Locking the dimeric GABA(B) G-protein-coupled receptor in its active state

Spinocerebellar Ataxia 44 Caused by a Novel GRM1 Variant: Reviewing the Contrasting Pathogenic Mechanisms Underlying Two GRM1-Associated Hereditary Ataxias

GRM1 encodes type 1 metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR1). Its pathogenic variants are associated with the rare autosomal recessive cerebellar ataxia 13 (SCAR13) due to loss of mGluR1 function, and the even rarer spinocerebellar ataxia 44 (SCA44) due to a gain-of-function molecular basis. We report a new case of SCA44 caused by a novel and de novo GRM1 variant c.2303 C > T (p.Thr768Ile), which was considered "likely pathogenic" by the American College of Medical Genetic criteria (PS2, PM2, PP3). This variant was predicted to lead to a stability effect on mGluR1 in the evaluation with DynaMut2, like the other known SCA44 GRM1 variants and in contrast to lower stability or destabilizing effects for SCAR13 missense variants. The affected residue Thr768 was located close to the binding pockets of allosteric modulators and within the highly conserved cholesterol recognition association/interaction consensus motif. Collectively, this novel GRM1 variant caused SCA44 by increasing the constitutive activity of mGluR1. Our findings underscore the distinct molecular mechanisms of mGluR1 aberration for the two GRM1-associated hereditary ataxias, and provide a mechanism-relevant prospect in the pharmacological therapies for restoring mGluR1 function.

Light-controlled artificial transmembrane signal transduction for 'ON/OFF'-switchable transphosphorylation of an RNA model substrate

Inspired by nature, it is of significant importance to design and construct biomimetic signaling systems to mimic natural signal transduction. Herein, we report an azobenzene/α-cyclodextrin (α-CD)-based signal transduction system with three functional modules: a light-responsive headgroup, lipid-anchored group, pro-catalyst tailgroup. The transducer can be inserted into the vesicular membrane to trigger the transmembrane translocation of molecules under the activation of light, forming a ribonuclease-like effector site and leading to the transphosphorylation of the RNA model substrate inside the vesicles. Moreover, the transphosphorylation process can be reversibly turned 'ON/OFF' over multiple cycles by the activation and deactivation of the pro-catalyst. This artificial photo-controlled signal transduction successfully constructs a signal responsive catalysis system across the membrane to utilize light to reversibly control the internal transphosphorylation process of an RNA model substrate, which might provide a new strategy for future design to utilize exogenous signals for implementing endogenous enzyme manipulation and gene regulation.

Kinetic fingerprinting of metabotropic glutamate receptors

Dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are abundantly expressed in neurons. In mammals, eight subunit isoforms, mGluR1-8, have been identified, forming the groups I, II, and III. We investigated receptor dimerization and kinetics of these mGluR isoforms in excised membrane patches by FRET and confocal patch-clamp fluorometry. We show that 5 out of 8 homodimeric receptors develop characteristic glutamate-induced on- and off-kinetics, as do 11 out of 28 heterodimers. Glutamate-responsive heterodimers were identified within each group, between groups I and II as well as between groups II and III, but not between groups I and III. The glutamate-responsive heterodimers showed heterogeneous activation and deactivation kinetics. Interestingly, mGluR7, not generating a kinetic response in homodimers, showed fast on-kinetics in mGluR2/7 and mGluR3/7 while off-kinetics retained the speed of mGluR2 or mGluR3 respectively. In conclusion, glutamate-induced conformational changes in heterodimers appear within each group and between groups if one group II subunit is present.

Structural Basis of GABAB Receptor Regulation and Signaling

GABA_B receptors (GBRs), the G protein-coupled receptors for the inhibitory neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), activate Go/i-type G proteins that regulate adenylyl cyclase, Ca²⁺ channels, and K⁺ channels. GBR signaling to enzymes and ion channels influences neuronal activity, plasticity processes, and network activity throughout the brain. GBRs are obligatory heterodimers composed of GB1a or GB1b subunits with a GB2 subunit. Heterodimeric GB1a/2 and GB1b/2 receptors represent functional units that associate in a modular fashion with regulatory, trafficking, and effector proteins to generate receptors with distinct physiological functions. This review summarizes current knowledge on the structure, organization, and functions of multi-protein GBR complexes.

Design of bivalent ligands targeting putative GPCR dimers

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been exploited as primary targets for drug discovery, and GPCR dimerization offers opportunities for drug design and disease treatment. An important strategy for targeting putative GPCR dimers is the use of bivalent ligands, which are single molecules that contain two pharmacophores connected through a spacer. Here, we discuss the selection of pharmacophores, the optimal length and chemical composition of the spacer, and the choice of spacer attachment points to the pharmacophores. Furthermore, we review the most recent advances (from 2018 to the present) in the design, discovery and development of bivalent ligands. We aim to reveal the state-of-the-art design strategy for bivalent ligands and provide insights into future opportunities in this promising field of drug discovery.

Kinetic Analysis of the Early Signaling Steps of the Human Chemokine Receptor CXCR4

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are biologic switches that transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular responses in the cell. Temporally resolving GPCR transduction pathways is key to understanding how cell signaling occurs. Here, we investigate the kinetics and dynamics of the activation and early signaling steps of the CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 4 in response to its natural ligands CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 12 and macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), using Förster resonance energy transfer-based approaches. We show that CXCR4 presents a multifaceted response to CXCL12, with receptor activation (≈0.6 seconds) followed by a rearrangement in the receptor/G protein complex (≈1 seconds), a slower dimer rearrangement (≈1.7 seconds), and prolonged G protein activation (≈4 seconds). In comparison, MIF distinctly modulates every step of the transduction pathway, indicating distinct activation mechanisms and reflecting the different pharmacological properties of these two ligands. Our study also indicates that CXCR4 exhibits some degree of ligand-independent activity, a relevant feature for drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 12/CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 4 axis represents a well-established therapeutic target for cancer treatment. We demonstrate that CXCR4 exhibits a multifaceted response that involves dynamic receptor dimer rearrangements and that is kinetically embedded between receptor-G protein complex rearrangements and G protein activation. The alternative endogenous ligand macrophage migration inhibitory factor behaves opposite to CXCL12 in each assay studied and does not lead to G protein activation. This detailed understanding of the receptor activation may aid in the development of more specific drugs against this target.

