1
|
Bauer ML, O'Brien KM, Kovach AI. Can at‐risk species serve as effective conservation surrogates? Case study in northeastern
US
shrublands. Ecosphere 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.4081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa L. Bauer
- Department of Natural Resources and the Environment University of New Hampshire Durham New Hampshire USA
| | - Kathleen M. O'Brien
- Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge United States Fish and Wildlife Service Wells Maine USA
| | - Adrienne I. Kovach
- Department of Natural Resources and the Environment University of New Hampshire Durham New Hampshire USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Margenau EL, Wood PB, Rota CT. Habitat management for stopover and breeding songbird communities along rights-of-way in forest-dominated landscapes. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 32:e2540. [PMID: 35066965 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The proliferation of energy rights-of-way (pipelines and powerlines; ROWs) in the central Appalachian region has prompted wildlife management agencies to consider ways to use these features to manage and conserve at-risk songbird species. However, little empirical evidence exists regarding best management strategies to enhance habitat surrounding ROWs for the songbird community during stopover or breeding periods. We used a before-after-control-impact design to study cut-back border (linear tree cuttings along abrupt forest edges) harvest width (15, 30, and 45 m wide into the forest), and harvest intensity (14 and 4.5 m2 /ha basal area retention) prescriptions along ROWs and assessed their effects on mature forest and young forest songbird species and avian guilds (forest gap habitat, forest interior habitat, young forest habitat, and species of regional conservation priority) up to 2 years after treatment throughout West Virginia. Species richness during the spring stopover period initially decreased at the 1-year post-treatment period but returned to pre-treatment levels by 2 years post-treatment. Breeding season responses to cut-back border treatments varied across harvest width, harvest intensity, and time, but all responses of focal species abundance and guild richness were neutral or positive. Cut-back border harvest intensity had a stronger influence (i.e., more positive responses) than harvest width on breeding focal species abundances and guild richness. For harvest intensity, the more intense, 4.5 m2 /ha retention treatment had a stronger influence (i.e., more positive responses) than the less intense, 14 m2 /ha retention treatment. For harvest width, the narrowest treatment (15-m wide) had the strongest influence (i.e., more positive responses) of all width treatments, followed by the widest (45-m wide treatment) with the least influence from the 30-m wide treatment. Abundances and richness increased from pre-treatment to 2 years post-treatment across all species and guilds that exhibited a response. These results suggest that cut-back borders increase breeding season habitat suitability along ROWs for the mature forest and young forest songbird community as well as for species of regional conservation priority in the short-term. These findings can aid the development of management guidelines for the forest songbird community along abrupt forest edges of man-made habitat features in forest-dominated landscapes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L Margenau
- West Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Petra B Wood
- US Geological Survey, West Virginia Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Christopher T Rota
- School of Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Systematic Review of Bird Response to Privately-Owned, Managed Pine Stands in the Southeastern U.S. FORESTS 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/f12040442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The southeastern U.S. is widely known as a bastion of privately-owned, managed pine (Pinus spp.) forests, comprised primarily of native pine species. The region supports high levels of biodiversity, but also a multi-billion-dollar forest products economy critical to socioeconomic stability of rural areas. We conducted a systematic review of studies focused exclusively on avifaunal associations within privately-owned, managed pine landscapes in the southeastern U.S. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis framework to examine all available studies that evaluated aspects of avian diversity, abundance, and community composition across a suite of forest types, stand ages, and forest management practices within southeastern managed pine systems in the last 70 years. We screened 160 records through primary database searches, and 1696 secondary records from supplemental searches and other sources, and identified 103 relevant articles for inclusion. As expected, although there is no single forest management practice that best provides for avian communities, we found practices that: (1) involve prudent site preparation; (2) promote forest thinning and intermediate management practices; (3) provide non-pine vegetative cover; (4) supply fine- and meso-filter resources such as retained snags and coarse woody debris; and (5) promote heterogeneity in cover types, largely enhanced value of southeastern managed pine systems to avian communities. Overall, it appears that avian communities can be best maintained by providing a diverse mosaic of forest conditions in managed pine landscapes. Key research gaps include improving understanding avian population demographics, such as survival, reproduction, and dispersal.