Prevention of venous thromboembolism

Comparing fondaparinux and low molecular weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality despite the availability of prophylactic medications. There has been a debate about which thromboprophylaxis medication, Fondaparinux or low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), is better after hip and knee arthroplasty. We have compared these two treatment regimens in our study. Electronic databases like PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect were searched from inception to August 2024. The weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes were pooled using the Review Manager software version 5.4.1, and a random effects model was employed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (ROB 2.0) were used to assess the quality of the included studies. Publication bias was evaluated visually through funnel plots and statistically through Egger's regression. GRADE assessment was used to analyze the certainty of evidence. A total of 17 studies, 9 Cohorts, and 8 Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) pooling a total of 74 499 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Fondaparinux showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of VTE [0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.48, 0.71]; P  < 0.00001; I2  = 36%] and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: [0.56, 1.00]; P  = 0.05; I2  = 68%) compared to LMWH. Major bleeding (RR = 2.06, 95% CI: [1.19, 3.57]; P  = 0.01; I2  = 43%), surgical site bleeding (RR = 1.67, 95% CI: [1.04, 2.66]; P  = 0.03; I2  = 9%), and postoperative transfusions (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: [1.02, 1.12]; P  = 0.004; I2  = 0%) were significantly higher in the Fondaparinux group. Symptomatic VTE, pulmonary embolism, mortality, and operating time showed no significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion, Fondaparinux is superior to LMWH in VTE and DVT prophylaxis. However, it is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding, surgical site bleeding, and postoperative transfusions.

Venous Thromboembolism Subsequent to the Management of Panfacial Fracture- A Clinical Paper and Review

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major factor responsible for death in patients suffering from prolonged immobilisation due to various causes like old age, pregnancy, stroke, and prolonged surgical procedures to mention a few. Long-duration surgeries as in fixation and reconstruction in panfacial fractures and facial orthognathic surgeries can be potential cases predisposed for VTE in maxillofacial surgery.

Method

A fifty-eight-year-old patient suffered from pulmonary thromboembolism following long-duration surgery for panfacial fracture fixation and reconstruction under general anaesthesia. He was promptly managed via medical management and recovered well.

Discussion

Pulmonary thromboembolism is a severe complication that can lead to severe morbidity or even death. Owing to the characteristics of venous thrombosis, all collaborating healthcare team members should be trained to assess risk factors for efficient diagnosis which can facilitate specialised intervention that can result in better patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Maxillofacial surgeons need to evaluate the risk of thromboembolism in patients and institute efficient diagnosis whenever required to deliver optimised and better patient care. Although thromboembolism is a preventable disease state, the key is to keep a close eye on the patient's clinical features to identify and treat them at the right time for better patient care and survival.

Direct factor Xa inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparins or vitamin K antagonists for prevention of venous thromboembolism in elective primary hip or knee replacement or hip fracture repair

BACKGROUND

People undergoing major orthopaedic surgery are at increased risk of postoperative thromboembolic events. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are recommended for thromboprophylaxis in this population. New oral anticoagulants, including direct factor Xa inhibitors, are recommended as alternatives. They may have more advantages than disadvantages compared to LMWHs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs, another type of anticoagulant).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of prophylactic anticoagulation with direct factor Xa inhibitors compared with low molecular weight heparins and vitamin K antagonists in people undergoing major orthopaedic surgery for elective total hip or knee replacement or hip fracture surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two other databases, and two trial registers to 11 November 2023. We conducted reference checks to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of direct factor Xa inhibitors to LMWHs or VKAs in people undergoing major orthopaedic surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, major venous thromboembolism (VTE), symptomatic VTE, major bleeding, and serious hepatic and non-hepatic adverse events. We evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies using Cochrane's risk of bias 1 tool. We calculated estimates of treatment effects using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and used GRADE criteria to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 53 RCTs (44,371 participants). Participants' average age was 64 years (range: 18 to 93 years). Only one RCT compared a VKA with direct factor Xa inhibitors. All 53 RCTs compared direct factor Xa inhibitors with LMWHs. Twenty-three studies included participants undergoing total hip replacement; 21 studies, total knee replacement; and three studies included people having hip fracture surgery. The studies' average duration was approximately 42 days (range: two to 720 days). Compared to LMWHs, direct factor Xa inhibitors may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.31; I2 = 0%; 28 studies, 29,698 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Direct factor Xa inhibitors may make little to no difference to major venous thromboembolic events compared to LMWHs, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.71; absolute risk difference: 12 fewer major VTE events per 1000 participants, 95% CI 16 fewer to 7 fewer; I2 = 48%; 28 studies, 24,574 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Compared to LMWHs, direct factor Xa inhibitors may reduce symptomatic VTE (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.83; I2 = 0%; 33 studies, 31,670 participants; low-certainty evidence). The absolute benefit of substituting factor Xa inhibitors for LMWHs may be between two and five fewer symptomatic VTE episodes per 1000 patients. In the meta-analysis with all studies pooled, direct factor Xa inhibitors appeared to make little or no difference to major bleeding compared to LMWHs, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.30; I2 = 15%; 36 studies, 39,778 participants; very low certainty-evidence). • In a subgroup analysis limited to studies comparing rivaroxaban to LMWHs, people given rivaroxaban may have had more major bleeding events (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.98; I2 = 0%; 17 studies, 17,630 participants; low-certainty evidence). The absolute risk of substituting rivaroxaban for LMWH may be between one and seven more major bleeding events per 1000 patients. • In a subgroup analysis limited to studies comparing direct factor Xa inhibitors other than rivaroxaban to LMWHs, people given these other direct factor Xa inhibitors may have had fewer major bleeding events, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.02; absolute risk difference: 3 fewer major bleeding events per 1000 participants, 95% CI 5 fewer to 0 fewer; I2 = 0%; 19 studies, 22,148 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Direct factor Xa inhibitors may make little to no difference in serious hepatic adverse events compared to LMWHs, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 3.01, 95% CI 0.12 to 73.93; 2 studies, 3169 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Only two studies reported this outcome, with one death in the intervention group due to hepatitis reported in one study, and no events reported in the other study. People given direct factor Xa inhibitors may have a lower risk of serious non-hepatic adverse events than those given LMWHs (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.97; I2 = 18%; 15 studies, 26,246 participants; low-certainty evidence). The absolute benefit of substituting factor Xa inhibitors for LMWH may be between three and 14 fewer serious non-hepatic adverse events per 1000 patients. Only one study compared a direct factor Xa inhibitor with a VKA. It reported outcome data with imprecise results due to the small number of events. It showed no difference in the effects of the study drugs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors may have little to no effect on all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors may slightly reduce symptomatic VTE events when compared with LMWH. They may make little or no difference to major VTE events, but the evidence is very uncertain. In the evaluation of major bleeding, the evidence suggests rivaroxaban results in a slight increase in major bleeding events compared to LMWHs. The remaining oral direct factor Xa inhibitors may have little to no effect on major bleeding, but the evidence is very uncertain. Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors may reduce serious non-hepatic adverse events slightly compared to LMWHs. They may have little to no effect on serious hepatic adverse events, but the evidence is very uncertain. Due to the high rates of missing participants and selective outcome reporting, the effect estimates may be biased.

Theatre Safety Club 2024

The Theatre Safety Club 2024 took place on 6 November in London and on 26 November in Newcastle. The CPDcertified event aimed to educate and provide insight into safety in the operating theatre, boasting an impressive line-up of speakers and sessions that were well attended. The conference was sponsored by Cardinal Health, a leading healthcare company providing value-based product solutions, with a comprehensive portfolio covering mechanical thromboprophylaxis, nutritional insufficiency solutions, thermometry and surgical gloves.

Examining the controversies in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for vascular surgery patients: A critical review

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant concern in vascular surgery due to its potentially severe consequences. Effective prophylactic measures are essential to minimize the risks associated with VTE. However, considerable controversy remains regarding the optimal strategies for VTE prevention in patients undergoing vascular procedures.

METHODS

This review critically analyzes key clinical research, guidelines, and expert opinions to explore the advantages and limitations of various VTE prophylaxis approaches. The pharmacological and mechanical methods are explored, with a focus on balancing the risk of VTE against the potential for bleeding complications, particularly in high-risk patients.