Nonclassical Ligand-Independent Regulation of Go Protein by an Orphan Class C G-Protein-Coupled Receptor

The orphan G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) GPR158 is expressed in the brain, where it is involved in the osteocalcin effect on cognitive processes, and at the periphery, where it may contribute to glaucoma and cancers. GPR158 forms a complex with RGS7-β5, leading to the regulation of neighboring GPCR-induced Go protein activity. GPR158 also interacts with αo, although no canonical Go coupling has been reported. GPR158 displays three VCPWE motifs in its C-terminal domain that are putatively involved in G-protein regulation. Here, we addressed the scaffolding function of GPR158 and its VCPWE motifs on Go. We observed that GPR158 interacted with and stabilized the amount of RGS7-β5 through a 50-residue region downstream of its transmembrane domain and upstream of the VCPWE motifs. We show that two VCPWE motifs are involved in αo binding. Using a Gαo-βγ bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) sensor, we found that GPR158 decreases the BRET signal as observed upon G-protein activation; however, no constitutive activity of GPR158 could be detected through the measurement of various G-protein-mediated downstream responses. We propose that the effect of GPR158 on Go is unlikely due to a canonical activation of Go, but rather to the trapping of Gαo by the VCPWE motifs, possibly leading to its dissociation from βγ Such action of GPR158 is expected to prolong the βγ activity, as also observed with some activators of G-protein signaling. Taken together, our data revealed a complex functional scaffolding or signaling role for GPR158 controlling Go through an original mechanism.

Oligomerization of a G protein-coupled receptor in neurons controlled by its structural dynamics

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) play essential roles in intercellular communication. Although reported two decades ago, the assembly of GPCRs into dimer and larger oligomers in their native environment is still a matter of intense debate. Here, using number and brightness analysis of fluorescently labeled receptors in cultured hippocampal neurons, we confirm that the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 2 (mGlu₂) is a homodimer at expression levels in the physiological range, while heterodimeric GABA_B receptors form larger complexes. Surprisingly, we observed the formation of larger mGlu₂ oligomers upon both activation and inhibition of the receptor. Stabilizing the receptor in its inactive conformation using biochemical constraints also led to the observation of oligomers. Following our recent observation that mGlu receptors are in constant and rapid equilibrium between several states under basal conditions, we propose that this structural heterogeneity limits receptor oligomerization. Such assemblies are expected to stabilize either the active or the inactive state of the receptor.

Developing a Biased Unmatched Bivalent Ligand (BUmBL) Design Strategy to Target the GPCR Homodimer Allosteric Signaling (cAMP over β-Arrestin 2 Recruitment) Within the Melanocortin Receptors

Understanding the functional relevance of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) homodimerization has been limited by the insufficient tools to assess asymmetric signaling occurring within dimers comprised of the same receptor type. We present unmatched bivalent ligands (UmBLs) to study the asymmetric function of melanocortin homodimers. UmBLs contain one agonist and one antagonist pharmacophore designed to target a melanocortin homodimer such that one receptor is occupied by an agonist and the other receptor by an antagonist pharmacophore. First-in-class biased UmBLs (BUmBLs) targeting the human melanocortin-4 receptor (hMC4R) were discovered. The BUmBLs displayed biased agonism by potently stimulating cAMP signaling (EC₅₀ ∼ 2-6 nM) but minimally activating the β-arrestin recruitment pathway (≤55% maximum signal at 10 μM). To our knowledge, we report the first single-compound strategy to pharmacologically target melanocortin receptor allosteric signaling that occurs between homodimers that can be applied straightforwardly in vitro and in vivo to other GPCR systems.

Conformational dynamics of a class C G-protein-coupled receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of membrane receptors in eukaryotes. Crystal structures have provided insight into GPCR interaction with ligands and G-proteins^1,2, but our understanding of the conformational dynamics of activation is incomplete. Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are dimeric class C GPCRs that modulate neuronal excitability, synaptic plasticity, and serve as drug targets for neurological disorders^3,4. A “clamshell” ligand-binding domain (LBD), which contains the ligand binding site, is coupled to the transmembrane domain (TMD) via a cysteine rich domain, and LBD closure appears to be the first step in activation^5,6. Crystal structures of isolated mGluR LBD dimers led to the suggestion that activation also involves a reorientation of the dimer interface from a “relaxed” to an “active” state^7,8, but the relationship between ligand binding, LBD closure and dimer interface rearrangement in activation remains unclear. We used single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer (smFRET) to probe the activation mechanism of full-length mammalian group II mGluRs. We find that the LBDs interconvert between three conformations: resting, activated and a short-lived intermediate state. Orthosteric agonists induce transitions between these conformational states with efficacy determined by occupancy of the active conformation. Unlike mGluR2, mGluR3 displays basal dynamics, which are Ca²⁺ dependent and lead to basal protein activation. Our results support a general mechanism for the activation of mGluRs in which agonist binding induces closure of the LBDs followed by dimer interface reorientation. Our experimental strategy should be widely applicable to study conformational dynamics in GPCRs and other membrane proteins.

