1
|
Parsons MG, Hermelin D, Hennenfent A, Tiller RV, Annambhotla P, Negrón ME, Basavaraju SV, Katz LM. Animal vaccine strain Brucella abortus infection in a plateletpheresis donor: A case report. Transfusion 2024; 64:946-948. [PMID: 38501889 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Meredith G Parsons
- Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - María E Negrón
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Louis M Katz
- ImpactLife Blood Services and Scott Co. Health Department, Davenport, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Su JR, Shay D, Ryan M, Basavaraju SV, Broder KR, Clark M, Buddy Creech C, Cunningham F, Goddard K, Guy H, Edwards KM, Forshee R, Hamburger T, Hause AM, Klein NP, Kracalik I, Lamer C, Loran DA, McNeil MM, Montgomery J, Moro P, Myers TR, Olson C, Oster ME, Sharma AJ, Schupbach R, Weintraub E, Whitehead B, Anderson S. Overview of U.S. COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance systems. Vaccine 2024:S0264-410X(24)00224-X. [PMID: 38631952 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
The U.S. COVID-19 vaccination program, which commenced in December 2020, has been instrumental in preventing morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 disease. Safety monitoring has been an essential component of the program. The federal government undertook a comprehensive and coordinated approach to implement complementary safety monitoring systems and to communicate findings in a timely and transparent way to healthcare providers, policymakers, and the public. Monitoring involved both well-established and newly developed systems that relied on both spontaneous (passive) and active surveillance methods. Clinical consultation for individual cases of adverse events following vaccination was performed, and monitoring of special populations, such as pregnant persons, was conducted. This report describes the U.S. government's COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring systems and programs used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Defense, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Indian Health Service. Using the adverse event of myocarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination as a model, we demonstrate how the multiple, complementary monitoring systems worked to rapidly detect, assess, and verify a vaccine safety signal. In addition, longer-term follow-up was conducted to evaluate the recovery status of myocarditis cases following vaccination. Finally, the process for timely and transparent communication and dissemination of COVID-19 vaccine safety data is described, highlighting the responsiveness and robustness of the U.S. vaccine safety monitoring infrastructure during the national COVID-19 vaccination program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julianne Gee
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States.
| | - Tom T Shimabukuro
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - John R Su
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - David Shay
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Margaret Ryan
- Defense Health Agency, Immunization Healthcare Division, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Karen R Broder
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Matthew Clark
- Indian Health Service (IHS), IHS National Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee, Durango, CO, United States
| | - C Buddy Creech
- Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Francesca Cunningham
- Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Center for Medication Safety - Pharmacy Benefit Management Services, Hines, IL, United States
| | - Kristin Goddard
- Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Harrison Guy
- Indian Health Service (IHS), IHS National Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee, Durango, CO, United States
| | - Kathryn M Edwards
- Vanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center and School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Richard Forshee
- Office of Biologics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Tanya Hamburger
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Anne M Hause
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Nicola P Klein
- Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, United States
| | - Ian Kracalik
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Chris Lamer
- Indian Health Service (IHS), IHS National Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee, Durango, CO, United States
| | - David A Loran
- Defense Health Agency, Immunization Healthcare Division, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Michael M McNeil
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Jay Montgomery
- Defense Health Agency, Immunization Healthcare Division, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Pedro Moro
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Tanya R Myers
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Christine Olson
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Matthew E Oster
- National Center for Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC, Atlanta GA, United States; Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Andrea J Sharma
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Ryan Schupbach
- Indian Health Service (IHS), IHS National Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee, Durango, CO, United States
| | - Eric Weintraub
- National Center for Emerging Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Brett Whitehead
- Indian Health Service (IHS), IHS National Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee, Durango, CO, United States
| | - Steven Anderson
- Office of Biologics and Pharmacovigilance, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chavez Ortiz JL, Griffin I, Kazakova SV, Stewart PB, Kracalik I, Basavaraju SV. Transfusion-related errors and associated adverse reactions and blood product wastage as reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module, 2014-2022. Transfusion 2024; 64:627-637. [PMID: 38476028 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transfusion-related errors are largely preventable but may lead to blood product wastage and adverse reactions, resulting in patient harm. In the United States, the incidence of transfusion-related errors is poorly understood nationally. We used data from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Hemovigilance Module to describe and quantify transfusion-related errors, as well as associated transfusion-related adverse reactions and blood product wastage. METHODS During 2014-2022, data from the NHSN Hemovigilance Module were used to analyze errors, including near misses (errors with no transfusion), incidents (errors with transfusion), and associated serious adverse reactions (severe, life-threatening, or death). RESULTS During 2014-2022, 80 acute care facilities (75 adult; 5 pediatric) reported 63,900 errors. Most errors occurred during patient blood sample collection (21,761, 34.1%) and blood sample handling (16,277, 25.5%). Less than one-fifth of reported errors (9822, 15.4%) had a completed incident form. Of those, 8780 (89.3%) were near misses and 1042 (10.7%) incidents. More than a third of near misses (3363, 38.3%) were associated with a discarded blood product, resulting in 4862 discarded components. Overall, 87 adverse reactions were associated with errors; six (7%) were serious. CONCLUSIONS Over half of the transfusion-related errors reported to the Hemovigilance Module occurred during blood sample collection or sample handling. Some serious adverse reactions identified were associated with errors, suggesting that additional safety interventions may be beneficial. Increased participation in the Hemovigilance Module could enhance generalizability and further inform policy development regarding error prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel L Chavez Ortiz
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Isabel Griffin
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sophia V Kazakova
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Phylicia B Stewart
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Chenega Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian Kracalik
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wortham JM, Haddad MB, Stewart RJ, Annambhotla P, Basavaraju SV, Nabity SA, Griffin IS, McDonald E, Beshearse EM, Grossman MK, Schildknecht KR, Calvet HM, Keh CE, Percak JM, Coloma M, Shaw T, Davidson PJ, Smith SR, Dickson RP, Kaul DR, Gonzalez AR, Rai S, Rodriguez G, Morris S, Armitige LY, Stapleton J, Lacassagne M, Young LR, Ariail K, Behm H, Jordan HT, Spencer M, Nilsen DM, Denison BM, Burgos M, Leonard JM, Cortes E, Thacker TC, Lehman KA, Langer AJ, Cowan LS, Starks AM, LoBue PA. Second Nationwide Tuberculosis Outbreak Caused by Bone Allografts Containing Live Cells - United States, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2024; 72:1385-1389. [PMID: 38175804 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm725253a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
During July 7-11, 2023, CDC received reports of two patients in different states with a tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis following spinal surgical procedures that used bone allografts containing live cells from the same deceased donor. An outbreak associated with a similar product manufactured by the same tissue establishment (i.e., manufacturer) occurred in 2021. Because of concern that these cases represented a second outbreak, CDC and the Food and Drug Administration worked with the tissue establishment to determine that this product was obtained from a donor different from the one implicated in the 2021 outbreak and learned that the bone allograft product was distributed to 13 health care facilities in seven states. Notifications to all seven states occurred on July 12. As of December 20, 2023, five of 36 surgical bone allograft recipients received laboratory-confirmed TB disease diagnoses; two patients died of TB. Whole-genome sequencing demonstrated close genetic relatedness between positive Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures from surgical recipients and unused product. Although the bone product had tested negative by nucleic acid amplification testing before distribution, M. tuberculosis culture of unused product was not performed until after the outbreak was recognized. The public health response prevented up to 53 additional surgical procedures using allografts from that donor; additional measures to protect patients from tissue-transmitted M. tuberculosis are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Marshall KE, Free RJ, Filardo TD, Schwartz NG, Hernandez-Romieu AC, Thacker TC, Lehman KA, Annambhotla P, Dupree PB, Glowicz JB, Scarpita AM, Brubaker SA, Czaja CA, Basavaraju SV. Incomplete tissue product tracing during an investigation of a tissue-derived tuberculosis outbreak. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:115-122. [PMID: 37717630 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
In the United States, there is currently no system to track donated human tissue products to individual recipients. This posed a challenge during an investigation of a nationwide tuberculosis outbreak that occurred when bone allograft contaminated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Lot A) was implanted into 113 patients in 18 US states, including 2 patients at 1 health care facility in Colorado. A third patient at the same facility developed spinal tuberculosis with an isolate genetically identical to the Lot A outbreak strain. However, health care records indicated this patient had received bone allograft from a different donor (Lot B). We investigated the source of this newly identified infection, including the possibilities of Lot B donor infection, product switch or contamination during manufacturing, product switch at the health care facility, person-to-person transmission, and laboratory error. The findings included gaps in tissue traceability at the health care facility, creating the possibility for a product switch at the point of care despite detailed tissue-tracking policies. Nationally, 6 (3.9%) of 155 Lot B units could not be traced to final disposition. This investigation highlights the critical need to improve tissue-tracking systems to ensure unbroken traceability, facilitating investigations of recipient adverse events and enabling timely public health responses to prevent morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen E Marshall
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA; Division of State and Local Readiness, Office of Readiness and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
| | - Rebecca J Free
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Thomas D Filardo
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Noah G Schwartz
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Alfonso C Hernandez-Romieu
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tyler C Thacker
- National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, USA
| | - Kimberly A Lehman
- National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, USA
| | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Peter B Dupree
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Janet Burton Glowicz
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ann M Scarpita
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Scott A Brubaker
- Division of Human Tissues, Office of Cellular Therapy and Human Tissue CMC, Office of Therapeutic Products, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Villa CH, Illoh O, Kracalik I, Basavaraju SV, Eder AF. Posttransfusion sepsis attributable to bacterial contamination in platelet collection set manufacturing, United States. Transfusion 2023; 63:2351-2357. [PMID: 37909342 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- C H Villa
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - O Illoh
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - I Kracalik
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - S V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - A F Eder
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McGinnis S, Free RJ, Burnell J, Basavaraju SV, Kanaskie T, Hannapel EJ, Plipat N, Warren K, Edens C. Suspected Legionella Transmission from a Single Donor to Two Lung Transplant Recipients - Pennsylvania, May 2022. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1811-1814. [PMID: 37914432 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
