Significant interactions with new antiretrovirals and psychotropic drugs

Psychiatric side-effects of medications: recent developments

Medications often induce neuropsychiatric side-effects. This article reviews psychiatric side-effects that are well known and describes those induced by recently developed medications. Therapeutic innovations have been prominent in the treatment of HIV infection, Parkinson's disease and epilepsy and therefore psychiatric side-effects caused by these agents are described in more detail.

Medicinal-Induced Behavior Disorders

Commonly used medications can have neuropsychiatric and behavioral effects that may be idiosyncratic or metabolic in nature, or a function of interactions with other drugs, toxicity, or withdrawal. This article explores an approach to the patient with central nervous system toxicity, depending on presentation of sedation versus agitation and accompanying physical signs and symptoms. The effects of antihypertensives, opioids, antibiotics, antiepileptic agents, steroids, Parkinson's disease medications, antipsychotics, medications for human immunodeficiency virus infection, cancer chemotherapeutics, and immunotherapies are discussed. A look at the prevalence of adverse reactions to medications and the errors underlying such occurrences is included.

Significant Drug Interactions in the HIV Patient

Current treatment guidelines advocate the use of triple combination antiretroviral therapy for the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with one protease inhibitor (PI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Additionally, patients often receive medications for prophylaxis and treatment of opportunistic infections and comorbid illnesses. Polypharmacy with potent medications places the patient with HIV at significant risk of drug interactions. The purpose of this review is to assist clinicians regarding awareness and management of clinically significant drug interactions frequently encountered in the HIV population.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions are discussed in depth with several tables of significant interactions encountered in the patient with HIV. Certain combinations of NRTIs have antagonistic antiretroviral action (e.g., zidovudine plus stavudine), and thus should be avoided. All of the currently available PIs and delavirdine are cytochrome (CYP) 450 inhibitors and can cause significant inhibition of concomitant drug metabolism. Nevirapine is a CYP 450 inducer and can cause induction of drug metabolism, whereas efavirenz may cause inhibition or induction. Drug-herbal interactions are reviewed, including the decreased concentrations of indinavir following the administration of St. John’s wort. Additionally, the pharmacist’s role as an integral member of the HIV patient care team is discussed.

Drug-Drug Interactions and HIV Therapy: What Should Pharmacists Know?

Drug-interaction issues continue to present a major dilemma for the clinician caring for complex patients such as those infected with HIV. The inherent possibility of a drug interaction is magnified by the multitude of drugs being administered in highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In addition, other classes of medications are used to alleviate side effects, reduce toxicities associated with HAART, or treat concomitant diseases. The modification of one drug by another substance or drug-drug interaction is the main focus of this article. Drug-drug interactions may result in toxicity, treatment failure, or loss of effectiveness and can significantly affect a patient’s clinical outcome. An understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of HIV drug-drug interactions may allow for the early detection or avoidance of troublesome regimens and prudent management if they develop. Although HIV drug interactions are usually thought of as detrimental, resulting in a loss of therapeutic effect or toxicity, some drug interactions such as ritonavir boosted protease inhibitor–based antiretroviral treatments are beneficial and are commonly used in clinical practice. Therefore, pharmacists need to understand drug interaction mechanisms, remember key drug interactions, and vigilantly monitor patients for potential complications.

Impact of HIV infection and smoking on lung immunity and related disorders

HIV-infected persons not only have higher rates of smoking than the general population, but are also unusually vulnerable to the associated adverse health effects, both infective and noninfective in origin. Indeed, in the setting of well-organised care and availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy, HIV-infected smokers lose more life-years to smoking than to HIV infection per se, presenting a major challenge to healthcare providers. Not surprisingly, the respiratory system is particularly susceptible to the damaging interactive chronic inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of HIV and smoking, intensifying the risk of the development of opportunistic infections, as well as lung cancer and obstructive lung disorders. The impact of smoking on the immunopathogenesis and frequencies of these respiratory conditions in the setting of HIV infection, as well as on the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy, represent the primary focus of this review.

Evaluation of sub-chronic toxic effects of petroleum ether, a laboratory solvent in Sprague-Dawley rats

BACKGROUND

In general, organic solvents are inhibiting many physiological enzymes and alter the behavioural functions, but the available scientific knowledge on laboratory solvent induced organ specific toxins are very limited. Hence, the present study was planned to determine the sub-chronic toxic effects of petroleum ether (boiling point 40-60°C), a laboratory solvent in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The SD rats were divided into three different groups viz., control, low exposure petroleum ether (250 mg/kg; i.p.) and high exposure petroleum ether (500 mg/kg; i.p.) administered group. The animals were exposed with petroleum ether once daily for 2 weeks. Prior to the experiment and end of the experiment animals behaviour, locomotor and memory levels were monitored. Before initiating the study animals were trained for 2 weeks for its learning process and its memory levels were evaluated. Body weight (BW) analysis, locomotor activity, anxiogenic effect (elevated plus maze) and learning and memory (Morris water navigation task) were monitored at regular intervals. On 14(th) day of the experiment, few ml of blood sample was collected from all the experimental animals for estimation of biochemical parameters. At the end of the experiment, all the animals were sacrificed, and brain, liver, heart, and kidney were collected for biochemical and histopathological analysis.

RESULTS

In rats, petroleum ether significantly altered the behavioural functions; reduced the locomotor activity, grip strength, learning and memory process; inhibited the regular body weight growth and caused anxiogenic effects. Dose-dependent organ specific toxicity with petroleum ether treated group was observed in brain, heart, lung, liver, and kidney. Extrapyramidal effects that include piloerection and cannibalism were also observed with petroleum ether administered group. These results suggested that the petroleum ether showed a significant decrease in central nervous system (CNS) activity, and it has dose-dependent toxicity on all vital organs.

CONCLUSION

The dose-dependent CNS and organ specific toxicity was observed with sub-chronic administration of petroleum ether in SD rats.

