Safety and efficacy of low-dose pioglitazone (7.5 mg/day) vs. standard-dose pioglitazone (15 mg/day) in Japanese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Efficacy of 3 months of additional pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes patients with alcoholic fatty liver disease

Pioglitazone ameliorates liver dysfunction in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD); however, its efficacy in T2D patients with alcoholic fatty liver disease (AFLD) is unclear. Here, we conducted a retrospective single-center trial investigating whether pioglitazone ameliorates liver dysfunction in T2D patients with AFLD. T2D patients (n = 100) receiving 3 months of additional pioglitazone were divided into those with or without fatty liver (FL), and those with FL were further classified into AFLD (n = 21) and NAFLD (n = 57) groups. The effects of pioglitazone were compared across groups using medical record data on body weight changes; HbA1c, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP) levels; and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index. The pioglitazone dose (mean dose: 10.6 ± 4.6 mg/day) did not affect weight gain but significantly decreased the HbA1c level in patients with or without FL (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). The decrease in HbA1c level was significantly more pronounced in patients with FL than in those without FL (P < 0.05). In patients with FL, the HbA1c, AST, ALT, and γ-GTP levels significantly decreased after pioglitazone treatment than before (P < 0.01). The AST and ALT levels, but not the γ-GTP level, and the FIB-4 index significantly decreased after pioglitazone addition in the AFLD group, similar to that in the NAFLD group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Similar effects were observed following low-dose pioglitazone treatment (≤ 7.5 mg/day) (P < 0.05) in T2D patients with AFLD and NAFLD. These results suggest that pioglitazone may be also an effective treatment option for T2D patients with AFLD.

A double-blind, Randomized controlled trial on glucose-lowering EFfects and safety of adding 0.25 or 0.5 mg lobeglitazone in type 2 diabetes patients with INadequate control on metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapy: REFIND study

AIMS

To compare the efficacy and safety of adding low-dose lobeglitazone (0.25 mg/day) or standard-dose lobeglitazone (0.5 mg/day) to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with inadequate glucose control on metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP4) inhibitor therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this phase 4, multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial, patients with T2DM insufficiently controlled by metformin and DPP4 inhibitor combination therapy were randomized to receive either low-dose or standard-dose lobeglitazone. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of low-dose lobeglitazone in terms of glycaemic control, expressed as the difference in mean glycated haemoglobin levels at week 24 relative to baseline values and compared with standard-dose lobeglitazone, using 0.5% non-inferiority margin.

RESULTS

At week 24, the mean glycated haemoglobin levels were 6.87 ± 0.54% and 6.68 ± 0.46% in low-dose and standard-dose lobeglitazone groups, respectively (p = .031). The between-group difference was 0.18% (95% confidence interval 0.017-0.345), showing non-inferiority of the low-dose lobeglitazone. Mean body weight changes were significantly greater in the standard-dose group (1.36 ± 2.23 kg) than in the low-dose group (0.50 ± 1.85 kg) at week 24. The changes in HOMA-IR, lipid profile and liver enzyme levels showed no significant difference between the groups. Overall treatment-emergent adverse events (including weight gain, oedema and hypoglycaemia) occurred more frequently in the standard-dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding low-dose lobeglitazone to metformin and DPP4 inhibitor combination resulted in a non-inferior glucose-lowering outcome and fewer adverse events compared with standard-dose lobeglitazone. Therefore, low-dose lobeglitazone might be one option for individualized strategy in patients with T2DM.

Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment

There has been a rise in the prevalence of non-alcohol fatty liver disease (NAFLD) due to the popularity of western diets and sedentary lifestyles. One quarter of NAFLD patients is diagnosed with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), with histological evidence not only of fat accumulation in hepatocytes but also of liver cell injury and death due to long-term inflammation. Severe NASH patients have increased risks of cirrhosis and liver cancer. In this review, we discuss the pathogenesis and current methods of diagnosis for NASH, and current status of drug development for this life-threatening liver disease.

