Reduction in total leukocytes in malaria patients compared to febrile controls: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Procalcitonin is elevated in severe malaria and is a promising biomarker of severe malaria and multi-organ dysfunction: A cross-sectional study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Elevated procalcitonin (PCT) has been reported in bacterial infection and is positively associated with the severity of the disease. Patients with severe Plasmodium falciparum malaria also display higher procalcitonin levels compared to those with non-severe disease, indicating a possible role for bacterial infection in severe disease, however this observation remained variable in different study population. Furthermore, the significance of PCT in different clinical categories of severe malaria has not been evaluated so far.

METHODS

A total of 74 P. falciparum-infected subjects were enrolled in the study comprising of 55 cases complicated malaria [cerebral malaria- 14; non-cerebral severe malaria- 21; multi-organ dysfunction- 20] and 19 uncomplicated cases. Serum levels of PCT were quantified by fluorescence immunoassay. For meta-analysis, the literature search was performed in different databases, and all relevant articles were screened, and eligible reports were identified based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed by comprehensive meta-analysis software V3 and MedCalc 20.218.

RESULTS

Patients with severe P. falciparum malaria had significantly higher PCT levels compared to uncomplicated cases (p = 0.01). Analysis of PCT in different categories of patients with severe malaria revealed significantly elevated PCT in multi-organ dysfunctions compared to those with uncomplicated malaria (p = 0.004) and cerebral malaria (p = 0.05). Interestingly the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed procalcitonin as a promising biomarker for differentiating severe malaria (AUC: 0.697, p = 0.01) and multi-organ dysfunction (AUC: 0.704, p = 0.007) from uncomplicated malaria and other clinical categories of falciparum malaria, respectively. Furthermore, meta-analysis also revealed an elevated procalcitonin in severe malaria and it could be an important biomarker in the management of severe disease.

CONCLUSIONS

PCT is elevated in P. falciparum-infected patients and could be a good biomarker for diagnosis of severe malaria and multi-organ dysfunction. It can help in the management of severe disease with additional treatment options.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of inflammatory biomarkers associated with malaria infection and disease severity

Inflammatory biomarkers; C-reactive protein (CRP), Interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor- alpha (TNF-α) play a very crucial role in disease pathogenesis. Studies conducted earlier showed the associativity of these biomarkers with malaria severity. Meta-analysis of individual biomarkers was done in many studies, while in a few others, all these candidates were estimated, but the findings were inconclusive. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analyses were performed to evaluate differences in biomarkers mentioned above in complicated and uncomplicated malaria patients. Studies focussed on CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α with quantitative data on complicated and uncomplicated malaria patients were searched on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies selected for this review was checked following Newcastle-Ottawa Scale guidelines. The standard mean difference and confidence interval of biomarkers in the targeted groups were calculated using the random effects model. Egger's test and funnel plot asymmetry were performed to assess the publication bias. Thirteen studies that qualified the inclusion criteria were considered for this meta-analysis. CRP levels were higher in complicated malaria patients than uncomplicated ones (P < 0.00001, pooled SMD: 0.90 mg/L, 95 % CI: 0.51 to 1.30 mg/L, I2: 80 %, six studies). IL-6 levels were elevated in complicated cases (P < 0.00001, pooled SMD: 0.89 pg/ml, 95 % CI: 0.66 to 1.12, I2: 99 %, four studies) and TNF-α also showed an increase in severe complicated patients (P < 0.00001, pooled SMD: 1.18 pg/ml, 95 % CI: 1 to 1.36, I2: 99 %, six studies). In most of the included studies, CRP, IL-6, and TNF-α were higher in complicated malaria patients. Nevertheless, the results of a few studies were not convincing. Due to the lack of specificity in all individual biomarkers, none had adequate diagnostic accuracy. Considering the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the CRP activation pathway in malaria progression, the combination of these biomarkers should be used in monitoring the disease severity.

