Empiric Piperacillin-Tazobactam versus Carbapenems in the Treatment of Bacteraemia Due to Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Treated with Carbapenem Versus Non-carbapenem Therapy for AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Inducible AmpC β-lactamases in Gram-negative Enterobacterales pose therapeutic challenges. Although carbapenems are the preferred treatment, other antibiotics can serve as a viable alternative. Studies comparing treatment options report varied outcomes. This study evaluates 30-day mortality, treatment failure, and length of hospitalization in patients with AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with bacteremia caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. Exclusion criteria included: therapy duration < 72 h, coinfection, resistant isolates, and death within 72 h of diagnosis. Patients were divided into definitive carbapenem and noncarbapenem therapy. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, while secondary outcomes evaluated treatment failure and length of hospitalization. Statistical analysis used descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 214 screened patients, 80 met the inclusion criteria. Enterobacter cloacae (60%) was the predominant pathogen, primarily originating from line-related infections (55%). Carbapenems were the primary empirical (45%) and definitive (75%) therapies; 30-day mortality was higher in the non-carbapenem group (20% versus 3.3%, p = 0.08). Treatment failure was significantly higher in the non-carbapenem group (20% versus 1.6%, p < 0.01). The mean hospital stay was longer in the carbapenem group (26 ± 38.40 days) than the non-carbapenem group (11.15 ± 7.15 days, p = 0.87). Older age was significantly associated with higher mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.98-12.20, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Carbapenem use was significantly associated with improved survival, highlighting its importance in treatment strategies. Age significantly affects survival, stressing the need for personalized treatments. Further research and strategies are needed to address clinical failures and enhance antimicrobial stewardship.

The role of piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of Hidradenitis suppurativa

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease. Most patients with moderate-to-severe disease require long-term antibiotic treatment, or biologic treatments to control their disease. Despite these interventions, relapses are common. This study evaluated the effectiveness of piperacillin/tazobactam treatment in patients with Hurley stage II and III HS who experienced disease flares and did not respond to conventional antibiotic and biologic treatment. Methods: Patients with HS hospitalized at the Department of Dermatology, Sheba Medical Center between August 2021 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A cohort of ten such patients were treated with piperacillin/tazobactam for 6-21 days. Eight (80%) and two (20%) patients respectively demonstrated 2- and 1-grade improvements, from their baseline HS-Physician Global Assessment score. During the follow-up period, nine patients were monitored. HS Clinical Response (HiSCR) was achieved in six (66.7%) and five (55.6%) patients at the 3- and 6-month follow-up visits, respectively. Conclusions: In conclusion, Piperacillin/tazobactam emerges as a promising therapeutic option for disease flare-up in patients with Hurley stage II and III HS who do not respond to conventional treatment. Thus, piperacillin/tazobactam should be considered as crisis therapy for this patient subset.

Piperacillin-tazobactam vs. carbapenems for treating hospitalized patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To meta-analyse the clinical efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam vs. carbapenems for treating hospitalized patients affected by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (BSIs).

METHODS

Two authors independently searched PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus database up to January 17, 2024, to retrieve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies comparing piperacillin-tazobactam vs. carbapenems for the management of hospitalized patients with ESBL-BSIs. Data were independently extracted by the two authors, and the quality of included studies was independently assessed according to ROB 2.0 or ROBINS-I tools. Mortality rate was selected as primary outcome. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratios (ORs) retrieved from studies providing adjustment for confounders using a random-effects model with the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

After screening 3,418 articles, 10 studies were meta-analysed (one RCT and nine retrospective observational studies; N = 1,962). Mortality rate did not significantly differ between treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam vs. carbapenems (N = 6; OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 0.96-2.07; I² = 23.6%). The findings were consistent also in subgroup analyses assessing patients receiving empirical therapy (N = 5; OR: 1.36; 95% CI: 0.99-1.85), or patients having in ≥50% of cases urinary/biliary tract as the primary BSI source (N = 2; OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.84-1.89). Conversely, the mortality rate was significantly higher with piperacillin-tazobactam only among patients having in <50% of cases urinary/biliary tract as the primary source of BSI (N = 3; OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.00-4.07).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that, after performing appropriate adjustments for confounders, mortality and clinical outcome in patients having ESBL-producing Enterobacterales BSIs did not significantly differ among those receiving piperacillin-tazobactam compared to those receiving carbapenems.

Evaluation of predictors of third-generation cephalosporin non-susceptibility and factors affecting recurrence or death in bacteremia caused by Citrobacter freundii complex, Enterobacter cloacae complex, and Klebsiella aerogenes

Factors involved in the susceptibility of third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) to bacteremia caused by Citrobacter freundii complex, Enterobacter cloacae complex, and Klebsiella aerogenes were investigated based on a case-case-control design. Antimicrobial therapy administered 30 days prior to bacteremia and hospitalization within 90 days were common risk factors for the 3GC susceptible and 3GC non-susceptible groups, while hospitalization from an institution or another hospital was a specific risk factor for the 3GC non-susceptible group. We also attempted to examine the factors affecting the clinical outcome of bacteremia. Hospitalization more than 14 days before the onset of bacteremia was an independent factor indicating poor clinical outcome. In contrast, the implementation of source control was an independent predictor of successful treatment. Although a longer hospital stay before the onset of bacteremia was associated with worse clinical outcomes, implementation of source control may have contributed to improved treatment outcomes for bacteremia.

Towards an update on the antimicrobial use in Adult Care Units in Brazil: insights from multi-hospital prevalence study

Introduction. Efforts to understand the burden of antibiotic use in low- and middle-income countries such as Brazil are essential for developing strategies that are effective and appropriate in the context of endemic multidrug-resistant organisms.Aim. This study aims to determine antimicrobial-prescribing practices among patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) for adults in Brazil.Methodology. A 1-day point prevalence multicentre survey was conducted in 58 adult ICUs across the five regions of Brazil. The institutions were categorized according to their type and size. Detailed antimicrobial prescription data were prospectively provided to all patients hospitalized on the day of data collection.Results. A total of 620 patients were included in the study, of whom 63.9% were receiving at least one antimicrobial. Of these, 34.6% were treated for an infection, but only 39.9% of the cases were based on microbiological criteria. Empirical treatment was applied to 72.3% of the patients. Significant differences in antibiotic usage were observed across the different hospitals included in the study. Overall, treatment was most commonly directed towards pneumonia (51.8%) and bloodstream infections (29.6%). Glycopeptides (19.4%) and carbapenems (18.5%) were the most prescribed in teaching hospitals, while in non-teaching hospitals, carbapenems (17.8%) and broad-spectrum cephalosporins (16.8%) were most frequently used.Conclusion. Our study reveals alarming data on antibiotic use in adult ICUs in Brazil, with high frequencies of severe healthcare-associated infections acquired in these units, where patients are frequently subjected to empirical treatment.

Effect of incremental tazobactam concentrations on the bactericidal activity of piperacillin against ESBL-producing enterobacterales clinical isolates causing bacteraemia

We evaluated the activity of piperacillin in relation to INCREASING TAZOBACTAM CONCENTRATION against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales collected from patients with bacteraemia. Increasing tazobactam concentration (4, 12 or 24 mg/L) exerted a reduction of piperacillin MICs under the clinical breakpoint in a concentration-dependent manner (0%, 60% and 90% of clinical isolates). Also, activity of piperacillin/tazobactam based at higher achievable serum concentrations (123/14 mg/L) is needed to reduce the bacterial growth in 92% of ESBL-producers. CHANGES IN THE PIPERACILLIN MIC IN RELATION TO INCREASING TAZOBACTAM SUGGEST THAT REALTIME TDM COULD BE USED FOR DRIVEN ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY WITH PIPERACILLIN/TAZOBACTAM IN BSI DUE TO ESBL STRAINS.

No improvement in mortality among critically ill patients with carbapenems as initial empirical therapy and more detection of multi-drug resistant pathogens associated with longer use: a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study

Whether empirical therapy with carbapenems positively affects the outcomes of critically ill patients with bacterial infections remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the use of carbapenems as the initial antimicrobial administration reduces mortality and whether the duration of carbapenem use affects the detection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens. This was a post hoc analysis of data acquired from Japanese participating sites from a multicenter, prospective observational study [Determinants of Antimicrobial Use and De-escalation in Critical Care (DIANA study)]. A total of 268 adult patients with clinically suspected or confirmed bacterial infections from 31 Japanese intensive care units (ICUs) were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: patients who were administered carbapenems as initial antimicrobials (initial carbapenem group, n = 99) and those who were not administered carbapenems (initial non-carbapenem group, n = 169). The primary outcomes were mortality at day 28 and detection of MDR pathogens. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that mortality at day 28 did not differ between the two groups [18 (18%) vs 27 (16%), respectively; odds ratio: 1.25 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-2.65), P = 0.564]. The subdistribution hazard ratio for detecting MDR pathogens on day 28 per additional day of carbapenem use is 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05-1.13, P < 0.001 using the Fine-Gray model with death regarded as a competing event). In conclusion, in-hospital mortality was similar between the groups, and a longer duration of carbapenem use as the initial antimicrobial therapy resulted in a higher risk of detection of new MDR pathogens.IMPORTANCEWe found no statistical difference in mortality with the empirical use of carbapenems as initial antimicrobial therapy among critically ill patients with bacterial infections. Our study revealed a lower proportion of inappropriate initial antimicrobial administrations than those reported in previous studies. This result suggests the importance of appropriate risk assessment for the involvement of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens and the selection of suitable antibiotics based on risk. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate that a longer duration of carbapenem use as initial therapy is associated with a higher risk of subsequent detection of MDR pathogens. This finding underscores the importance of efforts to minimize the duration of carbapenem use as initial antimicrobial therapy when it is necessary.

