Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences

Using linked data to explore medical complications associated with Robson classification of cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2018

Background

Cesarean delivery rates in the United States far exceed the World Health Organization (WHO)'s recommended population cesarean rate of 15%. This has resulted in calls from experts to reduce cesarean delivery rates. However, crude cesarean delivery rates are not necessarily comparable across populations since different birthing populations have different distributions of underlying cesarean delivery risk factors. WHO recommends using the Robson classification system to compare standardized cesarean delivery rates across populations, though it has been rarely used within the U.S.

Objective

The objectives of this study were to understand the distribution of cesarean deliveries using the Robson Classification system and to identify associated conditions (and potential drivers) of cesarean delivery across Robson groups.

Study Design

Our data comes from the Pregnancy and Early Life Longitudinal Data System from the Massachusetts Department of Health, which contains all birth certificate records for Massachusetts from 2011 to 2018. Using the WHO Robson Classification System Implementation guide, we categorized births into one of its 10 categories based on data from birth certificate records and ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes from billing records. Using the linked birth certificate records and hospital discharge records we went beyond the Robson classifications and examined patterns in maternal comorbidities and labor and delivery complications of cesarean deliveries across Robson groups.

Results

Among the 25% of birthing people who had singleton, term, vertex births with spontaneous labor, the cesarean delivery rate was 15% for nulliparous and 3% for multiparous (with no prior cesarean). The prevalence of maternal risk factors was 28% in the former and 30% in the latter. Labor and delivery complications were present in 46% and 35% of births, respectively. Birthing people with breech or transverse fetal presentation had the highest cesarean delivery rates around 95%. Multiparous birthing people with a prior cesarean delivery and cephalic, singleton, term births were the largest contributor to the cesarean delivery rate (38% of all cesareans). Almost all births for malpresentation or malposition of fetus had at least one labor and delivery complication but much lower rates of risk factors (between 25% and 46%).

Conclusion

While cesarean delivery rates, maternal risk factors, and labor and delivery complications followed similar patterns across Robson groups, there were notable discrepancies, especially in births with noncephalic presentations where maternal comorbidity rates matched lower cesarean-risk groups like the nulliparous single-term cephalic births.

Multi-level factors influencing caesarean section preferences among women in low- and middle- income countries: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Women's preferences regarding caesarean section (CS) are a significant contributing factor to the increasing and widely varying rates of this procedure across countries and regions. This trend is particularly pronounced in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where both overuse and underuse of CS can pose significant health risks. Understanding the multi-level factors influencing CS preferences is essential for promoting the appropriate use of this procedure and ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

AIM

To systematically review literature examining multi-level factors influencing CS preferences among women in LMICs through ecological systems and exploring the prevalence of CS preferences.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Six electronic databases were searched: Academic Search Ultimate (EBSCO), MEDLINE (EBSCO), Nursing & Allied Health Premium (ProQuest), PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus. The search included studies published from January 2014 to August 2024. The quality of each article was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool.

FINDINGS

A total of 17 studies were included in this review. The proportion of CS preferences varied significantly, ranging from 8.8 % to 58 % in LMICs. The multi-level factors influencing CS preferences were summarized across four levels, based on ecological systems: microsystem level (sociodemographic factors, reproductive factors, psychological factors, and literacy-related factors), mesosystem level (healthcare influence, family and relative influence), exosystem level (healthcare environment and social media influence), and macrosystem level (socio-cultural factors).

CONCLUSION

Factors within the microsystem, mesosystem, and macrosystem levels displayed the substantial influence aligned with ecological systems. To reduce unnecessary CS, future research should comprehensively explore multi-level factors. Policymakers should implement prominent factors across the system.

Labor Pain Management in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Labor pain is a subjective phenomenon that varies based on women's expectations. To have a positive childbirth experience, laboring women should have pain relief based on their request. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the utilization of labor pain management and associated factors among obstetric caregivers in Ethiopia DATA SOURCES: Different electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, Scopus, Embase, CINAHL, DOAJ, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and CAB Abstracts) were searched for published studies, whereas Google Scholar and Google Search were used for unpublished studies.

REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used throughout this work. Duplicate results were removed using EndNote X8. Quality was assessed by the JBI tool. Stata 17 was used for analysis. A random effects model was used, and the results were presented using a forest plot. Heterogeneity and publication bias were evaluated using Cochran's Q test and I2 test.

RESULTS

The pooled utilization of pharmacological pain management was 28% (95% CI [12, 43]), whereas the pooled estimate of nonpharmacological pain management was 43% (95% CI [37, 49]). Obstetric care provider attitude was positively associated with both pharmacological and nonpharmacological labor pain management (adjusted odds ratio = 1.73, 95% CI [1.20, 2.26], adjusted odds ratio = 2.94, 95% CI [2.01, 3.87], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Labor pain management utilization among obstetric care providers in Ethiopia was poor. Health care provider attitude was positively associated with labor pain management. On-site training was recommended for obstetric care providers to improve the practice of labor pain management. © 20XX by the American Society for Pain Management Nursing.

More than an idea: why ectogestation should become a concrete option

This paper calls for the development of a method of ectogestation as an emancipatory intervention for women. I argue that ectogestation would have a dual social benefit: first, by providing a gestational alternative to pregnancy, it would create unique conditions to reevaluate one's reproductive preferences-which, for women, always include gestational considerations-and to satisfy a potential preference not to gestate. Enabling the satisfaction of such a preference is particularly valuable due to the pressures women face to embrace pregnancy as central to their identity, while at the same time being penalised by it. Second, ectogestation would address certain specific negative social implications of gestation and childbirth, which cannot be avoided through social measures as they are caused by the corporeal nature of these phenomena. Finally, I argue that it is unfair to hold ectogestation to a higher standard than other innovations such as modern contraceptives and non-medical egg freezing.

