Drug-induced hepatitis in an acromegalic patient during combined treatment with pegvisomant and octreotide long-acting repeatable attributed to the use of pegvisomant

Efficacy and Safety of Pegvisomant in the Treatment of Acromegaly

Pegvisomant, the first and currently only clinically available growth hormone receptor antagonist, is an effective therapeutic option for the medical treatment of acromegaly, a rare disorder characterized by excessive growth hormone secretion. With now over 20 years of real world experience, its safety and efficacy is well-established. However, several aspects of its clinical use are still controversially discussed. The high cost of pegvisomant has limited its use in several countries, and recent studies have reported a lower efficacy than the initial clinical trials. A reported increase in tumor volume under therapy varies between studies and has been attributed to either actual growth or re-expansion after cessation of somatostatin receptor ligand therapy. Furthermore, different combinations of pegvisomant and other therapeutic agents aiming at reduction of acromegaly disease activity have been proposed to increase or retain effectiveness while lowering side effects and cost. This review aims to assess current clinical data on the safety and efficacy of pegvisomant while also addressing controversies surrounding its use.

Pegvisomant: a growth hormone receptor antagonist used in the treatment of acromegaly

PURPOSE

To review published data on pegvisomant and its therapeutic role in acromegaly.

METHODS

Electronic searches of the published literature were conducted using the keywords: acromegaly, growth hormone (GH) receptor (antagonist), pegvisomant, therapy. Relevant articles (n = 141) were retrieved and considered for inclusion in this manuscript.

RESULTS

Pegvisomant is a genetically engineered, recombinant growth hormone receptor antagonist, which is effective in normalizing serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels in the majority of patients with acromegaly and ameliorating symptoms and signs associated with GH excess. Pegvisomant does not have direct antiproliferative effects on the underlying somatotroph pituitary adenoma, which is the etiology of GH excess in the vast majority of patients with acromegaly. Therefore, patients receiving pegvisomant monotherapy require regular pituitary imaging in order to monitor for possible increase in tumor size. Adverse events in patients on pegvisomant therapy include skin rashes, lipohypertrophy at injection sites, and idiosyncratic liver toxicity (generally asymptomatic transaminitis that is reversible upon drug discontinuation), thus necessitating regular patient monitoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegvisomant is an effective therapeutic agent in patients with acromegaly who are not in remission after undergoing pituitary surgery. It mitigates excess GH action, as demonstrated by IGF-1 normalization, but has no direct effects on pituitary tumors causing acromegaly. Regular surveillance for possible tumor growth and adverse effects (hepatotoxicity, skin manifestations) is warranted.

The role of combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly

PURPOSE

Uncontrolled acromegaly results in approximately 2-fold excess mortality. Pituitary surgery is first-line therapy, and medical treatment is indicated for persistent disease. While cabergoline and pegvisomant are used in select patients, somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) remain the cornerstone of medical treatment. Management of patients poorly responsive to SRLs is therefore, challenging. The purpose of this review is to highlight the options for combination medical therapy in the treatment of acromegaly, with an emphasis on efficacy and safety.

METHODS

All original articles/abstracts detailing combination medical therapy in acromegaly were identified from a PubMed search.

RESULTS

Studies reviewed included retrospective and open-label prospective studies. While the combination of SRL and cabergoline was generally well tolerated, a lower baseline insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) level was the best predictor of efficacy; this combination may be most effective in patients with mildly elevated IGF-1. SRL-pegvisomant combination normalized IGF-1 in the majority of patients; continued efficacy despite individual drug dosing reduction was also reported. The risk of significant liver enzyme elevation was, however, higher than that reported with SRL monotherapy; close monitoring is recommended. Data on pegvisomant-cabergoline combination is limited, but this may be an option in the setting of SRL intolerance. Reports on temozolomide used in combination with other medical therapies in patients with aggressive GH-secreting tumors are also summarized.

