1
|
Lambrou AS, South E, Ballou ES, Paden CR, Fuller JA, Bart SM, Butryn DM, Novak RT, Browning SD, Kirby AE, Welsh RM, Cornforth DM, MacCannell DR, Friedman CR, Thornburg NJ, Hall AJ, Hughes LJ, Mahon BE, Daskalakis DC, Shah ND, Jackson BR, Kirking HL. Early Detection and Surveillance of the SARS-CoV-2 Variant BA.2.86 - Worldwide, July-October 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 72:1162-1167. [PMID: 37883327 PMCID: PMC10602619 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7243a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Early detection of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants is critical to guiding rapid risk assessments, providing clear and timely communication messages, and coordinating public health action. CDC identifies and monitors novel SARS-CoV-2 variants through diverse surveillance approaches, including genomic, wastewater, traveler-based, and digital public health surveillance (e.g., global data repositories, news, and social media). The SARS-CoV-2 variant BA.2.86 was first sequenced in Israel and reported on August 13, 2023. The first U.S. COVID-19 case caused by this variant was reported on August 17, 2023, after a patient received testing for SARS-CoV-2 at a health care facility on August 3. In the following month, eight additional U.S. states detected BA.2.86 across various surveillance systems, including specimens from health care settings, wastewater surveillance, and traveler-based genomic surveillance. As of October 23, 2023, sequences have been reported from at least 32 countries. Continued variant tracking and further evidence are needed to evaluate the full public health impact of BA.2.86. Timely genomic sequence submissions to global public databases aided early detection of BA.2.86 despite the decline in the number of specimens being sequenced during the past year. This report describes how multicomponent surveillance and genomic sequencing were used in real time to track the emergence and transmission of the BA.2.86 variant. This surveillance approach provides valuable information regarding implementing and sustaining comprehensive surveillance not only for novel SARS-CoV-2 variants but also for future pathogen threats.
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith DJ, Free RJ, Thompson Iii GR, Baddley JW, Pappas PG, Benedict K, Gold JAW, Tushla LA, Chiller T, Jackson BR, Toda M. Clinical Testing Guidance for Coccidioidomycosis, Histoplasmosis, and Blastomycosis in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia for Primary and Urgent Care Providers. Clin Infect Dis 2023:ciad619. [PMID: 37802909 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis are underrecognized and frequently misdiagnosed fungal infections that can clinically resemble bacterial and viral community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This guidance is intended to help clinicians in outpatient settings test for these fungal diseases in patients with CAP to reduce misdiagnoses, unnecessary antibacterial use, and poor outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dallas J Smith
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca J Free
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - George R Thompson Iii
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and the Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
- University of California Davis Center for Valley Fever, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - John W Baddley
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter G Pappas
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kaitlin Benedict
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeremy A W Gold
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lisa A Tushla
- Terranova Medica, LLC, Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
| | - Tom Chiller
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mitsuru Toda
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Smith DJ, Gold JAW, Benedict K, Wu K, Lyman M, Jordan A, Medina N, Lockhart SR, Sexton DJ, Chow NA, Jackson BR, Litvintseva AP, Toda M, Chiller T. Public Health Research Priorities for Fungal Diseases: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Save Lives. J Fungi (Basel) 2023; 9:820. [PMID: 37623591 PMCID: PMC10455901 DOI: 10.3390/jof9080820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Fungal infections can cause severe disease and death and impose a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems. Public health research requires a multidisciplinary approach and is essential to help save lives and prevent disability from fungal diseases. In this manuscript, we outline the main public health research priorities for fungal diseases, including the measurement of the fungal disease burden and distribution and the need for improved diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccines. Characterizing the public health, economic, health system, and individual burden caused by fungal diseases can provide critical insights to promote better prevention and treatment. The development and validation of fungal diagnostic tests that are rapid, accurate, and cost-effective can improve testing practices. Understanding best practices for antifungal prophylaxis can optimize prevention in at-risk populations, while research on antifungal resistance can improve patient outcomes. Investment in vaccines may eliminate certain fungal diseases or lower incidence and mortality. Public health research priorities and approaches may vary by fungal pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dallas J. Smith
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; (J.A.W.G.); (K.B.); (K.W.); (M.L.); (A.J.); (N.M.); (S.R.L.); (D.J.S.); (N.A.C.); (B.R.J.); (A.P.L.); (M.T.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Tom Chiller
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; (J.A.W.G.); (K.B.); (K.W.); (M.L.); (A.J.); (N.M.); (S.R.L.); (D.J.S.); (N.A.C.); (B.R.J.); (A.P.L.); (M.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu K, Annambhotla P, Free RJ, Ritter JM, Leitgeb B, Jackson BR, Toda M, Basavaraju SV, Gold JAW. Fatal Invasive Mold Infections after Transplantation of Organs Recovered from Drowned Donors, United States, 2011-2021. Emerg Infect Dis 2023; 29. [PMID: 37279517 DOI: 10.3201/eid2907.230524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Drowned organ donors can be exposed to environmental molds through the aspiration of water; transplantation of exposed organs can cause invasive mold infections in recipients. We describe 4 rapidly fatal cases of potentially donor-derived invasive mold infections in the United States, highlighting the importance of maintaining clinical suspicion for these infections in transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Caceres DH, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, Whitaker M, Jackson BR, Kim L, Surie D, Cikesh B, Lindsley MD, McCotter OZ, Berkow EL, Toda M. Fungal Pathogens as Causes of Acute Respiratory Illness in Hospitalized Veterans: Frequency of Fungal Positive Test Results Using Rapid Immunodiagnostic Assays. J Fungi (Basel) 2023; 9:jof9040456. [PMID: 37108910 PMCID: PMC10145596 DOI: 10.3390/jof9040456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Fungal respiratory illnesses caused by endemic mycoses can be nonspecific and are often mistaken for viral or bacterial infections. We performed fungal testing on serum specimens from patients hospitalized with acute respiratory illness (ARI) to assess the possible role of endemic fungi as etiologic agents. Patients hospitalized with ARI at a Veterans Affairs hospital in Houston, Texas, during November 2016-August 2017 were enrolled. Epidemiologic and clinical data, nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal samples for viral testing (PCR), and serum specimens were collected at admission. We retrospectively tested remnant sera from a subset of patients with negative initial viral testing using immunoassays for the detection of Coccidioides and Histoplasma antibodies (Ab) and Cryptococcus, Aspergillus, and Histoplasma antigens (Ag). Of 224 patient serum specimens tested, 49 (22%) had positive results for fungal pathogens, including 30 (13%) by Coccidioides immunodiagnostic assays, 19 (8%) by Histoplasma immunodiagnostic assays, 2 (1%) by Aspergillus Ag, and none by Cryptococcus Ag testing. A high proportion of veterans hospitalized with ARI had positive serological results for fungal pathogens, primarily endemic mycoses, which cause fungal pneumonia. The high proportion of Coccidioides positivity is unexpected as this fungus is not thought to be common in southeastern Texas or metropolitan Houston, though is known to be endemic in southwestern Texas. Although serological testing suffers from low specificity, these results suggest that these fungi may be more common causes of ARI in southeast Texas than commonly appreciated and more increased clinical evaluation may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego H Caceres
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
- Center of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Studies in Translational Microbiology and Emerging Diseases (MICROS) Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota 111221, Colombia
| | | | - Michael Whitaker
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
- US Public Health Service, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
| | - Lindsay Kim
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
- US Public Health Service, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
| | - Diya Surie
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
- US Public Health Service, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
| | - Bryanna Cikesh
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Mark D Lindsley
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Orion Z McCotter
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
- Oregon Health Authority, Portland, OR 97232, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Berkow
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Mitsuru Toda
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lyman M, Forsberg K, Sexton DJ, Chow NA, Lockhart SR, Jackson BR, Chiller T. Worsening Spread of Candida auris in the United States, 2019 to 2021. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:489-495. [PMID: 36940442 DOI: 10.7326/m22-3469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Candida auris is an emerging fungal threat that has been spreading in the United States since it was first reported in 2016. OBJECTIVE To describe recent changes in the U.S. epidemiology of C auris occurring from 2019 to 2021. DESIGN Description of national surveillance data. SETTING United States. PATIENTS Persons with any specimen that was positive for C auris. MEASUREMENTS Case counts reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention by health departments, volume of colonization screening, and antifungal susceptibility results were aggregated and compared over time and by geographic region. RESULTS A total of 3270 clinical cases and 7413 screening cases of C auris were reported in the United States through 31 December 2021. The percentage increase in clinical cases grew each year, from a 44% increase in 2019 to a 95% increase in 2021. Colonization screening volume and screening cases increased in 2021 by more than 80% and more than 200%, respectively. From 2019 to 2021, 17 states identified their first C auris case. The number of C auris cases that were resistant to echinocandins in 2021 was about 3 times that in each of the previous 2 years. LIMITATION Identification of screening cases depends on screening that is done on the basis of need and available resources. Screening is not conducted uniformly across the United States, so the true burden of C auris cases may be underestimated. CONCLUSION C auris cases and transmission have risen in recent years, with a dramatic increase in 2021. The rise in echinocandin-resistant cases and evidence of transmission is particularly concerning because echinocandins are first-line therapy for invasive Candida infections, including C auris. These findings highlight the need for improved detection and infection control practices to prevent spread of C auris. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Lyman
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (M.L., K.F., D.J.S., N.A.C., S.R.L., B.R.J., T.C.)
| | - Kaitlin Forsberg
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (M.L., K.F., D.J.S., N.A.C., S.R.L., B.R.J., T.C.)
| | - D Joseph Sexton
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (M.L., K.F., D.J.S., N.A.C., S.R.L., B.R.J., T.C.)
| | - Nancy A Chow
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (M.L., K.F., D.J.S., N.A.C., S.R.L., B.R.J., T.C.)
| | - Shawn R Lockhart
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (M.L., K.F., D.J.S., N.A.C., S.R.L., B.R.J., T.C.)
