Outcomes by Candida spp. in the ReSTORE Phase 3 trial of rezafungin versus caspofungin for candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis

Rezafungin is a long-acting, intravenously administered echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis (IC). Non-inferiority of rezafungin vs caspofungin for the treatment of adults with candidemia and/or IC was demonstrated in the Phase 3 ReSTORE study based on the primary endpoints of day 14 global cure and 30-day all-cause mortality. Here, an analysis of ReSTORE data evaluating efficacy outcomes by baseline Candida species is described. Susceptibility testing was performed for Candida species using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute reference broth microdilution method. There were 93 patients in the modified intent-to-treat population who received rezafungin; 94 received caspofungin. Baseline Candida species distribution was similar in the two treatment groups; C. albicans (occurring in 41.9% and 42.6% of patients in the rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively), C. glabrata (25.8% and 26.6%), and C. tropicalis (21.5% and 18.1%) were the most common pathogens. Rates of global cure and mycological eradication at day 14 and day 30 all-cause mortality by Candida species were comparable in the rezafungin and caspofungin treatment groups and did not appear to be impacted by minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for either rezafungin or caspofungin. Two patients had baseline isolates with non-susceptible MIC values (both in the rezafungin group: one non-susceptible to rezafungin and one to caspofungin, classified as intermediate); both were candidemia-only patients in whom rezafungin treatment was successful based on the day 30 all-cause mortality endpoint. This analysis of ReSTORE demonstrated the efficacy of rezafungin for candidemia and IC in patients infected with a variety of Candida species.

Developing Crowdsourced Clinical Registry Studies

ABSTRACT

Crowdsourced registries have been used to quickly gather information, especially during emerging public health concerns. Registries that began during the COVID-19 pandemic were used to rapidly answer key questions on coinfections, experimental treatments, and morbidity and mortality outcomes. Registries are also used more frequently to support clinical trials and track long-term outcomes in patient populations. This article reviews registry methodology, including the collection of data from crowdsourcing and real-world sources, that can be applied to nurse researcher and clinical research nurse skill sets. The authors illustrate a recently reported crowdsourced COVID-19 and cryptococcal disease registry that followed project management strategies and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality registry guidelines for planning, execution, and analysis of registries and other research methods.

MSG-15: Super-Bioavailability Itraconazole Versus Conventional Itraconazole in the Treatment of Endemic Mycoses-A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Comparative Trial

Background

Invasive fungal disease caused by dimorphic fungi is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Super-bioavailability itraconazole (SUBA-itra) is a novel antifungal agent with pharmacokinetic advantages over currently available formulations. In this prospective comparative study, we report the outcomes of patients with endemic fungal infections (histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, and sporotrichosis).

Methods

This open-label randomized trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics SUBA-itra compared with conventional itraconazole (c-itra) treatment for endemic fungal infections. An independent data review committee determined responses on treatment days 42 and 180.

Results

Eighty-eight patients were enrolled for IFD (SUBA-itra, n = 42; c-itra, n = 46) caused by Histoplasma (n = 51), Blastomyces (n = 18), Coccidioides (n = 13), or Sporothrix (n = 6). On day 42, clinical success was observed with SUBA-itra and c-itra on day 42 (in 69% and 67%, respectively, and on day 180 (in 60% and 65%). Patients treated with SUBA-itra exhibited less drug-level variability at days 7 (P = .03) and 14 (P = .06) of randomized treatment. The concentrations of itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole were comparable between the 2 medications (P = .77 and P = .80, respectively). There was a trend for fewer adverse events (AEs; 74% vs 87%, respectively; P = .18) and serious AEs (10% vs 26%; P = .06) in the SUBA-itra-treated patients than in those receiving c-itra. Serious treatment-emergent AEs were less common in SUBA-itra-treated patients (12% vs 50%, respectively; P < .001).

Conclusions

SUBA-itra was bioequivalent, well tolerated, and efficacious in treating endemic fungi, with a more favorable safety profile than c-itra.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT03572049.

Efficacy and safety of rezafungin and caspofungin in candidaemia and invasive candidiasis: pooled data from two prospective randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Rezafungin, a new US Food and Drug Administration-approved, long-acting echinocandin to treat candidaemia and invasive candidiasis, was efficacious with a similar safety profile to caspofungin in clinical trials. We conducted pooled analyses of the phase 2 STRIVE and phase 3 ReSTORE rezafungin trials.

METHODS

ReSTORE was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 trial conducted at 66 tertiary care centres in 15 countries. STRIVE was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 2 trial conducted at 44 centres in 10 countries. Adults (≥18 years) with candidaemia or invasive candidiasis were treated with once-a-week intravenous rezafungin (400 mg and 200 mg) or once-a-day intravenous caspofungin (70 mg and 50 mg). Efficacy was evaluated in a pooled modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Primary efficacy endpoint was day 30 all-cause mortality (tested for non-inferiority with a pre-specified margin of 20%). Secondary efficacy endpoint was mycological response. Safety was also evaluated. The STRIVE and ReSTORE trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02734862 and NCT03667690, and both studies are complete.

FINDINGS

ReSTORE was conducted from Oct 12, 2018, to Oct 11, 2021, and STRIVE from July 26, 2016, to April 18, 2019. The mITT population, pooling the data from the two trials, comprised 139 patients for rezafungin and 155 patients for caspofungin. Day 30 all-cause mortality rates were comparable between groups (19% [26 of 139] for the rezafungin group and 19% [30 of 155] for the caspofungin group) and the upper bound of the 95% CI for the weighted treatment difference was below 10% (-1·5% [95% CI -10·7 to 7·7]). Mycological eradication occurred by day 5 in 102 (73%) of 139 rezafungin patients and 100 (65%) of 155 caspofungin patients (weighted treatment difference 10·0% [95% CI -0·3 to 20·4]). Safety profiles were similar across groups.

INTERPRETATION

Rezafungin was non-inferior to caspofungin for all-cause mortality, with a potential early treatment benefit, possibly reflecting rezafungin's front-loaded dosing regimen. These findings are of clinical importance in fighting active and aggressive infections and reducing the morbidity and mortality caused by candidaemia and invasive candidiasis.

FUNDING

Melinta Therapeutics and Cidara Therapeutics.

Description of Cryptococcosis Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Disease Survey Through the Mycosis Study Group Education and Research Consortium (MSG-19)

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections have been described throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Cryptococcal disease after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been reported in several isolated case reports and 1 larger case series. We sought to describe cryptococcal infections following SARS-CoV-2 through establishing a database to investigate underlying risk factors, disease manifestations, and outcomes.

METHODS

We created a crowdsourced call for cases solicited through the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emerging Infectious Diseases Network, and infectious diseases Twitter groups. Data were collected in a web-based and secure REDCap survey without personal identifiers.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine cases were identified and submitted by 29 separate institutional sites. Cryptococcosis was diagnosed a median of 22 days (interquartile range, 9-42 days) after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mortality among those with available follow-up was 72% (26/36) for the immunocompetent group and 48% (15/31) for the immunocompromised group (likelihood ratio, 4.01; P = .045). We observed a correlation between disease manifestation (central nervous system infection, proven/probable disseminated disease, and respiratory) and mortality (P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate of 59% for patients with cryptococcosis following SARS-CoV-2 is higher than that of modern Cryptococcus cohorts. There was an association between immunocompromised status and cryptococcal disease manifestations as well as mortality. Moreover, our series emphasizes the need for clinical and laboratory assessment of opportunistic infections beyond 30 days when concerning symptoms develop.

Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of cryptococcosis: an initiative of the ECMM and ISHAM in cooperation with the ASM

Cryptococcosis is a major worldwide disseminated invasive fungal infection. Cryptococcosis, particularly in its most lethal manifestation of cryptococcal meningitis, accounts for substantial mortality and morbidity. The breadth of the clinical cryptococcosis syndromes, the different patient types at-risk and affected, and the vastly disparate resource settings where clinicians practice pose a complex array of challenges. Expert contributors from diverse regions of the world have collated data, reviewed the evidence, and provided insightful guideline recommendations for health practitioners across the globe. This guideline offers updated practical guidance and implementable recommendations on the clinical approaches, screening, diagnosis, management, and follow-up care of a patient with cryptococcosis and serves as a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence on cryptococcosis. This Review seeks to facilitate optimal clinical decision making on cryptococcosis and addresses the myriad of clinical complications by incorporating data from historical and contemporary clinical trials. This guideline is grounded on a set of core management principles, while acknowledging the practical challenges of antifungal access and resource limitations faced by many clinicians and patients. More than 70 societies internationally have endorsed the content, structure, evidence, recommendation, and pragmatic wisdom of this global cryptococcosis guideline to inform clinicians about the past, present, and future of care for a patient with cryptococcosis.

Recommendations on prevention of infections during chimeric antigen receptor T-cell and bispecific antibody therapy in multiple myeloma

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell and bispecific antibody therapies have shown unprecedented efficacy in heavily pretreated patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, their use is associated with a significant risk of severe infections, which can be attributed to various factors such as hypogammaglobulinemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, T-cell exhaustion, cytokine-release syndrome and immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. As these therapies have been recently approved by regulatory agencies, it is crucial to establish practical guidelines for infection monitoring and prevention until robust data from prospective clinical trials become available. To address this issue, a panel of experienced investigators from the Academic Consortium to Overcome Multiple Myeloma through Innovative Trials (COMMIT) developed consensus recommendations for mitigating infections associated with CAR T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies in MM patients.

A conceptual framework for nomenclatural stability and validity of medically important fungi: a proposed global consensus guideline for fungal name changes supported by ABP, ASM, CLSI, ECMM, ESCMID-EFISG, EUCAST-AFST, FDLC, IDSA, ISHAM, MMSA, and MSGERC

The rapid pace of name changes of medically important fungi is creating challenges for clinical laboratories and clinicians involved in patient care. We describe two sources of name change which have different drivers, at the species versus the genus level. Some suggestions are made here to reduce the number of name changes. We urge taxonomists to provide diagnostic markers of taxonomic novelties. Given the instability of phylogenetic trees due to variable taxon sampling, we advocate to maintain genera at the largest possible size. Reporting of identified species in complexes or series should where possible comprise both the name of the overarching species and that of the molecular sibling, often cryptic species. Because the use of different names for the same species will be unavoidable for many years to come, an open access online database of the names of all medically important fungi, with proper nomenclatural designation and synonymy, is essential. We further recommend that while taxonomic discovery continues, the adaptation of new name changes by clinical laboratories and clinicians be reviewed routinely by a standing committee for validation and stability over time, with reference to an open access database, wherein reasons for changes are listed in a transparent way.

Challenges in management of invasive fungal infections in stem cell transplant

Invasive fungal infections cause significant morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. In order to minimize these infections, prophylaxis has become routine, although the agents used have changed over time. This presents new challenges as we consider an approach to breakthrough infections and recognize the epidemiologic shift toward isolates with higher rates of drug resistance. This review outlines the management of the most common pathogens (Candida, Aspergillus, Mucorales) as well as rarer pathogens that have higher rates of resistance (Trichosporon, Fusarium, Scedosporium, and Lomentospora). We discuss potential approaches to proven or possible breakthrough infections with yeast and pulmonary mold disease. Finally, we outline the role for combination therapy and newer antifungals, acknowledging current knowledge gaps and areas for future exploration.

Cryptococcal Meningoencephalitis in Phenotypically Normal Patients

Cryptococcosis is an invasive fungal infection found worldwide that causes significant morbidity and mortality among a broad range of hosts. There are approximately 223,000 new cases of cryptococcosis annually throughout the world, and at least 180,000 deaths are attributed to this infection each year. Most of these are due to complications of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis among HIV-infected patients in resource-limited environments. The majority of individuals diagnosed with cryptococcosis have underlying conditions associated with immune dysfunction such as HIV, solid organ transplant, hematologic malignancy, organ failure syndromes, and/or the use of immunosuppressive agents such as glucocorticosteroids and biologic agents. In most clinical series, there is a small proportion of patients with cryptococcosis who are phenotypically normal; that is, they have no clinically obvious predisposition to disease. Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis (CME) presentation and management differ substantially between these normal individuals and their immunocompromised counterparts. In this review, we will focus on CME in the phenotypically normal host and underscore differences in the clinical presentation, management, outcome, and potential risk factors for these patients compared to immunocompromised persons who develop this potential devastating invasive fungal infection.

Clinical Testing Guidance for Coccidioidomycosis, Histoplasmosis, and Blastomycosis in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia for Primary and Urgent Care Providers

Coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis are underrecognized and frequently misdiagnosed fungal infections that can clinically resemble bacterial and viral community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This guidance is intended to help clinicians in outpatient settings test for these fungal diseases in patients with CAP to reduce misdiagnoses, unnecessary antibacterial use, and poor outcomes.

Clinical safety and efficacy of novel antifungal, fosmanogepix, for the treatment of candidaemia: results from a Phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Fosmanogepix is a first-in-class antifungal targeting the fungal enzyme Gwt1, with broad-spectrum activity against yeasts and moulds, including multidrug-resistant fungi, formulated for intravenous (IV) and oral administration.

METHODS

This global, multicenter, non-comparative study evaluated the safety and efficacy of fosmanogepix for first-line treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic adults. Participants with candidaemia, defined as a positive blood culture for Candida spp. within 96 h prior to study entry, with ≤2 days of prior systemic antifungals, were eligible. Participants received fosmanogepix for 14 days: 1000 mg IV twice daily on Day 1, followed by maintenance 600 mg IV once daily, and optional switch to 700 mg orally once daily from Day 4. Eligible participants who received at least one dose of fosmanogepix and had confirmed diagnosis of candidaemia (<96 h of treatment start) composed the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Primary efficacy endpoint was treatment success at the end of study treatment (EOST) as determined by the Data Review Committee. Success was defined as clearance of Candida from blood cultures with no additional antifungal treatment and survival at the EOST.

RESULTS

Treatment success was 80% (16/20, mITT; EOST) and Day 30 survival was 85% (17/20; 3 deaths unrelated to fosmanogepix). Ten of 21 (48%) were switched to oral fosmanogepix. Fosmanogepix was well tolerated with no treatment-related serious adverse events/discontinuations. Fosmanogepix had potent in vitro activity against baseline isolates of Candida spp. (MICrange: CLSI, 0.002-0.03 mg/L).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this single-arm Phase 2 trial suggest that fosmanogepix may be a safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious treatment for non-neutropenic patients with candidaemia, including those with renal impairment.