RESULTS

The review addresses controversial issues such as the choice of anticoagulants, dosage, timing, and duration of prophylaxis. The lack of consensus in existing guidelines and the variability in clinical practice regarding VTE prevention in vascular surgery patients is highlighted. The role of patient-specific risk factors, including the use of intraoperative anticoagulation and bleeding risks, is also examined.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a comprehensive evaluation of VTE prophylaxis strategies in vascular surgery, emphasizing the need for individualized, evidence-based approaches. Clarifying these controversies is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing both thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.

The effects of young and aged, male and female megakaryocyte conditioned media on angiogenic properties of endothelial cells

With aging, the risk of fractures and compromised healing increases. Angiogenesis plays a significant role in bone healing and is impaired with aging. We have previously shown the impact of megakaryocytes (MKs) in regulating bone healing. Notably, MKs produce factors known to promote angiogenesis. We examined the effects of conditioned media (CM) generated from MKs derived from young (3-4-month-old) and aged (22-24-month-old), male and female C57BL/6J mice on bone marrow endothelial cell (BMEC) growth and function. Female MK CM, regardless of age, caused a >65% increase in BMEC proliferation and improved vessel formation by >115%. Likewise, young male MK CM increased vessel formation by 160%. Although aged male MK CM resulted in >150% increases in the formation of vascular nodes and meshes, 62% fewer vessels formed compared to young male MK CM treatment. Aged female MK CM improved migration by over 2500%. However, aged female and male MK CM caused less wound closure. MK CM treatments also significantly altered the expression of several genes including PDGFRβ, CXCR4, and CD36 relative to controls and between ages. Further testing of mechanisms responsible for age-associated differences may allow for novel strategies to improve MK-mediated angiogenesis and bone healing, particularly within the aging population.

Adequacy of Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis After Gastrointestinal Surgery in a Sudanese Teaching Hospital: A Prospective Audit

Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a condition that occurs when a blood clot forms in a vein. VTE includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Regular monitoring and risk assessment are crucial for effectively using VTE prevention measures. This study aimed to evaluate the practices related to VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis within our surgical unit in a Sudanese teaching hospital. Methods This study was conducted at Alnao teaching hospital and was comprised of two cycles. It examined adult patients who underwent gastrointestinal operations. Data from medical records including age, sex, type of operation, whether VTE and bleeding risk assessments were performed, whether pharmacological or mechanical prophylaxis was administered, and any contraindications to VTE prophylaxis. The practice of VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis prescription was compared to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis. Following cycle one, regular educational sessions were conducted for medical staff, emphasizing the need for improved practices in assessing the risk of VTE and prophylaxis prescription. Results 32 patients in cycle one and 29 patients in cycle two were included. VTE and bleeding risks were assessed in 0/32 (0.00%) of patients in cycle one compared to 29/29 (100%) in cycle two. In cycle one, 0/32 (0.00%) patients were given VTE prophylaxis according to the guidelines. This practice improved to 17/29 (58.6%) in cycle two. Conclusion The audit highlights the role of organized methods and education in improving adherence to VTE prophylaxis guidelines. Targeted interventions like educational sessions and risk assessment tools led to significant practice improvements, particularly in low-resource settings. Continuous auditing and training are essential for maintaining and enhancing compliance with VTE prophylaxis standards.

Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolic complications using pneumatic compression cuffs in oral cancer patients in maxillofacial surgery

OBJECTIVES

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is still considered to be a significant medical issue. Physical measures to prevent perioperative venous thrombosis include early mobilization and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether IPC can reduce the incidence of postoperative thromboembolic events in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing maxillofacial surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 2020 and May 2021, 75 patients with OSCC who did not receive perioperative prophylaxis using IPC were retrospectively examined to determine the occurrence of postoperative thromboembolism. Accordingly, 79 patients who received perioperative thrombosis prophylaxis using an IPC system as part of surgical tumor therapy from May 2021 to September 2023 were included in the study. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of postoperative thromboembolism.

RESULTS

In the control group without IPC, thromboembolic events were observed in five out of 75 patients during postoperative hospitalization. In the intervention group, no thromboembolic occurrences were identified among the 79 patients studied (p = 0.02). The mean Caprini score in the control group was 7.72, whereas in the intervention group it averaged 8.30 (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of IPC-devices as supplementary perioperative thrombosis prophylaxis resulted in a notable decrease in postoperative venous thromboembolism (Number Needed to Treat = 15), which is why implementation of the system as a regular part of the clinical routine for perioperative management of OSCC patients can be considered a sensible approach.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of IPC enhances patient outcomes and may lead to improved postoperative care protocols in this high-risk patient population.

Risk Stratification and Management of Intermediate- and High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of mortality. Not only is PE associated with short-term mortality, but up to ~20% of patients might suffer from long-term consequences such as post-PE syndrome and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Current risk stratification tools poorly predict those who are at risk for short-term deterioration and those who develop long-term consequences. Traditionally, systemic thrombolysis has been considered the first-line therapy for patients with high-risk PE without contraindications; however, it comes with the risk of major bleeding (notably intracranial hemorrhage). The use of catheter-directed interventions (embolectomy or thrombolysis) has been increasing owing to their low bleeding risk; however, randomized trial data supporting their efficacy in improving clinical outcomes are limited. In this review, we highlight the evidence supporting the available advanced therapies for high- and intermediate-risk PE and summarize the ongoing trials which are evaluating these therapies.

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis Among Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the major and potentially life-threatening complications following major orthopedic surgeries. Research evidence comparing the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis specific to total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been limited. Hence, this review was done to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban against enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search in databases including Medline, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library from inception until May 2021. Randomized controlled trials directly comparing the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis among patients undergoing THA were eligible for inclusion. Outcome parameters assessed were efficacy in terms of total VTE and all-cause mortality, major VTE, deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, and safety in terms of major bleeding events, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, minor bleeding events, total bleeding events, drug-related adverse events, and wound infection. We performed a meta-analysis with a random effects model and reported a pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Eleven studies, including 9057 participants, were analyzed. Amongst efficacy outcomes, VTE and all-cause mortality pooled an RR of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34-0.99), major VTE pooled an RR of 0.37 (95% CI: 0.15-0.90), deep vein thrombosis pooled an RR of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.32-1.02), and symptomatic VTE pooled an RR of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.30-0.87). Amongst safety outcomes, major bleeding events pooled an RR of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.80), total bleeding events pooled an RR of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.93-1.34), drug-related adverse event pooled an RR of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.87-1.12), and wound infection pooled an RR of 1.11 (95% CI: 0.58-2.14).

CONCLUSION

Rivaroxaban is a more efficacious drug in terms of VTE and all-cause mortality compared to enoxaparin following THA, and rivaroxaban was non-inferior in terms of safety profiles such as wound infection, bleeding, and drug-related adverse events.

Antithrombotic prophylaxis following total knee arthroplasty: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major concern following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal pharmacological prophylaxis remains, however, controversial. The present investigation compared several non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants commonly employed as VTE prophylaxis following TKA. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare apixaban, aspirin, dabigatran, edoxaban, enoxaparin, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban. The outcomes of interest were to compare the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and major and minor haemorrhages.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-Analyses of Health Care Interventions. In March 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were accessed with no time constraints. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more drugs for the prevention of VTE following TKA were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

Data from 29,678 patients were collected. Of them, 67% (19,884 of 29,678 patients) were women. The mean age of the patients was 66.8 ± 2.8 years, and the mean BMI was 29.2 ± 1.5 kg/m2. There was comparability in age, sex, and BMI at baseline. Apixaban 5 mg, dabigatran 220 mg, and rivaroxaban 10 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of DVT. Apixaban 5 mg, enoxaparin 60 mg, and rivaroxaban 40 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of PE. Apixaban 5 mg, rivaroxaban 10 mg, and apixaban 10 mg were associated with the lowest rate of major haemorrhages. Apixaban 5 mg and 20 mg, and dabigatran 220 mg were associated with the lowest rate of minor haemorrhages.

CONCLUSION

Administration of apixaban 5 mg demonstrated the best balance between VTE prevention and haemorrhage control following TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, network meta-analysis of RCTs.

The effect of intraoperative intermittent pneumatic compression on deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing elective craniotomy

Objective

Postoperative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is commonly observed in patients undergoing craniotomy and is associated with a high incidence of pulmonary embolism and poor clinical outcomes. Herein, we investigated the prophylactic effect of DVT of intraoperative intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) in patients undergoing craniotomy.

