Periprosthetic hip fractures: an update into their management and clinical outcomes

Outcomes of traumatic Vancouver type AG periprosthetic fractures treated nonoperatively

Introduction

The optimal treatment for postoperative Vancouver AG fractures has not been established. This study is a case series investigating the outcomes of patients from a single, academic tertiary referral center with conservative management of postoperative, traumatic periprosthetic fractures, specifically Vancouver type AG fractures.

Methods

This study was a retrospective review of 225 patients diagnosed with periprosthetic fracture at an academic, tertiary referral center from January 2007 to June 2023. Of these patients, 18 were identified as having Vancouver Type AG fractures and underwent conservative treatment with a walker. Radiographic fracture healing, patient reported pain, ambulatory status, and abductor strength were evaluated.

Results

All 18 patients included in this case series suffered from traumatic postoperative periprosthetic fractures from falls, and none were noted to have any concomitant osteolytic changes. Mean age at the time of fracture of 81.4, range (62-96). Mean BMI at the time of fracture was 24.1, range (18-38.1). 1 patient passed away from unrelated medical problems 3 months after fracture onset, 2 were lost to follow-up after emergency department (ED) discharge, 3 demonstrated healing, but not yet fully healed fractures at their last follow-up, and 3 patients presented to the ED at a much later time for non-orthopaedic related issues and demonstrated healed fractures on radiographic. For the remaining 9 patients, mean length of time to heal after onset of fracture was 14.2 weeks, range (6-44). No weakness was noted during their last follow-up, and only 1 patient noted residual 1 of 10 pain. 5 patients noted to using walkers, 3 using canes, and 1 interchanging between a walker and cane during the last follow-up.

Conclusion

Patients with minimally to nondisplaced Vancouver type AG can achieve fracture healing and pain resolution with conservative, protected weight-bearing management in the setting of postoperative trauma.

"Close to the tip, with little bone to grip": stabilizing two periprosthetic proximal femur fractures above a distal femur megaprosthesis using a combination of DHS and 3.5 mm screws

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures is increasing, presenting significant challenges due to patient longevity and the complexity of repeated surgeries. This report details the successful treatment of a previously unreported periprosthetic fracture pattern using a modified dynamic hip screw (DHS) technique. Two cases involved patients with extracapsular fractures in short proximal femur segments above megaprostheses. The fractures were reduced and stabilized with a DHS device, complemented by 3.5 mm screws from a different manufacturer to achieve effective bicortical fixation around the thick stems. Early weight-bearing was initiated postoperatively, with both patients achieving fracture healing without mechanical complications. This approach highlights the importance of careful preoperative planning and the selection of appropriate fixation methods, particularly in complex cases where traditional solutions may not be viable.

Patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures are older adults who are commonly diagnosed with osteoporosis

This study focused on individuals aged ≥ 50 years with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF). When compared to those with native hip fractures, patients with PFF were older, had a higher BMI, and demonstrated a greater number of comorbidities. Given the high frequency of osteoporosis risk factors and the BMD results, PFF should be classified as osteoporotic fractures.

INTRODUCTION

To compare patients presenting with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) to patients with native hip fractures with a special focus on bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, in order to reinforce the hypothesis that PFF are osteoporotic fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-centre, observational study of all patients aged ≥ 50 years with low-energy PFF identified at the Lille University Hospital from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022, was conducted. The PFF group was compared to a group of patients with native hip fractures hospitalized during the same period. To compare the T-score data, we used a linear mixed model that considered a predefined adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. Adjusted means ± standard error of the mean (SEM) are derived from the mixed model.

RESULTS

Among 71 patients with PFF (78.9% female, median (IQR) age 81 (72-88) years), osteoarthritis (57.8%) was the primary indication for hip surgery. Compared with the native hip fracture group (n = 117), patients in the PFF group were significantly older (p = 0.002), had a significantly greater BMI (p = 0.043), and had a higher history of multiple falls (54.3% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001). A greater frequency of previous low-energy fractures (69.0% vs. 44.0%, p < 0.001) and an increased prescription of anti-osteoporosis medications (26.8% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.006) in patients with PFF were found. Adjusted T-scores differed between the two groups at the lumbar spine (mean adjusted ± SEM, - 0.5 ± 0.2 (PFF group) vs. - 1.2 ± 0.2 (comparator group), p = 0.008) but not at the femoral neck or at the total hip.

CONCLUSION

Low-energy PFF should be considered as an osteoporotic fracture and treated accordingly.

Decreased Revision Risk with Cementless Collared Metadiaphyseal-Filling Stems Compared to Cemented Fixation in Patients 65 Years and Older

BACKGROUND

Compared to other cementless designs, collared metadiaphyseal-filling femoral stems are associated with a lower risk of revision and periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients ≥ 65 years. However, it is unclear how these designs compare to cemented femoral stems. We utilized the American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) to examine the risk of revision comparing cementless collared metadiaphyseal-filling versus cemented femoral stem designs.

METHODS

Data from 2012 to 2021 was analyzed in patients ≥ 65 years, linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid data. We identified 79,022 primary THAs, stratified into two groups: cementless collared metadiaphyseal-filling stems (n = 61,854) and cemented fixation (n = 17,168). Inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighting (IPTW) cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the risks of all-cause revision and revision for periprosthetic femoral fracture, aseptic loosening, dislocation, and infection.

RESULTS

Compared to cemented stems, cementless collared metadiaphyseal-filling stems showed a lower risk of all-cause revision (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 0.56, P < 0.001), aseptic loosening (HR 0.35, CI 0.22 to 0.57, P < 0.001), dislocation (HR 0.39, CI 0.26 to 0.58, P < 0.001), and infection (HR 0.53, CI 0.36 to 0.78, P = 0.001). There was no difference in periprosthetic femoral fracture risk (HR 0.80, CI 0.45 to 1.42, P = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients undergoing primary THA, cementless collared metadiaphyseal-filling stems were associated with decreased risk of all-cause revision, revision for aseptic loosening, dislocation, and infection, but there was no difference in periprosthetic femoral fracture risk compared to cemented stems. Further study of cementless collared metadiaphyseal-filling designs compared to cemented fixation is warranted as there may be benefits of decreased revision risk with cementless fixation.

A Micro-CT Based Cadaveric Study Investigating Bone Density Changes During Hip Arthroplasty Surgery

The impact of broaching and uncemented implantation on bone density during total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. Previous studies have typically examined extracted bone sections, which may not directly correlate with outcomes in human hip systems. This study aimed to evaluate bone density changes resulting from broaching and uncemented implantation using micro-computed tomography (μCT) on cadaveric samples. An in-house density calibration phantom (DCP) was developed by validating the densities of polymer inserts through mass and volume measurements. Its performance was then evaluated using lamb bone in comparison with a commercial DCP (QRM-50124). The sensitivity of density predictions to μCT scan parameters was also evaluated with the lamb bone. Additionally, density predictions from medical-CT and μCT scans were compared using the in-house DCP. Finally, uncemented THA procedures were performed on three cadaveric femurs, each undergoing three μCT scans at various surgical stages to assess changes in bone density. The density predictions obtained using the in-house DCP achieved an accuracy of ±0.097 g/cc compared to QRM-50124, with a precision of ±0.052 g/cc. The sensitivity to changes in μCT scan parameters was ±0.022 g/cc. Notably, density predictions from medical-CT and μCT scans were similar, particularly in cortical bone. Broaching and implantation led to an average increase in bone density of 0.137 g/cc, which was attributed to the accumulation of bone debris around the bone-implant interface. This accumulation raised the bone volume fraction, ranging from 3.31% to 20.69%, which acts as an autograft. These measurements have been made for the first time using a µCT and an in-house DCP.

Preventing Periprosthetic Femur Fractures in Anterior-Based Approaches

Anterior approaches including the direct anterior and anterior-based muscle sparing approaches have grown in popularity for total hip arthroplasty. Despite many benefits, some studies have demonstrated an increased risk of periprosthetic fracture. Preoperatively, patient selection, careful templating, and strategic implant choice may decrease fracture risk. Recently, cemented stems and modern tapered, collared uncemented stems have been associated with lower fracture rates as well. Using careful surgical techniques, obtaining adequate exposure through sequential releases, and understanding various broaching strategies can all play a role in decreasing periprosthetic facture through anterior approaches to total hip arthroplasty.