Update on Outbreak of Fungal Meningitis among U.S. Residents who Received Epidural Anesthesia at Two Clinics in Matamoros, Mexico

BACKGROUND

Public health officials are responding to an outbreak of fungal meningitis among patients who received procedures under epidural anesthesia at two clinics (River Side Surgical Center and Clinica K-3) in Matamoros, Mexico, during January 1-May 13, 2023. This report describes outbreak epidemiology and outlines interim diagnostic and treatment recommendations.

METHODS

Interim recommendations for diagnosis and management were developed by the Mycoses Study Group Research Education and Consortium (MSGERC) based on the clinical experience of clinicians caring for patients during the current outbreak or during previous outbreaks of healthcare-associated fungal meningitis in Durango, Mexico, and the United States.

RESULTS

As of July 7, 2023, the situation has evolved into a multistate and multinational fungal meningitis outbreak. A total of 185 residents in 22 U.S. states and jurisdictions have been identified who might be at risk of fungal meningitis because they received epidural anesthesia at the clinics of interest in 2023. Among these patients, 11 suspected, 10 probable, and 10 confirmed U.S. cases have been diagnosed, with severe vascular complications and eight deaths occurring. Fusarium solani species complex has been identified as the causative agent, with antifungal susceptibility testing of a single isolate demonstrating poor in vitro activity for most available antifungals. Currently, triple therapy with intravenous voriconazole, liposomal amphotericin B, and fosmanogepix is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Efforts to understand the source of this outbreak and optimal treatment approaches are ongoing, but infectious diseases physicians should be aware of available treatment recommendations. New information will be available on CDC's website.

Fungal Endocarditis: Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management

Fungal endocarditis accounts for 1% to 3% of all infective endocarditis cases, is associated with high morbidity and mortality (>70%), and presents numerous challenges during clinical care. Candida spp. are the most common causes of fungal endocarditis, implicated in over 50% of cases, followed by Aspergillus and Histoplasma spp. Important risk factors for fungal endocarditis include prosthetic valves, prior heart surgery, and injection drug use. The signs and symptoms of fungal endocarditis are nonspecific, and a high degree of clinical suspicion coupled with the judicious use of diagnostic tests is required for diagnosis. In addition to microbiological diagnostics (e.g., blood culture for Candida spp. or galactomannan testing and PCR for Aspergillus spp.), echocardiography remains critical for evaluation of potential infective endocarditis, although radionuclide imaging modalities such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography are increasingly being used. A multimodal treatment approach is necessary: surgery is usually required and should be accompanied by long-term systemic antifungal therapy, such as echinocandin therapy for Candida endocarditis or voriconazole therapy for Aspergillus endocarditis.

Real-world Use of Mold-Active Triazole Prophylaxis in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Diseases: Results From a Subgroup Analysis of a Multicenter National Registry

Background

Antifungal prophylaxis can prevent invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) in high-risk, immunocompromised patients. This study assessed the real-world use of mold-active triazoles (MATs) for the prevention of IFDs.

Methods

This subgroup analysis of a multicenter, observational, prospective registry in the United States from March 2017 to April 2020 included patients who received MATs for prophylaxis (isavuconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole) at study index/enrollment. The primary objective was to describe patient characteristics and patterns of MAT use. Exploratory assessments included the frequency of breakthrough IFDs and MAT-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs).

Results

A total of 1177 patients (256 isavuconazole, 397 posaconazole, 272 voriconazole, and 252 multiple/sequenced MATs at/after index/enrollment) were included in the prophylaxis subgroup analysis. Patient characteristics were similar across MAT groups, but risk factors varied. Hematological malignancy predominated (76.5%) across all groups. Breakthrough IFDs occurred in 7.1% (73/1030) of patients with an investigator's assessment (5.0% [11/221] isavuconazole; 5.3% [20/374] posaconazole; 4.0% [9/226] voriconazole; and 15.8% [33/209] multiple/sequenced MATs). Aspergillus (29.5% [18/61]) and Candida (36.1% [22/61]) species were the most common breakthrough pathogens recovered. ADRs were reported in 14.1% of patients, and discontinuation of MATs due to ADRs was reported in 11.1% of patients (2.0% [5/245] isavuconazole; 8.2% [30/368] posaconazole; and 10.1% [27/267] voriconazole).

Conclusions

Breakthrough IFDs were uncommon in patients who received MATs for prophylaxis. Candida and Aspergillus species were the most commonly reported breakthrough pathogens. The discontinuation of MATs due to ADRs was infrequent. These findings support prophylactic strategies with isavuconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole in high-risk patients.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Antifungal, Fosmanogepix, in Patients with Candidemia Caused by Candida auris: Results from a Phase 2 Trial

Fosmanogepix (FMGX), a novel antifungal available in intravenous (IV) and oral formulations, has broad-spectrum activity against pathogenic yeasts and molds, including fungi resistant to standard of care antifungals. This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study evaluated FMGX safety and efficacy for treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis caused by Candida auris. Eligible participants were ≥18 years, with established candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis caused by C. auris, (cultured within 120 h [for candidemia] or 168 h [for invasive candidiasis without candidemia] with accompanying clinical signs) and limited treatment options. Participants were treated with FMGX (≤42 days; loading dose: 1000 mg IV twice daily [Day 1], followed by 600 mg IV once daily [QD]). Switching to oral FMGX 800 mg QD was permitted from Day 4. Primary endpoint was treatment success (survival and clearance of C. auris from blood/tissue cultures without additional antifungals) at the end of the study treatment (EOST), assessed by an independent data review committee (DRC). Day 30 survival was a secondary endpoint. In vitro susceptibility of Candida isolates was assessed. Nine participants with candidemia (male:6, female:3; 21 to 76 years) in intensive care units in South Africa were enrolled; all received IV FMGX only. DRC-assessed treatment success at EOST and Day 30 survival were 89% (8/9). No treatment related adverse events or study drug discontinuations were reported. FMGX demonstrated potent in vitro activity against all C. auris isolates (MIC range: 0.008 to 0.015 μg/mL [CLSI]; 0.004-0.03 μg/mL [EUCAST]), with the lowest MICs compared to other antifungals tested. Thus, the results showed that FMGX was safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in participants with candidemia caused by C. auris.

P22 Patient-level meta-analysis of efficacy and safety from STRIVE and ReSTORE: randomized, double-blinded, multicentre Phase 2 and Phase 3 trials of rezafungin in the treatment of candidaemia and/or invasive candidiasis

Background

Rezafungin is a next-generation echinocandin in development for treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) and for prevention of invasive fungal disease caused by Candida, Aspergillus and Pneumocystis spp. in blood and marrow transplantation. Rezafungin once-weekly (QWk) was compared to caspofungin once-daily (QD) in two double-blind, randomized, controlled trials in patients with candidaemia and/or IC: STRIVE (Phase 2; NCT02734862) and the recently completed ReSTORE (Phase 3; NCT03667690). STRIVE demonstrated the efficacy and safety profile of rezafungin. ReSTORE showed rezafungin noninferiority to caspofungin for 30 day all-cause mortality (ACM) and global response at Day 14 with comparable safety. Patient-level meta-analyses of efficacy and safety from both trials are presented.

