Impact of Stigma on Clinician Training for Opioid Use Disorder Care: A Qualitative Study in a Primary Care Learning Collaborative

Experiences of Team Collaboration in Primary Care-Based Delivery of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

Team-based models of care delivery are increasingly utilized to address co-occurring mental health and/or substance use conditions. However, little is known about how team-based models function among primary care teams delivering treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). The research team conducted qualitative interviews with a sample of multidisciplinary, primary care team members delivering OUD treatment using the collaborative care model (CoCM). Providers were recruited from 13 diverse United States (U.S.) clinics participating in a multisite hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Interviews were audio recorded and professionally transcribed. All transcripts were double-coded using a coding schema informed by relational coordination theory. Thirty-five team members completed an interview, including 14 primary care providers (PCPs), 13 behavioral health care managers (BHCM), and eight consulting psychiatric providers (CPP). Four themes emerged: (1) team-based work increases shared knowledge about patients; (2) team members leverage one another's relationships with patients to increase treatment engagement; (3) team collaboration is enhanced when BHCMs have opportunities and space to connect informally with PCPs; and (4) increased mutual respect between team members is needed to maximize patient engagement efforts. Team-based models may enhance patient engagement in OUD care by increasing the volume of patient contacts and augmenting therapeutic alliances.

Effect of opioid use disorder training on the attitudes of emergency medicine providers toward treatment of opioid use disorder

BACKGROUND

Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) remains a significant public health concern in the United States, claiming a staggering number of lives annually. Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine has emerged as an effective intervention. However, its utilization remains low, especially in Emergency Departments (EDs), due in part to bias against addiction. This study evaluated the impact of a grant to increase OUD treatment in the ED from the Ohio Department of Health on bias among ED providers.

METHODS

A longitudinal survey of emergency medicine providers was conducted before and after grant implementation to assess attitudes and prescribing behaviors.

RESULTS

While the grant increased the number of providers prescribing MAT and naloxone, it did not significantly alter attitudes toward OUD treatment in the ED. Providers overwhelmingly recognized addiction as a medical condition deserving empathy, but views on the appropriateness of EDs for addiction treatment remained unchanged.

DISCUSSION

Despite increased MAT prescriptions and naloxone distribution post-grant, the study suggests that broader cultural shifts are needed to integrate OUD treatment into ED practice fully. Efforts to destigmatize addiction and enhance provider education may be necessary to address underlying barriers to OUD treatment acceptance in the ED setting.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights a critical gap between favorable attitudes toward OUD treatment and actual practice. Although education and grant incentives led to increased MAT prescribing, most providers were hesitant to initiate ED treatment. Challenges included perceived lack of training, time constraints, and lingering stigma surrounding addiction.

Content analysis of perceptions of combined pharmacobehavioral treatment for American Indian people with opioid use disorder

OBJECTIVE

Both opioid misuse and overdose mortality have disproportionately impacted the American Indian population. Although medications for opioid use disorder, such as buprenorphine (BUP-NX), are highly effective in reducing overdose mortality, questions have been raised about the cultural acceptability of Western medical approaches in this population. Understanding patients' desired recovery pathways can lead to more culturally appropriate, patient-centered, and effective approaches to opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. In this qualitative study, we document experiences with combined pharmacobehavioral treatment for OUD and suggestions for enhancing it.

METHOD

Participants (N = 45) were American Indian patients and community members impacted by OUD. They participated in one-time, 45- to 60-min, semistructured interviews.