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (M.L., K.F., D.J.S., N.A.C., S.R.L., B.R.J., T.C.)
| | - Tom Chiller
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (M.L., K.F., D.J.S., N.A.C., S.R.L., B.R.J., T.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Benedict K, Jackson BR, Toda M. Diagnosis Codes for Mold Infections and Mold Exposure Before and After Hurricane Harvey Among a Commercially Insured Population-Houston, Texas, 2016-2018. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2023; 17:e504. [PMID: 36927602 PMCID: PMC10640901 DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2023.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Indoor mold after flooding poses health risks, including rare but serious invasive mold infections. The purpose of this study was to evaluate use of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes for mold infection and mold exposure in Houston, Texas, during the year before and the year after Hurricane Harvey. METHODS This study used data from MarketScan, a large health insurance claims database. RESULTS The incidence of invasive mold infections remained unchanged in the year after Hurricane Harvey; however, the incidence of diagnosis codes for mold exposure nearly doubled compared with the year before the hurricane (6.3 vs 11.0 per 100 000 enrollees, rate ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.0-3.1). CONCLUSIONS Diagnosis codes alone may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect changes in invasive mold infection rates within this population and time frame, demonstrating the need for more comprehensive studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mitsuru Toda
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gold JAW, Wu K, Jackson BR, Benedict K. Opportunities to improve guideline adherence for the diagnosis and treatment of onychomycosis: Analysis of commercial insurance claims data, United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:683-686. [PMID: 35809801 PMCID: PMC10695165 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.1201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy A W Gold
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Karen Wu
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kaitlin Benedict
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Toda M, Williams S, Jackson BR, Wurster S, Serpa JA, Nigo M, Grimes CZ, Atmar RL, Chiller TM, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Kontoyiannis DP. Invasive Mold Infections Following Hurricane Harvey-Houston, Texas. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad093. [PMID: 36910694 PMCID: PMC10003735 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Characterizing invasive mold infection (IMI) epidemiology in the context of large flooding events is important for public health planning and clinical decision making. Methods We assessed IMI incidence (per 10 000 healthcare encounters) 1 year before and after Hurricane Harvey at 4 hospitals in Houston, Texas. Potential IMI cases were assigned as proven or probable cases using established definitions, and surveillance cases using a novel definition. We used rate ratios to describe IMI incidence and multivariable logistic regression to examine patient characteristics associated with IMI case status. Results IMI incidence was significantly higher posthurricane (3.69 cases) than prehurricane (2.50 cases) (rate ratio, 1.48 [95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.00]), largely driven by surveillance IMI cases. Aspergillus was the most common species cultured (33.5% prehurricane and 39.9% posthurricane). About one-quarter (25.8%) of IMI patients lacked classical IMI risk factors such as hematologic malignancy and transplantations. Overall, 45.1% of IMI patients received intensive care, and in-hospital all-cause mortality was 24.2%. Conclusions IMI incidence likely increased following Hurricane Harvey and outcomes for IMI patients were severe. Patient and clinician education on IMI prevention and identification is warranted, particularly as the frequency of extreme weather events increases due to climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Toda
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Samantha Williams
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sebastian Wurster
- Division of Internal Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose A Serpa
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Masayuki Nigo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carolyn Z Grimes
- Division of Infectious Diseases, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert L Atmar
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tom M Chiller
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner
- Division of Infectious Diseases, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
- Division of Internal Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Benedict K, Baggs J, Wolford H, Jackson BR, Gold JAW. Hospitalizations for unspecified mycoses in a large administrative dataset and implications for fungal disease burden estimates, United States, 2019–2021. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad100. [PMID: 36968955 PMCID: PMC10034590 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Fungal diseases are frequently coded as “unspecified mycoses” in datasets used to estimate disease burden. In a large administrative database, 50.9% of unspecified mycosis hospitalizations during 2019–2021 had positive fungal laboratory testing, most commonly Candida (79.1%), highlighting a potential need for improved coding practices and greater fungal laboratory testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Benedict
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia , USA
| | - James Baggs
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia , USA
| | - Hannah Wolford
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia , USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia , USA
| | - Jeremy A W Gold
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia , USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Conrad AR, Tubach S, Cantu V, Webb LM, Stroika S, Moris S, Davis M, Hunt DC, Bradley KK, Kucerova Z, Strain E, Doyle M, Fields A, Neil KP, Gould LH, Jackson KA, Wise ME, Griffin PM, Jackson BR. Listeria monocytogenes Illness and Deaths Associated With Ongoing Contamination of a Multiregional Brand of Ice Cream Products, United States, 2010-2015. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 76:89-95. [PMID: 35797187 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frozen foods have rarely been linked to Listeria monocytogenes illness. We describe an outbreak investigation prompted by both hospital clustering of illnesses and product testing. METHODS We identified outbreak-associated listeriosis cases using whole-genome sequencing (WGS), product testing results, and epidemiologic linkage to cases in the same Kansas hospital. We reviewed hospital medical and dietary records, product invoices, and molecular subtyping results. Federal and state officials tested product and environmental samples for L. monocytogenes. RESULTS Kansas officials were investigating 5 cases of listeriosis at a single hospital when, simultaneously, unrelated sampling for a study in South Carolina identified L. monocytogenes in Company A ice cream products made in Texas. Isolates from 4 patients and Company A products were closely related by WGS, and the 4 patients with known exposures had consumed milkshakes made with Company A ice cream while hospitalized. Further testing identified L. monocytogenes in ice cream produced in a second Company A production facility in Oklahoma; these isolates were closely related by WGS to those from 5 patients in 3 other states. These 10 illnesses, involving 3 deaths, occurred from 2010 through 2015. Company A ultimately recalled all products. CONCLUSIONS In this US outbreak of listeriosis linked to a widely distributed brand of ice cream, WGS and product sampling helped link cases spanning 5 years to 2 production facilities, indicating longstanding contamination. Comprehensive sanitation controls and environmental and product testing for L. monocytogenes with regulatory oversight should be implemented for ice cream production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda R Conrad
- Atlanta Research and Education Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sheri Tubach
- Bureau of Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka, Kansas, USA
| | - Venessa Cantu
- Emerging and Acute Infectious Disease Unit, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Lindsey Martin Webb
- Bureau of Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka, Kansas, USA
| | - Steven Stroika
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Steve Moris
- Division of Food Safety and Lodging, Kansas Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, Kansas, USA
| | - Megan Davis
- Microbiology Division, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - D Charles Hunt
- Bureau of Epidemiology and Public Health Informatics, Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka, Kansas, USA
| | - Kristy K Bradley
- Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Zuzana Kucerova
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Errol Strain
- Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew Doyle
- Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Angela Fields
- Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, US Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Karen P Neil
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - L Hannah Gould
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kelly A Jackson
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Matthew E Wise
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Patricia M Griffin
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Benedict K, Moret R, Molinari NAM, Jackson BR. Survey of healthcare providers' testing practices for vulvovaginal candidiasis and treatment outcomes-United States, 2021. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278630. [PMID: 36584109 PMCID: PMC9803167 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common infection, and high-quality studies report that misdiagnosis is frequent, with diagnostic testing needed to distinguish it from other causes of vaginitis and avoid inappropriate empiric treatment. However, few recent studies have evaluated U.S. healthcare providers' testing practices for VVC in detail. We evaluated healthcare providers' self-reported testing practices for VVC and treatment outcomes as part of a nationwide online survey in order to identify potential opportunities for improving VVC testing and treatment in the United States. Among 1,503 providers surveyed, 21.3% reported "always" (7.4%) or "usually" (13.9%) ordering diagnostic testing for patients with suspected VVC; this proportion was higher among gynecologists (36.0%) compared with family practitioners (17.8%) and internists (15.8%). Most providers (91.2%) reported that patients' VVC "always" (6.4%) or "usually" (84.9%) responds to initial treatment. Whether the symptom resolution reported in this survey was truly related to VVC is unclear given high rates of misdiagnosis and known widespread empiric prescribing. With only about one-in-five providers reporting usually or always performing diagnostic testing for VVC despite guidelines recommending universal use, research is needed to address barriers to proper testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Benedict
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Ravan Moret
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Noelle Angelique M. Molinari
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Brendan R. Jackson
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sullivan M, Perrine CG, Kelleher J, Kanwar O, Kuwabara S, Bennett K, Jackson BR, Patel P, Pennini ME. Notes From the Field: Dispensing of Oral Antiviral Drugs for Treatment of COVID-19 by Zip Code-Level Social Vulnerability - United States, December 23, 2021-August 28, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:1384-1385. [PMID: 36301746 PMCID: PMC9620568 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7143a3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Equitable access to COVID-19 therapeutics is a critical aspect of the distribution program led by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).* Two oral antiviral products, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid)† and molnupiravir (Lagevrio),§ received emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2021, to reduce the risk for COVID-19-associated hospitalization and death for those patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at higher risk for severe illness (1,2). HHS has been distributing these medications at no cost to recipients since their authorization. Data collected from provider sites during December 23, 2021-May 21, 2022, indicated substantial disparities in the population-adjusted dispensing rates in high social vulnerability (high-vulnerability) zip codes compared with those in medium- and low-vulnerability zip codes (3). Specifically, dispensing rates for the 4-week period during April 24-May 21, 2022, were 122 per 100,000 residents (19% of overall population-adjusted dispensing rates) in high-vulnerability zip codes compared with 247 (42%) in medium-vulnerability and 274 (39%) in low-vulnerability zip codes. This report provides an updated analysis of dispensing rates by zip code-level social vulnerability and highlights important intervention strategies.