The effectiveness of antenatal education on improving labour and birth outcomes - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organisation has suggested antenatal education be integrated within standard antenatal care. However, evidence for the impact of antenatal education varies. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated randomised controlled trial evidence regarding the influence of antenatal education on labour and birth outcomes.

METHODS

Electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, Embase and Scopus) were searched for randomised controlled trials published between 2011 and 2023. Primary outcomes were mode of birth, epidural analgesia use, and induction of labour. Subgroup analysis by type of education (general education, specific technique, birth plan use) was performed. Three authors reviewed studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (n=7260 participants) were included, most (n=10) had low risk of bias. Antenatal education was associated with decreased rates of planned caesarean sections (Relative Risk (RR) 0.87; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.83-0.92, I2=0 %), but not unplanned caesareans (RR 0.99; 95 % CI, 0.88-1.12, I2=0 %),as well as increased vaginal births (RR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.07-1.21, I2=79 %) and increased spontaneous onset of labour (n=10 studies, RR, 1.07; 95 % CI, 1.01-1.14, I2=0 %). Epidural analgesia use (RR, 0.88; 95 % CI, 0.88-1.00, I2=78 %) was not significantly affected. General education and birth plan care interventions were found to be more effective than specific technique care.

CONCLUSION

Antenatal education programs studied improve some labour and birth outcomes, although with substantial heterogeneity regarding mode of birth and epidural analgesia use findings. General education appeared more effective than specific technique education.

Cesarean Delivery Upon Request in Pregnancies Following Vaginal Delivery: A Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND

The increasing rate of cesarean delivery (CD) is a significant concern in many societies worldwide. Vaginal delivery (VD) is preferred over CD for subsequent pregnancies after successful VD, for women with no specific obstetrical indications, primarily because of concerns about potential complications arising from the surgical procedure. However, the factors that influence the decision of requesting a CD have not yet been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to examine the underlying reasons that lead mothers to choose CDs in subsequent pregnancies following a VD.

METHODS

This retrospective study included women who underwent VD in their first pregnancy between 2011 and 2020 and had a second pregnancy and childbirth within the study period. The analysis focused on women eligible for a trial of labor (TOL) in their second pregnancy, excluding those with conditions necessitating a CD. The study defined two groups: the TOL in second pregnancy (TOLS) group, consisting of women with one previous VD who attempted a VD in their subsequent pregnancy; and the CD on maternal request in second pregnancy (CDRS) group, comprising women with one past VD who opted for a CD in their second pregnancy without medical indication. The TOLS and CDRS groups were compared regarding obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

During the study period, 372,749 women met the inclusion criteria: 368,311 women in TOLS group and 4,438 women in CDRS group. In the regression analysis for the CDRS, several factors were identified as increasing the risk of choosing CD, including age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.07), interval between the first and second pregnancies (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI 1.29-1.35), a history of pre-existing hypertension (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.17-2.65), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) during the first pregnancy (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36), hypertensive disease during pregnancy (HDP) (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67), preterm labor during the first pregnancy (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.32-1.86), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.21-1.47), traumatic event during delivery (aOR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), surgical VD (aOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.40), and pregnancies with abortive outcomes between the first and second pregnancies (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.08-1.29). Additionally, women with pre-existing diabetes (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.24-1.89), pre-existing hypertension (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.26-2.26), GDM (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37), or HDP (aOR, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.24-2.94) during the second pregnancy continued to exhibit an increased risk of opting for CD even after adjustment.

CONCLUSION

CD after VD was more prevalent among women with certain demographic characteristics and obstetric histories. Investigating the factors influencing women to request CD can be helpful in making informed decisions about safe delivery methods and may also affect the CD rate.

What is the best mode of delivery in nulliparous, singleton, term, vertex pregnancies

With approximately 145 million births occurring worldwide each year-over 30 million by cesarean delivery (CD), the need for evaluation of maternal and perinatal outcomes in different delivery scenarios is more pressing than ever. Recently, in a meta-analysis of the available randomized controlled trials, planned CD was associated with significantly decreased rates of low umbilical artery pH, and neonatal complications such as birth trauma, tube feeding, and hypotonia when compared to planned vaginal delivery (VD). Among singleton pregnancies, planned CD was associated with a significantly lower rate of perinatal death. For mothers, planned CD was associated with significantly less chorioamnionitis, more wound infection, and less urinary incontinence at 1 to 2 years. Conversely, planned VD has been associated with benefits such as a lower incidence of wound infection and quicker postpartum recovery compared to planned CD. Nonetheless, several risk factors for CD are increasing-such as older maternal age, obesity, diabetes, excessive gestational weight gain, and birth weight-while maternal pelvises are getting smaller. Concerns about the potential long-term risks of multiple cesarean deliveries, such as placenta accreta spectrum disorders, highlight the need for a balanced evaluation of both delivery modes. However, the total fertility rate is decreasing in the US and around the world, with many people wanting two or fewer babies, which decreases future risk of placenta accreta incurred by multiple cesarean deliveries in these individuals. Furthermore, one in four obstetricians-gynecologists has undergone a CD on maternal request for their nulliparous, singleton, term, vertex (NSTV) pregnancy, and CD rates less than about 19% have been associated with higher perinatal and maternal mortality. Thus, we propose that it is imperative that we prioritize conducting randomized trials to compare planned cesarean to planned VD for NSTV pregnancies. Such trials would need to include 8000 or more individuals; they would ideally follow each participant to the end of their reproductive life and study perinatal and maternal outcomes, including nonbiologic outcomes such as patient satisfaction, postpartum depression, breastfeeding rates, mother-infant bonding, post-traumatic stress, and cost-effectiveness. The time for such a trial is now, as it holds the potential to inform and improve obstetrical care practices globally. El resumen está disponible en Español al final del artículo.

