1
|
Ciarambino T, Crispino P, Buono P, Giordano V, Trama U, Iodice V, Leoncini L, Giordano M. Efficacy and Safety of Vaccinations in Geriatric Patients: A Literature Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1412. [PMID: 37766089 PMCID: PMC10537287 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
With the progressive lengthening of the average age of the population, especially in some countries such as Italy, vaccination of the elderly is a fixed point on which most of the public health efforts are concentrating as epidemic infectious diseases, especially those of the winter, have a major impact on the progression of severe disease, hospitalization, and death. The protection of the elderly against acute infectious diseases should not only limit mortality but also have a positive impact on the fragility of these people in terms of less disability and fewer care needs. However, vaccination of the elderly population differs in efficacy and safety compared to that of other population categories since aging and the consequent loss of efficiency of the immune system lead to a reduction in the immunogenicity of vaccines without achieving a lasting antibody coverage. There are various strategies to avoid the failure of immunization by vaccines such as resorting to supplementary doses with adjuvant vaccines, increasing the dosage of the antigen used, or choosing to inoculate the serum relying on various routes of administration of the vaccine. Vaccination in the elderly is also an important factor in light of growing antibiotic resistance because it can indirectly contribute to combating antibiotic resistance, reducing theoretically the use of those agents. Furthermore, vaccination in old age reduces mortality from infectious diseases preventable with vaccines and reduces the same rate of resistance to antibiotics. Given the importance and complexity of the topic, in this review, we will deal with the main aspects of vaccination in the elderly and how it can influence mortality and healthcare costs, especially in those countries where population aging is more evident. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed to identify all types of studies published up to 31 May 2023 that examined the association between vaccination and the elderly. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers (PC and TC) who independently extracted the following data and assessed the quality of each study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiziana Ciarambino
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital of Marcianise, ASL Caserta, 81031 Caserta, Italy
- Direzione di Staff Direzione Generale Tutela per la Salute Regione Campania, 80143 Naples, Italy; (P.B.); (U.T.)
| | - Pietro Crispino
- Internal Medicine Department, Hospital of Latina, ASL Latina, 04100 Latina, Italy;
| | - Pietro Buono
- Direzione di Staff Direzione Generale Tutela per la Salute Regione Campania, 80143 Naples, Italy; (P.B.); (U.T.)
| | | | - Ugo Trama
- Direzione di Staff Direzione Generale Tutela per la Salute Regione Campania, 80143 Naples, Italy; (P.B.); (U.T.)
| | - Vincenzo Iodice
- ASL Caserta, Direttore Sanitario Aziendale, 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Laura Leoncini
- ASL Caserta, Direttore Sanitario, P.O. Marcianise, 81025 Marcianise, Italy
| | - Mauro Giordano
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Science, University of Campania, L. Vanvitelli, 81100 Naples, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stoffel ST, Schwenkglenks M, Mutschler T. General Practitioners' Awareness and Perception of Current Pneumococcal Vaccination for Adult Patients with Known Risk Factors in Switzerland: Evidence from a Survey. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1101. [PMID: 37376490 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In Switzerland, the National Immunization Advisory Group (NITAG) has formulated recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination among adult risk patients. Little is known about general practitioners' (GPs') perception, knowledge, and implementation of these recommendations. Therefore, we investigated GPs' awareness and drivers of and barriers to pneumococcal vaccination using a cross-sectional web-based survey of GPs. Of the 300 study participants, 81.3% were aware of the recommendations for vaccinating at-risk adult