In July 2022, the Pennsylvania Department of Health received two reports of laboratory-confirmed Legionnaires disease in patients who had recently received lung transplants from the same donor at a single Pennsylvania hospital. The donor's cause of death was freshwater drowning in a river, raising suspicion of potential donor-derived transmission, because Legionella bacteria naturally live in fresh water. Further investigation of patients receiving other organs from the same donor did not identify additional legionellosis cases. Health care-associated infection caused by water exposure at the hospital was also evaluated as a potential source of infection and was found to be unlikely. Hospital water quality parameter measurements collected during May-June 2022 were within expected ranges and no water disruptions were noted, although no testing for Legionella was performed during this period. Notifiable disease data did not identify any other Legionnaires disease cases with exposure to this hospital within the 6 months before or after the two cases. Although laboratory testing did not confirm the source of recipient infections, available data suggest that the most likely source was the donor lungs. This cluster highlights the need for increased clinical awareness of possible infection with Legionella in recipients of lungs from donors who drowned in fresh water before organ recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca J Free
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC
| | - Jacqueline Burnell
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC
| | - Trevor Kanaskie
- Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth J Hannapel
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| | | | | | - Chris Edens
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Free RJ, Sapiano MRP, Chavez Ortiz JL, Stewart P, Berger J, Basavaraju SV. Continued stabilization of blood collections and transfusions in the United States: Findings from the 2021 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey. Transfusion 2023; 63 Suppl 4:S8-S18. [PMID: 37070720 PMCID: PMC10543447 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND National Blood Collection and Utilization Surveys (NBCUS) have reported decreases in U.S. blood collections and transfusions since 2008. The declines began to stabilize in 2015-2017, with a subsequent increase in transfusions in 2019. Data from the 2021 NBCUS were analyzed to understand the current dynamics of blood collection and use in the United States. METHODS In March 2022, all community-based (53) and hospital-based (83) blood collection centers, a randomly selected 40% of transfusing hospitals performing 100-999 annual inpatient surgeries, and all transfusing hospitals performing ≥1000 annual inpatient surgeries were sent a 2021 NBCUS survey to ascertain blood collection and transfusion data. Responses were compiled, and national estimates were calculated for the number of units of blood and blood components collected, distributed, transfused, and outdated in 2021. Weighting and imputation were applied to account for non-responses and missing data, respectively. RESULTS Survey response rates were 92.5% (49/53) for community-based blood centers, 74.7% (62/83) for hospital-based blood centers, and 76.3% (2102/2754) for transfusing hospitals. Overall, 11,784,000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11,392,000-12,177,000) whole blood and apheresis red blood cell (RBC) units were collected in 2021, a 1.7% increase from 2019; 10,764,000 (95% CI, 10,357,000-11,171,000) whole blood-derived and apheresis RBC units were transfused, a 0.8% decrease. Total platelet units distributed increased by 0.8%; platelet units transfused decreased by 3.0%; plasma units distributed increased by 16.2%; and plasma units transfused increased by 1.4%. DISCUSSION The 2021 NBCUS findings demonstrate a stabilization in U.S. blood collections and transfusions, suggesting a plateau has been reached for both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J. Free
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mathew R. P. Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Lantana Consulting Group, East Thetford, Vermont, USA
| | - Joel L. Chavez Ortiz
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Oakridge Institute for Science and Education, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Phylicia Stewart
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Chenega Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James Berger
- Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kracalik I, Kent AG, Villa CH, Gable P, Annambhotla P, McAllister G, Yokoe D, Langelier CR, Oakeson K, Noble-Wang J, Illoh O, Halpin AL, Eder AF, Basavaraju SV. Posttransfusion Sepsis Attributable to Bacterial Contamination in Platelet Collection Set Manufacturing Facility, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2023; 29:1979-1989. [PMID: 37561399 PMCID: PMC10521617 DOI: 10.3201/eid2910.230869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
During May 2018‒December 2022, we reviewed transfusion-transmitted sepsis cases in the United States attributable to polymicrobial contaminated apheresis platelet components, including Acinetobacter calcoaceticus‒baumannii complex or Staphylococcus saprophyticus isolated from patients and components. Transfused platelet components underwent bacterial risk control strategies (primary culture, pathogen reduction or primary culture, and secondary rapid test) before transfusion. Environmental samples were collected from a platelet collection set manufacturing facility. Seven sepsis cases from 6 platelet donations from 6 different donors were identified in patients from 6 states; 3 patients died. Cultures identified Acinetobacter calcoaceticus‒baumannii complex in 6 patients and 6 transfused platelets, S. saprophyticus in 4 patients and 4 transfused platelets. Whole-genome sequencing showed environmental isolates from the manufacturer were closely related genetically to patient and platelet isolates, indicating the manufacturer was the most probable source of recurrent polymicrobial contamination. Clinicians should maintain awareness of possible transfusion-transmitted sepsis even when using bacterial risk control strategies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kracalik I, Sapiano MRP, Wild RC, Ortiz JC, Stewart P, Berger JJ, Basavaraju SV, Free RJ. Supplemental findings of the 2021 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey. Transfusion 2023; 63 Suppl 4:S19-S42. [PMID: 37702255 PMCID: PMC10783319 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Department of Health and Human Services' National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS) has been conducted biennially since 1997. Data are used to estimate national blood collection and use. Supplemental data from the 2021 NBCUS not presented elsewhere are presented here. METHODS Data on survey participation, donor characteristics, blood component cost, transfusion-associated adverse reactions, and implementation of blood safety measures, including pathogen-reduction of platelets, during 2021, were analyzed. Comparisons are made to 2019 survey data where available (2013-2019 for survey participation). RESULTS During 2021, there were 11,507,000 successful blood donations in the United States, a 4.8% increase from 2019. Persons aged 45-64 years accounted for 42% of all successful blood donations. Donations by persons aged 65 years and older increased by 40.7%, while donations among minorities and donors aged <25 years decreased. From 2019 to 2021, the median price hospitals paid per unit of leukoreduced red blood cells, leukoreduced and pathogen-reduced apheresis platelets, and fresh frozen plasma increased. The largest increase in price per unit of blood component in 2021 was for leukoreduced apheresis platelets, which increased by ~$51. Between 2019 and 2021, the proportion of transfusing facilities reporting use of pathogen-reduced platelets increased, from 13% to 60%. Transfusion-related adverse reactions declined slightly between 2019 and 2021, although the rate of transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections remained unchanged. CONCLUSION During 2021, blood donations increased nationally, although donations from those aged <25 years and minorities declined. The prices hospitals paid for most blood products increased, as did the use of pathogen-reduced platelets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Kracalik
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center
for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mathew R. P. Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center
for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Lantana Consulting Group, East Thetford, Vermont, USA
| | - Robert C. Wild
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center
for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- CACI International, Reston, Virginia, USA
| | - Joel Chavez Ortiz
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center
for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Oakridge Institute for Science and Education, Atlanta,
Georgia, USA
| | - Phylicia Stewart
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center
for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Chenega Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James J. Berger
- Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy, Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Health, Department of Health and Human Services,
Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center
for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca J. Free
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center
for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Basavaraju SV, Free RJ, Chavez Ortiz JL, Stewart P, Berger J, Sapiano MRP. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood donation and transfusions in the United States in 2020. Transfusion 2023; 63 Suppl 4:S1-S7. [PMID: 37052192 PMCID: PMC10543386 DOI: 10.1111/trf.17359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Reports have suggested the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in blood donation shortages and adverse impacts on the blood supply. Using data from the National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS), we quantified the pandemic's impact on red blood cell (RBC) and apheresis platelet collections and transfusions in the United States during year 2020. METHODS The 2021 NBCUS survey instrument was modified to include certain blood collection and utilization variables for 2020. The survey was distributed to all US blood collection centers, all US hospitals performing ≥1000 surgeries annually, and a 40% random sample of hospitals performing 100-999 surgeries annually. Weighting and imputation were used to generate national estimates for whole blood and apheresis platelet donation; RBC and platelet transfusion; and convalescent plasma distribution. RESULTS Whole blood collections were stable from 2019 (9,790,000 units; 95% CI: 9,320,000-10,261,000) to 2020 (9,738,000 units; 95% CI: 9,365,000-10,110,000). RBC transfusions decreased by 6.0%, from 10,852,000 units (95% CI: 10,444,000-11,259,000) in 2019 to 10,202,000 units (95% CI: 9,811,000-10,593,000) in 2020. Declines were steepest during March-April 2020, with transfusions subsequently rebounding. Apheresis platelet collections increased from 2,359,000 units (95% CI: 2,240,000-2,477,000) in 2019 to 2,408,000 units (95% CI: 2,288,000-2,528,000) in 2020. Apheresis platelet transfusions increased from 1,996,000 units (95% CI: 1,846,000-2,147,000) in 2019 to 2,057,000 units (95% CI: 1,902,000-2,211,000) in 2020. CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in reduced blood donations and transfusions in some months during 2020 but only a minimal annualized decline compared with 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Rebecca J. Free
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Joel L. Chavez Ortiz
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Oakridge Institute for Science and Education, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Phylicia Stewart
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Chenega Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James Berger
- Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mathew R. P. Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Lantana Consulting Group, East Thetford, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McGinnis S, Free RJ, Burnell J, Basavaraju SV, Kanaskie T, Hannapel EJ, Plipat N, Warren K, Edens C. Suspected Legionella Transmission from a Single Donor to Two Lung Transplant Recipients - Pennsylvania, May 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 72:1001-1004. [PMID: 37708069 PMCID: PMC10511268 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7237a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
In July 2022, the Pennsylvania Department of Health received two reports of laboratory-confirmed Legionnaires disease in patients who had recently received lung transplants from the same donor at a single Pennsylvania hospital. The donor's cause of death was freshwater drowning in a river, raising suspicion of potential donor-derived transmission, because Legionella bacteria naturally live in fresh water. Further investigation of patients receiving other organs from the same donor did not identify additional legionellosis cases. Health care-associated infection caused by water exposure at the hospital was also evaluated as a potential source of infection and was found to be unlikely. Hospital water quality parameter measurements collected during May-June 2022 were within expected ranges and no water disruptions were noted, although no testing for Legionella was performed during this period. Notifiable disease data did not identify any other Legionnaires disease cases with exposure to this hospital within the 6 months before or after the two cases. Although laboratory testing did not confirm the source of recipient infections, available data suggest that the most likely source was the donor lungs. This cluster highlights the need for increased clinical awareness of possible infection with Legionella in recipients of lungs from donors who drowned in fresh water before organ recovery.