Identification of an allosteric hotspot for additive activation of PPARγ in antidiabetic effects

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), such as rosiglitazone (RSG), which activates peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ (PPARγ), are a potent class of oral antidiabetic agents with good durability. However, the clinical use of TZDs is challenging because of their side effects, including weight gain and hepatotoxicity. Here, we found that bavachinin (BVC), a lead natural product, additively activates PPARγ with low-dose RSG to preserve the maximum antidiabetic effects while reducing weight gain and hepatotoxicity in db/db mice caused by RSG monotherapy. Structural and biochemical assays demonstrated that an unexplored hotspot around Met329 and Ser332 in helix 5 is triggered by BVC cobinding to RSG-bound PPARγ, thereby allosterically stabilizing the active state of the activation-function 2 motif responsible for additive activation with RSG. Based on this hotspot, we discovered a series of new classes of allosteric agonists inducing the activity of TZDs in the same manner as BVC. Together, our data illustrate that the hotspot of PPARγ is druggable for the discovery of new allosteric synergists, and the combination therapy of allosteric synergists and TZD drugs may provide a potential alternative approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Safety and efficacy of low dose pioglitazone compared with standard dose pioglitazone in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease: A randomized controlled trial

Background

Choices of hypoglycemic agents for patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are limited. Available data among patients with CKD suggest that pioglitazone was effective and safe, with no increase in serious adverse effects. However, weight gain and fluid retention are major clinical problems for pioglitazone among patients with CKD. We conducted this study to compare the efficacy and side effects of low dose pioglitazone with standard dose pioglitazone among patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD.

Methods

A total of 75 patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD and inadequate glycemic control receiving any pharmacological antidiabetic treatment were randomly assigned to 2 groups. One group consisted of 37 patients treated with standard dose pioglitazone (15 mg/day) and another group consisted of 38 patients treated with low dose pioglitazone (7.5 mg/day). Glycosylated hemoglobinA1c (HbA1c) and metabolic profiles were monitored every 8 weeks for 24 weeks. Body composition was assessed using bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA).

Results

After 6 months of therapy, HbA1c levels decreased in both standard and low dose pioglitazone groups. The mean changes in HbA1c for standard and low dose pioglitazone were 1.1±1.6 and -1.4±1.5 (P = 0.543), respectively. Compared with low dose pioglitazone, standard dose pioglitazone treatment led to a greater increase in body weight, fat mass, total body water and extracellular water composition. No major adverse effects including hypoglycemia, congestive heart failure and abnormal liver function were identified.

Conclusion

Pioglitazone 7.5 mg once daily treatments presented similar glycemic control to standard dose pioglitazone and exhibited beneficial effects on weight gain and fluid retention among patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD.

p-21 Activated Kinase as a Molecular Target for Chemoprevention in Diabetes

Hypothesis: Anti-diabetic drugs modulate p-21 activated kinase (PAK) signaling. Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with increased cancer risk. PAK signaling is implicated in cellular homeostasis when regulated, and cancer when unrestrained. Recent reports provided a role for PAK signaling in glucose homeostasis, but the role of PAKs in the pathogenesis of T2DM is unknown. Here, we performed a mini-meta-analysis to explore if anti-diabetic drugs modify PAK signaling pathways, and provide insight regarding modulation of these pathways, to potentially reduce diabetes-associated cancer risk. Methods: PAK interacting partners in T2DM were identified using the online STRING database. Correlation studies were performed via systematic literature review to understand the effect of anti-diabetic drugs on PAK signaling. A mini-meta-analysis correlated multiple clinical studies and revealed the overall clinical response rate and percentage of adverse events in piogliazone (n = 53) and metformin (n = 91) treated patients with PAK-associated diseases. Results: A total of 30 PAK interacting partners were identified (10: reduced beta-cell mass; 10: beta-cell dysfunction; 10: obesity-insulin resistance), which were highly associated with Wnt, and G-protein signaling. The anti-diabetic drug metformin activated signaling pathways upstream; whereas pioglitazone inhibited pathways downstream of PAK. Overall, clinical response upon pioglitazone treatment was 53%. Seventy-nine percent of pioglitazone and 75% of metformin treated patients had adverse events. Pioglitazone reduced molecular-PAK biomarkers of proliferation (Ki67 and CyclinD1), and metformin had the opposite effect. Conclusions: PAK signaling in T2DM likely involves Wnt and G-protein signaling, which may be altered by the anti-diabetic drugs metformin and pioglitazone. Apart from the therapeutic limitations of adverse events, pioglitazone may be promising in chemoprevention. However long-term multi-centered studies, which initiate pioglitazone treatment early will be required to fully assess the full potential of these drugs.

