1
|
Lele AV, Moreton EO, Mejia-Mantilla J, Blacker SN. The Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Spine Surgery in High and Low/Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2024:00008506-990000000-00128. [PMID: 39298547 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000001006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 08/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
In this review article, we explore the implementation and outcomes of enhanced recovery after spine surgery (spine ERAS) across different World Bank country-income levels. A systematic literature search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases for articles on the implementation of spine ERAS in both adult and pediatric populations. Study characteristics, ERAS elements, and outcomes were analyzed and meta-analyses were performed for length of stay (LOS) and cost outcomes. The number of spine ERAS studies from low-middle-income countries (LMICs) increased since 2017, when the first spine ERAS implementation study was published. LMICs were more likely than high-income countries (HICs) to conduct studies on patients aged ≥18 years (odds ratio [OR], 6.00; 95% CI, 1.58-42.80), with sample sizes 51 to 100 (OR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.21-22.90), and randomized controlled trials (OR, 7.25; 95% CI, 1.77-53.50). Preoperative optimization was more frequently implemented in LMICs than in HICs (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.06-4.41), and operation time was more often studied in LMICs (OR 3.78; 95% CI, 1.77-8.35). Implementation of spine ERAS resulted in reductions in LOS in both LMIC (-2.06; 95% CI, -2.47 to -1.64 d) and HIC (-0.99; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.70 d) hospitals. However, spine ERAS implementation did result in a significant reduction in costs. This review highlights the global landscape of ERAS implementation in spine surgery, demonstrating its effectiveness in reducing LOS across diverse settings. Further research with standardized reporting of ERAS elements and outcomes is warranted to explore the impact of spine ERAS on cost-effectiveness and other patient-centered outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit V Lele
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Samuel N Blacker
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trenchfield D, Fras S, McCurdy M, Narayanan R, Lee Y, Issa T, Toci G, Oghli Y, Siddiqui H, Vo M, Mahmood H, Schilken M, Pashaee B, Mangan J, Kurd M, Kaye ID, Canseco JA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK, Schroeder GD. Opioid Prescription Trends Among Orthopaedic, Primary Care, and Pain Management Providers in Spine Surgery Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024:00124635-990000000-01072. [PMID: 39186611 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine prescription trends across specialties in the perioperative care of patients undergoing spine surgery from 2018 to 2021. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A range of measures, including implementation of state prescription drug monitoring programs, have been instituted to combat the opioid epidemic. Considering the continued presence of opioids for spine-related pain management, a better understanding of the patterns of opioid prescription practices may be important for future intervention. METHODS All patients aged 18 years and older who underwent elective posterior lumbar decompression and fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, and anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion from 2018 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics and surgical characteristics were collected through a Structured Query Language search and manual chart review. Opioid prescription data were collected through Pennsylvania's Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) database and grouped into the following prescriber categories: primary care, pain management, physiatry, and orthopaedic surgery. RESULTS Of the 1,062 patients, 302 (28.4%) underwent anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion, 345 (32.4%) underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion, and 415 (39.1%) underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. From 2018 to 2021, there were no significant differences in total opioid prescriptions from orthopaedic surgery (P = 0.892), primary care (P = 0.571), pain management (P = 0.687), or physiatry (P = 0.391) providers. Pain management providers prescribed the most opioids between 1 year and 2 months preoperatively (P = 0.003), between 2 months and 1 year postoperatively (P = 0.018), and overall (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Despite increasing national awareness of the opioid epidemic and the establishment of statewide prescription drug monitoring programs, prescription rates have not changed markedly in spine patients. Pain management and primary care physicians prescribe opioids at a higher rate in the chronic periods before and after surgery, likely in part because of longitudinal relationships with these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort Study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delano Trenchfield
- 3pt?>From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tretiakov PS, Onafowokan OO, Mir JM, Lorentz N, Galetta M, Das A, Shin J, Sciubba D, Krol O, Joujon-Roche R, Williamson T, Imbo B, Yee T, Jankowski PP, Hockley A, Schoenfeld AJ, Passias PG. The Impact of Peri-operative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols on Outcomes Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery. Global Spine J 2024:21925682241249105. [PMID: 38647538 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241249105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols on peri-operative course in adult cervical deformity (ACD) corrective surgery. METHODS Patients ≥18 yrs with complete pre-(BL) and up to 2-year (2Y) radiographic and clinical outcome data were stratified by enrollment in an ERAS protocol that commenced in 2020. Differences in demographics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment targets, peri-operative factors and complication rates were assessed via means comparison analysis. Logistic regression analysed differences while controlling for baseline disability and deformity. RESULTS We included 220 patients (average age 58.1 ± 11.9 years, 48% female). 20% were treated using the ERAS protocol (ERAS+). Disability was similar between both groups at baseline. When controlling for baseline disability and myelopathy, ERAS- patients were more likely to utilize opioids than ERAS+ (OR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.45-2.50, P = .016). Peri-operatively, ERAS+ had significantly lower operative time (P < .021), lower EBL (583.48 vs 246.51, P < .001), and required significantly lower doses of propofol intra-operatively than ERAS- patients (P = .020). ERAS+ patients also reported lower mean LOS overall (4.33 vs 5.84, P = .393), and were more likely to be discharged directly to home (χ2(1) = 4.974, P = .028). ERAS+ patients were less likely to require steroids after surgery (P = .045), were less likely to develop neuromuscular complications overall (P = .025), and less likely experience venous complications or be diagnosed with venous disease post-operatively (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in ACD surgery demonstrate significant benefit in terms of peri-operative outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oluwatobi O Onafowokan
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nathan Lorentz
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Galetta
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ankita Das
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospitals, Boston MA, USA
| | - Daniel Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy Yee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pawel P Jankowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hoag Neurosciences Institute, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Aaron Hockley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AL, Canada
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hwang YH, Ha BJ, Kim HC, Lee BH, Park JY, Chin DK, Yi S. A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study Comparing 3 Different Spine Pedicle Screw Fixation Methods: Freehand, Fluoroscopy-Guided, and Robot-Assisted Techniques. Neurospine 2024; 21:83-94. [PMID: 38569633 PMCID: PMC10992644 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448036.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the accuracy of robotic spine surgery and conventional pedicle screw fixation in lumbar degenerative disease. We evaluated clinical and radiological outcomes to demonstrate the noninferiority of robotic surgery. METHODS This study employed propensity score matching and included 3 groups: robot-assisted mini-open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) (robotic surgery, RS), c-arm guided minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (C-arm guidance, CG), and freehand open PLIF (free of guidance, FG) (54 patients each). The mean follow-up period was 2.2 years. The preoperative spine condition was considered. Accuracy was evaluated using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale (GRS score) and Babu classification (Babu score). Radiological outcomes included adjacent segmental disease (ASD) and mechanical failure. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on the visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, 36-item Short Form health survey, and clinical ASD rate. RESULTS Accuracy was higher in the RS group (p < 0.01) than in other groups. The GRS score was lower in the CG group, whereas the Babu score was lower in the FG group compared with the RS group. No significant differences were observed in radiological and clinical outcomes among the 3 groups. Regression analysis identified preoperative facet degeneration, GRS and Babu scores as significant variables for radiological and clinical ASD. Mechanical failure was influenced by the GRS score and patients' age. CONCLUSION This study showed the superior accuracy of robotic spine surgery compared with conventional techniques. When combined with minimally invasive surgery, robotic surgery is advantageous with reduced ligament and muscle damage associated with traditional open procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoon Ha Hwang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byeong-Jin Ha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | - Hyung Cheol Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Byung Ho Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Yoon Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong-Kyu Chin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Magableh HM, Ibrahim S, Pennington Z, Nathani KR, Johnson SE, Katsos K, Freedman BA, Bydon M. Transforming Outcomes of Spine Surgery-Exploring the Power of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of 15 198 Patients. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01058. [PMID: 38358272 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to optimize patient outcomes by reducing the surgical stress response, expediting recovery, and reducing care costs. We aimed to evaluate the impact of implementing ERAS protocols on the perioperative surgical outcomes and financial implications associated with spine surgeries. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed studies directly comparing outcome differences between spine surgeries performed with and without utilization of ERAS pathways was conducted along Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS Of 676 unique articles identified, 59 with 15 198 aggregate patients (7748 ERAS; 7450 non-ERAS) were included. ERAS-treated patients had shorter operative times (mean difference [MD]: 10.2 mins; P < .01), shorter hospitalizations (MD: 1.41 days, P < .01), fewer perioperative complications (relative risk [RR] = 0.64, P < .01), lower postoperative opioid use (MD of morphine equivalent dose: 164.36 mg; P < .01), and more rapid mobilization/time to first out-of-bed ambulation (MD: 0.92 days; P < .01). Spine surgeries employing ERAS were also associated with lower total costs (MD: $1140.26/patient; P < .01), especially in the United States (MD: $2869.11/patient, P < .01) and lower postoperative visual analog pain scores (MD = 0.56, P < .01), without any change in odds of 30-day readmission (RR: 0.80, P = .13) or reoperation (RR: 0.88, P = .60). Subanalyses based on the region of spine showed significantly lower length of stay in both cervical and lumbar surgeries implementing ERAS. Type of procedure showed a significantly lesser time-to-initiate mobilization in fusion surgeries using ERAS protocols compared with decompression. CONCLUSION The present meta-analysis indicates that current literature supports ERAS implementation as a means of reducing care costs and safely accelerating hospital discharge for patients undergoing spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamzah M Magableh
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sufyan Ibrahim
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Zachary Pennington
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Karim Rizwan Nathani
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sarah E Johnson
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Konstantinos Katsos
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brett A Freedman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Mayo Clinic Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tabarestani TQ, Wang TY, Sykes DAW, Mehta VA, Yang LZ, Chow SC, Shaffrey CI, Wiggins WF, Chi JH, Abd-El-Barr MM. Two-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion With an Expandable Titanium Cage Through Kambin's Triangle Without Facetectomy. Int J Spine Surg 2023; 17:760-770. [PMID: 37553259 PMCID: PMC10753344 DOI: 10.14444/8540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been heightened interest in performing percutaneous lumbar interbody fusions (percLIFs) through Kambin's triangle, an anatomic corridor allowing entrance into the disc space. However, due to its novelty, there are limited data regarding the long-term benefits of this procedure. Our objective was to determine the long-term efficacy and durability of the percutaneous insertion of an expandable titanium cage through Kambin's triangle without facetectomy. METHODS A retrospective review of patients undergoing percLIF via Kambin's triangle using an expandable titanium cage was performed. Demographics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), radiographic measurements, perioperative variables, and complications were recorded. VAS, ODI, and radiographic measurements were compared with baseline using the generalized estimating equations assuming normally distributed data. Fusion was assessed with computed tomography (CT) at 1 and 2 years after the procedure. RESULTS A total of 49 patients were included. Spondylolisthesis, lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and anterior/posterior disc space height were all significantly improved postoperatively at each time point of 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (P < 0.001). Pelvic incidence-LL mismatch decreased significantly at each follow-up (P < 0.001) with a mean reduction of 4° by 24 months. VAS back scores reduced by >2 points at the 6, 12, and 24 month follow-ups. ODI scores reduced by >15 points at the 12- and 24-month follow-ups. Of the patients who had 1- and 2-year CT images, fusion rates at those time points were 94.4% (17/18) and 87.5% (7/8), respectively. The mean annual rate of surgically significant adjacent segment disease was 2.74% through an average follow-up of 2.74 years. CONCLUSION These results highlight that percLIF, a procedure done without an endoscope or facetectomy, can be performed using an expandable titanium cage through Kambin's triangle with excellent radiographic and clinical results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE percLIF via Kambin's triangle is a safe and succesful procedure with long-term improvements in both clinical and radiographic outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Troy Q Tabarestani
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Timothy Y Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David A W Sykes
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Vikram A Mehta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Lexie Z Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shein-Chung Chow
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Walter F Wiggins
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John H Chi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feng Y, Ma Y, Lai J, Wang C, Ma X, Liu J. Influence of rapid recovery nutritional support on functional recovery and hospitalization duration in patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar surgery. Am J Transl Res 2023; 15:7023-7034. [PMID: 38186983 PMCID: PMC10767528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of a nutrition support model, specifically focused on rapid recovery, on postoperative recovery in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted, utilizing the medical records of 114 patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent MIS-TLIF at the Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine from February 2020 to October 2022. Among these patients, 63 individuals received a nutrition support model based on the concept of rapid recovery, comprising the observation group, while the remaining 51 patients received conventional postoperative support, forming the control group. The study compared the post-intervention lumbar function recovery, postoperative pain score, perioperative hospital stay, and patient satisfaction with nursing work between the two groups. RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 months after the intervention between the two groups (P>0.05). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in the modified Barthel index and visual analog scale scores at 6 months after the intervention between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of operation time and intraoperative blood loss, there was no statistically significant difference observed between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). However, when compared to the control group, the observation group showed significant shorter hospital stay and time to ambulation after the intervention, leading to a decrease in treatment cost (P<0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, history of diabetes, nursing plan, operation time, and preoperative JOA score were identified as independent risk factors for prolonged hospital stay (P<0.05). CONCLUSION The nutrition support model, which is based on the concept of rapid recovery, has been found to have several benefits for patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing MIS-TLIF. These benefits include reducing the hospital stay, treatment cost, and the time to ambulation. Additionally, logistic regression analysis has identified several independent risk factors that can affect the length of hospital stay. These risk factors include age, history of diabetes, nursing plan, operation time, and preoperative JOA score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiyun Feng
- Department of Spine Surgery, Elderly Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese MedicineNo. 732, Jiayu Pass West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
| | - Yanan Ma
- Department of Spine Surgery, Elderly Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese MedicineNo. 732, Jiayu Pass West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
| | - Jifang Lai
- Department of Joint Movement, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese MedicineNo. 732, Jiayu Pass West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