Collapse
|
13
|
Gould CV, Free RJ, Bhatnagar J, Soto RA, Royer TL, Maley WR, Moss S, Berk MA, Craig-Shapiro R, Kodiyanplakkal RPL, Westblade LF, Muthukumar T, Puius YA, Raina A, Hadi A, Gyure KA, Trief D, Pereira M, Kuehnert MJ, Ballen V, Kessler DA, Dailey K, Omura C, Doan T, Miller S, Wilson MR, Lehman JA, Ritter JM, Lee E, Silva-Flannery L, Reagan-Steiner S, Velez JO, Laven JJ, Fitzpatrick KA, Panella A, Davis EH, Hughes HR, Brault AC, St George K, Dean AB, Ackelsberg J, Basavaraju SV, Chiu CY, Staples JE. Transmission of yellow fever vaccine virus through blood transfusion and organ transplantation in the USA in 2021: report of an investigation. Lancet Microbe 2023; 4:e711-e721. [PMID: 37544313 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-5247(23)00170-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2021, four patients who had received solid organ transplants in the USA developed encephalitis beginning 2-6 weeks after transplantation from a common organ donor. We describe an investigation into the cause of encephalitis in these patients. METHODS From Nov 7, 2021, to Feb 24, 2022, we conducted a public health investigation involving 15 agencies and medical centres in the USA. We tested various specimens (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, intraocular fluid, serum, and tissues) from the organ donor and recipients by serology, RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, metagenomic next-generation sequencing, and host gene expression, and conducted a traceback of blood transfusions received by the organ donor. FINDINGS We identified one read from yellow fever virus in cerebrospinal fluid from the recipient of a kidney using metagenomic next-generation sequencing. Recent infection with yellow fever virus was confirmed in all four organ recipients by identification of yellow fever virus RNA consistent with the 17D vaccine strain in brain tissue from one recipient and seroconversion after transplantation in three recipients. Two patients recovered and two patients had no neurological recovery and died. 3 days before organ procurement, the organ donor received a blood transfusion from a donor who had received a yellow fever vaccine 6 days before blood donation. INTERPRETATION This investigation substantiates the use of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the broad-based detection of rare or unexpected pathogens. Health-care workers providing vaccinations should inform patients of the need to defer blood donation for at least 2 weeks after receiving a yellow fever vaccine. Despite mitigation strategies and safety interventions, a low risk of transfusion-transmitted infections remains. FUNDING US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, and the CDC Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity Cooperative Agreement for Infectious Diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn V Gould
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
| | - Rebecca J Free
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Julu Bhatnagar
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Raymond A Soto
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tricia L Royer
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Warren R Maley
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sean Moss
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew A Berk
- Department of Neurology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rebecca Craig-Shapiro
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Lars F Westblade
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thangamani Muthukumar
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yoram A Puius
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amresh Raina
- Section of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplant, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Pulmonary Hypertension, Cardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Azam Hadi
- Section of Advanced Heart Failure, Transplant, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Pulmonary Hypertension, Cardiovascular Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kymberly A Gyure
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Danielle Trief
- Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marcus Pereira
- Transplant Infectious Disease Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew J Kuehnert
- Office of the Director, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, NJ, USA
| | - Vennus Ballen
- Bureau of Public Health Clinics, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | - Debra A Kessler
- Medical Programs and Services, New York Blood Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kimberly Dailey
- Division of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, West Virginia Department of Health, Charleston, WV, USA
| | - Charles Omura
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Thuy Doan
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Steve Miller
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael R Wilson
- Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Lehman
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Jana M Ritter
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Lee
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Luciana Silva-Flannery
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sarah Reagan-Steiner
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jason O Velez
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Janeen J Laven
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Kelly A Fitzpatrick
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Amanda Panella
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Emily H Davis
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Holly R Hughes
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Aaron C Brault
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Kirsten St George
- Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA; Department of Biomedical Science, Graduate School of Public Health, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Amy B Dean
- Laboratory of Viral Diseases, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Joel Ackelsberg
- Bureau of Communicable Diseases, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Charles Y Chiu
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - J Erin Staples
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wu K, Annambhotla P, Free RJ, Ritter JM, Leitgeb B, Jackson BR, Toda M, Basavaraju SV, Gold JAW. Fatal Invasive Mold Infections after Transplantation of Organs Recovered from Drowned Donors, United States, 2011-2021. Emerg Infect Dis 2023; 29. [PMID: 37279517 DOI: 10.3201/eid2907.230524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Drowned organ donors can be exposed to environmental molds through the aspiration of water; transplantation of exposed organs can cause invasive mold infections in recipients. We describe 4 rapidly fatal cases of potentially donor-derived invasive mold infections in the United States, highlighting the importance of maintaining clinical suspicion for these infections in transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Schwartz NG, Hernandez-Romieu AC, Annambhotla P, Filardo TD, Althomsons SP, Free RJ, Li R, Wilson WW, Deutsch-Feldman M, Drees M, Hanlin E, White K, Lehman KA, Thacker TC, Brubaker SA, Clark B, Basavaraju SV, Benowitz I, Burton Glowicz J, Cowan LS, Starks AM, Bamrah Morris S, LoBue P, Stewart RJ, Wortham JM, Haddad MB. Nationwide tuberculosis outbreak in the USA linked to a bone graft product: an outbreak report. Lancet Infect Dis 2022; 22:1617-1625. [PMID: 35934016 PMCID: PMC9605268 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00425-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission through solid organ transplantation has been well described, but transmission through transplanted tissues is rare. We investigated a tuberculosis outbreak in the USA linked to a bone graft product containing live cells derived from a single deceased donor. METHODS In this outbreak report, we describe the management and severity of the outbreak and identify opportunities to improve tissue transplant safety in the USA. During early June, 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) worked with state and local health departments and health-care facilities to locate and sequester unused units from the recalled lot and notify, evaluate, and treat all identified product recipients. Investigators from CDC and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed donor screening and tissue processing. Unused product units from the recalled and other donor lots were tested for the presence of M tuberculosis using real-time PCR (rt PCR) assays and culture. M tuberculosis isolates from unused product and recipients were compared using phylogenetic analysis. FINDINGS The tissue donor (a man aged 80 years) had unrecognised risk factors, symptoms, and signs consistent with tuberculosis. Bone was procured from the deceased donor and processed into 154 units of bone allograft product containing live cells, which were distributed to 37 hospitals and ambulatory surgical centres in 20 US states between March 1 and April 2, 2021. From March 3 to June 1, 2021, 136 (88%) units were implanted into 113 recipients aged 24-87 years in 18 states (some individuals received multiple units). The remaining 18 units (12%) were located and sequestered. 87 (77%) of 113 identified product recipients had microbiological or imaging evidence of tuberculosis disease. Eight product recipients died 8-99 days after product implantation (three deaths were attributed to tuberculosis after recognition of the outbreak). All 105 living recipients started treatment for tuberculosis disease at a median of 69 days (IQR 56-81) after product implantation. M tuberculosis was detected in all eight sequestered unused units tested from the recalled donor lot, but not in lots from other donors. M tuberculosis isolates from unused product and recipients were more than 99·99% genetically identical. INTERPRETATION Donor-derived transmission of M tuberculosis via bone allograft resulted in substantial morbidity and mortality. All prospective tissue and organ donors should be routinely assessed for tuberculosis risk factors and clinical findings. When these are present, laboratory testing for M tuberculosis should be strongly considered. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah G Schwartz
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Alfonso C Hernandez-Romieu
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Thomas D Filardo
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sandy P Althomsons
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rebecca J Free
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ruoran Li
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - W Wyatt Wilson
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Molly Deutsch-Feldman
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Epidemic Intelligence Service, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Emily Hanlin
- Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Public Health, Dover, DE, USA
| | - Kelly White
- Indiana Department of Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Kimberly A Lehman
- National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Tyler C Thacker
- National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, USA
| | - Scott A Brubaker
- Division of Human Tissues, Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Brychan Clark
- Division of Human Tissues, Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Isaac Benowitz
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Janet Burton Glowicz
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lauren S Cowan
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Angela M Starks
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sapna Bamrah Morris
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Philip LoBue
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Rebekah J Stewart
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jonathan M Wortham
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maryam B Haddad
- Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kracalik I, Oster ME, Broder KR, Cortese MM, Glover M, Shields K, Creech CB, Romanson B, Novosad S, Soslow J, Walter EB, Marquez P, Dendy JM, Woo J, Valderrama AL, Ramirez-Cardenas A, Assefa A, Campbell MJ, Su JR, Magill SS, Shay DK, Shimabukuro TT, Basavaraju SV. Outcomes at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults in the USA: a follow-up surveillance study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health 2022; 6:788-798. [PMID: 36152650 PMCID: PMC9555956 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00244-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Kracalik
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Matthew E Oster
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karen R Broder
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Margaret M Cortese
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maleeka Glover
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Karen Shields
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - C Buddy Creech
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Brittney Romanson
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shannon Novosad
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Emmanuel B Walter
- Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paige Marquez
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Jared Woo
