Acid Suppressive Therapy and the Effects on Protease Inhibitors

Evaluation of US Food and Drug Administration Drug Label Recommendations for Coadministration of Antivirals and Acid-Reducing Agents

Coadministration with acid-reducing agents (ARAs), including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine H2 -receptor antagonists (H2 blockers), and antacids has been demonstrated to reduce antiviral exposure and efficacy. Therefore, it is essential that US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labels include recommendations to manage these drug-drug interactions (DDIs). This investigation analyzed information in FDA drug labels to manage DDIs between ARAs and antivirals approved from 1998 to 2019. To ascertain clinical adoption, we assessed whether FDA label recommendations were incorporated into current antiviral clinical practice guidelines. We identified 82 label recommendations for 43 antiviral approvals. Overall, 56.1% of recommendations were deemed clinically actionable, with the most common actionable management strategies being dose adjustment during coadministration (40.2%) and coadministration not recommended (9.8%). The sources informing DDI recommendations were clinical DDI studies (59.8%) and predictions of altered exposure (40.2%). Antivirals with low aqueous solubility were more likely to have label recommendations and were more commonly investigated using clinical DDI studies (P < 0.01). For recommendations informed by clinical DDI studies, changes in drug exposure were associated with actionable label recommendations (P < 0.01). The frequency of exposure changes in clinical DDI studies was similar across antiviral indications, but exposure changes were numerically higher for antacids (71.4%) relative to PPIs (42.9%) and H2 blockers (28.6%). Of DDI pairs identified within drug labels, 76.8% were included in guidelines, and recommended management strategies were concordant in 90.5% of cases. Our findings demonstrate that current regulatory oversight mostly (but not completely) results in actionable label recommendations to manage DDIs for high-risk antivirals.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of HIV Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnancy: A Narrative Review

To date, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has played an important role in the management of pregnant HIV patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy. Historically, in pregnant women living with HIV, the third agent in triple therapy has been either non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors (PIs). PIs have been the preferred agents because of their robustness from the perspective of viral resistance and the dominant drug class for the management of HIV during pregnancy for the previous decade. As with many drugs used during pregnancy, pharmacokinetic changes decrease exposure to these agents as the pregnancy progresses. This can lead to viral escape at the time of pregnancy and ultimately increase the risk of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. TDM has been well-established for this class of highly active antiretroviral therapy, and appropriate dose adjustment studies have been performed. At present, there is a shift from the traditional treatment paradigm in pregnancy to a new drug class, integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs). Although INSTIs are affected by pharmacokinetic changes during pregnancy, they do not harbor the same issues with viral escape as seen with PIs at birth and in general eliminate the need for boosting with additional agents like ritonavir (r) and cobicistat (c) [bar elvitegravir (EVG)] that can lead to interactions with treatment of other common infections in HIV, including tuberculosis. Furthermore, INSTIs are the most successful medication for rapidly reducing the viral load (VL) in HIV patients, a useful factor where VL may be unknown, or in late presenters. These merits make INSTIs the best choice in pregnancy, although their use has been hindered in recent years by a report of neural tube defects from a large African study with dolutegravir (DTG). New data from Botswana and Brazil indicate that this risk is less significant than previously reported, necessitating further data to shed light on this critical issue. Current international guidelines including DHHS, EACS, WHO, and BHIVA (for patients with VLs >100,000 copies/mL or late presenters) now recommend INSTIs as first-line agents. The role of TDM in INSTIs shifts to cases of insufficient viral suppression with standard adherence measures, cases of drug-drug interactions, or cases where EVG/c is continued throughout pregnancy, and thus remains an important aspect of HIV care in pregnancy.

Adverse drug reactions due to drug-drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors: assessment of systematic reviews with AMSTAR method

INTRODUCTION

Many systematic reviews resulted in claims on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Such a large number begs for consensus on the clinical significance of findings.

AREAS COVERED

We critically evaluated the safety of PPI use with respect to DDIs with a meta-review of systematic reviews published between 1978 and 2015. We assessed the evidence by their reliability, repeatability, transparency, and objectivity according to the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) criteria.

EXPERT OPINION

Clinicians must assess risks for each PPI for certain comorbid conditions. DDIs don't substantiate class effect for PPIs; each PPI could induce unique DDIs. Concomitant use of PPIs with thienopyridines (e.g. clopidogrel) could be justified in patients without strong affinity to cytochrome CYP2C19 and with high risk of bleeding (e.g. patients with prior upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Helicobacter pylori infection, advanced age, steroid treatment, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use). DDIs could occur in an AIDS subpopulation treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). DDIs exist for cancer patients undergoing targeted therapy. Hypomagnesemia could increase in the setting of advanced age and polypharmacy. Omeprazole poses high risks owing to its pharmacokinetic DDI profile. Future systematic reviews should incorporate these additional risks for better clinical guidance.

