Evaluation of the pharmacological activities of RAD1901, a selective estrogen receptor degrader

Selective steroid receptor modulators, degraders and PROTACs: Therapeutic strategies in management of endocrine-related cancers

Endocrine-related disorders are highly prevalent globally, affecting millions of people. Such diseases are multifactorial in origin and are influenced by the complex interplay of genetics, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Recurring disruptions in the endocrine homeostasis can lead to a cascade of endocrine-related cancers. It is well known that nuclear receptors (NRs), particularly estrogen receptor and androgen receptor malfunctioning promote the oncogenesis of breast cancer and prostate cancer, respectively. However, existing therapeutics against these diseases, including aromatase inhibitors, (anti-) hormonal therapy, etc., often yield limited success, prompting to explore alternative methods of disease management. Additionally, drug resistance is prominent in cancer patients undergoing multidrug therapy. Currently, novel drug design strategies targeting NRs are being implemented for the discovery of a new generation of small molecule modulators, including selective NR modulators (SNuRMs) and degraders (SNuRDs). Moreover, proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) as NR degraders, are also being developed primarily to overcome drug resistance, enhance protein selectivity, and mitigate off-target toxicity. This review highlights recent advancements in SNuRMs and SNuRDs for managing NRs-associated endocrine/metabolic disorders. Furthermore, we discuss the therapeutic potential of PROTAC degraders as a stand-alone strategy for receptor-mediated disease intervention, offering new avenues for precision medicine.

Activation of PERK/eIF2α/ATF4 signaling inhibits ERα expression in breast cancer

Approximately 70-80% of breast cancers rely on estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) for growth. The unfolded protein response (UPR), a cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), is an important process crucial for oncogenic transformation. The effect of ERS on ERα expression and signaling remains incompletely elucidated. Here, we focused on the regulatory mechanisms of ERS on ERα expression in ER-positive breast cancer (ER+ BC). Our results demonstrate that ERα protein and mRNA levels in ER+ BC cells are considerably reduced by the ERS inducers thapsigargin (TG) and brefeldin A (BFA) via the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4 signaling pathway. ChIP-qPCR and luciferase reporter gene analysis revealed that ERS induction facilitated ATF4 binding to the ESR1 (the gene encoding ERα) promoter region, thereby suppressing ESR1 promoter activity and inhibiting ERα expression. Furthermore, selective activation of PERK signaling or ATF4 overexpression attenuated ERα expression and tumor cell growth both in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that ERS suppresses ERα expression transcriptionally via the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4 signaling. Our study provides insights into the treatment of ER+ BC by targeting ERα signaling through selective activation of the PERK branch of the UPR.

Discovery of Palazestrant (OP-1250), a Potent and Orally Bioavailable Complete Estrogen Receptor Antagonist (CERAN) and Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader (SERD)

Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is a leading cause of cancer death in women. Most breast cancer patients are administered estrogen-receptor-targeted endocrine therapies to treat or prevent progressive metastatic disease. Development of endocrine resistance through acquisition of mutations in the estrogen receptor gene, ESR1, that constitutively activate the estrogen receptor leads to relapse. Complete antagonism of both WT and mutant ESR1 (mutESR1) with an oral therapeutic that persistently antagonizes ER-driven oncogenic transcriptional activities is a requirement for efficacy. Here, we describe our discovery of the investigational drug OP-1250 (palazestrant). OP-1250 is a potent complete estrogen receptor antagonist (CERAN) and selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that is active in both WT and mutESR1 breast cancer tumors. OP-1250's effective induction of tumor regression either as a single agent or in combination with a CDK4/6 inhibitor has led to the rapid advancement of this compound into a Phase 3 clinical trial (OPERA-01).

Elacestrant in Women with Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer: Results from the Preoperative Window-of-Opportunity ELIPSE Trial

PURPOSE

Elacestrant has shown significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with standard-of-care endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, whereas potential benefit in early-stage disease requires further exploration. The SOLTI-ELIPSE window-of-opportunity trial investigated the biological changes induced by a short course of preoperative elacestrant in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients with untreated T1c (≥1.5 cm)-T3, N0, ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer with locally assessed Ki67 ≥10% received elacestrant at a daily dose of 345 mg for 4 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was complete cell cycle arrest, defined as Ki67 ≤2.7%, on day 28.

RESULTS

Overall, 22 patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Elacestrant was associated with a complete cell cycle arrest rate of 27.3% and a statistically significant Ki67 geometric mean change of -52.9% (P = 0.007; 95% confidence interval, -67.4 to -32.1). Notably, the treatment with elacestrant led to a shift toward a more endocrine-sensitive and less proliferative tumor phenotype based on PAM50-based gene signatures. Elacestrant increased the expression of immune-response genes (GZMB, CD4, and CD8A) and suppressed proliferation and estrogen-signaling genes (MKI67, ESR1, and AR). These biological changes were independent of the levels of Ki67 suppression on day 28. The most common adverse events were grade 1 anemia (21.7%), hot flushes (8.7%), constipation (8.7%), and abdominal pain (8.7%). One patient experienced a grade 3 cutaneous rash, leading to treatment discontinuation. No other serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative treatment with elacestrant in early breast cancer demonstrated relevant biological and molecular responses and exhibited a manageable safety profile. These findings support further investigation of elacestrant in the early setting.

Post-marketing safety of elacestrant in breast cancer: a pharmacovigilance investigation using the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration approved a new oral selective estrogen receptor downregulator for breast cancer, namely, elacestrant (Orserdu). This study aimed to analyze the signals of adverse events (AEs) within the introduction of elacestrant to the market using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

Reports on the AEs of elacestrant after its marketing were obtained from the FAERS database. Disproportionality was analyzed using the reporting odds ratio to calculate the magnitude of the risk of the target drug and the AE combination, and the proportional reporting ratio to quantify the strength of the association between the drug and the AEs.

RESULTS

A total of 3132 reports on elacestrant-related AEs were obtained, with disease progression, drug ineffectiveness, product dose omission, arthralgia, asthenia, increased tumor marker levels, and bone pain (Number of reported cases (a) ≥ 3 and lower limit of 95% confidence interval >1) being the high-frequency events not mentioned on the drug label. The top three total frequencies at the system organ class level comprised general disorders and administration site conditions, gastrointestinal disorders, and musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

FAERS data analyses were conducted to evaluate the safety of post-marketing clinical use of elacestrant and to ensure that physicians identify the risk factors for the AEs of this drug.

Elacestrant in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a post-hoc analysis

Background

Breast cancer is a leading cause of mortality in women. Hormone therapy plays a crucial role in treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Elacestrant is a selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that has shown promise in early-phase clinical trials. This post-hoc analysis systematically evaluates elacestrant's effectiveness in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients, providing insights into its efficacy, safety, and potential advantages over existing treatments.

Methods

We adhered to the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines and systematically searched the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science, and Embase. We conducted the post-hoc analysis using R software (V 4.3.3), applying the inverse variance method and the DerSimonian-Laird estimator to pool effect estimates with a random-effects model. We assessed heterogeneity using the Cochran's Q test and the I 2 statistic.