Effectiveness of mind-body interventions in labour pain management during normal delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Labour pain is a common experience among women and poses risks to both the mother and neonate. Mind-body interventions have demonstrated effectiveness in diverse contexts, but their effectiveness in labour pain management remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the effects of each category of mind-body interventions on labour pain management, particularly pain intensity; the use of pharmacological pain relief medications; and the consequent outcomes, including the rate of caesarean section, duration of labour, and fear of childbirth.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search for related articles was conducted in 10 databases. Randomised controlled trials focusing on the effectiveness of mind-body interventions in labour pain management were included. Two researchers independently conducted methodological quality assessments, data extraction and grading the evidence. Meta-analyses were conducted when studies measured the same outcomes. Standardised mean differences were calculated for continuous variables, whilst risk ratios were calculated for dichotomous variables. All analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 25 studies from 24 trials were included, and six categories of mind-body interventions, namely hypnosis, mindfulness, breathing skills, muscle relaxation techniques, guided imagery, and therapeutic touch, were identified. Specifically, hypnosis and mindfulness might be effective in relieving labour pain intensity, with large effect sizes (SMD: -1.45, 95 % confidence interval [CI] -2.34, -0.55, I2 = 91 %; SMD: -1.22, 95 % CI -2.07, -0.37, I2 = 93 %, respectively), but could not reduce the use of epidural analgesia. Mindfulness, in particular, yielded statistically significant reductions in the rate of caesarean section, with a small effect size (RR: 0.46, 95 % CI 0.21, 0.97, I2 = 49 %), and in fear of childbirth, with a medium effect size (SMD: -0.63, 95 % CI -1.09, -0.17, I2 = 65 %). Additionally, all categories of mind-body interventions were associated with a significantly decreased duration of labour compared with the control conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Mind-body interventions may have potential benefits in terms of decreasing labour pain intensity, the rate of caesarean section, the duration of labour, and fear of childbirth, with small-to-large effect sizes. Particularly, hypnosis and mindfulness exhibited significant positive effects in terms of relieving labour pain intensity, with large effect sizes. These interventions could serve as complementary or alternative methods for labour pain management in clinical practice. Nevertheless, further rigorous randomised controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.

REGISTRATION

CRD42024498600 (PROSPERO, January 15, 2024).

Rising caesarean section rates and factors affecting women's decision-making about mode of birth in Indonesia: a longitudinal qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Caesarean section (CS) rates in Indonesia are increasing rapidly. Understanding women's preferences about mode of birth is important to help contextualise these rising rates and can help develop interventions to optimise CS. This study aimed to explore Indonesian women's preferences and decision-making about mode of birth, and how their preferences may change throughout pregnancy and birth.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 28 women accessing private and public health facilities in Jakarta, the region with the highest CS rates. Interviews were conducted two times: during the woman's third trimester of pregnancy and in the postpartum period, between October 2022 and March 2023. We used a reflexive thematic approach for analysis.

RESULTS

We generated three themes: (1) preferences about the mode of birth, (2) decision-making about the mode of birth and (3) regrets about the actual mode of birth. Most women preferred vaginal birth. However, they were influenced by advertisements promoting enhanced recovery after CS (ERACS) as an 'advanced technique' of CS, promising a comfortable, painless and faster recovery birth. This messaging influenced women to perceive CS as equivalent or even superior to vaginal birth. Where women's preferences for mode of birth shifted around the time of birth, this was primarily due to the obstetricians' discretion. Women felt they did not receive adequate information from obstetricians on the benefits and risks of CS and vaginal birth and felt disappointed when their actual mode of birth was not aligned with their preferences.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that despite rising CS rates, Indonesian women prefer vaginal birth. This highlights the need for better communication strategies and evidence-based information from healthcare providers. Given the rising popularity of ERACS, more work is urgently needed to standardise and regulate its use.

Engaging women to set the research agenda for assisted vaginal birth

INTRODUCTION

Public and patient involvement can provide crucial insights to optimise research by enhancing relevance and appropriateness of studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) engaged in an inclusive process to ensure that both technical experts and women had a voice in defining the research gaps and needs to increase or reintroduce the use of assisted vaginal birth (AVB) in settings where this intervention is needed but unavailable or underused.

METHODS

We describe the methods and outcomes of online workshops led by WHO to obtain women representatives' perspectives about AVB research gaps and needs.

RESULTS

After technical experts created a list of research questions based on various evidence syntheses, WHO organised four online workshops with 31 women's representatives from 27 mostly low- and middle-income (LMIC) countries. Women rated the importance and priority of the research questions proposed by the technical experts, improving and broadening some of them, added new questions, and voiced their main concerns and views about AVB. Women helped to put the research questions into context in their communities, highlighted neglected factors/dimensions that influence practices and affect women's experience during labour and childbirth, underscored less salient consequences of AVB, and highlighted the main concerns of women about research on AVB. The consolidated vision of technical experts and women's representatives resulted in a technical brief published by WHO. The technical brief is expected to stimulate global research and action closely aligned with women's priorities.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe a successful experience of engaging women, mostly from LMICs, in the identification of research gaps and needs to reintroduce AVB use. This process contributed to better aligning research questions with women's views, concerns, and priorities. Given the scarcity of reports about engaging women from LMICs to optimise research, this successful experience can serve as an inspiration for future work.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Women representatives were involved at every stage of the workshops described in full in this manuscript.