Structure, Dynamics, and Allosteric Potential of Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor N-Terminal Domains

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) are tetrameric cation channels that mediate synaptic transmission and plasticity. They have a unique modular architecture with four domains: the intracellular C-terminal domain (CTD) that is involved in synaptic targeting, the transmembrane domain (TMD) that forms the ion channel, the membrane-proximal ligand-binding domain (LBD) that binds agonists such as L-glutamate, and the distal N-terminal domain (NTD), whose function is the least clear. The extracellular portion, comprised of the LBD and NTD, is loosely arranged, mediating complex allosteric regulation and providing a rich target for drug development. Here, we briefly review recent work on iGluR NTD structure and dynamics, and further explore the allosteric potential for the NTD in AMPA-type iGluRs using coarse-grained simulations. We also investigate mechanisms underlying the established NTD allostery in NMDA-type iGluRs, as well as the fold-related metabotropic glutamate and GABAB receptors. We show that the clamshell motions intrinsically favored by the NTD bilobate fold are coupled to dimeric and higher-order rearrangements that impact the iGluR LBD and ultimately the TMD. Finally, we explore the dynamics of intact iGluRs and describe how it might affect receptor operation in a synaptic environment.

Pro-Opiomelanocortin (POMC) Neurones, POMC-Derived Peptides, Melanocortin Receptors and Obesity: How Understanding of this System has Changed Over the Last Decade

Following the cloning of the melanocortin receptor and agouti protein genes, a model was developed for the central melanocortin system with respect to the regulation of energy and glucose homeostasis. This model comprised leptin regulation of melanocortin peptides and agouti-related peptide (AgRP) produced from central pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) and AgRP neurones, respectively, as well as AgRP competitive antagonism of melanocortin peptides activating melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R) to Gαs and the cAMP signalling pathway. In the last decade, there have been paradigm shifts in our understanding of the central melanocortin system as a result of the application of advanced new technologies, including Cre-LoxP transgenic mouse technology, pharmacogenetics and optogenetics. During this period, our understanding of G protein coupled receptor signal transduction has also dramatically changed, such that these receptors are now known to exist in the plasma membrane oscillating between various inactive and active conformational states, and the active states signal through G protein-dependent and G protein-independent pathways. The present review focuses on evidence obtained over the past decade that has changed our understanding of POMC gene expression and regulation in the central nervous system, POMC and AgRP neuronal circuitry, neuroanatomical functions of melanocortin receptors, melanocortin 3 receptor (MC3R) and MC4R, and signal transduction through MC3R and MC4R.

Activation of the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type B (GABA(B)) Receptor by Agonists and Positive Allosteric Modulators

Since the discovery of the GABA(B) agonist and muscle relaxant baclofen, there have been substantial advancements in the development of compounds that activate the GABA(B) receptor as agonists or positive allosteric modulators. For the agonists, most of the existing structure-activity data apply to understanding the role of substituents on the backbone of GABA as well as replacing the carboxylic acid and amine groups. In the cases of the positive allosteric modulators, the allosteric binding site(s) and structure-activity relationships are less well-defined; however, multiple classes of molecules have been discovered. The recent report of the X-ray structure of the GABA(B) receptor with bound agonists and antagonists provides new insights for the development of compounds that bind the orthosteric site of this receptor. From a therapeutic perspective, these data have enabled efforts in drug discovery in areas of addiction-related behavior, the treatment of anxiety, and the control of muscle contractility.

Dimer-dependent intrinsic/basal activity of the class B G protein-coupled receptor PAC1 promotes cellular anti-apoptotic activity through Wnt/β-catenin pathways that are associated with dimer endocytosis

The high expression of PACAP (pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide)-preferring receptor PAC1 is associated with nerve injury and tumors. Our previous report (Yu R, et al. PLoS One 2012; 7: e51811) confirmed the dimerization of PAC1 and found that the M-PAC1 mutation in the N-terminal first Cys/Ala lost the ability to form dimers. In this study, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells overexpressing wild-type PAC1 (PAC1-CHO) had significantly higher anti-apoptotic activities against serum withdrawal-induced apoptosis associated with a lower caspase 3 activity and a higher Bcl-2 level in a ligand-independent manner than those of CHO cells overexpressing the mutant M-PAC1 (M-PAC1-CHO). PAC1-CHO had significantly higher β-catenin, cyclin D1 and c-myc levels corresponding to the Wnt/β-catenin signal than did M-PAC1-CHO. In addition, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitor XAV939 significantly inhibited the anti-apoptotic activities of PAC1-CHO. Top-flash assays demonstrated that PAC1-CHO had a significantly stronger Wnt/β-catenin signal than did M-PAC1-CHO. Acetylcysteine (NAC) as an inhibitor of the dimerization of PAC1 inhibited the anti-apoptotic activities that were endowed by PAC1 and decreased the Wnt/β-catenin signal in Top-flash assays. In the PAC1 Tet (tetracycline)-on inducible gene expression system by doxycycline (Dox), higher expression levels of PAC1 resulted in higher anti-apoptotic activities that were associated with a stronger Wnt/β-catenin signal. A similar correlation was also found with the down-regulation of PAC1 in the Neuro2a neuroblastoma cell. BiFC combined with fluorescence confocal imaging indicated that during serum-withdrawal-induced apoptosis, PAC1 dimers displayed significant endocytosis. These findings indicate that PAC1 has ligand-independent and dimer-dependent intrinsic/basal activity, conferring cells with anti-apoptotic activities against serum withdrawal, which is involved in the Wnt/β-catenin signal and is associated with the endocytosis of PAC1 dimers. The discovery and study of the dimer-dependent basal activity of PAC1 not only help us understand the physiological and pathological role of PAC1 but also promote the development of drugs targeting PAC1.

