Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for patients with huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Prognostic Evaluation of Conversion Therapy following Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced or Transarterial Chemoembolization Unsuitable Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with advanced-stage or intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) had poor prognoses. Recent advancements in hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated higher tumor response rates, which improved overall survival (OS). HAIC achieves an OS rate of approximately 14.5-15.3 months with a 39.1-42.5% tumor response rate. In comparison, ICIs have a 12-14 month OS rate with a 26-33% tumor response rate. Given these promising responses, this study evaluates the efficacy of conversion therapy with curative intent following HAIC or ICIs, focusing on survival outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients with advanced or TACE-unsuitable intermediate HCC. Patients completed two HAIC or four ICI cycles, followed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria imaging. Based on demographics, cirrhosis status, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification (BCLC) stage, treatment responses, and treatment modality, survival impacts were analyzed. OS was compared between HAIC and immunotherapy groups. The effect of conversion therapy with curative intent on survival outcomes was analyzed using a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Among the 80 patients, 26 achieved positive response (CR/PR) with HAIC or ICIs, and 9 of them subsequently underwent conversion therapy with curative intent. Key prognostic factors included Child-Pugh stage B versus A (HR = 2.21, p = 0.041), BCLC stage C versus B (HR = 4.38, p = 0.011), and elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels (HR = 5.02, p < 0.001). Positive responders saw substantial survival benefits (HR = 0.26, p = 0.001). Patients undergoing conversion therapy exhibited significantly enhanced survival. Median OS was 13.58 months with standard therapy, while the curative intent surgery group did not reach the median OS (p = 0.002). For CR/PR patients, 48-month survival was 75.0% for the curative surgery group versus 38.0% for standard treatment.

CONCLUSION

Conversion therapy with curative intent following HAIC or ICIs might enhance survival in patients with advanced or TACE-unsuitable intermediate-stage HCC.

Clinical Effects and Safety of Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Lipiodol versus Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Alone for Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in 2 groups of patients: those who receive lipiodol (referred to as the lipiodol group) and those who do not receive lipiodol (referred to as the control group).

METHODS

From January 2016 through December 2023, 85 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this retrospective study. In total, 40 patients received HAIC with lipiodol, while 45 patients were given HAIC without lipiodol. The modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumors were used to evaluate the tumor response, which was assessed through an imaging study. The two groups were compared regarding their overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

RESULTS

The outcomes between the lipiodol group and control group demonstrated no significant difference: the objective response rates (p = 0.066) were 32.5% and 15.6%; the disease control rates (p = 0.556) were 67.5% and 73.3%; the median OS times (p = 0.339) were 224 days and 398 days; the median PFS (p = 0.334) times were 191 days and 286 days in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively. Adverse events also showed no significant difference between the two groups: elevation of total bilirubin (p = 0.834) rates were 40.0% and 37.8%; elevation of alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.191) percentages were 35.0% and 22.2%; and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase values (p = 0.058) were 65.0% and 44.4% in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC without lipiodol was non-inferior to HAIC with lipiodol in the clinical outcome.

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in 2 groups of patients: those who receive lipiodol (referred to as the lipiodol group) and those who do not receive lipiodol (referred to as the control group).

METHODS

From January 2016 through December 2023, 85 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma were enrolled in this retrospective study. In total, 40 patients received HAIC with lipiodol, while 45 patients were given HAIC without lipiodol. The modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumors were used to evaluate the tumor response, which was assessed through an imaging study. The two groups were compared regarding their overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety.

RESULTS

The outcomes between the lipiodol group and control group demonstrated no significant difference: the objective response rates (p = 0.066) were 32.5% and 15.6%; the disease control rates (p = 0.556) were 67.5% and 73.3%; the median OS times (p = 0.339) were 224 days and 398 days; the median PFS (p = 0.334) times were 191 days and 286 days in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively. Adverse events also showed no significant difference between the two groups: elevation of total bilirubin (p = 0.834) rates were 40.0% and 37.8%; elevation of alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.191) percentages were 35.0% and 22.2%; and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase values (p = 0.058) were 65.0% and 44.4% in the lipiodol group and the control group, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC without lipiodol was non-inferior to HAIC with lipiodol in the clinical outcome.

The ARH score, a practical guide to decision-making for retreatment with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusionchemotherapy (HAIC) is a promising option for large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Identifying patients who could benefit from continuous HAIC remains a challenge. We aimed to establish an objective model to guide the decision for retreatment with HAIC.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2020, the data of patients with large unresectable HCC without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread undergoing multiple HAIC cycles from 3 different centers were retrieved. We investigated the basic tumor parameters and the effect of HAIC on liver function and tumor response, and their impact on overall survival (OS). A point score (ARH, Assessment for Retreatment with HAIC) was built by using a stepwise Cox regression model in the training cohort (n = 112) and was validated in an independent validation cohort (n = 71).

RESULTS

The high α-fetoprotein before the second cycle of HAIC, an increase in Child-Pugh score, and undesirable radiologic tumor responses remained independent negative prognostic factors and were used to create the ARH score. The prognosis of HCC patients deteriorated significantly with the increase in ARH score. The median OS of patients with ARH score 0-2 points and ≥ 2.5 points were 19.37 months and 11.60 months (P < 0.001). All of these results had been confirmed in the external validation cohort and demonstrated significance across multiple subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The ARH score makes an excellent prediction of the prognosis of HCC patients who received retreatment of HAIC. Patients with an ARH score ≥ 2.5 prior to the second cycle of HAIC may not profit from further sessions.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations. However, there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC.