| | - Chunyan Wang
- Department of Spine Surgery, Elderly Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese MedicineNo. 732, Jiayu Pass West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
| | - Xiaoyan Ma
- Department of Spine Surgery, Elderly Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese MedicineNo. 732, Jiayu Pass West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Trauma Orthopedics, Pediatric Orthopedics, Emergency Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Gansu University of Chinese MedicineNo. 732, Jiayu Pass West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park MW, Park SJ, Chung SG. Relationships Between Skeletal Muscle Mass, Lumbar Lordosis, and Chronic Low Back Pain in the Elderly. Neurospine 2023; 20:959-968. [PMID: 37798990 PMCID: PMC10562244 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346494.247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Loss of skeletal muscle mass is known to be associated with multiple morbidities. However, there is a dearth of reports on its association with lumbar lordosis and musculoskeletal pain. The aim of this study was to delineate the cross-sectional relationship between loss of skeletal muscle mass, lumbar lordosis, and chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS A total of 721 medical records were reviewed, and data from 165 older subjects (over 65 years old; 81 men and 84 women) were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects were categorized into either the CLBP group (back pain for more than 6 months; 35 men and 36 women) or the control group (46 men and 48 women). The modified skeletal muscle mass index (MSMI, appendicular skeletal muscle mass [kg]/weight [kg] × 100), assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis, and lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) were measured and compared between the CLBP group and the control group. The correlation between MSMI and LLA was investigated. RESULTS The LLA of men and women in the CLBP group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.05). The MSMI was decreased in the CLBP group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). For both sexes, positive correlations were observed between the MSMI and LLA. CONCLUSION A close cross-sectional relationship was observed between MSMI, LLA, and CLBP. This suggests a potential interaction between the reduction in skeletal muscle mass and altered lumbar spine sagittal alignment, which could lead to CLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myung Woo Park
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Sun Gun Chung
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Byvaltsev VA, Goloborodko VY, Kalinin AA, Shepelev VV, Pestryakov YY, Riew KD. A standardized anesthetic/analgetic regimen compared to standard anesthetic/analgetic regimen for patients with high-risk factors undergoing open lumbar spine surgery: a prospective comparative single-center study. Neurosurg Rev 2023; 46:95. [PMID: 37093302 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-023-02005-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
The objective of the study is to improve the results of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery who are at high risk for anesthesia and/or surgical complications. Two independent groups were compared: the study group (SG, n = 40) (standardized neuroanesthetic protocol with multimodal analgesia) and the control group (CG, n = 40) (intravenous anesthesia based on propofol and fentanyl). The data were collected using prospective observation of early and long-term results of lumbar fusion. After 24 months, the level of functional state and quality of life were studied. Patients in the SG did not have statistically significant changes in intraoperative hemodynamics; the best indicators of cognitive functions were noted. The effectiveness of the SG compared with the CG was confirmed by a statistically significantly lower amount of perioperative opioid drugs required (p = 0.01) and a minimal level of incisional pain (p < 0.05). An intergroup comparison of the adverse effects of anesthesia revealed a significantly lower number in the SG (n = 4) compared to the CG (n = 16) (p = 0.004). The number of postoperative surgical complications was comparable (p = 0.72). Intergroup comparison showed improved ODI, SF-36, and the Macnab scale at 24 months after surgery in the SG compared to the CG (p < 0.05). Long-term clinical results correlated with the level of incisional pain in the first three postoperative days. Our standardized neuroanesthetic protocol ensured effective treatment of postoperative incisional pain, significantly decreased the perioperative use of opioids, reduced adverse anesthesia events, and improved long-term clinical results in patients with high risk factors for anesthetic complications who undergoing open lumbar spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim A Byvaltsev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krassnogo Vosstaniya Street, off 201, 664003, Irkutsk, Irkutskaya Oblast, Russia.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Railway Clinical Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia.
- Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Irkutsk, Russia.
| | - Victoria Yu Goloborodko
- Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krassnogo Vosstaniya Street, off 201, 664003, Irkutsk, Irkutskaya Oblast, Russia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Railway Clinical Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia
| | - Andrei A Kalinin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krassnogo Vosstaniya Street, off 201, 664003, Irkutsk, Irkutskaya Oblast, Russia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Railway Clinical Hospital, Irkutsk, Russia
| | - Valerii V Shepelev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krassnogo Vosstaniya Street, off 201, 664003, Irkutsk, Irkutskaya Oblast, Russia
| | - Yurii Ya Pestryakov
- Department of Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krassnogo Vosstaniya Street, off 201, 664003, Irkutsk, Irkutskaya Oblast, Russia
| | - K Daniel Riew
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University, New York, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dincer A, Wang A, Kanter MJ, Olmos M, Yang M, Riesenburger RI, Kryzanski JT. Clinical Outcomes of Liposomal Bupivacaine Erector Spinae Block in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery. Neurosurgery 2023; 92:590-598. [PMID: 36512838 PMCID: PMC10158925 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain is a barrier to early mobility and discharge after lumbar surgery. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has been shown to decrease postoperative pain and narcotic consumption after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs) when injected into the marginal suprafascial/subfascial plane-liposomal bupivacaine (MSSP-LB). Erector spinae plane (ESP) infiltration is a relatively new analgesic technique that may offer additional benefits when performed in addition to MSSP-LB. OBJECTIVE To evaluate postoperative outcomes of combining ESP-LB with MSSP-LB compared with MSSP-LB alone after single-level TLIF. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed for patients undergoing single-level TLIFs under spinal anesthesia, 25 receiving combined ESP-LB and MSSP-LB and 25 receiving MSSP-LB alone. The primary outcome was length of hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score, time to ambulation, and narcotics usage. RESULTS Baseline demographics and length of surgery were similar between groups. Hospitalization was significantly decreased in the ESP-LB + MSSP-LB cohort (2.56 days vs 3.36 days, P = .007), as were days to ambulation (0.96 days vs 1.29 days, P = .026). Postoperative pain area under the curve was significantly decreased for ESP-LB + MSSP-LB at 12 to 24 hours (39.37 ± 21.02 vs 53.38 ± 22.11, P = .03) and total (44.46 ± 19.89 vs 50.51 ± 22.15, P = .025). Postoperative narcotic use was significantly less in the ESP-LB + MSSP-LB group at 12 to 24 hours (13.18 ± 4.65 vs 14.78 ± 4.44, P = .03) and for total hospitalization (137.3 ± 96.3 vs 194.7 ± 110.2, P = .04). CONCLUSION Combining ESP-LB with MSSP-LB is superior to MSSP-LB alone for single-level TLIFs in decreasing length of hospital stay, time to ambulation, postoperative pain, and narcotic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alper Dincer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Andy Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew J. Kanter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michelle Olmos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - Ron I. Riesenburger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| | - James T. Kryzanski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Contartese D, Salamanna F, Brogini S, Martikos K, Griffoni C, Ricci A, Visani A, Fini M, Gasbarrini A. Fast-track protocols for patients undergoing spine surgery: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:57. [PMID: 36683022 PMCID: PMC9869597 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-06123-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Fast-track is an evidence-based multidisciplinary strategy for pre-, intra-, and postoperative management of patients during major surgery. To date, fast-track has not been recognized or accepted in all surgical areas, particularly in orthopedic spine surgery where it still represents a relatively new paradigm. PURPOSE The aim of this review was provided an evidenced-based assessment of specific interventions, measurement, and associated outcomes linked to enhanced recovery pathways in spine surgery field. METHODS We conducted a systematic review in three databases from February 2012 to August 2022 to assess the pre-, intra-, and postoperative key elements and the clinical evidence of fast-track protocols as well as specific interventions and associated outcomes, in patients undergoing to spine surgery. RESULTS We included 57 full-text articles of which most were retrospective. Most common fast-track elements included patient's education, multimodal analgesia, thrombo- and antibiotic prophylaxis, tranexamic acid use, urinary catheter and drainage removal within 24 hours after surgery, and early mobilization and nutrition. All studies demonstrated that these interventions were able to reduce patients' length of stay (LOS) and opioid use. Comparative studies between fast-track and non-fast-track protocols also showed improved pain scores without increasing complication or readmission rates, thus improving patient's satisfaction and functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS According to the review results, fast-track seems to be a successful tool to reduce LOS, accelerate return of function, minimize postoperative pain, and save costs in spine surgery. However, current studies are mainly on degenerative spine diseases and largely restricted to retrospective studies with non-randomized data, thus multicenter randomized trials comparing fast-track outcomes and implementation are mandatory to confirm its benefit in spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deyanira Contartese