Methods

Details of STRIVE and ReSTORE were previously described. In this analysis of data from both trials, patients who received rezafungin QWk (400 mg in Week 1, then 200 mg) were compared with those who received caspofungin QD (70 mg on Day 1 followed by 50 mg) for ≥14 days (up to 4 weeks). Efficacy endpoints included 30 day ACM (primary US FDA), mycological response at Day 5 (secondary), and time to first negative blood culture (TTNBC) (exploratory). Safety was evaluated by adverse events (AEs).

Results

Groups were well matched (Table 1). Figure 1 shows 30 day ACM (overall and by final diagnosis). Mycological response at Day 5 was 73.4% (102/139) and 64.5% (100/155) in rezafungin and caspofungin groups, respectively (difference=9.5, 95% CI=−0.9, 19.9). In patients with positive blood culture before randomization, median TTNBC was 22.3 h in rezafungin-treated versus 26.3 h in caspofungin-treated patients (stratified log rank p=0.0034, not adjusted for multiplicity). The summary of AEs (Table 2) demonstrates similar outcomes for rezafungin and caspofungin groups.

Conclusions

In the Phase 2/3 patient-level meta-analysis, rezafungin QWk demonstrated efficacy with a similar 30 day ACM rate and safety comparable to that of caspofungin QD. Data for mycological eradication at Day 5 and TTNBC support results from the primary efficacy endpoint and provide initial evidence for the theory that high, front-loaded drug exposure leads to faster fungal clearance. Further analysis of this integrated dataset may provide additional insights on rezafungin efficacy and safety.

Rezafungin versus caspofungin for treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (ReSTORE): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Rezafungin is a next-generation, once-a-week echinocandin in development for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis and for the prevention of invasive fungal disease caused by Candida, Aspergillus, and Pneumocystis spp after blood and marrow transplantation. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous rezafungin versus intravenous caspofungin in patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis.

METHODS

ReSTORE was a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised phase 3 trial done at 66 tertiary care centres in 15 countries. Adults (≥18 years) with systemic signs and mycological confirmation of candidaemia or invasive candidiasis were eligible for inclusion and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous rezafungin once a week (400 mg in week 1, followed by 200 mg weekly, for a total of two to four doses) or intravenous caspofungin (70 mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 50 mg daily) for no more than 4 weeks. The primary endpoints were global cure (consisting of clinical cure, radiological cure, and mycological eradication) at day 14 for the European Medical Agency (EMA) and 30-day all-cause mortality for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), both with a target non-inferiority margin of 20%, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients who received one or more doses of study drug and had documented Candida infection based on a culture from blood or another normally sterile site obtained within 96 h before randomisation). Safety was evaluated by the incidence and type of adverse events and deaths in the safety population, defined as all patients who received any amount of study drug. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03667690, and is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 12, 2018, and Aug 29, 2021, 222 patients were screened for inclusion, and 199 patients (118 [59%] men; 81 [41%] women; mean age 61 years [SD 15·2]) were randomly assigned (100 [50%] patients to the rezafungin group and 99 [50%] patients to the caspofungin group). 55 (59%) of 93 patients in the rezafungin group and 57 (61%) of 94 patients in the caspofungin group had a global cure at day 14 (weighted treatment difference -1·1% [95% CI -14·9 to 12·7]; EMA primary endpoint). 22 (24%) of 93 patients in the rezafungin group and 20 (21%) of 94 patients in the caspofungin group died or had an unknown survival status at day 30 (treatment difference 2·4% [95% CI -9·7 to 14·4]; FDA primary endpoint). In the safety analysis, 89 (91%) of 98 patients in the rezafungin group and 83 (85%) of 98 patients in the caspofungin group had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events that occurred in at least 5% of patients in either group were pyrexia, hypokalaemia, pneumonia, septic shock, and anaemia. 55 (56%) patients in the rezafungin group and 52 (53%) patients in the caspofungin group had serious adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Our data show that rezafungin was non-inferior to caspofungin for the primary endpoints of day-14 global cure (EMA) and 30-day all-cause mortality (FDA). Efficacy in the initial days of treatment warrants evaluation. There were no concerning trends in treatment-emergent or serious adverse events. These phase 3 results show the efficacy and safety of rezafungin and support its ongoing development.

FUNDING

Cidara Therapeutics and Mundipharma.

231. Outcomes by Baseline Pathogen and Susceptibility in the ReSTORE Phase 3 Trial of Rezafungin Once Weekly Compared with Caspofungin Once Daily in Patients with Candidemia and/or Invasive Candidiasis

Background

Rezafungin is a next-generation, once-weekly echinocandin in development for treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis (IC), and for prevention of invasive fungal diseases caused by Candida, Aspergillus, and Pneumocystis in allogeneic blood and marrow transplant recipients (Fig 1). ReSTORE (NCT03667690) is a global, double-blind, double-dummy, 1:1 randomized, controlled, Phase 3 non-inferiority trial that evaluated the efficacy and safety of rezafungin once weekly (QWk) versus caspofungin once daily (QD) in patients with candidemia and/or IC. This analysis of the completed ReSTORE trial was conducted to evaluate outcomes by baseline pathogen and susceptibility.

Methods

In ReSTORE, adults (≥18 y) with systemic signs and mycological confirmation of candidemia and/or IC received either rezafungin QWk (400 mg Week 1, then 200 mg QWk) or caspofungin QD for ≥14 days (up to 4 weeks) with optional oral fluconazole step-down in the caspofungin arm. The primary endpoints were global cure at day (D) 14 (per Data Review Committee confirmation of investigator-assessed clinical cure [and radiological cure for IC) + mycological eradication]) and all-cause mortality (ACM) at D30 (Fig 2). Secondary endpoints included mycological eradication at D14. For this analysis, D14 global cure and mycological eradication by treatment group were analyzed by Candida species and in vitro susceptibility at baseline (CLSI broth microdilution MIC values; M27 Ed4) (Fig 3).

Results

A total of 204 Candida isolates were recovered in 187 patients across both treatment groups. Of the 204 isolates, C. albicans was the most common species, followed by C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis; 61% of all baseline isolates were non-albicans Candida (Fig 3). The rates of D14 global cure and mycological eradication by pathogen are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Overall, outcomes by Candida species and MIC did not appear to be affected by MIC values for either rezafungin or caspofungin (Table 3).

Conclusion

Rezafungin was efficacious across multiple Candida species in the Phase 3 ReSTORE trial that demonstrated non-inferiority of rezafungin to caspofungin. There was no clear correlation between increased MIC values and clinical outcomes.