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Amy L Valderrama
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Agape Assefa
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - John R Su
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shelley S Magill
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David K Shay
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tom T Shimabukuro
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Free RJ, Levi ME, Bowman JS, Bixler D, Brooks JT, Buchacz K, Moorman A, Berger J, Basavaraju SV. Updated U.S. Public Health Service Guideline for testing of transplant candidates aged <12 years for infection with HIV, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus - United States, 2022. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2269-2272. [PMID: 36039545 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Free
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Marilyn E Levi
- Division of Transplantation, Health Systems Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland
| | - James S Bowman
- Division of Transplantation, Health Systems Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Danae Bixler
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - John T Brooks
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kate Buchacz
- Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anne Moorman
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - James Berger
- Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Free RJ, Levi ME, Bowman JS, Bixler D, Brooks JT, Buchacz K, Moorman A, Berger J, Basavaraju SV. Updated U.S. Public Health Service Guideline for Testing of Transplant Candidates Aged <12 Years for Infection with HIV, Hepatitis B Virus, and Hepatitis C Virus - United States, 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:844-846. [PMID: 35771714 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7126a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) has periodically published recommendations about reducing the risk for transmission of HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) through solid organ transplantation (1-4). Updated guidance published in 2020 included the recommendation that all transplant candidates receive HIV, HBV, and HCV testing during hospital admission for transplant surgery to more accurately assess their pretransplant infection status and to better identify donor transmitted infection (4). In 2021, CDC was notified that this recommendation might be unnecessary for pediatric organ transplant candidates because of the low likelihood of infection after the perinatal period and out of concern that the volume of blood drawn for testing could negatively affect critically ill children.* CDC and other partners reviewed surveillance data from CDC on estimates of HIV, HBV, and HCV infection rates in the United States and data from the Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network (OPTN)† on age and weight distributions among U.S. transplant recipients. Feedback from the transplant community was also solicited to understand the impact of changes to the existing policy on organ transplantation. The 2020 PHS guideline was accordingly updated to specify that solid organ transplant candidates aged <12 years at the time of transplantation who have received postnatal infectious disease testing are exempt from the recommendation for HIV, HBV, and HCV testing during hospital admission for transplantation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Free RJ, Annambhotla P, La Hoz RM, Danziger-Isakov L, Jones JM, Wang L, Sankthivel S, Levi ME, Michaels MG, Kuhnert W, Klassen D, Basavaraju SV, Kracalik IT. Risk of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Transmission Through Solid Organ Transplantation and Outcomes of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among Recent Transplant Recipients. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac221. [PMID: 35873294 PMCID: PMC9297154 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is transmissible through lung transplantation, and outcomes among infected organ recipients may be severe. Transmission risk to extrapulmonary organ recipients and recent (within 30 days of transplantation) SARS-CoV-2-infected recipient outcomes are unclear. METHODS During March 2020-March 2021, potential SARS-CoV-2 transmissions through solid organ transplantation were investigated. Assessments included SARS-CoV-2 testing, medical record review, determination of likely transmission route, and recent recipient outcomes. RESULTS During March 2020-March 2021, approximately 42 740 organs were transplanted in the United States. Forty donors, who donated 140 organs to 125 recipients, were investigated. Nine (23%) donors and 25 (20%) recipients were SARS-CoV-2 positive by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Most (22/25 [88%]) SARS-CoV-2-infected recipients had healthcare or community exposures. Nine SARS-CoV-2-infected donors donated 21 organs to 19 recipients. Of these, 3 lung recipients acquired SARS-CoV-2 infections from donors with negative SARS-CoV-2 testing of pretransplant upper respiratory tract specimens but from whom posttransplant lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Sixteen recipients of extrapulmonary organs from SARS-CoV-2-infected donors had no evidence of posttransplant COVID-19. All-cause mortality within 45 days after transplantation was 6-fold higher among SARS-CoV-2-infected recipients (9/25 [36%]) than those without (6/100 [6%]). CONCLUSIONS Transplant-transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is uncommon. Pretransplant NAAT of lung donor LRT specimens may prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through transplantation. Extrapulmonary organs from SARS-CoV-2-infected donors may be safely usable, although further study is needed. Reducing recent recipient exposures to SARS-CoV-2 should remain a focus of prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Free
- Correspondence: Rebecca Free, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS V18-4, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA ()
| | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ricardo M La Hoz
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Jefferson M Jones
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lijuan Wang
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Senthil Sankthivel
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Marilyn E Levi
- Division of Transplantation, Health Systems Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Marian G Michaels
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wendi Kuhnert
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David Klassen
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian T Kracalik
- COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Malinis M, LaHoz RM, Vece G, Annambhotla P, Aslam S, Basavaraju SV, Bucio J, Danziger-Isakov L, Florescu DF, Jones JM, Rana M, Wolfe CR, Michaels MG. Donor-derived tuberculosis among solid organ transplant recipients in the United States - 2008-2018. Transpl Infect Dis 2022; 24:e13800. [PMID: 35064737 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Mycobacterium tuberculosis can be transmitted via organ donation and result in severe outcomes. To better understand donor-derived tuberculosis (DDTB), all potential transmissions reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee between 2008-2018 were analyzed. Among 51 total reports, nine (17%) (9 donors/35 recipients) had ≥1 recipient with proven/probable disease transmission. Of these, eight were reported due to recipient disease, and one was reported due to a positive donor result. Proven/probable DDTB transmissions were reported in six lung and five non-lung recipients. The median time to diagnosis was 104 days post-transplant (range 0-165 days). Pulmonary TB, extrapulmonary TB, pulmonary plus extrapulmonary TB, and asymptomatic TB infection with positive interferon-gamma release assay were present in five, three, one, and two recipients, respectively. All recipients received treatment and survived except for one whose death was not attributed to TB. All donors associated with proven/probable DDTB had ≥1 TB risk factor. Six were born in a TB-endemic country, five had traveled to a TB-endemic country, 3 had been incarcerated, and 3 had latent TB infection. These cases highlight the importance of evaluating donors for TB based on risk factors. Early post-transplant TB in organ recipients of donors with TB risk factors requires prompt reporting to OPTN to identify other potential affected recipients and implement timely treatment interventions. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maricar Malinis
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Ricardo M LaHoz
- Division of Infectious Disease and Geographic Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Saima Aslam
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Diana F Florescu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, NE
| | | | - Meenakshi Rana
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Marian G Michaels
- Department of Pediatrics, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Soto RA, McDonald E, Annambhotla P, Velez JO, Laven J, Panella AJ, Machesky KD, White JL, Hyun J, Freuck E, Habel J, Oh D, Levi M, Hasz R, Eidbo E, Staples JE, Basavaraju SV, Gould CV. West Nile Virus Transmission by Solid Organ Transplantation and Considerations for Organ Donor Screening Practices, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 28:403-406. [PMID: 34843660 PMCID: PMC8798677 DOI: 10.3201/eid2802.211697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
West Nile virus (WNV) is the most common domestic arbovirus in the United States. During 2018, WNV was transmitted through solid organ transplantation to 2 recipients who had neuroinvasive disease develop. Because of increased illness and death in transplant recipients, organ procurement organizations should consider screening during region-specific WNV transmission months.
Collapse
|
22
|
Natarajan P, Lockhart SR, Basavaraju SV, Anjan S, Lindsley MD, McGrath MM, Oh DH, Jackson BR. Donor-derived Cryptococcus gattii sensu stricto infection in two kidney transplant recipients, southeastern United States. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3780-3784. [PMID: 34173328 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cryptococcus gattii infection is a rare cause of severe pulmonary disease and meningoencephalitis that has only recently been detected in the southeastern United States. We describe an organ transplant-associated outbreak of C. gattii infection involving an HIV-negative immunosuppressed donor in this region who died following new-onset headache and seizure of unknown cause. Retrospective cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) testing of donor serum was positive. Two of the three transplant recipients developed severe C. gattii infection 11 and 12 weeks following transplantation. One recipient died from severe pulmonary infection, identified on autopsy, and the other ill recipient survived following treatment for cryptococcal meningitis. This outbreak underscores the importance of considering cryptococcosis in patients with clinical findings suggestive of subacute meningitis or other central nervous system (CNS) pathology, and the potential benefit of routine pre-transplant donor CrAg screening using lateral flow assay to guide recipient antifungal prophylaxis. The case also adds to emerging evidence that C. gattii is a potential threat in the southeastern United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,U.S. Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Shweta Anjan
- Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | | | - Martina M McGrath
- Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David H Oh
- Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Brendan R Jackson
- CDC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,U.S. Public Health Service, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Mowla SJ, Drexler NA, Cherry CC, Annambholta PD, Kracalik IT, Basavaraju SV. Ehrlichiosis and Anaplasmosis among Transfusion and Transplant Recipients in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2021; 27:2768-2775. [PMID: 34670661 PMCID: PMC8544963 DOI: 10.3201/eid2711.211127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Physicians should be aware that these infections are rare but can have severe outcomes. Ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis are emerging tickborne diseases that can also be transmitted through blood transfusions or organ transplants. Since 2000, ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases in the United States have increased substantially, resulting in potential risk to transplant and transfusion recipients. We reviewed ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis cases among blood transfusion and solid organ transplant recipients in the United States from peer-reviewed literature and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention investigations. We identified 132 cases during 1997–2020, 12 transfusion-associated cases and 120 cases in transplant recipients; 8 cases were donor-derived, and in 13 cases illness occurred <1 year after transplant. Disease in the remaining 99 cases occurred ≥1 year after transplant, suggesting donor-derived disease was unlikely. Severe illness or death were reported among 15 transfusion and transplant recipients. Clinicians should be alert for these possible infections among transfusion and transplant recipients to prevent severe complications or death by quickly treating them.