Weight effects of antidiabetic agents

Obesity and diabetes are on the rise, which remains a continuous health concern worldwide. It is important to consider weight effects of antidiabetic agents prior to initiation as different antidiabetic agents impact weight differently. Areas covered: New agents to treat diabetes, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, have emerged over recent years that have been shown to result in weight reduction. Unfortunately, other antidiabetic medications used can cause weight gain such as with insulin, sulfonylureas, and thiazolidediones while some remain weight neutral (metformin and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors). The weight effects of these antidiabetic medications described are from select relevant guidelines, clinical trials, reviews, and meta-analysis found through PubMed and Ovid databases up to July 2017. Expert commentary: This article summarizes the current evidence available on the weight effects of these agents in patients with diabetes. Evaluating potential risks, such as weight gain, with potential benefits, such as improvement in glycemic control, will help with designing optimal therapeutic diabetes regimens.

The Low-Dose (7.5 mg/day) Pioglitazone Therapy

Pioglitazone is one of thiazolidinedione derivatives, which stimulates nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and improves glucose and lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis showed that pioglitazone therapy was associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with pre-diabetes and diabetes. Further, in a cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone therapy was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality. Despite these beneficial effects, the meta-analysis showed that pioglitazone therapy had higher risks of heart failure, bone fractures, edema and weight gain. To find out the efficacy and safety of the low-dose (7.5 mg/day) pioglitazone therapy, we reviewed the dose-response of pioglitazone on favorable effects and adverse effects due to pioglitazone, by searching the reports on effects of daily dose of 7.5 mg and/or 15 mg and/or 30 mg of pioglitazone. The low-dose pioglitazone therapy may show the same degree of improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism, fatty liver, insulin resistance, and adiponectin as the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy. Furthermore, the low-dose pioglitazone therapy may also show less adverse effects on weight gain, edema and heart failure as compared with the standard- and high-dose pioglitazone therapy.

Revitalization of pioglitazone: the optimum agent to be combined with a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor

The recently completed EMPA-REG study showed that empagliflozin significantly decreased the major adverse cardiac events (MACE) endpoint, which comprised cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke, in patients with high-risk type 2 diabetes (T2DM), primarily through a reduction in cardiovascular death, without a significant decrease in either MI or stroke. In the PROactive study, pioglitazone decreased the MACE endpoint by a similar degree to that observed in the EMPA-REG study, through a marked reduction in both recurrent MI and stroke and a modest reduction in cardiovascular death. These observations suggest that pioglitazone might be an ideal agent to combine with empagliflozin to further reduce cardiovascular events in patients with high-risk diabetes as empagliflozin also promotes salt/water loss and would be expected to offset any fluid retention associated with pioglitazone therapy. In the present paper, we provide an overview of the potential benefits of combined pioglitazone/empagliflozin therapy to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM.

Efficacy and safety of lobeglitazone monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus over 24-weeks: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo controlled trial

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the glucose-lowering and lipid-modifying effects, and safety profile of lobeglitazone, a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor- γ agonist, compared to placebo as a monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Research Design and Methods

In this 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo controlled study, 173 patients were randomly assigned (a 2∶1 ratio) to lobeglitazone 0.5 mg (n = 115) or matching placebo (n = 58) orally once daily. The primary endpoint was the change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to the end of treatment. The secondary endpoints included various glycemic parameters, lipid parameters and safety profile (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01001611).

Results

At 24 weeks, a significant reduction in HbA1c was observed with lobeglitazone versus placebo (−0.44% vs 0.16%, mean difference −0.6%, p<0.0001). The goal of HbA1c <7% was achieved significantly more in the lobeglitazone group compared to the placebo group (44% vs 12%, p<0.0001). Markers of insulin resistance were also improved in the lobeglitazone group. In addition, lobeglitazone treatment significantly improved triglycerides, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, small dense low density lipoprotein cholesterol, free fatty acid, and apolipoprotein-B/CIII compared to placebo (p<0.01, respectively). More weight gain was observed in the lobeglitazone group than the placebo group (0.89 kg vs – 0.63 kg, mean difference 1.52 kg, p<0.0001). The safety profile was comparable between the two groups and lobeglitazone was well tolerated.