METHODS

A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study. The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability.

RESULTS

HAIC outperformed Sorafenib (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.42-0.72; HR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.78; OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.37-5.98; OR = 5.45, 95%CI: 3.57-8.30; OR = 7.15, 95%CI: 4.06-12.58; OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.99-4.19; OR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.92, respectively) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.33-0.75; HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-0.98; OR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.36-6.98; OR = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.54-2.80; OR = 3.16, 95%CI: 1.71-5.85; OR = 2.67, 95%CI: 1.59-4.50; OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.05-0.54, respectively) in terms of efficacy and safety. HAIC + lenvatinib + ablation, HAIC + ablation, HAIC + anti- programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and HAIC + radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone. HAIC + TACE + S-1, HAIC + lenvatinib, HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE, and HAIC + sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC. HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE + S-1 and HAIC + TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone.

CONCLUSION

HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE. Furthermore, combined with other interventions, HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.

Clinical features and prognostic factors of patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with chemotherapy: a population-based study

Background

In inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), chemotherapy is a common treatment strategy. However, there is a lack of reliable methods to predict the prognosis of patients with inoperable HCC after chemotherapy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the clinical characteristics of patients with inoperable HCC and to establish and validate nomogram models for predicting the survival outcomes in this patient group following chemotherapy.

Methods

The data of patients diagnosed with HCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively collected. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify potential factors for inoperability in patients with HCC. Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy on prognosis. Additionally, Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the potential risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with inoperable HCC treated with chemotherapy. Finally, we constructed prognostic nomograms for predicting the 1- and 3-year survival probabilities.

Results

A total of 3,519 operable patients with HCC and 4,656 patients with inoperable HCC were ultimately included in this study. Logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between patient age, gender, race, tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage, tumor size, pretreatment alpha fetoprotein (AFP) levels, and marital status with inoperability. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed a significant improvement in both OS and CSS with the administration of chemotherapy. Moreover, 1,456 patients with inoperable HCC were enrolled in the training group and 631 patients with inoperable HCC were enrolled in the validation group to develop and validate the prognostic models. Cox regression models indicated that TNM stage, tumor size, and pretreatment AFP were independent risk factors for predicting OS and CSS in patients with inoperable HCC receiving chemotherapy. These factors were subsequently integrated into the predictive nomograms.

Conclusions

We preliminarily developed survival models with strong predictive capabilities for estimating survival probabilities in patients with HCC following chemotherapy. These models hold potential for clinical application and warrant further exploration through additional studies.

Comparable Clinical Outcomes Between Transarterial Chemoembolization or Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and PD-1 Inhibitors in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To compare the treatment efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and Methods

81 unresectable HCC patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 30 or 51 patients treated with either TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors combined with TACE (TTP) or HAIC (HTP), respectively. Tumor response and survival outcomes were compared.

Results

The median overall survival (mOS) was 21.0 months in the TTP group and 15.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.525; HR = 1.23; 95% CI 0.66-2.29). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.7 months in the TTP group and 9.9 months in the HTP group (P = 0.160; HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.42-1.16). After Propensity Score Matching (PSM), the mOS was 21.0 months in the TTP group and 18.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.644; HR = 1.20; 95% CI 0.56-2.58). The mPFS was 6.4 months in the TTP group and 15.0 months in the HTP group (P = 0.028; HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.26-0.93). The disease control rate in overall response (90.2% vs 76.7%, P = 0.116, before PSM; 91.7% vs 75.0%, P = 0.121, after PSM) and intrahepatic response (94.1% vs 80.0%, P = 0.070, before PSM; 91.7% vs 79.2%, P = 0.220, after PSM) were higher in the HTP group than in the TTP group.

Conclusion

Though including more advanced tumors, the clinical outcomes of HAIC combined with TKIs and PD-1 inhibitors are comparable to TACE-based combination therapy for unresectable HCC. Nevertheless, HTP significantly improved the PFS benefits in HCC patients with with large tumor burden or vascular invasion.

Survival benefit of preoperative hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin followed by hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Background: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) demonstrated promising efficacy against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) as an alleviative treatment. We aimed to explore the survival benefit of preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC and establish a predictive nomogram. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed data from 1251 HCC patients who underwent liver resection. 1027 patients received liver resection alone (LR group), and 224 patients were treated with FOLFOX-HAIC followed by liver resection (HLR group). Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted between the two groups. The nomogram was established based on the findings of the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: After Propensity score matching according to initial tumor characteristics, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 85.4, 72.0, and 67.2% in the LR group and 95.2, 84.7, and 75.9% in the HLR group, respectively (p = 0.014). After PSM according to preoperative tumor characteristics, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 87.9, 76.6, and 72.3% in the LR group and 95.4, 84.4, and 75.1% in the HLR group, respectively (p = 0.24). Harrell's C-indexes of the nomogram for OS prediction in patients with preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC were 0.82 (95% CI 0.78-0.86) in the training cohort and 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.93) in the validation cohort and the nomogram performed well-fitted calibration curves. Conclusion: Preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC is associated with a longer survival outcome for HCC patients. The novel nomogram efficiently predicted the OS of patients who underwent preoperative FOLFOX-HAIC.

Immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progress and new strategy

Due to its widespread occurrence and high mortality rate, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an abhorrent kind of cancer. Immunotherapy is a hot spot in the field of cancer treatment, represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which aim to improve the immune system's ability to recognize, target and eliminate cancer cells. The composition of the HCC immune microenvironment is the result of the interaction of immunosuppressive cells, immune effector cells, cytokine environment, and tumor cell intrinsic signaling pathway, and immunotherapy with strong anti-tumor immunity has received more and more research attention due to the limited responsiveness of HCC to ICI monotherapy. There is evidence of an organic combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents and ICI catering to the unmet medical needs of HCC. Moreover, immunotherapies such as adoptive cellular therapy (ACT), cancer vaccines and cytokines also show encouraging efficacy. It can significantly improve the ability of the immune system to eradicate tumor cells. This article reviews the role of immunotherapy in HCC, hoping to improve the effect of immunotherapy and develop personalized treatment regimens.

Combining HAIC and Sorafenib as a Salvage Treatment for Patients with Treatment-Failed or Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been proven to be an effective treatment for advanced HCC. In this study, we present our single-center experience of implementing combined sorafenib and HAIC treatment for these patients and compare the treatment benefit with that of sorafenib alone.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study. Our study included 71 patients who started taking sorafenib between 2019 and 2020 at Changhua Christian Hospital in order to treat advanced HCC or as a salvage treatment after the failure of a previous treatment for HCC. Of these patients, 40 received combined HAIC and sorafenib treatment. The efficacy of sorafenib alone or in combination with HAIC was measured in regard to overall survival and progression-free survival. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with overall survival and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

HAIC combined with sorafenib treatment and sorafenib alone resulted in different outcomes. The combination treatment resulted in a better image response and objective response rate. Moreover, among the patients aged under 65 years old and male patients, the combination therapy resulted in a better progression-free survival than sorafenib alone. A tumor size ≥ 3 cm, AFP > 400, and ascites were associated with a poor progression-free survival among young patients. However, the overall survival of these two groups showed no significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined HAIC and sorafenib treatment showed a treatment effect equivalent to that of sorafenib alone as a salvage treatment modality used to treat patients with advanced HCC or with experience of a previously failed treatment.

Comparative effectiveness of interventional therapeutic modalities for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta‑analysis

It is unclear whether hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is more efficient in the combination therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Head-to-head comparisons among HAIC-related therapies are lacking. For this network meta-analysis, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to April 1, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible if they evaluated the use or prolongation of TACE or HAIC in patients with advanced HCC and reported or collected survival data. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthesize data and make direct and indirect comparisons between treatments. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to explore the efficacy of various treatment options on overall survival (OS), odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CI were used for overall response rate (ORR), whereas risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CI were used for serious adverse events (SAEs). The analysis of 7 trials including a total of 1,073 patients found that sorafenib with HAIC-oxaliplatin improved survival (HR=0.33, 95% CI: 0.25-0.44); the ORR was also improved in patients treated with sorafenib plus HAIC-oxaliplatin and sorafenib plus PF-HAIC (OR=22.18, 95% CI: 10.69-52.56; and OR=2.72, 95% CI: 1.43-5.36, respectively). The incidence of liver injury was elevated in patients treated with sorafenib plus TACE (OR=5.93, 95% CI: 2.70-15.41). However, no differences in the incidences of other SAEs were identified among the treatment groups. The present meta-analysis provides preliminary evidence for the comparative safety and efficacy of HAIC and TACE combined with sorafenib, and indicates the dominance of HAIC-oxaliplatin in HCC interventional therapy. However, high-quality RCTs are required to further confirm the efficacy of HAIC-oxaliplatin. The present study has been registered with PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42021288497).

Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized Phase III Trial

PURPOSE

In a previous phase II trial, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) yielded higher treatment responses than transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare the overall survival of patients treated with FOLFOX-HAIC versus TACE as first-line treatment in this population.

METHODS

In this randomized, multicenter, open-label trial, adults with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (largest diameter ≥ 7 cm) without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic spread were randomly assigned 1:1 to FOLFOX-HAIC (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m², leucovorin 400 mg/m², fluorouracil bolus 400 mg/m² on day 1, and fluorouracil infusion 2,400 mg/m² for 24 hours, once every 3 weeks) or TACE (epirubicin 50 mg, lobaplatin 50 mg, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles). The primary end point was overall survival by intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed in patients who received ≥ 1 cycle of study treatment.

RESULTS

Between October 1, 2016, and November 23, 2018, 315 patients were randomly assigned to FOLFOX-HAIC (n = 159) or TACE (n = 156). The median overall survival in the FOLFOX-HAIC group was 23.1 months (95% CI, 18.5 to 27.7) versus 16.1 months (95% CI, 14.3 to 17.9) in the TACE group (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.75; P < .001). The FOLFOX-HAIC group showed a higher response rate than the TACE group (73 [46%] v 28 [18%]; P < .001) and a longer median progression-free survival (9.6 [95% CI, 7.4 to 11.9] v 5.4 months [95% CI, 3.8 to 7.0], P < .001). The incidence of serious adverse events was higher in the TACE group than in the FOLFOX-HAIC group (30% v 19%, P = .03). Two deaths in the FOLFOX-HAIC group and two in the TACE group were deemed to be treatment-related.