Disclosures

George R. Thompson, III, MD, Amplyx: Advisor/Consultant|Amplyx: Grant/Research Support|Astellas: Advisor/Consultant|Astellas: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Advisor/Consultant|F2G: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: DSMB|Scynexis: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support Alex Soriano, MD, MSD, Pfizer, Shionogi, Angelini, Menarini, Gilead: Honoraria Oliver A. Cornely, Prof. Dr., Abbott: Honoraria|Abbvie: Advisor/Consultant|Actelion: Board Member|Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria|Allecra Therapeutics: Board Member|Amplyx: Advisor/Consultant|Amplyx: Grant/Research Support|Astellas: Honoraria|Basilea: Advisor/Consultant|Basilea: Grant/Research Support|Biocon: Advisor/Consultant|Biosys: Advisor/Consultant|BMBF: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Advisor/Consultant|Cidara: Board Member|Cidara: Expert Testimony|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|CoRe Consulting: Stocks/Bonds|Da Volterra: Advisor/Consultant|DLR: Grant/Research Support|DZIF: Grant/Research Support|Entasis: Board Member|EU Directorate-General for Resarch and Innovation: Grant/Research Support|F2G: Grant/Research Support|German Patent and Trade Mark Office: German patent (DE 10 2021 113 007.7)|Gilead: Advisor/Consultant|Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Grupo Biotoscana/United Medical/Knight: Honoraria|Hikma: Honoraria|IQVIA: Board Member|Janssen: Board Member|Matinas: Advisor/Consultant|Matinas: Grant/Research Support|MedPace: Advisor/Consultant|MedPace: Grant/Research Support|MedScape: Honoraria|MedUpdate: Honoraria|Menarini: Advisor/Consultant|Merck/MSD: Grant/Research Support|Merck/MSD: Honoraria|Molecular Partners: Advisor/Consultant|MSG-ERC: Advisor/Consultant|Mundipharma: Grant/Research Support|Mylan: Honoraria|Noxxon: Advisor/Consultant|Octapharma: Advisor/Consultant|Octapharma: Grant/Research Support|Paratek: Board Member|Pardes: Advisor/Consultant|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Honoraria|Projektträger Jülich: Grant/Research Support|PSI: Advisor/Consultant|PSI: Board Member|Pulmocide: Board Member|Scynexis: Advisor/Consultant|Scynexis: Grant/Research Support|Seres: Advisor/Consultant|Shionogi: Board Member|Wiley (Blackwell): Editor-in-Chief, Mycoses Bart-Jan Kullberg, MD, FRCP, FIDSA, Cidara: Independent Data Review Committee Jeffrey B. Locke, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics: Employee|Cidara Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Taylor Sandison, MD, MPH, Cidara Therapeutics: Employee|Cidara Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds.

A Care Step Pathway for the Diagnosis and Treatment of COVID-19-Associated Invasive Fungal Infections in the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, a pandemic. Patients with severe cases resulting in hospitalization and mechanical ventilation are at risk for COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis, an invasive fungal infection, and should be screened for aspergillosis if they have persistent hemodynamic instability and fever. Early detection and treatment of this fungal infection can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To develop an evidence-based care step pathway tool to help intensive care unit clinicians assess, diagnose, and treat COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis.

METHODS

A panel of 18 infectious disease experts, advanced practice registered nurses, pharmacists, and clinical researchers convened in a series of meetings to develop the Care Step Pathway tool, which was modeled on a tool developed by advanced practice nurses to evaluate and manage side effects of therapies for melanoma. The Care Step Pathway tool addresses various aspects of disease management, including assessment, screening, diagnosis, antifungal treatment, pharmacological considerations, and exclusion of other invasive fungal coinfections.

RESULTS

The Care Step Pathway tool was applied in the care of a patient with COVID-19-associated aspergillosis. The patient was successfully treated.

CONCLUSION

The Care Step Pathway is an effective educational tool to help intensive care unit clinicians consider fungal infection when caring for COVID-19 patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit, especially when the clinical course is deteriorating and antibiotics are ineffective.

Invasive candidiasis: Investigational drugs in the clinical development pipeline and mechanisms of action

INTRODUCTION

The epidemiology of invasive Candida infections is evolving. Infections caused by non-albicans Candida spp. are increasing; however, the antifungal pipeline is more promising than ever and is enriched with repurposed drugs and agents that have new mechanisms of action. Despite progress, unmet needs in the treatment of invasive candidiasis remain and there are still too few antifungals that can be administered orally or that have CNS penetration.

AREAS COVERED

The authors shed light on those antifungal agents active against Candida that are in late-stage clinical development. Mechanisms of action and key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties are discussed. Insights are offered on the potential future roles of the investigational agents MAT-2203, oteseconazole, ATI-2307, VL-2397, NP-339, and the repurposed drug miltefosine.

EXPERT OPINION

Ibrexafungerp and fosmanogepix have novel mechanisms of action and will provide effective options for the treatment of Candida infections (including those caused by multiresistant Candida spp). Rezafungin, an echinocandin with an extended half-life allowing for once weekly administration, will be particularly valuable for outpatient treatment and prophylaxis. Despite this, there is an urgent need to garner clinical data on investigational drugs, especially in the current rise of azole-resistant and multi-drug resistant Candida spp.

Noninvasive Testing and Surrogate Markers in Invasive Fungal Diseases

Invasive fungal infections continue to increase as at-risk populations expand. The high associated morbidity and mortality with fungal diseases mandate the continued investigation of novel antifungal agents and diagnostic strategies that include surrogate biomarkers. Biologic markers of disease are useful prognostic indicators during clinical care, and their use in place of traditional survival end points may allow for more rapid conduct of clinical trials requiring fewer participants, decreased trial expense, and limited need for long-term follow-up. A number of fungal biomarkers have been developed and extensively evaluated in prospective clinical trials and small series. We examine the evidence for these surrogate biomarkers in this review and provide recommendations for clinicians and regulatory authorities.

Clinical utility of antifungal susceptibility testing

Invasive fungal diseases cause significant morbidity and mortality, in particular affecting immunocompromised patients. Resistant organisms are of increasing importance, yet there are many notable differences in the ability to both perform and interpret antifungal susceptibility testing compared with bacteria. In this review, we will highlight the strengths and limitations of resistance data of pathogenic yeasts and moulds that may be used to guide treatment and predict clinical outcomes.

Cryptococcus neoformans-specific and non-Cryptococcous neoformans-specific antibody profiles in organ transplant recipients with and without cryptococcosis

Antibody immunity has not been studied in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) with cryptococcosis. We determined serum antibody levels in OTRs: 23 cryptococcosis cases and 21 controls. Glucuronoxylomannan immunoglobulin M (IgM) and laminarin IgM were lower in cases than controls, were inversely associated with cryptococcosis status, and may hold promise as markers of cryptococcosis.

123. Oral Ibrexafungerp Outcomes by Fungal Disease in Patients from an Interim Analysis of a Phase 3 Open-label Study (FURI)

Background

Candida species are a major cause of invasive and mucocutaneouls infections. There are limited oral treatment options available for patients with Candida infections who are unresponsive to or who are intolerant of currently available antifungals. Oral ibrexafungerp is an investigational broad-spectrum glucan synthase inhibitor antifungal with activity against Candida and Aspergillus species, including azole- and echinocandin-resistant strains. A Phase 3 open-label, single-arm study of ibrexafungerp (FURI; NCT03059992) is ongoing for the treatment of patients intolerant of or with fungal disease refractory to standard antifungal therapy. We present an analysis of patient outcomes from the FURI study by fungal disease type.

Table 1: FURI Outcomes by Fungal Disease

Methods

FURI patients were eligible for enrollment if they have proven or probable, severe mucocutaneous candidiasis, invasive candidiasis or invasive aspergillosis,other fungal diseases and evidence of failure to, intolerance to, or toxicity related to a currently approved standard-of-care antifungal treatment or can not receive approved oral antifungal options (e.g., susceptibility of the organism) and a continued IV antifungal therapy is clinically undesirable or unfeasible.

