Maternal and fetal outcome after long-term pamidronate treatment before conception: a report of two cases

Postpartum multiple vertebral fractures in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta type I: A case report and literature review

A 39-year-old woman with type I osteogenesis imperfecta reported experiencing back pain at 35 weeks of gestation. Two days following an elective cesarean section, the patient developed a Th12 vertebral compression fracture; 3 weeks postoperatively, she sustained an L3 vertebral compression fracture. The patient displayed a lumbar spine Z-score of -1.7; she subsequently discontinued breastfeeding, and treatment with active vitamin D was initiated. Genetic testing confirmed a diagnosis of osteogenesis imperfecta.

Does the use of bisphosphonates during pregnancy affect fetal outcomes? A systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of maternal exposure to bisphosphonates (BPs) during pregnancy on neonatal outcomes. It aimed to disclosfe the impact of BPs on neonates and identify aspects that require further investigation.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Science Direct, LILACS, EMBASE, and Web of Science was conducted until August 2022, with no time restrictions. The selection criteria included studies published in English that evaluated pregnant women who were exposed to BPs.

RESULTS

From an initial pool of 2169 studies, 13 met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. These studies collectively included 106 women (108 pregnancies) who were exposed to BPs either before orduring pregnancy. A summary of the key characteristics of the selected studies and the risk of bias assessment are provided. Exposure to BPs occurs at various stages of pregnancy, with different indications for BP treatment. The most frequently reported neonatal outcomes were spontaneous abortion, congenital malformations, hypocalcemia, preterm birth, and low birth weight.

CONCLUSION

Although previous reports have linked BPs before or during pregnancy with adverse neonatal outcomes, these associations should be interpreted with caution. Given the complexity of these findings, further research is necessary to provide more definitive insights to guide clinical decisions regarding the use of BPs in pregnant women.

Whole exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of fetal clubfoot

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the value of whole exome sequencing (WES) for clubfoot (CF) fetuses with or without other structural abnormalities and to further explore the genetic causes of fetal CF.

METHODS

this study included 83 singleton pregnancies diagnosed with fetal CF referred to our center between January 2016 and March 2022; cases were divided into two groups: isolated CF and non-isolated CF. After excluding cases with positive karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis results, WES was performed for the eligible fetuses and parents. Monogenic variants detected by WES and perinatal outcomes were recorded and evaluated at postnatal follow-up.

RESULTS

overall, clinically significant variations were identified in 12.0% (10/83) of fetuses, and the detection rate was significantly higher in the non-isolated than in the isolated CF group (8/36, 22.2% vs. 2/47, 4.3%, p = 0.031). We additionally detected eight (9.6%) fetuses harboring variants of unknown significance. We identified 11 clinically significant variations correlating with clinical phenotypes in nine genes from ten fetuses, with KLHL40 being the most frequent (n = 2). Furthermore, we observed a significant difference in termination and survival rates between isolated and non-isolated CF cases (27.6 vs. 77.8% and 59.6 vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001 for both).

CONCLUSION

our data indicate that WES has a high additional diagnostic yield for the molecular diagnosis of fetal CF, markedly enhancing existing prenatal diagnostic capabilities and expanding our understanding of intrauterine genetic disorders, thus assisting us to better interpret fetal phenotype in the future.

Evidence based Latin American Guidelines of clinical practice on prevention, diagnosis, management and treatment of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis. A 2022 update : This manuscript has been produced under the auspices of the Committee of National Societies (CNS) and the Committee of Scientific Advisors (CSA) of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF)

Guidelines and recommendations developed and endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) are intended to provide guidance for particular pattern of practice for physicians who usually prescribe glucocorticoid (GC) therapy, and not to dictate the care of a particular patient. Adherence to the recommendations within this guideline is voluntary and the ultimate determination regarding their application should be made by the physician in light of each patient's circumstances. Guidelines and recommendations are intended to promote a desirable outcome but cannot guarantee any specific outcome. This guideline and its recommendations are not intended to dictate payment, reimbursement or insurance decisions. Guidelines and recommendations are subjected to periodic revisions as a consequence of the evolution of medicine, technology and clinical practice. A panel of Latin American (LATAM) experts specialized in osteoporosis with recognized clinical experience in managing patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) met to produce evidence-based LATAM recommendations for the diagnosis and management of GIO. These guidelines are particularly intended to general practitioners and primary care physicians who prescribe GC treatments in LATAM to guide their daily clinical practice in terms of evaluation, prevention and treatment of GIO. These recommendations were based on systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE Library database during the period from 2012 to 2021. Randomized clinical trials (RCT), systematic reviews of RCT, controlled observational studies, guidelines and consensus were considered. Based on the review and expert opinion the panel members voted recommendations during two successive rounds of voting by panel members. Agreements for each statement were considered if a concordance of at least 70% was achieved following Delphi methodology. Grading of recommendations was made according to the Oxford Centre for the Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) criteria. Among five GIO guidelines and consensus initially identified, two of them (American College of Rheumatology 2017 and the Brazilian Guidelines 2021) were selected for comparison considering the latter as the most current guides in the LATAM region. Based on this methodology fifty statements were issued. All of them but four (1.20, 1.21, 1.23 and 4.2) attained agreement.

Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an update of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (2020)

The Brazilian guidelines for prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis were updated and important topics were included such as assessment of risk fracture using FRAX Brazil, use of denosumab, and also recommendations for the use of glucocorticoid pulse therapy and inhaled glucocortiocoid.