Collapse
|
24
|
Jones JM, Stone M, Sulaeman H, Fink RV, Dave H, Levy ME, Di Germanio C, Green V, Notari E, Saa P, Biggerstaff BJ, Strauss D, Kessler D, Vassallo R, Reik R, Rossmann S, Destree M, Nguyen KA, Sayers M, Lough C, Bougie DW, Ritter M, Latoni G, Weales B, Sime S, Gorlin J, Brown NE, Gould CV, Berney K, Benoit TJ, Miller MJ, Freeman D, Kartik D, Fry AM, Azziz-Baumgartner E, Hall AJ, MacNeil A, Gundlapalli AV, Basavaraju SV, Gerber SI, Patton ME, Custer B, Williamson P, Simmons G, Thornburg NJ, Kleinman S, Stramer SL, Opsomer J, Busch MP. Estimated US Infection- and Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Based on Blood Donations, July 2020-May 2021. JAMA 2021; 326:1400-1409. [PMID: 34473201 PMCID: PMC8414359 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.15161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 127] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE People who have been infected with or vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 have reduced risk of subsequent infection, but the proportion of people in the US with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from infection or vaccination is uncertain. OBJECTIVE To estimate trends in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence related to infection and vaccination in the US population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In a repeated cross-sectional study conducted each month during July 2020 through May 2021, 17 blood collection organizations with blood donations from all 50 US states; Washington, DC; and Puerto Rico were organized into 66 study-specific regions, representing a catchment of 74% of the US population. For each study region, specimens from a median of approximately 2000 blood donors were selected and tested each month; a total of 1 594 363 specimens were initially selected and tested. The final date of blood donation collection was May 31, 2021. EXPOSURE Calendar time. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Proportion of persons with detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid antibodies. Seroprevalence was weighted for demographic differences between the blood donor sample and general population. Infection-induced seroprevalence was defined as the prevalence of the population with both spike and nucleocapsid antibodies. Combined infection- and vaccination-induced seroprevalence was defined as the prevalence of the population with spike antibodies. The seroprevalence estimates were compared with cumulative COVID-19 case report incidence rates. RESULTS Among 1 443 519 specimens included, 733 052 (50.8%) were from women, 174 842 (12.1%) were from persons aged 16 to 29 years, 292 258 (20.2%) were from persons aged 65 years and older, 36 654 (2.5%) were from non-Hispanic Black persons, and 88 773 (6.1%) were from Hispanic persons. The overall infection-induced SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimate increased from 3.5% (95% CI, 3.2%-3.8%) in July 2020 to 20.2% (95% CI, 19.9%-20.6%) in May 2021; the combined infection- and vaccination-induced seroprevalence estimate in May 2021 was 83.3% (95% CI, 82.9%-83.7%). By May 2021, 2.1 SARS-CoV-2 infections (95% CI, 2.0-2.1) per reported COVID-19 case were estimated to have occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Based on a sample of blood donations in the US from July 2020 through May 2021, vaccine- and infection-induced SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence increased over time and varied by age, race and ethnicity, and geographic region. Despite weighting to adjust for demographic differences, these findings from a national sample of blood donors may not be representative of the entire US population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jefferson M. Jones
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mars Stone
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Honey Dave
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | | | - Edward Notari
- Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Paula Saa
- Scientific Affairs, American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Brad J. Biggerstaff
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chris Lough
- LifeSouth Community Blood Centers, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | | | - Gerardo Latoni
- Banco de Sangre de Servicios Mutuos, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | | | - Jed Gorlin
- Innovative Blood Resources, St Paul, Minnesota
| | - Nicole E. Brown
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Carolyn V. Gould
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kevin Berney
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tina J. Benoit
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maureen J. Miller
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Alicia M. Fry
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Aron J. Hall
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Adam MacNeil
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Adi V. Gundlapalli
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Susan I. Gerber
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Monica E. Patton
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Brian Custer
- Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Natalie J. Thornburg
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Steven Kleinman
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Miller MJ, Skrzekut A, Kracalik I, Jones JM, Lofy KH, Konkle BA, Haley NR, Duvenhage M, Bonnett T, Holbrook M, Higgs E, Basavaraju SV, Paranjape S. How do I… facilitate a rapid response to a public health emergency requiring plasma collection with a public-private partnership? Transfusion 2021; 61:2814-2824. [PMID: 34510475 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In March 2020, there were no treatment options for COVID-19. Passive immune therapy including anti-SARS-CoV-2 hyperimmune globulin (hIVIG) was a logical candidate for COVID-19 therapeutic trials, given past success treating emerging pathogens with endogenous neutralizing antibodies. We established a plasma collection protocol for persons recovered from COVID-19. To speed recruitment in the first U.S. hotspot, Seattle, Washington, federal and state public health agencies collaborated with Bloodworks Northwest to collect convalescent plasma (CP) for manufacturing hIVIG. During March-December 2020, we identified and recruited prospective CP donors via letters to persons recovered from COVID-19 with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prospective donors were pre-screened and administered a medical history survey. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody (NAb) titers were classified as qualifying (≥1:80) or non-qualifying (<1:80) for enrollment based on a live virus neutralization assay. Generalized estimating equations were used to identify characteristics of donors associated with qualifying versus nonqualifying NAb titers. Overall, 21,359 letters resulted in 3207 inquiries, 2159 prescreenings with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 573 donors (27% of all pre-screenings with confirmed infection) who provided a screening plasma donation. Of 573 donors screened, 254 (44%) provided plasma with qualifying NAb titers, resulting in 1284 units for hIVIG manufacture. In a multivariable model, after adjusting for other factors, time (60 days) from COVID-19 symptom onset to screening was associated with lower odds of qualifying NAb (adjusted odds ratio = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.94). The collaboration facilitated a rapid response to develop and provide hIVIG for clinical trials and CP for transfusion. Only 1 in 12 donor inquiries resulted in a qualifying plasma donation. Challenges included recruitment and the relatively low percentage of persons with high NAb titers and limited screening capacity. This resource-intensive collaboration may not be scalable but informs preparedness and response strategies for plasma collection in future epidemics. Operational readiness plans with templates for screening, consent, and data collection forms are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen J Miller
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,COVID-19 Response Team, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Ian Kracalik
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jefferson M Jones
- COVID-19 Response Team, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kathryn H Lofy
- Washington State Department of Health, Tumwater, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Duvenhage
- Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Tyler Bonnett
- Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael Holbrook
- Division of Clinical Research, Integrated Research Facility, NIAID, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Li R, Wilson WW, Schwartz NG, Hernandez-Romieu AC, Glowicz J, Hanlin E, Taylor M, Pelkey H, Briody CA, Gireesh L, Eskander M, Lingenfelter K, Althomsons SP, Stewart RJ, Free R, Annambhotla P, Basavaraju SV, Wortham JM, Morris SB, Benowitz I, Haddad MB, Hong R, Drees M. Notes from the Field: Tuberculosis Outbreak Linked to a Contaminated Bone Graft Product Used in Spinal Surgery - Delaware, March-June 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:1261-1263. [PMID: 34499629 PMCID: PMC8437057 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7036a4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
27
|
Bixler D, Annambhotla P, Montgomery MP, Mixon‐Hayden T, Kupronis B, Michaels MG, La Hoz RM, Basavaraju SV, Kamili S, Moorman A. Unexpected hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation — United States, 2014–2019. Am J Transplant 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Danae Bixler
- Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention CDC Atlanta GeorgiaUSA
| | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- Office of Blood, Other Organ, and Tissue Safety National Center For Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CDC Atlanta GeorgiaUSA
| | - Martha P. Montgomery
- Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention CDC Atlanta GeorgiaUSA
| | - Tonya Mixon‐Hayden
- Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention CDC Atlanta GeorgiaUSA
| | - Ben Kupronis
- Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention CDC Atlanta GeorgiaUSA
| | | | | | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Office of Blood, Other Organ, and Tissue Safety National Center For Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases CDC Atlanta GeorgiaUSA
| | - Saleem Kamili
- Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention CDC Atlanta GeorgiaUSA
| | - Anne Moorman
- Division of Viral Hepatitis National Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention CDC Atlanta GeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mowla SJ, Sapiano MRP, Jones JM, Berger JJ, Basavaraju SV. Supplemental findings of the 2019 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey. Transfusion 2021; 61 Suppl 2:S11-S35. [PMID: 34337759 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Supplemental data from the 2019 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS) are presented and include findings on donor characteristics, autologous and directed donations and transfusions, platelets (PLTs), plasma and granulocyte transfusions, pediatric transfusions, transfusion-associated adverse events, cost of blood units, hospital policies and practices, and implementation of blood safety measures, including pathogen reduction technology (PRT). METHODS National estimates were produced using weighting and imputation methods for a number of donors, donations, donor deferrals, autologous and directed donations and transfusions, PLT and plasma collections and transfusions, a number of crossmatch procedures, a number of units irradiated and leukoreduced, pediatric transfusions, and transfusion-associated adverse events. RESULTS Between 2017 and 2019, there was a slight decrease in successful donations by 1.1%. Donations by persons aged 16-18 decreased by 10.1% while donations among donors >65 years increased by 10.5%. From 2017 to 2019, the median price paid for blood components by hospitals for leukoreduced red blood cell units, leukoreduced apheresis PLT units, and for fresh frozen plasma units continued to decrease. The rate of life-threatening transfusion-related adverse reactions continued to decrease. Most whole blood/red blood cell units (97%) and PLT units (97%) were leukoreduced. CONCLUSION Blood donations decreased between 2017 and 2019. Donations from younger donors continued to decline while donations among older donors have steadily increased. Prices paid for blood products by hospitals decreased. Implementation of PRT among blood centers and hospitals is slowly expanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjida J Mowla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mathew R P Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jefferson M Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James J Berger
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of HIV/AIDS and infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Savinkina AA, Haass KA, Sapiano MRP, Henry RA, Berger JJ, Basavaraju SV, Jones JM. Transfusion-associated adverse events and implementation of blood safety measures - findings from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey. Transfusion 2021; 60 Suppl 2:S10-S16. [PMID: 32134123 DOI: 10.1111/trf.15654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Serious transfusion-associated adverse events are rare in the United States. To enhance blood safety, various measures have been developed. With use of data from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS), we describe the rate of transfusion-associated adverse events and the implementation of specific blood safety measures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Data from the 2017 NBCUS were used with comparison to already published estimates from 2015. Survey weighting and imputation were used to obtain national estimates of transfusion-associated adverse events, and the number of units treated with pathogen reduction technology (PRT), screened for Babesia, and leukoreduced. RESULTS The rate of transfusion-associated adverse events requiring any diagnostic or therapeutic interventions was stable (275 reactions per 100,000 transfusions in 2015 and 282 reactions per 100,000 transfusions in 2017). In 2017 among US blood collection centers, 16 of 141 (11.3%) reported screening units for Babesia and 28 of 144 (19.4%) reported PRT implementation; 138 of 2279 (6.1%) hospitals reported transfusing PRT-treated platelets. In 2017, 134 of 2336 (5.7%) hospitals reported performing secondary bacterial testing of platelets (50,922 culture-based and 63,220 rapid immunoassay tests); in 2015, 71 of 1877 (3.8%) hospitals performed secondary testing (87,155 culture-based and 21,779 rapid immunoassay tests). Nearly all whole blood/red blood cell units and platelet units were leukoreduced. CONCLUSIONS Besides leukoreduction, implementation of most blood safety measures reported in this study remains low. Nationally, hospitals might be shifting from culture-based secondary bacterial testing to rapid immunoassays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra A Savinkina