CONCLUSION

While more prospective, randomized controlled trials on long-term efficacy and safety are needed, combination medical therapy remains a treatment strategy that should be considered for acromegaly patients poorly responsive to SRLs.

Long-term treatment with pegvisomant for acromegaly: a 10-year experience

BACKGROUND

Efficacy of the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant (PEG) has differed between preclinical and observational studies mainly due to dose adjustment and IGF-I normalization criteria. An escape phenomenon has also been described, but its definition and underlying causes have not been fully established.

OBJECTIVE

To re-evaluate the outcomes of long-term PEG in a series of previously published patients and analyse the escape phenomenon.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with acromegaly resistant to SSA in whom PEG was started as monotherapy, who had been included in a previous publication. We prospectively evaluated 64 (56·3% women) from six tertiary care referral hospitals in Spain, for whom data as of June 2014 were available. Escape to PEG was defined as confirmed loss of biochemical control (IGF-I >1·2xULN), after at least 6 months of previous control with a stable dose of PEG.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 13·0 (5·9-34·8) years since diagnosis, and 9·0 (4·1-10·4) years since the first administration of PEG. Fifty-one (89·5%) patients had an adequate IGF-I control at the last follow-up visit, 9 of them without treatment. Tumour growth was reported in 6 of 64 cases (9·4%), none of whom had received prior radiotherapy (P = 0·011). Seven patients died during follow-up. We found 16 escapes in 10 patients (15·6%). We identified potential underlying causes in 9 cases (tumour regrowth, previous treatment modifications, concomitant menopause and change in testosterone administration). The reason was unknown in 7 escapes, which occurred in 6 patients (9·4%). All patients, except one, achieved subsequent biochemical control after treatment adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

We reassure the efficacy and safety of long-term PEG. An escape phenomenon may occur, but it can be overcome by adjusting therapy.

Genetic Predictors of Response to Different Medical Therapies in Acromegaly

In the era of predictive medicine, management of diseases is evolving into a more personal and individualized approach, as more data are available regarding clinical, biochemical, radiological, molecular, histopathological, and genetic aspects. In the particular setting of acromegaly, which is a rare, chronic, debilitating, and disfiguring disease, an optimized approach deems even more necessary, especially because of an associated increased morbidity and mortality, the impact on patients' quality of life, and the increased cost of frequently necessary life-long treatments. In this paper, we review the available studies that address potential genetic influences on acromegaly, their role in the outcome, and response to treatments, as well as their contribution to the risk of developing side effects. We focus mainly on pharmacogenetic factors involved during treatment with dopamine agonists, somatostatin analogs, and pegvisomant. Specifically, mutations in dopamine receptors, somatostatin receptors, growth hormone receptors, and metabolic pathways involved in growth hormone action; polymorphisms in the insulin-like growth factor and the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins; and polymorphisms in other genes that may determine differences in the frequency of developing adverse events.

Long-term efficacy and safety of pegvisomant in combination with long-acting somatostatin analogs in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

Treatment for acromegaly patients with long-acting somatotropin release-inhibiting factor (LA-SRIF) often does not result in complete normalization of IGF-1. Addition of pegvisomant (PEGV), a GH receptor antagonist, could improve this; however, the literature has not described long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To assess long-term efficacy and safety of this combined treatment in the largest current single-center cohort of patients, from 2004-2013.

DESIGN

Acromegaly patients were treated for at least 6 months with a high-dose LA-SRIF. To patients with persistently elevated IGF-1 levels (>1.2 × upper limit of normal) or poor quality of life, PEGV was added as one weekly injection.