Collapse
|
14
|
Jordan A, James AE, Gold JAW, Wu K, Glowicz J, Wolfe F, Vyas K, Litvintseva A, Gade L, Liverett H, Alverson M, Burgess M, Wilson A, Li R, Benowitz I, Gulley T, Patil N, Chakravorty R, Chu W, Kothari A, Jackson BR, Garner K, Toda M. Investigation of a Prolonged and Large Outbreak of Healthcare-Associated Mucormycosis Cases in an Acute Care Hospital-Arkansas, June 2019-May 2021. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac510. [PMID: 36320193 PMCID: PMC9605704 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Outbreaks of healthcare-associated mucormycosis (HCM), a life-threatening fungal infection, have been attributed to multiple sources, including contaminated healthcare linens. In 2020, staff at Hospital A in Arkansas alerted public health officials of a potential HCM outbreak. Methods We collected data on patients at Hospital A who had invasive mucormycosis during January 2017-June 2021 and calculated annual incidence of HCM (defined as mucormycosis diagnosed within ≥7 days after hospital admission). We performed targeted environmental assessments, including linen sampling at the hospital, to identify potential sources of infection. Results During the outbreak period (June 2019-June 2021), 16 patients had HCM; clinical features were similar between HCM patients and non-HCM patients. Hospital-wide HCM incidence (per 100 000 patient-days) increased from 0 in 2018 to 3 in 2019 and 6 in 2020. For the 16 HCM patients, the most common underlying medical conditions were hematologic malignancy (56%) and recent traumatic injury (38%); 38% of HCM patients died in-hospital. Healthcare-associated mucormycosis cases were not epidemiologically linked by common procedures, products, units, or rooms. At Hospital A and its contracted offsite laundry provider, suboptimal handling of laundered linens and inadequate environmental controls to prevent mucormycete contamination were observed. We detected Rhizopus on 9 (9%) of 98 linens sampled at the hospital, including on linens that had just arrived from the laundry facility. Conclusions We describe the largest, single-center, HCM outbreak reported to date. Our findings underscore the importance of hospital-based monitoring for HCM and increased attention to the safe handling of laundered linens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Jordan
- Correspondence: Alexander Jordan, MPH, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA ()
| | - Allison E James
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Jeremy A W Gold
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Karen Wu
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Janet Glowicz
- Prevention and Response Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Frankie Wolfe
- Medical Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Keyur Vyas
- Medical Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Anastasia Litvintseva
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lalitha Gade
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hazel Liverett
- Medical Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Mary Alverson
- Medical Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Mary Burgess
- Medical Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Amy Wilson
- Medical Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Ruoran Li
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Prevention and Response Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Isaac Benowitz
- Prevention and Response Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Trent Gulley
- Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Naveen Patil
- Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | | | - Winston Chu
- Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Atul Kothari
- Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kelley Garner
- Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Seagle EE, Jackson BR, Lockhart SR, Jenkins EN, Revis A, Farley MM, Harrison LH, Schaffner W, Markus TM, Pierce RA, Zhang AY, Lyman MM. Recurrent Candidemia: Trends and Risk Factors Among Persons Residing in 4 US States, 2011-2018. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac545. [PMID: 36324324 PMCID: PMC9620433 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Candidemia is a common healthcare-associated infection with high mortality. Estimates of recurrence range from 1% to 17%. Few studies have focused on those with recurrent candidemia, who often experience more severe illness and greater treatment failure. We describe recurrent candidemia trends and risk factors. Methods We analyzed population-based candidemia surveillance data collected during 2011-2018. Persons with >1 episode (defined as the 30-day period after a positive Candida species) were classified as having recurrent candidemia. We compared factors during the initial episode between those who developed recurrent candidemia and those who did not. Results Of the 5428 persons identified with candidemia, 326 (6%) had recurrent infection. Recurrent episodes occurred 1.0 month to 7.6 years after any previous episode. In multivariable logistic regression controlling for surveillance site and year, recurrent candidemia was associated with being 19-44 years old (vs ≥65 years; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.05 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.10-4.44]), being discharged to a private residence (vs medical facility; aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.12-2.08]), hospitalization in the 90 days prior to initial episode (aOR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.27-2.18]), receipt of total parenteral nutrition (aOR, 2.08 [95% CI, 1.58-2.73]), and hepatitis C infection (aOR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.12-2.43]). Conclusions Candidemia recurrence >30 days after initial infection occurred in >1 in 20 persons with candidemia. Associations with younger age and hepatitis C suggest injection drug use may play a modifiable role. Prevention efforts targeting central line care and total parenteral nutrition use may help reduce the risk of recurrent candidemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E Seagle
- ASRT, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shawn R Lockhart
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Emily N Jenkins
- Correspondence: Emily N. Jenkins, MPH, ASRT, Inc, Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS H24-9, Atlanta, GA, 30329 ()
| | - Andrew Revis
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Monica M Farley
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lee H Harrison
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | | | - Rebecca A Pierce
- Oregon Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Alexia Y Zhang
- Oregon Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hepler SA, Kaufeld KA, Benedict K, Toda M, Jackson BR, Liu X, Kline D. Integrating Public Health Surveillance and Environmental Data to Model Presence of Histoplasma in the United States. Epidemiology 2022; 33:654-659. [PMID: 35545229 PMCID: PMC9345522 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, the true geographic distribution of the environmental fungus Histoplasma capsulatum remains poorly understood but appears to have changed since it was first characterized. Histoplasmosis is caused by inhalation of the fungus and can range in severity from asymptomatic to life threatening. Due to limited public health surveillance and under detection of infections, it is challenging to directly use reported case data to characterize spatial risk. METHODS Using monthly and yearly county-level public health surveillance data and various environmental and socioeconomic characteristics, we use a spatio-temporal occupancy model to estimate latent, or unobserved, presence of H. capsulatum , accounting for imperfect detection of histoplasmosis cases. RESULTS We estimate areas with higher probabilities of the presence of H. capsulatum in the East North Central states around the Great Lakes, reflecting a shift of the endemic region to the north from previous estimates. The presence of H. capsulatum was strongly associated with higher soil nitrogen levels. CONCLUSIONS In this investigation, we were able to mitigate challenges related to reporting and illustrate a shift in the endemic region from historical estimates. This work aims to help inform future surveillance needs, clinical awareness, and testing decisions for histoplasmosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Staci A. Hepler
- From the Mathematics and Statistics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | - Mitsuru Toda
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Xiaonan Liu
- From the Mathematics and Statistics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - David Kline
- Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Massetti GM, Jackson BR, Brooks JT, Perrine CG, Reott E, Hall AJ, Lubar D, Williams IT, Ritchey MD, Patel P, Liburd LC, Mahon BE. Summary of Guidance for Minimizing the Impact of COVID-19 on Individual Persons, Communities, and Health Care Systems - United States, August 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:1057-1064. [PMID: 35980866 PMCID: PMC9400529 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7133e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
As SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, continues to circulate globally, high levels of vaccine- and infection-induced immunity and the availability of effective treatments and prevention tools have substantially reduced the risk for medically significant COVID-19 illness (severe acute illness and post-COVID-19 conditions) and associated hospitalization and death (1). These circumstances now allow public health efforts to minimize the individual and societal health impacts of COVID-19 by focusing on sustainable measures to further reduce medically significant illness as well as to minimize strain on the health care system, while reducing barriers to social, educational, and economic activity (2). Individual risk for medically significant COVID-19 depends on a person's risk for exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and their risk for developing severe illness if infected (3). Exposure risk can be mitigated through nonpharmaceutical interventions, including improving ventilation, use of masks or respirators indoors, and testing (4). The risk for medically significant illness increases with age, disability status, and underlying medical conditions but is considerably reduced by immunity derived from vaccination, previous infection, or both, as well as timely access to effective biomedical prevention measures and treatments (3,5). CDC's public health recommendations change in response to evolving science, the availability of biomedical and public health tools, and changes in context, such as levels of immunity in the population and currently circulating variants. CDC recommends a strategic approach to minimizing the impact of COVID-19 on health and society that relies on vaccination and therapeutics to prevent severe illness; use of multicomponent prevention measures where feasible; and particular emphasis on protecting persons at high risk for severe illness. Efforts to expand access to vaccination and therapeutics, including the use of preexposure prophylaxis for persons who are immunocompromised, antiviral agents, and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, should be intensified to reduce the risk for medically significant illness and death. Efforts to protect persons at high risk for severe illness must ensure that all persons have access to information to understand their individual risk, as well as efficient and equitable access to vaccination, therapeutics, testing, and other prevention measures. Current priorities for preventing medically significant illness should focus on ensuring that persons 1) understand their risk, 2) take steps to protect themselves and others through vaccines, therapeutics, and nonpharmaceutical interventions when needed, 3) receive testing and wear masks if they have been exposed, and 4) receive testing if they are symptomatic, and isolate for ≥5 days if they are infected.
Collapse
|
18
|
Smith DJ, Williams SL, Benedict KM, Jackson BR, Toda M. Surveillance for Coccidioidomycosis, Histoplasmosis, and Blastomycosis - United States, 2019. MMWR Surveill Summ 2022; 71:1-14. [PMID: 36006889 PMCID: PMC9575547 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7107a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM/CONDITION Coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis are underdiagnosed fungal diseases that often mimic bacterial or viral pneumonia and can cause disseminated disease and death. These diseases are caused by inhalation of fungal spores that have distinct geographic niches in the environment (e.g., soil or dust), and distribution is highly susceptible to climate changes such as expanding arid regions for coccidioidomycosis, the northward expansion of histoplasmosis, and areas like New York reporting cases of blastomycosis previously thought to be nonendemic. The national incidence of coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis is poorly characterized. REPORTING PERIOD 2019. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM The National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) tracks cases of coccidioidomycosis, a nationally notifiable condition reported to CDC by 26 states and the District of Columbia. Neither histoplasmosis nor blastomycosis is a nationally notifiable condition; however, histoplasmosis is voluntarily reported in 13 states and blastomycosis in five states. Health departments classify cases based on the definitions established by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. RESULTS In 2019, a total of 20,061 confirmed coccidioidomycosis, 1,124 confirmed and probable histoplasmosis, and 240 confirmed and probable blastomycosis cases were reported to CDC. Arizona and California reported 97% of coccidioidomycosis cases, and Minnesota and Wisconsin reported 75% of blastomycosis cases. Illinois reported the greatest percentage (26%) of histoplasmosis cases. All three diseases were more common among males, and the proportion for blastomycosis (70%) was substantially higher than for histoplasmosis (56%) or coccidioidomycosis (52%). Coccidioidomycosis incidence was approximately four times higher for non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons (17.3 per 100,000 population) and almost three times higher for Hispanic or Latino persons (11.2) compared with non-Hispanic White (White) persons (4.1). Histoplasmosis incidence was similar across racial and ethnic categories (range: 0.9-1.3). Blastomycosis incidence was approximately six times as high among AI/AN persons (4.5) and approximately twice as high among non-Hispanic Asian and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander persons (1.6) compared with White persons (0.7). More than one half of histoplasmosis (54%) and blastomycosis (65%) patients were hospitalized, and 5% of histoplasmosis and 9% of blastomycosis patients died. States in which coccidioidomycosis is not known to be endemic had more cases in spring (March, April, and May) than during other seasons, whereas the number of cases peaked slightly in autumn (September, October, and November) for histoplasmosis and in winter (December, January, and February) for blastomycosis. INTERPRETATION Coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis are diseases occurring in geographical niches within the United States. These diseases cause substantial illness, with approximately 20,000 coccidioidomycosis cases reported in 2019. Although substantially fewer histoplasmosis and blastomycosis cases were reported, surveillance was much more limited and underdiagnosis was likely, as evidenced by high hospitalization and death rates. This suggests that persons with milder symptoms might not seek medical evaluation and the symptoms self-resolve or the illnesses are misdiagnosed as other, more common respiratory diseases. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION Improved surveillance is necessary to better characterize coccidioidomycosis severity and to improve detection of histoplasmosis and blastomycosis. These findings might guide improvements in testing practices that enable timely diagnosis and treatment of fungal diseases. Clinicians and health care professionals should consider coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, and blastomycosis in patients with community-acquired pneumonia or other acute infections of the lower respiratory tract who live in or have traveled to areas where the causative fungi are known to be present in the environment. Culturally appropriate tailored educational messages might help improve diagnosis and treatment. Public health response to these three diseases is hindered because information gathered from states' routine surveillance does not include data on populations at risk and sources of exposure. Broader surveillance that includes expansion to other states, and more detail about potential exposures and relevant host factors can describe epidemiologic trends, populations at risk, and disease prevention strategies.
