Classification of osteoporosis and osteopenia in men is dependent on site-specific analysis

Comparison of the Spine and Hip BMD Assessments Derived from Quantitative Computed Tomography

Quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) is being used as the main method to diagnose osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the most common tools for measuring BMD. Compared to DXA, quantitative computed tomography (QCT) can determine in three dimensions the true volumetric BMD (vBMD) at any skeletal site. In addition to the spine, the hip is an important site for axial BMD measurement. This study examines lumbar spine and hip BMD of Chinese adults by QCT. Age related changes in bone mass derived by QCT measurements were determined. The osteoporosis QCT detection rates at the spine and hip are assessed in both female and male, and agreement of skeletal status category between the spine and hip in older adults is also assessed.

Quantitative ultrasound measurements of the calcaneus and hand phalanges in elderly Spanish men: relationship with peripheral bone mineral density of the hand phalanges

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this pilot study were to describe quantitative ultrasound (US) measurements and peripheral bone mineral density (BMD) of the hand phalanges on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and to examine the correlations between them in elderly Spanish men.

METHODS

We studied 199 healthy men (mean age ± SD, 73.31 ± 5.10 years). The participants were not taking any medications, and they reported no diseases, including diseases that are associated with abnormalities in mineral metabolism. Phalangeal and calcaneal quantitative US measurements and phalangeal BMD measurements were performed in all participants.

RESULTS

A bivariate correlation analysis showed no association between quantitative US assessments at the phalanges or the calcaneus (P = .409). After adjustment for potential confounders, the correlation between phalangeal BMD and phalangeal quantitative US measurements was r = 0.417 (P < .0001), and the correlation for calcaneal quantitative US was r = 0.26 (P = .001). Further adjustment by percentage of body fat increased quantitative US correlations with phalangeal BMD: r = 0.450 (P < .0001) at the phalanges; r = 0.291 (P = .001) at the calcaneus.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a small correlation between quantitative US measurements at the calcaneus and phalangeal BMD that increases to a moderate level with quantitative US measurements at the phalanges in elderly Spanish men.

Lumbar spine bone mineral density in US adults: demographic patterns and relationship with femur neck skeletal status

This analysis examines lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) of US adults from NHANES 2005-2008 by age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Prevalence of low spine BMD and agreement between the prevalence of low BMD at the spine and femur neck in older adults are also assessed.

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar spine BMD data from a representative sample of the US population have not been previously available.

METHODS

We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2008 to examine demographic patterns in lumbar spine BMD among US adults age ≥20 years and the prevalence of low lumbar spine BMD in adults age ≥50 years. Agreement between the prevalence of low BMD at the femur neck and spine in older adults was also assessed. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure lumbar spine and femur neck BMD. World Health Organization definitions were used to categorize skeletal status as normal, osteopenia, or osteoporosis.

RESULTS

Compared to non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks had higher and Mexican Americans had lower lumbar spine BMD. Lumbar spine BMD declined with age in women, but not in men. Approximately 4.7 million (10%) older US women and 1 million (3%) older men had lumbar spine osteoporosis in 2005-2008. Roughly one third of them differed in skeletal status at the spine and hip but most were normal at one site and osteopenic at the other. Only 3-10%, depending on sex, had osteoporosis at one skeletal site but not at the other skeletal site. Between 76% and 87% with discordant skeletal status had lumbar spine T-scores within 1 unit of the category threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that measuring either the femur neck or the lumbar spine will correctly classify the majority of individuals who present for care as osteoporotic or not.

Osteopenia and osteoporosis in adult baboons (Papio hamadryas)

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the degree to which baboons, an important animal model in skeletal research, spontaneously experience age-related osteopenia and osteoporosis.

METHODS

We measured bone mineral density (BMD) in 667 baboons, assigned T-scores to older animals based on sex-specific young adult reference groups, and compared reproductive history in older females with low BMD to those with normal BMD.

