1
|
Keenan JC, Medford AJ, Dai CS, Wander SA, Spring LM, Bardia A. Novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) to target hormone receptor positive breast cancer: Elacestrant as the poster-child. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024. [PMID: 38642015 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2346188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype, and therapeutic management relies primarily on inhibiting ER signaling. In the metastatic setting, ER signaling is typically targeted by selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the latter of which prevent estrogen production. Activating ESR1 mutations are among the most common emergent breast cancer mutations and confer resistance to AIs. AREAS COVERED Until 2023, fulvestrant was the only approved SERD; fulvestrant is administered intramuscularly, and in some cases may also have limited efficacy in the setting of certain ESR1 mutations. In 2023, the first oral SERD, elacestrant, was approved for use in ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and represents a new class of therapeutic options. While the initial approval was as monotherapy, ongoing studies are evaluating elacestrant (as well as other oral SERDs) in combination with other therapies including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, which parallels the current combination uses of fulvestrant. EXPERT OPINION Elacestrant's recent approval sheds light on the use of biomarkers such as ESR1 to gauge a tumor's endocrine sensitivity. Ongoing therapeutic and correlative biomarker studies will offer new insight and expanding treatment options for patients with advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Charles S Dai
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Seth A Wander
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Spring LM, Tolaney SM, Fell G, Bossuyt V, Abelman RO, Wu B, Maheswaran S, Trippa L, Comander A, Mulvey T, McLaughlin S, Ryan P, Ryan L, Abraham E, Rosenstock A, Garrido-Castro AC, Lynce F, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Tung N, Mittendorf EA, Ellisen LW, Bardia A. Response-guided neoadjuvant sacituzumab govitecan for localized triple-negative breast cancer: results from the NeoSTAR trial. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:293-301. [PMID: 38092228 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting TROP2, is approved for pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). We conducted an investigator-initiated clinical trial evaluating neoadjuvant (NA) SG (NCT04230109), and report primary results. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants with early-stage TNBC received NA SG for four cycles. The primary objective was to assess pathological complete response (pCR) rate in breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/isN0) to SG. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), safety, event-free survival (EFS), and predictive biomarkers. A response-guided approach was utilized, and subsequent systemic therapy decisions were at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS From July 2020 to August 2021, 50 participants were enrolled (median age = 48.5 years; 13 clinical stage I disease, 26 stage II, 11 stage III). Forty-nine (98%) completed four cycles of SG. Overall, the pCR rate with SG alone was 30% [n = 15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18% to 45%]. The ORR per RECIST V1.1 after SG alone was 64% (n = 32/50, 95% CI 77% to 98%). Higher Ki-67 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were predictive of pCR to SG (P = 0.007 for Ki-67 and 0.002 for TILs), while baseline TROP2 expression was not (P = 0.440). Common adverse events were nausea (82%), fatigue (76%), alopecia (76%), neutropenia (44%), and rash (48%). With a median follow-up time of 18.9 months (95% CI 16.3-21.9 months), the 2-year EFS for all participants was 95%. Among participants with a pCR with SG (n = 15), the 2-year EFS was 100%. CONCLUSIONS In the first NA trial with an ADC in localized TNBC, SG demonstrated single-agent efficacy and feasibility of response-guided escalation/de-escalation. Further research on optimal duration of SG as well as NA combination strategies, including immunotherapy, are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - S M Tolaney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - G Fell
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - V Bossuyt
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - R O Abelman
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - B Wu
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - S Maheswaran
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - L Trippa
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - A Comander
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - T Mulvey
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - S McLaughlin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - P Ryan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - L Ryan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - E Abraham
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - A Rosenstock
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | | | - F Lynce
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - B Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - S J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - N Tung
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - E A Mittendorf
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - L W Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston; Ludwig Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - A Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weiss A, Jin Q, Waks AG, Yardley D, Spring LM, Wrabel E, Tayob N, Viale G, Krop IE, King TA, Metzger-Filho O. Axillary Nodal Response to Neoadjuvant T-DM1 Combined with Pertuzumab in a Prospective Phase II Multi-Institution Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:303-311. [PMID: 38047578 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with ERBB2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer experience high pathologic complete response (pCR) rates after standard neoadjuvant anti-HER2 systemic therapy. We examined axillary pathologic nodal response to neoadjuvant dual HER2-targeted therapy alone, based on breast pathologic response, in a multi-institution clinical trial. STUDY DESIGN Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer were enrolled to a phase II single-arm trial, which administered 6 cycles of neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) plus pertuzumab. Rates of pathologic nodal disease (ypN) in patients who were clinically node-negative (cN0) and node-positive (cN1) were analyzed, by residual breast disease (pCR and residual cancer burden [RCB] I to III). RESULTS One hundred fifty-eight patients completed preoperative treatment and proceeded to surgery. Of 92 patients who were cN0, 48 (52.2%) and 10 (10.9%) experienced breast pCR and RCB I, respectively. Of these, 100% were ypN0. Of 34 with RCB II to III, 26 (76.5%) were ypN0. Of 30 patients who were cN1 with breast pCR, 100% were ypN0; of the 12 patients who were cN1 with RCB I, 66.7% were ypN0; and of the 24 patients who were cN1 with RCB II to III, 25% were ypN0. ypN0 rates were significantly different between patients who did and did not experience a pCR, in both cN0 (p = 0.002) and cN1 (p < 0.001) subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with dual HER2-targeted therapy who experienced a breast pCR or RCB I response were frequently ypN0. These findings support future trials considering omission of axillary surgical staging for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in neoadjuvant trials of active HER2-targeted regimens, particularly if they experience breast pCR or RCB I.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Weiss
- From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY (Weiss)
| | - Qingchun Jin
- Department of Data Science (Jin, Tayob), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA
| | - Adrienne G Waks
- Division of Medical Oncology (Waks, Metzger-Filho), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Waks, Tayob, King, Metzger-Filho)
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA (Waks, Wrabel, King, Metzger-Filho)
| | - Denise Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN (Yardley)
| | | | - Eileen Wrabel
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA (Waks, Wrabel, King, Metzger-Filho)
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Department of Data Science (Jin, Tayob), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Waks, Tayob, King, Metzger-Filho)
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS and University of Milan, Milan, Italy (Viale)
| | - Ian E Krop
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT (Krop)
| | - Tari A King
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Waks, Tayob, King, Metzger-Filho)
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA (Waks, Wrabel, King, Metzger-Filho)
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (King)
| | - Otto Metzger-Filho
- Division of Medical Oncology (Waks, Metzger-Filho), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Waks, Tayob, King, Metzger-Filho)
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA (Waks, Wrabel, King, Metzger-Filho)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Varkaris A, Fece de la Cruz F, Martin EE, Norden BL, Chevalier N, Kehlmann AM, Leshchiner I, Barnes H, Ehnstrom S, Stavridi AM, Yuan X, Kim JS, Ellis H, Papatheodoridi A, Gunaydin H, Danysh BP, Parida L, Sanidas I, Ji Y, Lau K, Wulf GM, Bardia A, Spring LM, Isakoff SJ, Lennerz JK, Del Vecchio K, Pierce L, Pazolli E, Getz G, Corcoran RB, Juric D. Allosteric PI3Kα Inhibition Overcomes On-target Resistance to Orthosteric Inhibitors Mediated by Secondary PIK3CA Mutations. Cancer Discov 2024; 14:227-239. [PMID: 37916958 PMCID: PMC10850944 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PIK3CA mutations occur in ∼8% of cancers, including ∼40% of HR-positive breast cancers, where the PI3K-alpha (PI3Kα)-selective inhibitor alpelisib is FDA approved in combination with fulvestrant. Although prior studies have identified resistance mechanisms, such as PTEN loss, clinically acquired resistance to PI3Kα inhibitors remains poorly understood. Through serial liquid biopsies and rapid autopsies in 39 patients with advanced breast cancer developing acquired resistance to PI3Kα inhibitors, we observe that 50% of patients acquire genomic alterations within the PI3K pathway, including PTEN loss and activating AKT1 mutations. Notably, although secondary PIK3CA mutations were previously reported to increase sensitivity to PI3Kα inhibitors, we identified emergent secondary resistance mutations in PIK3CA that alter the inhibitor binding pocket. Some mutations had differential effects on PI3Kα-selective versus pan-PI3K inhibitors, but resistance induced by all mutations could be overcome by the novel allosteric pan-mutant-selective PI3Kα-inhibitor RLY-2608. Together, these findings provide insights to guide strategies to overcome resistance in PIK3CA-mutated cancers. SIGNIFICANCE In one of the largest patient cohorts analyzed to date, this study defines the clinical landscape of acquired resistance to PI3Kα inhibitors. Genomic alterations within the PI3K pathway represent a major mode of resistance and identify a novel class of secondary PIK3CA resistance mutations that can be overcome by an allosteric PI3Kα inhibitor. See related commentary by Gong and Vanhaesebroeck, p. 204 . See related article by Varkaris et al., p. 240 . This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 201.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Varkaris
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ferran Fece de la Cruz
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Bryanna L. Norden
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nicholas Chevalier
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Allison M. Kehlmann
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Haley Barnes
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara Ehnstrom
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Xin Yuan
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Janice S. Kim
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Haley Ellis
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Brian P. Danysh
- Cancer Program, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Ioannis Sanidas
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yongli Ji
- Hematology-Oncology, Exeter Hospital, New Haven
| | - Kayao Lau
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gerburg M. Wulf
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura M. Spring
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven J. Isakoff
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jochen K. Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Levi Pierce
- Relay Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Gad Getz
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan B. Corcoran
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dejan Juric
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li Z, Metzger Filho O, Viale G, dell'Orto P, Russo L, Goyette MA, Kamat A, Yardley DA, Gupta Abramson V, Arteaga CL, Spring LM, Chiotti K, Halsey C, Waks AG, King TA, Lester SC, Bellon JR, Winer EP, Spellman PT, Krop IE, Polyak K. HER2 heterogeneity and treatment response-associated profiles in HER2-positive breast cancer in the NCT02326974 clinical trial. J Clin Invest 2024; 134:e176454. [PMID: 38300710 PMCID: PMC10977978 DOI: 10.1172/jci176454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDHER2-targeting therapies have great efficacy in HER2-positive breast cancer, but resistance, in part due to HER2 heterogeneity (HET), is a significant clinical challenge. We previously described that in a phase II neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and pertuzumab (P) clinical trial in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, none of the patients with HER2-HET tumors had pathologic complete response (pCR).METHODSTo investigate cellular and molecular differences among tumors according to HER2 heterogeneity and pCR, we performed RNA sequencing and ERBB2 FISH of 285 pretreatment and posttreatment tumors from 129 patients in this T-DM1+P neoadjuvant trial. A subset of cases was also subject to NanoString spatial digital profiling.RESULTSPretreatment tumors from patients with pCR had the highest level of ERBB2 mRNA and ERBB signaling. HER2 heterogeneity was associated with no pCR, basal-like features, and low ERBB2 expression yet high ERBB signaling sustained by activation of downstream pathway components. Residual tumors showed decreased HER2 protein levels and ERBB2 copy number heterogeneity and increased PI3K pathway enrichment and luminal features. HET tumors showed minimal treatment-induced transcriptomic changes compared with non-HET tumors. Immune infiltration correlated with pCR and HER2-HET status.CONCLUSIONResistance mechanisms in HET and non-HET tumors are distinct. HER2-targeting antibodies have limited efficacy in HET tumors. Our results support the stratification of patients based on HET status and the use of agents that target downstream components of the ERBB signaling pathway in patients with HET tumors.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT02326974.FUNDINGThis study was funded by Roche and the National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zheqi Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Otto Metzger Filho
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, School of Medicine, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia dell'Orto
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Leila Russo
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Marie-Anne Goyette
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Avni Kamat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Denise A Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Carlos L Arteaga
- University of Texas Southwestern, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kami Chiotti
- Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Carol Halsey
- Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Adrienne G Waks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tari A King
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Susan C Lester
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer R Bellon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Paul T Spellman
- Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abelman R, Spring LM, Corcoran RB, Bardia A. Corrigendum to "Moving towards tissue-agnostic antibody drug conjugates: HER2 expression as the poster child": [Ann Oncol 34 (2023) 968-969]. Ann Oncol 2024:S0923-7534(23)05111-6. [PMID: 38195362 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Abelman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - L M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R B Corcoran
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spring LM, Mortensen L, Abraham E, Keenan J, Medford A, Ma A, Padden S, Denault E, Ryan L, Iafrate AJ, Lennerz J, Hochberg E, Wander SA, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Juric D, Brennan KA, Smith DE, Civiello B, Mulvey T, Comander A, Ellisen LW, Schwartz JH, Bardia A. Virtual Molecular and Precision Medicine Clinic to Improve Access to Clinical Trials for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Academic/Community Collaboration. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:69-76. [PMID: 37922440 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a demand for improved care delivery surrounding genomic testing and clinical trial enrollment among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We sought to improve the current process via real-time informal consultation and prescreening assessment for patients with MBC treated by community and academic medical oncologists by implementing a virtual molecular and precision medicine (vMAP) clinic. METHODS The vMAP program used a virtual referral system directed to a multidisciplinary team with precision medicine expertise. Providers contacted vMAP regarding patients with MBC, and on receipt of referral, the vMAP team engaged in discussion to identify if further diagnostics were needed (including genomic testing) and to identify potential clinical trials or standard treatment options. Recommendations were then sent to the referring provider within 72 hours. Pre-/postsurveys were issued to network physicians to assess for barriers, clinical trial access, and vMAP referral experience. Program implementation was evaluated with the Squire 2.0 reporting guidelines for quality improvement in health care as a framework. RESULTS Eighty-one cases from 22 providers were referred to vMAP over a 26-month period. The average response time to the referring provider with a finalized recommendation was 1.90 ± 1.82 days. A total of 86.4% of cases had clinical trial options on vMAP prescreen, with 40.7% initiating formal screening assessments and 27 patients (33.3%) ultimately enrolling on trials. On resurvey, 92% of survey responses across community oncology referring providers said that they were very likely to use vMAP again. CONCLUSION In the initial 2-year period, vMAP demonstrated an efficient means to offer real-time interpretation of genomic testing and identification of clinical trials for patients with MBC, with effective clinical trial enrollment and high rates of referring provider satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Mass General Cancer Center at Waltham, Waltham, MA
| | | | | | | | - Arielle Medford
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Annie Ma
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - A John Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jochen Lennerz
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ephraim Hochberg
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Seth A Wander
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Mass General/North Shore Cancer Center, Danvers, MA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Mass General Cancer Center at Waltham, Waltham, MA
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Deborah E Smith
- Mass General Cancer Center at Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, MA
| | - Barbara Civiello
- Mass General Cancer Center at Wentworth-Douglass Hospital, Dover, NH
| | - Therese Mulvey
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Amy Comander
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Mass General Cancer Center at Waltham, Waltham, MA
- Mass General Cancer Center at Newton Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA
| | - Leif W Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Joel H Schwartz
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Mass General/North Shore Cancer Center, Danvers, MA
- Mass General Cancer Center at Cooley Dickinson Hospital, Northampton, MA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Mass General Cancer Center at Waltham, Waltham, MA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Taylor MS, Wu C, Fridy PC, Zhang SJ, Senussi Y, Wolters JC, Cajuso T, Cheng WC, Heaps JD, Miller BD, Mori K, Cohen L, Jiang H, Molloy KR, Chait BT, Goggins MG, Bhan I, Franses JW, Yang X, Taplin ME, Wang X, Christiani DC, Johnson BE, Meyerson M, Uppaluri R, Egloff AM, Denault EN, Spring LM, Wang TL, Shih IM, Fairman JE, Jung E, Arora KS, Yilmaz OH, Cohen S, Sharova T, Chi G, Norden BL, Song Y, Nieman LT, Pappas L, Parikh AR, Strickland MR, Corcoran RB, Mustelin T, Eng G, Yilmaz ÖH, Matulonis UA, Chan AT, Skates SJ, Rueda BR, Drapkin R, Klempner SJ, Deshpande V, Ting DT, Rout MP, LaCava J, Walt DR, Burns KH. Ultrasensitive Detection of Circulating LINE-1 ORF1p as a Specific Multicancer Biomarker. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:2532-2547. [PMID: 37698949 PMCID: PMC10773488 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
