Adolescents Obtaining Abortion Without Parental Consent: Their Reasons and Experiences of Social Support

Factors influencing unintended pregnancy and abortion among unmarried young people in Nigeria: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Unintended pregnancies and abortions among unmarried adolescents in Nigeria are outcomes of the interplay of multifaceted factors. Abortion, a global public health and social issue, impacts both developed and developing countries. This scoping review explored the literature and mapped the risk factors for unintended pregnancies and abortions among unmarried female adolescents in Nigeria.

METHODS

A scoping literature search was conducted across databases, including PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, JSTOR, African Index Medicus, and Scopus. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed articles and reports in English, focusing on unmarried female adolescents. The range of interest included the past incidents of having sex, unintended pregnancies, contraceptive use, and abortions among this demographic. Studies categorized as grey literature were excluded to ensure the reliability and validity of the synthesized information.

RESULTS

A total of 560 articles, 553 identified through databases and 7 through hand search, were subjected to a comprehensive full-text review, resulting in the inclusion of 22 studies that met the criteria for the final review. The scoping review shed light on the past incidents of having sex, unintended pregnancies, contraceptive use, and abortions among unmarried adolescents in Nigeria. The range of incidence for having sex varied from 57.2% to 82.7%, with the prevalence of unintended pregnancies ranging from 23.4% to 92.7%. Contraceptive use was notably low, with 21.5% reporting low usage, contributing to the high incidence of abortions, ranging from 20.2% to 51.0%. Factors influencing unintended pregnancies included a lack of awareness of modern contraceptives and limited access to sexual and reproductive health information. For induced abortions, factors such as the impact on educational career, childbearing outside wedlock and fear of expulsion from school were identified.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review, through a systematic examination of existing literature, contributes to a more robust understanding of the factors influencing unintended pregnancies and abortions among unmarried adolescents in Nigeria. The findings inform future research directions and guide the development of targeted interventions to improve reproductive health outcomes for this vulnerable population.

States' Abortion Laws Associated With Intimate Partner Violence-Related Homicide Of Women And Girls In The US, 2014-20

Women who are pregnant or recently gave birth are significantly more likely to be killed by an intimate partner than nonpregnant, nonpostpartum women of reproductive age, implicating the risk of fatal violence conferred by pregnancy itself. The rapidly increasing passage of state legislation has restricted or banned access to abortion care across the US. We used the most recent and only source of population-based data to examine the association between state laws that restrict access to abortion and trends in intimate partner violence-related homicide among women and girls ages 10-44 during the period 2014-20. Using robust difference-in-differences ecologic modeling, we found that enforcement of each additional Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) law was associated with a 3.4 percent increase in the rate of intimate partner violence-related homicide in this population. We estimated that 24.3 intimate partner violence-related homicides of women and girls ages 10-44 were associated with TRAP laws implemented in the states and years included in this analysis. Assessment of policies that restrict access to abortion should consider their potential harm to reproductive-age women through the risk for violent death.

Medication abortion for adolescents in the United States: Strengthening the role of pediatric primary care providers

BACKGROUND

Recent legal changes have led to mounting abortion restrictions in the United States (US), disproportionately impacting adolescents, who already face multifaceted barriers to abortion care. Informed by the framework of reproductive justice, adolescents who become pregnant deserve comprehensive, unbiased, and non-judgmental pregnancy options counseling, inclusive of all choices for pregnancy continuation and termination. Pediatric primary care providers are at the front lines of caring for adolescent patients' reproductive health needs and frequently diagnose pregnancy, provide pregnancy options counseling, and assist patients in accessing abortion care. They are uniquely poised to provide this care given their trusted, ongoing relationships with adolescent patients and their families, and their values of deep respect for adolescents' individuality and autonomy.

METHODS

In this commentary, we aim to describe the medical and legal landscape of adolescent abortion access in the US and provide recommendations to support pediatric primary care providers' involvement in abortion care. We focus on medication abortion, as the provision of medication abortion has the potential to encompass a broad group of clinicians, including pediatric primary care providers.

