Direct diabetes-related costs in young patients with early-onset, long-lasting type 1 diabetes

Influence of rs1292037 Genetic Variant on miR-21 Gene Expression in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Case-Control Study

Background and Aims

Alterations in the expression pattern of miRNAs seem to be linked with autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Regarding the importance of assessing this potential link, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between miR-21 rs1292037 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and T1DM susceptibility. Furthermore, we investigated the miR-21 expression level in T1DM.

Methods

A total of 250 T1DM patients and 250 controls were genotyped using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and miR-21 expression levels were assessed using real-time PCR. Moreover, the potential targets of miR-21 were investigated using different bioinformatics web servers.

Results

Our results showed that the T/C genotype and the C allele were more frequent in T1DM patients than in controls. Individuals carrying the T/C genotype in overdominant model were 2.74-fold at a higher risk of T1DM (OR = 2.74; 95%CI, 1.78-4.27; p < 0.0001). In addition, miR-21 expression was more than twofold higher in patients than in controls (p < 0.0001) and it was found to be significantly upregulated when carrying the T/C genotype. Regarding miR-21 predicted target genes, its overexpression may be associated with beta cell death, diabetic nephropathy, inflammatory responses, impaired insulin production or secretion, and T-cell cytotoxicity, which are important in the initiation and progression of T1DM.

Conclusion

Our results suggested that miR-21 rs1292037 may confer genetic susceptibility to T1DM. Therefore, it seems that this genetic link should be further investigated to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in these patients.

Availability, price and affordability of insulin, delivery devices and self-monitoring blood glucose devices in Indonesia

Insulin is essential for the survival of people with type 1 diabetes and for better management of people with type 2 diabetes. People with diabetes using insulin also require self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) devices (e.g., meters, strips, continuous monitoring systems) for day-to-day management. It is essential to ensure that insulin and these devices are available and affordable. This study aimed to evaluate the availability, price, and affordability of insulin and SMBG devices in Indonesia using an adaptation of the World Health Organization/Health Action International (WHO/HAI) price survey. A total of 34 public health facilities (hospitals, primary healthcare centres/Puskesmas) and 37 private pharmacies were sampled. Information from three major online marketplaces was also collected. Prices were expressed as median patient prices (US$). Affordability was defined as the number of days' wages needed by the lowest paid unskilled government worker (LPGW) to purchase 30 days' supply of insulin, delivery devices and SMBGs. Availability of analogue insulin was slightly higher in public facilities (63.6%) than in the private sector (43.2%), with no human insulin available in both sectors. Conversely, better availability was observed in private facilities for SMBG devices as public sector facilities did not supply devices for self-testing. Median prices for 1000IU analogues varied between the public sector (US$ 5.26) and the private sector (US$11.24). The highest median price of analogues was seen in online marketplaces (US$ 28.65). The least costly median price of SMBG devices were observed in online platforms (meter: US$ 18.37, test strip: US$ 0.27, lancet: US$ 0.02). A low-income person had to work 2-3 days to buy 1000IU of analogues. It required 5-7 days' and 4-5 day's wages to purchase a meter and a month's supply of test strips, respectively. The availability and affordability of insulin and SMBG devices remain important issues in Indonesia requiring holistic approaches for further improvement.

Barriers to Type 1 Diabetes Adherence in Adolescents

Background: Adolescence is a particularly crucial period of physical, emotional, and social development and adaptation, rendering these formative years rather challenging for individuals with chronic conditions like type 1 diabetes (T1D). Despite rapid improvement in diabetes therapies, adolescents with T1D are characterized by poorer adherence to treatment regimens compared with other pediatric age groups. Insufficient adherence is strongly related to low diabetes control, increasing morbidity, and risk for premature mortality. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of adolescents' most common barriers to T1D adherence, stressing the need for a deep and comprehensive understanding of these barriers. The complexity of these barriers is underscored by the diverse factors contributing to poor T1D adherence in adolescents. Methods: A narrative review was conducted, surveying four databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science) for full-text articles in the English language published up to June 2024. All studies related to barriers to T1D adherence in adolescents were considered. The literature was selected using selection and exclusion criteria and extracted and organized using Mendeley. Exclusion criteria included studies with insufficient data and non-peer-reviewed articles. This review revealed that adolescents face numerous obstacles to T1D adherence related to psychological factors, flux in family dynamics, perceived social pressures, therapy-related factors, transitioning responsibility, risk-taking behaviors, and pubertal changes. Conclusions: Navigating the adaptations to the different aspects of T1D, from treatment to complications and adolescents' personal growth, effectively requires a thorough understanding of the barriers of a treatment regimen that patients at this critical age face.