Results

Our post-hoc analysis encompassed 3 clinical trials and a total of 835 participants. The mean age of all 835 participants across the three trials was 59.5 years (95% CI: 58.7-60.3). The pooled progression-free survival (PFS)-was estimated at 4.38 (95% CI: -7.58-16.35, P = 0.47), and the pooled objective response rate (ORR) was 7% (95% CI: 2-18%, P = 0.04), with significant heterogeneity observed among the studies.

Discussion

Elacestrant shows promise for improving outcomes in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer, but further research is needed to confirm its effectiveness. Future studies should include larger sample sizes, comprehensive phase II and III trials, and investigation of elacestrant in combination with other drugs or in preoperative settings.

Interaction between Estrogen Receptors and p53: A Broader Role for Tamoxifen?

Tamoxifen is one of the most widely used anticancer drugs in the world. It is a safe drug with generally well-tolerated side effects and has been prescribed for the treatment of early-stage and advanced-stage or metastatic estrogen receptor α (ERα/ESR1)-positive breast cancer. Tamoxifen therapy also provides a 38% reduction of the risk of developing breast cancer in women at high risk. With the advent of newer medications targeting ERα-positive breast cancer, tamoxifen is now mainly used as adjuvant therapy for lower-risk premenopausal breast cancer and cancer prevention. It is widely accepted that tamoxifen as a selective estrogen receptor modulator exerts its therapeutic effect by competitively binding to ERα, leading to the recruitment of corepressors and inhibition of transcription of genes involved in the proliferation of breast cancer epithelium. As such, expression of ERα in breast tumors has been considered necessary for tumors to be responsive to tamoxifen therapy. However, ERα-independent effects of tamoxifen in various in vitro and in vivo contexts have been reported over the years. Importantly, the recent discovery that ERα and estrogen receptor β (ERβ/ESR2) can bind tumor suppressor protein p53 with functional consequences has provided new insights into the mechanisms underlying response to tamoxifen therapy and resistance. Furthermore, these findings have paved the way for broadening the use of tamoxifen by potentially repurposing it to treat triple negative (negative for ERα, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and progesterone receptor) breast cancer. Herein, we summarize these developments and discuss their mechanistic underpinnings and clinical implications.

Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders for breast cancer treatment: focus on pharmacological differences

PURPOSE

The management of hormone receptor-positive (HR +) breast cancer (BC) relies on endocrine therapy (ET), with a primary focus on disrupting estrogen receptor (ER) signaling due to its critical role in BC tumorigenesis and progression. While effective for both early-stage and advanced breast cancers, ET frequently encounters resistance mechanisms, including both ligand-dependent and ligand-independent trajectories, ultimately leading to disease progression.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus databases to review the current evidence on the use of novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) for the treatment of HR+ BC.

CONCLUSIONS

Somatic activating mutations of the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) gene are known to sustain ER activity, boost ER-dependent gene transcription, and foster resistance to ET. The most significant gap remains after treatment failure with ET and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, where fulvestrant monotherapy typically results in a median progression-free survival of 2-3 months. Novel compounds, including oral SERDs, have been explored for their potential to overcome therapeutic resistance, both as monotherapy and in combination with other targeted therapies. Herein, we provide an overview on the latest findings on oral SERDs, examining their mechanism of action, safety data, and pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics profiles.

Mitoxantrone inhibits and downregulates ER α through binding at the DBD-LBD interface

Targeting the estrogen receptor (ER or ERα) through competitive antagonists, receptor downregulators, or estrogen synthesis inhibition remains the primary therapeutic strategy for luminal breast cancer. We have identified a novel mechanism of ER inhibition by targeting the critical interface between its DNA-binding domain (DBD) and ligand-binding domain (LBD). We demonstrate that mitoxantrone (MTO), a topoisomerase II inhibitor, binds at this previously unexplored DBD-LBD interface. Using comprehensive computational, biophysical, biochemical, and cellular analyses, we show that independent of its DNA damage response activity, MTO binding induces distinct conformational changes in ER, leading to its cytoplasmic redistribution and subsequent proteasomal degradation. Notably, MTO effectively inhibits clinically relevant ER mutations (Y537S and D538G) that confer resistance to current endocrine therapies, outperforming fulvestrant in both in vitro and in vivo assays. Our findings establish domain-domain interaction targeting as a viable therapeutic strategy for ER, with translational implications for other nuclear receptors.

The EstroGene2.0 database for endocrine therapy response and resistance in breast cancer

Endocrine therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) are the cornerstone to treat ER-positive breast cancers patients, but resistance often limits their effectiveness. Notable progress has been made although the fragmented way data is reported has reduced their potential impact. Here, we introduce EstroGene2.0, an expanded database of its precursor 1.0 version. EstroGene2.0 focusses on response and resistance to endocrine therapies in breast cancer models. Incorporating multi-omic profiling of 361 experiments from 212 studies across 28 cell lines, a user-friendly browser offers comprehensive data visualization and metadata mining capabilities ( https://estrogeneii.web.app/ ). Taking advantage of the harmonized data collection, our follow-up meta-analysis revealed transcriptomic landscape and substantial diversity in response to different classes of ER modulators. Endocrine-resistant models exhibit a spectrum of transcriptomic alterations including a contra-directional shift in ER and interferon signalings, which is recapitulated clinically. Dissecting multiple ESR1-mutant cell models revealed the different clinical relevance of cell model engineering and identified high-confidence mutant-ER targets, such as NPY1R. These examples demonstrate how EstroGene2.0 helps investigate breast cancer's response to endocrine therapies and explore resistance mechanisms.

Elacestrant in the treatment landscape of ER-positive, HER2-negative, ESR1-mutated advanced breast cancer: a contemporary narrative review

Introduction

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer with ESR1 mutations presents a significant therapeutic challenge due to its adaptive resistance mechanisms to chemotherapy, especially endocrine treatment. Elacestrant, a novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), has emerged as a promising agent in this treatment-resistant era.

Method

A comprehensive search was conducted on pivotal clinical trials, including the RAD1901-005 Trial, EMERALD TRIAL, ELIPSE, and ELEVATE, focusing on their methodologies, patient populations, treatment regimens, and outcomes.

Discussion

This narrative review describes the available preclinical and clinical evidence on elacestrant, focusing on its pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety within the existing literature. Elacestrant has demonstrated excellent activity against ESR1 mutations associated with resistance to first-line endocrine therapies. Clinical trials have shown improved progression-free survival in patients with advanced ER+/HER2-, ESR1-mutated breast cancer. Safety profiles indicate a tolerable side effect spectrum consistent with other agents. Its oral bioavailability offers a convenient alternative to injectable SERDs, with potential implications for patient adherence and quality of life. The review also discusses the comparative efficacy of elacestrant relative to existing endocrine therapies and its possible use in combination regimens.

