Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Associated with Pharmacological Weight Loss: A Meta-Analysis

A synthesis of pathways linking diet, metabolic risk and cardiovascular disease: a framework to guide further research and approaches to evidence-based practice

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most common non-communicable disease occurring globally. Although previous literature has provided useful insights into the important role that diet plays in CVD prevention and treatment, understanding the causal role of diets is a difficult task considering inherent and introduced weaknesses of observational (e.g. not properly addressing confounders and mediators) and experimental research designs (e.g. not appropriate or well designed). In this narrative review, we organised current evidence linking diet, as well as conventional and emerging physiological risk factors, with CVD risk, incidence and mortality in a series of diagrams. The diagrams presented can aid causal inference studies as they provide a visual representation of the types of studies underlying the associations between potential risk markers/factors for CVD. This may facilitate the selection of variables to be considered and the creation of analytical models. Evidence depicted in the diagrams was systematically collected from studies included in the British Nutrition Task Force report on diet and CVD and database searches, including Medline and Embase. Although several markers and disorders linked to conventional and emerging risk factors for CVD were identified, the causal link between many remains unknown. There is a need to address the multifactorial nature of CVD and the complex interplay between conventional and emerging risk factors with natural and built environments, while bringing the life course into the spotlight.

Low Perception of Obesity as a Pathological Condition Among Italian Cardiologists

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is not only an important modifiable cardiovascular risk factor but also a chronic disease with relevant consequences on morbidity and mortality in the general population. According to European guidelines, cardiologists must recognize and treat it properly.

AIMS

To assess perception of obesity as a modifiable pathological condition and the importance to treat it in a real-world sample of cardiologists and residents in cardiology.

METHODS

A nationwide, web-based, epidemiological survey on the perception of obesity as a disease and as a modifiable cardiovascular risk factors was conducted in 137 medical doctors (cardiologists and residents in cardiology). Participants filled with their answers a questionnaire of 31 questions about perception of obesity and strategies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.

RESULTS

Of 137 individuals enrolled in our survey only 5 (3.6%) reported to measure waist circumference in their clinical practice and only 3 (2.2%) reported to measure waist-to-hip ratio. One-hundred-twenty participants (87.6%) would not prescribe an anti-obesity drug to a patient with grade II obesity. Sixty-eight (49.6%) participants have never read or heard of a clinical trial on obesity. On the other hand, 134 (97.8%) routinely measured blood pressure in their clinical practice, 129 (94.2%) would prescribe a statin for a hypercholesterolemic patient and 132 (96.4%) subjects have read/heard a clinical trial on type 2 diabetes in their life.

CONCLUSIONS

Although obesity is a chronic disease and an important modifiable cardiovascular risk factor such as arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, cigarette smoke and diabetes, cardiologists and residents in cardiology substantially underestimate it ignoring that it should be treated as a proper disease.

Remission as an Emerging Therapeutic Target in Type 2 Diabetes in the Era of New Glucose-Lowering Agents: Benefits, Challenges, and Treatment Approaches

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease with a growing prevalence, associated with an increased risk of complications. The introduction of new classes of antidiabetic drugs into clinical practice has dramatically changed the landscape of diabetes therapy. However, despite the progress made in the pharmacotherapy of T2DM, mitigating the burden of the disease on individuals, societies and health care systems remains a challenge. Remission has recently emerged as a therapeutic target in T2DM, achievable through a wide range of interventions. Recent studies have shown that extensive lifestyle changes, such as weight reduction, bariatric surgery, and intensive glucose lowering therapy, can prompt the remission of diabetes, but some unanswered questions remain regarding its long-term effects on diabetic complications. Metabolic surgery and novel classes of glucose-lowering medications are currently the most effective interventions to induce weight loss and by extension remission in patients with diabetes; however, the ideal strategy to achieve the long-term maintenance of remission remains doubtful. In this narrative review, we discuss the available therapeutic approaches to target the remission of diabetes through personalized multimodal care, based on the latest evidence.