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ober HK, Jones GM, Gottlieb IGW, Johnson SA, Smith L, Brosi BJ, Fletcher RJ. Bat community response to intensification of biomass production for bioenergy across the southeastern United States. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2020; 30:e02155. [PMID: 32358982 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Human demand for food, fiber, and space is accelerating the rate of change of land cover and land use. Much of the world now consists of a matrix of natural forests, managed forests, agricultural cropland, and urbanized plots. Expansion of domestic energy production efforts in the United States is one driver predicted to influence future land-use and land management practices across large spatial scales. Favorable growing conditions make the southeastern United States an ideal location for producing a large portion of the country's renewable bioenergy. We investigated patterns of bat occurrence in two bioenergy feedstocks commonly grown in this region (corn, Zea mays, and pine, Pinus taeda and P. elliottii). We also evaluated potential impacts of the three major pathways of woody biomass extraction (residue removal following clearcut harvest, short-rotation energy plantations, and mid-rotation forest thinning) to bat occurrence through a priori land-use contrasts. We acoustically sampled bat vocalizations at 84 sites in the Southeastern Plains and Southern Coastal Plains of the southeastern United States across three years. We found that mid-rotation thinning resulted in positive effects on bat occurrence, and potential conversion of unmanaged (reference) forest to managed forest for timber and/or bioenergy harvest resulted in negative effects on bat occurrence when effects were averaged across all species. The effects of short-rotation energy plantations, removal of logging residues from plantation clearcuts, and corn were equivocal for all bat species examined. Our results suggest that accelerated production of biomass for energy production through either corn or intensively managed pine forests is not likely to have an adverse effect on bat communities, so long as existing older unmanaged forests are not converted to managed bioenergy or timber plantations. Beyond bioenergy crop production, mid-rotation thinning of even-aged pine stands intended for timber production, increases to the duration of plantation rotations to promote older forest stands, arranging forest stands and crop fields to maximize edge habitat, and maintaining unmanaged forests could benefit bat communities by augmenting roosting and foraging opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly K Ober
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA
| | - Gavin M Jones
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA
| | - Isabel G W Gottlieb
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA
- School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA
| | - Shelly A Johnson
- UF/IFAS Extension, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA
| | - Lora Smith
- Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Newton, Georgia, 39870, USA
| | - Berry J Brosi
- Department of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA
| | - Robert J Fletcher
- Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA
- School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hanle J, Duguid MC, Ashton MS. Legacy forest structure increases bird diversity and abundance in aging young forests. Ecol Evol 2020; 10:1193-1208. [PMID: 32076507 PMCID: PMC7029076 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Revised: 10/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Many studies have demonstrated the importance of early-successional forest habitat for breeding bird abundance, composition, and diversity. However, very few studies directly link measures of bird diversity, composition and abundance to measures of forest composition, and structure and their dynamic change over early succession. This study examines the relationships between breeding bird community composition and forest structure in regenerating broadleaf forests of southern New England, USA, separating the influences of ecological succession from retained stand structure. We conducted bird point counts and vegetation surveys across a chronosequence of forest stands that originated between 2 and 24 years previously in shelterwood timber harvests, a silvicultural method of regenerating oak-mixed broadleaf forests. We distinguish between vegetation variables that relate to condition of forest regeneration and those that reflect legacy stand structure. Using principal components analyses, we confirmed the distinction between regeneration and legacy vegetation variables. We ran regression analysis to test for relationships between bird community variables, including