The concomitant use of second-generation antipsychotics and long-term antiretroviral therapy may be associated with increased cardiovascular risk

To study the effect of concurrent use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) on metabolic syndrome (MetS) components conferring increased cardiovascular risk in a sample of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults taking antiretroviral therapy (ART). A retrospective study of participants consecutively recruited at the UCSD HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program examined effects of combined ART and SGAs on body mass index (BMI), nonfasting serum lipids, diabetes mellitus (DM) incidence, and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Metabolic outcome variables and covariates were compared using t-tests, Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. Linear and logistic multivariable models explored metabolic outcomes for participants taking (SGA+) or not taking (SGA-) concomitant SGAs, after controlling for demographic and HIV disease- and ART-related covariates. Of 2229 HIV-infected participants, 12% (N=258) were treated with SGAs. In multivariable models adjusted for relevant covariates, the SGA+ group had significantly higher mean triglycerides, significantly higher odds of DM, significantly higher MAPs and marginally higher BMI. The use of SGAs in HIV-infected adults taking ART was independently associated with worse indicators of MetS and cardiovascular risk. Aggressive monitoring for the metabolic complications from concurrent SGA and ART is indicated in all patients receiving these medication combinations.

HIV infection and depression

Major depression is highly prevalent among HIV-positive patients (HIVpp). The prevalence of depression ranges between 18% and 81%, depending on the population studied and the methodology of the study. The etiology of depression in HIVpp is likely determined by: (i) biological factors (alterations in the white matter structure, hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid dysfunction, Tat-protein-induced depressive behavior); (ii) psychosocial factors (HIV stigma, occupational disability, body image changes, isolation and debilitation); (iii) history or comorbidity of psychiatric illness; and (iv) the perinatal period in HIVpp women. Symptomatology of depression differs between HIVpp and HIV-negative patients (HIVnp). Depression may also alter the function of lymphocytes in HIVpp and decrease natural killer cell activity, contributing to the increased mortality in these patients. Selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors are considered the first-line treatment. Treatment of depression can improve quality of life and lead to a better prognosis of HIV infection.

Safe Treatment of Seizures in the Setting of HIV/AIDS

OPINION STATEMENT

HIV(+) patients are at increased risk for developing seizures due to the vulnerability of the central nervous system to HIV-associated diseases, immune dysfunction, and metabolic disturbances. In patients with acute seizures, standard protocols still apply with urgent seizure cessation being the priority. Management of the person with established epilepsy who contracts HIV is challenging, but the decision to initiate chronic antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in an HIV(+) patient is also difficult. Chronic treatment guidelines emphasize the interactions between AEDs and antiretroviral (ARV) medications, but provide no explicit advice regarding when to initiate an AED, what medication to select, and/or the duration of treatment. Epidemiologic data regarding seizure recurrence risk in HIV(+) individuals is not available. The risk of further seizures likely depends upon the underlying etiology for the seizure(s) and patients' immune status and may be increased by the use of efavirenz (an ARV). The issues for consideration include AED-ARV interactions, organ dysfunction, seizure type, and drug side effects, which may worsen or be confused with symptoms of HIV and/or epilepsy. Co-administration of enzyme inducing (EI)-AEDs and ARVs can result in virological failure, breakthrough seizure activity, AED toxicity, and/or ARV toxicity. Where available, the AED of choice in HIV(+) patients is levetiracetam due to its broad spectrum activity, ease of use, minimal drug interactions, and favorable side effect profile. Lacosamide, gabapentin, and pregabalin are also favored choices in patients with partial onset seizures and/or those failing levetiracetam. Where newer AEDs are not available, valproic acid may be the treatment of choice in terms of an AED, which will not cause enzyme induction-associated ARV failure, but its side effect profile causes other obvious problems. In resource-limited settings (RLS) where only EI-AEDs are available, there are no good treatment options and further pressure needs to be placed upon policymakers to address this care gap and public health threat.

Clinical implications and management of drug-drug interactions between antiretroviral agents and psychotropic medications

Medications used in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) often have drug-drug interactions which complicate treatment of psychiatric illnesses in HIV-infected patients. Protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are the two classes of HIV medications most likely to be involved with interactions, with the majority occurring via the cytochrome P450 (CYP450) system. These interactions can result in either increased or decreased exposure to psychotropic and antiretroviral medications, often requiring dosage adjustments and increased monitoring. This article reviews some of the major drug interactions with antiretroviral agents.

The impact of DSM-IV mental disorders on adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy among adult persons living with HIV/AIDS: a systematic review

This is a systematic review of eighty-two published studies investigating the impact of DSM-IV mental disorders on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) adherence and persistence among persons living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). Sixty-two articles examined depression, with 58 % (N = 32/62) finding lower cART adherence and persistence. Seventeen articles examined one or more anxiety disorders, with the majority finding no association with cART adherence or persistence. Eighty percent of the studies that evaluated the impact of psychotic (N = 3), bipolar (N = 5) and personality disorders (N = 2) on cART adherence and persistence also found no association. Seven out of the nine studies (78 %) evaluating the impact of antidepressant treatment (ADT) on cART adherence found improvement. Adherence and depression measurements varied significantly in studies; common research measurements would improve data harmonization. More research specifically addressing the impact of other mental disorders besides depression on cART adherence and RCTs evaluating ADT on cART adherence are also needed.

The mysteries and demands of HIV care: qualitative analyses of HIV specialists’ views on their expertise

To deepen our understanding of the mysteries and demands associated with HIV care and to inform the debate about HIV specialization, we conducted in-depth interviews with a purposive sample of 20 identified HIV specialists in the San Francisco Bay Area. Participants were from several medical specialties and reported a median of 50% of their time spent in HIV patient care. Through constant comparison, a template of open codes was constructed to identify themes that emerged from the data. Data were analyzed according to the conventions of qualitative research and revealed six interrelated themes: (1) coping with uncertainty and rapid change: being 'comfortable with mystery'; (2) the powerful role of experience; (3) the dual faces of knowledge: 'knowing the patient' and 'knowing the facts'; (4) the dual faces of passion: challenge and calling; (5) stress and burnout; and (6) the relationship between academia and 'the trenches'. The themes underscore the dual dimensions of HIV care: providers must interweave the 'half-baked' science about drug therapies, side effects and drug interactions with the psychosocial and lifestyle factors of the patient. They also provide insight into quantitative findings linking greater HIV experience with better patient outcomes and suggest that providers need skills associated with generalist and specialist training, a phenomenon that argues for a 'special' specialty for HIV care.