RESULTS

Findings from conventional content analysis indicated participants were grateful for a Tribally run combined pharmacobehavioral OUD treatment program, which made treatment more financially and geographically accessible over a large, rural area. Participants expressed satisfaction with BUP-NX and the accompanying behavioral health programming but were interested in making it more accessible through telemedicine appointments and mailed prescriptions. Participants noted the importance of clear communication about this kind of programming, which tends to be less structured than other substance-use treatment programs, but also appreciated its tailored, compassionate, and holistic approach. Participants were interested in robust counseling options; a low-barrier, acceptance-based, and harm-reduction orientation; as well as more culturally aligned programming that honored their Native heritage and traditional medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment providers, researchers, and policymakers should consider integration of more patient-driven, compassionate, and culturally aligned means of intervention for American Indian patients with OUD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

'Do they care?': a qualitative examination of patient perspectives on primary care clinician communication related to opioids in the USA

OBJECTIVES

This substudy's objectives were to (1) examine the transferability of a four archetype framework (simplified pattern of prototypical features) for patients at high risk for opioid use disorder (OUD) developed from a previous study with a similar population; (2) explore how patient preferences for terminology can inform clinician communication strategies for patients with OUD across archetypes and (3) explore how patient perceptions of opioid risks can inform clinician communication strategies across patient archetypes.

DESIGN

This qualitative study collected data via semistructured phone interviews with patients about views on opioid-related discussions with primary care clinicians. Qualitative data were coded using the Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction technique and analysed via iterative inductive/deductive thematic analysis.

SETTING

40 primary care clinics affiliated with two health systems (site1=Pennsylvania; site2=Minnesota, Wisconsin and North Dakota).

PARTICIPANTS

40 adults meeting one of the following: OUD diagnosis; taking medication for OUD (MOUD) and ≥3 opioid prescriptions in the previous year.

RESULTS

The aforementioned four archetype framework transferred well to the study sample and hinted at archetype differences in participant OUD-terminology preferences and opioid risk perceptions. Two additional archetypes of 'in treatment/recovery for OUD and not taking MOUD' and 'in treatment/recovery for OUD and taking MOUD' were identified. Participants best fitting archetypes 1-4 preferred clinicians to refrain from using addiction terminology to describe their relationship with opioids, finding the term 'dependence' as more appropriate and a signal that clinicians cared for patients. Participants who best first archetypes 5-6 felt 'addiction' was an appropriate, direct term that accurately described their condition, often using it themselves. Patients in all archetypes recognised risks of harm from using opioids, especially participants fitting archetypes 2, 5 and 6 who conveyed the greatest concern.

CONCLUSION

The modified six archetype framework may help clinicians tailor their communication and care for patients diagnosed with or at high risk for OUD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04198428.

Empowering Primary Care Nurse Practitioners: A Multilevel Approach to Combating the Opioid Crisis

AIMS

We offer a literature-driven, empirically informed, and highly warranted recommendation for a multilevel approach tailored to nurse practitioners. This approach aimed to drive change at the individual level (nurse practitioner), dyadic level (nurse-patient therapeutic relationship), and systems level (organisational culture, education, and policy) to strengthen nurse practitioners' capacity to deliver optimal opioid use disorder care.

BACKGROUND

The opioid overdose epidemic is a global public health crisis, with the United States facing the most severe impact. Access to evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder remains a significant barrier. Primary care nurse practitioners can play a crucial role in expanding access and bridging the treatment gap. Addressing factors influencing access to, quality of, and effectiveness of treatment requires urgent and careful consideration.

DESIGN

This position paper highlights the multilevel barriers that inhibit nurse practitioners in managing opioid use disorder, negatively impacting treatment access and opioid use disorder-related outcomes.

METHOD

The Advanced Practice Provider conceptual model was adapted to guide this paper. This adapted model illustrates the interconnected layers among nurse practitioners, clinical care, education, professional development, and organisational culture and policy in caring for patients with opioid use disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Equipping primary care nurse practitioners with the necessary tools to both understand opioid addiction and empower patients experiencing it can have a profound impact. This impact benefits the provider and patient and extends to addressing the opioid crisis at multiple levels. Future research should explore nurse practitioners' experiences when working with individuals with opioid use disorder, identify barriers that hinder positive interactions with patients seeking treatment, and pragmatically test and implement multilevel interventions designed to holistically benefit providers and patient outcomes.