nesting and foraging functional guild abundances, and vegetation variables. We confirmed these relationships with hierarchical partitioning. Our results demonstrate that regenerating and legacy vegetation correlate with bird community variables across stand phases and that the strength with which they drive bird community composition changes with forest succession. While measures of regeneration condition explain bird abundance and diversity variables during late initiation, legacy stand structure explains them during stem exclusion. Canopy cover, ground-story diversity, and canopy structure diversity are the most powerful and consistent explanatory variables. Our results suggest that leaving varied legacy stand structure to promote habitat heterogeneity in shelterwood harvests contributes to greater bird community diversity. Interestingly, this is particularly important during the structurally depauperate phase of stem exclusion of young regenerating forests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Hanle
- School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Marlyse C. Duguid
- School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Mark S. Ashton
- School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenCTUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ground Beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) Response to Harvest Residue Retention: Implications for Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Production. FORESTS 2019. [DOI: 10.3390/f11010048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Research Highlights: Our study adds to the scant literature on the effects of forest bioenergy on ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and contributes new insights into the responses of ground beetle species and functional groups to operational harvest residue retention. We discovered that count of Harpalus pensylvanicus (DeGeer)—a habitat generalist—increased owing to clear-cut harvests but decreased due to harvest residue reductions; these observations uniquely allowed us to separate effects of additive forest disturbances to demonstrate that, contrarily to predictions, a generalist species considered to be adapted to disturbance may be negatively affected by altered habitat elements associated with disturbances from renewable energy development. Background and Objectives: Despite the potential environmental benefits of forest bioenergy, woody biomass harvests raise forest sustainability concerns for some stakeholders. Ground beetles are well established ecological indicators of forest ecosystem health and their life history characteristics are connected to habitat elements that are altered by forest harvesting. Thus, we evaluated the effects of harvest residue retention following woody biomass harvest for forest bioenergy on ground beetles in an operational field experiment. Materials and Methods: We sampled ground beetles using pitfall traps in harvest residue removal treatments representing variable woody biomass retention prescriptions, ranging from no retention to complete retention of all merchantable woody biomass. We replicated treatments in eight clear-cut stands in intensively managed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) forests in North Carolina and Georgia. Results: Harvest residue retention had no effect on ground beetle richness and diversity. However, counts of H. pensylvanicus, Anisodactylus spp., and “burrower” and “fast runner” functional groups, among others, were greater in treatments with no woody biomass harvest than those with no harvest residue retention; all of these ground beetles may confer ecosystem services in forests. We suggest that H. pensylvanicus is a useful indicator species for burrowing and granivorous ground beetle response to harvest residue reductions in recently harvested stands. Lastly, we propose that retaining 15% retention of total harvest residues or more, depending on regional and operational variables, may support beneficial ground beetle populations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fritts SR, Moorman CE, Grodsky SM, Hazel DW, Homyack JA, Farrell CB, Castleberry SB, Evans EH, Greene DU. Rodent response to harvesting woody biomass for bioenergy production. J Wildl Manage 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R. Fritts
- Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology ProgramNorth Carolina State UniversityBox 7646RaleighNC27695‐7646USA
| | - Christopher E. Moorman
- Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology ProgramNorth Carolina State UniversityBox 7646RaleighNC27695‐7646USA
| | - Steven M. Grodsky
- Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology ProgramNorth Carolina State UniversityBox 7646RaleighNC27695‐7646USA
| | - Dennis W. Hazel
- Department of Forestry and Environmental ResourcesNorth Carolina State UniversityBox 7646RaleighNC27695‐7646USA
| | | | | | - Steven B. Castleberry
- University of Georgia, Warnell School of Forestry and Natural ResourcesAthensGA30602‐2152USA
| | - Emily H. Evans
- Department of BiologyGeorgia Southern UniversityP.O. Box 8042StatesboroGA30460USA
| | - Daniel U. Greene
- Department of Natural Resources ManagementTexas Tech UniversityP.O. Box 42125LubbockTX79409USA
| |
Collapse
|