INTRODUCTION

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are used in almost all medical specialties and the incidences of vertebral/nonvertebral fractures range from 30 to 50% in individuals treated with GCs for over 3 months. Thus, osteoporosis and frailty fractures should be prevented and treated in patients initiating treatment or already being treated with GCs. The Committee for Osteoporosis and Bone Metabolic Disorders of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (BSR) established in 2012 the Brazilian Guidelines for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO). Herein, we provide a comprehensive update of the original guidelines based on improved available scientific evidence and/or expert experience.

METHODS

From March to June 2020, the Osteoporosis Committee of the BRS had meetings to update the questions presented in the first consensus (2012). Thus, twenty-six questions considered essential for the preparation of the recommendations were selected. A systematic literature review based on real-life scenarios was undertaken to answer the proposed questions. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases were searched using specific search keywords.

RESULTS

Based on the review and expert opinion, the recommendations were updated for each of the 26 questions. We included 48 new bibliographic references that became available after the date of the publication of the first version of the consensus.

CONCLUSION

We updated the Brazilian guidelines for the prevention/treatment of GIO. New topics were added in this update, such as the assessment of risk fracture using FRAX Brazil, the use of denosumab, and approaches for the treatment of children and adolescents. Furthermore, we included recommendations for the use of inhaled GCs and GC pulse therapy in clinical settings.

Osteogenesis imperfecta and pregnancy: a case report

Background

Osteogenesis imperfecta is a rare connective tissue disorder of varying phenotypic presentations. In pregnancies complicated by osteogenesis imperfecta, there is an increased risk to both the mother and fetus.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 34-year-old, wheelchair-bound, primigravid African (Zimbabwean) patient with short stature and skeletal deformities. Her care, requiring a multidisciplinary team approach, resulted in the delivery of a live baby girl with a birth weight of 2100 g, also with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Conclusion

Good outcomes are reported when a multidisciplinary team is involved in the care of patients with osteogenesis imperfecta. Pregnancies can be carried to term but require close antenatal surveillance. Prenatal diagnosis is possible with ultrasound and genetic testing. Delivery should be carefully planned by a multidisciplinary team. Decisions on delivery mode should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Clinical evidence of the effect of bisphosphonates on pregnancy and the infant

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are potent inhibitors of osteoclast mediated bone resorption. These drugs are widely used in the management of osteoporosis and other diseases, characterized by high bone turnover. The effect of BPs on gestation and lactation, when they are used as therapeutic agents in premenopausal women, is yet unknown. We conducted a detailed literature review and identified the cases of BPs use in young women, as well as, the effects of this therapy on the gestation and the embryo. The published data, regarding the use of BPs in premenopausal women and their effects on the pregnancy outcome, are limited. However, we could identify the outcomes of 40 pregnant women, who had received BPs prior to or during pregnancy, that have been documented in the literature. All women had valid indications to receive BPs for serious bone metabolism conditions. We could not identify any prospective trials, which focus on pregnancy outcomes following after the in-utero exposure to BPs. In total, no serious adverse effects were reported. Problems related to the offspring, such as hypocalcemia and a tendency for low body weight (LBW), were self-resolving. In addition, no serious adverse outcomes were reported for women having completed pregnancy. Nevertheless, follow-up was limited for both outcomes suggesting the necessity of national and international registries.

Pamidronate Administration During Pregnancy and Lactation Induces Temporal Preservation of Maternal Bone Mass in a Mouse Model of Osteogenesis Imperfecta

During pregnancy and lactation, the maternal skeleton undergoes significant bone loss through increased resorption to provide the necessary calcium supply to the developing fetus and suckling neonate. This period of skeletal vulnerability has not been clearly associated with increased maternal fracture risk, but these physiological conditions can exacerbate an underlying metabolic bone condition like osteogenesis imperfecta. Although bisphosphonates (BPs) are commonly used in postmenopausal women, there are cases where premenopausal women taking BPs become pregnant. Given BPs' long half-life, there is a need to establish how BPs affect the maternal skeleton during periods of demanding metabolic bone changes that are critical for the skeletal development of their offspring. In the present study, pamidronate- (PAM-) amplified pregnancy-induced bone mass gains and lactation-induced bone loss were prevented. This preservation of bone mass was less robust when PAM was administered at late stages of lactation compared with early pregnancy and first day of lactation. Pregnancy-induced osteocyte osteolysis was also observed and was unaffected with PAM treatment. No negative skeletal effects were observed in offspring from PAM-treated dams despite lactation-induced bone loss prevention. These findings provide important insight into (1) a treatment window for when PAM is most effective in preserving maternal bone mass, and (2) the maternal changes in bone metabolism that maintain calcium homeostasis crucial for fetal and neonatal bone development. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Pregnancy and newborn outcomes after exposure to bisphosphonates: a case-control study

We analyzed women and newborn outcome after maternal exposure to BPs. BPs have no teratogenic effect on the 36 analyzed pregnancies compared to unexposed controls matched on women underlying diseases (either systemic disease, either "bone" disease) but some outcome differed: neonatal complications rate in systemic diseases and live birth rate in bone diseases).

INTRODUCTION

The effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) during pregnancy remains unclear. We aimed to study pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to BPs during pregnancy.

METHODS

Data for cases and controls were from the French Reference Centre of Teratogenic Agents. Cases were women who received BPs in the 6 weeks before or during a pregnancy and had systemic or bone diseases. We included two respectively matched control groups: women with systemic diseases not exposed to BPs and healthy women not exposed to BPs or any teratogenic agent. Four controls were assigned to each case.

