Impaired counterregulatory hormone responses to hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with new onset IDDM

Effect of Liraglutide Treatment on Whole-body Glucose Fluxes in C-peptide-Positive Type 1 Diabetes During Hypoglycemia

CONTEXT

The effect of liraglutide in C-peptide-positive (C-pos) type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients during hypoglycemia remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of a 12-week liraglutide treatment on the body glucose fluxes during a hypoglycemic clamp in C-pos T1D patients and its impact on the alpha- and beta-cell responses during hypoglycemia.

DESIGN

This was a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Each C-pos T1D patient was allocated to the treatment sequence liraglutide/placebo or placebo/liraglutide with daily injections for 12 weeks adjunct to insulin treatment, separated by a 4-week washout period.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Fourteen T1D patients with fasting C-peptide ≥ 0.1 nmol/L.

INTERVENTION(S)

All patients underwent a hyperinsulinemic-stepwise-hypoglycemic clamp with isotope tracer [plasma glucose (PG) plateaus: 5.5, 3.5, 2.5, and 3.9 mmol/L] after a 3-month liraglutide (1.2 mg) or placebo treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The responses of endogenous glucose production (EGP) and rate of peripheral glucose disposal (Rd) were similar for liraglutide and placebo treatment during the clamp.

RESULTS

The numbers of hypoglycemic events were similar in both groups. At the clamp, mean glucagon levels were significantly lower at PG plateau 5.5 mmol/L in the liraglutide than in the placebo group but showed similar responses to hypoglycemia in both groups. Mean C-peptide levels were significantly higher at PG-plateaus 5.5 and 3.5 mmol/L after liraglutide treatment, but this effect was not reflected in EGP and Rd. Hemoglobin A1c and body weight were lower, and a trend for reduced insulin was seen after liraglutide treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that 3 months of liraglutide treatment does not promote or prolong hypoglycemia in C-pos T1D patients.

Impact of C-Peptide Status on the Response of Glucagon and Endogenous Glucose Production to Induced Hypoglycemia in T1DM

CONTEXT

Complete loss of β-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may lead to an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the impact of C-peptide status on glucagon response and endogenous glucose production (EGP) during hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM.

DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted an open, comparative trial.

PATIENTS

Ten C-peptide positive (C-pos) and 11 matched C-peptide negative (C-neg) patients with T1DM were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

Plasma glucose was normalized over the night fast, and after a steady-state (baseline) plateau all patients underwent a hyperinsulinemic, stepwise hypoglycemic clamp with glucose plateaus of 5.5, 3.5, and 2.5 mmol/L and a recovery phase of 4.0 mmol/L. Blood glucagon was measured with a specific and highly sensitive glucagon assay. EGP was determined with a stable isotope tracer technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Impact of C-peptide status on glucagon response and EGP during hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

Glucagon concentrations were significantly lower in C-pos and C-neg patients than previously reported. At baseline, C-pos patients had higher glucagon concentrations than C-neg patients (8.39 ± 4.6 vs 4.19 ± 2.4 pmol/L, P = 0.016, mean ± standard deviation) but comparable EGP rates (2.13 ± 0.2 vs 2.04 ± 0.3 mg/kg/min, P < 0.391). In both groups, insulin suppressed glucagon levels, but hypoglycemia revealed significantly higher glucagon concentrations in C-pos than in C-neg patients. EGP was significantly higher in C-pos patients at hypoglycemia (2.5 mmol/L) compared with C-neg patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Glucagon concentrations and EGP during hypoglycemia were more pronounced in C-pos than in C-neg patients, which indicates that preserved β-cell function may contribute to counterregulation during hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM.