Conclusion

Ongoing clinical trials assessing elacestrant and other SERDs will yield data that might aid clinicians in determining the optimal selection and order of endocrine treatment drugs for ER+ breast cancer. The integration of targeted and immunotherapeutic agents with traditional chemotherapy represents a pivotal shift in Breast Cancer treatment, moving towards more personalized and effective regimens.

EstroGene2.0: A multi-omic database of response to estrogens, ER-modulators, and resistance to endocrine therapies in breast cancer

Endocrine therapies targeting the estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1) are the cornerstone to treat ER-positive breast cancers patients, but resistance often limits their effectiveness. Understanding the molecular mechanisms is thus key to optimize the existing drugs and to develop new ER-modulators. Notable progress has been made although the fragmented way data is reported has reduced their potential impact. Here, we introduce EstroGene2.0, an expanded database of its precursor 1.0 version. EstroGene2.0 focusses on response and resistance to endocrine therapies in breast cancer models. Incorporating multi-omic profiling of 361 experiments from 212 studies across 28 cell lines, a user-friendly browser offers comprehensive data visualization and metadata mining capabilities (https://estrogeneii.web.app/). Taking advantage of the harmonized data collection, our follow-up meta-analysis revealed substantial diversity in response to different classes of ER-modulators including SERMs, SERDs, SERCA and LDD/PROTAC. Notably, endocrine resistant models exhibit a spectrum of transcriptomic alterations including a contra-directional shift in ER and interferon signaling, which is recapitulated clinically. Furthermore, dissecting multiple ESR1-mutant cell models revealed the different clinical relevance of genome-edited versus ectopic overexpression model engineering and identified high-confidence mutant-ER targets, such as NPY1R. These examples demonstrate how EstroGene2.0 helps investigate breast cancer's response to endocrine therapies and explore resistance mechanisms.

Novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) to target hormone receptor positive breast cancer: elacestrant as the poster-child

INTRODUCTION

Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype, and therapeutic management relies primarily on inhibiting ER signaling. In the metastatic setting, ER signaling is typically targeted by selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the latter of which prevent estrogen production. Activating ESR1 mutations are among the most common emergent breast cancer mutations and confer resistance to AIs.

AREAS COVERED

Until 2023, fulvestrant was the only approved SERD; fulvestrant is administered intramuscularly, and in some cases may also have limited efficacy in the setting of certain ESR1 mutations. In 2023, the first oral SERD, elacestrant, was approved for use in ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and represents a new class of therapeutic options. While the initial approval was as monotherapy, ongoing studies are evaluating elacestrant (as well as other oral SERDs) in combination with other therapies including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, which parallels the current combination uses of fulvestrant.

EXPERT OPINION

Elacestrant's recent approval sheds light on the use of biomarkers such as ESR1 to gauge a tumor's endocrine sensitivity. Ongoing therapeutic and correlative biomarker studies will offer new insight and expanding treatment options for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Estrogen Receptor Alpha Mutations, Truncations, Heterodimers, and Therapies

Annual breast cancer (BCa) deaths have declined since its apex in 1989 concomitant with widespread adoption of hormone therapies that target estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), the prominent nuclear receptor expressed in ∼80% of BCa. However, up to ∼50% of patients who are ER+ with high-risk disease experience post endocrine therapy relapse and metastasis to distant organs. The vast majority of BCa mortality occurs in this setting, highlighting the inadequacy of current therapies. Genomic abnormalities to ESR1, the gene encoding ERα, emerge under prolonged selective pressure to enable endocrine therapy resistance. These genetic lesions include focal gene amplifications, hotspot missense mutations in the ligand binding domain, truncations, fusions, and complex interactions with other nuclear receptors. Tumor cells utilize aberrant ERα activity to proliferate, spread, and evade therapy in BCa as well as other cancers. Cutting edge studies on ERα structural and transcriptional relationships are being harnessed to produce new therapies that have shown benefits in patients with ESR1 hotspot mutations. In this review we discuss the history of ERα, current research unlocking unknown aspects of ERα signaling including the structural basis for receptor antagonism, and future directions of ESR1 investigation. In addition, we discuss the development of endocrine therapies from their inception to present day and survey new avenues of drug development to improve pharmaceutical profiles, targeting, and efficacy.

Pharmacological insights on novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders in breast cancer

The therapeutic landscape of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer includes endocrine treatments with aromatase inhibitors (AIs), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs). Fulvestrant is the first approved SERD with proven efficacy and good tolerability in clinical practice. However, drug resistance, low receptor affinity, and parental administration stimulated the search for new oral SERDs opening a new therapeutic era in ER + breast cancer. Elacestrant is an orally bioavailable SERD that has been recently approved by the FDA for postmenopausal women with ER+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1)-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following at least one line of endocrine therapy. Other molecules of the same class currently tested in clinical trials are amcenestrant, giredestrant, camizestrant, and imlunestrant. The current review article offers a detailed pharmacological perspective of this emerging drug class, which may help with their possible future clinical applications.

Targeting systemic and gut microbial metabolism in ER+ breast cancer

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast tumors have a better overall prognosis than ER- tumors; however, there is a sustained risk of recurrence. Mounting evidence indicates that genetic and epigenetic changes associated with resistance impact critical signaling pathways governing cell metabolism. This review delves into recent literature concerning the metabolic pathways regulated in ER+ breast tumors by the availability of nutrients and endocrine therapies and summarizes research on how changes in systemic and gut microbial metabolism can affect ER activity and responsiveness to endocrine therapy. As targeting of metabolic pathways using dietary or pharmacological approaches enters the clinic, we provide an overview of the supporting literature and suggest future directions.

US Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Elacestrant for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative, ESR1-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved elacestrant for the treatment of postmenopausal women or adult men with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-), estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1)-mutated advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression after at least one line of endocrine therapy (ET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Approval was based on EMERALD (Study RAD1901-308), a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter trial in 478 patients with ER+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer, including 228 patients with ESR1 mutations. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either elacestrant 345 mg orally once daily (n = 239) or investigator's choice of ET (n = 239).

RESULTS

In the ESR1-mut subgroup, EMERALD demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review assessment (n = 228; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; P value = .0005). Although the overall survival (OS) end point was not met, there was no trend toward a potential OS detriment (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.30]) in the ESR1-mut subgroup. PFS also reached statistical significance in the intention-to-treat population (ITT, N = 478; HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88]; P value = .0018). However, improvement in PFS in the ITT population was primarily attributed to results from patients in the ESR1-mut subgroup. More patients who received elacestrant experienced nausea, vomiting, and dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSION

The approval of elacestrant in ER+, HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer was restricted to patients with ESR1 mutations. Benefit-risk assessment in the ESR1-mut subgroup was favorable on the basis of a statistically significant improvement in PFS in the context of an acceptable safety profile including no evidence of a potential detriment in OS. By contrast, the benefit-risk assessment in patients without ESR1 mutations was not favorable. Elacestrant is the first oral estrogen receptor antagonist to receive FDA approval for patients with ESR1 mutations.