RESULTS

Thirty-six women were exposed to BPs including 5 just before pregnancy and 30 during the first trimester; 23 had systemic diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, n = 5; rheumatoid arthritis, n = 5; other, n = 13) and 13 had bone diseases. Rate of observed congenital malformations did not differ in women with a systemic or a bone disease compared to their respective controls (respectively 2/23 [8.7%] vs 2/92 [2.2%], p = 0.178 and 0/13 [0%] vs 0/52 [0%], p = 1.00). Among women with systemic diseases, non-specific neonatal complications were more frequent for cases (4/16 [25.0%] vs 4/64 [6.3%], p = 0.027). Among women with bone disorders, the live birth rate was lower for cases than healthy controls (8/10 [80%] vs 50/50 [100%], p = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

We found no major teratogenic effects of BPs, but rates of neonatal complications were increased for women with systemic diseases, as were spontaneous abortions for women with bone diseases likely linked to the severity of the underlying diseases and concomitant medications.

Consensus guidelines on the use of bisphosphonate therapy in children and adolescents

Bisphosphonate therapy is the mainstay of pharmacological intervention in young people with skeletal fragility. The evidence of its use in a variety of conditions remains limited despite over three decades of clinical experience. On behalf of the Australasian Paediatric Endocrine Group, this evidence-based consensus guideline presents recommendations and discusses the graded evidence (using the GRADE system) for these recommendations. Primary bone fragility disorders such as osteogenesis imperfecta are considered separately from osteoporosis secondary to other clinical conditions (such as cerebral palsy, Duchenne muscular dystrophy). The use of bisphosphonates in non-fragility conditions, such as fibrous dysplasia, avascular necrosis, bone cysts and hypercalcaemia, is also discussed. While these guidelines provide an evidence-based approach where possible, further research is required in all clinical applications in order to strengthen the recommendations made.

Assessment and clinical management of bone disease in adults with eating disorders: a review

AIM

To review current medical literature regarding the causes and clinical management options for low bone mineral density (BMD) in adult patients with eating disorders.

BACKGROUND

Low bone mineral density is a common complication of eating disorders with potentially lifelong debilitating consequences. Definitive, rigorous guidelines for screening, prevention and management are lacking. This article intends to provide a review of the literature to date and current options for prevention and treatment.

METHODS

Current, peer-reviewed literature was reviewed, interpreted and summarized.

CONCLUSION

Any patient with lower than average BMD should weight restore and in premenopausal females, spontaneous menses should resume. Adequate vitamin D and calcium supplementation is important. Weight-bearing exercise should be avoided unless cautiously monitored by a treatment team in the setting of weight restoration. If a patient has a Z-score less than expected for age with a high fracture risk or likelihood of ongoing BMD loss, physiologic transdermal estrogen plus oral progesterone, bisphosphonates (alendronate or risedronate) or teriparatide could be considered. Other agents, such as denosumab and testosterone in men, have not been tested in eating-disordered populations and should only be trialed on an empiric basis if there is a high clinical concern for fractures or worsening bone mineral density. A rigorous peer-based approach to establish guidelines for evaluation and management of low bone mineral density is needed in this neglected subspecialty of eating disorders.

Premenopausal Osteoporosis

Most premenopausal women with low trauma fracture(s) or low bone mineral density have a secondary cause of osteoporosis or bone loss. Where possible, treatment of the underlying cause should be the focus of management. Premenopausal women with an ongoing cause of bone loss and those who have had, or continue to have, low trauma fractures may require pharmacologic intervention. Clinical trials provide evidence of benefits of bisphosphonates and teriparatide for bone mineral density in several types of premenopausal osteoporosis, but studies are small and do not provide evidence regarding fracture risk reduction.

Osteogenesis imperfecta and clubfoot-a rare combination: Case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare congenital genetic osteodystrophy, which has a prevalence of 1:20,000. OI is caused by the mutation of the COL1A1/COL1A2 genes, leading to a deficit of quality and/or quantity in the synthesis of procollagen-α type 1. Seven different forms of diverse clinical entity have been classified by Sillence and Glorieux, although, recently, up to 11 forms characterized by different genetic mutations have been recognized. Patients with OI suffer from extreme bone fragility and osteoporosis, which often predisposes them to frequent fractures. This paper presents the case of a child with OI type IV who, at birth, was also diagnosed with a severe clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus) grade III. Patient's mother also suffers from OI type IV.

METHODS

The treatment was started by placing femoro-podalic corrective casts, according to the Ponseti method, but some unexpected problems occurred during this treatment. When the patient was 3 months of age, we decided to correct the clubfoot before the time limit planned, performing a bilateral posteromedial surgical release.

RESULTS

Three weeks after surgery the casts were removed and replaced with bilateral Spica cast-like braces. On the 6th postoperative week, the patient began wearing Bebax corrective shoes, after 1 year ambidextrous orthopedic shoes. Now, he is 2 years old and has started to walk properly without any orthesis.

CONCLUSION

In the presence of an orthopedic pathology associated with OI, it is recommended to manage the patient according to the underlying pathology, always considering the bone fragility associated with OI. The final surgical treatment to correct the clubfoot can be done earlier, if necessary. In our opinion, this uncommon association between OI and clubfoot is non-syndromic. This means that the two congenital diseases are not necessarily included in a singular uncommon genetic syndrome, but the clubfoot was caused by multifactorial causes, especially by both the mother's bisphosphonate drug therapy and the amniocentesis performed during her pregnancy to drain polyhydramnios. In our analysis, those environmental factors could have interacted with an already altered genetic substratum, contributing to develop this rare combination of congenital disorders.

