1
|
Lewis D, Wong WWL, Lipscomb J, Horton S. An Exploratory Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of a Multi-cancer Early Detection Blood Test Compared with Standard of Care Screening in Ontario, Canada. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2024; 42:393-407. [PMID: 38150120 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01345-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Determining whether multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are cost effective is important in deciding whether they should be included in the clinical path of cancer care, especially for cancers where screening tools do not exist. RESEARCH OBJECTIVE The main objective of this study is to determine the cost effectiveness of including a MCED screening regimen together with existing provincial screening protocols for selected cancers that are prevalent in Ontario, Canada, among average risk persons aged 50-75 years. The selected cancers include breast, colorectal, lung, esophageal, liver, pancreatic, stomach, and ovarian. METHODS Cost effectiveness was estimated from a provincial Ministry of Health perspective. A state-transition Markov model representing the decision path of both the proposed and existing screening strategies along the natural history of the selected types of cancers was implemented. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using data from available literature and the guidelines published by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) for conducting a cost-effectiveness analysis, which included a discount rate of 1.5% applied to all costs and outcomes. Costs were also converted to 2022 Canadian dollars. To test the robustness of the model, both univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS MCED screening resulted in more diagnosed cases of each type of cancer, even at an earlier stage of disease. This was also associated with fewer related deaths compared with standard of care. Notwithstanding, the analysis revealed that the MCED intervention was not cost effective [ICER: CAD$143,369 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY)], given a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 per QALY. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that the MCED intervention strategy was preferred to standard of care no more than 2% of the time at this WTP for both males and females. The model was most sensitive to the cost of MCED screening, and the levels of specificity of the MCED and colorectal cancer screening tests. CONCLUSION The main contribution of the study is to present and execute a methodological approach that can be adopted to test the cost effectiveness of an MCED tool in the Canadian setting. The model is also sufficiently generic that it could be adapted to other jurisdictions, and with consideration for increasing the WTP threshold beyond the common $100,000 per QALY limit, given the life-threatening nature of cancer, to ensure that MCED interventions are cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diedron Lewis
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
| | - William W L Wong
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph Lipscomb
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Susan Horton
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alabdulkader AM, Mustafa T, Almutailiq DA, Al-Maghrabi RA, Alzanadi RH, Almohsen DS, Alkaltham NK. Knowledge and barriers to screening for colorectal cancer among individuals aged 40 years or older visiting primary healthcare clinics in Al-Khobar, Eastern Province. J Family Community Med 2024; 31:25-35. [PMID: 38406224 PMCID: PMC10883426 DOI: 10.4103/jfcm.jfcm_291_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third as the most common cancer in the world and the 4th most common cause of deaths from cancer. In Saudi Arabia, CRC is the most common cancer in males and the third most common in females. Early screening reduces the risk of CRC and death. However, there is a lack of awareness of CRC screening in Saudi Arabia. The objective of this study was to determine the knowledge, practices, and barriers to CRC screening using the Health Belief Model (HBM). MATERIALS AND METHODS This study enrolled Saudis aged 40 years or older visiting PHCCs in Al-Khobar. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire or a direct interview of the selected participants. Information sought included sociodemographics, past CRC screening, CRC knowledge, and HBM items. Data analysis was done using SPSS; the Chi-squared test and ANOVA were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS A total of 206 of the individuals approached completed the questionnaire. The average age was 51.1 years, and 51% were males. Only 10% reported that a physician had provided information on CRC prevention or discussed/recommended screening for CRC, and 10% had undergone screening for CRC. Seventy-five percent of respondents had heard of CRC, and 74% said that CRC was preventable. Regarding the HBM, no significant difference in the mean scores for perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, self-efficacy, and benefits of CRC screening was found by age groups. The mean score for perceived severity was higher for females than males. About 60% of participants were extremely likely to have a screening test for CRC done on the day if recommended by the doctor. CONCLUSION The knowledge and awareness of CRC screening of the targeted sample is inadequate. Individuals with higher perceived susceptibility, severity of CRC, and perceived benefit of the screening tests were more willing to undergo the test. The highest perceived barrier was having no symptoms, and the lowest was "getting a stool test is too much of a hassle." These findings underline the importance of having a national screening program and campaigns to deal with the concerns of people and raise awareness of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Assim M. Alabdulkader
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tajammal Mustafa
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Danah A. Almutailiq
- College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Razan A. Al-Maghrabi
- College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rabab H. Alzanadi
- College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Danyah S. Almohsen
- College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nourah K. Alkaltham
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kalyta A, Ruan Y, Telford JJ, De Vera MA, Peacock S, Brown C, Donnellan F, Gill S, Brenner DR, Loree JM. Association of Reducing the Recommended Colorectal Cancer Screening Age With Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Costs in Canada Using OncoSim. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:1432-1436. [PMID: 37471076 PMCID: PMC10360004 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Importance Recent US guideline updates have advocated for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to begin at age 45 years in average-risk adults, whereas Canadian screening programs continue to begin screening at age 50 years. Similarities in early-onset CRC rates in Canada and the US warrant discussion of earlier screening in Canada, but there is a lack of Canadian-specific modeling data to inform this. Objective To estimate the association of a lowered initiation age for CRC screening by biennial fecal immunochemical test (FIT) with CRC incidence, mortality, and health care system costs in Canada. Design, Setting, and Participants/Exposures This economic evaluation computational study used microsimulation modeling via the OncoSim platform. Main Outcomes and Measures Modeled rates of CRC incidence, mortality, and health care costs in Canadian dollars. Results This analysis included 4 birth cohorts (1973-1977, 1978-1982, 1983-1987, and 1988-1992) representative of the Canadian population accounting for previously documented effects of increasing CRC incidence in younger birth cohorts. Screening initiation at age 45 years resulted in a net 12 188 fewer CRC cases, 5261 fewer CRC deaths, and an added 92 112 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) to the cohort population over a 40-year period relative to screening from age 50 years. Screening initiation at age 40 years yielded 18 135 fewer CRC cases, 7988 fewer CRC deaths, and 150 373 QALYs. The cost per QALY decreased with younger birth cohorts to a cost of $762 per QALY when Canadians born in 1988 to 1992 began screening at age 45 years or $2622 per QALY with screening initiation at age 40 years. Although costs associated with screening and resulting therapeutic interventions increased with earlier screening, the overall health care system cost of managing CRC decreased. Conclusions and Relevance This economic evaluation study using microsimulation modeling found that earlier screening may reduce CRC disease burden and add life-years to the Canadian population at a modest cost. Guideline changes suggesting earlier CRC screening in Canada may be justified, but evaluation of the resulting effects on colonoscopy capacity is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yibing Ruan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Jennifer J. Telford
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mary A. De Vera
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stuart Peacock
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Carl Brown
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Fergal Donnellan
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Darren R. Brenner
- Departments of Oncology and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Diedrich L, Brinkmann M, Dreier M, Rossol S, Schramm W, Krauth C. Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290353. [PMID: 37594967 PMCID: PMC10438011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is effective in reducing both incidence and mortality. Colonoscopy and stool tests are most frequently used for this purpose. Sigmoidoscopy is an alternative screening measure with a strong evidence base. Due to its distinct characteristics, it might be preferred by subgroups. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy for CRC screening compared to other screening methods and to identify influencing parameters. METHODS A systematic literature search for the time frame 01/2010-01/2023 was conducted using the databases MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit, Web of Science, NHS EED, as well as the Cost-Effectiveness Registry. Full economic analyses examining sigmoidoscopy as a screening measure for the general population at average risk for CRC were included. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. All included studies were critically assessed based on a questionnaire for modelling studies. RESULTS Twenty-five studies are included in the review. Compared to no screening, sigmoidoscopy is a cost-effective screening strategy for CRC. When modelled as a single measure strategy, sigmoidoscopy is mostly dominated by colonoscopy or modern stool tests. When combined with annual stool testing, sigmoidoscopy in 5-year intervals is more effective and less costly than the respective strategies alone. The results of the studies are influenced by varying assumptions on adherence, costs, and test characteristics. CONCLUSION The combination of sigmoidoscopy and stool testing represents a cost-effective screening strategy that has not received much attention in current guidelines. Further research is needed that goes beyond a narrow focus on screening technology and models different, preference-based participation behavior in subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Diedrich
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Melanie Brinkmann
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maren Dreier
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Siegbert Rossol
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/M, Germany
| | - Wendelin Schramm
- GECKO Institute for Medicine, Informatics and Economics, Heilbronn University, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vahdat V, Alagoz O, Chen JV, Saoud L, Borah BJ, Limburg PJ. Calibration and Validation of the Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) Microsimulation Model Using Deep Neural Networks. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:719-736. [PMID: 37434445 PMCID: PMC10422851 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231184175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Machine learning (ML)-based emulators improve the calibration of decision-analytical models, but their performance in complex microsimulation models is yet to be determined. METHODS We demonstrated the use of an ML-based emulator with the Colorectal Cancer (CRC)-Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model, which includes 23 unknown natural history input parameters to replicate the CRC epidemiology in the United States. We first generated 15,000 input combinations and ran the CRC-AIM model to evaluate CRC incidence, adenoma size distribution, and the percentage of small adenoma detected by colonoscopy. We then used this data set to train several ML algorithms, including deep neural network (DNN), random forest, and several gradient boosting variants (i.e., XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost) and compared their performance. We evaluated 10 million potential input combinations using the selected emulator and examined input combinations that best estimated observed calibration targets. Furthermore, we cross-validated outcomes generated by the CRC-AIM model with those made by CISNET models. The calibrated CRC-AIM model was externally validated using the United Kingdom Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial (UKFSST). RESULTS The DNN with proper preprocessing outperformed other tested ML algorithms and successfully predicted all 8 outcomes for different input combinations. It took 473 s for the trained DNN to predict outcomes for 10 million inputs, which would have required 190 CPU-years without our DNN. The overall calibration process took 104 CPU-days, which included building the data set, training, selecting, and hyperparameter tuning of the ML algorithms. While 7 input combinations had acceptable fit to the targets, a combination that best fits all outcomes was selected as the best vector. Almost all of the predictions made by the best vector laid within those from the CISNET models, demonstrating CRC-AIM's cross-model validity. Similarly, CRC-AIM accurately predicted the hazard ratios of CRC incidence and mortality as reported by UKFSST, demonstrating its external validity. Examination of the impact of calibration targets suggested that the selection of the calibration target had a substantial impact on model outcomes in terms of life-year gains with screening. CONCLUSIONS Emulators such as a DNN that is meticulously selected and trained can substantially reduce the computational burden of calibrating complex microsimulation models. HIGHLIGHTS Calibrating a microsimulation model, a process to find unobservable parameters so that the model fits observed data, is computationally complex.We used a deep neural network model, a popular machine learning algorithm, to calibrate the Colorectal Cancer Adenoma Incidence and Mortality (CRC-AIM) model.We demonstrated that our approach provides an efficient and accurate method to significantly speed up calibration in microsimulation models.The calibration process successfully provided cross-model validation of CRC-AIM against 3 established CISNET models and also externally validated against a randomized controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vahab Vahdat
- Health Economics and Outcome Research, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Oguzhan Alagoz
- Departments of Industrial & Systems Engineering and Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Jing Voon Chen
- Health Economics and Outcome Research, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Leila Saoud
- Health Economics and Outcome Research, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Bijan J. Borah
- Division of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul J. Limburg
- Health Economics and Outcome Research, Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Voelkel V, Draeger T, van Mossel S, Siesling S, Koffijberg H. The value of time-dependent risk predictions in a screening context - a comprehensive simulation analysis validated on German cancer registry data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:239. [PMID: 36088300 PMCID: PMC9464381 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01718-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Risk-prediction tools allow classifying individuals into risk groups based on risk thresholds. Such risk categorization is often used to inform screening schemes by offering screening only to individuals at increased risk of harmful events. Adding information concerning an individual’s risk development over time would allow assessing not just who to screen but also when to screen. This paper illustrates the value of personalised, time-dependent risk predictions to optimize risk-based screening schemes. Methods In a simulation analysis, two different time-dependent risk-based screening approaches are compared to another risk-based, but time-independent approach regarding their impact on screening efficiency. For this purpose, 81 scenarios featuring 5000 patients with five consecutive annual risk estimations for a hypothetical disease D are simulated, using different parameters to model disease progression and risk distribution. This simulation analysis is validated using a real-world clinical case study based on German breast cancer patients and the INFLUENCE-nomogram for locoregional breast cancer recurrence. Results If individual risk estimations were used to personalise screening for a disease D aiming at detecting a 90% of curable cases, more than 20% of screening examinations could be avoided relative to a conventional uninformed approach, depending on the simulated scenario. Whereas an individual but time-independent approach is associated with acceptable saving potentials in case of a relatively homogenous risk distribution, the time-dependent approaches are superior when the complexity of a scenario increases. With slowly progressing diseases, risk-accumulation over time needs to be considered to achieve the highest screening efficiency on population level, for rapidly progressing diseases, an interval-specific approach is superior. The possible benefits of time-dependent risk-based screening were confirmed in the real-world clinical case study. Conclusions Appropriate approaches to use time-dependent risk predictions may considerably enhance screening efficiency on individual and population level. Therefore, predicting risk development over time should be supported by future prediction tools and be incorporated in decision algorithms. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01718-2.
