Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis is connected with lower mortality. A single institution experience

Internal Versus External Fixation of the Anterior Ring in Unstable Pelvic Fractures Was Associated With Discharge to Home

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether anterior internal or definitive external fixation combined with posterior internal fixation of unstable pelvic fractures was associated with frequency of discharge to home.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two Level 1 trauma centers and one academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients aged 16 years or older with unstable OTA/AO 61B/C pelvis fractures treated with operative fixation of the anterior and posterior pelvic ring by three fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons from October 2020 to November 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

The primary outcome was the adjusted odds of discharge to home with internal fixation compared with definitive external fixation of the anterior pelvic ring on multivariable analysis considering patient, injury, and treatment characteristics. Secondary outcomes included bivariable associations between anterior fixation type and intensive care unit (ICU) days, ventilator days, hospital length of stay, and hospital charges.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients (65%) who were treated with internal fixation presented with higher mean Glasgow Coma Scale scores (13.5 ± 3.6 vs. 10.5 ± 5.4, P < 0.01) than 43 patients treated with definitive external fixation but were otherwise similar regarding age [mean 48.1 ± 19.9 vs. 41.2 ± 15.8, range (16-96) versus (19-77), P = 0.07], sex (36.7% vs. 44.2% female, P = 0.42193), mean body mass index (28.4 ± 6.2 vs. 28.7 ± 7.4 kg/m 2 , P = 0.93), any medical comorbidities (50.6% vs. 44.2%, P = 0.62), substance use (13.9% vs. 27.9%, P = 0.09884), insurance type ( P = 0.97), mean Injury Severity Score (24.8 ± 12.0 vs. 29.5 ± 14.0, range 5-57 vs. 10-57, P = 0.14), pelvis fracture pattern ( P = 0.12187), and preinjury living environment ( P = 0.67695). On multivariable analysis, patients treated with internal fixation were more frequently discharged to home (53.2% vs. 27.9%, odds ratio 3.39, 95% confidence interval 1.29-9.84, P = 0.0198). Patients treated with anterior internal fixation also experienced fewer mean ICU days (6.0 ± 8.8 vs. 9.8 ± 16.3, P = 0.0213), ventilator days (3.5 ± 8.2 vs. 6.9 ± 15.9, P < 0.0081), and hospital days (18.7 ± 16.2 vs. 31.2 ± 26.7, P < 0.01) and incurred less hospital charges ($278,563.29±$261,602.35 vs. $580,625.98±$503,067.98, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received anterior and posterior internal fixation of their unstable pelvis fractures were more likely to discharge to home than patients treated with anterior definitive external fixation and posterior internal fixation. Anterior internal fixation was also associated with fewer ICU, ventilator, and hospital days, as well as less hospital charges.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Pelvis/acetabulum: management of geriatric injuries

Geriatric pelvic and acetabular fractures pose significant challenges due to patient frailty, comorbidities, and the complexity of fracture patterns. This review examines current evidence and evolving strategies for managing these injuries. Treatment approaches range from nonoperative management to surgical interventions, including percutaneous fixation, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and total hip arthroplasty, either as a standalone procedure or combined with ORIF. Decision making is guided by fracture morphology, patient functionality, and physiological reserve to optimize clinical outcomes. Minimally invasive techniques, particularly for fragility fractures of the pelvis, have gained traction because of their ability to provide stable fixation while minimizing surgical morbidity. The importance of early mobilization and a multidisciplinary perioperative approach is highlighted as essential in reducing complications and improving recovery. Despite advancements, controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment of complex acetabular fractures in elderly patients. This review synthesizes the latest evidence and expert perspectives to aid clinicians in selecting the most appropriate management strategies, with the goal of restoring mobility, minimizing complications, and enhancing the quality of life in this vulnerable population.

Influencing factors for fragility fractures of the pelvis on length of stay and complication rate

PURPOSE

Increasing incidence of fragility pelvic ring fractures (FFP) is driven by demographic. An analysis of the patient population, along with the factors influencing total length of stay (LoS), and endpoints such as complications is essential for a better understanding and treatment of FFP injuries.

METHODS

This retrospective data analysis includes all inpatients treated from January 2018 to December 2022, with an FFP. Excluded were patients < 65 years, high-energy trauma, acetabular fractures, or pathological fractures. Collected data included demographics as well as information about comorbidities, diagnostics, therapy, LoS and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 363 patients were included, of which 14% (n = 52) were male and 86% (n = 311) female. The average age was 84.4 ± 6.6 years. While 31.1% (n = 113) were mobile without aid before onset of symptoms there was a significant (p < 0.01) decrease to 5.2% (n = 19) at discharge. Only 43.8% (n = 159) remained self-dependent at discharge, compared to 62.3% (n = 226) before injury (p < 0.01). Significantly longer LoS was found with higher FFP types (p < 0.01), higher number of complications (p < 0.01) as well as operative treatment (p < 0.01) and MRI diagnostics (p < 0.01). A significant increase on the number of complications was found with FFP IV (p = 0.02) and operative treatment (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Higher FFP types, higher number of complications, as well as operative treatment and MRI diagnostics prolonged the total LoS. FFP IV and operative treatment were associated with higher number of complications. By identifying specific factors influencing the inpatient stay, further prospective studies may show improved complication/ mortality rates by optimizing those factors.

