Immunofluorescence with dual microwave retrieval of paraffin-embedded sections in the assessment of human renal biopsy specimens

Diagnostic Immunostaining of Renal Biopsies: An Overview of Markers for Glomerular Diseases

Background

The analysis of a renal biopsy is made complex by multifactorial etiologies involving different renal compartments. Recent proteomic data, pattern-based classification, and a better understanding of various glomerular renal diseases have underscored the importance of immunohistology as an integral part of the diagnostic evaluation of renal biopsies. These include immunofluorescence on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded renal tissue (IF-P), IgG subclass staining, typing of amyloid, and other organized deposits, classification of membranous nephropathy, etc.

Summary

We describe the recent immunohistological markers on immunofluorescence (IF) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on fresh and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded renal native biopsies for proper evaluation and classification of glomerular diseases. The article also provides information on the diagnostic utility, interpretation, and established antibody clones described in the literature for various glomerular diseases. The indications of IF-P in renal biopsies are also outlined.

Key Messages

Immunohistology has become integral to diagnosing and classifying various glomerular renal diseases. A specific protein or antigen-based classification has prognostic and therapeutic implications. Additionally, it provides clue for screening the patient for an underlying etiology.

Direct immunofluorescence on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded versus fresh frozen human renal biopsies: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

The data referring to the value of direct immunofluorescence on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (IF-Paraffin) in the diagnosis of renal diseases is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate whether renal biopsies evaluated by routine immunofluorescence on frozen tissue (IF-Frozen) would yield adequate findings to confirm diagnoses when the IF-Paraffin technique was applied.

METHODS

To show immunoglobulins, complement components, and light chains, 55 native renal biopsies were subjected to IF-Paraffin and IF-Frozen staining techniques. The intensity of the staining was compared, and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

The IF-Paraffin technique showed a sensitivity of 89%, 81%, 86%, 30%, 71%, 60%, and 77% for IgG, IgM, IgA, C1q, C3, κ, and λ, respectively, whereas specificity was 91%, 100%, 100%, 96%, 94%, 98%, and 100%. It showed diagnostic findings in 87% of cases. Compared to cases that had both IF-Paraffin and IF-Frozen staining techniques, 43 of 55 showed either equal intensity for the diagnostic immunoglobulin/complement or a little difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct immunofluorescence on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections cannot replace immunofluorescence on frozen sections in the assessment of renal biopsies, but may be a "salvage technique" when frozen tissue is insufficient or unavailable and must be interpreted with great caution.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Direct Immunofluorescence Test on Paraffin-Embedded Blocks in Comparison with Frozen Section Blocks in Renal Biopsies

Background

In several published research, the evaluation of renal disorders using immunofluorescence on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections versus immunofluorescence on frozen sections was compared. Each technique's accuracy varies greatly. This study's objective was to assess IF-P as a potential replacement for IF-F in the diagnosis of renal biopsy specimens.

Materials and Methods

To show immunoglobulin IgA, IgG, IgM, and C3 immune deposits, proteinase K digestion of paraffin-embedded renal biopsy was standardized and used in 51 renal biopsies. Sensitivity, specificity, false-positive, and false-negative values were calculated.

Results

IF-P showed a sensitivity of 93.1%, 76.9%, 63.6%, and 33.3%, and a specificity of 100%, 97.3%, 95%, and 100% for IgG, IgA, IgM, and C3, respectively. Compared to cases that had both routine IF and IF-P, 50 of 51 showed either the same amount of staining for the diagnostic immunoglobulin/complement or a small amount of difference. In most of the cases (49 of 51), diagnostic findings were found.

Conclusion

IF-P is a sensitive and precise approach for assessing immune deposits in renal tissue biopsies. We come to the conclusion that IF-P serves as a beneficial salvage immunohistochemistry method for renal biopsies that do not contain enough cortical tissue for IF-F.

Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry

Immunofluorescence is an important immunochemical technique that utilizes fluorescence-labeled antibodies to detect specific target antigens. It is used widely in both scientific research and clinical laboratories. Immunofluorescence allows for excellent sensitivity and amplification of signal in comparison to immunohistochemistry. However, analysis of samples labeled with fluorescence-labeled antibodies has to be performed using a fluorescence microscope or other type of fluorescence imaging. There are two methods available: direct (primary) and indirect (secondary) immunofluorescence. Here, we describe the principle of immunofluorescence methods as well as the preparation of fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues for both direct and indirect immunofluorescence labeling.

Immunoperoxidase and Immunofluorescence on Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Sections versus Immunofluorescence on Frozen Sections in the Assessment of Renal Biopsies

Introduction:

There are few published studies comparing immunofluorescence on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections (IF-P) and immunoperoxidase on FFPE tissue sections (IP-P) with immunofluorescence on frozen sections (IF-F) for evaluation of renal diseases. Also, the accuracy for each method differs greatly. The aim of this study was to evaluate IF-P and IP-P as an alternative to IF-F (gold standard method) in the diagnosis of renal biopsies specimens.

Methods:

In all, 101 renal biopsies were subjected to IF-P, IP-P, and IF-F staining to demonstrate immunoglobulin IgA, IgG, and IgM immune deposits. Sensitivity, specificity, false-positive, and false-negative values were calculated.

Results:

IP-P showed sensitivity of 61.8%, 74.2%, and 64.2%, and specificity of 84.8%, 69.2%, and 66.7% for IgA, IgG, and IgM, respectively. IF-P showed a sensitivity of 45.6%, 69.4% and 52.8%, and specificity of 87.9%, 87.2% and 77.1% for IgA, IgG and IgM, respectively. False-positive cases of IF-P and IP-P were 4, 5, and 11 and 5, 12, and 16 for IgA, IgG, and IgM, respectively.

Conclusion:

Where IF-F lacks glomeruli or fresh renal biopsies are not available, IP-P is a sensitive method, whereas IF-P is a specific method for the evaluation of immune deposits in the renal tissue biopsies. The presence of false-positive cases in both methods deserves further research.

Paraffin Immunofluorescence: A Valuable Ancillary Technique in Renal Pathology

Immunofluorescence on frozen tissue is the gold standard immunohistochemical technique for evaluation of immune deposits in the kidney. When frozen tissue is not available or lacks glomeruli, immunofluorescence can be performed on paraffin tissue after antigen retrieval (paraffin immunofluorescence). Excellent results can be obtained by paraffin immunofluorescence in most immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritides and dysproteinemia-associated kidney lesions, and thus this technique has become a valuable salvage technique in renal pathology. Furthermore, new data have emerged suggesting that paraffin immunofluorescence can be used as an unmasking technique, as it is more sensitive than frozen tissue immunofluorescence in some kidney lesions, such as crystalline light chain proximal tubulopathy and is needed to establish the diagnosis of certain unique lesions, such as membranous-like glomerulopathy with masked IgG kappa deposits and membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis with masked monotypic Ig deposits. However, it is important to recognize and be aware of the limitations and pitfalls associated with paraffin immunofluorescence. These include poor sensitivity for detection of C3 deposits and for the diagnosis of primary membranous nephropathy. Here, we summarize the available techniques of paraffin immunofluorescence, review its role and performance as a salvage and unmasking technique in renal pathology, address its limitations and pitfalls, and highlight unusual forms of glomerulopathy that require paraffin immunofluorescence for diagnosis.

Paraffin immunofluorescence for detection of immune complexes in renal biopsies: an efficient salvage technique for diagnosis of glomerulonephritis in dogs

Background

Renal biopsy is an essential tool for the diagnosis of proteinuric kidney diseases in dogs, and evaluation of immune complexes (IC) by immunofluorescence (IF) of frozen sections (IF-F) is required for the diagnosis of IC-mediated glomerulonephritis (ICGN). However, the use of frozen sections from renal biopsies can have limitations. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable IF method using formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections to detect ICs in dog ICGN.

Methods

Renal biopsy specimens were obtained from dogs with protein-losing nephropathies. FFPE sections were prepared, and eight antigen retrieval pretreatment protocols were performed: digestion with trypsin, microwave (MW) heating in citrate buffer (MW-CB; pH 6.0), MW heating in Tris-EDTA buffer (MW-TEB; pH 9.0), as well as combinations of the above, and a non-treated control.