Collapse
|
7
|
Gheysariyeha F, Rahimi F, Tabesh E, Hemami MR, Adibi P, Rezayatmand R. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13673. [PMID: 35974390 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the use of CRC screening tests can reduce the incidence and mortality of the disease by early detection. This study aims to review cost-effectiveness strategies in different ages and countries, systematically. METHODS We searched ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed and Embase for related studies between 2010 and 2020. Articles that reported costs per Quality-Adjusted Life Year or Life Year Gain and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios to compare the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening strategies in the average-risk population were included in our study. RESULTS The search strategies identified 426 records and finally 48 articles were included in the systematic review based on included and excluded criteria. We identified seven strategies for CRC screening. Most of the strategies were performed in aged 50-75. These studies were reported by cost per Quality-Adjusted life year (QALY)/Life Year Gain (LYG) based on methods and perspectives and the ICER of comparison of two-by-two strategies. CONCLUSION Most of the CRC screening strategies were cost-effective, but there was big heterogeneity between the cost-effectiveness analysis of CRC screening strategies because of different screening methods, perspectives and screening populations. So, it is important to consider this heterogeneity to compare the economic evaluation studies in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Gheysariyeha
- Department of Health Economics, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Farimah Rahimi
- Pharmacoeconomics and Pharma Management, Research Assistant Professor, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Elham Tabesh
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isfahan Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center (IGHRC), Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | | | - Payman Adibi
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Isfahan Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center (IGHRC), Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Reza Rezayatmand
- Health Economics, Health Management and Economics Research Center Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Unmet Healthcare Needs among College Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for System-Wide and Structural Changes for Service Delivery. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10081360. [PMID: 35893182 PMCID: PMC9330704 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10081360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, college students faced health disparities in addition to a negative burden on academic performance; however, little is reported in the literature regarding healthcare utilization. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among consenting college student participants aged 18 or older from a Hispanic-serving institution. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to analyze demographic characteristics and the types of healthcare services needed by such characteristics. Logistic regression was used to adjust for noted sex differences in associations between reporting limited healthcare services and types of healthcare services. Results: The study population of 223 participants was mostly Hispanic/Latino (65%) and female (73%). Of the population, 11% reported they could not obtain needed healthcare services, with time being reported as the most common reason. Significant associations were found between seeking general healthcare services/routine screening, seeking mental health services, and seeking sexual health services with reporting limited healthcare services, with sex-adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of 1.90 (95% CI: 1.08, 3.36), 3.21 (95% CI: 1.44, 4.15), and 2.58 (95% CI: 1.05, 6.35), respectively. Conclusions: Availability and inability to obtain health services may exacerbate college student health disparities. Targeted interventions are needed in the population to mitigate the potential burdens of unmet healthcare needs, particularly among minority college students.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ismael J, Díaz MC, Gabay C, Caro LE, Cerisoli C, Figueredo R, Canseco S, Rodriguez P, Criado L, Raffa I, O'Connor J, Kopitowsky K, Adi J, Del Solar CG. Clinical practice guidelines providing new data about CRC screening in argentinian population with average risk based on iFOBT. CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2022.100997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
10
|
Medina-Lara A, Grigore B, Lewis R, Peters J, Price S, Landa P, Robinson S, Neal R, Hamilton W, Spencer AE. Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2021; 24:1-332. [PMID: 33252328 DOI: 10.3310/hta24660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tools based on diagnostic prediction models are available to help general practitioners diagnose cancer. It is unclear whether or not tools expedite diagnosis or affect patient quality of life and/or survival. OBJECTIVES The objectives were to evaluate the evidence on the validation, clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and availability and use of cancer diagnostic tools in primary care. METHODS Two systematic reviews were conducted to examine the clinical effectiveness (review 1) and the development, validation and accuracy (review 2) of diagnostic prediction models for aiding general practitioners in cancer diagnosis. Bibliographic searches were conducted on MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) in May 2017, with updated searches conducted in November 2018. A decision-analytic model explored the tools' clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in colorectal cancer. The model compared patient outcomes and costs between strategies that included the use of the tools and those that did not, using the NHS perspective. We surveyed 4600 general practitioners in randomly selected UK practices to determine the proportions of general practices and general practitioners with access to, and using, cancer decision support tools. Association between access to these tools and practice-level cancer diagnostic indicators was explored. RESULTS Systematic review 1 - five studies, of different design and quality, reporting on three diagnostic tools, were included. We found no evidence that using the tools was associated with better outcomes. Systematic review 2 - 43 studies were included, reporting on prediction models, in various stages of development, for 14 cancer sites (including multiple cancers). Most studies relate to QCancer® (ClinRisk Ltd, Leeds, UK) and risk assessment tools. DECISION MODEL In the absence of studies reporting their clinical outcomes, QCancer and risk assessment tools were evaluated against faecal immunochemical testing. A linked data approach was used, which translates diagnostic accuracy into time to diagnosis and treatment, and stage at diagnosis. Given the current lack of evidence, the model showed that the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tools in colorectal cancer relies on demonstrating patient survival benefits. Sensitivity of faecal immunochemical testing and specificity of QCancer and risk assessment tools in a low-risk population were the key uncertain parameters. SURVEY Practitioner- and practice-level response rates were 10.3% (476/4600) and 23.3% (227/975), respectively. Cancer decision support tools were available in 83 out of 227 practices (36.6%, 95% confidence interval 30.3% to 43.1%), and were likely to be used in 38 out of 227 practices (16.7%, 95% confidence interval 12.1% to 22.2%). The mean 2-week-wait referral rate did not differ between practices that do and practices that do not have access to QCancer or risk assessment tools (mean difference of 1.8 referrals per 100,000 referrals, 95% confidence interval -6.7 to 10.3 referrals per 100,000 referrals). LIMITATIONS There is little good-quality evidence on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tools. Many diagnostic prediction models are limited by a lack of external validation. There are limited data on current UK practice and clinical outcomes of diagnostic strategies, and there is no evidence on the quality-of-life outcomes of diagnostic results. The survey was limited by low response rates. CONCLUSION The evidence base on the tools is limited. Research on how general practitioners interact with the tools may help to identify barriers to implementation and uptake, and the potential for clinical effectiveness. FUTURE WORK Continued model validation is recommended, especially for risk assessment tools. Assessment of the tools' impact on time to diagnosis and treatment, stage at diagnosis, and health outcomes is also recommended, as is further work to understand how tools are used in general practitioner consultations. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42017068373 and CRD42017068375. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 66. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonieta Medina-Lara
- Health Economics Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Bogdan Grigore
- Exeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Ruth Lewis
- North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Jaime Peters
- Exeter Test Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Sarah Price
- Primary Care Diagnostics, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Paolo Landa
- Health Economics Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Sophie Robinson
- Peninsula Technology Assessment Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Richard Neal
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - William Hamilton
- Primary Care Diagnostics, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Anne E Spencer
- Health Economics Group, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weisband YL, Torres L, Paltiel O, Sagy YW, Calderon-Margalit R, Manor O. Socioeconomic Disparity Trends in Cancer Screening Among Women After Introduction of National Quality Indicators. Ann Fam Med 2021; 19:396-404. [PMID: 34546946 PMCID: PMC8437575 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Primary care physicians have an important role in encouraging adequate cancer screening. Disparities in cancer screening by socioeconomic status (SES) may affect presentation stage and cancer survival. This study aimed to examine whether breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening rates in women differed by SES and age, and whether screening rates and SES disparities changed after introduction of a primary care-based national quality indicator program. METHODS This repeated cross-sectional study spanning 2002-2017 included all female Israeli residents in age ranges appropriate for each cancer screening assessed. SES was measured both as an individual-level variable based on exemption from copayments and as an area-level variable using census data. RESULTS In 2017, the most recent year in the study period, screening rates among 1,529,233 women were highest for breast cancer (70.5%), followed by colorectal cancer (64.3%) and cervical cancer (49.6%). Women in the highest area-level SES were more likely to undergo cervical cancer screening compared with those in the lowest (odds ratio = 3.56; 99.9% CI, 3.47-3.65). Temporal trends showed that after introduction of quality indicators for breast and colorectal cancer screening in 2004 and 2005, respectively, rates of screening for these cancers increased, with greater reductions in disparities for the former. The quality indicator for cervical cancer screening was introduced in 2015, and no substantial changes have occurred yet for this screening. CONCLUSIONS We found increased uptake and reduced socioeconomic disparities after introduction of cancer screening indicators. Recent introduction of a cervical cancer screening indicator may increase participation and reduce disparities, as has occurred for breast and colorectal cancer screening. These findings related to Israel's quality indicators program highlight the importance of primary care clinicians in increasing cancer screening rates to improve outcomes and reduce disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luz Torres
- Research Department, Cardioinfantil Foundation-Cardiology Institute, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ora Paltiel
- Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yael Wolff Sagy
- Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Orly Manor
- Braun School of Public Health, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kalyta A, De Vera MA, Peacock S, Telford JJ, Brown CJ, Donnellan F, Gill S, Loree JM. Canadian Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines: Do They Need an Update Given Changing Incidence and Global Practice Patterns? Curr Oncol 2021; 28:1558-1570. [PMID: 33919428 PMCID: PMC8161738 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer death in Canada. Organized screening programs targeting Canadians aged 50 to 74 at average risk of developing the disease have contributed to decreased rates of CRC, improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. However, data shows that recent incidence reductions are unique to the screening-age population, while rates in people under-50 are on the rise. Similar incidence patterns in the United States prompted the American Cancer Society and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to recommend screening begin at age 45 rather than 50. We conducted a review of screening practices in Canada, framing them in the context of similar global health systems as well as the evidence supporting the recent U.S. recommendations. Epidemiologic changes in Canada suggest earlier screening initiation in average-risk individuals may be reasonable, but the balance of costs to benefits remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Kalyta
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (A.K.); (S.G.)