GLP-1 Agonist to Treat Obesity and Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: What Have We Achieved so Far?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss evidence supporting the use of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) to treat obesity and their role as a cardioprotective drug. Obesity is not just a hypertrophy of the adipose tissue because it may become dysfunctional and inflamed resulting in increased insulin resistance. Being overweight is associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular events and weight loss achieved through lifestyle changes lowers risk factors, but has no clear effect on cardiovascular outcomes. In contrast, treating obesity with GLP-1RA decreases cardiovascular risk and the possible mechanisms of cardioprotection achieved by this class of drugs are discussed. GLP-1RA were initially developed to treat type 2 diabetes patients, in whom the effects upon glycemia and, moreover, weight loss, especially with long-acting GLP-1RA, were evident. However, cardiovascular safety trials in type 2 diabetes patients, the majority presenting cardiovascular disease and excess weight, showed that GLP-1 receptor agonists were indeed capable of decreasing cardiovascular risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Type 2 diabetes treatment with GLP-1RA liraglutide and semaglutide paved way to a ground-breaking therapy specific for obesity, as shown with the SCALE 3 mg/day liraglutide program and the STEP 2.4 mg/week semaglutide program. A novel molecule with superior performance is tirzepatide, a GLP-1 and GIP (Gastric Inhibitory Peptide) receptor agonist and recent results from the SURPASS and SURMOUNT programs are briefly described. Liraglutide was approved without a CVOT (Cardiovascular Outcome Trial) because authorities accepted the results from the LEADER study, designed for superiority. The SELECT study with semaglutide will report results only in 2023 and tirzepatide is being tested in patients with diabetes in the SURPASS-CVOT. Clinical studies highlight that GLP-1RA to treat obesity, alongside their concomitant cardioprotective effects, have become a hallmark in clinical science.

Classical risk factors for primary coronary artery disease from an aging perspective through Mendelian Randomization

The significance of classical risk factors in coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear in older age due to possible changes in underlying disease pathologies. Therefore, we conducted Mendelian Randomization approaches to investigate the causal relationship between classical risk factors and primary CAD in different age groups. A Mendelian Randomization study was conducted in European-ethnicity individuals from the UK Biobank population. Analyses were performed using data of 22,313 CAD cases (71.6% men) and 407,920 controls (44.5% men). Using logistic regression analyses, we investigated the associations between standardized genetic risk score and primary CAD stratified by age of diagnosis. In addition, feature importance and model accuracy were assessed in different age groups to evaluate predictive power of the genetic risk scores with increasing age. We found age-dependent associations for all classical CAD risk factors. Notably, body mass index (OR 1.22 diagnosis < 50 years; OR 1.02 diagnosis > 70 years), blood pressure (OR 1.12 < 50 years; OR 1.04 > 70 years), LDL cholesterol (OR 1.16 < 50 years; OR 1.02 > 70 years), and triglyceride levels (OR 1.11 < 50 years; 1.04 > 70 years). In line with the Mendelian Randomization analyses, model accuracy and feature importance of the classical risk factors decreased with increasing age of diagnosis. Causal determinants for primary CAD are age dependent with classical CAD risk factors attenuating in relation with primary CAD with increasing age. These results question the need for (some) currently applied cardiovascular disease risk reducing interventions at older age.

The challenge of addressing obesity in people with poorly controlled asthma

Objective

There is a high prevalence of obesity in people with asthma, and obesity is associated with poorly controlled asthma. Significant weight loss might improve asthma control: the purpose of this study was to investigate patient characteristics and factors that might affect implementation of a weight loss and/or roflumilast intervention, to target both obesity and asthma.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of people with obesity and poorly controlled asthma performed at 13 sites across the United States.

Results

One hundred and two people participated in this study. Median BMI was 37 (IQR 35-42). The majority, 55%, were African American and 76% were female. Fifty two percent had very poorly controlled asthma. Most participants were quite sedentary (70% reported being inactive or participating only in light-intensity activities according to the Stanford Brief Activity Survey). Participants reported significant impairments related to physical function on the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite questionnaire (median score 67 [IQR 41-84]). Thirty-five percent of participants reported mild, and 2 % moderate, depressive symptoms as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9.

Conclusions

Poorly controlled asthma and obesity often affect minority populations and are associated with significant impairments in health related to physical function and low levels of physical activity that might complicate efforts to lose weight. Interventions targeted at poorly controlled asthma associated with obesity in the United States need to address factors complicating health in underserved communities, such as increasing opportunities for physical activity, while also managing activity limitations related to the combination of asthma and obesity.