Italian association of clinical endocrinologists (AME) position statement: drug therapy of osteoporosis

Treatment of osteoporosis is aimed to prevent fragility fractures and to stabilize or increase bone mineral density. Several drugs with different efficacy and safety profiles are available. The long-term therapeutic strategy should be planned, and the initial treatment should be selected according to the individual site-specific fracture risk and the need to give the maximal protection when the fracture risk is highest (i.e. in the late life). The present consensus focused on the strategies for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis taking into consideration all the drugs available for this purpose. A short revision of the literature about treatment of secondary osteoporosis due both to androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer and to aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer was also performed. Also premenopausal females and males with osteoporosis are frequently seen in endocrine settings. Finally particular attention was paid to the tailoring of treatment as well as to its duration.

The management of osteoporosis in children

This article reviews the manifestations and risk factors associated with osteoporosis in childhood, the definition of osteoporosis and recommendations for monitoring and prevention. As well, this article discusses when a child should be considered a candidate for osteoporosis therapy, which agents should be prescribed, duration of therapy and side effects. There has been significant progress in our understanding of risk factors and the natural history of osteoporosis in children over the past number of years. This knowledge has fostered the development of logical approaches to the diagnosis, monitoring, and optimal timing of osteoporosis intervention in this setting. Current management strategies are predicated upon monitoring at-risk children to identify and then treat earlier rather than later signs of osteoporosis in those with limited potential for spontaneous recovery. On the other hand, trials addressing the prevention of the first-ever fracture are still needed for children who have both a high likelihood of developing fractures and less potential for recovery. This review focuses on the evidence that shapes the current approach to diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of osteoporosis in childhood, with emphasis on the key pediatric-specific biological principles that are pivotal to the overall approach and on the main questions with which clinicians struggle on a daily basis. The scope of this article is to review the manifestations of and risk factors for primary and secondary osteoporosis in children, to discuss the definition of pediatric osteoporosis, and to summarize recommendations for monitoring and prevention of bone fragility. As well, this article reviews when a child is a candidate for osteoporosis therapy, which agents and doses should be prescribed, the duration of therapy, how the response to therapy is adjudicated, and the short- and long-term side effects. With this information, the bone health clinician will be poised to diagnose osteoporosis in children and to identify when children need osteoporosis therapy and the clinical outcomes that gauge efficacy and safety of treatment.

Neonatal transient hypophosphatemic hypercalciuric rickets in dizygous twins: A role for maternal alendronate therapy before pregnancy or antireflux medications?

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates (BP) are sometimes used in children and young women, but their use requires expertise and caution due to the relative lack of long-term efficacy and safety data.

CLINICAL CASES

We report on two dizygotic male twins with a past of mild prematurity who presented at the age of 2 months with moderate clinical craniotabes, hypophosphatemia, normal circulating calcium, severe hypercalciuria, and low parathyroid hormone levels. Following supplementation with oral phosphorus and native vitamin D, the clinical and biological abnormalities disappeared within 2 months. Since the twins were dizygotic and were identical in terms of clinical presentation and progression, the only likely explanation for these transient mineral abnormalities was prenatal or neonatal exposure to a toxic agent. Taking into account their medical past, two drugs were possibly involved: either oral alendronate that their mother had received before pregnancy for misdiagnosed osteoporosis or antireflux medications, or both.

DISCUSSION

We believe that these two cases could correspond to the first description of a potential mother-to-fetus transmission of alendronate, inducing early and transient hypophosphatemic rickets, the clinical picture being worsened by the antireflux drugs impairing intestinal phosphate absorption. For pediatric rheumatologists, this raises the question of more clearly defining the indications for BP in female children and teenagers; for rheumatologists, this also demonstrates the importance of correctly diagnosing osteoporosis and not using BP off-label, especially in women of child-bearing age.

Update on osteoporosis from the 2014 Santa Fe Bone symposium

The 2014 Santa Fe Bone Symposium provided a setting for the presentation and discussion of the clinical relevance of recent advances in the fields of osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease. The format included oral presentations of abstracts by endocrinology fellows, plenary lectures, panel discussions and breakout sessions, with ample opportunities for informal discussions before and after scheduled events. Topics addressed in these proceedings included a review of the important scientific publications in the past year, fracture prevention in patients with dysmobility and immobility, fracture liaison services for secondary fracture prevention, management of pre-menopausal osteoporosis, the role of bone microarchitecture in determining bone strength, measurement of microarchitecture in clinical practice and methods to improve the quality of bone density testing. This is a report of the proceedings of the 2014 Santa Fe Bone Symposium.

Bisphosphonate therapy in pediatric patients

Although for many decades bisphosphonates were used for adult bone loss, bisphosphonate administration in pediatric patients is new and was initiated in the past 15-year. The indications for pediatric bisphosphonates was extended to childhood malignancies with bone involvement, after additional effects were unveiled for bisphosphonates with recent research. In this article we review childhood bone loss and conditions with bone involvement in which bisphosphonate therapy have been used. We also review mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates, and present indications of bisphosphonate therapy in pediatric patients based on results of clinical trials.