| | - Mary A. De Vera
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada;
| | - Stuart Peacock
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada;
| | - Jennifer J. Telford
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; (J.J.T.); (F.D.)
| | - Carl J. Brown
- Division of General Surgery, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada;
| | - Fergal Donnellan
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; (J.J.T.); (F.D.)
| | - Sharlene Gill
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (A.K.); (S.G.)
| | - Jonathan M. Loree
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer/University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada; (A.K.); (S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ruel-Laliberté J, Binette A, Bertrand A. Salpingectomie bilatérale aux fins de contraception permanente : série de cas et facteurs limitant le changement de pratique. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2020; 42:948-952. [PMID: 32345552 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and the Society of Gynaecologic Oncology of Canada (GOC) recommend complete removal of the fallopian tubes as a permanent contraceptive method because of its association with a reduced risk of ovarian cancer. Currently, many women are not offered bilateral salpingectomy as an alternative to tubal ligation for permanent contraception. METHOD As part of a quality improvement initiative, we reviewed all cases of sterilization performed at our university centre between 1 January and 31 December 2018. A literature review of the clinical and ethical considerations that prevent clinicians from offering bilateral salpingectomy as permanent contraception is also presented. RESULTS The records of 111 women who underwent tubal sterilization were reviewed. Of these, 31.5% underwent bilateral salpingectomy; 46.8% underwent tubal fulguration; 12.6% underwent clip ligation; and 9.1% underwent tubal implant ligation (Essure). According to the information on file, only 36.3% of women were offered bilateral salpingectomy, and of these, 83.8% chose this method. CONCLUSION Bilateral salpingectomy should be offered to all women seeking permanent contraception. The benefits and very low risks associated with this procedure should make it a first choice option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ruel-Laliberté
- Médecin résidente, Service d'obstétrique-gynécologie générale, Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke.
| | - Audrey Binette
- Obstétricienne-gynécologue, Service d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Hôpital régional de Rimouski, Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux du Bas-St-Laurent
| | - Amélie Bertrand
- Professeure adjointe, Service d'obstétrique-gynécologie générale, Département d'obstétrique et gynécologie, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhong GC, Sun WP, Wan L, Hu JJ, Hao FB. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:684-697.e15. [PMID: 31790657 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy are the most commonly used strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening worldwide. We aimed to compare their efficacy and cost-effectiveness in CRC screening in an average-risk population. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database were searched. Risk ratio (RR) was used to evaluate the differences in detection rates of colorectal neoplasia between FIT and colonoscopy groups. A random-effects model was used to pool RRs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FIT versus colonoscopy. RESULTS Six randomized controlled trials and 17 cost-effectiveness studies were included. The participation rate in the FIT group was higher than that in the colonoscopy group (41.6% vs 21.9%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, FIT had a detection rate of CRC comparable with colonoscopy (RR, .73; 95% confidence interval, .37-1.42) and lower detection rates of any adenoma and advanced adenoma than 1-time colonoscopy. Most included cost-effectiveness studies showed that annual (13/15) or biennial (5/6) FIT was cost-saving (ICER < $0) or very cost-effective ($0 < ICER ≤ $25000/quality-adjusted life-year) compared with colonoscopy every 10 years. CONCLUSIONS FIT may be similar to 1-time colonoscopy in the detection rate of CRC, although it has lower detection rates of any adenoma and advanced adenoma than 1-time colonoscopy. Furthermore, annual or biennial FIT appears to be very cost-effective or cost-saving compared with colonoscopy every 10 years. These findings indicate, at least partly, that FIT is noninferior to colonoscopy in CRC screening in an average-risk population. Our findings should be treated with caution and need to be further confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo-Chao Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei-Ping Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lun Wan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the People's Hospital of Dazu district, Chongqing, China
| | - Jie-Jun Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Fa-Bao Hao
- Pediatric Surgery Center, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Litwin O, Sontrop JM, McArthur E, Tinmouth J, Rabeneck L, Vinden C, Sood MM, Baxter NN, Tanuseputro P, Welk B, Garg AX. Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening by Physicians Is Associated With Greater Uptake by Their Patients. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:905-914. [PMID: 31682852 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Physicians' own screening practices might affect screening in their patients. We conducted a population-based study to evaluate whether family physicians who underwent colorectal cancer testing were more likely to have patients who underwent colorectal cancer testing. METHODS We collected demographic and health care information on residents of Ontario, Canada from administrative databases; the sample was restricted to individuals at average risk of colorectal cancer who were 52-74 years old as of April 21, 2016. We obtained a list of all registered physicians in the province; physicians (n = 11,434) were matched with nonphysicians (n = 45,736) on age, sex, and residential location. Uptake of colorectal tests was defined by a record of a fecal occult blood test in the past 2 years, flexible sigmoidoscopy in the past 5 years, or colonoscopy in the past 10 years. Patients were assigned to family physicians based on billing claim frequency, and then the association between colorectal testing in family physicians and their patients was examined using a modified Poisson regression model. RESULTS Uptake of colorectal tests by physicians and nonphysicians (median age 60 years; 71% men) was 67.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.0%-68.7%) and 66.6% (95% CI, 66.2%-67.1%), respectively. Physicians were less likely than nonphysicians to undergo fecal occult blood testing and were more likely to undergo colonoscopy; prevalence ratios were 0.44 (95% CI, 0.42-0.47) and 1.24 (95% CI, 1.22-1.26), respectively. Uptake of colorectal tests by family physicians was associated with greater uptake by their patients (adjusted prevalence ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08-1.12). CONCLUSIONS Approximately one-third of physicians and nonphysicians are overdue for colorectal cancer screening. Patients are more likely to be tested if their family physician has been tested. There is an opportunity for physicians to increase their participation in colorectal cancer screening, which could, in turn, motivate their patients to undergo screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen Litwin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jessica M Sontrop
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jill Tinmouth
- ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Public Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Public Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher Vinden
- ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manish M Sood
- ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Public Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Blayne Welk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; ICES Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barichello S, Deng L, Ismond KP, Loomes DE, Kirwin EM, Wang H, Chang D, Svenson LW, Thanh NX. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of a urine metabolomics test vs. alternative colorectal cancer screening strategies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:1953-1962. [PMID: 31673772 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03419-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the success of provincial screening programs, colorectal cancer (CRC) is still the third most common cancer in Canada and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Fecal-based tests, such as fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), form the foundation of the provincial CRC screening programs in Canada. However, those tests have low sensitivity for CRC precursors, adenomatous polyps and have low adherence. This study evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a new urine metabolomic-based test (UMT) that detects adenomatous polyps and CRC. METHODS A Markov model was designed using data from the literature and provincial healthcare databases for Canadian at average risk for CRC; calibration was performed against statistics data. Screening strategies included the following: FOBT every year, FIT every year, colonoscopy every 10 years, and UMT every year. The costs, quality adjusted life years (QALY) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for each strategy were estimated and compared. RESULTS Compared with no screening, a UMT strategy reduced CRC mortality by 49.9% and gained 0.15 life years per person at $42,325/life year gained in the base case analysis. FOBT reduced CRC mortality by 14.9% and gained 0.04 life years per person at $25,011/life year gained. FIT reduced CRC mortality by 35.8% and gained 0.11 life years per person at $25,500/life year while colonoscopy reduced CRC mortality by 24.7% and gained 0.08 life years per person at $50,875/life year. CONCLUSIONS A UMT strategy might be a cost-effective strategy when used in programmatic CRC screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Barichello
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lu Deng
- Metabolomic Technologies Inc., Suite 132, 9650 20 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6R 3T2, Canada.
| | - Kathleen P Ismond
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Metabolomic Technologies Inc., Suite 132, 9650 20 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6R 3T2, Canada
| | - Dustin E Loomes
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Haili Wang
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Metabolomic Technologies Inc., Suite 132, 9650 20 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6R 3T2, Canada
| | - David Chang
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Metabolomic Technologies Inc., Suite 132, 9650 20 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6R 3T2, Canada
| | - Lawrence W Svenson
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.,Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nguyen Xuan Thanh
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ran T, Cheng CY, Misselwitz B, Brenner H, Ubels J, Schlander M. Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies-A Systematic Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1969-1981.e15. [PMID: 30659991 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Widespread screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has reduced its incidence and mortality. Previous studies investigated the economic effects of CRC screening. We performed a systematic review to provide up-to-date evidence of the cost effectiveness of CRC screening strategies by answering 3 research questions. METHODS We searched PubMed, National Institute for Health Research Economic Evaluation Database, Social Sciences Citation Index (via the Web of Science), EconLit (American Economic Association) and 3 supplemental databases for original articles published in English from January 2010 through December 2017. All monetary values were converted to US dollars (year 2016). For all research questions, we extracted, or calculated (if necessary), per-person costs and life years (LYs) and/or quality-adjusted LYs, as well as the incremental costs per LY gained or quality-adjusted LY gained compared with the baseline strategy. A cost-saving strategy was defined as one that was less costly and equally or more effective than the baseline strategy. The net monetary benefit approach was used to answer research question 2. RESULTS Our review comprised 33 studies (17 from Europe, 11 from North America, 4 from Asia, and 1 from Australia). Annual and biennial guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests, annual and biennial fecal immunochemical tests, colonoscopy every 10 years, and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years were cost effective (even cost saving in most US models) compared to no screening. In addition, colonoscopy every 10 years was less costly and/or more effective than other common strategies in the United States. Newer strategies such as computed tomographic colonography, every 5 or 10 years, was cost effective compared with no screening. CONCLUSIONS In an updated review, we found that common CRC screening strategies and computed tomographic colonography continued to be cost effective compared to no screening. There were discrepancies among studies from different regions, which could be associated with the model types or model assumptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Ran
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Chih-Yuan Cheng
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Benjamin Misselwitz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jasper Ubels
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Malagón M, Ramió-Pujol S, Serrano M, Serra-Pagès M, Amoedo J, Oliver L, Bahí A, Mas-de-Xaxars T, Torrealba L, Gilabert P, Miquel-Cusachs JO, García-Nimo L, Saló J, Guardiola J, Piñol V, Cubiella J, Castells A, Aldeguer X, Garcia-Gil J. Reduction of faecal immunochemical test false-positive results using a signature based on faecal bacterial markers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2019; 49:1410-1420. [PMID: 31025420 DOI: 10.1111/apt.15251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2018] [Revised: 05/22/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is the second commonest cause of cancer mortality. Some countries are implementing colorectal cancer screening to detect lesions at an early stage using non-invasive tools like the faecal immunochemical test. Despite affordability, this test shows a low sensitivity for precancerous lesions and a low positive predictive value for colorectal cancer, resulting in a high false-positive rate. AIM To develop a new, non-invasive colorectal cancer screening tool based on bacterial faecal biomarkers, which in combination with the faecal immunochemical test, could allow a reduction in the false-positive rate. This tool is called risk assessment of intestinal disease for colorectal cancer (RAID-CRC). METHODS We performed both the faecal immunochemical test and the bacterial markers analysis (RAID-CRC test) in stool samples from individuals with normal colonoscopy (167), non-advanced adenomas (88), advanced adenomas (30) and colorectal cancer (48). All the participants showed colorectal cancer-associated symptoms. RESULTS Performance of the faecal immunochemical test for advanced neoplasia (ie advanced adenoma and colorectal cancer) was determined by using the cut-off value established in Catalonia (20 µg haemoglobin/g of faeces) for a population-based screening approach. Sensitivity and specificity values of 83% and 80%, respectively, and positive and negative predictive values of 56% and 94%, respectively, were obtained. When both the immunological and the biological analysis were combined, the corresponding values were 80% and 90% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively, and 70% and 94% for positive and negative predictive values, respectively, resulting in a 50% reduction of the false-positive rate. CONCLUSIONS RAID-CRC test allows a substantial reduction in the faecal immunochemical test false-positive results (50%) in a symptomatic population. Further validation is indicated in a colorectal cancer-screening scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Malagón
- GoodGut SL, Girona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona-IDIBGI, Salt, Spain.,Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Joan Amoedo
- GoodGut SL, Girona, Spain.,Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Bahí
- Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona-IDIBGI, Salt, Spain
| | | | | | - Pau Gilabert
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | | | - Laura García-Nimo
- Clinical Analysis Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, Ourense, Spain
| | - Joan Saló
- Consorci Hospitalari de Vic, Vic, Spain
| | - Jordi Guardiola
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, l'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
| | - Virginia Piñol
- Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Joaquin Cubiella
- Department of Gastroenterology, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur, CIBERehd, Ourense, Spain
| | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Aldeguer
- GoodGut SL, Girona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona-IDIBGI, Salt, Spain.,Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cost-Utility Analysis of Imaging for Surveillance and Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 213:17-25. [PMID: 30995098 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare imaging-based surveillance and diagnostic strategies in patients at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) while taking into account technically inadequate examinations and patient compliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A Markov model simulated seven strategies for HCC surveillance and diagnosis in patients with cirrhosis: strategy A, ultrasound (US) for surveillance and CT for diagnosis; strategy B, US for surveillance and complete MRI for diagnosis; strategy C, US for surveillance and CT for inadequate or positive surveillance; strategy D, US for surveillance and complete MRI for inadequate or positive surveillance; strategy E, surveillance and diagnosis with CT followed by complete MRI for inadequate surveillance; strategy F, surveillance and diagnosis with complete MRI followed by CT for inadequate surveillance; and strategy G, surveillance with abbreviated MRI followed by CT for inadequate surveillance or complete MRI for positive surveillance. Two compliance scenarios were evaluated: optimal and conservative. For each scenario, the most cost-effective strategy was based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000 (Canadian) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS. Base-case analysis revealed that strategy E was the most cost-effective when compliance was optimal ($13,631/QALY), and strategy G was the most cost-effective when compliance was conservative ($39,681/QALY). Sensitivity analyses supported the base-case analysis in the optimal compliance scenario, but several parameters altered the most cost-effective strategy in the conservative compliance scenario. CONCLUSION. In an optimal compliance scenario, CT for HCC surveillance and diagnosis and complete MRI for inadequate CT was most cost-effective. In a conservative compliance scenario, abbreviated MRI may be an alternative to US-based surveillance.
