1
|
Matima R, van der Westhuizen C, Lund C, Mukumbang FC. Mental health policy implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review protocol. PLoS One 2025; 20:e0320420. [PMID: 40131984 PMCID: PMC11936231 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Formulating and implementing mental health policy is foundational to public mental health. The implementation of mental health policy varies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with some countries having better implementation outcomes than others. Low implementation poses challenges relating to addressing the high burden and wide treatment gaps of mental health conditions. While different implementation strategies are applied to implement mental health policy in different contexts, there is little knowledge of what category of strategies are being used and how and why their implementation produces varied outcomes. To this end, we propose to conduct a realist synthesis to explain how, why, for whom, and under what health system conditions certain policy implementation strategies work or not in LMICs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This paper will detail the protocol on conducting a realist review of the literature on mental health policy implementation in LMICs. Realist reviews/syntheses are theory-driven reviews designed to formulate and test (confirm, refute, or refine) initial programme theories to explain how, why, for whom and under what contexts a programme, intervention or policy works as intended or not. Theory is built by exploring and abstracting context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations in the data. These CMO configurations are identified through retroductive theorizing, a mechanism-centred approach to theory development. We will adopt these steps to guide the process of realist synthesis: i) identify the research question, clarifying the scope of the review and formulating the initial programme theory (ii) conducting background searches in PubMed, PsycINFO, Africa-Wide Information, African. Index Medicus (AIM), CINAHL and Scopus databases, and grey literature (iii) appraising the quality of studies and data extraction and (iv) synthesising data. REGISTRATION The review is part of a realist evaluation exploring mental health policy implementation in LMICs and is registered under PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42024580312). Findings will inform the development of initial mental health policy implementation programme theories explaining why and how mental health policy implementation in LMICs works.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rangarirai Matima
- Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town
| | - Claire van der Westhuizen
- Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town
| | - Crick Lund
- Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town
- Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London
| | - Ferdinand C. Mukumbang
- Department of Global Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Resar DF, Sapire R, Caldwell B, Jenkins S, Sikwese K, Wambui J, Nzano B, Amole C. Ensuring People Living with HIV Inform the Future of HIV Treatment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for a Community-Led Research Agenda. AIDS Behav 2024; 28:3437-3448. [PMID: 38992225 PMCID: PMC11427585 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04442-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
The HIV treatment landscape in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is rapidly evolving, exemplified by the expansion of differentiated service delivery (DSD) during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Long-acting products represent a new frontier that will require a significant redesign of health systems. It is critical to understand service delivery and product preferences of people living with HIV (PLHIV) and ensure evidence generation is guided by community priorities. We conducted a scoping review to identify gaps among preference studies and inform future research. Peer-reviewed articles published from January 2014-May 2022 reporting acceptability or preference data from PLHIV or caregivers for one or more service delivery or product attribute were eligible. Service delivery studies were restricted to LMIC populations while product studies had no geographical restrictions. Based on gaps identified, we consulted advocates to develop community-led research agenda recommendations. Of 6,493 studies identified, 225 studies on service delivery attributes and 47 studies on product preferences were eligible. The most frequently studied delivery models were integration (n = 59) and technology-based interventions (n = 55). Among product literature, only 15 studies included LMIC populations. Consultation with advocates highlighted the need for research on long-acting products, including among pediatric, pregnant, and breastfeeding PLHIV, PLHIV on second-line regimens, and key populations. Consultation also emphasized the need to understand preferences on clinic visit frequency, side effects, and choice. While the preference literature has expanded, gaps remain around long-acting regimens and their delivery. To fill these gaps, the research agenda must be guided by the priorities of communities of PLHIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle F Resar
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, 383 Dorchester Ave, Boston, MA, 02127, USA.