Methods

A total of 516 patients who underwent elective craniotomy between December 2021 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group (received intraoperative IPC) or control group (without IPC). Lower extremity ultrasound was performed on both legs before and after surgery (1 h, 24 h, and 7 days post-intervention). DVT was defined as the visualization of a thrombus within the vein lumen of the leg. Coagulation and platelet function were measured at the start and end of the craniotomy.

Results

A total of 504 patients (251 in the intervention group and 253 in the control group) completed the study. Among these patients, 20.4% (103/504) developed postoperative DVT within the first week after surgery, with 16.7% occurring within 24 h. The incidence of postoperative DVT in the intervention group (9.6%, 24/251) was significantly lower than that in the control group (22.9%, 58/253, p < 0.001). Intraoperative IPC reduced the risk of DVT by 64.6% (0.354, 95% CI, 0.223-0.564, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in coagulation and platelet function between the two groups (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

DVT may develop within 24 h after the craniotomy. Intraoperative application of IPC reduces the incidence of postoperative DVT.

Venous Thromboembolism after DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Review of Outcomes after a Postoperative Prophylaxis Protocol

BACKGROUND

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is among the higher-risk patient groups for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in plastic surgery. Surgeons often opt for a patient-specific approach to postoperative anticoagulation, and the field has yet to come to a consensus on VTE chemoprophylaxis regimens.

METHODS

A new chemoprophylaxis protocol was introduced starting in March of 2019 that involved 2 weeks of treatment with enoxaparin, regardless of patient risk factors. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction at the authors' institution between January of 2014 and March of 2020. Patients were grouped based on whether they enrolled in the new VTE protocol in the postoperative period or not. Patient demographics, prophylaxis type, and outcomes data were recorded, retrospectively. The primary outcome measure was postoperative VTE incidence.

RESULTS

Risk of VTE was significantly higher in patients discharged without VTE prophylaxis compared with patients discharged with prophylaxis (3.7% versus 0%; P = 0.03). Notably, zero patients in the VTE prophylaxis group developed a deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. In addition, the risk of a VTE event was 25 times greater in patients with a Caprini score greater than or equal to 6 ( P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

The authors demonstrate the successful implementation of a 2-week VTE chemoprophylaxis protocol in DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients that significantly reduces the rate of VTE while not affecting the rate of hematoma complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Availability in ECMO Reduces the Failure to Rescue in Patients With Pulmonary Embolism After Major Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis of 2.4 Million Cases

Objective

Postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, which can be treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy, a novel therapy option for acute cardiorespiratory failure. We postulate that hospitals with ECMO availability have more experienced staff, technical capabilities, and expertise in treating cardiorespiratory failure.

Design

A retrospective analysis of surgical procedures in Germany between 2012 and 2019 was performed using hospital billing data. High-risk surgical procedures for postoperative PE were analyzed according to the availability of and expertise in ECMO therapy and its effect on outcome, regardless of whether ECMO was used in patients with PE.

Methods

Descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses were applied to identify possible associations and correct for confounding factors (complications, complication management, and mortality).

Results

A total of 13,976,606 surgical procedures were analyzed, of which 2,407,805 were defined as high-risk surgeries. The overall failure to rescue (FtR) rate was 24.4% and increased significantly with patient age, as well as type of surgery. The availability of and experience in ECMO therapy (defined as at least 20 ECMO applications per year; ECMO centers) are associated with a significantly reduced FtR in patients with PE after high-risk surgical procedures. In a multivariate analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for FtR after postoperative PE was significantly lower in ECMO centers (OR, 0.75 [0.70-0.81], P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The availability of and expertise in ECMO therapy lead to a significantly reduced FtR rate of postoperative PE. This improved outcome is independent of the use of ECMO in these patients.

Traumatic lower extremity amputation as a risk factor for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate whether lower extremity (LE) amputation among civilian casualties is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

All patients with severe LE injuries (AIS ≥3) derived from the ACS-TQIP (2013-2020) were divided into those who underwent trauma-associated amputation and those with limb salvage. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias and confounding and compare the rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

RESULTS

A total of 145,667 patients with severe LE injuries were included, with 3443 patients requiring LE amputation. After successful matching, patients sustaining LE amputation still experienced significantly higher rates of PE (4.2% vs. 2.5%, p ​< ​0.001) and DVT (6.5% vs. 3.4%, p ​< ​0.001). A sensitivity analysis examining patients with isolated major LE trauma similarly showed a higher rate of thromboembolic complications, including higher incidences of PE (3.2% vs. 2.0%, p ​= ​0.015) and DVT (4.7% vs. 2.6%, p ​< ​0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide analysis, traumatic lower extremity amputation is associated with a significantly higher risk of VTE events, including PE and DVT.

Venous thromboembolic outcomes in patients with lymphedema and lipedema: An analysis from the National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Patients with lymphedema and lipedema share physical exam findings that may lead to misdiagnosis. Poor mobility is common in patients with obesity and patients with lymphedema and lipedema. This may constitute a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Our objective was to evaluate the association of VTE in obese patients with lymphedema and lipedema.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was searched from 2016 to 2020 to identify hospital admissions of obese female patients with lymphedema and lipedema. Patients were analyzed in the context of presence or absence of VTE while adjusting for complex cluster sampling techniques. Predictors of VTE were accessed by multivariable regression.

RESULTS

Lymphedema was identified in 189,985 patients and lipedema in 50,645 patients. VTE was observed in 3.12% (n = 374,210) of patients with obesity. In patients with obesity, VTE was more common in patients with lymphedema than without (2.6% vs 1.6%; p < 0.01). Similarly, VTE was more common in patients with lipedema than without (0.6% vs 0.4%; p < 0.01). After multivariable logistic regression, VTE events in obese patients with lymphedema were higher versus without (OR 1.6; CI 1.08-2.43; p = 0.02). Similarly, VTE events were more common in obese patients with lipedema versus obese patients without lipedema (OR 1.20; CI 1.03-1.41; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In this hypothesis-generating study, lymphedema and lipedema show a positive association with VTE after adjusting for baseline patient characteristics such as obesity, which is a known independent risk factor for VTE. Mechanisms whereby lymphedema and lipedema are associated with VTE should be investigated.

Antithrombotic prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several clinical investigations have compared different pharmacologic agents for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, no consensus has been reached. The present investigation compared enoxaparin, fondaparinux, aspirin and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) commonly used as prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty (THA). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed, setting as outcomes of interest the rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and major and minor haemorrhages.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of healthcare interventions. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two or more drugs used for the prophylaxis of VTE following THA were accessed. PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were accessed in March 2023 with no time constraint.

RESULTS

Data from 31,705 patients were extracted. Of these, 62% (19,824) were women, with age, sex ratio, and body mass index (BMI) being comparable at baseline. Apixaban 5 mg, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban 60 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of DVT. Dabigatran 220 mg, apixaban 5 mg, and aspirin 100 mg were the most effective in reducing the rate of PE. Apixaban 5 mg, ximelagatran 2 mg and aspirin 100 mg were associated with the lowest rate of major haemorrhages, while rivaroxaban 2.5 mg, apixaban 5 mg and enoxaparin 40 mg were associated with the lowest rate of minor haemorrhages.

CONCLUSION

Administration of apixaban 5 mg demonstrated the best balance between VTE prevention and haemorrhage control following THA. Level of evidence Level I, network meta-analysis of RCTs.

Association Between Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and the Incidence of Thromboembolism Following Orthopedic Procedures: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant concern following orthopedic procedures, necessitating effective prophylactic measures. The rates of VTE prophylaxis, however, vary widely between institutions and nations, falling between 13% and 70% on average. In the absence of adequate thromboprophylaxis, pulmonary embolism, which accounts for 5% to 10% of mortality in hospitalized patients, is one of the leading causes of death. This study investigates the relationship between VTE prophylaxis and thromboembolism incidence, considering patient characteristics, risk assessment completion, anticoagulant prescription, and weight-bearing status.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the knowledge gap by examining the relationship between VTE prevention and the prevalence of thromboembolism also to examine the anticoagulant prescription trends for patients being discharged from orthopedic operations and to investigate the connection between post-procedure weight-bearing status and the development of VTE problems.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective, cross-sectional design was employed, analyzing 200 orthopedic procedure patients from January to June of 2023 performed at Rehman Medical Institute. After getting ethical approval from the institutional ethical approval board, data were collected on the basis of variables encompassing patient attributes, surgery details, VTE risk factors, prophylaxis type, and VTE complications. Data was entered and analyzed via IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), and the data were run through various tests including descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and chi-square. Results were then presented in the form of a table.