Improved biomarkers are needed for early cancer detection, risk stratification, treatment selection, and monitoring treatment response. Although proteins can be useful blood-based biomarkers, many have limited sensitivity or specificity for these applications. Long INterspersed Element-1 (LINE-1) open reading frame 1 protein (ORF1p) is a transposable element protein overexpressed in carcinomas and high-risk precursors during carcinogenesis with negligible expression in normal tissues, suggesting ORF1p could be a highly specific cancer biomarker. To explore ORF1p as a blood-based biomarker, we engineered ultrasensitive digital immunoassays that detect mid-attomolar (10-17 mol/L) ORF1p concentrations in plasma across multiple cancers with high specificity. Plasma ORF1p shows promise for early detection of ovarian cancer, improves diagnostic performance in a multianalyte panel, provides early therapeutic response monitoring in gastroesophageal cancers, and is prognostic for overall survival in gastroesophageal and colorectal cancers. Together, these observations nominate ORF1p as a multicancer biomarker with potential utility for disease detection and monitoring. SIGNIFICANCE The LINE-1 ORF1p transposon protein is pervasively expressed in many cancers and is a highly specific biomarker of multiple common, lethal carcinomas and their high-risk precursors in tissue and blood. Ultrasensitive ORF1p assays from as little as 25 μL plasma are novel, rapid, cost-effective tools in cancer detection and monitoring. See related commentary by Doucet and Cristofari, p. 2502. This article is featured in Selected Articles from This Issue, p. 2489.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin S. Taylor
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Connie Wu
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter C. Fridy
- Laboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
| | - Stephanie J. Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yasmeen Senussi
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Justina C. Wolters
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Tatiana Cajuso
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Wen-Chih Cheng
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John D. Heaps
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bryant D. Miller
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kei Mori
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Healthcare Optics Research Laboratory, Canon U.S.A., Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Limor Cohen
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Hua Jiang
- Laboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
| | - Kelly R. Molloy
- Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
| | - Brian T. Chait
- Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion Chemistry, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
| | | | - Irun Bhan
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph W. Franses
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xiaoyu Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xinan Wang
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David C. Christiani
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bruce E. Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew Meyerson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ravindra Uppaluri
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ann Marie Egloff
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elyssa N. Denault
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura M. Spring
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tian-Li Wang
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Euihye Jung
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kshitij S. Arora
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Osman H. Yilmaz
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sonia Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tatyana Sharova
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gary Chi
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bryanna L. Norden
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yuhui Song
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Linda T. Nieman
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leontios Pappas
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aparna R. Parikh
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew R. Strickland
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan B. Corcoran
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tomas Mustelin
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - George Eng
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Ömer H. Yilmaz
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT, Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Ursula A. Matulonis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew T. Chan
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven J. Skates
- MGH Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bo R. Rueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ronny Drapkin
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Samuel J. Klempner
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David T. Ting
- Mass General Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael P. Rout
- Laboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
| | - John LaCava
- Laboratory of Cellular and Structural Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - David R. Walt
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kathleen H. Burns
- Department of Pathology, Mass General Brigham and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Medford AJ, Moy B, Spring LM, Hurvitz SA, Turner NC, Bardia A. Molecular Residual Disease in Breast Cancer: Detection and Therapeutic Interception. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4540-4548. [PMID: 37477704 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death in women despite screening and therapeutic advances. Early detection allows for resection of local disease; however, patients can develop metastatic recurrences years after curative treatment. There is no reliable blood-based monitoring after curative therapy, and radiographic evaluation for metastatic disease is performed only in response to symptoms. Advances in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays have allowed for a potential option for blood-based monitoring. The detection of ctDNA in the absence of overt metastasis or recurrent disease indicates molecular evidence of cancer, defined as molecular residual disease (MRD). Multiple studies have shown that MRD detection is strongly associated with disease recurrence, with a lead time prior to clinical evidence of recurrence of many months. Importantly, it is still unclear whether treatment changes in response to ctDNA detection will improve outcomes. There are currently ongoing trials evaluating the efficacy of therapy escalation in the setting of MRD, and these studies are being conducted in all major breast cancer subtypes. Additional therapies under study include CDK4/6 inhibitors, PARP inhibitors, HER2-targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. This review will summarize the underlying scientific principles of various MRD assays, their known prognostic roles in early breast cancer, and the ongoing clinical trials assessing the efficacy of therapy escalation in the setting of MRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle J Medford
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara A Hurvitz
- University of California Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nicholas C Turner
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abelman R, Spring LM, Corcoran R, Bardia A. Moving towards tissue-agnostic antibody drug conjugates: HER2 expression as the poster child. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:968-969. [PMID: 37996170 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Abelman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - L M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R Corcoran
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rojas K, Spring LM, O'Riordan L, Weiss A. Endocrine Therapy for Surgeons: Practical Pearls for Managing Menopausal, Bone Loss and Sexual Adverse Effects. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:5951-5961. [PMID: 37495843 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13907-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer patients are living longer than ever before and as such the population of breast cancer survivors continues to grow. Approximately 80% of breast cancers are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and most patients will receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant estrogen blockade, referred to as endocrine therapy. Although endocrine therapy reduces HR+ breast cancer recurrence by 30-50%, significant adverse effects pose a threat to treatment adherence. These adverse effects include vasomotor symptoms, colloquially referred to as hot flashes, bone loss, joint arthralgias, genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM), previously referred to as vaginal atrophy, and low libido. This review will present the evidence-based treatments available for each of these adverse effects, including clear treatment algorithms for GSM, which is often experienced by patients but overlooked by providers. The most important takeaway is to ask open-ended questions, encourage reporting of these symptoms, and refer patients to specialty providers as needed. Surgeons may be the first to encounter these symptoms, therefore it is critical to remain informed of the treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Rojas
- Dewitt Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, MUSIC™ Sexual Health After Cancer Program, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Anna Weiss
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
- Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weiss A, Li T, Desai NV, Tung NM, Poorvu PD, Partridge AH, Nakhlis F, Dominici L, Sinclair N, Spring LM, Faggen M, Constantine M, Krop IE, DeMeo M, Wrabel E, Alberti J, Chikarmane S, Tayob N, King TA, Tolaney SM, Winer EP, Mittendorf EA, Waks AG. Impact of Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel/Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab on Breast Tumor Downsizing for Patients with HER2+ Breast Cancer: Single-Arm Prospective Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg 2023:00019464-990000000-00667. [PMID: 37194964 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of abbreviated neoadjuvant regimens for HER2+ breast cancer on rates of breast conservation therapy (BCT) is unclear. We aimed to determine BCT rates in a single-arm prospective trial of neoadjuvant paclitaxel/trastuzumab/pertuzumab (THP) in patients with stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer. STUDY DESIGN BCT eligibility was prospectively recorded before and after THP. Pre- and post-treatment mammogram and breast ultrasound were required; breast MRI was encouraged. Patients with a large tumor to breast size ratio were eligible for downsizing. Multifocal/multicentric tumors, extensive calcifications, and contraindications to radiation were considered BCT contraindications. RESULTS Overall, 92 patients who received neoadjuvant THP on trial were included. At presentation, 39 (42.4%) were considered eligible for BCT and 53 (57.6%) were not. BCT-eligible patients were older (median 54 years versus 47 years, respectively, p=0.006) and had smaller tumors by palpation (median 2.5 cm versus 3 cm, respectively, p=0.004). Of 53 BCT-ineligible patients, 28 were candidates for tumor downsizing, whereas 25 had contraindications to BCT. Overall, 51(55.4%) patients underwent BCT. Of the 28 patients who were candidates for downsizing, 22 (78.6%) became BCT-eligible after THP and 18/22 (81.8%) underwent BCT. In total, 44/92 (47.8%) patients experienced breast pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0), including 11/25 (44.0%) patients with BCT contraindications at presentation. CONCLUSIONS De-escalated neoadjuvant systemic therapy led to high BCT rates in this cohort. The impact of de-escalated systemic therapy on local therapy and outcomes in early stage HER2+ breast cancer warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Neelam V Desai
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA
| | - Nadine M Tung
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA
| | - Philip D Poorvu
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Faina Nakhlis
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Laura Dominici
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Natalie Sinclair
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Meredith Faggen
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Constantine
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ian E Krop
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michelle DeMeo
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
| | - Eileen Wrabel
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
| | - Jillian Alberti
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
| | - Sona Chikarmane
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA
| | | | - Sara M Tolaney
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth A Mittendorf
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston MA
| | - Adrienne G Waks
- Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston MA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Brett JO, Dubash TD, Johnson GN, Niemierko A, Mariotti V, Kim LS, Xi J, Pandey A, Dunne S, Nasrazadani A, Lloyd MR, Kambadakone A, Spring LM, Micalizzi DS, Onozato ML, Che D, Nayar U, Brufsky A, Kalinsky K, Ma CX, O'Shaughnessy J, Han HS, Iafrate AJ, Ryan LY, Juric D, Moy B, Ellisen LW, Maheswaran S, Wagle N, Haber DA, Bardia A, Wander SA. A Gene Panel Associated With Abemaciclib Utility in ESR1-Mutated Breast Cancer After Prior Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6-Inhibitor Progression. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200532. [PMID: 37141550 PMCID: PMC10530719 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE For patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), first-line treatment is endocrine therapy (ET) plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i). After disease progression, which often comes with ESR1 resistance mutations (ESR1-MUT), which therapies to use next and for which patients are open questions. An active area of exploration is treatment with further CDK4/6i, particularly abemaciclib, which has distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with the other approved CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib and ribociclib. We investigated a gene panel to prognosticate abemaciclib susceptibility in patients with ESR1-MUT MBC after palbociclib progression. METHODS We examined a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with ESR1-MUT MBC who received abemaciclib after disease progression on ET plus palbociclib. We generated a panel of CDK4/6i resistance genes and compared abemaciclib progression-free survival (PFS) in patients without versus with mutations in this panel (CDKi-R[-] v CDKi-R[+]). We studied how ESR1-MUT and CDKi-R mutations affect abemaciclib sensitivity of immortalized breast cancer cells and patient-derived circulating tumor cell lines in culture. RESULTS In ESR1-MUT MBC with disease progression on ET plus palbociclib, the median PFS was 7.0 months for CDKi-R(-) (n = 17) versus 3.5 months for CDKi-R(+) (n = 11), with a hazard ratio of 2.8 (P = .03). In vitro, CDKi-R alterations but not ESR1-MUT induced abemaciclib resistance in immortalized breast cancer cells and were associated with resistance in circulating tumor cells. CONCLUSION For ESR1-MUT MBC with resistance to ET and palbociclib, PFS on abemaciclib is longer for patients with CDKi-R(-) than CDKi-R(+). Although a small and retrospective data set, this is the first demonstration of a genomic panel associated with abemaciclib sensitivity in the postpalbociclib setting. Future directions include testing and improving this panel in additional data sets, to guide therapy selection for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie O. Brett
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Taronish D. Dubash
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Andrzej Niemierko
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Leslie S.L. Kim
- Baylor University Medical Center Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX
| | - Jing Xi
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Apurva Pandey
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Siobhan Dunne
- Baylor University Medical Center Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX
| | - Azadeh Nasrazadani
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Maxwell R. Lloyd
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Laura M. Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Douglas S. Micalizzi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Maristela L. Onozato
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Dante Che
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Utthara Nayar
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Adam Brufsky
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
- Emory University Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA
| | - Cynthia X. Ma
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Joyce O'Shaughnessy
- Baylor University Medical Center Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Anthony J. Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lianne Y. Ryan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Leif W. Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shyamala Maheswaran
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Daniel A. Haber
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Seth A. Wander
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Isakoff SJ, Said MR, Kwak AH, Glieberman E, O'Rourke EA, Stroiney A, Spring LM, Moy B, Bardia A, Horick N, Peppercorn JM. Feasibility of introducing a smartphone navigation application into the care of breast cancer patients (The FIONA Study). Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 199:501-509. [PMID: 37103597 PMCID: PMC10132949 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06918-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with breast cancer (BC) face complex medical information and decisions. The Outcomes4Me mobile app provides evidence-based BC education, symptom management tracking and clinical trial matching. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility of introducing this app into routine BC care. METHODS In this pilot study among BC patients undergoing therapy at an academic cancer center, patients were followed for 12 weeks with survey administration and electronic health record (EHR) abstraction at baseline and completion. Feasibility was defined as 40% of patients engaging with the app 3 or more times during the study. Additional endpoints included app usability (system usability scale), patient care experience, symptom evaluation, and clinical trial matching. RESULTS The study enrolled 107 patients from 6/01/2020 to 3/31/2021. Utilization of the app was deemed feasible with 60% of patients engaging with the app at least 3 times. SUS score of 70 indicated above average usability. New diagnosis and higher education level was associated with greater app engagement, with usability similar across all age groups. 41% of patients found the app helped track symptoms. Cognitive and sexual symptoms were infrequently reported, but were more frequently captured in the app than in the EHR. After using the app, 33% of patients reported increased interest in clinical trial enrollment. CONCLUSION Introducing the Outcomes4Me patient navigation app into routine BC care is feasible and may improve the patient experience. These results support further evaluation of this mobile technology platform to improve BC education, symptom management, and decision making. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY Clinicaltrials.gov registration #: NCT04262518.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Maya R Said
- Outcomes4Me Inc, One Beacon St, 15th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| | - Agnes H Kwak
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Eva Glieberman
- Outcomes4Me Inc, One Beacon St, 15th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| | - Emily A O'Rourke
- Outcomes4Me Inc, One Beacon St, 15th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| | - Amanda Stroiney
- Outcomes4Me Inc, One Beacon St, 15th Floor, Boston, MA, 02108, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Nora Horick
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Peppercorn
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Medford AJ, Haradhvala NJ, Vidula N, Abelman R, Spring LM, Ellisen LW, Getz G, Bardia A. Abstract 960: Overlapping expression landscape of antibody drug conjugate targets, trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) & human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Antibody drug conjugates (ADC) are novel drugs linking potent payloads to antibodies targeting antigen-expressing tumors. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), targeting Trop-2, is approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC); and trastuzumab deruxtecan, targeting HER2, is approved for HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. To understand the potentially overlapping clinical landscape of Trop-2 and HER2 antigens, we evaluated RNA expression data in breast cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project.
Methods TCGA dataset was assessed for Trop-2 and HER2 expression via processed RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data of the corresponding genes TACSTD2 and ERBB2. Medium/high gene expression was assessed as >100 transcripts per million (TPM). Samples were classified HER2-low per ASCO/CAP guidelines. Gene expression across clinical parameters was assessed via one-way ANOVA.
Results 1076 patients with primary breast cancer were included. The majority (59%) had both high TACSTD2 expression (TACSTD2hi) and high ERBB2 expression (ERBB2hi) (see Table). Median TACSTD2 expression was 572 TPM (IQR 349-666 TPM); median ERBB2 expression was 122 TPM (IQR 73-192 TPM). No significant difference was observed in TACSTD2 or ERBB2 expression among invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, mixed histology, or other (p = 0.07, 0.23). No significant difference in TACSTD2 expression was noted between HER2-low and HER2-negative subtypes (p=0.34).
Conclusions While SG is approved in TNBC, TACSTD2 is expressed across all breast cancer subtypes, including HER2-low, suggesting a broader population may benefit from Trop-2-targeted ADCs. Furthermore, given that over half of breast cancers have high expression of both TACSTD2 and ERBB2, additional studies are needed to understand the optimal sequencing of ADC-based therapies for patients with breast cancer.