Pathogenesis of Anemia in Canine Babesiosis: Possible Contribution of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines and Chemokines-A Review

Canine babesiosis is a tick-borne protozoan disease caused by intraerythrocytic parasites of the genus Babesia. The infection may lead to anemia in infected dogs. However, anemia is not directly caused by the pathogen. The parasite's developmental stages only have a marginal role in contributing to a decreased red blood cell (RBC) count. The main cause of anemia in affected dogs is the immune response to the infection. This response includes antibody production, erythrophagocytosis, oxidative damage of RBCs, complement activation, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Moreover, both infected and uninfected erythrocytes are retained in the spleen and sequestered in micro-vessels. All these actions are driven by pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, especially IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-8. Additionally, imbalance between the actions of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines plays a role in patho-mechanisms leading to anemia in canine babesiosis. This article is a review of the studies on the pathogenesis of anemia in canine babesiosis and related diseases, such as bovine or murine babesiosis and human or murine malaria, and the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in the mechanisms leading to anemia in infected dogs.

Plasmodium vivax and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection in Venezuelan pregnant women: a case series

BACKGROUND

Malaria-endemic areas are not spared from the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to co-infection scenarios where overlapping symptoms impose serious diagnostic challenges. Current knowledge on Plasmodium spp. and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) co-infection in pregnant women remains limited, especially in Latin America, where Plasmodium vivax infection is highly prevalent.

METHODS

This is a case series of five pregnant women with P. vivax and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection hospitalized in two main malaria referral centers of the Capital District and Bolivar state, Venezuela between March 13, 2020 and December 31, 2021.

RESULTS

Clinical and laboratory data from five pregnant women with a mean age of 22 years were analyzed; three of them were in the third trimester of pregnancy. Comorbidities included obesity in two cases, hypertension in one, and asthma in one. Three out of five patients had severe to critical COVID-19 disease. Dry cough, fever, chills, and headache were the most frequent symptoms reported. Laboratory analyses showed elevated aspartate/alanine aminotransferase and creatinine levels, thrombocytopenia, and severe anemia as the most relevant abnormalities. The mean period between symptom onset and a positive molecular test for SARS-CoV-2 infection or positive microscopy for Plasmodium spp. was 4.8 ± 2.5 days and 2.8 ± 1.6 days, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 5.4 ± 7 days. Three women recovered and were discharged from the hospital. Two women died, one from cerebral malaria and one from respiratory failure. Three adverse fetal outcomes were registered, two miscarriages and one stillbirth.

CONCLUSION

This study documented a predominance of severe/critical COVID-19 disease and a high proportion of adverse maternal-fetal outcomes among pregnant women with malaria and COVID-19 co-infection. More comprehensive prospective cohort studies are warranted to explore the risk factors, management challenges, and clinical outcomes of pregnant women with this co-infection.

Microscopic and submicroscopic infection by Plasmodium falciparum: Immunoglobulin M and A profiles as markers of intensity and exposure

Assessment of serological Plasmodium falciparum–specific antibodies in highly endemic areas provides valuable information about malaria status and parasite exposure in the population. Although serological evidence of Plasmodium exposure is commonly determined by Plasmodium-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels; IgM and IgA are likely markers of malaria status that remain relatively unexplored. Previous studies on IgM and IgA responses have been based on their affinity for single antigens with shortage of immune responses analysis against the whole Plasmodium proteome. Here, we provide evidence of how P. falciparum infection triggers the production of specific IgM and IgA in plasma and its relationship with parasite density and changes in hematological parameters. A total of 201 individuals attending a hospital in Breman Asikuma, Ghana, were recruited into this study. Total and P. falciparum–specific IgM, IgA, and IgG were assessed by ELISA and examined in relation to age (0–5, 14–49, and ≥50 age ranges); infection (submicroscopic vs. microscopic malaria); pregnancy and hematological parameters. Well-known IgG response was used as baseline control. P. falciparum–specific IgM and IgA levels increased in the population with the age, similarly to IgG. These data confirm that acquired humoral immunity develops by repeated infections through the years endorsing IgM and IgA as exposure markers in endemic malaria regions. High levels of specific IgA and IgM in children were associated with microscopic malaria and worse prognosis, because most of them showed severe anemia. This new finding shows that IgM and IgA may be used as diagnostic markers in this age group. We also found an extremely high prevalence of submicroscopic malaria (46.27% on average) accompanied by IgM and IgA levels indistinguishable from those of uninfected individuals. These data, together with the observed lack of sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) compared to PCR, invoke the urgent need to implement diagnostic markers for submicroscopic malaria. Overall, this study opens the potential use of P. falciparum–specific IgM and IgA as new serological markers to predict malaria status in children and parasite exposure in endemic populations. The difficulties in finding markers of submicroscopic malaria are highlighted, emphasizing the need to explore this field in depth.

