Cell-level metadata are indispensable for documenting single-cell sequencing datasets

CZI Cell Science Program, Abdulla S, Aevermann B, Assis P, Badajoz S, Bell SM, Bezzi E, Cakir B, Chaffer J, Chambers S, Cherry J, Chi T, Chien J, Dorman L, Garcia-Nieto P, Gloria N, Hastie M, Hegeman D, Hilton J, Huang T, Infeld A, Istrate AM, Jelic I, Katsuya K, Kim YJ, Liang K, Lin M, Lombardo M, Marshall B, Martin B, McDade F, Megill C, Patel N, Predeus A, Raymor B, Robatmili B, Rogers D, Rutherford E, Sadgat D, Shin A, Small C, Smith T, Sridharan P, Tarashansky A, Tavares N, Thomas H, Tolopko A, Urisko M, Yan J, Yeretssian G, Zamanian J, Mani A, Cool J, Carr A. CZ CELLxGENE Discover: a single-cell data platform for scalable exploration, analysis and modeling of aggregated data

Hundreds of millions of single cells have been analyzed using high-throughput transcriptomic methods. The cumulative knowledge within these datasets provides an exciting opportunity for unlocking insights into health and disease at the level of single cells. Meta-analyses that span diverse datasets building on recent advances in large language models and other machine-learning approaches pose exciting new directions to model and extract insight from single-cell data. Despite the promise of these and emerging analytical tools for analyzing large amounts of data, the sheer number of datasets, data models and accessibility remains a challenge. Here, we present CZ CELLxGENE Discover (cellxgene.cziscience.com), a data platform that provides curated and interoperable single-cell data. Available via a free-to-use online data portal, CZ CELLxGENE hosts a growing corpus of community-contributed data of over 93 million unique cells. Curated, standardized and associated with consistent cell-level metadata, this collection of single-cell transcriptomic data is the largest of its kind and growing rapidly via community contributions. A suite of tools and features enables accessibility and reusability of the data via both computational and visual interfaces to allow researchers to explore individual datasets, perform cross-corpus analysis, and run meta-analyses of tens of millions of cells across studies and tissues at the resolution of single cells.

MAMS: matrix and analysis metadata standards to facilitate harmonization and reproducibility of single-cell data

Many datasets are being produced by consortia that seek to characterize healthy and disease tissues at single-cell resolution. While biospecimen and experimental information is often captured, detailed metadata standards related to data matrices and analysis workflows are currently lacking. To address this, we develop the matrix and analysis metadata standards (MAMS) to serve as a resource for data centers, repositories, and tool developers. We define metadata fields for matrices and parameters commonly utilized in analytical workflows and developed the rmams package to extract MAMS from single-cell objects. Overall, MAMS promotes the harmonization, integration, and reproducibility of single-cell data across platforms.

CellSTAR: a comprehensive resource for single-cell transcriptomic annotation

Large-scale studies of single-cell sequencing and biological experiments have successfully revealed expression patterns that distinguish different cell types in tissues, emphasizing the importance of studying cellular heterogeneity and accurately annotating cell types. Analysis of gene expression profiles in these experiments provides two essential types of data for cell type annotation: annotated references and canonical markers. In this study, the first comprehensive database of single-cell transcriptomic annotation resource (CellSTAR) was thus developed. It is unique in (a) offering the comprehensive expertly annotated reference data for annotating hundreds of cell types for the first time and (b) enabling the collective consideration of reference data and marker genes by incorporating tens of thousands of markers. Given its unique features, CellSTAR is expected to attract broad research interests from the technological innovations in single-cell transcriptomics, the studies of cellular heterogeneity & dynamics, and so on. It is now publicly accessible without any login requirement at: https://idrblab.org/cellstar.

PlaqView 2.0: A comprehensive web portal for cardiovascular single-cell genomics

Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) is a powerful genomics technology to interrogate the cellular composition and behaviors of complex systems. While the number of scRNA-seq datasets and available computational analysis tools have grown exponentially, there are limited systematic data sharing strategies to allow rapid exploration and re-analysis of single-cell datasets, particularly in the cardiovascular field. We previously introduced PlaqView, an open-source web portal for the exploration and analysis of published atherosclerosis single-cell datasets. Now, we introduce PlaqView 2.0 (www.plaqview.com), which provides expanded features and functionalities as well as additional cardiovascular single-cell datasets. We showcase improved PlaqView functionality, backend data processing, user-interface, and capacity. PlaqView brings new or improved tools to explore scRNA-seq data, including gene query, metadata browser, cell identity prediction, ad hoc RNA-trajectory analysis, and drug-gene interaction prediction. PlaqView serves as one of the largest central repositories for cardiovascular single-cell datasets, which now includes data from human aortic aneurysm, gene-specific mouse knockouts, and healthy references. PlaqView 2.0 brings advanced tools and high-performance computing directly to users without the need for any programming knowledge. Lastly, we outline steps to generalize and repurpose PlaqView's framework for single-cell datasets from other fields.

The need to reassess single-cell RNA sequencing datasets: the importance of biological sample processing

Background: The advent of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and additional single-cell omics technologies have provided scientists with unprecedented tools to explore biology at cellular resolution. However, reaching an appropriate number of good quality reads per cell and reasonable numbers of cells within each of the populations of interest are key to infer relevant conclusions about the underlying biology of the dataset. For these reasons, scRNAseq studies are constantly increasing the number of cells analysed and the granularity of the resultant transcriptomics analyses. Methods: We aimed to identify previously described fibroblast subpopulations in healthy adult human skin by using the largest dataset published to date (528,253 sequenced cells) and an unsupervised population-matching algorithm. Results: Our reanalysis of this landmark resource demonstrates that a substantial proportion of cell transcriptomic signatures may be biased by cellular stress and response to hypoxic conditions. Conclusions: We postulate that careful design of experimental conditions is needed to avoid long processing times of biological samples. Additionally, computation of large datasets might undermine the extent of the analysis, possibly due to long processing times.

The need to reassess single-cell RNA sequencing datasets: more is not always better

Background: The advent of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) and additional single-cell omics technologies have provided scientists with unprecedented tools to explore biology at cellular resolution. However, reaching an appropriate number of good quality reads per cell and reasonable numbers of cells within each of the populations of interest are key to infer conclusions from otherwise limited analyses. For these reasons, scRNAseq studies are constantly increasing the number of cells analysed and the granularity of the resultant transcriptomics analyses. Methods: We aimed to identify previously described fibroblast subpopulations in healthy adult human skin by using the largest dataset published to date (528,253 sequenced cells) and an unsupervised population-matching algorithm. Results: Our reanalysis of this landmark resource demonstrates that a substantial proportion of cell transcriptomic signatures may be biased by cellular stress and response to hypoxic conditions. Conclusions: We postulate that the "more is better" approach, currently prevalent in the scientific community, might undermine the extent of the analysis, possibly due to long computational processing times inherent to large datasets.