Table Patient subsets(HR = hormone receptor) n TACSTD2hi & ERBB2hi TACSTD2hi & ERBB2low TACSTD2low & ERBB2hi TACSTD2low & ERBB2low All 1,076 632 (59%) 394 (36%) 19 (2%) 31 (3%) Histology 843 Invasive ductal carcinoma 507 267 (32%) 215 (25%) 10 (1%) 15 (2%) Invasive lobular carcinoma 130 103 (12%) 24 (3%) 1 (<1%) 2 (<1%) Mixed 91 63 (7%) 24 (3%) 2 (<1%) 2 (<1%) Other 115 65 (8%) 43 (5%) 2 (<1%) 5 (<1%) HER2 Status 345 HR+/HER2-low 254 170 (49%) 77 (22%) 6 (1%) 1 (<1%) TNBC/HER2-low 55 12 (3%) 39 (11%) 1 (<1%) 3 (<1%) HR+/HER2-negative 24 13 (4%) 11 (3%) 0 0 TNBC/HER2-negative 12 1 (<1%) 10 0 1 (<1%)
Citation Format: Arielle J. Medford, Nicholas J. Haradhvala, Neelima Vidula, Rachel Abelman, Laura M. Spring, Leif W. Ellisen, Gad Getz, Aditya Bardia. Overlapping expression landscape of antibody drug conjugate targets, trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (Trop-2) & human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 960.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle J. Medford
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Boston, MA
| | | | - Neelima Vidula
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel Abelman
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Laura M. Spring
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Leif W. Ellisen
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gad Getz
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Boston, MA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Taylor MS, Connie W, Fridy PC, Zhang SJ, Senussi Y, Wolters JC, Cheng WC, Heaps J, Miller BD, Mori K, Cohen L, Jiang H, Molloy KR, Norden BL, Chait BT, Goggins M, Bhan I, Franses JW, Yang X, Taplin ME, Wang X, Christiani DC, Johnson BE, Meyerson M, Uppaluri R, Egloff AM, Denault EN, Spring LM, Wang TL, Shih IM, Jung E, Arora KS, Zukerberg LR, Yilmaz OH, Chi G, Matulonis UA, Song Y, Nieman L, Parikh AR, Strickland M, Corcoran RB, Mustelin T, Eng G, Yilmaz ÃMH, Skates SJ, Rueda BR, Drapkin R, Klempner SJ, Deshpande V, Ting DT, Rout MP, LaCava J, Walt DR, Burns KH. Ultrasensitive detection of circulating LINE-1 ORF1p as a specific multi-cancer biomarker. bioRxiv 2023:2023.01.25.525462. [PMID: 36747644 PMCID: PMC9900799 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.25.525462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Improved biomarkers are needed for early cancer detection, risk stratification, treatment selection, and monitoring treatment response. While proteins can be useful blood-based biomarkers, many have limited sensitivity or specificity for these applications. Long INterspersed Element-1 (LINE-1, L1) open reading frame 1 protein (ORF1p) is a transposable element protein overexpressed in carcinomas and high-risk precursors during carcinogenesis with negligible detectable expression in corresponding normal tissues, suggesting ORF1p could be a highly specific cancer biomarker. To explore the potential of ORF1p as a blood-based biomarker, we engineered ultrasensitive digital immunoassays that detect mid-attomolar (10-17 M) ORF1p concentrations in patient plasma samples across multiple cancers with high specificity. Plasma ORF1p shows promise for early detection of ovarian cancer, improves diagnostic performance in a multi-analyte panel, and provides early therapeutic response monitoring in gastric and esophageal cancers. Together, these observations nominate ORF1p as a multi-cancer biomarker with potential utility for disease detection and monitoring.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sood R, Ryan L, Niemierko A, Spring LM, Juric D, Isakoff SJ, Wander SA, Shin J, Ko N, Ellisen L, Moy B, Bardia A, Vidula N. Abstract PD1-10: Impact of Race on Clinical, Socioeconomic, and Genomic Characteristics, Clinical Trial Participation, and Receipt of Genotype-matched Therapy Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd1-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Clinical outcomes in breast cancer differ across racial and ethnic populations. We have previously demonstrated that receipt of genotype-matched therapy targeted to an actionable mutation may potentially improve patient outcomes (Vidula, CCR, 2021). We evaluated the impact of race on clinical, socioeconomic, and genomic characteristics, clinical trial participation, and receipt of genotype-matched therapy among patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with MBC at an academic institution who underwent cell-free DNA testing (cfDNA, Guardant360, 74 gene panel) as part of routine clinical care from 11/29/2016-11/2/2020. Patient demographics (including self-reported race and ethnicity) and clinical trial enrollment (at same institution) were determined by retrospective data collection. Mutations identified in cfDNA were characterized as actionable based on the variant interpretation performed by Guardant360 using vetted genomic databases, and receipt of genotype-matched therapy targeted to an actionable mutation was determined as previously described (Vidula, CCR, 2021). Pearson’s chi-squared and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables between groups, with p< 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Results: Four hundred and twenty-five patients with MBC and cfDNA results were identified, of which 369 were White (87%), 27 Black (6.4%), 15 Hispanic (3.5%), and 14 Asian (3.3%). There were no significant differences in median age at MBC diagnosis (p=0.064), disease subtype distribution (p=0.74), proportions of de-novo/recurrent MBC (p=0.95), presence of visceral metastases (p=0.84), Charleston comorbidity index (p=0.93), menopausal status (p=0.3), and level of education (p=0.44) across racial groups. Higher proportions of non-primary English speakers were seen in Hispanic (80%) and Asian (29%) races (p< 0.001). Median distance traveled to the institution also varied based on race, with White patients traveling further (White: 39.1 miles, Black: 21.8 miles, Hispanic 9.4 miles, Asian 9.1 miles, p< 0.001). In addition, type of insurance varied based on race, with White patients having the highest rates of commercial insurance and Medicare, Black patients having the highest rate of state-supported insurance, and Asian patients having the highest uninsured rates (p< 0.001). Clinical trial enrollment rates did not significantly differ by race (White: 44%, Black: 37%, Hispanic: 47%, and Asian 21%, p=0.34), but patients without insurance were significantly less likely to be enrolled on a trial than those with commercial insurance (p=0.03). The proportion of patients with ≥1 actionable mutation in cfDNA did not vary significantly by race (White: 78%, Black: 56%, Hispanic: 73%, Asian 86%, p=0.18) and the median number of actionable mutations found in cfDNA was similar across races (p=0.31). However, receipt of genotype-matched therapy targeted to an actionable mutation varied by race, with the highest rates of matched therapy in White patients (White: 28%, Black: 11%, Hispanic 13%, Asian 14%, p< 0.001). After multivariable logistic regression adjusting for subtype, commercial insurance versus other insurance types, and proximity to the center, White patients remained significantly more likely to receive matched therapy (p=0.029). Conclusions: We observed significant race-based differences in non-English speaking status, insurance type, and median distance traveled to the institution. Racial/ethnic minority patients were less likely to receive genotype-matched therapy than White patients. Further research is needed to identify barriers and reduce disparities in access to precision medicine.
Citation Format: Rupali Sood, Lianne Ryan, Andrzej Niemierko, Laura M. Spring, Dejan Juric, Steven J. Isakoff, Seth A. Wander, Jennifer Shin, Naomi Ko, Leif Ellisen, Beverly Moy, Aditya Bardia, Neelima Vidula. Impact of Race on Clinical, Socioeconomic, and Genomic Characteristics, Clinical Trial Participation, and Receipt of Genotype-matched Therapy Among Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupali Sood
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts
| | - Lianne Ryan
- 2Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | | | - Laura M. Spring
- 4Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dejan Juric
- 5Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Seth A. Wander
- 7Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Leif Ellisen
- 10Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Aditya Bardia
- 12Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Neelima Vidula
- 13Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wander SA, Keenan JC, Niemierko A, Juric D, Spring LM, Supko J, Vidula N, Isakoff SJ, Ryan L, Padden S, Fisher E, Newton A, Moy B, Ellisen L, Micalizzi DS, Bardia A. Abstract PD13-07: PD13-07 Combination therapy with the AKT inhibitor, ipatasertib, endocrine therapy, and a CDK4/6 inhibitor for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): results from the phase I TAKTIC trial. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd13-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) provide significant clinical benefit in patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and have become a standard of care treatment. Prior insights from tumor profiling and preclinical analyses suggest that AKT1 activation can induce CDK4/6i resistance. We hypothesized that targeting AKT1 following CDK4/6i progression may be an effective therapeutic strategy and conducted a clinical trial to evaluate both doublet (ET+AKTi) and triplet (ET+AKTIi+CDK 4/6i) therapy in the ≥ 2nd line MBC setting. Methods: TAKTIC is an open-label phase Ib clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03959891) evaluating the combination of the AKT inhibitor ipatasertib (ipat) with fulvestrant (Arm A), an aromatase inhibitor (Arm B), or the triplet combination (Arm C) with fulvestrant + palbociclib (palbo). The primary objective is to evaluate the safety (NCI CTCAE 5.0) and tolerability of ipat in combination with endocrine therapy +/- CDK4/6i. Secondary objectives include clinical efficacy, as determined by objective response rate (RECIST v1.1), clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Key inclusion criteria include unresectable HR+/HER2- MBC; at least 1 prior therapy for MBC including any CDK4/6i; up to 2 prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC (no limit on prior endocrine therapy). Here, we present an updated interim analysis from all study arms. Results: The trial completed accrual with 77 pts enrolled from June 2019 – February 2022, including 19 on Arm A, 16 on Arm B, and 42 on Arm C. Median age was 62 (range 32-88) and 65/77 pts (84%) received prior CDK4/6i (median no. of prior lines = 3, range 1-13). 56/77 pts (73%) had measurable disease at baseline and 50/77 pts (65%) had visceral metastases in the liver/lung (68% Arm A, 44% Arm B, 71% Arm C). Pts enrolled on Arms A and B received ipat at 400mg in combination with fulvestrant or an aromatase inhibitor, respectively. In Arm C, 27/42 pts enrolled into the dose escalation phase and received ipat + palbo at varying doses in combination with fulvestrant. Two DLTs were observed in the 300mg ipat + 125mg palbo cohort (grade 4 neutropenia ≥ 7 days). ET+400mg ipat + 100mg palbo was determined to be the recommended phase 2 dose (R2PD), and the remaining 15/42 pts on Arm C were treated at this dose level in the expansion phase. Treatment was well tolerated in all arms. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia (39/77, 50.6%), leukopenia (15/77, 19.5%), diarrhea (11/77, 14/3%), transaminitis (7/77, 9.1%), lymphopenia (6/77, 7.8%), rash (6/77, 7.8%), and thrombocytopenia (3/77, 3.9%). As of 6/28/2022, 16/77 pts remain on treatment. The median treatment duration for all pts is estimated at 6 months (range 0.5-39). Among the 56 pts with measurable disease, 11 had partial response (PR) and 32 had stable disease (SD) as the best response. CBR, defined as percentage of pts who achieved PR or SD > 6 months, was 48% across the study (53% Arm A, 31% Arm B, 57% Arm C). The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8 – 7.4) and the median OS was 24.5 months (95% CI: 17.1 – 33.9). Conclusions: The combination of ipat with endocrine therapy +/- palbo is well tolerated in heavily pre-treated pts, with preliminary evidence of clinical activity. This trial demonstrates how molecular insights related to CDK4/6i resistance inform potential therapy combinations. Further studies are needed to evaluate AKTi-based combinations in pts with HR+ MBC.
Citation Format: Seth A. Wander, Jennifer C. Keenan, Andrzej Niemierko, Dejan Juric, Laura M. Spring, Jeffrey Supko, Neelima Vidula, Steven J. Isakoff, Lianne Ryan, Sarah Padden, Elizabeth Fisher, Amber Newton, Beverly Moy, Leif Ellisen, Douglas S. Micalizzi, Aditya Bardia. PD13-07 Combination therapy with the AKT inhibitor, ipatasertib, endocrine therapy, and a CDK4/6 inhibitor for hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): results from the phase I TAKTIC trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD13-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth A. Wander
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Dejan Juric
- 4Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Neelima Vidula
- 7Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Lianne Ryan
- 9Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | - Leif Ellisen
- 14Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Aditya Bardia
- 16Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McArthur H, Leal JHS, Abaya CD, Reddy S, Carter M, Basho R, Phillips M, Chan D, Hool H, Park D, El-Masry M, McAndrew P, Sikaria S, Spring LM, Bardia A, Tighiouart M, Dadmanesh F, Giuliano A, Shiao S, Page DB. Abstract OT3-25-01: Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted Therapy +/- Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An Open Label Randomized Phase II Trial. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-ot3-25-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) is synergistic with HER2-directed therapy in pre-clinical models. Clinically, pembrolizumab (K)-mediated ICI plus HER2-directed therapy with trastuzumab (H) was safe and demonstrated modest activity in H-resistant HER2-positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer. Because ICI may confer more robust activity when administered earlier in the course of disease, H and K administered in the curative-intent, treatment-naive setting may allow for de-escalation of cytotoxic chemotherapy; confer life-long, tumor-specific immunity; and ultimately, improve cure rates. Moreover, the synergy of H and K with paclitaxel (T) may overcome the need for dual HER2-blockade with H plus pertuzumab (P). In this randomized, multicenter, phase II, open-label, multi-center trial the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant THP vs THP-K vs TH-K are explored. Methods: 174 patients (pts) ≥18y with previously untreated, stage II-III, HER2+ breast cancer will be randomized and stratified by clinical nodal status (positive vs. negative) and hormone receptor status (positive vs. negative). In arm A, pts receive T at 80mg/m2 weekly for 12 weeks, H at 8mg/Kg (loading dose) and then 6mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses, P at 840 mg (loading dose) and then 420mg/Kg every 3 weeks x 3 doses (THP). In arm B, pts receive THP plus K at 200mg every 3 weeks x 4 doses (THP-K). In arm C, pts receive TH-K; however, in a preplanned interim analysis, arm C did not meet the pre-defined efficacy threshold and this arm was subsequently closed. Enrollment to arms A and B continue. Definitive surgery is 3-6 weeks after the last dose. After surgery, pts are treated per the treating physician’s discretion including radiotherapy per local clinical standard. Pts whose tumors are hormone-receptor positive will receive hormone therapy per local standard-of-care. The primary end point is pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the breast and axilla (ypT0/Tis ypN0). Secondary end points include pCR rate by ypT0ypN0 and ypT0/Tis, residual cancer burden index, event free survival, breast conserving surgery rate, safety and overall survival. Exploratory correlative studies will characterize potential immune biomarkers predictive of efficacy and/or toxicity. Funding sources: BCRF, Merck NCT03747120
Citation Format: Heather McArthur, Jorge Henrique Santos Leal, Christina DiLauro Abaya, Sangeetha Reddy, Meredith Carter, Reva Basho, Michelle Phillips, David Chan, Hugo Hool, Dorothy Park, Mary El-Masry, Philomena McAndrew, Swati Sikaria, Laura M. Spring, Aditya Bardia, Mourad Tighiouart, Farnaz Dadmanesh, Armando Giuliano, Stephen Shiao, David B. Page. Neoadjuvant HER2-targeted Therapy +/- Immunotherapy with Pembrolizumab (neoHIP): An Open Label Randomized Phase II Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-25-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura M. Spring
- 14Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- 15Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | - David B. Page
- 20Robert W. Franz Cancer Research Center and Alliance, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Keenan JC, Medford AJ, Oshry LJ, Boyraz B, Dai CS, Kiedrowski LA, Menshikova S, Butusova A, Gogakos T, Occhiogrosso R, Ryan P, Lennerz J, Spring LM, Moy B, Ellisen L, Bardia A. Abstract P5-02-13: TRK inhibitor in a patient with metastatic triple negative breast cancer and NTRK fusions identified via cell-free DNA analysis. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p5-02-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Tissue-agnostic indications for targeted therapies are expanding options for patients with advanced solid tumors. The FDA approvals of the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and the TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib provide rationale for next generation sequencing (NGS) in effectively all advanced solid tumor patients, as findings may indicate targeted therapy even in disease that may seem otherwise refractory. Here, we present the case of a post-menopausal woman with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) who had disease progression on multiple lines of therapy prior to the identification of two actionable NTRK mutations, identified via cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and tissue-based NGS. She was subsequently started on the TRK inhibitor larotrectinib and had a marked clinical response. Case Presentation: A 64-year-old woman presented with metastatic TNBC five years after being treated for a localized breast cancer. The cancer rapidly progressed through 4 lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, including immunotherapy [atezolizumab/nab-paclitaxel (progression after 5 months)], antibody-drug conjugate-based therapy [sacituzumab govitecan (progression after 2 months)], and chemotherapy [gemcitabine/carboplatin (progression after 3 months), eribulin (progression after 2 months)]. Her CA 15-3 had also been consistently increasing to a peak of 206 IU/mL. Germline genetic testing was negative. Ultimately, NGS evaluation of cfDNA via an 83-gene assay (Guardant Health, Inc.) identified two NTRK3 fusions: an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion [mutant allele fraction (MAF) = 10.9%] associated with the rare secretory breast carcinoma, and CRTC3-NTRK3 (MAF = 3.2%), a fusion partner previously undescribed in breast cancer. Liver biopsy was sent for whole exome sequencing and RNA-seq analysis (BostonGene, Inc), which provided orthogonal confirmation of both the ETV6-NTRK3 and CRTC3-NTRK3 fusions. Review of the tumor pathology showed invasive ductal carcinoma with secretory features; this pathology and the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion were consistent with a diagnosis of secretory breast carcinoma. She was started on the TRK inhibitor larotrectinib, and she had a significant clinical and radiographic response after only two months of therapy. Recheck of her CA 15-3 showed a decrease to 48 IU/mL, the lowest level in our records. Repeat cfDNA testing showed a decrease of the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion to MAF 0.40% and the CRTC3-NTRK3 fusion to MAF 0.07%. The patient took larotrectinib for 7 months with good disease control. Unfortunately, unrelated to her therapy, she had experienced multiple fractures secondary to her existing osseous metastases, and these led to significant morbidity. She and her family elected to transition to comfort measures, after which she passed away. Discussion: In the presented case, the identification of NTRK fusions by plasma-based genotyping resulted in matched selection of genotype-directed therapy, and this otherwise refractory TNBC exhibited marked response to targeted therapy. While TNBC had historically been considered a subtype of breast cancer without targetable options, the expanding roles of NGS testing and targeted therapies are changing the paradigm. The actionability of rare genomic events such as NTRK fusions makes identifying them critical for individual patients, particularly in heterogeneous diseases such as TNBC. Tissue-agnostic targeted therapies now give reason for NGS testing in most solid tumors, as reflected in updated consensus guidelines. This case demonstrates the significant potential benefits of NGS testing in advanced and refractory cancers.