Collapse
|
19
|
Gold JAW, Kelleher J, Magid J, Jackson BR, Pennini ME, Kushner D, Weston EJ, Rasulnia B, Kuwabara S, Bennett K, Mahon BE, Patel A, Auerbach J. Dispensing of Oral Antiviral Drugs for Treatment of COVID-19 by Zip Code-Level Social Vulnerability - United States, December 23, 2021-May 21, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:825-829. [PMID: 35737571 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7125e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted and exacerbated long-standing inequities in the social determinants of health (1-3). Ensuring equitable access to effective COVID-19 therapies is essential to reducing health disparities. Molnupiravir (Lagevrio) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) are oral antiviral agents effective at preventing hospitalization and death in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at high risk* for progression to severe COVID-19 when initiated within 5 days of symptom onset. These medications received Emergency Use Authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2021† and were made available at no cost to recipients through the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on December 23, 2021. Beginning March 7, 2022, a series of strategies was implemented to expand COVID-19 oral antiviral access, including the launch of the Test to Treat initiative.§ Data from December 23, 2021-May 21, 2022, were analyzed to describe oral antiviral prescription dispensing overall and by week, stratified by zip code social vulnerability. Zip codes represented areas classified as low, medium, or high social vulnerability; approximately 20% of U.S. residents live in low-, 31% in medium-, and 49% in high-social vulnerability zip codes.¶ During December 23, 2021-May 21, 2022, a total of 1,076,762 oral antiviral prescriptions were dispensed (Lagevrio = 248,838; Paxlovid = 827,924). Most (70.3%) oral antivirals were dispensed during March 7-May 21, 2022. During March 6, 2022-May 21, 2022, the number of oral antivirals dispensed per 100,000 population increased from 3.3 to 77.4 in low-, from 4.5 to 70.0 in medium-, and from 7.8 to 35.7 in high-vulnerability zip codes. The number of oral antivirals dispensed rose substantially during the overall study period, coincident with the onset of initiatives to increase access. However, by the end of the study period, dispensing rates in high-vulnerability zip codes were approximately one half the rates in medium- and low-vulnerability zip codes. Additional public health, regulatory, and policy efforts might help decrease barriers to oral antiviral access, particularly in communities with high social vulnerability.
Collapse
|
20
|
Gold JAW, Ahmad FB, Cisewski JA, Rossen LM, Montero AJ, Benedict K, Jackson BR, Toda M. Increased Deaths From Fungal Infections During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic-National Vital Statistics System, United States, January 2020-December 2021. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 76:e255-e262. [PMID: 35717660 PMCID: PMC9214147 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated fungal infections cause severe illness, but comprehensive data on disease burden are lacking. We analyzed US National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) data to characterize disease burden, temporal trends, and demographic characteristics of persons dying of fungal infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Using NVSS's January 2018-December 2021 Multiple Cause of Death Database, we examined numbers and age-adjusted rates (per 100 000 population) of deaths due to fungal infection by fungal pathogen, COVID-19 association, demographic characteristics, and year. RESULTS Numbers and age-adjusted rates of deaths due to fungal infection increased from 2019 (n = 4833; rate, 1.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.3]) to 2021 (n = 7199; rate, 1.8 [1.8-1.8] per 100 000); of 13 121 such deaths during 2020-2021, 2868 (21.9%) were COVID-19 associated. Compared with non-COVID-19-associated deaths (n = 10 253), COVID-19-associated deaths more frequently involved Candida (n = 776 [27.1%] vs n = 2432 [23.7%], respectively) and Aspergillus (n = 668 [23.3%] vs n = 1486 [14.5%]) and less frequently involved other specific fungal pathogens. Rates of death due to fungal infection were generally highest in nonwhite and non-Asian populations. Death rates from Aspergillus infections were approximately 2 times higher in the Pacific US census division compared with most other divisions. CONCLUSIONS Deaths from fungal infection increased during 2020-2021 compared with previous years, primarily driven by COVID-19-associated deaths, particularly those involving Aspergillus and Candida. Our findings may inform efforts to prevent, identify, and treat severe fungal infections in patients with COVID-19, especially in certain racial/ethnic groups and geographic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy A W Gold
- Corresponding author: Jeremy A. W. Gold, MD, MS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road Northeast, Mailstop H24-10, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA,
| | - Farida B Ahmad
- National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA
| | - Jodi A Cisewski
- National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA
| | - Lauren M Rossen
- National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA
| | - Alejandro J Montero
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kaitlin Benedict
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mitsuru Toda
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Benedict K, Gold JAW, Dietz S, Anjum S, Williamson PR, Jackson BR. Testing for cryptococcosis at a major commercial laboratory—United States, 2019–202. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac253. [PMID: 35855002 PMCID: PMC9280322 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cryptococcosis is a serious opportunistic fungal disease, and the proportion of cases among patients with immunosuppressive conditions other than HIV or organ transplant has increased. Understanding laboratory testing patterns for cryptococcosis is useful for estimating its true burden and developing testing guidance. Methods We identified cryptococcosis tests (cryptococcal antigen [CrAg], cryptococcal antibody, and fungal cultures) performed at a major national commercial laboratory ordered during March 1, 2019–October 1, 2021, and analyzed test results, patient and provider features, reasons for testing, geography, and temporal trends. Results Among 29 180 serum CrAg tests, 4422 (15.2%) were positive, and among 10 724 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) CrAg tests, 492 (4.6%) were positive. Frequent reasons for serum CrAg testing in nonhospital settings (10 882 tests) were HIV (44.6%) and cryptococcosis (17.0%); other underlying conditions were uncommonly listed (<10% total). Serum CrAg positivity declined from 25.6% in October 2019 to 11.3% in September 2021. The South had the highest positivity for serum CrAg tests (16.6%), CSF CrAg tests (4.7%), and fungal cultures (0.15%). Among 5009 cryptococcal antibody tests, 5 (0.1%) were positive. Conclusions Few outpatient serum CrAg tests were performed for patients with immunocompromising conditions other than HIV, suggesting potential missed opportunities for early detection. Given the high positive predictive value of CrAg testing, research is needed to improve early diagnosis, particularly in patients without HIV. Conversely, the low yield of antibody testing suggests that it may be of low value. The decline in CrAg positivity during the COVID-19 pandemic warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Benedict
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeremy A. W. Gold
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stephanie Dietz
- Division of Health Informatics and Surveillance, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Seher Anjum
- Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Immunology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter R. Williamson
- Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Immunology, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Brendan R. Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Benedict K, Singleton AL, Jackson BR, Molinari NAM. Survey of incidence, lifetime prevalence, and treatment of self-reported vulvovaginal candidiasis, United States, 2020. BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:147. [PMID: 35538480 PMCID: PMC9092842 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01741-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common gynecologic problem in the United States but estimates of its true incidence and prevalence are lacking. We estimated self-reported incidence and lifetime prevalence of healthcare provider-diagnosed VVC and recurrent VVC (RVVC), assessed treatment types, and evaluated demographic and health-related risk factors associated with VVC. Methods An online survey sent to 4548 U.S. adults; data were weighted to be representative of the population. We conducted descriptive and bivariate analyses to examine demographic characteristics and health related factors associated with having VVC in the past year, lifetime prevalence of VVC, and over-the-counter (OTC) and prescription antifungal treatment use. We conducted multivariate analyses to assess features associated with 1) having VVC in the past year, 2) number of VVC episodes in the past year, and 3) lifetime prevalence of VVC. Results Among the subset of 1869 women respondents, 98 (5.2%) had VVC in the past year; of those, 5 (4.7%) had RVVC. Total, 991 (53%) women reported healthcare provider-diagnosed VVC in their lifetime. Overall, 72% of women with VVC in the past year reported prescription antifungal treatment use, 40% reported OTC antifungal treatment use, and 16% reported both. In multivariate analyses, odds of having VVC in the past year were highest for women with less than a high school education (aOR = 6.30, CI: 1.84–21.65), with a child/children under 18 years old (aOR = 3.14, CI: 1.58–6.25), with diabetes (aOR = 2.93, CI: 1.32–6.47), who were part of a couple (aOR = 2.86, CI: 1.42–5.78), and with more visits to a healthcare provider for any reason (aOR = 2.72, CI: 1.84–4.01). Similar factors were associated with increasing number of VVC episodes in the past year and with lifetime prevalence of VVC. Conclusion VVC remains a common infection in the United States. Our analysis supports known clinical risk factors for VVC and suggests that antifungal treatment use is high, underscoring the need to ensure appropriate diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Benedict
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-9, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
| | - Alyson L Singleton
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-9, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-9, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Noelle Angelique M Molinari
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-9, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Benedict K, Lyman M, Jackson BR. Possible misdiagnosis, inappropriate empiric treatment, and opportunities for increased diagnostic testing for patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis-United States, 2018. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0267866. [PMID: 35482794 PMCID: PMC9049332 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a common cause of vaginitis, but the national burden is unknown, and clinical diagnosis without diagnostic testing is often inaccurate. We aimed to calculate rates and evaluate diagnosis and treatment practices of VVC and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC) in the United States. We used the 2018 IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases, which include health insurance claims data on outpatient visits and prescriptions for >28 million people. We used diagnosis and procedure codes to examine underlying conditions, vaginitis-related symptoms and conditions, diagnostic testing, and antibacterial and antifungal treatment among female patients with VVC. Among 12.3 million female patients in MarketScan, 149,934 (1.2%) had a diagnosis code for VVC; of those, 3.4% had RVVC. The VVC rate was highest in the South census region (14.3 per 1,000 female patients) and lowest in the West (9.9 per 1000). Over 60% of patients with VVC did not have codes for any diagnostic testing, and microscopy was the most common test type performed in 29.5%. Higher rates of diagnostic testing occurred among patients who visited an OB/GYN (53.4%) compared with a family practice or internal medicine provider (24.2%) or other healthcare provider types (31.9%); diagnostic testing rates were lowest in the South (34.0%) and highest in the Midwest (41.0%). Treatments on or in the 7 days after diagnosis included systemic fluconazole (70.0%), topical antifungal medications (19.4%), and systemic antibacterial medications (17.2%). The low frequencies of diagnostic testing for VVC and high rates of antifungal and antibacterial use suggest substantial empiric treatment, including likely overprescribing of antifungal medications and potentially unnecessary antibacterial medications. These findings support a need for improved clinical care for VVC to improve both patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship, particularly in the South and among non-OB/GYN providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Benedict
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Meghan Lyman
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Brendan R. Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Saydah SH, Brooks JT, Jackson BR. Surveillance for Post-COVID Conditions Is Necessary: Addressing the Challenges with Multiple Approaches. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37:1786-1788. [PMID: 35167066 PMCID: PMC8853042 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07446-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon H Saydah
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - John T Brooks
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wurster S, Paraskevopoulos T, Toda M, Jiang Y, Tarrand JJ, Williams S, Chiller TM, Jackson BR, Kontoyiannis DP. Invasive mould infections in patients from floodwater-damaged areas after hurricane Harvey - a closer look at an immunocompromised cancer patient population. J Infect 2022; 84:701-709. [PMID: 35288118 PMCID: PMC11018252 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Extensive floodwater damage following hurricane Harvey raised concerns of increase in invasive mould infections (IMIs), especially in immunocompromised patients. To more comprehensively characterize the IMI landscape pre- and post-Harvey, we used a modified, less restrictive clinical IMI (mcIMI) definition by incorporating therapeutic-intent antifungal drug prescriptions combined with an expanded list of host and clinical features. METHODS We reviewed 103 patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, Texas), who lived in Harvey-affected counties and had mould-positive cultures within 12 months pre-/post-Harvey (36 and 67 patients, respectively). Cases were classified as proven or probable IMI (EORTC/MSG criteria), mcIMI, or colonization/contamination. We also compared in-hospital mortality and 42- day survival outcomes of patients with mcIMI pre-/post-Harvey. RESULTS The number of patients with mould- positive cultures from Harvey-affected counties almost doubled from 36 pre- Harvey to 67 post- Harvey (p < 0.01). In contrast, no significant changes in (mc)IMI incidence post-Harvey nor changes in the aetiological mould genera were noted. However, patients with mcIMIs from flood affected areas had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS We observed increased colonization but no excess cases of (mc)IMIs in immunosuppressed cancer patients from affected areas following a large flooding event such as hurricane Harvey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Wurster
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Timotheos Paraskevopoulos
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Mitsuru Toda
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mycotic Diseases Branch, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Ying Jiang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Jeffrey J Tarrand
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Samantha Williams
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mycotic Diseases Branch, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Tom M Chiller
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mycotic Diseases Branch, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mycotic Diseases Branch, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gold JAW, Revis A, Thomas S, Perry L, Blakney RA, Chambers T, Bentz ML, Berkow EL, Lockhart SR, Lysen C, Nunnally NS, Jordan A, Kelly HC, Montero AJ, Farley MM, Oliver NT, Pouch SM, Webster AS, Jackson BR, Beer KD. Clinical Characteristics, Healthcare Utilization, and Outcomes among Patients in a Pilot Surveillance System for Invasive Mold Disease—Georgia, United States, 2017–2019. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac215. [DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Invasive mold diseases (IMD) cause severe illness, but public health surveillance data are lacking. We describe data collected from a laboratory-based, pilot IMD surveillance system.