The Application of artificial intelligence in periprosthetic joint infection

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) represents one of the most devastating complications following total joint arthroplasty, often necessitating additional surgeries and antimicrobial therapy, and potentially leading to disability. This significantly increases the burden on both patients and the healthcare system. Given the considerable suffering caused by PJI, its prevention and treatment have long been focal points of concern. However, challenges remain in accurately assessing individual risk, preventing the infection, improving diagnostic methods, and enhancing treatment outcomes. The development and application of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have introduced new, more efficient possibilities for the management of many diseases. In this article, we review the applications of AI in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PJI, and explore how AI methodologies might achieve individualized risk prediction, improve diagnostic algorithms through biomarkers and pathology, and enhance the efficacy of antimicrobial and surgical treatments. We hope that through multimodal AI applications, intelligent management of PJI can be realized in the future.

Temporal Patterns and Treatment Associations in Complications Following Hip Arthroplasty

Background and Objectives: Hip arthroplasty is commonly performed to enhance mobility and quality of life in patients with severe joint degeneration. However, post-surgery complications such as infections, dislocations, and mechanical failures remain prevalent and vary over time. This study examines the relationship between time intervals post-surgery and the occurrence of complications and explores the associations between specific treatment modalities and complications. It also investigates temporal patterns of infectious and mechanical complications to inform more effective post-surgery care. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on hip arthroplasty patients to analyze the occurrence and distribution of complications across medium-term (1-5 years) and long-term (≥6 years) intervals. Treatment modalities, including joint debridement, lavage, antibiotics, and mechanical interventions, were analyzed for their association with complications. Chi-Square tests were used, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: A significant association was found between time intervals and complications (χ2 = 58.149, df = 19, p < 0.001). Infections were more prevalent in the medium-term, while mechanical complications such as dislocation, implant loosening, and periprosthetic fractures were more common in the long-term. Antibiotics were strongly linked to infectious complications (χ2 = 279.000, p < 0.001), and mechanical treatments were associated with fractures and dislocations. Conclusions: The study confirms that the timing of complications post-surgery plays a critical role in their occurrence. Specific complications become more prevalent at different intervals, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies. Antibiotics for infections and mechanical interventions for fractures and dislocations should be adjusted based on timing. These findings highlight the importance of time-specific post-surgery care and suggest areas for further research on long-term strategies and risk factors.

An Uncommon Deformity of the Collarless, Polished, Double-Taper (CPT) Stem After a Periprosthetic Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty

We present an uncommon case of a Collarless, Polished, Double-Taper (CPT) stem deformity (irreversible stem bending) occurring due to a Periprosthetic Fracture (PPF) in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The entire course of the case, including treatment, risk factors, and failure analysis of the deformed CPT by its manufacturer, Zimmer Biomet (Warsaw, USA),is described. The discussion considers in detail the (risk) factors that led to this particular stem deformity, incorporating current literature. We conclude with learning points on how to prevent stem abnormalities in PPFs in the future.  In our case, there were some case-specific risk factors associated with bending of the CPT stem. These factors are a relative varus angle, relative under-sizing of the stem, and a potentially inadequate cement mantle around the primary stem. No material or manufacture failure of the stem could be found. Still, it is very unusual that the femoral stem deforms without fracturing. Taken together, we present a unique case of a Periprosthetic Fracture with CPT stem deformity following Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Cementless Versus Cemented Stems in Patients Aged 70 Years or Older Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the most appropriate femoral implant selection in older patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our study aimed to compare the survivorship, reasons for revision, and patient-reported outcome measures of uncemented versus cemented THA in patients aged ≥ 70 years.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed primary THAs performed on patients aged ≥ 70 years between January 1, 2007, and October 1, 2019. A total of 2,136 patients [cemented (n = 355), cementless (n = 1,781)] were included. Demographics including age in years (77 versus 83), body mass index (29 versus 26), and sex (59 versus 83% women) were different between the cementless and cemented THA cohorts, respectively. Patient characteristics, implant characteristics, revision information, mortality, and patient-reported outcome measures [Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, Veterans Rand 12 Item Health Survey (VR12), and the Harris Hip Score were collected. Kaplan-Meier survivorship was performed with all-cause, aseptic, and aseptic stem revisions as the endpoint. Change scores were calculated and compared with independent t-tests.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the 5- and 10-year cumulative survival in the cementless and cemented THA cohorts for all-cause (P = 0.11), aseptic (P = 0.83), and aseptic stem revisions (P = 0.61). Both cohorts demonstrated excellent long-term survival for all-cause (96.8 versus 95.5), aseptic (97.8 versus 98.3), and aseptic stem (98.4 versus 98.3) revisions. There were no differences in change scores for Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (33.9 versus 35.3, P = 0.48), VR12 mental (0.56 versus 1.42, P = 0.58), VR12 physical (8.9 versus 8.0, P = 0.21), and Harris Hip (43.1 versus 44.9, P = 0.25) scores between the cementless and cemented cohorts at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was found in survival rates of cementless compared to cemented stems for all causes and aseptic causes in patients aged ≥ 70 years undergoing elective THA. Both cementless and cemented femoral stems provide a safe and efficacious option for performing THA in older patients.

Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures in England: Patient profiles and short-term outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) present a growing challenge for healthcare services, but there are limited national data on patient profiles, short-term outcomes, and post-discharge follow-up. We aimed to fill these gaps.

METHODS

Using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), we identified POPFF discharges from hospitals in England for patients aged 18 and above between April 2016 and December 2022. We flagged prior admissions for hip fracture and elective hip or knee replacement surgery (primary, revision or re-revision) between April 2000 and the day of the POPFF admission date. We extracted information on patient factors, treatment modes for POPFF (nonoperative, fixation, revision), and outcomes (in-hospital mortality, length of stay, unplanned readmission). We used outpatient data to summarise post-hospitalisation follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 39,035 cases, 65.9 % were female; the median age was 82 years. HES data identified that 34.0 % had previously undergone elective hip replacement, 26.2 % elective knee replacement, and 22.8 % surgery for hip fracture. Those with a prior hip fracture were more likely to have delirium during the index POPFF admission, and, compared with those with a prior elective hip or knee replacement, they faced higher in-hospital mortality (5.1 % vs 3.2 % and 3.6 %, respectively), rates of readmission (15.4 % vs 13.1 % and 12.8 %, respectively), and hip re-fracture after POPFF (2.9 % vs 1.2 % and 1.6 %, respectively). Their median length of stay was longer (16 vs 14 days, p < 0.001). The most common reason for hospital readmission following POPFF was another fracture (11.3 % of all readmissions). Overall, 74 % of patients were discharged from outpatient follow-up within 12 months.

CONCLUSION

This is the first national description of the burden of adverse outcomes for people with POPFF in England, of whom a large proportion require ongoing specialist support. Fewer POPFF cases follow prior hip fracture surgery than elective joint replacement, but these patients face higher risks of worse outcomes. With an expected increasing incidence of POPFF, this may have considerable health service implications.

Mitigating calcar fracture risk with automated impaction during total hip arthroplasty

Background

Automated broaching has recently been introduced for total hip arthroplasty (THA), with the goal of improving surgical efficiency and reducing surgeon workload. While studies have suggested that this technique may improve femoral sizing and alignment, little has been published regarding its safety, particularly with regard to calcar fractures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the risk of calcar fracture during automated broaching, and to determine if this risk can be mitigated.

Methods

We queried our prospective institutional database and identified 1596 unilateral THAs performed by the senior author using automated impaction between 2019 and 2023. We identified the incidence of calcar fracture with automated impaction, and whether the fracture occurred during broaching or stem insertion. We additionally determined calcar fracture incidence within two consecutive subgroups of patients using different stem insertion techniques; subgroup (1): automated broaching with automated stem insertion for all patients; versus subgroup (2): automated broaching with automated stem insertion ONLY if a cushion of cancellous bone separated the broach from the calcar, otherwise the stem was placed manually. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed with Student's t-test and Fisher's exact test, respectively.

Results

Seventeen calcar fractures occurred intraoperatively (1.1 %). Only two fractures occurred during automated broaching (0.1 %), while fifteen occurred during final stem impaction (0.9 %) (p = 0.007). Four calcar fractures (1.4 %) occurred in subgroup 1, compared to two in subgroup 2 (0.6 %) (p = 0.28).

Conclusions

Our study found a calcar fracture incidence of 1.1 % using automated impaction, consistent with historically reported rates of 0.4-3.7 %. We found that calcar fractures are more likely to occur during stem insertion than during femoral broaching. We recommend that if any part of the final broach is in direct contact with the calcar, the final stem should be impacted manually to minimize fracture risk.

Quantifying bone compaction and implant-bone contact in uncemented total hip arthroplasty through μCT and digital volume correlation: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The stability of uncemented implants during total hip arthroplasty (THA) depends on bone compaction and the bone-implant contact area achieved during the surgical process, particularly during broaching and implantation. However, the evaluation of these factors in actual hip is limited through experimental studies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to quantify bone compaction, and the bone-implant contact area achieved during uncemented THA through a μCT-based cadaveric study of three femur samples.

