1
|
de Francisco P, Amaro F, Martín-González A, Gutiérrez JC. AP-1 (bZIP) Transcription Factors as Potential Regulators of Metallothionein Gene Expression in Tetrahymena thermophila. Front Genet 2018; 9:459. [PMID: 30405686 PMCID: PMC6205968 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Metallothioneins (MT) are multi-stress proteins mainly involved in metal detoxification. MT gene expression is normally induced by a broad variety of stimulus and its gene expression regulation mainly occurs at a transcriptional level. Conserved motifs in the Tetrahymena thermophila MT promoters have been described. These motifs show a consensus sequence very similar to AP-1 sites, and bZIP type transcription factors might participate in the MT gene expression regulation. In this research work, we characterize four AP-1 transcription factors in each of four different analyzed Tetrahymena species, detecting a high conservation among them. Each AP-1 molecule has its counterpart in the other three Tetrahymena species. A comparative qRT-PCR analysis of these AP-1 genes have been carried out in different T. thermophila strains (including metal-adapted, knockout and/or knockdown strains among others), and under different metal-stress conditions (1 or 24 h Cd2+, Cu2+, or Pb2+ treatments). The possible interaction of these transcription factors with the conserved AP-1 motifs present in MT promoters has been corroborated by protein-DNA interaction experiments. Certain connection between the expression patterns of the bZIP and MT genes seems to exist. For the first time, and based on our findings, a possible gene expression regulation model including both AP-1 transcription factors and MT genes from the ciliate T. thermophila has been elaborated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia de Francisco
- Departamento de Genética, Fisiología y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Amaro
- Departamento de Genética, Fisiología y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Martín-González
- Departamento de Genética, Fisiología y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Gutiérrez
- Departamento de Genética, Fisiología y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dey B, Thukral S, Krishnan S, Chakrobarty M, Gupta S, Manghani C, Rani V. DNA-protein interactions: methods for detection and analysis. Mol Cell Biochem 2012; 365:279-99. [PMID: 22399265 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-012-1269-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2011] [Accepted: 02/16/2012] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
DNA-binding proteins control various cellular processes such as recombination, replication and transcription. This review is aimed to summarize some of the most commonly used techniques to determine DNA-protein interactions. In vitro techniques such as footprinting assays, electrophoretic mobility shift assay, southwestern blotting, yeast one-hybrid assay, phage display and proximity ligation assay have been discussed. The highly versatile in vivo techniques such as chromatin immunoprecipitation and its variants, DNA adenine methyl transferase identification as well as 3C and chip-loop assay have also been summarized. In addition, some in silico tools have been reviewed to provide computational basis for determining DNA-protein interactions. Biophysical techniques like fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) techniques, FRET-FLIM, circular dichroism, atomic force microscopy, nuclear magnetic resonance, surface plasmon resonance, etc. have also been highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bipasha Dey
- Department of Biotechnology, Jaypee Institute of Information Technology, A-10 Sector-62, Noida 201307, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiang D, Jarrett HW, Haskins WE. Methods for proteomic analysis of transcription factors. J Chromatogr A 2009; 1216:6881-9. [PMID: 19726046 PMCID: PMC2778203 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2009] [Revised: 08/12/2009] [Accepted: 08/17/2009] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Investigation of the transcription factor (TF) proteome presents challenges including the large number of low abundance and post-translationally modified proteins involved. Specialized purification and analysis methods have been developed over the last decades which facilitate the study of the TF proteome and these are reviewed here. Generally applicable proteomics methods that have been successfully applied are also discussed. TFs are selectively purified by affinity techniques using the DNA response element (RE) as the basis for highly specific binding, and several agents have been discovered that either enhance binding or diminish non-specific binding. One such affinity method called "trapping" enables purification of TFs bound to nM concentrations and recovery of TF complexes in a highly purified state. The electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) is the most important assay of TFs because it provides both measures of the affinity and amount of the TF present. Southwestern (SW) blotting and DNA-protein crosslinking (DPC) allow in vitro estimates of DNA-binding-protein mass, while chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) allows confirmation of promoter binding in vivo. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis methods (2-DE), and 3-DE methods which combines EMSA with 2-DE, allow further resolution of TFs. The synergy of highly selective purification and analytical strategies has led to an explosion of knowledge about the TF proteome and the proteomes of other DNA- and RNA-binding proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daifeng Jiang
- Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249 USA
| | - Harry W. Jarrett
- Department of Chemistry, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249 USA
| | - William E. Haskins
- Department of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249 USA
- RCMI Proteomics, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249 USA
- Protein Biomarkers Cores, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249 USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229 USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiang D, Jia Y, Zhou Y, Jarrett HW. Two-dimensional southwestern blotting and characterization of transcription factors on-blot. J Proteome Res 2009; 8:3693-701. [PMID: 19388704 DOI: 10.1021/pr900214p] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Two-dimensional Southwestern blotting (2D-SW) described here combines several steps. Proteins are separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose (NC) or polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. The blotted proteins are then partially renatured and probed with a specific radiolabeled oligonucleotide for Southwestern blotting (SW) analysis. The detected proteins are then processed by on-blot digestion and identified by LC-MS/MS analysis. A transcription factor, bound by a specific radiolabeled element, is thus characterized without aligning with protein spots on a gel. In this study, we systematically optimize conditions for 2D-SW and on-blot digestion. By quantifying the SW signal using a scintillation counter, the optimal conditions for SW were determined to be PVDF membrane, 0.5% PVP40 for membrane blocking, serial dilution of guanidine HCl for denaturing and renaturing proteins on the blot, and an SDS stripping buffer to remove radiation from the blot. By the quantification of the peptide yields using nano-ESI-MS analysis, the optimized conditions for on-blot digestions were found to be 0.5% Zwittergent 3-16 and 30% acetonitrile in trypsin digestion buffer. With the use of the optimized 2D-SW technique and on-blot digestion combined with HPLC-nano-ESI-MS/MS, a GFP-C/EBP model protein was successfully characterized from a bacterial extract, and native C/EBP beta was identified from 100 microg of HEK293 nuclear extract without any previous purification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daifeng Jiang
- Department of Chemistry, University of Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoneveld O, Gaemers I, Das A, Hoogenkamp M, Renes J, Ruijter J, Lamers W. Structural requirements of the glucocorticoid-response unit of the carbamoyl-phosphate synthase gene. Biochem J 2005; 382:463-70. [PMID: 15196051 PMCID: PMC1133802 DOI: 10.1042/bj20040471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2004] [Revised: 06/11/2004] [Accepted: 06/14/2004] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The GRU (glucocorticoid-response unit) within the distal enhancer of the gene encoding carbamoyl-phosphate synthase, which comprises REs (response elements) for the GR (glucocorticoid receptor) and the liver-enriched transcription factors FoxA (forkhead box A) and C/EBP (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein), and a binding site for an unknown protein denoted P3, is one of the simplest GRUs described. In this study, we have established that the activity of this GRU depends strongly on the positioning and spacing of its REs. Mutation of the P3 site within the 25 bp FoxA-GR spacer eliminated GRU activity, but the requirement for P3 could be overcome by decreasing the length of this spacer to < or =12 bp, by optimizing the sequence of the REs in the GRU, and by replacing the P3 sequence with a C/EBPbeta sequence. With spacers of < or =12 bp, the activity of the GRU depended on the helical orientation of the FoxA and GR REs, with highest activities observed at 2 and 12 bp respectively. Elimination of the 6 bp C/EBP-FoxA spacer also increased GRU activity 2-fold. Together, these results indicate that the spatial positioning of the transcription factors that bind to the GRU determines its activity and that the P3 complex, which binds to the DNA via a 75 kDa protein, functions to facilitate interaction between the FoxA and glucocorticoid response elements when the distance between these transcription factors means that they have difficulties contacting each other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onard J. L. M. Schoneveld
- *AMC Liver Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 69–71, 1105 BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid C. Gaemers
- *AMC Liver Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 69–71, 1105 BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Atze T. Das
- *AMC Liver Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 69–71, 1105 BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Hoogenkamp
- *AMC Liver Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 69–71, 1105 BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Renes
- ‡Department of Human Biology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan M. Ruijter
- †Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 69–71, 1105 BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter H. Lamers
- *AMC Liver Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 69–71, 1105 BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- †Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 69–71, 1105 BK, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- To whom correspondence should be addressed, at AMC Liver Center (email )
| |
Collapse
|