Conclusions

Lobeglitazone 0.5 mg showed a favorable balance in the efficacy and safety profile. The results support a potential role of lobeglitazone in treating type 2 diabetes.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01001611

Efficacy and tolerability of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone in drug-naïve Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, 28 weeks' treatment, comparative study

OBJECTIVE

A 28-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate efficacy and tolerability of rosiglitazone in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.

RESEARCH AND DESIGN METHODS

373 patients were randomized to rosiglitazone (4-8 mg/day), pioglitazone (15-45 mg/day) or placebo. Agents were titrated to maximum doses at fixed time points in a pre-defined manner. Primary endpoints were superiority of each active treatment compared to placebo in HbA(1c) at week 16, and non-inferiority between active agents in HbA(1c) at week 28, based on a -0.45% margin.

RESULTS

At week 16, improvements versus placebo were observed with rosiglitazone 4 mg/day (-0.96%, p < 0.001) and pioglitazone 30 mg/day (-1.26%, p < 0.001). At week 28, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone were associated with significant changes from baseline of -0.94% and -1.35%, respectively and rosiglitazone produced statistically and clinically significant improvement versus placebo (-1.29%, CI: -1.62, -0.97). Pioglitazone also showed significant improvement versus placebo (-1.64%, CI: -1.96, -1.31). Non-inferiority of rosiglitazone (4-8 mg/day) to pioglitazone (30-45 mg/day) was not demonstrated (treatment-difference: -0.41%, 95% CI: -0.64, -0.18). More patients treated with pioglitazone were withdrawn from the study by adverse events compared with rosiglitazone (14 vs. 4, p = 0.015). Pioglitazone was associated with higher incidences of adverse events relating to edema and weight gain compared with rosiglitazone (edema: 25.2 vs. 11.3%, weight gain: 9.4 vs. 4.4%). There were no reports of ischemic heart disease or congestive heart failure in any treatment group.

CONCLUSION

Although non-inferiority to pioglitazone up to 45 mg in efficacy was not shown, rosiglitazone was confirmed to have clinically meaningful efficacy over placebo and fewer fluid-related events than pioglitazone. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as protocol NCT00297063.

Thiazolidinediones and PPARγ agonists: time for a reassessment

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are anti-diabetic drugs that act as insulin sensitizers and are used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. TZDs, which are ligands for the transcription factor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor PPARγ, have a wide spectrum of action, including modulation of glucose and lipid homeostasis, inflammation, atherosclerosis, bone remodeling and cell proliferation. Randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and durability of the anti-hyperglycemic action of TZDs, and have suggested that the TZD pioglitazone also exerts cardioprotective action. However, the clinical use of TZDs is limited by the occurrence of several adverse events, including body-weight gain, congestive heart failure, bone fractures and possibly bladder cancer. Therefore, there is an unmet need for the development of new safer PPARγ-modulating drugs.

Pioglitazone: side effect and safety profile

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are useful glucose-lowering agents for patients with Type 2 diabetes. Through PPAR-gamma-mediated effects, these drugs not only improve insulin sensitivity and glycemia, they also have beneficial effects on lipid metabolism and the vascular endothelium, with potential to improve cardiovascular risk. However, this promise has not been entirely fulfilled. The first TZD, troglitazone, was withdrawn after reports of severe liver damage. The second TZD, rosiglitazone, has been reported in meta-analyses to be associated with possible increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. The third TZD approved for clinical use in the US, pioglitazone, appears to be associated with decreased CVD events in most studies/meta-analyses.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We undertook a literature search in Pubmed from the year 2000 onwards to review the side effect/safety profile of pioglitazone.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

A comprehensive summary of the currently available data on the side effect/safety profile of pioglitazone.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The main adverse effects reported with pioglitazone are those common to the TZD class: weight gain, pedal edema, bone loss and precipitation of congestive heart failure in at-risk individuals, without any increase in CVD/all-cause mortality. Overall, the safety profile of pioglitazone is favorable and remains a useful option for the treatment of insulin-resistant patients with Type 2 diabetes. Further studies are needed to confirm/clarify its cardiovascular benefits.