Citation Format: Jennifer C. Keenan, Arielle J. Medford, Lauren J. Oshry, Baris Boyraz, Charles S. Dai, Lesli A. Kiedrowski, Sofia Menshikova, Anna Butusova, Tasos Gogakos, Rachel Occhiogrosso, Phoebe Ryan, Jochen Lennerz, Laura M. Spring, Beverly Moy, Leif Ellisen, Aditya Bardia. TRK inhibitor in a patient with metastatic triple negative breast cancer and NTRK fusions identified via cell-free DNA analysis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arielle J. Medford
- 2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center/Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura M. Spring
- 13Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Leif Ellisen
- 15Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya Bardia
- 16Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hamilton E, Spring LM, Fasching PA, Franco S, DeBoer RH, Cortés J, Kalinsky K, Juric D, Bardia A, Haftchenary S, Lteif A, Zarate JP, Cen L, Neven P. Abstract P4-01-42: Pooled analysis of post-progression treatments after first-line ribociclib + endocrine therapy in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 studies. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p4-01-42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The MONALEESA (ML) studies showed significant PFS & OS benefits for 1L ribociclib (RIB) + endocrine therapy (ET) in patients (pts) with pre/peri & postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. The benefit of RIB beyond study treatment (tx) was also observed, with improvements in PFS2 & delays in time to 1st subsequent chemotherapy (CT). While there is currently no preferred tx for the next line post-progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i), except alpelisib in pts with a PIK3CA mutation, guidelines encourage multiple lines of ET or ET-based therapies before switching to CT (except for visceral crisis). This pooled exploratory analysis of the ML studies examined outcomes of various tx strategies post progression on RIB + ET.
Methods: Data from pts receiving 1L therapy in ML-2, -3, & -7 (NSAI cohort only & excluding pts with early relapse [≤ 12 mo after end of (neo)adjuvant ET] whose prognosis is closer to that of 2L pts) were pooled & pts receiving 1st subsequent therapies after progression were analyzed. Three groups of subsequent therapies were assessed: ET only, CT, & targeted therapy. Subsequent CT comprises CT +/- any other therapy; targeted therapy includes CDK4/6i, mTORi, PI3Ki, AKTi, etc, +/- ET. Subsequent CT & targeted therapy groups are mutually exclusive. Median duration of study tx, 1st subsequent therapy, & OS (from randomization to death) were analyzed by KM methods. Weighted Cox regressions were performed using inversed propensity scoring matching method (inverse probability tx weighting [IPTW]) to ensure compatible pt characteristics between tx arms. These are not randomized comparisons; only baseline characteristics were used for the estimation of propensity scores in the IPTW, imbalance of prognostic factors at progression may exist.
Results: Median follow-up time was 74 mo. 461 pts treated with RIB (81%) & 440 (86%) with PBO discontinued study tx & received a subsequent therapy. In the RIB arms, the most common 1st subsequent therapies were ET only (40%), CT (29%), combination with targeted therapy (28%), & other (4%); for the PBO arms, 34% received CT as a 1st subsequent therapy & 31% each received ET only or combination with targeted therapy (5% received other). In 14% & 20% of pts in the RIB & PBO arms, the 1st subsequent therapy was a CDK4/6i, of these 31% & 12% were RIB. In general, regardless of type of 1st subsequent therapy, the duration of both the study tx & the 1st subsequent therapy was longer for pts treated with RIB vs PBO (Table). In both RIB & PBO arms, pts who received subsequent CT had the shortest duration on study tx, whereas those who received subsequent targeted therapy combination had the longest. Among pts on 1L RIB + ET, after matching pre-randomization baseline characteristics, subsequent CDK4/6i use was associated with the longest mOS (84 [84-NE] mo), followed by ET only (60 [51-68] mo), then a non-CDK4/6i targeted therapy (52 [43-72] mo); post-progression CT was associated with the shortest mOS (37 [32-48] mo).
Conclusions: This large, pooled analysis of the ML studies shows that, in general, duration of any subsequent therapy was numerically longer post-1L RIB + ET vs PBO + ET, & subsequent CT was used less frequently for pts on RIB vs PBO. Both findings confirm that upfront tx with RIB does not worsen pt outcomes. This trend in enhancement of outcomes of subsequent therapies seen with 1L RIB suggests a post-tx effect that merits further exploration.
Citation Format: Erika Hamilton, Laura M. Spring, Peter A. Fasching, Sandra Franco, Richard H DeBoer, Javier Cortés, Kevin Kalinsky, Dejan Juric, Aditya Bardia, Sina Haftchenary, Agnes Lteif, Juan Pablo Zarate, Liyi Cen, Patrick Neven. Pooled analysis of post-progression treatments after first-line ribociclib + endocrine therapy in patients with HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer in the MONALEESA-2, -3, and -7 studies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-42.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura M. Spring
- 2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sandra Franco
- 4Luis Carlos Sarmiento Angulo Cancer Treatment and Research Center CTIC, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | | | - Javier Cortés
- 6International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain & Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- 7Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dejan Juric
- 8Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- 9Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Agnes Lteif
- 11Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | | | - Liyi Cen
- 13Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | - Patrick Neven
- 14Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Medford AJ, Scarpetti L, Niemierko A, Isakoff SJ, Moy B, Wander SA, Deluca E, Abraham E, Shin J, Schnipper L, Comander AE, Mulvey T, Spickard E, Kalashnikova E, Rodriguez A, Ellisen L, Bardia A, Spring LM. Abstract PD17-03: Cell-free DNA monitoring in a phase II study of adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib for localized HR+/HER2- breast cancer (LEADER). Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd17-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: While adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) reduces recurrence risk in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer, many patients still experience disease recurrence. Adjuvant therapeutic advances are needed to improve outcomes. Meanwhile, monitoring for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the adjuvant setting may detect molecular residual disease and/or emergences of molecular recurrence from tumor dormancy. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors have shown efficacy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, and abemaciclib is now approved for adjuvant use in high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Adjuvant clinical trials have evaluated upfront use of adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibition; however, the optimal timing of adding a CDK 4/6 inhibitor for HR+/HER2- breast cancer remains unknown. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial to evaluate the addition of the CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib in patients with at least one remaining year of adjuvant ET regardless of duration of ET prior to trial enrollment, and we prospectively collected plasma for ctDNA analysis. Methods: Eligible patients had Stage I-III HR+/HER2- breast cancer and had been on adjuvant ET (any number of years) with at least one year of treatment remaining. Patients were randomized to one of two ribociclib schedules: continuous (400 mg daily, 28-day cycle) or intermittent (600 mg daily days 1-21, 28-day cycle) for one year. Patients were concurrently treated with an aromatase inhibitor (plus GnRH agonist, if premenopausal). Time to recurrence was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. ctDNA monitoring was performed using the SignateraTM platform, a tumor-informed assay based on whole exome sequencing of the primary tumor for multiplex PCR-NGS ctDNA assay design with targeting of up to 16 single nucleotide variants. Plasma samples were collected at the start of ribociclib/ET and serially during follow-up visits. Results: Among 81 patients treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy and the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib, 42 patients had samples suitable for ctDNA analysis: 3 (7%) had a single ctDNA test, 17 (40%) had 2 serial ctDNA tests, and 22 (52%) had 3 serial ctDNA tests. After a median follow-up of 20 months, 2 patients who received ribociclib (intermittent dosing) experienced disease recurrence with recurrence-free survival of 100% at 1 year from study entry and 97% (95% CI 88-99%) at 2 years. ctDNA was detected exclusively in the only 2 patients that experienced recurrence, with lead times of 7 months and 8 months prior to clinical recurrence. Both patients had no detectable ctDNA at the start of ribociclib/ET. One patient had detectable ctDNA [mean tumor molecules/mL (MTM/mL) = 0.1] while on ribociclib/ET for 5 months, after which she completed a full 12 months of treatment. One month after completing ribociclib/ET (8 months after ctDNA detection), she presented with metastases in the liver and bones. The second patient had 2 negative ctDNA tests at days 0 and 147 while receiving ribociclib/ET and became ctDNA positive (MTM/mL = 0.1) at day 350. She developed CNS-only metastatic disease 7 months after completing ribociclib/ET. Among the other 40 patients who did not have detectable ctDNA, none have experienced recurrence. Conclusions: Overall, only 2 patients had detectable ctDNA, and both patients developed recurrent metastatic disease after completion of ribociclib with ET. Notably, one of these patients developed CNS-only disease. While follow-up is early, the remaining patients did not have detectable ctDNA and have not developed recurrent disease. This study suggests monitoring for ctDNA may identify patients at increased risk for recurrence in the extended adjuvant period and potentially guide therapy escalation.
Citation Format: Arielle J. Medford, Lauren Scarpetti, Andrzej Niemierko, Steven J. Isakoff, Beverly Moy, Seth A. Wander, Elizabeth Deluca, Elizabeth Abraham, Jennifer Shin, Lowell Schnipper, Amy E. Comander, Therese Mulvey, Erik Spickard, Ekaterina Kalashnikova, Angel Rodriguez, Leif Ellisen, Aditya Bardia, Laura M. Spring. Cell-free DNA monitoring in a phase II study of adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib for localized HR+/HER2- breast cancer (LEADER) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD17-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle J. Medford
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center/Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | - Seth A. Wander
- 6Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Therese Mulvey
- 12Massachusetts General Hospital North Shore Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Leif Ellisen
- 16Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya Bardia
- 17Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura M. Spring
- 18Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Connolly JJ, Spring LM, Taghian AG, Gadd M, Warren L, Garrido-Castro AC, King T, Mittendorf EA, Leone JP, Casey DL, Carey L, Traina TA, Abdou Y, Khan A, Plitas G, Wright J, Santa-Maria CA, Jacobs L, Blitzblau R, Hwang ES, Anders C, Krop I, Wolff AC, Thompson AM, Denault E, Gupta G, Ho A. Abstract OT3-15-01: TBCRC-053: P-RAD: A Randomized Study of Preoperative Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab and No, Low or High Dose RADiation in Node-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-ot3-15-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens has been shown to significantly improve outcomes in patients with triple negative breast cancer and is being investigated for high-risk hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. Preclinical evidence suggests radiation therapy (RT) can stimulate intra-tumoral T cell infiltration and enhance the expression and immune detection of tumor-specific neoantigens. This phase II pilot randomized study (NCT04443348) aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different doses of preoperative primary tumor RT boost when combined with neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, then followed by standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Dual co-primary endpoints include determining the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in the non-irradiated and pathologically confirmed metastatic axillary lymph node(s) in each treatment arm and quantifying tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes in on-treatment (C1D14) tumor biopsies. We hypothesize that high-dose RT will increase the proportion of tumors with high T cell infiltration (i.e., top quartile) from 25% to 55%. Secondary endpoints include measuring residual cancer burden, evaluating tolerability of the regimen, and assessing quality of life. Exploratory endpoints include evaluation of treatment-associated changes in the tumor immune microenvironment, circulating immune cell analyses, and circulating tumor DNA kinetics. Methods: The study plans to enroll 128 participants with either triple negative (n=80) or high-risk HR=/HER2- (n=48) breast cancer who will be randomized to receive no, low (9 Gy), or high (24 Gy) dose of preoperative RT boost, after which 24 participants of either breast cancer subtype will be enrolled to an exploratory high dose proton therapy boost cohort. The eligibility criteria include patients who have biopsy-proven, axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer that is either triple negative (defined as ER< 10%, PR< 10%, and HER2-negative) or high-risk HR+/HER2- (grade III or having a high-risk genomic assay score). Study treatment is given in 6-week cycles, with 400 mg Pembrolizumab given on day 1 of each cycle. For those participants randomized to receive a preoperative RT boost, treatment is delivered in 3 fractions (3 × 3 Gy or 3 × 8 Gy) over consecutive business days, where one of the fractions is given on the same day as C1D1 Pembrolizumab. Standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy begins on C1D15 with paclitaxel (plus carboplatin for triple negative) administered weekly for 12 weeks, and then starting on C3D15, dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide is administered every 2 weeks for 8 weeks. Following neoadjuvant treatment, participants will receive standard breast surgery (including removal of the pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph node) followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab, radiation therapy, and standard-of-care systemic therapy as clinically indicated. Tissue samples from the primary tumor and biopsy-proven lymph node are taken at baseline, C1D14, and at the time of surgery. There are eleven blood collection timepoints throughout the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Participants will be followed for 2 years after surgery to assess safety and durability of responses. Results: This study has accrued 12 participants to date, including 10 with triple negative breast cancer and 2 with high-risk HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Formal results for this study are forthcoming, as the trial is actively accruing at 6 institutions, with plans to open at 3 more within the year. For persons with a specific interest in this trial, please contact Joseph Connolly, Multi-Center Coordinator, at jconnolly28@mgh.harvard.edu.
Citation Format: Joseph J. Connolly, Laura M. Spring, Alphonse G. Taghian, Michele Gadd, Laura Warren, Ana C. Garrido-Castro, Tari King, Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, Jose P. Leone, Dana L. Casey, Lisa Carey, Tiffany A. Traina, Yara Abdou, Atif Khan, George Plitas, Jean Wright, Cesar Augusto Santa-Maria, Lisa Jacobs, Rachel Blitzblau, E Shelley Hwang, Carey Anders, Ian Krop, Antonio C. Wolff, Alastair M. Thompson, Elyssa Denault, Gaorav Gupta, Alice Ho. TBCRC-053: P-RAD: A Randomized Study of Preoperative Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab and No, Low or High Dose RADiation in Node-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-15-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura M. Spring
- 2Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Tari King
- 7Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School
| | | | - Jose P. Leone
- 9Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Lisa Carey
- 11UNC-Lindberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Yara Abdou
- 13University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Jacobs
- 18Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Carey Anders
- 21Duke University Medical Center/Duke Cancer Institute, North Carolina
| | - Ian Krop
- 22Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | - Alice Ho
- 27Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bardia A, Hurvitz S, Press MF, Wang LS, McAndrew NP, Chan D, Phan V, Villa D, Tetef ML, Chamberlain E, Abdulla N, Lomis T, Spring LM, Applebaum S, Dakhil S, DiCarlo B, Kim DD, Kirimis E, Lawler WE, Master AK, McCann K, Hayashi E, Kivork C, Chauv J. Abstract GS2-03: GS2-03 TRIO-US B-12 TALENT: Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan with or without anastrozole for HER2-low, HR+ early stage breast cancer. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-gs2-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Although patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) frequently experience disease response to neoadjuvant therapy, fewer than 10% achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) with standard chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, even in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Thus, finding more effective therapies for this disease remains an unmet need. HER2 is expressed at a low level (IHC 1+ or 2+) in approximately 60-70% of HR+ BC. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a, T-DXd) is a novel HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugate (ADC) that is FDA approved in the US for HER2-positive and HER2-low metastatic BC (with boxed warnings for interstitial lung disease). However, the efficacy of T-DXd in the neoadjuvant setting is not known. The primary objective of TALENT (TRIO-US B-12, NCT04553770) is to evaluate the clinical activity and safety of neoadjuvant T-DXd alone or in combination with endocrine therapy in pts with HR+/HER2-low early BC.
Methods: Men and women with previously untreated, operable invasive early stage, non-recurrent, HR+, HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH- by local or central review) BC measuring > 2 cm were eligible. In stage 1 of clinical trial, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive T-DXd (5.4 mg/kg IV q21 days) alone, Arm A, or in combination with anastrozole AI (1 mg PO QD), Arm B. Originally 6 cycles (cy) were given but in 02/2022, an amendment increased the number of treatment cy from 6 to 8 for newly enrolled pts, or those who had not yet had surgery. Men and pre/peri-menopausal women randomized to Arm B also received a GnRH agonist. Stratification factors were HER2 expression (1+ vs. 2+) and menopausal status (men as postmenopausal). Tumor tissue collected at baseline, cy 1 day 17-21, and at surgery. Breast imaging performed at baseline, cy 2 and pre-surgery/EOT. Primary endpoint is pCR rate (ypT0/is ypN0) at surgery. In stage 1, intent was to randomize 58 pts (if at least 2 pCR occurred in an arm, arm progresses to Stage 2 and an additional 15 pts to be enrolled). Other endpoints include safety, objective response rate (ORR), changes in Ki67 expression, Residual Cancer Burden index, exploratory biomarker analysis, and health-related quality of life. Here we present results from stage 1 of the trial.
Results: From 09/21/2020 to 10/13/2022, 58 pts were enrolled and treated (29 Arm A, 29 Arm B) in stage 1 of trial. Five pts came off study before completing study therapy (2 after cy 1, 2 after cy 2, 1 after cy 3). As of data cut-off (10/05/2022), 33 pts completed study treatment and have had surgery (17 Arm A, 16 Arm B), 13 are on treatment and 7 are pending surgery; 27 pts completed 6 cy and 13 completed 8 cy. Baseline characteristics were balanced between arms. 19/58 pts were Stage IIA, 26/58 Stage IIB, 12/58 Stage IIIA, and 1/58 Stage IIIB at baseline. 46/58 pts had baseline HER2 expression (from central review) of 1+, 4/58 were 0, 6/58 were 2+, 1/58 had multicentric lesion 1+ and 2+, and 1/58 had a single lesion with 1+ and 2+. In Arm A, 1/17 pt had pCR after 8 cy, 2/17 pts had RCB-I after 6 cy (17.6% RCB 0/1). In Arm B, 1/16 pt had RCB-I after 8 cy (6.3%). The ORR for response-evaluable pts in Arm A was 75% (12/16, 1 CR, 11 PR) and in Arm B was 63.2% (12/19, 2 CR, 10 PR); 1 patient (Arm B) had PD. ILD occurred in 1 pt (1.7%), Gr 2 and resolved 11 days after stopping therapy. Most common treatment-related Grade ≥ 3 AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, include hypokalemia (1.7%, 5.2%), diarrhea (3.4%, 3.4%), neutropenia (3.4%, 1.7%), fatigue (1.7%, 3.4%), headache (3.4%, 1.7%), vomiting (3.4%, 1.7%), dehydration (1.7%, 1.7%) and nausea (3.4%, 0%).