Accuracy in navigated percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation of pelvic fragility fractures is increasingly being used to maintain mobility and reduce pain in the elderly patient population. Traditionally, this is performed using 2D fluoroscopy. Several newer, navigated techniques have emerged that may further facilitate this procedure. It, however, remains unclear whether there is a benefit regarding accuracy, radiation exposure and complications of these new navigation techniques when compared to the traditional 2D fluoroscopy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase were searched for both randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing new navigation techniques to 2D fluoroscopy for percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation. Effect estimates were pooled (random effects) and presented as odds ratio, mean difference and standardized mean difference with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

19 studies were included. The 2D fluoroscopy group had 642 patients and the new navigation group 663 patients. Accuracy was significantly higher in the new navigation group (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.53-3.90), especially O-Arm, 3D CT and Robotic navigation. On average, accuracy was 82% in the 2D group and 92% in the new navigation group, which was significant. Also, fluoroscopy time (MD 71.89 s, 95% CI 51.37-92.41) and frequency (MD 17.22 images in total, 95% CI 7.73-26.70) were significantly reduced in the new navigation group. Complications are acceptably low, however, poorly reported in both groups.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated a higher accuracy, lower fluoroscopic frequency and time for new navigation techniques compared to 2D fluoroscopy. More advanced navigation techniques, such as 3D CT and robotic navigation, appeared to be even better.

Dual-energy CT in diagnosing sacral fractures: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and intra- and inter-rater reliabilities

PURPOSE

Evaluating sacral fractures is crucial in fragility fractures of the pelvis. Dual-energy CT (DECT) is considered useful for diagnosing unclear fractures on single-energy CT (SECT). This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of DECT in diagnosing sacral fractures.

METHODS

Thirty cases with suspected sacral fractures underwent SECT, DECT, and MRI. The exams were evaluated by two groups: three inexperienced surgeons (Group I) and three experienced surgeons (Group E). Diagnoses were made initially using SECT (pre-DECT) and then reassessed including DECT (post-DECT). This process was repeated twice. Presence of fractures was determined based on MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Diagnostic accuracy was statistically compared between two groups.

RESULTS

Sensitivity was 0.73 in pre-DECT and 0.9 in post-DECT, while specificity was 0.83 in pre-DECT and 0.91 in post-DECT. Sensitivity significantly improved with the addition of DECT (McNemar test: p < 0.001). Intra-rater reliability (Fleiss' kappa coefficient) was 0.44 in pre-DECT and 0.76 in post-DECT. Inter-rater reliability (Cohen's kappa coefficient) was 0.6 in pre-DECT and 0.81 in post-DECT. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly lower in group I than group E in pre-DECT (P = 0.019, 0.048), but there was no significant difference between two groups in post-DECT.

CONCLUSION

Combined use of DECT with SECT improved the detection rate of sacral fractures and enhanced intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. High diagnostic accuracy was achieved regardless of the observer's experience. These results indicate that DECT is a useful imaging modality for diagnosing sacral fractures.

Lateral Compression Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: Diagnosis, Classifications, and Modern Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the diagnosis, classification, and modern management of lateral compression fragility fractures of the pelvis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Practice patterns are shifting toward early operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis among patients who are unable to mobilize or whose injuries demonstrate occult instability on stress imaging. Early internal fixation appears to decrease pain, facilitate mobilization, accelerate hospital discharge, and minimize morbidity in this population. Lateral compression pelvic ring injuries are the most common type of fragility fracture of the pelvis. Similar to fragility fractures of the hip, lateral compression fragility fractures of the pelvis are typically sustained in a ground level fall. These injuries are associated with long acute hospital and post-acute facility admissions, loss of physical function, loss of independence, mortality, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and caregiver burnout. Unlike hip fractures, for which urgent operative treatment and early mobilization reduce mortality, lateral compression fragility fractures of the pelvis are commonly treated without surgery. Recommendations for nonoperative management of these injuries in older adults may be inappropriately generalized from studies of younger patient populations with high-energy mechanisms of pelvis fracture. However, strong evidence to support early internal fixation of these injuries practice is lacking. High quality investigations of early surgical intervention for lateral compression fragility fractures of the pelvis are needed to guide care for these patients.

Compressive effect and collapse behavior of three different transsacral implants in sacral fragility fractures - a retrospective analysis of 106 cases

PURPOSE

The aim of this study were the retrospective evaluation of the compressive effect and complication rates of transsacral stabilization of osteoporosis-associated sacral fragility fractures in 106 patients using three different implants (6.0 mm sacral bar, n = 32; 7.3 mm screw, n = 26; 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System, n = 48) with regard to the image morphological and clinical-perioperative outcome.

METHODS

For this purpose, the sacral width was determined preoperatively and postoperatively using multiplanar CT reconstructions and correlated with the measured bone density (HU). The results were compared with each other on an implant-specific basis.