Palazestrant (OP-1250), A Complete Estrogen Receptor Antagonist, Inhibits Wild-type and Mutant ER-positive Breast Cancer Models as Monotherapy and in Combination

The estrogen receptor (ER) is a well-established target for the treatment of breast cancer, with the majority of patients presenting as ER-positive (ER+). Endocrine therapy is a mainstay of breast cancer treatment but the development of resistance mutations in response to aromatase inhibitors, poor pharmacokinetic properties of fulvestrant, agonist activity of tamoxifen, and limited benefit for elacestrant leave unmet needs for patients with or without resistance mutations in ESR1, the gene that encodes the ER protein. Here we describe palazestrant (OP-1250), a novel, orally bioavailable complete ER antagonist and selective ER degrader. OP-1250, like fulvestrant, has no agonist activity on the ER and completely blocks estrogen-induced transcriptional activity. In addition, OP-1250 demonstrates favorable biochemical binding affinity, ER degradation, and antiproliferative activity in ER+ breast cancer models that is comparable or superior to other agents of interest. OP-1250 has superior pharmacokinetic properties relative to fulvestrant, including oral bioavailability and brain penetrance, as well as superior performance in wild-type and ESR1-mutant breast cancer xenograft studies. OP-1250 combines well with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors in xenograft studies of ER+ breast cancer models and effectively shrinks intracranially implanted tumors, resulting in prolonged animal survival. With demonstrated preclinical efficacy exceeding fulvestrant in wild-type models, elacestrant in ESR1-mutant models, and tamoxifen in intracranial xenografts, OP-1250 has the potential to benefit patients with ER+ breast cancer.

A novel scaffold long-acting selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader with superior preclinical profile against ER+ breast cancer

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women worldwide, with the majority of cases showing expression of estrogen receptors (ERs). Although drugs targeting ER have significantly improved survival rates in ER-positive patients, drug resistance remains an unmet clinical need. Fulvestrant, which overcomes selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) and AI (aromatase inhibitor) resistance, is currently the only long-acting selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) approved for both first and second-line settings. However, it fails to achieve satisfactory efficacy due to its poor solubility. Therefore, we designed and synthesized a series of novel scaffold (THC) derivatives, identifying their activities as ER antagonists and degraders. G-5b, the optimal compound, exhibited binding, antagonistic, degradation or anti-proliferative activities comparable to fulvestrant in ER+ wild type and mutants breast cancer cells. Notably, G-5b showed considerably improved stability and solubility. Research into the underlying mechanism indicated that G-5b engaged the proteasome pathway to degrade ER, subsequently inhibiting the ER signaling pathway and leading to the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest events. Furthermore, G-5b displayed superior in vivo pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties, coupled with a favorable safety profile in the MCF-7 tamoxifen-resistant (MCF-7/TR) tumor xenograft model. Collectively, G-5b has emerged as a highly promising lead compound, offering potent antagonistic and degradation activities, positioning it as a novel long-acting SERD worthy of further refinement and optimization.

The Next-Generation Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader Camizestrant (AZD9833) Suppresses ER+ Breast Cancer Growth and Overcomes Endocrine and CDK4/6 Inhibitor Resistance

Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERD) could become the backbone of endocrine therapy (ET) for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer, as they achieve greater inhibition of ER-driven cancers than current ETs and overcome key resistance mechanisms. In this study, we evaluated the preclinical pharmacology and efficacy of the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant (AZD9833) and assessed ER-co-targeting strategies by combining camizestrant with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR-targeted therapy in models of progression on CDK4/6i and/or ET. Camizestrant demonstrated robust and selective ER degradation, modulated ER-regulated gene expression, and induced complete ER antagonism and significant antiproliferation activity in ESR1 wild-type (ESR1wt) and mutant (ESR1m) breast cancer cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Camizestrant also delivered strong antitumor activity in fulvestrant-resistant ESR1wt and ESR1m PDX models. Evaluation of camizestrant in combination with CDK4/6i (palbociclib or abemaciclib) in CDK4/6-naive and -resistant models, as well as in combination with PI3Kαi (alpelisib), mTORi (everolimus), or AKTi (capivasertib), indicated that camizestrant was active with CDK4/6i or PI3K/AKT/mTORi and that antitumor activity was further increased by the triple combination. The response was observed independently of PI3K pathway mutation status. Overall, camizestrant shows strong and broad antitumor activity in ER+ breast cancer as a monotherapy and when combined with CDK4/6i and PI3K/AKT/mTORi.

SIGNIFICANCE

Camizestrant, a next-generation oral SERD, shows promise in preclinical models of ER+ breast cancer alone and in combination with CDK4/6 and PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors to address endocrine resistance, a current barrier to treatment.

Therapeutic resistance to anti-oestrogen therapy in breast cancer

The hormone receptor oestrogen receptor-α (ER) orchestrates physiological mammary gland development, breast carcinogenesis and the progression of breast tumours into lethal, treatment-refractory systemic disease. Selective antagonism of ER signalling has been one of the most successful therapeutic approaches in oncology, benefiting patients as both a cancer preventative measure and a cancer treatment strategy. However, resistance to anti-oestrogen therapy is a major clinical challenge. Over the past decade, we have gained an understanding of how breast cancers evolve under the pressure of anti-oestrogen therapy. This is best depicted by the case of oestrogen-independent mutations in the gene encoding ER (ESR1), which are virtually absent in primary breast cancer but highly prevalent (20-40%) in anti-oestrogen-treated metastatic disease. These and other findings highlight the 'evolvability' of ER+ breast cancer and the need to understand molecular processes by which this evolution occurs. Recent development and approval of next-generation ER antagonists to target ESR1-mutant breast cancer underscores the clinical importance of this evolvability and sets a new paradigm for the treatment of ER+ breast cancers.

Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of elacestrant

Elacestrant, a novel oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader (SERD), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on January 27, 2023, for use in patients with ER and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer whose tumors harbor an ESR1 missense mutation (ESR1-mut), after at least one line of endocrine therapy (ET). The FDA made its decision based on the randomized phase 3 EMERALD trial, which met its primary endpoint of improved median progression-free survival (mPFS) with elacestrant monotherapy versus standard-of-care endocrine monotherapy in the overall intention to treat population; however, this benefit was largely driven by the ESR1-mut cohort. Elacestrant is a dose-dependent mixed ER agonist/antagonist, which at high doses acts as a direct ER antagonist as well as selective downregulator of ER. It is 11% bioavailable, primarily metabolized by CYP3A4 in the liver and excreted in feces. This leads to drug-drug interactions with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers, such as itraconazole and rifampin, respectively. In accordance with its clearance route, dose reduction is recommended in patients with moderate hepatic dysfunction but not in renal dysfunction. Studies evaluating elacestrant in severe hepatic dysfunction as well as in patients from racial and ethnic minority groups are ongoing. Overall, elacestrant is the first orally bioavailable SERD approved by the FDA for use in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Current clinical trials are ongoing evaluating it in the adjuvant setting in patients with early stage ER-positive breast cancers.