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.,Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - Kathryn A Haass
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mathew R P Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Richard A Henry
- Office of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - James J Berger
- Office of HIV/AIDS and Infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jefferson M Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sapiano MRP, Jones JM, Savinkina AA, Haass KA, Berger JJ, Basavaraju SV. Supplemental findings of the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey. Transfusion 2021; 60 Suppl 2:S17-S37. [PMID: 32134122 DOI: 10.1111/trf.15715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This report provides supplemental results from the 2017 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey on characteristics of the donor population, autologous and directed donations and transfusions, platelets, plasma and granulocyte transfusions, pediatric transfusions, severe donor-related adverse events, cost of blood units, hospitals policies and practices, and inventory, dosing, and supply. METHODS Weighting and imputation were used to generate national estimates including number of donors, donations, donor deferrals, autologous and directed donations and transfusions, severe donor-related adverse events, platelet and plasma collections and transfusions, number of cross-match procedures, irradiation and leukoreduction, and pediatric transfusions. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2017, successful donations decreased slightly by 2.1% with a 10.3% decrease in donations by persons aged 16-18 years and a 14.4% increase in donations by donors aged >65 years. The median price paid for blood components by hospitals decreased from $211 to $207 for leukoreduced red blood cell units, from $523 to $517 for leukoreduced apheresis platelet units, and from $54 to $51 for fresh frozen plasma units. Plasma transfusions decreased 13.6%, but group AB plasma units transfused increased 24.7%. CONCLUSION Between 2015 and 2017, blood donations declined slightly because of decreases in donations from younger donors, but the number of donations from older donors increased. The price hospitals pay for blood has continued to decrease. Plasma transfusions have decreased, but the proportion of plasma transfusions involving group AB plasma have increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew R P Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jefferson M Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alexandra A Savinkina
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.,Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - Kathryn A Haass
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - James J Berger
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of HIV/AIDS and infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Washington, DC
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bixler D, Annambhotla P, Montgomery MP, Mixon-Hayden T, Kupronis B, Michaels MG, La Hoz RM, Basavaraju SV, Kamili S, Moorman A. Unexpected Hepatitis B Virus Infection After Liver Transplantation - United States, 2014-2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:961-966. [PMID: 34237046 PMCID: PMC8312757 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7027a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Unexpected donor-derived hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is defined as a new HBV infection in a recipient of a transplanted organ from a donor who tested negative for total antihepatitis B core antibody (total anti-HBc), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and HBV DNA* before organ procurement. Such infections are rare and are associated with injection drug use among deceased donors (1). During 2014-2019, CDC received 20 reports of HBV infection among recipients of livers from donors who had no evidence of past or current HBV infection. Investigation included review of laboratory data and medical records. Fourteen of these new HBV infections were detected during 2019 alone; infections were detected a median of 38 (range = 5-116) weeks after transplantation. Of the 14 donors, 13 were hepatitis C virus (HCV)-seropositive† and had a history of injection drug use within the year preceding death, a positive toxicology result, or both. Because injection drug use is the most commonly reported risk factor for hepatitis C,§ providers caring for recipients of organs from donors who are HCV-seropositive or recently injected drugs should maintain awareness of infectious complications of injection drug use and monitor recipients accordingly (2). In addition to testing for HBV DNA at 4-6 weeks after transplantation, clinicians caring for liver transplant recipients should consider testing for HBV DNA 1 year after transplantation or at any time if signs and symptoms of viral hepatitis develop, even if previous tests were negative (2).
Collapse
|
32
|
Kracalik I, Mowla S, Katz L, Cumming M, Sapiano MRP, Basavaraju SV. Impact of the early coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on blood utilization in the United States: A time-series analysis of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module. Transfusion 2021; 61 Suppl 2:S36-S43. [PMID: 33990963 PMCID: PMC8242767 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted healthcare services worldwide. However, little has been reported regarding the impact on blood utilization. We quantified the impact of COVID-19 on blood utilization and discards among facilities reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module. METHODS Facilities continuously reporting data, during January 2016-June 2020, on transfused and discarded blood components, stratified by component type (red blood cells [RBC], platelets, and plasma), were included. Interrupted time-series analysis with generalized estimating equations, adjusting for facility surgical volume and seasonality, was used to quantify changes in blood utilization and discards relative to a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services notification delaying nonessential medical procedures (March 2020). RESULTS Seventy-two facilities included in the analyses, on average, transfused 44,548 and discarded 2,202 blood components monthly. Following the March 2020 notification and after multivariable adjustment, RBC and platelet utilization declined, -9.9% (p < .001) and -13.6% (p = .014), respectively. Discards increased for RBCs (30.2%, p = .047) and platelets (60.4%, p = .002). No statistically significant change in plasma was found. Following these abrupt changes, blood utilization and discards rebounded toward baseline with RBC utilization increasing by 5.7% (p < .001), and platelet and RBC discards decreasing -16.4% (<0.001) and -12.7 (p = .001), respectively. CONCLUSION Following notification delaying elective surgical procedures, blood utilization declined substantially while blood discards increased, resulting in substantial wastage of blood products. Ongoing and future pandemic response efforts should consider the impact of interventions on blood supply and demand to ensure blood availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Kracalik
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sanjida Mowla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Louis Katz
- Mississippi Valley Regional Blood Center, Davenport, Iowa, USA
| | - Melissa Cumming
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew R P Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Lantana Consulting Group, Inc, East Thetford, Vermont, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jones JM, Sapiano MRP, Mowla S, Bota D, Berger JJ, Basavaraju SV. Has the trend of declining blood transfusions in the United States ended? Findings of the 2019 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey. Transfusion 2021; 61 Suppl 2:S1-S10. [PMID: 34165191 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous iterations of National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS) have demonstrated declines in blood collection and transfusion in the United States since 2008, including declines of 3.0% and 6.1% in red blood cell (RBC) collections and transfusions between 2015 and 2017, respectively. This study describes results of the 2019 NBCUS. METHODS The survey was distributed to all US blood collection centers, all hospitals performing ≥1000 surgeries annually, and a 40% random sample of hospitals performing 100-999 surgeries annually. Weighting and imputation were used to generate national estimates for units of blood and components collected, distributed, transfused, and outdated. RESULTS In 2019, 11,590,000 RBC units were collected (95% confidence interval [CI], 11,151,000-12,029,000 units), a 5.1% decrease compared with 2017, while 10,852,000 RBC units were transfused (95% CI, 10,444-11,259 units), a 2.5% increase from 2017. Between 2017 and 2019, platelet distributions (2,508,000 units; 95% CI, 2,375,000-2,641,000 units) decreased by 2.0%, and plasma distributions (2,679,000 units; 95% CI, 2,525,000-2,833,000 units) decreased by 16.5%. During the same time period, platelet transfusions (2,243,000 units; 95% CI, 1,846,000-2,147,000 units) increased by 15.8% and plasma transfusions (2,185,000 units; 95% CI, 2,068,000-2,301,000 units) decreased by 8.0%. CONCLUSION Utilization of RBC in the United States might have reached a nadir. Between 2017 and 2019, RBC collections declined while RBC transfusions did not significantly change, suggesting a narrowing between blood supply and demand. Monitoring national blood collection and utilization data is integral to understanding trends in blood supply safety and availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jefferson M Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mathew R P Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sanjida Mowla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Dorothy Bota
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Northrup Grumman Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James J Berger
- Office of HIV/AIDS and infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Basavaraju SV, Patton ME, Grimm K, Rasheed MAU, Lester S, Mills L, Stumpf M, Freeman B, Tamin A, Harcourt J, Schiffer J, Semenova V, Li H, Alston B, Ategbole M, Bolcen S, Boulay D, Browning P, Cronin L, David E, Desai R, Epperson M, Gorantla Y, Jia T, Maniatis P, Moss K, Ortiz K, Park SH, Patel P, Qin Y, Steward-Clark E, Tatum H, Vogan A, Zellner B, Drobeniuc J, Sapiano MRP, Havers F, Reed C, Gerber S, Thornburg NJ, Stramer SL. Serologic Testing of US Blood Donations to Identify Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-Reactive Antibodies: December 2019-January 2020. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 72:e1004-e1009. [PMID: 33252659 PMCID: PMC7799215 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 disease, was first identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019, with subsequent worldwide spread. The first U.S. cases were identified in January 2020. Methods To determine if SARS-CoV-2 reactive antibodies were present in sera prior to the first identified case in the U.S. on January 19, 2020, residual archived samples from 7,389 routine blood donations collected by the American Red Cross from December 13, 2019 to January 17, 2020, from donors resident in nine states (California, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and Wisconsin) were tested at CDC for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Specimens reactive by pan-immunoglobulin (pan Ig) enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against the full spike protein were tested by IgG and IgM ELISAs, microneutralization test, Ortho total Ig S1 ELISA, and receptor binding domain / Ace2 blocking activity assay. Results Of the 7,389 samples, 106 were reactive by pan Ig. Of these 106 specimens, 90 were available for further testing. Eighty four of 90 had neutralizing activity, 1 had S1 binding activity, and 1 had receptor binding domain / Ace2 blocking activity >50%, suggesting the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2-reactive antibodies. Donations with reactivity occurred in all nine states. Conclusions These findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 may have been introduced into the United States prior to January 19, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Monica E Patton
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kacie Grimm
- American Red Cross, Scientific Affairs, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Sandra Lester
- American Red Cross, Scientific Affairs, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa Mills
- Synergy America, Inc, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Brandi Freeman
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Azaibi Tamin
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Jarad Schiffer
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Vera Semenova
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Han Li
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Shanna Bolcen
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Darbi Boulay
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Peter Browning
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Li Cronin
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Rita Desai
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Monica Epperson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Tao Jia
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | | | - So Hee Park
- Eagle Global Scientific, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Palak Patel
- CFD Research Corporation, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
| | - Yunlong Qin