Minimizing morbidity of hypoglycemia in diabetes: a review of mini-dose glucagon

Type 1 diabetes is a common chronic disease of childhood and one of the most difficult conditions to manage. Advances in insulin formulations and insulin delivery devices have markedly improved the ability to achieve normal glucose homeostasis. However, hypoglycemia remains the primary limiting factor in achieving normoglycemia and is a frequent complication in children with acute gastroenteritis and/or poor oral intake. In situations of impaired carbohydrate intake or absorption, glucagon therapy is the only out-of-hospital treatment option available to families and caregivers. Glucagon is recommended for the treatment of severe hypoglycemia and rapidly increases blood glucose by increasing hepatic glucose production from glycogenolysis. Mini-dose glucagon is a widely utilized off-label treatment for managing mild or impending hypoglycemia and is administered as a small subcutaneous injection. It was initially described for use in children who were unable to tolerate or absorb oral carbohydrates but not in need of advanced medical care. Yet, mini-dose glucagon may be useful in any individual with relative insulin excess. The regimen aims to prevent severe hypoglycemic episodes and is safe, effective, and easily administered by patients and caregivers in the out-of-hospital setting. By empowering patients and their families, this important tool could help to alleviate the physical, psychosocial, and financial burden evolving from impending hypoglycemia.

Blunted glucagon but not epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia occurs in youth with less than 1 yr duration of type 1 diabetes mellitus

CONTEXT

Glycemic control is limited by the barrier of hypoglycemia. Recurrent hypoglycemia impairs counterregulatory (CR) hormone responses to subsequent hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the glucagon and epinephrine responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in adolescents with recent-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).

METHODS

We assessed the CR responses to hypoglycemia by performing a hyperinsulinemic (2.0 mU/kg/min), euglycemic (BG 90 mg/dL; 5.0 mmol/L)-hypoglycemic (BG 55 mg/dL; 3.0 mmol/L) clamp in 25 recent-onset (<1 yr duration) patients 9-18 yr old (mean ± SD: 13.4 ± 2.7) with T1DM and 16 non-diabetic controls 19-25 yr old (mean ± SD 23.3 ± 1.8). Twenty of the T1DM subjects were retested 1-yr (53 ± 3 wk) later.

RESULTS

At the initial and 1-yr studies, peak glucagon (pGON) and incremental glucagon (ΔGON) during hypoglycemia were lower in the T1DM subjects [median pGON = 47 pg/mL (quartiles: 34, 72), ΔGON = 16 (4, 27) initially and pGON = 50 pg/mL (42, 70), ΔGON = 12 (9, 19) at 1-yr] than in controls [pGON = 93 pg/mL (60, 111); ΔGON = 38 pg/mL (19, 66), p = 0.01 and p = 0.004 for ΔGON at initial and 1-yr study, respectively]. In contrast, peak epinephrine (pEPI) and incremental epinephrine (ΔEPI) levels were similar in the T1DM (pEPI = 356 pg/mL (174, 797) and ΔEPI = 322 pg/mL (143, 781) initially and pEPI = 469 pg/mL (305, 595) and ΔEPI = 440 pg/mL (285, 574) at 1 yr) and in controls (pEPI = 383 pg/mL (329, 493) and ΔEPI = 336 pg/mL (298, 471) p = 0.97 and 0.21 for ΔEPI at initial and 1-yr study, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Even within the first year of T1DM, glucagon responses to hypoglycemia are blunted but epinephrine responses are not, suggesting that the mechanisms involved in the loss of these hormonal responses, which are key components in pathophysiology of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure, are different.

Lack of association between residual insulin production and glucagon response to hypoglycemia in youth with short duration of type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To examine the loss of glucagon response to hypoglycemia and its relationship with residual β-cell function early in the course of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in youth.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Twenty-one youth with T1D duration <1 year (ages 8-18 years, T1D duration 6-52 weeks) underwent mixed-meal tolerance tests (MMTTs) to assess residual β-cell function and hypoglycemic clamps to assess glucagon responses to hypoglycemia. Glucagon responses to hypoglycemia in T1D subjects were compared with those in 12 nondiabetic young adults (ages 19-25 years).