Collapse
|
20
|
Rosso C, Cabianca L, Gili FM. Non-invasive markers to detect colorectal cancer in asymptomatic population. MINERVA BIOTECNOL 2019. [DOI: 10.23736/s1120-4826.18.02493-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
21
|
Leddin D, Lieberman DA, Tse F, Barkun AN, Abou-Setta AM, Marshall JK, Samadder NJ, Singh H, Telford JJ, Tinmouth J, Wilkinson AN, Leontiadis GI. Clinical Practice Guideline on Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Individuals With a Family History of Nonhereditary Colorectal Cancer or Adenoma: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Banff Consensus. Gastroenterology 2018; 155:1325-1347.e3. [PMID: 30121253 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS A family history (FH) of colorectal cancer (CRC) increases the risk of developing CRC. These consensus recommendations developed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association, aim to provide guidance on screening these high-risk individuals. METHODS Multiple parallel systematic review streams, informed by 10 literature searches, assembled evidence on 5 principal questions around the effect of an FH of CRC or adenomas on the risk of CRC, the age to initiate screening, and the optimal tests and testing intervals. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to develop the recommendations. RESULTS Based on the evidence, the Consensus Group was able to strongly recommend CRC screening for all individuals with an FH of CRC or documented adenoma. However, because most of the evidence was very-low quality, the majority of the remaining statements were conditional ("we suggest"). Colonoscopy is suggested (recommended in individuals with ≥2 first-degree relatives [FDRs]), with fecal immunochemical test as an alternative. The elevated risk associated with an FH of ≥1 FDRs with CRC or documented advanced adenoma suggests initiating screening at a younger age (eg, 40-50 years or 10 years younger than age of diagnosis of FDR). In addition, a shorter interval of every 5 years between screening tests was suggested for individuals with ≥2 FDRs, and every 5-10 years for those with FH of 1 FDR with CRC or documented advanced adenoma compared to average-risk individuals. Choosing screening parameters for an individual patient should consider the age of the affected FDR and local resources. It is suggested that individuals with an FH of ≥1 second-degree relatives only, or of nonadvanced adenoma or polyp of unknown histology, be screened according to average-risk guidelines. CONCLUSIONS The increased risk of CRC associated with an FH of CRC or advanced adenoma warrants more intense screening for CRC. Well-designed prospective studies are needed in order to make definitive evidence-based recommendations about the age to commence screening and appropriate interval between screening tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desmond Leddin
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Ireland; Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
| | - David A Lieberman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Frances Tse
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alan N Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ahmed M Abou-Setta
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - John K Marshall
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - N Jewel Samadder
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Harminder Singh
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada; Section of Gastroenterology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Jennifer J Telford
- Division of Gastroenterology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna N Wilkinson
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Grigorios I Leontiadis
- Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Areia M, Fuccio L, Hassan C, Dekker E, Dias-Pereira A, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Cost-utility analysis of colonoscopy or faecal immunochemical test for population-based organised colorectal cancer screening. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 7:105-113. [PMID: 30788122 DOI: 10.1177/2050640618803196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Organised programmes for colorectal cancer screening demand a high burden of medical and economic resources. The preferred methods are the faecal immunochemical test and primary colonoscopy. Objective The purpose of this study was to perform an economic analysis and comparison between these tests in Europe. Methods We used a Markov cost-utility analysis from a societal perspective comparing biennial faecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy every 10 years screening versus non-screening in Portugal. The population was screened, aged from 50-74 years, and efficacy was evaluated in quality-adjusted life years. For the base-case scenario, the faecal immunochemical test cost was €3 with 50% acceptance and colonoscopy cost was €397 with 38% acceptance. The threshold was set at €39,760/quality-adjusted life years and the primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results Screening by biennial faecal immunochemical test and primary colonoscopy every 10 years resulted in incremental utilities of 0.00151 quality-adjusted life years and 0.00185 quality-adjusted life years at additional costs of €4 and €191, respectively. The faecal immunochemical test was the most cost-effective option providing an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2694/quality-adjusted life years versus €103,633/quality-adjusted life years for colonoscopy. Colonoscopy capacity would have to increase 1.3% for a faecal immunochemical test programme or 31% for colonoscopy. Conclusion Biennial faecal immunochemical test screening is better than colonoscopy as it is cost-effective, allows more individuals to get screened, and provides a more rational use of the endoscopic capacity available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Areia
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.,Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - António Dias-Pereira
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto (FMUP), Porto, Portugal.,Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Silva-Illanes N, Espinoza M. Critical Analysis of Markov Models Used for the Economic Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2018; 21:858-873. [PMID: 30005759 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2017] [Revised: 11/12/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening is challenging because of the need to model the underlying unobservable natural history of the disease. OBJECTIVES To describe the available Markov models and to critically analyze their main structural assumptions. METHODS A systematic search was performed in eight relevant databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Econlit, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database, Health Economic Evaluations Database, Health Technology Assessment database, Cost-Effective Analysis Registry, and European Network of Health Economics Evaluation Databases), identifying 34 models that met the inclusion criteria. A comparative analysis of model structure and parameterization was conducted using two checklists and guidelines for cost-effectiveness screening models. RESULTS Two modeling techniques were identified. One strategy used a Markov model to reproduce the natural history of the disease and an overlaying model that reproduced the screening process, whereas the other used a single model to represent a screening program. Most of the studies included only adenoma-carcinoma sequences, a few included de novo cancer, and none included the serrated pathway. Parameterization of adenoma dwell time, sojourn time, and surveillance differed between studies, and there was a lack of validation and statistical calibration against local epidemiological data. Most of the studies analyzed failed to perform an adequate literature review and synthesis of diagnostic accuracy properties of the screening tests modeled. CONCLUSIONS Several strategies to model colorectal cancer screening have been developed, but many challenges remain to adequately represent the natural history of the disease and the screening process. Structural uncertainty analysis could be a useful strategy for understanding the impact of the assumptions of different models on cost-effectiveness results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Manuel Espinoza
- HTA Unit, Centre for Clinical Research UC, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Melnitchouk N, Soeteman DI, Davids JS, Fields A, Cohen J, Noubary F, Lukashenko A, Kolesnik OO, Freund KM. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening in Ukraine. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION 2018; 16:20. [PMID: 29977160 PMCID: PMC5992826 DOI: 10.1186/s12962-018-0104-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is associated with high mortality when detected at a later stage. There is a paucity of studies from low and middle income countries to support the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We aim to analyze the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening compared to no screening in Ukraine, a lower-middle income country. Methods We developed a deterministic Markov cohort model to assess the cost-effectiveness of three colorectal cancer screening strategies [fecal occult blood test (FOBT) every year, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FOBT every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years] compared to no screening. We modeled outcomes in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. We performed sensitivity analyses on treatment adherence, test characteristics and costs. Analyses were conducted from the perspective of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Results The base-case lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis showed that all three screening strategies were cost saving compared to no screening, and among the three strategies, colonoscopy every 10 years was the dominant strategy compared to no screening with standard adherence to treatment. When decreased adherence to treatment was modeled, colonoscopy every 10 years was the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $843 per QALY compared with no screening. Conclusion Our findings indicate that colorectal cancer screening can save money and improve health compared to no screening in Ukraine. Colonoscopy every 10 years is superior to the other screening modalities evaluated in this study. This knowledge can be used to concentrate efforts on developing a national screening program in Ukraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelya Melnitchouk
- 1Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Djøra I Soeteman
- 2Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA
| | | | - Adam Fields
- 1Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Joshua Cohen
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Farzad Noubary
- Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | | | | | - Karen M Freund
- 6Tufts Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine Boston, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Shen SC, Lofters A, Tinmouth J, Paszat L, Rabeneck L, Glazier RH. Predictors of non-adherence to colorectal cancer screening among immigrants to Ontario, Canada: a population-based study. Prev Med 2018; 111:180-189. [PMID: 29548788 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2017] [Revised: 03/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Though colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have increased over time in Ontario, Canada, immigrants continue to have lower rates of screening. This study examines the association between non-adherence to CRC screening and immigration, socio-demographic, healthcare utilization, and primary care physician characteristics among immigrants to Ontario. This is a population-based retrospective cross-sectional study that uses healthcare administrative databases housed at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences. Our cohort comprised immigrants aged 60 to 74 years who lived in Ontario on March 31, 2015 and who had been eligible for the Ontario Health Insurance Plan for at least 10 years. The outcome was lack of adherence to CRC screening with any modality (fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy) on March 31, 2015. Our cohort contained 182,949 immigrants. Overall 70,134 (38%) individuals were not adherent to screening. Risk of non-adherence to CRC screening was higher among immigrants who were from low (adjusted relative risk [ARR] 1.35, 95%CI 1.28-1.42) or low-middle (ARR 1.27, 95%CI 1.24-1.30, population-attributable risk [PAR] 9.8%) income countries and refugees (ARR 1.09, 95%CI 1.06-1.11). Compared to those from the United States, Australia, and New Zealand, immigrants from most other world regions, particularly Eastern Europe and Central Asia (ARR 1.28, 95%CI 1.21-1.37), had higher risks of non-adherence. Non-immigration factors such as low healthcare use and lack of primary care enrolment also increased the risk of non-adherence to screening. These findings can be used to inform future efforts to improve uptake of CRC screening among immigrant groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Paszat
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard H Glazier
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Characteristics of Patients with Colonic Polyps Requiring Segmental Resection. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 2018:7046385. [PMID: 29670868 PMCID: PMC5833871 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7046385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear if the availability of new techniques for removal of large colonic polyps has affected the use of segmental colon resection. We sought to evaluate the characteristics of polyps undergoing surgical resection, including involvement of therapeutic gastroenterologists (TG). METHODS 484 patients had a colonic resection; 165 (34%) were identified from the pathology database with polyp, adenoma, or mass in the clinical history field; these charts were reviewed. RESULTS 128 patients (mean age 68 yrs, 72% male) were included. The mean polyp size was 2.9 cm (0.4 cm-12.0 cm). Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 50 (39.1%). 97 (75.8%) patients had a polyp that was felt to be unresectable by EMR, and 31 (24.2%) underwent successful EMR followed by surgery for adenocarcinoma (n = 29). The indication for surgery in those with unresectable polyps was variable and was not clearly documented in 51 (52.6%); only 17 of these patients (17.5%) had a TG involved. CONCLUSION A high proportion of polyps managed by segmental resection did not contain adenocarcinoma. This data suggests that even in a tertiary care center where advanced endoscopic techniques are easily available, they are not always utilized. Educational endeavors to ensure that ideal pathways of intervention are utilized require implementation.