Novel Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Agents for Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

It has become clear that patients whose cancers have progressed post-CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy (CDK4/6i) are not deriving the same magnitude of benefit to subsequent standard endocrine therapy as historical studies would suggest. For example, anticipated duration of benefit to fulvestrant prior to CDK4/6i historically was ~ 5-6 months, and data from the VERONICA and EMERALD trials report less than 2 months. This has magnified our need for novel endocrine agents. Some have argued that patients post-CDK4/6i may just have more endocrine-resistant tumors and perhaps should just receive chemotherapy. While this may be appropriate for some, we do not currently have an assay that reliably predicts whose cancers remain endocrine sensitive and whose are endocrine resistant. ESR1 mutations can enrich for patients whose tumors are more likely to be heavily dependent on estrogen, but this is certainly not the whole answer and many patients without ESR1 mutations continue to derive benefit from subsequent endocrine agents. Most patients would strongly prefer the side effect profile of endocrine agents compared to chemotherapy, and thus, premature use of cytotoxic agents when subsequent ER targeting can control disease is not preferred. These novel ER targeting agents (PROTAC, SERD, SERCA, CERAN) hold great promise to not only outperform standard agents like fulvestrant, but also offer the promise of agents with a different side effect profile that may be more advantageous when compared to menopausal symptoms, hot flashes, arthralgias, and sexual side effects so commonly seen with AIs. We also are likely to see these novel agents move to earlier lines, whether that be 1st line in combination with CDK4/6i or even adjuvant disease.

Targeting the Estrogen Receptor for the Treatment of Breast Cancer: Recent Advances and Challenges

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is a well-established therapeutic target for the treatment of ER-positive (ER+) breast cancers. Despite the tremendous successes achieved with tamoxifen, a selective ER modulator, and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), resistance to these therapies is a major clinical problem. Therefore, induced protein degradation and covalent inhibition have been pursued as new therapeutic approaches to target ERα. This Perspective summarizes recent progress in the discovery and development of oral selective ER degraders (SERDs), complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs), selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists (SERCAs), and proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) ER degraders. We focus on those compounds which have been advanced into clinical development.

Selective Estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) for the treatment of breast cancer: An overview

Discovery of SERDs has changed the direction of anticancer research, as more than 70% of breast cancer cases are estrogen receptor positive (ER+). Therapies such as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) and aromatase inhibitors (AI's) have been effective, but due to endocrine resistance, SERDs are now considered essential therapeutics for the treatment of ER+ breast cancer. The present review deliberates the pathophysiology of SERDs from the literature covering various molecules in clinical trials. Estrogen receptors active sites distinguishing characteristics and interactions with currently available FDA-approved drugs have also been discussed. Designing strategy of previously reported SERDs, their SAR analysis, in silico, and the biological efficacy have also been summarized along with appropriate examples.

Novel endocrine therapies: What is next in estrogen receptor positive, HER2 negative breast cancer?

Endocrine therapy (ET) is the cornerstone of management in hormone receptor (HR)+ breast cancer (BC). Indeed, targeting the estrogen receptor (ER) signaling at different levels is a successful strategy, since BC largely relies on the ER signaling as a driver of tumorigenesis and progression. In metastatic BC, progression of disease typically occurs due to either ligand-independent ER signaling, which favors tumor proliferation and survival in the absence of hormonal stimuli, or an ER-independent signaling, which exploits alternative transcription pathways. For instance, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations induce constitutive ER activity, in turn upregulating ER-dependent gene transcription and causing resistance to estrogen depleting therapies. The largest unmet need lies after progression on ET + cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, where fulvestrant alone provides an average 2-3-month PFS. In this context, novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) and other next-generation ETs are being investigated, both as single agents and in combination with targeted therapies. Elacestrant, the next generation ET in most advanced clinical development and the first to be FDA approved, demonstrated improved outcomes compared to standard ETs in ET pre-treated HR+/HER2- metastatic BC in the phase 3 EMERALD clinical trial. Additionally, other agents are showing promising results in both preclinical and early phase clinical settings. In this review, emerging data related to oral SERDs and other novel ETs in managing HR+/HER2- BC are presented. Major challenges and future perspectives related to the optimal sequence of therapeutic options and the molecular landscape of endocrine resistance are also provided.

An emerging generation of endocrine therapies in breast cancer: a clinical perspective

Anti-estrogen therapy is a key component of the treatment of both early and advanced-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. This review discusses the recent emergence of several anti-estrogen therapies, some of which were designed to overcome common mechanisms of endocrine resistance. The new generation of drugs includes selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), orally administered selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), as well as more unique agents such as complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs), proteolysis targeting chimeric (PROTACs), and selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists (SERCAs). These drugs are at various stages of development and are being evaluated in both early and metastatic settings. We discuss the efficacy, toxicity profile, and completed and ongoing clinical trials for each drug and highlight key differences in their activity and study population that have ultimately influenced their advancement.

Elacestrant: First Approval

Elacestrant (ORSERDU™) is an orally available selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) being developed by Stemline Therapeutics, a subsidiary of Menarini Group, for the treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. In January 2023, elacestrant received its first approval for the treatment of postmenopausal women or adult men with ER-positive, HER2-negative, estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1)-mutated (as determined by a US FDA-approved test) advanced or metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following ≥ 1 line of endocrine therapy in the USA. A regulatory assessment of elacestrant for the treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer is currently underway in the EU. Development of elacestrant for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms has been discontinued. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of elacestrant leading to this first approval for this indication.

Design of SERENA-6, a phase III switching trial of camizestrant in ESR1-mutant breast cancer during first-line treatment

ESR1 mutation (ESR1m) is a frequent cause of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), which is a first-line therapy for hormone-receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Camizestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that in a phase II study significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) over fulvestrant (also a SERD) in ER+/HER2- ABC. SERENA-6 (NCT04964934) is a randomized, double-blind, phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of switching from an AI to camizestrant, while maintaining the same CDK4/6i, upon detection of ESR1m in circulating tumor DNA before clinical disease progression on first-line therapy for HR+/HER2- ABC. The aim is to treat ESR1m clones and extend the duration of control of ER-driven tumor growth, delaying the need for chemotherapy. The primary end point is PFS; secondary end points include chemotherapy-free survival, time to second progression event (PFS2), overall survival, patient-reported outcomes and safety.

Evaluating Elacestrant in the Management of ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Evidence to Date

Breast cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer mortality in women. Endocrine therapy is the backbone treatment for hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, the most common subtype. Although several endocrine therapy agents are available, essentially all HR-positive metastatic breast cancers will become resistant to these drugs. ESR1 mutations represent an important mechanism of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Elacestrant is a novel oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) that selectively binds to the estrogen receptor in breast cancer cells, inhibiting tumor growth. Preclinical data suggested greater efficacy of elacestrant in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) or everolimus. In a Phase III clinical trial, elacestrant demonstrated a significant although modest improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to standard of care endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Importantly, there was also a significant benefit in patients with ESR1 mutations, which led to the FDA approval of elacestrant in this patient group. Elacestrant was generally well tolerated, with main side effects being upper gastrointestinal symptoms. There are several ongoing clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of elacestrant in the early setting as well as in combination with other targeted agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Other novel oral SERDs are also currently being evaluated in the treatment of HR-positive breast cancer. Results of ongoing clinical trials with these drugs will help clinicians decide the best sequence and combination of endocrine therapy agents.

