Prophylactic Antitubercular Therapy Is Associated With Accelerated Disease Progression in Patients With Crohn's Disease Receiving Anti-TNF Therapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Antibiotic Therapy for Active Crohn's Disease Targeting Pathogens: An Overview and Update

Crohn's disease (CD) is a multifactorial chronic disorder that involves a combination of factors, including genetics, immune response, and gut microbiota. Therapy includes salicylates, immunosuppressive agents, corticosteroids, and biologic drugs. International guidelines do not recommend the use of antibiotics for CD patients, except in the case of septic complications. Increasing evidence of the involvement of gut bacteria in this chronic disease supports the rationale for using antibiotics as the primary treatment for active CD. In recent decades, several pathogens have been reported to be involved in the development of CD, but only Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Mycobacterium avium paratubercolosis (MAP) have aroused interest due to their strong association with CD pathogenesis. Several meta-analyses have been published concerning antibiotic treatment for CD patients, but randomized trials testing antibiotic treatment against E. coli and MAP have not shown prolonged benefits and have generated conflicting results; several questions are still unresolved regarding trial design, antibiotic dosing, the formulation used, the treatment course, and the outcome measures. In this paper, we provide an overview and update of the trials testing antibiotic treatment for active CD patients, taking into account the role of pathogens, the mechanisms by which different antibiotics act on harmful pathogens, and antibiotic resistance. Finally, we also present new lines of study for the future regarding the use of antibiotics to treat patients with active CD.

Antibiotics for inflammatory bowel disease: Current status

There is abundant literature reporting about the use of antibiotics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but their role in the management of IBD is not entirely clear. Diverse infectious organisms have been implicated in the pathogenesis of Crohn's disease. Also, infections are believed to be a trigger for flares of ulcerative colitis. The benefit of the routine use of antibiotics in IBD is equivocal. However, there are certain situations, where antibiotics have a clear role and evidence of benefit: perianal fistula, intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn's disease, acute pouchitis and infection-related flares. However, there is a lack of supportive evidence for the routine use of antibiotics in all disease-related flares. Evidence indicates a lack of benefit of intravenous antibiotics in acute severe ulcerative colitis and only limited benefit in active ulcerative colitis. Limited evidence suggests the role of a combination of oral antibiotics in pediatric ulcerative colitis. Certain targeted antibiotic regimens have been used in IBD. In ulcerative colitis, limited evidence suggests the benefit of the use of an antibiotic cocktail directed against Fusobacterium varium. Therapy directed against Escherichia coli does not seem to have a benefit in inflammatory Crohn's disease. In Crohn's disease, antimycobacterial therapy may result in symptomatic improvement but no durable benefit. Antitubercular therapy (ATT), on the contrary, may result in fibrotic transformation, suggesting a need to avoid misdiagnosis and limit the duration of ATT in Crohn's disease. This review assesses the published literature with respect to antibiotic use and provides guidance to clinicians in appropriate antibiotic use in various situations in the setting of IBD.

Comprehensive review and update of stricturing Crohn's disease

Up to 50% of patients with Crohn's disease develop a stricture within 10 years of diagnosis. Crohn's strictures can compose of inflammation, fibrosis or smooth muscle expansion and usually a combination of these. There have been numerous new developments in imaging modalities in determining the composition of Crohn's strictures. Magnetic resonance imaging remains the best upfront imaging modality to characterize Crohn's strictures. Gastrointestinal ultrasound (GIUS) has an increasing role in clinical practice, particularly for monitoring stricture response as a treat-to-target tool. Novel imaging techniques to differentiate between fibrosis and inflammatory strictures have been developed including contrast-enhanced GIUS, strain or shear wave elastography with GIUS and multiple new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols, including diffusion weighted, delayed contrast enhancement and magnetization transfer MR protocols. However, these techniques require further validation and standardization. Regarding therapeutics, anti-tumor necrosis agents with a treat-to-target strategy have the highest quality evidence in treating strictures and can lead to stricture regression in some cases. Endoscopic balloon dilatation remains a mainstay in the treatment algorithm of treating predominantly fibrostenotic Crohn's strictures, particularly those which are symptomatic, < 5 cm in length and not causing prestenotic dilatation. Endoscopic balloon dilatation has greater effectiveness in anastomotic strictures. Surgery remains an important treatment option in Crohn's strictures, with segmental resection and stricturoplasty having their own advantages and disadvantages. Kono-S anastomosis may be superior to conventional anastomosis for endoscopic recurrence; however, further high-quality studies are required to confirm this. Using risk stratification models such as the BACARDI risk model is important to guide management decisions between a medical and surgical approach. Early post-operative medical prophylaxis with an advanced therapy is an important consideration to prevent disease recurrence. This review expands on the above topics, highlights research gaps and provides a suggested investigation and management pathway in stricturing Crohn's disease.

Differentiating gastrointestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease- a comprehensive review

Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis (GITB) and Crohn's disease (CD) are both chronic granulomatous diseases with a predilection to involve primarily the terminal ileum. GITB is often considered a disease of the developing world, while CD and inflammatory bowel disease are considered a disease of the developed world. But in recent times, the epidemiology of both diseases has changed. Differentiating GITB from CD is of immense clinical importance as the management of both diseases differs. While GITB needs anti-tubercular therapy (ATT), CD needs immunosuppressive therapy. Misdiagnosis or a delay in diagnosis can lead to catastrophic consequences. Most of the clinical features, endoscopic findings, and imaging features are not pathognomonic for either of these two conditions. The definitive diagnosis of GITB can be clinched only in a fraction of cases with microbiological positivity (acid-fast bacilli, mycobacterial culture, or PCR-based tests). In most cases, the diagnosis is often based on consistent clinical, endoscopic, imaging, and histological findings. Similarly, no single finding can conclusively diagnose CD. Multiparametric-based predictive models incorporating clinical, endoscopy findings, histology, radiology, and serology have been used to differentiate GITB from CD with varied results. However, it is limited by the lack of validation studies for most such models. Many patients, especially in TB endemic regions, are initiated on a trial of ATT to see for an objective response to therapy. Early mucosal response assessed at two months is an objective marker of response to ATT. Prolonged ATT in CD is recognized to have a fibrotic effect. Therefore, early discrimination may be vital in preventing the delay in the diagnosis of CD and avoiding a complicated course.