Stewardship Prompts to Improve Antibiotic Selection for Urinary Tract Infection: The INSPIRE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the second most common infection leading to hospitalization and is often associated with gram-negative multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Clinicians overuse extended-spectrum antibiotics although most patients are at low risk for MDRO infection. Safe strategies to limit overuse of empiric antibiotics are needed.

Objective

To evaluate whether computerized provider order entry (CPOE) prompts providing patient- and pathogen-specific MDRO risk estimates could reduce use of empiric extended-spectrum antibiotics for treatment of UTI.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Cluster-randomized trial in 59 US community hospitals comparing the effect of a CPOE stewardship bundle (education, feedback, and real-time and risk-based CPOE prompts; 29 hospitals) vs routine stewardship (n = 30 hospitals) on antibiotic selection during the first 3 hospital days (empiric period) in noncritically ill adults (≥18 years) hospitalized with UTI with an 18-month baseline (April 1, 2017-September 30, 2018) and 15-month intervention period (April 1, 2019-June 30, 2020).

Interventions

CPOE prompts recommending empiric standard-spectrum antibiotics in patients ordered to receive extended-spectrum antibiotics who have low estimated absolute risk (<10%) of MDRO UTI, coupled with feedback and education.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was empiric (first 3 days of hospitalization) extended-spectrum antibiotic days of therapy. Secondary outcomes included empiric vancomycin and antipseudomonal days of therapy. Safety outcomes included days to intensive care unit (ICU) transfer and hospital length of stay. Outcomes were assessed using generalized linear mixed-effect models to assess differences between the baseline and intervention periods.

Results

Among 127 403 adult patients (71 991 baseline and 55 412 intervention period) admitted with UTI in 59 hospitals, the mean (SD) age was 69.4 (17.9) years, 30.5% were male, and the median Elixhauser Comorbidity Index count was 4 (IQR, 2-5). Compared with routine stewardship, the group using CPOE prompts had a 17.4% (95% CI, 11.2%-23.2%) reduction in empiric extended-spectrum days of therapy (rate ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.77-0.89]; P < .001). The safety outcomes of mean days to ICU transfer (6.6 vs 7.0 days) and hospital length of stay (6.3 vs 6.5 days) did not differ significantly between the routine and intervention groups, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

Compared with routine stewardship, CPOE prompts providing real-time recommendations for standard-spectrum antibiotics for patients with low MDRO risk coupled with feedback and education significantly reduced empiric extended-spectrum antibiotic use among noncritically ill adults admitted with UTI without changing hospital length of stay or days to ICU transfers.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03697096.

Comparative Impact of an Optimized PK/PD Target Attainment of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs. Meropenem on the Trend over Time of SOFA Score and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Infusion Monotherapy for Treating Documented Gram-Negative BSIs and/or VAP

(1) Background: The advantage of using carbapenems over beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations in critically ill septic patients still remains a debated issue. We aimed to assess the comparative impact of an optimized pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of piperacillin-tazobactam vs. meropenem on the trend over time of both Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and inflammatory biomarkers in critically ill patients receiving continuous infusion (CI) monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam or meropenem for treating documented Gram-negative bloodstream infections (BSI) and/or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). (2) Methods: We performed a retrospective observational study comparing critically ill patients receiving targeted treatment with CI meropenem monotherapy for documented Gram-negative BSIs or VAP with a historical cohort of critical patients receiving CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. Patients included in the two groups were admitted to the general and post-transplant intensive care unit in the period July 2021-September 2023 and fulfilled the same inclusion criteria. The delta values of the SOFA score between the baseline of meropenem or piperacillin-tazobactam treatment and those at 48-h (delta 48-h SOFA score) or at 7-days (delta 7-days SOFA) were selected as primary outcomes. Delta 48-h and 7-days C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT), microbiological eradication, resistance occurrence, clinical cure, multi-drug resistant colonization at 90-day, ICU, and 30-day mortality rate were selected as secondary outcomes. Univariate analysis comparing primary and secondary outcomes between critically ill patients receiving CI monotherapy with piperacillin-tazobactam vs. meropenem was carried out. (3) Results: Overall, 32 critically ill patients receiving CI meropenem monotherapy were compared with a historical cohort of 43 cases receiving CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. No significant differences in terms of demographics and clinical features emerged at baseline between the two groups. Optimal PK/PD target was attained in 83.7% and 100.0% of patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem, respectively. No significant differences were observed between groups in terms of median values of delta 48-h SOFA (0 points vs. 1 point; p = 0.89) and median delta 7-days SOFA (2 points vs. 1 point; p = 0.43). Similarly, no significant differences were found between patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam vs. meropenem for any of the secondary outcomes. (4) Conclusion: Our findings may support the contention that in critically ill patients with documented Gram-negative BSIs and/or VAP, the decreases in the SOFA score and in the inflammatory biomarkers serum levels achievable with CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy at 48-h and at 7-days may be of similar extent and as effective as to those achievable with CI meropenem monotherapy provided that optimization on real-time by means of a TDM-based expert clinical pharmacological advice program is granted.

Leveraging Large Data, Statistics, and Machine Learning to Predict the Emergence of Resistant E. coli Infections

Drug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections, on average, increase the length of stay (LOS) in U.S. hospitals by 5 days, translating to approximately $15,000 per patient. We used statistical and machine-learning models to explore the relationship between antibiotic usage and antibiotic resistance over time and to predict the clinical and financial costs associated with resistant E. coli infections. We acquired data on antibiotic utilization and the resistance/sensitivity of 4776 microbial cultures at a Kaiser Permanente facility from April 2013 to December 2019. The ARIMA (autoregressive integrated moving average), neural networks, and random forest time series algorithms were employed to model antibiotic resistance trends. The models' performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean squared error (RMSE). The best performing model was then used to predict antibiotic resistance rates for the year 2020. The ARIMA model with cefazolin, followed by the one with cephalexin, provided the lowest RMSE and MAE values without signs of overfitting across training and test datasets. The study showed that reducing cefazolin usage could decrease the rate of resistant E. coli infections. Although piperacillin/tazobactam did not perform as well as cefazolin in our time series models, it performed reasonably well and, due to its broad spectrum, might be a practical target for interventions in antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), at least for this particular facility. While a more generalized model could be developed with data from multiple facilities, this study acts as a framework for ASP clinicians to adopt statistical and machine-learning approaches, using region-specific data to make effective interventions.

Efficacy of cefoperazone/sulbactam for ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia and the factors associated with poor outcomes

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the efficacy of cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SUL) in extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales infections and identify factors influencing outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study was conducted in Taiwan (January 2015 to December 2020) and examined the efficacy of CPZ/SUL treatment in ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using agar dilution; ESBL/AmpC genes were detected using polymerase chain reaction. The primary outcome was clinical success, whereas the secondary outcome was 30-day mortality. Clinical success was defined as the complete resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of K. pneumoniae or E. coli infection, with no evidence of persistent or recurrent bacteraemia. The factors influencing outcomes were identified using a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

CPZ/SUL demonstrated a clinical success rate of 82.7% (91/110) in treating ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia, with a 30-day mortality rate of 9.1% (10/110). Among 110 ESBL-producing isolates, a high clinical success rate was observed at an MIC of ≤32/32 mg/L. Multivariate analysis revealed that a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) of ≥6 was associated with lower clinical success [odds ratio (OR): 5.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-29.14, P = 0.033]. High Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores (≥6) were significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR: 14.34, 95% CI: 1.45-141.82, P = 0.023).

DISCUSSION

CPZ/SUL demonstrated a clinical success rate of 82.7% (91/110) in treating ESBL-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia. Treatment success was evident when the CPZ and SUL MIC was ≤32/32 mg/L. Comorbidities (CCI ≥6) were associated with lower clinical success, while disease severity (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥6) correlated with higher mortality.

