagenomic next-generation sequencing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in the distinction between pulmonary non-infectious and infectious disease

Background

The aim of the current study was to investigate the clinical value of cellular analysis and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in differentiating pulmonary non-infectious and infectious diseases in immunocompetent patients.

Methods

The present retrospective study was conducted from December 2017 to March 2020, and included immunocompetent patients with suspected pulmonary infection. High-resolution computed tomography, total cell counts and classification of BALF, conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), laboratory tests and mNGS of BALF were performed. Patients were assigned to pulmonary non-infectious disease (PNID) and pulmonary infectious disease (PID) groups based on final diagnoses. PNID-predictive values were analyzed via areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Optimal cutoffs were determined by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity.

Results

A total of 102 patients suspected of pulmonary infection were enrolled in the study, 23 (22.5%) with PNID and 79 (77.5%) with PID. The diagnostic efficiency of BALF mNGS for differentiating PID from PNID was better than that of CMTs. Neutrophil percentage (N%) and the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes (N/L) in BALF were significantly lower in the PNID group than in the PID group. The AUCs for distinguishing PNID and PID were 0.739 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.636-0.825) for BALF N%, 0.727 (95% CI 0.624-0.815) for BALF N/L, and 0.799 (95% CI 0.702-0.876) for BALF mNGS, with respective cutoff values of 6.7%, 0.255, and negative. Joint models of BALF mNGS combined with BALF N/L or BALF N% increased the respective AUCs to 0.872 (95% CI 0.786-0.933) and 0.871 (95% CI 0.784-0.932), which were significantly higher than those for BALF mNGS, BALF N%, and BALF N/L alone.

Conclusions

BALF N% ≤ 6.7% or BALF N/L ≤ 0.255 combined with a negative BALF mNGS result can effectively distinguish PNID from PID in immunocompetent patients with suspected pulmonary infection. BALF mNGS outperforms CMTs for identifying pathogens in immunocompetent patients, and the combination of mNGS and CMTs may be a better diagnostic strategy.

Molecular Diagnosis of Osteoarticular Implant-Associated Infection: Available Techniques and How We Can Use Them

Despite recent advances during the last few years, microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections remains a challenge. Molecular biology techniques have been developed to try to overcome this problem, and recently, many of them have become available for many laboratories. Some of them, especially commercial multiplex PCR-based assays and universal 16S rDNA homemade PCR assays, are now available in many laboratories. Moreover, new technologies have appeared, especially metagenomics and next-generation sequencing. These techniques have demonstrated their potential in many studies but appear to be experimental at present. A few studies have evaluated the possible use of these methods in the clinical routine, and a review of the critical aspects for the selection of a molecular method (accuracy, complexity, cost) was performed. Finally, a proposal for a protocol that includes molecular biology techniques was made according to the literature published in this field. In conclusion, molecular biology techniques are ready to be used in the clinical routine of a microbiology laboratory, but their use must be carried out in accordance with the many special characteristics of each laboratory. In all cases, the interpretation of the results must be conducted by a multidisciplinary team with experience in the management of these patients.

Clinical Use of a 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene-Based Sanger and/or Next Generation Sequencing Assay to Test Preoperative Synovial Fluid for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis

Preoperative pathogen identification in patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is typically limited to synovial fluid culture. Whether sequencing-based approaches are of potential use in identification of pathogens in PJI, and if so which approach is ideal, is incompletely defined. The objective of the study was to analyze the accuracy of a 16S rRNA (rRNA) gene-based PCR followed by Sanger sequencing and/or targeted metagenomic sequencing approach (tMGS) performed on synovial fluid for PJI diagnosis. A retrospective study was conducted, analyzing synovial fluids tested between August 2020 and May 2021 at a single center. Subjects with hip, knee, shoulder, and elbow arthroplasties who had synovial fluid aspirated and clinically subjected to sequence-based testing and conventional culture were studied. A total of 154 subjects were included in the study; 118 had noninfectious arthroplasty failure (NIAF), while 36 had PJI. Clinical sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of PJI were 69% and 100%, respectively, for the sequencing-based approach and 72% and 100%, respectively, for conventional culture (P = 0.74). The combination of both tests was more sensitive (83%) than culture alone (P = 0.04). Results of sequencing-based testing led to changes in treatment in four of 36 (11%) PJI subjects. Microbial identification was achieved using Sanger and next generation sequencing in 19 and 6 subjects, respectively. When combined with culture, the described 16S rRNA gene sequencing-based approach increased sensitivity compared to culture alone, suggesting its potential use in the diagnosis of PJI when synovial fluid culture is negative. IMPORTANCE Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a dreadful complication of joint replacement. Noninvasive identification of infectious pathogens has been traditionnally limited to culture-based testing of synovial fluid which has poor sensitivity. Sanger and Next-generation sequencing (NGS) may be used for synovial fluid testing in PJI, but experience in routine practice is sparse. We used a targeted metagenomic sequencing approach for routine testing of synovial fluid involving NGS when Sanger sequencing had failed or was likely to fail. The objective of this study was to analyze the approach's performance for diagnosis of PJI in comparison to culture for testing synovial fluid. Overall, the sequencing-based approach was not superior to culture for diagnosis of PJI, but yielded positive results in some culture-negative samples.

