Patient Preferences for Receiving Education on Venous Thromboembolism Prevention - A Survey of Stakeholder Organizations

A Call to Action for Anticoagulation Stewardship to Address Suboptimal Thromboprophylaxis Practices for at-Risk Non-Orthopedic Surgical Patients in Vietnam: An Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the current practices of VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing abdominal-pelvic surgery (PAS) and to identify the factors that influence surgeons' practice of VTE prophylaxis.

Patients and Methods

This two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-method study used chart audits followed by semi-structured interviews based on the theoretical domain framework (TDF). During Phase I, quantitative data from 240 medical records of patients with PAS in April 2023 were audited to measure adherence rates to the standard thromboprophylaxis guidelines. In Phase II, in-depth interviews with 16 surgeons were conducted and analyzed using thematic content analysis based on the TDF framework to understand the determinants of thromboprophylaxis in patients with PAS.

Results

Audits of 240 medical records of patients showed the rate of appropriate prophylactic methods was low (11.7%). For patients on anticoagulant prophylaxis, adherence rates regarding drug selection and dosage were high (100% and 89.3%, respectively), whereas adherence rates regarding time of initiation and length of prophylaxis were low (50% and 28.6%, respectively). A qualitative analysis identified 12 theoretical domains relevant to thromboprophylaxis practices among surgeons. The most encountered barriers included concerns about bleeding risk, resource issues, low beliefs about preventive benefits for certain patients with PAS, inadequate knowledge and training, and a lack of protocol and policy. The most encountered enablers included positive beliefs in prophylaxis benefits, mandatory policy and computerized supportive tools, thromboprophylaxis set as patient safety goals, leadership and multidisciplinary working, and training.

Conclusion

Significant quality gaps were present in VTE prevention practice for abdominal-pelvic surgical patients, and multiple coexisting factors prevented the full adoption of practice standards. The implementation of an anticoagulation stewardship program is essential for addressing practical issues.

Caregiver Preferences Toward Patient Education Materials for Children With Cleft Lip and/or Palate

ObjectiveTo determine caregiver preferences for education modalities.Design/SettingA cross-sectional study of caregivers of patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) seen at this American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association-approved center in the Midwest between January 2017 and September 2022 was conducted.Patients/ParticipantsThe population included parents of patients undergoing primary or secondary revision surgeries after a diagnosis of CL/P.Main Outcome MeasuresA phone interview gathered demographics, education preferences, familial research, and resources.ResultsOf the 81 families of CL/P patients, 42 families consented for interviews. Patients first presented to the clinic at an average age of 2.3 years of age (range 0-17) and had a mean age of 10.1 years (range 1-23) at the time of parental interview. The majority of interviewees identified as the patient's mother (90.5%), Caucasian (78.6%), and had completed a college education (81%). The majority (85.7%) of caregivers reported completing research prior to the first appointment. Most participants preferred electronic resources (35.7%), support groups (29%), books or written material (29%), with fewer preferring videos (12%), social media (7%), or podcasts (2%).ConclusionThe majority of families preferred having multiple resources available to learn about CL/P; however, the most common preferences were additional books, pamphlets, and online materials such as websites, videos, and audiobooks. With the multitude of options available for patient education materials, designing and providing high-quality materials that will be used by families and meet the health literacy of this diverse patient population is crucial.

Theatre Safety Club 2024

The Theatre Safety Club 2024 took place on 6 November in London and on 26 November in Newcastle. The CPDcertified event aimed to educate and provide insight into safety in the operating theatre, boasting an impressive line-up of speakers and sessions that were well attended. The conference was sponsored by Cardinal Health, a leading healthcare company providing value-based product solutions, with a comprehensive portfolio covering mechanical thromboprophylaxis, nutritional insufficiency solutions, thermometry and surgical gloves.

Patient-centric care in primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): shared decision-making and assessment of health-related quality of life

ABSTRACTImmune thrombocytopenia (ITP), an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet counts and increased bleeding risk, can impair health-related quality of life (HRQoL), impacting patients' daily lives and mental health. A number of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (both generic and specific to ITP) can be used to understand the impact of ITP on HRQoL and generate evidence to guide disease management. As well-developed PRO tools could help in HRQoL assessment, their optimization could help to solidify a patient-centric approach to ITP management. Shared decision-making is a collaborative process between a patient and their healthcare professional in making decisions about care. Treatment decisions based on this shared process between physician and patient are recommended by clinical guidelines. The goal of this narrative review is to discuss treatment decisions with regards to patient-centric ITP management, with a focus on the impact of PRO measures and the process of shared decision-making in practice.

Preparation of Patients for Central Venous Catheter Care in the Home: Perspectives From Health Care Personnel

Patients managing central venous catheters (CVCs) outside of hospitals need training in CVC care. Using 3 focus groups, the study identified themes in how health care personnel (HCP) prepare patients and their caregivers for CVC care at home. Four major themes and 25 nested subthemes were identified: (1) providing the right amount of education at the right time, (2) tailoring education to patient needs, (3) developing patient education tools, and (4) managing differences in recommendations to patients. HCPs in the study ensured patients and caregivers learn what they need to know when they need to know it, using appropriate patient education tools. Patients and caregivers are largely responsible for CVC care and central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention outside of acute care hospitals and long-term care settings, and HCP take seriously their obligation to provide them with appropriate education and tools to best enhance their ability to keep themselves safe.

A Multi-center Cross-Sectional Assessment of Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward Thromboprophylaxis