Real-Time TDM-Guided Optimal Joint PK/PD Target Attainment of Continuous Infusion Piperacillin-Tazobactam Monotherapy Is an Effective Carbapenem-Sparing Strategy for Treating Non-Severe ESBL-Producing Enterobacterales Secondary Bloodstream Infections: Findings from a Prospective Pilot Study

(1) Objectives: To assess the impact of optimal joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous infusion (CI) piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy on the microbiological outcome of documented ESBL-producing Enterobacterlaes secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs). (2) Methods: Patients hospitalized in the period January 2022-October 2023, having a documented secondary BSI caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, and being eligible for definitive targeted CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy according to specific pre-defined inclusion criteria (i.e., absence of septic shock at onset; favorable clinical evolution in the first 48 h after starting treatment; low-intermediate risk primary infection source) were prospectively enrolled. A real-time therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided expert clinical pharmacological advice (ECPA) program was adopted for optimizing (PK/PD) target attainment of CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy. Steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of both piperacillin and tazobactam were measured, and the free fractions (f) were calculated based on theoretical protein binding. The joint PK/PD target attainment was considered optimal whenever the piperacillin fCss/MIC ratio was >4 and the tazobactam fCss/target concentration (CT) ratio was >1 (quasi-optimal or suboptimal if only one or neither of the two thresholds were achieved, respectively). Univariate analysis was carried out for assessing variables potentially associated with failure in achieving the optimal joint PK/PD target of piperacillin-tazobactam and microbiological eradication. (3) Results: Overall, 35 patients (median age 79 years; male 51.4%) were prospectively included. Secondary BSIs resulted from urinary tract infections as a primary source in 77.2% of cases. The joint PK/PD target attainment was optimal in as many as 97.1% of patients (34/35). Microbiological eradication occurred in 91.4% of cases (32/35). Attaining the quasi-optimal/suboptimal joint PK/PD target of CI piperacillin-tazobactam showed a trend toward a higher risk of microbiological failure (33.3% vs. 0.0%; p = 0.08) (4) Conclusions: Real-time TDM-guided optimal joint PK/PD target attainment of CI piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy may represent a valuable and effective carbapenem-sparing strategy when dealing with non-severe ESBL-producing Enterobacterales secondary BSIs.

Comparison of the relative efficacy of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors and carbapenems in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales represents a significant clinical challenge. The present study was thus developed to explore the relative efficacy of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) and carbapenems for the treatment of hospitalized patients suffering from cUTIs caused by BLBLI-susceptible ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales.

METHODS

Data from 557 patients from four Chinese teaching hospitals diagnosed with cUTIs caused by ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales from January 2017 to May 2022 were retrospectively assessed.

RESULT

The 30 day rate of treatment failure, defined by unresolved symptoms or mortality, was 10.4% (58/557). Independent predictors of 30 day treatment failure included immunocompromised status, bacteraemia, septic shock, lack of infection source control and appropriate empirical treatment. When data were controlled for potential confounding variables, BLBLI treatment exhibited a comparable risk of 14 day (OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.86-3.00, P = 0.133) and 30 day treatment failure (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.66-3.15, P = 0.354) relative to carbapenem treatment for the overall cohort of patients. In contrast, BLBLI treatment in immunocompromised patients was associated with an elevated risk of both 14 day (OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.43-7.10, P = 0.005) and 30 day treatment failure (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.07-8.80, P = 0.038) relative to carbapenem treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that carbapenem treatment may be superior to BLBLI treatment for immunocompromised patients suffering from cUTIs caused by ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales species. However, these results will need to be validated in appropriately constructed randomized controlled trials to ensure appropriate patient treatment.

Carbapenem-sparing beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors versus carbapenems for bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE) have become a worldwide public health threat, and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs) are considered as one reliable carbapenem-sparing antibiotic. However, it is still controversial whether BLBLIs are truly noninferior to carbapenems. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of BLBLIs with carbapenems for ESBL-PE BSIs.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted until December 2021 to enroll studies comparing BLBLIs with carbapenems for ESBL-PE BSIs. A subgroup analysis was performed based on the choice of therapy (empirical, definitive, and mixed therapy). The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (#CRD42022316011).

RESULTS

A total of 2786 patients from one randomized clinical trial and 25 cohorts were included. There was no statistically significant difference between BLBLIs and carbapenems groups in therapeutical response (odds ratio [OR] = 1.19, P = 0.45) and mortality (OR = 1.06, P = 0.68). Furthermore, although the statistical difference was also not found in the subgroup analysis, BLBLIs performed better in definitive therapy than empirical therapy than carbapenems, with a numerically higher therapeutical response (OR = 1.42 vs 0.89) and a mildly lower mortality (OR = 0.85 vs 1.14).

CONCLUSION

BLBLIs were noninferior to carbapenems for ESBL-PE BSIs, especially in definitive therapy. BLBLIs may be a valid alternative to spare the use of carbapenems.

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Multidrug Resistant Escherichia coli Urosepsis: A Review

Escherichia coli is a versatile commensal and pathogenic member of the human microflora. As the primary causative pathogen in urosepsis, E. coli places an immense burden on healthcare systems worldwide. To further exacerbate the issue, multi drug resistance (MDR) has spread rapidly through E. coli populations, making infections more troublesome and costlier to treat. This paper aimed to review the literature concerning the development of MDR in uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and explore the existing evidence of current and emerging treatment strategies. While some MDR strains maybe treated with β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations as well as cephalosporins, cephamycin, temocillin and fosfomycin, current treatment strategies for many MDR UPEC strains are reliant on carbapenems. Carbapenem overreliance may contribute to the alarming dissemination of carbapenem-resistance amongst some UPEC communities, which has ushered in a new age of difficult to treat infections. Alternative treatment options for carbapenem resistant UPEC may include novel β-lactam-β-lactamase or carbapenemase inhibitor combinations, cefiderocol, polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides or fosfomycin. For metallo-β-lactamase producing strains (e.g., NDM, IMP-4), combinations of cefazidime-avibacam with aztreonam have been used. Additionally, the emergence of new antimicrobials brings new hope to the treatment of such infections. However, continued research is required to successfully bring these into the clinic for the treatment of MDR E. coli urosepsis.

Distribution of β-lactamases and emergence of carbapenemases co-occurring Enterobacterales isolates with high-level antibiotic resistance identified from patients with intra-abdominal infection in the Asia-Pacific region, 2015-2018

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to assess the geographic distribution and molecular characteristics of β-lactamases among Enterobacterales isolates causing intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) from 2015 to 2018 in the Asia-Pacific region.

METHOD

Isolates were investigated for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases using multiplex PCR assays and full-gene DNA sequencing.

RESULT

A total of 832 Enterobacterales isolates from 8 different countries with β-lactamase genes were analysed. Plasmid-mediated ESBLs and AmpC β-lactamases were encoded in 598 (71.9 %) and 314 (37.7 %) isolates, respectively. In 710 (85.3 %) carbapenemase-negative isolates, positivity for both AmpC β-lactamases and ESBLs was identified in 51 (8.5 %) Escherichia coli and 24 (3.4 %) Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. The most prevalent countries were Taiwan and Vietnam, and the co-occurrence of CMY/CTX-M in E. coli and DHA-1/ESBLs in K. pneumoniae was predominant. All isolates showed high susceptibility to colistin, but susceptibility to carbapenems varied among different resistance mechanism combinations. Among 122 (14.7 %) isolates encoding carbapenemase, NDM (n = 67, including 64.2 % NDM-1) was the most common, followed by the OXA-48-type (n = 49), KPC (n = 24) and IMP (n = 4). The most prevalent country was Thailand (n = 44), followed by Vietnam (n = 35) and the Philippines (n = 21). Twenty-two isolates were found to encode multiple carbapenemases, 16 of which were collected from Thailand and harbored NDM-1, OXA-232 and CTX-M-15. Despite high susceptibility to amikacin, susceptibility to colistin was only 56 %.

CONCLUSION

The emergence of carbapenem-non-susceptible AmpC/ESBL co-occurring Enterobacterales and colistin non-susceptible carbapenemases co-occurring K. pneumoniae highlights potential therapeutic challenges in the Asia-Pacific region.

The Clinical Evaluation of Third-generation Cephalosporins as Definitive Therapy for Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes Bacteremia

Background Third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) may be susceptible in vitro to Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes. However, treatment with mainly fourth-generation cephalosporins or carbapenems is currently recommended. Diversification of antimicrobial agents in therapy is required to avoid the selection pressure of resistant organisms by broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents. Aims This study investigated the clinical efficacy of 3GC therapy for Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes bacteremia in a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Methods Patients with Enterobacter spp. or Klebsiella aerogenes detected in blood cultures and treated with a susceptible antimicrobial agent were included in the study. Propensity score matching was performed to align patient background bases, and clinical outcomes between the 3GC and non-3GC groups were compared. Treatment success was defined as having no need for treatment escalation or the addition of other antimicrobial agents, no recurrence, or no death within 30 days. Results The study included 188 cases, of which 57 and 131 were included in the 3GC and non-3GC treatment groups, respectively; 53 patients in each group were matched by propensity score matching. There were no significant differences between groups in rates of switching to a susceptible antimicrobial or adding another agent, relapse within 30 days, or death within 30 days. In the 3GC group, source control was associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Conclusions Definitive 3GC therapy for susceptible Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella aerogenes bacteremia is as clinically effective and valuable a targeted therapy as non-3GC therapy and can be implemented under conditions in which infection source control measures are in place.

Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and non-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a hollow-fibre infection model

BACKGROUND

Urosepsis caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli is increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are commonly recommended for the treatment of ESBL infections; however, to minimize the emergence of carbapenem resistance, interest in alternative treatments has heightened.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli clinical isolates.

METHODS

E. coli isolates, obtained from national reference laboratory in Bangladesh, were characterized by phenotypic tests, WGS, susceptibility tests and mutant frequency analysis. Three ESBL-producing and two non-producing E. coli were exposed to piperacillin/tazobactam (4.5 g, every 6 h and every 8 h, 30 min infusion) and meropenem (1 g, every 8 h, 30 min infusion) in a hollow-fibre infection model over 7 days.

RESULTS

Piperacillin/tazobactam regimens attained ∼4-5 log10 cfu/mL bacterial killing within 24 h and prevented resistance emergence over the experiment against ESBL-producing and non-producing E. coli. However, compared with 8 hourly meropenem, the 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam attained ∼1 log10 lower bacterial kill against one of three ESBL-producing E. coli (CTAP#173) but comparable killing for the other two ESBL-producing (CTAP#168 and CTAP#169) and two non-producing E. coli (CTAP#179 and CTAP#180). The 6 hourly piperacillin/tazobactam regimen attained ∼1 log10 greater bacterial kill compared with the 8 hourly regimen against CTAP#168 and CTAP#179 at 24 h.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests piperacillin/tazobactam may be a potential alternative to carbapenems to treat urosepsis caused by ESBL-producing E. coli, although clinical trials with robust design are needed to confirm non-inferiority of outcome.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infection after solid organ transplantation: Recent trends in epidemiology and therapeutic approaches

Background

Infections caused by multidrug‐resistant gram‐negative bacilli (MDR GNB), in particular extended‐spectrum β‐lactamase‐producing (ESBL‐E) and carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), pose a major threat in solid organ transplantation (SOT). Outcome prediction and therapy are challenging due to the scarcity of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or well‐designed observational studies focused on this population.

Methods

Narrative review with a focus on the contributions provided by the ongoing multinational INCREMENT‐SOT consortium (ClinicalTrials identifier NCT02852902) in the fields of epidemiology and clinical management.

Results

The Spanish Society of Transplantation (SET), the Group for Study of Infection in Transplantation of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (GESITRA‐SEIMC), and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI) recently published their recommendations for the management of MDR GNB infections in SOT recipients. We revisit the SET/GESITRA‐SEIMC/REIPI document taking into consideration new evidence that emerged on the molecular epidemiology, prognostic stratification, and treatment of post‐transplant ESBL‐E and CRE infections. Results derived from the INCREMENT‐SOT consortium may support the therapeutic approach to post‐transplant bloodstream infection (BSI). The initiatives devoted to sparing the use of carbapenems in low‐risk ESBL‐E BSI or to repurposing existing non‐β‐lactam antibiotics for CRE in both non‐transplant and transplant patients are reviewed, as well as the eventual positioning in the specific SOT setting of recently approved antibiotics.

Conclusion

Due to the clinical complexity and relative rarity of ESBL‐E and CRE infections in SOT recipients, multinational cooperative efforts such as the INCREMENT‐SOT Project should be encouraged. In addition, RCTs focused on post‐transplant serious infection remain urgently needed.

The impact of public health interventions on the future prevalence of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: a population based mathematical modelling study

Background

Future prevalence of colonization with extended-spectrum betalactamase (ESBL-) producing K. pneumoniae in humans and the potential of public health interventions against the spread of these resistant bacteria remain uncertain.

Methods

Based on antimicrobial consumption and susceptibility data recorded during > 13 years in a Swiss region, we developed a mathematical model to assess the comparative effect of different interventions on the prevalence of colonization.

Results

Simulated prevalence stabilized in the near future when rates of antimicrobial consumption and in-hospital transmission were assumed to remain stable (2025 prevalence: 6.8% (95CI%:5.4–8.8%) in hospitals, 3.5% (2.5–5.0%) in the community versus 6.1% (5.0–7.5%) and 3.2% (2.3–4.2%) in 2019, respectively). When overall antimicrobial consumption was set to decrease by 50%, 2025 prevalence declined by 75% in hospitals and by 64% in the community. A 50% decline in in-hospital transmission rate led to a reduction in 2025 prevalence of 31% in hospitals and no reduction in the community. The best model fit estimated that 49% (6–100%) of observed colonizations could be attributable to sources other than human-to-human transmission within the geographical setting.

Conclusions

Projections suggests that overall antimicrobial consumption will be, by far, the most powerful driver of prevalence and that a large fraction of colonizations could be attributed to non-local transmissions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07441-z.

Emulating the MERINO randomised control trial using data from an observational cohort and trial of rapid diagnostic (BSI-FOO)

Objective

The aim of this study was to emulate the MERINO trial of piperacillin-tazobactam vs meropenem for the definitive treatment of bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible E coli or Klebsiella spp.

Methods

Data from an observational study of BSI and a randomised controlled trial of a rapid diagnostic in BSI were used to emulate the MERINO trial. The primary outcome of the emulated trial was 28-day mortality after blood culture. Outcomes were compared using logistic regression adjusted for propensity score for emulated intervention.

Results

Of the 6,371 observational study and RCT participants, 1,968 had a bloodstream infection with E. coli or Klebsiella spp. of which 121 met the eligibility criteria. In the emulated trial, a total of 14/82 patients (17.1%) allocated to piperacillin-tazobactam met the primary outcome compared with 6/39 (15.4%) in the meropenem group (unadjusted odds ratio 1.13 (95% CI 0.40 to 3.21)). After adjustment for propensity score, the odds ratio increased to 1.31 (95% CI 0.40 to 4.26). This difference is in the same direction but of a smaller magnitudethan observed in the MERINO trial, where 30-day mortality was met by 23/187 patients (12.3%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam and 7/191 (3.7%) in the meropenem group (unadjusted odds ratio of 3.69 (95% CI 1.48 to 10.41)).

Conclusions

The mortality rate in an emulated trial population was more than double the mortality rate in the MERINO trial. The methodology used attempts to address the concern that previous results could be explained by biases such as selection bias and uncontrolled confounding and provides information on how a trial such as the MERINO trial may have performed in the NHS.

Is Piperacillin-Tazobactam an Appropriate Empirical Agent for Hospital-Acquired Sepsis and Community-Acquired Septic Shock of Unknown Origin in Australia?

Early appropriate empirical antibiotics are critical for reducing mortality in sepsis. For hospital-acquired sepsis of unknown origin in Australia, piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) is recommended as an empirical therapy. Anecdotally, some institutions also use TZP for community-acquired septic shock. This narrative review aimed to scrutinise the appropriateness of TZP as an empirical agent for undifferentiated hospital-acquired sepsis and community-acquired septic shock. An online database (Medline) was searched for relevant studies in adults published in the last 10 years. Studies were included if they addressed separately reported clinical outcomes related to a relevant aspect of TZP therapy in sepsis. Of 290 search results, no studies directly addressed the study aim. This review therefore explores several themes that emerged from the contemporary literature, all of which must be considered to fully interrogate the appropriateness of TZP use in this context. This review reveals the paucity and low quality of evidence available for TZP use in sepsis of unclear origin, while demonstrating the urgent need and equipoise for an Australian audit of TZP use in patients with sepsis of unknown origin.

A Retrospective Study on Bile Culture and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Patients with Biliary Tract Infections

Aim

This study aimed to provide profiles of microorganisms isolated from bile and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of biliary tract infections (BTIs) in our center.

Methods

A total of 277 patients diagnosed with BTIs at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from 2011 to 2018 were included in this study. Medical records were reviewed to obtain clinical and demographic data. Bile specimens were prepared through endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD), and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGD) under aseptic conditions. In those with positive bile culture results, blood cultures were concurrently conducted. The concordance of the results between bile culture and blood culture were also analysed.