RESULTS

We discuss the importance of providing options counseling to adolescents within the reproductive justice framework, improving abortion education for pediatric providers, and expanding access to abortion care by supporting providers at an institutional level if they opt to provide medication abortions.

CONCLUSION

In light of the current legal landscape, the role of pediatric primary care providers in ensuring adolescent access to abortion care is ever more critical. Although many pediatric and adolescent providers already provide this important care, we, a team of obstetricians/gynecologists and adolescent medicine physicians, echo prior calls for improved training and institutional support for pediatric providers to counsel about and provide abortion-related care. We hope that highlighting the role of pediatric providers in this sphere will help center the needs of adolescent patients and help them fulfill their family planning goals.

Characteristics and Circumstances of Adolescents Obtaining Abortions in the United States

The purpose of this study is to describe the sociodemographic and situational circumstances of adolescents obtaining abortion in the United States prior to the Dobbs decision. We use data from the Guttmacher Institute's 2021-2022 Abortion Patient Survey, a cross-sectional survey of 6698 respondents; our analytic sample includes 633 adolescents (<20 years), 2152 young adults (20-24 years), and 3913 adults (25+ years). We conducted bivariate analyses to describe the characteristics and logistical and financial circumstances of adolescents obtaining abortions in comparison to respondents in the other age groups. The majority of adolescents identified as non-white (70%), and 23% identified as something other than heterosexual. We found that 26% of adolescents reported having no health insurance, and two-thirds of adolescent respondents reported that somebody had driven them to the facility. Adolescents differed from adults in their reasons for delays in accessing care; a majority of adolescents (57%) reported not knowing they were pregnant compared to 43% of adults, and nearly one in five adolescents did not know where to obtain the abortion compared to 11% of adults. Adolescents were more likely than adults to obtain a second-trimester abortion, which has increased costs. This study found that this population was more vulnerable than adults on several measures. Findings suggest that adolescents navigate unique barriers with regard to information and logistics to access abortion care.

The impact of third-party authorization requirements on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence

OBJECTIVES

This review synthesizes legal and health evidence to demonstrate the health and human rights impacts of third-party authorization requirements (TPAs) on abortion seekers.

RESULTS

The synthesized evidence substantiates the pre-existing position in international human rights law that requirements that abortion be authorized by third parties like parents, spouses, committees, and courts create barriers to abortion, should not be introduced at all, or should be repealed where they exist.

CONCLUSIONS

The review establishes that rights-based regulation of abortion should not impose TPAs in any circumstances. Instead, the provision and management of abortion should be treated in a manner cognizant with the general principles of informed consent in international human rights law, presuming capacity in all adults regardless of marital status and treatment sought, and recognizing the evolving capacity of young people in line with their internationally-protected rights.

"Time and money and support": Adolescents and young adults' perceived social and logistical support needs for safe abortion care

OBJECTIVE

To understand what support adolescents and young adults need to access abortion amidst the changing legal landscape.

STUDY DESIGN

A diverse nationwide sample (N = 638, response rate 78%) of individuals aged 14-24 responded to a text message survey in July 2022 about the social and logistical support they would need for safe abortion access. Responses were coded and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Respondents described parents and friends as primary sources of social support for potential abortion decisions. They frequently cited money and transportation as logistical support needs for out-of-state abortion care.

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents and young adults report needing social support and specific resources to ensure access to abortion.

IMPLICATIONS

This study highlights the perspectives and experiences of a diverse, nationwide sample of adolescents and young adults on their perceived abortion-related social and logistical support needs. These findings can support centering adolescents and young adults in practice and policy change to minimize barriers, improve social support, tailor resources and information about abortion, and streamline access to essential reproductive health services in a post-Dobbs landscape.