Effects of the H2-receptor antagonist famotidine on the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir-ritonavir with or without tenofovir in HIV-infected patients

Significant pharmacokinetic interactions can result between acid-suppressing agents and some protease inhibitors (PIs) in the management of HIV infection. In healthy subjects, famotidine, an H(2)-receptor antagonist, reduces exposures of atazanavir by 4-28% at doses of 20-40 mg twice daily. This study evaluated the effect of famotidine 20-40 mg twice daily on the pharmacokinetics of atazanavir/ritonavir 300/100 mg once daily with and without tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300 mg in HIV-infected patients (n=40; 87.5% male; mean age 42, range 26-63 years; 55% white). Coadministration of famotidine 40 mg and atazanavir/ritonavir to HIV-infected patients reduced exposures of atazanavir by approximately 20%. This is comparable to reductions seen in HIV-uninfected subjects. Coadministration of famotidine 20 mg had less impact on atazanavir exposures, with no reduction of atazanavir geometric mean plasma concentration at 24 h postdose (C(min)). In the presence of TDF, administration of famotidine 20-40 mg twice daily 2 h after and 10 h before atazanavir/ritonavir reduced exposures of atazanavir by 19-25%. However, all individual atazanavir C(min) values remained at least five-fold above the population mean protein-binding adjusted 90% maximum effect (EC(90)) against wild-type HIV (14 ng/mL). No viral load rebound was observed at end of study. The results confirmed that coadministration of an H(2)-receptor antagonist with atazanavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patients resulted in similar magnitude of reductions in atazanavir exposures as in healthy subjects. This supports the current dose recommendations for coadministration of an H(2)-receptor antagonist with atazanavir/ritonavir.

Renal transplantation in patients with HIV

HIV infection has been a major global health problem for almost three decades. With the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy in 1996, and the advent of effective prophylaxis and management of opportunistic infections, AIDS mortality has decreased markedly. In developed countries, this once fatal infection is now being treated as a chronic condition. As a result, rates of morbidity and mortality from other medical conditions leading to end-stage liver, kidney and heart disease are steadily increasing in individuals with HIV. Presence of HIV infection used to be viewed as a contraindication to transplantation for multiple reasons: concerns for exacerbation of an already immunocompromised state by administration of additional immunosuppressants; the use of a limited supply of donor organs with unknown long-term outcomes; and, the risk of viral transmission to the surgical and medical staff. This Review examines open questions on kidney transplantation in patients infected with HIV-1 and clinical strategies that have resulted in good outcomes. It also describes the clinical concerns associated with the treatment of renal transplant recipients with HIV.

Unboosted atazanavir plus co-formulated lamivudine/abacavir as a ritonavir-sparing simplification strategy in routine clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of antiretroviral therapy with unboosted atazanavir (400 mg once daily) plus co-formulated abacavir/lamivudine as a treatment simplification strategy in HIV-infected patients with sustained viral suppression in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study including patients who were switched to unboosted atazanavir plus abacavir/lamivudine and whose HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL. The primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects who maintained viral suppression after 48 weeks of follow-up. Secondary endpoints included the percentage of subjects who maintained viral suppression after 96 weeks of follow-up, the incidence of adverse events, changes in CD4+ T-cell count and in lipid profile, and the percentage of patients with subtherapeutic atazanavir trough concentrations during follow-up.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were included. None had a prior history of resistance to protease inhibitors or to lamivudine or abacavir. The percentage of patients with viral suppression at Week 48 was 73.9% when all the included patients were considered (full dataset analysis) and 85.0% when only subjects on treatment were considered. There was a continuous immune recovery and an improvement in lipid profile during follow-up. Two thirds of the patients had subtherapeutic atazanavir trough concentrations in plasma in at least one determination during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Antiretroviral therapy with unboosted atazanavir plus abacavir/lamivudine is safe and effective in the long term as a treatment simplification strategy in HIV-infected patients with sustained virological suppression in routine clinical practice.

