TMSOTf assisted synthesis of 2'-deoxy-2'-[18F]fluoro-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine ([18F]FAC)

Analysis of capecitabine metabolites in conjunction with digital autoradiography in a murine model of pancreatic cancer suggests extensive drug penetration through the tumor

Previously published digital autoradiography of 3 H-labeled capecitabine reveals a near-uniform distribution of activity throughout a murine pancreatic model. This is in contrast both to 14 C-labeled gemcitabine, and established expectations, as the dense stroma of pancreatic cancer is understood to inhibit drug penetration. Capecitabine is a pro-drug for 5 FU. The positioning of the radiolabel on capecitabine leaves open the possibility that much of the autoradiographic signal is generated by nontoxic compounds. Studies were performed on tumors derived via organoid culture from a murine KPC tumor. As before, we performed autoradiography comparing 3 H capecitabine to the gemcitabine analog 18 F-FAC. The metabolism of capecitabine in this model was studied through LC-MS of tumor tissue. The autoradiographs confirmed that the 3 H label from capecitabine was much more uniformly distributed through the tumor than the 18 F from the gemcitabine analog. LC-MS revealed that approximately 75% of the molar mass of capecitabine had been converted into 5 FU or pre-5 FU compounds. The remainder had been converted into nontoxic species. Therapeutically relevant capecitabine metabolites achieve a relatively even distribution in this pancreatic cancer model, in contrast to the gemcitabine analog 18 F-FAC. In a human xenograft model, (BxPC3), the 3 H label from capecitabine was also uniformly spread across the tumor autoradiographs. However, at 2 h post-administration the metabolism of capecitabine had proceeded further and the bulk of the agent was in the form of nontoxic species.

Predicting Gemcitabine Delivery by 18F-FAC PET in Murine Models of Pancreatic Cancer

¹⁸F-FAC (2'-deoxy-2'-¹⁸F-fluoro-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine) has close structural similarity to gemcitabine and thus offers the potential to image drug delivery to tumors. We compared tumor ¹⁸F-FAC PET images with ¹⁴C-gemcitabine levels, established ex vivo, in 3 mouse models of pancreatic cancer. We further modified tumor gemcitabine levels with injectable PEGylated recombinant human hyaluronidase (PEGPH20) to test whether changes in gemcitabine would be tracked by ¹⁸F-FAC. Methods: ¹⁸F-FAC was synthesized as described previously. Three patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models were grown in the flanks of NSG mice. Mice were given PEGPH20 or vehicle intravenously 24 h before coinjection of ¹⁸F-FAC and ¹⁴C-gemcitabine. Animals were euthanized and imaged 1 h after tracer administration. Tumor and muscle uptake of both ¹⁸F-FAC and ¹⁴C-gemcitabine was obtained ex vivo. The efficacy of PEPGPH20 was validated through staining with hyaluronic acid binding protein. Additionally, an organoid culture, initiated from a KPC (Pdx-1 Cre LSL-Kras^G12D LSL-p53^R172H) tumor, was used to generate orthotopically growing tumors in C57BL/6J mice, and these tumors were then serially transplanted. Animals were injected with PEGPH20 and ¹⁴C-gemcitabine as described above to validate increased drug uptake by ex vivo assay. PET/MR images were obtained using a PET insert on a 7-T MR scanner. Animals were imaged immediately before injection with PEGPH20 and again 24 h later. Results: Tumor-to-muscle ratios of ¹⁴C-gemcitabine and ¹⁸F-FAC correlated well across all PDX models and treatments (R ² = 0.78). There was a significant increase in the tumor PET signal in PEGPH20-treated PDX animals, and this signal was matched in ex vivo counts for 2 of 3 models. In KPC-derived tumors, PEGPH20 raised ¹⁴C-gemcitabine levels (tumor-to-muscle ratio of 1.9 vs. 2.4, control vs. treated, P = 0.013). PET/MR ¹⁸F-FAC images showed a 12% increase in tumor ¹⁸F-FAC uptake after PEGPH20 treatment (P = 0.023). PEGPH20-treated animals uniformly displayed clear reductions in hyaluronic acid staining. Conclusion: ¹⁸F-FAC PET was shown to be a good surrogate for gemcitabine uptake and, when combined with MR, to successfully determine drug uptake in tumors growing in the pancreas. PEGPH20 had moderate effects on tumor uptake of gemcitabine.

Comparing the intra-tumoral distribution of Gemcitabine, 5-Fluorouracil, and Capecitabine in a murine model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To develop a technique to compare the intra-tumoral distribution of the drug gemcitabine, its surrogate [18F]-fluoroarabinocytosine ([18F]-FAC) and related chemotherapeutics 5-FU and capecitabine in a pre-clinical model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Using a KPC-organoid derived model of PDAC, we obtained autoradiographic images of the tumor distribution of, [14C]-gemcitabine, [14C]-5-FU, [3H]-capecitabine. These were compared indirectly by co-administering [18F]-FAC, a close analog of gemcitabine with a proven equivalent intra-tumor distribution. The short half-life of 18F allows for clean separation of 3H/14C labeled drugs in specimens by dual isotope digital autoradiography. Autoradiographic images of [14C]-gemcitabine, [3H]-capecitabine and [14C]-5-FU were each correlated to [18F]-FAC on a pixel-by-pixel basis. The tumor drug penetration was compared using cumulative histograms.

RESULTS

Gemcitabine distribution correlated strongly with FAC as expected. 5-FU also gave a similar microdistribution to that of FAC, whereas no correlation was found between capecitabine or its metabolic products and FAC distribution. Accumulation of Gemcitabine and 5-FU was lower in hypoxic regions of the tumor, whereas no such correlation was observed for capecitabine and its metabolites.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine and 5-FU target the same regions of the tumor, leaving hypoxic cells untreated. Capecitabine metabolites penetrate further into the tumor but it is yet to be determined whether these metabolites are the active form of the drug.