Results

Two hundred and sixty-seven bile cultures were positive, while 280 strains of micro-organisms were isolated. Among these, 76.8% were Gram-negative, 22.5% were Gram-positive and 0.7% were fungi. The most common microorganisms were Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterococcus faecalis. Gram-negative bacteria we tested were highly sensitive to ertapenem, imipenem, tigecycline, and amikacin. Gram-positive bacteria we tested were highly sensitive to tigecycline, teicoplanin, linezolid, vancomycin, and chloramphenicol. For the 44 patients with positive bile cultures, a blood culture was also performed. Among them, 29 cases yielded positive blood culture results. Among those cases with positive blood culture, 48.3% showed complete agreement with bile culture, 3.4% showed partial agreement, and 48.3% showed disagreement. The most common microorganisms in blood culture were the same as in bile culture. Additionally, the proportion of Staphylococcus epidermidis was significantly higher in blood culture (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Our study provided a comprehensive analysis of the bacteria distribution and drug resistance profiles in patients with BTIs in northern China. Further studies should be conducted to validate our findings.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Efficacy of Noncarbapenem β-Lactams Compared to Carbapenems for Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales Urinary Tract Infections

Background

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales are frequent causes of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Severe infections caused by ESBL Enterobacterales are often treated with carbapenems, but optimal treatment for less severe infections such as UTIs is unclear.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to 4 hospitals in an academic healthcare system with an ESBL UTI treated with either a noncarbapenem β-lactam (NCBL) or a carbapenem for at least 48 hours from 1 April 2014 to 30 April 2018. Those who received an NCBL were compared to those receiving a carbapenem, with a primary outcome of hospital length of stay (LOS) and secondary outcomes of clinical and microbiological response, days until transition to oral therapy, rate of relapsed infection, and rate of secondary infections with a multidrug-resistant organism.

Results

Characteristics were similar among patients who received carbapenems (n = 321) and NCBLs (n = 171). There was no difference in LOS for the NCBL group compared to the carbapenem group (13 days vs 15 days, P = .66). The NCBL group had higher rates of microbiologic eradication (98% vs 92%, P = .002), shorter time to transition to oral therapy (5 days vs 9 days, P < .001), shorter overall durations of therapy (7 days vs 10 days, P < .001), and lower rates of relapsed infections (5% vs 42%, P = .0003).

Conclusions

Patients treated with NCBLs had similar LOS, higher rates of culture clearance, and shorter durations of antibiotic therapy compared to patients treated with carbapenems, suggesting that treatment for ESBL UTIs should not be selected solely based on phenotypic resistance.

Mortality and its predictors among hospitalized patients with infections due to extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacteriaceae in Malaysia: a retrospective observational study

Background

Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) pathogens are associated with morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of data describing the treatments and outcomes of ESBL infections in Malaysia. This study evaluated the treatments, mortality and associated factors among patients hospitalized with infections due to ESBL positive enterobacteriaceae. This is a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary hospital from January 2018 to June 2020. Hospitalized patients with ESBL-positive enterobacteriaceae infections were included. A clinical pharmacist collected data by reviewing the patients’ electronic medical records. The data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential analyses.

Results

This analysis included 110 patients with a mean age of 62.1 ± 14.4 years. Klebsiella pneumoniae (53.6%) and Escherichia coli (40.9%) were the most prevalent pathogens among the 110 infections. Bacteremia (42.7%) was the most frequent diagnosis. The isolates were resistant to majority of penicillins and cephalosporins. However, over a third (39.3%) were susceptible to piperacillin–tazobactam, while carbapenem susceptibility was extremely high (≥ 99%). The most frequently used empiric and definitive antibiotics was piperacillin–tazobactam and meropenem, respectively. Less than a third (28.2%) of patients received active empiric antibiotics, and the mean duration before active antibiotics was 3.9 ± 2.7. Overall, hospital mortality rate was 13.6%, and mortality was significantly associated with ICU admission (AOR 8.75; 95% CI 1.05–72.75; P = 0.045) and diabetes mellitus (AOR 9.85; 95% CI 1.04–93.09; P = 0.046).

Conclusions

Carbapenems are the major antibiotics used to treat ESBL-positive enterobacteriaceae infections. Hospital mortality rate is relatively high and is significantly associated with  in patients admitted to ICU and those with diabetes mellitus. Antibiotic stewardship interventions are necessary to promote early administration of active antibiotics and to reduce overuse of carbapenem antibiotics.

Distribution and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Risk Factors Among Kidney Transplantation Recipients with Infections Over 13 Years: A Retrospective Study

Background

Infection ranks as the most common complication after kidney transplantation (KT) and threatens outcomes of kidney transplantation recipients (KTR). This study aimed to investigate the microbiological profile of infection, assess bacterial resistance and identify risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infection among KTR.

Methods

During the study period, 866 recipients underwent kidney transplant surgery. We studied the distribution of pathogens, resistance rate of MDR bacteria and the risk factors of MDR bacterial infection.

Results

Totally, 214 species of pathogens (110 species were MDR bacteria) were isolated in 119 KTR. Escherichia coli (E. coli) was the most common bacteria of the infection. MDR extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) were most resistant to ampicillin, cefazolin, ciprofloxacin and complex sulfamethoxazole, while quite sensitive to imipenem, amikacin and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIT). All MDR gram-positive bacteria were quite sensitive to linezolid and vancomycin, except that MDR Staphylococcus was also susceptible to rifampicin. Female gender (OR = 3.497, 95% CI = 1.445–8.467, P = 0.006), pathogen types > 1 (OR = 3.832, 95% CI = 1.429–10.273, P = 0.008) and postoperative time < 3 months (OR = 0.331, 95% CI = 0.137–0.799, P = 0.014) were independent risk factors for MDR bacterial infection.

Conclusion

PIT and amikacin may be an alternative choice of ESBL-E infection. Rifampicin can also be prescribed for MDR Staphylococcus infection. MDR bacterial infection was associated with female gender, pathogen types more than 1 and 3 months postoperative period.

Controversies in the management of ESBL-producing Enterabacterales. Clinical Implications

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing organisms currently represent a major health problem. Although recently published guidelines still consider carbapenems as the treatment of choice for ESBL-producing infections, it is necessary to find non-carbapenem β-lactams as alternatives to reduce the effects associated with their overutilization. In this review we focus on these alternatives to carbepenem use. It is possible that piperacillin-tazobactam may be an alternative in clinical settings with "low inoculum" infections like urinary tract infections. Newer β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) are potential options too. The current available data support the efficacy of both ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against susceptible ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). We are waiting for the results of MERINO-3 study to confirm whether ceftolozane-tazobactam is a good option versus meropenem for treating bloodstream infections caused by ESBL- or AmpC-producing Enterobacterales.

European Society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by ESICM -European Society of intensive care Medicine)

SCOPE

These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of 3^rd generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination vs. monotherapy.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanni (CRAB). Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak).

RECOMMENDATIONS

The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low and low certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.

The role of tazobactam-based combinations for the management of infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales are a global threat to public health due to their antimicrobial resistance profile and, consequently, their limited available treatment options. Tazobactam is a sulfone β-lactamase inhibitor with in vitro inhibitory activity against common ESBLs in Enterobacterales, including CTX-M. However, the role of tazobactam-based combinations in treating infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacterales remains unclear. In the United States, two tazobactam-based combinations are available, piperacillin-tazobactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam. We evaluated and compared the roles of tazobactam-based combinations against ESBL-producing organisms with emphasis on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic exposures in relation to MIC distributions and established breakpoints, clinical outcomes data specific to infection site, and considerations for downstream effects with these agents regarding antimicrobial resistance development. While limited data with ceftolozane-tazobactam are encouraging for its potential role in infections due to ESBL-producing Enterobacterales, further evidence is needed to determine its place in therapy. Conversely, currently available microbiologic, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and clinical data do not suggest a role for piperacillin-tazobactam, and we caution clinicians against its usage for these infections.

Comparison of therapy with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations or carbapenems for bacteraemia of nonurinary source caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae

Background

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae has become a public health concern. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with nonurinary source bacteraemia caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) or Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-producing EK) receiving β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLICs) versus carbapenem treatment and assess the risk factors of mortality with these two drugs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-centre study of adult hospitalised patients with ESBL-producing EK bloodstream infection (BSI) from nonurinary source at our centre over a 4-year period. One hundred and eighty patients who received BLICs or carbapenems were included in the analysis. The outcome variables were 14-day treatment failure and 30-day mortality. For more reliable results, propensity score analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of the two drugs and analyse their risk factors for 30-day mortality.

Results

Out of 180 patients, 114 received BLICs, and 66 received carbapenem therapy. Compared to carbapenem-treated patients, those treated with BLICs were older and had higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, but they had shorter stay in the hospital. Additionally, their Pitt bacteraemia score, SOFA score, rate of leukaemia, and immune compromise were lower. After propensity score matching (PSM), the baseline characteristics of patients in the two treatment groups were balanced. BLICs were associated with a higher 14-day treatment failure rate (20.6%, 13/63) than carbapenems (16.3%, 7/43), although the difference was not significant in either univariate analysis (P = 0.429) or multivariate analysis (P = 0.122). And the 30-day mortality rate in BTG (11.1%, 7/63) and CTG (11.6%, 5/43) did not significantly differ (univariate analysis, P = 0.926; multivariate analysis, P = 0.420). In the multivariate analysis, after PSM, leukaemia was the only independent predictor of mortality in both BTG and CTG.