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially avoidable condition that affects hospitalized patients. Risk stratification and preventative strategies have substantial evidence supporting their use, but reasons hinder widespread adoption, compliance, and success, explaining the continuation of VTE. Thromboprophylaxis consists of several measures that are frequently adopted to avoid the complications of VTE. The study evaluated knowledge, attitude, and practice toward using thromboprophylaxis by health professionals. Methods This multi-center cross-sectional study was carried out on health professionals involved in patient care working in various secondary and tertiary hospitals in the study region between October 2023 and February 2024. A previously published questionnaire was sent in the form of an online survey to the study participants. Fifteen, ten, and nine questions evaluated the participants' knowledge, attitude, and practice of thromboprophylaxis, respectively. The study followed the checklist for reporting results of the Internet E-survey (CHERRIES) guidelines. Frequency and percentages were calculated. Bi-variable and multi-variable logistic regression were carried out and presented as crude and adjusted odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results Of the 219 participants, 115 (52.5%) and 104 (47.5%) were males and females. More than 50.7% were in the age group of >30 years, and the majority of the participants possessed a bachelor's (104 (47.5%)) degree. One hundred seventy-six (80.4%) of the study participants were working in government hospitals, and the majority (112 (51.1%)) were nurses. One hundred sixty-two (74% (67.63-79.65)), 175 (79.9% (73.98-85.01)) and 211 (96.3% (92.93)) had satisfactory knowledge, a positive attitude, and good practice regarding thromboprophylaxis, respectively. Regarding the facility characteristics, 196 (89.5%), 150 (68.5%), and 164 (74.9%) respondents agreed with the availability of a VTE prevention policy, VTE prevention consultants, and the availability of anticoagulants. Eighty (36.5%) participants responded with a 'not availability' of pneumatic compression devices. Of the 15 knowledge questions, the majority (124 (56.6%)) participants faulted the false statements regarding 'patients of DVT being symptomatic' and 119 (54.3%) on the statement that helping patients 'out of bed activity does not prevent VTE'. On multi-variable analysis, participants who were aware of having a VTE prevention policy and availability of anticoagulants were more knowledgeable with adjusted odds ratios of 5.39 (1.88-15.39) and 2.52 (1.12-5.63) respectively. Every practice domain received >90% approval ratings. Conclusions The study concludes that an overall satisfactory knowledge and positive attitude regarding thromboprophylaxis exists among the participants. The study proposes more training sessions on VTE prevention and orientation of health professionals on the availability of VTE policy guidelines and facility availability of resources for thromboprophylaxis.

Risk-based and individualised management of bleeding and thrombotic events in adults with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)

Although bleeding is one of the main symptoms of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), risk factors for bleeding have yet to be fully established. Low platelet count (PC; <20-30 × 109 /L) is generally indicative of increased risk of bleeding. However, PC and bleeding events cannot be fully correlated; many other patient- and disease-related factors are thought to contribute to increased bleeding risk. Furthermore, even though ITP patients have thrombocytopenia and are at increased risk of bleeding, ITP also carries higher risk of thrombotic events. Factors like older age and certain ITP treatments are associated with increased thrombotic risk. Women's health in ITP requires particular attention concerning haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Management of bleeding/thrombotic risk, and eventually antithrombotic therapies in ITP patients, should be based on individual risk profiles, using a tailored, patient-centric approach. Currently, evidence-based recommendations and validated tools are lacking to support decision-making and help clinicians weigh risk of bleeding against thrombosis. Moreover, evidence is lacking about optimal PC for achieving haemostasis in invasive procedures settings. Further research is needed to fully define risk factors for each event, enabling development of comprehensive risk stratification approaches. This review discusses risk-based and individualised management of bleeding and thrombosis risk in adults with primary ITP.

Extended-duration thromboprophylaxis following major abdominopelvic surgery - For everyone or selected cases only?

Major abdominopelvic surgery is an important risk factor for postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is the leading cause of 30-day postoperative mortality in patients with cancer undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery. Randomized controlled trials have shown that extended duration thromboprophylaxis using a low molecular weight heparin or a direct oral anticoagulant significantly decreases the risk of overall VTE (symptomatic events and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis). Hence, several clinical practice guidelines suggest the use of extended duration thromboprophylaxis for all high-risk patients undergoing major abdominopelvic surgery. Despite these recommendations by clinical practice guidelines, adoption of extended duration thromboprophylaxis in clinical practice remains low and clinical equipoise seems to persist. In this narrative review, we aim is to highlight and summarize the reasons that may explain discrepancy between clinical guideline recommendations and current practice regarding extended duration thromboprophylaxis in this patient population. We also aim to review different personalized approaches based on patients' individualized risk of VTE that may foster shared decision making and improve patient outcomes by reducing decisional conflict, increasing patient knowledge, and increasing risk perception accuracy.

Methods to assess adults' learning styles and factors affecting learning in health education: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To develop learner-centered education, knowledge about learning styles and factors that affect the ability to learn in patients and their significant others are essential. The present scoping review aims to identify current evidence on 1) how learning styles are assessed within health education, for adult patients as well as their significant others and 2) factors affecting learning in adult patients and their significant others who receive health education.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were performed in ERIC, PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

1) participants ≥ 18 years; 2) participants were patients or significant others; 3) assessment of learning style and/or factors affecting learning; and 4) health education as context.

RESULTS

45 articles were included. Learning style within health education can be assessed with multiple choice questions, qualitative methods and a validated questionnaire. Health literacy was the most reported factor affecting learning, followed by anxiety and illness condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Prior to the development of learner-centered education for patients and significant others, learning styles as well as factors affecting learning should be assessed in both patients and significant others.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The process of learning is complex, and it is a shared responsibility of both the learner and the educator.

Using the Caprini Risk Score to Increase Awareness of Venous Thrombus Embolism in the Community: Know Your Score II

To assess individual participants' baseline thrombosis risk calculated by Caprini Risk Score (CRS) before injury, illness, or hospitalization occur, to increase the awareness of venous thromboembolism (VTE) by viewing 2 short videos. A cross-sectional study was conducted online between August 2022 and January 2023 in the USA, UK, and India to assess the risk of thrombosis of individuals as a baseline. One nursing practitioner and 4 high school students were on the research team. Descriptive statistical methods were used in data analysis. A total of 928 usable completed questionnaires from 945 participants were analyzed. The mean CRS was 4.93 ± 3.175; 0 to 4 (N  =  460, 49.6%), 5 to 8 (N  =  394, 42.5%), and 9 (N  =  74: 8.0%). History of blood clots (N  =  247, 26.6%), <40 years old (N  =  133, 52.6%); women on oral contraceptives (N  =  324, 34.9%), history of smoking (30%), diabetes (26%), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; 17.3%). Top-level findings: High incidence of family history of thrombosis (26.6%), smoking, diabetes, contraceptives, and IBD. The average CRS (7.9) in patients over 75 years indicates that even a minor surgical procedure may be associated with significant VTE risk. We achieved an important goal by increasing awareness of VTE using this unique method involving high school students and a nurse working with friends and families to complete the CRS assessment. Encouraging the respondents to share information with their personal physicians prior to the event and keep these data in their medical file is a potential valuable source of saving time. This study emphasizes the importance of individuals collecting baseline information prior to illness or hospitalization.