METHODS

Three cadaveric femur samples underwent uncemented THA, with μCT scans conducted at intermediate surgical steps. The bone compaction resulting from the surgical process was quantified using two parameters: (a) displacement and strain induced using Digital Volume Correlation (DVC), (b) changes in bone volume fraction (BV/TV) around the bone-implant interface. Furthermore, the bone-implant contact, and its location were evaluated, including an assessment of the robustness and sensitivity of the measurements.

RESULTS

The DVC showed that the trabecular bone deformed plastically, with a displacement of 0.09 ± 0.13 mm, a Von-Mises strain of 7082.28 ± 9162.73 με due to the surgical process. Broken trabecular bone accumulated around the bone-implant interface, increasing BV/TV from 3.31 % to 20.69 %. Bone-implant contact (BIC) was limited, ranging from 3.05 % to 5.22 %, but 75.26 %-82.27 % of the maximum potential contact area (PBICA) was achieved. All samples established a three-point contact, and sensitivity analysis revealed a robust BIC calculation with minimal variability of ±0.87 %.

CONCLUSION

The findings offer important insights into bone-implant behaviour during the uncemented THA process. These insights could be useful for physics-based pre-surgical planning to evaluate the stability of uncemented implants and help surgeons choose the most appropriate implants for their patients.

Retrospective survival analysis of the use of uncemented modular tapered stems for revision in periprosthetic Vancouver B-type fractures. Is instability a threat to survival?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Periprosthetic hip fractures show increasing incidence and complexity, representing a challenge for the surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the survival of uncemented modular tapered stems in the treatment of periprosthetic Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures and review the main complications and factors associated with decreased survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients submitted to revision arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic femoral stem Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures with an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (MRP-Titan). Demographic and radiographic parameters were analyzed. The survival rate (free of reoperation) was calculated at 2- and 5-years using the Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 73.5 years and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Arthroplasty survivorship at 2 years was 73.7% and at 5 years was 67.5% (mean 8.4 years; range 6.7-10.2). Survivorship was inferior in the patients with episodes of instability (mean 2.5 years; range 0-5.42) (p<0.001). At least one episode of instability occurred in 26.3% of patients and 60% of these patients had a femoral head size 32mm or lower. At least one episode of instability occurred in 71.4% of patients with a greater trochanter fracture (p=0.008). The consolidation rate was 90.6% and the mortality rate was 23.7%. In the group of patients that died, 55.6% were submitted to at least one revision surgery (p=0.044).

CONCLUSION

Survivorship of an uncemented modular stem (MRP-Titan) in revision for PHF is significantly reduced by episodes of instability.

Retrospective survival analysis of the use of uncemented modular tapered stems for revision in periprosthetic Vancouver B-type fractures. Is instability a threat to survival?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Periprosthetic hip fractures show increasing incidence and complexity, representing a challenge for the surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the survival of uncemented modular tapered stems in the treatment of periprosthetic Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures and review the main complications and factors associated with decreased survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients submitted to revision arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic femoral stem Vancouver B2 and B3 type fractures with an uncemented modular fluted tapered stem (MRP-Titan). Demographic and radiographic parameters were analyzed. The survival rate (free of reoperation) was calculated at 2- and 5-years using the Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included with a mean age of 73.5 years and a mean follow-up of 5 years. Arthroplasty survivorship at 2 years was 73.7% and at 5 years was 67.5% (mean 8.4 years; range 6.7-10.2). Survivorship was inferior in the patients with episodes of instability (mean 2.5 years; range 0-5.42) (p<0.001). At least one episode of instability occurred in 26.3% of patients and 60% of these patients had a femoral head size 32mm or lower. At least one episode of instability occurred in 71.4% of patients with a greater trochanter fracture (p=0.008). The consolidation rate was 90.6% and the mortality rate was 23.7%. In the group of patients that died, 55.6% were submitted to at least one revision surgery (p=0.044).

CONCLUSION

Survivorship of an uncemented modular stem (MRP-Titan) in revision for PHF is significantly reduced by episodes of instability.

Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic femoral fractures around cemented polished taper-slip stems - how should we treat these? A systematic scoping review and algorithm for management

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) are a challenging complication of hip arthroplasty surgery, posing a high risk of morbidity, mortality and reoperation. The Vancouver Classification describes a B2 PFF around a loose stem with sufficient bone stock. In recent years, the number of B2 PFFs and cementation of femoral stems have increased substantially.

HYPOTHESIS

This systematic scoping review aimed to review the options available to surgeons in managing Vancouver B2 PFFs around cemented polished taper-slip (PTS) stems and establish an algorithm of management to treat varying fracture presentations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study reviewed articles reporting on Vancouver B2 PFFs around cemented femoral stems between 2012 and 2022. Data extracted included: patient demographics, index prosthesis, surgical intervention and decision for treatment, operation time, transfusion requirement, length of hospital stay, post-operative rehabilitation protocol, mobility outcomes, radiological outcomes, complications, reoperations, mortality rates and follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, fourteen studies met all inclusion criteria including 552 cases. Mean patient age was 76.8 years with a male:female ratio 1:1.83 and median follow-up 49.2 months. Treatment options included open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), revision arthroplasty using cementless modular and monoblock long-stems ± distal locking, cement-in-cement revision and cemented long-stem revision ± impaction bone grafting.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of B2 PFFs around cemented PTS stems is complex and aims to obtain stable fracture and stem fixation. Options include ORIF, cement-in-cement and cementless revision. The optimal choice depends on a combination of patient, fracture and surgeon factors. This review has proposed an algorithm to aid in decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; systematic scoping review.

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Is a Feasible Alternative to Femoral Revision Arthroplasty in Geriatric Patients with Vancouver B2/3 Type Periprosthetic Fractures: A Study Analyzing In-Hospital Outcomes

Purpose: The surgical management of periprosthetic femoral fractures is particularly challenging in geriatric patients due to physiological limitations. The choice between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and hip revision arthroplasty for treating Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures remains controversial. This study aims to contribute further evidence by analyzing the in-hospital outcomes in geriatric patients with Vancouver B2/3 fractures. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 133 patients treated for Vancouver B2/3 fractures at a level I trauma center from 2017 to 2023. Data were collected on preclinical characteristics, comorbidities, Vancouver classification, surgery-related parameters, and postoperative outcomes for an age- and gender-matched analysis. A subgroup analysis was also conducted on patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 and 4. Results: Among the 133 patients, 85 suffered Vancouver B2 fractures and 48 Vancouver B3 fractures. Age-and-gender-matched analysis revealed that ORIF was more commonly performed in patients with higher ASA grades. A subgroup analysis of ASA 3 and 4 patients and an age-and-gender-matched analysis showed that ORIF resulted in shorter operation times and less blood loss. No significant differences were found in mortality or complication rates. Conclusions: ORIF is associated with shorter operation times, less bleeding, and comparable in-hospital outcomes in treating Vancouver B2/3 fractures in higher-risk geriatric patients compared to revision arthroplasty. The retrospective design and small sample size in the ORIF group are limitations of the study. Further studies with functional evaluation are still required.

Predictors of outcomes after internal fixation of periprosthetic femoral hip fractures Subgroup analysis of the peri-implant and peri-prosthetic fractures Spanish registry (PIPPAS)

PURPOSE

To identify risk factors predisposing patients to poor outcomes after fixation of periprosthetic hip fractures around femoral stems.

METHODS

Prospective multicentre cohort study of fractures around a hip replacement stem managed by internal fixation. The primary outcome was one-year mortality, while secondary outcomes were local complications and healthcare burden-related outcomes (nursing facility utilization and hospital length of stay).

RESULTS

One-year mortality was 16.2%. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score (OR=1.17; 95%CI=1.03-1.33)), Pfeiffer Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) score (OR=1.16; 1.06-1.28), prosthetic dysfunction (OR=1.90; 1.00-3.61), and postoperative medical complications (OR=1.97; 1.06-3.68) were predictors of mortality. Patients with prior prosthetic dysfunction, lower Pfeiffer SPMSQ scores, Vancouver A fractures, and fractures fixed only using cerclages were at higher risk of local complications, which occurred in 9.3% of cases. Medical (OR=1.81; 1.05-3.13) and local complications (OR=5.56; 2.42-3.13) emerged as consistent risk factors for new institutionalization. Average hospitalization time was 13.9±9.2 days. Each day of fixation delay led to an average 1.4-day increase in total hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Frail periprosthetic hip-fracture patients with poorer functional status, dysfunctional replacements, and postoperative complications are at increased risk of mortality. Postoperative complications are more common in patients with dysfunctional arthroplasties, Vancouver A fractures, and fixation using cerclages alone. Postoperative complications were the most consistent predictor of higher healthcare resource utilization.