Clinically significant adverse events from a drug interaction between quetiapine and atazanavir-ritonavir in two patients

Clinicians caring for patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and diagnosed with psychiatric comorbidities must be aware of potential drug-drug interactions, particularly with protease inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy. Although possible interactions can be predicted based on a drug's pharmacokinetic parameters, the clinical significance is often unknown. We describe two patients who experienced serious quetiapine adverse effects potentially mediated through an interaction with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir. The first patient was a 57-year-old man with HIV and bipolar disease who developed rapid and severe weight gain when quetiapine was added to a stable atazanavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral regimen. After the patient discontinued both quetiapine and ritonavir, his weight returned to its baseline value. The second patient was a 32-year-old woman with HIV, anxiety disorder, and a history of intravenous drug abuse who developed increased sedation and mental confusion when an atazanavir-ritonavir-based antiretroviral regimen was added to her stable antianxiety drug regimen, which included quetiapine. Her symptoms resolved promptly after discontinuation of the quetiapine. Use of the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale indicated that the adverse effects experienced by the two patients were possibly related and probably related, respectively, to an interaction between quetiapine and atazanavir-ritonavir. Quetiapine is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, and ritonavir is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. Thus, it is reasonable to theorize that quetiapine concentrations will increase when these drugs are used concurrently, which would be the likely cause of the toxicities in these two patients. To our knowledge, these are the first published reports of a clinically significant interaction between atazanavir-ritonavir and quetiapine. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for this interaction, and extreme caution should be used when prescribing quetiapine and other atypical antipsychotic agents in HIV-positive patients who are receiving antiretroviral therapy.

Treatment considerations for psychiatric syndromes associated with HIV infection

Psychiatric syndromes associated with HIV disease were recognized early in the AIDS epidemic. Public education, new technologies and antiretroviral therapies have resulted in earlier recognition and therapautic interventions of HIV infection, improving the physical health for individuals living with HIV. While HIV-associated psychiatric symptoms have been recognized for more than 20 years, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying psychiatric symptoms among HIV-infected individuals and treatments for these symptoms have not kept pace with advances in HIV therapies. In this article, we discuss current knowledge of the psychiatric symptoms occurring with HIV disease, specifically mood, anxiety and psychotic disorders, evidence-based treatments and treatment considerations, new strategies for the treatments of psychiatric symptoms in HIV disease are also discussed.

Psychopharmacology in HIV-infected patients

Neuropsychiatric disorders and syndromes may be underdiagnosed and inadequately treated in individuals infected with HIV. Depression in particular is among the most prevalent diagnoses, and data from controlled clinical studies have shown that antidepressant medications are efficacious and safe for treating depression in HIV-infected persons. A significant shortcoming of this literature is that most of the available data are from studies conducted before the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. In addition, apart from antidepressant medications, controlled studies systematically assessing efficacy and safety issues for other classes of psychotropic drugs (e.g., antipsychotic and anxiolytic medications) in HIV-infected persons are lacking. This review summarizes essential findings pertaining to the use of psychotropic medications to treat depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders in the context of HIV. It includes a discussion of clinically relevant treatment considerations (e.g., side effects, drug-drug interactions) derived from the existing literature as well as judgments that clinicians face in the absence of research data. Despite some shortcomings of the existing literature, overall there is compelling evidence that the appropriate use of psychotropic medications (coupled with behavioral therapy) can improve the quality of life of mentally ill HIV-infected individuals.

Interaction study of the combined use of paroxetine and fosamprenavir-ritonavir in healthy subjects

Human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients have an increased risk for depression. Despite the high potential for drug-drug interactions, limited data on the combined use of antidepressants and antiretrovirals are available. Theoretically, ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors may inhibit CYP2D6-mediated metabolism of paroxetine. We wanted to determine the effect of fosamprenavir-ritonavir on paroxetine pharmacokinetics and vice versa and to evaluate the safety of the combination. Group A started with 20 mg paroxetine every day for 10 days; after a wash-out period of 16 days, subjects received paroxetine (20 mg every day) plus fosamprenavir-ritonavir (700/100 mg twice a day) from days 28 to 37. Group B received the regimens in reverse order. On days 10 and 37, pharmacokinetic curves were recorded. Twenty-six healthy subjects (18 females, 8 males) were included. Median (range) age and weight were 44.4 (18.2 to 64.3) years and 68.8 (51.0 to 89.4) kg. Three subjects were excluded (two because of adverse events; one for nonadherence). Addition of fosamprenavir-ritonavir to paroxetine resulted in a significant decrease in paroxetine exposure: the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of paroxetine plus fosamprenavir-ritonavir to paroxetine alone were 0.45 (0.41 to 0.49) for the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)), 0.49 (0.45 to 0.53) for the maximum concentration of the drug in plasma (C(max)), and 0.75 (0.71 to 0.80) for the apparent elimination half-life (t(1/2)). The free fraction of paroxetine showed a median (interquartile range) increase of 30% (18 to 42%) after the addition of fosamprenavir-ritonavir. The AUC(0-12), C(max), C(min), and t(1/2) of amprenavir and ritonavir were similar to those of historical controls. No serious adverse events occurred. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir reduced total paroxetine exposure by 55%. This is partly explained by protein displacement of paroxetine. We think that this interaction is clinically relevant and that titration to a higher dose of paroxetine may be necessary to accomplish the needed antidepressant effect.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions with non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a diverse group of compounds that inhibit HIV Type 1 reverse transcriptase. Although possessing a common mechanism of action, the approved NNRTIs, delavirdine, efavirenz and nevirapine, differ in structural and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Each of the NNRTIs undergoes biotransformation by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme system, thus making them prone to clinically significant drug interactions when combined with other antiretrovirals. In addition, they interact with other concurrent medications and complementary/alternative medicines, acting as either inducers or inhibitors of drug-metabolising CYP enzymes. These drug interactions become an important consideration in the clinical use of these agents when designing combination regimens, as recommended by current guidelines. This review provides an updated summary of pharmacokinetic interactions with NNRTIs.