Collapse
|
27
|
Solbak NM, Xu JY, Vena JE, Al Rajabi A, Vaseghi S, Whelan HK, McGregor SE. Patterns and predictors of adherence to colorectal cancer screening recommendations in Alberta's Tomorrow Project participants stratified by risk. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:177. [PMID: 29370789 PMCID: PMC5784699 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5095-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is an important modifiable behaviour for cancer control. Regular screening, following recommendations for the type, timing and frequency based on personal CRC risk, contributes to earlier detection and increases likelihood of successful treatment. Methods To determine adherence to screening recommendations in a large provincial cohort of adults, participants in Alberta’s Tomorrow Project (n = 9641) were stratified based on increasing level of CRC risk: age (Age-only), family history of CRC (FamilyHx), personal history of bowel conditions (PersonalHx), or both (Family/PersonalHx) using self-reported information from questionnaires. Provincial and national guidelines for timing and frequency of screening tests were used to determine if participants were up-to-date based on their CRC risk. Screening status was compared between enrollment (2000–2006) and follow-up (2008) to determine screening pattern over time. Results The majority of participants (77%) fell into the average risk Age-only strata. Only a third of this strata were up-to-date for screening at baseline, but the proportion increased across the higher risk strata, with > 90% of the highest risk Family/PersonalHx strata up-to-date at baseline. There was also a lower proportion (< 25%) of the Age-only group who were regular screeners over time compared to the higher risk strata, though age, higher income and uptake of other screening tests (e.g. mammography) were associated with a greater likelihood of regular screening in multinomial logistic regression. Conclusions The low (< 50%) adherence to regular CRC screening in average and moderate risk strata highlights the need to further explore barriers to uptake of screening across different risk profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan M Solbak
- Cancer Measurement, Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada. .,Alberta's Tomorrow Project, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, 1820 Richmond Road SW, Calgary, AB, T2T 5C7, Canada.
| | - Jian-Yi Xu
- Cancer Measurement, Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer E Vena
- Cancer Measurement, Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ala Al Rajabi
- Cancer Measurement, Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, CancerControl Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Sanaz Vaseghi
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Heather K Whelan
- Department of Health and Physical Education, Faculty of Health, Community and Education, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - S Elizabeth McGregor
- Population, Public and Indigenous Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Byrne MF, Shahidi N, Rex DK. Will Computer-Aided Detection and Diagnosis Revolutionize Colonoscopy? Gastroenterology 2017; 153:1460-1464.e1. [PMID: 29100847 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Byrne
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Neal Shahidi
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tai RWM, Choi SKY, Coyte PC. The Cost-Effectiveness of Salpingectomies for Family Planning in the Prevention of Ovarian Cancer. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2017; 40:317-327. [PMID: 29054509 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.06.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2017] [Revised: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynaecologic cancer. Disease prevention may be the only method to reduce the incidence of ovarian cancer. The Society of Gynecologic Oncology advised that salpingectomies may be an appropriate and feasible strategy for ovarian cancer risk reduction. This study conducted an economic evaluation from a societal perspective of bilateral salpingectomies versus conventional sterilization techniques in the prevention of ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN We performed a micro-cost analysis comparing laparoscopic tubal coagulation, tubal clips and bilateral salpingectomies at the Michael Garron Hospital, formerly the Toronto East General Hospital, from 2015 to 2016. A Markov model was used in the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses on these surgical procedures in ovarian cancer prevention. Costs were derived for the number ovarian cancer cases observed per sterilization method, cancer treatment, and associated procedural costs over each cancer patient's lifetime. The number of bilateral salpingectomies required to prevent an additional ovarian cancer case with the recommended treatment was also estimated. RESULTS Bilateral salpingectomies performed at the Michael Garron Hospital generated savings of $7823 per life-year gained (95% CI $3248-$10 190; incremental cost [ΔC] -$907, incremental effect [ΔE] 0.11 life-years gained) compared with tubal clips and savings of $6315 per life-year gained (95% CI -$6360 to $9342; ΔC -$755, ΔE 0.11 life-years gained) compared with tubal coagulation. Most importantly, for every 150 bilateral salpingectomies performed, one case of ovarian cancer may be prevented. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy is the dominant, cost-effective surgical strategy when compared to tubal clips and tubal coagulation to prevent ovarian cancer. Laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomies reduce costs and enhance quality-adjusted life-years relative to the two alternative treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R W Melissa Tai
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON; Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, ON.
| | | | - Peter C Coyte
- Institute of Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Projected effect of fecal immunochemical test threshold for colorectal cancer screening on outcomes and costs for Canada using the OncoSim microsimulation model. J Cancer Policy 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2017.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
31
|
Aronsson M, Carlsson P, Levin LÅ, Hager J, Hultcrantz R. Cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity faecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1078-1086. [PMID: 28561259 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2016] [Revised: 11/25/2016] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening can decrease morbidity and mortality. However, there are widespread differences in the implementation of programmes and choice of strategy. The primary objective of this study was to estimate lifelong costs and health outcomes of two of the currently most preferred methods of screening for colorectal cancer: colonoscopy and sensitive faecal immunochemical test (FIT). METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in a Swedish population was performed using a decision analysis model, based on the design of the Screening of Swedish Colons (SCREESCO) study, and data from the published literature and registries. Lifelong cost and effects of colonoscopy once, colonoscopy every 10 years, FIT twice, FIT biennially and no screening were estimated using simulations. RESULTS For 1000 individuals invited to screening, it was estimated that screening once with colonoscopy yielded 49 more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and a cost saving of €64 800 compared with no screening. Similarly, screening twice with FIT gave 26 more QALYs and a cost saving of €17 600. When the colonoscopic screening was repeated every tenth year, 7 additional QALYs were gained at a cost of €189 400 compared with a single colonoscopy. The additional gain with biennial FIT screening was 25 QALYs at a cost of €154 300 compared with two FITs. CONCLUSION All screening strategies were cost-effective compared with no screening. Repeated and single screening strategies with colonoscopy were more cost-effective than FIT when lifelong effects and costs were considered. However, other factors such as patient acceptability of the test and availability of human resources also have to be taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Aronsson
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P Carlsson
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - L-Å Levin
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - J Hager
- Departments of Surgery and Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden
| | - R Hultcrantz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Goede SL, Rabeneck L, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Paszat LF, Hoch JS, Yong JHE, Kroep S, Tinmouth J, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. Harms, benefits and costs of fecal immunochemical testing versus guaiac fecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0172864. [PMID: 28296927 PMCID: PMC5351837 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2016] [Accepted: 02/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ColonCancerCheck screening program for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Ontario, Canada, is considering switching from biennial guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) screening between age 50-74 years to the more sensitive, but also less specific fecal immunochemical test (FIT). The aim of this study is to estimate whether the additional benefits of FIT screening compared to gFOBT outweigh the additional costs and harms. METHODS We used microsimulation modeling to estimate quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and costs of gFOBT and FIT, compared to no screening, in a cohort of screening participants. We compared strategies with various age ranges, screening intervals, and cut-off levels for FIT. Cost-efficient strategies were determined for various levels of available colonoscopy capacity. RESULTS Compared to no screening, biennial gFOBT screening between age 50-74 years provided 20 QALYs at a cost of CAN$200,900 per 1,000 participants, and required 17 colonoscopies per 1,000 participants per year. FIT screening was more effective and less costly. For the same level of colonoscopy requirement, biennial FIT (with a high cut-off level of 200 ng Hb/ml) between age 50-74 years provided 11 extra QALYs gained while saving CAN$333,300 per 1000 participants, compared to gFOBT. Without restrictions in colonoscopy capacity, FIT (with a low cut-off level of 50 ng Hb/ml) every year between age 45-80 years was the most cost-effective strategy providing 27 extra QALYs gained per 1000 participants, while saving CAN$448,300. INTERPRETATION Compared to gFOBT screening, switching to FIT at a high cut-off level could increase the health benefits of a CRC screening program without considerably increasing colonoscopy demand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Lucas Goede
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Rabeneck
- Prevention and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Ann G. Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | | | - Jeffrey S. Hoch
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jean H. E. Yong
- Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sonja Kroep
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
ten Haaf K, Tammemägi MC, Bondy SJ, van der Aalst CM, Gu S, McGregor SE, Nicholas G, de Koning HJ, Paszat LF. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada. PLoS Med 2017; 14:e1002225. [PMID: 28170394 PMCID: PMC5295664 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) results indicate that computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening for current and former smokers with three annual screens can be cost-effective in a trial setting. However, the cost-effectiveness in a population-based setting with >3 screening rounds is uncertain. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lung cancer screening in a population-based setting in Ontario, Canada, and evaluate the effects of screening eligibility criteria. METHODS AND FINDINGS This study used microsimulation modeling informed by various data sources, including the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP), Ontario Cancer Registry, smoking behavior surveys, and the NLST. Persons, born between 1940 and 1969, were examined from a third-party health care payer perspective across a lifetime horizon. Starting in 2015, 576 CT screening scenarios were examined, varying by age to start and end screening, smoking eligibility criteria, and screening interval. Among the examined outcome measures were lung cancer deaths averted, life-years gained, percentage ever screened, costs (in 2015 Canadian dollars), and overdiagnosis. The results of the base-case analysis indicated that annual screening was more cost-effective than biennial screening. Scenarios with eligibility criteria that required as few as 20 pack-years were dominated by scenarios that required higher numbers of accumulated pack-years. In general, scenarios that applied stringent smoking eligibility criteria (i.e., requiring higher levels of accumulated smoking exposure) were more cost-effective than scenarios with less stringent smoking eligibility criteria, with modest differences in life-years gained. Annual screening between ages 55-75 for persons who smoked ≥40 pack-years and who currently smoke or quit ≤10 y ago yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $41,136 Canadian dollars ($33,825 in May 1, 2015, United States dollars) per life-year gained (compared to annual screening between ages 60-75 for persons who smoked ≥40 pack-years and who currently smoke or quit ≤10 y ago), which was considered optimal at a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 Canadian dollars ($41,114 May 1, 2015, US dollars). If 50% lower or higher attributable costs were assumed, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of this scenario was estimated to be $38,240 ($31,444 May 1, 2015, US dollars) or $48,525 ($39,901 May 1, 2015, US dollars), respectively. If 50% lower or higher costs for CT examinations were assumed, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of this scenario was estimated to be $28,630 ($23,542 May 1, 2015, US dollars) or $73,507 ($60,443 May 1, 2015, US dollars), respectively. This scenario would screen 9.56% (499,261 individuals) of the total population (ever- and never-smokers) at least once, which would require 4,788,523 CT examinations, and reduce lung cancer mortality in the total population by 9.05% (preventing 13,108 lung cancer deaths), while 12.53% of screen-detected cancers would be overdiagnosed (4,282 overdiagnosed cases). Sensitivity analyses indicated that the overall results were most sensitive to variations in CT examination costs. Quality of life was not incorporated in the analyses, and assumptions for follow-up procedures were based on data from the NLST, which may not be generalizable to a population-based setting. CONCLUSIONS Lung cancer screening with stringent smoking eligibility criteria can be cost-effective in a population-based setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin ten Haaf