| | - Rachel Sapire
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, 383 Dorchester Ave, Boston, MA, 02127, USA
| | - Benvy Caldwell
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, 383 Dorchester Ave, Boston, MA, 02127, USA
| | - Sarah Jenkins
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, 383 Dorchester Ave, Boston, MA, 02127, USA
| | | | | | - Brian Nzano
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, 383 Dorchester Ave, Boston, MA, 02127, USA
| | - Carolyn Amole
- Clinton Health Access Initiative, 383 Dorchester Ave, Boston, MA, 02127, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Van Hemelryck S, Van Landuyt E, Hufkens V, Vanveggel S. Assessment of swallowability and acceptability of scored darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablets in HIV-1-infected children aged ≥6 to <12 years, using matching placebo tablets: A randomized study. Antivir Ther 2024; 29:13596535241248282. [PMID: 38725258 DOI: 10.1177/13596535241248282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) fixed-dose combination (FDC) was developed as a once-daily, complete antiretroviral (ARV) regimen therapy to address the need for simplified protease inhibitor-based ARV regimens. This study assessed the swallowability and acceptability for long-term use of scored placebo tablets matching the D/C/F/TAF FDC tablets in children living with HIV-1. METHODS This study (NCT04006704) was a Phase 1, open-label, randomized, single-dose, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study in children living with HIV-1, aged ≥6 to <12 years and weighing ≥25 to <40 kg, on a stable ARV regimen for ≥3 months. Participants were asked to swallow whole (size, 21 × 11 × 7 mm) and split matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets. Swallowability of the matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets (primary endpoint) was assessed by observers. Acceptability of taking matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets and current ARVs was evaluated by participants using a 3-point questionnaire. Participants rated the acceptability for long-term daily use of the placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets, and observers assessed how easily caregivers could split a scored tablet by hand, using 3-point questionnaires. RESULTS Among the 24 participants who enrolled and completed the study, 95.8% (23/24) were able to swallow the whole and split matching placebo D/C/F/TAF tablets after 1 or 2 attempts. Most participants (>70%) rated the acceptability of tablets for long-term daily use as acceptable or good to take. Breaking the tablets was considered easy or OK by 79.2% (19/24) of caregivers. CONCLUSION Scored D/C/F/TAF FDC tablets are swallowable - with whole favoured over split - and considered at least acceptable for long-term daily intake in children living with HIV-1 aged ≥6 to <12 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04006704.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wexler C, Maloba M, Sliefert M, Babu S, Maosa N, Maliski E, Nicolay Z, Were F, Mbithi Y, Mugendi G, Thomas G, Acharya H, Finocchario-Kessler S. Assessing user preferences for design characteristics of oral dissolvable strips for pediatric HIV medication: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1103. [PMID: 37845699 PMCID: PMC10580521 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10078-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current infant antiretroviral therapy formulations pose barriers to daily adherence due to complex weight-based dosing, conspicuous preparation, and poor palatability. These adherence barriers jeopardize adherence, making patients vulnerable to virologic failure, development of drug resistance, and preventable mortality. Our team has previously established proof-of-principle for multi-drug oral dissolvable strips as alternative pediatric antiretroviral formulations with the potential to overcome these challenges and improve pediatric ART adherence and outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess caregiver and provider preferences for oral dissolvable strips and its packaging to inform its development. METHODS Guided by concepts of user-centered design, we conducted key informant interviews with 30 HIV care providers and focus group discussions targeting caregivers of children < 10 years of age living with HIV at 3 Kenyan hospitals. Key informant interviews and focus group discussions were audio recorded, translated/transcribed verbatim, and hand coded for a-priori and emergent themes. RESULTS A total of 30 providers and 72 caregivers (caring for 83 children, aged 5 months to 18 years) participated in the study. Caregivers and providers expressed a strong desire for an easier way to administer medication, especially among children too young to swallow tablets whole, and expressed enthusiasm around the idea of oral dissolvable strips. Key preferences included a pleasant taste; one strip per dose; small size with rapid dissolution; clear markings and instructions; and no special storage requirements. For packaging, stakeholders preferred individually wrapped strips within a dispenser. The individual packaging should be durable, waterproof, and easy to dispose of in communal spaces. They should also be easy to open, with clear indications where to open. The packaging holding the strips should be durable, re-usable, accommodating of various refill frequencies, and easy to use for children as young as 6. DISCUSSION The concept of oral dissolvable strips was highly acceptable to caregivers of children living with HIV and HIV care providers. By engaging stakeholders in an iterative design process starting from the early phases of design and development, we will maximize the likelihood of developing a product that is acceptable to the caregiver and infant, therefore leading to sustainable adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Wexler
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
| | - May Maloba