Conclusions: This is the first report of a trial evaluating neoadjuvant T-DXd in HER2 low breast cancer. T-DXd +/- endocrine therapy demonstrates promising clinical activity for pts with HR+ BC. Updated study results will be provided at the time of presentation.
Citation Format: Aditya Bardia, Sara Hurvitz, Michael F. Press, Lisa S. Wang, Nicholas P. McAndrew, David Chan, Vu Phan, Deborah Villa, Merry L. Tetef, Erin Chamberlain, Nihal Abdulla, Thomas Lomis, Laura M. Spring, Steven Applebaum, Shaker Dakhil, Brian DiCarlo, David D. Kim, Evangelia Kirimis, William E. Lawler, Aashini K. Master, Kelly McCann, Edwin Hayashi, Christine Kivork, James Chauv. GS2-03 TRIO-US B-12 TALENT: Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan with or without anastrozole for HER2-low, HR+ early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya Bardia
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara Hurvitz
- 2University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael F. Press
- 3Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - David Chan
- 6Torrance Memorial Physician Network (TMPN)
| | - Vu Phan
- 7Cancer Blood and Specialty Clinic
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura M. Spring
- 13Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - James Chauv
- 24UCLA JCCC Division of Clinical Trials Development
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mortensen L, Keenan JC, Abraham E, Padden S, Ma A, Denault E, Ryan L, Medford AJ, Ellisen L, Schwartz JH, Bardia A, Spring LM. Abstract P1-08-01: Virtual molecular and precision medicine (vMAP) clinic to improve access to clinical trials for patients with metastatic breast cancer: an academic-community collaboration. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p1-08-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Despite improved outcomes for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), attributed in part to advancements in precision therapeutics, clinical trial enrollment and genomic testing are relatively underutilized in the community oncology setting. To address this need, we launched a virtual molecular and precision medicine (vMAP) clinic to improve access for patients in our community network. Here we describe the initial results from the virtual clinic initiative. Methods: In 2020, the vMAP clinic was launched to provide real-time access to precision medicine expertise through virtual, email-based consultation directed to a multidisciplinary team. As part of the service, providers contacted vMAP regarding patients with MBC at the time of initial presentation or disease progression. Upon receipt, the vMAP team (including breast medical oncologists, a breast oncology research nurse, a research assistant, and ad hoc consultation from cancer genetics and molecular pathology representatives) engaged in discussion to identify potential clinical trials with slot availability or standard of care (SOC) options and provided recommendations to the referring provider within 72 hours. Relevant patient data and vMAP referral outcomes were recorded. Providers across the community network were surveyed at project onset and after seventeen months. Results: In its first 14-month period (June 2020-July 2021), 47 cases from 16 providers across seven community oncology sites and one academic site were referred to vMAP. A majority (88.6%) of patients had undergone somatic genomic testing (tissue-based, plasma-based, or both) to inform treatment guidance. All cases were screened for available clinical trials as well as SOC options at the time of referral. The average response time to the referring provider with a finalized recommendation was 1.77 days (range 0-5). Forty cases (85.1%) had clinical trial options identified on vMAP pre-screen. Subsequently, 22 patients (46.8%) screened for vMAP recommended clinical trials with 18 (38.3%) initiating enrollment. Of the remaining patients that did not pursue clinical trial screening, 17 (36.2%) started vMAP-recommended SOC treatment, five (10.6%) pursued a different treatment, one (2.1%) was not a candidate for further treatment, and two (4.3%) opted to receive care at a non-affiliated institution, and subsequent treatment information was not available. Reasons that patients did not enroll on trials included trial ineligibility, formal clinical trial screening failure, and patient/provider preference. At project onset, network provider survey results confirmed a previously suggested demand for improvements in processes surrounding genomic testing interpretation and clinical trial enrollment. Post-referral survey results indicated vMAP recommendations and pre-screenings improved the processes surrounding interpretation of genomic testing and clinical trial screening and enrollment, with high rates of referring provider satisfaction. Conclusion: A precision medicine virtual clinic demonstrated an efficient and flexible means to offer real-time interpretation of genomic and molecular test results and identification of appropriate treatment options, including clinical trials when applicable, for patients with MBC. The service highlights an example of an academic-community collaboration model to expand precision medicine and clinical trial access for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Citation Format: Lindsey Mortensen, Jennifer C. Keenan, Elizabeth Abraham, Sarah Padden, Annie Ma, Elyssa Denault, Lianne Ryan, Arielle J. Medford, Leif Ellisen, Joel H. Schwartz, Aditya Bardia, Laura M. Spring. Virtual molecular and precision medicine (vMAP) clinic to improve access to clinical trials for patients with metastatic breast cancer: an academic-community collaboration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Annie Ma
- 5Massachusetts General Hospital/UMass Chan Medical School
| | | | - Lianne Ryan
- 7Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Arielle J. Medford
- 8Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center/Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| | - Leif Ellisen
- 9Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Aditya Bardia
- 11Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lloyd MR, Ryan L, Medford AJ, Keenan JC, Spring LM, Vidula N, Moy B, Juric D, Ellisen L, Bardia A, Wander SA. Abstract P1-13-07: Investigating NF1 Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients with Hormone-receptor Positive (HR+) Breast Tumors Resistant to CDK4/6 Inhibition (CDK4/6i): A Retrospective Clinical Analysis. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p1-13-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are standard of care for the management of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Genomic alterations that drive resistance to CDK4/6i are diverse, and while the molecular landscape is heterogeneous, several mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance converge on the RAS/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways. NF1 downregulates RAS and dampens cellular proliferation. Laboratory-based models demonstrate that loss of NF1 is associated with resistance to endocrine therapy (ET), and emergence of NF1 mutations (NF1m) are correlated with progressive disease (PD) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). While NF1m may diminish CDK4/6i susceptibility, a clear relationship has not been elucidated. The primary objective of this study was to characterize patient (pt) response to CDK4/6i in NF1m HR+/HER2- MBC. Methods: We identified 47 pts with NF1m via a database with one or more ctDNA samples sequenced at variable time-points as part of routine care for MBC. NF1m were categorized as pathogenic (p)NF1m or variants of uncertain significance (VUS) based on their associated Guardant report. We identified 27 pts with HR+/HER2- MBC and NF1m that received at least 1 line of CDK4/6i in the metastatic setting. Intrinsic resistance was defined as PD < 6 months on a CDK4/6i regimen, and acquired resistance was defined as PD >6 months. Pts with intrinsic resistance or acquired resistance and NF1m detected post-PD were categorized as having a resistance phenotype potentially driven by NF1m. Pts with NF1m detected prior to therapy and >6 months clinical response on a CDK4/6i were categorized as having NF1m tumors sensitive to CDK4/6i. Results: The NF1m cohort (n = 27) had 9 pts with pNF1m, while 18 pts expressed VUS. The median age at MBC diagnosis was 54 years, and 67% had visceral metastasis at ctDNA collection. Pts received a median of 1 prior line (range: 0 - 6) of ET or chemotherapy in the metastatic setting before CDK4/6i. Amongst pts with pathogenic variants (n = 9), we found 3 pts with pNF1m were intrinsically resistant to CDK4/6i. Acquired resistance was seen in 1 pt with pNF1m detected post-PD, and 2 pts had evidence of both acquired and subsequent intrinsic resistance to a later line of CDK4/6i. Overall, 67% (6/9) of pNF1m pts demonstrated a CDK4/6i resistance phenotype; mutant allele fraction (AF) ranged from 0.2% - 29.9%, and the mean maximum allele fraction (MAF) was 6.0%. Pre- and post-treatment samples were available on 3 pts with pNF1m, and 1 of these pts had an AF rise from 2.7% to 12.3% when comparing ctDNA pre- and post-CDK4/6i. ctDNA from 4 of 6 resistant tumors harbored other putative drivers including alterations in FGFR, KRAS, PTEN, and RB. We identified 2 counter-examples of pNF1m tumors sensitive to CDK4/6i. These pts expressed relatively low NF1m AF, ranging 0.1% - 0.5% with a mean MAF 0.3%. Another pNF1m pt had intrinsic resistance to initial CDK4/6i but was sensitive to later-line CDK4/6i. In the subgroup of pts with VUS-NF1m (n = 18), a more mixed picture of resistance and sensitivity was seen. 8 pts had intrinsic or acquired resistance, 8 pts had NF1m tumors sensitive to CDK4/6i, and 1 pt had evidence of both; 61% (n = 11) of pts expressed alterations in other resistance mediating genes. 1 pt stopped therapy due to toxicity rather than PD. Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that tumor expression of pNF1m may be associated with CDK4/6i resistance in pts with HR+/HER2- MBC, and allele fraction could be predictive of drug susceptibility. Tumors harboring VUS had varied sensitivity, suggesting that some of these mutations may not be pathogenic, and counter-examples of pNF1m MBC benefiting from CDK4/6i plus ET highlight the complexities in predicting drug response based on single gene alteration. Future effort is warranted to explore the potential impact of NF1 on CDK4/6i resistance, as well as the potential role for therapies targeting the MAPK pathway in this patient population.
Citation Format: Maxwell R. Lloyd, Lianne Ryan, Arielle J. Medford, Jennifer C. Keenan, Laura M. Spring, Neelima Vidula, Beverly Moy, Dejan Juric, Leif Ellisen, Aditya Bardia, Seth A. Wander. Investigating NF1 Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA of Patients with Hormone-receptor Positive (HR+) Breast Tumors Resistant to CDK4/6 Inhibition (CDK4/6i): A Retrospective Clinical Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lianne Ryan
- 2Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital
| | - Arielle J. Medford
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center/Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | - Laura M. Spring
- 5Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neelima Vidula
- 6Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Dejan Juric
- 8Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leif Ellisen
- 9Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya Bardia
- 10Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Seth A. Wander
- 11Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Spring LM, Barlow WE, Bardia A, Sharma P, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN, Kalinsky K. Abstract HER2-19: HER2-19 Impact of HER2 low status on clinical outcomes in participants with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, HR+/HER2- breast cancer with recurrence score </25 randomized to endocrine therapy +/- chemotherapy: results from SWOG S1007 (RxPONDER). Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-her2-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: HER2 low breast cancer, defined as tumors with HER2 IHC expression 1+ or 2+ without HER2 gene amplification, represents a potential new therapeutic subgroup of metastatic breast cancer (BC). However, the clinical significance of HER2 low status in early BC remains unclear. Previously, the RxPONDER trial (NCT01272037), a prospective, randomized trial of endocrine therapy (ET) vs. chemoendocrine therapy (CET) in women with lymph node positive (LN+) BC, demonstrated invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) with ET vs CET varies by menopausal status. We evaluated the impact of HER2 low vs zero status in the RxPONDER trial (SWOG S1007), stratified by menopausal status and treatment groups.
Methods: Eligibility criteria included women >/18 years of age with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) BC, Recurrence Score (RS) </25, 1-3+ LN and no contraindications to taxane and/or anthracycline based CT. The impact of HER2 low status and other baseline clinicopathological features on clinical outcomes were evaluated using covariates in Cox regression analysis. HER2 IHC status was per local testing. HER2 low was defined as IHC 1+ or IHC 2+ without HER2 gene amplification, and HER2 zero was defined as IHC 0. The primary endpoint was IDFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of a first invasive recurrence (local, regional, or distant), a new invasive primary cancer (breast cancer or another type of cancer), or death from any cause. Secondary objectives included distant-relapse free survival (DRFS).
Results: Among the 4,983 eligible participants, 4,588 had IHC HER2 status available. 52% of 2,052 pre-menopausal women had HER2 low BC and 57% of 3,042 post-menopausal women had HER2 low BC. There was a small, but statistically significant (p=0.03) difference, in RS between HER2 low (mean 14.5) and HER2 zero (mean 14.1) status. The proportion of participants with HER2 low and zero were balanced between treatment group assignment (CET vs ET). Among pre-menopausal women adjusting for RS, CET led to an observed improvement in IDFS among both HER2 low (HR=0.67; 95% CI 0.43-1.04) and HER2 zero subgroups (HR=0.57; 95% CI 0.36-0.89) (interaction p=0.55). Similarly, among post-menopausal women, there was no difference in IDFS between CET vs ET among both HER2 low (HR=0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.29) and HER2 zero (HR=1.12; 95% CI 0.80-1.56) subgroups (interaction p=0.57). In multivariable analysis, adjusting for treatment arm, RS, and menopausal status, HER2 low status was not associated with worse IDFS compared to HER2 zero status (HR=0.93; 95% CI 0.78-1.11). Additionally, no differences were noted in DRFS.
Conclusion: HER2 low or zero status had no impact on clinical outcomes with CET vs ET among pre-menopausal or post-menopausal women with HR+/HER- BC with 1-3+ LNs and RS </25. HER2 low evaluation should not be currently used for CET vs ET clinical decision making among patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer with 1-3+ LN and RS </25. Further research on the role of HER2 low status in other settings may be warranted.
Citation Format: Laura M. Spring, William E. Barlow, Aditya Bardia, Priyanka Sharma, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Kevin Kalinsky. HER2-19 Impact of HER2 low status on clinical outcomes in participants with 1-3 positive lymph nodes, HR+/HER2- breast cancer with recurrence score </25 randomized to endocrine therapy +/- chemotherapy: results from SWOG S1007 (RxPONDER) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr HER2-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M. Spring
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Aditya Bardia
- 3Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- 4University of Kansas Medical Center Westwood, Westwood, KS, USA
| | | | | | - Kevin Kalinsky
- 7Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Medford AJ, Velimirovic M, Niemierko A, Hensing WL, Davis AA, Clifton KK, Keenan JC, Dai CS, Kiedrowski LA, Shah AN, Gerratana L, Spring LM, Ellisen L, Doebele RC, Cristofanilli M, Bardia A. Abstract P5-02-07: Cell-free DNA detection of GATA3 mutations in metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer: a retrospective, observational multi-institutional analysis. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-p5-02-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background GATA3 mutations (GATA3mut) have been reported in 10-20% of hormone receptor positive (HR+) breast cancers. It has been shown that targeting GATA3mut HR+ breast cancer with MDM2 inhibitors invokes synthetic lethality. MDM2 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets p53 for degradation, and research suggests that restoring p53 by blocking MDM2 may be effective in treating GATA3mut HR+ breast cancer. One potential mechanism of this efficacy has been shown to be through the PI3K-AKT pathway. We thus sought to characterize the GATA3mut landscape in a multi-institutional cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis and to determine the association between GATA3mut and TP53 mutations, as well as alterations in the PI3K-AKT pathway and the impact of GATA3 on survival. Methods We analyzed cfDNA data collected at the Massachusetts General Hospital and at Washington University in St Louis via Guardant360, a next generation sequencing assay that analyzed up to 74 genes during the study period. The association of GATA3mut and co-mutations as well as number of prior therapies was estimated using Pearson’s chi-squared test for categorical variables, two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continues variables, and multivariable logistic regression. The impact of GATA3mut and GATA3 wildtype (WT) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression analysis, adjusting for age, number of prior therapies, visceral metastases, and de novo metastases. PFS and OS were evaluated in the overall study population, as well as in subgroups of patients that received endocrine monotherapy and chemotherapy. Results Out of 647 patients with HR+ MBC, 10% (n = 68) had non-synonymous GATA3 mutations. Among these 68 GATA3mut patients, 37% (n = 25) were mutations in exon 5, all but two of which were in the second zinc finger, and 62% (n = 42) were in exon 6. 62% (n = 42) were frameshift mutations, 20% (n = 14) were indels, and 18% (n = 12) were point mutations. Median mutant allele fraction (MAF) of GATAmut was 0.95% (range 0.03 – 30.5%). There was no statistically significant association of GATA3mut with the number of prior therapies, PR status, or the presence of ESR1, TP53, or PI3K-AKT pathway mutations. In the GATA3mut population, TP53 co-mutations (n = 21) were found with a median MAF of 0.6%. PI3K-AKT pathway alterations occurred in 47% (n=32) of GATA3mut patients (PIK3CA n = 27; AKT n = 2; PTEN n = 3). In the combined cohort, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS after adjusting for visceral metastases, de novo disease, number of prior therapies, and age. In a cohort of 80 patients that received endocrine monotherapy (GATA3 WT n = 74, GATA3mut n = 6), GATA3mut were associated with borderline worse PFS (HR 2.6; p = 0.061) and worse OS (HR 4.5; p = 0.009). There was no statistically significant difference in PFS or OS in a subgroup that received chemotherapy. Conclusions GATA3 mutations can be identified via cfDNA in patients with HR+ MBC. Co-mutations in TP53 occurred at overall low MAF. Further research is needed to characterize the functional impact of these low level TP53 co-mutations and develop therapeutic strategies to target GATA3 mutant MBC.