Healthcare expenditure and technology use in pediatric diabetes care

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic diseases in childhood. With more advanced care options including ever-evolving technology, allocation of resources becomes increasingly important to guarantee equal care for all. Therefore, we investigated healthcare resource utilization, hospital costs, and its determinants in Dutch children with diabetes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational analysis with hospital claims data of 5,474 children with diabetes mellitus treated in 64 hospitals across the Netherlands between 2019-2020.

RESULTS

Total hospital costs were €33,002,652 per year, and most of these costs were diabetes-associated (€28,151,381; 85.3%). Mean annual diabetes costs were €5,143 per child, and treatment-related costs determined 61.8%. Diabetes technology significantly increased yearly diabetes costs compared to no technology: insulin pumps € 4,759 (28.7% of children), Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring € 7,259 (2.1% of children), and the combination of these treatment modalities € 9,579 (27.3% of children). Technology use increased treatment costs significantly (5.9 - 15.3 times), but lower all-cause hospitalisation rates were observed. In all age groups, diabetes technology use influenced healthcare consumption, yet in adolescence usage decreased and consumption patterns changed.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that contemporary hospital costs of children with diabetes of all ages are driven primarily by the treatment of diabetes, with technology use as an important additive factor. The expected rise in technology use in the near future underlines the importance of insight into resource use and cost-effectiveness studies to evaluate if improved outcomes balance out these short-term costs of modern technology.

Do sex differences in paediatric type 1 diabetes care exist? A systematic review

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Sex differences are present in cardiovascular care and in outcomes among adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, which typically commences in childhood. Whether sex influences care and outcomes in childhood is not known. This systematic review provides an overview of sex differences in children with type 1 diabetes, focusing on patient and disease characteristics, treatment, comorbidities and complications.

METHODS

Literature in MEDLINE up to 15 June 2021 was searched, using the terms diabetes mellitus, sex characteristics, sex distribution, children and/or adolescents. All primary outcome studies on children with type 1 diabetes that mentioned a sex difference in outcome were included, with the exception of qualitative studies, case reports or case series. Studies not pertaining to the regular clinical care process and on incidence or prevalence only were excluded. Articles reporting sex differences were identified and assessed on quality and risk of bias using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Narrative synthesis and an adapted Harvest plot were used to summarise evidence by category.

RESULTS

A total of 8640 articles were identified, rendering 90 studies for review (n=643,217 individuals). Studies were of observational design and comprised cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies. Most of the included studies showed a higher HbA_1c in young female children both at diagnosis (seven studies, n=22,089) and during treatment (20 out of 21 studies, n=144,613), as well as a steeper HbA_1c increase over time. Many studies observed a higher BMI (all ages, ten studies, n=89,700; adolescence, seven studies, n=33,153), a higher prevalence of being overweight or obese, and a higher prevalence of dyslipidaemia among the female sex. Hypoglycaemia and partial remission occurred more often in male participants, and ketoacidosis (at diagnosis, eight studies, n=3561) and hospitalisation was more often seen in female participants. Most of the findings showed that female participants used pump therapy more frequently (six studies, n=211,324) and needed higher insulin doses than male participants. Several comorbidities, such as thyroid disease and coeliac disease, appeared to be more common in female participants. All studies reported lower quality of life in female participants (15 studies, n=8722). Because the aim of this study was to identify sex differences, studies with neutral outcomes or minor differences may have been under-targeted. The observational designs of the included studies also limit conclusions on the causality between sex and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Sex disparities were observed throughout diabetes care in children with type 1 diabetes. Several outcomes appear worse in young female children, especially during adolescence. Focus on the cause and treatment of these differences may provide opportunities for better outcomes.

REGISTRATION

This systematic review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020213640).