RESULTS

A significant compressive effect was found for all implants (6.0 mm sacral bar 7.1 ± 3.4 mm, 7.3 mm screw 6.9 ± 1.8 mm, 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System 8 ± 2.4 mm). No implant-specific difference in compression could be detected. Overall, the washers broke into the iliac cortex in 9% of cases. The subgroups did not differ significantly in this respect (6.0 mm sacral bar: 4 [13%], 7.3 mm screw 1 [1%], 7.5 mm ISG-Rod System (5 [10%], p = 0.581). A correlation between the degree of osteoporosis and the compressive effect could not be demonstrated. Significant implant-specific differences were found in the incision-suture time, with only ø0:39 ± 0:13 h required for implantation of the 7.5 mm ISG Rod System (6.0 mm sacral bar: ø1:09 ± 0:22 h, 7.3 mm screw: ø0:55 ± 0:20 h). The fluoroscopy time was significantly lower with the 7.3 mm screw (ø0:57 ± 0:23 min) and the 7.5 mm ISG Rod System (ø0:42 ± 00:17 min) than with the 6.0 mm sacral bar (ø1:36 ± 0:46 min).

CONCLUSION

A significant compressive effect was demonstrated with all three implants. No implant-specific complications or surgical site complications were identified in either the overall cohort or the subgroups. The 7.5 mm ISG Rod System shows advantages with regard to the duration of surgery and fluoroscopy.

Innovative development of robot reduction system in geriatric pelvic fractures: A single-center case series in Beijing, China

Displaced fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) pose significant challenges in orthopaedic trauma, owing to patient comorbidities, deteriorating bone quality, and surgical complexities. Despite technological advancements, no robotic methods have been documented for displaced FFP management. To address this, we introduced an advanced robot-assisted fracture reduction system, comprising a tracking device, path planning software, and robotic arms. This study evaluated fifteen consecutive patients with displaced FFP (average age 80.4 ± 9.1 years), who underwent robot-assisted reduction and internal fixation (RARIF) between January 2022 and May 2023. All were categorized as Rommens FFP type III, with a median time of 6 days (range 4-11) from injury to surgery. Operative times averaged 165 ± 44 min, with median blood loss of 50 mL. Postoperative radiographs showed all patients achieved excellent or good reductions as per Matta criteria, marking a 100 % success rate. A 6-month follow-up revealed an average modified Majeed score of 81.4, with 85.7 % of patients rated excellent or good. All fractures healed without complications. Leveraging our intelligent system, RARIF proves to be a safe and effective approach for displaced FFP, facilitating postoperative pain alleviation and early mobilization despite compromised health and bone conditions. This approach may revolutionize the management of FFP in an increasingly aging population, signaling a significant shift in therapeutic strategies. Translational Potential of this Article: Elderly patients with displaced FFP often present complex surgical challenges due to comorbidities and poor bone quality, complicating reduction procedures and often leading to ineffective fixation. Addressing these challenges, we have developed an innovative robot-assisted fracture reduction system, offering a practical alternative to conventional methods. This system optimizes the applied force and direction during the reduction process, thereby reducing the needs for manual and repetitive attempts. Our report, detailing the successful implementation of this technique in 15 FFP cases, signifies a considerable leap forward in the field of orthopaedic surgery. This technique notably benefits the elderly population, a group traditionally marginalized in receiving care for complex orthopedic conditions.

Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures - A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients

The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.

Conservative or operative therapy in patients with a fragility fracture of the pelvis: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis is rising. Whereas the treatment for FFP type I, III, and IV is clear, the optimal treatment for FFP type II remains a topic of discussion. Traditionally these fractures have been treated conservatively. However, there is a shift toward early surgical stabilization with percutaneous screw fixation to reduce pain and promote mobility in an already frail patient population. High-quality evidence, however, is lacking. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial was designed to compare conservative management to early percutaneous screw fixation in patients with type II fragility fractures.

METHODS

This is a monocenter randomized controlled trial. All patients with a FFP type II are screened for inclusion. After obtaining informed consent, patients are randomized between conservative management and surgical stabilization. Conservative management consists of early mobilization under guidance of physiotherapy and analgesics. Patients randomized for surgical treatment are operated on within 72 h using percutaneous screw fixation. The primary endpoint is mobility measured by the DEMMI score. Secondary endpoints are other dimensions of mobility, pain levels, quality of life, mortality, and morbidity. The total follow-up is 1 year. The required sample size is 68.

DISCUSSION

The present study aims to give certainty on the potential benefit of surgical treatment. Current literature on this topic remains unclear. According to the volume of FFP at the study hospital, we assume that the number of patients needed for this study is gathered within 2 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04744350. Registered on February 8, 2021.

Evaluation of a treatment protocol based on conservative therapy for fragility fractures of the pelvis

PURPOSE

In an aging society, fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) have increased significantly. However, there is no clear consensus on the timing and criteria for transitioning from conservative treatment to surgery for these fractures. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effects of our treatment protocol for FFP based on conservative treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study including 74 patients with FFP at our institution between 2015 and 2021. All patients were treated conservatively for the first two weeks. During this period, only wheelchair transfer was allowed. If the patient could not walk after this period, surgery was performed. Fracture type (Rommens classification), walking ability, presence of complications after admission, presence of fracture union, and surgical treatment was investigated. Patients were divided into two groups: a stable group (type I/II) and an unstable group (type III/IV).