Results

An independent Data Review Committee (DRC) provided an assessment of treatment response for 74 patients enrolled in the FURI study from 22 centers in US, UK and EU treated with ibrexafungerp for mucocutaneous or invasive fungal infections from 2016- 2020. A total of 39 (52.7%) patients had invasive candidiasis, 32 (43.2%) had mucocutaneous candidiasis and 3 (4.5%) patients had invasive aspergillosis. The percent of patients who were determined to have a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), clinical improvement (CI) was 63.5%, stable disease (SD) was 23.0%, patients with progression of disease 6.8% and 4 patients were indeterminate. Additionally, there was 1 death in the FURI study that was not related to fungal disease. Table 1 shows outcomes by fungal disease type as determined by the DRC.

Conclusion

Analysis of 74 patients from the FURI study indicates that oral ibrexafungerp provides a favorable therapeutic response in patients with challenging fungal disease and limited treatment options.

Disclosures

Peter G. Pappas, MD, Astellas (Research Grant or Support)Cidara (Research Grant or Support)F2G (Consultant)Matinas (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Mayne Pharma (Research Grant or Support)Scynexis (Research Grant or Support) Oliver Cornely, Prof., Actelion (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Al-Jazeera Pharmaceuticals (Consultant)Allecra Therapeutics (Consultant)Amplyx (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Basilea (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Biocon (Consultant)Biosys (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)CoRe Consulting (Consultant)Da Volterra (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)DFG (German Research Foundation) (Grant/Research Support)Entasis (Consultant)F2G (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Grupo Biotoscana (Consultant)Immunic (Grant/Research Support)IQVIA (Consultant)Janssen (Grant/Research Support)Matinas (Consultant)Medicines Company (Grant/Research Support)MedPace (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Melinta Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)Menarini (Consultant)Merck/MSD (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Molecular Partners (Consultant)MSG-ERC (Consultant)Mylan (Consultant)Nabriva (Consultant)Noxxon (Consultant)Octapharma (Consultant)Paratek (Consultant)Pfizer (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)PSI (Consultant)Roche Diagnostics (Consultant)Scynexis (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Seres (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)Wiley (Blackwell) (Other Financial or Material Support) Philipp Koehler, MD, Ambu GmbH (Consultant, Speaker's Bureau)Astellas Pharma (Speaker's Bureau)Euopean Confederation of Medical Mycology (Speaker's Bureau)German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Consultant, Speaker's Bureau)MSD (Speaker's Bureau)Noxxon N.V. (Consultant)Pfizer (Speaker's Bureau)State of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany (Grant/Research Support) Todd P. McCarty, MD, Cidara (Grant/Research Support)GenMark (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Honoraria for Research Presentation)T2 Biosystems (Consultant) Barbara D. Alexander, MD, MHS, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Consultant) Rachel Miller, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Caryn Morse, MD, Chimerix (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Covis Pharma (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Gilead Sciences Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Ridgeback Biotherapeutics (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Roche (Scientific Research Study Investigator)SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Theratechnologies (Advisor or Review Panel member)Viiv (Advisor or Review Panel member) Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner, MD, Amplyx (Consultant)Cidara (Consultant)F2G (Consultant)Gilead (Grant/Research Support, Speaker's Bureau)Pfizer (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Speaker's Bureau)Scynexis (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Viracor (Consultant) Jürgen Prattes, Dr, AbbVie Inc. (Shareholder)Gilead (Speaker's Bureau)MSD (Grant/Research Support)Novo Nordisk (Shareholder)Pfizer (Advisor or Review Panel member)Stryker (Shareholder) Andrej Spec, MD, MSCI, Mayne Pharma (Grant/Research Support) Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, DDS, PhD, FRCPath, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Thomas J. Walsh, MD, PhD (hon), Scynexis (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Shionogi (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Francisco M. Marty, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Marisa Miceli, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Martin Hoenigl, MD, Astellas (Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Grant/Research Support)Pfizer (Grant/Research Support) Martin Hoenigl, MD, Astellas (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; F2G (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Gilead (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Pfiyer (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support; Scýnexis (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Grant/Research Support Thomas F. Patterson, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Nkechi Azie, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) David A. Angulo, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

120. An open-label comparative trial of SUBA-itraconazole (SUBA) versus conventional itraconazole (c-itra) for treatment of proven and probable endemic mycoses (MSG-15): a pharmacokinetic (PK) and adverse Event (AE) analysis

Background

C-itra is the drug of choice for treatment of most non-CNS, non-life-threatening forms of endemic mycoses (EM), including histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis, sporotrichosis and talaromycosis. SUBA represents a new formulation of itraconazole that utilizes nanotechnology to improve bioavailability when administered orally. SUBA is formulated as nanoparticles allowing for absorption in the small bowel while not relying on gastric acidity for optimal absorption. MSG-15 is an open-label, comparative clinical trial comparing SUBA to c-itra for the treatment of EM. Herein we report the final PK and AE profiles of these two compounds.

Methods

Subjects with proven and probable EM were eligible this open-label comparative study. The protocol allowed up to 14 d of prior therapy with any antifungal for this episode of EM. Subjects were randomized to receive either SUBA 130 mg po bid or c-itra 200 mg po bid for up to 6 months. Follow up occurred at 7, 14, 28, 42, 84 and 180 d post-enrollment. PK samples were obtained at 7, 14, and 42 d. Clinical assessment, including symptom assessment, AEs, overall drug tolerance, and quality of life were assessed at each visit. We used descriptive statistics for this analysis.

Results

89 subjects with EM entered the trial, including 43 on SUBA and 46 on c-itra. We measured PK serum levels of itra and hydroxyl-itra at days 7, 14, and 42 and these data are depicted in Figures 1-3. There were no significant differences in these levels, including combined itra/hydroxyl-itra levels, among the two study arms. AUC for itra and hydroxyl-itra were similar for both arms. AEs as assessed at each study evaluation were also quite similar among the two study arms. Overall, any AE occurred in 74% vs 85% of SUBA and c-itra recipients, respectively (NS). Drug-related AEs occurred in 35% vs 41% of SUBA and itra recipients, respectively (NS). Most common drug-related AEs included cardiovascular (edema and hypertension), nausea and loss of appetite.

Combined Itraconazole and Hydroxy-itraconazole Concentration Over Time

Conclusion

Compared to c-itra, SUBA demonstrates almost identical serum levels despite being dosed at roughly 60% standard dosing for c-itra (130 mg po bid vs 200 mg po bid). SUBA is slightly better tolerated than c-itra, although the specific AEs are similar.

Disclosures

Peter G. Pappas, MD, Astellas (Research Grant or Support)Cidara (Research Grant or Support)F2G (Consultant)Matinas (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Mayne Pharma (Research Grant or Support)Scynexis (Research Grant or Support) Andrej Spec, MD, MSCI, Mayne Pharma (Grant/Research Support) Marisa Miceli, MD, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) George R. R. Thompson III, III, MD, Amplyx (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Appili (Consultant)Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Avir (Grant/Research Support)Cidara (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)F2G (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Mayne (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Pfizer (Advisor or Review Panel member)

Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Invasive Fungal Infection

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can become complicated by secondary invasive fungal infections (IFIs), stemming primarily from severe lung damage and immunologic deficits associated with the virus or immunomodulatory therapy. Other risk factors include poorly controlled diabetes, structural lung disease and/or other comorbidities, and fungal colonization. Opportunistic IFI following severe respiratory viral illness has been increasingly recognized, most notably with severe influenza. There have been many reports of fungal infections associated with COVID-19, initially predominated by pulmonary aspergillosis, but with recent emergence of mucormycosis, candidiasis, and endemic mycoses. These infections can be challenging to diagnose and are associated with poor outcomes. The reported incidence of IFI has varied, often related to heterogeneity in patient populations, surveillance protocols, and definitions used for classification of fungal infections. Herein, we review IFI complicating COVID-19 and address knowledge gaps related to epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of COVID-19-associated fungal infections.

