1
|
Moso MA, Taiaroa G, Steinig E, Zhanduisenov M, Butel-Simoes G, Savic I, Taouk ML, Chea S, Moselen J, O'Keefe J, Prestedge J, Pollock GL, Khan M, Soloczynskyj K, Fernando J, Martin GE, Caly L, Barr IG, Tran T, Druce J, Lim CK, Williamson DA. Non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viral detection and whole genome sequencing from COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices: a laboratory evaluation study. THE LANCET. MICROBE 2024; 5:e317-e325. [PMID: 38359857 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(23)00375-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been high uptake of rapid antigen test device use for point-of-care COVID-19 diagnosis. Individuals who are symptomatic but test negative on COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices might have a different respiratory viral infection. We aimed to detect and sequence non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses from rapid antigen test devices, which could assist in the characterisation and surveillance of circulating respiratory viruses in the community. METHODS We applied archival clinical nose and throat swabs collected between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2022, that previously tested positive for a common respiratory virus (adenovirus, influenza, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza, rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus [RSV], or seasonal coronavirus; 132 swabs and 140 viral targets) on PCR to two commercially available COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices, the Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device and Roche SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Self-Test. In addition, we collected 31 COVID-19 rapid antigen test devices used to test patients who were symptomatic at The Royal Melbourne Hospital emergency department in Melbourne, Australia. We extracted total nucleic acid from the device paper test strips and assessed viral recovery using multiplex real-time PCR (rtPCR) and capture-based whole genome sequencing. Sequence and genome data were analysed through custom computational pipelines, including subtyping. FINDINGS Of the 140 respiratory viral targets from archival samples, 89 (64%) and 88 (63%) were positive on rtPCR for the relevant taxa following extraction from Panbio or Roche rapid antigen test devices, respectively. Recovery was variable across taxa: we detected influenza A in nine of 18 samples from Panbio and seven of 18 from Roche devices; parainfluenza in 11 of 20 samples from Panbio and 12 of 20 from Roche devices; human metapneumovirus in 11 of 16 from Panbio and 14 of 16 from Roche devices; seasonal coronavirus in eight of 19 from Panbio and two of 19 from Roche devices; rhinovirus in 24 of 28 from Panbio and 27 of 28 from Roche devices; influenza B in four of 15 in both devices; and RSV in 16 of 18 in both devices. Of the 31 COVID-19 devices collected from The Royal Melbourne Hospital emergency department, 11 tested positive for a respiratory virus on rtPCR, including one device positive for influenza A virus, one positive for RSV, four positive for rhinovirus, and five positive for SARS-CoV-2. Sequences of target respiratory viruses from archival samples were detected in 55 (98·2%) of 56 samples from Panbio and 48 (85·7%) of 56 from Roche rapid antigen test devices. 98 (87·5%) of 112 viral genomes were completely assembled from these data, enabling subtyping for RSV and influenza viruses. All 11 samples collected from the emergency department had viral sequences detected, with near-complete genomes assembled for influenza A and RSV. INTERPRETATION Non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses can be detected and sequenced from COVID-19 rapid antigen devices. Recovery of near full-length viral sequences from these devices provides a valuable opportunity to expand genomic surveillance programmes for public health monitoring of circulating respiratory viruses. FUNDING Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund and Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Moso
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - George Taiaroa
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eike Steinig
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Madiyar Zhanduisenov
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Grace Butel-Simoes
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ivana Savic
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mona L Taouk
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Socheata Chea
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jean Moselen
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jacinta O'Keefe
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Prestedge
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Georgina L Pollock
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mohammad Khan
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Katherine Soloczynskyj
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Janath Fernando
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Genevieve E Martin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Leon Caly
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ian G Barr
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Thomas Tran
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Julian Druce
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chuan K Lim
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Deborah A Williamson