RESULTS

Fracture union was achieved in all patients. Thirteen patients developed complications after being admitted to our hospital; seven showed decreased walking ability, and six required surgeries. The stable and unstable groups comprised 47 and 27 patients, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the percentage of patients who developed complications or experienced decrease in walking ability. The percentage of patients who required surgery was significantly higher in the unstable group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our FFP management protocol was effective regardless of fracture type. It is important to provide a period for careful assessment of instability, and to try to prevent fracture progression.

Fragility fractures of the pelvis: First 48 cases of surgical treatment at a level 1 trauma center in France

INTRODUCTION

Longer life expectancy is accompanied by a higher incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP), which has repercussions on mortality and nursing home admissions. Given the paucity of data at French healthcare facilities, we carried out a retrospective study to (1) evaluate how surgical treatment of FFP with posterior displacement (type III and IV according to Rommens and Hofmann) affects a patient's pain, functional status and ability to stay at home and (2) evaluate the postoperative complications and mortality rate.

HYPOTHESIS

Surgery for posteriorly displaced FFP will relieve pain and preserve the patient's independence.

METHODS

All the patients over 65 years of age who were operated on for a posterior FFP between January 2015 and August 2020 were included in this prospective, single-center study. The demographics, fracture type, details of the surgical treatment, complications and mortality were analyzed. Pain (visual analog scale, VAS), functional status (Activity of Daily Living [ADL] and Instrumental Activity of Daily Living [IADL]), mobility (Parker score) and rates of nursing home admissions were compared before the fracture, after surgery and at a mean follow-up of 28 months (minimum follow-up of 1 year).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients with a mean age of 75 years were included. Twenty-four of these patients (50%) had at least two comorbidities. The FFPs were either type IV (31/48; 65%) or type III (17/48; 35%). The mean VAS for pain was significantly lower on the first day postoperative (3.5 versus 4.8; p=0.02). This significant reduction continued upon discharge from the hospital (1.95; p=0.003) and persisted at the mean follow-up of 28 months (2.2; p=0.64). The complication rate was 15% (7/48) and the mortality rate at the final review was 15% (7/48). Among the surviving patients, 81% (29/36) returned to living at home. The ADL (5.1 versus 5.8; p=0.09), IADL (5.9 versus 6.9; p=0.15) and Parker score (6.8 versus 8.2; p=0.08) at the final review were not significantly different from the values before the fracture.

CONCLUSION

This is the first French study of patients operated on for an FPP. Fixation of posteriorly displaced fractures allows surviving patients to retain their mobility. Pain relief is achieved quickly and maintained during the follow-up period. Thus, our initial hypothesis is affirmed. The complication rate is not insignificant; given the complexity of this surgery, percutaneous treatment is preferable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Conservative treatment of fragility fracture of the pelvis: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although an increasing number of studies have reported the usefulness of early minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP), MIS is difficult to perform in every hospital, partly because of equipment problems. Moreover, different opinions exist on FFP treatment methods and the indication for surgery is usually determined by the fracture type. Since our hospital follows a conservative approach as the basic treatment, this study examined the outcomes of such an FFP approach.

HYPOTHESIS

FFP outcomes are influenced by the fracture type and walking ability before the injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated the bone fusion rate, bone fusion duration, unloading duration, walking ability trends, and outcomes in 76 patients with FFP treated conservatively at our hospital.

RESULTS

The union rate, mean period until union, and follow-up period were 93.4%, 3.3 months, and 14.3 months, respectively. Walking ability significantly decreased from 5.1 points before the injury to 4.4 points during the last follow-up (p<0.01). The average unloading period was 12.8 days, and FFPs showed a high bone fusion rate, even with conservative treatment.

DISCUSSION

Most patients eventually returned to their pre-injury status despite slightly decreased walking ability. Given the invasive nature of surgery, the indications for surgery should be carefully assessed after considering the risk-benefit ratio.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective study.

Epidemiology of fragility fracture of the pelvic ring: a regional population-based study in Northern Japan

Using a regional population-based dataset in Japan, we identified the epidemiological characteristics of patients with fragility fractures of the pelvic ring. The incidence rate was 35.5-121.2 per 100,000 population/year. Age-specific incidence increased after 75 years. This fracture is associated with worse prognosis in terms of walking function and life expectancy.

PURPOSE

Fragility fracture of the pelvic ring (FFP) is common among older patients; however, little information is available on the epidemiology of FFP worldwide. We aimed to identify the epidemiological characteristics of patients with FFP using a regional population-based dataset in Japan.

METHODS

This descriptive epidemiologic study analyzed data obtained from clinical information of patients diagnosed with FFP from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2020 at a regional dominant hospital in Japan. We calculated the crude and age-adjusted annual incidences and the age-specific incidence and described epidemiological date, injury characteristics, walking ability before and after FFP, and mortality. Additionally, we investigated factors associated with walking ability.

RESULTS

We identified 66 FFP patients, of whom 55 (83.3%) were female, with a mean age of 82.2 years. The crude annual incidence of FFP ranged from 35.5-121.2 per 100,000 population/year during the study period. The age-specific incidence of FFP increased after 75 and 80 years in females and males, respectively. In total, 44.4% of patients had declines in walking ability 1 year after their FFP injuries. Patients with declining walking ability were significantly older (p < 0.01), and age ≥ 80 years was significantly associated with the decline in walking ability (p < 0.01). The 1- and 5-year mortality rates were 15.4% and 39.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The incidence rate of FFP was 35.5-121.2 per 100,000 population/year. Age-specific incidence of FFP increased after 75 years. Our results indicate that FFP is associated with worse prognosis of walking function and life expectancy.