Prediction of Early Adverse Events After THA: A Comparison of Different Machine-Learning Strategies Based on 262,356 Observations From the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) Dataset

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative risk prediction models can support shared decision-making before total hip arthroplasties (THAs). Here, we compare different machine-learning (ML) approaches to predict the six-month risk of adverse events following primary THA to obtain accurate yet simple-to-use risk prediction models.

METHODS

We extracted data on primary THAs (N = 262,356) between 2010 and 2018 from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association dataset. We benchmarked a variety of ML algorithms in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting the risk of revision caused by periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), dislocation or periprosthetic fracture (PPF), and death. All models were internally validated against a randomly selected test cohort (one-third of the data) that was not used for training the models.

RESULTS

The incidences of revisions because of PJI, dislocation, and PPF were 0.8%, 0.4%, and 0.3%, respectively, and the incidence of death was 1.2%. Overall, Lasso regression with stable iterative variable selection (SIVS) produced models using only four to five input variables but with AUROC comparable to more complex models using all 32 variables available. The SIVS-based Lasso models based on age, sex, preoperative diagnosis, bearing couple, fixation, and surgical approach predicted the risk of revisions caused by PJI, dislocations, and PPF, as well as death, with AUROCs of 0.61, 0.67, 0.76, and 0.86, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that satisfactory predictive potential for adverse events following THA can be reached with parsimonious modeling strategies. The SIVS-based Lasso models may serve as simple-to-use tools for clinical risk assessment in the future.

Indications and clinical results of Non-Operative management of periprosthetic hip fractures in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The increase in life expectancy in the general population has led to a rise in the use of hip arthroplasties and consequently, to an increase in the incidence of periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHF). The impact of this type of fracture on patients necessitates a personalized approach to treatment, whether surgical or non-operative, taking into account the trajectory and associated comorbidities.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 80 patients over the age of 70 diagnosed with a periprosthetic hip fracture between 2011 and 2018. These cases were reviewed after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. We included demographic data, comorbidities including Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), primary prosthesis characteristics, fracture type according to the Vancouver classification, treatment received and mortality among others. Radiographs were analyzed during follow-up and Merle D'Aubigné and visual analog scales were performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two of the 80 fractures analyzed involved total hip arthroplasties, 26 were hemiartroplasties and only 2 were revision prostheses. A total of 77.5 % had cementless stems and 88.8 % of the patients had significant comorbidities. There were 29 B1 (36.3 %) and 30 B2 (37.5 %) fractures which compromised most of the study cohort. Fifty-three patients underwent surgery compared to 27 patients (34 %) treated non-operatively; most of the latter had short, oblique undisplaced B1 fractures. 28 fractures (35 %) required reduction and fixation (ORIF) while 25 patients (31.3 %) underwent a revision arthroplasty (RA). The mean score at 3 months for the VAS scale was 2.9 points and for Merle D'Aubigné scale, the scores were 4.3 points for pain, 4.1 for mobility and 3.8 for ambulation. Seven patients who underwent surgery died in the first 2 months compared to 2 in the non-operative group. Revision arthroplasty had the highest prevalence of mortality (p=0.032) as did those with a CCI ≥ 6 (p=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

In some low functional demand elderly patients with significant comorbidities non-operative treatment can be considered, especially in fractures with short transverse and oblique patterns where it provides similar clinical and radiographic results to surgical treatment whilst avoiding additional risks in these fragile and vulnerable patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV (Case Series).

Long stem revision versus short stem revision with plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture: a comparative study of eighty five cases

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFs) around the hip are challenging complications in orthopaedic surgery, particularly Vancouver type B2 (VTB2) fractures. The surgical management of these fractures is crucial and depends on various factors. Cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis is an alternative surgical technique. This study aims to compare the outcomes of this surgical technique with revision arthroplasty (RA) with long stem in the treatment of VTB2 PPFs.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a single medical institute from February 2010 to May 2019. Patients who had received either total hip arthroplasty or bipolar hemiarthroplasty and subsequently developed a VTB2 PPF were included; patients who sustained intra-operative fractures or received a cemented stem previously were excluded from the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups: group I received RA with cementless long stem, while group II underwent RA with cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis. Demographic data, radiographic and functional outcomes, and complications were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 85 patients diagnosed with VTB2 PPFs were included in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data, including age, gender, mean follow-up times, estimated blood loss, and operative times. The radiographic results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of subsidence and implant stability between the two groups. However, group II tended to have less subsidence and periprosthetic osteolysis. Patients in group II had significantly better functional scores (mean Harris hip score: post-operative: 60.2 in group I and 66.7 in group ii; last follow-up: 77.4 in group 1 and 83.2 in group II (both p < 0.05)). There were no significant differences in the overall complication rate, including infection, dislocation, re-fracture, and revision surgery, between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both surgical techniques, cementless long stem and cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis, are effective in the treatment of Vancouver B2 PPFs, with no significant differences in outcomes or complications. However, patients in cementless short taper stem with plate osteosynthesis had better functional scores at both post-operative and the last follow-up.

Early Postoperative Functional Recovery in Older Patients With Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: Comparison Between Cemented and Cementless Stem Revisions

Background

Early postoperative functional recovery is important in older patients with lower-extremity fractures to prevent disuse, and periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are no exception. This study aimed to compare the postoperative functional recovery in the early phase after revision for PFF with loose stems between cemented and cementless stems.

Methods

Eighteen patients with Unified Classification System type B2 PFF were included in this retrospective cohort study with a follow-up period of about 2 years. All patients underwent stem revision and were divided into 2 groups: the cemented stem group (n = 9) and the cementless stem group (n = 9). In postrevision, functional independence measure score, independent walk rate, activities of daily living recovery rate to the original level at 2 weeks postoperatively, the Beals and Tower classification for radiological status, and survival rate for readmission as endpoints were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

Patients in the cemented group recovered functional mobility earlier than in the cementless group, with higher postoperative functional independence measure functional subscale values (73 vs 50 points, P = .02), higher independent walk rate (89 vs 11%, P < .01), and more postoperative activities of daily living recovery (100% vs 44%, P = .03) at 2 weeks postoperatively. The Beals and Tower classification and survival rates were similar in both groups.

Conclusions

Revision using a cemented stem for PFF in older patients was a useful surgical procedure in terms of early postoperative functional recovery. Cemented stem revision was comparable with cementless in bone union and safety at 2 years postoperatively.

Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Beyond B2

The proliferation of hip arthroplasty has seen concomitant increases in periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs). The most common pattern involves fracture at the level of a loose prosthesis (B2). B2 PFFs have a unique mechanopathogenesis linked to the tendency of polished taper-slip cemented stems to subside in the cement. Such stems carry a much higher PFF risk than other cemented designs. Mega-data, consistent across national registries, suggest that increasing application of the taper-slip principle has resulted in the emergence of highly polished, very low friction cemented prostheses. These have the propensity to migrate within the cement, increasing B2 PFF risk. This would explain the strong association between cobalt-chromium stems and PFF. Is PFF the mode of failure of polished taper-slip stems rather than aseptic loosening? Established wisdom teaches that B2 PFFs should be managed with revision surgery. There is a large body of new evidence that, in certain instances, fixation results in outcomes at least equivalent to revision arthroplasty, with shorter surgical time, decreased transfusion requirements, and lower dislocation risk. This is so in B2 PFFs around cemented polished taper-slip stems with an intact bone-cement interface. We outline advances in understanding of B2 PFF with special reference to mechanopathogenesis and indications for fixation.

Cemented vs cementless stems for revision arthroplasties due to Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fracture

PURPOSE

According to Vancouver classification, B2 type fractures are most often treated with removal of the loose stem and implantation of a long stem that bypasses the fracture site. However, there is a controversy about the stem fixation that should be used: cemented or cementless. Hence, this study aims to compare cemented and cementless stems in prosthetic revision due to Vancouver B2 (VB2) periprosthetic hip fracture.

METHODS

A retrospective study was done including all the patients treated with stem exchange due to VB2 periprosthetic hip fracture in a tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the stem fixation used: cemented or cementless. Functional outcomes, hospital stay, surgical time, complication rate, and mortality were compared between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

Of the 30 included patients, 13 (43.4%) were treated with cementless stems and 17 (56.7%) with cemented stems. There were no statistically significant differences in age, gender, anesthesia risk scale (ASA) or functional capacity prior to the intervention. Patients treated with cementless stems had a higher complication and reintervention rate than those treated with cemented stems: 62 and 45% versus 34 and 6% (p = 0.035; p = 0.010), respectively. Furthermore, in the group of cementless stems a higher proportion of non-union was found (53.8% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.037). Also, the hospital stay (33 vs. 24 days; p = 0.037) and the time to full weight-bearing (21 days vs. 9 days; p < 0.001) were longer in the cementless stem group.