patients, but only 42.7% were aware of all risk groups. The recommendations were perceived by 79.7% as slightly to very complex. Most GPs (66.7%) had good arguments to convince patients to get vaccinated, but only 41.7% reported recognizing patients at risk for pneumococcal disease, and only 46.7% checked their patients' vaccination status and proposed vaccination if needed. The main reasons for not vaccinating were patients' refusal (80.1%), lack of reimbursement by the health insurance (34.5%), patients' fear of side effects (25.1%), and lack of regulatory approval despite the NITAG recommendations (23.7%). Most (77.3%) agreed that the treating chronic disease specialist should recommend the vaccination and 94.7% believed that adult-risk patients would not be aware of their need for pneumococcal vaccinations. Optimal implementation of the recommendations will require addressing knowledge gaps and reported barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro Tiziano Stoffel
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, London WC1E 6BT, UK
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Schwenkglenks
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine (ECPM), University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Janssens A, Vaes B, Abels C, Crèvecoeur J, Mamouris P, Merckx B, Libin P, Van Pottelbergh G, Neyens T. Pneumococcal vaccination coverage and adherence to recommended dosing schedules in adults: a repeated cross-sectional study of the INTEGO morbidity registry. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1104. [PMID: 37286969 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15939-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 2014, Belgium's Superior Health Council has recommended pneumococcal vaccination for adults aged 19-85 years at increased risk for pneumococcal diseases with a specific vaccine administration sequence and timing. Currently, Belgium has no publicly funded adult pneumococcal vaccination program. This study investigated the seasonal pneumococcal vaccination trends, evolution of vaccination coverage and adherence to the 2014 recommendations. METHODS INTEGO is a general practice morbidity registry in Flanders (Belgium) that represents 102 general practice centres and comprised over 300.000 patients in 2021. A repeated cross-sectional study was performed for the period between 2017 and 2021. Using adjusted odds ratios computed via multiple logistic regression, the association between an individual's characteristics (gender, age, comorbidities, influenza vaccination status and socioeconomic status) and schedule-adherent pneumococcal vaccination status was assessed. RESULTS Pneumococcal vaccination coincided with seasonal flu vaccination. The vaccination coverage in the population at risk decreased from 21% in 2017 to 18.2% in 2018 and then started to increase to 23.6% in 2021. Coverage in 2021 was highest for high-risk adults (33.8%) followed by 50- to 85-year-olds with comorbidities (25.5%) and healthy 65- to 85-year-olds (18.7%). In 2021, 56.3% of the high-risk adults, 74.6% of the 50+ with comorbidities persons, and 74% of the 65+ healthy persons had an adherent vaccination schedule. Persons with a lower socioeconomic status had an adjusted odds ratio of 0.92 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.87-0.97) for primary vaccination, 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.75) for adherence to the recommended second vaccination if the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine was administered first and 0.86 (95% CI 0.76-0.97) if the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine was administered first. CONCLUSION Pneumococcal vaccine coverage is slowly increasing in Flanders, displaying seasonal peaks in sync with influenza vaccination campaigns. However, with less than one-fourth of the target population vaccinated, less than 60% high-risk and approximately 74% of 50 + with comorbidities and 65+ healthy persons with an adherent schedule, there is still much room for improvement. Furthermore, adults with poor socioeconomic status had lower odds of primary vaccination and schedule adherence, demonstrating the need for a publicly funded program in Belgium to ensure equitable access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne Janssens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium.