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Royal Melbourne Hospital at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coan EW, Tuon FF. Laboratory diagnosis of measles infection using molecular and serology during 2019-2020 outbreak in Brazil. J Clin Virol 2024; 170:105623. [PMID: 38065047 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laboratory diagnosis of measles can be challenging, and the reintroduction of the measles virus in Brazil has brought about new issues. The aim of this study was to analyze the qPCR results of swab and urine samples and compare them with those of immunological methods for the diagnosis of measles. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study based on a retrospective analysis of 3,451 suspected cases using laboratory test surveillance databases for qPCR (respiratory swabs and urine) and serologic tests for IgM and paired IgG. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and agreement through kappa and adjusted kappa coefficients (PABAK) were calculated using different diagnostic strategies. RESULTS The swab and urine samples obtained using real-time qPCR were equivalent. Samples collected simultaneously and the combined samples showed moderate agreement between IgM ELISA and real-time qPCR; however, 48.9 % of the IgM ELISA analyses did not demonstrate detectable qPCR concentrations during simultaneous collections and 43.9 % of combined collections. The paired analysis of IgG showed an accuracy of 67.5 % for IgM and 90.7 % for real-time qPCR. CONCLUSIONS Diagnosis based on IgM presents detection delimitation in samples collected early (1-5 days), suggesting that these individuals satisfy at least two criteria. In addition to qPCR, paired analysis of IgG using ELISA can be used to increase the sensitivity and specificity of laboratory diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Wessler Coan
- Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba PR, Brazil
| | - Felipe Francisco Tuon
- Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba PR, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Someya K, Okemoto-Nakamura Y, Kurata T, Kanbayashi D, Saito N, Itamochi M, Otsuki N, Hanada K, Takeda M. Establishment of measles virus receptor-expressing Vero cells lacking functional poliovirus receptors. Microbiol Immunol 2023; 67:166-170. [PMID: 36564197 DOI: 10.1111/1348-0421.13047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Global efforts are underway to eliminate measles and rubella, and active viral surveillance is the key to achieving this goal. In addition, the World Health Organization announced guidelines for handling materials potentially infectious for poliovirus (PV) to minimize the risk of PV reintroduction and to achieve PV eradication. To support global efforts, we established new PV-non-susceptible cell lines that are useful for the isolation of measles virus (MeV) and rubella virus (RuV) (Vero ΔPVR1/2 hSLAM+). In the cell lines, MeV and RuV replicated efficiently, with no concern regarding PV replication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenji Someya
- Department of Virology III, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.,Global Specialized Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, The World Health Organization, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Okemoto-Nakamura
- Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | - Noriko Saito
- Aichi Prefectural Institute of Public Health, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Noriyuki Otsuki
- Department of Virology III, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.,Global Specialized Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, The World Health Organization, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kentaro Hanada
- Department of Quality Assurance and Radiological Protection, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makoto Takeda
- Department of Virology III, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.,Global Specialized Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, The World Health Organization, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
González-Praetorius A, Fernández-García A, Pérez-Olmeda M, García-Rivera MV, Caballero-López B, Gilaberte-Reyzabal S, Román-Marcos E, Ory-Machón FD, Echevarría-Mayo JE. Measles outbreak in the sanitary area of Guadalajara (Spain): difficulty in microbiological diagnosis in the era of its elimination. ENFERMEDADES INFECCIOSAS Y MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA (ENGLISH ED.) 2022; 40:532-538. [PMID: 35811250 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimce.2022.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Spain, like in other countries where endemic measles has been eliminated, there is a need for available diagnostic tolos for confirming any cases in order to prevent and control its transmission. We describe the different microbiological tests used for the diagnosis of measles during an outbreak that occurred in 2019 in the province of Guadalajara (Spain). METHODS Serological and molecular tests were performed at the Microbiology laboratory of the Guadalajara University Hospital and at the National Center for Microbiology of the Carlos III Health Institute (Majadahonda, Spain). Patient data were obtained from the surveillance system. RESULTS A total of 43 patients had a laboratory diagnosis of measles: 29 cases by PCR (pharyngeal exudate or urine) and positive specific IgM, 11 cases by PCR, and 3 cases only by a positive IgM. Genotype D8 was identified in 35 confirmed cases and genotype A in two that were discarded as post-vaccination cases. PCR was positive in the acute sera of 11 out of 14 patients with a negative IgM. Eleven confirmed cases had recieved one or two vaccine doses. Twelve adult patients were hospitalizated, all of them with a diagnostic of hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS The combination of molecular tests and the presence of specific IgM is necessary for a correct diagnosis of measles and also to classify patients with a breakthrough infection or vaccine failures (primary or secondary). Genotyping is essential for the correct classification of the patients in the context of a measles elimination program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aurora Fernández-García
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación, Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mayte Pérez-Olmeda
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Victoria García-Rivera
- Servicio de Epidemiología, Dirección General de Salud Pública de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
| | | | | | - Elena Román-Marcos
- Servicio de Epidemiología, Dirección General de Salud Pública de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
| | - Fernando de Ory-Machón
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación, Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Emilio Echevarría-Mayo
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación, Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