CONCLUSION

Cemented fixation in stem revision due to Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fracture could be an optimal option with faster recovery which could decrease the rate of complications and reintervention, without compromising the fracture healing and patient mortality. Thus, this option can be considered when an anatomical reduction can be obtained, especially in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities in which a less aggressive surgical option should be considered.

Fixation or Revision for Periprosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology, New Trends, and Projections in the United States

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fractures can be devastating complications after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The management of periprosthetic fractures is complex, spanning expertise in arthroplasty and trauma. The purpose of this study was to examine and project trends in the operative treatment of periprosthetic fractures in the United States.

METHODS

A large, public and private payer database was queried to capture all International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis codes for periprosthetic femoral and tibial fractures. Statistical models were created to assess trends in treatment for periprosthetic fractures and to predict future surgical rates. An alpha value of 0.05 was used to assess significance. A Bonferroni correction was applied where applicable to account for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

In this study, from 2016 to 2021, 121,298 patients underwent surgical treatment for periprosthetic fractures. There was a significant increase in the total number of periprosthetic fractures. The incidence of periprosthetic hip fractures rose by 38% and that for periprosthetic knee fractures rose by 73%. The number of periprosthetic fractures is predicted to rise 212% from 2016 to 2032. There was a relative increase in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) compared with revision arthroplasty for both periprosthetic hip fractures and periprosthetic knee fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Periprosthetic fractures are anticipated to impose a substantial health-care burden in the coming decades. Periprosthetic knee fractures are predominantly treated with ORIF rather than revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), whereas periprosthetic hip fractures are predominantly treated with revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) rather than ORIF. Both periprosthetic knee fractures and periprosthetic hip fractures demonstrated increasing trends in this study. The proportion of periprosthetic hip fractures treated with ORIF relative to revision THA has been increasing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing at 25 years

Aims

The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) was introduced in 1997 to address the needs of young active patients using a historically proven large-diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing. A single designer surgeon's consecutive series of 130 patients (144 hips) was previously reported at five and ten years, reporting three and ten failures, respectively. The aim of this study was to extend the follow-up of this original cohort at 25 years.

Methods

The study extends the reporting on the first consecutive 144 resurfacing procedures in 130 patients for all indications. All operations were undertaken between August 1997 and May 1998. The mean age at operation was 52.1 years (SD 9.93; 17 to 76), and included 37 female patients (28.5%). Failure was defined as revision of either component for any reason. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Routine follow-up with serum metal ion levels, radiographs, and Oxford Hip Scores (OHSs) was undertaken.

Results

Overall implant survival was 83.50% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79 to 0.90) at 25 years, and the number at risk was 79. Survival in male patients at 25 years was 89.5% (95% CI 0.83 to 0.96) compared to 66.9% for female patients (95% CI 0.51 to 0.83). Ten additional failures occurred in the period of ten to 25 years. These involved an adverse reaction to metal debris in four patients, a periprosthetic femoral neck fracture affecting five patients, and aseptic loosening in one patient. The median chromium levels were 49.50 nmol/l (interquartile range (IQR) 34 to 70), and the median cobalt serum levels were 42 nmol/l (IQR 24.50 to 71.25). The median OHS at last follow-up was 35 (IQR 10 to 48). During the 25-year study period, 29 patients died. Patient survival at 25 years was 75.10% (95% CI 0.67 to 0.83).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that MoM hip resurfacing using the BHR provides a durable alternative to total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly in younger male patients with osteoarthritis wishing to maintain a high level of function. These results compare favourably to the best results for THAs.

Groove design optimization of femoral heads in solid hip implants: Study on stress distribution and total deformation using FEA and full factorial design

Hip replacement surgery is a common procedure that relies on the implant's design to withstand daily activities. This study aims to investigate the impact of different surface groove designs on the performance of solid hip implants using finite element analysis (FEA) and optimization techniques. The study evaluates the influence of grooves on the stress distribution and total deformation of the implant, considering three designs: no grooves, horizontal grooves, and vertical grooves on the surface of the femoral head. The simulations were conducted using Ansys Mechanical, and the optimization process was carried out using the general full factorial design method in Minitab software. The results demonstrate that the groove design significantly affects the stress distribution and wear of the implant. The vertical groove design shows better overall results, indicating the best performance. The study also evaluated the influence of force on the performance of the implant, with different load range. The optimization process using the general full factorial design method revealed that the optimal groove design was a vertical model with an optimized groove depth and width. These findings offer valuable insights into the impact of surface groove designs on the performance of solid hip implants, leading to better patient outcomes and longer implant lifespan. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the effect of surface groove design on the performance of solid hip implants.

Treatment of Periprosthetic Hip Fractures Vancouver B1 and C: The Significance of Bicortical Fixation. A Bicentric Study Comparing Two Osteosynthesis Systems

INTRODUCTION The incidence of periprosthetic fractures (PFFs) is estimated to range from 0.1% to 4.1%1, due to the increasing prevalence of joint arthroplasties, coupled with an aging population. Numerous risk factors, including advanced age (>80 years), female gender, implant type, prior diagnoses of osteonecrosis and rheumatoid arthritis, revision surgery, aseptic stem mobilization, and the use of non-cemented stems, have been identified. Survivors of periprosthetic fractures often experience functional deterioration, facing a fourfold higher risk of hospitalization for postoperative complications compared to patients undergoing primary implantation, especially in the first postoperative year. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 2018 and 2022, at the Maggiore Hospitals in Bologna and the San Matteo Policlinic in Pavia, we performed osteosynthesis on 84 patients with periprosthetic fractures of Vancouver type B1 or C. In 38 patients, we employed angular stable plates with the Zimmer Biomet NCB-PP® system. In 46 patients, we utilized INTRAUMA plates: DF distal femur and PFF proximal. Relevant postoperative follow-up outcomes considered included reintervention, infectious complications, radiographic healing, and functional recovery, with reference to changes in the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and the Harris Hip Score (HHS). All patients underwent clinical and radiographic evaluations during the follow-up period, averaging 28 months (range: 12-48 months), with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. RESULTS At the 4-month postoperative assessment, 71% of patients maintained their preoperative functional level, 19% experienced a 1-point GOS scale drop, and 10% died (GOS 5). The average HHS at 4 months was 80.2 points (range: 65-90). At the 6-month follow-up, 98.2% of patients achieved complete healing on radiographic examination. Only 1 patient (1.2%) developed a pseudoarthrosis site with synthesis device rupture. Only 1 patient (1.2%) required additional surgical treatment 2 years later due to the development of un aseptic perisynthetic fluid collection, while the remaining 5 patients (6%) who developed complications benefited from conservative treatment: 4 patients (3.6%) with infectious complications were treated with intravenous antibiotics. In the 2 patients (2.3%) with mobilization or rupture of synthesis devices, clinical and radiographic monitoring was opted for. 8 patients (10.7%) died: one 48 hours after the surgery, and the other 7 more than one month after the surgery. CONCLUSION Our clinical findings align with to existing scientific literature on periprosthetic fractures (B1 and C according to Vancouver classification). Moreover, good stability has been guaranteed at the radiological follow up by Zimmer Biomet NCB-PP® and INTRAUMA DF distal femur and PFF proximal plates. The locking construct allows for improved stability especially in osteoporotic bone.

Impact of surgical timing and type of operative procedure on outcomes in periprosthetic hip fractures: an observational study at an NHS trust centre in the UK

PURPOSE

There is a global trend of increased periprosthetic fractures due to the growing number of arthroplasty procedures. The present study assessed the impact of factors such as time to surgery and type of surgery on the outcomes, which have been seldom evaluated for periprosthetic fractures.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted on consecutive 87 patients within an NHS district hospital trust in the UK. Patients who underwent a complete hip replacement prior to the fracture, received fixation therapy, or underwent revision surgery within the specified time were screened. Patients were grouped in two ways: based on time to surgery and based on surgery type. Logistic regression models were performed to assess for statistically significant differences in post-operative complication, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates between groups, whilst adjusting for age, gender, and ASA grade.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 29 patients underwent revision arthroplasty, and 17 patients were subjected to both, ORIF and revision arthroplasty. Sixty of the 87 patients were operated on > 48 h of injury. The median hospital stay was significantly lower in the ORIF plus revision arthroplasty group, versus other surgical groups (p < 0.05) whilst it was significantly higher in the group of patients who underwent surgery after 48 h of injury (p < 0.05). Numerically higher mortality was noted in the revision arthroplasty group (31.03%, p > 0.05). The group that was operated after 48 h of injury showed greater mortality but was comparable to the other group (25% vs. 14.81%, p > 0.05). For post-operative complications, none of the variables were significantly predictive (p > 0.05). However, for 30-day mortality, ASA grade (p = 0.04) and intra-operative complications (p = 0.0001) were significantly predictive. Additionally, for 1-year mortality, ASA grade (p = 0.004) was noted to be significantly predictive.