Relationship of baseline HbA1c and efficacy of current glucose-lowering therapies: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

AIMS

Baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) concentrations vary between clinical trials of glucose-lowering agents and this may affect interpretation of clinical efficacy. The objective of this study is to quantify the relationship between baseline HbA(1c) and reduction of HbA(1c) in clinical trials.

METHODS

PubMed literature searches from 1991 to 2007. Randomized controlled studies with placebo-controlled or comparator arms [> or = 9 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population] ranging in duration from 23 to 52 weeks, in which baseline and change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were reported. The relationship between baseline HbA(1c) and change in HbA(1c) was analysed by a weighted least-squared regression model accounting for ITT population and variance of HbA(1c) change. Fourteen per cent of independently abstracted studies met the selection criteria.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis from 59 clinical trials (8479 patients) produced weighted R(2) of 0.35 (P < 0.0001) for the association of baseline HbA(1c) and absolute change in HbA(1c). Subanalysis of eight metformin clinical trials demonstrated a stronger association [weighted R(2) of 0.67 (P = 0.0130)]. Exclusion of metformin clinical trials from the overall meta-analysis (n = 51) yielded a weighted R(2) of 0.31 (P < 0.0001). Subanalyses of clinical trials of glucose-lowering therapies predominantly targeting fasting (n = 37) or postprandial (n = 22) blood glucose produced weighted R(2) values of 0.27 (P < 0.001) and 0.42 (P < 0.005), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate a positive relationship between baseline HbA(1c) and the magnitude of HbA(1c) change across 10 categories of glucose-lowering therapies, irrespective of class or mode of action. These observations should be considered when assessing clinical efficacy of diabetes therapies derived from clinical trials.

Low-dose pioglitazone increases serum high molecular weight adiponectin and improves glycemic control in Japanese patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes

We investigated the effects of low-dose pioglitazone (7.5mg/day) on serum high molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin and fluid retention (estimated from hematocrit) in 14 male and 16 female patients with type 2 diabetes. All of them were being treated with sulfonylureas and had poor glycemic control. Patients were given 7.5 mg/day of pioglitazone and were followed for 12 weeks at monthly intervals. In all 30 patients, HbA1c was significantly decreased after 12 weeks of treatment with pioglitazone (8.2+/-0.7% vs. 7.4+/-0.8%, P<0.0001). Serum HMW adiponectin increased markedly from 5.2 (2.4, 8.6) microg/ml at baseline to 9.8 (4.1, 12.6) microg/ml at the end of pioglitazone treatment (P<0.0001). When the changes were evaluated separately for each sex, diabetic men showed no increase of body weight or BMI after treatment, while HbA1c decreased significantly, and did Hct. Serum HMW adiponectin increased significantly after treatment. In diabetic women, neither body weight nor BMI increased after treatment with pioglitazone, as was the case for the men. HbA1c decreased significantly, and did Hct. Serum HMW adiponectin increased significantly after treatment. In conclusion, low-dose pioglitazone therapy could significantly improved glycemic control and markedly increased serum HMW adiponectin in both male and female Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Beneficial effects of sarpogrelate hydrochloride, a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, supplemented with pioglitazone on diabetic model mice

OBJECTIVE

Feeding behavior control and dietetics with consequent weight reduction can be the most efficacious and fundamental methods to normalize fasting blood glucose. However, pioglitazone treatment has been found to incrementally increase body weight. In this study, we investigated whether the combined application of a 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist, sarpogrelate, with pioglitazone can provide a clinical benefit.

METHODS

Diabetic male KK-A(y) mice were randomly assigned to four groups: those receiving 10 mg/kg/day pioglitazone treatment for 30 days (pioglitazone group, n = 7), those receiving 30 mg/kg/day sarpogrelate treatment for 30 days (sarpogrelate group, n = 7), those receiving both agents for 30 days (pioglitazone + sarpogrelate group, n = 7) and those receiving no treatment (control group, n = 7).