Conclusions

Our study showed that BLICs had higher 14-day treatment failure rate compared with carbapenems, although there were no statistically significant differences because of the small number of patients, therefore, further evaluation of the efficacy of BLICs is needed.

An Evidence-Based Multidisciplinary Approach Focused at Creating Algorithms for Targeted Therapy of BSIs, cUTIs, and cIAIs Caused by Enterobacterales in Critically Ill Adult Patients

Prompt implementation of appropriate targeted antibiotic therapy represents a valuable approach in improving clinical and ecological outcome in critically septic patients. This multidisciplinary opinion article focused at developing evidence-based algorithms for targeted antibiotic therapy of bloodstream (BSIs), complicated urinary tract (cUTIs), and complicated intrabdominal infections (cIAIs) caused by Enterobacterales. The aim was to provide a guidance for intensive care physicians either in appropriately placing novel antibiotics or in considering strategies for sparing the broadest-spectrum antibiotics. A multidisciplinary team of experts (one intensive care physician, one infectious disease consultant, one clinical microbiologist and one MD clinical pharmacologist), performed several rounds of assessment to reach agreement in developing six different algorithms according to the susceptibility pattern (one each for multi-susceptible, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing, AmpC beta-lactamase-producing, Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing, OXA-48-producing, and Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales). Whenever multiple therapeutic options were feasible, a hierarchical scale was established. Recommendations on antibiotic dosing optimization were also provided. In order to retrieve evidence-based support for the therapeutic choices proposed in the algorithms, a comprehensive literature search was performed by a researcher on PubMed-MEDLINE from inception until March 2021. Quality and strength of evidence was established according to a hierarchical scale of the study design. Only articles published in English were included. It is expected that these algorithms, by allowing prompt revision of antibiotic regimens whenever feasible, appropriate place in therapy of novel beta-lactams, implementation of strategies for sparing the broadest-spectrum antibiotics, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimization of antibiotic dosing regimens, may be helpful either in improving clinical outcome or in containing the spread of antimicrobial resistance.

Could simulation methods solve the curse of sparse data within clinical studies of antibiotic resistance?

Infectious disease (ID) physicians and ID pharmacists commonly confront therapeutic questions relating to antibiotic resistance. Randomized controlled trial data are few and meta-analytic-based approaches to develop the evidence-base from several small studies that might relate to an antibiotic resistance question are not simple. The overriding challenge is the sparsity of data which is problematic for traditional frequentist methods, being the paradigm underlying the derivation of ‘P value’ inferential statistics. In other sparse data contexts, simulation methods enable answers to key questions that are meaningful, quantitative and potentially relevant. How these simulation methods ‘work’ and how Bayesian-based methods, being not ‘P value based’, can facilitate simulation are reviewed. These methods are becoming increasingly accessible. This review highlights why sparse data is less of an issue within Bayesian versus frequentist paradigms. A fictional pharmacokinetic study with sparse data illustrates a simplistic application of Bayesian and simulation methods to antibiotic dosing. Whether within epidemiological projections or clinical studies, simulation methods are likely to play an increasing role in antimicrobial resistance research within both hospital and community studies of either rare infectious disease or infections within specific population groups.

Efficacy of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors to treat extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia secondary to urinary tract infection in kidney transplant recipients (INCREMENT-SOT Project)

BACKGROUND

Whether active therapy with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLI) is as affective as carbapenems for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) bloodstream infection (BSI) secondary to urinary tract infection (UTI) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 306 KTR admitted to 30 centers from January 2014 to October 2016. Therapeutic failure (lack of cure or clinical improvement and/or death from any cause) at days 7 and 30 from ESBL-E BSI onset was the primary and secondary study outcomes, respectively.

RESULTS

Therapeutic failure at days 7 and 30 occurred in 8.2% (25/306) and 13.4% (41/306) of patients. Hospital-acquired BSI (adjusted OR [aOR]: 4.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.50-11.20) and Pitt score (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.21-1.77) were independently associated with therapeutic failure at day 7. Age-adjusted Charlson Index (aOR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.05-1.48), Pitt score (aOR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.35-2.17), and lymphocyte count ≤500 cells/μL at presentation (aOR: 3.16; 95% CI: 1.42-7.06) predicted therapeutic failure at day 30. Carbapenem monotherapy (68.6%, primarily meropenem) was the most frequent active therapy, followed by BLBLI monotherapy (10.8%, mostly piperacillin-tazobactam). Propensity score (PS)-adjusted models revealed no significant impact of the choice of active therapy (carbapenem-containing vs any other regimen, BLBLI- vs carbapenem-based monotherapy) within the first 72 hours on any of the study outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that active therapy based on BLBLI may be as effective as carbapenem-containing regimens for ESBL-E BSI secondary to UTI in the specific population of KTR. Potential residual confounding and unpowered sample size cannot be excluded (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02852902).

Treatment of extended-spectrum β-lactamases infections: what is the current role of new β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The widespread diffusion of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Enterobacteriales currently represents a major threat for public health worldwide. Carbapenems are currently considered the first-line choice for serious ESBL infections. However, the dramatic global increase in ESBL prevalence has led to a significant overuse of carbapenems that has promoted the selection and spread of carbapenemases, which might further prejudicated our ability to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens. Therefore, strategies to limit the use of carbapenems should be implemented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although piperacillin-tazobactam should no longer be considered an alternative to carbapenems for definitive treatment of bloodstream infections due to ESBL-producing strains, it might still represent an alternative for step-down therapy or for low-to-moderate severity infection originating from urinary or biliary sources and when piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration of 4 mg/l or less. Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam are both carbapenem sparing agents that appear interesting alternatives for treatment of serious ESBL infections. New β-lactams/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLI), including cefepime-enmetazobactam, ceftaroline fosamil-avibactam, aztreonam-avibactam and cefepime-zidebactam, are also promising agents for treatment of ESBL infections, but further clinical data are needed to establish their efficacy relative to carbapenems. The role of carbapenems/β-lactamase inhibitors remain to be clarified.

SUMMARY

New BL/BLI have distinctive specificities and limitations that require further investigations. Future randomized clinical trials are required to define the best strategy for their administering for ESBL infections.

<p>Optimal Empiric Treatment for <em>Klebsiella pneumoniae</em> Infections in Short-Stay ICU Patients During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Results from a Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis</p>

Objective

There is a paucity of published data to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imipenem (IPM) and piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) dosing regimens in the treatment of septic patients acquiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT).

Methods and Materials

Critically-ill patients were grouped into short-stay and long-stay intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Pathogens were isolated from bloodstream infections in these patients. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value was determined by agar dilution method. Population PK models were introduced in this study, and differences in the likelihood of achieving efficacious and toxic exposures of IPM and PT for critically-ill patients were assessed.

Results

A total of 86 K. pneumoniae bloodstream infection associated isolates were collected, and the MIC₅₀ and MIC₉₀ for short-stay ICU patients were 0.5/4 mg/L and 32/128 mg/L, respectively. IMP 0.5g q8h reached 90% probability of target attainment (PTA) against isolates with MICs ≤2 mg/L and was recommended to empirically treat short-stay ICU patients during CRRT based on the target of 40% ƒT>MIC. However, based on a more aggressive target of 100% ƒT>MIC, all the simulated IMP regimens except for IMP 1g q6h failed to achieve >80% cumulative fraction of response (CFR) in such patients. Unfortunately, the risk of drug-related toxicity for IMP 1g q6h was relatively high (50–85%). For PT, even the regimen of 4/0.5g q6h failed to provide sufficient antimicrobial exposure in short-stay ICU patients acquiring CRRT.

Conclusion

No dose adjustment was required for the conventional IMP and PT regimens in the critically-ill population acquiring CRRT. Empirical treatment of IMP 0.5g q8h/q6h, not for PT, may provide sufficient antimicrobial exposure for short-stay ICU patients during CRRT. PT should be used in the knowledge of MIC results.

Treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli after solid organ transplant: Outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli (GNB) cause significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from all SOT recipients at a single center from 1 January 2007 to 15 April 2017 treated for infections caused by multi-drug-resistant GNB. This study examined the effects of specific antibiotics on nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, 30-day mortality, and length of stay in the hospital and intensive care unit.