CONCLUSION

Revision and delayed periprosthetic fracture management (> 48 h after injury) group showed a numerically greater mortality risk; however, this finding was not statistically significant. ASA grading at baseline is predictive of mortality for periprosthetic fractures.

Periprosthetic Hip Fractures around the Stem: Can the Stem Design Affect Fracture Features?

Background: Total hip arthroplasty is one of the most successful orthopedic surgeries; nevertheless, many of these surgeries are the causes of failure, and among them, periprosthetic fractures are one of the major causes of revision. Our study focuses on periprosthetic hip fractures with two different stem designs. The aim of the study was to analyze the obtained results, focusing on the features of periprosthetic stem fractures observed. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed periprosthetic fractures occurring between 2010 and 2023, involving Alloclassic® or CLS® uncemented femoral stems. We analyzed demographic data, proximal femur morphology, and the fracture type. Results: We identified 97 patients. Considering the proximal femur morphology, we found that there was statistically significant prevalence of Dorr A proximal femur morphology in the CLS® group and of Dorr C in the Alloclassic® group. Considering the distribution of the fracture pattern, we reported a non-statistically significant prevalence of the fracture pattern with stable stems in the CLS® group. Conclusions: The choice of the prosthetic design of the femoral stem is a crucial element when planning total hip arthroplasty. However, we found a non-statistically significant difference between the two stems considered, raising questions about the real role of stem design as a primary determinant of periprosthetic hip fractures.

Registry-based study of survivorship of cemented femoral components versus collared cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty in older patients with osteoarthritis

Aims

In recent years, the use of a collared cementless femoral prosthesis has risen in popularity. The design intention of collared components is to transfer some load to the resected femoral calcar and prevent implant subsidence within the cancellous bone of the metaphysis. Conversely, the load transfer for a cemented femoral prosthesis depends on the cement-component and cement-bone interface interaction. The aim of our study was to compare the three most commonly used collared cementless components and the three most commonly used tapered polished cemented components in patients aged ≥ 75 years who have undergone a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry from 1 September 1999 to 31 December 2022 were analyzed. Collared cementless femoral components and cemented components were identified, and the three most commonly used components in each group were analyzed. We identified a total of 11,278 collared cementless components and 47,835 cemented components. Hazard ratios (HRs) from Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age and sex, were obtained to compare the revision rates between the groups.

Results

From six months postoperatively onwards, patients aged ≥ 75 years undergoing primary THA with primary diagnosis of OA have a lower risk of all-cause revision with collared cementless components than with a polished tapered cemented component (HR 0.78 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.96); p = 0.018). There is no difference in revision rate prior to six months.

Conclusion

Patients aged ≥ 75 years with a primary diagnosis of OA have a significantly lower rate of revision with the most common collared cementless femoral component, compared with the most common polished tapered cemented components from six months postoperatively onwards. The lower revision rate is largely due to a reduction in revisions for fracture and infection.

Quality of Life After Proximal Femoral Fractures Treated With Gamma Nail in Sudan

Background Hip fracture is a public health problem globally, and it poses one of the biggest challenges in healthcare due to its associated complications. Objectives The aim of this study is to investigate the quality of life in adult patients in Khartoum State, Sudan, after they have undergone treatment using a gamma nail for proximal femoral fractures. Methodology This cross-sectional descriptive hospital-based study was conducted at Ibrahim Malik, Omdurman, and Bahri Teaching Hospitals over six months, from April to October 2022. The data were collected using an interview questionnaire that covered relevant aspects of the study. The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, V. 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The study was approved by the Sudan Medical Specialization Board, and ethical clearance was obtained. Results The study included 37 patients. More than half of the patients (59.5%, n=22) were women. The mean age of cases was 66.7 years (standard deviation, ±15.6). The mean time from the time of the fracture to the time of surgery was eight days (±15). Twenty-three (62.2%, n=23) (JRB1) of the patients started weight bearing on the second postoperative day. Regarding the health-related quality of life, 21.6% of the patients had a good health-related quality of life, 67.6% had a fair health-related quality of life, and 10.8% had a poor health-related quality of life. None of the patients reported an excellent quality of life. Based on the Oxford Hip Score, 54.1% of the patients had satisfactory joint function, 29.7% had mild to moderate hip joint function, 13.5% had moderate to severe hip joint function disturbance, and one patient (2.7%) had severe hip joint function problems. Conclusion In this study, the vast majority of the patients who underwent gamma nail surgery for hip fracture had quality of life scores in the fair to good range afterward. The results indicate that nailing is associated with good outcomes regarding quality of life and is an acceptable option for femoral fracture surgeries in Sudan.

Increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection after traumatic injury in joint revision patients

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although some risk factors of PJI were well studied, the association between trauma and PJI remains unknown in revision patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, a total of 71 patients with trauma history before revisions (trauma cohort) were propensity score matched (PSM) at a ratio of 1 to 5 with a control cohort of revision patients without a history of trauma. Then, the cumulative incidence rate of PJI within 3 years after operation between the two groups was compared. The secondary endpoints were aseptic revisions within 3 postoperative years, complications up to 30 postoperative days, and readmission up to 90 days. During a minimal 3-year follow-up, the survival was comparatively analyzed between the trauma cohort and the control cohort.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of PJI was 40.85% in patients with trauma history against 27.04% in the controls (P = 0.02). Correspondingly, the cumulative incidence of aseptic re-revisions was 12.68% in patients with trauma history compared with 5.07% in the control cohort (P = 0.028). Cox regression revealed that trauma history was a risk factor of PJI (HR, 1.533 [95%CI, (1.019,2.306)]; P = 0.04) and aseptic re-revisions (HR, 3.285 [95%CI, (1.790,6.028)]; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that revision patients with trauma history carried a higher risk of PJI compared to those without trauma history. Moreover, after revisions, the trauma patients were still at higher risk for treatment failure due to PJI, periprosthetic joint fracture, and mechanical complications.

Periprosthetic femoral fractures

The incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures is rising in the UK, because of an ageing population and an increasing number of hip arthroplasty operations being performed. They can occur intra- or postoperatively, and usually follow low energy trauma. They present with pain, swelling over the thigh, and an inability to weight bear. Periprosthetic femoral fractures are usually classified as per the unified classification system. Their management usually is dependent on their classification, with type A (fracture at level of greater or lesser trochanter) managed non-operatively with protected weight bearing, type B (fracture adjacent to implant) managed with either open reduction internal fixation or revision surgery, and type C (fracture distal to implant) managed with open reduction internal fixation. Owing to their complexity, these patients must be adequately optimised before surgery and appropriately rehabilitated.

Biomechanical analysis of different THA cementless femoral stem designs in physiological and osteoporotic bone during static loading conditions

BACKGROUND

The influence of THA stem design on periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) risk is subject of debate. This study aims to compare the effects of different cementless stem designs on stress-strain distributions in both physiological and osteoporotic femur under various loading conditions.

MATERIALS

A biomechanical study using finite-element analysis was conducted. Four models were developed: three with implanted femurs and a native one chosen as control. Each model was analyzed for both healthy and osteoporotic bone. The following stem designs were examined: short anatomical stem with femoral neck preservation, double-wedge stem, and anatomical standard stem. Three loading conditions were assessed: gait, sideways falling, and four-point bending.

RESULTS

During gait in physiological bone, the anatomical stem and the short anatomical stem with femoral neck preservation showed stress distribution similar to the native model. The double-wedge stem reduced stress in the proximal area but concentrated it in the meta-diaphysis. In osteoporotic bone, the double-wedge stem design increased average stress by up to 10%. During sideways falling, the double-wedge stem exhibited higher stresses in osteoporotic bone. No significant differences in average stress were found in any of the studied models during four-point bending.

CONCLUSION

In physiological bone, anatomical stems demonstrated stress distribution comparable to the native model. The double-wedge stem showed uneven stress distribution, which may contribute to long-term stress shielding. In the case of osteoporotic bone, the double-wedge stem design resulted in a significant increase in average stress during both gait and sideways falling, potentially indicating a higher theoretical risk of PFF.