RESULTS

The patients (n = 141) were treated with PEGV and LA-SRIFs for a median period of 4.9 years (range, 0.5-9.2). Efficacy, defined as the lowest measured IGF-1 level during treatment, was 97.0%. The median PEGV dose to achieve this efficacy was 80 mg weekly (interquartile range, 60-120 mg). Combination treatment-related adverse events were recorded in 26 subjects (18.4%). Pituitary tumor size increase was observed in one patient. Injection-site reactions were observed in four subjects. In 19 patients (13.5%), transiently elevated liver transaminases of more than three times the upper limit of normal were observed, of which 83% occurred within the first year of combination treatment. Eight patients died, at a mean age of 71 years; none of them were considered treatment-related.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination treatment with LA-SRIFs and PEGV was effective in 97% of the patients, it appears to be a safe medical treatment and it reduces the required dose of PEGV.

Fat content in liver and skeletal muscle changes in a reciprocal manner in patients with acromegaly during combination therapy with a somatostatin analog and a GH receptor antagonist: a randomized clinical trial

CONTEXT

Pegvisomant is a GH antagonist, which is used for the treatment of acromegalic patients. It effectively blocks the hepatic and peripheral effects of GH, but transient elevations in circulating liver enzymes of unknown pathogenesis may occur, which seems to be more prevalent when the treatment is combined with a somatostatin analog (SA). Accumulation of intrahepatic lipid is a known cause of elevated liver enzymes, and there is evidence to suggest that GH impacts lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to measure lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle in acromegalic patients before and after cotreatment with pegvisomant and SA as compared with SA monotherapy.

DESIGN

Eighteen acromegalic patients well controlled on SA monotherapy were randomized in a parallel study over 24 wk to 1) unchanged SA monotherapy, or 2) cotreatment with pegvisomant (15-30 mg twice a week) and SA (half the usual dosage).

SETTING

This was an investigator-initiated study in a single tertiary referral center.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intrahepatic lipid (IHL) and intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) was assessed by ¹H magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

RESULTS

IHL increased in the cotreatment group compared with SA only (P = 0.002). The increase was positively correlated to weekly pegvisomant dose (r² = 0.52; P = 0.01). By contrast, IMCL decreased in the cotreatment group compared with SA only (P = 0.01). These changes related neither to insulin sensitivity nor inflammatory markers.

CONCLUSION

Cotreatment with pegvisomant and a reduced SA dose increase IHL and decrease IMCL compared with SA monotherapy. The clinical implications remain unclear, but increased IHL may be causally linked to the transient elevations in liver enzymes observed during pegvisomant treatment.

Self-limited acute hepatotoxicity caused by pegvisomant

We present a case of acute severe hepatitis in a patient with acromegaly receiving combination therapy with somatostatin analogs and pegvisomant. Hepatitis resolved completely 18 weeks after diagnosis of hypertransaminasemia without discontinuation of therapy and with a close clinical and biochemical follow-up. In this case, despite the severity of the hepatitis, therapy could be continued as hypertransaminasemia was gradually decreasing after the maximum peak. We also review the literature on toxic hepatitis associated to pegvisomant therapy analyzing the etiology, clinical predisposing factors and natural evolution.

Combination treatment with somatostatin analogues and pegvisomant in acromegaly

Mono-therapy using long-acting somatostatin analogues and surgery cannot provide optimal biochemical control in a large proportion of patients with acromegaly. This results in increased mortality, poor control of signs and symptoms of disease and decreased quality of life. Combined treatment with somatostatin analogues and pegvisomant (a growth-hormone-receptor antagonist) seems to be an attractive option. Combination treatment is highly effective at normalising the level of insulin-like growth factor 1 in over 90% of patients and has a favourable effect on quality of life in those with biochemically controlled acromegaly. Moreover, combination therapy with somatostatin analogues results in a clinically relevant decrease in tumour size in about 20% of patients, whereas pegvisomant (PEG-V) mono-therapy does not decrease pituitary tumour size. Transient elevations in the levels of transaminases are the main adverse effects of combination treatment, which occur in about 11-15% of patients.