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC—University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Martin C. Tammemägi
- Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan J. Bondy
- University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ontario Tobacco Research Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carlijn M. van der Aalst
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC—University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sumei Gu
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - S. Elizabeth McGregor
- Population, Public & Indigenous Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Garth Nicholas
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Harry J. de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC—University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lawrence F. Paszat
- University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Shahidi N, Cheung WY. Colorectal cancer screening: Opportunities to improve uptake, outcomes, and disparities. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8:733-740. [PMID: 28042387 PMCID: PMC5159671 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i20.733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 09/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer screening has become a standard of care in industrialized nations for those 50 to 75 years of age, along with selected high-risk populations. While colorectal cancer screening has been shown to reduce both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer, it is a complex multi-disciplinary process with a number of important steps that require optimization before tangible improvements in outcomes are possible. For both opportunistic and programmatic colorectal cancer screening, poor participant uptake remains an ongoing concern. Furthermore, current screening modalities (such as the guaiac based fecal occult blood test, fecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy) may be used or performed suboptimally, which can lead to missed neoplastic lesions and unnecessary endoscopic evaluations. The latter poses the risk of adverse events, such as perforation and post-polypectomy bleeding, as well as financial impacts to the healthcare system. Moreover, ongoing disparities in colorectal cancer screening persist among marginalized populations, including specific ethnic minorities (African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, Indigenous groups), immigrants, and those who are economically disenfranchised. Given this context, we aimed to review the current literature on these important areas pertaining to colorectal cancer screening, particularly focusing on the guaiac based fecal occult blood test, the fecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
35
|
Telford J, Gentile L, Gondara L, McGahan C, Coldman A. Performance of a quantitative fecal immunochemical test in a colorectal cancer screening pilot program: a prospective cohort study. CMAJ Open 2016; 4:E668-E673. [PMID: 28018880 PMCID: PMC5173467 DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND British Columbia undertook a colorectal cancer screening pilot program in 3 communities. Our objective was to assess the performance of 2-specimen fecal immunochemical testing in the detection of colorectal neoplasms in this population-based screening program. METHODS A prospective cohort of asymptomatic, average-risk people aged 50 to 74 years completed 2 quantitative fecal immunochemical tests every 2 years, with follow-up colonoscopy if the result of either test was positive. Participant demographics, fecal immunochemical test results, colonoscopy quality indicators and pathology results were recorded. Non-screen-detected colorectal cancer that developed in program participants was identified through review of data from the BC Cancer Registry. RESULTS A total of 16 234 people completed a first round of fecal immunochemical testing, with a positivity rate of 8.6%; 5378 (86.0% of eligible participants) completed a second round before the end of the pilot program, with a positivity rate of 6.7%. Of the 1756 who had a positive test result, 1555 (88.6%) underwent colonoscopy. The detection rate of colorectal cancer was 3.5 per 1000 participants. The positive predictive value of the fecal immunochemical test was 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8%-6.0%) for colorectal cancer, 35.0% (95% CI 32.5%-37.2%) for high-risk polyps and 62.0% (95% CI 59.6%-64.4%) for all neoplasms. The number needed to screen was 283 to detect 1 cancer, 40 to detect 1 high-risk polyp and 22 to detect any neoplasm. INTERPRETATION Screening every 2 years with a 2-specimen fecal immunochemical test surpassed the current benchmark for colorectal cancer detection in population-based screening. This study has implications for other jurisdictions planning colorectal cancer screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Telford
- Department of Medicine (Telford) and School of Population and Public Health (Coldman), University of British Columbia; Departments of Population Oncology (Telford, Gentile, Gondara, McGahan) and Cancer Control Research (Coldman), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - Laura Gentile
- Department of Medicine (Telford) and School of Population and Public Health (Coldman), University of British Columbia; Departments of Population Oncology (Telford, Gentile, Gondara, McGahan) and Cancer Control Research (Coldman), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - Lovedeep Gondara
- Department of Medicine (Telford) and School of Population and Public Health (Coldman), University of British Columbia; Departments of Population Oncology (Telford, Gentile, Gondara, McGahan) and Cancer Control Research (Coldman), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - Colleen McGahan
- Department of Medicine (Telford) and School of Population and Public Health (Coldman), University of British Columbia; Departments of Population Oncology (Telford, Gentile, Gondara, McGahan) and Cancer Control Research (Coldman), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| | - Andrew Coldman
- Department of Medicine (Telford) and School of Population and Public Health (Coldman), University of British Columbia; Departments of Population Oncology (Telford, Gentile, Gondara, McGahan) and Cancer Control Research (Coldman), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pil L, Fobelets M, Putman K, Trybou J, Annemans L. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer. Eur J Intern Med 2016; 32:72-8. [PMID: 27157827 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2016] [Revised: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality in Belgium. In Flanders (Belgium), a population-based screening program with a biennial immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) in women and men aged 56-74 has been organised since 2013. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the colorectal population-based screening program in Flanders (Belgium). METHODS A health economic model was conducted, consisting of a decision tree simulating the screening process and a Markov model, with a time horizon of 20years, simulating natural progression. Predicted mortality and incidence, total costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with and without the screening program were calculated in order to determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CRC screening. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted, taking into account uncertainty of the model parameters. RESULTS Mortality and incidence were predicted to decrease over 20years. The colorectal screening program in Flanders is found to be cost-effective with an ICER of 1681/QALY (95% CI -1317 to 6601) in males and €4,484/QALY (95% CI -3254 to 18,163). The probability of being cost-effective given a threshold of €35,000/QALY was 100% and 97.3%, respectively. The budget impact analysis showed the extra cost for the health care payer to be limited. CONCLUSION This health economic analysis has shown that despite the possible adverse effects of screening and the extra costs for the health care payer and the patient, the population-based screening program for CRC in Flanders is cost-effective and should therefore be maintained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Pil
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
| | - M Fobelets
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Jette, Belgium.
| | - K Putman
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Jette, Belgium.
| | - J Trybou
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
| | - L Annemans
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiteit Gent, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ali MU, Warren R, Kenny M, Sherifali D, Raina P. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2016; 15:298-313. [PMID: 27133893 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 03/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the effectiveness of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in asymptomatic adults. A search was conducted of the Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. A targeted search of PubMed was conducted for on-topic randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis across 4 RCTs for guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening showed a reduction of 18% (risk ratio [RR], 0.82; 95% CI [CI], 0.73-0.92) and 26% (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.83) in CRC mortality for the screening group compared to controls, respectively. The number needed to screen (NNS) were 377 (95% CI, 249-887) and 864 (95% CI, 672-1266) for gFOBT and FS screening, respectively. A reduction of 8% and 27% in incidence of late-stage CRC was also observed for gFOBT and FS screening, respectively, but both had no significant effect on all-cause mortality. A single RCT found that screening with immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) had no significant impact on CRC mortality (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72-1.07). Screening with FS has potential harms such as perforation, major and minor bleeding, and death from the procedure or from follow-up colonoscopy. gFOBT and FS screening reduce CRC mortality and incidence of late-stage disease. The absolute effect and NNS were much more favorable for older adults (≥ 60 years), suggesting that a targeted screening approach may avoid exposing younger adults to the harms of CRC screening, from which they are unlikely to derive any significant benefit. Although there is insufficient RCT evidence on the impact of iFOBT on mortality outcomes. compared to gFOBT, this test showed higher sensitivity and comparable specificity, indicating the need to update and reevaluate the evidence in light of future high-quality research. The protocol for this systematic review have been published with PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014009777.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre (MERSC), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Muhammad Usman Ali
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre (MERSC), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rachel Warren
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre (MERSC), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meghan Kenny
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre (MERSC), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diana Sherifali
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre (MERSC), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Parminder Raina
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre (MERSC), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cost-effectiveness of screening for anal cancer using regular digital ano-rectal examinations in men who have sex with men living with HIV. J Int AIDS Soc 2016; 19:20514. [PMID: 26942721 PMCID: PMC4778406 DOI: 10.7448/ias.19.1.20514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Revised: 01/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Anal cancer in men who have sex with men (MSM) living with HIV is an important issue but there are no consistent guidelines for how to screen for this cancer. In settings where screening with anal cytology is unavailable, regular anal examinations have been proposed in some guidelines but their cost-effectiveness is unknown. Methods Our objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of regular anal examinations to screen for anal cancer in HIV-positive MSM living in Australia using a probabilistic Markov model. Data sources were based on the medical literature and a clinical trial of HIV-positive MSM receiving an annual anal examination in Australia. The main outcome measures for calculating effectiveness were undiscounted and discounted (at 3%) lifetime costs, life years gained, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results Base-case analysis estimated the average cost of screening for and management of anal cancer ranged from $195 for no screening to $1,915 for lifetime annual screening of men aged ≥ 50. Screening of men aged ≥ 50 generated ICERs of $29,760 per QALY gained (for screening every four years), $32,222 (every three years) and $45,484 (every two years). Uncertainty for ICERs was mostly influenced by the cost (financially and decrease in quality of life) from a false-positive result, progression rate of anal cancer, specificity of the anal examination, the probability of detection outside a screening program and the discount rate. Conclusions Screening for anal cancer by incorporating regular anal examinations into routine HIV care for MSM aged ≥ 50 is most likely to be cost-effective by conventional standards. Given that anal pap smears are not widely available yet in many clinical settings, regular anal exams for MSM living with HIV to detect anal cancer earlier should be implemented.