Osteogenesis imperfecta: diagnosis and treatment

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic bone fragility disorder characterized by low bone mass, skeletal deformity, and variable short stature. OI is predominantly caused by dominant mutations affecting type 1 collagen synthesis, with a number of other genes implicated in OI over recent years. The clinical severity of OI can vary greatly, even within families who share a common mutation. Optimal management of OI requires a multidisciplinary approach involving pediatrician, endocrinologist (bone and mineral physician), rehabilitation specialist, orthopedic surgeon, dentist, geneticist, social worker/psychologist, physiotherapist, and occupational therapist. Bisphosphonate therapy remains the mainstay of medical treatment in OI and has been shown to decrease bone pain, enhance well-being, improve muscle strength and mobility and decrease fracture incidence. Novel therapies are beginning to emerge as more is understood about the signaling pathways involved in bone formation. The following summarizes the diagnosis, genetic heterogeneity and management of OI in pediatric practice.

Intravenous zoledronic Acid given every 6 months in childhood osteoporosis

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 12 months of zoledronic acid (ZA) administered every 6 months to children with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 27 patients (16 male, 11 female) treated with ZA (0.05 mg/kg/dose) every 6 months for 1 year. 20 were immobile, 4 steroid-induced osteoporosis, 2 idiopathic osteoporosis and 1 neurofibromatosis type 1. 16 had long bone fractures and 12 had vertebral wedging at baseline. Mineral homeostasis, bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral morphometry were evaluated at baseline and 12 months. Results were compared to published data on 3-monthly ZA treatment.

RESULTS

Median age at ZA start was 10.5 years (range 6.2-13.3). Following the first infusion, 2 developed asymptomatic hypocalcemic, 14 developed temperature > 38°C, 13 aches/pain and 6 nausea. At 12 months, there was reduction in bone turnover and improvement in BMD and vertebral shape. No patient fractured after starting ZA. Growth was normal. Outcomes were similar to 3-monthly ZA.

CONCLUSION

ZA administered 6-monthly was associated with acute phase reaction to the first dose and improvement in BMD, reduction in bone turnover and improved vertebral shape at 12 months.

Evaluation and management of the premenopausal woman with low BMD

Interpretation of bone mineral density (BMD) results in premenopausal women is particularly challenging, since the relationship between BMD and fracture risk is not the same as for postmenopausal women. In most cases, Z scores rather than T scores should be used to define "low BMD" in premenopausal women. The finding of low BMD in a premenopausal woman should prompt thorough evaluation for secondary causes of bone loss. If a secondary cause is found, management should focus on treatment of this condition. In a few cases where the secondary cause cannot be eliminated, treatment with a bone active agent to prevent bone loss should be considered. In women with no fractures and no known secondary cause, low BMD is associated with microarchitectural defects similar to young women with fractures; however, no longitudinal data are available to allow use of BMD to predict fracture risk. BMD is likely to be stable in these women with isolated low BMD, and pharmacologic therapy is rarely necessary. Assessment of markers of bone turnover and follow-up bone density measurements can help to identify those with an ongoing process of bone loss that may indicate a higher risk for fracture, and possible need for pharmacologic intervention.

A case of teriparatide on pregnancy-induced osteoporosis

Pregnancy-induced osteoporosis is a rare disorder characterized by fragility fracture and low bone mineral density (BMD) during or shortly after pregnancy, and its etiology is still unclear. We experienced a case of a 39-year-old woman who suffered from lumbago 3 months after delivery. Biochemical evidence of increased bone resorption is observed without secondary causes of osteoporosis. Radiologic examination showed multiple compression fractures on her lumbar vertebrae. We report a case of patient with pregnancy-induced osteoporosis improved her clinical symptom, BMD and bone turnover marker after teriparatide therapy.

Effectiveness of pamidronate as treatment of symptomatic osteonecrosis occurring in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis (ON) is a severe complication of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatments. Recent studies suggest that bisphosphonates might reduce pain and loss of motor function in patients with ON. We assessed the effects of pamidronate compared to standard care in patients with symptomatic ON (sON) and studied whether steroids might be continued after diagnosis of ON in some patients.

METHODS

We evaluated 17 patients with sON as complication of primary ALL treatment between 2000 and 2008. Fourteen patients were treated with pamidronate. Mobility and pain control were monitored in all patients. Affected joints were classified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at ON diagnosis and after 6-72 months.

RESULTS

Out of 220 patients with ALL, 17 (7.7%) patients developed sON. The median age at ALL diagnosis was 11 years (range: 2.7-16.6 years) and sON occurred a median of 13.4 months (range: 2.5-34 months) after ALL diagnosis. Affected joints were hip, knee and ankle. MRI scans showed 7 severe, 4 moderate, and 6 mild ON lesions. Fourteen patients showed improvement in pain (77% of patients) and motor function (59% of patients), even though corticoids were reintroduced in 4 patients. MRI demonstrated improvement, stability or worsening in 6, 3, and 5 cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pamidronate seems to be effective in the management of pain and motor function recovery in sON. Further studies are needed to provide evidence as to whether bisphosphonates can be recommended for the treatment or the prevention of ON in childhood ALL patients.

Osteoporosis in young adults: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Postmenopausal osteoporosis is mainly caused by increased bone remodeling resulting from estrogen deficiency. Indications for treatment are based on low areal bone mineral density (aBMD, T-score  ≤ -2.5), typical fragility fractures (spine or hip), and more recently, an elevated 10-year fracture probability (by FRAX®). In contrast, there is no clear definition of osteoporosis nor intervention thresholds in younger individuals. Low aBMD in a young adult may reflect a physiologically low peak bone mass, such as in lean but otherwise healthy persons, whereas fractures commonly occur with high-impact trauma, i.e., without bone fragility. Furthermore, low aBMD associated with vitamin D deficiency may be highly prevalent in some regions of the world. Nevertheless, true osteoporosis in the young can occur, which we define as a T-score below -2.5 at spine or hip in association with a chronic disease known to affect bone metabolism. In the absence of secondary causes, the presence of fragility fractures, such as in vertebrae, may point towards genetic or idiopathic osteoporosis. In turn, treatment of the underlying condition may improve bone mass as well. In rare cases, a bone-specific treatment may be indicated, although evidence is scarce for a true benefit on fracture risk. The International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) convened a working group to review pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in the young, excluding children and adolescents, and provide a screening strategy including laboratory exams for a systematic approach of this condition.