IMPACT TO NURSING

This American-based reflection offers valuable insights to nurse practitioners worldwide as they consider effective strategies for addressing opioid use disorder in primary care settings.

Knowledge of medications for opioid use disorder and associated stigma among primary care professionals

BACKGROUND

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are the gold standard. However, significant barriers limit their use in the primary care setting, including limited knowledge of the medications and stigmatizing attitudes. In this study, we assess knowledge levels among primary care-aligned professionals (PCPs) currently in practice, and whether knowledge of MOUD is associated with stigma and treatment attitudes.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Using rosters from the state of Ohio licensing boards, we surveyed 403 physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician associates in 2022, on the mechanism of different MOUD, as well as stigma and treatment attitudes. To assess MOUD knowledge, we employed descriptive and bivariate statistics. We fit four linear regression models, which controlled for empathy towards patients with OUD and provider demographics to assess the relationship between MOUD knowledge and four endpoints: stigma, perceived controllability of opioid use, perceived vulnerability to opioid use disorder, and support for abstinence-only treatment.

RESULTS

43% of participants correctly identified the mechanism of all 3 medications whereas 13% of participants did not identify the mechanism of any MOUD correctly. MOUD knowledge was higher among physicians as compared to nurse practitioners and physician associates. Lower MOUD knowledge was associated with more negative attitudes towards patients with OUD and MOUD treatment.

CONCLUSION

Expanding access to MOUD treatment requires a trained and willing health-care professional (HCP) workforce. Our findings highlight considerable variation in clinician knowledge of MOUD and suggest that knowledge levels are also related to negative attitudes towards patients with OUD and MOUD. Training interventions that increase knowledge, as well as focus on stigma reduction, are critical for reducing the longstanding treatment gap for opioid use disorder.

Implementation of medication for opioid use disorder treatment during a natural disaster: The PROUD-LA study

BACKGROUND

The impacts of climate change-related extreme weather events (EWEs) on Medication for Opioid Use Disorders (MOUD) implementation for Medicaid beneficiaries are relatively unknown. Such information is critical to disaster planning and other implementation strategies. In this study we examined implementation determinants and strategies for MOUD during EWEs.

METHODS

The Louisiana-based Community Resilience Learning Collaborative and Research Network (C-LEARN) utilized Rapid Assessment Procedures-Informed Community Ethnography (RAPICE), involving community leaders in study design, execution, and data analysis. We conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with 42 individuals, including MOUD Medicaid member patients and their caregivers, healthcare providers and administrators, and public health officials with experience with climate-related disasters. We mapped key themes onto updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains.

RESULTS

MOUD use is limited during EWEs by pharmacy closures, challenges to medication prescription and access across state lines, hospital and clinic service limits, overcrowded emergency departments, and disrupted communications with providers. MOUD demand simultaneously increases due to the stress associated with displacement, resource loss, the COVID-19 pandemic, and social determinants of health. Effective implementation strategies include healthcare system disaster plans with protocols for clear and regular patient-provider communication, community outreach, additional staffing, and virtual delivery of services. Providers can also increase MOUD access by having remote access to EHRs, laptops and contact information, resource lists, collaborative networks, and contact with patients via call centers and social media. Patients can retain access to MOUD via online patient portals, health apps, call centers, and provider calls and texts. The impact of EWEs on MOUD access and use is also influenced by individual characteristics of both patients and providers.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing frequency and severity of climate-related EWEs poses a serious threat to MOUD for Medicaid beneficiaries. MOUD-specific disaster planning and use of telehealth for maintaining contact and providing care are effective strategies for MOUD implementation during EWEs. Potential considerations for policies and practices of Medicaid, providers, and others to benefit members during hurricanes or major community stressors, include changes in Medicaid policies to enable access to MOUD by interstate evacuees, improvement of medication refill flexibilities, and incentivization of telehealth services for more systematic use.