CONCLUSION

FOLFOX-HAIC significantly improved overall survival over TACE in patients with unresectable large hepatocellular carcinoma.

The Role of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this study was to investigate comprehensively the clinical effect of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) on patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The following electronic databases were searched for eligible articles published from inception to July 2020: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The main final indicators were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies entailing 4,506 cases were included for a meta-analysis. The results showed that HAIC could improve advanced HCC patients' OS (HR, 0.49; 95% CI: 0.37-0.61) and PFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI: 0.36-0.68). Remarkably, compared with Japan (HR, 0.58) and Korea (HR, 0.54), for the unresectable HCC patients, the HAIC group achieved higher efficacy on OS than the control group in China (HR, 0.24). The resectable HCC patients, who received HAIC adjuvant chemotherapy, exhibited favorable prognosis for OS (HR, 0.58; 95% CI: 0.27-0.88) and DFS (HR, 0.49; 95% CI: 0.31-0.68).

CONCLUSION

HAIC improved long-term survival for both resectable and unresectable HCC patients in comparison with other therapies. However, the clinical effect of HAIC needs to be ascertained by large-scale well-designed studies.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: a case-control study

AIM

To study the treatment efficacy and survival of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT) with compensated cirrhosis in comparison with sorafenib as the standard of care therapy versus best supportive care (BSC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This case-control study included 91 patients with advanced HCC and PVTT divided into three groups: Group 1 20 treated with HAIC, (50 mg adriamycin and 50 mg cisplatin were infused in hepatic artery); Group 2, 42 patients treated with BSC; and Group 3, 29 patients treated with sorafenib. Patients were followed up for assessment and comparison of treatment outcome by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and survival.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference among the groups studied regarding baseline demographic and tumour characteristics. The majority of patients who received sorafenib therapy (82.8%) had stable disease. The response rate (complete response + partial response) was significantly better in the HAIC group. HAIC patients had the longest survival compared with the best supportive care and sorafenib groups, which was statistically significant (29.2 ± 21.8, 4.55 ± 11.41, and 11.52 ± 8.72 months respectively, p=0.007) CONCLUSION: HAIC is a safe procedure with a better response rate and longer survival than best supportive care or sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC and PVTT.

Transient deterioration of albumin-bilirubin scores in early post-dose period of molecular targeted therapies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with 50% or higher liver occupation: A STROBE-compliant retrospective observational study

Real-world clinical cases of molecularly targeted agent (MTA) administration to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with ≥50% liver occupation have been reported, but treatment outcomes have rarely been described. We have encountered several cases in which albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores deteriorated markedly and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels elevated in the early post-dose period. The present study therefore investigated early clinical changes in ALBI score and CRP levels after initiating MTA in advanced HCC patients with ≥50% liver occupation, focusing on antitumor response at 6 weeks.This retrospective study included 46 HCC patients with liver occupation ≥50% and 191 patients with <50%, Child-Pugh score ≤7, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scores of 0 or 1, who were treated with sorafenib or lenvatinib as first-line systemic therapy at our hospital between June 2011 and January 2020. We analyzed their medical records up to March 2020 and investigated the outcomes and changes in CRP and ALBI scores classified according to antitumor response at 6 weeks.Overall survival was significantly longer in patients with partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) (13.7 months) than in patients with progressive disease (PD) (1.7 months, P < .001) in the ≥50% group. Patients with antitumor response of PR + SD at 6 weeks in the ≥50% group showed more marked deterioration of ALBI score at 2 weeks than those in the <50% group. These significant differences between groups had again disappeared at 4 and 6 weeks. Focusing on patients with PD at 6 weeks, ALBI score deteriorated over time in both groups. Regarding CRP, on 6-week PR + SD patients, a significant increase in CRP levels at 1 and 2 weeks was evident in the >50% group compared to the <50% group. These significant differences between groups had again disappeared at 4 and 6 weeks. In PD patients, no difference between groups in CRP elevation occurred at 1 and 2 weeks.In MTA treatment for patients with ≥50% liver occupation, to obtain an antitumor response of PR + SD, adequate management might be important considering transient deteriorated ALBI scores and elevated CRP levels.

Prognostic nomogram predicting survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has shown encouraging efficacy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aims to establish and validate a novel nomogram to predict individualized survival outcomes for patients with unresectable HCC after HAIC.

METHODS

Between January 2016 and December 2018, 463 patients diagnosed with HCC who initially received HAIC were included in this study (training cohort: n = 308; validation cohort: n = 153). The prognostic nomogram was constructed based on the training cohort using the independent predictors assessed by the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the model were evaluated by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve and area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (tdAUC) curve.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 35.4 months, 358 patients had died. Six factors, including C-reactive protein, albumin-bilirubin grade, alpha fetoprotein, extrahepatic metastasis, portal vein invasion and tumor size, were selected to establish the nomogram. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.710, which was significantly better than that of six conventional staging systems (P < 0.001), and the nomogram had a higher tdAUC over time. The calibration curve showed good agreement between the predicted probability and actual outcome. According to specified values, the nomogram stratified patients into three or four risk groups (P < 0.001). Similar findings could be observed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram in this study accurately predicted the OS of patients with unresectable HCC after HAIC.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Followed by Lipiodol Infusion for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Single-Center Experience