- Eagle Global Scientific, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | | | - Briana Zellner
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jan Drobeniuc
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Fiona Havers
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Carrie Reed
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Susan Gerber
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Susan L Stramer
- American Red Cross, Scientific Affairs, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Penumarthi LR, La Hoz RM, Wolfe CR, Jackson BR, Mehta AK, Malinis M, Danziger-Isakov L, Strasfeld L, Florescu DF, Vece G, Basavaraju SV, Michaels MG. Cryptococcus transmission through solid organ transplantation in the United States: A report from the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:1911-1923. [PMID: 33290629 PMCID: PMC8096655 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Cryptococcus species can cause serious life-threatening infection in solid organ transplant recipients by reactivation of prior infection, posttransplant de novo infection, or donor transmission from the transplanted organ. Although previously reported in the literature, the extent of donor-derived cryptococcosis in the United States has not been documented. We analyzed potential donor-derived Cryptococcus transmission events reported to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) for investigation by the Ad Hoc Disease Transmission Advisory Committee (DTAC). All reports between 2009 and 2019 in which transmission to recipients was designated proven or probable, or determined to be averted due to implementation of prophylaxis (intervention without disease transmission-"IWDT") were included. During 2009-2019, 58 reports of potential donor-derived cryptococcosis were submitted to DTAC. Among these reports, 12 donors were determined to have resulted in proven or probable transmission to 23/34 (67.6%) recipients. Most of these donors (10/12 [83%]) exhibited central nervous system-related symptoms prior to death and 5/23 (22%) infected recipients died. For 11 different donors, prophylaxis, most often with fluconazole, was administered to 23/35 (65.7%) recipients. Clinicians should maintain awareness of donor-derived cryptococcosis and consider prompt prophylaxis or treatment followed by reporting to OPTN for further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasya R. Penumarthi
- Office of Blood, Organ, and Other Tissue Safety, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Ricardo M. La Hoz
- Division of Infectious Disease and Geographic Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Cameron R. Wolfe
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Brendan R. Jackson
- Mycotic Diseases Branch, Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Aneesh K. Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Maricar Malinis
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Lara Danziger-Isakov
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center & University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Lynne Strasfeld
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Division of Infectious Diseases, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Diana F. Florescu
- Infectious Diseases Division, Transplant Infectious Diseases Program, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Office of Blood, Organ, and Other Tissue Safety, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Marian G. Michaels
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Taylor L, Condon T, Destrampe EM, Brown JA, McGavic J, Gould CV, Chambers TV, Kosoy OI, Burkhalter KL, Annambhotla P, Basavaraju SV, Groves J, Osborn RA, Weiss J, Stramer SL, Misch EA. Powassan Virus Infection Likely Acquired Through Blood Transfusion Presenting as Encephalitis in a Kidney Transplant Recipient. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 72:1051-1054. [PMID: 32539111 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
A kidney transplant patient without known tick exposure developed encephalitis 3 weeks after transplantation. During the transplant hospitalization, the patient had received a blood transfusion from an asymptomatic donor later discovered to have been infected with Powassan virus. Here, we describe a probable instance of transfusion-transmitted Powassan virus infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Taylor
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Taryn Condon
- Epidemiology Resource Center, Indiana State Department of Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Eric M Destrampe
- Department of Pathology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jennifer A Brown
- Epidemiology Resource Center, Indiana State Department of Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jeanette McGavic
- Epidemiology Resource Center, Indiana State Department of Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Carolyn V Gould
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Trudy V Chambers
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Olga I Kosoy
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Kristen L Burkhalter
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
| | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jamel Groves
- American Red Cross Scientific Affairs, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca A Osborn
- Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - John Weiss
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin and American Red Cross Blood Services, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Susan L Stramer
- American Red Cross Scientific Affairs, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Misch
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kracalik I, Mowla S, Basavaraju SV, Sapiano MRP. Transfusion-related adverse reactions: Data from the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module - United States, 2013-2018. Transfusion 2021; 61:1424-1434. [PMID: 33880771 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 01/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite current blood safety measures, transfusion recipients can experience transfusion-related adverse reactions. Monitoring these reactions can aid in understanding the effectiveness of current transfusion safety measures. Data from the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module were used to quantify adverse reaction risk. METHODS Facilities reporting at least one month of transfused blood components and transfusion-related adverse reactions during January 2013-December 2018 were included. Adverse reaction rates (number per 100,000 components transfused) were calculated for transfused components stratified by component type, collection, and modification methods. RESULTS During 2013-2018, 201 facilities reported 18,308 transfusion-related adverse reactions among 8.34 million blood components transfused (220/100,000). Adverse reactions were higher among apheresis (486/100,000) and pathogen-reduced platelets (579/100,000) than apheresis red blood cells (197/100,000). Allergic reactions (41%) were most common. There were 23 fatalities and 9% of all adverse reactions were serious (severe, life-threatening, or fatal). Reactions involving pulmonary complications (transfusion-associated circulatory overload, transfusion-related acute lung injury and transfusion-associated dyspnea) accounted for 35% of serious reactions but 65% of fatalities. Most (76%) of the 37 transfusion-transmitted infections were serious; none involved pathogen-reduced components. CONCLUSIONS One in 455 blood components transfused was associated with an adverse reaction although the risk of serious reactions (1 in 6224) or transfusion-transmitted infections (1 in 225,440) was lower. Some serious reactions identified were preventable, suggesting additional safety measures may be beneficial. Higher reaction rates identified among pathogen-reduced platelets require further study. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring reactions through national hemovigilance to inform current safety measures and the need for strategies to increase healthcare facility participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Kracalik
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sanjida Mowla
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mathew R P Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Lantana Consulting Group, Inc., East Thetford, Vermont, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mowla SJ, Kracalik IT, Sapiano MRP, O'Hearn L, Andrzejewski C, Basavaraju SV. A Comparison of Transfusion-Related Adverse Reactions Among Apheresis Platelets, Whole Blood-Derived Platelets, and Platelets Subjected to Pathogen Reduction Technology as Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network Hemovigilance Module. Transfus Med Rev 2021; 35:78-84. [PMID: 33934903 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Despite advances in transfusion safety, concerns with safety of platelet transfusions remain including platelet-related sepsis and higher reaction rates observed among patients receiving apheresis platelets (APLTs). National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Hemovigilance Module (HM) data were analyzed to quantify the burden and severity of adverse reactions occurring from APLTs and whole blood-derived platelets (WBD-PLTs). Facilities participating in NHSN HM during 2010-2018 were included. Adverse reaction rates (number per 100,000 components transfused) were calculated for APLTs and WBD-PLTs stratified by severity, use of platelet additive solution (PAS), and pathogen reduction technology (PRT). Chi-square tests were used to compare rates. During the study interval, 2,000,589 platelets were transfused: 1,435,154 APLTs; 525,902 WBD-PLTs; and among APLTs, 39,533 PRT-APLTs. APLT adverse reaction rates were higher (478 vs 70/ 100,000, P< .01) and more often serious (34 vs 6/100,000; P< .01) compared with WBD-PLTs. Adverse reactions were higher among PRT-APLTs (572/100,000) and were less often serious (18/100,000) compared with non-PRT-APLTs (35/100,000) although this association was not statistically significant. Among components implicated in adverse reactions, 92% of APLTs were suspended in plasma. Compared with PRT-APLTs stored in PAS, rates were higher among units stored in plasma (760 vs 525/100,000). Most serious reactions (75%) were allergic. No transfusion-transmitted infections were reported among PRT-APLTs. APLTs were associated with a 6-fold and 2-fold higher serious adverse reaction risks compared with WBD-PLTs and PRT-APLTs, respectively. These findings demonstrate the importance of monitoring transfusion-related adverse reactions to track the safety of platelet transfusions and quantify the impact of mitigation strategies through national hemovigilance systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjida J Mowla
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA; Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Ian T Kracalik
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mathew R P Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lynne O'Hearn
- Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Chester Andrzejewski
- Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Dollard SC, Annambhotla P, Wong P, Meneses K, Amin MM, La Hoz RM, Lease ED, Budev M, Arrossi AV, Basavaraju SV, Thomas CP. Donor-derived human herpesvirus 8 and development of Kaposi sarcoma among 6 recipients of organs from donors with high-risk sexual and substance use behavior. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:681-688. [PMID: 32633035 PMCID: PMC7891580 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Kaposi sarcoma (KS) can develop following organ transplantation through reactivation of recipient human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) infection or through donor-derived HHV-8 transmission. We describe 6 cases of donor-derived HHV-8 infection and KS investigated from July 2018 to January 2020. Organs from 6 donors, retrospectively identified as HHV-8-positive, with a history of drug use disorder, were transplanted into 22 recipients. Four of 6 donors had risk factors for HHV-8 infection reported in donor history questionnaires. Fourteen of 22 organ recipients (64%) had evidence of posttransplant HHV-8 infection. Lung recipients were particularly susceptible to KS. Four of the 6 recipients who developed KS died from KS or associated complications. The US opioid crisis has resulted in an increasing number and proportion of organ donors with substance use disorder, and particularly injection drug use history, which may increase the risk of HHV-8 transmission to recipients. Better awareness of the risk of posttransplant KS for recipients of organs from donors with HHV-8 infection risk could be useful for recipient management. Testing donors and recipients for HHV-8 is currently challenging with no validated commercial serology kits available. Limited HHV-8 antibody testing is available through some US reference laboratories and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Phili Wong
- Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Katherine Meneses
- Liver Transplant DepartmentUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | - Minal M. Amin
- Centers for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Ricardo M. La Hoz
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Erika D. Lease
- Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Maria Budev
- Department of Pulmonary MedicineCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandOhioUSA
| | | | | | - Christie P. Thomas
- Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Iowa Carver College of MedicineIowa CityIowaUSA,Veterans Affairs Medical CenterIowa CityIowaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jones JM, Kracalik I, Rana MM, Nguyen A, Keller BC, Mishkin A, Hoopes C, Kaleekal T, Humar A, Vilaro J, Im G, Smith L, Justice A, Leaumont C, Lindstrom S, Whitaker B, La Hoz RM, Michaels MG, Klassen D, Kuhnert W, Basavaraju SV. SARS-CoV-2 Infections among Recent Organ Recipients, March-May 2020, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 27:552-555. [PMID: 33327990 PMCID: PMC7853574 DOI: 10.3201/eid2702.204046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted public health investigations of 8 organ transplant recipients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Findings suggest the most likely source of transmission was community or healthcare exposure, not the organ donor. Transplant centers should educate transplant candidates and recipients about infection prevention recommendations.