Patient Perspectives on Mental Health and Pain Management Support Needed Versus Received During Opioid Deprescribing

Prescription opioid tapering has increased significantly over the last decade. Evidence suggests that tapering too quickly or without appropriate support may unintentionally harm patients. The aim of this analysis was to understand patients' experiences with opioid tapering, including support received or not received for pain control or mental health. Patients with evidence of opioid tapering from 6 health care systems participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews; family members of suicide decedents with evidence of opioid tapering were also interviewed. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. Participants included 176 patients and 16 family members. Results showed that 24% of the participants felt their clinicians checked in with them about their taper experiences while 41% reported their clinicians did not. A majority (68%) of individuals who experienced suicide behavior during tapering reported that clinicians did check in about mood and mental health changes specifically; however, 27% of that group reported no such check-in. More individuals reported negative experiences (than positive) with pain management clinics-where patients are often referred for tapering and pain management support. Patients reporting successful tapering experiences named shared decision-making and ability to adjust taper speed or pause tapering as helpful components of care. Fifty-six percent of patients reported needing more support during tapering, including more empathy and compassion (48%) and an individualized approach to tapering (41%). Patient-centered approaches to tapering include reaching out to monitor how patients are doing, involving patients in decision-making, supporting mental health changes, and allowing for flexibility in the tapering pace. PERSPECTIVE: Patients tapering prescription opioids desire more provider-initiated communication including checking in about pain, setting expectations for withdrawal and mental health-related changes, and providing support for mental health. Patients preferred opportunities to share decisions about taper speed and to have flexibility with pausing the taper as needed.

Leveraging neuroscience education to address stigma related to opioid use disorder in the community: a pilot study

Opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose deaths are a public health crisis. One contributing factor is stigma towards people who use opioids. We developed and conducted a public-facing, half-day educational event designed to challenge misperceptions about OUD from a contemporary neuroscience perspective. Participants engaged with three different resources on the neurobiology of addiction, and, at the end of the event, they rated its effectiveness. We also collected and compared pre- and post-event composite OUD stigma scales. Participants rated our approach and the overall event as highly effective. Additionally, OUD stigma scores were lower immediately following the event, and this decrease was primarily driven by decreased internalized stigma. Here, we demonstrate an effective proof-of-concept that an accessible, public-facing, neuroscience education event may reduce OUD stigma in the community.

At a Crossroads: Opioid Use Disorder, the X-Waiver, and the Road Ahead

Background: Buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone) is widely considered the first-line treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD), which causes significant morbidity and mortality in the United States, but prior to 2023, practitioners interested in prescribing buprenorphine/naloxone for OUD needed a special Drug Enforcement Administration certification (the X-Waiver) that imposed a patient cap and other limitations. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 considerably decreased the restrictions on prescribing practitioners. Buprenorphine/naloxone can now be prescribed like any other prescription opioid, excluding methadone. The historic context for the opioid crisis, OUD, the X-Waiver, and additional initiatives that may be needed beyond legislative change to effectively address OUD are the subjects of this review. Methods: To develop this review of the opioid crisis, OUD, and OUD treatment, we conducted a literature search of the PubMed database and constructed a timeline of the opioid crisis and changes in OUD treatment, specifically the X-Waiver, to characterize the historic context of OUD and the X-Waiver against the background of the opioid crisis. Results: The opioid crisis has had pervasive public health and economic impacts in the United States. Major changes to the treatment of OUD have occurred as a result of the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 that imposed the X-Waiver and the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 that repealed the X-Waiver. Conclusion: The repeal of the X-Waiver is predicted to increase the accessibility of buprenorphine/naloxone in the United States. However, additional work beyond legislative change, including institutional support and reduction of stigma and disparities, is needed to substantially improve outcomes for OUD patients.