Antifungal Pipeline

In many ways, fungal diseases are forgotten or neglected. Given the significantly lower frequency compared to similar bacterial etiologies across the spectrum of infectious syndromes, it makes sense that anti-bacterial agents have seen the bulk of development in recent decades. The vast majority of new antifungal medications approved for use in the past 10 years have been new versions in the same class as existing agents. Clinical mycology is crying out for new mechanisms of action in the setting of rising resistance and emergence of new organisms. Fortunately, this trend appears to be reversing. There are numerous agents in advanced stages of development offering novel dosing regimens and mechanisms of action to combat these threats. Herein we review seven antifungal agents that we hope to see come to market in the coming years to aid physicians in the treatment of mucocutaneous and invasive fungal infections.

COVID-19-Lessons Learned and Questions Remaining

In this article, the editors of Clinical Infectious Diseases review some of the most important lessons they have learned about the epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and identify essential questions about COVID-19 that remain to be answered.

Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is a collective term that refers to a group of infectious syndromes caused by a variety of species of Candida, 6 of which cause most cases globally. Candidemia is probably the most commonly recognized syndrome associated with IC; however, Candida can cause invasive infection of any organ, especially visceral organs, vasculature, bones and joints, the eyes and central nervous system. Targeted prevention and empirical therapy are important interventions for patients at high risk for IC, and the current approach should be based on a combination of clinical risk factors and non-culture-based diagnostics, when available.

Cryptococcal Antigen in Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid for Detecting Cryptococcal Meningitis in Adults Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies

Cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) detection could direct the timely initiation of antifungal therapy. We searched MEDLINE and Embase for studies where CrAg detection in serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and CSF fungal culture were done on adults living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who had suspected cryptococcal meningitis (CM). With Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2), we evaluated the risk of bias in 11 included studies with 3600 participants, and used a random-effects meta-analysis to obtain summary sensitivity and specificity of serum and CSF CrAg, as well as agreement between CSF CrAg and CSF culture. Summary sensitivity and specificity of serum CrAg were 99.7% (97.4-100) and 94.1% (88.3-98.1), respectively, and summary sensitivity and specificity of CSF CrAg were 98.8% (96.2-99.6) and 99.3% (96.7-99.9), respectively. Agreement between CSF CrAg and CSF culture was 98% (97-99). In adults living with HIV who have CM symptoms, serum CrAg negativity may rule out CM, while positivity should prompt induction antifungal therapy if lumbar puncture is not feasible. In a first episode of CM, CSF CrAg positivity is diagnostic.

MSG07: An International Cohort Study Comparing Epidemiology and Outcomes of Patients with Cryptococcus neoformans or Cryptococcus gattii infections

BACKGROUND

Cryptococcosis due to Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii varies with geographic region, populations affected, disease manifestations and severity of infection, which impact treatment.

METHODS

We developed a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with culture-proven cryptococcosis during 1995-2013 from five centers in North America and Australia. We compared underlying diseases, clinical manifestations, treatment and outcomes in patients with C. gattii or C. neoformans infection.

RESULTS

A total of 709 patients (452 C. neoformans; 257 C. gattii) were identified. Mean age was 50.2 years; 61.4% were male; and 52.3% were Caucasian. Time to diagnosis was prolonged in C. gattii patients compared with C. neoformans (mean 52.2 vs 36.0 days; p<0.003) and there was a higher proportion of C. gattii patients without underlying disease (40.5% vs 10.2%; p<0.0001). Overall, 59% had central nervous system (CNS) infection, with lung (42.5%) and blood (24.5%) being common sites. Pulmonary infection was more common in patients with C. gattii than those with C. neoformans (60.7% vs 32.1%; p<0.0001). CNS or blood infections were more common in C. neoformans-infected patients (p≤0.0001 for both). Treatment of CNS disease with induction therapy of amphotericin B and flucytosine occurred in 76.4% of patients. Crude 12-month mortality was higher in patients with C neoformans (28.4% vs 20.2%; Odds Ratio 1.56; 95% CI 1.08, 2.26).

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes differences in species-specific epidemiology and outcomes of patients with cryptococcosis, including underlying diseases, site of infection and mortality. Species identification in patients with cryptococcosis is necessary to discern epidemiologic patterns, guide treatment regimens and predict clinical progression and outcomes.

Core Recommendations for Antifungal Stewardship: A Statement of the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

In recent years, the global public health community has increasingly recognized the importance of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the fight to improve outcomes, decrease costs, and curb increases in antimicrobial resistance around the world. However, the subject of antifungal stewardship (AFS) has received less attention. While the principles of AMS guidelines likely apply to stewarding of antifungal agents, there are additional considerations unique to AFS and the complex field of fungal infections that require specific recommendations. In this article, we review the literature on AMS best practices and discuss AFS through the lens of the global core elements of AMS. We offer recommendations for best practices in AFS based on a synthesis of this evidence by an interdisciplinary expert panel of members of the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. We also discuss research directions in this rapidly evolving field. AFS is an emerging and important component of AMS, yet requires special considerations in certain areas such as expertise, education, interventions to optimize utilization, therapeutic drug monitoring, and data analysis and reporting.

144. MSG-15: Pharmacokinetic (PK), Adverse Events (AEs), and Tolerability Data from an Open Label Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) Comparing Oral Suba-itraconazole (SUBA-ITC) to Conventional Itraconazole (C-ITC) for Treatment of Endemic Mycosis (EM)

Background

C-ITC is a drug of choice for non-life-threatening, non-CNS histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, sporotrichosis, coccidioidomycosis and other EM. Oral C-ITC is problematic due to inconsistent absorption often leading to sub-therapeutic serum levels. SUBA-ITC is an FDA approved formulation which utilizes nanotechnology to provide more consistent absorption when compared to C-ITC. We performed an open-label RCT comparing SUBA-ITC to C-ITC for non-life-threatening non-CNS EM, and is the first US based RCT examining SUBA-ITC. Herein we report the PK during the first 6 wks of study therapy (rx) and drug-related AEs and tolerability throughout the course of rx.

Methods

Subjects with a proven or probable EM, who had received <14 days prior antifungal tx, and were able to take po meds were eligible. Those with life-threatening and CNS disease or prohibited meds were excluded. Subjects were randomized to SUBA-ITC 130 mg or C-ITC 200mg, both PO BID, for up to 6 mo. All subjects received loading doses x 3d. Clinical assessment was performed on d 7, 14, 28, 42, 84, and 180. PK and safety evaluations were performed on d 7, 14 and 42. Serum levels and AUC were calculated and demonstrated using combined ITC and hydroxy-ITC measurements. Tolerability was based on subject ability to remain on rx.