Medical therapy in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease characterized by excess secretion of growth hormone (GH) and increased circulating insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) concentrations. The disease is associated with increased morbidity and premature mortality, but these effects can be reduced if GH levels are decreased to <2.5 μg/l and IGF-1 levels are normalized. Therapy for acromegaly is targeted at decreasing GH and IGF-1 levels, ameliorating patients' symptoms and decreasing any local compressive effects of the pituitary adenoma. The therapeutic options for acromegaly include surgery, radiotherapy and medical therapies, such as dopamine agonists, somatostatin receptor ligands and the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant. Medical therapy is currently most widely used as secondary treatment for persistent or recurrent acromegaly following noncurative surgery, although it is increasingly used as primary therapy. This Review provides an overview of current and future pharmacological therapies for patients with acromegaly.

Pegvisomant-induced liver injury is related to the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism of Gilbert's syndrome

CONTEXT

Pegvisomant (PEG) therapy has been associated with drug-induced liver dysfunction in acromegalic patients. The mechanism of its toxicity remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to determine whether or not the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism associated with Gilbert's syndrome influences the development of liver dysfunction during PEG treatment.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional study was conducted in four Spanish university hospitals.

PATIENTS

Thirty-six acromegalic patients with active disease, resistant to somatostatin analogs, participated.

RESULTS

The prevalence of the UGT1A1*28 homozygous and heterozygous genotypes in acromegalic patients was 14 and 44%, respectively. Ten patients (28%) developed liver function test (LFT) abnormalities. There was a tendency for more frequent liver function abnormalities in males (70% males vs. 30% females, P = 0.058). Carriers of the UGT1A1*28 polymorphism had a higher incidence of LFT abnormalities than the UGT1A1 wild type (43% carriers vs. 7% wild type, P = 0.024). This difference persisted when adjusted in an all-factors multiple regression analysis [coefficient of determination (R(2)) = 0.463; P = 0.008] for age, gender, alcohol consumption, and UGT1A1*28 polymorphism. A stepwise multivariate likelihood binary logistic regression analysis (R(2) = 0.40; P = 0.003) identified male gender (beta = 7.21; P = 0.033) and UGT1A1*28 polymorphism (beta = 14.1; P = 0.028) as the only significant predictors for the development of LFT abnormalities.

CONCLUSIONS

The UGT1A1*28 genotype and male gender predict an increased incidence of LFT abnormalities during PEG therapy in acromegaly.

Comparison of pegvisomant and long-acting octreotide in patients with acromegaly naïve to radiation and medical therapy

BACKGROUND

Normalization of IGF-I in patients with acromegaly is associated with a decrease in mortality. Pegvisomant may be more effective in lowering IGF-I than octreotide.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The efficacy and safety of pegvisomant and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) were compared in 118 patients with acromegaly in this 52-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized study. The primary endpoint was IGF-I normalization at week 52. Secondary endpoints included mean changes from baseline in IGF-I, IGF binding protein 3, acromegaly signs and symptom scores, ring size, acromegaly quality of life questionnaire scores, and safety.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients received pegvisomant and 57 received octreotide LAR. IGF-I normalized in 51% of pegvisomant patients and 34% treated with octreotide LAR (p=0.09, ns). Patients with baseline IGF-I > or = 2x upper limit of normal had a higher rate of IGF-I normalization with pegvisomant vs octreotide LAR (p=0.05). Among the patients who did not achieve a normalized IGF-I, pegvisomant-treated patients were more likely to be receiving < 30 mg of study drug (71% vs 16%). Treatment-related adverse events were mild-to-moderate in both groups. Mean fasting glucose decreased in diabetic and non-diabetic patients on pegvisomant whereas octreotide LAR was associated with an increase at week 52 (p=0.005 and p=0.003 between groups, respectively). Mean change in tumor volume during treatment was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegvisomant and octreotide LAR were equally effective in normalizing IGF-I in the overall population, and pegvisomant was more effective in patients with higher baseline IGF-I levels. Pegvisomant had a more favorable effect on parameters of glycemic control.

