Slowly progressive insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes positive for anti-GAD antibody ELISA test may be strongly associated with a future insulin-dependent state

Antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase in intravenous immunoglobulin preparations can affect the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIgs) contain various autoantibodies, including those against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADAb), a valuable biomarker of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Passive transfer of GADAb from IVIgs to patients poses a risk of misdiagnosis, and information on the specific titres of GADAb and their impact on diagnostic accuracy remains limited. This study aimed to provide further insights into the origin of GADAb detected in patient serum following IVIg infusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

GADAb titres in IVIg products from Japan and the United States were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based assays. For reliable quantification, GADAb titres in pooled plasma were quantified and compared with those in the IVIg products. The determined titres were used to estimate the likelihood of passively detecting acquired GADAb in individuals receiving IVIgs.

RESULTS

GADAbs were prevalent in IVIg products; however, the titres varied significantly among different lots and products. Importantly, IVIg-derived GADAb was estimated to remain detectable in patient serum for up to 100 days following a dosage of 2000 mg/kg.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should consider that IVIg preparations may contain GADAb, which can lead to false-positive results in serological assays. Careful interpretation of the assay results is key to the definitive diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

High glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody titers may be associated with a decline in β-cell function over time and future insulin deficiency in latent autoimmune diabetes in adults

AIMS

Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is characterized by positive islet-associated autoantibodies including glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA), and gradual decline in insulin secretion, progressing to insulin dependency. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine whether GADA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (GADA-ELISA) titer of ≥180 U/mL could be associated with decline in β-cell function in participants with LADA.

METHODS

Sixty-three participants with LADA were recruited and an association between insulin secretion capacity and disease duration was investigated. Insulin peptide-specific inflammatory immunoreactivity was investigated to determine the disease's activity.

RESULTS

There was a significant inverse correlation between disease duration and C-peptide index in participants with GADA-ELISA titer of ≥180 U/mL (Spearman's r (rs) = -0.516, p < 0.01). The positivity rate of insulin peptide-specific inflammatory immunoreactivity was significantly higher in those with ≥180 U/mL than in those with <180 U/mL (p < 0.05). In participants with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1*04:05, a significant inverse correlation was observed between disease duration and C-peptide index in those with ≥180 U/mL (rs = -0.751, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

GADA-ELISA titer of ≥180 U/mL, especially with HLA-DRB1*04:05, might reflect higher disease activity and may be associated with decline in β-cell function over time and future insulin dependency in LADA.

Comparison of positive rates between glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies and ElisaRSR™ 3 Screen ICA™ in recently obtained sera from patients who had been previously diagnosed with slowly progressive type 1 diabetes

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the positivity rates of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies (GADA) and ElisaRSR™ 3 Screen ICA™ (3 Screen ICA), a newly developed assay for the simultaneous measurement of GADA, insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibodies (IA-2A), and zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies (ZnT8A), in recently obtained sera from patients who had been previously diagnosed with slowly progressive type 1 diabetes (SPIDDM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 53 patients with SPIDDM who were positive for GADA at the diagnosis and 98 non-diabetic individuals, and investigated the diagnostic accuracy of the 3 Screen ICA (cutoff index ≥30 units) compared with that of GADA. In addition, we compared the clinical characteristics of patients with SPIDDM who were negative or positive on 3 Screen ICA.

RESULTS

The positivity rates of 3 Screen ICA, GADA, IA-2A, and ZnT8A were 88.7, 86.8, 24.5, and 13.2%, respectively. The respective sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for SPIDDM were 88.7, 100, 100, and 94.2% by 3 Screen ICA and 86.8, 100, 100.0, and 93.3% by GADA. There were no significant differences in age at onset, duration of diabetes, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin and C-peptide levels, and the prevalence of autoimmune thyroiditis between patients with SPIDDM who were positive or negative on 3 Screen ICA. However, the prevalence of insulin users was significantly higher in those who were positive than in those who were negative on 3 Screen ICA.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to GADA, 3 Screen ICA may be a useful diagnostic tool for detecting patients with SPIDDM.