RESULTS

Among 200 individuals 24 individuals experienced VTE, while 176 did not. Significant gender-based VTE differences were observed (p = 0.01). Hypertension (HTN) showed a significant association (p = 0.04) with VTE. Major surgeries were correlated with higher VTE incidence (p = 0.03). Pharmacological prophylaxis reduced the occurrence of VTE (p = 0.01). Early mobilization and Ted stockings were correlated with lower VTE incidence (p = 0.04, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

This study reveals gender-specific VTE differences, emphasizes the role of HTN, surgical nature, and prophylaxis in VTE incidence, and supports tailored prophylactic strategies. Our findings align with previous research and emphasize the significance of tailored prophylaxis strategies. By examining multiple factors, including gender, co-morbidities, surgical characteristics, and prophylactic methods, our study contributes to the evidence base that supports clinical decision-making and enhances patient safety in orthopedic surgery.

Nomogram model combined thrombelastography for venous thromboembolism risk in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery

Background: The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram model in combination with thromboelastography (TEG) to predict the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after lung cancer surgery. Methods: The data of 502 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lung cancer from December 2020 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were then randomized into training and validation groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out in the training group and independent risk factors were included in the nomogram to construct risk prediction models. The predictive capability of the model was assessed by the consistency index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), the calibration plot and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The nomogram risk prediction model comprised of the following five independent risk factors: age, operation time, forced expiratory volume in one second and postoperative TEG parameters k value(K) and reaction time(R). The nomogram model demonstrated better predictive power than the modified Caprini model, with the C-index being greater. The calibration curve verified the consistency of nomogram between the two groups. Furthermore, DCA demonstrated the clinical value and potential for practical application of the nomogram. Conclusion: This study is the first to combine TEG and clinical risk factors to construct a nomogram to predict the occurrence of VTE in patients after lung cancer surgery. This model provides a simple and user-friendly method to assess the probability of VTE in postoperative lung cancer patients, enabling clinicians to develop individualized preventive anticoagulation strategies to reduce the incidence of such complications.

Prevalence and factors related with venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to the critical care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Venous thromboembolism is one of the most common cardiovascular disorders in the any intensive care units (ICUs), which annually leads to death and imposes great costs on patients and society worldwide. The present study was conducted with the aim of determining the prevalence and factors related to venous thromboembolism in the ICUs as a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The current study was conducted in international databases, on all descriptive and analytical studies and clinical and semi-experimental trial studies, without time limit until November 2, 2021. The present study was designed and implemented based on PRISMA guideline. The quality of the studies was checked using STROBE checklist and meta-analysis was performed using CMA software.

RESULTS

Among the 3204 articles found, after the evaluations, 189 articles entered the full text review phase, and as a result, 38 articles were included in the study. The reported prevalence of thromboembolism was 1-45%. The prevalence of venous thromboembolism was 12% in overall. The chance of venous thromboembolism was higher in ICUs patients >57 years old and ICUs patients with a history of venous thromboembolism.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that venous thromboembolism has a higher prevalence in ICUs patients in comparison to non-ICUs patients. It is recommended to nurses and healthcare staffs to provide accurate decision and care for prevention of venous thromboembolism and paying attention to the patient's warning signs, timely administration of anticoagulants, and monitor coagulation factors.

Biosimilar versus branded enoxaparin to prevent postoperative venous thromboembolism after surgery for digestive tract cancer: Randomized trial

Cancer and/or major surgery are two factors that predispose to post-operative thrombosis. The annual incidence of venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) in cancer patients was estimated at 0.5%-20%. Surgery increases the risk of VTED by 29% in the absence of thromboprophylaxis. Enoxaparin is a low molecular weight heparin that is safe and effective. Branded Enoxaparin and biosimilar Enoxaparin are two enoxaparin treatments. This study aimed to compare Branded Enoxaparin with biosimilar Enoxaparin in patients operated on for digestive cancer regarding the prevention of postoperative thrombosis event, to compare the tolerance of the two treatments and to identify independent predictive factors of thromboembolic incident. A randomized controlled trial conducted in a single-centre, surgical department B of Charles Nicolle Hospital, over a 5-year period from October 12th, 2015, to July 08th, 2020. We included all patients over 18 who had cancer of the digestive tract newly diagnosed, operable and whatever its nature, site, or stage, operated on in emergency or elective surgery. The primary endpoint was any asymptomatic thromboembolic event, demonstrated by systematic US Doppler of the lower limbs on postoperative day 7 to day 10. The sonographer was unaware of the prescribed treatment (Branded Enoxaparin [BE] or biosimilar Enoxaparin [BSE]). Of one hundred sixty-eight enrolled patients, six patients (4.1%) had subclinical venous thrombosis. Among those who had subclinical thrombosis, four patients (5.6%) were in the Branded Enoxaparin group and two patients (2.7%) in the Biosimilar Enoxaparin group without statistically significant difference (p = 0.435). Analysis of the difference in means using Student's t test demonstrated the equivalence of the two treatments. Our study allowed us to conclude that there was no statistically significant difference between Branded Enoxaparin and Biosimilar Enoxaparin regarding the occurrence of thromboembolic accidents postoperatively. BE and BSE are equivalent. Trial registration. Trial registration: The trial was registered on CLINICALTRIALS.GOV under the number NCT02444572.

Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis Adherence Rates After Major Cancer Surgery

Importance

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major source of preventable morbidity and mortality and is a leading cause of death in the US after cancer surgery. Previous research demonstrated variability in VTE chemoprophylaxis prescribing, although it is unknown how these rates compare with performance in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

Objective

To determine VTE rates after cancer surgery, as well as rates of inpatient and outpatient (posthospital discharge) chemoprophylaxis adherence within the VHA.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study within 101 hospitals of the VHA health system included patients aged 41 years or older without preexisting bleeding disorders or anticoagulation usage who underwent surgical treatment for cancer with general surgery, thoracic surgery, or urology between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022. The VHA Corporate Data Warehouse, Pharmacy Benefits Management database, and the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were used to identify eligible patients. Data analysis was conducted between January 2022 and July 2023.

Exposures

Inpatient surgery for cancer with general surgery, thoracic surgery, or urology.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rates of postoperative VTE events within 30 days of surgery and VTE chemoprophylaxis adherence were determined. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine incidence-rate ratios of inpatient and postdischarge chemoprophylaxis adherence by surgical specialty.

Results

Overall, 30 039 veterans (median [IQR] age, 67 [62-71] years; 29 386 men [97.8%]; 7771 African American or Black patients [25.9%]) who underwent surgery for cancer and were at highest risk for VTE were included. The overall postoperative VTE rate was 1.3% (385 patients) with 199 patients (0.7%) receiving a diagnosis during inpatient hospitalization and 186 patients (0.6%) receiving a diagnosis postdischarge. Inpatient chemoprophylaxis was ordered for 24 139 patients (80.4%). Inpatient chemoprophylaxis ordering rates were highest for patients who underwent procedures with general surgery (10 102 of 10 301 patients [98.1%]) and lowest for patients who underwent procedures with urology (11 471 of 17 089 patients [67.1%]). Overall, 3142 patients (10.5%) received postdischarge chemoprophylaxis, with notable variation by specialty.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings indicate the overall VTE rate after cancer surgery within the VHA is low, VHA inpatient chemoprophylaxis rates are high, and postdischarge VTE chemoprophylaxis prescribing is similar to that of non-VHA health systems. Specialty and procedure variation exists for chemoprophylaxis and may be justified given the low risks of overall and postdischarge VTE.