Preferences and Experiences Regarding Pregnancy Options Counseling in Adolescence and Young Adulthood: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

Perspectives of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) experiencing pregnancy options counseling (POC) are absent from the literature. This study explores AYA experiences and preferences related to POC to inform best practice guidelines.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured phone interviews in 2020-2021 among US-based individuals, 18-35 years old, who experienced a pregnancy less than 20 years of age. We performed qualitative descriptive analysis of positive and negative attributes of AYA's experiences with POC.

RESULTS

Fifty participants reported 59 pregnancies (16 parenting, 19 abortions, 18 adoptions, three miscarriages) between the ages of 13 and 19 years. Positive attributes of POC experienced included: (1) provider communication that was compassionate, respectful, supportive, and attentive to nonverbal cues; (2) provider neutrality; (3) discussion of all pregnancy options; (4) asking about feelings, choice, life plans, and additional supports; (5) provision of informational materials; and (6) warm handoffs/follow-up facilitation. Negative attributes of POC experienced included: (1) judgmental, impersonal, or absent communication; (2) lack of counseling on all options and/or coercive/directive counseling; (3) insufficient time and supportive resources; and (4) confidentiality concerns. We identified no differences in these perspectives across pregnancy outcomes reported. Participants generally desired counseling about all options, with rare exceptions of ambivalence.

DISCUSSION

Individuals who experienced an adolescent pregnancy described similar positive and negative attributes of POC regardless of preferred pregnancy outcome. Their perspectives highlight how crucial interpersonal communication skills are for effective POC for AYA. POC training across health care specialties should emphasize confidential, compassionate, and nonjudgmental care for AYA patients.

Patterns and Predictors of Abortion Care-Seeking Practices in India: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey (2019-2021)

Background India continues to have unsafe abortions despite progressive legislation since the past five decades facilitating ease of access to abortion services. This study describes abortion care-seeking patterns (social/therapeutic/humanitarian/sex-selective/safe/unsafe), preferences (public/private/at home), and their determinants among Indian women. Methods Data were taken from the Indian National Family and Health Survey (NFHS-5) (2019-2021) including women aged 15-49 years, who had terminated their last pregnancy by induced abortion within five years prior to the survey (N = 5,856). A bivariate analysis, followed by a multinomial logistic regression model, was performed to assess the predictors affecting the choice of healthcare facility type for an abortion. Predictors of unsafe and self-managed abortions were examined using binary logistic regression. Results About 665,671 women in the reproductive age group responded to the survey, of which 3.42% (n=22,767) reported their most recent pregnancy within the last five years terminated in either a miscarriage, stillbirth or abortion, of which 5,856 (25.72%) underwent an induced abortion. Women undergoing surgical abortion were more likely to avail of either a public (adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR)=38.06 (23.62, 61.35)) or a private facility (aRRR=44.53 (28.11,70.53)) compared to at-home abortions. Women reporting a social and humanitarian reason for abortion were less likely to undergo an abortion at a public (aRRR=0.25 (0.17,0.35)) or private facility (aRRR=0.32 (0.23,0.44)) than at home. Furthermore, a total of 147 (2.43%) abortions were classified as unsafe. Women reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion were observed to have a higher likelihood of engaging in an unsafe abortion (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)= 1.61 (0.70, 3.70)) compared to those citing a therapeutic reason. Conclusions Self-managed abortions at home were more prevalent in women of lower socioeconomic status, adolescent girls, and those reporting sex-selective reasons for abortion. Furthermore, the reproductive-health program in India should enhance capacity-building initiatives for primary-care healthcare providers, including doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, to effectively prescribe and supervise abortion through medication methods.