Citation Format: Arielle J. Medford, Marko Velimirovic, Andrzej Niemierko, Whitney L. Hensing, Andrew A. Davis, Katherine K. Clifton, Jennifer C. Keenan, Charles S. Dai, Lesli A. Kiedrowski, Ami N. Shah, Lorenzo Gerratana, Laura M. Spring, Leif Ellisen, Robert C. Doebele, Massimo Cristofanilli, Aditya Bardia. Cell-free DNA detection of GATA3 mutations in metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer: a retrospective, observational multi-institutional analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-02-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle J. Medford
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center/Dana Farber Cancer Institute
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ami N. Shah
- 10Northwestern University - Feinberg School of Medicine
| | - Lorenzo Gerratana
- 11Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano
| | - Laura M. Spring
- 12Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leif Ellisen
- 13Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Aditya Bardia
- 16Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abelman RO, Wu B, Spring LM, Ellisen LW, Bardia A. Mechanisms of Resistance to Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041278. [PMID: 36831621 PMCID: PMC9954407 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), with antibodies targeted against specific antigens linked to cytotoxic payloads, offer the opportunity for a more specific delivery of chemotherapy and other bioactive payloads to minimize side effects. First approved in the setting of HER2+ breast cancer, more recent ADCs have been developed for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and, most recently, hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. While antibody-drug conjugates have compared favorably against traditional chemotherapy in some settings, patients eventually progress on these therapies and require a change in treatment. Mechanisms to explain the resistance to ADCs are highly sought after, in hopes of developing next-line treatment options and expanding the therapeutic windows of existing therapies. These resistance mechanisms are categorized as follows: change in antigen expression, change in ADC processing and resistance, and efflux of the ADC payload. This paper reviews the recently published literature on these mechanisms as well as potential options to overcome these barriers.
Collapse
|
30
|
Abelman RO, Keenan JC, Ryan PK, Spring LM, Bardia A. Current and Emerging Role of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:151-167. [PMID: 36435607 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are rapidly evolving therapies that are uniquely able to deliver potent chemotherapy specifically to cancer cells while largely sparing normal cells. ADCs have 3 components: (1) antibody targeted to a tumor-involved antigen, (2) cytotoxic payload, and (3) linker that connects the cytotoxic agent to the antibody. Once the antibody binds the target on the cell surface, the ADC is incorporated into the cell via receptor-mediated endocytosis. Inside the cells, the linker is cleaved in the lysosome and the payload is then released intracellularly. This article will review ADCs in clinical development for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer C Keenan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Phoebe K Ryan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Breast Cancer Research, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Medford AJ, Oshry L, Boyraz B, Kiedrowski L, Menshikova S, Butusova A, Dai CS, Gogakos T, Keenan JC, Occhiogrosso RH, Ryan P, Lennerz JK, Spring LM, Moy B, Ellisen LW, Bardia A. TRK inhibitor in a patient with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and NTRK fusions identified via cell-free DNA analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231152844. [PMID: 36743521 PMCID: PMC9893401 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231152844] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Tissue-agnostic indications for targeted therapies have expanded options for patients with advanced solid tumors. The Food and Drug Administration approvals of the programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and the TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib provide rationale for next-generation sequencing (NGS) in effectively all advanced solid tumor patients given potential for clinical responses even in otherwise refractory disease. As proof of concept, this case report describes a 64-year-old woman with triple-negative breast cancer refractory to multiple lines of therapy, found to have a rare mutation on NGS which led to targeted therapy with meaningful response. She initially presented with metastatic recurrence 5 years after treatment for a localized breast cancer, with rapid progression through four lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, including immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugate-based therapy, and chemotherapy. Germline genetic testing was normal. Ultimately, NGS evaluation of cell-free DNA via an 83-gene assay (Guardant Health, Inc.) identified two NTRK3 fusions: an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion associated with the rare secretory breast carcinoma, and CRTC3-NTRK3, a novel fusion partner not previously described in breast cancer. Liver biopsy was sent for whole exome sequencing and RNA-seq analysis of tissue (BostonGene, Inc., Boston, MA, USA), which provided orthogonal confirmation of both the ETV6-NTRK3 and CRTC3-NTRK3 fusions. She was started on the TRK inhibitor larotrectinib with a marked clinical and radiographic response after only 2 months of therapy. The patient granted verbal consent to share her clinical story, images, and data in this case report. This case demonstrates the significant potential benefits of NGS testing in advanced cancer and the lessons we may learn from individual patient experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lauren Oshry
- Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA,Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Baris Boyraz
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Charles S. Dai
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tasos Gogakos
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Rachel H. Occhiogrosso
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Phoebe Ryan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jochen K. Lennerz
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M. Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leif W. Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
McLaughlin S, Nakajima E, Bar Y, Hutchinson JA, Shin J, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Bardia A, Kuter I, Spring LM. Adjuvant trastuzumab and vinorelbine for early-stage HER2+ breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359221146133. [PMID: 36643653 PMCID: PMC9837262 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221146133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The single-arm phase II APT trial established trastuzumab and paclitaxel (TH) as the standard adjuvant regimen for small human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) tumors. However, paclitaxel causes alopecia and has high rates of neuropathy and hypersensitivity reactions. In patients with metastatic HER2+ breast cancer (BC), the combination of trastuzumab and vinorelbine (TV) is effective and well tolerated. There is a need for alternative non-anthracycline/taxane-based regimens for patients with HER2+ early-stage BC, especially for those with contraindications or who wish to avoid side effects of taxane-based regimens. Here we describe our institutional experience with adjuvant TV for patients with early-stage HER2+ BC. Methods Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes of patients with localized HER2+ BC treated with adjuvant TV from 2007 to 2021 at a large academic medical institution were collected. Study endpoints included invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. IDFS and OS were measured from start date of TV treatment to date of event/last follow-up and date of death/last follow-up, respectively. Results A total of 30 patients were treated with TV. All patients received trastuzumab at standard dosing and vinorelbine at a starting dose of 25 mg/m2 either on days 1/8 or on days 1/8/21 (weekly) of a 21-day cycle with four planned cycles. Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range: 36-81). 90.3% of patients had anatomic pathologic stage IA BC and 9.7% stage IIA BC. Of the 30 patients, 24 of them opted to pursue TV due to concerns related to alopecia, neuropathy, and other toxicities, and 6 switched from treatment with TH to TV due to toxicities. Eight patients experienced neutropenia with no cases of febrile neutropenia. No patients experienced alopecia or long-term neuropathy. With a median follow-up of 68 months (5.7 years), the 5-year IDFS rate was 90.9%, with one local and one distant recurrence. The 5-year OS was 100%. Conclusions Trastuzumab in combination with vinorelbine in the adjuvant, early-stage setting for low-risk HER2+ BC demonstrated clinical efficacy and appeared to be well tolerated. TV warrants further evaluation as an alternative regimen to TH for patients with early-stage HER2+ BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yael Bar
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Shin
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven J. Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Brett JO, Ritterhouse LL, Newman ET, Irwin KE, Dawson M, Ryan LY, Spring LM, Rivera MN, Lennerz JK, Dias-Santagata D, Ellisen LW, Bardia A, Wander SA. Clinical Implications and Treatment Strategies for ESR1 Fusions in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Case Series. Oncologist 2022; 28:172-179. [PMID: 36493359 PMCID: PMC9907034 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC), endocrine resistance is commonly due to genetic alterations of ESR1, the gene encoding estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). While ESR1 point mutations (ESR1-MUT) cause acquired resistance to aromatase inhibition (AI) through constitutive activation, far less is known about the molecular functions and clinical consequences of ESR1 fusions (ESR1-FUS). This case series discusses 4 patients with HR+ MBC with ESR1-FUS in the context of the existing ESR1-FUS literature. We consider therapeutic strategies and raise the hypothesis that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) may be effective against ESR1-FUS with functional ligand-binding domain swaps. These cases highlight the importance of screening for ESR1-FUS in patients with HR+ MBC while continuing investigation of precision treatments for these genomic rearrangements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie O Brett
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren L Ritterhouse
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erik T Newman
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kelly E Irwin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Megan Dawson
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lianne Y Ryan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Miguel N Rivera
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dora Dias-Santagata
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Pathology, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leif W Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Seth A Wander
- Corresponding author: Seth A. Wander, MD, PhD, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Tel: +1 617 726 6500; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Dias-Santagata D, Heist RS, Bard AZ, da Silva AFL, Dagogo-Jack I, Nardi V, Ritterhouse LL, Spring LM, Jessop N, Farahani AA, Mino-Kenudson M, Allen J, Goyal L, Parikh A, Misdraji J, Shankar G, Jordan JT, Martinez-Lage M, Frosch M, Graubert T, Fathi AT, Hobbs GS, Hasserjian RP, Raje N, Abramson J, Schwartz JH, Sullivan RJ, Miller D, Hoang MP, Isakoff S, Ly A, Bouberhan S, Watkins J, Oliva E, Wirth L, Sadow PM, Faquin W, Cote GM, Hung YP, Gao X, Wu CL, Garg S, Rivera M, Le LP, John Iafrate A, Juric D, Hochberg EP, Clark J, Bardia A, Lennerz JK. Implementation and Clinical Adoption of Precision Oncology Workflows Across a Healthcare Network. Oncologist 2022; 27:930-939. [PMID: 35852437 PMCID: PMC9632318 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision oncology relies on molecular diagnostics, and the value-proposition of modern healthcare networks promises a higher standard of care across partner sites. We present the results of a clinical pilot to standardize precision oncology workflows. METHODS Workflows are defined as the development, roll-out, and updating of disease-specific molecular order sets. We tracked the timeline, composition, and effort of consensus meetings to define the combination of molecular tests. To assess clinical impact, we examined order set adoption over a two-year period (before and after roll-out) across all gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary (GI) malignancies, and by provider location within the network. RESULTS Development of 12 disease center-specific order sets took ~9 months, and the average number of tests per indication changed from 2.9 to 2.8 (P = .74). After roll-out, we identified significant increases in requests for GI patients (17%; P < .001), compliance with testing recommendations (9%; P < .001), and the fraction of "abnormal" results (6%; P < .001). Of 1088 GI patients, only 3 received targeted agents based on findings derived from non-recommended orders (1 before and 2 after roll-out); indicating that our practice did not negatively affect patient treatments. Preliminary analysis showed 99% compliance by providers in network sites, confirming the adoption of the order sets across the network. CONCLUSION Our study details the effort of establishing precision oncology workflows, the adoption pattern, and the absence of harm from the reduction of non-recommended orders. Establishing a modifiable communication tool for molecular testing is an essential component to optimize patient care via precision oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dora Dias-Santagata
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca S Heist
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam Z Bard
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Valentina Nardi
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren L Ritterhouse
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas Jessop
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander A Farahani
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mari Mino-Kenudson
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill Allen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aparna Parikh
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph Misdraji
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Present affiliation: Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ganesh Shankar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Justin T Jordan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria Martinez-Lage
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Frosch
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Timothy Graubert
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amir T Fathi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gabriela S Hobbs
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert P Hasserjian
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Noopur Raje
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremy Abramson
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joel H Schwartz
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Miller
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mai P Hoang
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy Ly
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara Bouberhan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jaclyn Watkins
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Esther Oliva
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lori Wirth
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter M Sadow
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William Faquin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gregory M Cote
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yin P Hung
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xin Gao
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chin-Lee Wu
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Salil Garg
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Miguel Rivera
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Long P Le
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ephraim P Hochberg
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Clark
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Denault E, Nakajima E, Naranbhai V, Hutchinson JA, Mortensen L, Neihoff E, Barabell C, Comander A, Juric D, Kuter I, Mulvey T, Peppercorn J, Rosenstock AS, Shin J, Vidula N, Wander SA, Moy B, Ellisen LW, Isakoff SJ, Iafrate AJ, Gainor JF, Bardia A, Spring LM. Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221119370. [PMID: 36051470 PMCID: PMC9425892 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221119370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To explore the immunogenicity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines in patients with breast cancer based on type of anticancer treatment. Methods Patients with breast cancer had anti-spike antibody concentrations measured ⩾14 days after receiving a full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination series. The primary endpoint was IgA/G/M anti-spike antibody concentration. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze log10-transformed antibody titer concentrations. Results Between 29 April and 20 July 2021, 233 patients with breast cancer were enrolled, of whom 212 were eligible for the current analysis. Patients who received mRNA-1273 (Moderna) had the highest antibody concentrations [geometric mean concentration (GMC) in log10: 3.0 U/mL], compared to patients who received BNT162b2 (Pfizer) (GMC: 2.6 U/mL) (multiple regression adjusted p = 0.013) and Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen) (GMC: 2.6 U/mL) (p = 0.071). Patients receiving cytotoxic therapy had a significantly lower antibody titer GMC (2.5 U/mL) compared to patients on no therapy or endocrine therapy alone (3.0 U/mL) (p = 0.005). Patients on targeted therapies (GMC: 2.7 U/mL) also had a numerically lower GMC compared to patients not receiving therapy/on endocrine therapy alone, although this result was not significant (p = 0.364). Among patients who received an additional dose of vaccine (n = 31), 28 demonstrated an increased antibody response that ranged from 0.2 to >4.4 U/ mL. Conclusion Most patients with breast cancer generate detectable anti-spike antibodies following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, though systemic treatments and vaccine type impact level of response. Further studies are needed to better understand the clinical implications of different antibody levels, the effectiveness of additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses, and the risk of breakthrough infections among patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vivek Naranbhai
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Amy Comander
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Irene Kuter
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theresa Mulvey
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aron S Rosenstock
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Shin
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neelima Vidula
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Seth A Wander
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leif W Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A John Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Justin F Gainor
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Brett JO, Weipert CM, Ritterhouse LL, Zhang N, Yu J, Ryan LY, Spring LM, Rivera MN, Lennerz JK, Dias-Santagata D, Ellisen LW, Bardia A, Wander SA. Abstract 5248: CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) is effective in the real-world setting for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC) with ESR1 mutations and fusions. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background For HR+ MBC, ESR1 point mutations (ESR1-MUT) are a common mechanism of acquired resistance to aromatase inhibition (AI); ESR1 fusions (ESR1-FUS) are rare and promote intrinsic resistance to ER-targeting drugs. Retrospective analyses of CDK4/6i trials suggest ESR1-MUT does not cause CDK4/6i resistance, but whether CDK4/6i is effective for ESR1-MUT, or for ESR1-FUS, in the real-world setting is unknown.
Methods Real-world evidence was sourced from the GuardantInform database of commercial payer claims and ctDNA tests from 170,000+ individuals. Patients with MBC who started CDK4/6i within 30 days of ctDNA testing were categorized as ESR1-MUT vs. ESR1-WT and analyzed for time-to-next-treatment (TTNT). Separately, cases with ESR1-FUS detected by tissue RNA-Seq were extracted from a clinicopathologic database at an academic cancer center.
Results There was no significant difference in TTNT on CDK4/6i for ESR1-MUT vs. ESR1-WT. As expected, ESR1-MUT had shorter overall survival (OS), even after adjustment for age, CDK4/6i drug, and prior treatment (HR 0.58 (0.42-0.82), p=0.002, multivariable Cox). Endocrine partner analysis was limited by lack of clinical annotation to 27% of cases: AI was given to 55% of ESR1-WT and 25% of ESR1-MUT; fulvestrant was given to 39% of ESR1-WT and 68% of ESR1-MUT. Additional stratified analyses will be presented.
In the clinicopathologic database, we identified 4 ESR1-FUS cases, and all received CDK4/6i. Progression-free survival durations on CDK4/6i were 4, 10, 11, and 33+ months.
Conclusions Using real-world evidence, we demonstrate that CDK4/6i is effective in both ESR1-MUT and ESR1-WT HR+ MBC, supporting the use of CDK4/6i in this setting. CDK4/6i may be additionally beneficial for patients with ESR1-FUS. Future directions include expanding the ESR1-FUS cohort and deciphering the heterogeneity of CDK4/6i responses in this patient population.
ESR1-WT ESR1-MUT p-value n=612 n=145 TTNT, median days (95% CI) 99 (85-121) 102 (85-152) 0.84 (log-rank) OS, median years (95% CI) 5.1 (4.5-NA) 2.2 (2.0-NA) <0.0001 (log-rank) CDK4/6i drug palbociclib: 71.1% ribociclib: 9.8% abemaciclib: 19.1% palbociclib: 60% ribociclib: 5.5% abemaciclib: 34.5% 0.038 (chi-square) Prior lines of treatment 0: 21.2% 1: 26.1% 2: 18.6% 3+: 34.0% median: 2 0: 15.9% 1: 22.8% 2: 17.2% 3+: 44.1% median: 2 0.013 (Mann-Whitney U)
Citation Format: Jamie O. Brett, Caroline M. Weipert, Lauren L. Ritterhouse, Nicole Zhang, Junhua Yu, Lianne Y. Ryan, Laura M. Spring, Miguel N. Rivera, Jochen K. Lennerz, Dora Dias-Santagata, Leif W. Ellisen, Aditya Bardia, Seth A. Wander. CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) is effective in the real-world setting for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC) with ESR1 mutations and fusions [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5248.