Nanopore 16S amplicon sequencing enables rapid detection of pathogen in knee periprosthetic joint infection

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether nanopore 16S amplicon sequencing is capable of bacterial identification in patients with knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and we compared its efficacy with conventional culture studies.

METHODS

In total, 36 patients who had clinical manifestation suspected of PJI were enrolled in this study. To begin, synovial fluids were aspirated from the affected knee using aseptic technique and tissues specimens were obtained during the surgery. Next, DNA was extracted from the synovial fluid or tissues, and 16S rDNA PCR was performed. In PCR positive cases, nanopore amplicon sequencing was then performed for up to 3 h. The results of amplicon sequencing were compared to those of conventional culture studies.

RESULTS

Of the 36 patients enrolled, 22 were classified as true infections according to the MSIS criteria whereas 14 were considered uninfected. Among the 22 PJI cases, 19 cases were culture positive (CP-PJI) while three cases were culture negative (CN-PJI). In 14 of 19 (73.7 %) CP- PJI cases, 16S sequencing identified concordant bacteria with conventional culture studies with a significantly shorter turnaround time. In some cases, nanopore 16S sequencing was superior to culture studies in the species-level identification of pathogen and detection of polymicrobial infections. Altogether, in the majority of PJI candidate patients (32 of 36, 88.9 %), 16S sequencing achieved identical results to cultures studies with a significantly reduced turnaround time (100.9 ± 32.5 h vs. 10.8 ± 7.7 h, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nanopore 16S sequencing was found to be particularly useful for pathogen identification in knee PJI. Although the sensitivity was not superior to culture studies, the nanopore 16S sequencing was much faster, and species-level identification and detection of polymicrobial infections were superior to culture studies.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing assists the diagnosis treatment of fungal osteoarticular infections

Background

Fungal osteoarticular infection (FOI) is not commonly seen in clinical practice but proposes a great challenge to orthopedic surgeons. In this study, we aimed to investigate the risk factors, the clinical features, and surgical outcomes of FOI in our institution. Specifically, we aimed to explore the role of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in the diagnosis and treatment of FOI.

Methods

All the patients who were diagnosed and managed with FOI in our institution from January 2007 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, including primary fungal implant-related infection, primary fungal osteomyelitis or arthritis, and fungal infections secondary to bacterial osteomyelitis or implant-related bacterial infections. The potential risk factors and the clinical and surgical features were analyzed. The pathogen data were compared between culture and the mNGS test.

Results

A total of 25 patients were included, namely, 12 primary implant-related infections, 7 primary fungal osteomyelitis or arthritis, and 6 fungal infections secondary to bacterial osteomyelitis or implant-related bacterial infections. Most cases had undergone multiple surgeries or long-term antibiotic treatment. Diagnosis was mainly based on microbial culture and the mNGS test. Optimization of culture methods and the use of mNGS assisted the diagnosis. Specifically, mNGS was performed in 12 patients, 5 of whom were culture-negative. In the remaining seven cases, mNGS demonstrated the same results as culture. Management of FOI was complicated as most patients required multiple surgeries followed by long-term antifungal treatment. In selected cases, antifungal-impregnated cement spacer retention can be an optional choice. The overall success rate was 100% (25/25) for our cohort.

Conclusion

We concluded that patients with comorbidities and a history of multiple surgeries or long-term antibiotics are under higher risk for FOI. Use of mNGS assists the diagnosis and treatment of FOI. Surgery combined with long-term antifungal treatment achieved satisfactory outcomes. In selected cases, antifungal-impregnated cement spacer retention can be an optional treatment choice.