RESULTS

Peak MMTT-stimulated C-peptide levels (range 0.12-1.43) were ≥ 0.2 nmol/L in all but one T1D subject. As expected, the median of glucagon responses to hypoglycemia in the T1D subjects (18 pg/mL [interquartile range 7-32]) was significantly reduced compared with the responses in nondiabetic control subjects (38 pg/mL [19-66], P = 0.02). However, there was no correlation between the incremental increase in plasma glucagon during the hypoglycemic clamp and the incremental increase and peak plasma C-peptide level during the MMTT. Similarly, the seven T1D subjects who failed to achieve an increase in glucagon ≥ 12 pg/mL (i.e., 3 SD above baseline values) had C-peptide response ≥ 0.2 nmol/L (0.54-1.12), and the one T1D subject with peak stimulated <0.2 nmol/L had a 14 pg/mL increase in plasma glucagon in response to hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired plasma glucagon responses to hypoglycemia are evident in youth with T1D during the first year of the disease. Moreover, defective and absent glucagon responses to hypoglycemia were observed in patients who retained clinically important residual endogenous β-cell function.

Early loss of the glucagon response to hypoglycemia in adolescents with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the glucagon response to hypoglycemia and identify influencing factors in patients with type 1 diabetes compared with nondiabetic control subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp studies were performed in all participants. The glucagon response to both hypoglycemia and arginine was measured, as well as epinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone responses to hypoglycemia. Residual β-cell function was assessed using fasting and stimulated C-peptide.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight nonobese adolescents with type 1 diabetes (14 female, mean age 14.9 years [range 11.2-19.8]) and 12 healthy control subjects (6 female, 15.3 years [12.8-18.7]) participated in the study. Median duration of type 1 diabetes was 0.66 years (range 0.01-9.9). The glucagon peak to arginine stimulation was similar between groups (P = 0.27). In contrast, the glucagon peak to hypoglycemia was reduced in the group with diabetes (95% CI): 68 (62-74) vs. 96 (87-115) pg/mL (P < 0.001). This response was greater than 3 SDs from baseline for only 7% of subjects with type 1 diabetes in comparison with 83% of control subjects and was lost at a median duration of diabetes of 8 months and as early as 1 month after diagnosis (R = -0.41, P < 0.01). There was no correlation in response with height, weight, BMI, and HbA(1c). Epinephrine, cortisol, and growth hormone responses to hypoglycemia were present in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The glucagon response to hypoglycemia in adolescents with type 1 diabetes is influenced by the duration of diabetes and can be lost early in the course of the disease.

Association of Basal hyperglucagonemia with impaired glucagon counterregulation in type 1 diabetes

Glucagon counterregulation (GCR) protects against hypoglycemia, but is impaired in type 1 diabetes (T1DM). A model-based analysis of in vivo animal data predicts that the GCR defects are linked to basal hyperglucagonemia. To test this hypothesis we studied the relationship between basal glucagon (BasG) and the GCR response to hypoglycemia in 29 hyperinsulinemic clamps in T1DM patients. Glucose levels were stabilized in euglycemia and then steadily lowered to 50 mg/dL. Glucagon was measured before induction of hypoglycemia and at 10 min intervals after glucose reached levels below 70 mg/dL. GCR was assessed by CumG, the cumulative glucagon levels above basal; MaxG, the maximum glucagon response; and RIG, the relative increase in glucagon over basal. Analysis of the results was performed with our mathematical model of GCR. The model describes interactions between islet peptides and glucose, reproduces the normal GCR axis and its impairment in diabetes. It was used to identify a control mechanism consistent with the observed link between BasG and GCR. Analysis of the clinical data showed that higher BasG was associated with lower GCR response. In particular, CumG and RIG correlated negatively with BasG (r = −0.46, p = 0.012 and r = −0.74, p < 0.0001 respectively) and MaxG increased linearly with BasG at a rate less than unity (p < 0.001). Consistent with these results was a model of GCR in which the secretion of glucagon has two components. The first is under (auto) feedback control and drives a pulsatile GCR and the second is feedback independent (basal secretion) and its increase suppresses the GCR. Our simulations showed that this model explains the observed relationships between BasG and GCR during a three-fold simulated increase in BasG. Our findings support the hypothesis that basal hyperglucagonemia contributes to the GCR impairment in T1DM and show that the predictive power of our GCR animal model applies to human pathophysiology in T1DM.