ACROSTUDY: the first 5 years

ACROSTUDY is an observational registry intended to collect safety and efficacy data on pegvisomant therapy. A total of 792 patients have been enrolled, of whom 83% had commenced pegvisomant prior to recruitment. The mean follow-up is 1.66 years with the mean duration of pegvisomant therapy 3.31 years representing 2625 patient years of treatment. About 90% of patients were on once daily pegvisomant, and 67% were on monotherapy. Disappointingly, IGF1 was normalised in <70% of patients; furthermore, in 80% of patients with an elevated IGF1, the daily dose of pegvisomant was 20 mg or less. A total of 56 serious adverse events (AEs) were reported, of which 13 were related to pegvisomant. A total of 276 AEs were reported, of which 56 were considered related to pegvisomant. The AEs most frequently attributed to pegvisomant were disturbed liver function tests and injection site reactions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was available in 684 patients. A total of 411 patients had at least one MRI on pegvisomant compared with a baseline. In 31 patients, a decrease in tumour size has been reported, of whom 20 had previously received radiotherapy. An increase in tumour size has been reported and confirmed in 22 patients. In 11 patients, there was contradictory data on tumour size, while, in six patients, central review of the films failed to confirm increase in tumour size. In conclusion, the safety data are generally reassuring, while the IGF1 normalisation rate is disappointing, which probably reflects a failure of dose titration. Further effort is needed to understand the reasons for the failure of dose titration.

A randomized, controlled, multicentre trial comparing pegvisomant alone with combination therapy of pegvisomant and long-acting octreotide in patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

For patients with acromegaly who are suboptimally controlled on long-acting octreotide (LAR), treatment options are to switch to pegvisomant monotherapy (PM) or add pegvisomant to LAR (P-LAR). Our objective was to evaluate if the safety and efficacy of these regimens differ.

DESIGN

This was an open-label, multicentre, randomized, 40-week outpatient study. The control arm consisted of patients controlled on LAR (n = 28).

PATIENTS

A total of 27 patients with suboptimally controlled acromegaly [as indicated by a serum IGF-I level > or = 1.3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) of the age-related reference range] were randomized to PM (10 mg once daily initially, then adjusted in 5-mg increments every 8 weeks based on IGF-I levels) and 29 to P-LAR (LAR dosing remained fixed).

MEASUREMENTS

The primary end-point was adverse events (AEs). The secondary end-point was biochemical IGF-I-based efficacy. The RIA for IGF-I was discontinued by the manufacturer during the study and a chemiluminescent assay was subsequently used. Previously obtained IGF-I levels were re-analysed.

RESULTS

PM and P-LAR were well tolerated and there were no differences in the number of AEs. Patients receiving P-LAR tended to be more likely to have clinically significant increases in hepatic transaminase levels, especially those receiving high-dose LAR. Normalization of IGF-I was similar with both regimens (56% and 62% of patients for PM and P-LAR respectively). The change in IGF-I assay resulted in lower rates of IGF-I normalization than expected. Reductions in fasting glucose levels were greater with PM than with P-LAR (-0.8 mmol/l; 95% confidence interval -1.16, -0.53 mmol/l).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients suboptimally controlled on LAR, PM and P-LAR were equally well tolerated and effective in normalizing IGF-I, and overall clinical improvement was observed with both regimens. Thus, pegvisomant monotherapy and adjunctive therapy are equally viable options for the treatment of LAR-resistant acromegaly.

Somatostatin analog and pegvisomant combination therapy for acromegaly

Optimal biochemical control cannot be attained by long-acting somatostatin analog monotherapy in a large proportion of patients with acromegaly. Such therapy might result in increased mortality, poor control of signs and symptoms of disease and decreased quality of life. Combination treatment with somatostatin analogs and pegvisomant (a growth-hormone-receptor antagonist) is, however, highly effective at normalizing the level of insulin-like growth factor I in over 90% of patients and might also have a favorable effect on quality of life in those with biochemically controlled acromegaly. Moreover, whereas pegvisomant monotherapy does not lead to a decrease in the size of the pituitary tumor, combination therapy with somatostatin analogs results in a clinically relevant decrease in tumor size in about 20% of patients. The main adverse effects of combination treatment are transient elevations in the levels of transaminases, which occur in about 15% of patients, especially in those with diabetes mellitus. In this Review, we discuss the available data on the long-term efficacy and safety of somatostatin analog-pegvisomant combination treatment and its potential use in patients with acromegaly.