RESULTS

A total of 225 infections were identified among 143 patients. Carbapenem-sensitive organisms were present in 112 (49.8%) infections and were associated with decreased 30-day mortality (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16-0.75). Neurotoxicity was associated with polymyxin use with an 8% increase in odds of neurotoxicity per day of exposure (P=.03). There was no relationship between nephrotoxicity and any individual antibiotic class. Increased hospital length-of-stay occurred among patients exposed to aminoglycosides (β-statistic = 0.48 (0.23); P = .04), while there was no relationship between antibiotic class and intensive care unit (ICU) length-of-stay. Mortality at 30 days occurred in 37 infections (16%). Carbapenem exposure was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P = .02). No other antibiotic class had a significant impact on 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Carbapenems appear to be a safe and effective treatment for solid-organ transplant recipients with infections caused by carbapenem-sensitive multidrug-resistant GNB; treatment of carbapenem-resistant gram-negatives remains challenging.

The effect of intervention by an antimicrobial stewardship team on anaerobic bacteremia

The effect of antimicrobial stewardship (AS) on anaerobic bacteremia is uncertain. This study aimed to assess the effect of interventions by the AS team (AST) on clinical and microbiological outcomes and antimicrobial use. An AS program was introduced at Osaka City University Hospital in January 2014; an interdisciplinary AST was established. We enrolled patients with anaerobic bacteremia between January 2009 and December 2018. Patients were classified into the pre-intervention group (from January 2009 to December 2013) and the post-intervention group (from January 2014 to December 2018). A significant decrease in definitive carbapenem use (P = 0.0242) and an increase in empiric tazobactam/piperacillin use (P = 0.0262) were observed in the post-intervention group. The de-escalation rate increased significantly from 9.38% to 32.7% (P = 0.0316) in the post-intervention group. The susceptibility of Bacteroides species and 30-day mortality did not worsen in the post-intervention group. These results showed that interventions by an AST can reduce carbapenem use and increase the de-escalation rate without worsening patient outcomes.

Optimizing therapy of bloodstream infection due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) are increasing worldwide. Carbapenems are usually regarded as the antibiotics of choice for the treatment of serious ESBL infections. However, because of the alarming emergence or carbapenem resistance, interest in effective alternatives has emerged. The present review summarizes the findings published on the antibiotics currently available for treatment of patients with an ESBL-E bloodstream infection (BSI).

RECENT FINDINGS

Meropenem and imipenem are the drugs recommended for treatment of ESBL BSIs in critically ill patients, and in infections with high bacterial loads or elevated β-lactam minimum inhibitory concentrations. Ertapenem should be reserved for patients with less severe presentations, and should be used at high doses. In milder presentations or BSIs from low-risk sources, other carbapenem-sparing alternatives could be considered: cephamycins, fluoroquinolones, and particularly a β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitor combination (particularly piperacillin/tazobactam). Optimized dosing of piperacillin/tazobactam is recommended (high doses and extended infusion). There are few data on the use of the promising newly available drugs (e.g. ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, and plazomicin), and it seems reasonable to reserve them as last-resort drugs.

SUMMARY

Carbapenems should be used in patients with serious infections; alternatives could be used individually, particularly for definitive treatment of patients with milder presentations.

Carbapenem-Sparing Strategies for ESBL Producers: When and How

Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria are prevalent worldwide and correlated with hospital infections, but they have been evolving as an increasing cause of community acquired infections. The spread of ESBL constitutes a major threat for public health, and infections with ESBL-producing organisms have been associated with poor outcomes. Established therapeutic options for severe infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms are considered the carbapenems. However, under the pressure of carbapenem overuse and the emergence of resistance, carbapenem-sparing strategies have been implemented. The administration of carbapenem-sparing antibiotics for the treatment of ESBL infections has yielded conflicting results. Herein, the current available knowledge regarding carbapenem-sparing strategies for ESBL producers is reviewed, and the optimal conditions for the "when and how" of carbapenem-sparing agents is discussed. An important point of the review focuses on piperacillin-tazobactam as the agent arousing the most debate. The most available data regarding non-carbapenem β-lactams (i.e., ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, temocillin, cephamycins and cefepime) are also thoroughly presented as well as non β-lactams (i.e., aminoglycosides, quinolones, tigecycline, eravacycline and fosfomycin).

Antimicrobial resistance of bacteraemia in the emergency department of a German university hospital (2013-2018): potential carbapenem-sparing empiric treatment options in light of the new EUCAST recommendations

Background

This study investigated predominant microorganisms causing community-onset bacteraemia at the medical emergency department (ED) of a tertiary-care university hospital in Germany from 2013 to 2018 and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

Methods

Antimicrobial resistance patterns in patients with positive blood cultures presenting to an internal medicine ED were retrospectively analysed.

Results

Blood cultures were obtained at 5191 of 66,879 ED encounters, with 1013 (19.5%) positive results, and true positive results at 740 encounters (diagnostic yield, 14.3%). The most frequently isolated relevant microorganisms were Enterobacterales (n = 439, 59.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 92, 12.4%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 34, 4.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 32, 4.3%), Streptococcus pyogenes (n = 16, 2.2%), Enterococcus faecalis (n = 18, 2.4%), and Enterococcus faecium (n = 12, 1.6%). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed a high proportion of resistance against ampicillin-sulbactam in Enterobacterales (42.2%). The rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was low (0.4%).

Piperacillin-tazobactam therapy provided coverage for 83.2% of all relevant pathogens using conventional breakpoints. Application of the new European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations increased the percentage of susceptible isolates to high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam to 92.8% (p < 0.001). Broad-spectrum carbapenems would only cover an additional 4.8%. The addition of vancomycin or linezolid extended coverage by just 1.7%.

Conclusions

Using an ureidopenicillin-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination at the high dose suggested by the new EUCAST recommendations provided nearly 93% coverage for relevant pathogens in patients with suspected bloodstream infection in our cohort. This might offer a safe option to reduce the empiric use of carbapenems. Our data support the absence of a general need for glycopeptides or oxazolidinones in empiric treatment.

Outcomes of treating AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia with carbapenems vs. non-carbapenems

INTRODUCTION

AmpC β-lactamases are found in Enterobacter species, Serratia species, Citrobacter freundii, Providencia species and Morganella morganii ('ESCPM'). Carbapenems are commonly used to treat severe 'ESCPM' infections. Carbapenem-sparing agents are needed because of increasing carbapenem resistance worldwide. Use of cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam has limited supportive clinical data. We evaluated the efficacy of non-carbapenems vs. carbapenems in 'ESCPM' bacteraemia.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with 'ESCPM' bacteraemia. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Analyses were performed on patients who received carbapenems vs. piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime monotherapy as empirical and definitive therapy. Propensity score for carbapenem therapy was adjusted for in multivariate analyses for 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients were included. The most common bacterium isolated was Enterobacter species (58.1%). Common sources were urinary (22.8%) and vascular lines (22.0%). Carbapenems (28.6%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (28.6%) were the commonest empirical antibiotics. Carbapenems (54.8%) and cefepime (23.7%) were the most common definitive antibiotics. Median Pitt bacteraemia score was 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 0-2). Overall, 30-day mortality was 12.9%. Adjusted multivariate analyses for empirical and definitive antibiotic treatment models yielded risk factors for 30-day mortality, including higher Pitt bacteraemia score (empirical: adjusted OR [aOR] 1.21 for each point increase, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01-1.45; definitive: aOR 1.33 for each point increase, 95% CI:1.06-1.69) and age (empirical: aOR 1.04 for each year increase, 95% CI:1.01-1.08). Empirical piperacillin-tazobactam (aOR 0.29, 95% CI:0.07-1.27) and definitive cefepime (aOR 0.65, 95% CI:0.12-3.55) were not associated with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with carbapenem therapy, empirical piperacillin-tazobactam and definitive cefepime were not associated with 30-day mortality in 'ESCPM' bacteraemia.

Extended spectrum β-lactamase producing enterobacteriaceae: carbapenem sparing options

Introduction: Carbapenems have an important place in our antibiotic armamentarium and have been trusted to effectively treat infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae for many years. However, the utility of carbapenems has been compromised by the emergence of resistance especially in Enterobacteriaceae. Therefore, carbapenem-sparing alternative antibiotics are of extreme importance in clinical practice.Areas covered: We reviewed studies addressing currently available antibiotic options used as both empiric and definitive therapy for the treatment of infections due to ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae published in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus databases without any date restriction. Current treatment alternatives included beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, cefepime, cephamycins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, temocillin and, various oral alternative agents. We also summarized the clinical and molecular epidemiology, early prediction methods and impact of initial empirical therapy and de-escalation approach for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections.Expert opinion: The current literature would endorse the carbapenem utilization for patients with severe and high inoculum-high risk infections. However, for milder infections particularly for urinary tract infections, various carbapenem-sparing antibiotics can be considered in selected cases. For infections including easily drainable intra-abdominal infections and catheter-related infections in which catheter removal is readily available more reliable data are needed to recommend non-carbapenem antibiotics confidently.