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) followed by lipiodol infusion in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). Materials and Methods: Thirty-two patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who received HAIC with regimens of cisplatin, mitomycin-C, and 5-fluorouracil followed by lipiodol infusion were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was tumor response rate. The modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was used for assessment of treatment response. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Prognostic factors for survival also were evaluated. Results: The median OS and PFS were 11.9 and 9.5 months, respectively. Seventeen patients (53.1%) achieved objective response, and 23 patients (71.9%) achieved disease control. The length of survival in the responder and disease control groups was longer than in the non-responder and progressive disease groups after two cycles of HAIC (responder vs. non-responder: 16.5 vs. 7.9 months, p = 0.001; disease control vs. progressive disease: 12.3 vs. 5.6 months, p < 0.001) and after completing HAIC (responder vs. non-responder: 15.7 vs. 6.9 months, p = 0.001; disease control vs. progressive disease: 13.6 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Better survival was associated with Child-Pugh A liver function (p = 0.013), with early response to two HAIC cycles (p = 0.009), and with response (p = 0.02) and disease control (p = 0.001) after completing HAIC treatment. Conclusion: HAIC followed by lipiodol infusion is a safe and feasible treatment for advanced HCC with PVTT. Patients with early response could continue HAIC treatment with expected prolonged survival.

Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy Improves the Efficacy of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) immunotherapy have shown promising outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), respectively. However, the combination of the two treatments has not been reported. In this study, we compared the efficacy of HAIC combined with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (HAICAP) and HAIC in patients with advanced HCC.

Methods

Between November 2018 and December 2019, advanced HCC patients that were treated with either HAICAP or HAIC were retrospectively recruited and reviewed for eligibility. Efficacy was evaluated according to tumor response and survival.

Results

As a result, 229 patients were included in this study. Patients were divided into HAICAP group (n = 81) and HAIC group (n = 148) accordingly. The follow-up time ranged from 1.0 to 21.6 months, with a median of 11.0 months. The median overall survival was 18.0 months in the HAICAP group and 14.6 months in the HAIC group (p = 0.018; HR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.34–0.91). The median progression-free survival was 10.0 months in the HAICAP group and 5.6 months in the HAIC group (p = 0.006; HR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.43–0.87). The disease control rate in overall response (83% vs 66%; p = 0.006) and intrahepatic response (85% vs 74%, respectively; p = 0.045) were higher in the HAICAP group than in the HAIC group.

Conclusion

In comparison to HAIC, HAICAP was associated with a better treatment response and survival benefits for patients with advanced HCC.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy vs transcatheter arterial embolization for patients with huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

For the treatment of huge unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) generally had poor effects and high complication rates. Our previous study found that Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a safe procedure and provides better survival than symptomatic treatment for the patients with huge unresectable HCC. The aim of the study is to compare the effect of HAIC vs TAE in patients with huge unresectable HCC.Since 2000 to 2005, patients with huge (size > 8 cm) unresectable HCC were enrolled. Twenty-six patients received HAIC and 25 patients received TAE. Each patient in the HAIC group received 2.5 + 1.4 (range: 1-6) courses of HAIC and in the TAE group received 1.8 + 1.2 (range: 1-5) courses of TAE. Baseline characteristics and survival were compared between the HAIC and TAE group.The HAIC group and the TAE group were similar in baseline characteristics and tumor stages. The overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 42% and 31% in the HAIC group and 28% and 24% in the TAE group. The patients in the HAIC group had higher overall survival than the TAE group (P = .077). Cox-regression multivariate analysis revealed that HAIC is the significant factor associated with overall survival (relative risk: 0.461, 95% confidence interval: 0.218-0.852, P = .027). No patients died of the complications of HAIC but three patients (12%) died of the complications of TAE.In conclusion, HAIC is a safe procedure and provides better survival than TAE for patients with huge unresectable HCCs.

Bi-monthly hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as a novel strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in decompensated cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We previously reported the comparable efficacy of bi-monthly hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (B-HAIC) to that of sorafenib chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) in patients with compensated cirrhosis. In this study, we demonstrate the efficacy of B-HAIC in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with aHCC refractory to transcatheter arterial chemo-embolization (TACE) were treated with B-HAIC and were divided into two groups according to hepatic functional reserve (Child-Pugh grade). Overall survival period, treatment response, and adverse events in each group were analyzed.

RESULTS

Efficacy and disease control rates in the Child-Pugh B group (n=24; 21% and 71%, respectively) were not significantly impaired compared the Child-Pugh A group (n=21; 38% and 67%, respectively). Median survival time and survival rate at 12 months in the Child-Pugh B group were 422 days and 58.3%, respectively, whereas those in the ChildPugh A group were 567 days and 70.8%, respectively. Importantly, the hepatic functional reserve of patients did not worsen in either group during the treatment period. Furthermore, the occurrence rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation of anti-tumor treatment was not significantly increased in the Child-Pugh B group.

CONCLUSION

Given the preservation of hepatic functional reserve afforded by B-HAIC chemotherapy in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, B-HAIC might be an acceptable alternative strategy for aHCC patients who do not respond to TACE.

Objective Response by mRECIST Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib in the SILIUS Trial

OBJECTIVE

In SILIUS (NCT01214343), combination of sorafenib and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with sorafenib alone. In this study, we explored the relationship between objective response by mRECIST and OS in the sorafenib group, in the combination group, and in all patients in the SILIUS trial.