Women's caesarean section preferences: A multicountry cross-sectional survey in low- and middle-income countries

OBJECTIVE

To measure the proportion of women's preferences for CS in hospitals with high caesarean section rates and to identify related factors.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional hospital-based postpartum survey was conducted. We used multilevel multivariate logistic regression and probit models to analyse the association between women's caesarean section preferences and maternal characteristics. Probit models take into account selection bias while excluding women who had no preference.

SETTING

Thirty-two hospitals in Argentina, Thailand, Vietnam and Burkina Faso were selected.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 1,979 post-partum women with no potential medical need for caesarean section were included among a representative sample of women who delivered at each of the participating facilities during the data collection period.

FINDINGS

The overall caesarean section rate was 23.3 %. Among women who declared a preference in late pregnancy, 9 % preferred caesarean section, ranging from 1.8 % in Burkina Faso to 17.8 % in Thailand. Primiparous women were more likely to prefer a caesarean section than multiparous women (β=+0.16 [+0.01; +0.31]; p = 0.04). Among women who preferred caesarean section, doctors were frequently cited as the main influencers, and "avoid pain in labour" was the most common perceived benefit of caesarean section.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a high proportion of women prefer vaginal birth and highlight that the preference for caesarean section is linked to women's fear of pain and the influence of doctors. These results can inform the development of interventions aimed at supporting women and their preferences, providing them with evidence-based information and changing doctors' behaviour in order to reduce the number of unnecessary caesarean sections.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY

The QUALI-DEC trial is registered on the Current Controlled Trials website (https://www.isrctn.com/) under the number ISRCTN67214403.

Translation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)

BACKGROUND

Evidence relating maternal birth experience to a range of maternal and neonatal outcomes is increasingly compelling. Consequently valid and reliable self-report of birth experience from the mothers perspective is critical.

AIM

The current study sought to translate and validate a Hungarian-language version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R).

METHOD

Following forward and backwards translation into Hungarian, the Hungarian BSS-R (HU-BSS-R) was administered to women in a major Transylvanian hospital maternity unit within 72 h postpartum. Key psychometric characteristics were then examined in relation to factor structure, divergent and convergent validity, internal consistency, and known-groups discriminant validity.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and thirty-two women completed the HU-BSS-R. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the HU-BSS-R to offer an excellent fit to data for the established tri-dimensional measurement model. The HU-BSS-R was also found to offer excellent convergent and divergent validity and known-groups discriminant validity. No significant differences were observed between internal consistency observations between the current study and the original UK validation study.

CONCLUSIONS

The HU-BSS-R is a valid and reliable translation of the original BSS-R, it has proved itself to have excellent psychometric properties and is suitable for use in the Hungarian maternity context.

Subcutaneous vs intravenous fentanyl for labor pain management: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Labor pain is the most intense pain a woman will experience during her lifetime. Epidural anesthesia is recommended as the most effective method for pain relief, but it has several limitations. Fentanyl has high analgesic potency with short-acting duration, but the large-scale trials that assessed the effectiveness and safety of it for labor pain management are still limited.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and harm and maternal satisfaction of subcutaneous vs intravenous fentanyl for labor pain management.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. A total of 226 women were randomized to receive intravenous or subcutaneous fentanyl for labor pain management. Pain scores were evaluated before and after fentanyl administration at 5, 30, and 60 minutes and then every 60 minutes until delivery. The data were analyzed based on the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Both intravenous and subcutaneous fentanyl significantly decreased labor pain from baseline to delivery (overall mean change, -1.39; 95% confidence interval, -1.62 to -1.17; and -0.89; 95% confidence interval, -1.24 to -0.05, respectively). The reduction in the pain score between the 2 groups was not different (overall mean difference, -0.35; 95% confidence interval, -0.76 to 0.05). Maternal satisfaction was high for both intravenous and subcutaneous fentanyl (89.4% and 93.8%, respectively). There was no difference in the maternal satisfaction rate between the 2 groups (relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.03). No serious maternal and neonatal adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Both intravenously and subcutaneously administered fentanyl were safe and significantly reduced pain from baseline to delivery among low-risk pregnancies. Maternal satisfaction with the childbirth experience was high regardless of the route of administration of fentanyl. No serious adverse effects of fentanyl were observed in either the mothers or the neonates.

Women's preference for a vaginal birth in Brazilian private hospitals: effects of a quality improvement project

BACKGROUND

In 2015, a quality improvement project called "Adequate Childbirth Project" (PPA) was implemented in Brazilian private hospitals in order to reduce cesarean sections without clinical indication. The PPA is structured in four components, one of which is directed at women and families. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of PPA on women's preference for vaginal birth (VB) at the end of pregnancy.

METHODS

Evaluative research conducted in 12 private hospitals participating in the PPA. Interviews were carried out in the immediate postpartum period and medical record data were collected at hospital discharge. The implementation of PPA activities and women's preference for type of birth at the beginning and end of pregnancy were compared in women assisted in the PPA model of care and in the standard of care model, using a chi-square statistical test. To estimate the effect of PPA on women's preference for VB at the end of pregnancy, multiple logistic regression was performed with selection of variables using a causal diagram.

