Prevalence of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations and polymorphisms in NNRTI-naïve HIV-infected patients

Predictive Efficacy of Dual Therapies Combining Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors with Second-Generation Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Following HIV-1 Treatment Failure in Cameroon: Implications for the Use of a Long-Acting Therapeutic Strategy in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Dual therapies (DT) combining integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) with second-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (2nd-Gen-NNRTIs) offer new possibilities for HIV treatment to improve adherence. However, drug resistance associated mutations (RAMs) to prior antiretrovirals may jeopardize the efficacy of DT. We herein describe the predicted efficacy of DT combining INSTIs + 2nd-Gen-NNRTI following treatment failure among Cameroonian patients. We genotyped the HIV-1 pol gene using Sanger sequencing and assessed acquired RAMs to NNRTIs and INSTIs in patients failing treatment from March 2019 to December 2023. Drug susceptibility was interpreted using Stanford HIVdb v9.5, and statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v22. Of 130 successfully genotyped participants (median age (IQR): 38 (27-46) years; 59.2% female), 92.3% had RAMs to NNRTIs and 1.5% to INSTIs. Prevailing RAMs were Y181C (32.3%) among NNRTIs and R263K (0.7%) among INSTIs. Among 2nd-Gen-NNRTIs, etravirine, doravirine and rilpivirine had 43.85%, 41.54% and 38.46% genotypic sensitivity, respectively. Among INSTIs, we found 97.69% efficacy for dolutegravir/bictegravir, 96.15% for cabotegravir and 92.31% for elvitegravir/raltegravir. The overall predictive efficacy of DT was lower among participants who failed 1st-Gen-NNRTI (p < 0.001); with etravirine + dolutegravir/bictegravir combination showing the highest score (43.8%). Conclusively, DT combining INSTIs + 2nd-Gen-NNRTIs might be suboptimal in the context of previous ART failure, especially with NNRTI-based treatment in low- and middle-income countries. The general data clearly indicate that without resistance testing, it is nearly impossible to use long-acting dual therapies in previously failing patients.

Scaffold hopping: exploration of acetanilide-containing uracil analogues as potential NNRTIs

In order to identify novel nonnucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase two series of amide-containing uracil derivatives were designed as hybrids of two scaffolds of previously reported inhibitors. Subsequent biological evaluation confirmed acetamide uracil derivatives 15a-k as selective micromolar NNRTIs with a first generation-like resistance profile. Molecular modeling of the most active compounds 15c and 15i was employed to provide insight on their inhibitory properties and direct future design efforts.

Burden of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in HIV-1-infected patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The prevalence of HIV drug resistance varies with geographic location, year, and treatment exposure. This study generated yearly estimates of nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance in treatment-naive (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) patients in the United States (US), Europe (EU), and Canada. Studies reporting NNRTI resistance identified in electronic databases and 11 conferences were analyzed in three groups: (1) TN patients in one of four geographic regions [US, Canada, EU countries with larger surveillance networks ("EU1"), and EU countries with fewer data ("EU2")]; (2) TE patients from any region; and (3) TN patients failing NNRTI-based treatments in clinical trials. Analysis data included 158 unique studies from 22 countries representing 84 cohorts of TN patients, 21 cohorts of TE patients, and 8 trials reporting resistance at failure. From 1995 to 2000, resistance prevalence in TN patients increased in US and EU1 from 3.1% to 7.5% and 0.8% to 3.6%, respectively. Resistance in both regions stabilized in 2006 onward. Little resistance was identified in EU2 before 2000, and increased from 2006 (5.0%) to 2010 (13.7%). One TN Canadian study was identified and reported resistance of 8.1% in 2006. Half of TN clinical trial patients had resistance after treatment failure at weeks 48-144. Resistance in TE patients increased from 1998 (10.1%) to 2001 (44.0%), then decreased after 2004. Trends in NNRTI resistance among TN patients show an increased burden in the US and some EU countries compared to others. These findings signify a need for alternate first-line treatments in some regions.