Optimizing reduction in basal hyperglucagonaemia to repair defective glucagon counterregulation in insulin deficiency

In health, the pancreatic islet cells work as a network with highly co-ordinated signals over time to balance glycaemia within a narrow range. In type 1 diabetes (T1DM), with autoimmune destruction of the β-cells, lack of insulin is considered the primary abnormality and is the primary therapy target. However, replacing insulin alone does not achieve adequate glucose control and recent studies have focused on controlling the endogenous glucagon release as well. In T1DM, glucagon secretion is disordered but not absolutely deficient; it may be excessive postprandially yet it is characteristically insufficient and delayed in response to hypoglycaemia. We review our system-level analysis of the pancreatic endocrine network mechanisms of glucagon counterregulation (GCR) and their dysregulation in T1DM and focus on possible use of α-cell inhibitors (ACIs) to manipulate the glucagon axis to repair the defective GCR. Our results indicate that the GCR abnormalities are of 'network origin'. The lack of β-cell signalling is the primary deficiency that contributes to two separate network abnormalities: (i) absence of a β-cell switch-off trigger and (ii) increased intraislet basal glucagon. A strategy to repair these abnormalities with ACI is proposed, which could achieve better control of glycaemia with reduced hypoglycaemia risk.

Variables associated with severe hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Hypoglycemia remains a central problem in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and limits the achievement of good or normal glycemic control. The Diabetes Control and Complication Trial showed that intensive treatment of T1DM increased the risk of severe hypoglycemia (SH) when compared to conventional therapy. The aim of our study was to determine the incidence of SH and associated variables in a population of children and adolescents with T1DM.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a 7.5-yr prospective study enrolling 195 patients aged 13.9 ± 6.6 yr. The study was carried out by referring to the T1DM population-based register in the Abruzzo region of Italy. The incidence of SH, defined as blood glucose levels <50 mg/dL (<2.77 mmol/L) associated with altered states of consciousness (including confusional state, seizures, and coma) was recorded. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) percentage, insulin dose, insulin regimen, time since diagnosis, and age at onset were also recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-three severe hypoglycemic events occurred during the study period; the overall incidence was 9.4 episodes per 100 patient-years. Significant predictors of hypoglycemia were diabetes duration >10 yr (p = 0.01), basal/bolus insulin ratio (ratio of daily basal insulin units to daily bolus insulin units) >0.8 (p = 0.01). No relationship was found between hypoglycemic episodes and HbA1c levels, daily insulin requirements, or insulin regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

In these patients, a relatively low incidence of SH was recorded, without pronounced association with lower HbA1c or multiple daily injection insulin therapy. SH seems to be mainly related to management of diabetes. We believe that the main path to SH prevention is through patient and family education in the management of T1DM.

Dynamic changes in pancreatic endocrine cell abundance, distribution, and function in antigen-induced and spontaneous autoimmune diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Insulin deficiency in type 1 diabetes and in rodent autoimmune diabetes models is caused by beta-cell-specific killing by autoreactive T-cells. Less is known about beta-cell numbers and phenotype remaining at diabetes onset and the fate of other pancreatic endocrine cellular constituents.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We applied multicolor flow cytometry, confocal microscopy, and immunohistochemistry, supported by quantitative RT-PCR, to simultaneously track pancreatic endocrine cell frequencies and phenotypes during a T-cell-mediated beta-cell-destructive process using two independent autoimmune diabetes models, an inducible autoantigen-specific model and the spontaneously diabetic NOD mouse.

RESULTS

The proportion of pancreatic insulin-positive beta-cells to glucagon-positive alpha-cells was about 4:1 in nondiabetic mice. Islets isolated from newly diabetic mice exhibited the expected severe beta-cell depletion accompanied by phenotypic beta-cell changes (i.e., hypertrophy and degranulation), but they also revealed a substantial loss of alpha-cells, which was further confirmed by quantitative immunohistochemisty. While maintaining normal randomly timed serum glucagon levels, newly diabetic mice displayed an impaired glucagon secretory response to non-insulin-induced hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematically applying multicolor flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry to track declining beta-cell numbers in recently diabetic mice revealed an altered endocrine cell composition that is consistent with a prominent and unexpected islet alpha-cell loss. These alterations were observed in induced and spontaneous autoimmune diabetes models, became apparent at diabetes onset, and differed markedly within islets compared with sub-islet-sized endocrine cell clusters and among pancreatic lobes. We propose that these changes are adaptive in nature, possibly fueled by worsening glycemia and regenerative processes.