RESULTS

Four thousand seven hundred ninety-eight women were interviewed. The implementation of the planned activities of PPA was less than 50%, but were significantly more frequent among women assisted in the PPA model of care. Women in this group also showed a greater preference for VB at the beginning and end of pregnancy. The PPA showed an association with greater preference for VB at the end of pregnancy in primiparous (OR 2.54 95% CI 1.99-3.24) and multiparous women (OR 1.44 95% CI 0.97-2.12), although in multiparous this association was not significant. The main factor associated with the preference for VB at the end of pregnancy was the preference for this type of birth at the beginning of pregnancy, both in primiparous (OR 18.67 95% CI 14.22-24.50) and in multiparous women (OR 53.11 95% CI 37.31-75.60).

CONCLUSIONS

The PPA had a positive effect on women's preference for VB at the end of pregnancy. It is plausible that more intense effects are observed with the expansion of the implementation of the planned activities. Special attention should be given to information on the benefits of VB in early pregnancy.

Voices of Women With Emergency Cesarean Section Experience: A Qualitative Approach

The midwifery psychoeducation, relationship with the midwives, feelings from the surgery, and delivery expectations are major factors that affect the birth experiences of mothers following an emergency cesarean section. This study aimed to give voice to mothers to express the feelings they had before, during, and after an emergency cesarean section and primarily to express whether their expectations were met after the surgery. The research was conducted on mothers who gave birth through an emergency cesarean section in a public hospital by completing specific questionnaires. This study was carried out with 15 mothers. The data was collected through a semi-structured questionnaire form, including socio-demographic characteristics. From the research, four main themes and 11 sub-themes emerged. The main themes described are "midwifery psychoeducation," "relationship with the midwives," "feelings from the C-section," and "delivery expectations." The majority of women did not attend parenting preparation classes either because they did not consider it necessary or because they were unaware of their existence. The presence of a midwife remains valuable during the perinatal period for most mothers. However, feelings vary between fear, shock, terror, disappointment, pain, and in some cases happiness. In the majority of cases, emergency cesarean section did not meet the expectations of mothers, who described it as a violent and sudden experience. The results highlight the need to strengthen midwives in order to promote psychosocial education, support during childbirth, and counseling for traumatic experiences.

How does hospital organisation influence the use of caesarean sections in low- and middle-income countries? A cross-sectional survey in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Vietnam for the QUALI-DEC project

BACKGROUND

Improving the understanding of non-clinical factors that lead to the increasing caesarean section (CS) rates in many low- and middle-income countries is currently necessary to meet the challenge of implementing effective interventions in hospitals to reverse the trend. The objective of this study was to study the influence of organizational factors on the CS use in Argentina, Vietnam, Thailand and Burkina Faso.

METHODS

A cross-sectional hospital-based postpartum survey was conducted in 32 hospitals (8 per country). We selected women with no potential medical need for CS among a random sample of women who delivered at each of the participating facilities during the data collection period. We used multilevel multivariable logistic regression to analyse the association between CS use and organizational factors, adjusted on women's characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 2,092 low-risk women who had given birth in the participating hospitals were included. The overall CS rate was 24.1%, including 4.9% of pre-labour CS and 19.3% of intra-partum CS. Pre-labour CS was significantly associated with a 24-hour anaesthetist dedicated to the delivery ward (ORa = 3.70 [1.41; 9.72]) and with the possibility to have an individual room during labour and delivery (ORa = 0.28 [0.09; 0.87]). Intra-partum CS was significantly associated with a higher bed occupancy level (ORa = 1.45 [1.09; 1.93]): intrapartum CS rate would increase of 6.3% points if the average number of births per delivery bed per day increased by 10%.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that organisational norms and convenience associated with inadequate use of favourable resources, as well as the lack of privacy favouring women's preference for CS, and the excessive workload of healthcare providers drive the CS overuse in these hospitals. It is also crucial to enhance human and physical resources in delivery rooms and the organisation of intrapartum care to improve the birth experience and the working environment for those providing care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The QUALI-DEC trial is registered on the Current Controlled Trials website ( https://www.isrctn.com/ ) under the number ISRCTN67214403.

Implementing the QUALI-DEC project in Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand and Viet Nam: a process delineation and theory-driven process evaluation protocol

The project 'Quality Decision-making by women and providers' (QUALI-DEC) combines four non-clinical interventions to promote informed decision-making surrounding mode of birth, improve women's birth experiences, and reduce caesarean sections among low-risk women. QUALI-DEC is currently being implemented in 32 healthcare facilities across Argentina, Burkina Faso, Thailand, and Viet Nam. In this paper, we detail implementation processes and the planned process evaluation, which aims to assess how and for whom QUALI-DEC worked, the mechanisms of change and their interactions with context and setting; adaptations to intervention and implementation strategies, feasibility of scaling-up, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. We developed a project theory of change illustrating how QUALI-DEC might lead to impact. The theory of change, together with on the ground observations of implementation processes, guided the process evaluation strategy including what research questions and perspectives to prioritise. Main data sources will include: 1) regular monitoring visits in healthcare facilities, 2) quantitative process and output indicators, 3) a before and after cross-sectional survey among post-partum women, 4) qualitative interviews with all opinion leaders, and 5) qualitative interviews with postpartum women and health workers in two healthcare facilities per country, as part of a case study approach. We foresee that the QUALI-DEC process evaluation will generate valuable information that will improve interpretation of the effectiveness evaluation. At the policy level, we anticipate that important lessons and methodological insights will be drawn, with application to other settings and stakeholders looking to implement complex interventions aiming to improve maternal and newborn health and wellbeing.Trial registration: ISRCTN67214403.