Effectiveness of a Patient Education Bundle on Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Administration by Sex

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent cause of preventable harm among hospitalized patients. Many prescribed prophylaxis doses are not administered despite supporting evidence. We previously demonstrated a patient-centered education bundle improved VTE prophylaxis administration broadly; however, patient-specific factors driving nonadministration are unclear. We examine the effects of the education bundle on missed doses of VTE prophylaxis by sex.

METHODS

We performed a post-hoc analysis of a nonrandomized controlled trial to evaluate the differences in missed doses by sex. Pre-intervention and intervention periods for patients admitted to 16 surgical and medical floors between 10/2014-03/2015 (pre-intervention) and 04/2015-12/2015 (intervention) were compared. We examined the conditional odds of (1) overall missed doses, (2) missed doses due to patient refusal, and (3) missed doses for other reasons.

RESULTS

Overall, 16,865 patients were included (pre-intervention 6853, intervention 10,012), with 2350 male and 2460 female patients (intervention), and 6373 male and 5682 female patients (control). Any missed dose significantly reduced on the intervention floors among male (odds ratio OR 0.55; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.44-0.70, P < 0.001) and female (OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.47-0.73, P < 0.001) patients. Similar significant reductions ensued for missed doses due to patient refusal (P < 0.001). Overall, there were no sex-specific differences (P-interaction >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our intervention increased VTE prophylaxis administration for both female and male patients, driven by decreased patient refusal. Patient education should be applicable to a wide range of patient demographics representative of the target group. To improve future interventions, quality improvement efforts should be evaluated based on patient demographics and drivers of differences in care.

Have all races experienced reductions in complication rates following total hip arthroplasty? A NSQIP analysis between 2011 and 2019

INTRODUCTION

Despite numerous articles in the orthopedic literature evaluating racial and ethnic disparities, inequalities in total joint arthroplasty outcomes remain. While the National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database has been previously utilized to highlight these disparities, no previous analysis has evaluated how the rate of various perioperative complications has changed over recent years when segregating by patient race. Specifically, we evaluated if all races have experienced decreases in (1) medical complications, (2) wound complications, (3) venous thromboembolism (VTE), and (4) readmission/reoperation rates following total hip arthroplasty (THA) over recent years?

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 27,130 (total hip arthroplasty) was utilized to identify all THA procedures conducted between 2011 and 2019. Patients were segregated according to race and various demographics were collected. Linear regression was utilized to evaluate changes in each complication rate between 2011 and 2019. A multivariate regression was then conducted for each complication to evaluate whether race independently was associated with each outcome.

RESULTS

Our analysis included a total of 212,091 patients undergoing primary THA. This included 182,681 (85.76%) White, 19,267 (9.04%) Black, 5928 (2.78%) Hispanic, and 4215 (1.98%) Asian patients. We found that for urinary tract infection (UTI), acute renal failure, superficial SSI, and readmission rates, White patients experienced significant reductions between 2011 and 2019. However, this was not consistent across all races. Black race was associated with a significantly increased risk of acute renal failure (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.17-3.34; p = 0.008), renal insufficiency (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.62-3.28; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07-1.66; p = 0.01), and pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR: 1.76, 95% CIL: 1.36-2.24; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis highlights specific complications for which further interventions are necessary to reduce inequalities across races. These include medical optimization, increased patient education, and continued efforts at understanding how social factors may impact-related care inequalities. Future study is needed to evaluate specific interventions that can be applied at the health systems level to ensure all patients undergoing THA receive the highest quality of care regardless of race.

Alert-Triggered Patient Education Versus Nurse Feedback for Nonadministered Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Doses: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial

Background Many hospitalized patients are not administered prescribed doses of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Methods and Results In this cluster-randomized controlled trial, all adult non-intensive care units (10 medical, 6 surgical) in 1 academic hospital were randomized to either a real-time, electronic alert-triggered, patient-centered education bundle intervention or nurse feedback intervention to evaluate their effectiveness for reducing nonadministration of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Primary outcome was the proportion of nonadministered doses of prescribed pharmacologic prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes were proportions of nonadministered doses stratified by nonadministration reasons (patient refusal, other). To test our primary hypothesis that both interventions would reduce nonadministration, we compared outcomes pre- versus postintervention within each cohort. Secondary hypotheses were tested comparing the effectiveness between cohorts. Of 11 098 patient visits, overall dose nonadministration declined significantly after the interventions (13.4% versus 9.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.64 [95% CI, 0.57-0.71]). Nonadministration decreased significantly (P<0.001) in both arms: patient-centered education bundle, 12.2% versus 7.4% (OR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.48-0.66]), and nurse feedback, 14.7% versus 11.2% (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62-0.84]). Patient refusal decreased significantly in both arms: patient-centered education bundle, 7.3% versus 3.7% (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.37-0.58]), and nurse feedback, 9.5% versus 7.1% (OR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.59-0.86]). No differential effect occurred on medical versus surgical units. The patient-centered education bundle was significantly more effective in reducing all nonadministered (P=0.03) and refused doses (P=0.003) compared with nurse feedback (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.0-1.61]; P=0.03 for interaction). Conclusions Information technology strategies like the alert-triggered, targeted patient-centered education bundle, and nurse-focused audit and feedback can improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis administration. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03367364.

How well do European patients understand cancer-associated thrombosis? A patient survey

Ongoing concerns regarding the morbidity and mortality from cancer-associated thrombosis led the European Cancer Patient Coalition (ECPC), the voice of cancer patients across Europe, to create a pan-European cancer-associated awareness patient survey to assess cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) knowledge among a large population of patients with cancer. The ECPC survey represents the largest of its kind among patients/caregivers with CAT. It identified significant gaps in patient awareness and knowledge of CAT as well as a need for educational CAT-related discussions and interventions between healthcare professionals and patients with cancer and their caregivers. The aim of this paper is to highlight these gaps and to provide awareness of what/when information should be shared with patients/caregivers. Notably, the importance of providing information on how to reduce their risk of CAT, the role of anticoagulant prophylaxis and treatment (short- and long-term) including possible side-effects, and finally how to identify CAT symptoms early. Here we outline what type of information should be provided, as well as when and how to best discuss CAT with our oncology patients and their caregivers along the cancer care continuum, to reduce the risk of CAT and associated complications with a goal of improving patient outcomes.

Physicians' perceptions and preferences for implementing venous thromboembolism (VTE) clinical practice guidelines: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism is a primary cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalised patients. Clinical practice guidelines were developed to prevent venous thromboembolism events. This study adopted the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore the beliefs and perceptions of physicians adoption of clinical practice guidelines for the uptake of venous thromboembolism prevention guidelines.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a stratified purposive sample of internal medicine physicians in an acute hospital. The interview topic guide was developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify the factors perceived to influence the practice. Two researchers coded the interview transcripts using thematic content analysis. Emerging relevant themes were mapped to TDF domains.