Geriatric Patients Presenting With Isolated Pubic Rami Fractures and Inability to Mobilize May Have Occult Lateral Compression Pelvic Ring Injuries With Dynamic Instability

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence of patients with isolated pubic rami fractures on computed tomography scans who have dynamic instability secondary to occult lateral compression pelvic ring injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparison study.

SETTING

Urban level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

This study included geriatric patients with isolated pubic rami fractures and inability to mobilize secondary to pain.

INTERVENTION

Lateral stress radiographs of pelvis to evaluate for ≥1 cm dynamic instability.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Physical therapy clearance, hospital length of stay, and discharge location.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were identified over 12 months. Patients were predominantly geriatric (median age: 75 years, interquartile range: 67 to 90), woman (11/19), with unilateral (17/19) comminuted distal rami fractures (12/19) sustained in ground-level falls (12/19). Dynamic instability was identified in 42% of patients (8/19). Magnetic resonance imaging, obtained in 6 of these patients, demonstrated occult posterior ring fractures in all cases. Patients with dynamic instability were more likely to have comminuted distal rami fractures (Nakatani type 1b) and a longer hospital length of stay. There was also a trend for these patients to be unable to clear physical therapy by discharge (63% (5/8) versus 36% (4/11)). The 90-day mortality rate of the cohort was 16% (3/19).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with seemingly isolated pubic rami fractures on radiographs and computed tomography scans who are unable to mobilize may have occult lateral compression injuries with dynamic instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Posterior pelvic ring involvement detected with CT taken within a week of admission in acute fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) does not predict failure of conservative treatment: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute low energy pubic rami fractures in the elderly receive primarily conservative treatment. There is debate to what extent posterior ring involvement, which is detected superiorly by CT compared to X-ray, has an impact on outcome and may require modified treatment. We want to demonstrate if posterior ring involvement has an influence on different types of outcome in primarily conservatively treated acute FFP, questioning the usefulness of early CT. Additionally we analysed the early fracture pattern in cases where conservative treatment failed with need for secondary surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 155 consecutive patients, recruited between 2009 and 2016, aged over 65 years diagnosed with an acute LE-PFr on X-ray at the emergency department of a single, level-one trauma centre and receiving an early CT. A set of outcome parameters was compared between patients with an isolated pubic rami fracture (CTia) and patients who had a combined posterior pelvic ring fracture (CTcp).

RESULTS

There were 155 patients of whom 85.2% were female with a mean age of 83 years. 76.8% of patients living at home returned home and 15.5% moved to a nursing home. Mortality rate during hospitalisation was 6.4% and 14.8% at one year post-trauma. Secondary fracture displacement occurred in 22.6%. Secondary surgery was performed in 6 cases (3.9%). Median hospitalisation length of stay was 21 days (range 0 to 112 days). There was no significant association between the subgroups and change in residential status (p = 0.65), complications during hospitalisation (p = 0.75), mortality rate during admission (p = 0.75) and at 1 year (p = 0.88), readmission within 30 days (p = 0.46) and need for secondary surgery (p = 0.2). There was a significant increased median length of stay (p = 0.011) and rate of secondary displacement (p = 0.015) in subgroup CTcp. Secondary displacement had no impact on in-hospital complications (p = 0.7) nor mortality rate during admission (p = 0.79) or at 1 year (0.77). Early CT in patients who underwent secondary surgery showed stable B2.1 lesions in 4 of 6 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that early CT in patients with conservatively treated acute LE-PFr in order to detect posterior lesions, has limited value in predicting failure of conservative treatment.

A systematic review regarding clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of surgical and non-surgical patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis

We conducted this systematic review to clarify the clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes of surgical and non-surgical patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP). We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and MEDLINE for English language articles on FFP. We calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) of surgical patients in comparison to non-surgical patients for clinical characteristics (Rommens FFP classification, age, sex, dementia, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and malignancy), complications (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, cardiac event, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, pressure ulcer, multiple organ failure, anemia caused by surgical bleeding, and surgical site infection), and outcomes (hospital mortality and one-year mortality). Five studies involving 1,090 patients with FFP (surgical patients, n = 432; non-surgical patients, n = 658) were included. FFP type III and IV (OR = 8.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.99 to 11.88; p<0.00001), a younger age (MD = -3.29; 95% CI -3.83 to -2.75; p<0.00001), the absence of dementia (OR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.57; p<0.0001), and the presence of osteoporosis (OR = 1.74; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.35; p = 0.0003) were significantly associated with the surgical patients. Urinary tract infection (OR = 2.06; 95% CI 1.37 to 3.10; p = 0.0005), anemia caused by surgical bleeding (OR = 4.55; 95% CI 1.95 to 10.62; p = 0.0005), and surgical site infection (OR = 16.74; 95% CI 3.05 to 91.87; p = 0.001) were significantly associated with the surgical patients. There were no significant differences in the outcomes between the surgical and non-surgical patients. Our findings may help to further understand the treatment strategy for FFP and improve clinical outcomes.