Unconventional isoquinoline-based SERMs elicit fulvestrant-like transcriptional programs in ER+ breast cancer cells

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is a ligand-dependent master transcriptional regulator and key driver of breast cancer pathology. Small molecule hormones and competitive antagonists favor unique ERα conformational ensembles that elicit ligand-specific transcriptional programs in breast cancer and other hormone-responsive tissues. By affecting disparate ligand binding domain structural features, unconventional ligand scaffolds can redirect ERα genomic binding patterns to engage novel therapeutic transcriptional programs. To improve our understanding of these ERα structure-transcriptional relationships, we develop a series of chemically unconventional antagonists based on the antiestrogens elacestrant and lasofoxifene. High-resolution x-ray co-crystal structures show that these molecules affect both classical and unique structural motifs within the ERα ligand binding pocket. They show moderately reduced antagonistic potencies on ERα genomic activities but are effective anti-proliferative agents in luminal breast cancer cells. Interestingly, they favor a 4-hydroxytamoxifen-like accumulation of ERα in breast cancer cells but lack uterotrophic activities in an endometrial cell line. Importantly, RNA sequencing shows that the lead molecules engage transcriptional pathways similar to the selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant. This advance shows that fulvestrant-like genomic activities can be achieved without affecting ERα accumulation in breast cancer cells.

Integrating new oral selective oestrogen receptor degraders in the breast cancer treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Oral SERDs are under extensive development to overcome fulvestrant main limitations, including intramuscular-only formulation and poor performance in early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer. This review summarizes the most relevant evidence published so far and envisions the potential integration of oral SERDs in the therapeutic algorithm of HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Amcenestrant and giredestrant, two of the most promising oral SERDs, recently failed to show a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pivotal trials. Conversely, elacestrant demonstrated significant PFS superiority over standard-of-care endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors or fulvestrant) in MBC. Additionally, it did not show unusual side effects observed with other oral SERDs, like bradycardia, hematotoxicity and vision impairment, and proved to be effective also in case of ESR1 -mutant endocrine-resistant breast cancer. Combination trials of oral SERDs with target agents, such as CDK4/6-inhibitors, are ongoing. Finally, some window-of-opportunity trials showed promising on-target activity in early-stage for this drug class.

SUMMARY

Promising results from early-phase trials are not translating into sufficient clinical benefit in pivotal trials of main oral SERDs in monotherapy, except for elacestrant. Whether oral SERDs might become the backbone for combination strategies in MBC or the preferred (neo)adjuvant endocrine agents is under evaluation.

Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial

PURPOSE

Patients with pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer have poor prognosis. Elacestrant is a novel, oral selective ER degrader that demonstrated activity in early studies.

METHODS

This randomized, open-label, phase III trial enrolled patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had one-two lines of endocrine therapy, required pretreatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and ≤ 1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily or standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review in all patients and patients with detectable ESR1 mutations.

RESULTS

Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant (n = 239) or SOC (n = 238). ESR1 mutation was detected in 47.8% of patients, and 43.4% received two prior endocrine therapies. PFS was prolonged in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P = .002) and patients with ESR1 mutation (hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P = .0005). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.2% receiving elacestrant and 3.1% receiving SOC. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were 3.4% in the elacestrant arm versus 0.9% in SOC. Nausea of any grade occurred in 35.0% receiving elacestrant and 18.8% receiving SOC (grade 3/4, 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Elacestrant is the first oral selective ER degrader demonstrating a significant PFS improvement versus SOC both in the overall population and in patients with ESR1 mutations with manageable safety in a phase III trial for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Accelerating drug development in breast cancer: New frontiers for ER inhibition

The estrogen receptor (ER) is an important driver in the proliferation, tumorigenesis, and progression of breast cancers, and targeting ER signaling at different levels is a successful strategy in the control of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. Endocrine therapy has been the treatment of choice for HR+ breast cancer in the early and advanced stages with multiple agents, including selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMS), selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), which vary in their mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetics. Combination strategies also employ cyclin dependent kinase 4 and 6 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to maximize the benefits of endocrine therapy. This paper reviews the clinical development of SERDs and other novel ER inhibitors, as well as combination strategies to overcome mechanisms of ER pathway escape. It also assesses the advantages of newer oral ER inhibitors with increased bioavailability, improved therapeutic index, better administration, and increased efficacy, as well as discussing future directions in the field.

Stereospecific lasofoxifene derivatives reveal the interplay between estrogen receptor alpha stability and antagonistic activity in ESR1 mutant breast cancer cells

Chemical manipulation of estrogen receptor alpha ligand binding domain structural mobility tunes receptor lifetime and influences breast cancer therapeutic activities. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) extend estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) cellular lifetime/accumulation. They are antagonists in the breast but agonists in the uterine epithelium and/or in bone. Selective estrogen receptor degraders/downregulators (SERDs) reduce ERα cellular lifetime/accumulation and are pure antagonists. Activating somatic ESR1 mutations Y537S and D538G enable resistance to first-line endocrine therapies. SERDs have shown significant activities in ESR1 mutant setting while few SERMs have been studied. To understand whether chemical manipulation of ERα cellular lifetime and accumulation influences antagonistic activity, we studied a series of methylpyrollidine lasofoxifene (Laso) derivatives that maintained the drug’s antagonistic activities while uniquely tuning ERα cellular accumulation. These molecules were examined alongside a panel of antiestrogens in live cell assays of ERα cellular accumulation, lifetime, SUMOylation, and transcriptional antagonism. High-resolution x-ray crystal structures of WT and Y537S ERα ligand binding domain in complex with the methylated Laso derivatives or representative SERMs and SERDs show that molecules that favor a highly buried helix 12 antagonist conformation achieve the greatest transcriptional suppression activities in breast cancer cells harboring WT/Y537S ESR1. Together these results show that chemical reduction of ERα cellular lifetime is not necessarily the most crucial parameter for transcriptional antagonism in ESR1 mutated breast cancer cells. Importantly, our studies show how small chemical differences within a scaffold series can provide compounds with similar antagonistic activities, but with greatly different effects of the cellular lifetime of the ERα, which is crucial for achieving desired SERM or SERD profiles.