RESULTS

A total of sixteen medical physicians were interviewed over a six-month period. Nine theoretical domains derived from thirty-three belief statements were identified as relevant to the target behaviour; knowledge (education about the importance of VTE guidelines); beliefs about capabilities (with practice VTE tool easier to implement); beliefs about consequences (positive consequences in reducing the development of VTE, length of stay, financial burden and support physician decision) and (negative consequence risk of bleeding); reinforcement (recognition and continuous reminders); goals (patient safety goal); environmental context and resources (workload and availability of medications were barriers, VTE coordinator and electronic medical record were enablers); social influences (senior physicians and patient/family influence the VTE practice); behavioural regulation (monitoring and mandatory hospital policy); and nature of the behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Theoretical Domains Framework, factors thought to influence the implementation of VTE clinical practice guidelines were identified which can be used to design theoretically based interventions by targeting specific psychological constructs and linking them to behaviour change techniques to change the clinical practice of physicians.

A mixed-methods study to evaluate a patient-designed tool to reduce harm from cancer-associated thrombosis: The EMPOWER study

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and serious complication of systemic anticancer therapies. Delays in presentation increase risk of death or long-term morbidity.

BACKGROUND

A patient charity developed an information video for patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy including what to do if they developed symptoms of VTE. This was introduced into clinical practice in a regional cancer center and its impact compared with a district general hospital where the video was not used.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used, comprising clinical audit data, patient surveys, and key informant interviews. The time between development of VTE symptoms and seeking medical evaluation was routinely recorded on patients attending a regional cancer-associated thrombosis service with systemic anticancer therapy-provoked VTE. The video was then embedded into clinical practice at the regional cancer center for 3 months. The primary outcome was the difference in time to presentation with VTE symptoms, between patients attending the regional cancer center and the district general hospital (which acted as control). Other outcomes included impact on radiology resources, patient knowledge, and perspectives of chemotherapy nurses.

RESULTS

Addition of the video was associated with a lower mean time to presentation from 8.9 to 2.9 days (0.33 hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval, 4.5-7.4; P < .0001). This may reflect greater awareness of VTE, resulting in earlier clinical presentation when they developed attributable symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The video was associated with reduced delays in diagnosis of systemic anticancer therapy-associated VTE by 6 days, thereby reducing long-term complications.

Perioperative Blood Transfusions Are Associated with a Higher Incidence of Thromboembolic Events After TKA: An Analysis of 333,463 TKAs

BACKGROUND

Given the morbidity, mortality, and financial burden associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) after TKA, orthopaedic providers continually seek to identify risk factors associated with this devastating complication. The association between perioperative transfusion status and VTE risk has not been thoroughly explored, with previous studies evaluating this relationship being limited in both generalizability and power.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Therefore, we sought to determine whether perioperative transfusions were associated with an increased risk of (1) pulmonary embolism (PE) or (2) deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after primary TKA in a large, multi-institutional sample.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was implemented for our analysis. The definitions of complications, such as DVT and PE, and risk adjustment validation is monitored by the central ACS NSQIP office to ensure participating hospitals are adhering to the same guidelines to log patients. Additionally, both preoperative and intraoperative/72 hour postoperative transfusion status is included for all patients. Therefore, ACS NSQIP was determined to be the most appropriate database for our analysis. All patients who underwent primary TKA between 2011 and 2018 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 27447. Primary TKAs designated as "non-elective" were excluded, thereby providing a cohort composed solely of patients undergoing unilateral primary elective TKA for further analysis. The final analysis included 333,463 patients undergoing TKA (mean age 67 ± 9 years, 62% female). Preoperative transfusions were received by < 0.01% (48 of 333,463) of the patients, while 4% (14,590 of 333,463) received a transfusion within the interim between the start of surgery up to 72 hours postoperatively. All missing values were imputed through multiple imputation by chained equation to avoid variable availability-based selection and the subsequent listwise deletion-associated bias in the estimate of parameters. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted using variables identified in a univariate model to calculate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for risk factors associated with symptomatic DVT and/or PE. For variables that maintained significance in the multivariable model, an additional model without confounders was used to generate fully adjusted ORs and 95% CIs. A propensity score matched comparison between recipients versus nonrecipients (1:1) of transfusion (preoperative and intraoperative/72 hours postoperative) was then conducted to evaluate the independent association between DVT/PE development and patients' transfusion status. Significance was determined at a p value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Adjusted multivariable regression analysis accounting for patient age, sex, race, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class and baseline comorbidities demonstrated the absence of an association between preoperative (OR 1.75 [95% CI 0.24 to 12.7]; p = 0.58) or intraoperative/72 hours postoperative (OR 1.12 [95% CI 0.93 to 1.35]; p = 0.23) transfusions and higher odds of developing PE. Similar findings were demonstrated after propensity score matching. Although multivariable regression demonstrated the absence of an association between preoperative transfusion and the odds of developing DVT within the 30-day postoperative period (OR 1.85 [95% CI 0.43 to 8.05]; p = 0.41), intraoperative/postoperative transfusion was associated with higher odds of DVT development (OR 3.68 [95% CI 1.14 to 1.53]; p < 0.001) relative to transfusion naïve patients. However, this significance was lost after propensity score matching.

CONCLUSION

After controlling for various potential confounding variables such as ASA Class, age, anesthesia type, and BMI, the receipt of an intra- or postoperative transfusion was found to be associated with an increased risk of DVT. Our findings should encourage orthopaedic providers to strictly adhere to blood management protocols, further tighten transfusion eligibility, and adjust surgical approach and implant type to reduce the incidence of transfusion among patients with other DVT risk factors. Additionally, our findings should encourage a multidisciplinary approach to VTE prophylaxis and prevention, as well as to blood transfusion guideline adherence, among all providers of the care team.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Disseminating a patient-centered education bundle to reduce missed doses of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis to a community hospital

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable harm in hospitalized patients. However, many doses of prescribed pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis are frequently missed. We investigated the effect of a patient-centered education bundle on missed doses of VTE prophylaxis in a community hospital.