Risk of venous thromboembolism or hemorrhage among individuals with chronic kidney disease on prophylactic anticoagulant after hip or knee arthroplasty

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) confers a high risk of thrombosis and bleeding. However, little evidence exists regarding the optimal choice of postoperative thromboprophylaxis in these patients. We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study among adults ≥66 years old with CKD undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty who had filled an outpatient prophylactic anticoagulant prescription between 2010 and 2020 in Ontario, Canada. The primary outcomes of venous thrombosis (VTE) and hemorrhage were identified by validated algorithms using relevant diagnoses and billing codes. Overlap-weighted cause-specific Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) on the 90-day risk of VTE and hemorrhage compared with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). A total of 27  645 patients were prescribed DOAC (N = 22  943) or LMWH (N = 4702) after arthroplasty. Rivaroxaban was the predominant DOAC (94.5%), while LMWH mainly included enoxaparin (67%) and dalteparin (31.5%). DOAC users had higher eGFRs, fewer co-morbidities, and surgery in more recent years compared to LMWH users. After weighing, DOAC (compared with LMWH) was associated with a lower risk of VTE (DOAC: 1.5% vs. LMWH: 2.1%, weighted hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.94) and a higher risk of hemorrhage (DOAC: 1.3% vs. LMWH: 1.0%, weighted HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-1.99). Additional analyses including a more stringent VTE defining algorithm, different eGFR cut-offs, and limiting to rivaroxaban and enoxaparin showed consistent findings. Among elderly adults with CKD, DOAC was associated with a lower VTE risk and a higher hemorrhage risk compared to LMWH following hip or knee arthroplasty.

Just What the Doctor Ordered: Missed Ordering of Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis Is Associated With Increased VTE Events in High-risk General Surgery Patients

OBJECTIVE

To define the impact of missed ordering of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis in high-risk general surgery populations.

BACKGROUND

The primary cause of preventable death in surgical patients is VTE. Although guidelines and validated risk calculators assist in dosing recommendations, there remains considerable variability in ordering and adherence to recommended dosing.

METHODS

All adult inpatients who underwent a general surgery procedure between 2016 and 2019 and were entered into Atrium Health National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry were identified. Patients at high risk for VTE (2010 Caprini score ≥5) and without bleeding history and/or acute renal failure were included. Primary outcome was 30-day postoperative VTE. Electronic medical record identified compliance with "perfect" VTE chemoprophylaxis orders (pVTE): no missed orders and no inadequate dose ordering. Multivariable analysis examined association between pVTE and 30-day VTE events.

RESULTS

A total of 19,578 patients were identified of which 4252 were high-risk inpatients. Hospital compliance of pVTE was present in 32.4%. pVTE was associated with shorter postoperative length of stay and lower perioperative red blood cell transfusions. There was 50% reduced odds of 30-day VTE event with pVTE (odds ratio: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.30-0.80) and 55% reduction in VTE event/mortality (odds ratio: 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.63). After controlling for relevant covariates, pVTE remained significantly associated with decreased odds of VTE event and VTE event/mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

pVTE ordering in high-risk general surgery patients was associated with 42% reduction in odds of postoperative 30-day VTE. Comprehending factors contributing to missed or suboptimal ordering and development of quality improvement strategies to reduce them are critical to improving outcomes.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Major Orthopedic Surgeries and Factor XIa Inhibitors

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), poses a significant risk during and after hospitalization, particularly for surgical patients. Among various patient groups, those undergoing major orthopedic surgeries are considered to have a higher susceptibility to PE and DVT. Major lower-extremity orthopedic procedures carry a higher risk of symptomatic VTE compared to most other surgeries, with an estimated incidence of ~4%. The greatest risk period occurs within the first 7-14 days following surgery. Major bleeding is also more prevalent in these surgeries compared to others, with rates estimated between 2% and 4%. For patients undergoing major lower-extremity orthopedic surgery who have a low bleeding risk, it is recommended to use pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with or without mechanical devices. The choice of the initial agent depends on the specific surgery and patient comorbidities. First-line options include low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), direct oral anticoagulants, and aspirin. Second-line options consist of unfractionated heparin (UFH), fondaparinux, and warfarin. For most patients undergoing knee or hip arthroplasty, the initial agents recommended for the early perioperative period are LMWHs (enoxaparin or dalteparin) or direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban or apixaban). In the case of hip fracture surgery, LMWH is recommended as the preferred agent for the entire duration of prophylaxis. However, emerging factor XI(a) inhibitors, as revealed by a recent meta-analysis, have shown a substantial decrease in the occurrence of VTE and bleeding events among patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery. This discovery poses a challenge to the existing paradigm of anticoagulant therapy in this specific patient population and indicates that factor XI(a) inhibitors hold great promise as a potential strategy to be taken into serious consideration.

Evidence-based pharmacological prophylaxis recommendations for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized acutely ill medical patients: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines

Venous thromboembolism is a complex multifactorial disease considered the most common cause of preventable deaths in hospitalized patients. Recommendations about pharmacological venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adult hospitalized patients are available in clinical practice guidelines for optimization of healthcare delivery and improvement of patient outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines using ADAPTE to synthesize recommendations for pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients at a medium complexity university hospital. Recommendations for pharmacological prophylaxis were extracted from seven clinical practice guidelines considered of high quality after assessment with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. These recommendations will support discussion with specialists and implementation of practices in the setting of the hospital studied.

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Post-Prostatectomy Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the recommended treatments to achieve oncological outcomes in localized prostate cancer. However, a radical prostatectomy is a major abdominopelvic surgery. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication associated with surgical procedures, including RP. There is a lack of consensus regarding VTE prophylaxis in urological procedures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate different aspects of VTE in post-radical prostatectomy patients. A comprehensive literature search was performed, and relevant data were extracted. The primary aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis (wherever possible) of VTE occurrence in post-RP patients in relation to surgical approach, pelvic lymph node dissection, and type of prophylaxis (mechanical or combined prophylaxis). The secondary aim was to investigate the incidence and other risk factors of VTE in post-RP patients. A total of 16 studies were included for quantitative analysis. Statistical methods for analysis included the DerSimonian-Laird random effects. We were able to conclude that the overall incidence of VTE in post-radical prostatectomy is 1% (95% CI) and minimally invasive procedures (MIS), including laparoscopic, as well as robotic procedures for radical prostatectomy and RP without pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND), are associated with less risk of developing VTE. Additional pharmacological prophylaxis to mechanical methods may not be necessary in all cases and should be considered in high-risk patients only.

Rivaroxaban versus nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis following thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A randomized, noninferiority trial

The benefit of rivaroxaban in thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery remains unknown. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban, patients who underwent thoracic surgery for lung cancer were enrolled, and randomly assigned to rivaroxaban or nadroparin groups in a 1:1 ratio; anticoagulants were initiated 12-24 h after surgery and continued until discharge. Four hundred participants were required according to a noninferiority margin of 2%, assuming venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence rates of 6.0% and 12.6% for patients in the rivaroxaban and nadroparin groups, respectively. The primary efficacy outcome was any VTE during the treatment and 30-day follow-up periods. The safety outcome was any on-treatment bleeding event. Finally, 403 patients were randomized (intention-to-treat [ITT] population), with 381 included in per-protocol (PP) population. The primary efficacy outcomes occurred in 12.5% (25/200) of the rivaroxaban group and 17.7% (36/203) of the nadroparin group (absolute risk reduction, -5.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], [-12.2-1.7]), indicating the noninferiority of rivaroxaban in ITT population. Sensitivity analysis was performed in the PP population and yielded similar results, confirming the noninferiority of rivaroxaban. In the safety analysis population, the incidence of any on-treatment bleeding events did not differ significantly between the groups (12.2% for rivaroxaban vs. 7.0% for nadroparin; relative risk [RR], 1.9; 95% CI, [0.9-3.7]; p = .08), including major bleeding (9.7% vs. 6.5%; RR, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.9-3.7]; p = .24), and nonmajor bleeding (2.6% vs. 0.5%; RR, 5.2 [95% CI, 0.6-45.2]; p = .13). Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis after oncologic lung surgery was shown to be noninferior to nadroparin.