A research agenda to improve incidence and outcomes of assisted vaginal birth

Access to emergency obstetric care, including assisted vaginal birth and caesarean birth, is crucial for improving maternal and childbirth outcomes. However, although the proportion of births by caesarean section has increased during the last few decades, the use of assisted vaginal birth has declined. This is particularly the case in low- and middle-income countries, despite an assisted vaginal birth often being less risky than caesarean birth. We therefore conducted a three-step process to identify a research agenda necessary to increase the use of, or reintroduce, assisted vaginal birth: after conducting an evidence synthesis, which informed a consultation with technical experts who proposed an initial research agenda, we sought and incorporated the views of women's representatives of this agenda. This process has allowed us to identify a comprehensive research agenda, with topics categorized as: (i) the need to understand women's perceptions of assisted vaginal birth, and provide appropriate and reliable information; (ii) the importance of training health-care providers in clinical skills but also in respectful care, effective communication, shared decision-making and informed consent; and (iii) the barriers to and facilitators of implementation and sustainability. From women's feedback, we learned of the urgent need to recognize labour, childbirth and postpartum experiences as inherently physiological and dignified human processes, in which interventions should only be implemented if necessary. The promotion and/or reintroduction of assisted vaginal birth in low-resource settings requires governments, policy-makers and hospital administrators to support skilled health-care providers who can, in turn, respectfully support women in labour and childbirth.

Low-Value Surgical Procedures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Scoping Review

Importance

Overuse of surgical procedures is increasing around the world and harms both individuals and health care systems by using resources that could otherwise be allocated to addressing the underuse of effective health care interventions. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is some limited country-specific evidence showing that overuse of surgical procedures is increasing, at least for certain procedures.

Objectives

To assess factors associated with, extent and consequences of, and potential solutions for low-value surgical procedures in LMICs.

Evidence Review

We searched 4 electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Global Index Medicus) for studies published from database inception until April 27, 2022, with no restrictions on date or language. A combination of MeSH terms and free-text words about the overuse of surgical procedures was used. Studies examining the problem of overuse of surgical procedures in LMICs were included and categorized by major focus: the extent of overuse, associated factors, consequences, and solutions.

Findings

Of 4276 unique records identified, 133 studies across 63 countries were included, reporting on more than 9.1 million surgical procedures (median per study, 894 [IQR, 97-4259]) and with more than 11.4 million participants (median per study, 989 [IQR, 257-6857]). Fourteen studies (10.5%) were multinational. Of the 119 studies (89.5%) originating from single countries, 69 (58.0%) were from upper-middle-income countries and 30 (25.2%) were from East Asia and the Pacific. Of the 42 studies (31.6%) reporting extent of overuse of surgical procedures, most (36 [85.7%]) reported on unnecessary cesarean delivery, with estimated rates in LMICs ranging from 12% to 81%. Evidence on other surgical procedures was limited and included abdominal and percutaneous cardiovascular surgical procedures. Consequences of low-value surgical procedures included harms and costs, such as an estimated US $3.29 billion annual cost of unnecessary cesarean deliveries in China. Associated factors included private financing, and solutions included social media campaigns and multifaceted interventions such as audits, feedback, and reminders.

Conclusions and Relevance

This systematic review found growing evidence of overuse of surgical procedures in LMICs, which may generate significant harm and waste of limited resources; the majority of studies reporting overuse were about unnecessary cesarean delivery. Therefore, a better understanding of the problems in other surgical procedures and a robust evaluation of solutions are needed.

Optimizing the childbirth experience: A pragmatic approach

In our efforts to optimize the labor experience and mitigate childbirth‐associated disability and mortality, we offer a call to action to identify drivers of and provide solutions to rising cesarean delivery rates, provide equitable care to mothers requesting elective cesarean, improve the operative safety of indicated cesarean deliveries, and provide guidance on acute care decision‐making in the labor suite and referral to levels of care.

The perfect birth: a content analysis of midwives' posts about birth on Instagram

BACKGROUND

There is limited research into how midwives use social media within their professional role. Small pilot studies have explored the introduction of social media into maternity practice and teaching but there is little evidence around how midwives use social media professionally. This is important as 89% of pregnant women turn to social media for advice during pregnancy, and how midwives use social media could be influencing women, their perception of birth and their decision making.

METHODS

AIM: To analyse how popular midwives portray birth on the social media platform Instagram. This is an observational mixed methods study using content analysis. Five 'popular' midwives from each country (UK, New Zealand, USA and Australia) were identified and their posts about birth collated from a one-year period (2020-21). Images/videos were then coded. Descriptive statistics enabled comparison of the posts by country. Categorisation was used to analyse and understand the content.

RESULTS

The study identified 917 posts from the 20 midwives' accounts, containing 1216 images/videos, with most coming from USA (n = 466), and UK (n = 239), Australia (n = 205) and New Zealand (n = 7) respectively. Images/videos were categorised into 'Birth Positivity', 'Humour', 'Education', 'Birth Story' and 'Advertisement'. Midwives' portrayals of birth represented a greater proportion of vaginal births, waterbirths and homebirths than known national birth statistics. The most popular midwives identified mainly had private businesses (n = 17). Both the midwives and women portrayed in images were primarily white, demonstrating a disproportionate representation.

CONCLUSION

There is a small midwifery presence on Instagram that is not representative of the broader profession, or the current picture of midwifery care. This paper is the first study to explore how midwives are using the popular social media platform Instagram to portray birth. It provides insight into how midwives post an un-medicalised, low risk representation of birth. Further research is recommended to explore midwives' motivation behind their posts, and how pregnant and postnatal women engage with social media.