Zoledronic acid improves bone mineral density, reduces bone turnover and improves skeletal architecture over 2 years of treatment in children with secondary osteoporosis

There are limited data on the use of bisphosphonate therapy for secondary osteoporoses in childhood, and no previous reports of the use of zoledronic acid in this group. We report 20 children with a variety of underlying primary diagnoses with associated secondary osteoporosis, who were treated with 3 monthly zoledronic acid for 2 years (annualised dose 0.1mg/kg/year). There was a significant improvement in lumbar spine (by 1.88 SD±1.24 over first 12 months, p<0.001) and total bone mineral density as assessed by dual energy absorptiometry (DXA) scans, with a similar increase in bone mineral content for lean tissue mass (mean increase 1.34 SD in first 12 months, p<0.001). Bone turnover was reduced with a suppression of both osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase in the first 12 months of treatment. Skeletal architecture was improved, with increased second metacarpal cortical thickness from 2.44mm to 2.72mm (p<0.001) and improved vertebral morphometry, with 7 patients who had vertebral wedging at baseline showing improved anterior (p=0.017) and middle (p=0.001) vertebral height ratios. Aside from well reported transient side effects with the first dose, there were no adverse effects reported. No adverse effects on anthropometric parameters were seen over the course of the study. Despite all patients having sustained fragility fractures prior to treatment, no fractures were reported during the study period. Further evidence is required to confirm efficacy, with long term follow up required to assess the impact of treatment on fracture risk.

Safety of zoledronic acid and incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) during adjuvant therapy in a randomised phase III trial (AZURE: BIG 01-04) for women with stage II/III breast cancer

The AZURE trial is an ongoing phase III, academic, multi-centre, randomised trial designed to evaluate the role of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in the adjuvant therapy of women with stage II/III breast cancer. Here, we report the safety and tolerability profile of ZOL in this setting. Eligible patients received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy and were randomised to receive neither additional treatment nor intravenous ZOL 4 mg. ZOL was administered after each chemotherapy cycle to exploit potential sequence-dependent synergy. ZOL was continued for 60 months post-randomisation (six doses in the first 6 months, eight doses in the following 24 months and five doses in the final 30 months). Serious (SAE) and non-serious adverse event (AE) data generated during the first 36 months on study were analysed for the safety population. 3,360 patients were recruited to the AZURE trial. The safety population comprised 3,340 patients (ZOL 1,665; control 1,675). The addition of ZOL to standard treatment did not significantly impact on chemotherapy delivery. SAE were similar in both treatment arms. No significant safety differences were seen apart from the occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in the ZOL group (11 confirmed cases; 0.7%; 95% confidence interval 0.3-1.1%). ZOL in the adjuvant setting is well tolerated, and can be safely administered in addition to adjuvant therapy including chemotherapy. The adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of ZOL, with a low incidence of ONJ.

A single dose of intravenous zoledronate prevents glucocorticoid therapy-associated bone loss in acute flare of Crohn's disease, a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of zoledronate (ZOL) in preventing glucocorticoid therapy-associated bone loss in patients with acute flare of Crohn's disease (CD) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

Forty CD patients starting a glucocorticoid therapy (60 mg prednisolone per day) for acute flare (CD activity index (CDAI) >220) were randomized to compare the effect of ZOL (4 mg intravenous, n=20) or placebo (n=20) on change in lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). All patients received calcium citrate (800 mg) and colecalciferol (1,000 IU) daily. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) was performed at baseline and day 90. Follow-up examinations at day 1/7/14/30 and 90 included laboratory tests and adverse event/serious adverse events reports.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were available for per-protocol analysis. With placebo (n=18), a decrease in BMD was seen (T-score: -0.98 ± 0.8, day 0 and -1.25 ± 0.77, day 90, P=0.06), with ZOL (n=18) BMD increased (-1.15 ± 1.02, day 0 and -0.74 ± 1.09, day 90, P=0.03). The change in BMD under placebo (-0.26 ± 0.21) vs. ZOL (+0.41 ± 0.19) was highly significant (P=0.006). In all, 14 out of 18 patients with ZOL had an increase in BMD (+0.64 ± 0.48), 12 of 18 with placebo a decrease (-0.50 ± 0.39). Changes of clinical findings and laboratory results of inflammation (leukocytes, platelets, and C-reactive protein) were the same in- and between-groups throughout the study. With ZOL, serum bone degradation marker β-Cross-Laps decreased. Study medication was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

ZOL is effective in preventing glucocorticoid therapy-induced bone loss in patients with acute flare of CD and should be considered whenever a glucocorticoid therapy is started in CD patients.

Intravenous bisphosphonate treatment and pregnancy: its effects on mother and infant bone health

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 Gaucher's disease (GD1) is a lysosomal storage disorder associated with disabling bone involvement. The choice treatment for Gaucher's disease is enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). The use of bisphosphonate treatment for osteopenia and osteoporosis has been suggested.