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for identification of central nervous system pathogens in HIV-infected patients

Although considerable interest in metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been attracted in recent years, limited data are available regarding the performance of mNGS in HIV-associated central nervous system (CNS) infection. Here, we conducted a retrospectively analyzing of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) mNGS reports and other clinical data from 80 HIV-infected patients admitted to the Second Hospital of Nanjing, China from March, 2018 to March, 2022. In our study, CSF mNGS reported negative result, mono-infection, and mixed infection in 8.8, 36.2, and 55% of the patients, respectively. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), positive in 52.5% of samples, was the most commonly reported pathogen, followed by cytomegalovirus (CMV), John Cunningham virus (JCV), torque teno virus (TTV), cryptococcus neoformans (CN), toxoplasma Gondii (TE), and mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). 76.2% of the EBV identification and 54.2% of the CMV identification were not considered clinically important, and relative less sequence reads were reported in the clinical unimportant identifications. The clinical importance of the presence of TTV in CSF was not clear. Detection of JCV, CN, or TE was 100% suggestive of specific CNS infection, however, 60% of the MTB reports were considered contamination. Moreover, of the 44 (55%) mixed infections reported by mNGS, only 4 (5%) were considered clinical important, and mNGS failed to identify one mixed infection. Additionally, except for MTB, CSF mNGS tended to have high sensitivity to identify the above-mentioned pathogens (almost with 100% sensitivity). Even all the diagnostic strategies were evaluated, the cause of neurological symptoms remained undetermined in 6 (7.5%) patients. Overall, our results suggest that mNGS is a very sensitive tool for detecting common opportunistic CNS pathogen in HIV-infected patients, although its performance in CNS tuberculosis is unsatisfactory. EBV and CMV are commonly detected by CSF mNGS, however, the threshold of a clinical important detection remains to be defined.

Next-Generation Sequencing Supports Targeted Antibiotic Treatment for Culture Negative Orthopedic Infections

The isolation of an infective pathogen can be challenging in some patients with active, clinically apparent infectious diseases. Despite efforts in the microbiology lab to improve the sensitivity of culture in orthopedic implant-associated infections, the clinically relevant information often falls short of expectations. The management of peri-prosthetic joint infections (PJI) provides an excellent example of the use and benefits of newer diagnostic technologies to supplement the often-inadequate yield of traditional culture methods as a substantial percentage of orthopedic infections are culture-negative. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to improve upon this yield. Bringing molecular diagnostics into practice can provide critical information about the nature of the infective organisms and allow targeted therapy in these otherwise challenging situations. This review article describes the current state of knowledge related to the use and potential of NGS to diagnose infections, particularly in the setting of PJIs.

Molecular Approach for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

The incidence of total joint arthroplasty is increasing over time since the last decade and expected to be more than 4 million by 2030. As a consequence, the detection of infections associated with surgical interventions is increasing and prosthetic joint infections are representing both a clinically and economically challenging problem. Many pathogens, from bacteria to fungi, elicit the immune system response and produce a polymeric matrix, the biofilm, that serves as their protection. In the last years, the implementation of diagnostic methodologies reduced the error rate and the turn-around time: polymerase chain reaction, targeted or broad-spectrum, and next-generation sequencing have been introduced and they represent a robust approach nowadays that frees laboratories from the unique approach based on culture-based techniques.

Metal Artifact Reduction Sequences MRI: A Useful Reference for Preoperative Diagnosis and Debridement Planning of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

The diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is complex and the use of MRI in PJI is gaining attention from orthopedic surgeons as MR technology continues to advance. This study aimed to investigate whether metal artefact reduction sequence (MARS) MRI could be used as an adjunct in the preoperative diagnosis of PJI and to explore its role in PJI debridement planning. From January 2020 to November 2021, participants with metal joint prostheses that needed to be judged for infection were prospectively enrolled. According to Musculoskeletal Infection Society standards, 31 cases were classified as infection, and 20 as non-infection. The sensitivity and specificity of MARS MRI for the diagnosis of PJI were 80.65% and 75%, respectively. In MARS MRI, the incidence of bone destruction, lamellar synovitis, and extracapsular soft tissue oedema were significantly higher in PJI than in non-PJI. Fourteen suspicious occult lesions were found in the preoperative MARS MRI in 9 cases, and the location of 9 infection lesions was confirmed intraoperatively. In conclusion, MARS MRI is an effective diagnostic tool for PJIand can provide a visual reference for preoperative surgical planning.