Pegvisomant-induced cholestatic hepatitis with jaundice in a patient with Gilbert's syndrome

We report on a patient with active acromegaly and Gilbert's syndrome who developed severe hepatic dysfunction during pegvisomant (PEGv) monotherapy. She was partially resistant to all previous therapies, including long-acting somatostatin analogs and cabergoline. Five months after starting PEGv therapy, with an already normalized IGF1, she developed cholestatic liver dysfunction with jaundice. Liver or biliary diseases including biliary sludge, cholelithiasis or liver steatosis were excluded. A liver biopsy was in keeping with drug-induced liver injury. The discontinuation of PEGv was followed by full clinical and biochemical recovery in 6 weeks. PEGv therapy was not resumed. Apart from a minimal increase of bilirubin levels, no liver function test abnormalities were found during the 4-year follow-up period after the PEGv was discontinued. Drug-induced liver injury is the most serious systemic adverse event resulting from PEGv therapy. Since patients with mild and asymptomatic liver disease could be at a higher risk of PEGv-induced hepatotoxicity, frequent monitoring of hepatic enzymes should be required in these cases.

Combined treatment for acromegaly with long-acting somatostatin analogs and pegvisomant: long-term safety for up to 4.5 years (median 2.2 years) of follow-up in 86 patients

BACKGROUND

We previously reported on the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) and (twice) weekly pegvisomant (PEG-V) in acromegaly and improvement after the addition of PEG-V to long-acting SSA.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term safety in a larger group of acromegalic patients over a larger period of time: 29.2 (1.2-57.4) months (mean (range)).

DESIGN

Pegvisomant was added to SSA monotherapy in 86 subjects (37 females), to normalize serum IGF1 concentrations (n=63) or to increase the QoL. The median dosage was 60.0 (20-200) mg weekly.

RESULTS

After a mean treatment period of 29.2 months, 23 patients showed dose-independent PEG-V related transient liver enzyme elevations (TLEE). TLEE occurred only once during the continuation of combination therapy, but discontinuation and re-challenge induced a second episode of TLEE. Ten of these patients with TLEE also suffered from diabetes mellitus (DM). In our present series, DM had a 2.28 odds ratio (CI 1.16-9.22; p=0.03) higher risk for developing TLEE. During the combined therapy, a clinical significant decrease in tumor size by more than 20% was observed in 14 patients. Two of these patients were previously treated by pituitary surgery, 1 with additional radiotherapy and all other patients received primary medical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Long-term combined treatment with SSA and twice weekly PEG-V up to more than 4 years seems to be safe. Patients with both acromegaly and DM have a 2.28 higher risk of developing TLEE. Clinical significant tumor shrinkage was observed in 14 patients during combined treatment.

Growth hormone excess and the development of growth hormone receptor antagonists

In 1990, a single amino acid substitution in the growth hormone (GH) gene at position 119 was found to transform the consequent protein from an agonist to an antagonist at the growth hormone receptor (GHR). Further amino acid substitutions plus prolongation of the half-life of the protein by pegylation resulted in the first clinically effective GHR antagonist, pegvisomant. Following extensive clinical trials, this medication has emerged as the most efficacious therapy for treatment-resistant acromegaly. Subsequent advances in our understanding of GH-GHR interactions and downstream GH signalling pathways suggest that pegvisomant binds to preformed GHR dimers and prevents rotational changes within the receptor-GH complex necessary for intracellular signalling to occur. This article reviews the discovery of pegvisomant, from initial experimental data to successful licensing of the drug for treatment-resistant acromegaly, and discusses its other potential therapeutic uses in diseases with abnormalities in the GH-IGF-I axis.