Leveraging neuroscience education to address stigma related to opioid use disorder (OUD) in the community: A pilot study

Opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose deaths are a public health crisis. One contributing factor is stigma towards people who use opioids. We developed and conducted a public-facing, half-day educational event designed to challenge misperceptions about OUD from a contemporary neuroscience perspective. Participants engaged with three different resources on the neurobiology of addiction; at the end of the event, they rated its effectiveness. We also collected and compared pre- and post-event composite OUD stigma scales. Participants rated our approach and the overall event as highly effective. Additionally, OUD stigma scores were lower immediately following the event, and this decrease was primarily driven by decreased internalized stigma. Here, we demonstrate an effective proof-of-concept that an accessible, public-facing, neuroscience education event may reduce OUD stigma in the community.

Intersectionality in nursing research: A scoping review

Background

An intersectional approach to health research provides an analytical foundation to explain the multidimensionality of health status, resource accessibility, privilege, oppression, and current and historical context. The use of intersectionality in health research has known limitations. Its use in health-related fields too often focuses on outcomes, such as health disparities, rather than processes, such as power structures and social determinants.

Objective

This scoping review serves to examine how intersectionality has been implemented by nurses in the peer-reviewed literature. We offer insight into how it may be incorporated to inform future nursing research and healthcare provision.

Design & Methods

Systematic searches of PubMed (n = 257), SCOPUS (n = 807), EMBASE (n = 396), CINAHL (n = 224), and Health Source: Nursing and Academics (n = 491), published since the seminal publication on intersectionality (1989 - 2023), identified 131 research articles that met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and synthesis were used to describe the breadth and depth of the literature specific to the application of intersectionality in nursing research.

Results

The included studies used intersectionality to examine the intersections of numerous identities, such as race, gender, and immigration status. However, most studies were descriptive/observational in nature, underreported their methods, and conducted deficit-based research instead of strength-based inquiries. Of note, the vast majority of included articles were published within the last five years.

Conclusions

Future researchers using intersectionality as a framework can improve their approach by reporting clear definitions and operationalization of intersectionality. Observational science dominated the included studies; future research should focus on intervention development and evaluation using an intersectional lens. Lastly, caution should be placed on research that focuses solely on deficits among marginalized communities, which places scientists at risk of perpetuating stereotypes or enhancing already-existing stigmas.

Evaluation of a Primary Care-Based Multidisciplinary Transition Clinic for Patients Newly Initiated on Buprenorphine in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Care transitions represent vulnerable events for patients newly initiating medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Multidisciplinary primary care-based transition clinics may improve care linkage and retention in MOUD treatment. Additionally, these interventions may help primary care clinicians (PCPs) overcome barriers to adopting MOUD into practice. In this evaluation, we assessed the impact of a primary care-based transition clinic for patients newly initiating buprenorphine for opioid use disorder (OUD) in the emergency department.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective program evaluation within a single academic health system involving adults who newly initiated buprenorphine for OUD through an emergency department-based program and were referred to follow up in either a dedicated multidisciplinary primary care-based transition clinic (SPARC) vs referral to usual primary care (UPC). We performed descriptive analyses comparing patient demographics, referral volume, linkage to care, treatment retention, and markers of high-quality care between the 2 groups. A log-rank test was used to determine the difference in probabilities of retention between SPARC and UPC over 6 months.

RESULTS

Over 12 months, the number of referrals to SPARC was greater than to UPC (N = 64 vs N = 26). About 58% of patients referred to SPARC attended an initial visit vs 38% referred to UPC. Treatment retention was consistently greater in SPARC than UPC (1 m: 90% vs 60%; 3 m: 76% vs 40%; 6 m: 60% vs 30%). Markers of care quality including naloxone provision (100% vs 80%) and infectious screening (81% vs 40%) were greater in SPARC clinic. SPARC was associated with a statistically significant increased probability of retention in treatment as compared to UPC (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational evaluation, a primary care-based multidisciplinary transition clinic for patients initiating buprenorphine MOUD was associated with expanded access to longitudinal OUD treatment and superior linkage to care, retention in care, and quality of care compared to referral to usual primary care. Further research using a more rigorous research design is required to further evaluate these findings.