Internal fixation of radiation-induced fragility fractures of the pelvis: a case series

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for radiation-induced fragility fractures of the pelvis (RI-FFP) is not well evaluated due to the rarity of the condition.

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prevalence of RI-FFP, the radiological and clinical outcomes as well as the complications of patients treated with internal fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of our database was performed to identify all surgically treated patients with RI-FFP. Surgical stabilization was recommended for patients with FFP type III and FFP type IV. Surgical stabilization was also recommended after 5-7 days for patients with FFP type II in case of unsuccessful conservative treatment. Demographic data, fracture patterns according to the FFP classification of Rommens and Hofmann, type of treatment and surgery-related complications including nonunion, hardware failure, fracture progression (secondary fracture) or infection were documented.

RESULTS

Among 500 patients with FFP, the prevalence of patients with RI-FFP was 1% (5/500): 5 patients with a median age of 79 years (76-79). The median time interval from radiation to fracture was 18 months (18-24). All of them underwent internal fixation. Two patients experienced surgery-related complications, one due to hardware failure and one due to fracture progression. At median follow-up of 27 months, all fractures had healed. Patients reached a good level of mobility with a median Parker Mobility Score of 7 and suffered moderate pain with a median value of 2.5 on the numeric rating scale.

CONCLUSION

RI-FFP remains a rare injury (1%). In our experience, patients, who underwent surgical treatment, obtained a high level of mobility and a moderate pain score after 2 years of follow-up. Internal fixation can be recommended in RI-FFP. Because bone healing may be impaired due to previous irradiation, highly stable constructs are required to avoid fracture progression or revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective study.

Comparative outcome of different treatment options for fragility fractures of the sacrum

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures of the sacrum (FFS) have been detected more and more frequently in recent times, and the incidence will continue to increase due to increasing life expectancy. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of conservative, interventional and surgical treatment of FFS.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 292 patients (276 women, 16 men) with confirmed FFS were followed up over a period of 2 years. The age of the women was Ø 81.2 (58 - 99) and that of the men Ø 78.1 (76 - 85) years. The pain was quantified using a VAS. Fractures were classified in accordance with the Rommens and Hofmann and with the Denis classification using conventional X-rays, CT and MRI. A QCT of the lumbar spine was performed to quantify bone mineral density. Concomitant diseases of every patient were recorded. An interdisciplinary case conference determined the individual treatment concept considering the age, type of fracture, pain level and comorbidities with classification into conservative, interventional (any type of sacroplasty) or surgical treatment. Over the course pain and independence were measured, complications and patient satisfaction were documented. A vitamin D determination was done, and existing comorbidities were included.

RESULTS

Patients with a pain level of ≤5 benefited from the conservative therapy measures, with pain levels > 5 significantly delaying the development of mobility. After sacroplasty, the pain reduced significantly, which caused a rapid improvement in mobility without any significant difference being found between vertebro- (VSP), balloon (BSP), radiofrequency (RFS) and cement sacroplasty (CSP). In terms of pain reduction and mobilization, the surgical treated patients benefited from osteosynthesis, although more complex fracture types with lumbopelvic stabilization took longer. Overall, there were no deaths during the hospital stay. Mortality after 12 months was 21.7% for the conservative, 8.4% for the interventional and 13.6% for the surgical therapy group; the differences are significant. For patients in the conservative therapy group who were difficult to mobilize due to pain, the mortality increased to 24.3%. Over 24 months, patients achieved the best independence after sacroplasty. At 12 and 24 months, subjective satisfaction with the therapies was best after sacroplasty, followed by osteosynthesis and conservative measures. All patients had a pronounced vitamin D deficiency and manifest osteoporosis. Cardiovascular pathologies were the main concomitant diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with FFS with a low level of pain benefit from conservative therapy measures, whereby complications and mortality increase significantly in the case of persistent immobilizing pain. Patients with an unacceptable level of pain resulting from non-dislocated fractures benefit significantly from sacroplasty. Patients with unstable and displaced fractures (Rommens and Hofmann type III and IV) should be operated on promptly. Different techniques are available for sacroplasty and osteosynthesis, which lead to an improvement of independence and a reduction in mortality.

Perioperative outcome of minimally invasive stabilisation of bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum: a comparative study of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation versus spinopelvic fixation

PURPOSE

Pelvic fragility fractures have steadily risen over the past decades. The primary treatment goal is the fastest possible mobilisation. If conservative therapy fails, surgical fixation is a promising approach. This study compares the outcome of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation (BTS) and spinopelvic fixation (SP) as minimally invasive techniques for bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum (BFFS).