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Salamanna
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Brogini
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Konstantinos Martikos
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cristiana Griffoni
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ricci
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Anesthesia-resuscitation and Intensive care, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Visani
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Surgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Milena Fini
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Scientific Direction, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gasbarrini
- grid.419038.70000 0001 2154 6641Spine Surgery, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cho S, Choi H, Jeong H, Kwon SY, Roh EJ, Jeong KH, Baek I, Kim BJ, Lee SH, Han I, Cha JM. Preclinical Study of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using a 3-Dimensional Manufacturing Setting for Enhancing Spinal Fusion. Stem Cells Transl Med 2022; 11:1072-1088. [PMID: 36180050 PMCID: PMC9585955 DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szac052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal fusion surgery is a surgical technique that connects one or more vertebrae at the same time to prevent movement between the vertebrae. Although synthetic bone substitutes or osteogenesis-inducing recombinant proteins were introduced to promote bone union, the rate of revision surgery is still high due to pseudarthrosis. To promote successful fusion after surgery, stem cells with or without biomaterials were introduced; however, conventional 2D-culture environments have resulted in a considerable loss of the innate therapeutic properties of stem cells. Therefore, we conducted a preclinical study applying 3D-spheroids of human bone marrow-dewrived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to a mouse spinal fusion model. First, we built a large-scale manufacturing platform for MSC spheroids, which is applicable to good manufacturing practice (GMP). Comprehensive biomolecular examinations, which include liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and bioinformatics could suggest a framework of quality control (QC) standards for the MSC spheroid product regarding the identity, purity, viability, and potency. In our animal study, the mass-produced and quality-controlled MSC spheroids, either undifferentiated or osteogenically differentiated were well-integrated into decorticated bone of the lumbar spine, and efficiently improved angiogenesis, bone regeneration, and mechanical stability with statistical significance compared to 2D-cultured MSCs. This study proposes a GMP-applicable bioprocessing platform and QC directions of MSC spheroids aiming for their clinical application in spinal fusion surgery as a new bone graft substitute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumin Cho
- Department of Mechatronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.,3D Stem Cell Bioengineering Laboratory, Research Institute for Engineering and Technology, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyemin Choi
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHA University School of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyundoo Jeong
- Department of Mechatronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Yeon Kwon
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHA University School of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Ji Roh
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHA University School of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang-Hun Jeong
- Department of Mechatronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.,3D Stem Cell Bioengineering Laboratory, Research Institute for Engineering and Technology, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Inho Baek
- Department of Biomedical Technology, Dongguk University, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Byoung Ju Kim
- Department of Biomedical Technology, Dongguk University, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Hong Lee
- Department of Biomedical Technology, Dongguk University, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Inbo Han
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHA University School of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Min Cha
- Department of Mechatronics Engineering, College of Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.,3D Stem Cell Bioengineering Laboratory, Research Institute for Engineering and Technology, Incheon National University, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Porche K, Yan S, Mohamed B, Garvan C, Samra R, Melnick K, Vaziri S, Seubert C, Decker M, Polifka A, Hoh DJ. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves return of physiological function in frail patients undergoing one- to two-level TLIFs: an observational retrospective cohort study. Spine J 2022; 22:1513-1522. [PMID: 35447326 PMCID: PMC9534035 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multimodal approach which has been shown to facilitate recovery of physiological function, and reduce early post-operative pain, complications, and length of stay (LOS) in open one- to two-level TLIF. The benefit of ERAS in specifically frail patients undergoing TLIF has not been demonstrated. Frailty is clinically defined as a syndrome of physiological decline that can predispose patients undergoing surgery to poor outcomes. PURPOSE This study primarily evaluated the benefit of an ERAS protocol in frail patients undergoing one- or two-level open TLIF compared to frail patients without ERAS. Secondarily, we assessed whether outcomes in frail patients with ERAS approximated those seen in nonfrail patients with ERAS. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective consecutive patient cohort with controls propensity-matched for age, body mass index, sex, and smoking status. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients that underwent one- or two-level open TLIF for degenerative disease from August, 2015 to July, 2021 by a single surgeon. ERAS was implemented in December 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measure was return of postoperative physiological function defined as the summation of first day to ambulate, first day to bowel movement, and first day to void. Additional outcome measures included LOS, daily average pain scores, opioid use, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission rate, and reoperation. METHODS A retrospective analysis of frail patients > 65 years of age undergoing one- to two-level open TLIF post-ERAS were compared to propensity matched frail pre-ERAS patients. Frailty was assessed using the Fried phenotype classification (score >1). Patient demographics, LOS, first-day-to-ambulate (A1), first-day-to-bowel movement (B1), first-day-to-void (V1) were collected. Return of physiological function was defined as A1+B1+V1. Primary analysis was a comparison of frail patients pre-ERAS versus post-ERAS to determine effect of ERAS on return of physiologic function with frailty. Secondary analysis was a comparison of post-ERAS frail versus post-ERAS nonfrail patients to determine if return of physiologic function in frail patients with ERAS approximates that of nonfrail patients. RESULTS In the primary analysis, 32 frail patients were included with mean age ± standard deviation of 72.8±4.4 years, mean BMI 28.8±5.5, 65.6% were male, 15 pre-ERAS and 17 post-ERAS. Patient characteristics were similar between groups. After ERAS implementation, return of physiological function improved by a mean 3.2 days overall (post-ERAS 3.4 vs. pre-ERAS 6.7 days) (p<.0001), indicating a positive effect of ERAS in frail patients. Additionally, length of stay improved by 1 day (4.8±1.6 vs. 3.8±1.9 days, p<.0001). Total daily intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (MME) as well as average daily pain scores were similar between groups. Secondarily, 26 nonfrail patients post ERAS were used as a comparison group with the 17 post-ERAS frail cohort. Mean age of this cohort was 73.4±4.6 years, mean BMI 27.4±4.9, and 61.9% were male. Return of physiologic function was similar between cohorts (post-ERAS nonfrail 3.5 vs. post-ERAS frail 3.4 days) (p=.938), indicating the benefit with ERAS in frail patients approximates that of nonfrail patients. CONCLUSIONS ERAS significantly improves return of physiologic function and length of stay in patients with frailty after one- to two-level TLIF, and approximates improved outcomes seen in non-frail patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608; 1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.