In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against phenotypically defined extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from hospitalized patients (SMART 2016)

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined broth microdilution testing method (M07, 11th edition, 2018) was used to determine MICs for ceftolozane/tazobactam and eight comparator agents against 21,952 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae submitted by 161 clinical laboratories in 51 countries in 2016 as a part of the SMART global surveillance program. MICs were interpreted using CLSI breakpoints (M100 29th edition, 2019). 89.7% of isolates of Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, compared to 70.0%, 76.3%, 77.7%, 84.7%, 93.6%, and 96.4%, respectively, for ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem. 82.4% of isolates of ESBL-positive, carbapenemase-negative Enterobacteriaceae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, compared to 1.5%, 7.8%, 20.3%, 71.1%, 94.7%, and 98.7%, respectively, for ceftriaxone, cefepime, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, ertapenem, and meropenem. In vitro susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam was >60% higher than susceptibility to other advanced-generation cephalosporins among all Enterobacteriaceae and >10% higher than susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam among ESBL-positive Enterobacteriaceae collected globally in 2016.

Treatment of urinary tract infections in the era of antimicrobial resistance and new antimicrobial agents

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a growing concern due to limited treatment options. Knowledge of the common uropathogens in addition to local susceptibility patterns is essential in determining appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy of UTIs. The recommended first-line empiric antibiotic therapy for acute uncomplicated bacterial cystitis in otherwise healthy adult nonpregnant females is a 5-day course of nitrofurantoin, a 3-g single dose of fosfomycin tromethamine, or a 5-day course of pivmecillinam. High rates of resistance for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin preclude their use as empiric treatment of UTIs in several communities, particularly if patients who were recently exposed to them or in patients who are at risk of infections with extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing Enterobacteriales. Second-line options include oral cephalosporins such as cephalexin or cefixime, fluoroquinolones and β-lactams, such as amoxicillin-clavulanate. Current treatment options for UTIs due to AmpC- β -lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, fluoroquinolones, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam and carbapenems. Treatment oral options for UTIs due to ESBLs-E coli include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, pivmecillinam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, finafloxacin, and sitafloxacin while pivmecillinam, fosfomycin, finafloxacin, and sitafloxacin are treatment oral options for ESBLs- Klebsiella pneumoniae. Parenteral treatment options for UTIs due to ESBLs-producing Enterobacteriales include piperacillin-tazobactam (for ESBL-E coli only), carbapenems including meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, and sulopenem, ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, cefiderocol, fosfomycin, sitafloxacin, and finafloxacin. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/cilastatin-relebactam, colistin, fosfomycin, aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, aztreonam and amoxicillin-clavulanate, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, cefiderocol, tigecycline are treatment options for UTIs caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE). Treatment options for UTIs caused by multidrug resistant (MDR)-Pseudomonas spp. include fluoroquinolones, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, carbapenems including imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam, meropenem, and fosfomycin, ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, aminoglycosides including plazomicin, aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, cefiderocol, and colistin. It is important to use the new antimicrobials wisely for treatment of UTIs caused by MDR-organisms to avoid resistance development.

The higher prevalence of extended spectrum beta-lactamases among Escherichia coli ST131 in Southeast Asia is driven by expansion of a single, locally prevalent subclone

The ST131 multilocus sequence type (MLST) of Escherichia coli is a globally successful pathogen whose dissemination is increasing rates of antibiotic resistance. Numerous global surveys have demonstrated the pervasiveness of this clone; in some regions ST131 accounts for up to 30% of all E. coli isolates. However, many regions are underrepresented in these published surveys, including Africa, South America, and Asia. We collected consecutive bloodstream E. coli isolates from three countries in Southeast Asia; ST131 was the most common MLST type. As in other studies, the C2/H30Rx clade accounted for the majority of ST131 strains. Clinical risk factors were similar to other reported studies. However, we found that nearly all of the C2 strains in this study were closely related, forming what we denote the SEA-C2 clone. The SEA-C2 clone is enriched for strains from Asia, particularly Southeast Asia and Singapore. The SEA-C2 clone accounts for all of the excess resistance and virulence of ST131 relative to non-ST131 E. coli. The SEA-C2 strains appear to be locally circulating and dominant in Southeast Asia, despite the intuition that high international connectivity and travel would enable frequent opportunities for other strains to establish themselves.

Risk factors and outcomes in non-transplant patients with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia: a retrospective study from 2013 to 2016

Background

Escherichia coli is one of the most common strains of extended-spectrum β-lactam (ESBL)-producing bacteria, and the prevention and treatment of ESBL-producing E. coli infections is an ongoing challenge. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of ESBL-producing E. coli bacteremia in non-transplant patients remain to be elucidated.

Methods

This retrospective study included 491 non-transplant patients with E. coli bloodstream infections (BSIs) from January 2013 to December 2016 and was conducted to investigate the risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes of these infections.

Results

Of the 491 E. coli BSI patients, 57.6% suffered from infections with ESBL-producing strains. A multivariate analysis showed that urinary tract infection, prior use of cephalosporin, and treatment with β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combination antibiotics were independent risk factors for the development of ESBL-producing E. coli BSIs. The overall mortality rate in E. coli BSI patients was 14.46%, and there was no significant difference in the 28 day mortality rate between ESBL-producing E. coli and non-ESBL-producing E. coli BSI patients (14.8% vs. 14.0%, respectively; P = 0.953). Similarly, there was no difference between the community-acquired infection group and the nosocomial infection group. Hepatobiliary disease, carbapenem exposure, high APACHE II score, and hypoproteinemia were independent risk factors for death in E. coli BSI patients. Multivariate analysis showed that hypoproteinemia and severe disease were independent risk factors for death from ESBL-producing E. coli BSIs. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the 28 day mortality between patients with ESBL-producing E. coli BSIs treated with carbapenem monotherapy versus those treated with BLBLI combination antibiotics (12.8% vs. 17.9%, respectively; P = 0.384).

Conclusions

Prior use of cephalosporin or BLBLI combination antibiotics increased the risk ratio for ESBL-producing E. coli infection. Hypoproteinemia and severe disease are independent risk factors for death in patients with E. coli BSIs. There was no significant difference in the 28 day prognosis of patients with ESBL-producing E. coli and those with non-ESBL-producing E. coli BSIs. These data do not support the conclusion that carbapenems might be more effective than BLBLI antibiotics for treatment of patients with BSIs caused by ESBL-producing E. coli.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0599-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with bacterial infection: Protocol for a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Early empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy is recommended for patients with severe infections, including sepsis. β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations or carbapenems are often used to ensure coverage of likely pathogens. Piperacillin/tazobactam is proposed as a carbapenem-sparing agent to reduce the incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and superinfections. In the recently published MERINO trial, increased mortality from piperacillin/tazobactam was suggested in patients with bacteraemia with resistant Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species. Whether these findings also apply to empirical piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with other severe infections, including sepsis, is unknown. We aim to assess the benefits and harms of empirical and definitive piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems for patients with severe bacterial infections.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol has been prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols statement, the Cochrane Handbook and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We will include randomised clinical trials assessing piperacillin/tazobactam vs carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections of any origin. The primary outcome will be all-cause short-term mortality ≤ 90 days. Secondary outcomes will include all-cause long-term mortality > 90 days, adverse events, quality of life, use of life support, secondary infections, antibiotic resistance, and length of stay. We will conduct meta-analyses, including pre-planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses for all assessed outcomes. The risk of random errors in the meta-analyses will be assessed by trial sequential analysis.

Development of Broth Microdilution MIC and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Quality Control Ranges for the Combination of Cefepime and the Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor Enmetazobactam

Third-generation cephalosporin resistance among Enterobacteriaceae, mediated by the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), is a very serious medical concern with limited therapeutic options. Enmetazobactam (formerly AAI101) is a novel penicillanic sulfone β-lactamase inhibitor active against a wide range of ESBLs. The combination of enmetazobactam and cefepime has entered phase 3 development in patients with complicated urinary tract infections. Using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M23 tier 2 study design, broth microdilution MIC and disk diffusion quality control (QC) ranges were determined for cefepime-enmetazobactam. Enmetazobactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 8 μg/ml in the MIC assay, and a cefepime-enmetazobactam disk mass of 30/20 μg was used in the disk diffusion assay. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, E. coli ATCC 35218, E. coli NCTC 13353, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 were chosen as reference strains. The CTX-M-15-producing E. coli NCTC 13353 isolate is recommended for routine testing to control for inhibition of ESBL activity by enmetazobactam. Broth microdilution MIC QC ranges spanned 3 to 4 doubling dilutions and contained 99.6% to 100.0% of obtained MIC values for the five reference strains. Disk diffusion yielded inhibition zone diameter QC ranges that spanned 7 mm and encompassed 97.1% to 100.0% of the obtained values. Quality control ranges were approved by the CLSI in 2017 (broth microdilution MIC) and 2019 (disk diffusion). The established QC ranges will ensure that appropriate assay performance criteria are attained using CLSI reference methodology when determining the susceptibility of clinical isolates to cefepime-enmetazobactam.