RESULTS

Feed intake was lower in the pioglitazone + sarpogrelate group than in the pioglitazone group. Water intake was also significantly lower in the pioglitazone, sarpogrelate and pioglitazone + sarpogrelate groups than in the control group. Combined application (pioglitazone + sarpogrelate) resulted in a 176% increase in leptin concentration compared with vehicle control. Body weight was significantly higher in the pioglitazone group, and there was a trend toward a smaller increment in body weight in the pioglitazone + sarpogrelate group. Mean values, calculated by multiplying insulin concentration and nonfasting glucose concentration, were significantly lower in the pioglitazone + sarpogrelate group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the combined application of sarpogrelate with pioglitazone provides therapeutic benefits not only in preventing adverse effects but also in the treatment of diabetes.

Effects of pretreatment with low-dose metformin on metabolic parameters and weight gain by pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether or not "low dose" metformin could prevent weight gain induced by pioglitazone.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes received 500-750 mg metformin a day for 12 weeks as an observation period before the start of the intervention. After an observation period, inadequately controlled patients (hemoglobin A1c >or=7.5%, n=34) received additional treatment with 15 mg pioglitazone (+P, M+P group). The other patients (n= 35) continued metformin monotherapy (Met group). In addition, another group consisting of 28 patients treated with 15 mg pioglitazone alone (Pio group) was observed. Body mass index (BMI), as well as several clinical parameters of glycemic control and lipid metabolism, was compared before and after 24 weeks of intervention.

RESULTS

BMI increased significantly in the Pio group [24.0+/-3.8 vs. 24.8+/-4.3 kg/m(2), (mean +/- SD), p<0.001], but not in the M+P group (25.1+/-3.5 vs. 25.3+/-3.4 kg/m(2), NS) and Met group (24.0+/-3.3 vs. 24.0+/-3.5 kg/m(2), NS). In addition to improvement in glycemic control, a significant reduction in the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), defined as log [TG x0.0112/HDL-C x0.02586], was observed in the Pio group (0.06+/-0.23 vs. -0.04+/-0.27, p<0.05) and M+P group (0.08+/-0.24 vs. -0.001+/-0.252, p<0.01), but not in the Met group.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates potential benefits of the addition of pioglitazone to "low dose" metformin in terms of improvement of glucose and lipid metabolism without weight gain.

Combined low-dose pioglitazone, flutamide, and metformin for women with androgen excess

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

One of the treatments for hyperinsulinemic hyperandrogenism in nonobese women is combined androgen receptor blockade (with flutamide; Flu), insulin sensitization (with metformin; Met) plus an estroprogestagen contraceptive. We tested whether adding low-dose pioglitazone (Pio; 7.5 mg/d) confers more benefit.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a university hospital.

STUDY POPULATION AND DESIGN

This double-blind study enrolled 38 young women with hyperinsulinemic hyperandrogenism [mean body mass index (BMI) 24 kg/m(2)], all of whom started on Flu (62.5 mg/d) and Met (850 mg/d) plus a transdermal estroprogestagen, each for 21 of 28 d over 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned to receive, in addition, placebo (n=19) or Pio (n=19; 7.5 mg/d) for the same 21 of 28 d over 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES

BMI, waist to hip ratio, hirsutism score, fasting endocrine-metabolic markers, body composition, abdominal fat (visceral vs. sc), and carotid intima-media thickness were measured at study start and after 6 months.

RESULTS

PioFluMet reduced intima-media thickness more than FluMet and lowered glucose, IGF-I, and C-reactive protein more as well as the ratio of low-density lipoprotein to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes. PioFluMet treatment was followed by a leaner body composition and a loss of visceral fat (both P < 0.001). In the total group, the changes included not only decreases in waist to hip ratio, hirsutism score, and testosterone (all P < 0.001) but also minor drops in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and lactate dehydrogenase (all P < 0.005), indicating absence of hepatotoxicity; BMI remained unchanged. Clinical side effects were not detected.

CONCLUSION

In this proof-of-concept study, addition of Pio to FluMet plus an estroprogestagen led to improvements in the endocrine-metabolic condition, in low-grade inflammation, in total and visceral adiposity, and in markers of cardiovascular health.