METHODS

Association between objective response and OS in patients treated with sorafenib (n = 103) or combination (n = 102) and all patients (n = 205) were analyzed. The median OS of responders was compared with that of non-responders. Landmark analyses were performed according to objective response at several fixed time points, as sensitivity analyses, and the effect on OS was evaluated by Cox regression analysis with objective response as a time-dependent covariate, with other prognostic factors.

RESULTS

In the sorafenib group, OS of responders (n = 18) was significantly better than that of non-responders (n = 78) (p < 0.0001), where median OS was 27.2 (95% CI, 16.0-not reached) months for responders and 8.9 (95% CI, 6.5-12.6) months for non-responders. HRs from landmark analyses at 4, 6, and 8 months were 0.45 (p = 0.0330), 0.37 (p = 0.0053), and 0.36 (p = 0.0083), respectively. Objective response was an independent predictor of OS based on unstratified Cox regression analyses. In the all patients and the combination group, similar results were obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

In the SILIUS trial, objective response by sorafenib assessed by mRECIST is an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with HCC.

Outcomes of conventional transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma ≥10 cm

AIM

To retrospectively evaluate the outcomes of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≥10 cm.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with naïve HCC ≥10 cm (mean maximum tumor diameter, 130 ± 27.6 mm; single [n = 12], 2-9 [n = 6], and ≥10 [n = 7]) without extrahepatic spread treated with cTACE were eligible. Five (20%) had vascular invasion. Two to three stepwise cTACE sessions using iodized oil ≤10 mL in one cTACE session were scheduled. When the tumor recurred, additional cTACE was repeated on demand, if possible. Overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The prognostic factors were evaluated using uni- and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Stepwise cTACE sessions were completed for 20 (80%) patients, but could not be completed for four (16%). In the remaining (4%) patient, the whole tumor was embolized in one session. Additional treatment, mainly cTACE, was undertaken for 19 (76%) patients. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 68, 34.7, and 23.1%, respectively. A tumor number of three was a significant prognostic factor (P = 0.020) and the 1-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates in patients with ≤3 and ≥4 tumors were 81.3 and 33.3, 55.6 and 11.1, and 38.9% and 0%, respectively. Whole tumor embolization and the serum level of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II were also significant prognostic factors (P < 0.001 and P = 0.042, respectively). Bile duct complications requiring additional interventions developed in two (8%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Conventional TACE is safe and effective for huge HCCs, but has limited effects in cases with four or more tumors.

Saffron inhibits the proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma via inducing cell apoptosis

BACKGROUND

Liver cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of saffron on liver cancer cell line QGY-7703 and the underlying molecular mechanism.

METHODS

Cell growth was detected by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay and cell cycle was assessed by flow cytometry. Besides, cell apoptosis was analyzed by Annexin V/PI (Propidium Iodide) staining, and the senescent cells morphology staining of β-galactosidase was evaluated by microscopy. In addition, ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) Kit was used to assess the activity of telomerase. Moreover, reverse transcription-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) and Western blot analysis was applied to detect mRNA and protein expression levels, respectively.

RESULTS

Saffron treatment in QGY-7703 cells could significantly inhibit cell growth, arrest cell cycle in the G0/G1 phase, and induce cell apoptosis. Besides, the treatment of saffron could obviously decrease telomerase activity and hTERT level in QGY-7703 cells. In addition, enhanced Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and increased expression of P21 were found in saffron-treated cells. Moreover, we found that the number of senescent cells increased dramatically and the morphology of cells changed obviously after saffron treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Saffron administration may provide some experimental evidence for the inhibitory effect of saffron on the proliferation of QGY-7703 cells, suggesting that saffron may have potential utility for the treatment of liver cancer.

Efficacy of bi-monthly hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Even though the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is widely accepted, controversies on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still exist. We evaluated the efficacy of an approach with repeated hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) given at eight-week intervals for the treatment of advanced HCC.

METHODS

Of the 66 compensated cirrhotic patients with advanced HCC refractory to transcatheter arterial chemo-embolization (TACE) enrolled in our study, 21 were treated by bi-monthly hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (B-HAIC) and the rest by sorafenib. The overall survival periods, curative responses, and adverse events in each group were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The efficacy rate was significantly higher in the B-HAIC group (38%, 11%, P<0.05). The median survival time and the survival rate at 12 months in the B-HAIC group were 567 days and 70.8%, and those in the sorafenib group were 366 days and 47.6%, respectively. Thus, our data suggests that the B-HAIC treatment is not inferior to sorafenib for the treatment of advanced HCC in compensated cirrhotic patients. Furthermore, the occurrence of serious adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment was less frequent in the B-HAIC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the hepatic function reserve preservation afforded by the B-HAIC treatment in our experience, we suggest that B-HAIC should be considered an alternative strategy for advanced HCC patients who do not respond to TACE.