Results

A combination of trypsin for 30 min (Try-30) and MW-TEB; pH 9.0 was the most effective antigen retrieval pretreatment, with clear positive signals for IgG, IgA, IgM, and C3 detected by IF-FFPE. Granular signals, an important diagnostic indicator of ICGN, were clearly observed by both IF-F and IF-FFPE after combined pretreatment with Try-30 and MW-TEB, and IgG, IgA, IgM, and C3 signals were almost completely matched in all samples by IF-F and IF-FFPE.

Conclusion

IF-FFPE with Try-30 and MW-TEB pretreatment is a valuable technique for the diagnosis of renal diseases in dogs. This method could be an efficient tool when standard IF-F cannot be used, or does not provide useful results due to lack of glomeruli in the specimens for IF-F.

Microwave-Assisted Tissue Preparation for Rapid Fixation, Decalcification, Antigen Retrieval, Cryosectioning, and Immunostaining

Microwave irradiation of tissue during fixation and subsequent histochemical staining procedures significantly reduces the time required for incubation in fixation and staining solutions. Minimizing the incubation time in fixative reduces disruption of tissue morphology, and reducing the incubation time in staining solution or antibody solution decreases nonspecific labeling. Reduction of incubation time in staining solution also decreases the level of background noise. Microwave-assisted tissue preparation is applicable for tissue fixation, decalcification of bone tissues, treatment of adipose tissues, antigen retrieval, and other special staining of tissues. Microwave-assisted tissue fixation and staining are useful tools for histological analyses. This review describes the protocols using microwave irradiation for several essential procedures in histochemical studies, and these techniques are applicable to other protocols for tissue fixation and immunostaining in the field of cell biology.

An efficient immunodetection method for histone modifications in plants

BACKGROUND

Epigenetic mechanisms can be highly dynamic, but the cross-talk among them and with the genome is still poorly understood. Many of these mechanisms work at different places in the cell and at different times of organism development. Covalent histone modifications are one of the most complex and studied epigenetic mechanisms involved in cellular reprogramming and development in plants. Therefore, the knowledge of the spatial distribution of histone methylation in different tissues is important to understand their behavior on specific cells.

RESULTS

Based on the importance of epigenetic marks for biology, we present a simplified, inexpensive and efficient protocol for in situ immunolocalization on different tissues such as flowers, buds, callus, somatic embryo and meristematic tissue from several plants of agronomical and biological importance. Here, we fully describe all the steps to perform the localization of histone modifications. Using this method, we were able to visualize the distribution of H3K4me3 and H3K9me2 without loss of histological integrity of tissues from several plants, including Agave tequilana, Capsicum chinense, Coffea canephora and Cedrela odorata, as well as Arabidopsis thaliana.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many protocols to study chromatin modifications; however, most of them are expensive, difficult and require sophisticated equipment. Here, we provide an efficient protocol for in situ localization of histone methylation that dispenses with the use of expensive and sensitive enzymes. The present method can be used to investigate the cellular distribution and localization of a wide array of proteins, which could help to clarify the biological role that they play at specific times and places in different tissues of various plant species.

When tissue antigens and antibodies get along: revisiting the technical aspects of immunohistochemistry--the red, brown, and blue technique

Once focused mainly on the characterization of neoplasms, immunohistochemistry (IHC) today is used in the investigation of a broad range of disease processes with applications in diagnosis, prognostication, therapeutic decisions to tailor treatment to an individual patient, and investigations into the pathogenesis of disease. This review addresses the technical aspects of immunohistochemistry (and, to a lesser extent, immunocytochemistry) with attention to the antigen-antibody reaction, optimal fixation techniques, tissue processing considerations, antigen retrieval methods, detection systems, selection and use of an autostainer, standardization and validation of IHC tests, preparation of proper tissue and reagent controls, tissue microarrays and other high-throughput systems, quality assurance/quality control measures, interpretation of the IHC reaction, and reporting of results. It is now more important than ever, with these sophisticated applications, to standardize the entire IHC process from tissue collection through interpretation and reporting to minimize variability among laboratories and to facilitate quantification and interlaboratory comparison of IHC results.