Methods

We performed a pre-post analysis examining missed doses of VTE prophylaxis in a community hospital. A real-time alert from the electronic health record system facilitated the delivery of a patient education bundle intervention. We included all patient visits on a single floor where at least 1 dose of VTE prophylaxis was prescribed during pre- (January 1, 2018, - November 31, 2018) and post- (January 1 - June 31, 2019) intervention periods. Outcomes included any missed dose (primary) and reasons for missed doses (refusal, other [secondary]) and were compared between both periods.

Results

1,614 patient visits were included. The proportion of any missed dose significantly decreased (13.8% vs. 8.2% [OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48, 0.64]) between the pre-post intervention periods. Patient refusal was the most frequent reason for missed doses. In the post-intervention period, patient refusal significantly decreased from 8.8% to 5.0% (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46, 0.64). Similarly, other reasons for missed doses significantly decreased from 5.0% to 3.2% (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51, 0.77).

Conclusions

A real-time alert-triggered patient-centered education bundle developed and tested in an academic hospital, significantly reduced missed doses of prescribed pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis when disseminated to a community hospital.

Perspectives of patients and health professionals on important factors influencing rehabilitation following acute pulmonary embolism: A multi-method study

BACKGROUND

International guidelines on pulmonary embolism (PE) management and rehabilitation have recently been published. However, the contained recommendation about an efficient follow-up strategy after PE is difficult for health care professionals to implement because limited research exists about what strategies are efficient.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to 1) describe and explore perspectives and experiences of health care professionals (HCPs) and patients participating in a post-PE rehabilitation intervention, and 2) provide suggestions for future post-PE management and rehabilitation interventions.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The study was a multi-method study, nested in a larger randomized controlled trial, combining data from two focus group interviews with 10 HCPs, 16 individual interviews with patients, data from exercise diaries and logbooks from HCPs participating in a rehabilitation intervention.

RESULTS

Key factors for successful post-PE management, considered important for reducing anxiety and confusion by both patients and HCPs, were the presence of a multidisciplinary specialized team, initiation of management shortly after discharge, and having regular follow-ups, e.g. telephone consultations. In terms of rehabilitation, repeatedly testing physical performance, resuming exercise under the guidance and support of specialized personnel, and access to peer support, were considered important for increasing motivation and self-efficacy for engaging in physical activity again.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers suggestions for key elements to include in post-PE management and rehabilitation interventions, as well as the structuring of care. However, research still needs to be undertaken before solid recommendations for the content and structure of successful post-PE management and rehabilitation can be given.

Multidisciplinary, patient-centred approach to improving compliance with venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in a district general hospital

Hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE) accounts for an estimated 25 000 preventable deaths per annum in the UK and is associated with significant healthcare costs. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on the prevention of VTE in hospitalised patients highlight the clinical and cost-effectiveness of VTE prevention strategies. A multidisciplinary quality improvement team (MD QIT) based in a district general hospital sought to improve compliance with VTE prophylaxis prescription to greater than 85% of patients within a 3-month time frame. Quality improvement methodology was adopted over three cycles of the project. Interventions included the introduction of a 'VTE sticker' to prompt risk assessment; educational material for medical staff and allied healthcare professionals; and patient information raising the awareness of the importance of VTE prophylaxis. Implementation of these measures resulted in significant and sustained improvements in rates of risk assessment within 24 hours of admission to hospital from 51% compliance to 94% compliance after cycle 2 of the project. Improvements were also observed in medication dose adjustment for the patient weight from 69% to 100% compliance. Dose adjustments for renal function showed similar trends with compliance with guidelines improving from 80% to 100%. These results were then replicated in a different clinical environment. In conclusion, this project exemplifies the benefits of MD QITs in terms of producing sustainable and replicable improvements in clinical practice and in relation to meeting approved standards of care for VTE risk assessment and prescription. It has been demonstrated that the use of educational material in combination with a standardised risk assessment tool, the 'VTE sticker', significantly improved clinical practice in the context of a general medical environment.

Call to Action to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major preventable disease that affects hospitalized inpatients. Risk stratification and prophylactic measures have good evidence supporting their use, but multiple reasons exist that prevent full adoption, compliance, and efficacy that may underlie the persistence of VTE over the past several decades. This policy statement provides a focused review of VTE, risk scoring systems, prophylaxis, and tracking methods. From this summary, 5 major areas of policy guidance are presented that the American Heart Association believes will lead to better implementation, tracking, and prevention of VTE events. They include performing VTE risk assessment and reporting the level of VTE risk in all hospitalized patients, integrating preventable VTE as a benchmark for hospital comparison and pay-for-performance programs, supporting appropriations to improve public awareness of VTE, tracking VTE nationwide with the use of standardized definitions, and developing a centralized data steward for data tracking on VTE risk assessment, prophylaxis, and rates.

Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Medically Ill Patients: An NATF Anticoagulation Action Initiative

Hospitalized patients with acute medical illnesses are at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) during and after a hospital stay. Risk factors include physical immobilization and underlying pathophysiologic processes that activate the coagulation pathway and are still present after discharge. Strategies for optimal pharmacologic VTE thromboprophylaxis are evolving, and recommendations for VTE prophylaxis can be further refined to protect high-risk patients after hospital discharge. An early study of extended VTE prophylaxis with a parenteral agent in medically ill patients yielded inconclusive results with regard to efficacy and bleeding. In the Acute Medically Ill VTE Prevention with Extended Duration Betrixaban (APEX) trial, extended use of betrixaban halved symptomatic VTE, decreased hospital readmission, and reduced stroke and major adverse cardiovascular events compared with standard enoxaparin prophylaxis. Based on findings from APEX, the Food and Drug Administration approved betrixaban in 2017 for extended VTE prophylaxis in acute medically ill patients. In the Reducing Post-Discharge Venous Thrombo-Embolism Risk (MARINER) study, extended use of rivaroxaban halved symptomatic VTE in high-risk medical patients compared with placebo. In 2019, rivaroxaban was approved for extended thromboprophylaxis in high-risk medical patients, thus making available a new strategy for in-hospital and post-discharge VTE prevention. To address the critical unmet need for VTE prophylaxis in medically ill patients at the time of hospital discharge, the North American Thrombosis Forum (NATF) is launching the Anticoagulation Action Initiative, a comprehensive consensus document that provides practical guidance and straightforward, patient-centered recommendations for VTE prevention during hospitalization and after discharge.