Bivalent GAD autoantibody ELISA improves clinical utility and risk prediction for adult autoimmune diabetes

AIM/INTRODUCTION

To investigate the differences in the clinical significance and glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody (GADA) affinity between RIA (RIA-GADA) and ELISA (ELISA-GADA) in patients with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 415 patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled, including 199 acute-onset type 1 diabetes, 168 slowly progressive type 1 diabetes (SPIDDM), and 48 fulminant type 1 diabetes. GADA affinity was measured by a competitive binding experiment using unlabeled recombinant human GAD65 protein, and the diagnostic performance of both assays and the relationship between GADA affinity and the decline of fasting C-peptide (F-CPR) were examined.

RESULTS

While the ELISA-GADA displayed a higher sensitivity than the RIA method in diagnosing type 1 diabetes in acute-onset patients, about 40% of SPIDDM patients with low-titer RIA-GADA were determined as negative by the ELISA method. Patients with type 1 diabetes with RIA-GADA alone had an older age of onset, less diabetic ketoacidosis, a higher BMI, and a higher F-CPR compared with patients positive for both RIA-GADA and ELISA-GADA. Additionally, 36% of RIA-GADA-positive patients had low-affinity GADA (<10¹⁰  L/mol), which was significantly higher than in the ELISA-GADA-positive patients (4%, P < 0.0001). Furthermore, over a 3 year monitoring period, F-CPR levels decreased in ELISA-GADA-positive SPIDDM, whereas it was maintained in patients with RIA-GADA alone, regardless of GADA affinity.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that bivalent ELISA for GADA is superior to the RIA method in diagnosing type 1 diabetes. Moreover, the diagnostic superiority of the ELISA-GADA made possible the concurrent identification of SPIDDM patients at high-risk of early progression, and allowed for more accurate clinical diagnosis and management.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.

Research of anti-GAD and anti-IA2 autoantibodies by ELISA test in a series of Moroccan pediatric patients with diabetes type 1

Introduction

Type I diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease with a prediabetic, asymptomatic period characterized by the selective destruction of insulin-producing β cells. During the pre-clinical phase, various auto-antibodies are generated against several beta cell antigens such as anti glutamate acid decarboxylase (Anti-GAD), anti tyrosine phosphatase (Anti-IA2). Today, the coupled detection of Anti-IA2 with that of Anti-GAD proves its great importance in the diagnosis and prediction of type 1 diabetes. The combined positivity for both antibodies has a specificity and a positive predictive value of 100%.

Objectives

In this work, we evaluate the diagnostic value of anti-GAD and anti-IA2 antibodies in a series based on 78 Moroccan subjects initially under 16, suspected T1D.

Results and Discussion

Our series consists mainly of 74% of newly diagnosed patients for T1D and 26% of confirmed diagnostic patients, of whom 52% are females. The mean age of diagnosis is 7 ± 4 years, the mean of HbA1c at the time of diagnosis is 11.63 ± 2.16%, and the percentage of family history in our series is 69%. The proportion of positive results for anti-IA2 antibodies and anti-GAD antibodies are, respectively, 76.92% and 62.82%, and 52.56% of patients are positive for both auto-antibodies. This study confirms that anti-GAD and anti-IA2 auto-antibodies assays can detect patients early and the autoantibodies can persist several years after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes.

Conclusion

This study confirmed the diagnosis and classification of T1D (type 1A) in 87.18% of patients, and we reported that the prevalence of anti-GAD and anti-IA2 is higher in girls than in boys.

Increased diagnosis of autoimmune childhood-onset Japanese type 1 diabetes using a new glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, compared with a previously used glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody radioimmunoassay kit

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

We compared the results of testing for glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADAb) using a radioimmunoassay (RIA) and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in individuals with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum specimens were collected from 1,024 Japanese children (426 boys and 598 girls) in 2013. The median age at diagnosis was 7 years (0-18 years). The blood specimens were obtained at a median age of 13 years (2-22 years).