Novel tight binding PETT, HEPT and DABO-based non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a key component of effective combination antiretroviral therapies for HIV/AIDS. NNRTIs despite their chemical diversity, bind to a common allosteric site of HIV-1 RT, the primary target for anti-AIDS chemotherapy, and noncompetitively inhibit DNA polymerization. NNRTIs currently in clinical use have a low genetic barrier to resistance and therefore, the need for novel NNRTIs active against drug-resistant mutants selected by current therapies is of paramount importance. We describe the chemistry and biological evaluation of highly potent novel phenethylthiazolylthiourea (PETT), 1-[(2-hydroxyethoxy)methyl]-6-(phenylthio)thymine (HEPT) and dihydroalkoxybenzyloxopyrimidine (DABO) derivatives targeting the hydrophobic binding pocket of HIV-1 RT. These NNRTIs were rationally designed by molecular modeling and docking studies using a novel composite binding pocket that predicted how drug-resistant mutations would change the RT binding pocket shape, volume, and chemical make-up and how these changes could affect NNRTI binding. Several ligand derivatization sites were identified for docked NNRTIs that fit the composite binding pocket. The best fit was determined by calculating an inhibition constant (Ludi Ki) of the docked compound for the composite binding pocket. Compounds with a Ludi Ki of <1 microM were identified as the most promising tight binding NNRTIs. These NNRTIs displayed high selective indices with robust anti-HIV-1 activity against the wild-type and drug-resistant isolates carrying multiple RT gene mutations. The high rate of treatment failure due to the emergence of drug resistance mutations makes the discovery of broad-spectrum PETT, HEPT and DABO-based NNRTIs useful as a component of effective combination regimens.

Effects of the G190A substitution of HIV reverse transcriptase on phenotypic susceptibility of patient isolates to delavirdine

BACKGROUND

Cross resistance is common among the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). G190A appears in 5-15% of the patients treated with nevirapine or efavirenz who develop clinical resistance.

OBJECTIVES

In this study we investigated the effect of G190A and other NNRTI substitutions on the phenotypic susceptibility to this class of drugs.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified 15 individuals, who after treatment with NNRTIs (nevirapine or efavirenz; median exposure of 20 months), developed isolated G190A, G190A in combination with K103N, or K103N alone. Phenotypic and genotypic analyses of stored plasma specimens were performed before and after the mutations occurred to assess NNRTI susceptibility.

RESULTS

All isolates that developed only G190A substitution became less susceptible to nevirapine (median: 125-fold) and efavirenz (median: 10-fold) but were 2.5-fold more sensitive to delavirdine (Wilcoxon P = 0.06). In the group with only K103N substitution, acquisition of resistance to all NNRTIs was observed. In the group with the double substitutions, G190A and K103N, delavirdine susceptibility decreased 13-fold, while resistance to nevirapine and efavirenz decreased by 239- and 154-folds, respectively (Kruskal-Wallis H P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that the presence of a G190A substitution attenuates the phenotypic resistance associated with a K103N substitution, although resistance is still present. The in vivo significance of the increased phenotypic susceptibility to delavirdine is not known but could be evaluated in a clinical trial.

Genetic variation at NNRTI resistance-associated positions in patients infected with HIV-1 subtype C

OBJECTIVE

Genetic differences between subtypes of HIV-1, even when not associated with key resistance mutations, are known to affect baseline susceptibility to specific antiretroviral drugs and resistance-development pathways. We studied the prevalence and patterns of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-associated mutations in HIV-1 subtype C-infected patients.

METHOD

We analysed the genetic variation at sites associated with NNRTI and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in subtype C- versus B-infected patients, both drug-naive and -experienced. We extended the comparison to subtype B records from the Stanford database.

RESULTS

A total of 150 subtype B and 341 subtype C-infected patients were studied. No significant differences were found in treatment and clinical parameters between the groups. In NNRTI-naive patients, changes in NNRTI positions were present in 9.3% of subtype B- versus 33.1% of subtype C-infected patients (P < 0.001). Differences were seen in both drug-naive (subtype B, 10.0% versus subtype C, 50.1%; P < 0.021) and drug-experienced NNRTI-naive patients (subtype B, 9.0% versus subtype C, 23.8%; P < 0.001). In NNRTI experienced patients, the number of A98G/S changes was significantly higher in subtype C patients treated with either efavirenz or nevirapine (P < 0.0001), and V106M was higher in efavirenz-treated subtype C-infected patients (P < 0.0001). The average mutation rates were 1.26 and 1.67 per patient for subtypes B and C, respectively (P = 0.036). The frequency of nucleoside associated mutations, but not M184V, in treated patients was significantly higher in subgroup B-infected patients (P = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

Collectively, these data indicate that genetic variation at NNRTI resistance-associated positions such as V106M and A98S is substantially greater in subtype C-infected patients than in subtype B-infected patients. The natural structure of each subtype probably affects the frequency and pattern of drug resistance mutations selected under treatment.

Drug resistance in non-subtype B HIV-1

Treatment of HIV-1 with antiretroviral therapy may select mutations in the pol gene associated with resistance to reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. To provide durable clinical benefit, emergence of drug resistance is countered by prescription of alternative drug regimens. Data on sequential treatments that are effective after virologic failure and the selection of drug resistance is largely confined to HIV-1 subtype B, the clade that has circulated in North America and Europe. However, HIV-1 subtype B currently accounts for only 12% of the estimated 40 million HIV infected individuals worldwide. The global HIV-1 epidemic includes infection with nine identified HIV-1 group M subtypes (A-K), as well as distinct sub-subtypes and numerous chimerical or recombinant forms. Increasing access to treatment of HIV-1 in the developing world and increasing non-subtype B infection through travel and migration pose new questions about the susceptibility and response of these diverse HIV-1 viruses to antiretroviral drugs. Here we review HIV diversity and the published literature on drug resistance, comparing the known resistance mutations in individuals infected with subtype B to the growing experience in the treatment of non-subtype B HIV-1 worldwide.