Increased adverse drug reactions to antimicrobials and anticonvulsants in patients with HIV infection

OBJECTIVE

To review the incidence, signs, symptoms, and mechanisms of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, and antimycobacterial medications among people with HIV.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE/PubMed (1980-November 2005) and National Library of Medicine Meeting Abstracts (1989-November 2005), as well as hand searches of journals and abstracts, were conducted to identify primary literature. Reference lists were reviewed to identify additional relevant reports.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant articles and abstracts, particularly of in vitro experiments and clinical studies, were compiled and reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ADRs, especially in HIV-infected patients, are a cause for concern. Sulfonamides, anticonvulsants, and antimycobacterial drugs are commonly used to prevent and treat complications of HIV, including seizures and opportunistic infections. Patients with HIV have a much greater rate of ADRs to these drug classes, including severe and life-threatening hypersensitivity reactions. Several mechanisms of these ADRs have been postulated. Sulfamethoxazole and anticonvulsant hypersensitivity may involve the increased formation and decreased detoxification of reactive metabolites. The mechanisms for the marked increase in hypersensitivity ADRs to antimycobacterial drugs may be related to an altered immune profile in patients infected with both tuberculosis and HIV.

CONCLUSIONS

ADRs to antimicrobial and anticonvulsant therapy cause markedly increased morbidity and mortality in HIV-positive patients. Further research involving the interaction between HIV and the increased ADRs to these drugs is required.

Co-location of health care for adults with serious mental illness and HIV infection

This study describes persons with serious mental illness and comorbid HIV infection and examines the effect of co-location of mental health and HIV care on satisfaction, service utilization, and appropriateness of care. One hundred and eighteen subjects completed interviews and gave blood samples; medical records were abstracted. Most reported few barriers to care and satisfaction with mental health and HIV treatment. Co-location of mental health and HIV care did not influence satisfaction with care, utilization of services, or appropriateness of care. This report challenges the notion that persons with serious mental illnesses receive inadequate health care and that they have minimal capacity for illness management. These subjects may be benefiting from increased funding for, and attention to, persons with HIV infection.

Psychotropic medications and HIV

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome have high rates of psychiatric illness. The effective management of these psychiatric conditions can improve a patient's quality of life and may improve antiretroviral adherence. Care providers for patients with HIV infection frequently encounter clinical situations in which psychotropic medications are needed or are being used. Those clinical situations require familiarity with the broad category of medications termed "psychotropic." That familiarity should include a basic understanding of indications, adverse effects, and drug interactions. In particular, it is very important to recognize the many potential interactions based on cytochrome P450 metabolism, which is common to many psychotropics, the protease inhibitors, and the nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors. In a brief review of the use of psychotropic medications in patients with HIV infection, we discuss indications, adverse effects, and drug interactions for commonly used antidepressants, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, psychostimulants, and drugs of abuse.

Possible interaction between lopinavir/ritonavir and valproic Acid exacerbates bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of exacerbated mania potentially related to an interaction between lopinavir/ritonavir and valproic acid (VPA) and propose a mechanism of action for this interaction.

CASE SUMMARY

A 30-year-old man with bipolar disorder and HIV initiated treatment with lopinavir/ritonavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. Prior to beginning therapy with these antiretrovirals, he was receiving VPA 250 mg 3 times daily, with his most recent VPA concentration measured at 495 micromol/L. Twenty-one days after starting antiretroviral treatment, he became increasingly manic. His VPA concentration at admission was 238 micromol/L, a 48% decrease. The daily VPA dose was increased to 1500 mg, and olanzapine was introduced. The VPA concentration following this dose escalation was 392 micromol/L, and the patient improved clinically.

DISCUSSION

Fifty percent of VPA is metabolized by glucuronidation, 40% undergoes mitochondrial beta-oxidation, and less than 10% is eliminated by the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. Ritonavir can induce glucuronidation of several medications including ethinyl estradiol, levothyroxine, and lamotrigine. We believe that ritonavir-mediated induction of VPA glucuronidation resulted in a decrease in VPA concentrations and efficacy. An objective causality assessment suggested that the increased mania was probably related to the decrease in VPA concentration and that a possible interaction exists between lopinavir/ritonavir and VPA.

CONCLUSIONS

A potential interaction exists between VPA and all ritonavir-boosted antiretroviral regimens. Clinicians should monitor patients closely for a decreased VPA effect when these medications are given concomitantly.

Drug treatment of depression in HIV-positive patients : safety considerations

Safe and effective treatment of major depression, one of the most common comorbid conditions in individuals infected with HIV, significantly lowers morbidity and mortality from HIV disease. However, optimal treatment of both conditions is complicated by interactions between the disease processes as well as the pharmacological agents used to treat them. In patients with HIV it may be difficult to distinguish major depression from other physiological and emotional states that present with similar symptoms. Accurate diagnosis of major depression is thus complex and essential to preventing inappropriate exposure of patients to potentially harmful psychotropic medications. This review outlines important initial steps in making this diagnosis. All patients with HIV should be screened for depression by their medical providers and referred to a psychiatrist for full evaluation when necessary. The mainstay of treatment for major depression in patients with HIV disease is pharmacotherapy. Depressed patients with HIV respond to the same wide variety of antidepressant-class medications as depressed patients without HIV, including tricyclic antidepressants, paroxetine, fluoxetine and trazodone. Notably, new studies have also shown that some psychiatric medications can inhibit HIV replication. No particular antidepressant medication is superior for the treatment of depressed HIV-infected patients; however, the most important component of treatment of major depression in HIV-disease is patient adherence, which is highly influenced by antidepressant adverse effects. This review outlines adverse effects of antidepressant-class medications that are of particular concern in HIV-infected patients and describes pharmacological strategies for overcoming these potential barriers to medication adherence. This review also describes situations in which some adverse effects of antidepressant-class medications may be safely exploited to benefit depressed patients with HIV disease. Potential interactions between antidepressant-class medications and HIV medications, as well as pharmacological treatment strategies for treating the psychiatric adverse effects of HIV medications, are also discussed.