C-reactive protein as an early biomarker for malaria infection and monitoring of malaria severity: a meta-analysis

This study investigated whether C-reactive protein (CRP) can be used as a marker for the early detection and monitoring of malaria severity. Potentially relevant studies were searched in Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science. Differences in CRP between (1) severe malaria and uncomplicated malaria, (2) uncomplicated malaria and asymptomatic malaria, (3) uncomplicated malaria and febrile/healthy controls, and (4) asymptomatic malaria and febrile/healthy controls were estimated using random-effects models. Twenty-nine studies were included for meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis demonstrated higher mean CRP levels in (1) patients with severe malaria compared with uncomplicated malaria (p < 0.001, standard mean difference [SMD]: 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-2.12, I2: 95.1%), (2) patients with uncomplicated malaria than in those with asymptomatic malaria (p: 0.001, SMD: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.67-2.62, I2: 96.7%), (3) patients with uncomplicated malaria compared with febrile/healthy controls (p < 0.001, SMD: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.37-3.40, I2: 98.5%), and (4) patients with asymptomatic malaria compared with febrile/healthy controls (p < 0.001, SMD: 2.55, 95% CI: 1.60-3.50, I2: 99.2%). This study demonstrated CRP levels are a biomarker for the early detection and monitoring of malaria severity.

Prevalence and characteristics of malaria among COVID-19 individuals: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and analysis of case reports

BACKGROUND

The world population is currently at a very high risk of Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). People who live in malaria-endemic areas and get infected by SARS-CoV-2 may be at increased risk of severe COVID-19 or unfavorable disease outcomes if they ignore their malaria status. Therefore, the present study aimed to synthesize, qualitatively and quantitatively, information on the prevalence and characteristics of malaria infection among COVID-19-infected individuals. The findings will help us better understand this particular comorbidity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

The systematic review protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the identification number: CRD42021247521. We searched for studies reporting on the coinfection of COVID-19 and malaria in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to March 27, 2021 using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. The study's methodological quality in the search output was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools for cross-sectional study. The pooled prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infection among patients infected with COVID-19 was estimated using the random effect model and then graphically presented as forest plots. The heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using Cochrane Q and I2 statistics. The characteristics of patients co-infected with COVID-19 and malaria were derived from case reports and series and were formally analyzed using simple statistics.

RESULTS

Twelve of 1,207 studies reporting the coinfection of COVID-19 and malaria were selected for further analysis. Results of quantitative synthesis show that the pooled prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infection (364 cases) among COVID-19 individuals (1,126 cases) is 11%, with a high degree of heterogeneity (95% CI: 4%-18%, I2: 97.07%, 5 studies). Most of the coinfections were reported in Nigeria (336 cases), India (27 cases), and the Democratic Republic of Congo (1 case). Results of qualitative synthesis indicate that patients with coinfection are typically symptomatic at presentation with mild or moderate parasitemia. An analysis of case reports and series indicates that co-infected individuals often display thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and elevated bilirubin levels. Among four patients (30%) who required treatment with intravenous artesunate, one experienced worsened clinical status after administering the drug. One serious outcome of coinfection involved a pregnant woman who experienced fetal abortion due to the initial misdiagnosis of malaria.

CONCLUSIONS

All individuals in malaria-endemic regions who are febrile or display symptoms of COVID-19 should be evaluated for malaria to avoid serious complications. Further prospective studies are required to investigate the burden and outcomes of COVID-19 in malaria-endemic regions. Prompt management is required to prevent serious outcomes in individuals co-infected with COVID-19 and malaria.