Pancreatic network control of glucagon secretion and counterregulation

Glucagon counterregulation (GCR) is a key protection against hypoglycemia compromised in insulinopenic diabetes by an unknown mechanism. In this work, we present an interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of the GCR control mechanisms. Our results indicate that a pancreatic network which unifies a few explicit interactions between the major islet peptides and blood glucose (BG) can replicate the normal GCR axis and explain its impairment in diabetes. A key and novel component of this network is an alpha-cell auto-feedback, which drives glucagon pulsatility and mediates triggering of pulsatile GCR by hypoglycemia via a switch-off of the beta-cell suppression of the alpha-cells. We have performed simulations based on our models of the endocrine pancreas which explain the in vivo GCR response to hypoglycemia of the normal pancreas and the enhancement of defective pulsatile GCR in beta-cell deficiency by switch-off of intrapancreatic alpha-cell suppressing signals. The models also predicted that reduced insulin secretion decreases and delays the GCR. In conclusion, based on experimental data we have developed and validated a model of the normal GCR control mechanisms and their dysregulation in insulin deficient diabetes. One advantage of this construct is that all model components are clinically measurable, thereby permitting its transfer, validation, and application to the study of the GCR abnormalities of the human endocrine pancreas in vivo.

System-level control to optimize glucagon counterregulation by switch-off of α-cell suppressing signals in β-cell deficiency

BACKGROUND

Glucagon counterregulation (GCR) is a key protection against hypoglycemia that is compromised in diabetes. In β-cell-deficient rats, GCR pulsatility can be amplified if insulin (INS) or somatostatin (SS) are infused in the pancreatic artery and then switched off during hypoglycemia. The data indicate that these signals act by different mechanisms, and here we analyze the differences between the two switch offs (SOs) and predict the GCR-amplifying effect of their individual or combined application.

METHODS

A minimal control network (MCN) of α/δ-cell interactions is approximated by differential equations to explain the GCR response to a SO and test in silico the hypotheses: (i) INS SO suppresses basal and pulsatile, while SS SO blocks only pulsatile glucagon release and (ii) simultaneous application of the two switch offs will augment the individual GCR response.

RESULTS

The mechanism postulated in (i) explains the differences in the GCR responses between the SOs. The MCN predicts that simultaneous application of INS and SS decreases basal glucagon but increases post-SO amplitude, thus doubling the response of GCR achieved by each of the individual signals.

CONCLUSION

The current analyses predict that INS and SS SOs improve defective GCR in β-cell deficiency through different but complementary mechanisms and suggest SO strategies to maximally enhance GCR in type 1 diabetes by simultaneous manipulation of the network control. These results are clinically relevant, as they could have application to design of an artificial pancreas by providing ways to augment GCR that would not require glucagon infusion.

Amplification of pulsatile glucagon counterregulation by switch-off of alpha-cell-suppressing signals in streptozotocin-treated rats

Glucagon counterregulation (GCR) is a key protection against hypoglycemia that is compromised in diabetes via an unknown mechanism. To test the hypothesis that alpha-cell-inhibiting signals that are switched off during hypoglycemia amplify GCR, we studied streptozotocin (STZ)-treated male Wistar rats and estimated the effect on GCR of intrapancreatic infusion and termination during hypoglycemia of saline, insulin, and somatostatin. Times 10 min before and 45 min after the switch-off were analyzed. Insulin and somatostatin, but not saline, switch-off significantly increased the glucagon levels (P = 0.03), and the fold increases relative to baseline were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the insulin and somatostatin groups vs. the saline group. The peak concentrations were also higher in the insulin (368 pg/ml) and somatostatin (228 pg/ml) groups vs. the saline (114 pg/ml) group (P < 0.05). GCR was pulsatile in most animals, indicating a feedback regulation. After the switch-off, the number of secretory events and the total pulsatile production were lower in the saline group vs. the insulin and somatostatin groups (P < 0.05), indicating enhancement of glucagon pulsatile activity by insulin and somatostatin compared with saline. Network modeling analysis demonstrates that reciprocal interactions between alpha- and delta-cells can explain the amplification by interpreting the GCR as a rebound response to the switch-off. The model justifies experimental designs to further study the intrapancreatic network in relation to the switch-off phenomenon. The results of this proof-of-concept interdisciplinary study support the hypothesis that GCR develops as a rebound pulsatile response of the intrapancreatic endocrine feedback network to switch-off of alpha-cell-inhibiting islet signals.