Medical therapy: options and uses

Since the initial use of medical treatment for acromegaly, several advances have been made in the understanding of the pathophysiology of growth hormone producing tumors, resulting in the development of multiple medical options and novel treatments. Currently there are three major classes of medication available for the treatment of acromegaly: somatostatin receptor ligands, growth hormone receptor antagonists, and dopamine agonists. Somatostatin receptor ligands are the treatment of choice for acromegaly due to their effectiveness in controlling growth hormone excess in approximately 60% of patients and their beneficial effects on tumor volume. Clinical trials have demonstrated efficacy of pegvisomant in up to 97% of patients, but long term data and safety have yet to be established. Dopamine agonists are inexpensive, but their use is hampered by their lack of efficacy compared to other medications. Medical therapy has an established role as adjuvant therapy after non-curative surgery, as well as primary therapy for selected patients unsuitable for surgical resection. Medical treatment to control growth hormone hypersecretion is often needed after radiation therapy until the effects are evident. Preliminary data suggest a potential role for medical treatment prior to surgical resection, surgical debulking to improve medical efficacy, and combination therapy with multiple medications from the three classes. More studies are required, however, to validate the utility of these approaches in treating acromegaly. With the available therapies, disease control can be achieved in nearly all patients with acromegaly.

Acromegaly

Acromegaly is caused by growth hormone hypersecretion, mostly from a pituitary adenoma, driving insulin-like growth factor 1 overproduction. Manifestations include skeletal and soft tissue growth and deformities; and cardiac, respiratory, neuromuscular, endocrine, and metabolic complications. Increased morbidity and mortality require early and tight disease control. Surgery is the treatment of choice for microadenomas and well-defined intrasellar macroadenomas. Complete resection of large and invasive macroadenomas rarely is achieved; hence, their low rate of disease remission. Pharmacologic treatments, including long-acting somatostatin analogs, dopamine agonists, and growth hormone receptor antagonists, have assumed more importance in achieving biochemical and symptomatic disease control.

Long-term efficacy and safety of combined treatment of somatostatin analogs and pegvisomant in acromegaly

BACKGROUND

We previously reported the efficacy of a combined treatment of active acromegaly with both long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSA) and pegvisomant (PEG-V).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess long-term efficacy and safety in a larger group of acromegalic patients after a period of 138 (35-149) wk [median (range)].

DESIGN

PEG-V was added to high-dose SSA treatment in 32 subjects (13 females) who had not shown a normalization in serum IGF-I concentrations during SSA monotherapy. PEG-V dosage was increased until IGF-I concentration normalized. The maximal dose was 80 mg twice weekly.

RESULTS

After dose finding, IGF-I remained within the normal range in all subjects with PEG-V administered once (n = 24) or twice (n = 8) weekly, on a total weekly dose of 60 (40-160) mg. Baseline IGF-I levels were positively correlated with the required dosage of PEG-V (r = 0.48; P = 0.006). PEG-V-dependent liver enzyme disturbances were observed in 11 (6 diabetic) subjects, of which symptomatic gallstones explained two cases. These liver enzyme disturbances were transient in all subjects without discontinuation or dose adaptation of PEG-V. In our series, diabetic patients had a 5.1 times (odds ratio) (confidence interval, 1.02-25.54; P < 0.05) higher risk for developing liver enzyme disturbances. These liver enzyme disturbances seemed to occur earlier. Pituitary adenoma size decreased in four patients. No increase in tumor size was observed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Long-term combined treatment with long-acting SSA and (twice) weekly PEG-V for active acromegaly seems to be effective and safe. Patients with acromegaly and diabetes seem to have a higher risk of developing transient liver enzyme disturbances.