Virological significance, prevalence and genetic basis of hypersusceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) are used to treat HIV-infected individuals in combination with nucleoside analogues (NRTI) and protease inhibitors. Long-term treatment with antiretroviral agents results in the emergence of strains with decreased susceptibility (resistance) to the drugs and is one of the major factors in loss of drug efficacy. Conversely, there have been recent reports of HIV strains with increased susceptibility (hypersusceptibility) to NNRTIs. These isolates emerge in patients on long-term antiretroviral therapy particularly in individuals receiving NRTIs. The prevalence of NNRTI hypersusceptibility ranges between 17.5 and 50% in NRTI-treatment experienced compared to 10% in NRTI-naïve patients. There is an inverse correlation between NNRTI hypersusceptibility and phenotypic NRTI resistance and a direct correlation between the number of NRTI resistance mutations present in the HIV reverse transcriptase. Re-sensitisation of phenotypic NNRTI resistance has been reported by NRTI mutations and is not likely to be detected using genotypic resistance assays. Recent studies demonstrate that NNRTI hypersusceptible virus at baseline is likely to predict better virological outcomes in patients on NNRTI-based salvage regimens compared to patients with NNRTI susceptible virus. These studies have implications for the sequence of antiretroviral drug use where patients may benefit from NRTI therapy before the introduction of NNRTIs, however more studies are needed to examine this treatment rationale.

Brazilian Network for HIV Drug Resistance Surveillance (HIV-BResNet): a survey of chronically infected individuals

OBJECTIVE

To study the prevalence of HIV drug resistance mutations and subtype distribution in a Brazilian drug-naive population. Asymptomatic, drug-naive HIV-1-infected individuals were targeted in 13 voluntary counseling and testing centers spread around the country.

METHODS

Plasma viral RNA was extracted from 535 HIV-1-positive subjects. Protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) genomic regions were sequenced for subtype determination and analysis of drug resistance mutations.

RESULTS

Eight samples (2.24 %) showed primary mutations related to protease inhibitor (PI) resistance, eight (2.36%) to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) and seven (2.06%) to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI). Accessory mutations were found in the PR gene at the following positions: L63P/V/T/A/I [153/345 (44.3%)], M36I/L [149/345 (43.2%)], L10I/F/V [82/345 (23.8%)], V77I [60/345 (17.4%)], A71V/T [11/345 (3.2%)], K20M/R [10/345 (2.9%)], and V82I [4/345 (1.2%)]. Mutations known to be associated with reduced sensitivity to NRTI or NNRTI (V118I, E44D, K219R, T69A, and V75L) were found in a low prevalence (0.6-2.4%). A high proportion of the isolates from subtype C was found in the southern states. Subtype F-related viruses were the main non-B variant in the rest of the country.

CONCLUSIONS

Brazil has a low prevalence of drug-resistant strains circulating among recently diagnosed individuals. However, there was an increase in these rates compared with similar studies performed with samples collected in Brazil from 1996 to 1998. Continued surveys are required to detect trends in these rates, but routine genotypic testing in the drug-naive population prior to antiretroviral initiation is not required in Brazil.

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance among antiretroviral-naive HIV-positive pregnant women

From 1999 to 2001, the overall prevalence of resistance in the antiretroviral (ART)-naive population in St. Louis, Missouri, was 17%. We sought to determine if resistance testing in ART-naive HIV-positive pregnant women identified resistant mutations, which would modify our initial choice of therapy. A retrospective chart review was performed on all HIV-positive pregnant women seen from January 2000 to December 2001 at a university hospital. There were 72 pregnancies. Twenty-seven of 72 patients were ART naive. Genotype testing was performed in 18 of 27 naive patients. Three of 18 ART-naive patients (17%) had primary resistance (95% CI: 4%-41%) by genotype to NNRTIs. The primary mutation, G190S, conferring resistance to NNRTIs was present in 1 patient. Another had the K103N mutation. One had the K103R mutation, which conferred phenotypic resistance to NNRTIs by 8.3-fold, warranting a change in the initial regimen. In our community, resistance testing in ART-naive pregnant patients is warranted. Switching later to a more complex regimen during pregnancy may adversely affect adherence, resulting in virologic failure. Strategies to avoid prescribing a suboptimal regimen include waiting to initiate ART until the resistance testing results are available and/or beginning ART with a protease inhibitor-based regimen if the patient is already in the third trimester of pregnancy at the time of her initial clinic presentation.