Discovery of a Negative Allosteric Modulator of GABAB Receptors

Initialized from the scaffold of CGP7930, an allosteric agonist of GABAB receptors, a series of noncompetitive antagonists were discovered. Among these compounds, compounds 3, 6, and 14 decreased agonist GABA-induced maximal effect of IP3 production in HEK293 cells overexpressing GABAB receptors and Gqi9 proteins without changing the EC50. Compounds 3, 6, and 14 not only inhibited agonist baclofen-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation but also blocked CGP7930-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in HEK293 cells overexpressing GABAB receptors. The results suggested that compounds 3, 6, and 14 are negative allosteric modulators of GABAB receptors. The representative compound 14 decreased GABA-induced IP3 production with IC50 of 37.9 μM and had no effect on other GPCR Class C members such as mGluR1, mGluR2, and mGluR5. Finally, we showed that compound 14 did not bind to the orthosteric binding sites of GABAB receptors, demonstrating that compound 14 negatively modulated GABAB receptors activity as a negative allosteric modulator.

Structural mechanism of ligand activation in human GABA(B) receptor

Human GABA(B) (γ-aminobutyric acid class B) receptor is a G-protein-coupled receptor central to inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. It functions as an obligatory heterodimer of the subunits GBR1 and GBR2. Here we present the crystal structures of a heterodimeric complex between the extracellular domains of GBR1 and GBR2 in the apo, agonist-bound and antagonist-bound forms. The apo and antagonist-bound structures represent the resting state of the receptor; the agonist-bound complex corresponds to the active state. Both subunits adopt an open conformation at rest, and only GBR1 closes on agonist-induced receptor activation. The agonists and antagonists are anchored in the interdomain crevice of GBR1 by an overlapping set of residues. An antagonist confines GBR1 to the open conformation of the inactive state, whereas an agonist induces its domain closure for activation. Our data reveal a unique activation mechanism for GABA(B) receptor that involves the formation of a novel heterodimer interface between subunits.

PACAP induces the dimerization of PAC1 on the nucleus associated with the cAMP increase in the nucleus

PAC1 is PACAP (pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide) preferring receptor belonging to class B G protein couple receptor (GPCR) mediating the most effects of PACAP. The dimerization of PAC1 has been proven by our previous research. The bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) combined with fluorescence confocal microscope image was used in this research to explore the profiles of PAC1 dimers during the activation by PACAP. Fluorescence metry and cAMP assays were both used to detect the functions of the dimerization of PAC1 on the nucleus induced by PACAP. It was found that PACAP in concentration lower than 10nM induced the de-dimerization of PAC1 on the plasma membranes and the re-dimerization of PAC1 on the nucleus. While PACAP in concentration higher than 10nM, the nuclear localized PAC1 dimers were further translocated from outside/on the nucleus into the nucleus. In addition, it was also found that the more PAC1 dimers on the nucleus produced the higher cAMP level in the nucleus, and the levels of cAMP in the nucleus varied synchronously with functions of PACAP on the proliferation of PAC1-CHO cells. These results indicated the dimerization of PAC1 on the nucleus may be involved in the cell signals produced by PACAP. The finding and the research on the dimerization of PAC1 on the nucleus will help us to step forward to clarify the physiological and pharmacological role of PAC1.

Distinct roles of metabotropic glutamate receptor dimerization in agonist activation and G-protein coupling

The eight metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are key modulators of synaptic transmission and are considered promising targets for the treatment of various brain disorders. Whereas glutamate acts at a large extracellular domain, allosteric modulators have been identified that bind to the seven transmembrane domain (7TM) of these dimeric G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). We show here that the dimeric organization of mGluRs is required for the modulation of active and inactive states of the 7TM by agonists, but is not necessary for G-protein activation. Monomeric mGlu2, either as an isolated 7TM or in full-length, purified and reconstituted into nanodiscs, couples to G proteins upon direct activation by a positive allosteric modulator. However, only a reconstituted full-length dimeric mGlu2 activates G protein upon glutamate binding, suggesting that dimerization is required for glutamate induced activation. These data show that, even for such well characterized GPCR dimers like mGluR2, a single 7TM is sufficient for G-protein coupling. Despite this observation, the necessity of dimeric architecture for signaling induced by the endogenous ligand glutamate confirms that the central core of signaling complex is dimeric.

Structure and functional interaction of the extracellular domain of human GABA(B) receptor GBR2

Inhibitory neurotransmission is mediated primarily by GABA. The metabotropic GABA(B) receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor central to mammalian brain function. Malfunction of GABA(B) receptor has been implicated in several neurological disorders. GABA(B) receptor functions as a heterodimeric assembly of GBR1 and GBR2 subunits, where GBR1 is responsible for ligand-binding and GBR2 is responsible for G protein coupling. Here we demonstrate that the GBR2 ectodomain directly interacts with the GBR1 ectodomain to increase agonist affinity by selectively stabilizing the agonist-bound conformation of GBR1. We present the crystal structure of the GBR2 ectodomain, which reveals a polar heterodimeric interface. We also identify specific heterodimer contacts from both subunits, and GBR1 residues involved in ligand recognition. Lastly, our structural and functional data indicate that the GBR2 ectodomain adopts a constitutively open conformation, suggesting a structural asymmetry in the active state of GABA(B) receptor that is unique to the GABAergic system.

Structure and ligand recognition of class C GPCRs

The G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are one of the largest super families of cell-surface receptors and play crucial roles in virtually every organ system. One particular family of GPCRs, the class C GPCRs, is distinguished by a characteristically large extracellular domain and constitutive dimerization. The structure and activation mechanism of this family result in potentially unique ligand recognition sites, thereby offering a variety of possibilities by which receptor activity might be modulated using novel compounds. In the present article, we aim to provide an overview of the exact sites and structural features involved in ligand recognition of the class C GPCRs. Furthermore, we demonstrate the precise steps that occur during the receptor activation process, which underlie the possibilities by which receptor function may be altered by different approaches. Finally, we use four typical family members to illustrate orthosteric and allosteric sites with representative ligands and their corresponding therapeutic potential.