Medication use in the elderly patient: focus on the perioperative/perianesthesia setting

As the population ages, the use of multiple medications also increases. Polypharmacy (taking multiple drugs at a time) presents concerns to the perianesthesia nurse who is caring for the geriatric patient. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs are often altered in older adult patients. Adverse drug reactions and drug interactions occur more often in geriatric patients than in younger patients. For these reasons, the benefits and risks of multiple medications and the administration of certain types of drugs must be carefully considered in the elderly patient. The selection of any medication should be individually based on the benefits and risks. Adverse drug reactions play a significant role in hospitalization for the general population, and the elderly are more susceptible to these. These drug reactions often contribute to significant morbidity as well as mortality. Medications need to be considered carefully in the older adult patient, but perhaps more so in the perioperative/perianesthesia period. Drug interactions are diverse. The type of anesthesia may influence the patient's outcome, depending on the medications the patient is currently taking. The patient's response to the stress of surgery is also affected by individual medical conditions as well as medications the patient is currently receiving Polypharmacy, inappropriate medications, adverse drug reactions, drug-disease issues, and drug interactions in the geriatric population are concerns in the perioperative/perianesthesia setting.

Use of Selective Serotonin-Reuptake Inhibitors in the Treatment of Depression in Adults with HIV

OBJECTIVE:

To review the safety and efficacy of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for the treatment of depression in adults with HIV.

DATA SOURCES:

We searched Pre-MEDLINE and MEDLINE (1966-May 2004) using terms including generic names of antidepressants and antiretrovirals, depression, HIV, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. All English-language articles were included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

SSRIs may be effective and better tolerated than tricyclic antidepressants in HIV-positive adults. SSRIs did not appear to affect CD4+ cell counts.

CONCLUSIONS:

Controlled trials comparing SSRIs are lacking; thus, it is difficult to determine whether one SSRI is more efficacious than another. It appears that most SSRIs may be used in HIV-positive adults. If drug-drug interactions are a concern, sertraline, citalopram, and possibly escitalopram may be considered.

Mental illness and length of inpatient stay for medicaid recipients with AIDS

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associations between comorbid mental illness and length of hospital stays (LOS) among Medicaid beneficiaries with AIDS. DATA SOURCE AND COLLECTION/STUDY SETTING: Merged 1992-1998 Medicaid claims and AIDS surveillance data obtained from the State of New Jersey for adults with >or=1 inpatient stay after an AIDS diagnosis from 1992 to 1996.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study of 6,247 AIDS patients with 24,975 inpatient visits. Severe mental illness (SMI) and other less severe mental illness (OMI) diagnoses at visits were ascertained from ICD-9 Codes. About 4 percent of visits had an SMI diagnosis; 5 percent had an OMI diagnosis; 43 percent did not have a mental illness diagnosis, but were patients who had been identified as having an SMI or OMI history; and 48 percent were from patients with no identified history of mental illness.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The overall mean hospital LOS was 12.7 days. After adjusting for measures of HIV disease severity and health care access in multivariate models, patients presenting with primary and secondary severe mental illness (SMI) diagnoses had approximately 32 percent and approximately 11 percent longer LOS, respectively, than did similar patients without a mental illness history (p<0.001 for each). But in these adjusted models of length of stay: (1) diagnosis of OMI was not related to LOS, and (2) in the absence of a mental illness diagnosed at the visit, an identified history of either SMI or OMI was also not related to LOS. In adjusted models of time to readmission for a new visit, current diagnosis of SMI or OMI and in the absences of a current diagnosis, history of SMI or OMI all tended to be associated with quicker readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

This study finds greater (adjusted) LOS for AIDS patients diagnosed with severe mental illness (but not for those diagnosed with less severe mental comorbidity) at a visit. The effect of acute severe mental illness on hospitalization time may be comparable to that of an acute AIDS opportunistic illness. While previous research raises concerns that mental illness increases LOS by interfering with treatment of HIV conditions, the associations here may simply indicate that extra time is needed to treat severe mental illnesses or arrange for discharge of afflicted patients.

Evaluation of HIV drug interaction web sites

BACKGROUND

Clinicians frequently consult HIV drug interaction Web sites of unknown quality.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and identify HIV drug interaction Web sites of high quality and usefulness for healthcare professionals.

METHODS

Relevant Web sites were identified through a structured search on commonly used search engines. An assessment tool containing 4 domains (content, reliability, access restrictions, ease of navigation) was developed. English and French Web sites were selected for review if they included HIV drug interaction information directed to healthcare professionals. Web sites were excluded if antiretroviral interaction data were not available or were out of date. Commercial online databases and sites that required payment were not included. Seventeen HIV pharmacists from across Canada participated in the review. The Web sites were ranked with total mean scores. Mean scores for each domain were then analyzed. Interrater agreement and ANOVA using the rater as a covariate were determined.

RESULTS

Nine Web sites met the criteria for review. Web sites from Toronto General Hospital (Canada), HIVinSite (beta version) (US), and the University of Liverpool (UK) ranked highest for total mean scores and for content. Other Web sites were found to be reliable, accessible, and easy to navigate; however, they did not consistently include unpublished data or data on herbal preparations, recreational drugs, or multiple interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Three HIV interaction Web sites of high quality were identified that can be valuable tools for HIV and non-HIV health-care professionals. Regular reviews are necessary in order to keep pace with the growing body of HIV interaction data and the constant evolution of Web sites.

Prevalence, diagnosis, and pharmacological treatment of mood disorders in HIV disease

Human immunodeficiency virus seropositive (HIV+) individuals are at a heightened risk of developing mood disorders and related syndromes. Over the past several decades, increased rates of mood disorders, including depression and mania, have been reported among HIV+ individuals. Because alterations in mood may impact on quality of life and perhaps reduce adherence to antiretroviral treatment regimens that are critical for preventing disease progression, recognition and effective treatment of mood disorders is essential. There are accumulating data showing that antidepressants and mood stabilizers, as well as other novel agents, might benefit HIV+ individuals suffering from a concomitant mood disturbance. This review highlights the relevant studies that have examined prevalence rates of mood disorders in HIV+ individuals, characteristics of HIV disease that influence the diagnosis and psychopharmacologic treatment of mood disorders, including complex interactions with antiretroviral medications, as well as the available evidence regarding the efficacy of agents used to treat depression and mania in the context of HIV disease.