| | - Sandra Yan
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Basma Mohamed
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1600 SW Archer Road, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608
| | - Cynthia Garvan
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1600 SW Archer Road, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608
| | - Ronny Samra
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Sasha Vaziri
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Christoph Seubert
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1600 SW Archer Road, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608
| | - Matthew Decker
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Adam Polifka
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Daniel J. Hoh
- 1600 SW Archer Rd, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA 32608,1505 SW Archer Rd, Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are a set of interventions which are carried out in the preoperative and perioperative period. They are aimed to decrease the harmful effects of surgery on the body and help the patient recover better post-surgery. The effectiveness of ERAS has been well established in various other surgical specialities. Earlier spine surgery was thought to be very complex for application of ERAS protocols. However, this has changed over the last decade with (ERAS) protocols gaining widespread popularity in spine surgery. Initial studies involving ERAS in spine surgery were limited to lumbar spine. However, over the years the horizon of ERAS has expanded to include anterior cervical surgeries, spine deformity, spinal tumors and spine surgery in the elderly. ERAS has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay, overall hospital costs, opioid consumption in perioperative and postoperative period and to lower complication rates in spine surgery. In this narrative review, we discuss various aspects of ERAS in spine surgery including the benefits of ERAS in spine surgery, the various components of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures of ERAS protocol.
Collapse
|
15
|
Braxton EE, Brena KR, Spears H, Conrad E, Heinze JD. Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane nerve blocks: a novel application for the management of acute postoperative pain in awake spine surgery. Illustrative case. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY: CASE LESSONS 2022; 3:CASE21633. [PMCID: PMC9379654 DOI: 10.3171/case21633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pain management is a limiting factor for early ambulation and discharge following spine fusion surgery. Awake spinal surgery, when combined with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, is associated with enhanced recovery in well-selected patients. Some neurosurgeons have recently aimed to further improve outcomes by utilizing erector spinae plane block catheters, allowing for a continuous infusion of local anesthetic to improve the management of acute postoperative pain following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
OBSERVATIONS
A patient who underwent a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with perioperatively placed erector spinae plane catheters at the T12 level ambulated 30 minutes after surgery and was discharged the same day (length of stay, 4.6 hours). The total amount of narcotics administered during the hospital stay was 127.5 morphine milligram equivalents.
LESSONS
The placement of bilateral erector spine plane nerve block catheters at the T12 level with an ambulatory infusion pump may help to improve acute postoperative pain management for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernest E. Braxton
- Department of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail, Colorado
- Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation, Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail, Colorado; and
| | - Kyle R. Brena
- Department of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail, Colorado
- Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation, Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail, Colorado; and
| | - Holley Spears
- Department of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail, Colorado
| | - Emerson Conrad
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Vail, Colorado
| | - Jared D. Heinze
- Department of Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail, Colorado
- Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation, Vail-Summit Orthopaedics and Neurosurgery, Vail, Colorado; and
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
This paper is the forty-third consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2020 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bodnar
- Department of Psychology and Neuropsychology Doctoral Sub-Program, Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY, 11367, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Trivedi R, John J, Ghodke A, Trivedi J, Munigangaiah S, Dheerendra S, Balain B, Ockendon M, Kuiper J. Intrathecal morphine in combination with bupivacaine as pre-emptive analgesia in posterior lumbar fusion surgery: a retrospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 2022; 17:241. [PMID: 35436917 PMCID: PMC9017052 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03124-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal morphine (ITM) in combination with bupivacaine as pre-emptive analgesia in patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery. This is in comparison with traditional opioid analgesics such as intravenous (IV) morphine. Methods Two groups were identified retrospectively. The first (ITM group) included patients who had general anaesthesia (GA) with low-dose spinal anaesthesia prior to induction using 1–4 mls of 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.2 mg ITM. 1 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered per hour of predicted surgery time, up to a maximum of 4 ml. The insertion level for the spinal anaesthetic corresponded to the spinal level of the iliac crest line and the level at which the spinal cord terminated. The control group had GA without any spinal anaesthesia. Patients were instead administered opioid analgesia in the form of IV morphine or diamorphine. The primary outcome was the consumption of opioids administered intraoperatively and in recovery, and over the first 48 h following discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Total opioid dose was measured, and a morphine equivalent dose was calculated. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores in recovery and at day two postoperatively, and the length of stay in hospital. Results For the ITM group, the median total amount of IV morphine equivalent administered intraoperatively and in recovery, was 0 mg versus 17 mg. The median total amount morphine equivalent, administered over the first 48 h following discharge from PACU was 20 mg versus 80 mg. Both are in comparison with the control group. The median length of stay was over 1 day less and the median VAS for pain in recovery was 6 points lower. No evidence was found for a difference in the worst VAS for pain at day two postoperatively. Conclusion ITM in combination with bupivacaine results in a significantly decreased use of perioperative opioids. In addition, length of hospital stay is reduced and so too is patient perceived pain intensity. Trial registration The study was approved by the ethics committee at The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital as a service improvement project (Approval no. 1617_004).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Trivedi
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK.
