Correction: Interventions to improve resilience in physicians who have completed training: A systematic review

Combating Burnout Amongst Residents Through Fostering Resilience: A Systematic Review

BackgroundBurnout, marked by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and depletion of professional efficacy, is rampant among residents. With deleterious effects on productivity, conduct and patient care, resident programs have increasingly emphasized resilience training to combat burnout. However, the personalized nature of burnout complicates the effective design of such programs. Premised on recent works that identify burnout as a result of shifting personhood, this study utilizes the Ring Theory of Personhood to guide the conceptualization of resilience training programs that address changes in the belief systems shaping one's self-concept.MethodsA systematic scoping review to explore how resilience is addressed and assessed amongst medical residents was conducted. Guided by the PRISMA-compliant Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA), searches for relevant articles published between 1st January 2000 and 4th November 2024 on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC and PsycINFO were performed. The SEBA methodology facilitated the integration of the themes and categories identified using thematic and content analyses.ResultsOf 15 953 abstracts screened, 666 articles were reviewed and 69 full-text articles were included. Three domains were identified: guiding theories; methods of teaching resilience; and assessment.ConclusionThe reliance on individual or societal theories has constrained the understanding, design and assessment of resilience programs. Current approaches, including mindfulness workshops, self-care initiatives and organization-led resilience training, are neither timely nor focused on the needs of each resident. To mitigate burnout, personalized, longitudinal and timely support is essential. Mentoring offers a more suitable alternative, providing culturally sensitive, resource-appropriate, sustainable and clinically relevant support to build resilience effectively.

The role of grit and resilience in children with reading disorder: a longitudinal cohort study

Prior studies have suggested that grit and resilience predict both academic and career success. However, these qualities have not been examined in children with reading disorder (RD). We therefore investigated whether grit and resilience were associated with anxiety, depression, academic performance, and quality of life (QOL) in these students. This 3-year longitudinal cohort study included 163 participants with RD from 3 schools. Evaluations were completed by parents and/or teachers every 3 months. The Grit and Resilience Scale was adapted from the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and the 12-item Grit Scale. Outcome measures included anxiety (School Anxiety Scale - Teacher Report and the 8-item Spence Children's Anxiety Scale), depression (Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire), academic performance, and QOL (Pediatric QOL Inventory 4.0). Multivariate linear regression models (adjusting for age and sex) assessed the associations at baseline. Repeated measures analysis using mixed-effects models assessed the relationship longitudinally. There were statistically significant associations between grit and resilience and all outcomes at baseline and over time. After adjusting for age and sex, improved grit and resilience was associated with decreased anxiety (β =  - 0.4, p < 0.001) and improved academic performance (β = 0.5, p < 0.001) when grit and resilience was measured by teachers, as well as decreased depression (β =  - 0.3, p < 0.001) and improved QOL (β = 0.6, p < 0.001) when grit and resilience was measured by parents. Grit and resilience are significantly related to mental health, academic performance, and QOL in children with RD. This suggests that interventions to improve grit and resilience may lead to positive benefits.

Wrestling With the Invincibility Myth: Exploring Physicians' Resistance to Wellness and Resilience-Building Interventions

PURPOSE

Physicians are expected to provide compassionate, error-free care while navigating systemic challenges and organizational demands. Many are burning out. While organizations are scrambling to address the burnout crisis, physicians often resist interventions aimed at enhancing their wellness and building their resilience. The purpose of this research was to empirically study this phenomenon.

METHOD

Constructivist grounded theory was used to inform the iterative data collection and analysis process. In spring 2018, 22 faculty physicians working in Canada participated in semistructured interviews to discuss their experiences of wellness and burnout, their perceptions of wellness initiatives, and how their experiences and perceptions influence their uptake of the rapidly proliferating strategies aimed at nurturing their resilience. Themes were identified using constant comparative analysis.

RESULTS

Participants suggested that the values of compassion espoused by health care organizations do not extend to physicians, and they described feeling dehumanized by professional values steeped in an invincibility myth in which physicians are expected to be "superhuman" and "sacrifice everything" for medicine. Participants described that professional values and organizational norms impeded work-life balance, hindered personal and professional fulfillment, and discouraged disclosure of struggles. In turn, participants seemed to resist wellness and resilience-building interventions focused on fixing individuals rather than broader systemic, organizational, and professional issues. Participants perceived that efforts aimed at building individual resilience are futile without changes in professional values and sustained organizational support.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that professional and organizational norms and expectations trigger feelings of dehumanization for some physicians. These feelings likely exacerbate burnout and may partly explain physicians' resistance to resilience-building strategies. Mitigating burnout and developing and sustaining a resilient physician workforce will require both individual resistance to problematic professional values and an institutional commitment to creating a culture of compassion for patients and physicians alike.