Drug interactions between antiretroviral drugs and comedicated agents

HIV-infected individuals usually receive a wide variety of drugs in addition to their antiretroviral drug regimen. Since both non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors are extensively metabolised by the cytochrome P450 system, there is a considerable potential for pharmacokinetic drug interactions when they are administered concomitantly with other drugs metabolised via the same pathway. In addition, protease inhibitors are substrates as well as inhibitors of the drug transporter P-glycoprotein, which also can result in pharmacokinetic drug interactions. The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are predominantly excreted by the renal system and may also give rise to interactions. This review will discuss the pharmacokinetics of the different classes of antiretroviral drugs and the mechanisms by which drug interactions can occur. Furthermore, a literature overview of drug interactions is given, including the following items when available: coadministered agent and dosage, type of study that is performed to study the drug interaction, the subjects involved and, if specified, the type of subjects (healthy volunteers, HIV-infected individuals, sex), antiretroviral drug(s) and dosage, interaction mechanism, the effect and if possible the magnitude of interaction, comments, advice on what to do when the interaction occurs or how to avoid it, and references. This discussion of the different mechanisms of drug interactions, and the accompanying overview of data, will assist in providing optimal care to HIV-infected patients.

Short-term exposure to low-dose ritonavir impairs clearance and enhances adverse effects of trazodone

Antiretroviral agents may participate in drug interactions that influence the efficacy and toxicity of other antiretrovirals, as well as pharmacologic treatments of coincident or complicating diseases. The viral protease inhibitor, ritonavir, may cause drug interactions by inhibiting the activity of cytochrome P450-3A (CYP3A) isoforms. In a single-dose, blinded, four-way crossover study, 10 healthy volunteer subjects received 50 mg of trazodone hydrochloride or matching placebo concurrent with low-dose ritonavir (four doses of 200 mg each) or with placebo. Compared to the control condition, ritonavir significantly reduced apparent oral clearance of trazodone (155 +/- 23 vs. 75 +/- 12 ml/min, p < 0.001), prolonged elimination half-life (6.7 +/- 0.7 vs. 14.9 +/- 3.9 h, p < 0.05), and increased peak plasma concentrations (842 +/- 64 vs. 1125 +/- 111 ng/ml, p < 0.05) (mean +/- SE). Coadministration of trazodone with ritonavir increased sedation, fatigue, and performance impairment compared to trazodone plus placebo; differences reached significance only for the digitsymbol substitution test. Three subjects experienced nausea, dizziness, or hypotension when trazodone was given with ritonavir; 1 of these subjects also experienced syncope. Thus short-term low-dose administration of ritonavir impairs oral clearance of trazodone and increases the occurrence of adverse reactions. The findings are consistent with impairment of CYP3A-mediated trazodone metabolism by ritonavir.

Recognizing and preventing drug interactions in older adults with HIV

Currently, adults older than 50 account for approximately 15% of the total number of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) cases. As baby boomers age, the number of older adults infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is expected to rise. This expected increase is due, in part, to an increase in the number of individuals newly diagnosed with HIV, and, in part, to improved efficacy of the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) medications used to treat HIV/AIDS. Older individuals who are infected with HIV also are expected to seek treatment for common conditions associated with aging. Thus, a considerable risk for drug interactions between the medications used specifically for HIV treatment and those used for other conditions exists. This article is intended as a guide for gerontological nurses facing these complexities. It includes reviews of the goals of HAART therapy and of the mechanisms of drug interactions, as well as detailed discussions related to the effects of HAART and their potential interactions with medications used to treat conditions commonly found in aging populations.

Antiretroviral therapy-induced psychosis: case report and brief review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

We present a case of psychosis in an individual with known HIV infection whose symptoms developed approximately 1 month following the commencement of combination antiretroviral therapy consisting of abacavir (ABC), nevirapine and combivir. She presented with severe persecutory delusions, accompanied by mutism, posturing and catatonia. Following cessation of therapy and the introduction of a low-dose antipsychotic, her mental state resolved to a stable premorbid level, and no further disturbances of behaviour were noted. Furthermore, when re-challenged with the above combination minus ABC, there were no further episodes of psychosis. It is proposed that the aetiology of the psychosis was related to her antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

Cessation of antiretroviral medication and initiation of antipsychotic medication with appropriate monitoring and assessment.

RESULTS

Subjective and objective improvements in psychotic symptoms and presentation.

CONCLUSION

The current case suggests that sudden onset psychotic disturbances in HIV-infected individuals in the absence of other known organic or other causal factors could be related to treatment with antiretroviral therapy, and that cessation of this can markedly improve psychiatric morbidity. Furthermore, treatment with antipsychotic medication can lead to alleviation of psychotic symptoms and enable the re-introduction of antiretroviral medication.

Impact of tobacco use on the development of opportunistic respiratory infections in HIV seropositive patients on antiretroviral therapy

The increased risk of developing lung diseases in cigarette smokers has been well recognized. The association between smoking and the risk of developing pulmonary infections in HIV-1-infected patients, however, which has not been established, was evaluated in the present study. Twenty-seven cases with lower respiratory infections (15 Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), 12 TB cases) were compared with 27 age, gender, socio-economic and HIV status-matched patients, without history of respiratory diseases. Medical history and physical examinations were obtained every 6 months. Blood was drawn for CD4 and viral load measurements. A substantial number of HIV + smokers who developed PCP (one-third) had been on highly active retroviral therapy (HAART) for more than 6 months and prophylaxis had been discontinued. Multivariate analyses indicated that in HIV-infected people, after controlling for HIV status and antiretrovirals, cigarette smoking doubled the risk for developing PCP (p = 0.01). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that long-term smoking also increased the risk (2 x) of developing tuberculosis (p = 0.04). Moreover, daily tobacco use seemed to attenuate by 40% the immune and virological response to antiretroviral therapies. These findings indicate that tobacco use significantly increases the risk of pulmonary diseases in HIV infected subjects and has a potential deleterious impact on antiretroviral treatment.