| | - J John
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - A Ghodke
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - J Trivedi
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - S Munigangaiah
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - S Dheerendra
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - B Balain
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - M Ockendon
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| | - J Kuiper
- The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Gobowen, Oswestry, SY10 7AG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Roh YH, Lee JC, Hwang J, Cho HK, Soh J, Choi SW, Shin BJ. Long-Term Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 10-Year Follow-up Results. J Korean Med Sci 2022; 37:e105. [PMID: 35380029 PMCID: PMC8980361 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many studies have reported that minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) provides satisfactory treatment comparable to other fusion methods. However, in the case of MI-TLIF, there are concerns about the long-term outcome compared to conventional bilateral PLIF due to the small amount of disc removal and the lack of autogenous bone graft. Long-term follow-up studies are still lacking as most of the previous reports have follow-up periods of up to 5 years. METHODS Thirty patients who underwent MI-TLIF were followed up for > 10 years (mean, 11.1 years). Interbody fusion rates were determined using a modified Bridwell grading system. Adjacent segment disease (ASD) was defined as radiological adjacent segment degeneration (R-ASDeg) as seen on plain X-rays; reoperated adjacent segment disease referred to the subsequent need for revision surgery. Clinical outcomes after surgery were assessed based on back and leg pain as well as the Oswestry disability index (ODI). RESULTS The overall radiological fusion rate, at the 1-, 5-, and 10-year follow-up was 77.1%, 91.4%, and 94.3%, respectively. The incidence of R-ASDeg 1, 5, and 10 years after surgery was 6.7%, 16.7%, and 43.3% at the proximal adjacent segment and 4.8%, 14.3%, and 28.6% at the distal adjacent segment, respectively. R-ASDeg at either the proximal or distal segment was determined in 50.0% of the patients 10 years postoperatively. All clinical parameters improved significantly during follow-up, although the ODI and the visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain at the 10-year follow-up were significantly worse in the R-ASDeg group than in the other patients (P = 0.009, P = 0.040). CONCLUSION MI-TLIF improved both clinical and radiological outcomes, and the improvements were maintained for up to 10 years after surgery. However, R-ASDeg developed in up to 50% of the patients within 10 years, and both leg pain on the VAS and the ODI were worse in patients with R-ASDeg.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-Ho Roh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
| | - Jae Chul Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jinyeong Hwang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung-Ki Cho
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaewan Soh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Sung-Woo Choi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Joon Shin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Band IC, Yenicay AO, Montemurno TD, Chan JS, Ogden AT. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Surgery Reduces Length of Hospital Stay and Inpatient Narcotic Use. World Neurosurg X 2022; 14:100120. [PMID: 35257094 PMCID: PMC8897578 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2022.100120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has the potential to improve outcomes, hasten patient recovery, and reduce costs. ERAS has been applied to spine surgery for several years, but data are limited around the impact of ERAS on minimally invasive spine surgery, specifically. The authors report their experience implementing a multimodal ERAS protocol for patients receiving minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Methods The ERAS protocol was implemented at The Valley Hospital Hospital in Ridgewood, New Jersey in January 2020. Following implementation, all patients receiving minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by a single surgeon were studied. The authors analyze the impact of the protocol on length of stay (LOS), disposition post discharge, and opioid consumption postoperatively in the inpatient and outpatient settings. Results Sixteen patients were enrolled in the protocol and compared with 17 historical controls. LOS was significantly shorter in the ERAS cohort (1.6 vs. 2.4 days, P = 0.022). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to disposition; the majority of patients were discharged to home without need for in-home medical services. Patients in the ERAS cohort consumed significantly fewer opioid analgesics postoperatively in the inpatient setting (51 mg morphine milligram equivalents vs. 320 mg morphine milligram equivalents, P = 0.00016). On average, patients in the ERAS cohort were prescribed fewer opioids analgesics post discharge. Conclusions ERAS application to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion was safe and effective, significantly reducing LOS and inpatient opioid consumption. These data reflect the importance of uniformly applying a multimodal ERAS protocol to accelerate recovery and reduce narcotic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle C Band
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, United States
| | - Altan O Yenicay
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
| | - Tina D Montemurno
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
| | - Jenny S Chan
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
| | - Alfred T Ogden
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Hospitals, New York, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Porche K, Samra R, Melnick K, Brennan M, Vaziri S, Seubert C, Polifka A, Hoh DJ, Mohamed B. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. Spine J 2022; 22:399-410. [PMID: 34687905 PMCID: PMC9595392 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is a multidisciplinary, multimodal approach which has been shown to facilitate recovery of physiological function, and reduce postoperative pain, complication rates, and length of stay without adversely affecting readmission rates. Design and implementation of ERAS protocols in the recent spine surgery literature has primarily focused on patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar surgery. However, conventional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) remains a common procedure and to date there are no studies assessing an ERAS protocol in this patient population. PURPOSE This study presents a single surgeon experience implementing an ERAS protocol in patients undergoing 1- or 2-level open TLIF. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective consecutive patient cohort with controls propensity-matched for age, body mass index, sex, and smoking status. PATIENT SAMPLE Consecutive patients that underwent 1- or 2-level open TLIF for degenerative disease from 12/2018 - 02/2021 and controls from 12/2011-12/2017 by a single surgeon. ERAS was implemented in December 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES Primary: length of stay; Secondary: first day to ambulate, first day to bowel movement, first day to void, daily average and maximum pain scores, opioid use, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission rate, and re-operations. METHODS Demographic, perioperative, clinical, radiographic data were collected. Multivariate mixed-linear regression models were developed for length of stay, physiological function, pain scales, and opiate use. RESULTS There were 114 patients included with 57 in each cohort. After propensity matching, patient characteristics were similar between groups. Operative time decreased significantly after institution of ERAS (170±44 vs. 141±37 minutes, p <.0001) as did length of stay (4.6±1.7 vs. 3.6±1.6 days, p<.0001). First day of ambulation, bowel movement, and bladder voiding improved by 0.8 (p<.0001), 0.7 (p=.008), and 0.8 (p<.0001) days, respectively, in the ERAS cohort. Total daily intravenous morphine milligram equivalent (MME) (8±9 vs. 36±38, p<0.0001) and total 72-hour MME consumption (53±33 vs. 68±48, p<.0001) was significantly lower in the ERAS cohort; however, 72-hour MME consumption was not found to be significantly different in a sensitivity analysis controlling for preoperative MME. Average daily pain scores were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with other studies demonstrating benefit of an ERAS protocol for minimally invasive spine procedures, ERAS was associated with decreased operative time, reduced length of stay, decrease in IV opioid consumption, and improved physiological outcomes for open 1- and 2-level TLIF. ERAS can be a potentially effective strategy for improving patient outcome and efficiency of healthcare resources for common conventional spinal surgeries such as open TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Ronny Samra
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Melnick
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Meghan Brennan
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Sasha Vaziri
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christoph Seubert
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Adam Polifka
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Daniel J Hoh
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Basma Mohamed