Patient values and preferences regarding VTE disease: a systematic review to inform American Society of Hematology guidelines

Values and preferences relate to the importance that patients place on health outcomes (eg, bleeding, having a deep venous thrombosis) and are essential when weighing benefits and harms in guideline recommendations. To inform the American Society of Hematology guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) disease, we conducted a systematic review of patients' values and preferences related to VTE. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to April of 2018 (PROSPERO-CRD42018094003). We included quantitative and qualitative studies. We followed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidance for rating the certainty and presenting findings for quantitative research about the relative importance of health outcomes and a grounded theory approach for qualitative thematic synthesis. We identified 14 quantitative studies (2465 participants) describing the relative importance of VTE-related health states in a widely diverse population of patients, showing overall small to important impact on patients' lives (certainty of the evidence from low to moderate). Additionally, evidence from 34 quantitative studies (6424 participants) and 15 qualitative studies (570 participants) revealed that patients put higher value on VTE risk reduction than on the potential harms of the treatment (certainty of evidence from low to moderate). Studies also suggested a clear preference for oral medication over subcutaneous medication (moderate certainty). The observed variability in health state values may be a result of differences in the approaches used to elicit them and the diversity of included populations rather than true variability in values. This finding highlights the necessity to explore the variability induced by different approaches to ascertain values.

Using electronic health record system triggers to target delivery of a patient-centered intervention to improve venous thromboembolism prevention for hospitalized patients: Is there a differential effect by race?

Background

Racial disparities are common in healthcare. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of preventable harm, and disparities observed in prevention practices. We examined the impact of a patient-centered VTE education bundle on the non-administration of preventive prophylaxis by race.

Methods

A post-hoc, subset analysis (stratified by race) of a larger nonrandomized trial. Pre-post comparisons analysis were conducted on 16 inpatient units; study periods were October 2014 through March 2015 (baseline) and April through December 2015 (post-intervention). Patients on 4 intervention units received the patient-centered, nurse educator-led intervention if the electronic health record alerted a non-administered dose of VTE prophylaxis. Patients on 12 control units received no intervention. We compared the conditional odds of non-administered doses of VTE prophylaxis when patient refusal was a reason for non-administration, stratified by race.

Results

Of 272 patient interventions, 123 (45.2%) were white, 126 (46.3%) were black, and 23 (8.5%) were other races. A significant reduction was observed in the odds of non-administration of prophylaxis on intervention units compared to control units among patients who were black (OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46–0.81, p<0.001), white (OR 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44–0.75, p<0.001), and other races (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29–0.88, p = 0.015).

Conclusion

Our finding suggests that the patient education materials, developed collaboratively with a diverse group of patients, improved patient’s understanding and the importance of VTE prevention through prophylaxis. Quality improvement interventions should examine any differential effects by patient characteristics to ensure disparities are addressed and all patients experience the same benefits.

Defining Quality in Hand Surgery From the Patient's Perspective: A Qualitative Analysis

PURPOSE

Quality measures are used to evaluate health care delivery. They are traditionally developed from the physician and health system viewpoint. This approach can lead to quality measures that promote care that may be misaligned with patient values and preferences. We completed an exploratory, qualitative study to identify how patients with hand problems define high-quality care. Our purpose was to develop a better understanding of the surgery and recovery experience of hand surgery patients, specifically focusing on knowledge gaps, experience, and the surgical process.

METHODS

A steering committee (n = 10) of patients who had previously undergone hand surgery reviewed and revised an open-ended survey. Ninety-nine patients who had undergone hand surgery at 2 tertiary care institutions completed the open-ended, structured questionnaire during their 6- to 8-week postoperative clinic visit. Two reviewers completed a thematic analysis to generate subcodes and codes to identify themes in high-quality care from the patient's perspective.

RESULTS

We identified 4 themes of high-quality care: (1) Being prepared and informed for the process of surgery, (2) Regaining hand function without pain or complication, (3) Patients and caregivers negotiating the physical and psychological challenges of recovery, and (4) Financial and logistical burdens of undergoing hand surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple areas that patients identify as representing high-quality care are not reflected in current quality measures for hand surgery. The patient-derived themes of high-quality care can inform future patient-centered quality measure development.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Efforts to improve health care delivery may have the greatest impact by addressing areas of care that are most valued by patients. Such areas include patient education, system navigation, the recovery process, and cost.

Nonadministration of medication doses for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in a cohort of hospitalized patients

PURPOSE

Results of a study to characterize patterns of nonadministration of medication doses for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention among hospitalized patients are presented.

METHODS

The electronic records of all patients admitted to 4 floors of a medical center during a 1-month period were examined to identify patients whose records indicated at least 1 nonadministered dose of medication for VTE prophylaxis. Proportions of nonadministered doses by medication type, intended route of administration, and VTE risk categorization were compared; reasons for nonadministration were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 12.7% of all medication doses prescribed to patients in the study cohort (n = 75) during the study period (857 of 6,758 doses in total) were not administered. Nonadministration of 1 or more doses of VTE prophylaxis medication was nearly twice as likely for subcutaneous anticoagulants than for all other medication types (231 of 1,112 doses [20.8%] versus 626 of 5,646 doses [11.2%], p < 0.001). For all medications prescribed, the most common reason for nonadministration was patient refusal (559 of 857 doses [65.2%]); the refusal rate was higher for subcutaneous anticoagulants than for all other medication categories (82.7% versus 58.8%, p < 0.001). Doses of antiretrovirals, immunosuppressives, antihypertensives, psychiatric medications, analgesics, and antiepileptics were less commonly missed than doses of electrolytes, vitamins, and gastrointestinal medications.

CONCLUSION

Scheduled doses of subcutaneous anticoagulants for hospitalized patients were more likely to be missed than doses of all other medication types.