Pseudo-Parkinson disease secondary to ritonavir-buspirone interaction

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of Parkinson-like symptoms appearing in a patient after introduction of ritonavir to buspirone therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 54-year-old HIV-positive white man presented to the clinic with a 2-week history of ataxia, shuffling gait, cogwheel rigidity, resting tremor, and sad affect with masked features. This patient had been receiving high-dose buspirone (40 mg every morning and 30 mg every evening) for 2 years prior to the introduction of ritonavir/indinavir combination therapy (400 mg/400 mg twice daily) 6 weeks prior to initiation of the above symptoms. Buspirone was decreased to 15 mg 3 times daily, ritonavir/indinavir was discontinued, and amprenavir 1200 mg twice daily was added. The patient's symptoms began to subside after 1 week, with complete resolution after about 2 weeks. The patient continued to receive buspirone for an additional 12 months without recurrence of symptoms.

DISCUSSION

This is the first reported interaction of buspirone and antiretrovirals. Buspirone, extensively metabolized by CYP3A4, was likely at supratherapeutic levels due to the inhibitory effect of ritonavir and, secondarily, indinavir. The Parkinson-like symptoms developed rapidly and severely, impacted this patient's quality of life, and necessitated significant clinic expenditures to identify this drug-drug interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

This case demonstrates a severe drug-drug interaction between buspirone and ritonavir and further demonstrates the need for awareness of the metabolic profile for all agents an HIV-infected patient is receiving.

Neuropsychopharmacologic treatment of depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders in HIV-infected individuals

How can neuropsychiatric disorders and syndromes be underdiagnosed and inadequately treated in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus? Depression in particular is among the most prevalent diagnoses and there is a solid foundation of data from controlled clinical studies that has begun to examine the efficacy of various antidepressants in HIV-infected persons. This article summarizes essential findings pertaining to the use of psychotropic medications to treat depression and other neuropsychiatric disorders in the context of immunodeficiency. This includes discussion of clinically significant treatment considerations (eg, efficacy, side effects, drug-drug interactions) derived from the existing literature. Taken together, there is compelling evidence that psychopharmacologic intervention can improve the quality of life of mentally ill HIV-infected individuals.

Comorbidity of depression with other medical diseases in the elderly

A major factor in the context of evaluating depression in the elderly is the role of medical problems. With aging there is a rapid increase in the prevalence of a number of medical disorders, including cancer, heart disease, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, stroke, and arthritis. In this article, we hope to bring clarity to the definition of comorbidity and then discuss a number of medical disorders as they relate to depression. We evaluate medical comorbidity as a risk factor for depression as well as the converse, that is, depression as a risk factor for medical illness. Most of the disorders that we focus on occur in the elderly, with the exception of HIV infection. This review focuses exclusively on unipolar disorder. The review summarizes the current state of the art and also makes recommendations for future directions.

Pharmacologic treatment of mood disorders in acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)

Mood disorders in HIV are common and can impact on the course of the illness. With the increasing use of newer psychopharmacologic and antiviral medications, clinicians need to take precautions while prescribing them. This paper gives an overview of the most recent literature describing the pharmacologic treatment of mood disorders in HIVpositive patients. The authors of this paper focus on antidepressants, mood stabilizers, neuroleptics, and psychostimulants, as well as on areas of controversy. The authors' own clinical experiences are also included.

Severe interaction between ritonavir and acenocoumarol

OBJECTIVE

To report a clinically severe interaction between ritonavir (RTV) and acenocoumarol resulting in a decrease in the anticoagulant effect severe enough to eventually preclude RTV administration.

CASE SUMMARY

An asymptomatic, HIV-infected, 46-year-old man with mitraortic prosthetic valves receiving acenocoumarol therapy started stavudine, lamivudine, and RTV 600 mg twice daily. His international normalized ratio (INR) decreased dramatically (the opposite of what should be expected). Although the acenocoumarol dose was progressively increased to 3 times the original dose, it was impossible to achieve the previous INR and RTV was withdrawn.

DISCUSSION

RTV is an inducer of the hepatic isoenzymes CYP1A2, CYP1A4, and CYP2C9/19 and leads to extensive metabolism of acenocoumarol that cannot be balanced by dose increases. This effect is the opposite of what was expected to occur, considering that RTV is also a strong inhibitor of most hepatic isoenzymes.

CONCLUSIONS

RTV severely decreases the anticoagulant effect of acenocoumarol. It must be added to the list of drugs that affect the action of oral anticoagulants, and it probably should be avoided in patients receiving acenocoumarol.

Seizures in HIV-seropositive individuals: epidemiology and treatment

Seizures are a relatively common occurrence in patients with HIV infection. They may be a result of HIV infection of the CNS or a manifestation of an opportunistic infection. Because seizures are likely to recur in patients infected with HIV and because they are a poor prognostic indicator, it is generally recommended that all HIV-seropositive patients experiencing a first seizure without a recognisable and reversible cause be treated. Clinicians faced with treating seizures in HIV-seropositive patients often encounter a therapeutic dilemma since few data exist in this area. In selecting appropriate anticonvulsant therapy, clinicians must consider both therapy-compromising drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. Ideal anticonvulsants for this setting are those that do not effect viral replication, have limited protein binding and have no effects on the cytochrome P450 system, such as gabapentin, topiramate and tiagabine. Unless the benefits outweigh the risks, valproic acid (sodium valproate) should be avoided as it has been shown to stimulate HIV replication. Since few data exist, controlled trials examining pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between anticonvulsants and antiretrovirals are needed. Until such time, clinicians caring for these patients should examine existing data carefully and employ vigilant monitoring.

Practical psychopharmacology in HIV-1 and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

HIV-1 infection poses a challenge for psychiatrists of the medically ill. Many factors concerning the care of HIV-1-infected patients need to be considered when prescribing psychotropics. These include careful diagnosis, taking into account medical disorders associated with HIV-1 that can present with psychiatric symptoms, as well as medications that HIV-1 patients may be taking that can cause a variety of neuropsychiatric side effects. Another important issue is the potential for drug-illness interactions. In general, HIV-1 patients seem to be more sensitive to the development of adverse drug reactions than do non-HIV-1 patients, especially as the illness progresses. It is also important to be cognizant of the complex multidrug regimens that many HIV-1 patients are on to avoid known drug-drug interactions and be on the alert for other potential interactions when using psychotropic medications.