González-Praetorius A, Fernández-García A, Pérez-Olmeda M, García-Rivera MV, Caballero-López B, Gilaberte-Reyzabal S, Román-Marcos E, de Ory-Machón F, Echevarría-Mayo JE. Measles outbreak in the sanitary area of Guadalajara (Spain): Difficulty in microbiological diagnosis in the era of its elimination. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 2021; 40:S0213-005X(21)00232-9. [PMID: 34429225 DOI: 10.1016/j.eimc.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Spain, like in other countries where endemic measles has been eliminated, there is a need for available diagnostic tools for confirming any cases in order to prevent and control its transmission. We describe the different microbiological tests used for the diagnosis of measles during an outbreak that occurred in 2019 in the province of Guadalajara (Spain). METHODS Serological and molecular tests were performed at the Microbiology laboratory of the Guadalajara University Hospital and at the National Center for Microbiology of the Carlos III Health Institute (Majadahonda, Spain). Patient data were obtained from the surveillance system. RESULTS A total of 43 patients had a laboratory diagnosis of measles: 29 cases by PCR (pharyngeal exudate or urine) and positive specific IgM, 11 cases by PCR, and 3 cases only by a positive IgM. Genotype D8 was identified in 35 confirmed cases and genotype A in 2 that were discarded as post-vaccination cases. PCR was positive in the acute sera of 11 out of 14 patients with a negative IgM. Eleven confirmed cases had recieved one or 2 vaccine doses. Twelve adult patients were hospitalizated, all of them with a diagnostic of hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS The combination of molecular tests and the presence of specific IgG and IgM are necessary for a correct diagnosis of measles and also to classify patients with a breakthrough infection or vaccine failures (primary or secondary). Genotyping is essential for the correct classification of the patients in the context of a measles elimination program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aurora Fernández-García
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, España
| | - Mayte Pérez-Olmeda
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, España
| | - M Victoria García-Rivera
- Servicio de Epidemiología, Dirección General de Salud Pública de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, España
| | | | | | - Elena Román-Marcos
- Servicio de Epidemiología, Dirección General de Salud Pública de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, España
| | - Fernando de Ory-Machón
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, España
| | - Juan Emilio Echevarría-Mayo
- Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, España; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Characteristics of Measles Exanthema: A Study of a Series of 13 Adult Cases and Review of the Literature. Am J Dermatopathol 2020; 41:914-923. [PMID: 31021834 DOI: 10.1097/dad.0000000000001431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Despite available vaccination, measles is one of the leading causes of death among young children in developing countries. In clinical practice, the spectrum of differential diagnoses of morbilliform exanthemas associated with fever is wide, and it can be hard to differentiate from other infectious eruptions, especially in adults or in atypical courses in immunocompromised patients. The goal of our study was to identify characteristic histomorphological and immunohistochemical patterns of measles exanthema through the study of 13 skin biopsy specimens obtained from 13 patients with this disease and a review of cases in the literature. Histopathological features of measles exanthema are quite distinctive and characterized by a combination of multinucleated keratinocytes, and individual and clustered necrotic keratinocytes in the epidermis with pronounced folliculosebaceous as well as acrosyringeal involvement. Immunohistochemical staining of skin biopsies with anti-measles virus (MeV) nucleoprotein and anti-MeV phosphoprotein can be of great value in confirming the diagnosis of measles. Both methods can serve as quick additional diagnostic tools for prompt implementation of quarantine measures and for providing medical assistance, even in patients in whom the clinician did not consider measles as a differential diagnosis of the rash due to the rarity of the disease in a putatively vaccinated community.
Collapse
|
7
|
McMahon JL, Northill JA, Finger M, Lyon M, Lambert SB, Mackay IM. Laboratory methods supporting measles surveillance in Queensland, Australia, 2010-2017. Access Microbiol 2020; 2:acmi000093. [PMID: 32974570 PMCID: PMC7470308 DOI: 10.1099/acmi.0.000093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Australia was officially recognised as having eliminated endemic measles transmission in 2014. Maintaining laboratory support for surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, is an essential component of reaching and maintaining transmission-free status. METHODOLOGY Real-time and conventional PCR-based tools were used to detect, differentiate from measles vaccine virus (MeVV), and sequence fragments of measles viruses (MeV) identified from specimens collected in Queensland. Specimens were mostly from travellers who had visited or returned to Queensland from international or interstate sites or been in contact with a case from either group. RESULTS Between 2010 and 2017, 13 678 specimens were tested in our laboratory using real-time RT-PCR (RT-rPCR), identifying 533 positives. Most specimens were swabs (70.98 %) and urines (25.56 %). A MeVV RT-rPCR was used on request and identified 154 instances of MeVV. MeV-positive extracts were genotyped as required. Genotypes identified among sequenced specimens included B3, D4, D8, D9, G3, and H1 as well as members of clade A as expected from the detection of MeV among virus introductions due to global travel and vaccination. CONCLUSION We describe the workflow employed and results from our laboratory between 2010 and 2017 for the sensitive detection of MeV infection, supporting high-quality surveillance to ensure the maintenance of Australia's measles-free status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie L. McMahon
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Public Health Virology Laboratory, Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia
| | - Judith A. Northill
- Public Health Virology Laboratory, Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mitchell Finger
- Public Health Virology Laboratory, Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Lyon