Use of Judicial Bypass of Mandatory Parental Consent to Access Abortion and Judicial Bypass Denials, Florida and Texas, 2018-2021

Objectives. To describe minors' use of judicial bypass to access abortion and the percentage of bypass petitions denied in Florida and Texas. Methods. Data were derived from official state statistics on judicial bypasses and abortions by age in Texas and Florida; abortions in Texas among minor nonresidents were estimated. In addition, judicial bypass petitions as a percentage of abortions received by minors and judicial bypass denials as a percentage of petitions were calculated. Results. Between 2018 and 2021, minors received 5527 abortions in Florida and an estimated 5220 abortions in Texas. Use of judicial bypass was stable at 14% to 15% in Florida and declined from 14% to 10% in Texas. Among petitions for judicial bypass, denials increased in Florida from 6% to a maximum of 13% and remained stable in Texas at 5% to 7%. Conclusions. Minors' use of judicial bypass in Texas and Florida is substantial. The percentage of denials is higher and increasing in Florida. Public Health Implications. Minors who need confidential abortion care may now be forced to seek judicial bypass far from home. Parental involvement laws in states that do not ban abortion will compound barriers to abortion care. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(3):316-319. https://doi.org/10.2105/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307173).

Unwanted abortion disclosure and social support in the abortion decision and mental health symptoms: A cross-sectional survey

OBJECTIVES

To assess the extent of unwanted abortion disclosure and levels of social support in the abortion decision and their association with depression, anxiety, and stress.

STUDY DESIGN

From January to June 2019, we surveyed people presenting for abortion at four clinics in California, New Mexico, and Illinois regarding their experiences accessing abortion. We used multivariable regression to examine associations between unwanted abortion disclosure and social support in the abortion decision, and symptoms of depression, anxiety and stress.

RESULTS

Among 1092 people approached, 784 (72% response rate) eligible individuals initiated the survey, and 746 responded to the unwanted abortion disclosure item and were included in analyses. Over one-quarter (27%) told someone they would have preferred not to tell about their decision, mostly due to obstacles getting to the appointment-time to appointment (46%), travel distance (33%), and costs (32%). Three-quarters (74%, n=546) had at least one person in their life who supported the abortion decision "very much"; 20% had someone who supported the decision "not at all." In adjusted analyses, unwanted abortion disclosure was associated with more symptoms of depression (B = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.28, 0.95), anxiety (B = 1.79; 95% CI: 0.76, 2.82) and stress (B = 1.80, 95% CI: 0.64, 1.72). People also had more symptoms of depression and stress when one or more person (B = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.27, 1.02 and B = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.15, 1.35, respectively) or the man involved in the pregnancy (B = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.18 and B = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.13, 1.78, respectively) supported their decision "not at all" (vs "very much" support).

CONCLUSION

Being forced to disclose the abortion decision due to logistical and cost constraints may be harmful to people's mental health.

IMPLICATIONS

Logistical burdens such as travel, time to access care, and costs needed to access abortion may force people seeking abortion to involve others who are unsupportive in the abortion decision having negative implications for their mental health.

The Adolescent's Right to Confidential Care When Considering Abortion

The American Academy of Pediatrics reaffirms its position that the rights of adolescents under 18 years of age to confidential care when considering legal medical and surgical abortion therapies should be protected. Most adolescents voluntarily involve parents and other trusted adults in decisions regarding pregnancy termination and should be encouraged to do so when safe and appropriate. The legal climate surrounding abortion law is rapidly becoming more restrictive and threatens to adversely impact adolescents. Mandatory parental involvement, the judicial bypass procedure, and general restrictive abortion policies pose risks to adolescents' health by causing delays in accessing medical care, increasing volatility within a family, and limiting their pregnancy options. These harms underscore the importance of adolescents' access to confidential abortion care. This statement presents a summary of pertinent current information related to the impact of legislation requiring mandatory parental involvement in an adolescent's decision to obtain abortion services.

Parental Involvement Policies for Minors Seeking Abortion in the Southeast and Quality of Care

Introduction

Thirty-seven states require minors seeking abortion to involve a parent, either through notification or consent. Little research has examined how implementation of these laws affect service delivery and quality of care for those who involve a parent.

Methods

Between May 2018 and September 2019, in-depth interviews were conducted with 34 staff members involved in scheduling, counseling, and administration at abortion facilities in three Southeastern states. Interviews explored procedures for documenting parental involvement, minors' and parents' reactions to requirements, and challenges with implementation and compliance. Both inductive and deductive codes, informed by the Institute of Medicine's healthcare quality framework, were used in the thematic analysis.