Depression among Patients with HIV/AIDS: A Treatment Dilemma

Increased longevity of HIV-infected individuals due to expanding pharmacological research allows a longer period of time for mood disorders to come to medical attention. A longer period of time exists in which the treatment of depression can make a difference in the quality of life, function, and course of HIV infection. Many HIV-related symptoms and concurrent treatment regimens can complicate the choices made regarding mood disorder treatments. Certain HIV/AIDS patients are at greater risk for developing depression, such as those with substance abuse/dependence. Differentiation between the clinical presentation of depression in the general population versus the HIV/AIDS population is important. Although differentiating between symptoms of depression, somatic complaints, and cognitive deficits may be difficult, specific symptoms in HIV-infected individuals prevail. Substantial evidence suggests that antidepressant therapy and psychotherapy are effective in most HIV-positive patients with major depression. One of the greatest difficulties in drug selection for the HIV-infected population is the avoidance of clinically significant drug-drug interactions between antidepressants and antiretrovirals. Evaluating the tolerability of antidepressant medications is also an important factor of effective treatment. This article attempts to clarify all the aforementioned issues pertaining to treatment choices in HIVinfected individuals suffering from depression.

Serotonin syndrome in HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy and fluoxetine

OBJECTIVE

To describe HIV-infected individuals taking antidepressants who developed the serotonin syndrome due to drug--drug or drug--food interactions.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Case studies carried out at the HIV Outpatient Clinic, Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

HIV-positive patients who were receiving antiretroviral and antidepressant therapies and presented with symptoms consistent with the serotonin syndrome. Their antidepressants were discontinued or the doses reduced in order to resolve the symptoms.

RESULTS

Five cases of serotonin syndrome developed after patients who were taking antidepressants ingested P450 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Serotonin syndrome should be suspected in patients on serotonergic medications who present with mental status change, autonomic dysfunction, and neuromuscular abnormalities. Suspicion should be heightened in those who are ingesting substances known to inhibit P450 enzymes, such as protease inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and grapefruit juice.

[Pharmacological study and clinical effect of HIV protease inhibitor amprenavir]

Amprenavir is a novel protease inhibitor with antiviral activity, and was approved in the U.S. (AGEN-ERASE) in 1999 for use in combination with other antiretrovirals for the treatment of HIV infection. The drug is developed by Kissei Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. in Japan, approved in the same year, and has been distributed by them (PROZEI). Amprenavir achieves a viral load of less than 400 copies/ml when it is given in triple combination therapy in both therapy-naive patients and patients previously treated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). The recommended dose of amprenavir is eight 150-mg capsules, twice daily, or 1200 mg, b.i.d. Amprenavir may be taken with or without a meal; however, it should not to be taken with high-fat meals because its oral bioavailability may possibly be affected by fat. One of the major concerns associated with anti-HIV agents is the resistance mutation development, and the presence of I50V, M46I/L, I47V, I54L/V and I84V genotype has been observed in amprenavir therapy experienced subjects. Differences in resistance patterns and resistance mutation interactions may have amprenavir recognized as an alternative choice of drugs in maintaining efficacy. Therefore, amprenavir is believed to add an important treatment option in HIV infection therapy. It should be noted that P450 isozyme CYP3A4 is responsible for amprenavir; thus, care must be taken to avoid combined amprenavir with drugs that affect the action of CYP3A4, that act on the production CYP3A4 substrates, or that are metabolized by CYP3A4 metabolism. Amprenavir is the fifth protease inhibitor approved in Japan, and it is important to understand its differential and identical properties from other protease inhibitors to maximize its efficacy.

Nevirapine: pharmacokinetic considerations in children and pregnant women

Nevirapine is a potent non-nucleoside inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. It is effective when used as part of combination therapy to treat HIV-1-infected individuals and as monotherapy for prevention of mother-to-child HIV-1 transmission. Nevirapine pharmacokinetics are characterised by rapid absorption and distribution, followed by prolonged elimination. Nevirapine is generally well tolerated. The most common toxicity is rash, which is usually mild and self-limiting. The primary route of nevirapine elimination is through metabolism by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Nevirapine elimination accelerates during long term administration because of autoinduction of the enzymes involved in its elimination pathway. The recommended regimen for adults is nevirapine 200mg once daily for 2 weeks, followed by 200mg twice daily. Nevirapine elimination is prolonged in pregnant women during labour and in newborns. A regimen of a single 200mg oral dose administered to the mother during labour and a single 2 mg/kg dose administered to the newborn at 48 to 72 hours after birth maintains serum nevirapine concentrations above 100 microg/L (10 times the in vitro 50% inhibitory concentration against wild-type HIV-1) throughout the first week of life. This limited regimen has been shown to be extremely well tolerated and to reduce mother-to-child transmission by nearly 50% in mothers and infants receiving no other antiretrovirals. There are few data describing the safety and pharmacokinetics of nevirapine during long term use in pregnancy. In children, nevirapine elimination accelerates during the first years of life, reaching a maximum at around 2 years of age, followed by a gradual decline during the rest of childhood. Children should receive 4 mg/kg once daily for the first 2 weeks of therapy, followed by 7 mg/kg doses twice daily if below the age of 8 years or 4 mg/kg twice daily if older than 8 years. Alternatively, children may receive 150 mg/m2 across all ages, once daily for the first 2 weeks of therapy followed by the same dose twice daily.

Maximizing life's potentials in AIDS: a psychopharmacologic update

Psychiatric factors play a major role in the AIDS pandemic. They have an impact on transmission, morbidity, coping, adherence, and quality of life and of death. Substance-related disorders are associated with HIV transmission through needle sharing, sexual transmission, exchange of sex for drugs, and perinatal transmission. Persons with AIDS have a high prevalence of substance-related disorders, mood disorders, dementia, mania, and delirium. Persons with AIDS require complex medications, including combination antiretroviral therapy and prophylaxis and treatment for opportunistic infections and cancers. Recognition and treatment of distressing symptoms can maximize life's potentials and enhance adherence with risk prevention and with care. We describe an integrated approach to the use of psychotropic medications in the care of persons with AIDS. With the new antiretroviral therapies available, psychotropic medications can be helpful in alleviating distressing symptoms, promoting less risk taking, and adhering to complex medical care. The intricacies and complexities of new medical and psychopharmacological issues are delineated in order to enable caregivers help persons with AIDS to maximize life's potentials.