Interdomain movements in metabotropic glutamate receptor activation

Many cell surface receptors are multimeric proteins, composed of several structural domains, some involved in ligand recognition, whereas others are responsible for signal transduction. In most cases, the mechanism of how ligand interaction in the extracellular domains leads to the activation of effector domains remains largely unknown. Here we examined how the extracellular ligand binding to the venus flytrap (VFT) domains of the dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors activate the seven transmembrane (7TM) domains responsible for G protein activation. These two domains are interconnected by a cysteine-rich domain (CRD). We show that any of the four disulfide bridges of the CRD are required for the allosteric coupling between the VFT and the 7TM domains. More importantly, we show that a specific association of the two CRDs corresponds to the active state of the receptor. Indeed, a specific crosslinking of the CRDs with intersubunit disulfide bridges leads to fully constitutively active receptors, no longer activated by agonists nor by allosteric modulators. These data demonstrate that intersubunit movement at the level of the CRDs represents a key step in metabotropic glutamate receptor activation.

The oligomeric state sets GABA(B) receptor signalling efficacy

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have key roles in cell-cell communication. Recent data suggest that these receptors can form large complexes, a possibility expected to expand the complexity of this regulatory system. Among the brain GPCRs, the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor is one of the most abundant, being distributed in most brain regions, on either pre- or post-synaptic elements. Here, using specific antibodies labelled with time-resolved FRET compatible fluorophores, we provide evidence that the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor can form higher-ordered oligomers in the brain, as suggested by the close proximity of the GABA(B1) subunits. Destabilizing the oligomers using a competitor or a GABA(B1) mutant revealed different G protein coupling efficiencies depending on the oligomeric state of the receptor. By examining, in heterologous system, the G protein coupling properties of such GABA(B) receptor oligomers composed of a wild-type and a non-functional mutant heterodimer, we provide evidence for a negative functional cooperativity between the GABA(B) heterodimers.

Allosteric modulation of family C G-protein-coupled receptors: from molecular insights to therapeutic perspectives

Allosteric receptor modulation is an attractive concept in drug targeting because it offers important potential advantages over conventional orthosteric agonism or antagonism. Allosteric ligands modulate receptor function by binding to a site distinct from the recognition site for the endogenous agonist. They often have no effect on their own and therefore act only in conjunction with physiological receptor activation. This article reviews the current status of allosteric modulation at family C G-protein coupled receptors in the light of their specific structural features on the one hand and current concepts in receptor theory on the other hand. Family C G-protein-coupled receptors are characterized by a large extracellular domain containing the orthosteric agonist binding site known as the "venus flytrap module" because of its bilobal structure and the dynamics of its activation mechanism. Mutational analysis and chimeric constructs have revealed that allosteric modulators of the calcium-sensing, metabotropic glutamate and GABA(B) receptors bind to the seven transmembrane domain, through which they modify signal transduction after receptor activation. This is in contrast to taste-enhancing molecules, which bind to different parts of sweet and umami receptors. The complexity of interactions between orthosteric and allosteric ligands is revealed by a number of adequate biochemical and electrophysiological assay systems. Many allosteric family C GPCR modulators show in vivo efficacy in behavioral models for a variety of clinical indications. The positive allosteric calcium sensing receptor modulator cinacalcet is the first drug of this type to enter the market and therefore provides proof of principle in humans.

Astrocytes as gatekeepers of GABAB receptor function

The long-lasting actions of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA result from the activation of metabotropic GABA(B) receptors. Enhanced GABA(B)-mediated IPSCs are critical for the generation of generalized thalamocortical seizures. Here, we demonstrate that GABA(B)-mediated IPSCs recorded in the thalamus are primarily defined by GABA diffusion and activation of distal extrasynaptic receptors potentially up to tens of micrometers from synapses. We also show that this diffusion is differentially regulated by two astrocytic GABA transporters, GAT1 and GAT3, which are localized near and far from synapses, respectively. A biologically constrained model of GABA diffusion and uptake shows how the two GATs differentially modulate amplitude and duration of GABA(B) IPSCs. Specifically, the perisynaptic expression of GAT1 enables it to regulate GABA levels near synapses and selectively modulate peak IPSC amplitude, which is primarily dependent on perisynaptic receptor occupancy. GAT3 expression, however, is broader and includes distal extrasynaptic regions. As such, GAT3 acts as a gatekeeper to prevent diffusion of GABA away from synapses toward extrasynaptic regions that contain a potentially enormous pool of GABA(B) receptors. Targeting this gatekeeper function may provide new pharmacotherapeutic opportunities to prevent the excessive GABA(B) receptor activation that appears necessary for thalamic seizure generation.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors: from the workbench to the bedside

Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors were discovered in the mid 1980s and originally described as glutamate receptors coupled to polyphosphoinositide hydrolysis. Almost 6500 articles have been published since then, and subtype-selective mGlu receptor ligands are now under clinical development for the treatment of a variety of disorders such as Fragile-X syndrome, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease and L-DOPA-induced dyskinesias, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic pain, and gastroesophageal reflux disorder. Prof. Erminio Costa was linked to the early times of the mGlu receptor history, when a few research groups challenged the general belief that glutamate could only activate ionotropic receptors and all metabolic responses to glutamate were secondary to calcium entry. This review moves from those nostalgic times to the most recent advances in the physiology and pharmacology of mGlu receptors, and highlights the role of individual mGlu receptor subtypes in the pathophysiology of human disorders. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Trends in neuropharmacology: in memory of Erminio Costa'.