Predictive factors on postoperative venous thromboembolism after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious and preventable postoperative complication. However, the predictive significance of perioperative biochemical parameters for VTE after minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 149 patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery were collected between October 2021 and October 2022. Biochemical parameters related to preoperative and postoperative day 1, day 3, and day 5 were collected, including D-Dimer, mean platelet volume (MPV), and maximum amplitude (MA) of thromboelastography (TEG). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to explore the predictive powers of meaningful biochemical parameters for postoperative VTE, and calibration curves were used to assess predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

The overall cumulative incidence of VTE was 8.1% (12/149). The preoperative and postoperative day 3 D-Dimer, postoperative day 3, and day 5 MPV, and postoperative day 1, day 3, and day 5 TEG-MA was significantly higher in the VTE group than in the non-VTE group (P < 0.05). The results of both the ROC curve and the calibration curve indicated that these meaningful D-Dimer, MPV, and TEG-MA had moderate discrimination and consistency for postoperative VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

D-Dimer, MPV, and TEG-MA may predict postoperative VTE in patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer at specific times in the perioperative period.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with sickle cell disease undergoing noncardiovascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) will have a baseline hypercoagulable state and an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Few data are available regarding the efficacy of standard prophylaxis in preventing VTE after noncardiovascular surgery for patients with SCD. Our objective was to investigate the incidence of VTE in patients with SCD who had undergone noncardiovascular surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective medical record review of 352 patients with SCD who had undergone noncardiovascular surgery from August 2009 to August 2019 at Beaumont Hospitals. An equal number of control patients without SCD were propensity matched for age, sex, race, body mass index, and specific surgery. The data collected included demographics, comorbidities, VTE prophylaxis used, occurrence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), hospital length of stay, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

We found no differences in age, race, sex, ethnicity, operative time, or hospital length of stay between the SCD and propensity-matched control patients. DVT prophylaxis was used more frequently for the SCD patients than for the controls (96.0% vs 88.6%; P < .001). Four SCD patients (1.1%) had developed DVT vs five control patients (1.4%; P > .999). One patient in each group had developed PE (0.3%; P > .999). No difference was found in 30-day mortality between the SCD group and the control group (1 [0.3%] vs 3 [0.9%]; P = .312). Of those with a diagnosis of VTE ≤30 days postoperatively, no differences were present in age, sex, race, BMI, or procedure type. DVT had been diagnosed significantly later in the SCD patients than in the controls (median, postoperative day 12 vs 5; P = .014). None of the five SCD patients with VTE was a smoker compared with four of the six non-SCD patients with VTE, who were current or former tobacco users (P = .061). All the patients who had developed VTE had received DVT prophylaxis at surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no differences in the perioperative rates of DVT, PE, or mortality between the SCD patients and matched control patients after noncardiovascular surgery. Vigilant attention to routine VTE prophylaxis seemed to effectively reduce the VTE risk for these hypercoagulable patients. SCD patients might need VTE prophylaxis for a longer period postoperatively compared with those without SCD.

Expediting the Management of Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) in the Emergency Department Through Clinical Pathway Design at a District General Hospital: A Quality Improvement Project

BACKGROUND

Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is an uncommon condition that occurs due to compression of the terminal portion of the spinal cord. Early recognition and intervention in CES are crucial for an improved prognosis. Delayed diagnosis and action may lead to irreversible adverse effects, i.e., permanent disability, and in some circumstances can lead to litigation.

AIM

 The aim of this quality improvement project (QIP) was to identify areas for improvement and expedite the management of suspected CES patients presenting to the hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study in which patients admitted to the Poole district hospital were analyzed in three groups with more than 50 patients in each subset group. The first group was audited from 1^st October 2020 to 27^th November 2020; a re-audit on the second group of patients was done from 1^st June 2021 to 16^th July 2021; the third group was re-audited from 1^st of January 2022 to 31^st of March 2022.

RESULTS

There were a total of 168 patients in all audit groups, of whom 71% were female. The mean time from getting triaged to having an MRI improved from 13hrs 54mins to 10hrs 39mins. The total inpatient length of stay (LOS) of less than 24 hours was 28% in the first cycle and improved to 54.4% by the third cycle of the audit. Eight patients exhibited a diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome (CES) and were sent to the tertiary care center.

CONCLUSIONS

This quality improvement project identified delays in requesting the MRI for the diagnosis of CES and was addressed by ED booking the scans directly. This, in turn, reduced the length of stay in the hospital for patients who did not have cauda equina syndrome.

Incidence and risk factors of clinically important venous thromboembolism in tibial plateau fractures

While there are multiple reports on venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with several orthopedic procedures, the knowledge regarding incidence and risk factors of VTE in tibial plateau fractures is limited. This study aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors of clinically important venous thromboembolism (CIVTE) in patients with tibial plateau fractures. All adult patients who underwent surgical treatment of tibia plateau fractures between 2003 and 2018 in our level 1 trauma center were included in the study. All patients suspected CIVTE were assessed by the ultrasonography and/or CT scan. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to evaluate the association between potential risk factors and CIVTE Variables. Thirty-nine of 462 patients (8.4%) developed clinically important venous thromboembolism, in which pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were observed in 18 (3.9%) and 21 (4.54%) patients, respectively. Male gender (OR 9.75; 95% CI 2.34-40.66), spine injury (OR 9.51; 95% CI 3.39-26.64), other extremity injury (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.58-8.66), length of stay in ICU (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.09-1.2) were all risk factors for CIVTE. The incidence of CIVTE in tibial plateau fracture was relatively high (8.4%); The male gender, spine injury, other extremity injury, length of stay in ICU were the independent risk factors.

Massive pulmonary embolism and intra-cardiac thrombus requiring systemic thrombolysis 9-hours post emergency laparotomy

The link between abdominal surgery and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been well established with recent evidence exploring the optimal VTE risk reducing strategy. However, despite these strategies pulmonary embolisms (PEs) do occur, which in the immediate post-operative setting creates a dilemma; to treat the VTE with anticoagulation but balance against the risk of hemorrhage. Treatment guidelines often do not include post-operative patients leaving the decision up to the treating physician to weigh the relative risks on an individual basis. We present a 59-year-old lady who developed a life-threatening submassive PE within 9 h of an emergency laparotomy for a perforated rectal cancer. She was treated with systemic thrombolysis after alternative interventions had been excluded. She responded well to therapy with no major bleeding. She was successfully discharged home after a short period of inpatient rehabilitation.

Optimizing Perioperative Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis on a Gynecologic Oncology Service

BACKGROUND

Perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after gynecologic cancer surgery. Here we report a quality improvement intervention to increase perioperative VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance.

STUDY DESIGN

All operations performed by a gynecologic oncologist at a tertiary urban university medical center admitted to the hospital for at least one midnight were included. Using a pre/post design with a washout period, we sought to increase perioperative VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance from 22% in the historical control (HC) cohort to 90% in the quality improvement (QI) cohort. The perioperative VTE chemoprophylaxis process was standardized by addressing four domains: preoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis, surgical time-out, postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis, and intervention education and compliance tracking. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare HC vs QI cohort compliance.

RESULTS

There were 130 surgical cases in the HC cohort and 131 in the QI cohort. Forty-two percent underwent laparotomy, and 57% had cancer at the time of operation. VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance improved from 22% in the HC cohort to 82% in the QI cohort (p < 0.001). Preoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance improved from 76% in the HC cohort to 94% in the QI cohort (p < 0.001), and postoperative VTE chemoprophylaxis compliance improved from 27% to 87% (p < 0.001). Thirty-day postoperative VTE occurred in three patients (2%) in the HC cohort and none in the QI cohort (p = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

A low-cost and low-technology QI initiative intervention improved perioperative compliance with VTE chemoprophylaxis.

Update on Guidelines for the Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis

Patients with cancer are at high risk of developing arterial and venous thromboembolism (VTE). They constitute 15% to 20% of the patients diagnosed with VTE. Depending on the type of tumor, cancer therapy, and presence of other risk factors, 1% to 25% of patients with cancer will develop thrombosis. The decision to start patients with cancer on primary thromboprophylaxis depends on patient preference, balancing risk of bleeding versus risk of thrombosis, cost, and adequate organ function. Currently, guidelines recommend against the use of routine primary thromboprophylaxis in unselected ambulatory patients with cancer. Validated risk assessment models can accurately identify patients at highest risk for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). This review summarizes the recently updated NCCN Guidelines for CAT primary prophylaxis, with a primarily focus on VTE prevention. Two main clinical questions that providers commonly encounter will also be addressed: which patients with cancer should receive primary thromboprophylaxis (both surgical and medical oncology patients) and how to safely choose between different anticoagulation agents.