Prior hypoglycemia enhances glucose responsiveness in some ventromedial hypothalamic glucosensing neurons

Antecedent insulin-induced hypoglycemia (IIH) reduces adrenomedullary responses (AMR) to subsequent bouts of hypoglycemia. The ventromedial hypothalamus [VMH: arcuate (ARC) + ventromedial nuclei] contains glucosensing neurons, which are thought to be mediators of these AMR. Since type 1 diabetes mellitus often begins in childhood, we used juvenile (4- to 5-wk-old) rats to demonstrate that a single bout of IIH (5 U/kg sc) reduced plasma glucose by 24% and peak epinephrine by 59% 1 day later. This dampened AMR was associated with 46% higher mRNA for VMH glucokinase, a key mediator of neuronal glucosensing. Compared with neurons from saline-injected rats, ventromedial nucleus glucose-excited neurons from insulin-injected rats demonstrated a leftward shift in their glucose responsiveness (EC50= 0.45 and 0.10 mmol/l for saline and insulin, respectively, P = 0.05) and a 31% higher maximal activation by glucose ( P = 0.05), although this maximum occurred at a higher glucose concentration (saline, 0.7 vs. insulin, 1.5 mmol/l). Although EC50values did not differ, ARC glucose-excited neurons had 19% higher maximal activation, which occurred at a lower glucose concentration in insulin- than saline-injected rats (saline, 2.5 vs. insulin, 1.5 mmol/l). In addition, ARC glucose-inhibited neurons from insulin-injected rats were maximally inhibited at a fivefold lower glucose concentration (saline, 2.5 vs. insulin, 0.5 mmol/l), although this inhibition declined at >0.5 mmol/l glucose. These data suggest that the increased VMH glucokinase after IIH may contribute to the increased responsiveness of VMH glucosensing neurons to glucose and the associated blunting of the AMR.

Recurrent hypoglycemia reduces the glucose sensitivity of glucose-inhibited neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus nucleus

Recurrent hypoglycemia blunts the brain's ability to sense and respond to subsequent hypoglycemic episodes. Glucose-sensing neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus nucleus (VMN) are well situated to play a role in hypoglycemia detection. VMN glucose-inhibited (GI) neurons, which decrease their firing rate as extracellular glucose increases, are extremely sensitive to decreased extracellular glucose. We hypothesize that recurrent hypoglycemia decreases the glucose sensitivity of VMN GI neurons. To test our hypothesis, 14- to 21-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats were subcutaneously injected with regular human insulin (4 U/kg) or saline (control) for three consecutive days. Blood glucose levels 1 h after insulin injection on day 3 were significantly lower than on day 1, reflecting an impaired ability to counteract hypoglycemia. On day 4, the glucose sensitivity of VMN GI neurons was measured using conventional whole cell current-clamp recording. After recurrent insulin-induced hypoglycemia, VMN GI neurons only responded to a glucose decrease from 2.5 to 0.1, but not 0.5, mM. Additionally, lactate supplementation also decreased glucose sensitivity of VMN GI neurons. Thus our findings suggest that decreases in glucose sensitivity of VMN GI neurons may contribute to the impairments in central glucose-sensing mechanisms after recurrent hypoglycemia.

Continuous glucose monitoring and the reality of metabolic control in preschool children with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To determine using the MiniMed continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) 1) whether twice-daily insulin injection therapy achieves adequate control in preschool children with type 1 diabetes and 2) whether the CGMS is more informative than self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) regarding glucose control and well tolerated by preschool children and their families.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten children <6 years of age with type 1 diabetes were monitored twice using the CGMS. The distribution of glucose values was analyzed, particularly the frequency, duration, and distribution of hypoglycemia. We analyzed the accuracy of the CGMS in detecting hypoglycemia as well as the clinical relevance of the difference between CGMS and SMBG values.