Methods
During 2017–2019, the Emerging Infections Program conducted active IMD surveillance at three Atlanta-area hospitals. We ascertained potential cases by reviewing histopathology, culture, and Aspergillus galactomannan results and classified patients as having an IMD case (based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group [MSG] criteria) or a non-MSG IMD case (based on the treating clinician’s diagnosis and use of mold-active antifungal therapy). We described patient features and compared patients with MSG versus non-MSG IMD cases.
Results
Among 304 patients with potential IMD, 104 (34.2%) met an IMD case definition (41 MSG, 63 non-MSG). The most common IMD types were invasive aspergillosis (n = 66, 63.5%), mucormycosis (n = 8, 7.7%), and fusariosis (n = 4, 3.8%); the most frequently affected body sites were pulmonary (n = 66, 63.5%), otorhinolaryngologic (n = 17, 16.3%), and cutaneous/deep tissue (n = 9, 8.7%). Forty-five (43.3%) IMD patients received intensive care unit-level care, and 90-day all-cause mortality was 32.7%; these outcomes did not differ significantly between MSG and non-MSG IMD patients.
Conclusions
IMD patients had high mortality rates and a variety of clinical presentations. Comprehensive IMD surveillance is needed to assess emerging trends, and strict application of MSG criteria for surveillance might exclude > one-half of clinically significant IMD cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Revis
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Stepy Thomas
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lewis Perry
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rebekah A. Blakney
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Taylor Chambers
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Monica M. Farley
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nora T. Oliver
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stephanie M. Pouch
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Andrew S. Webster
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Benedict K, Whitham HK, Jackson BR. Economic Burden of Fungal Diseases in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac097. [PMID: 35350173 PMCID: PMC8946773 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
We conservatively estimated the US economic burden of fungal diseases as $11.5 billion in 2019: direct medical costs ($7.5 billion), productivity loss due to absenteeism ($870 million), and premature deaths ($3.2 billion). An alternative "value of statistical life" approach yielded >$48 billion. These are likely underestimates given underdiagnosis and underreporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Benedict
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hilary K Whitham
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hernandez-Romieu AC, Carton TW, Saydah S, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Boehmer TK, Garret NY, Bailey LC, Cowell LG, Draper C, Mayer KH, Nagavedu K, Puro JE, Rasmussen SA, Trick WE, Wanga V, Chevinsky JR, Jackson BR, Goodman AB, Cope JR, Gundlapalli AV, Block JP. Prevalence of Select New Symptoms and Conditions Among Persons Aged Younger Than 20 Years and 20 Years or Older at 31 to 150 Days After Testing Positive or Negative for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2147053. [PMID: 35119459 PMCID: PMC8817203 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.47053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE New symptoms and conditions can develop following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Whether they occur more frequently among persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with those without is unclear. OBJECTIVE To compare the prevalence of new diagnoses of select symptoms and conditions between 31 and 150 days after testing among persons who tested positive vs negative for SARS-CoV-2. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study analyzed aggregated electronic health record data from 40 health care systems, including 338 024 persons younger than 20 years and 1 790 886 persons aged 20 years or older who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 during March to December 2020 and who had medical encounters between 31 and 150 days after testing. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes were used to capture new symptoms and conditions that were recorded 31 to 150 days after a SARS-CoV-2 test but absent in the 18 months to 7 days prior to testing. The prevalence of new symptoms and conditions was compared between persons with positive and negative SARS-CoV-2 tests stratified by age (20 years or older and young than 20 years) and care setting (nonhospitalized, hospitalized, or hospitalized and ventilated). RESULTS A total of 168 701 persons aged 20 years or older and 26 665 younger than 20 years tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 1 622 185 persons aged 20 years or older and 311 359 younger than 20 years tested negative. Shortness of breath was more common among persons with a positive vs negative test result among hospitalized patients (≥20 years: prevalence ratio [PR], 1.89 [99% CI, 1.79-2.01]; <20 years: PR, 1.72 [99% CI, 1.17-2.51]). Shortness of breath was also more common among nonhospitalized patients aged 20 years or older with a positive vs negative test result (PR, 1.09 [99% CI, 1.05-1.13]). Among hospitalized persons aged 20 years or older, the prevalence of new fatigue (PR, 1.35 [99% CI, 1.27-1.44]) and type 2 diabetes (PR, 2.03 [99% CI, 1.87-2.19]) was higher among those with a positive vs a negative test result. Among hospitalized persons younger than 20 years, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (PR, 2.14 [99% CI, 1.13-4.06]) was higher among those with a positive vs a negative test result; however, the prevalence difference was less than 1%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, among persons hospitalized after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, diagnoses of certain symptoms and conditions were higher than among those with a negative test result. Health care professionals should be aware of symptoms and conditions that may develop after SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly among those hospitalized after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso C Hernandez-Romieu
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Sharon Saydah
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Tegan K Boehmer
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nedra Y Garret
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - L Charles Bailey
- Applied Clinical Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lindsay G Cowell
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, Department of Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas
| | - Christine Draper
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Kshema Nagavedu
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Sonja A Rasmussen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville
| | - William E Trick
- Health Research & Solutions, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Valentine Wanga
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer R Chevinsky
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alyson B Goodman
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer R Cope
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Adi V Gundlapalli
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jason P Block
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mejía-Santos H, Montoya S, Chacón-Fuentes R, Zielinski-Gutierrez E, Lopez B, Ning MF, Farach N, García-Coto F, Rodríguez-Araujo DS, Rosales-Pavón K, Urbina G, Rivera AC, Peña R, Tovar A, Paz MC, Lopez R, Pardo-Cruz F, Mendez C, Flores A, Varela M, Chiller T, Jackson BR, Jordan A, Lyman M, Toda M, Caceres DH, Gold JAW. Notes from the Field: Mucormycosis Cases During the COVID-19 Pandemic - Honduras, May-September 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:1747-1749. [PMID: 34914675 PMCID: PMC8675660 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7050a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
30
|
Gold JAW, Tolu SS, Chiller T, Benedict K, Jackson BR. Incidence of Invasive Fungal Infections in Patients Initiating Ibrutinib and other Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitors - United States, July 2016-June 2019. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 75:334-337. [PMID: 34893821 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab1026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We analyzed administrative data to determine the one-year incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFI) in patients initiating small molecule kinase inhibitor (SMKI) therapy. IFI incidence by SMKI ranged from 0.0 to 10.6%, with patients on midostaurin having the highest incidence. Thirty-eight (3.0%) of 1286 patients on ibrutinib developed an IFI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Seda S Tolu
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tom Chiller
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Baddley JW, Thompson GR, Chen SCA, White PL, Johnson MD, Nguyen MH, Schwartz IS, Spec A, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Jackson BR, Patterson TF, Pappas PG. Coronavirus Disease 2019-Associated Invasive Fungal Infection. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab510. [PMID: 34877364 PMCID: PMC8643686 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can become complicated by secondary invasive fungal infections (IFIs), stemming primarily from severe lung damage and immunologic deficits associated with the virus or immunomodulatory therapy. Other risk factors include poorly controlled diabetes, structural lung disease and/or other comorbidities, and fungal colonization. Opportunistic IFI following severe respiratory viral illness has been increasingly recognized, most notably with severe influenza. There have been many reports of fungal infections associated with COVID-19, initially predominated by pulmonary aspergillosis, but with recent emergence of mucormycosis, candidiasis, and endemic mycoses. These infections can be challenging to diagnose and are associated with poor outcomes. The reported incidence of IFI has varied, often related to heterogeneity in patient populations, surveillance protocols, and definitions used for classification of fungal infections. Herein, we review IFI complicating COVID-19 and address knowledge gaps related to epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of COVID-19-associated fungal infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John W Baddley
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine and Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - George R Thompson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Sharon C -A Chen
- Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital and Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - P Lewis White