CASE

A 22-year-old woman diagnosed with GD1 had received ERT intermittently, depending on availability of the enzyme since the enzyme was not always available. Due to severe bone involvement and multiple vertebral fractures, intravenous administration of 60 mg of pamidronate every 3 months and safe contraception were indicated. Fifteen days after receiving the fourth infusion, the patient informed us she was pregnant. A baby girl was born by cesarean delivery at week 37, showing no evidence of skeletal abnormality or clinical signs of hypocalcemia. The baby developed normally, presenting no significant pathology. At present (age 15 months), height, body weight, and bone mineral density by DXA are within normal range. The mother showed stable total skeleton and right femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) values, no new fractures, and only ~3% decrease in lumbar spine BMD 15 months post-delivery and after a 1 year breastfeeding period (expected average ~7-8%).

CONCLUSION

It could be posited that pamidronate exerted a positive protective effect on the mother's skeleton with no evidence of adverse effects on pregnancy or on the baby's health to date.

Treatment with teriparatide in a patient with pregnancy-associated osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

The decrease of BMD during a physiological pregnancy can in rare cases be intensified and lead to dramatic microarchitectural changes, which causes an increase incidence of fractures, preferably at the spine. This dramatic clinical picture is called pregnancy-associated osteoporosis.

CASE HISTORY

We present the case of a 40-year-old woman (gravida IV, para II) with acute back pain right after delivery due to four fractures of the spine. The diagnosis was confirmed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement result (T-score -4.1 SD (0.598 g/cm(2)) at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), T-score -1.5 SD (0.759 g/cm(2)) at the total hip). Due to the severity of symptoms, a therapy with teriparatide (20 mg daily) was started for a period of 18 months.

RESULTS

After end of therapy, the T-score had significantly increased at the lumbar spine as well as at the hip (T-score of -2.1 (0.813 g/cm(2)) and -0.6 (0.864 g/cm(2)), respectively. The relative increase of BMD at the spine and total hip was 36% and 13.8%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

Our report demonstrates the successful use of teriparatide underlined by the increase of bone mineral density and the improvement of clinical symptoms in a case of severe pregnancy-associated osteoporosis for the first time.

Osteoporosis in anorexia nervosa

Anorexia nervosa is a condition associated with reduced bone mass and increased bone fragility, for which there is no known effective treatment. Anorexia nervosa usually has its onset during adolescence, the critical time when peak bone mass is accrued. Low bone mass is caused by reduced bone formation, as well as accelerated bone resorption. The etiology is multifactorial and includes poor nutrition, low bodyweight, sex hormone deficiency and hypercortisolism. Weight gain and resumption of menses is accompanied by some improvement in bone mass, but may not restore it to normal levels. Oral estrogen-replacement therapy is not effective in increasing bone mass in this disorder. The bisphosphonates, used in conjunction with nutritional rehabilitation and weight gain, have shown promise, but concerns about safety have limited their use. The aim of this article is to highlight recent recommendations regarding the assessment of fracture risk in children and adolescents, summarize the evidence for low bone mass and increased fracture risk in anorexia nervosa, and discuss approaches to the management of low bone mass in this disorder.

The successful use of pamidronate in an 11-year-old girl with complex regional pain syndrome: response to treatment demonstrated by serial peripheral quantitative computerised tomographic scans

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disorder that can cause significant functional morbidity. While it usually presents in adulthood, it has also been reported in children. Multiple treatment modalities have been reported with mixed success. Bisphosphonate therapy has been shown to be effective in adult patients, but there are limited data in children. We report the successful use of intravenous pamidronate therapy in diminishing pain, improving function, and restoring bone mass in an 11-year-old girl with CRPS of her left lower limb following a tibial fracture. Previous treatment with intense physiotherapy and regional sympathetic blockade had not improved her symptoms. Pain improved within weeks of the first pamidronate infusion, with subsequent improvement in function. The benefit in pain reduction and function was sustained during the 2-year treatment regime. Improvement in bone mass and density was demonstrated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computerised tomography (pQCT). pQCT scans showed marked improvement in bone size and geometry and muscle bulk on the affected side. No adverse affects were reported. We conclude that intravenous pamidronate was associated with reduced pain, a return of function, and recovery of bone and muscle parameters in a child with CRPS. Before definitive conclusions can be drawn, a randomised controlled trial similar to those undertaken in adults previously is required to fully validate this approach.

Bisphosphonates in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases: Can they be used in women of childbearing age?

Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) are prevalent in women during their childbearing age. For their treatment, high doses of corticosteroid (CS) for long-term periods are often required, increasing the risk of bone loss. According to recent guidelines, bisphosphonates (BP) should be used as first line treatment to prevent CS induced osteoporosis. However, due to their long-term release from bone and their ability to cross the placenta, it has been suggested to avoid BP in women during their fertile years. BP seem to decrease foetus bone length in pregnant animals, but not in humans, at least, when they are administered at therapeutic dosage. BP are embryo toxic in animals when used at high dosage. In a systematic literature review, we found 58 women treated with BP close before or during pregnancy, showing no related congenital malformations. However, the Unit of Clinical and Epidemiological Genetics in University of Padova collected ten cases of women treated with BP during pregnancy, reporting 20% of congenital malformations. Thus, we suggest to avoid BP during pregnancy and caution with their use in fertile women. When they have to be given before pregnancy, specific affinities of the BP have to be considered to plan the washout period beforehand.

Osteoporosis in children: pediatric and pediatric rheumatology perspective: a review

It is increasingly recognized that osteoporosis affects children as well as adults both as a primary problem and as secondary to various diseases, medications, and lifestyle issues. In this review, we emphasize the correct diagnosis of osteoporosis in children as opposed to adults, etiology, and pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical treatments. We especially focus on rheumatologic conditions associated with osteoporosis and management issues.