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Correlating Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Results with Neoplastic Findings on Colonoscopy in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: A Prospective Study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 2016:4650471. [PMID: 28116286 PMCID: PMC5220421 DOI: 10.1155/2016/4650471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2016] [Revised: 11/06/2016] [Accepted: 11/09/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims. The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) recommends a fecal immunochemical test- (FIT-) positive predictive value (PPV) for all adenomas of ≥50%. We sought to assess FIT performance among average-risk participants of the British Columbia Colon Screening Program (BCCSP). Methods. From Nov-2013 to Dec-2014 consecutive participants of the BCCSP were assessed. Data was obtained from a prospectively collected database. A single quantitative FIT (NS-Plus, Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Japan) with a cut-off of ≥10 μg/g (≥50 ng/mL) was used. Results. 20,322 FIT-positive participants underwent CSPY. At a FIT cut-off of ≥10 μg/g (≥50 ng/mL) the PPV for all adenomas was 52.0%. Increasing the FIT cut-off to ≥20 μg/g (≥100 ng/mL) would increase the PPV for colorectal cancer (CRC) by 1.5% and for high-risk adenomas (HRAs) by 6.5% at a cost of missing 13.6% of CRCs and 32.4% of HRAs. Conclusions. As the NS-Plus FIT cut-off rises, the PPV for CRC and HRAs increases but at the cost of missed lesions. A cut-off of ≥10 μg/g (≥50 ng/mL) produces a PPV for all adenomas exceeding national recommendations. Health authorities need to take into consideration endoscopic resources when selecting a FIT positivity threshold.
Collapse
|
41
|
Comparison of One versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 2016:5914048. [PMID: 28044123 PMCID: PMC5156785 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5914048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective. To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of two versus one abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in a Canadian population. Methods. Three communities enrolled in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening pilot program from 01/2009 to 04/2013 using 2 FITs. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and FIT results. Participants completed both FITs and had one positive FIT and colonoscopy. PPV of one versus two abnormal FITs was calculated using a weighted-generalized score statistic. A two-sided 5% significance level was used. Results. 1576 of 17,031 average-risk participants, 50-75 years old, had a positive FIT. Colonoscopy revealed 58 (3.7%) cancers, 419 (31.6%) high-risk polyps, and 374 (23.7%) low-risk polyps as the most significant lesion. PPV of one versus two positive FITs for cancer, high-risk polyps, and any neoplasia were 1% versus 8%, 20% versus 40%, and 48% versus 67%, respectively (p value < 0.0001). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 7 CRCs and 98 high-risk polyps. Conclusions. PPV of two positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for CRC and high-risk polyps. The added value of the second FIT was 12% of total CRCs and 23% of total high-risk polyps.
Collapse
|
42
|
Mäklin S, Hakama M, Rissanen P, Malila N. Use of hospital resources in the Finnish colorectal cancer screening programme: a randomised health services study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2016; 2:e000063. [PMID: 26719814 PMCID: PMC4691665 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2015-000063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Revised: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 11/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To estimate the difference in use of hospital resources in the Finnish Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening programme between those invited and controls, within the year of randomisation and the next year. Design CRC screening was implemented in Finland in 2004 as a population-based randomised design using biennial faecal occult blood test (FOBT) for men and women aged 60–69 years. Those randomised to screening and control groups during years 2004–2009 were included in this analysis and use of hospital resources was estimated. Data were collected from the national register on hospital discharges. Outpatient visits, inpatient episodes and colonoscopies were compared between the two groups. Results The screening group comprised of 123 149 and control group of 122 930 people. Most people in both groups had not used hospital resources at all. More people in the screening group than in the control group had at least one hospital-based outpatient visit (7.8% vs 7.4%), inpatient episode (3.9% vs 3.8%) and colonoscopy (1.5% vs 1.3%). In total, the screening group had 31 975 and control group 27 061 cumulative outpatient visits, 9260 and 7903 inpatient episodes, and 2686 and 1756 hospital colonoscopies, respectively. The proportion of those with a positive FOBT result with at least one outpatient visit, one inpatient episode or one colonoscopy, was 3.7 times, 2.5 times or 9 times that of those with a negative FOBT result, respectively. Conclusions CRC screening using the FOBT slightly increased the volume of hospital outpatient visits, inpatient episodes and hospital colonoscopies in Finland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suvi Mäklin
- Finnish Cancer Registry , Helsinki , Finland
| | | | - Pekka Rissanen
- School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland
| | - Nea Malila
- Finnish Cancer Registry , Helsinki , Finland ; School of Health Sciences, University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wong JSM, Hoffbauer S, Yeh DH, Rotenberg B, Gupta M, Sommer DD. The usefulness of routine histopathology of bilateral nasal polyps - a systematic review, meta-analysis, and cost evaluation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 44:46. [PMID: 26537414 PMCID: PMC4632485 DOI: 10.1186/s40463-015-0100-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2015] [Accepted: 10/28/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Controversy regarding the usefulness of routine histopathological examination of bilateral nasal polyps removed during endoscopic sinus surgery to identify occult diagnoses still exists. There is a paucity of high-level evidence in the literature. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Two independent reviewers were used. Pooled proportions and numbers needed to screen were calculated. A cost per life year model was generated based on varying survival benefits and compared to other Canadian screening programs to provide financial context. Results Six studies (n = 3772 patients) were included. Of the 3772 patients, 3751 had a pre-operative clinical and post-operative pathological diagnosis of inflammatory nasal polyps. Agreement proportion was 99.44 %. There were 18 unexpected benign and three unexpected malignant diagnoses identified. This translated to a proportion of 0.48 and 0.08 % respectively. Number needed to screen was 210 and 1258 respectively. Pooled proportion for expected findings using a random effect model was 0.99 (95 % CI = 0.99–1). Pooled proportion for unexpected benign findings using a random effect model was 0.00522 (95 % CI = 0.00133–0.01). Pooled proportion for unexpected malignant findings using a random effect model was 0.00107 (95 % CI = 0.000147–0.00283). The cost to pick up one unexpected benign diagnosis was $14557.2. The cost to pick up 1 unexpected malignant diagnosis was $87204.56. Cost per quality life year calculated ranged from 3211.83 to $64677.58 based on varying assumptions on the survival benefits of identifying an unexpected malignancy. Conclusions Routine pathological examination in screening for neoplasia may be low yield, however, no compelling evidence was found to cease such practice. Surgeons should exercise individual judgment in requesting routine examination. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40463-015-0100-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay S M Wong
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, McMaster University Medical Centre, 3V1 Clinic, 1200 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
| | - Stephanie Hoffbauer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, McMaster University Medical Centre, 3V1 Clinic, 1200 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
| | - David H Yeh
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| | - Brian Rotenberg
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
| | - Michael Gupta
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, McMaster University Medical Centre, 3V1 Clinic, 1200 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
| | - Doron D Sommer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, McMaster University Medical Centre, 3V1 Clinic, 1200 Main Street W, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Wong CKH, Lam CLK, Wan YF, Fong DYT. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:705. [PMID: 26471036 PMCID: PMC4608156 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1730-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2014] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening strategies from the healthcare service provider perspective based on Chinese population. Methods A Markov model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of recommended screening strategies including annual/biennial guaiac fecal occult blood testing (G-FOBT), annual/biennial immunologic FOBT (I-FOBT), and colonoscopy every 10 years in Chinese aged 50 year over a 25-year period. External validity of model was tested against data retrieved from published randomized controlled trials of G-FOBT. Recourse use data collected from Chinese subjects among staging of colorectal neoplasm were combined with published unit cost data ($USD in 2009 price values) to estimate a stage-specific cost per patient. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were quantified based on the stage duration and SF-6D preference-based value of each stage. The cost-effectiveness outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) represented by costs per life-years (LY) and costs per QALYs gained. Results In base-case scenario, the non-dominated strategies were annual and biennial I-FOBT. Compared with no screening, the ICER presented $20,542/LYs and $3155/QALYs gained for annual I-FOBT, and $19,838/LYs gained and $2976/QALYs gained for biennial I-FOBT. The optimal screening strategy was annual I-FOBT that attained the highest ICER at the threshold of $50,000 per LYs or QALYs gained. Conclusion The Markov model informed the health policymakers that I-FOBT every year may be the most effective and cost-effective CRC screening strategy among recommended screening strategies, depending on the willingness-to-pay of mass screening for Chinese population. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02038283 Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1730-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos K H Wong
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, 3/F, Ap Lei Chau Clinic, 161 Ap Lei Chau Main Street, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
| | - Cindy L K Lam
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, 3/F, Ap Lei Chau Clinic, 161 Ap Lei Chau Main Street, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Y F Wan
- Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, 3/F, Ap Lei Chau Clinic, 161 Ap Lei Chau Main Street, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Daniel Y T Fong
- School of Nursing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Okada T, Tanaka K, Kawachi H, Ito T, Nishikage T, Odagaki T, Zárate AJ, Kronberg U, López-Köstner F, Karelovic S, Flores S, Estela R, Tsubaki M, Uetake H, Eishi Y, Kawano T. International collaboration between Japan and Chile to improve detection rates in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer 2015; 122:71-7. [PMID: 26445309 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2015] [Revised: 08/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Chile, mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased rapidly. To help address this issue, the Prevention Project for Neoplasia of the Colon and Rectum (PRENEC) program was initiated in 2012 with intensive support from Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU) in Tokyo, Japan, as part of an international collaboration. METHODS From June 2012 to July 2014, a total of 10,575 asymptomatic participants were enrolled in PRENEC. Participants with positive immunochemical fecal occult blood test (iFOBT) results or a family history of CRC underwent colonoscopy. The colonoscopy results from a similar, previous project in Chile (PREVICOLON) were compared with those from PRENEC. Furthermore, the initial colonoscopies of 1562 participants in PRENEC were analyzed according to whether the colonoscopists were from TMDU or Chile. RESULTS The complete colonoscopy, adenoma detection, and cancer detection rates were 88.0%, 26.7%, and 1.1%, respectively, in PREVICOLON, while the corresponding values were 94.4%, 41.8%, and 6.0%, respectively, in PRENEC. In PRENEC, 107 cases of CRC were detected, amounting for 1.0% of all participants. Considering initial colonoscopies in PRENEC, the complete colonoscopy, adenoma detection, and cancer detection rates were 97.4%, 45.3%, and 9.3%, respectively, for physicians at TMDU and 93.3%, 41.5%, and 5.1%, respectively for Chilean physicians. The detection rates of intramucosal cancer were 7.3% and 3.7%, respectively, for TMDU and Chilean physicians. CONCLUSIONS Quality indicators of colonoscopy substantially improved from PREVICOLON to PRENEC. The assessments made by Chilean physicians alone were improved in PRENEC, but remained better in the TMDU group. Moreover, physicians from TMDU detected more CRCs than Chilean physicians, especially at earlier stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Okada
- Latin American Collaborative Research Center of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Santiago, Chile.,Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Tanaka
- Latin American Collaborative Research Center of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hiroshi Kawachi
- Latin American Collaborative Research Center of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Santiago, Chile
| | - Takashi Ito
- Latin American Collaborative Research Center of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Santiago, Chile.,Department of Human Pathology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Nishikage
- Latin American Collaborative Research Center of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Santiago, Chile
| | - Tomoyuki Odagaki
- Latin American Collaborative Research Center of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Udo Kronberg
- Unit of Coloproctology, Las Condes Clinic, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Stanko Karelovic
- Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Magallanes Hospital, Punta Arenas, Chile
| | - Sergio Flores
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dr. Eduardo Pereira Hospital, Valparaiso, Chile
| | - Ricardo Estela
- Chilean-Japanese Institute for Digestive Diseases, San Borja Arriaran Hospital, Santiago, Chile
