Time to Blood Culture Positivity by Pathogen and Primary Service

Clinical significance of inflammatory markers for evaluating disease severity of mixed-pathogen bloodstream infections of both Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp

Objective

In recent decades, there has been a notable increase in the morbidity and mortality rates linked to bacteremia and candidemia. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of inflammatory markers in assessing the disease severity in critically ill patients suffering from mixed-bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp.

Methods

In this retrospective research, patients diagnosed with BSIs who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) during the period of January 2019 to December 2022 were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: a mixed-pathogen BSI group with both Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp., and a single-pathogen BSI group with only Enterococcus spp. The study examined the differences in inflammatory marker levels and disease severity, including Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores, duration of ICU stay, and 30-day mortality, between the two groups. Furthermore, we sought to scrutinize the potential associations among these aforementioned parameters.

Results

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs) and levels of plasma C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the mixed-pathogen BSI group were higher than those in the single-pathogen BSI group. Spearman's rank correlation analysis showed that NLRs and plasma CRP and IL-6 levels were positively correlated with disease severity in the mixed-pathogen BSI group. Further, the levels of plasma IL-8 and TNF-α were also positively correlated with ICU stay duration and 30-day mortality. In multivariate analysis, plasma CRP and IL-6 levels were independently associated with 30-day mortality.

Conclusion

Mixed-pathogen BSIs caused by Enterococcus spp. and Candida spp. may give rise to increased NLRs and plasma CRP, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels in comparison to BSI caused by Enterococcus spp. only, thus leading to elevated disease severity in critically ill patients.

Finding significant pathogens in blood cultures in children: Should we set the timer to 36 hours?

Background

Knowledge of time to positivity (TTP) for blood cultures is useful to assess timing of discontinuation of empiric antimicrobials for suspected bacteremia with no focus.

Methods

An audit of positive blood cultures from the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) from November 1, 2019, to October 31, 2020, was performed to determine TTP, defined as the start of incubation to a positive signal from automated incubators.

Results

Three hundred seventy-six positive blood cultures were identified from 248 patients (average age: 6.27 [SD 6.24] years). Of these, 247 isolates were speciated; 90 (36.4%) were definitive/probable (DP) pathogens (median TTP 12.75 hours) and 157 (63.6%) possible/probable (PP) contaminants (median TTP 24.08 hours). At each time point, the adjusted rate of positive blood culture was significantly higher for DP pathogens compared to PP contaminants (hazard ratio [HR] 1.80 [95% CI 1.37, 2.36]) and for children ≤27 days old compared to the oldest age group (HR 1.94 [95% CI 1.19, 3.17]). By 36 hours, the proportion of positive cultures was significantly higher in the youngest age group (≤27 days) compared with the 3-11 years old age group (91.7% [95% CI 68.6%, 97.8%] versus 58.2% [95% CI 46.91%, 68.06%]).

Conclusion

Across all ages, the TTP was significantly shorter for blood cultures with DP pathogens compared to those with PP contaminants (HR 1.80 [95% CI 1.37, 2.36]). In newborns, 90% of blood cultures were positive by 36 hours supporting this re-assessment time for empiric antimicrobials. TTP was longer in children ≥12 months, possibly related to other factors such as blood culture volume.

Rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative rods directly from positive blood cultures using the novel Q-linea ASTar system

Adequate and timely antibiotic therapy is crucial for the treatment of sepsis. Innovative systems, like the Q-linea ASTar, have been developed to perform rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) directly from positive blood cultures (BCs). We conducted a prospective study to evaluate ASTar under real-life conditions with a focus on time-to-result and impact on antimicrobial therapy. Over 2 months, all positive BCs that showed Gram-negative rods upon microscopy were tested with the ASTar and our standard procedure (VITEK 2 from short-term culture). Additionally, we included multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from our archive. Both methods were compared to broth microdilution. In total, 78 bacterial strains (51 prospective and 27 archived) were tested. ASTar covered 94% of the species encountered. The categorical and essential agreement was 95.6% and 90.7%, respectively. ASTar caused 2.4% minor, 2.0% major, and 2.4% very major errors. The categorical agreement was similar to standard procedure. The average time between BC sampling and the availability of the antibiogram for the attending physician was 28 h 49 min for ASTar and 44 h 18 min for standard procedure. ASTar correctly identified all patients who required an escalation of antimicrobial therapy and 75% of those who were eligible for de-escalation. In conclusion, ASTar provided reliable AST results and significantly shortened the time to obtain an antibiogram. However, the percentage of patients that will profit from ASTar in a low-resistance setting is limited, and it is currently unclear if a change of therapy 29 h after BC sampling will have a significant impact on the patient's prognosis.

Fungal Endocarditis: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management

Fungal endocarditis accounts for 1% to 3% of all infective endocarditis cases, is associated with high morbidity and mortality (>70%), and presents numerous challenges during clinical care. Candida spp. are the most common causes of fungal endocarditis, implicated in over 50% of cases, followed by Aspergillus and Histoplasma spp. Important risk factors for fungal endocarditis include prosthetic valves, prior heart surgery, and injection drug use. The signs and symptoms of fungal endocarditis are nonspecific, and a high degree of clinical suspicion coupled with the judicious use of diagnostic tests is required for diagnosis. In addition to microbiological diagnostics (e.g., blood culture for Candida spp. or galactomannan testing and PCR for Aspergillus spp.), echocardiography remains critical for evaluation of potential infective endocarditis, although radionuclide imaging modalities such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography are increasingly being used. A multimodal treatment approach is necessary: surgery is usually required and should be accompanied by long-term systemic antifungal therapy, such as echinocandin therapy for Candida endocarditis or voriconazole therapy for Aspergillus endocarditis.

A new application of multiplex PCR combined with membrane biochip assay for rapid detection of 9 common pathogens in sepsis

Rapid and accurate identification of specific sepsis pathogens is critical for patient treatment and disease control. This study aimed to establish a new application for the rapid identification of common pathogens in patients with suspected sepsis and evaluate its role in clinical application. A multiplex PCR assay was designed to simultaneously amplify specific conserved regions of nine common pathogenic microorganisms in sepsis, including Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumonia, and Candida albicans. The PCR products were analyzed by a membrane biochip. The analytical sensitivity of the assay was determined at a range of 5-100 copies/reaction for each standard strain, and the detection range was 20-200 cfu/reaction in a series dilution of simulated clinical samples at different concentrations. Out of the 179 clinical samples, the positive rate for pathogens detected by the membrane biochip assay and blood culture method was 20.11% (36/179) and 18.44% (33/179), respectively. However, by comparing the positive rate of the nine common pathogens we detected, the membrane biochip assay tended to be more sensitive than the blood culture method (20.11% vs 15.64%). The clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the membrane biochip assay were 92.9%, 93.2%, 72.2% and 98.6%, respectively. Generally, this multiplex PCR combined membrane biochip assay can be used to detect major sepsis pathogens, and is useful for early initiation of effective antimicrobial treatment, and is feasible for sepsis pathogens identification in routine clinical practice.