Clinical Outcomes of Culture-Negative and Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Similar Success Rate, Different Incidence of Complications

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection (CN PJI) with those of culture-positive periprosthetic joint infection (CP PJI).

METHODS

This study retrospectively examined data from 77 patients who underwent revision surgery due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasty at our center from January 2012 to June 2017. There were 37 males and 40 females, with an average age of 63.6 year. All patients were classified by Tsukayama type, according to the bacterial culture results of synovial fluid and pre- and intraoperative tissues, 24 cases were included in the CN PJI group, and 53 cases were included in the CP PJI group. All patients underwent routine blood tests, liver, renal function tests, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements. The remission rates of CN PJI and CP PJI were compared. The effects of the culture results on the curative effect were further compared by survival analysis.

RESULTS

The patients were followed regularly with an average of 29.2 months (range, 12-76 months). In total, there were 24 cases of CN PJI, with an incidence of 29.63%. The overall success rate of CN PJI group was 86.4% (19/22), and overall success rate of CP PJI group was 87.5% (42/48). The relative efficacy of various surgical options was: one-stage revision 100% (7/7), two-stage revision 96.3% (26/27), debridement and implant retention 64.3% (9/14), respectively. There was no significant difference in the success rate between the CN PJI group and the CP PJI group. The incidence of antibiotic-related complications for the CN PJI group was significantly higher than that of the CP PJI group, with 58.3% for CN PJI and 11.3% for CP PJI, respectively.

CONCLUSION

When CN PJI was treated according to the strict standards for the diagnosis and treatment, the success rate of treatment for the CN PJI group was similar to that for the CP PJI group. The incidence of antibiotic-related complications from the CN PJI group was higher than that from the CP PJI group.

The Effectiveness of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

A prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following total joint arthroplasties with poor prognosis. Identifying an accurate and prompt diagnostic method is particularly important for PJI. Recently, the diagnostic value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) in detecting PJI has attracted much attention, while the evidence of its accuracy is quite limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of mNGS for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

We summarized published studies to identify the potential diagnostic value of mNGS for PJI patients by searching online databases using keywords such as "prosthetic joint infection", "PJI", and "metagenomic sequencing". Ten of 380 studies with 955 patients in total were included. The included studies provided sufficient data for the completion of 2-by-2 tables. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the SROC curve (AUC) to evaluate mNGS for PJI diagnosis.

RESULTS

We found that the pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of mNGS for PJI were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.97) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.97), respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 18.3 (95% CI, 10.9 to 30.6) and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.18), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93 to 0.97).

CONCLUSION

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing displays high accuracy in the diagnosis of PJI, especially for culture-negative cases.

Application of 68Ga-citrate PET/CT for differentiating periprosthetic joint infection from aseptic loosening after joint replacement surgery

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the utility of ⁶⁸Ga-citrate positron emission tomography (PET)/CT in the differentiation of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening (AL), and compare it with ^99mTc-methylene bisphosphonates (^99mTc-MDP) bone scan.

METHODS

We studied 39 patients with suspected PJI or AL. These patients underwent ⁶⁸Ga-citrate PET/CT, ^99mTc-MDP three-phase bone scan and single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT. PET/CT was performed at ten minutes and 60 minutes after injection, respectively. Images were evaluated by three nuclear medicine doctors based on: 1) visual analysis of the three methods based on tracer uptake model, and PET images attenuation-corrected with CT and those not attenuation-corrected with CT were analyzed, respectively; and 2) semi-quantitative analysis of PET/CT: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of lesions, SUVmax of the lesion/SUVmean of the normal bone, and SUVmax of the lesion/SUVmean of the normal muscle. The final diagnosis was based on the clinical and intraoperative findings, and histopathological and microbiological examinations.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 and 16 patients were diagnosed with PJI and AL, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of three-phase bone scan and SPECT/CT were 100% and 62.5%, 82.6%, and 100%, respectively. Attenuation correction (AC) at 60 minutes and non-AC at 60 minutes of PET/CT had the same highest sensitivity and specificity (91.3% and 100%), and AC at 60 minutes combined with SPECT/CT could improve the diagnostic efficiency (sensitivity = 95.7%). Diagnostic efficacy of the SUVmax was low (area under the curve (AUC) of ten minutes and 60 minutes was 0.814 and 0.806, respectively), and SUVmax of the lesion/SUVmean of the normal bone at 60 minutes was the best semi-quantitative parameter (AUC = 0.969).