Cost of Illness Analysis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Findings from a Lower-Middle Income Country

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is a major chronic illness that negatively influences individuals and society. Therefore, this research aimed to analyze and evaluate the cost associated with diabetes management, specific to the Pakistani Type 2 diabetes population. Research scheme and methods: A survey randomly collected information and data from diabetes patients throughout Pakistan out-patient clinics. Direct and indirect costs were evaluated, and data were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics.

RESULTS

An overall of 1839 diabetes patients participated in the study. The results have shown that direct and indirect costs are positively associated with the participants' socio-demographic characteristics, except for household income and educational status. The annual total cost of diabetes care was USD 740.1, amongst which the share of the direct cost was USD 646.7, and the indirect cost was USD 93.65. Most direct costs comprised medicine (USD 274.5) and hospitalization (USD 319.7). In contrast, the productivity loss of the patients had the highest contribution to the indirect cost (USD 81.36).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that direct costs significantly contributed to diabetes's overall cost in Pakistan and overall diabetes management estimated to be 1.67% (USD 24.42 billion) of the country's total gross domestic product. The expense of medications and hospitalization mostly drove the direct cost. Additionally, patients' loss of productivity contributed significantly to the indirect cost. It is high time for healthcare policymakers to address this huge healthcare burden. It is time to develop a thorough diabetes management plan to be implemented nationwide.

Financial burden for families of children with type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey from North India

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) incurs substantial out-of-pocket expenses (OOPE) on insulin and diabetes-related supplies. The information on OOPE is scarce from low- and middle-income countries. We aimed to estimate annual OOPE for children with T1D attending our diabetes clinic located in North India.

Methods

An online survey was conducted among parents of 380 children with T1D (mean age: 10.3 ± 4.6 years). Modified BG Prasad scale was used to estimate the socioeconomic status (SES).

Results

The mean duration of T1D was 3.6 ± 2.6 years; 54.9% of children were boys. The median HbA1c (IQR) was 7.9% (5–15%). 51.9% belonged to lower or lower-middle SES. Mean annual spending on glucose monitoring, insulin administration, and laboratory investigations were Indian Rupee (INR) 21,576, INR 28,965, and INR 5069, respectively (total INR 55,185, IQR: 26,575–105,027). The cost of a single visit to the doctor was approximately INR 2889. Thirty children required hospitalization during the last year, which costs INR 27,495 on average. 30.3% had more than 50% of their total family income spent on diabetes care, with a significant negative correlation with their SES (r =  – 0.738, p = 0.00). Only 11.6% were receiving financial support from any agency. 36.6% of families had to borrow money; the OOPE exceeded income from all sources in 8.2% of families.

Conclusions

There is a high financial burden of T1D care for North Indian children, almost on the verge of losing sustainability. Further studies are warranted to furnish larger OOPE data to guide policy decisions aimed at reducing direct costs to patients.

Costs of Public Health Screening of Children for Presymptomatic Type 1 Diabetes in Bavaria, Germany

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate costs associated with public health screening for presymptomatic type 1 diabetes in 90,632 children as part of the Fr1da study in Bavaria and in forecasts for standard care.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We report on resource use and direct costs for screening-related procedures in the Fr1da study coordination center and laboratory and in participating pediatric practices and local diabetes clinics. Data were obtained from Fr1da study documents, an online survey among pediatricians, and interviews and records of Fr1da staff members. Data were analyzed with tree models that mimic procedures during the screening process. Cost estimates are presented as they were observed in the Fr1da study and as they can be expected in standard care for various scenarios.

RESULTS

The costs per child screened in the Fr1da study were €28.17 (95% CI 19.96; 39.63) and the costs per child diagnosed with presymptomatic type 1 diabetes were €9,117 (6,460; 12,827). Assuming a prevalence of presymptomatic type 1 diabetes of 0.31%, as in the Fr1da study, the estimated costs in standard care in Germany would be €21.73 (16.76; 28.19) per screened child and €7,035 (5,426; 9,124) per diagnosed child. Of the projected screening costs, €12.25 would be the costs in the medical practice, €9.34 for coordination and laboratory, and €0.14 for local diabetes clinics.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides information for the planning and implementation of screening tests for presymptomatic type 1 diabetes in the general public and for the analysis of the cost-effectiveness of targeted prevention strategies.