| | - Masahiro Tsubaki
- Latin American Collaborative Research Center of Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Santiago, Chile
| | - Hiroyuki Uetake
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Surgical Specialties, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshinobu Eishi
- Department of Human Pathology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuyuki Kawano
- Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wong MCS, Ching JYL, Chan VCW, Lam TYT, Luk AKC, Wong SH, Ng SC, Wong VWS, Ng SSM, Wu JCY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY. Screening strategies for colorectal cancer among patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and family history. Int J Cancer 2015; 138:576-83. [PMID: 26289421 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) are at higher risks but how they should be screened remains uncertain. Hence, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening among patients with NAFLD and family history by different strategies. A hypothetical population of 100,000 subjects aged 40-75 years receive: (i) yearly fecal immunochemical test (FIT) at 50 years; (ii) flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) every 5 years at 50 years; (iii) colonoscopy 10 yearly at 50 years; (iv) colonoscopy 10 yearly at 50 years among those with family history/NAFLD and yearly FIT at 50 years among those without; (v) colonoscopy 10 yearly at 40 years among those with family history/NAFLD and yearly FIT at 50 years among those without and (vi) colonoscopy 10 yearly at 40 years among those with family history/NAFLD and colonoscopy 10 yearly at 50 years among those without. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was studied by Markov modeling. It was found that colonoscopy, FS and FIT reduced incidence of CRC by 49.5, 26.3 and 23.6%, respectively. Using strategies 4, 5 and 6, the corresponding reduction in CRC incidence was 29.9, 30.9 and 69.3% for family history, and 33.2, 34.7 and 69.8% for NAFLD. Compared with no screening, strategies 4 (US$1,018/life-year saved) and 5 (US$7,485) for family history offered the lowest ICER, whilst strategy 4 (US$5,877) for NAFLD was the most cost-effective. These findings were robust when assessed with a wide range of deterministic sensitivity analyses around the base case. These indicated that screening patients with family history or NAFLD by colonoscopy at 50 years was economically favorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C S Wong
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China.,School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Jessica Y L Ching
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Victor C W Chan
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Thomas Y T Lam
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Arthur K C Luk
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Sunny H Wong
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Siew C Ng
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Vincent W S Wong
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Simon S M Ng
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Justin C Y Wu
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Francis K L Chan
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| | - Joseph J Y Sung
- Institute of Digestive Disease, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, NT, HKSAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cantor SB, Rajan T, Linder SK, Volk RJ. A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of patient decision aids: A case study using colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2015; 77:168-73. [PMID: 25979678 PMCID: PMC5629970 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2014] [Revised: 03/24/2015] [Accepted: 05/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient decision aids are important tools for facilitating balanced, evidence-based decision making. However, the potential of decision aids to lower health care utilization and costs is uncertain; few studies have investigated the cost-effectiveness of decision aids that change patient behavior. Using an example of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening, we provide a framework for analyzing the cost-effectiveness of decision aids. METHODS A decision-analytic model with two strategies (decision aid or no decision aid) was used to calculate expected costs in U.S. dollars and benefits measured in life-years saved (LYS). Data from a systematic review of ten studies about decision aid effectiveness was used to calculate the percentage increase in the number of people choosing screening instead of no screening. We then calculated the incremental cost per LYS with the use of the decision aid. RESULTS The no decision aid strategy had an expected cost of $3023 and yielded 18.19 LYS. The decision aid strategy cost $3249 and yielded 18.20 LYS. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the decision aid strategy was $36,126 per LYS. Results were sensitive to the cost of the decision aid and the percentage change in behavior caused by the decision aid. CONCLUSIONS This study provides proof-of-concept evidence for future studies examining the cost-effectiveness of decision aids. The results suggest that decision aids can be beneficial and cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott B Cantor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Tanya Rajan
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Suzanne K Linder
- Department of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert J Volk
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Halligan S, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, Wardle J, von Wagner C, Lilford R, Yao GL, Zhu S, Atkin W. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy or barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer in older symptomatic patients: two multicentre randomised trials with economic evaluation (the SIGGAR trials). Health Technol Assess 2015; 19:1-134. [PMID: 26198205 PMCID: PMC4781284 DOI: 10.3310/hta19540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a relatively new diagnostic test that may be superior to existing alternatives to investigate the large bowel. OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic efficacy, acceptability, safety and cost-effectiveness of CTC with barium enema (BE) or colonoscopy. DESIGN Parallel randomised trials: BE compared with CTC and colonoscopy compared with CTC (randomisation 2 : 1, respectively). SETTING A total of 21 NHS hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Patients aged ≥ 55 years with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (CRC). INTERVENTIONS CTC, BE and colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES For the trial of CTC compared with BE, the primary outcome was the detection rate of CRC and large polyps (≥ 10 mm), with the proportion of patients referred for additional colonic investigation as a secondary outcome. For the trial of CTC compared with colonoscopy, the primary outcome was the proportion of patients referred for additional colonic investigation, with the detection rate of CRC and large polyps as a secondary outcome. Secondary outcomes for both trials were miss rates for cancer (via registry data), all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, patient acceptability, extracolonic pathology and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS A total of 8484 patients were registered and 5384 were randomised and analysed (BE trial: 2527 BE, 1277 CTC; colonoscopy trial: 1047 colonoscopy, 533 CTC). Detection rates in the BE trial were 7.3% (93/1277) for CTC, compared with 5.6% (141/2527) for BE (p = 0.0390). The difference was due to better detection of large polyps by CTC (3.6% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.0098), with no significant difference for cancer (3.7% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.66). Significantly more patients having CTC underwent additional investigation (23.5% vs. 18.3%; p = 0.0003). At the 3-year follow-up, the miss rate for CRC was 6.7% for CTC (three missed cancers) and 14.1% for BE (12 missed cancers). Significantly more patients randomised to CTC than to colonoscopy underwent additional investigation (30% vs. 8.2%; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in detection rates for cancer or large polyps (10.7% for CTC vs. 11.4% for colonoscopy; p = 0.69), with no difference when cancers (p = 0.94) and large polyps (p = 0.53) were analysed separately. At the 3-year follow-up, the miss rate for cancer was nil for colonoscopy and 3.4% for CTC (one missed cancer). Adverse events were uncommon for all procedures. In 1042 of 1748 (59.6%) CTC examinations, at least one extracolonic finding was reported, and this proportion increased with age (p < 0.0001). A total of 149 patients (8.5%) were subsequently investigated, and extracolonic neoplasia was diagnosed in 79 patients (4.5%) and malignancy in 29 (1.7%). In the short term, CTC was significantly more acceptable to patients than BE or colonoscopy. Total costs for CTC and colonoscopy were finely balanced, but CTC was associated with higher health-care costs than BE. The cost per large polyp or cancer detected was £4235 (95% confidence interval £395 to £9656). CONCLUSIONS CTC is superior to BE for detection of cancers and large polyps in symptomatic patients. CTC and colonoscopy detect a similar proportion of large polyps and cancers and their costs are also similar. CTC precipitates significantly more additional investigations than either BE or colonoscopy, and evidence-based referral criteria are needed. Further work is recommended to clarify the extent to which patients initially referred for colonoscopy or BE undergo subsequent abdominopelvic imaging, for example by computed tomography, which will have a significant impact on health economic estimates. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN95152621.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Halligan
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Edward Dadswell
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Wooldrage
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Wardle
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Lilford
- School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Population Evidence and Technologies, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK
| | - Guiqing L Yao
- School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wendy Atkin
- Cancer Screening and Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Palimaka S, Blackhouse G, Goeree R. Colon Capsule Endoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyps: An Economic Analysis. ONTARIO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SERIES 2015; 15:1-43. [PMID: 26366240 PMCID: PMC4561761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in Ontario. Most cases of colorectal cancer are preventable through early diagnosis and the removal of precancerous polyps. Colon capsule endoscopy is a non-invasive test for detecting colorectal polyps. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and the impact on the Ontario health budget of implementing colon capsule endoscopy for detecting advanced colorectal polyps among adult patients who have been referred for computed tomographic (CT) colonography. METHODS We performed an original cost-effectiveness analysis to assess the additional cost of CT colonography and colon capsule endoscopy resulting from misdiagnoses. We generated diagnostic accuracy data from a clinical evidence-based analysis (reported separately), and we developed a deterministic Markov model to estimate the additional long-term costs and life-years lost due to false-negative results. We then also performed a budget impact analysis using data from Ontario administrative sources. One-year costs were estimated for CT colonography and colon capsule endoscopy (replacing all CT colonography procedures, and replacing only those CT colonography procedures in patients with an incomplete colonoscopy within the previous year). We conducted this analysis from the payer perspective. RESULTS Using the point estimates of diagnostic accuracy from the head-to-head study between colon capsule endoscopy and CT colonography, we found the additional cost of false-positive results for colon capsule endoscopy to be $0.41 per patient, while additional false-negatives for the CT colonography arm generated an added cost of $116 per patient, with 0.0096 life-years lost per patient due to cancer. This results in an additional cost of $26,750 per life-year gained for colon capsule endoscopy compared with CT colonography. The total 1-year cost to replace all CT colonography procedures with colon capsule endoscopy in Ontario is about $2.72 million; replacing only those CT colonography procedures in patients with an incomplete colonoscopy in the previous year would cost about $740,600 in the first year. LIMITATIONS The difference in accuracy between colon capsule endoscopy and CT colonography was not statistically significant for the detection of advanced adenomas (≥ 10 mm in diameter), according to the head-to-head clinical study from which the diagnostic accuracy was taken. This leads to uncertainty in the economic analysis, with results highly sensitive to changes in diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS The cost-effectiveness of colon capsule endoscopy for use in patients referred for CT colonography is $26,750 per life-year, assuming an increased sensitivity of colon capsule endoscopy. Replacement of CT colonography with colon capsule endoscopy is associated with moderate costs to the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Palimaka
- Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Gord Blackhouse
- Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ron Goeree
- Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada ; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Discovery of a novel trimebutine metabolite and its impact on N-desmethyltrimebutine quantification by LC–MS/MS. Bioanalysis 2015; 7:1007-15. [DOI: 10.4155/bio.15.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Hélène Montpetit has a Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry from the University du Québec at Montreal. For the past 15 years, she has worked in the bioanalysis field in CROs environment as well as in a big Pharma. She currently holds a position as scientific reviewer in the method development group at Algorithme Pharma. Background: A failure in incurred sample reanalysis (ISR) for N-desmethyltrimebutine (NDMT), during the analysis of a trimebutine-containing drug GIC-1001 Phase I study, led to the discovery of a never-before reported metabolite of trimebutine. Results: A positive bias for NDMT during the ISR and post-reconstitution stability evaluations indicated the presence of an unstable metabolite of NDMT. Precursor ion scans performed on freshly extracted samples enabled the identification of this metabolite to be the NDMT glucuronide conjugate and its fragmentation pattern suggested that the glucuronide moiety was attached at the N-terminal of NDMT. Conclusions: An acidification step was introduced in the extraction procedure to completely hydrolyze the glucuronide and measure the total NDMT in plasma, rendering this method a successful fit-for-purpose assay.
Collapse
|