CONCLUSION

⁶⁸Ga-citrate showed the potential to differentiate PJI from AL, and visual analysis based on uptake pattern of tracer was reliable. The visual analysis method of AC at 60 minutes, combined with ^99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT, could improve the sensitivity from 91.3% to 95.7%. In addition, a major limitation of our study was that it had a limited sample size, and more detailed studies with a larger sample size are warranted. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(6):398-408.

Surgical Management for Chronic Destructive Septic Hip Arthritis: Debridement, Antibiotics, and Single-Stage Replacement is as Effective as Two-Stage Arthroplasty

Objective

To compare the surgical outcomes of debridement, antibiotics, and single‐stage total hip replacement (DASR) vs two‐stage arthroplasty (two‐stage arthroplasty) for chronic destructive septic hip arthritis (SHA).

Methods

Cases of chronic destructive SHA treated by DASR or two‐stage arthroplasty in our department from January 2008 to October 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic information, perioperative inflammation markers, intraoperative blood loss, microbial culture, and metagenomic new generation sequencing results were recorded. The perioperative complications, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, infection recurrence rate, and Harris Hip Score (HHS) at the last follow‐up were compared between the two groups.

Results

A total of 28 patients were included in the study, including 11 patients who received DASR and 17 patients who received two‐stage arthroplasty. There was no significant difference in demographic information, preoperative serum inflammatory markers, synovial fluid white blood cell count, or percentage of polymorphonuclear leukocytes between the two groups. The DASR group demonstrated significantly lower intraoperative blood loss [(368.2 ± 253.3) mL vs (638.2 ± 170.0) mL, p = 0.002], hospital stay [(22.6 ± 8.1) days vs (43.5 ± 13.2) days, p < 0.0001], and hospitalization expenses [(81,269 ± 11,496) RMB vs (137,524 ± 25,516) RMB, p < 0.0001] than the two‐stage arthroplasty group. In the DASR group, one patient had dislocation as a complication. There were no cases with recurrence of infection. In the two‐stage arthroplasty group, there was one case complicated with spacer fracture, one case with spacer dislocation, and one case with deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs. There were no cases with recurrence of infection. There were no significant differences in the readmission rate, complication rate, or HHS at the last follow‐up between the two groups.

Conclusions

Both DASR and two‐stage arthroplasty achieved a satisfactory infection cure rate and functional recovery for chronic destructive SHA, and DASR demonstrated significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and hospitalization costs than two‐stage arthroplasty. For appropriately indicated patients, if microbial data are available and a standardized debridement protocol is strictly followed, DASR can be a treatment option.

Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Species Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction in Orthopedic Device Infection

Diagnosis of orthopedic device-related infection is challenging, and causative pathogens may be difficult to culture. Metagenomic sequencing can diagnose infections without culture, but attempts to detect antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants using metagenomic data have been less successful. Human DNA depletion may maximize the amount of microbial DNA sequence data available for analysis. Human DNA depletion by saponin was tested in 115 sonication fluid samples generated following revision arthroplasty surgery, comprising 67 where pathogens were detected by culture and 48 culture-negative samples. Metagenomic sequencing was performed on the Oxford Nanopore Technologies GridION platform. Filtering thresholds for detection of true species versus contamination or taxonomic misclassification were determined. Mobile and chromosomal genetic AMR determinants were identified in Staphylococcus aureus-positive samples. Of 114 samples generating sequence data, species-level positive percent agreement between metagenomic sequencing and culture was 50/65 (77%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65 to 86%) and negative percent agreement was 103/114 (90%; 95% CI, 83 to 95%). Saponin treatment reduced the proportion of human bases sequenced in comparison to 5-μm filtration from a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 98.1% (87.0% to 99.9%) to 11.9% (0.4% to 67.0%), improving reference genome coverage at a 10-fold depth from 18.7% (0.30% to 85.7%) to 84.3% (12.9% to 93.8%). Metagenomic sequencing predicted 13/15 (87%) resistant and 74/74 (100%) susceptible phenotypes where sufficient data were available for analysis. Metagenomic nanopore sequencing coupled with human DNA depletion has the potential to detect AMR in addition to species detection in orthopedic device-related infection. Further work is required to develop pathogen-agnostic human DNA depletion methods, improving AMR determinant detection and allowing its application to other infection types.