- Public Health Virology Laboratory, Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stephen B. Lambert
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian M. Mackay
- Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Public Health Virology Laboratory, Forensic and Scientific Services, Queensland Health, Coopers Plains, Coopers Plains, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ma R, Lu L, Suo L, Zhangzhu J, Chen M, Pang X. Evaluation of the adequacy of measles laboratory diagnostic tests in the era of accelerating measles elimination in Beijing, China. Vaccine 2019; 37:3804-3809. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.05.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Revised: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
9
|
Importance of real-time RT-PCR to supplement the laboratory diagnosis in the measles elimination program in China. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0208161. [PMID: 30500842 PMCID: PMC6267958 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In addition to high vaccination coverage, timely and accurate laboratory confirmation of measles cases is critical to interrupt measles transmission. To evaluate the role of real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the diagnosis of measles cases, 46,363 suspected measles cases with rash and 395 suspected measles cases without rash were analyzed in this study; the cases were obtained from the Chinese measles surveillance system (MSS) during 2014–2017 and simultaneously detected by measles-specific IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and real-time RT-PCR. However, some IgM-negative measles cases were identified by real-time RT-PCR. The proportion of these IgM-negative and viral nucleic acid-positive measles cases was high among measles cases with measles vaccination history, cases without rash symptoms, and cases within 3 days of specimen collection after onset. The proportion of IgM-negative and viral nucleic acid-positive measles cases in the 0–3 day group was up to 14.4% for measles cases with rash and 40% for measles cases without rash. Moreover, the proportions of IgM-negative and nucleic acid-positive measles cases gradually increased with the increase in the measles vaccination dose. Therefore, integrated with IgM ELISA, real-time RT-PCR would greatly improve the accurate diagnosis of measles cases and avoid missing the measles cases, especially for measles cases during the first few days after onset when the patients were highly contagious and for measles cases with secondary vaccine failure. In conclusion, our study reconfirmed that IgM ELISA is the gold-standard detection assay for measles cases confirmation. However, real-time RT-PCR should be introduced and used to supplement the laboratory diagnosis, especially in the setting of pre-elimination and/or elimination wherever appropriate.
Collapse
|
10
|
Hübschen JM, Bork SM, Brown KE, Mankertz A, Santibanez S, Ben Mamou M, Mulders MN, Muller CP. Challenges of measles and rubella laboratory diagnostic in the era of elimination. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23:511-515. [PMID: 28412379 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The Member States of the WHO European Region adopted the goal of measles and rubella elimination more than 10 years ago, but so far only 21 of 53 countries have reached this target. Laboratory investigation of suspected cases is essential to support disease elimination efforts. Therefore, WHO maintains a network of accredited laboratories providing high-quality testing. Laboratory investigation heavily relies on specific IgM serology and increasingly on virus detection by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, but other methods such as IgG avidity testing and genetic characterization of virus strains have gained in importance. In elimination settings, often few samples from suspected cases are available for testing, but testing proficiency must be maintained. The predictive value of an IgM-positive result decreases and other rash-fever disease aetiologies become more important. In addition, cases with a rash after measles/rubella vaccination or with mild disease after waning of vaccine-induced antibodies are seen more often. Thus, it is necessary to perform comprehensive and potentially time-consuming and costly investigations of every suspected case using quality-controlled laboratory methods. At the same time rapid feedback to public health officers is required for timely interventions. The introduction of new laboratory methods for comprehensive case investigations requires training of staff under the supervision of WHO-accredited reference laboratories and the definition of appropriate test algorithms. Clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological data are essential for final case classification and investigation of chains of transmission in the endgame of measles and rubella elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Hübschen
- WHO European Regional Reference Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette and Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - S M Bork
- WHO European Regional Reference Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette and Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - K E Brown
- WHO Global Specialized Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Virus Reference Department, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - A Mankertz
- WHO European Regional Reference Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Santibanez
- WHO European Regional Reference Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Ben Mamou
- Vaccine-Preventable Diseases and Immunization, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M N Mulders
- Expanded Programme on Immunization, Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - C P Muller
- WHO European Regional Reference Laboratory for Measles and Rubella, Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette and Laboratoire National de Santé, Dudelange, Luxembourg.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zeng SZ, Zhang B, Zhang Y, Xie LY, Xiong J, Yu T, Xie ZP, Gao HC, Duan ZJ. Identification of 12 Cases of Acute Measles Encephalitis Without Rash: Table 1. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:1630-1633. [DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|