Results

62 subjects are included in this analysis (31 each in SUBA-ITC and C-ITC, respectively). Median serum levels of ITC + hydroxy-ITC at d 7, 14 and 42 were consistently higher in the SUBA-ITC arm (Fig 1, p=0.8, NS). Combined AUC (ITC+hydroxy-ITC) were 2951 and 2845 for SUBA-ITC and C-ITC, respectively (NS). 4 subjects in each arm had sub-therapeutic d 7 levels (< 1000ng/ml). Drug-related AEs and tolerability were similar in both arms (Table 1). Lower extremity edema, hypertension, nausea, and anorexia were the most common AEs. Premature study withdrawal was seen in 12 (19%) subjects overall (5 and 7 subjects, respectively on SUBA-ITC and C-ITC).

Figure 1

Conclusion

SUBA-ITC dosed at 130 mg BID PO is safe, well-tolerated, and consistently leads to combined serum ITC/hydroxy-ITC levels and AUC that are higher (NS) when compared to C-ITC 200 mg BID. Moreover, compared to C-ITC, SUBA-ITC achieves these serum levels when administered at substantially lower daily doses (130mg BID vs 200 mg BID).

Disclosures

Peter G. Pappas, MD, Mayne Pharma (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Andrej Spec, MD, MSCI, Mayne (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) Marisa H. Miceli, MD, FIDSA, SCYNEXIS, Inc. (Advisor or Review Panel member) Laurie Proia, MD, Mayne Pharma (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Ana Belen Arauz, MD, Mayne Pharma (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Justin Hayes, MD, Mayne Pharma (Grant/Research Support) Alisa Peinhardt, MAIS, BSN, Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium (Consultant)

Rezafungin versus Caspofungin in a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Study for the Treatment of Candidemia and Invasive Candidiasis- The STRIVE Trial

Background

Rezafungin (RZF) is a novel echinocandin exhibiting distinctive pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. STRIVE was a phase 2, double-blind, randomized trial designed to compare the safety and efficacy of RZF once weekly (QWk) to caspofungin (CAS) once daily for treatment of candidemia and/or invasive candidiasis (IC).

Methods

Adults with systemic signs and mycological confirmation of candidemia and/or IC were randomized to RZF 400 mg QWk (400 mg), RZF 400 mg on week 1 then 200 mg QWk (400/200 mg), or CAS 70 mg as a loading dose followed by 50 mg daily for ≤4 weeks. Efficacy assessments included overall cure (resolution of signs of candidemia/IC + mycological eradication) at day 14 (primary endpoint), investigator-assessed clinical response at day 14, and 30-day all-cause mortality (ACM) (secondary endpoints), and time to negative blood culture. Safety was evaluated by adverse events and ACM through follow-up.

Results

Of 207 patients enrolled, 183 were in the microbiological intent-to-treat population (~21% IC). Overall cure rates were 60.5% (46/76) for RZF 400 mg, 76.1% (35/46) for RZF 400/200 mg, and 67.2% (41/61) for CAS; investigator-assessed clinical cure rates were 69.7% (53/76), 80.4% (37/46), and 70.5% (43/61), respectively. In total, 30-day ACM was 15.8% for RZF 400 mg, 4.4% for RZF 400/200 mg, and 13.1% for CAS. Candidemia was cleared in 19.5 and 22.8 hours in RZF and CAS patients, respectively. No concerning safety trends were observed; ACM through follow-up was 15.2% (21/138) for RZF and 18.8% (13/69) for CAS.

Conclusions

RZF was safe and efficacious in the treatment of candidemia and/or IC.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02734862

Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential.

METHODS

To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved.

RESULTS

There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.

MSG-10: a Phase 2 study of oral ibrexafungerp (SCY-078) following initial echinocandin therapy in non-neutropenic patients with invasive candidiasis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of oral ibrexafungerp (formerly SCY-078), a novel orally bioavailable β-glucan synthase inhibitor, in subjects with invasive candidiasis versus the standard of care (SOC) and to identify the dose to achieve target exposure (15.4 μM·h) in >80% of the intended population.

METHODS

In a multinational, open-label study, patients with documented invasive candidiasis were randomized to receive step-down therapy to one of three treatment arms: two dosing regimens of novel oral ibrexafungerp or the SOC treatment following initial echinocandin therapy. Plasma samples were collected to evaluate exposure by population pharmacokinetic (PK) modelling. Safety was assessed throughout the study and global response at the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 27 subjects enrolled, 7 received ibrexafungerp 500 mg, 7 received ibrexafungerp 750 mg and 8 received the SOC. Five did not meet criteria for randomization. Population PK analysis indicated that an ibrexafungerp 750 mg regimen is predicted to achieve the target exposure in ∼85% of the population. The rate of adverse events was similar among patients receiving ibrexafungerp or fluconazole. Similar favourable response rates were reported among all groups: 86% (n = 6) in the ibrexafungerp 750 mg versus 71% (n = 5) in both the fluconazole and ibrexafungerp 500 mg treatment arms. The one subject treated with continued micafungin had a favourable global response.

CONCLUSIONS

The oral ibrexafungerp dose estimated to achieve the target exposure in subjects with invasive candidiasis is 750 mg daily. This dose was well tolerated and achieved a favourable global response rate, similar to the SOC.

Isavuconazole Versus Caspofungin in the Treatment of Candidemia and Other Invasive Candida Infections: The ACTIVE Trial

BACKGROUND

Isavuconazole was compared to caspofungin followed by oral voriconazole in a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multinational clinical trial for the primary treatment of patients with candidemia or invasive candidiasis.

METHODS

Adult patients were randomized 1:1 to isavuconazole (200 mg intravenous [IV] three-times-daily [TID] for 2 days, followed by 200 mg IV once-daily [OD]) or caspofungin (70 mg IV OD on day 1, followed by 50 mg IV OD [70 mg in patients > 80 kg]) for a maximum of 56 days. After day 10, patients could switch to oral isavuconazole (isavuconazole arm) or voriconazole (caspofungin arm). Primary efficacy endpoint was successful overall response at the end of IV therapy (EOIVT) in patients with proven infections who received ≥1 dose of study drug (modified-intent-to-treat [mITT] population). The pre-specified noninferiority margin was 15%. Secondary outcomes in the mITT population were successful overall response at 2 weeks after the end of treatment, all-cause mortality at days 14 and 56, and safety.

RESULTS

Of 450 patients randomized, 400 comprised the mITT population. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Successful overall response at EOIVT was observed in 60.3% of patients in the isavuconazole arm and 71.1% in the caspofungin arm (adjusted difference -10.8, 95% confidence interval -19.9--1.8). The secondary endpoints, all-cause mortality, and safety were similar between arms. Median time to clearance of the bloodstream was comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not demonstrate non-inferiority of isavuconazole to caspofungin for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis. Secondary endpoints were similar between both groups.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT00413218.

Impact of Infectious Disease Consultation on Clinical Management and Mortality in Patients With Candidemia

Candidemia has a high attributable mortality. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of infectious disease consultation on mortality and clinical outcomes in candidemia. Infectious disease consultation was associated with better adherence to guidelines and improved survival, even in patients with high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores.

Invasive Aspergillosis as an Under-recognized Superinfection in COVID-19

Pulmonary aspergillosis has been increasingly reported following severe respiratory viral infections. Millions have been infected by SARS-CoV-2, placing large numbers of patients at-risk for COVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Prompt recognition of this syndrome and is paramount to improve outcomes.