Endocrine resistance in breast cancer: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER +) breast cancer accounts for approximately 75% of all breast cancers. Endocrine therapies, including selective ER modulators (SERMs), aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and selective ER down-regulators (SERDs) provide substantial clinical benefit by reducing the risk of disease recurrence and mortality. However, resistance to endocrine therapies represents a major challenge, limiting the success of ER + breast cancer treatment. Mechanisms of endocrine resistance involve alterations in ER signaling via modulation of ER (e.g., ER downregulation, ESR1 mutations or fusions); alterations in ER coactivators/corepressors, transcription factors (TFs), nuclear receptors and epigenetic modulators; regulation of signaling pathways; modulation of cell cycle regulators; stress signaling; and alterations in tumor microenvironment, nutrient stress, and metabolic regulation. Current therapeutic strategies to improve outcome of endocrine-resistant patients in clinics include inhibitors against mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6, and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) subunit, p110α. Preclinical studies reveal novel therapeutic targets, some of which are currently tested in clinical trials as single agents or in combination with endocrine therapies, such as ER partial agonists, ER proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), next-generation SERDs, AKT inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor 1 and 2 (EGFR/HER2) dual inhibitors, HER2 targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. In this review, we summarize the established and emerging mechanisms of endocrine resistance, alterations during metastatic recurrence, and discuss the approved therapies and ongoing clinical trials testing the combination of novel targeted therapies with endocrine therapy in endocrine-resistant ER + breast cancer patients.

Latest generation estrogen receptor degraders for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) and full receptor antagonist provides an important therapeutic option for hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. Endocrine therapies include tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), that exhibits receptor agonist and antagonist activity, and aromatase inhibitors that block estrogen biosynthesis but which demonstrate acquired resistance. Fulvestrant, the only currently approved SERD, is limited by poor drug-like properties. A key focus for improving disease management has been development of oral SERDs with optimized target occupancy and potency and superior clinical efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

Using PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, and congress websites, this review explored the preclinical development and clinical pharmacokinetics from early phase clinical studies (2015 or later) of novel oral SERDs, including giredestrant, amcenestrant, camizestrant, elacestrant, and rintodestrant.

EXPERT OPINION

Numerous oral SERDs are in clinical development, aiming to form the core endocrine therapy for HR-positive breast cancer. Through property- and structure-based drug design of estrogen receptor-binding, antagonism, degradation, anti-proliferation, and pharmacokinetic properties, these SERDs have distinct profiles which impact clinical dosing, efficacy, and safety. Assuming preliminary safety and activity data are confirmed in phase 3 trials, these promising agents could further improve the management, outcomes, and quality of life in HR-positive breast cancer.

Benzothiophene derivatives as selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists: Design, synthesis and anti-ERα activities

Estrogen receptor α emerged as a well validated therapeutic target of breast cancer for decades. However, approximately 50% of patients who initially responding to standard-of-care (SoC), such as undergo therapy of Tamoxifen, generally inevitably progress to an endocrine-resistance ER+ phenotype. Recently, selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists (SERCAs) targeted to ERα have been demonstrated as a therapeutic alternative. In the present study, series of novel 6-OH-benzothiophene (BT) derivatives targeting ERα and deriving from Raloxifene were designed, synthesized, and biologically evaluated as covalent antagonists. Driven by the antiproliferative efficacy in ER+ breast cancer cells, our chemical optimization finally led to compound 19d that with potent antagonistic activity in ER+ tumor cells while without agonistic activity in endometrial cells. Moreover, the docking simulation was carried out to elucidate the binding mode, revealing 19d as an antagonist and covalently binding to the cysteine residue at the 530 position of ER helix H11.

A small-molecule activator of the unfolded protein response eradicates human breast tumors in mice

Metastatic estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive breast cancer is presently incurable. Seeking to target these drug-resistant cancers, we report the discovery of a compound, called ErSO, that activates the anticipatory unfolded protein response (a-UPR) and induces rapid and selective necrosis of ERα-positive breast cancer cell lines in vitro. We then tested ErSO in vivo in several preclinical orthotopic and metastasis mouse models carrying different xenografts of human breast cancer lines or patient-derived breast tumors. In multiple orthotopic models, ErSO treatment given either orally or intraperitoneally for 14 to 21 days induced tumor regression without recurrence. In a cell line tail vein metastasis model, ErSO was also effective at inducing regression of most lung, bone, and liver metastases. ErSO treatment induced almost complete regression of brain metastases in mice carrying intracranial human breast cancer cell line xenografts. Tumors that did not undergo complete regression and regrew remained sensitive to retreatment with ErSO. ErSO was well tolerated in mice, rats, and dogs at doses above those needed for therapeutic responses and had little or no effect on normal ERα-expressing murine tissues. ErSO mediated its anticancer effects through activation of the a-UPR, suggesting that activation of a tumor protective pathway could induce tumor regression.

Current and emerging estrogen receptor-targeted therapies for the treatment of breast cancer

Nearly 80% of all breast cancers are estrogen receptor positive (ER+) and require the activity of this transcription factor for tumor growth and survival. Thus, endocrine therapies, which target the estrogen signaling axis, have and will continue to be the cornerstone of therapy for patients diagnosed with ER+ disease. Several inhibitors of ER activity exist, including aromatase inhibitors (AIs), selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen receptor degraders/down-regulators (SERDs), and ER proteolysis-targeting chimeras (ER PROTACs); drugs which differ in the mechanism(s) by which they inhibit this signaling pathway. Notwithstanding their significant impact on the management of this disease, resistance to existing endocrine therapies remains a major impediment to durable clinical responses. Although the mechanisms of resistance are complex and varied, dependence on ER is typically retained after progression on SERMs and AIs, suggesting that ER remains a bona fide therapeutic target. The discovery and development of orally bioavailable drugs that eliminate ER expression (SERDs and ER PROTACs) will likely aid in treating this growing patient population. All of the existing endocrine therapies were developed with the intent of inhibiting the cancer cell intrinsic actions of ER and/or with the objective of achieving extreme estrogen deprivation and most achieve that goal. A longstanding question that remains to be addressed, however, is how actions of existing interventions extrinsic to the cancer cells influence tumor biology. We believe that these issues need to be addressed in the development of strategies to develop the next generation of ER-modulators optimized for positive activities in both cancer cells and other cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME).

Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degraders (SERDs) as a Novel Breast Cancer Therapy: Present and Future from a Clinical Perspective

Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) is the most common subtype of breast cancer. Endocrine therapy is the fundamental treatment against this entity, by directly or indirectly modifying estrogen production. Recent advances in novel compounds, such as cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors have improved progression-free survival and overall survival in these patients. However, some patients still develop endocrine resistance after or during endocrine treatment. Different underlying mechanisms have been identified as responsible for endocrine treatment resistance, where ESR1 gene mutations are one of the most studied, outstanding from others such as somatic alterations, microenvironment involvement and epigenetic changes. In this scenario, selective estrogen receptor degraders/downregulators (SERD) are one of the weapons currently in research and development against aromatase inhibitor- or tamoxifen-resistance. The first SERD to be developed and approved for ER+ breast cancer was fulvestrant, demonstrating also interesting activity in ESR1 mutated patients in the second line treatment setting. Recent investigational advances have allowed the development of new oral bioavailable SERDs. This review describes the evolution and ongoing studies in SERDs and new molecules against ER, with the hope that these novel drugs may improve our patients’ future landscape.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Studies of Elacestrant, A Novel Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in Healthy Post-Menopausal Women

Background and Objectives

Advanced estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer is currently treated with endocrine therapy. Elacestrant is a novel, nonsteroidal, selective estrogen receptor degrader with complex dose-related ER agonist/antagonist activity that is being developed as a treatment option for ER+ breast cancer.