Atazanavir: its role in HIV treatment

Azatanavir is a protease inhibitor (PI) approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Atazanavir is a substrate and inhibitor of cytochrome P450 isozyme 3A and an inhibitor and inducer of P-glycoprotein. It has similar virologic efficacy as efavirenz and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in antiretroviral-naive individuals. Its impact on lipids is less than other PIs and it is suitable for those in whom hyperlipidemia is undesirable. Ritonavir boosting of atazanavir enhances the bioavailability of atazanavir but may result in some elevation of lipids and is recommended for treatment-experienced patients and those receiving efavirenz or tenofovir. Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir has similar antiviral activity as ritonavir-boosted lopinavir in both antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced patients. Atazanavir causes unconjugated bilirubinemia in over 40% of patients but results in less than 2% discontinuations. Atazanavir is licensed for once-daily use and atazanavir/ritonavir competes with lopinavir/ritonavir as the most commonly prescribed PI.

Effects of acid-reducing agents on the pharmacokinetics of lopinavir/ritonavir and ritonavir-boosted atazanavir

A total of 71 HIV-negative healthy adults were randomized to 1 of 6 regimens to receive lopinavir/ritonavir tablets 400/100 mg twice daily (bid) or 800/200 mg once daily (qd) or atazanavir 300 mg + ritonavir 100 mg qd from study days 1 to 15 with a moderate-fat meal. One hour before breakfast, either omeprazole 40 mg qd was administered on study days 11 through 15, or a single dose of ranitidine 150 mg was administered on study day 11. Lopinavir, atazanavir, and ritonavir pharmacokinetics were determined on study days 10, 11, and 15 and compared using point estimates and 90% confidence intervals (CIs). The point estimates for lopinavir Cmax and AUCtau were in the range of 0.92 to 1.08, with 90% CI contained within the range of 0.80 to 1.25 after coadministration of omeprazole or ranitidine. The point estimates for atazanavir Cmax and AUCtau were decreased by 48% to 62% with the upper bound of the 90% CI <or=0.55 after coadministration of omeprazole or ranitidine. The results indicated that lopinavir bioavailability was not affected by the coadministration of omeprazole or ranitidine. In contrast, atazanavir bioavailability was decreased by 48% to 62% when coadministered with ritonavir and either omeprazole or ranitidine.

Pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in pregnant women

Highly active antiretroviral therapy is recommended for HIV-infected pregnant women to prevent mother-to-child transmission. The specific physiological background induced by pregnancy leads to significant changes in maternal pharmacokinetics, suggesting potential variability in plasma concentrations of antiretrovirals during gestation. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) is recommended in certain situations, including pregnancy, but its systematic use in HIV-infected pregnant women remains controversial. This review provides an update of the pharmacokinetic data available for PIs and NNRTIs in pregnant women and highlights the clinical interest of systematic TDM of certain antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy, including nevirapine, nelfinavir, saquinavir, indinavir and lopinavir.

Interactions between protease inhibitors and acid-reducing agents: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic review of the available pharmacokinetic and clinical data on drug interactions between protease inhibitors (PIs) and acid-reducing agents, and their clinical relevance.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using Medline and EMBASE, abstracts of the previous 2 years of major conferences were searched and the drug information service of the manufacturer of every currently available PI was contacted. All data were summarized, and verified by at least two authors.

RESULTS

A total of 1231 references were identified, 22 of which were studies of pharmacokinetic interactions between PIs and acid-suppressive agents and a further 12 of which provided pharmacokinetic and/or clinical data.

CONCLUSIONS

Many pharmacokinetic studies show a lack of a drug interaction between at least one acid-reducing agent and most PIs. Little clinical information is available, except on interactions between atazanavir and acid-reducing agents. This is probably a consequence of the complexity of the interaction.

Children with HIV are not small adults: what is different in pharmacology?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs are highly variable among HIV-infected children. This review describes pharmacokinetic processes in children and recent pharmacokinetic data in children with HIV. The general lack of pharmacokinetic data and the potential role of therapeutic drug monitoring are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

It was found unexpectedly that exposure to lopinavir is decreased in the first 6 months of life. Recent findings of subtherapeutic efavirenz concentrations in children suggest that pediatric dose recommendations should be re-evaluated. In addition, recommended dosing of lamivudine leads to lower exposure in children younger than 6 years of age. Preliminary results of pediatric fixed-dose combination tablets for HIV-infected children with a higher nevirapine to stavudine and lamivudine ratio than adult fixed-dose combinations suggest adequate drug exposure. As an alternative to plasma sampling, concentrations of nevirapine can be determined in saliva.

SUMMARY

There is a shortage of pharmacokinetic data in the highly variable population of HIV-infected children. Selected pharmacology studies should be undertaken to improve pediatric dose guidance of existing antiretroviral drugs. Therapeutic drug monitoring is a useful tool to optimize treatment in HIV-infected children. More data are needed, however, to establish child-specific reference values.