| | - Bert Vaes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | | | - Jonas Crèvecoeur
- I-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Pavlos Mamouris
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | | | - Pieter Libin
- Interuniversity Institute of Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
- Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Computer Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Clinical and Epidemiological Virology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gijs Van Pottelbergh
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Centre of General Practice, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| | - Thomas Neyens
- I-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500, Hasselt, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, L-BioStat, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35, Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kühne F, Achtert K, Püschner F, Urbanski-Rini D, Schiller J, Mahar E, Friedrich J, Atwood M, Sprenger R, Vietri J, von Eiff C, Theilacker C. Cost-effectiveness of use of 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine among adults in Germany. Expert Rev Vaccines 2023; 22:921-932. [PMID: 37881844 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2262575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Despite national recommendations for use of pneumococcal vaccines, rates of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) remain high in Germany. New pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) with expanded coverage have the potential to reduce the pneumococcal disease burden among adults. METHODS Using a Markov model, we evaluated the lifetime outcomes/costs comparing 20-valent PCV (PCV20) with standard of care (SC) vaccinations for prevention of CAP and IPD among adults aged ≥60 years and at-risk adults aged 18-59 years in Germany. PCV20 also was compared with sequential vaccination with 15-valent PCV (PCV15) followed by PPSV23 in a scenario analysis. RESULTS Over the course of a lifetime (82 years), use of PCV20vs. SC would prevent 54,333 hospitalizations, 26368 outpatient CAP cases, 10946 disease-related deaths yield 74,694 additional life-years (LYs), while lowering total medical costs by 363.2 M €. PCV20 remained cost saving (i.e. dominant) versus SC even in numerous sensitivity analyses, including a sensitivity analysis assuming moderate effectiveness of the SC pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine against noninvasive pneumococcal CAP. In several scenario analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, PCV20 was also cost-saving compared toPCV15 PPSV23 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS One dose of PCV20 among adults aged ≥60 years and adults aged 18-59 years with moderate- and high-risk conditions wouldsubstantially reduce pneumococcal disease, save lives, and be cost saving compared with SC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katharina Achtert
- Private Institute for Applied Health Services Research (inav), Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Püschner
- Private Institute for Applied Health Services Research (inav), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Juliane Schiller
- Private Institute for Applied Health Services Research (inav), Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Mark Atwood
- Policy Analysis Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deb A, Podmore B, Barnett R, Beier D, Galetzka W, Qizilbash N, Haeckl D, Boellinger T, Johnson KD, Weiss T. Pneumococcal vaccination coverage in individuals (16-59 years) with a newly diagnosed risk condition in Germany. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:753. [PMID: 36171549 PMCID: PMC9517976 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07736-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite recommendations from the German Standing Committee on Vaccination (STIKO), pneumococcal vaccination coverage remains low in vulnerable populations. This study estimated the pneumococcal vaccination coverage rate (VCR) and timing among individuals aged 16–59 years in Germany who were recommended to receive pneumococcal vaccination, according to STIKO. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the German InGef database. Individuals aged 16 to 59 years diagnosed with at least one “at-risk” (chronic disease) or “high-risk” (e.g., immunocompromising) condition considered to be at-risk of pneumococcal infection were identified at the time of first diagnosis, between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018, and followed up until December 31, 2019. The percentage of cumulative pneumococcal VCR with 95% confidence interval (CI) was reported for each calendar year of follow-up. Results There were 334,292 individuals followed for a median of 2.38 (interquartile range (IQR) 1.63–3.13) person years. For individuals aged 16–59 years diagnosed with an incident risk condition in 2016, pneumococcal VCR increased from 0.44% (95% CI 0.41–0.48) in 2016 to 1.24% (95% CI 1.18–1.30) in 2019. In 2019, VCRs were higher in individuals with high-risk conditions compared with at-risk conditions (2.24% (95% CI 2.09–2.40) vs. 0.90% (95% CI 0.85–0.96)). In 2019, VCRs were higher in individuals aged 50 to 59 years compared with individuals aged 16 to 49 years (2.25% (95% CI 2.10–2.41) vs. 0.90% (95% CI 0.84–0.96)). Similar trends were observed in individuals with newly diagnosed risk conditions identified in 2017 and in 2018. Older age, influenza vaccination and increasing number of risk conditions increased the likelihood of pneumococcal vaccination. Median time to vaccination from diagnosis of the risk condition was shorter for high-risk conditions (369.5 days (IQR 155.8–702.0)) compared to at-risk conditions (435.5 days (IQR 196.3–758.8)). Conclusion Despite recommendations from STIKO, pneumococcal vaccination coverage remains very low and with long delays in vulnerable individuals aged 16–59 in Germany. Further efforts are required to increase immunization levels and shorten time to vaccination among individuals 16–59 years of age developing conditions with higher susceptibility to pneumococcal infection. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07736-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bélène Podmore
- OXON Epidemiology, London, UK.,London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Dominik Beier
- InGef-Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Galetzka
- InGef-Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nawab Qizilbash
- OXON Epidemiology, London, UK.,London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|