Methods

Two first-in-human phase 1 studies of elacestrant in healthy postmenopausal women (Study 001/Study 004) were conducted to determine its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile as well as its safety and maximum tolerated dose.

Results

In total, 140 postmenopausal subjects received at least one dose of study drug (114 received elacestrant and 26 received placebo). Single-ascending dose and multiple-ascending dose assessments showed that doses up to 1000 mg daily were safe and well tolerated, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Oral administration of elacestrant had an absolute bioavailability of 10% and a mean half-life ranging from 27 to 47 h, reaching steady state after 5–6 days. Mean occupancy of the ER in the uterus after seven daily doses was 83% for 200 mg and 92% for 500 mg daily. The median ratio of elacestrant concentrations in the cerebral spinal fluid vs. plasma was 0.126% (500 mg dose) and 0.205% (200 mg dose). Most adverse events were related to the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate that elacestrant has good bioavailability when administered orally with a half-life that supports once-daily administration. Engagement of the ER and some ability to cross the blood-brain barrier was demonstrated in addition to an acceptable safety profile.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13318-020-00635-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Targeted Protein Degradation: An Emerging Therapeutic Strategy in Cancer

Drug discovery in the scope of cancer therapy has been focused on conventional agents that nonselectively induce DNA damage or selectively inhibit the activity of key oncogenic molecules without affecting their protein levels. An emerging therapeutic strategy that garnered attention in recent years is the induction of Targeted Protein Degradation (TPD) of cellular targets by hijacking the intracellular proteolysis machinery. This novel approach offers several advantages over conventional inhibitors and introduces a paradigm shift in several pharmacological aspects of drug therapy. While TPD has been found to be the major mode of action of clinically approved anticancer agents such as fulvestrant and thalidomide, recent years have witnessed systematic endeavors to expand the repertoire of proteins amenable to therapeutic ablation by TPD. Such endeavors have led to three major classes of agents that induce protein degradation, including molecular glues, Proteolysis Targeting Chimeras (PROTACs) and Hydrophobic Tag (HyT)-based degraders. Here, we briefly highlight agents in these classes and key advances made in the field with a focus on clinical translation in cancer therapy.

Heterodimeric GW7604 Derivatives: Modification of the Pharmacological Profile by Additional Interactions at the Coactivator Binding Site

(E/Z)-3-(4-((E)-1-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylbut-1-enyl)phenyl)acrylic acid (GW7604) as a derivative of (Z)-4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) was linked by diaminoalkane spacers to molecules that are known binders to the coactivator binding site (benzimidazole or thioxo-quinazolinone scaffolds). With this modification, an optimization of the pharmacological profile was achieved. The most active thioxo-quinazolinone derivative 16 showed extraordinarily high affinity to the estrogen receptor (ER) β (RBA = 110%), inhibited effectively the coactivator recruitment (IC₅₀ = 20.88 nM (ERα) and 28.34 nM (ERβ)), acted as a pure estradiol (E2) antagonist in a transactivation assay (IC₅₀ = 18.5 nM (ERα) and 7.5 nM (ERβ)), and downregulated the ERα content in MCF-7 cells with an efficacy of 60% at 1 μM. The cytotoxicity was restricted to hormone-dependent MCF-7 (IC₅₀ = 4.2 nM) and tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7TamR cells (IC₅₀ = 476.6 nM). The compounds bearing a thioxo-quinazolinone moiety can therefore be assigned as pure E2-antagonistic selective ER degraders/downregulators. By contrast, the benzimidazole derivatives acted solely as pure antagonists without degradation of the ER.

Phase I Study of Elacestrant (RAD1901), a Novel Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

This phase I study (RAD1901-005; NCT02338349) evaluated elacestrant, an investigational oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD), in heavily pretreated women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer, including those with estrogen receptor gene alpha (ESR1) mutation. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D).

METHODS

The study consisted of a 3 + 3 design (elacestrant capsules) followed by expansion at RP2D (400-mg capsules, then 400-mg tablets) for the evaluation of safety and antitumor activity. Elacestrant was taken once daily until progression or intolerability.

RESULTS

Of 57 postmenopausal women enrolled, 50 received RP2D (400 mg once daily): median age, 63 years; median three prior anticancer therapies, including cyclin-dependent kinase 4,6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i; 52%), SERD (52%), and ESR1 mutation (circulating tumor DNA; 50%). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred; the most common adverse events at RP2D (400-mg tablet; n = 24) were nausea (33.3%) and increased blood triglycerides and decreased blood phosphorus (25.0% each). Most adverse events were grade 1-2 in severity. The objective response rate was 19.4% (n = 31 evaluable patients receiving RP2D), 15.0% in patients with prior SERD, 16.7% in patients with prior CDK4/6i, and 33.3% in patients with ESR1 mutation (n = 5/15). The clinical benefit rate (24-week) was 42.6% overall (n = 47 patients receiving RP2D), 56.5% (n = 23, ESR1 mutation), and 30.4% (n = 23, prior CDK4/6i). Elacestrant clinical benefit was associated with decline in ESR1 mutant allele fraction.

CONCLUSION

Elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily has an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated single-agent activity with confirmed partial responses in heavily pretreated patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Notably, responses were observed in patients with ESR1 mutation as well as those with prior CDK4/6i and prior SERD. A phase III trial investigating elacestrant versus standard endocrine therapy is ongoing.

From Pure Antagonists to Pure Degraders of the Estrogen Receptor: Evolving Strategies for the Same Target

Pure antiestrogens, or selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), have proven to be effective in treating breast cancer that has progressed on tamoxifen and/or aromatase inhibitors. However, the only FDA-approved pure antiestrogen, fulvestrant, is limited in efficacy by its low bioavailability. The search for orally bioavailable SERDs has continued for nearly as long as the clinical history of the injection-only fulvestrant. Oral SERDs that have been developed and tested in patients ranged from nonsteroidal ER binders containing an acrylic acid or amino side chain to bifunctional proteolysis-targeting chimera (PROTAC) pure ER degraders. Structural evolution in the development of oral SERD molecules has been closely associated with quantifiable ER-degrading potency, as seen in the structural comparison analysis of acrylic acid and basic amino side-chain-bearing SERDs. Failure to improve on fulvestrant in the clinical trials by numerous acidic SERDs and early basic SERDs is blamed on tolerability and/or insufficient efficacy, which will likely be overcome by the new-generation basic SERD molecules and PROTAC ER degraders with improved oral bioavailability, low toxicity, and superior efficacy of receptor degradation.