Patients with dementia and atrial fibrillation less frequently receive direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and experience higher thrombotic and mortality risk

OBJECTIVE

To investigate differences in clinical presentation, anticoagulation pattern and outcomes in patients with dementia and atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

A total of 1217 hospitalized patients with non-valvular AF from two institutions were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis of dementia was established by a psychiatrist or a neurologist prior to or during hospitalization. Adequacy of warfarin anticoagulation was assessed during follow-up using at least 10 standardized international ratio values. In addition to unmatched comparison, nested case-control study was performed to further evaluate differences in clinical outcomes between patients with and without dementia.

RESULTS

A total of 162/1217 (13.3%) patients were diagnosed with dementia. Among other associations, patients with dementia were significantly older with higher number of comorbidities, had lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), (P < 0.05 for all analyses). Patients with dementia were significantly less likely to receive direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; 27.2% vs 40.3%; P = 0.001) and were significantly more likely to be inadequately anticoagulated with warfarin (38.9% vs 28.6%; P = 0.008) than patients without dementia. After matching based on age, eGFR, LVEF, and CHA₂DS₂-VAS_C patients with dementia were significantly more likely to experience inferior overall survival (HR = 1.8; P = 0.001) and shorter time to thrombosis (HR = 2.3; P = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Our findings speak in support of increased thrombotic and mortality risks in patients with dementia, possibly due to inadequate anticoagulation and higher number of comorbidities.

Do Cost Limitations of Extended Prophylaxis After Surgery Apply to Ulcerative Colitis Patients?

BACKGROUND

Colorectal surgery patients with ulcerative colitis are at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism. Extended prophylaxis for thromboembolism prevention has been used in colorectal surgery patients, but it has been criticized for its lack of cost-effectiveness. However, the cost-effectiveness of extended prophylaxis for postoperative ulcerative colitis patients may be unique.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of extended prophylaxis in postoperative ulcerative colitis patients.

DESIGN

A decision analysis compared costs and benefits in postoperative ulcerative colitis patients with and without extended prophylaxis over a lifetime horizon.

SETTING

Assumptions for decision analysis were identified from available literature for a typical ulcerative colitis patient's risk of thrombosis, age at surgery, type of thrombosis, prophylaxis risk reduction, bleeding complications, and mortality.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs ($) and benefits (quality-adjusted life year) reflected a societal perspective and were time-discounted at 3%. Costs and benefits were combined to produce the main outcome measure, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($ per quality-adjusted life year). Multivariable probabilistic sensitivity analysis modeled uncertainty in probabilities, costs, and disutilities.

RESULTS

Using reference parameters, the individual expected societal total cost of care was $957 without and $1775 with prophylaxis (not cost-effective; $257,280 per quality-adjusted life year). Preventing a single mortality with prophylaxis would cost $5 million (number needed to treat: 6134 individuals). Adjusting across a range of scenarios upheld these conclusions 77% of the time. With further sensitivity testing, venous thromboembolism cumulative risk (>1.5%) and ePpx regimen pricing (<$299) were the 2 parameters most sensitive to uncertainty.

LIMITATIONS

Recommendations of decision analysis methodology are limited to group decision-making, not an individual risk profile.

CONCLUSION

Routine ePpx in postoperative ulcerative colitis patients is not cost-effective. This finding is sensitive to higher-than-average rates of venous thromboembolism and low-cost prophylaxis opportunities. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B818.

SE APLICAN LAS LIMITACIONES DE COSTOS DE LA PROFILAXIS PROLONGADA DESPUS DE LA CIRUGA A LOS PACIENTES CON COLITIS ULCEROSA

ANTECEDENTES:Los pacientes de cirugía colorrectal con colitis ulcerosa tienen un mayor riesgo de tromboembolismo venoso posoperatorio. La profilaxis extendida para la prevención de la tromboembolia se ha utilizado en pacientes con cirugía colorrectal, aunque ha sido criticada por su falta de rentabilidad. Sin embargo, la rentabilidad de la profilaxis prolongada para los pacientes posoperados con colitis ulcerosa puede ser aceptable.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la rentabilidad de la profilaxis prolongada en pacientes posoperados con colitis ulcerosa.DISEÑO:Un análisis de decisiones comparó los costos y beneficios en pacientes posoperados con colitis ulcerosa con y sin profilaxis prolongada de por vida.AJUSTE:Los supuestos para el análisis de decisiones se identificaron a partir de la literatura disponible para el riesgo de trombosis de un paciente con colitis ulcerosa típica, la edad al momento de la cirugía, el tipo de trombosis, la reducción del riesgo con profilaxis, las complicaciones hemorrágicas y la mortalidad.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Los costos ($) y los beneficios (año de vida ajustado por calidad) reflejaron una perspectiva social y se descontaron en el tiempo al 3%. Los costos y los beneficios se combinaron para producir la principal medida de resultado, la relación costo-efectividad incremental ($ por año de vida ajustado por calidad). El análisis de sensibilidad probabilística multivariable modeló la incertidumbre en probabilidades, costos y desutilidades.RESULTADOS:Utilizando parámetros de referencia, el costo total de atención social esperado individual fue de $957 sin profilaxis y $1775 con profilaxis (no rentable; $257,280 por año de vida ajustado por calidad). La prevención de una sola mortalidad con profilaxis costaría $5.0 millones (número necesario a tratar: 6.134 personas). El ajuste en una variedad de escenarios mantuvo estas conclusiones el 77% de las veces. Con más pruebas de sensibilidad, el riesgo acumulado de TEV (>1,5%) y el precio del régimen de ePpx (<$299) fueron los dos parámetros más sensibles a la incertidumbre.LIMITACIONES:Las recomendaciones de la metodología de análisis de decisiones se limitan a la toma de decisiones en grupo, no a un perfil de riesgo individual.CONCLUSIÓN:La profilaxis extendida de rutina en pacientes posoperados con colitis ulcerosa no es rentable. Este hallazgo es sensible a tasas de TEV superiores al promedio y oportunidades de profilaxis de bajo costo. Consulted Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B818. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio).

A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study of Craniotomy and Prophylactic Enoxaparin Timing

INTRODUCTION

 Post-operative venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is the standard of care after craniotomy, but there is debate over when to initiate VTE prophylaxis to decrease the morbidity and mortality experienced by these patients. This study aims to determine the effects of starting enoxaparin on day one vs. day three after craniotomy.

METHODS

We used a multi-institutional health research network (TriNetX) to gather data from the electronic medical records of patients who started enoxaparin one day after craniotomy (cohort 1) and patients who started it three days later (cohort 2). Our primary endpoint was mortality, with the secondary endpoints of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), additional craniotomy, pulmonary embolism (PE), myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), ventilator and tracheostomy dependence, or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube dependence. Patients were propensity score-matched for demographics, common comorbidities, and anticoagulant and antiplatelet use.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 1,554 patients were identified in each cohort. In cohort 1, 21.171% of patients were deceased after five years vs. 26.126% in cohort 2 (p= 0.0012; OR 0.759, 95% CI (0.643,0.897)). The 30-day survival was 94.521% vs. 93.049%, the 90-day survival was 90.200% vs. 87.335%, and the 365-day survival was 80.619 vs. 76.817%. Deep venous thrombosis occurred in 5.277% of cohort 1 and 7.851% of cohort 2 (p=0.0038, OR 0.654, 95% CI [0.49,0.873]). There was no increase in intracerebral hemorrhage in cohort 1. There were no statistically significant differences in subsequent craniotomy rates, PE, MI, IS, ventilator/tracheostomy, or PEG tube dependence.

CONCLUSION

Starting enoxaparin on day one after craniotomy was associated with decreased mortality and DVTs, with no difference in rates of PE, MI, IS, tracheostomy/PEG dependence, or further craniotomy.

Ageing attenuates bone healing by mesenchymal stem cells in a microribbon hydrogel with a murine long bone critical-size defect model

BACKGROUND

Despite the high incidence of fractures and pseudoarthrosis in the aged population, a potential role for the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of bone defects in elderly patients has not been elucidated. Inflammation and the innate immune system, including macrophages, play crucial roles in the differentiation and activation of MSCs. We have developed lentivirus-transduced interleukin 4 (IL4) over-expressing MSCs (IL4-MSCs) to polarize macrophages to an M2 phenotype to promote bone healing in an established young murine critical size bone defect model. In the current study, we explore the potential of IL4-MSCs in aged mice.