- Public Health Wales Microbiology Cardiff, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa D Johnson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - M Hong Nguyen
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ilan S Schwartz
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrej Spec
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas F Patterson
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
- South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Peter G Pappas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Natarajan P, Lockhart SR, Basavaraju SV, Anjan S, Lindsley MD, McGrath MM, Oh DH, Jackson BR. Donor-derived Cryptococcus gattii sensu stricto infection in two kidney transplant recipients, southeastern United States. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3780-3784. [PMID: 34173328 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cryptococcus gattii infection is a rare cause of severe pulmonary disease and meningoencephalitis that has only recently been detected in the southeastern United States. We describe an organ transplant-associated outbreak of C. gattii infection involving an HIV-negative immunosuppressed donor in this region who died following new-onset headache and seizure of unknown cause. Retrospective cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing of donor serum was positive. Two of the three transplant recipients developed severe C. gattii infection 11 and 12 weeks following transplantation. One recipient died from severe pulmonary infection, identified on autopsy, and the other ill recipient survived following treatment for cryptococcal meningitis. This outbreak underscores the importance of considering cryptococcosis in patients with clinical findings suggestive of subacute meningitis or other central nervous system (CNS) pathology, and the potential benefit of routine pre-transplant donor CrAg screening using lateral flow assay to guide recipient antifungal prophylaxis. The case also adds to emerging evidence that C. gattii is a potential threat in the southeastern United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,U.S. Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Shweta Anjan
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Martina M McGrath
- Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David H Oh
- Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,U.S. Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Karmarkar EN, O'Donnell K, Prestel C, Forsberg K, Gade L, Jain S, Schan D, Chow N, McDermott D, Rossow J, Toda M, Ruiz R, Hun S, Dale JL, Gross A, Maruca T, Glowicz J, Brooks R, Bagheri H, Nelson T, Gualandi N, Khwaja Z, Horwich-Scholefield S, Jacobs J, Cheung M, Walters M, Jacobs-Slifka K, Stone ND, Mikhail L, Chaturvedi S, Klein L, Vagnone PS, Schneider E, Berkow EL, Jackson BR, Vallabhaneni S, Zahn M, Epson E. Rapid Assessment and Containment of Candida auris Transmission in Postacute Care Settings-Orange County, California, 2019. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174:1554-1562. [PMID: 34487450 PMCID: PMC10984253 DOI: 10.7326/m21-2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Candida auris, a multidrug-resistant yeast, can spread rapidly in ventilator-capable skilled-nursing facilities (vSNFs) and long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). In 2018, a laboratory serving LTACHs in southern California began identifying species of Candida that were detected in urine specimens to enhance surveillance of C auris, and C auris was identified in February 2019 in a patient in an Orange County (OC), California, LTACH. Further investigation identified C auris at 3 associated facilities. OBJECTIVE To assess the prevalence of C auris and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in LTACHs and vSNFs in OC. DESIGN Point prevalence surveys (PPSs), postdischarge testing for C auris detection, and assessments of IPC were done from March to October 2019. SETTING All LTACHs (n = 3) and vSNFs (n = 14) serving adult patients in OC. PARTICIPANTS Current or recent patients in LTACHs and vSNFs in OC. INTERVENTION In facilities where C auris was detected, PPSs were repeated every 2 weeks. Ongoing IPC support was provided. MEASUREMENTS Antifungal susceptibility testing and whole-genome sequencing to assess isolate relatedness. RESULTS Initial PPSs at 17 facilities identified 44 additional patients with C auris in 3 (100%) LTACHs and 6 (43%) vSNFs, with the first bloodstream infection reported in May 2019. By October 2019, a total of 182 patients with C auris were identified by serial PPSs and discharge testing. Of 81 isolates that were sequenced, all were clade III and highly related. Assessments of IPC identified gaps in hand hygiene, transmission-based precautions, and environmental cleaning. The outbreak was contained to 2 facilities by October 2019. LIMITATION Acute care hospitals were not assessed, and IPC improvements over time could not be rigorously evaluated. CONCLUSION Enhanced laboratory surveillance and prompt investigation with IPC support enabled swift identification and containment of C auris. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellora N Karmarkar
- Epidemic Intelligence Service Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, and the California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California (E.N.K.)
| | - Kathleen O'Donnell
- Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, California (K.O., D.S., J.J., M.C., L.M., M.Z.)
| | - Christopher Prestel
- Epidemic Intelligence Service Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (C.P., J.R., M.T.)
| | - Kaitlin Forsberg
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and IHRC, Atlanta, Georgia (K.F.)
| | - Lalitha Gade
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Seema Jain
- California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California (S.J., H.B., T.N., Z.K., S.H., E.E.)
| | - Douglas Schan
- Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, California (K.O., D.S., J.J., M.C., L.M., M.Z.)
| | - Nancy Chow
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Darby McDermott
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - John Rossow
- Epidemic Intelligence Service Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (C.P., J.R., M.T.)
| | - Mitsuru Toda
- Epidemic Intelligence Service Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (C.P., J.R., M.T.)
| | - Ryan Ruiz
- Washington State Public Health Laboratories, Shoreline, Washington (R.R., S.H., E.S.)
| | - Sopheay Hun
- Washington State Public Health Laboratories, Shoreline, Washington (R.R., S.H., E.S.)
| | - Jennifer L Dale
- Minnesota Department of Health Public Health Laboratory, St. Paul, Minnesota (J.L.D., A.G., P.S.V.)
| | - Annastasia Gross
- Minnesota Department of Health Public Health Laboratory, St. Paul, Minnesota (J.L.D., A.G., P.S.V.)
| | - Tyler Maruca
- Maryland Department of Health Laboratories Administration, Baltimore, Maryland (T.M., L.K.)
| | - Janet Glowicz
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Richard Brooks
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, and the Maryland Department of Health, Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Outbreak Response Bureau, Baltimore, Maryland (R.B.)
| | - Hosniyeh Bagheri
- California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California (S.J., H.B., T.N., Z.K., S.H., E.E.)
| | - Teresa Nelson
- California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California (S.J., H.B., T.N., Z.K., S.H., E.E.)
| | - Nicole Gualandi
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Zenith Khwaja
- California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California (S.J., H.B., T.N., Z.K., S.H., E.E.)
| | - Sam Horwich-Scholefield
- California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California (S.J., H.B., T.N., Z.K., S.H., E.E.)
| | - Josh Jacobs
- Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, California (K.O., D.S., J.J., M.C., L.M., M.Z.)
| | - Michele Cheung
- Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, California (K.O., D.S., J.J., M.C., L.M., M.Z.)
| | - Maroya Walters
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Kara Jacobs-Slifka
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Nimalie D Stone
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Lydia Mikhail
- Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, California (K.O., D.S., J.J., M.C., L.M., M.Z.)
| | | | - Liore Klein
- Maryland Department of Health Laboratories Administration, Baltimore, Maryland (T.M., L.K.)
| | - Paula Snippes Vagnone
- Minnesota Department of Health Public Health Laboratory, St. Paul, Minnesota (J.L.D., A.G., P.S.V.)
| | - Emily Schneider
- Washington State Public Health Laboratories, Shoreline, Washington (R.R., S.H., E.S.)
| | - Elizabeth L Berkow
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Snigdha Vallabhaneni
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia (L.G., N.C., D.M., J.G., N.G., M.W., K.J., N.D.S., E.L.B., B.R.J., S.V.)
| | - Matthew Zahn
- Orange County Health Care Agency, Santa Ana, California (K.O., D.S., J.J., M.C., L.M., M.Z.)
| | - Erin Epson
- California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California (S.J., H.B., T.N., Z.K., S.H., E.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wanga V, Chevinsky JR, Dimitrov LV, Gerdes ME, Whitfield GP, Bonacci RA, Nji MAM, Hernandez-Romieu AC, Rogers-Brown JS, McLeod T, Rushmore J, Lutfy C, Bushman D, Koumans E, Saydah S, Goodman AB, Coleman King SM, Jackson BR, Cope JR. Long-Term Symptoms Among Adults Tested for SARS-CoV-2 - United States, January 2020-April 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:1235-1241. [PMID: 34499626 PMCID: PMC8437054 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7036a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
35
|
Benedict K, Williams S, Beekmann SE, Polgreen PM, Jackson BR, Toda M. Testing Practices for Fungal Respiratory Infections and SARS-CoV-2 among Infectious Disease Specialists, United States. J Fungi (Basel) 2021; 7:jof7080605. [PMID: 34436144 PMCID: PMC8397131 DOI: 10.3390/jof7080605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In an online poll, 174 infectious disease physicians reported that testing frequencies for coccidioidomycosis, histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, and cryptococcosis were similar before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating that these physicians remain alert for these fungal infections and were generally not concerned about the possibility of under-detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Benedict
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; (S.W.); (B.R.J.); (M.T.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Samantha Williams
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; (S.W.); (B.R.J.); (M.T.)
| | - Susan E. Beekmann
- Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; (S.E.B.); (P.M.P.)
| | - Philip M. Polgreen
- Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA; (S.E.B.); (P.M.P.)
| | - Brendan R. Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; (S.W.); (B.R.J.); (M.T.)