The effect of almond intake on glycemic control: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Number trials have evaluated the effect of almond intake on glycemic control in adults; however, the results remain equivocal. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aims to examine the effectiveness of almond intake on glycemic parameters. Online databases including PubMed, Scopus, ISI web of science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched up to August 2021 for trials that examined the effect of almond intake on glycemic control parameters including fasting blood sugar (FBS), insulin, HOMA-IR, and HbA1C. Treatment effects were expressed as mean difference (MD) and the standard deviation (SD) of outcomes. To estimate the overall effect of almond intake, we used the random-effects model. In total, 24 studies with 31 arms were included in our analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that almond intake did not significantly change the concentrations of FBS, HbA1c, insulin levels, and HOMA-IR. In conclusion, there is currently no convincing evidence that almonds have a clear beneficial effect on glycemic control. Future studies are needed before any confirmed conclusion could be drowned.

Effect of orlistat on serum uric acid level in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Hyperuricemia increases the risk of gout and cardiovascular diseases. Obesity increases the risk of hyperuricemia while weight loss (>5 kg) has been reported to decrease urate. The effects of orlistat on serum uric acid (SUA) are still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the influence of orlistat on SUA levels in adults.

METHODS

Relevant studies, published up to May 2020, were searched systematically through PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Google Scholar. All relevant randomised controlled clinical trials were included. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were also carried out.

RESULTS

Overall 7 trials (9 datasets) that enrolled 1786 subjects were included. Orlistat showed in a significant change in SUA level (Difference in means: -17.661 μmol, 95% CI: -31.615 to -3.707, P = .01). A low heterogeneity observed across the studies (I² = 25.119%). After categorising studies on the basis of duration and sample size, the effect of orlistat on SUA was significant. The results of meta-regression were showed that significant relationships were not found between orlistat and SUA in the duration of intervention.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant reduction in SUA following orlistat therapy in adults.

Obesity Management in Cardiometabolic Disease: State of the Art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize research from the last 5 years on the effects of weight loss treatments, including lifestyle changes, anti-obesity medications, and bariatric procedures on cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and CVD outcomes in adults.

RECENT FINDINGS

This narrative review includes and summarizes the contemporary evidence of the effects of these different weight loss approaches individually. A literature search was performed using the key words obesity, weight loss, CVD, cardiometabolic, and risk factors and included key clinical trials from the past 5 years. Obesity management through weight loss is associated with improvements in CVD risk factors, such as improved blood pressure, lipid profiles, and glycemic control, with greater weight loss leading to greater improvements in CVD risk factors. Bariatric surgery is associated with greater weight loss than the other procedures and treatments for obesity, and for this, and possibly for other reasons, it is associated with greater reductions in CVD outcomes and mortality. Obesity is an independent risk factor and modulator of other CVD risk factors, and thus, treatment of obesity should be an integral part of management strategies to reduce CVD risk. Future trials and real-world studies of longer duration are needed to inform providers and patients on how to individualize the approach to modifying risks of cardiometabolic disorders through obesity management.

Cardiovascular safety of long-term anti-obesity drugs in subjects with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Anti-obesity therapy can reduce body weight; however, it is not clear whether it can reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of long-term anti-obesity drugs on MACEs in individuals with overweight or obesity.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and clinical trial registries ( https://clinicaltrials.gov ) were searched up to 3 May 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared anti-obesity drugs with controls and reported cardiovascular events in subjects with overweight or obesity. Heterogeneity was described by the I² value. The Mantel-Haenszel randomized effects model was adopted to calculate risk ratios (RR) and weighted mean differences (WMD). Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the stability of the effects. Publication bias was assessed by Begg's funnel plot and Egger's test. The Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool was used to evaluate the bias of each included RCT.

RESULTS

Twelve articles were included; 21,391 and 17,618 subjects were in the anti-obesity drug and placebo groups, respectively. There was no difference in MACEs between the anti-obesity drug and placebo groups (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.88-1.12). Compared with placebo, anti-obesity interventions reduced body weight (WMD: - 3.96 kg; 95% CI: - 4.89, - 3.03) and improved lipid and blood glucose profiles. The intervention also did not increase the incidence of depression or anxiety or the risk of suicidal ideation.