METHODS

We performed a prospective, non-randomised, case-controlled study. Patients were included if they remained bedridden due to pain despite conservative treatment. Group assignment depended on sacral anatomy and fracture type. The outcome was estimated by blood loss calculation, cut-seam time, fluoroscopy time, complications, duration of stay at the intensive/intermediate care unit (ICU/IMC), and total inpatient stay. The mobility level at discharge was recorded.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included (SP: 49, BTS: 24). There was no difference in blood loss (BTS: 461 ± 628 mL, SP: 509 ± 354 mL). BTS showed a significantly lower cut-seam time (72 ± 23 min) than SP (94 ± 27 min). Fluoroscopy time did not differ (BTS: 111 ± 61 s vs. 103 ± 45 s). Thirteen percent of BTS and 16% of SP patients required ICU/IMC stay (BTS: 0.6 ± 1.8 days, SP: 0.5 ± 1.5 days) during inpatient stay (BTS: 9 ± 4 days, SP: 8 ± 3 days). Fourteen patients suffered from urinary tract infections (BTS: 8%; SP: 25%). In-patient mortality was low (BTS: 4.2%, SP: 4.1%). At discharge, the BTS group was almost back to the initial mobility level. In SP patients, mobility was significantly lower than before complaints (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Both methods allow early mobilization of BFFS patients. Blood loss can be kept low. Hence, transfusion requirement is correspondingly low. The IMC/ICU and the total inpatient stay are lower than reported in the literature. Both BTS and SP can be recommended as safe and low-complication methods for use in BFFS patients. BTS is superior to SP with respect to surgery duration and level of mobility at discharge.

Mortality and functional outcomes of fragility fractures of the pelvis by fracture type with conservative treatment: a retrospective, multicenter TRON study

PURPOSE

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are becoming a commonly encountered disease in aging societies. We aimed to (1) clarify the overall survival rate of FFP, (2) compare survival rates by Rommens and Hofmann classification FFP type, (3) investigate the complications during hospitalization, and (4) investigate walking ability before and after injury depending on the type of fracture in patients with FFP treated conservatively.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study included 867 patients with FFP treated conservatively between 2014 and 2018 and excluded patients with insufficient follow-up for two years, lost data, and operative cases. This is a retrospective multicenter study. We established the database, which is named as TRON. We evaluated survival rate by fracture type using the log-rank test. We compared walking ability as defined by a new mobility score and the modified Majeed Pelvic Score among fracture types.

RESULTS

We reviewed 552 cases (98 males and 454 females) with conservative treatment. The overall survival rates of patients with FFP treated conservatively were 0.90 at 1 year and 0.83 at 2 years. Although the survival rate was the lowest in FFP Type III, there was no significant difference in survival rates between fracture types (P = 0.143). The rates of complications during hospitalization were high for both Type III and Type IV fractures. Walking ability post-injury was worse in the patients with Type III fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival rate of patients treated by conservative treatment was relatively good. Type III in the Rommens and Hofmann classification was related to lower life expectancy and loss of walking ability.

[Minimally invasive stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis with transsacral bar and retrograde transpubic screw]

OBJECTIVE

Stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) using a minimally invasive technique. Insertion of a transsacral rod into the transsacral corridor of S1. Insertion of a retrograde transpubic screw through the superior branch of the pubic bone.

INDICATIONS

Uni- or bilateral displaced fragility fractures of the sacrum or sacroiliac joint. Nondisplaced fractures of the sacrum or sacroiliac joint in case of nonsuccessful conservative treatment. Uni- or bilateral fractures of the superior branch of the pubic bone, which are present in combination with a posterior pelvic instability.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Fragility fractures of the pelvis, which can be successfully treated conservatively. Absence of transsacral corridor in sacral body S1. Major displacement, nonreducible fractures of the superior branch of the pubic bone. Soft tissue infection at insertion site of implants.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

The transsacral bar is inserted under fluoroscopic control from ilium to ilium through the transsacral corridor of the sacral body S1. The retrograde transpubic screw is inserted from the pubic tubercle through the superior branch of the pubic bone past the acetabulum into the body of the ilium.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

An early mobilization with weight bearing of both lower extremities as tolerated by the patient is allowed. Conventional radiographs for control of the position of the implants and fractures are taken after mobilization RESULTS: In all, 64 patients with FFP type II, FFP type III or FFP type IV were stabilized with a transacral bar osteosynthesis in the posterior pelvis. In 32 patients (50%), additional sacroiliac screws were inserted. In 29 patients (45.3%) the transsacral bar osteosynthesis was combined with a transpubic retrograde screw. Median length of hospital stay was 17.5 days. In all, 20 patients (31.3%) suffered general, 10 patients (15.6%) suffered surgery-related complications, and 41 patients (64.1%) were mobile in the room or on the ward at discharge. One-year mortality was 10.9%. The values of the SF‑8 Physical and Mental Component Scores, Parker Mobility Score and Numeric Rating Scale were moderate, yet comparable with the values of patients of the same age.

A computed tomography based survey study investigating the agreement of the therapeutic strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis

Treatment recommendations for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) have been provided along with the good reliable FFP classification but they are not proven in large studies and recent reports challenge these recommendations. Thus, we aimed to determine the usefulness of the FFP classification determining the treatment strategy and favored procedures in six level 1 trauma centers. Sixty cases of FFP were evaluated by six experienced pelvic surgeons, six inexperienced surgeons in training, and one surgeon trained by the originator of the FFP classification during three repeating sessions using computed tomography scans with multiplanar reconstruction. The intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability for therapeutic decisions (non-operative treatment vs. operative treatment) were moderate, with Fleiss kappa coefficients of 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44–0.62) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.34–0.49). We found a therapeutic disagreement predominantly for FFP II related to a preferred operative therapy for FFP II. Operative treated cases were generally treated with an anterior–posterior fixation. Despite the consensus on an anterior–posterior fixation, the chosen procedures are highly variable and most plausible based on the surgeon’s preference.

Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP)

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a clinical entity with an increasing significance in clinical practice. Little is known about the conditions, which influence decision making and outcome.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective assessment of selected parameters of patients, who were admitted with a FFP in a 2-year period. Fractures were classified in accordance with the Rommens and Hofmann classification. Living environment, level of autonomy (independent walking), type of treatment (conservative versus operative), type of surgical technique, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L), Short Form-8 Physical Component Score (SF-8 PCS) and Short Form-8 Mental Component Score (SF-8 MCS), Barthel Index, Parker Mobility Score (PMS) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) were collected at primary presentation (t1), at discharge (t2) and after 3 (t3) and 12 months (t4). Length of hospital stay, in-hospital complications, surgery-related complications, new osteoporotic fractures and mortality rate within the first year were also registered. The key factors influencing the choice of therapy and outcome were looked for.

RESULTS

110 patients, 99 women (90%) and 11 men (10%), were included in the study. Their mean age was 79.2 years (SD 10 years). Fourteen patients had FFP type I (12.7%), 59 FFP type II (53.6%), 11 FFP type III (10%) and 26 FFP type IV fractures (23.6%). All patients with FFP type I were treated conservatively. 48 patients with FFP types II-IV were treated conservatively and 48 operatively. Patients, who got a conservative outpatient treatment first and were hospitalized later, had higher FFP fracture types at admission. Operatively treated patients were hospitalized at a median of 33.5 days after the beginning of complaints, whereas the median day of admission of the conservative group was the day of trauma (p < 0.001). The operatively treated patients were hospitalized in a worse clinical condition (SF-8 PCS, EQ-5D-5L, autonomy). Length of stay (LoS) of operatively treated patients was significantly longer than of conservatively treated (p < 0.001). There was a tendency to more in-hospital complications in the operative group (p = 0.059). The rate of surgery-related complications (8.3%) was low with only one revision needed. Selected outcome parameters improved during the observation period nearly reaching the level before FFP after 1 year. SF-8 PCS, Barthel index and rate of patients living home were higher in the operative group at t4. The improvement of autonomy (independent walking) between t1 and t4 was significant in the operated group (p = 0.04) but not in the conservative group (p = 0.96). One-year mortality rate was 11.7% with no difference between the fracture types. One-year mortality rate of conservatively treated patients with FFP type II-IV was 13.5% versus 6.9% in the operative group (p = 0.38).

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment is appropriate in patients with FFP type I as well as in patients with FFP type II, provided that the last ones are hospitalized immediately after the traumatic event. Surgical treatment is recommended in patients with higher fracture types, with delayed presentation or after unsuccessful conservative treatment. In the conservative and operative group, all selected parameters considerably improved between t1 and t4 with a steeper increase in the operative group. The rate of postoperative complications is low. The 1-year mortality rate is the lowest in the operative group. Surgical stabilization of FFP is safe and reliable provided it is performed with care and in the appropriate target group.

Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis and Sacrum: Current Trends in Literature

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) and fragility fractures of the sacrum (FFS), which are emerging in the geriatric population, exhibit characteristics that differ from those of pelvic ring disruptions occurring in the younger population. Treatment of FFP/FFS by a multidisciplinary team can be helpful in reducing morbidity and mortality with the goal of reducing pain, regaining early mobility, and restoring independence for activities of daily living. Conservative treatment, including bed rest, pain therapy, and mobilization as tolerated, is indicated for treatment of FFP type I and type II as loss of stability is limited with these fractures. Operative treatment is indicated for FFP type II when conservative treatment has failed and for FFP type III and type IV, which are displaced fractures associated with intense pain and increased instability. Minimally invasive stabilization techniques, such as percutaneous fixation, are favored over open reduction internal fixation. There is little evidence regarding outcomes of patients with FFP/FFS and more literature is needed for determination of optimal management. The aim of this article is to provide a concise review of the current literature and a discussion of the latest recommendations for orthopedic treatment and management of FFP/FFS.

The FFP-classification: From eminence to evidence

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are a clinical entity with a rapidly growing incidence among elderly women. The characteristics of these fractures are different from those appearing after high-energy trauma. In 2013, the comprehensive FFP-classification provided a new framework for analysis of these fractures. It is based on the estimation of loss of stability in the pelvic ring. It is connected with recommendations for surgical treatment, justified by the fact that higher instabilities will need surgical stabilization. Since ist appearance, we can observe an increasing clinical-scientific interest in FFP. Multiple publications use the FFP-classification studying the characteristics of fractures, choice of treatment and outcome. Other studies focus on minimal-invasive techniques for stabilization. The actual knowledge describes higher mortality rates as the reference population, lower mortality rates after operative treatment but for the price of surgery-related complications. Mobility, independency and quality of life are worse than before the fracture, independent of the FFP-classification and the type of treatment. The classification triggered a rapid increase of expertise. This publication gives a detailed overview on the evolution from eminence to evidence.