METHODS

A 2 mm femoral diaphyseal bone defect was created and fixed with an external fixation device in 15- to 17-month-old male and female BALB/c mice. Microribbon (µRB) scaffolds (Sc) with or without encapsulation of MSCs were implanted in the defect sites. Accordingly, the mice were divided into three treatment groups: Sc-only, Sc + MSCs, and Sc + IL4-MSCs. Mice were euthanized six weeks after the surgery; subsequently, MicroCT (µCT), histochemical and immunohistochemical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

µCT analysis revealed that bone formation was markedly enhanced in the IL4-MSC group. Compared with the Sc-only, the amount of new bone increased in the Sc + MSCs and Sc + IL4-MSC groups. However, no bridging of bone was observed in all groups. H&E staining showed fibrous tissue within the defect in all groups. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining was increased in the Sc + IL4-MSC group. The Sc + IL4-MSCs group showed a decrease in the number of M1 macrophages and an increase in the number of M2 macrophages, with a significant increase in the M2/M1 ratio.

DISCUSSION

IL4 promotes macrophage polarization to an M2 phenotype, facilitating osteogenesis and vasculogenesis. The addition of IL4-MSCs in the µRB scaffold polarized macrophages to an M2 phenotype and increased bone formation; however, complete bone bridging was not observed in any specimens. These results suggest that IL4-MSCs are insufficient to heal a critical size bone defect in aged mice, as opposed to younger animals. Additional therapeutic strategies are needed in this challenging clinical scenario.

The Impact of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prophylaxis for Thromboembolism in Thrombophilic Patients Undergoing Abdominoplastic Surgery

Congenital or acquired thrombophilia is observed in 10-15% of the general population; therefore, careful screening is carried out in patients at higher risk of venous thrombo-embolism (VTE). High risk of VTE is a contraindication in patients undergoing abdominoplasty. We evaluated rivaroxaban, an oral Xa inhibitor, with enoxaparin, a subcutaneously low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), in 48 female patients with documented thrombophilia, undergoing thrombo-prophylaxis after abdominoplasty. Patients were stratified into two groups according to thrombo-prophylaxis procedure: enoxaparin Group (n = 28) and rivaroxaban Group (n = 20). Hematologic outcomes were evaluated including VTE and hematoma. No episodes of VTE occurred in both groups; two patients during their course of enoxaparin presented severe hematoma for drainage and hemostasis revision. This study suggests that abdominoplasty, in patients with thrombophilia, in combination with thrombo-prophylaxis can be performed safely. Rivaroxaban was as effective as LMWH for preventing VTE, with only a moderate risk of clinically relevant bleeding. More research is needed to determine the optimal timing and duration of prophylaxis in patients undergoing plastic surgery.

Improved utilisation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in renal-impaired patients following a clinical pharmacist intervention

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of the clinical pharmacist in improving venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis prescription in patients with renal impairment (RI).

METHODS

This was an interventional cross-sectional study conducted in a nephrology ward. Patients' risk scores for VTE and bleeding during hospitalisation (evaluated by the Caprini Risk Assessment Model (RAM), Padua Prediction Score and IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Score, respectively), and the rate of VTE prophylaxis administration to patients, were evaluated before and after a clinical pharmacist's intervention.

RESULTS

In the pre-intervention phase, 34.8% of high-VTE-risk patients, of whom 12.5% were also at high risk of bleeding, received pharmacological prophylaxis. Moreover, 22.2% of low-VTE-risk patients received prophylaxis. In the intervention phase, prophylaxis was administered to all high-risk patients (mechanical prophylaxis in 7% of patients with a high risk of both VTE and bleeding, and heparin in the remainder) and to 3.3% of those at low risk of VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical pharmacist's intervention using RAMs can improve the rate of thrombosis prophylaxis prescription in patients with RI who have a high risk of VTE.

Risk of postoperative bleeding following dental extractions in patients on antithrombotic treatment

Introduction

The risk of bleeding after dental extractions in patients taking antithrombotic medication is not well known. This study aims to investigate the incidence of postoperative bleeding following dental extractions in adult patients taking antithrombotic medication in Saudi Arabia.

Methods

This retrospective study included 539 patients aged 18–93 years who attended 840 appointments for dental extractions from January 2012 to June 2016 at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Patients who returned with a complaint of bleeding were treated with local hemostatic measures as outpatients.

Results and Conclusion: Only 1.7% of extraction appointments were associated with postoperative bleeding. The highest risk of bleeding was noted in patients receiving warfarin (3.88%), whereas those on clopidogrel had no significant risk of bleeding. Women were found to have the highest rate of bleeding, particularly those on newer oral anticoagulant medications.

Dental extractions can be safely done in adults receiving antithrombotic treatment, provided established guidelines are followed; therefore, dental professionals must exercise caution when planning invasive dental treatment for patients on continued antithrombotic therapy.

Venous Thromboembolism and Pulmonary Embolism: Strategies for Prevention and Management

Perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication within the surgical patient population. Perioperative mechanical and chemoprophylaxis have been shown to reduce the incidence of both deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Prophylactic regimen must be tailored to the patient's individual risk factors as well as the nature of the procedure. In the event of VTE, treatment most commonly includes long-term anticoagulation, whereas more severe cases may require lytic or mechanical interventions.

Evaluating post-operative venous thromboembolism risk in urology patients using a validated risk assessment model

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important cause of post-surgical morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to apply a validated risk assessment model to evaluate the risk of post-operative VTE in urology patients.

Methods

This prospective descriptive observational study used the Caprini risk assessment model to evaluate VTE risk in patients planned for elective urology surgery at a tertiary Johannesburg hospital from January to June 2020.

Results

Two hundred and twenty-six patients with a mean age of 52 years were evaluated for post-operative VTE risk. The population was generally overweight, with a mean BMI of 26.3 kg/m2. The mean Caprini score was 4.42, reflecting a population at high risk for post-operative VTE. There was no statistically significant difference between males and females in this regard. On average, participants had three risk factors for post-operative VTE. Fifteen per cent of all patients were at low risk for VTE, while 40.3% of participants were categorised as moderate risk. The category with the highest percentage of participants (44.7%) was the high-risk category (Caprini score ≥ 5). High-risk patients undergoing oncology surgery comprised 16.8% of the population, and these patients may require extended duration pharmacological thromboprophylaxis to prevent VTE. The most clinically significant risk factors for post-operative VTE included age, obesity, malignancy and HIV infection.

Conclusion

Venous thromboembolism may be difficult to diagnose, and clinicians may underestimate the risk for it to develop. Risk assessment models, such as the Caprini score, are objective and a practical tool to guide the application of thromboprophylaxis. The application of the Caprini RAM in the elective urological surgery population at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital yields similar results to studies performed elsewhere on similar surgical populations. Further research is required to evaluate whether the actual incidence of VTE correlates with the risk assessment in this population. Clinician compliance with the use of RAMs as well as the corresponding recommendations for prophylaxis may need to be evaluated. A validated risk assessment model which accounts for procedure-specific risks in urology may be useful.

Epidemiologic study of patients with thrombotic events referred to a tertiary hospital in Southern Iran

Background and aim

Thromboembolic events mainly occur in older age is related with high morbidity and mortality, and considerable health-care costs particularly in developing countries. Both arterial and venous thromboembolism has known risk factors such as hyperlipidemia, obesity, diabetes, cancer, major surgery, central catheter. We aimed to evaluate the occurrence of thrombotic events and related risk factors in a group of Iranian patients.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, all patients (n = 99) who were complicated by thrombotic events referred to the Hematology Research Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences were investigated from 2015 to 2017, in Shiraz, Southern Iran. Data were collected from their medical records by a designed data gathering form.

Results

The median age of the occurrence of thrombosis was 51 (IQR: 31) years. From all thrombotic events 52.5% occurred in females. Venous thrombosis was more prevalent than arterial (61.6% vs. 38.4%). Hypertension, diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease were the most associated disease with thrombosis. Most of the patients (79.8%) had no episodes of relapse and the occurrence of relapse had no significant relationship with thrombophilia and underlying disease. Acceptable response rate for warfarin therapy was achieved in 46.5% with 5 mg and 43.4% with 5–7.5 mg.

Conclusion

Knowing the frequency and risk factors for thrombotic events lead to timely diagnosis and management of thrombosis. Atrial fibrillation and valvular rheumatic heart disease are the most common risk factors of thrombosis in our study showing prophylaxis is necessary in high-risk patients.