RESULTS

Although hypoglycemia was more frequent during the night (0.8 nighttime episodes . subject(-1) . 24 h(-1) vs. 0.3 daytime episodes . subject(-1) . 24 h(-1)), the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07). However, nighttime episodes lasted longer than daytime episodes (1.2 vs. 0.2 h . subject(-1) . 24 h(-1), P=0.006). Hypoglycemia accounted for 7% and normoglycemia for 24%, while hyperglycemia occurred 64% of the time, with postprandial hyperglycemia being an almost universal feature (94 +/- 7% of all postmeal values). The CGMS correlated well with SMBG without significant clinical discrepancy. The CGMS sensitivity to detect hypoglycemia was 70% with a specificity of 99%; however, the CGMS detected twice as many total episodes as SMBG (82 vs. 40).

CONCLUSIONS

Twice-daily insulin injection rarely achieves control in preschool children with type 1 diabetes. The CGMS is well tolerated by patients and has the advantage of revealing daily glucose trends missed by SMBG.

Mini-dose glucagon rescue for hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Children with type 1 diabetes are frequently difficult to manage during times of gastroenteritis or poor oral intake of carbohydrates because of mild or impending hypoglycemia. The present study describes the effective use of small doses of subcutaneous glucagon in these children.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We analyzed 33 episodes of impending or mild hypoglycemia in 28 children (ages 6.6 +/- 0.7 years). All were healthy except for type 1 diabetes and an episode of gastroenteritis. Using a standard U-100 insulin syringe, children ages < or = 2 years received two "units" (20 microg) of glucagon subcutaneously and those ages >2 years received one unit/year of age up to 15 units (150 microg). If the blood glucose did not increase within 30 min, the initial dosage was doubled and given at that time. We used patients' self-glucose monitoring devices, aqueous glucagon, standard insulin syringes, and frequent phone contact with a physician and/or a diabetes nurse educator in this study.

RESULTS

Blood glucose was 3.44 +/- 0.15 mmol/l before and 8.11 +/- 0.72 mmol/l 30 min after glucagon. In 14 children, relative hypoglycemia recurred, requiring retreatment (3.48 +/- 0.18 to 6.94 +/- 0.72 mmol/l). In four children, a third dose was required. The glucagon was well tolerated In 28 of the 33 episodes of impending hypoglycemia, the children remained at home and fully recovered. Five children were taken to their local hospital because of concerns of dehydration or fever, but none for hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-dose glucagon rescue, using subcutaneous injections, is effective in managing children with type 1 diabetes during episodes of impending hypoglycemia due to gastroenteritis or poor oral intake of carbohydrate.

Hypoglycemia: a complication of diabetes therapy in children

Hypoglycemia is the most common acute complication in insulin-treated type 1 diabetic patients. Most surveys have demonstrated that the tighter the glycemic control, and the younger the patient, the greater the frequency of both mild and severe hypoglycemia. However, people in poor metabolic control, with high glycosylated hemoglobin levels, are not protected from experiencing severe hypoglycemia. Focusing on the pediatric population, we review new or controversial issues surrounding the prevalence of hypoglycemia, its causes, its consequences and preventive strategies, and discuss possible mechanisms underlying the variability of responses to hypoglycemia.

Hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Risk factors, cognitive function, and management

This article examines the relationship between hypoglycemia and brain function in children with type 1 diabetes. Hypoglycemic episodes occurring in the first 5 years of life may permanently disrupt cognitive function in a subset of children with diabetes, and a single acute episode of hypoglycemia may produce a transient reduction in mental efficiency, alter the electroencephalogram, and increase regional cerebral blood flow. Because iatrogenic development of hypoglycemic unawareness and autonomic failure are the most likely mediators of moderately severe hypoglycemia, medical management efforts should be directed at the prevention of frequently recurring, mild hypoglycemia.