Direct Costs of Healthcare for Children with Type 1 Diabetes Using a CGM System: A Health Economic Analysis of the VIDIKI Telemedicine Study in a German Setting

AIMS

The Virtual Diabetes Outpatient Clinic for Children and Adolescents (VIDIKI) study was a 6-month quasi-randomized, multicentre study followed by an extension phase to evaluate the effects of monthly video consultations in addition to regular care. A health economic analysis was conducted to assess the direct costs.

METHODS

The cost data of 240 study participants (1-16 years of age) with type 1 diabetes who were already using a continuous glucose monitoring system were collected in the first 6 months of the study. The intervention group (IG) received monthly video consultations plus regular care, and the waiting control group (WG) received only regular care. Cost data were collected for a comparable anonymized group of children from the participating health insurance companies during the 6-month period before the study started (aggregated data group [AG]).

RESULTS

Cost data were analysed for the AG (N=840) 6 months before study initiation and those for the study participants (N=225/240). Hospital treatment was the highest cost category in the AG. There was a cost shift and cost increase in the IG and WG, whereby diabetes supplies were the highest cost category. The mean direct diabetes-associated 6-month costs were € 4,702 (IG) and € 4,936 (WG).

CONCLUSION

The cost development within the cost collection period over two years possibly reflects the switch to higher-priced medical supplies. Video consultation as an add-on service resulted in a small but nonsignificant reduction in the overall costs.

Type I Diabetes is the Main Cost Driver in Autoimmune Polyendocrinopathy

CONTEXT

Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy (AP), a chronic complex orphan disease, encompasses at least two autoimmune-induced endocrine diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate for the first time total, indirect and direct costs for patients with AP, as well as cost drivers.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional cost of illness study.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center for AP.

PATIENTS

146 consecutive, unselected AP patients.

INTERVENTION

Interviews pertaining to patients' socioeconomic situation covered a recall period of 12 months. Both the human capital (HCA) and the friction cost approaches (FCAs) were applied as estimation methods.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Direct and indirect annual costs, and sick leave and medication costs.

RESULTS

AP markedly impacts healthcare expenses. Mean overall costs of AP in Germany ranged from €5 971 090 to €29 848 187 per year (HCA). Mean indirect costs ranged from €3 388 284 to €16 937 298 per year (HCA) while mean direct costs ranged from €2 582 247 to €12 908 095/year. Mean direct costs per year were €1851 in AP patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D, 76%) and €671 without T1D, which amounts to additional direct costs of €1209 for T1D when adjusting for concomitant autoimmune disease (95% CI = €1026-1393, P < 0.0001). Sick leave cost estimates for AP patients with T1D exceeded those without T1D by 70% (FCA) and 43% (HCA), respectively. In multiple regression analyses, T1D predicted total and direct costs, medication costs and costs for diabetic devices (all P < 0.001). Overall, AP patients with T1D were 54% (FCA) more expensive than those without T1D.

CONCLUSIONS

Public health socioeconomic relevance of AP was demonstrated, with T1D as main cost driver.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of guided Internet- and mobile-based CBT for adolescents and young adults with chronic somatic conditions and comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms (youthCOACHCD): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with chronic somatic conditions have an increased risk of comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms. Internet- and mobile-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) might be one possibility to extend the access to evidence-based treatments. Studies suggest that guided iCBT can reduce anxiety and depression symptoms in AYA. However, little is known about the effectiveness of iCBT for AYA with chronic somatic conditions and comorbid symptoms of anxiety and/or depression in routine care. Evidence on the (cost-)effectiveness of iCBT is essential for its implementation in health care.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

This multicentre two-armed randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of guided iCBT (youthCOACHCD) in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) compared to enhanced treatment as usual (TAU+) in AYA aged 12-21 years with one of three chronic somatic conditions (type 1 diabetes, cystic fibrosis, or juvenile idiopathic arthritis). AYA with one of the chronic somatic conditions and elevated symptoms of anxiety or depression (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] and/or Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7] Screener score ≥ 7) will be eligible for inclusion. We will recruit 212 patients (2 × n = 106) in routine care through three German patient registries. Assessments will take place at baseline and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-randomization. The primary outcome will be combined depression and anxiety symptom severity as measured with the PHQ Anxiety and Depression Scale. Secondary outcomes will include health-related quality of life, coping strategies, self-efficacy, stress-related personal growth, social support, behavioural activation, adjustment and trauma-related symptoms, automatic thoughts, intervention satisfaction, working alliance, and Internet usage. The cost-effectiveness will be determined, and potential moderators and mediators of intervention effects will be explored.