| | - Mitsuru Toda
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; (S.W.); (B.R.J.); (M.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lyman M, Forsberg K, Reuben J, Dang T, Free R, Seagle EE, Sexton DJ, Soda E, Jones H, Hawkins D, Anderson A, Bassett J, Lockhart SR, Merengwa E, Iyengar P, Jackson BR, Chiller T. Notes from the Field: Transmission of Pan-Resistant and Echinocandin-Resistant Candida auris in Health Care Facilities - Texas and the District of Columbia, January-April 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:1022-1023. [PMID: 34292928 PMCID: PMC8297693 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7029a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
37
|
Rogers-Brown JS, Wanga V, Okoro C, Brozowsky D, Evans A, Hopwood D, Cope JR, Jackson BR, Bushman D, Hernandez-Romieu AC, Bonacci RA, McLeod T, Chevinsky JR, Goodman AB, Dixson MG, Lufty C, Rushmore J, Koumans E, Morris SB, Thompson W. Outcomes Among Patients Referred to Outpatient Rehabilitation Clinics After COVID-19 diagnosis - United States, January 2020-March 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:967-971. [PMID: 34237048 PMCID: PMC8312758 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7027a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
38
|
Rossow J, Ostrowsky B, Adams E, Greenko J, McDonald R, Vallabhaneni S, Forsberg K, Perez S, Lucas T, Alroy KA, Jacobs Slifka K, Walters M, Jackson BR, Quinn M, Chaturvedi S, Blog D. Factors Associated With Candida auris Colonization and Transmission in Skilled Nursing Facilities With Ventilator Units, New York, 2016-2018. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 72:e753-e760. [PMID: 32984882 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Candida auris is an emerging, multidrug-resistant yeast that spreads in healthcare settings. People colonized with C. auris can transmit this pathogen and are at risk for invasive infections. New York State (NYS) has the largest US burden (>500 colonized and infected people); many colonized individuals are mechanically ventilated or have tracheostomy, and are residents of ventilator-capable skilled nursing facilities (vSNF). We evaluated the factors associated with C. auris colonization among vSNF residents to inform prevention interventions. METHODS During 2016-2018, the NYS Department of Health conducted point prevalence surveys (PPS) to detect C. auris colonization among residents of vSNFs. In a case-control investigation, we defined a case as C. auris colonization in a resident, and identified up to 4 residents with negative swabs during the same PPS as controls. We abstracted data from medical records on patient facility transfers, antimicrobial use, and medical history. RESULTS We included 60 cases and 218 controls identified from 6 vSNFs. After controlling for potential confounders, the following characteristics were associated with C. auris colonization: being on a ventilator (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-15.4), receiving carbapenem antibiotics in the prior 90 days (aOR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.6-7.6), having ≥1 acute care hospital visit in the prior 6 months (aOR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.9-9.6), and receiving systemic fluconazole in the prior 90 days (aOR, 6.0; 95% CI, 1.6-22.6). CONCLUSIONS Targeted screening of patients in vSNFs with the above risk factors for C. auris can help identify colonized patients and facilitate the implementation of infection control measures. Antimicrobial stewardship may be an important factor in the prevention of C. auris colonization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Rossow
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Belinda Ostrowsky
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Eleanor Adams
- New York State Department of Health, Metropolitan Area Regional Office, New Rochelle, New York, USA
| | - Jane Greenko
- New York State Department of Health, Metropolitan Area Regional Office, New Rochelle, New York, USA
| | - Robert McDonald
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Snigdha Vallabhaneni
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kaitlin Forsberg
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stephen Perez
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Todd Lucas
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Karen A Alroy
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kara Jacobs Slifka
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Maroya Walters
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Monica Quinn
- New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Sudha Chaturvedi
- Wadsworth Laboratory, Albany, New York, USA.,Albany School of Public Health, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Debra Blog
- New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.,Albany School of Public Health, Albany, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Benedict K, Gibbons-Burgener S, Kocharian A, Ireland M, Rothfeldt L, Christophe N, Signs K, Jackson BR. Blastomycosis Surveillance in 5 States, United States, 1987-2018. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 27. [PMID: 33757624 PMCID: PMC8007286 DOI: 10.3201/eid2704.204078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis and the severity of illness suggest that surveillance underestimates the true number of cases. Blastomycosis is caused by inhalation of Blastomyces spp. fungi. Limited data are available on the incidence and geographic range of blastomycosis in the United States. To better characterize its epidemiologic features, we analyzed combined surveillance data from the 5 states in which blastomycosis is reportable: Arkansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. Surveillance identified 4,441 cases during 1987–2018, a mean of 192 cases per year. The mean annual incidence was <1 case/100,000 population in most areas but >20 cases/100,000 population in some northern counties of Wisconsin. Median patient age was 46 years, 2,892 (65%) patients were male, 1,662 (57%) were hospitalized, and 278 (8%) died. The median time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 33 days. The severity of illness and diagnostic delays suggest that surveillance underestimates the true number of cases. More in-depth surveillance in additional states could elucidate blastomycosis incidence and inform efforts to increase awareness.
Collapse
|
40
|
Benedict K, Toda M, Jackson BR. Revising Conventional Wisdom About Histoplasmosis in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis 2021; 8:ofab306. [PMID: 34703835 PMCID: PMC8538056 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofab306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies performed during the 1940s-1960s continue to serve as the foundation of the epidemiology of histoplasmosis given that many knowledge gaps persist regarding its geographic distribution, prevalence, and burden in the United States. We explore 3 long-standing, frequently cited, and somewhat incomplete epidemiologic beliefs about histoplasmosis: (1) histoplasmosis is the most common endemic mycosis in the United States, (2) histoplasmosis is endemic to the Ohio and Mississippi River Valleys, and (3) histoplasmosis is associated with bird or bat droppings. We also summarize recent insights about the clinical spectrum of histoplasmosis and changes in underlying conditions associated with the severe forms. Continuing to identify prevention opportunities will require better epidemiologic data, better diagnostic testing, and greater awareness about this neglected disease among health care providers, public health professionals, and the general public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Benedict
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mitsuru Toda
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Seagle EE, Jackson BR, Lockhart SR, Georgacopoulos O, Nunnally NS, Roland J, Barter DM, Johnston HL, Czaja CA, Kayalioglu H, Clogher P, Revis A, Farley MM, Harrison LH, Davis SS, Phipps EC, Tesini BL, Schaffner W, Markus TM, Lyman MM. The landscape of candidemia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 74:802-811. [PMID: 34145450 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented healthcare challenges, and COVID-19 has been linked to secondary infections. Candidemia, a fungal healthcare-associated infection, has been described in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. However, studies of candidemia and COVID-19 co-infection have been limited in sample size and geographic scope. We assessed differences in patients with candidemia with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis. METHODS We conducted a case-level analysis using population-based candidemia surveillance data collected through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Emerging Infections Program during April-August 2020 to compare characteristics of candidemia patients with and without a positive test for COVID-19 in the 30 days before their Candida culture using chi-square or Fisher exact tests. RESULTS Of the 251 candidemia patients included, 64 (25.5%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Liver disease, solid organ malignancies, and prior surgeries were each >3 times more common in patients without COVID-19 co-infection, whereas intensive care unit-level care, mechanical ventilation, having a central venous catheter, and receipt of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were each >1.3 times more common in patients with COVID-19. All cause in-hospital fatality was two times higher among those with COVID-19 (62.5%) than without (32.1%). CONCLUSIONS One quarter of candidemia patients had COVID-19. These patients were less likely to have certain underlying conditions and recent surgery commonly associated with candidemia and more likely to have acute risk factors linked to COVID-19 care, including immunosuppressive medications. Given the high mortality, it is important for clinicians to remain vigilant and take proactive measures to prevent candidemia in patients with COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma E Seagle
- ASRT, Inc; Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shawn R Lockhart
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ourania Georgacopoulos
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Natalie S Nunnally
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeremy Roland
- California Emerging Infections Program; Oakland, California, USA
| | - Devra M Barter
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment; Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Helen L Johnston
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment; Denver, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Hazal Kayalioglu
- Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health; New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Paula Clogher
- Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, Yale School of Public Health; New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Andrew Revis
- Atlanta VA Medical Center; Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Foundation for Atlanta Veterans Education and Research; Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Georgia Emerging Infections Program; Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Monica M Farley
- Atlanta VA Medical Center; Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine; Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lee H Harrison
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Shrum Davis
- New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, University of New Mexico; Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Erin C Phipps
- New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, University of New Mexico; Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Brenda L Tesini
- University of Rochester School of Medicine; Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Meghan M Lyman
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Toda M, Beekmann SE, Polgreen PM, Chiller TM, Jackson BR, Beer KD. Knowledge of Infectious Disease Specialists Regarding Aspergillosis Complicating Influenza, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 26:809-811. [PMID: 32186506 PMCID: PMC7101098 DOI: 10.3201/eid2604.190953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
In an online survey, we found that nearly one fifth of physicians in the United States who responded had seen or heard about a case of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis after severe influenza at their institution. However, <10% routinely used galactomannan testing to test for this fungus in patients with severe influenza.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
The geographic distribution of sporotrichosis in the United States is largely unknown. In a large commercial health insurance database, sporotrichosis was rare but most frequently occurred in southern and south-central states. Knowledge about where sporotrichosis is most likely to occur is essential for increasing clinician awareness of this rare fungal disease.