Age as a Risk Factor for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

Understanding the risk factors and outcomes of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IPFF) during hip arthroplasty is crucial for appropriate perioperative management. Previous studies have identified risk factors for IPFF in total hip arthroplasty patients, but data for hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the age associated with increased rates of IPFF in patients undergoing HA.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients aged 65 years and above who underwent a cementless HA for a displaced femoral neck fracture and had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Patients were stratified into five age groups (65-79, 80-84, 85-89, 90-94, and ≥ 95 years) and further divided into two subgroups (under 95 years and 95 years or older). The presence, location, and treatment of IPFF, as well as the effect of IPFF on the postoperative weight-bearing status, were compared between groups. A multivariate logistic regression was also performed. A total of 1,669 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study.

Results

The rates of IPFF were significantly higher for patients 95 years or older (p = 0.030). However, fracture location (greater trochanter fractures, p = 0.839; calcar fractures, p = 0.394; and femoral shaft fractures p = 0.110), intraoperative treatment (p = 0.424), and postoperative weight-bearing status (p = 0.229) were similar between the groups. While mortality and nonorthopedic-related readmissions were significantly higher for patients 95 years or older, orthopedic-related readmissions (p = 0.148) and revisions at the latest follow-up (p = 0.253) were comparable between groups. In a regression analysis, age over 95 years (odds ratio, 2.049; p = 0.049) and body mass index (odds ratio, 0.935; p = 0.016) were independently associated with IPFF.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that age over 95 years is a significant, independent risk factor for IPFF in patients undergoing cementless HA. Although we were unable to show an impact on perioperative outcomes and orthopedic complications, when operating on patients 95 years or older, surgeons should be aware of the increased risk of IPFF and consider the use of stem designs and fixation types associated with decreased IPFF rates.

The effectiveness ORIF for neglected periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Periprosthetic fractures are a growing concern due to the increasing frequency of primary joint replacement surgery, with total hip arthroplasty being the most common. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures after revision surgery ranges from 4 to 11 %, with up to 30 % reported after knee revision surgery. This case report aims to describe the treatment of an 81-year-old woman suffering from neglected periprosthetic femoral fracture post hemiarthroplasty.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 81-year-old woman with a history of hemiarthroplasty surgery and hypertension was admitted to the ER with pain in her right thigh. She had a middle shaft femoral fracture and was scheduled for open reduction and internal fixation. Despite being fully conscious and having an average pulse rate and blood pressure, she had cardiomegaly and congestive pulmonum. Unfortunately, this patient did not receive appropriate medical treatment after it occurred for 1 month. After surgery, we evaluated the implant, and the implant stabilized the fracture. After 1-3 months after surgery, the LEFS (The Lower Extremity Functional Scale) score was found that the score increase significantly after surgery.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

The Vancouver classification system manages periprosthetic fractures by assessing location, stability, and bone quality. Type A fractures involve the trochanter, while type B fractures are diaphyseal and can extend distally. ORIF is used for subtype B1 fractures, but newer techniques offer shorter operating times and fewer complications.

CONCLUSION

From this study, we can conclude that even though neglected cases procedure with ORIF promises a good outcome based on clinical evaluation.

Results of Utilizing Cerclage Wires in the Management of Intraoperative Vancouver B1 Fractures in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties: A Retrospective Cohort Investigation into Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Due to an increase in total hip arthroplasties (THAs), the incidence of periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHFs) is forecast to rise considerably in the next decades, with Vancouver B1 fractures (VB1) accounting for one third of total cases. Femur fixation with cerclages (with or without screws) is considered the current treatment option for intraoperative VB1.

METHODS

The study retrospectively includes data from patients who developed VB1 PPHFs during THAs from 3 December 2020 to 30 November 2022. The primary outcome of this study was to identify the reintervention-free survival rate. The secondary aim was to determine clinical and radiographic assessment at follow-up, based on Harris hip score (HHS) and limb length discrepancy (LLD).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients with a mean age of 60.03 ± 15.49 (22 to 77) years old were included. Overall, the Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated a reoperation-free survival rate of 99% (CI 95%) at 6 months. The mean limb length discrepancy (LLD) improved from -3.69 ± 6.07 (range -27.9 to 2.08) mm to 0.10 ± 0.67 (range -1.07 to 1.20) mm. The mean HHS improved from 42.72 ± 14.37 (range 21.00-96.00) to 94.40 ± 10.32 (range 56.00-100.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The employment of cerclage wires represents an effective strategy for handling intraoperative VB1 fractures. Level III retrospective cohort study.

Non-metallic cerclage fixation methods for proximal femoral osteotomy and periprosthetic hip fractures offer promising outcomes: A systematic review

Background

Periprosthetic femur fracture (PFF) is an important complication to consider in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this systematic review was to compare outcomes of conventional metallic versus modern non-metallic cerclage systems for PFFs and proximal femoral osteotomy.

Methods

The PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for clinical studies reporting PFFs or extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) in THA patients and cerclage fixation techniques.

Results

Eight studies with 1362 patients (1366 hips) were included. The mean age ranged from 48.2 to 81.7 years, and the study population was 79.4 % female. The infection rate at the site of the PFF or ETO was 0.22 % (3 of 1366 hips), all occurring in patients with non-metallic cerclage fixation. Sixteen of 18 (88.9 %) cases of stem subsidence occurred following metallic cerclage fixation. Significant stem subsidence was substantially higher in hips with metallic device fixation compared to those with non-metallic fixation, at rates of 5.1 % and 0.19 %, respectively. Hips with non-metallic fixation had a clinical or radiologic healing rate of 93.9 %. Loss of fixation was only seen in hips with metallic fixation, at a rate of 0.6 %. Postoperative outcome scores were comparable across both groups.

Conclusion

The findings of this systematic review suggest that available non-metallic cerclage fixation methods demonstrate similar clinical success as conventional metallic fixation methods when utilized in hip arthroplasty. The current use of novel materials appears to be safe and reliable for these surgeries and can be considered a dependable option for surgeons.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review of level III and IV studies.

Predictors of mortality in periprosthetic fractures of the hip: Results from the national PPF study

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) around the hip joint are increasing in prevalence. In this collaborative study, we aimed to investigate the impact of patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and modes of management on in-hospital mortality of PPFs involving the hip.

METHODS

Using a multi-centre cohort study design, we retrospectively identified adults presenting with a PPF around the hip over a 10-year period. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to study the independent correlation between patient, fracture, and treatment factors on mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,109 patients were included. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.3%. Multivariable analyses suggested that age, male sex, abbreviated mental test score (AMTS), pneumonia, renal failure, history of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and deep surgical site infection were each independently associated with mortality. Each yearly increase in age independently correlates with a 7% increase in mortality (OR 1.07, p=0.019). The odds of mortality was 2.99 times higher for patients diagnosed with pneumonia during their hospital stay [OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.07-8.37) p=0.037], and 7.25 times higher for patients that developed renal failure during their stay [OR 7.25 (95% CI 1.85-28.47) p=0.005]. Patients with history of PVD have a six-fold greater mortality risk (OR 6.06, p=0.003). Mode of treatment was not a significant predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSION

The in-hospital mortality rate of PPFs around the hip exceeds 5%. The fracture subtype and mode of management are not independent predictors of mortality, while patient factors such as age, AMTS, history of PVD, pneumonia, and renal failure can independently predict mortality. Peri-operative optimisation of modifiable risk factors such as lung and kidney function in patients with PPFs around the hip during their hospital stay is of utmost importance.

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures as a complication of total hip arthroplasty

Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are rare but potentially devastating complications of total hip arthroplasty. As the number of total hip arthroplasties performed annually increases, so has the incidence of periprosthetic fractures, with the topic being spotlighted more frequently in the orthopaedic community. There is a particular sparsity of literature regarding periprosthetic acetabular fractures, with periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty being traditionally far more commonly reported. This article aims to provide an up-to-date review of the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, classifications, and management strategies for periprosthetic acetabular fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Outcomes of cable fixation after Vancouver type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures

BACKGROUND

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the patients who underwent cable plate fixation due to a Vancouver-type B1 periprosthetic femur fracture and their clinical results.

METHODS

Vancouver-type B1 patients who were operated on for periprosthetic fractures between 2014 and 2019 were investi-gated. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), follow-up time, operation time, bleeding amount, non-union fracture, last surgery before fracture, the time between previous surgery and fracture, implant survival, patient survival, and complications were recorded. In addi-tion, the postoperative clinical functions of these patients were compared.

RESULTS

23 patients who met the study criteria (Vancouver type B1 fracture) were identified. The mean age of the patients was 60 (49-76) years, the mean BMI was 26.3 (17.5-40.7), and the postoperative mean follow-up period was 14 (6-36) months. Considering the gender distribution, there were 5 (22%) men and 18 (78%) women. The mean time between the last surgery before the fracture and the fracture was 6 months (0-30). While the mean operation time was 95 min (60-180), the average amount of bleeding was 310 mL (150-600). Functional evaluations of patients: In total, five patients had decreased ambulatory abilities after surgery. Nonunion was observed in 2 patients during the follow-ups, and these patients underwent open surgery for treatment.