Effect of Real-time Patient-Centered Education Bundle on Administration of Venous Thromboembolism Prevention in Hospitalized Patients

IMPORTANCE

Numerous interventions have improved prescription of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis; however, many prescribed doses are not administered to hospitalized patients, primarily owing to patient refusal.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a real-time, targeted, patient-centered education bundle intervention to reduce nonadministration of VTE prophylaxis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This nonrandomized controlled, preintervention-postintervention comparison trial included 19 652 patient visits on 16 units at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, from April 1 through December 31, 2015. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2016, through November 30, 2017, on an intention-to-treat basis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients on 4 intervention units received a patient-centered education bundle if a dose of VTE prophylaxis medication was not administered. Patients on 12 control units received no intervention.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Conditional odds of nonadministration of doses of VTE prophylaxis (primary outcome) before and after the intervention on control vs intervention units. Reasons for nonadministration (ie, patient refusal and other) and VTE event rates (secondary outcomes) were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 19 652 patient visits where at least 1 dose of VTE prophylaxis was prescribed were included (51.7% men; mean [SD] age, 55.6 [17.1] years). Preintervention and postintervention groups were relatively similar in age, sex, race, and medical or surgery unit. From the preintervention period to the postintervention period, on intervention units, the conditional odds of VTE prophylaxis nonadministration declined significantly (9.1% [95% CI, 5.2%-16.2%] vs 5.6% [95% CI, 3.1%-9.9%]; odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.48-0.67) compared with no change on control units (13.6% [95% CI, 9.8%-18.7%] vs 13.3% [95% CI, 9.6%-18.5%]; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91-1.07; P < .001 for interaction). The conditional odds of nonadministration owing to patient refusal decreased significantly on intervention units (5.9% [95% CI, 2.6%-13.6%] vs 3.4% [95% CI, 1.5%-7.8%]; OR, 0.53; 95% CI ,0.43-0.65) compared with no change on control units (8.7% [95% CI, 5.4%-14.0%] vs 8.5% [95% CI, 5.3%-13.8%]; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.08; P < .001 for interaction). On intervention units, the conditional odds of nonadministration owing to reasons other than patient refusal decreased (2.3% [95% CI, 1.5%-3.4%] vs 1.7% [95% CI, 1.1%-2.6%]; OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.94), with no change on control units (3.4% [95% CI, 2.7%-4.4%] vs 3.3% [95% CI, 2.6%-4.2%]; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.87-1.10; P = .04 for interaction). No differential effect occurred on medical vs surgical units (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.60-1.23; P = .41 for interaction). There was no statistical difference in the proportion of VTE events among patients on intervention vs control units (0.30% vs 0.18%; OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.16-2.23).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, a targeted patient-centered education bundle significantly reduced nonadministration of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized patients. This novel strategy improves health care quality by leveraging electronic data to target interventions in real time for at-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02402881.

Improving Patient Compliance With Mechanical Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) occurring in the postoperative period are serious yet preventable conditions. Multiple studies have demonstrated that the risk of postoperative VTE can be successfully reduced with mechanical prophylaxis and/or chemoprophylaxis. Patients are often noncompliant with mechanical prophylaxis in the postoperative period. We performed a prospective nonrandomized controlled study to determine if providing an educational pamphlet would increase knowledge and compliance with mechanical VTE prophylaxis. Patients receiving the educational pamphlet were more likely to rate their knowledge of VTE prophylaxis as "very good" when compared to the control group (73.1% vs. 30.2%, p < .001). Patients were also more likely to be compliant with mechanical prophylaxis in the educational group (53.9% vs. 30.2%, p = .014). Our study demonstrated that providing a simple educational pamphlet increased patient knowledge regarding VTE prophylaxis and increased compliance with mechanical prophylaxis.

Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in China: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the third leading cause of cardiovascular-associated death worldwide, and VTE prevention is one of the top patient safety strategies that hospitals can adopt. This study aimed to understand patients’ perceptions of VTE prevention related to major orthopedic surgery in order to guide the clinical practice of medical staff and improve patient quality of life. Patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery should receive interventions to prevent VTE. To encourage patient participation, these interventions should be patient-centered. However, few studies have examined the perceptions of VTE prevention among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery.

Methods

Participants were purposively selected from among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery in the orthopedic department of a level-three, class-A hospital in Beijing, China. Data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews, and findings were based on a thematic content analysis. All interviews were held during each patient’s hospital stay.

Results

From eight patients who participated, the following themes were identified: (1) unclear understanding of VTE, (2) poor understanding of the severity of postoperative VTE, and (3) poor understanding of VTE prevention.

Conclusions

There are weak links in clinical care related to VTE prevention. We should aim to more completely understand patients’ needs, strengthen the health education provided to patients, and improve patient adherence to preventative measures.

Exploring the impact of route of administration on medication acceptance in hospitalized patients: Implications for venous thromboembolism prevention

BACKGROUND

Non-administration of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis contributes to preventable patient harm. We hypothesized that non-administration would be more common for parenteral VTE prophylaxis than oral infectious disease or cardiac prophylaxis or for treatment medications. The primary study goal was to determine if non-administration of parenteral VTE prophylaxis is more frequent than other prophylactic or treatment medications.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study of consecutive admissions we used descriptive statistics and risk ratios (RR) to compare the number of non-administered doses of VTE prophylaxis, oral infectious disease and cardiovascular prophylaxis and treatment medications. To quantify the influence of demographic and clinical characteristics on non-administration, we estimated incidence rate ratios from Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

645 patients were admitted from July 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015. Median age was 52years (Interquartile range 43-57) and 365 (56.6%) were male. Subcutaneous VTE prophylaxis doses were not administered nearly 4-fold more frequently than oral infectious disease and cardiovascular prophylaxis (RR=3.93; 95% CI 3.36-4.59) and 3-fold more frequently than treatment medications (RR=3.06; 95% CI 2.91-3.22). Ninety percent of non-administered doses of VTE prophylaxis were refused. Risk factors for non-administration included younger age (age 18-35years), male sex, uninsured status, HIV-positivity and high VTE risk status.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous VTE prophylaxis is not administered more frequently than oral infectious diseases or cardiac prophylaxis and treatment medications. These data suggest that availability of an oral medication could improve the effectiveness of VTE prophylaxis in real world settings.

Validation of a Patient-Completed Caprini Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment

Introduction  Individualized risk assessment for venous thromboembolism (VTE) using the Caprini risk score (CRS), coupled with targeted prophylaxis based on the score, is effective in reducing postoperative VTE. Critics contend that using this tool is time consuming for health care providers. We decided to create a patient-completed CRS and conducted a prospective study to compare the scores calculated by a patient with those calculated by a blinded physician for the same patient.

Methods  In phase 1, we interviewed patients in our deep vein thrombosis (DVT) support group who had a history of thrombosis and included their family members to determine areas of misunderstanding in the original CRS. We created a patient-completed form based on these interviews. In phase 2, we further optimized the questions after a CRS-trained, blinded physician scored 20 hospitalized patients during the pilot study. In the final (third) phase, we measured the agreement level between the new form filled out by the trained physicians and those filled out by the patients. The study was approved by our local institutional review board. Using PASS version 11, we determined that a sample size of 37 individuals achieves a power of 80%, to detect a 0.1 difference between the null hypothesis correlation of 0.5 and the alternative hypothesis correlation of 0.7 using a two-sided hypothesis test with a significance level of 0.05. We tabulated the individuals' answers and categorized the scores by using SPSS version 23 to estimate the kappa value, linear correlation, and the Bland–Altman test. A kappa value greater than 0.8 indicated an “almost perfect agreement.”