CONCLUSION

Long-term anti-obesity drugs did not show a benefit in lowering MACEs in overweight or obese subjects, although the drugs resulted in a decrease in body weight and improved cardiometabolic parameters.

Long-term cardiovascular outcomes after orlistat therapy in patients with obesity: a nationwide, propensity-score matched cohort study

AIMS

The rising prevalence of obesity and its associated comorbidities represent a growing public health issue; in particular, obesity is known to be a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Despite the evidence behind the efficacy of orlistat in achieving weight loss in patients with obesity, no study thus far has quantified its long-term effect on cardiovascular outcomes. The purpose of this study is to explore long-term cardiovascular outcomes after orlistat therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A propensity-score matched cohort study was conducted on the nation-wide electronic primary and integrated secondary healthcare records of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The 36 876 patients with obesity in the CPRD database who had completed a course of orlistat during follow-up were matched on a 1:1 basis with equal numbers of controls who had not taken orlistat. Patients were followed up for a median of 6 years for the occurrence of the primary composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction or ischaemic stroke), and a number of secondary endpoints including primary endpoint components individually, the occurrence of new-onset heart failure, coronary revascularization, new chronic kidney disease stage III+ (CKD3+), and all-cause mortality. During the median study follow-up of 6 years, the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events was lower in the orlistat cohort [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.83, P < 0.001]. Patients who took orlistat experienced lower rates of myocardial infarction (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.88, P < 0.001) and ischaemic stroke (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.56 to -0.84, P < 0.001) as well as new-onset heart failure (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67-0.94, P = 0.007). There was no differences in revascularization rates (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.91-1.38, P = 0.27), but a lower rate of both CKD3+ development (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.73-0.83, P < 0.001) and mortality (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.36 to -0.41, P < 0.001) was observed.

CONCLUSION

In this nation-wide, propensity-score matched study, orlistat was associated with lower rates of overall major adverse cardiovascular events, new-onset heart failure, renal failure, and mortality. This study adds to current evidence on the known improvements in cardiovascular risk factor profiles of orlistat treatment by suggesting a potential role in primary prevention.

How to Manage Hypertension in People With Diabetes

Hypertension is a common condition that is often seen in patients with diabetes. Both diseases increase the risk of morbidity and mortality from CV events and kidney disease progression. Factors that influence blood pressure (BP) control in diabetes include the persons' genetic background for hypertension and kidney disease, level of obesity and insulin resistance, the magnitude of preexisting kidney disease, and lifestyle factors, such as level of sodium and potassium intake, sleep quality and exercise effort all of which can affect levels of sympathetic nerve activity and contribute to increased BP variability. Lifestyle intervention is a key component to the effective management of diabetes and hypertension and can markedly reduce event rates of both heart and kidney outcomes. The approach to pharmacologic treatment of BP in diabetes is crucial since certain classes of agents for both BP and diabetes confer significant benefits to reduce cardiorenal outcomes.

Weight-centric pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes mellitus - An essential component of cardiovascular disease prevention

Obesity and overweight are contributing factors for diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and ultimately, cardiovascular (CV) disease. Obesity is imposing an increasing health burden in rich and poor nations, with almost 30% of people globally now either obese or overweight - a staggering 2.1 billion. The link between obesity and T2DM is widely held to involve two adverse effects: obesity-induced insulin resistance and β-cell failure. This "unified field theory" raises questions about whether defects favoring progressive weight gain and metabolic impairment also contribute to β-cell decompensation. The concept of weight-centric management of T2DM is considered justified because of the strong negative impact of obesity on the effects of treatment of diabetes. Two pharmacotherapy options are considered: drugs developed primarily for blood glucose control that also exert a favorable effect on body weight and drugs developed primarily to induce weight loss that also have a favorable effect on glycemia. Treating hunger counter-regulatory mechanisms will have an additional effect on glucose control in T2DM. This narrative review addresses advances in pharmacotherapy for the management of obesity and obesity-related co-morbidities, with a focus on T2DM. It is also important to identify the correct balance between weight-centric and glucose-centric management of T2DM.