The complexity of their activation mechanism opens new possibilities for the modulation of mGlu and GABAB class C G protein-coupled receptors

In the human genome, 22 genes are coding for the class C G protein-coupled receptors that are receptors for the two main neurotransmitters glutamate and γ-aminobutyric acid, for Ca(2+) and for sweet and amino acid taste compounds. In addition to the GPCR heptahelical transmembrane domain responsible for G-protein activation, class C receptors possess a large extracellular domain that is responsible for ligand recognition. Recent studies had revealed that class C receptors are homo- or heterodimers with unique mechanism of activation. In the present review, we present an up-to-date view of the structures and activation mechanism of these receptors in particular the metabotropic glutamate and GABA(B) receptors. We show how the complexity of functioning of these transmembrane proteins can be used for the development of therapeutics to modulate their activity. We emphasize on the new approaches and drugs that could potentially become important in the future pharmacology of these receptors.

Functional evidence for a twisted conformation of the NMDA receptor GluN2A subunit N-terminal domain

Ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) possess in their extracellular region a large N-terminal domain (NTD) that precedes the agonist-binding domain and displays a clamshell-like architecture similar to the bacterial leucine/isoleucine/valine-binding protein (LIVBP). In addition to their role in receptor assembly, in NMDA receptors (NMDARs), the NTDs of GluN2A and GluN2B subunits form a major site for subunit-specific regulation of ion channel activity, in particular through binding of allosteric modulators such as the synaptically-enriched zinc ion. A recent crystallographic study of the isolated GluN2B NTD has revealed an unexpected twisted closed-cleft conformation caused by a rotation of ∼ 50° in the interlobe orientation compared with all other known LIVBP-like structures (Karakas et al., 2009). By measuring currents carried by recombinant NMDARs, we now provide functional evidence, through disulfide cross-linking and the identification of a new zinc-binding residue (D283), that the GluN2A NTD of intact GluN1/GluN2A receptors adopts a similar twisted conformation in its closed-cleft state. We propose that the twisted NTD conformation is a distinct structural feature of NMDARs (at least for GluN2A and GluN2B subunits), arguing for interactions between the NTDs in the tetrameric complex that are likely to differ between NMDA and AMPA/kainate receptors.

Allosteric modulators of GABA(B) receptors: mechanism of action and therapeutic perspective

γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) plays important roles in the central nervous system, acting as a neurotransmitter on both ionotropic ligand-gated Cl^--channels, and metabotropic G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). These two types of receptors called GABA_A (and C) and GABA_B are the targets of major therapeutic drugs such as the anxiolytic benzodiazepines, and antispastic drug baclofen (lioresal®), respectively. Although the multiplicity of GABA_A receptors offer a number of possibilities to discover new and more selective drugs, the molecular characterization of the GABA_B receptor revealed a unique, though complex, heterodimeric GPCR. High throughput screening strategies carried out in pharmaceutical industries, helped identifying new compounds positively modulating the activity of the GABA_B receptor. These molecules, almost devoid of apparent activity when applied alone, greatly enhance both the potency and efficacy of GABA_B agonists. As such, in contrast to baclofen that constantly activates the receptor everywhere in the brain, these positive allosteric modulators induce a large increase in GABA_B-mediated responses only WHERE and WHEN physiologically needed. Such compounds are then well adapted to help GABA to activate its GABA_B receptors, like benzodiazepines favor GABA_A receptor activation. In this review, the way of action of these molecules will be presented in light of our actual knowledge of the activation mechanism of the GABA_B receptor. We will then show that, as expected, these molecules have more pronounced in vivo responses and less side effects than pure agonists, offering new potential therapeutic applications for this new class of GABA_B ligands.

Heterodimerization of the GABAB receptor-implications for GPCR signaling and drug discovery

The identification of the molecular nature of the GABA(B) receptor and the demonstration of its heterodimeric structure has led to extensive studies investigating the mechanism of activation and signaling. Phylogenetic studies suggest that the formation of the heterodimer is a relatively recent event arising in conjunction with the evolution of the central nervous system. Heterodimerization has now been demonstrated for many other G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and plays a role in signaling and trafficking. This presents both challenges and opportunities for GPCR drug discovery. In the case of the GABA(B) receptor the best hope for the development of new drugs directed at this receptor is from allosteric modulators. This chapter summarizes our current understanding of the molecular function of the GABA(B) receptor and recent developments in the identification of allosteric modulators. The broader implication of heterodimerization on GPCR function and drug discovery is also discussed.

G-protein-coupled receptor oligomers: two or more for what? Lessons from mGlu and GABAB receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in the precise tuning of intercellullar communication. In the brain, both major neurotransmitters, glutamate and GABA, act on specific GPCRs [the metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) and GABA(B) receptors] to modulate synaptic transmission. These receptors are encoded by the largest gene family, and have been found to associate into both homo- and hetero-oligomers, which increases the complexity of this cell communication system. Here we show that dimerization is required for mGlu and GABA(B) receptors to function, since the activation process requires a relative movement between the subunits to occur. We will also show that, in contrast to the mGlu receptors, which form strict dimers, the GABA(B) receptors assemble into larger complexes, both in transfected cells and in the brain, resulting in a decreased G-protein coupling efficacy. We propose that GABA(B) receptor oligomerization offers a way to increase the possibility of modulating receptor signalling and activity, allowing the same receptor protein to have specific properties in neurons at different locations.