The Potential Value of Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet to Mean Platelet Volume Ratio in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

OBJECTIVE

To explore the possibility of obtaining more accurate information from routine blood tests for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. Between 2017 and 2018, a total of 246 patients who underwent total hip or knee revision surgery were included in this study. There were 146 females and 100 males, and the mean age of the patients was 62.1 ± 12.75 years. Laboratory parameters erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, plasma fibrinogen, serum white blood cell (WBC), and calculable ratio markers were collected. Based on leukocytes (monocyte count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count), platelet count, and mean platelet volume Inflammation-related ratio markers were calculated, which including monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and platelet to mean platelet volume ratio (PMR). Follow-up of all studied cases for at least 1 year. The diagnostic value of the markers based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The most optimal combinations of blood markers were selected by the prediction models. Statistical analyses and prediction models were performed using R software.

RESULTS

Of the 246 patients, 125 were diagnosed with PJI and 121 with aseptic loosening. A higher rate of patients underwent revision surgery due to hip prosthesis loosening in the aseptic loosening group (74.4%) compared to the PJI group (45.6%, P < 0.001). ROC curves showed that the area under the curve (AUC) for classical markers, fibrinogen was 0.853 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.805-0.901), ESR was 0.836 (95% CI, 0.785-0.887) and CRP was 0.825 (95% CI, 0.773-0.878). Followed by the PMR, PLR, NLR and MLR, which showed promising diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.791, 0.785, 0.736, and 0.733. The AUCs of the ratio markers were higher than those of D-dimer (0.691;95% CI, 0.6243-0.7584) and serum WBC (0.622; 95% CI, 0.552-0.691). After the predictive model calculation, AUC was up to 0.923 (95% CI, 0.891-0.951) when plasma fibrinogen combined with MLR and PMR and interpreted excellent discriminatory capacity with a sensitivity of 86.40% and a specificity of 84.17%. The new combination significantly increases the accuracy and reliability of the diagnosis of PJI (P < 0.001). The AUC increased to 0.899 (95% CI, 0.861-0.931; P = 0.007) and 0.916 (95% CI, 0.880-0.946; P < 0.001), followed by CRP and ESR, respectively. All plasma fibrinogen, ESR, and CRP combined with both PMR and MLR achieved the highest specificity (89.17%) and PPV (85.34%).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance greatly improved when plasma fibrinogen, ESR, and CRP combined with ratio markers.

The Role of Metagenomics and Next-Generation Sequencing in Infectious Disease Diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for pathogen detection is becoming increasingly available as a method to identify pathogens in cases of suspected infection. mNGS analyzes the nucleic acid content of patient samples with high-throughput sequencing technologies to detect and characterize microorganism DNA and/or RNA. This unbiased approach to organism detection enables diagnosis of a broad spectrum of infection types and can identify more potential pathogens than any single conventional test. This can lead to improved ability to diagnose patients, although there remains concern regarding contamination and detection of nonclinically significant organisms.

CONTENT

We describe the laboratory approach to mNGS testing and highlight multiple considerations that affect diagnostic performance. We also summarize recent literature investigating the diagnostic performance of mNGS assays for a variety of infection types and recommend further studies to evaluate the improvement in clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of mNGS testing.

SUMMARY

The majority of studies demonstrate that mNGS has sensitivity similar to specific PCR assays and will identify more potential pathogens than conventional methods. While many of these additional organism detections correlate with the expected pathogen spectrum based on patient presentations, there are relatively few formal studies demonstrating whether these are true-positive infections and benefits to clinical outcomes. Reduced specificity due to contamination and clinically nonsignificant organism detections remains a major concern, emphasizing the importance of careful interpretation of the organism pathogenicity and potential association with the clinical syndrome. Further research is needed to determine the possible improvement in clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of mNGS testing.

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Infectious Disease Diagnosis: A Review of the Literature With a Focus on Pediatrics

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel tool for identifying microbial DNA and/or RNA in blood and other clinical specimens. In the face of increasingly complex patients and an ever-growing list of known potential pathogens, mNGS has been proposed as a breakthrough tool for unbiased pathogen identification. Studies have begun to explore the clinical applicability of mNGS in a variety of settings, including endocarditis, pneumonia, febrile neutropenia, osteoarticular infections, and returning travelers. The real-world impact of mNGS has also been assessed through retrospective studies, documenting varying degrees of success and limitations. In this review, we will explore current highlights of the clinical mNGS literature, with a focus on pediatric data where available. We aim to provide the reader with a deeper understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of mNGS and to provide direction toward areas requiring further research.