A meta-analysis on the prevalence and characteristics of severe malaria in patients with Plasmodium spp. and HIV co-infection

Co-infection with malaria and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) increases the severity and mortality rates of both diseases. A better understanding of the effects of co-infections could help in the diagnosis, prompt treatment, prevention, and control of malarial parasites among HIV-infected patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we estimated the prevalence and characteristics of severe malaria (SM) caused by co-infection with HIV. We included relevant studies that were conducted between the years 1991 and 2018 and reporting on SM. We pooled the prevalence of SM in patients with co-infection, pooled odds ratios of SM in patients with co-infection and Plasmodium mono-infection, and differences in laboratory parameters such as parasite density and leucocyte counts, between co-infected and Plasmodium mono-infected patients. The meta-analysis included 29 studies (1126 SM cases). The pooled prevalence of SM in co-infected patients using the data of 23 studies (SM = 795 cases, all co-infection cases = 2534 cases) was 43.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 31.0–56.0%; I², 98.0%). Overall, the odds of SM from 18 studies were pooled. The odds of SM were significantly higher in co-infected patients than in Plasmodium mono-infected patients (OR 2.41; 95% CI 1.43–4.08; I² = 85%; P = 0.001) and also significantly higher in children (OR 9.69; 95% CI 5.14–18.3; I², 0%; P < 0.0001; two studies) than in adults (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.52–4.73; I², 79.0%; P = 0.0007; 12 studies). Co-infected patients with SM had a higher parasite density than those with Plasmodium mono-infection when the data of seven studies were analysed (SMD, 1.25; 95% CI 0.14–2.36; I², 98.0%; P = 0.03) and higher leukocyte counts when the data of four studies were analysed (MD, 1570 cells/µL; 95% CI 850–2300 cells/µL; I², 21.0%; P < 0.0001). Thus, the prevalence of SM among patients co-infected with Plasmodium spp. and HIV is high. Because co-infections could lead to SM, patients with Plasmodium spp. and HIV co-infection should be identified and treated to reduce the prevalence of SM and the number of deaths.

Comparison of Plasmodium ovale curtisi and Plasmodium ovale wallikeri infections by a meta-analysis approach

Malaria caused by Plasmodium ovale species is considered a neglected tropical disease with limited information about its characteristics. It also remains unclear whether the two distinct species P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri exhibit differences in their prevalence, geographic distribution, clinical characteristics, or laboratory parameters. Therefore, this study was conducted to clarify these differences to support global malaria control and eradication programs. Studies reporting the occurrence of P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri were explored in databases. Differences in proportion, clinical data, and laboratory parameters between the two species were estimated using a random-effects model and expressed as pooled odds ratios (ORs), mean difference (MD), or standardized MD depending on the types of extracted data. The difference in geographical distribution was visualized by mapping the origin of the two species. A total of 1453 P. ovale cases extracted from 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The p-value in the meta-analyses provided evidence favoring a real difference between P. ovale curtisi malaria cases (809/1453, 55.7%) and P. ovale wallikeri malaria cases (644/1453, 44.3%) (p: 0.01, OR 1.61, 95% CI 0.71-3.63, I2: 77%). Subgroup analyses established evidence favoring a real difference between P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri malaria cases among the imported cases (p: 0.02, 1135 cases). The p value in the meta-analyses provided evidence favoring a real difference in the mean latency period between P. ovale curtisi (289 cases) and P. ovale wallikeri malaria (266 cases) (p: 0.03, MD: 27.59, 95% CI 1.99-53.2, I2: 94%), total leukocyte count (p < 0.0001, MD: 840, 95% CI 610-1070, I2: 0%, two studies) and platelet count (p < 0.0001, MD: 44,750, 95% CI 2900-60,500, I2: 32%, three studies). Four continents were found to have reports of P. ovale spp., among which Africa had the highest number of reports for both P. ovale spp. in its 37 countries, with a global proportion of 94.46%, and an almost equal distribution of both P. ovale spp., where P. ovale curtisi and P. ovale wallikeri reflected 53.09% and 46.90% of the continent's proportion, respectively. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to demonstrate the differences in the characteristics of the two distinct P. ovale species. Malaria caused by P. ovale curtisi was found in higher proportions among imported cases and had longer latency periods, higher platelet counts, and higher total leukocyte counts than malaria caused by P. ovale wallikeri. Further studies with a larger sample size are required to confirm the differences or similarities between these two species to promote malaria control and effective eradication programs.