Molecular basis for amino acid sensing by family C G-protein-coupled receptors

Family C of human G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is constituted by eight metabotropic glutamate receptors, two gamma-aminobutyric acid type B (GABA(B1-2)) subunits forming the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor, the calcium-sensing receptor, three taste1 receptors (T1R1-3), a promiscuous L-alpha;-amino acid receptor G-protein-coupled receptor family C, group 6, subtype A (GPRC6A) and seven orphan receptors. Aside from the orphan receptors, the family C GPCRs are dimeric receptors characterized by a large extracellular Venus flytrap domain which bind the endogenous agonists. Except from the GABA(B1-2) and T1R2-3 receptor, all receptors are either activated or positively modulated by amino acids. In this review, we outline mutational, biophysical and structural studies which have elucidated the interaction of the amino acids with the Venus flytrap domains, molecular mechanisms of receptor selectivity and the initial steps in receptor activation.

Crosstalk between GABAB and mGlu1a receptors reveals new insight into GPCR signal integration

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have critical functions in intercellular communication. Although a wide range of different receptors have been identified in the same cells, the mechanism by which signals are integrated remains elusive. The ability of GPCRs to form dimers or larger hetero-oligomers is thought to generate such signal integration. We examined the molecular mechanisms responsible for the GABA(B) receptor-mediated potentiation of the mGlu receptor signalling reported in Purkinje neurons. We showed that this effect does not require a physical interaction between both receptors. Instead, it is the result of a more general mechanism in which the betagamma subunits produced by the Gi-coupled GABA(B) receptor enhance the mGlu-mediated Gq response. Most importantly, this mechanism could be generally applied to other pairs of Gi- and Gq-coupled receptors and the signal integration varied depending on the time delay between activation of each receptor. Such a mechanism helps explain specific properties of cells expressing two different Gi- and Gq-coupled receptors activated by a single transmitter, or properties of GPCRs naturally coupled to both types of the G protein.

Optical measurement of mGluR1 conformational changes reveals fast activation, slow deactivation, and sensitization

Metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) activation has been extensively studied under steady-state conditions. However, at central synapses, mGluRs are exposed to brief submillisecond glutamate transients and may not reach steady-state. The lack of information on the kinetics of mGluR activation impairs accurate predictions of their operation during synaptic transmission. Here, we report experiments designed to investigate mGluR kinetics in real-time. We inserted either CFP or YFP into the second intracellular loop of mGluR1beta. When these constructs were coexpressed in PC12 cells, glutamate application induced a conformational change that could be monitored, using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), with an EC(50) of 7.5 microM. The FRET response was mimicked by the agonist DHPG, abolished by the competitive antagonist MCPG, and partially inhibited by mGluR1-selective allosteric modulators. These results suggest that the FRET response reports active conformations of mGluR1 dimers. The solution exchange at the cell membrane was optimized for voltage-clamped cells by recording the current induced by co-application of 30 mM potassium. When glutamate was applied at increasing concentrations up to 2 mM, the activation time course decreased to a minimum of approximately 10 ms, whereas the deactivation time course remained constant (approximately 50 ms). During long-lasting applications, no desensitization was observed. In contrast, we observed a robust sensitization of the FRET response that developed over approximately 400 ms. Activation, deactivation, and sensitization time courses and amplitudes were used to derive a kinetic scheme and rate constants, from which we inferred the EC(50) and frequency dependence of mGluR1 activation under non-steady-state conditions, as occurs during synaptic transmission.

Mechanism of differential control of NMDA receptor activity by NR2 subunits

NMDA receptors (NMDARs) are a major class of excitatory neurotransmitter receptors in the central nervous system. They form glutamate-gated ion channels highly permeable to calcium that mediate activity-dependent synaptic plasticity1. NMDAR dysfunction is implicated in multiple brain disorders, including stroke, chronic pain and schizophrenia2. NMDARs exist as multiple subtypes with distinct pharmacological and biophysical properties largely determined by the type of NR2 subunit (NR2A-NR2D) incorporated in the heteromeric NR1/NR2 complex1,3,4. A fundamental difference between NMDAR subtypes is their channel maximal open probability (Po), which spans a 50-fold range from ~0.5 for NR2A-containing receptors to ~0.01 for NR2C- and NR2D-containing receptors; NR2B-containing receptors having an intermediate value (~0.1)5–9. These differences in Po confer unique charge transfer capacities and signaling properties on each receptor subtype4,6,10,11. The molecular basis for this profound difference in activity between NMDAR subtypes is unknown. Here we demonstrate that the subunit-specific gating of NMDARs is controlled by the region formed by the NR2 N-terminal domain (NTD), an extracellular clamshell-like domain previously shown to bind allosteric inhibitors12–15, and the short linker connecting the NTD to the agonist-binding domain (ABD). Subtype specificity of NMDAR Po largely reflects differences in the spontaneous (ligand-independent) equilibrium between open-cleft and closed-cleft conformations of the NR2-NTD. This NTD-driven gating control also impacts pharmacological properties, by setting the sensitivity to the endogenous inhibitors zinc and protons. Our results provide a proof-of-concept for a drug-based bidirectional control of NMDAR activity using molecules acting either as NR2-NTD “closers” or “openers” promoting receptor inhibition or potentiation, respectively.