Collapse
|
37
|
Spring LM, Bar Y, Isakoff SJ. The Evolving Role of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:723-734. [PMID: 35714678 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The role of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for localized breast cancer has evolved tremendously over the past several years. Currently, NAT is the preferred option for high-risk early triple-negative (TN) and HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers and is indicated for some estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancers. In addition to traditional absolute indications for NAT, relative indications such as the assessment of outcomes at the time of surgery and guidance of treatment escalation and de-escalation have greatly evolved in recent years. Pathologic complete response (pCR) and the Residual Cancer Burden (RCB) index are highly prognostic for disease recurrence and survival, mainly in patients with TN or HER2+ disease. Furthermore, post-NAT escalation strategies have been shown to improve long-term outcomes of patients who do not achieve pCR. Additionally, by allowing the direct assessment of drug effect on the tumor, the neoadjuvant setting has become an attractive setting for the exploration of novel agents and the identification of predictive biomarkers. Neoadjuvant trial design has also evolved, using adaptive treatment approaches that enable treatment de-escalation or escalation based on response. However, despite multiple practice-changing neoadjuvant trials and the addition of various new agents to the neoadjuvant setting for early breast cancer, many key questions remain. For example, patient selection for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in TN breast cancer, de-escalation methods in HER2+ breast cancer, and the use of gene expression profiles to guide NAT recommendations in ER+ breast cancer. This article reviews the current approach for NAT in localized breast cancer as well as evolving NAT strategies, the key remaining challenges, and the ongoing work in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, and.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yael Bar
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, and
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, and.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hurvitz S, Bardia A, Tetef ML, McAndrew NP, Applebaum S, Master AK, DiNome ML, Lee MK, Kirimis E, Kim DD, Wang LS, Greene K, Phan V, Abdulla N, Chan D, Spring LM, Kivork C, Chauv J. Abstract OT1-12-05: Phase II neoadjuvant trial evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan with or without anastrozole for HER2-low, HR+ early stage breast cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-ot1-12-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Although patients with clinical response of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) frequently respond to neoadjuvant therapy, fewer than 10% of patients achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) with standard chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, even in combination with targeted agents such as CDK4/6 inhibitors. Thus, finding more effective therapies for this disease remains an area of unmet need. HER2 amplification is a known driver of endocrine resistance and HER2 may be expressed at a low level (IHC 1+ or 2+) in up to 60% of HR+ BC. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a, T-DXd) is a novel HER2-targeting antibody drug conjugate (ADC) that is FDA approved for HER2-positive metastatic BC and has demonstrated promising clinical efficacy in HER2-low BC with an objective response rate of ~37%. The aim of TALENT (TRIO-US B-12) is to evaluate the clinical activity and toxicity of neoadjuvant T-DXd either alone or in combination with endocrine therapy in patients with HR+/HER2-low early BC. Methods TRIO-US B-12 TALENT (NCT04553770) is an ongoing randomized, multicenter, open-label, two-stage, phase II neoadjuvant trial for participants with early stage, HR+, HER2-low expressing (1+ or 2+ by IHC) BC. Eligible participants include men and women with previously untreated, operable invasive BC greater than 2.0 cm (cT2) in size. Pts with recurrent or metastatic BC, or inflammatory BC are excluded. Pts are randomized 1:1 to receive six cycles of T-DXd (5.4 mg/kg IV q21 days) either alone or in combination with anastrozole AI (1 mg PO QD). Men and pre/peri menopausal women randomized to the AI arm also receive standard of care GnRH agonist. Stratification factors include HER2 expression (1+ or 2+) and menopausal status (men stratified as post-menopausal). Tumor tissue is taken at baseline, cycle 1 day 17-21, and at surgery. Blood samples are taken at four time points for biomarker analysis. The primary endpoint is pCR rate (breast and lymph node) at definitive surgery. In stage I, 58 participants will be randomized (29/arm). If ≥2 participants in an arm achieve pCR, that arm will expand (stage II) to enroll an additional 15 participants (total of 44/arm). A pCR rate of >10% (5/44) would be considered favorable, warranting further evaluation of the treatment in a larger trial. Other endpoints include safety, changes in Ki67 expression, Residual Cancer Burden index, biomarker analysis (including serial cfDNA analysis), and health-related quality of life. As of June 2021, sixteen participants have enrolled. Conclusions To our knowledge this is the first and only ongoing study evaluating T-DXd with or without endocrine therapy for HR+, HER2-low breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. The study will shed light on clinical activity and biomarkers, which may guide larger confirmatory studies for patients with HR+, HER2-low early breast cancer.
Citation Format: Sara Hurvitz, Aditya Bardia, Merry L. Tetef, Nicholas P. McAndrew, Steven Applebaum, Aashini K. Master, Maggie L. DiNome, Minna K. Lee, Evangelia Kirimis, David D. Kim, Lisa S. Wang, Kyle Greene, Vu Phan, Nihal Abdulla, David Chan, Laura M. Spring, Christine Kivork, James Chauv. Phase II neoadjuvant trial evaluating trastuzumab deruxtecan with or without anastrozole for HER2-low, HR+ early stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-12-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Hurvitz
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachussetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Boston, MA
| | - Merry L. Tetef
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nicholas P. McAndrew
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Steven Applebaum
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Aashini K. Master
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Maggie L. DiNome
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Minna K. Lee
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Evangelia Kirimis
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David D. Kim
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Vu Phan
- Cancer Blood and Specialty Clinic, Los Alamitos, CA
| | | | - David Chan
- Torrance Memorial Physician Network (TMPN)/Cancer Care, Torrance, CA
| | - Laura M. Spring
- Massachussetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Boston, MA
| | - Christine Kivork
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - James Chauv
- University of California Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wander SA, Micalizzi DS, Dubash T, Juric D, Spring LM, Vidula N, Keenan J, Beeler M, Viscosi E, Che D, Fisher EL, Hepp RA, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Ellisen LW, Supko JG, Maheswaran S, Haber DA, Bardia A. Abstract P1-18-22: AKT inhibition in combination with endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and prior CDK4/6i exposure: A translational investigation. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p1-18-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, with endocrine therapy (ET), have become the standard of care for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. Prior insight from tumor biopsies and preclinical analyses suggest that AKT1 activation can provoke CDK4/6i resistance, highlighting a potential therapeutic role for AKT inhibition (AKTi) in this setting. However, combinatorial inhibition can be associated with significant toxicity and identification of the optimal biological dose is often challenging. In this translational co-clinical study, we evaluated escalating doses of AKTi combination with CDK 4/6i in parallel patient-derived pre-clinical models as well as a phase 1b clinical trial. Methods: In an open-label phase Ib dose-escalation clinical trial (TAKTIC, NCT03959891), we evaluated the safety, tolerability and efficacy of escalating doses of the AKT1 inhibitor ipatasertib (ipat) in combination with palbociclib (palbo) and fulvestrant (fulv) for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. Inclusion criteria include unresectable or metastatic disease, at least 1 prior therapy for MBC including any CDK4/6i, and up to 2 prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC (no limit on prior endocrine therapy). In addition, response to escalating doses of ipat and palbo (with fulv) were explored in vitro via an ATP-based viability assay in tumor cell lines derived from circulating tumor cells (CTC) isolated from patients with endocrine-refractory HR+ MBC. Results: In the dose-escalation portion of the phase 1b clinical trial, 23 patients received the triplet combination of ipat, palbo, and fulv (median number of prior lines = 4.3, range 1-7; 100% with prior CDK4/6i): 3 pts received ipat at 200mg + 125mg palbo, 15 pts received 300mg + 125mg palbo, and 5 pts received 400mg + 100mg palbo, all with fulv (500 mg). Among the 23 patients, 20 patients (86.9%) had disease control (4 partial response and 16 stable disease) as the best response, per RECIST. Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (n=20), lymphopenia (n=3), diarrhea (n=3), thrombocytopenia (n=2), transaminitis (n=2), and rash (n=2). Two DLTs were observed in the 300mg ipat + 125mg palbo cohort (grade 4 neutropenia ≥ 7 days), but none at 400mg + 100mg palbo. The combination of ipat and palbo demonstrated an additive effect in vitro, with increased sensitivity to lower doses of palbo in the presence of ipat. Based on the totality of data, 400mg ipat + 100mg palbo + fulv 500 mg was selected as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in the post-CDK4/6i setting. Conclusions: The triplet combination of endocrine therapy with AKTi and lower dose CDK4/6i appears to be well tolerated in heavily pre-treated pts, with preliminary evidence of clinical activity. Further study is needed to evaluate biomarkers associated with higher AKTi benefit in order to guide rational development of combination therapy for patients with HR+/HER2- MBC in the post-CDK4/6i setting. Overall, this translational study demonstrates how insight into the molecular mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance and combinatorial modeling can be leveraged to develop actionable therapeutic regimens for patients with MBC.
Citation Format: Seth A. Wander, Douglas S. Micalizzi, Taronish Dubash, Dejan Juric, Laura M. Spring, Neelima Vidula, Jennifer Keenan, Maureen Beeler, Elene Viscosi, Dante Che, Elizabeth L. Fisher, Rachel A. Hepp, Beverly Moy, Steven J. Isakoff, Leif W. Ellisen, Jeffrey G. Supko, Shyamala Maheswaran, Daniel A. Haber, Aditya Bardia. AKT inhibition in combination with endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and prior CDK4/6i exposure: A translational investigation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-18-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth A. Wander
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Neelima Vidula
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Maureen Beeler
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Elene Viscosi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Dante Che
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Rachel A. Hepp
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Denault E, Nakajima E, Naranbhai V, Balazs A, Mortensen L, Niehoff E, Barabell C, Hutchinson JA, Wander SA, Rosenstock AS, Ellisen LW, Moy B, Isakoff SJ, Gainor JF, Iafrate AJ, Bardia A, Spring LM. Abstract P3-23-02: Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with breast cancer receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p3-23-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: CDK 4/6 inhibitors have transformed the landscape of breast oncology. A CDK 4/6 inhibitor in combination with endocrine therapy is recommended as 1st line therapy for patients with metastatic hormone receptor positive breast cancer. CDK 4/6 inhibitors have purported immunomodulatory effects and while effective, myelosuppression is a common adverse effect of CDK 4/6 inhibitor treatment of breast cancer. The impact of CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy on immunogenicity of vaccines is not known. In this study, we evaluated the spike antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines among patients with breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy with or without CDK 4/6 inhibitors.Methods: In the Cancer COVID and Vaccine (CANVAX) study eligible patients included patients with breast cancer who had completed all scheduled doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Chart review was conducted to identify patients who had received endocrine therapy with or without CDK 4/6 inhibitor. We used validated assays to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 total IgA/M/G spike antibodies and virus neutralization. We evaluated the magnitude of antibody response based on geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) as well as the % of patients with inadequate seroconversion (defined as levels <100 U/ml). Independent T-test based on log-transformed antibody values was utilized to compare the spike antibody levels and p value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Between April 2021 and June 2021, 203 patients with breast cancer were enrolled. As of the cut-off date (2nd July 2021), results were available for 73 patients treated with endocrine therapy alone (N = 23), or with CDK 4/6 inhibitor-based therapy (N = 50). Most were females (98.6%), white (83.6%), and had metastatic breast cancer (68.5%). 49.3% had received BNT162b2 (Pfizer), 37% mRNA1273 (Moderna), and 13.7% Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson and Johnson/Janssen) vaccines. Overall, the mean spike antibody levels were similar between patients treated with endocrine therapy alone vs CDK 4/6 inhibitor-based therapy (GMC: 326 vs. 719 U/mL; p=0.704). Mean spike antibody levels were higher in patients with early breast cancer vs. metastatic breast cancer (GMC: 555 vs. 465 U/mL; p=0.031). However, patients who received Ad26.COV2.S had lower levels of mean spike antibody levels (GMC 47 U/ml), compared with patients treated with BNT162b2 (GMC 400 U/ml) or mRNA1273 (GMC 2203 U/mL; P<0.01 for both comparisons). Comparison of neutralization titers in 66 individuals supported the above results. 11 (15.1%) patients had low antibody titers (<100U/ml) of seroconversion and 3 received a booster vaccine, with 1 having available repeat titer results thus far demonstrating a significant improvement.Conclusions: The majority of patients receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitor have adequate antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, particularly mRNA vaccines. However, a minority of patients may require booster vaccine to augment immunity. Monitoring spike antibody levels could be helpful to identify patients with inadequate seroconversion and guide mitigation strategies for patients with breast cancer.
Citation Format: Elyssa Denault, Erika Nakajima, Vivek Naranbhai, Alejandro Balazs, Lindsey Mortensen, Elizabeth Niehoff, Caroline Barabell, Jennifer A. Hutchinson, Seth A. Wander, Aron S. Rosenstock, Leif W. Ellisen, Beverly Moy, Steven J. Isakoff, Justin F. Gainor, A. John Iafrate, Aditya Bardia, Laura M. Spring. Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with breast cancer receiving CDK 4/6 inhibitors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-23-02.
Collapse
|
41
|
Spring LM, Scarpetti L, Niemierko A, Isakoff SJ, Moy B, Wander SA, Smith E, Abraham E, Shin J, Patel JM, Comander A, Mulvey T, Bardia A. Abstract P1-14-02: Phase II study of adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, for localized ER+/HER2- breast cancer (LEADER, part 1). Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p1-14-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: CDK 4/6 inhibitors have demonstrated substantial efficacy in treating ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Therefore, there is great interest in exploring their ability to reduce recurrence risk in early breast cancer. However, conflicting results were observed in the large adjuvant phase 3 clinical trials investigating combination of endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitor (PALLAS, MONARCH-E). While these adjuvant clinical trials evaluated upfront use of CDK 4/6 inhibitor, the optimal timing of adding CDK 4/6 inhibitor for HR+/HER2- breast cancer remains unknown. We conducted a prospective phase II clinical trial to evaluate the addition of a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, in patients who were already on adjuvant endocrine therapy. Methods: In part 1 of the clinical trial, eligibility included patients with localized stage I-III ER+ (≥ 10%), HER2- breast cancer; completed surgery; and were on adjuvant endocrine therapy (any number of years) with at least one year or more of treatment remaining. Patients were randomized to two different ribociclib schedules: continuous (400 mg daily of 28-day cycle; arm 1) or intermittent (600 mg daily on days 1-21 of 28-day cycle; arm 2) for one year. Patients were concurrently treated with an aromatase inhibitor (plus GnRH agonist if premenopausal). Tolerance was evaluated via CTCAE version 4.03 and proportion of subjects who discontinued CDK 4/6 treatment early. Stratification factors for statistical analysis included: disease stage (III vs lower), duration of prior endocrine therapy (within 2 years; 2-5 years vs > 5 years), and whether the patient received prior chemotherapy or not. Baseline characteristics and risk factors for recurrence and for early discontinuation were compared between the arms of the study using Pearson's chi-squared test. Actuarial analysis of time to recurrence was done using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The primary objective of part 1 was to estimate adherence to ribociclib treatment in the adjuvant setting. Results: In total, 81 patients were enrolled between February 2018 and September 2019, and 25 (31%) discontinued ribociclib treatment early, with no significant difference between study arms. The most common grade 3 or greater adverse events (AEs) leading to study discontinuation were neutropenia (44%), alanine aminotransferase increase (28%), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (16%). Among patients who discontinued early, neutropenia was more frequent in the 600 mg arm, 9 of 12 patients (75%), versus 2 of 13 patients (15%) in the 400 mg arm. No patients discontinued early due to prolonged QTc. Ribociclib was dose reduced for 22 patients (27%), with no significant difference between study arms (p = 0.12). After a median follow-up of 20 months, two patients have experienced disease recurrence with recurrence-free survival of 100% at 1 year and 97% (95% CI 88-99%) at 2 years. Biomarker (ctDNA) results will be reported at the meeting. Conclusions: Results demonstrate that while serious AEs with one year of adjuvant ribociclib are low, a substantial number of patients discontinued adjuvant CDK 4/6 inhibitor within 1 year. Overall, with limited follow-up, only two patients had recurrent disease since completion of ribociclib treatment. Tolerability and identifying patient subsets who will most benefit need to be carefully considered with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant setting.
Citation Format: Laura M Spring, Lauren Scarpetti, Andrzej Niemierko, Steven J Isakoff, Beverly Moy, Seth A Wander, Elisabeth Smith, Elizabeth Abraham, Jennifer Shin, Jaymin M Patel, Amy Comander, Therese Mulvey, Aditya Bardia. Phase II study of adjuvant endocrine therapy with CDK 4/6 inhibitor, ribociclib, for localized ER+/HER2- breast cancer (LEADER, part 1) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-02.