Results

Parental involvement laws adversely affected four quality care domains: efficiency, patient-centeredness, timeliness, and equity. Administrative inefficiencies stemmed from the extensive documentation needed to prove an adult's relationship to a minor, increasing the time and effort needed to comply with state reporting requirements. If parents were not supportive of their minor's decision, participants felt they had a duty to intervene to ensure the minor's decision and needs remained centered. Staff further noted that delays to timely care accumulated as minors navigated parental involvement and other state mandates, pushing some beyond gestational age limits. Lower income families and those with complex familial arrangements had greater difficulty meeting state requirements.

Conclusions

Parental involvement mandates undermine health service delivery and quality for minors seeking abortion services in the Southeast.

Policy Implications

Removing parental involvement requirements would protect minors' reproductive autonomy and support the provision of equitable, patient-centered healthcare.

Reasons for and Logistical Burdens of Judicial Bypass for Abortion in Illinois

PURPOSE

Minors seeking abortion in states with parental involvement requirements can obtain judicial bypass (JB) as an alternative. Research on minors' reasons for choosing bypass and the logistical obstacles associated with bypass is limited, yet needed to assess potential burdens introduced by mandated parental involvement.

METHODS

Using data from all minors represented in JB proceedings by the Illinois Judicial Bypass Coordination Project in 2017 and 2018, we present descriptive statistics summarizing minors' demographic characteristics, reasons for seeking bypass, individuals involved in decision-making, and distances traveled and time elapsed to attend the court hearing.

RESULTS

Most minors obtaining bypass (n = 150) agreed to participate (n = 128). Just more than half (55%) were aged 17 years and lived with one parent (54%). A minority were already parenting (5%) and/or lived with someone besides a parent or on their own (16%). The reasons for bypass included concern about being forced to continue the pregnancy (50%), fear of being kicked out of their home and/or cut off financially (41%), having no/minimal relationship with parents (15%), and fear of physical/emotional abuse (13%). Minors traveled an average of 24 miles one-way (range 1-270 miles) to a courthouse for their hearing. On average, 6.4 days elapsed between contacting the Judicial Bypass Coordination Project and the hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

Judicial bypass can offer young people an opportunity to retain autonomy in decision-making, potentially avoiding abuse and other negative outcomes. However, even in a state with a well-organized network of attorneys, JB contributes 1 week to minors' abortion-seeking timeline and necessitates traveling long distances.

Judicial bypass attorneys' experiences with abortion stigma in Texas courts

Texas requires pregnant young people under 18 (i.e., minors) seeking abortion without parental consent to go to court with an attorney to petition a judge for permission to obtain abortion. There is a lack of empirical data on the process through which abortion laws stigmatize abortion and on the actors involved. We use data from in-depth qualitative interviews with 19 attorneys who participated in a collective 800 judicial bypass cases to explore what's at stake for multiple actors within a shared social space and how interactions between those actors reproduce stigma. We extend stigma theory to explain how structural abortion restrictions produce stigma at the individual level. We find that to protect their interests in "keeping pregnant minors in," the Texas court system constrains attorneys' ability to represent minors through politicization and stigmatization; attorneys face logistical and emotional challenges, including navigating hostile or ill-informed courts, witnessing court actors humiliate their clients without means of recourse, and experiencing stigma themselves. Although what's most at stake for their clients becomes most at stake for attorneys- helping young people obtain a judicial bypass so they can access abortion and protecting them from humiliation and trauma- they must reconcile their own violation of norms stigmatizing abortion with their consciences' motivation to represent bypass clients and protect their professional identity and career advancement from being "tainted" by taking judicial bypass cases. In order to protect what is at stake for their clients in the context of the highly stigmatized Texas courts, attorneys rationally make trade-offs that protect some stakes while undermining others. Moreover, attorneys' management of experienced stigma and their violation of norms stigmatizing abortion leads some to reproduce abortion stigma in their interactions with minors.