CONCLUSION

Cable and locking plate applications are successful in Vancouver type B1 fractures, which are one of the most common forms of periprosthetic fractures. In this technique, the duration of the operation can be shortened under ideal conditions, and the need for blood and blood products is reduced as blood loss is reduced. If there is a complication, you still have the chance to treat it with the option of revision arthroplasty.

Mid-Term Migration Behavior of an Uncemented Proximally Anchored Straight Stem-A Retrospective EBRA Migration Analysis

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is one of the most-common causes of the failure of cementless stems. Einzel Bild Röntgen Analyse-Femoral Component Analysis (EBRA-FCA) allows the diagnosis of stem migration, which can be considered a factor in predicting implant survival. The current study aimed to present the migration behavior of a tapered proximally anchored straight stem.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless CBC straight stem (Mathys AG, Bettlach, Switzerland) between 2005 and 2019. We analyzed the migration pattern using the EBRA-FCA software and reviewed their medical histories. In addition, periprosthetic radiolucency was rated according to the Gruen zones and femoral configuration according to Dorr.

RESULTS

A total of 333 stems in 332 patients (female 191; male 141) met our inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 63 (range 21-87) years. Migration analysis by EBRA-FCA showed a mean subsidence of 1.6 mm at final follow-up at 96 months with a maximum noted mean subsidence of 2.0 mm at 72 and 84 months. Dorr Type A showed a tendency of less subsidence than did Dorr Type B and was statistically significant at 6 (p = 0.0396) and 72 months (p = 0.0127). The body mass index (BMI) and increased subsidence were not found to correlate (p > 0.05). For this cohort, the overall femoral revision-free rate was 95.2% and the revision-free rate for aseptic loosening was 99.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed migration behavior in cementless stems with initial increased migration and subsequent secondary stabilization, suggesting an excellent long-term outcome. Stem migration of this tapered proximally anchored stem might be lower in Dorr Type A than in Dorr Type B femurs without being statistically significant at all time points.

The Association of Postoperative Osteoporosis Therapy With Periprosthetic Fracture Risk in Patients Undergoing Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

BACKGROUND

Displaced femoral neck fractures in older adults are generally treated with hip arthroplasty. One concern following hip arthroplasty is the risk for periprosthetic fractures (PPFs). Most patients who have hip fractures are candidates for antiosteoporotic therapy, but the impact of this treatment on PPFs is unknown. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether patients treated with antiosteoporotic medical therapy had lower odds of PPFs following arthroplasty for hip fracture.

METHODS

Patients at least 65 years old who underwent hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures from 2010 to 2020 were identified in a national database. Patients were stratified based on whether they initiated antiosteoporotic therapy within 1 year of hip arthroplasty. Minimum follow-up was 1 year, and maximum follow-up was 10.6 years. The primary endpoint was cumulative incidence of PPF as determined using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Overall, 2,026 patients who underwent arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture received antiosteoporotic medications within 1 year following surgery (mean follow up 4.8 years; range 1.0 to 10.6 years) and 33,639 patients did not (mean follow up 4.1 years; range 1.1 to 10.3 years).

RESULTS

The 10-year cumulative incidence of PPF for patients treated for osteoporosis was 3.88% compared to 5.92% for those who were untreated (P < .001). Adjusting for covariates, patients who received osteoporosis treatment had a significantly lower risk for PPF than those who were untreated (hazard ratio (HR): 0.663; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.465-0.861; P = .038).

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that osteoporosis treatment is associated with lower incidence of PPF following hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures. Treatment of osteoporosis should be initiated in eligible patients who sustain a femoral neck fracture, especially those who undergo hip arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic fractures: an unrecognized osteoporosis crisis

Total joint replacement is common and increasing. Many of these patients have low bone mineral density preoperatively, and arthroplasty leads to bone loss. As falls are common before and after arthroplasty, it is unsurprising that periprosthetic fractures, defined as those associated with an orthopedic device, whether a joint replacement or other internal fixation devices, are not rare. These fractures engender morbidity and mortality comparable to osteoporosis-related hip fractures but remain largely unrecognized and untreated by osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease clinicians. Indeed, recent osteoporosis guidelines are silent regarding periprosthetic fractures. The purposes of this clinical review are to briefly describe the epidemiology of arthroplasty procedures and periprosthetic fractures, raise awareness that these fractures are osteoporosis-related, and suggest approaches likely to reduce their occurrence. Notably, bone health evaluation is essential following the occurrence of a periprosthetic fracture to reduce subsequent fracture risk. Importantly, in addition to such secondary fracture prevention, primary prevention, i.e., bone health assessment and optimization prior to elective orthopedic procedures, is appropriate.

Managing periprosthetic fractures: perspectives on periprosthetic pelvic fractures

Periacetabular periprosthetic fractures are rare but potentially disastrous for the longevity of the adjacent implants, leading to multiple revision surgeries. It is of paramount importance to identify and treat intraoperative fractures, which will lead to satisfactory results. Postoperative fractures may be managed operatively or nonoperatively depending on the patient's pain and function, the fracture pattern, and the stability of the acetabular component.

Periprosthetic fracture management of the proximal femur

The most common periprosthetic fractures occur around the hip. The most widely used classification is the Vancouver classification, and management requires careful planning and skill in both arthroplasty and fracture surgery. This article presents an overview of the diagnosis, classification, and management of periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur. This work represents a summary review from Latin American Society Members of the International Orthopaedic Trauma Association.

Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Several studies comparing osteosynthesis and stem revision in Vancouver B2 (VB2) periprosthetic hip fractures (PPHF) have been published. This work aims to be the first systematic review and meta-analysis to include only studies involving statistical comparison between the two techniques.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to October 2021 for studies involving a comparison between VB2 treated by osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty. The effect size (ES) was calculated using Cohen´s d index.

RESULTS

From 17 published studies selected, a total of 856 patients were recruited (363 osteosynthesis / 493 revision arthroplasty). The pooled ES estimates for the Parker mobility score were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.22-1.84; I2 = 87.7%) for ORIF surgery, and 0.54 (95% CI, - 0.10-1.17; I2 = 83%) for revision surgery. The pooled ES estimates for the operative time, reintervention, complications, hospital stay and needing for blood transfusion were significant lower in ORIF than in revision surgery. There were no differences in first-year mortality between groups. There was a higher proportion of ASA > 3 patients in the ORIF group.

CONCLUSION

Osteosynthesis versus revision arthroplasty has a shorter operative time, less need for blood transfusion, fewer complications and reoperation rate and shorter hospital stay. Nonetheless, similar results were found for functional tests and first-year mortality. These results support the use of osteosynthesis in selected patients (low functional demand, multiple comorbidities, and high anesthetic risk).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Mini-invasive approach vs. traditional open reduction for periprosthetic hip fracture osteosynthesis with the NCB® plate

BACKGROUND

Postoperative hip periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is a frequent complication whose treatment does not achieve optimal results among eldery fragile patients. Locking compression plate (LCP) osteosynthesis is the gold standard treatment for Vancouver B1 and VC fractures and there is a growing consensus in doing the same with B2 fractures in patients with high comorbidity. Following that trend of being as non-aggressive as possible we investigated whether a mini-open (MO) approach would lead to better outcomes in LCP plate osteosynthesis of hip PFFs when compared to the traditional open approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 43 VB1, VB2 or VC hip PPFs treated with non contact bridging (NCB®) plate osteosynthesis by two possible approaches. MO vs traditional open approach. The main objective was to assess whether MO approach decreases operative time, bleeding and local complications. The secondary objective was to demonstrate that this may have a positive effect on patient function.

RESULTS

The mean age was 79.6 years old and 74.5% patients had an ASA score of III or IV. The surgical time was 148.53 min (SD 33.2) in the open approach versus 107.42 min (SD 25.6) in the MO, which was 31 min shorter (p<0.001). Hemoglobin dropped 0.9 points less, on average (p. 0.005) and 0.82 fewer blood concentrates were required (p. 0.022) with MO approach. There were no differences among complications but there was a trend towards greater independence and better mobility in the MO approach group with a postoperative Barthel of 74.37 (sd. 13.21) compared to the 66.67 points (sd. 13.7) in the traditional approach group.

CONCLUSION

MO approach in osteosynthesis of hip PFFs decreases operative time and intraoperative bleeding so it must be considered in fragile patients with high comorbidity.