Sorafenib plus low-dose cisplatin and fluorouracil hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus sorafenib alone in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (SILIUS): a randomised, open label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus sorafenib in phase 2 trials has shown favourable tumour control and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, no randomised phase 3 trial has tested the combination of sorafenib with continuous arterial infusion chemotherapy. We aimed to compare continuous hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy plus sorafenib with sorafenib alone in patients with advanced, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial (SILIUS) at 31 sites in Japan. Eligible patients were aged 20 years or older, with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma not suitable for resection, local ablation, or transarterial chemoembolisation; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1; Child-Pugh score 7 or lower; and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system with a computer-generated sequence to receive 400 mg sorafenib orally twice daily or 400 mg sorafenib orally twice daily plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (cisplatin 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 and fluorouracil 330 mg/m² continuously on days 1-5 and 8-12 of every 28-day cycle via an implanted catheter system). The primary endpoint was overall survival. The primary efficacy analysis comprised all randomised patients (the intention-to-treat population), and the safety analysis comprised all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01214343.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 4, 2010, and June 10, 2014, 206 patients were randomly assigned (103 to the sorafenib group, 103 to the sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy group). One patient in the sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy group withdrew after randomisation. Median overall survival was similar in the sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (n=102) and sorafenib monotherapy (n=103) groups (11·8 months [95% CI 9·1-14·5] vs 11·5 months [8·2-14·8]; hazard ratio 1·009 [95% CI 0·743-1·371]; p=0·955). Grade 3-4 adverse events that were more frequent in the sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy group than in the sorafenib monotherapy group included anaemia (15 [17%] of 88 vs six [6%] of 102), neutropenia (15 [17%] vs one [1%]), thrombocytopenia (30 [34%] vs 12 [12%]), and anorexia (12 [14%] vs six [6%]).

INTERPRETATION

Addition of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy to sorafenib did not significantly improve overall survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

FUNDING

Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.

Management consensus guideline for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2016 updated by the Taiwan Liver Cancer Association and the Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in Taiwan. To help clinical physicians to manage patients with HCC, the Taiwan Liver Cancer Association and the Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan produced the management consensus guideline for HCC.

METHODS

The recommendations focus on nine important issues on management of HCC, including surveillance, diagnosis, staging, surgery, local ablation, transarterial chemoembolization/transarterial radioembolization/hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, systemic therapy, radiotherapy, and prevention.

RESULTS

The consensus statements were discussed, debated and got consensus in each expert team. And then the statements were sent to all of the experts for further discussion and refinement. Finally, all of the experts were invited to vote for the statements, including the level of evidence and recommendation.

CONCLUSION

With the development of the management consensus guideline, HCC patients could benefit from the optimal therapeutic modality.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective non-randomized study

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A-B. However, the efficacy of TACE on large (≥ 10 cm) stage A-B HCC is far from satisfactory, and it is proposed that hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might be a better first-line treatment of this disease. Hence, we compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with the modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) regimen and those of TACE in patients with massive unresectable HCC.

METHODS

A prospective, non-randomized, phase II study was conducted on patients with massive unresectable HCC. The protocol involved HAIC with the mFOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m² intra-arterial infusion; leucovorin, 400 mg/m² intra-arterial infusion; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m² bolus infusion and 2400 mg/m² continuous infusion) every 3 weeks and TACE with 50 mg of epirubicin, 50 mg of lobaplatin, 6 mg of mitomycin, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The tumor responses, time-to-progression (TTP), and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study: 38 in the HAIC group and 41 in the TACE group. The HAIC group exhibited higher partial response and disease control rates than did the TACE group (52.6% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001; 83.8% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.004). The median TTPs for the HAIC and TACE groups were 5.87 and 3.6 months (hazard radio [HR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-4.76, P = 0.015). More patients in the HAIC group than in the TACE group underwent resection (10 vs. 3, P = 0.033). The proportions of grade 3-4 adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) were lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group (grade 3-4 AEs: 13 vs. 27, P = 0.007; SAEs: 6 vs. 15, P = 0.044). More patients in the TACE group than in the HAIC group had the study treatment terminated early due to intolerable treatment-related adverse events or the withdrawal of consent (10 vs. 2, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

HAIC with mFOLFOX yielded significantly better treatment responses and less serious toxicity than did TACE. HAIC might represent a feasible and promising first-line treatment for patients with massive unresectable HCC.

Anticancer effect of 20(S)-ginsenoside Rh2 on HepG2 liver carcinoma cells: Activating GSK-3β and degrading β-catenin

20(S)-ginsenoside Rh2 [(S)Rh2] possesses potential to prevent cancer in vitro as well as in vivo, but the underlying mechanism is still unknown. First, we infected HepG2 cells with lentivirus which carries β‑catenin. We detected the pharmacological effects of (S)Rh2 on HepG2 and HepG2‑β‑catenin cells and found that the IC50 of (S)Rh2 exposure on HepG2-β-catenin cells was higher than HepG2 cells. Flow cytometry (FCM) indicated that (S)Rh2 could be arrested in G0/G1 phase and induce early apoptosis in HepG2 and HepG2‑β‑catenin cells. Second, ELISA kit was used to check the activity of glycogen synthase kinase‑3β (GSK‑3β), which was upregulated by (S)Rh2. GSK‑3β inhibitor BIO, was used to verify that (S)Rh2 activated GSK‑3β. PCR and western blotting results indicated that (S)Rh2 could degrade the expression of β‑catenin, which combined with TCF in the nucleus and activate transcription of Wnt target genes, such as Bax, Bcl‑2, cyclin D1, MMP3, which were checked by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), PCR and western blotting. The results showed that the expression of Bax mRNA and proteins increased, while the cyclin D1, Bcl‑2, MMP3 mRNA and proteins were downregulated in HepG2 and HepG2‑β‑catenin cells which was induced by (S)Rh2. By contrast, with the HepG2-β-catenin + (S)Rh2 group, the expression of other mRNA and proteins in HepG2 + (S)Rh2 group changed significantly. In vivo, experiments were performed using a nude mouse xenograft model to investigate the (S)Rh2 effect. So these results suggested that (S)Rh2 could suppress proliferation, promote apoptosis and inhibit metastasis of HepG2, decrease weight of tumor by downregulating β‑catenin through activating GSK‑3β and the pharmacological effect of (S)Rh2 on HepG2 cells might be weakened by overexpression of β‑catenin.