Results  We tested the first patient-completed CRS version (phase 2) in a 20-patient pilot study. A poor agreement was observed with the body mass index (BMI) responses in multiple iterations, and so we excluded the BMI calculation from the final patient-completed CRS form. We recruited 42 patients with an average age of 55, mostly female (45%), who completed less than college education (62%) to fill out the updated CRS form (phase 3). An almost perfect agreement was found for both the individual questions and the overall score comparing physician and patient answers, resulting in a high correlation ( r  = 0.95). In Bland–Altman, we did not find any trend for extreme values.

Conclusion  We created and validated a patient-completed CRS form that has an excellent agreement level with the physician-completed form. From the results, the physician only needs to calculate the BMI. The average time for a patient to complete the form was 5 minutes. The average time for the physician to finalize the score was approximately 6 minutes. Implementation studies are needed to assess the correlation of the aggregated score, derived from this form, with the occurrence of perioperative VTE.

Effectiveness of two distinct web-based education tools for bedside nurses on medication administration practice for venous thromboembolism prevention: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common cause of preventable harm in hospitalized patients. While numerous successful interventions have been implemented to improve prescription of VTE prophylaxis, a substantial proportion of doses of prescribed preventive medications are not administered to hospitalized patients. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of nurse education on medication administration practice.

METHODS

This was a double-blinded, cluster randomized trial in 21 medical or surgical floors of 933 nurses at The Johns Hopkins Hospital, an academic medical center, from April 1, 2014 -March 31, 2015. Nurses were cluster-randomized by hospital floor to receive either a linear static education (Static) module with voiceover or an interactive learner-centric dynamic scenario-based education (Dynamic) module. The primary and secondary outcomes were non-administration of prescribed VTE prophylaxis medication and nurse-reported satisfaction with education modules, respectively.

RESULTS

Overall, non-administration improved significantly following education (12.4% vs. 11.1%, conditional OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.95, p = 0.002) achieving our primary objective. The reduction in non-administration was greater for those randomized to the Dynamic arm (10.8% vs. 9.2%, conditional OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.72-0.95) versus the Static arm (14.5% vs. 13.5%, conditional OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81-1.03), although the difference between arms was not statistically significant (p = 0.26). Satisfaction scores were significantly higher (p<0.05) for all survey items for nurses in the Dynamic arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Education for nurses significantly improves medication administration practice. Dynamic learner-centered education is more effective at engaging nurses. These findings suggest that education should be tailored to the learner.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02301793.

Prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding non-administration of prescribed pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis

Pharmacologic venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is important patient safety practice in hospitalized patients. However, a substantial number of ordered doses are not administered. Patient and nursing attitudes and behaviors can influence whether a patient receives a dose. The objective of this single center study was to evaluate prescriber knowledge and attitudes regarding missed doses of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis. An anonymous, 9-question survey was administered to internal medicine and general surgery resident physicians. The survey captured prescriber opinions on issues related to non-administration of VTE prophylaxis. Thirty-two percent of medicine residents compared with 3 % of surgery residents felt pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis was not necessary in an independently ambulating patient (P < 0.001). Medicine residents were more likely to agree that it is appropriate for nurses to make clinical decisions to determine whether a dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis should be administered to a patient (24 vs. 0 %, P < 0.001). Study findings indicate the need for additional resident physician education. Further investigation is needed to assess these beliefs and ensure patients receive necessary VTE prophylaxis.

The Johns Hopkins Venous Thromboembolism Collaborative: Multidisciplinary team approach to achieve perfect prophylaxis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of preventable harm in hospitalized patients. The critical steps in delivery of optimal VTE prevention care include (1) assessment of VTE and bleeding risk for each patient, (2) prescription of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis, (3) administration of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis in a patient-centered manner, and (4) continuously monitoring outcomes to identify new opportunities for learning and performance improvement. To ensure that every hospitalized patient receives VTE prophylaxis consistent with their individual risk level and personal care preferences, we organized a multidisciplinary task force, the Johns Hopkins VTE Collaborative. To achieve the goal of perfect prophylaxis for every patient, we developed evidence-based, specialty-specific computerized clinical decision support VTE prophylaxis order sets that assist providers in ordering risk-appropriate VTE prevention. We developed novel strategies to improve provider VTE prevention ordering practices including face-to-face performance reviews, pay for performance, and provider VTE scorecards. When we discovered that prescription of risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis does not ensure its administration, our multidisciplinary research team conducted in-depth surveys of patients, nurses, and physicians to design a multidisciplinary patient-centered educational intervention to eliminate missed doses of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis that has been funded by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. We expect that the studies currently underway will bring us closer to the goal of perfect VTE prevention care for every patient. Our learning journey to eliminate harm from VTE can be applied to other types of harm. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:S8-S14. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Is the Meaningful Use Venous Thromboembolism VTE-6 Measure Meaningful? A Retrospective Analysis of One Hospital's VTE-6 Cases

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common, often deadly cause of preventable harm for hospitalized patients. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Meaningful Use VTE-6 measure automatically captures data documented in a Meaningful Use-certified electronic health record (EHR) to identify patients with potentially preventable VTE, defined as those who developed radiologically confirmed, in-hospital VTE and did not receive prophylaxis between admission and the day prior to the diagnostic test order date. The validity of the Meaningful Use VTE-6 measure was assessed by reviewing the quality of VTE prophylaxis provided to patients identified by the measure.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients identified by VTE-6 during the first year of Meaningful Use Stage 1. The following information was abstracted from the Meaningful Use-certified EHR: patient demographics, clinical data, VTE prophylaxis prescribed and administered, and diagnostic testing. These data were then analyzed to assess prevention efforts prior to each VTE event and identify potential targets for improvement.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were identified as having sustained potentially preventable VTE by the Meaningful Use VTE-6 measure. Nine (60%) of the 15 patients identified were false positives and did not meet the rationale of the measure. For only 6 (40%) of the 15 patients was VTE considered to be truly potentially preventable; those patients provided targets for quality improvement measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients identified by the Meaningful Use VTE-6 algorithm did not suffer truly potentially preventable VTE. Misclassification of VTE as "potentially preventable" hinders efforts to target true opportunities for quality improvement.