Constitutive activation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor via cleft-spanning disulfide bonds

Although the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor plays a critical role in the central nervous system, many questions remain regarding the relationship between its structure and functional properties. In particular, the involvement of ligand-binding domain closure in determining agonist efficacy, which has been reported in other glutamate receptor subtypes, remains unresolved. To address this question, we designed dual cysteine point mutations spanning the NR1 and NR2 ligand-binding clefts, aiming to stabilize these domains in closed cleft conformations. Two mutants, E522C/I691C in NR1 (EI) and K487C/N687C in NR2 (KN) were found to exhibit significant glycine- and glutamate-independent activation, respectively, and co-expression of the two subunits produced a constitutively active channel. However, both individual mutants could be activated above constitutive levels in a concentration-dependent manner, indicating that cleft closure does not completely prevent agonist association. Interestingly, whereas the NR2 KN disulfide was found to potentiate channel gating and M3 accessibility, NR1 EI exhibited the opposite phenotype, suggesting that the EI disulfide may trap the NR1 ligand-binding domain in a lower efficacy conformation. Furthermore, both mutants affected agonist sensitivity at the opposing subunit, suggesting that closed cleft stabilization may contribute to coupling between the subunits. These results support a correlation between cleft stability and receptor activation, providing compelling evidence for the Venus flytrap mechanism of glutamate receptor domain closure.

Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane-bound receptors and also the targets of many drugs. Understanding of the functional significance of the wide structural diversity of GPCRs has been aided considerably in recent years by the sequencing of the human genome and by structural studies, and has important implications for the future therapeutic potential of targeting this receptor family. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the five main human GPCR families--Rhodopsin, Secretin, Adhesion, Glutamate and Frizzled/Taste2--with a focus on gene repertoire, general ligand preference, common and unique structural features, and the potential for future drug discovery.

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors: beyond two-state models and tertiary conformational changes

Transformation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) from a quiescent to an active state initiates signal transduction. All GPCRs share a common architecture comprising seven transmembrane-spanning alpha-helices, which accommodates signal propagation from a diverse repertoire of external stimuli across biological membranes to a heterotrimeric G protein. Signal propagation through the transmembrane helices likely involves mechanistic features common to all GPCRs. The structure of the light receptor rhodopsin may serve as a prototype for the transmembrane architecture of GPCRs. Early biochemical, biophysical, and pharmacological studies led to the conceptualization of receptor activation based on the context of two-state equilibrium models and conformational changes in protein structure. More recent studies indicate a need to move beyond these classical paradigms and to consider additional aspects of the molecular character of GPCRs, such as the oligomerization and dynamics of the receptor.

Activation of a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor by intersubunit rearrangement

Although many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimers, a possible role of this phenomenon in their activation remains elusive. A recent and exciting proposal is that a dynamic intersubunit interplay may contribute to GPCR activation. Here, we examined this possibility using dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). We first developed a system to perfectly control their subunit composition and show that mGluR dimers do not form larger oligomers. We then examined an mGluR dimer containing one subunit in which the extracellular agonist-binding domain was uncoupled from the G protein-activating transmembrane domain. Despite this uncoupling in one protomer, agonist stimulation resulted in symmetric activation of either transmembrane domain in the dimer with the same efficiency. This, plus other data, can only be explained by an intersubunit rearrangement as the activation mechanism. Although well established for other types of receptors such as tyrosine kinase and guanylate cyclase receptors, this is the first clear demonstration that such a mechanism may also apply to GPCRs.

Common structural requirements for heptahelical domain function in class A and class C G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in cell communication. Several classes of such receptors have been identified. Although all GPCRs possess a heptahelical domain directly activating G proteins, important structural and sequence differences within receptors from different classes suggested distinct activation mechanisms. Here we show that highly conserved charged residues likely involved in an interaction network between transmembrane domains (TM) 3 and 6 at the cytoplasmic side of class C GPCRs are critical for activation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor. Indeed, the loss of function resulting from the mutation of the conserved lysine residue into aspartate or glutamate in the TM3 of gamma-aminobutyric acid type B(2) can be partly rescued by mutating the conserved acidic residue of TM6 into either lysine or arginine. In addition, mutation of the conserved lysine into an acidic residue leads to a nonfunctional receptor that displays a high agonist affinity. This is reminiscent of a similar ionic network that constitutes a lock stabilizing the inactive state of many class A rhodopsin-like GPCRs. These data reveal that despite their original structure, class C GPCRs share with class A receptors at least some common structural feature controlling G protein activation.

GABA(B) receptors: structure and function

In the basal ganglia the effects of gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) are mediated by both ionotropic (GABA(A)) and metabotropic (GABA(B)) receptors. Although the existence and widespread distribution in the CNS of the GABA(B) receptor had been established in the 1980s the field of GABA(B) research was revolutionized with the discovery that two related G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) needed to dimerize to form the functional GABA(B) receptor at the cell surface. This finding lead to a number of studies of oligomerization in GPCRs and detailed pharmacological studies of the cloned receptors and their splice variants. Particular interest has focused on the proteins interacting with the receptor which may be important in mediating the longer term signalling effects of the receptor and modifying its cellular localization or physiology. The cloning of the GABA(B) receptors also lead to the identification of the first compounds interacting in an allosteric fashion with the receptor some of which may have therapeutic value. Most recently "knockouts" of both the GABA(B) subunits have been produced where in general as expected there is a loss of the majority of the inhibitory effects of the GABA(B) receptor.

Asymmetric conformational changes in a GPCR dimer controlled by G-proteins

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in cell communication. Although long considered as monomeric, it now appears that these heptahelical proteins can form homo- or heterodimers. Here, we analyzed the conformational changes in each subunit of a receptor dimer resulting from agonist binding to either one or both subunits by measuring the fluorescent properties of a leukotriene B(4) receptor dimer with a single 5-hydroxytryptophan-labeled protomer. We show that a receptor dimer with only a single agonist-occupied subunit can trigger G-protein activation. We also show that the two subunits of the receptor dimer in the G-protein-coupled state differ in their conformation, even when both are liganded by the agonist. No such asymmetric conformational changes are observed in the absence of G-protein, indicating that the interaction of the G-protein with the receptor dimer brings specific constraints that prevent a symmetric functioning of this dimer. These data open new options for the differential signaling properties of GPCR dimers.