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Berkman RA, Wright AH, Khan I, Sivaganesan A. Perioperative Modifications to the Open TLIF Provide Comparable Short-term Outcomes to the MIS-TLIF. Clin Spine Surg 2022; 35:E202-E210. [PMID: 33901034 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This study is a retrospective review of patients' charts and data from longitudinally collected clinical outcomes and opioid use. OBJECTIVE In the current study, we aim to compare short-term outcomes data for 139 Open transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) patients to recently published data for tubular and endoscopic MIS-TLIF. BACKGROUND CONTEXT In response to the downsides associated with Open TLIF, such as large incision, blood loss, delayed ambulation, prolonged hospitalization, and opioid-reliance, spine surgeons developed tubular retractor based "minimally-invasive" TLIF. However, the traditional Open TLIF retains its significance in terms of providing successful fusion and improved patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS We adapted several techniques with an aim to improve short-term outcomes for our Open TLIF patients that combined extensive perioperative counselling, an emphasis on early mobilization, avoidance of overuse of opioid analgesics, early discharge with home care arrangements, use of a posthospitalization drainage tube with intraoperative surgical modifications using small incisions (4-5 cm), a narrow 20 mm retractor, minimal muscle injury, and use of a cell saver to minimize net blood loss. The demographics and perioperative results were compared with data from recent MIS-TLIF studies using Student t test for continuous and χ2/exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS Among the total 139 patients, 115 underwent a single-level procedure, 90% of whom were discharged on the first postoperative day (length of stay=1.13±0.47 d) with an average net estimated blood loss of 176.17±87.88 mL. There were 24 two-level procedures with an average length of stay of 1.57±0.84 days, average net estimated blood loss was 216.96±85.70 mL. The patients had statistically significant improvements in PROs at 3 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study identify that patients who underwent modified Open TLIF demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes, as compared with the tubular MIS-TLIF, by virtue of avoidance of blood transfusions, shorter hospital stays, and significantly less opioid usage while experiencing satisfactory PROs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Berkman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Perez-Roman RJ, Govindarajan V, Bryant JP, Wang MY. Spinal anesthesia in awake surgical procedures of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3709 patients. Neurosurg Focus 2021; 51:E7. [PMID: 34852320 DOI: 10.3171/2021.9.focus21464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Awake surgery has previously been found to improve patient outcomes postoperatively in a variety of procedures. Recently, multiple groups have investigated the utility of this modality for use in spine surgery. However, few current meta-analyses exist comparing patient outcomes in awake spinal anesthesia with those in general anesthesia. Therefore, the authors sought to present an updated systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the utility of spinal anesthesia relative to general anesthesia in lumbar procedures. METHODS Following a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases, 14 clinical studies were included in our final qualitative and quantitative analyses. Of these studies, 5 investigated spinal anesthesia in lumbar discectomy, 4 discussed lumbar laminectomy, and 2 examined interbody fusion procedures. One study investigated combined lumbar decompression and fusion or decompression alone. Two studies investigated patients who underwent discectomy and laminectomy, and 1 study investigated a series of patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, posterolateral fusion, or decompression. Odds ratios, mean differences (MDs), and 95% confidence intervals were calculated where appropriate. RESULTS A meta-analysis of the total anesthesia time showed that time was significantly less in patients who received spinal anesthesia for both lumbar discectomies (MD -26.53, 95% CI -38.16 to -14.89; p = 0.00001) and lumbar laminectomies (MD -11.21, 95% CI -19.66 to -2.75; p = 0.009). Additionally, the operative time was significantly shorter in patients who underwent spinal anesthesia (MD -14.94, 95% CI -20.43 to -9.45; p < 0.00001). Similarly, when analyzing overall postoperative complication rates, patients who received spinal anesthesia were significantly less likely to experience postoperative complications (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.16-0.53; p < 0.0001). Furthermore, patients who received spinal anesthesia had significantly lower postoperative pain scores (MD -2.80, 95% CI -4.55 to -1.06; p = 0.002). An identical trend was seen when patients were stratified by lumbar procedures. Patients who received spinal anesthesia were significantly less likely to require postoperative analgesia (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.02-0.25; p < 0.0001) and had a significantly shorter hospital length of stay (MD -0.16, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.03; p = 0.02) and intraoperative blood loss (MD -52.36, 95% CI -81.55 to -23.17; p = 0.0004). Finally, the analysis showed that spinal anesthesia cost significantly less than general anesthesia (MD -226.14, 95% CI -324.73 to -127.55; p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS This review has demonstrated the varying benefits of spinal anesthesia in awake spine surgery relative to general anesthesia in patients who underwent various lumbar procedures. The analysis has shown that spinal anesthesia may offer some benefits when compared with general anesthesia, including reduction in the duration of anesthesia, operative time, total cost, and postoperative complications. Large prospective trials will elucidate the true role of this modality in spine surgery.
Collapse
|
23
|
Enhanced recovery after lumbar fusion surgery: Benefits of using Game Ready©. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107:102953. [PMID: 33957322 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The primary aim of this study was to evaluate how the Game Ready© cryotherapy system impacts postoperative analgesia following lumbar fusion. The secondary aim was to study the effect of cryotherapy on blood loss, transfusion rate and recovery after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective study of 60 patients divided into two consecutive sets. The first set of 30 patients underwent the current anesthesia protocol at our facility (control group) while the second set of 30 underwent the same protocol but the patient wore the Game Ready© cryotherapy belt immediately postoperative (GR group). RESULTS VAS for pain at H6 did not differ between groups [5.2±1.7 vs. 5.2±1.8 (p=0.94)]; however, there was a significant decrease in pain at H24 and H48 in the GR group relative to the control group (p=0.04; p=0.01; p=0.01). Consumption of morphine over the first 24 and 48hours was 50% less in the GR group than in the control group (p=0.01 and p<0.0001). Discharge occurred significantly earlier in the GR group (3.9±1.0 days) than the control group (5.1±0.9 days) (p<0.001). The estimated blood loss was greater in the control group than the GR group (574.7ml±339.2 vs. 305.9ml±229.6; p=0.0003). CONCLUSION Use of a cryotherapy device in the context of spine surgery is effective at controlling postoperative pain. It also decreases the consumption of analgesics, limits blood loss, reduces the need for transfusions, and contributes to enhanced recovery after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
|
24
|
Mazur-Hart DJ, Bowden SG, Pang BW, Yaghi NK, Nugent JG, Yablon LD, Domreis WO, Ohm ET, Sayama CM. Standardizing postoperative care for pediatric intradural Chiari decompressions to decrease length of stay. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 28:579-584. [PMID: 34416728 DOI: 10.3171/2021.5.peds20929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Amid national and local budget crises, cutting costs while maintaining quality care is a top priority. Chiari malformation is a relatively common pediatric neurosurgical pathology, and postoperative care varies widely. The postoperative course can be complicated by pain and nausea, which can extend the hospital stay. In this study, the authors aimed to examine whether instituting a standardized postoperative care protocol would decrease overall patient hospital length of stay (LOS) as well as cost to families and the hospital system. METHODS A retrospective study of pediatric patients who underwent an intradural Chiari decompression with expansile duraplasty at a single institution from January 2016 to September 2019 was performed. A standardized postoperative care protocol was instituted on May 17, 2018. Pre- and postprotocol groups were primarily analyzed for demographics, LOS, and the estimated financial expense of the hospital stay. Secondary analysis included readmissions, opioid consumption, and follow-up. RESULTS The analysis included 132 pediatric patients who underwent an intradural Chiari decompression with expansile duraplasty. The preprotocol group included 97 patients and the postprotocol group included 35 patients. Patient age ranged from 0.5 to 26 years (mean 9.5 years). The mean LOS preprotocol was 55.48 hours (range 25.90-127.77 hours), and the mean postprotocol LOS was 46.39 hours (range 27.58-77.38 hours). The comparison between means showed a statistically significant decrease following protocol initiation (95% CI 1.87-16.31 hours, p = 0.014). In the preprotocol group, 21 of 97 patients (22%) were discharged the first day after surgery compared with 14 of 35 patients (40%) in the postprotocol group (p = 0.045). The estimated cost of one night on the pediatric neurosurgical intermediate ward was approximately $4500, which gives overall cost estimates for 100 theoretical cases of $927,800 for the preprotocol group and $732,900 for the postprotocol group. CONCLUSIONS By instituting a Chiari protocol, postoperative LOS was significantly decreased, which resulted in decreased healthcare costs while maintaining high-quality and safe care.