DISCUSSION

iCBT might implicate novel ways to increase the access to evidence-based interventions in this specific population. The distinct focus on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of youthCOACHCD in patients with chronic somatic conditions, as well as intervention safety, will most likely provide important new insights in the field of paediatric e-mental health. A particular strength of the present study is its implementation directly into routine collaborative health care. As such, this study will provide important insights for health care policy and stakeholders and indicate how iCBT can be integrated into existing health care systems.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00017161. Registered on 17 September 2019.

Monthly Video-Consultation for Children With Type 1 Diabetes Using a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System: Design of ViDiKi, a Multimethod Intervention Study to Evaluate the Benefit of Telemedicine

BACKGROUND

The introduction of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) implies new challenges for diabetes care. As CGM systems are often directly linked to a web-based software solution, structured telemedicine care using a video-consultation may be a new option for families who care for children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

"ViDiKi" (Virtual Diabetes Outpatient Clinic for Children and Youth) is a multicenter controlled trial carried out in Northern Germany. ViDiKi will examine if monthly telemedical consultations, in addition to regular care, will improve glycemic control and psychosocial outcomes. The primary outcome is glycemic control as measured by a change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). A total of 240 participants aged between one year and 16 years using a CGM with multiple daily injections (MDI) or insulin pump therapy were recruited and assigned to a starter group or a six-month waiting control group. The sample size is designed to detect a between-group difference of 0.5% in HbA1c change at six months. Secondary outcomes are variability of blood glucose, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, and satisfaction with telemedicine. To gain deeper insight into the experience of using telemedicine, qualitative interviews will be conducted. In a health-economic analysis, the costs of telemedicine and a cost-of-care analysis will be calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the ViDiKi study shall give important information on the feasibility and putative benefits of telemedicine in children with T1DM and their caregivers.

GERMAN CLINICAL TRAILS REGISTER (DRKS)

DRKS00012645.

Blood glucose meters and test strips: global market and challenges to access in low-resource settings

Blood glucose meters and test strips for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) are often inaccessible to, and infrequently used by, people with diabetes in countries with limited resources for health care. Supplies for measuring blood glucose can also be scarce in health facilities, despite being needed in a myriad of clinical settings at all levels of the health system. Numerous studies and international guidelines emphasise the value of SMBG in diabetes care, particularly in people with type 1 diabetes. In this Review, we assess global access to blood glucose meters and test strips, collating published information on cost, availability, system accuracy, competitive bidding, technological trends, and non-financial barriers. We also provide new information on global market share data and prices, taxes and tariffs, and product availability. Blood glucose meters and test strips should be viewed similarly to essential medicines, with issues of access prioritised by relevant international agencies. Efforts are needed to reduce tariffs and taxes and to create unified global system accuracy requirements and accountable post-marketing evaluations. Preferential pricing arrangements, pooled procurement, and best-purchasing practices could help to lower direct costs. SMBG supplies should also be included in national health insurance schemes. Enhanced diabetes education of health professionals and patients is crucial to ensure effective use of SMBG. Finally, as technology advances for people who can afford new interstitial fluid glucose monitoring systems, blood glucose meters and test strips must remain available and become more affordable in low-resource settings.

Healthcare reimbursement costs of children with type 1 diabetes in the Netherlands, a observational nationwide study (Young Dudes-4)

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is one of the most common chronic diseases in children. Studies on costs related to T1DM are scarce and focused primarily on the costs directly related to diabetes. We aimed to investigate both the overall healthcare costs and the more specific costs related to the management of diabetes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective and observational, nationwide cohort study of all Dutch children (aged 0-18 years) with T1DM. Data were collected from the national registry for healthcare reimbursement, in which all Dutch insurance companies combine their reimbursement data. In the Netherlands for all Dutch citizens health care is covered by law and all children are treated by hospital-based paediatricians.