Prevalence, influencing factors, and outcomes of emergency caesarean section in public hospitals situated in the urban state of Lagos, Nigeria

Background

Caesarean section (CS) performed in an emergency can be life-saving for both the pregnant woman and her baby. In Nigeria, CS rates have been estimated to be 2.7% nationally, with the highest regional rate of 7.0% reported in the South-West of the country. Our objective in this facility-based retrospective cross-sectional study was to describe patterns and assess factors, obstetric indications, and outcomes of emergency CS in Lagos, Nigeria.

Methods

Socio-demographic, travel, and obstetric data of pregnant women were extracted from case notes. Travel data was inputted in Google Maps to extract travel time from the pregnant women' home to the hospital. Univariate, bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted.

Results

Of the 3,134 included pregnant women, 1,923 (61%) delivered via emergency CS. The odds of an emergency CS were significantly higher among women who were booked (OR=1.97, 95%CI 1.64-2.35), presented with obstructed labour (OR=2.59, 95%CI 1.68-3.99), pre-eclampsia/eclampsia (OR=1.67, 95%CI 1.08-2.56), multiple gestations (OR=2.71, 95%CI 1.72-4.28) and travelled from suburban areas (OR=1.43, 95%CI 1.15-1.78). There was an increasing dose-effect response between travel time to the hospital and emergency CS.

Conclusion

Optimisation of CS rates requires a multi-pronged approach during pregnancy and childbirth, with particular emphasis on supporting pregnant women living in the suburbs.

"Because it eases my Childbirth Plan": a qualitative study on factors contributing to preferences for caesarean section in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Although caesarean section (CS) rates have increased rapidly in Thailand, the upward trend is not supported by significant maternal or perinatal health benefits. The appropriate use of CS through QUALIty DECision-making by women and providers (QUALI-DEC project) aims to design and implement a strategy to optimize the use of CS through non-clinical interventions. This study aimed to explore the factors influencing women's and health professionals' preferences for CS delivery in Thailand.

METHODS

We conducted a formative qualitative study by using semi-structured in-depth interviews with pregnant and postpartum women, and healthcare staff. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants from eight hospitals across four regions of Thailand. Content analysis was used to develop the main themes.

RESULTS

There were 78 participants, including 27 pregnant and 25 postpartum women, 8 administrators, 13 obstetricians, and 5 interns. We identified three main themes and seven sub-themes of women and healthcare providers' perceptions on CS: (1) avoiding the negative experiences from vaginal birth (the pain of labor and childbirth, uncertainty during the labor period); (2) CS is a safer mode of birth (guarantees the baby's safety, a protective shield for doctors); and (3) CS facilitates time management (baby's destiny at an auspicious time, family's management, manage my work/time).

CONCLUSIONS

Women mentioned negative experiences and beliefs about vaginal delivery, labor pain, and uncertain delivery outcomes as important factors influencing CS preferences. On the other hand, CS is safer for babies and facilitates multiple tasks in women's lives. From health professionals' perspectives, CS is the easier and safer method for patients and them. Interventions to reduce unnecessary CS, including QUALI-DEC, should be designed and implemented, taking into consideration the perceptions of both women and healthcare providers.

Fentanyl for labour pain management: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Labour pain has been identified as an important reason for women to prefer caesarean section (CS). Fentanyl is one of the short acting opioids recommended by World Health Organization for pain relief during labour. This study aimed to identify and describe the available evidence on the use of fentanyl (monotherapy) for labour pain management by any routes of administration or regime.

METHODS

We included the records published until 31 December 2021 which reported administration of fentanyl to women with normal labour for labour pain relief. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by another reviewer using a standardised agreement form. We mapped and presented data descriptively in figure and tabular format.

RESULTS

We included 51 records from 49 studies in our scoping review. The studies were conducted in 12 countries, mostly high-income countries. The study designs of the 51 included records were varied as follows: 38 (74.5%) experimental studies (35 randomised controlled trials and three quasi-experimental studies), and 12 (23.5%) observational studies (five retrospective cohort studies, four prospective cohort studies, two retrospective descriptive studies, and one descriptive study) and one qualitative study. Of the included records, six used intranasal fentanyl, five used subcutaneous fentanyl, 18 (35.3%) used intravenous fentanyl, 18 (35.3%) used intrathecal fentanyl, and nine used epidural fentanyl. Many records compared fentanyl with another analgesic agent while five records (9.8%) had no comparison group and seven records (13.7%) compared with no analgesia group. The doses of fentanyl varied by routes, study and the requirement depended on the women. Pain assessment was the most frequent outcome measure presented in the records (78.4%). Only nine records (17.6%) investigated women's satisfaction about labour pain relief using fentanyl and seven records (13.7%) reported the effect of fentanyl on breastfeeding. The most common reported neonatal outcomes were foetal heart rate (33 records, 64.7%) and Apgar score (32 records, 62.7%).

CONCLUSION

There is limited primary evidence especially randomised controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness and harms of different routes of fentanyl in low- or middle-income countries. There is a need for high-quality research to establish the most effective route of fentanyl and associated effects for evidence-based international guidelines.

Fulfilment of expectations on birth and the postpartum period - A Swedish cohort study

BACKGROUND

The fulfilment of birth expectations is important to women and strongly related to birth satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate women's expectations and experiences of birth and the postnatal period and associated factors. An additional aim was to explore if women's expectations were fulfilled.

METHODS

A longitudinal cohort study of 280 women where 226 were followed up two months after birth. Data were collected using questionnaires. Odds ratios with a 95% confidence interval were calculated between the explanatory background variables and expectations/experiences.