Does treatment with bisphosphonates endanger the human pregnancy?

Bisphosphonates are clinically used in the treatment of various bone diseases including corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, hypercalcemia associated with malignancy, and osteogenesis imperfecta. They are therefore often used in women of childbearing age, but little is known about their possible effects on the human embryo and fetus. Animal studies have revealed unfavourable effects of bisphosphonate treatment on the fetus, mainly in the skeleton. Since bisphosphonates are retained for a long time in the human skeleton, concerns have been raised that even pre-pregnancy administration of bisphosphonates may result in embryofetal exposure and alter fetal bone modelling. To obtain current information on the risks and safety of bisphosphonate use in pregnancy, we performed a systematic search of the Medline and Embase databases, from 1950 and 1974, respectively, to September 2008. Fifty-one cases of exposure to bisphosphonates before or during pregnancy were identified; none of them described any skeletal abnormalities or other congenital malformations in the infants. The bisphosphonates used were alendronate (32 cases), pamidronate (11), etidronate (5), risedronate (2), and zoledronic acid (1). Although in theory bisphosphonates may affect bone modelling and development in the fetus, the 51 cases reported to date did not detect such pathology.

Clinical review 1: Bisphosphonate use in childhood osteoporosis

CONTEXT

As awareness of osteoporosis in childhood has increased, so have pressures to consider use of the pharmacological agents used to treat osteoporosis in adults. This review examines available research on the efficacy and safety of bisphosphonate therapy for pediatric osteoporosis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We reviewed the medical literature for key articles and consensus statements on the use of bisphosphonates in children through June 2008.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We compared reports using varying bisphosphonate agents, doses, and duration of therapy to treat osteogenesis imperfecta and a variety of secondary causes of osteoporosis in children. Conclusions drawn from a recently published Cochrane analysis and the consensus statements from experts in the field were considered as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of bisphosphonate therapy in pediatric patients remains controversial because of inadequate long-term efficacy and safety data. For this reason, many experts recommend limiting use of these agents to those children with recurrent extremity fractures, symptomatic vertebral collapse, and reduced bone mass. Current data are inadequate to support the use of bisphosphonates in children to treat reductions in bone mass/density alone. More research is needed to define appropriate indications for bisphosphonate therapy and the optimal agent, dose, and duration of use in pediatric patients.

Effects of bisphosphonates in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: an AACPDM systematic review

This systematic review of the effects of bisphosphonate treatment in children with osteogenesis imperfecta was conducted using the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine methodology for developing systematic reviews of treatment interventions (Revision 1.1) 2004. Despite a large body of published literature, there have been only eight studies with a sufficiently high level of internal validity to be truly informative. These studies confirm improvement in bone density. Many, but not all studies, demonstrate reduction in fracture rate and enhanced growth. There has been extremely limited evaluation of broader treatment impacts such as deformity, need for orthopedic surgery, pain, functioning, or quality of life. Short-term side effects were minimal. Which medication and dosing regimen is optimal and how long patients should be treated are unclear. This body of evidence would be strengthened by a larger controlled trial, because many studies lacked adequate power to evaluate stated outcomes. These studies do not address the impacts of bisphosphonates in children with milder forms of osteogenesis imperfecta and severe forms that are not due to mutations in the type I pro-collagen gene (e.g. types VII and VIII). Additional research is needed into treatment of infants. More studies evaluating medication choices, optimal dosing, duration of treatment, post-treatment impacts, and long-term side effects are necessary.

Clinical characteristics and medication use among premenopausal women with osteoporosis and low BMD: the experience of an osteoporosis referral center

AIMS

Osteoporosis is uncommon in premenopausal women, and most cases have a secondary cause. Women with osteoporosis and no known secondary cause are said to have idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP). We aimed to estimate the proportion of premenopausal women seen in our referral center with IOP as opposed to secondary osteoporosis, to describe their clinical characteristics, to compare women with a low-trauma fracture history with those with low bone mineral density (BMD) alone, and to estimate the frequency of bisphosphonate use.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records from all premenopausal women evaluated for osteoporosis or low BMD in our center during 2005. We included premenopausal women diagnosed on the basis of low-trauma fracture, low BMD or both (Z score < or= -2.0 or T score < or = -2.5), or both.

RESULTS

Among these patients (n = 61; mean age 37 +/- 8), 57 (93%) were Caucasian, 34 (57%) had a family history of osteoporosis, and 26 (43%) had used bisphosphonates. The most common secondary causes were amenorrhea (34%, n = 21), anorexia nervosa (16%, n = 10), and glucocorticoid exposure (13%, n = 8). After exclusion of secondary causes, 39% (24 of 61) of the entire group and 48% (14 of 29) of the fracture group were thought to have IOP. Women with a known secondary cause had lower BMD Z scores at the spine and hip than those with IOP. Women with low BMD and no fractures had shorter stature and weighed less than those with fractures, but overall differences between the groups were not statistically significant. Bisphosphonates had been prescribed for 38% (11 of 29) of women with a fracture history and 47% (15 of 32) of women with low BMD and no fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that IOP is common among premenopausal women with osteoporosis or low BMD evaluated at a referral center. The smaller stature of women diagnosed only on the basis of BMD criteria raises the question of whether their areal BMD measurements are spuriously low because of smaller bone size. The high proportion of premenopausal women who had been prescribed oral bisphosphonates for low BMD measurements is of concern, as such women are likely to be at low short-term risk of fracture, and a more conservative approach to therapy is preferable in this group.