Collapse
|
42
|
Naranbhai V, Pernat CA, Gavralidis A, St Denis KJ, Lam EC, Spring LM, Isakoff SJ, Farmer JR, Zubiri L, Hobbs GS, How J, Brunner AM, Fathi AT, Peterson JL, Sakhi M, Hambelton G, Denault EN, Mortensen LJ, Perriello LA, Bruno MN, Bertaux BY, Lawless AR, Jackson MA, Niehoff E, Barabell C, Nambu CN, Nakajima E, Reinicke T, Bowes C, Berrios-Mairena CJ, Ofoman O, Kirkpatrick GE, Thierauf JC, Reynolds K, Willers H, Beltran WG, Dighe AS, Saff R, Blumenthal K, Sullivan RJ, Chen YB, Kim A, Bardia A, Balazs AB, Iafrate AJ, Gainor JF. Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Cancer: The CANVAX Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:12-23. [PMID: 34752147 PMCID: PMC8683230 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with cancer are poorly understood. METHODS We performed a prospective cohort study of adults with solid-organ or hematologic cancers to evaluate anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin A/M/G spike antibodies, neutralization, and reactogenicity ≥ 7 days following two doses of mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, or one dose of Ad26.COV2.S. We analyzed responses by multivariate regression and included data from 1,638 healthy controls, previously reported, for comparison. RESULTS Between April and July 2021, we enrolled 1,001 patients; 762 were eligible for analysis (656 had neutralization measured). mRNA-1273 was the most immunogenic (log10 geometric mean concentration [GMC] 2.9, log10 geometric mean neutralization titer [GMT] 2.3), followed by BNT162b2 (GMC 2.4; GMT 1.9) and Ad26.COV2.S (GMC 1.5; GMT 1.4; P < .001). The proportion of low neutralization (< 20% of convalescent titers) among Ad26.COV2.S recipients was 69.9%. Prior COVID-19 infection (in 7.1% of the cohort) was associated with higher responses (P < .001). Antibody titers and neutralization were quantitatively lower in patients with cancer than in comparable healthy controls, regardless of vaccine type (P < .001). Receipt of chemotherapy in the prior year or current steroids were associated with lower antibody levels and immune checkpoint blockade with higher neutralization. Systemic reactogenicity varied by vaccine and correlated with immune responses (P = .002 for concentration, P = .016 for neutralization). In 32 patients who received an additional vaccine dose, side effects were similar to prior doses, and 30 of 32 demonstrated increased antibody titers (GMC 1.05 before additional dose, 3.17 after dose). CONCLUSION Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are modestly impaired in patients with cancer. These data suggest utility of antibody testing to identify patients for whom additional vaccine doses may be effective and appropriate, although larger prospective studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Naranbhai
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Center for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa, Durban, South Africa
| | - Claire A. Pernat
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Alexander Gavralidis
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Salem Hospital, Salem, MA
| | | | - Evan C. Lam
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Laura M. Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Steven J. Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jocelyn R. Farmer
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Leyre Zubiri
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Gabriela S. Hobbs
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Joan How
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Division of Hematology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew M. Brunner
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Amir T. Fathi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer L. Peterson
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mustafa Sakhi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Grace Hambelton
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Elyssa N. Denault
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lindsey J. Mortensen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Lailoo A. Perriello
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Marissa N. Bruno
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Brittany Y. Bertaux
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Aleigha R. Lawless
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Monica A. Jackson
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Elizabeth Niehoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Caroline Barabell
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Christian N. Nambu
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Erika Nakajima
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Trenton Reinicke
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Cynthia Bowes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Onosereme Ofoman
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Kerry Reynolds
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Wilfredo-Garcia Beltran
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Anand S. Dighe
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rebecca Saff
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kimberly Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Ryan J. Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Yi-Bin Chen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Arthur Kim
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - A. John Iafrate
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Justin F. Gainor
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lloyd MR, Spring LM, Bardia A, Wander SA. Mechanisms of Resistance to CDK4/6 Blockade in Advanced Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative Breast Cancer and Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 28:821-830. [PMID: 34725098 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard of care, in combination with antiestrogen therapy, for patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Various preclinical and translational research efforts have begun to shed light on the genomic and molecular landscape of resistance to these agents. Drivers of resistance to CDK4/6i therapy can be broadly subdivided into alterations impacting cell-cycle mediators and activation of oncogenic signal transduction pathways. The resistance drivers with the best translational evidence supporting their putative role have been identified via next-generation sequencing of resistant tumor biopsies in the clinic and validated in laboratory models of HR+ breast cancer. Despite the diverse landscape of resistance, several common, therapeutically actionable resistance nodes have been identified, including the mitotic spindle regulator Aurora Kinase A, as well as the AKT and MAPK signaling pathways. Based upon these insights, precision-guided therapeutic strategies are under active clinical development. This review will highlight the emerging evidence, in the clinic and in the laboratory, implicating this diverse spectrum of molecular resistance drivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell R Lloyd
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura M Spring
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Seth A Wander
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Medford A, Spring LM, Moy B, Bardia A. Antibody drug conjugates for patients with breast cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 2021; 45:100795. [PMID: 34635342 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2021.100795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The receptor-based classification of breast cancer predicts its optimal therapy. Hormone Receptor (HR) positive breast cancer is treated with endocrine therapy, and HER2+ disease is treated with HER2-targeted therapy. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined as tumors lacking HR and HER2, represents an aggressive subtype of breast cancer associated with poor prognosis. Development of targeted therapy for this subtype has been challenging since TNBC usually lacks targetable genomic alterations. However, the advent of antibody drug conjugates (ADC) to target antigens overexpressed in breast cancer has opened the door to a new class of breast cancer therapeutics. In this review, we describe the current FDA-approved ADC therapies for breast cancer, including sacituzumab govitecan, as well as agents currently in advanced stages of investigation. In addition, we review the potential therapeutic application of ADCs across different breast cancer subtypes. In the future, therapeutic advances in ADCs targeting different antigens could redefine the current receptor-based classification of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle Medford
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Filho OM, Viale G, Stein S, Trippa L, Yardley DA, Mayer IA, Abramson VG, Arteaga CL, Spring LM, Waks AG, Wrabel E, DeMeo MK, Bardia A, Dell'Orto P, Russo L, King TA, Polyak K, Michor F, Winer EP, Krop IE. Impact of HER2 Heterogeneity on Treatment Response of Early-Stage HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Phase II Neoadjuvant Clinical Trial of T-DM1 Combined with Pertuzumab. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:2474-2487. [PMID: 33941592 PMCID: PMC8598376 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Intratumor heterogeneity is postulated to cause therapeutic resistance. To prospectively assess the impact of HER2 (ERBB2) heterogeneity on response to HER2-targeted therapy, we treated 164 patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer with neoadjuvant trastuzumab emtansine plus pertuzumab. HER2 heterogeneity was assessed on pretreatment biopsies from two locations of each tumor. HER2 heterogeneity, defined as an area with ERBB2 amplification in >5% but <50% of tumor cells, or a HER2-negative area by FISH, was detected in 10% (16/157) of evaluable cases. The pathologic complete response rate was 55% in the nonheterogeneous subgroup and 0% in the heterogeneous group (P < 0.0001, adjusted for hormone receptor status). Single-cell ERBB2 FISH analysis of cellular heterogeneity identified the fraction of ERBB2 nonamplified cells as a driver of therapeutic resistance. These data suggest HER2 heterogeneity is associated with resistance to HER2-targeted therapy and should be considered in efforts to optimize treatment strategies. SIGNIFICANCE: HER2-targeted therapies improve cure rates in HER2-positive breast cancer, suggesting chemotherapy can be avoided in a subset of patients. We show that HER2 heterogeneity, particularly the fraction of ERBB2 nonamplified cancer cells, is a strong predictor of resistance to HER2 therapies and could potentially be used to optimize treatment selection.See related commentary by Okines and Turner, p. 2369.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2355.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto Metzger Filho
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Shayna Stein
- Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lorenzo Trippa
- Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Denise A Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | | | - Adrienne G Waks
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eileen Wrabel
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michelle K DeMeo
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrizia Dell'Orto
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Leila Russo
- Division of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Tari A King
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Franziska Michor
- Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Eric P Winer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ian E Krop
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Koh SB, Dontchos BN, Bossuyt V, Edmonds C, Cristea S, Melkonjan N, Mortensen L, Ma A, Beyerlin K, Denault E, Niehoff E, Hirz T, Sykes DB, Michor F, Specht M, Lehman C, Ellisen LW, Spring LM. Systematic tissue collection during clinical breast biopsy is feasible, safe and enables high-content translational analyses. NPJ Precis Oncol 2021; 5:85. [PMID: 34548623 PMCID: PMC8455592 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00224-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Systematic collection of fresh tissues for research at the time of diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy has the potential to fuel a wide variety of innovative studies. Here we report the initial experience, including safety, feasibility, and laboratory proof-of-principle, with the collection and analysis of research specimens obtained via breast core needle biopsy immediately following routine clinical biopsy at a single institution over a 14-month period. Patients underwent one or two additional core biopsies following collection of all necessary clinical specimens. In total, 395 patients were approached and 270 consented to the research study, yielding a 68.4% consent rate. Among consenting patients, 238 lesions were biopsied for research, resulting in 446 research specimens collected. No immediate complications were observed. Representative research core specimens showed high diagnostic concordance with clinical core biopsies. Flow cytometry demonstrated consistent recovery of hundreds to thousands of viable cells per research core. Among a group of HER2 + tumor research specimens, HER2 assessment by flow cytometry correlated highly with immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, and in addition revealed extensive inter- and intra-tumoral variation in HER2 levels of potential clinical relevance. Suitability for single-cell transcriptomic analysis was demonstrated for a triple-negative tumor core biopsy, revealing substantial cellular diversity in the tumor immune microenvironment, including a prognostically relevant T cell subpopulation. Thus, collection of fresh tissues for research purposes at the time of diagnostic breast biopsy is safe, feasible and efficient, and may provide a high-yield mechanism to generate a rich tissue repository for a wide variety of cross-disciplinary research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siang-Boon Koh
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian N Dontchos
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Veerle Bossuyt
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine Edmonds
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simona Cristea
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nsan Melkonjan
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Annie Ma
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kassidy Beyerlin
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elyssa Denault
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Taghreed Hirz
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - David B Sykes
- Center for Regenerative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Franziska Michor
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle Specht
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Constance Lehman
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leif W Ellisen
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Brett JO, Spring LM, Bardia A, Wander SA. ESR1 mutation as an emerging clinical biomarker in metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2021; 23:85. [PMID: 34392831 PMCID: PMC8365900 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-021-01462-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations are a common cause of acquired resistance to the backbone of therapy, estrogen deprivation by aromatase inhibition. How these mutations affect tumor sensitivity to established and novel therapies are active areas of research. These therapies include estrogen receptor-targeting agents, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators, covalent antagonists, and degraders (including tamoxifen, fulvestrant, and novel agents), and combination therapies, such as endocrine therapy plus CDK4/6, PI3K, or mTORC1 inhibition. In this review, we summarize existing knowledge surrounding the mechanisms of action of ESR1 mutations and roles in resistance to aromatase inhibition. We then analyze the recent literature on how ESR1 mutations affect outcomes in estrogen receptor-targeting and combination therapies. For estrogen receptor-targeting therapies such as tamoxifen and fulvestrant, ESR1 mutations cause relative resistance in vitro but do not clearly lead to resistance in patients, making novel agents in this category promising. Regarding combination therapies, ESR1 mutations nullify any aromatase inhibitor component of the combination. Thus, combinations using endocrine alternatives to aromatase inhibition, or combinations where the non-endocrine component is efficacious as monotherapy, are still effective against ESR1 mutations. These results emphasize the importance of investigating combinatorial resistance, challenging as these efforts are. We also discuss future directions and open questions, such as studying the differences among distinct ESR1 mutations, asking how to adjust clinical decisions based on molecular surveillance testing, and developing novel therapies that are effective against ESR1 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie O Brett
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Seth A Wander
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Spring LM, Clark SL, Li T, Goel S, Tayob N, Viscosi E, Abraham E, Juric D, Isakoff SJ, Mayer E, Moy B, Supko JG, Tolaney SM, Bardia A. Phase 1b clinical trial of ado-trastuzumab emtansine and ribociclib for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:103. [PMID: 34349115 PMCID: PMC8339067 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00311-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer are often treated with a multitude of therapies in the metastatic setting, and additional strategies to prolong responses to anti-HER2 therapies are needed. Preclinical evidence suggests synergy between cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors and anti-HER2 therapies. We conducted a phase 1b study of ribociclib and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with advanced/metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane in any setting, with four or fewer prior lines of therapy in the metastatic setting. A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used to evaluate various doses of ribociclib in combination with T-DM1, starting at 300 mg. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ribociclib in combination with T-DM1. A total of 12 patients were enrolled. During dose-escalation, patients received doses of ribociclib of 300 mg (n = 3), 400 mg (n = 3), 500 mg (n = 3), and 600 mg (n = 3). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The majority of toxicities were Grade 1 and 2, and the most common Grade 3 toxicities were neutropenia (33%), leukopenia (33%), and anemia (25%). After a median follow-up of 12.4 months, the median PFS was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.7-19.3). Based on the pharmacokinetic analysis, adverse events, and dose reductions, 400 mg was determined to be the RP2D for ribociclib given on days 8-21 of a 21-day cycle with T-DM1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shealagh L Clark
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tianyu Li
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shom Goel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nabihah Tayob
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elene Viscosi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Abraham
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erica Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey G Supko
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sara M Tolaney
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mortensen L, Ordulu Z, Dagogo-Jack I, Bossuyt V, Winters L, Taghian A, Smith BL, Ellisen LW, Kiedrowski LA, Lennerz JK, Bardia A, Spring LM. Locally Recurrent Secretory Carcinoma of the Breast with NTRK3 Gene Fusion. Oncologist 2021; 26:818-824. [PMID: 34176200 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Enhanced understanding of the molecular events underlying oncogenesis has led to the development of "tumor-agnostic" treatment strategies, which aim to target a tumor's genomic profile regardless of its anatomic site of origin. A classic example is the translocation resulting in an ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion, a characteristic driver of a histologically diverse array of cancers. The chimeric ETV6-NTRK3 fusion protein elicits constitutive activation of the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) C protein, leading to increased cell survival, growth, and proliferation. Two TRK inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, are currently approved for use in the metastatic setting for the treatment of advanced solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions. Here we report a rare case of recurrent secretory carcinoma of the breast (SCB) with NTRK3 gene fusion. Whereas most cases of SCB represent slow-growing tumors with favorable outcomes, the case detailed here is the first to the authors' knowledge of recurrence within 1 year of surgery. We review the molecular findings and potential clinical significance. KEY POINTS: The translocation resulting in the ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion is a known oncogenic driver characteristic of secretory carcinoma of the breast (SCB). Whereas most cases of SCB represent slow-growing tumors with favorable outcomes, the case here with ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion had local recurrence within 1 year of surgery. Two tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, are approved to treat NTRK fusion-positive tumors, demonstrating sustained high overall response rates in the metastatic setting. Approval of TRK inhibitors necessitates optimization of NTRK fusion detection assays, including detection with liquid biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Zehra Ordulu
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Veerle Bossuyt
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Loren Winters
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alphonse Taghian
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barbara L Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leif W Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Spring LM, Nakajima E, Hutchinson J, Viscosi E, Blouin G, Weekes C, Rugo H, Moy B, Bardia A. Sacituzumab Govitecan for Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Overview and Management of Potential Toxicities. Oncologist 2021; 26:827-834. [PMID: 34176192 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer have a poor prognosis. Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) is an antibody-drug conjugate that contains the irinotecan active metabolite, SN-38, linked to a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2, which is overexpressed in many solid tumors. In a basket design phase I/II study, sacituzumab govitecan demonstrated promising single-agent therapeutic activity in multiple cancer cohorts, leading to accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (TRODELVY) for the treatment of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who had received at least two prior therapies in the metastatic setting. Recently, results of the phase III trial, ASCENT, were confirmatory. There is limited available information on the adverse event management with sacituzumab govitecan needed to maximize the dose and duration of effective therapy while maintaining patient quality of life. This review summarizes the clinical development and the practical management of patients receiving sacituzumab govitecan. Sacituzumab govitecan has a well-defined and manageable toxicity profile, and rapid recognition and appropriate early and proactive management will allow clinicians to optimize sacituzumab govitecan treatment for patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Sacituzumab govitecan (TRODELVY) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate composed of the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN-38) conjugated to a monoclonal antibody targeting trophoblast cell surface antigen 2, an epithelial cell surface antigen overexpressed in many cancers. Because of the rapid approval of sacituzumab govitecan, there is limited available information on adverse event (AE) management with this agent. As such, this article reviews the clinical development of the drug, the AE profile, and provides recommendations regarding AE management to help optimize therapy with sacituzumab govitecan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erika Nakajima
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer Hutchinson
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Gayle Blouin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Colin Weekes
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hope Rugo
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|