Collapse
|
44
|
Gold JAW, Seagle EE, Nadle J, Barter DM, Czaja CA, Johnston H, Farley MM, Thomas S, Harrison LH, Fischer J, Pattee B, Mody RK, Phipps EC, Shrum Davis S, Tesini BL, Zhang AY, Markus TM, Schaffner W, Lockhart SR, Vallabhaneni S, Jackson BR, Lyman M. Treatment Practices for Adults with Candidemia at Nine Active Surveillance Sites - United States, 2017-2018. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:1609-1616. [PMID: 34079987 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Candidemia is a common opportunistic infection causing substantial morbidity and mortality. Because of an increasing proportion of non-albicans Candida species and rising antifungal drug resistance, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) changed treatment guidelines in 2016 to recommend echinocandins over fluconazole as first-line treatment for adults with candidemia. We describe candidemia treatment practices and adherence to the updated guidelines. METHODS During 2017-2018, the Emerging Infections Program conducted active population-based candidemia surveillance at nine U.S. sites using a standardized case definition. We assessed factors associated with initial antifungal treatment for the first candidemia case among adults using multivariable logistic regression models. To identify instances of potentially inappropriate treatment, we compared the first antifungal drug received with species and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) results from initial blood cultures. RESULTS Among 1,835 patients who received antifungal treatment, 1,258 (68.6%) received an echinocandin and 543 (29.6%) received fluconazole as initial treatment. Cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio = 2.06, 95% confidence interval: 1.29-3.29) was the only underlying medical condition significantly associated with initial receipt of an echinocandin (versus fluconazole). Over half (n = 304, 56.0%) of patients initially treated with fluconazole grew a non-albicans species. Among 265 patients initially treated with fluconazole and with fluconazole AFST results, 28 (10.6%) had a fluconazole-resistant isolate. CONCLUSIONS A substantial proportion of patients with candidemia were initially treated with fluconazole, resulting in potentially inappropriate treatment for those involving non-albicans or fluconazole-resistant species. Reasons for non-adherence to IDSA guidelines should be evaluated, and clinician education is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy A W Gold
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Emma E Seagle
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,ASRT Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Joelle Nadle
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Devra M Barter
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Helen Johnston
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Monica M Farley
- Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stepy Thomas
- Georgia Emerging Infections, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lee H Harrison
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jill Fischer
- Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Rajal K Mody
- Minnesota Department of Health, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.,Division of State and Local Readiness, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Erin C Phipps
- New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Sarah Shrum Davis
- New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Brenda L Tesini
- University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Alexia Y Zhang
- Oregon Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Meghan Lyman
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Toda M, Beer KD, Kuivila KM, Chiller TM, Jackson BR. Trends in Agricultural Triazole Fungicide Use in the United States, 1992-2016 and Possible Implications for Antifungal-Resistant Fungi in Human Disease. Environ Health Perspect 2021; 129:55001. [PMID: 33949891 PMCID: PMC8098123 DOI: 10.1289/ehp7484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The fungus Aspergillus fumigatus (A. fumigatus) is the leading cause of invasive mold infections, which cause severe disease and death in immunocompromised people. Use of triazole antifungal medications in recent decades has improved patient survival; however, triazole-resistant infections have become common in parts of Europe and are emerging in the United States. Triazoles are also a class of fungicides used in plant agriculture, and certain triazole-resistant A. fumigatus strains found causing disease in humans have been linked to environmental fungicide use. OBJECTIVES We examined U.S. temporal and geographic trends in the use of triazole fungicides using U.S. Geological Survey agricultural pesticide use estimates. DISCUSSION Based on our analysis, overall tonnage of triazole fungicide use nationwide was relatively constant during 1992-2005 but increased >4-fold during 2006-2016 to 2.9 million kg in 2016. During 1992-2005, triazole fungicide use occurred mostly in orchards and grapes, wheat, and other crops, but recent increases in use have occurred primarily in wheat, corn, soybeans, and other crops, particularly in Midwest and Southeast states. We conclude that, given the chemical similarities between triazole fungicides and triazole antifungal drugs used in human medicine, increased monitoring for environmental and clinical triazole resistance in A. fumigatus would improve overall understanding of these interactions, as well as help identify strategies to mitigate development and spread of resistance. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7484.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Toda
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Karlyn D. Beer
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kathryn M. Kuivila
- U.S. Geological Survey Oregon Water Science Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Tom M. Chiller
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R. Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Penumarthi LR, La Hoz RM, Wolfe CR, Jackson BR, Mehta AK, Malinis M, Danziger-Isakov L, Strasfeld L, Florescu DF, Vece G, Basavaraju SV, Michaels MG. Cryptococcus transmission through solid organ transplantation in the United States: A report from the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1911-1923. [PMID: 33290629 PMCID: PMC8096655 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cryptococcus species can cause serious life-threatening infection in solid organ transplant recipients by reactivation of prior infection, posttransplant de novo infection, or donor transmission from the transplanted organ. Although previously reported in the literature, the extent of donor-derived cryptococcosis in the United States has not been documented. We analyzed potential donor-derived Cryptococcus transmission events reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) for investigation by the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). All reports between 2009 and 2019 in which transmission to recipients was designated proven or probable, or determined to be averted due to implementation of prophylaxis (intervention without disease transmission-"IWDT") were included. During 2009-2019, 58 reports of potential donor-derived cryptococcosis were submitted to DTAC. Among these reports, 12 donors were determined to have resulted in proven or probable transmission to 23/34 (67.6%) recipients. Most of these donors (10/12 [83%]) exhibited central nervous system-related symptoms prior to death and 5/23 (22%) infected recipients died. For 11 different donors, prophylaxis, most often with fluconazole, was administered to 23/35 (65.7%) recipients. Clinicians should maintain awareness of donor-derived cryptococcosis and consider prompt prophylaxis or treatment followed by reporting to OPTN for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasya R. Penumarthi
- Office of Blood, Organ, and Other Tissue Safety, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ricardo M. La Hoz
- Division of Infectious Disease and Geographic Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Cameron R. Wolfe
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Brendan R. Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Aneesh K. Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Maricar Malinis
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center & University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Lynne Strasfeld
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Division of Infectious Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Diana F. Florescu
- Infectious Diseases Division, Transplant Infectious Diseases Program, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Office of Blood, Organ, and Other Tissue Safety, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Marian G. Michaels
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hernandez-Romieu AC, Leung S, Mbanya A, Jackson BR, Cope JR, Bushman D, Dixon M, Brown J, McLeod T, Saydah S, Datta D, Koplan K, Lobelo F. Health Care Utilization and Clinical Characteristics of Nonhospitalized Adults in an Integrated Health Care System 28-180 Days After COVID-19 Diagnosis - Georgia, May 2020-March 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:644-650. [PMID: 33914727 PMCID: PMC8084119 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7017e3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
48
|
Tsay SV, Mu Y, Williams S, Epson E, Nadle J, Bamberg WM, Barter DM, Johnston HL, Farley MM, Harb S, Thomas S, Bonner LA, Harrison LH, Hollick R, Marceaux K, Mody RK, Pattee B, Shrum Davis S, Phipps EC, Tesini BL, Gellert AB, Zhang AY, Schaffner W, Hillis S, Ndi D, Graber CR, Jackson BR, Chiller T, Magill S, Vallabhaneni S. Burden of Candidemia in the United States, 2017. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:e449-e453. [PMID: 32107534 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Candidemia is a common healthcare-associated bloodstream infection with high morbidity and mortality. There are no current estimates of candidemia burden in the United States (US). METHODS In 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted active population-based surveillance for candidemia through the Emerging Infections Program in 45 counties in 9 states encompassing approximately 17 million persons (5% of the national population). Laboratories serving the catchment area population reported all blood cultures with Candida, and a standard case definition was applied to identify cases that occurred in surveillance area residents. Burden of cases and mortality were estimated by extrapolating surveillance area cases to national numbers using 2017 national census data. RESULTS We identified 1226 candidemia cases across 9 surveillance sites in 2017. Based on this, we estimated that 22 660 (95% confidence interval [CI], 20 210-25 110) cases of candidemia occurred in the US in 2017. Overall estimated incidence was 7.0 cases per 100 000 persons, with highest rates in adults aged ≥ 65 years (20.1/100 000), males (7.9/100 000), and those of black race (12.3/100 000). An estimated 3380 (95% CI, 1318-5442) deaths occurred within 7 days of a positive Candida blood culture, and 5628 (95% CI, 2465-8791) deaths occurred during the hospitalization with candidemia. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis highlights the substantial burden of candidemia in the US. Because candidemia is only one form of invasive candidiasis, the true burden of invasive infections due to Candida is higher. Ongoing surveillance can support future burden estimates and help assess the impact of prevention interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon V Tsay
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Yi Mu
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sabrina Williams
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Erin Epson
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Joelle Nadle
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Wendy M Bamberg
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Devra M Barter
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Helen L Johnston
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Monica M Farley
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sasha Harb
- Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Stepy Thomas
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Lee H Harrison
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rosemary Hollick
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kaytlynn Marceaux
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rajal K Mody
- Minnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Sarah Shrum Davis
- New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Erin C Phipps
- New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
- University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Brenda L Tesini
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
- New York Emerging Infections Program, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Anita B Gellert
- New York Emerging Infections Program, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Sherry Hillis
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Danielle Ndi
- Tennessee Emerging Infections Program, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tom Chiller
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shelley Magill
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Snigdha Vallabhaneni
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zhang AY, Shrum S, Williams S, Petnic S, Nadle J, Johnston H, Barter D, Vonbank B, Bonner L, Hollick R, Marceaux K, Harrison L, Schaffner W, Tesini BL, Farley MM, Pierce RA, Phipps E, Mody RK, Chiller TM, Jackson BR, Vallabhaneni S. The Changing Epidemiology of Candidemia in the United States: Injection Drug Use as an Increasingly Common Risk Factor-Active Surveillance in Selected Sites, United States, 2014-2017. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 71:1732-1737. [PMID: 31676903 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz1061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Injection drug use (IDU) is a known, but infrequent risk factor on candidemia; however, the opioid epidemic and increases in IDU may be changing the epidemiology of candidemia. METHODS Active population-based surveillance for candidemia was conducted in selected US counties. Cases of candidemia were categorized as IDU cases if IDU was indicated in the medical records in the 12 months prior to the date of initial culture. RESULTS During 2017, 1191 candidemia cases were identified in patients aged >12 years (incidence: 6.9 per 100 000 population); 128 (10.7%) had IDU history, and this proportion was especially high (34.6%) in patients with candidemia aged 19-44. Patients with candidemia and IDU history were younger than those without (median age, 35 vs 63 years; P < .001). Candidemia cases involving recent IDU were less likely to have typical risk factors including malignancy (7.0% vs 29.4%; relative risk [RR], 0.2 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .1-.5]), abdominal surgery (3.9% vs 17.5%; RR, 0.2 [95% CI, .09-.5]), and total parenteral nutrition (3.9% vs 22.5%; RR, 0.2 [95% CI, .07-.4]). Candidemia cases with IDU occurred more commonly in smokers (68.8% vs 18.5%; RR, 3.7 [95% CI, 3.1-4.4]), those with hepatitis C (54.7% vs 6.4%; RR, 8.5 [95% CI, 6.5-11.3]), and in people who were homeless (13.3% vs 0.8%; RR, 15.7 [95% CI, 7.1-34.5]). CONCLUSIONS Clinicians should consider injection drug use as a risk factor in patients with candidemia who lack typical candidemia risk factors, especially in those with who are 19-44 years of age and have community-associated candidemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexia Y Zhang
- Oregon Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Sarah Shrum
- New Mexico Department of Health, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
| | - Sabrina Williams
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sarah Petnic
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Joelle Nadle
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Helen Johnston
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Devra Barter
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Lindsay Bonner
- Maryland Emerging Infections Program, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rosemary Hollick
- Maryland Emerging Infections Program, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kaytlynn Marceaux
- Maryland Emerging Infections Program, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lee Harrison
- Maryland Emerging Infections Program, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Brenda L Tesini
- University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Monica M Farley
- Emory University School of Medicine and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca A Pierce
- Oregon Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Erin Phipps
- New Mexico Emerging Infections Program, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Rajal K Mody
- Minnesota Department of Health, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.,Division of State and Local Readiness, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tom M Chiller
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Snigdha Vallabhaneni
- Mycotic Disease Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pettrone K, Burnett E, Link-Gelles R, Haight SC, Schrodt C, England L, Gomes DJ, Shamout M, O'Laughlin K, Kimball A, Blau EF, Ladva CN, Szablewski CM, Tobin-D'Angelo M, Oosmanally N, Drenzek C, Browning SD, Bruce BB, da Silva J, Gold JAW, Jackson BR, Morris SB, Natarajan P, Fanfair RN, Patel PR, Rogers-Brown J, Rossow J, Wong KK, Murphy DJ, Blum JM, Hollberg J, Lefkove B, Brown FW, Shimabukuro T, Midgley CM, Tate JE, Killerby ME. Characteristics and Risk Factors of Hospitalized and Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, March-April 2020. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 27:1164-1168. [PMID: 33754981 PMCID: PMC8007327 DOI: 10.3201/eid2704.204709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared the characteristics of hospitalized and nonhospitalized patients who had coronavirus disease in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. We found that risk for hospitalization increased with a patient’s age and number of concurrent conditions. We also found a potential association between hospitalization and high hemoglobin A1c levels in persons with diabetes.
Collapse
|