RESULTS

We analysed 6710 children distributed over 81 hospitals: 475 children in 6 university hospitals and 6235 children in 75 general hospitals. Total reimbursement for all children with T1DM over the period 2009 to 2011 was € 167,494,732 corresponding to an annual mean of € 55,831,577 of total costs and € 8326 euros per child. When comparing small (between 26 and 54 patients), medium (57-84 patients) and large (88-248 patients) general hospitals, costs per patient were highest in the hospitals with the highest number of T1DM patients. The costs for devices, secondary care and pharmaceutics had most impact on total expenditures. Over the study period, there was a slight decrease in per person costs.

CONCLUSION

The overall health expenditure of a child with T1DM is more than € 8000 per patient per annum. Given the move towards more device-intensive multidisciplinary care for these patients, the costs of treating T1DM in children are likely to increase further in the coming years.

Direct and indirect cost of diabetes care among patients with type 2 diabetes in private clinics: a multicenter study in Punjab, Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has a very high prevalence and poses a huge financial encumbrance on patients. This study aimed to evaluate the cost of diabetes care among patients with type 2 diabetes in private clinics of southern Punjab, Pakistan.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, prevalence-based, cost-of-illness (COI) study conducted in six private clinics of southern Punjab from July to September 2016, using a pretested questionnaire. Study participants were recruited using a random selection method. Continuous variables, including direct and indirect costs, were summarized using descriptive statistics. Inferential statistics were also used to analyze the correlation between the variables and cost.

RESULTS

The mean annual direct cost per patient with diabetes was estimated to be 332 USD. Medications accounted for the largest share (60.4%) of this cost. Age, locality, high socioeconomic status, and prolonged disease duration were significantly associated with the direct costs of illness (p < 0.05). Moreover, 19% of total earnings among very low-income patients were spent on diabetes care.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial proportion of patients' income is spent on diabetes care in Punjab. Our findings support the substantial individual and societal burden caused by diabetes.

Impact of quality of life (QoL) on glycemic control (HbA1c) among adolescents and emerging adults with long-duration type 1 diabetes: A prospective cohort-study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of self-reported chronic-generic and condition-specific quality of life (QoL) on glycemic control among adolescents and emerging adults with long-duration type 1 diabetes (T1D) in a longitudinal design.

METHODS

The database used was a nationwide cohort study of patients with ≥10 years T1D duration at baseline in Germany. The baseline questionnaire survey was conducted in 2009-2010, the follow-up survey in 2012-2013; additional clinical data of routine care procedures were linked. QoL was assessed by the DISABKIDS chronic generic module (DCGM-12) and diabetes module (DM) with treatment and impact scales. Regression analyses were conducted for the outcome hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at follow up with baseline DISABKIDS scores as predictors and sociodemographic and health-related covariates.

RESULTS

At baseline, the included 560 patients had a mean age of 15.9 (SD 2.3) years, a diabetes duration of 13.0 (2.0) years, and an HbA1c of 67 (14.2) mmol/mol. Mean follow-up time was 3.0 (0.6) years. Univariate analyses indicated associations between baseline QoL scores and HbA1c at follow-up (β[DCGM-12] = -0.174 (SE 0.038), β[DM treatment] = -0.100 (0.022), β[DM impact] = -0.177 (0.030), p < .001). The associations remained significant after adjustment for sociodemographic and illness-related factors, but dissolved (p > .60) when additionally adjusting for baseline HbA1c. In patients with poor baseline HbA1c (>75 mmol/mol), significant associations were observed between DCGM-12 and DM impact scores and follow-up HbA1c (β[DCGM-12] = -0.144 (0.062), p = .021; β[DM impact] = -0.139 (0.048), p = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

QoL was inversely associated with HbA1c after 3 years in the course of T1D only in patients poorly controlled at baseline.

Both the frequency of HbA1c testing and the frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose predict metabolic control: A multicentre analysis of 15 199 adult type 1 diabetes patients from Germany and Austria

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to examine the association between metabolic control and frequency of haemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c ) measurements and of self-monitoring of blood glucose, as well as the interaction of both.