RESULTS

The majority (79%) rated continuity as important, but few (32%) actually had a known midwife assisting during birth. Positive birth expectations were found in 37% and a positive birth experience in 66%. Many women (56%) preferred a short postnatal stay, and 63% went home within 24 h. Thirty-six percent preferred postnatal home visits, but only eight women (3.5%) received this. Breastfeeding expectations were high with 86% rating it as important but after birth 63% reported exclusively breastfeeding. Only a few background factors were associated with women's expectations and experiences. Most likely to be fulfilled were women's expectations for a vaginal birth (83%), a positive birth experience (71%) and short length of postnatal stay (67%). Postnatal home visits (96%) and continuity of care (73%) were not fulfilled.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women's expectations about continuity are fulfilled only to a minor degree. The fulfilment of postnatal expectations varied and the preference for a short postnatal stay was fulfilled whereas home visits were not.

Flat trend of high caesarean section rates in Peru: A pooled analysis of 3,376,062 births from the national birth registry, 2012 to 2020

Background

Methods

Findings

Interpretation

Funding

Cesarean section in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018: country analysis based on the Robson classification. An observational study

BACKGROUND

The use of caesarean section has steadily increased, with Latin America being the region with the highest rates. Multiple factors account for that increase and the Robson classification is appropriate to compare determinants at the clinical level for caesarean section rates over time. The purpose of this study is to describe the evolution of caesarean section rates by Robson groups in Uruguay from 2008 to 2018 using a country level database.

METHODS

We included the records of all women giving birth in Uruguay (pregnancies ≥22 weeks and weights ≥500 g) with valid data in the mode of childbirth recorded in the Perinatal Information System database between 2008 and 2018. Caesarean section rates were calculated by Robson groups for each of the years included, disaggregated by care sector (public/private) and by geographical area (Capital City/Non-Capital), with time trends and their significance analyzed using linear regression models.

RESULTS

Of the total 485,263 births included in this research, the overall caesarean section rate was 43,1%. In 2018, among the groups at lower risk of caesarean section (1 to 4), the highest rates were seen in women in group 2B (98,8%), followed by those in group 4B (97,9%). A significant increase in the number of caesarean sections was seen in groups 2B (97,9 to 98,8%), 3 (8,36 to 11,1%) and 4 (A (22,7 to 26,9%) and B (95,4 to 97,9%) Significant growth was also observed in groups 5 (74,3 to 78,1%), 8 (90,6 to 95,5%), and 10 (39,1 to 46,7%). The private sector had higher rates of caesarean section for all groups throughout the period, except for women in group 9. The private sector in Montevideo presented the highest rates in the groups with the lowest risk of caesarean section (1, 2A, 3 and 4A), followed by the private sector outside of the capital.

CONCLUSION

Uruguay is no exception to the increasing caesarean section trend, even in groups of women who have lower risk of requiring caesarean section. The implementation of interventions aimed at reducing caesarean section in the groups with lower obstetric risk in Uruguay is warranted.

Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives and trainees

OBJECTIVES

To explore obstetricians', midwives' and trainees' perceptions of caesarean section (CS) determinants in the context of public obstetric care services provision in Argentina. Our hypothesis is that known determinants of CS use may differ in settings with limited access to essential obstetric services.

SETTING

We conducted a formative research study in 19 public maternity hospitals in Argentina. An institutional survey assessed the availability of essential obstetric services. Subsequently, we conducted online surveys and semistructured interviews to assess the opinions of providers on known CS determinants.

RESULTS

Obstetric services showed an adequate provision of emergency obstetric care but limited services to support women during birth. Midwives, with some exceptions, are not involved during labour. We received 680 surveys from obstetricians, residents and midwives (response rate of 63%) and interviewed 26 key informants. Six out of 10 providers (411, 61%) indicated that the use of CS is associated with the complexities of our caseload. Limited pain management access was deemed a potential contributing factor for CS in adolescents and first-time mothers. Providers have conflicting views on the adequacy of training to deal with complex or prolonged labour. Obstetricians with more than 10 years of clinical experience indicated that fear of litigation was also associated with CS. Overall, there is consensus on the need to implement interventions to reduce unnecessary CS.

CONCLUSIONS

Public maternity hospitals in Argentina have made significant improvements in the provision of emergency services. The environment of service provision does not seem to facilitate the physiological process of vaginal birth. Providers acknowledged some of these challenges.

Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries

Women's fear and uncertainty about vaginal delivery and lack of empowerment in decision-making generate decision conflict and is one of the main determinants of high caesarean section rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to develop a decision analysis tool (DAT) to help pregnant women make an informed choice about the planned mode of delivery and to evaluate its acceptability in Vietnam, Thailand, Argentina, and Burkina Faso. The DAT targets low-risk pregnant women with a healthy, singleton foetus, without any medical or obstetric disorder, no previous caesarean scarring, and eligibility for labour trials. We conducted a systematic review to determine the short- and long-term maternal and offspring risks and benefits of planned caesarean section compared to planned vaginal delivery. We carried out individual interviews and focus group discussions with key informants to capture informational needs for decision-making, and to assess the acceptability of the DAT in participating hospitals. The DAT meets 20 of the 22 Patient Decision Aid Standards for decision support. It includes low- to moderate-certainty evidence-based information on the risks and benefits of both modes of birth, and helps pregnant women clarify their personal values. It has been well accepted by women and health care providers. Adaptations have been made in each country to fit the context and to facilitate its implementation in current practice, including the development of an App. DAT is a simple method to improve communication and facilitate shared decision-making for planned modes of birth. It is expected to build trust and foster more effective, satisfactory dialogue between pregnant women and providers. It can be easily adapted and updated as new evidence emerges. We encourage further studies in LMICs to assess the impact of DAT on quality decision-making for the appropriate use of caesarean section in these settings.