RESULTS

Among the 628 children whose serum specimens were collected within 5 years after diagnosis, the rate of GADAb positivity was 47.9% using RIA and 69.4% using ELISA. The participants were divided into four groups according to their RIA and ELISA results for GADAb as follows: group I (RIA+/ELISA+), group II (RIA+/ELISA-), group III (RIA-/ELISA+) and group IV (RIA-/ELISA-). The clinical and genetic characteristics of group I and group III were quite similar in terms of age at diagnosis, male/female ratio, relatively high positive rates for both autoantibody to protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 and autoantibody to the cation efflux transporter zinc transporter 8, and human leukocyte antigen genotype. Group II contained just five patients, and was characterized by a younger age at diagnosis, low positive rates for both autoantibody to protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 and autoantibody to the cation efflux transporter zinc transporter 8, and a unique human leukocyte antigen genotype. If the positive rates of either autoantibody to protein tyrosine phosphatase IA-2 or autoantibody to the cation efflux transporter zinc transporter 8 or both were added to the GADAb results using RIA, the percentage of autoimmune type 1 diabetes increased from 47.9% to 78.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of autoimmune childhood-onset Japanese type 1 diabetes increased when GADAb results were obtained using a new ELISA method, compared with a previously utilized RIA method.

Clinical and genetic characteristics of people with type 1 diabetes who have discrepancies in titers of anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody measured by radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to compare the clinical and genetic characteristics between people with type 1 diabetes who were positive and negative for autoantibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with low-titer GADA measured by radioimmunoassay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among Japanese people with type 1 diabetes in whom GADA were measured by both ELISA and radioimmunoassay, those who had low titers of GADA measured by radioimmunoassay (1.5-10 U/mL), regardless of positivity for GADA measured by ELISA, were studied. There were 65 participants with acute-onset type 1 diabetes and 30 participants with slowly progressive insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Clinical characteristics and human leukocyte antigen types were compared in ELISA-positive (≥5 U/mL) and ELISA-negative participants. Endogenous insulin secretion was evaluated by C-peptide index.

RESULTS

Among participants with slowly progressive insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, postprandial C-peptide index was significantly higher in ELISA-negative participants than in ELISA-positive participants (r = 0.619, P = 0.002). Among 52 participants whose human leukocyte antigen typing was carried out, all of the participants with slowly progressive insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus who had DRB1*09:01 were positive by GADA-ELISA (P = 0.021). In acute-onset type 1 diabetes participants, there were no significant differences for the C-peptide index and human leukocyte antigen genotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in the positivity for GADA-ELISA might reflect cytotoxicity toward pancreatic β-cells and preservation of endogenous insulin secretion in people with slowly progressive insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. We also suggest that the difference in the GADA-ELISA-specific epitope depends on the human leukocyte antigen genotype.

Discrepancy of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibody results between RSR radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in patients with type 1 diabetes is related to autoantibody affinity

AIM/INTRODUCTION

Autoantibodies to the 65 kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) are a valuable diagnostic and predictive marker for type 1 diabetes. Recently, it has been reported that a significant proportion of sera in the commercial RSR radioimmunoassay (RIA) that have tested positive for GADA have then turned negative in RSR enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests in patients with type 1 diabetes. The present study aimed to investigate whether the GADA result discrepancies between RSR-RIA and RSR-ELISA are related to autoantibody affinity.

METHODS

GADA affinity was measured by a competitive binding experiment using unlabeled recombinant human GAD65 in 12 discordant samples (5 RIA[+]/ELISA[-] and 7 RIA[-]/ELISA[+] sera). Furthermore, the effect of the initial incubation time on the GADA positivity was also examined using the ELISA test.

RESULTS

GADA affinities were >1010  L/mol in two of five RIA(+)/ELISA(-) and all of seven RIA(-)/ELISA(+) sera. After an initial incubation time longer than the recommended 1 h, the GADA titer in three of five RIA(+)/ELISA(-) sera and all RIA(-)/ELISA(+) sera increased 1.6- to 100-fold. However, the titer in 12 GADA-negative sera from healthy controls remained unchanged after the longer incubation. The increment ratio of GADA titer was positively correlated with GADA affinity (r = 0.991, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The RSR-RIA test identifies both high- and low-affinity GADA, whereas the RSR-ELISA test identifies only high-affinity GADA. A longer initial incubation time in the RSR-ELISA test increases the sensitivity of GADA with the same specificity in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Actual condition survey regarding mismatch of measurements between radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests for anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody in real-world clinical practice

Anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) is an important islet cell-associated autoantibody for the diagnosis of autoimmune type 1 diabetes mellitus. In Japan, the GADA assay kit was recently changed from radioimmunoassay (RIA) to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Thereafter, a mismatched measurement between the two tests became apparent in clinical situations. The present study aimed to clarify the actual extent of mismatch between the two measurements on a larger-scale real-world clinical practice. In this cross-sectional non-local/non-hospital-based study, we collected anonymized data on GADA levels of 598 participants, who were simultaneously measured with GADA-RIA and GADA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests. We found that 34% of the GADA-RIA-positive participants showed negative results in the GADA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test; the mismatch was predominantly observed in participants with relatively low GADA-RIA levels (<32 U/mL). This considerable mismatch might lead to physicians' confusion in diagnosing type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Circulating anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 antibody titers are positively associated with the capacity of insulin secretion in acute-onset type 1 diabetes with short duration in a Japanese population

Aims/Introduction

To elucidate the relationship between titers of islet autoantibodies, the C‐X‐C motif chemokine 10 – a circulating chemokine that activates T‐helper 1 cells leading to β‐cell destruction – and β‐cell function in type 1 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

In total, 58 type 1 diabetes patients positive for glutamic decarboxylase‐65 autoantibodies (GADA)‐radioimmunoassay (mean age 54.1 years; 27 acute‐onset cases and 31 slowly progressive cases) were enrolled; serum C‐X‐C motif chemokine 10 (n = 50), zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies (n = 50) and GADA (n = 58) by an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay, and insulinoma‐associated antigen‐2 autoantibodies by radioimmunoassay (n = 50) were measured. The ratio of 100 × random C‐peptide (ng/mL)‐to‐plasma glucose levels (mg/dL; C‐peptide index [CPI]) was measured.

Results

The CPI significantly decreased in both groups with the progression of disease duration. GADA titers by radioimmunoassay and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay were strongly correlated with the CPI in acute‐onset type 1 diabetes patients with a shorter disease duration (≤10 years), but not in those with a longer duration or slowly progressive type 1 diabetes. Neither insulinoma‐associated antigen‐2 nor zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies titers were correlated with the CPI. Serum C‐X‐C motif chemokine 10 levels in both groups were significantly higher than in non‐diabetic controls, and persisted at high levels even in those with chronic duration.

Conclusions

Among islet autoantibodies, the intensity of the humoral immune response, as defined by GADA titers, reflected the degree of residual β‐cell function in acute‐onset type 1 diabetes patients with short duration. Prolonged disease activity might accelerate β‐cell impairment in both subtypes of type 1 diabetes.

Association of Autoimmune Thyroid Disease with Anti-GAD Antibody ELISA Test Positivity and Risk for Insulin Deficiency in Slowly Progressive Type 1 Diabetes

The presence of antiglutamic acid decarboxylase antibody (GADA) is required for the diagnosis of slowly progressive type 1 diabetes (SPT1D). We examined the factors influencing GADA determination by radioimmunoassay (GADA-RIA) and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (GADA-ELISA). Sixty patients with SPT1D and 154 patients with type 2 diabetes were examined by both GADA-RIA and GADA-ELISA and for the presence of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). We compared the clinical characteristics of these patients based on the positivity or negativity of GADA-RIA and GADA-ELISA, and the existence or nonexistence of AITD. Thirty of 60 (50.0%) GADA-RIA-positive patients were GADA-ELISA negative, whereas none of the 154 GADA-RIA-negative patients were GADA-ELISA positive. Concomitant AITD was significantly less in patients with GADA-RIA and without GADA-ELISA and was significantly more in patients with GADA-RIA and GADA-ELISA. In GADA-RIA-positive patients, there was no significant difference in the GADA-RIA titer among the GADA-ELISA-negative patients with and without AITD, and the GADA-ELISA-positive patients without AITD; whereas the frequency of insulin deficiency was significantly higher in the patients with AITD and/or GADA-ELISA than in those without AITD and GADA-ELISA. Examination of GADA-ELISA and AITD in GADA-RIA-positive patients might be useful in predicting insulin deficiency in these patients.