METHODS

Data of 15 199 adult type 1 diabetes patients registered in a standardized electronic health record (DPV) were included. To model the association between metabolic control and frequency of HbA_1c testing or of self-monitoring of blood glucose, multiple hierarchic regression models with adjustment for confounders were fitted. Tukey-Kramer test was used to adjust P values for multiple comparisons. Vuong test was used to compare non-nested models.

RESULTS

The baseline variables of the study population were median age 19.9 [Q1; Q3: 18.4; 32.2] years and diabetes duration 10.4 [6.8; 15.7] years. Haemoglobin A_1c was 60.4 [51.5; 72.5] mmol/mol. Frequency of HbA_1c testing was 8.0 [5.0; 9.0] within 2 years, and daily self-monitoring of blood glucose frequency was 5.0 [4.0; 6.0]. After adjustment, a U-shaped association between metabolic control and frequency of HbA_1c testing was observed with lowest HbA_1c levels in the 3-monthly HbA_1c testing group. There was an inverse relationship between self-monitoring of blood glucose and HbA_1c with lower HbA_1c associated with highest frequency of testing (>6 daily measurements). Quarterly HbA_1c testing and frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose were associated with best metabolic control. The adjusted Vuong Z statistic suggests that metabolic control might be better explained by HbA_1c testing compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

This research reveals the importance of quarterly clinical HbA_1c monitoring together with frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose in diabetes management to reach and maintain target HbA_1c .

Budget Impact of Long-Acting Insulin Analogues: The Case in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes (T1D) treatment have been available on the Brazilian market since 2002. However, the population cannot access the analogues through the public health system.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incremental budget impact of long-acting insulin analogues coverage for T1D patients in the Brazilian public health system compared to NPH insulin.

METHODS

We performed a budget impact analysis of a five-year period. The eligible population was projected using epidemiological data from the International Diabetes Federation estimates for patients between 0-14 and 20-79 years old. The prevalence of T1D was estimated in children, and the same proportion was applied to the 15-19-year-old group due to a gap in epidemiological information. We considered 4,944 new cases per year and a 34.61/100,000 inhabitants mortality rate. Market share for long-acting insulin analogues was assumed as 20% in the first year, reaching 40% in the fifth year. The mean daily dose was taken from clinical trials. We calculated the bargaining power of the Ministry of Health by dividing the price paid for human insulin in the last purchase by the average regulated price. We performed univariate and multivariate sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The incremental budget impact of long-acting insulin analogues was US$ 28.6 million in the first year, and reached US$ 58.7 million in the fifth year. The total incremental budget impact was US$ 217.9 million over the five-year period. The sensitivity analysis showed that the percentage of T1D among diabetic adults and the insulin analogue price were the main factors that affected the budget impact.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost of the first year of long-acting insulin analogue coverage would correspond to 0.03% of total public health expenditure. The main advantage of this study is that it identifies potential bargaining power because it features more realistic profiles of resource usage, once centralized purchasing is established as an economically sustainable strategy. Clinical guidelines restricting the use of insulin analogues would make the decision towards insulin analogue coverage more affordable.

Valuing technology: A qualitative interview study with physicians about insulin pump therapy for children with type 1 diabetes

Insulin pumps for children with type 1 diabetes have been broadly adopted despite equivocal evidence about comparative effectiveness. To understand why and inform policy related to public funding for new technologies, we explored how physicians interpret the value of pumps. We conducted open-ended, semi-structured interviews with 16 physicians from a pediatric diabetes network in Ontario, Canada, and analyzed the data using interpretive description. Respondents recognized that pumps fell short of expectations because they required hard work, as well as family and school support. Yet, pumps were valued for their status as new technologies and as a promising step in developing future technology. In addition, they were valued for their role within a therapeutic relationship, given the context of chronic childhood disease. These findings identify the types of beliefs that influence the adoption and diffusion of technologies. Some beliefs bear on hopes for new technology that may inappropriately hasten adoption, creating excess cost with little benefit. On the other hand, some beliefs identify potential benefits that are not captured in effectiveness studies, but may warrant consideration in resource allocation decisions. Still others suggest the need for remediation, such as those bearing on disparity in pump use by socioeconomic status. Understanding how technologies are valued can help stakeholders decide how to address such beliefs and expectations in funding decisions and implementation protocols.