- Global Health Innovations, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Michala Sliefert
- School of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gregory Thomas
- School of Architecture and Design, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Harshdeep Acharya
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peh KQE, Kwan YH, Goh H, Ramchandani H, Phang JK, Lim ZY, Loh DHF, Østbye T, Blalock DV, Yoon S, Bosworth HB, Low LL, Thumboo J. An Adaptable Framework for Factors Contributing to Medication Adherence: Results from a Systematic Review of 102 Conceptual Frameworks. J Gen Intern Med 2021; 36:2784-2795. [PMID: 33660211 PMCID: PMC8390603 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06648-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the available conceptual models for factors contributing to medication adherence based on the World Health Organization (WHO)'s five dimensions of medication adherence via a systematic review, identify the patient groups described in available conceptual models, and present an adaptable conceptual model that describes the factors contributing to medication adherence in the identified patient groups. METHODS We searched PubMed®, Embase®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® for English language articles published from inception until 31 March 2020. Full-text original publications in English that presented theoretical or conceptual models for factors contributing to medication adherence were included. Studies that presented statistical models were excluded. Two authors independently extracted the data. RESULTS We identified 102 conceptual models, and classified the factors contributing to medication adherence using the WHO's five dimensions of medication adherence, namely patient-related, medication-related, condition-related, healthcare system/healthcare provider-related, and socioeconomic factors. Eight patient groups were identified based on age and disease condition. The most universally addressed factors were patient-related factors. Medication-related, condition-related, healthcare system-related, and socioeconomic factors were represented to various extents depending on the patient group. By systematically examining how the WHO's five dimensions of medication adherence were applied differently across the eight different patient groups, we present a conceptual model that can be adapted to summarize the common factors contributing to medication adherence in different patient groups. CONCLUSION Our conceptual models can be utilized as a guide for clinicians and researchers in identifying the facilitators and barriers to medication adherence and developing future interventions to improve medication adherence. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020181316.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yu Heng Kwan
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hendra Goh
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hasna Ramchandani
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jie Kie Phang
- Department of Rheumatology & Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zhui Ying Lim
- SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Dionne Hui Fang Loh
- SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Truls Østbye
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University, Durham, NC USA
| | - Dan V. Blalock
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC USA
| | - Sungwon Yoon
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hayden Barry Bosworth
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC USA
- Departments of Population Health Sciences and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, NC USA
| | - Lian Leng Low
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Family Medicine Academic Clinical Program, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Family Medicine and Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- PULSES Centre Grant, SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- Post-Acute and Continuing Care, Outram Community Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Julian Thumboo
- Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Rheumatology & Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- PULSES Centre Grant, SingHealth Regional Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yin DE, Ludema C, Cole SR, Golin CE, Miller WC, Warshaw MG, McKinney RE, on behalf of the PENPACT-1 (PENTA 9 / PACTG 390) Study Team. Time to treatment disruption in children with HIV-1 randomized to initial antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors versus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0242405. [PMID: 33226999 PMCID: PMC7682873 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Choice of initial antiretroviral therapy regimen may help children with HIV maintain optimal, continuous therapy. We assessed treatment-naïve children for differences in time to treatment disruption across randomly-assigned protease inhibitor versus non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based initial antiretroviral therapy. METHODS We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter phase 2/3, randomized, open-label trial in Europe, North and South America from 2002 to 2009. Children aged 31 days to <18 years, who were living with HIV-1 and treatment-naive, were randomized to antiretroviral therapy with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Time to first documented treatment disruption to any component of antiretroviral therapy, derived from treatment records and adherence questionnaires, was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimators and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS The modified intention-to-treat analysis included 263 participants. Seventy-two percent (n = 190) of participants experienced at least one treatment disruption during study. At 4 years, treatment disruption probabilities were 70% (protease inhibitor) vs. 63% (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor). The unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for treatment disruptions comparing protease inhibitor vs. non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens was 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-1.61 (adjusted HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.91-1.68). By study end, treatment disruption probabilities converged (protease inhibitor 81%, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor 84%) with unadjusted HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.84-1.48 (adjusted HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.84-1.50). Reported reasons for treatment disruptions suggested that participants on protease inhibitors experienced greater tolerability problems. CONCLUSIONS Children had similar time to treatment disruption for initial protease inhibitor and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based antiretroviral therapy, despite greater reported tolerability problems with protease inhibitor regimens. Initial pediatric antiretroviral therapy with either a protease inhibitor or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor may be acceptable for maintaining optimal, continuous therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dwight E. Yin
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Innovation, Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Mercy-Kansas City and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, United States of America
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Christina Ludema
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Stephen R. Cole
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Carol E. Golin
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - William C. Miller
- Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Meredith G. Warshaw
- Center for Biostatistics in AIDS Research, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ross E. McKinney
- Association of American Medical Colleges, District of Columbia, Washington, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chahal HS, Koukounas K, Capella P, Presto R, Murray JS, Shimer M, Riley K, Valdez ML. An Evaluation of US Food and Drug Administration's Program to Register HIV Drugs for Use in Resource-Constrained Settings. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1915787. [PMID: 31747034 PMCID: PMC6902815 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) program to review antiretroviral drugs for use in low-resource settings via the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) now supports treatment of more than 14 million patients with HIV. However, an in-depth evaluation of the program has not been undertaken. OBJECTIVE To conduct a quantitative analysis of the FDA-reviewed antiretroviral drug applications in order to assess the contributions of PEPFAR and to identify areas for improvement. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cross-sectional study was conducted of all PEPFAR applications submitted to the FDA from December 1, 2004, to May 31, 2018. The analyses were conducted between October 2018 and February 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Numbers and types of applications reviewed, how long it took for applications to obtain approval or tentative approval (time to registration), how often the FDA issued a complete response letter (CRL) identifying deficiencies precluding application approval or tentative approval and their reasons, and the association between CRLs and time to registration. RESULTS Overall, 260 PEPFAR applications for 327 antiretroviral therapies were reviewed by FDA, of which 216 applications (83%) for 272 drugs were authorized for use. Of the 216 authorized applications, 184 applications for 231 drugs remain in active status and, thus, are available for use. Twenty-six percent (56 of 216) of the applications were for pediatric-specific formulations or strengths; the remainder were for adults. For all 216 applications, the median (interquartile range) time to registration was 10.0 (7.0-17.5) months. Thirty-seven percent (95 of 260) of the applications received 1 or more CRLs, resulting in a total of 172 CRLs; most applications received 1 CRL, whereas some were issued up to 6 CRLs. Among all CRLs, 264 deficiency reasons were identified; the most common deficiencies were associated with manufacturing processes (155 [44%]), followed by product labeling (62 [23%]), and failing facility inspections (54 [20%]). Complete response letters were associated with an increased time to registration. Applications without CRLs had a median (interquartile range) time to registration of 9.0 (5.5-12.0) months, whereas those with at least 1 CRL took a median (interquartile range) of 22.0 (14.0-38.0) months (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The FDA's PEPFAR program has made many antiretroviral drugs available for global use. However, FDA and the pharmaceutical companies could take steps to improve the quality of applications submitted to prevent avoidable deficiencies in manufacturing processes and labeling. Further efforts to develop better, easier to use pediatric-specific therapies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harinder Singh Chahal
- Office of Public Health Strategy and Analysis, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Kalli Koukounas
- Office of Public Health Strategy and Analysis, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
- Now with McKinsey & Company, New York, New York
| | - Peter Capella
- Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Ryan Presto
- Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey S. Murray
- Office of New Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Martin Shimer
- Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Karen Riley
- Office of Public Health Strategy and Analysis, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Mary Lou Valdez
- Office of Global Policy and Strategy, Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|