RESULTS

Approximately 25% of older baboon females were osteopenic. No females or males were osteoporotic. Neither parity nor interbirth interval spine clearly distinguished low vs. normal BMD groups. Intersite correspondence in low BMD was highest between sites in the same region rather than sites of the same bone type.

CONCLUSION

As with humans, osteopenia is common among older females. The absence of osteoporotic animals may be due to colony maintenance resulting in truncation of the aged population and selection for healthier animals in the oldest ranges.

Sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic measures with multiple sites per unit

Medical researchers often study the performance of diagnostic tools. The performance of the diagnostic tool is evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity and similar measures. Sensitivity is defined as the probability of a positive diagnostic test in a patient with the illness or injury for which the test serves as a diagnostic tool. Specificity is the probability of a negative diagnostic test in a patient free of the disease or injury. For some conditions, the test is applied to several anatomic locations or at different times in a patient and each test can be positive or negative. The findings of the tests performed on the same patient are correlated and any summary measure should account for this correlation. We propose a summary measure for the subject that combines the results from all tests performed on the same patient while accounting for the correlation. The measure is easily calculated and requires no specific statistical software. We also provide an estimate of the standard error and confidence intervals. The method is illustrated with a study, conducted at the University of California, Davis School of Medicine, of the sensitivity of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and plain film (PF) radiography in detecting injuries in the cervical spine, such as fractures and soft tissue injuries.

Densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis in men: effect of measurement site and normative database

Controversy exists regarding which sites to measure, and the appropriate reference database to use, for densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis in men. While hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is routine, spinal osteoarthritis often elevates measured BMD in older men. Additionally, the use of male reference data is standard practice; however, recent reports suggest that a female database may be more appropriate. This study evaluated the effect of sites measured, and normative database utilized, on the densitometric diagnosis of osteoporosis in men. Spine, femur, and ultradistal radial BMD T-scores were determined in 595 male veterans using the GE Lunar male normative database. Subsequently, World Health Organization diagnostic criteria were applied, identifying 282 men with osteoporosis (T-score </= 2.5). The combination of femoral (lowest of neck or total) with the ultradistal radius site was more sensitive (p < 0.0001) for diagnosing osteoporosis than femur plus lumbar spine. When scans from 129 subjects with documented fractures were analyzed using female normative data, fewer (p < 0.0001) met an arbitrary threshold for receiving pharmacologic osteoporosis therapy. In conclusion, BMD measurement at only the spine and hip leads to underdiagnosis of osteoporosis in men. This situation will be exacerbated by utilization of a female normative database; more men with prior fracture may be categorized as not meeting a pharmaceutical intervention threshold.

North American male reference population for speed of sound in bone at multiple skeletal sites

Alternatives to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) have been sought to increase access to low-cost osteoporosis risk assessment. Early quantitative ultrasound (QUS) systems measured speed of sound (SOS) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) at the calcaneus, and these were demonstrated to be good predictors of hip fracture risk. Recent studies have demonstrated the usefulness of other peripheral sites to assess bone status. The Sunlight Omnisense (Sunlight Medical, Rehovot, Israel) is a portable, inexpensive QUS device capable of multiple-site SOS measurement. To provide a robust male reference database, 588 healthy Caucasian males aged 20-90 yr were recruited from 6 centers across North America. SOS measurements were taken at the distal 1/3 radius, proximal third phalanx, midshaft tibia, and fifth metatarsal. A female reference database has previously been collected at North American sites. The results indicate that SOS in males exhibits an age-related decline beginning in the fifth decade at the radius, phalanx, and metatarsal, whereas the tibial SOS remains nearly constant until the ninth decade. Although females reach a higher-peak SOS than males at most sites, SOS is higher in males at all sites after the sixth decade, as a result of a more gradual decline in SOS. Longitudinal monitoring of healthy men should be performed to confirm these cross-sectional results.