Current Status of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is frequently used to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Asian countries. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting the use of HAIC.

SUMMARY

Many studies report high response rates in patients with advanced HCC receiving HAIC, and clinical responses translate to survival benefits. Therefore, prediction of an antitumor response is important in selecting appropriate treatments. There are no proven post-sorafenib therapeutic measures or procedures for HCC patients with poor liver function, and HAIC is one of the few options for patients in these situations. Despite studies showing its effectiveness, the use of HAIC for treatment of advanced HCC is unclear because convincing data from large-scale randomized clinical trials are lacking. For HAIC to become a standard treatment for HCC, such trials must establish its efficacy compared with other HCC therapies; prediction of antitumor response in HAIC may aid trial design, and a multi-center, open-labelled, randomized clinical trial of HAIC in advanced HCC is currently in progress. Optimization of HCC treatment protocols and regimens is also required.

KEY MESSAGE

We think that both HAIC and sorafenib are effective treatments for advanced HCC, and this review presents evidence supporting this contention.

Retrograde-outflow percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion using cisplatin: A pilot study on pharmacokinetics and feasibility

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and underlying pharmacokinetics of the retrograde-outflow technique for percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion (PIHP).

METHODS

Retrograde-outflow PIHP was performed in 12 male pigs (weight, 37-44 kg) by redirecting hepatic outflow through the portal vein. Blood with cisplatin (2.5 mg/kg) in an extracorporeal circuit was circulated through the liver under isolation using rotary pumps with balloon catheters. Hepatic angiographic examinations were conducted during perfusion, and histopathological examinations of the organs were conducted after perfusion. The maximum platinum concentration (C max), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and chronologic laboratory data were measured.

RESULTS

Retrograde-outflow isolated hepatic angiography confirmed that contrast media flowed into the portal veins in all 12 pigs. The hepatic veins and inferior vena cava were not opacified. Hepatic C max (86.3 mg/l) was 39-fold greater than systemic C max (2.2 mg/l), and hepatic AUC (1330.8 min · mg/l) was 30-fold greater than systemic AUC (44.6 min · mg/l). Histopathological examinations revealed no ischaemic changes or other abnormalities in the liver, duodenum, small intestine, or colon. Within 1 week of the procedure, chronologic laboratory data (n = 3) normalized or returned to pre-therapy levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The retrograde-outflow technique appears to enable safe and feasible PIHP therapy.

KEY POINTS

• The portal vein acted as an outflow tract under retrograde-outflow PIHP. • Plasma hepatic-to-systemic exposure ratio was 39.2 for the maximum platinum concentration. • Plasma hepatic-to-systemic exposure ratio was 29.8 for the AUC. • The retrograde-outflow technique appears to enable safe and feasible PIHP.

Effect of trichostatin A on anti HepG2 liver carcinoma cells: inhibition of HDAC activity and activation of Wnt/β-Catenin signaling

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of deacetylase inhibitory trichostatin A (TSA) on anti HepG2 liver carcinoma cells and explore the underlying mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HepG2 cells exposed to different concentrations of TSA for 24, 48, or 72h were examined for cell growth inhibition using CCK8, changes in cell cycle distribution with flow cytometry, cell apoptosis with annexin V-FTIC/PI double staining, and cell morphology changes under an inverted microscope. Expression of β-catenin, HDAC1, HDAC3, H3K9, CyclinD1 and Bax proteins was tested by Western blotting. Gene expression for β-catenin, HDAC1and HDAC3 was tested by q-PCR. β-Catenin and H3K9 proteins were also tested by immunofluorescence. Activity of Renilla luciferase (pTCF/LEF-luc) was assessed using the Luciferase Reporter Assay system reagent. The activity of total HDACs was detected with a HDACs colorimetric kit.

RESULTS

Exposure to TSA caused significant dose-and time-dependent inhibition of HepG2 cell proliferation (p<0.05) and resulted in increased cell percentages in G0/ G1 and G2/M phases and decrease in the S phase. The apoptotic index in the control group was 6.22±0.25%, which increased to 7.17±0.20% and 18.1±0.42% in the treatment group. Exposure to 250 and 500nmol/L TSA also caused cell morphology changes with numerous floating cells. Expression of β-catenin, H3K9and Bax proteins was significantly increased, expression levels of CyclinD1, HDAC1, HDAC3 were decreased. Expression of β-catenin at the genetic level was significantly increased, with no significant difference in HDAC1and HDAC3 genes. In the cytoplasm, expression of β-catenin fluorescence protein was not obvious changed and in the nucleus, small amounts of green fluorescence were observed. H3K9 fluorescence protein were increased. Expression levels of the transcription factor TCF werealso increased in HepG2 cells following induction by TSA, whikle the activity of total HDACs was decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

TSA inhibits HDAC activity, promotes histone acetylation, and activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling to inhibit proliferation of HepG2 cell, arrest cell cycling and induce apoptosis.