Collapse
|
25
|
Kalinin AA, Goloborodko VY, Shepelev VV, Pestryakov YY, Biryuchkov MY, Satardinova EE, Byvaltsev VA. Accelerated Recovery Program for Patients with Polysegmental Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2021; 13:74-81. [PMID: 34513080 PMCID: PMC8353713 DOI: 10.17691/stm2021.13.2.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the accelerated recovery program for patients with polysegmental degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Kalinin
- Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia; Neurosurgeon, Neurosurgery Center, Road Clinical Hospital, 10 Botkin St., Irkutsk, 664005, Russia
| | - V Yu Goloborodko
- Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation No.12
| | - V V Shepelev
- Doctoral Student, Department of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia
| | - Yu Ya Pestryakov
- Doctoral Student, Department of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia
| | - M Yu Biryuchkov
- Professor, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery with Traumatology Course, West Kazakhstan Marat Ospanov Medical University, 68 Maresyev St., Aktobe, 030019, Kazakhstan
| | - E E Satardinova
- Associate Professor, Department of Reflexotherapy and Cosmetology, Irkutsk State Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education, 100 Yubileyny Microdistrict, Irkutsk, 664049, Russia
| | - V A Byvaltsev
- Professor, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, 1 Krasnogo Vosstaniya St., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia; Chief of the Neurosurgery Center, Road Clinical Hospital, 10 Botkin St., Irkutsk, 664005, Russia; Professor, Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Neurosurgery, Irkutsk State Medical Academy for Postgraduate Education, 100 Yubileyny Microdistrict, Irkutsk, 664049, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kou Y, Chang J, Guan X, Chang Q, Feng H. Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2021; 152:e352-e368. [PMID: 34087465 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) in treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. METHODS A literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies published up to November 15, 2020, that compared Endo-LIF with MIS-TLIF for treating lumbar degenerative diseases were retrieved. Data were extracted according to predefined clinical outcome measures. Primary outcomes were preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale for leg and back pain and Oswestry Disability Index scores. Secondary outcomes were operative time and intraoperative blood loss; length of hospitalization; and complication, reoperation, and fusion rates. Data analysis was conducted with statistical software. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 6 studies comprising 480 patients. Results of the merged analysis revealed similar complication, reoperation, and fusion rates and preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale for leg and back pain and Oswestry Disability Index scores (P > 0.05) for Endo-LIF and MIS-TLIF. Nevertheless, with the exception of longer operative time (P < 0.05), Endo-LIF compared favorably with MIS-TLIF, with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay (P < 0.05), and better long-term functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS Based on the evidence provided by this study, there is no significant difference in clinical efficacy and safety between Endo-LIF and MIS-TLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Although Endo-LIF has a longer operative time, it has the advantages of less tissue trauma and rapid recovery after operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanqiao Kou
- The Third Clinical Medical College of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Jianjun Chang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Xiaoming Guan
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Qiang Chang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Haoyu Feng
- Department of Spinal Surgery, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hyun SJ, Yoon SH, Kim JH, Oh JK, Lee CH, Shin JJ, Kang J, Ha Y. A Prospective, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Synthetic Bone Graft Material DBM Gel with rhBMP-2 versus DBM Gel Used during the TLIF Procedure in Patients with Lumbar Disc Disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2021; 64:562-574. [PMID: 33906347 PMCID: PMC8273782 DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2020.0331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) gel versus DBM gel with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).
Methods This study was designed as a prospective, multi-center, double-blind method, randomized study. All randomized subjects underwent TLIF with DBM gel with rhBMP-2 group (40 patients) as an experimental group or DBM gel group (36 patients) as a control group. Post-operative observations were performed at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. The spinal fusion rate on computed tomography scans and X-rays films, Visual analog scale pain scores, Oswestry disability index and SF-36 quality of life (QOL) scores were used for the efficacy evaluation. The incidence rate of adverse device effects (ADEs) and serious adverse device effects (SADEs) were used for safety evaluation.
Results The spinal fusion rate at 12 weeks for the DBM gel with rhBMP-2 group was higher with 73.68% compared to 58.82% for the DBM gel group. The 24 and 48 weeks were 72.22% and 82.86% for the DBM gel with rhBMP-2 group and 78.79% and 78.13%, respectively, for the DBM gel group. However, there were no significant differences between two groups in the spinal fusion rate at 12, 24, and 48 weeks post-treatment (p=0.1817, p=0.5272, p=0.6247). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence rate of ADEs (p=0.3836). For ADEs in the experimental group, ‘Pyrexia’ (5.00%) was the most common ADE, followed by ‘Hypesthesia’, ‘Paresthesia’, ‘Transient peripheral paralysis’, ‘Spondylitis’ and ‘Insomnia’ (2.50%, respectively). ADEs reported in control group included ‘Pyrexia’, ‘Chest discomfort’, ‘Pain’, ‘Osteoarthritis’, ‘Nephropathy toxic’, ‘Neurogenic bladder’, ‘Liver function analyses’ and ‘Urticaria’ (2.86%, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence rate of SADEs (p=0.6594). For SADE in the experimental group, ‘‘Pyrexia’ and ‘Spondylitis’ were 2.50%. SADE reported in the control group included 'Chest discomfort’, ‘Osteoarthritis’ and ‘Neurogenic bladder’. All SADEs described above were resolved after medical treatment.
Conclusion This study demonstrated that the spinal fusion rates of DBM gel group and DBM gel with rhBMP-2 group were not significantly different. But, this study provides knowledge regarding the earlier postoperative effect of rhBMP-2 containing DBM gel and also supports the idea that the longer term follow-up results are essential to confirm the safety and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Jae Hyun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Yoon
- Department of Neurosurgery, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Joo Han Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Keun Oh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| | - Chang-Hyun Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Jae Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Jiin Kang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yongin Severance Hospital, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Yoon Ha
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Eli I, Whitmore RG, Ghogawala Z. Spine Instrumented Surgery on a Budget-Tools for Lowering Cost Without Changing Outcome. Global Spine J 2021; 11:45S-55S. [PMID: 33890807 PMCID: PMC8076804 DOI: 10.1177/21925682211004895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Review article. OBJECTIVES There have been substantial increases in the utilization of complex spinal surgery in the last 20 years. Spinal instrumented surgery is associated with high costs as well as significant variation in approach and care. The objective of this manuscript is to identify and review drivers of instrumented spine surgery cost and explain how surgeons can reduce costs without compromising outcome. METHODS A literature search was conducted using PubMed. The literature review returned 217 citations. 27 publications were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The relevant literature on drivers of spine instrumented surgery cost is reviewed. RESULTS The drivers of cost in instrumented spine surgery are varied and include implant costs, complications, readmissions, facility-based costs, surgeon-driven preferences, and patient comorbidities. Each major cost driver represents an opportunity for potential reductions in cost. With high resource utilization and often uncertain outcomes, spinal surgery has been heavily scrutinized by payers and hospital systems, with efforts to reduce costs and standardize surgical approach and care pathways. CONCLUSIONS Education about cost and commitment to standardization would be useful strategies to reduce cost without compromising patient-reported outcomes after instrumented spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilyas Eli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA,Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, UT, USA
| | - Robert G. Whitmore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA
| | - Zoher Ghogawala
- Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA,Zoher Ghogawala, Department of Neurosurgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, 41 Mall Road, Burlington, MA 01805, Burlington, MA 01805, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Corniola MV, Tessitore E. Commentary: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Reduces Postoperative Opioid Use and 90-Day Readmission Rates After Open Thoracolumbar Fusion for Adult Degenerative Deformity. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:E136-E137. [PMID: 33034646 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marco V Corniola
- Neurosurgical Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Enrico Tessitore
- Neurosurgical Unit, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|