Collapse
|
41
|
Pouch SM, Katugaha SB, Shieh WJ, Annambhotla P, Walker WL, Basavaraju SV, Jones J, Huynh T, Reagan-Steiner S, Bhatnagar J, Grimm K, Stramer SL, Gabel J, Lyon GM, Mehta AK, Kandiah P, Neujahr DC, Javidfar J, Subramanian RM, Parekh SM, Shah P, Cooper L, Psotka MA, Radcliffe R, Williams C, Zaki SR, Staples JE, Fischer M, Panella AJ, Lanciotti RS, Laven JJ, Kosoy O, Rabe IB, Gould CV. Transmission of Eastern Equine Encephalitis Virus From an Organ Donor to 3 Transplant Recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 69:450-458. [PMID: 30371754 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciy923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In fall 2017, 3 solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients from a common donor developed encephalitis within 1 week of transplantation, prompting suspicion of transplant-transmitted infection. Eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV) infection was identified during testing of endomyocardial tissue from the heart recipient. METHODS We reviewed medical records of the organ donor and transplant recipients and tested serum, whole blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and tissue from the donor and recipients for evidence of EEEV infection by multiple assays. We investigated blood transfusion as a possible source of organ donor infection by testing remaining components and serum specimens from blood donors. We reviewed data from the pretransplant organ donor evaluation and local EEEV surveillance. RESULTS We found laboratory evidence of recent EEEV infection in all organ recipients and the common donor. Serum collected from the organ donor upon hospital admission tested negative, but subsequent samples obtained prior to organ recovery were positive for EEEV RNA. There was no evidence of EEEV infection among donors of the 8 blood products transfused into the organ donor or in products derived from these donations. Veterinary and mosquito surveillance showed recent EEEV activity in counties nearby the organ donor's county of residence. Neuroinvasive EEEV infection directly contributed to the death of 1 organ recipient and likely contributed to death in another. CONCLUSIONS Our investigation demonstrated EEEV transmission through SOT. Mosquito-borne transmission of EEEV to the organ donor was the likely source of infection. Clinicians should be aware of EEEV as a cause of transplant-associated encephalitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Pouch
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Shalika B Katugaha
- Infectious Diseases Physicians, Inc, Inova Fairfax Hospital Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Wun-Ju Shieh
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - William L Walker
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado.,Epidemic Intelligence Service, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jefferson Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Thanhthao Huynh
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sarah Reagan-Steiner
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Julu Bhatnagar
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kacie Grimm
- American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Susan L Stramer
- American Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Julie Gabel
- Georgia Department of Public Health, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - G Marshall Lyon
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Aneesh K Mehta
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Prem Kandiah
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David C Neujahr
- Division of Pulmonary Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeffrey Javidfar
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ram M Subramanian
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Samir M Parekh
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Palak Shah
- Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Fairfax Hospital Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Lauren Cooper
- Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Fairfax Hospital Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Mitchell A Psotka
- Department of Heart Failure and Transplantation, Inova Fairfax Hospital Heart and Vascular Institute, Falls Church, Virginia
| | - Rachel Radcliffe
- Division of Acute Disease Epidemiology, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia
| | | | - Sherif R Zaki
- Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia
| | - J Erin Staples
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Marc Fischer
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Amanda J Panella
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | | | - Janeen J Laven
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Olga Kosoy
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Ingrid B Rabe
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | - Carolyn V Gould
- Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID, CDC, Fort Collins, Colorado
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jones JM, Kracalik I, Levi ME, Bowman JS, Berger JJ, Bixler D, Buchacz K, Moorman A, Brooks JT, Basavaraju SV. Assessing Solid Organ Donors and Monitoring Transplant Recipients for Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B Virus, and Hepatitis C Virus Infection - U.S. Public Health Service Guideline, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep 2020; 69:1-16. [PMID: 32584804 PMCID: PMC7337549 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6904a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The recommendations in this report supersede the U.S Public Health Service (PHS) guideline recommendations for reducing transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) through organ transplantation (Seem DL, Lee I, Umscheid CA, Kuehnert MJ. PHS guideline for reducing human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and hepatitis C virus transmission through organ transplantation. Public Health Rep 2013;128:247-343), hereafter referred to as the 2013 PHS guideline. PHS evaluated and revised the 2013 PHS guideline because of several advances in solid organ transplantation, including universal implementation of nucleic acid testing of solid organ donors for HIV, HBV, and HCV; improved understanding of risk factors for undetected organ donor infection with these viruses; and the availability of highly effective treatments for infection with these viruses. PHS solicited feedback from its relevant agencies, subject-matter experts, additional stakeholders, and the public to develop revised guideline recommendations for identification of risk factors for these infections among solid organ donors, implementation of laboratory screening of solid organ donors, and monitoring of solid organ transplant recipients. Recommendations that have changed since the 2013 PHS guideline include updated criteria for identifying donors at risk for undetected donor HIV, HBV, or HCV infection; the removal of any specific term to characterize donors with HIV, HBV, or HCV infection risk factors; universal organ donor HIV, HBV, and HCV nucleic acid testing; and universal posttransplant monitoring of transplant recipients for HIV, HBV, and HCV infections. The recommendations are to be used by organ procurement organization and transplant programs and are intended to apply only to solid organ donors and recipients and not to donors or recipients of other medical products of human origin (e.g., blood products, tissues, corneas, and breast milk). The recommendations pertain to transplantation of solid organs procured from donors without laboratory evidence of HIV, HBV, or HCV infection. Additional considerations when transplanting solid organs procured from donors with laboratory evidence of HCV infection are included but are not required to be incorporated into Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network policy. Transplant centers that transplant organs from HCV-positive donors should develop protocols for obtaining informed consent, testing and treating recipients for HCV, ensuring reimbursement, and reporting new infections to public health authorities.
Collapse
|
43
|
Jones JM, Vikram HR, Lauzardo M, Hill A, Jones J, Haley C, Seaworth B, Oldham S, Brown M, Gutierrez F, Basavaraju SV. Tuberculosis transmission across three states: The story of a solid organ donor born in an endemic country, 2018. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22:e13357. [PMID: 32510808 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Transmission of tuberculosis (TB) from a deceased solid organ donor to recipients can result in severe morbidity and mortality. In 2018, four solid organ transplant recipients residing in three states but sharing a common organ donor were diagnosed with TB disease. Two recipients were hospitalized and none died. The organ donor was born in a country with a high incidence of TB and experienced 8 weeks of headache and fever prior to death, but was not tested for TB during multiple hospitalizations or prior to organ procurement. TB isolates of two organ recipients and a close contact of the donor had identical TB genotypes and closely related whole-genome sequencing results. Donors with risk factors for TB, in particular birth or residence in countries with a higher TB incidence, should be carefully evaluated for TB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jefferson M Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Michael Lauzardo
- Southeastern National Tuberculosis Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Amy Hill
- Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Jeffrey Jones
- San Antonio Infectious Diseases Consultants, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Clinton Haley
- North Texas Infectious Diseases Consultants, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Barbara Seaworth
- Heartland National Tuberculosis Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.,University of Texas Health Science Center, Tyler, Texas, USA
| | - Sara Oldham
- St. Mary's Regional Medical Center, Enid, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Marcus Brown
- St. Mary's Regional Medical Center, Enid, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Felipe Gutierrez
- Maricopa County Department of Public Health, Phoenix VA Health Care System, University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bardossy AC, Snavely EA, Nazarian E, Annambhotla P, Basavaraju SV, Pepe D, Maloney M, Musser KA, Haas W, Barros N, Pierce VM, Walters M, Epstein L. Donor-derived transmission through lung transplantation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii producing the OXA-23 carbapenemase during an ongoing healthcare facility outbreak. Transpl Infect Dis 2020; 22:e13256. [PMID: 32034865 PMCID: PMC10833477 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We describe a rare instance of donor-derived OXA-23-producing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii transmission during lung transplantation and the subsequent public health response. This investigation highlights how transplantation can introduce rare multidrug-resistant organisms into different healthcare facilities and regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana C. Bardossy
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Emily A. Snavely
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | | | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Dana Pepe
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Connecticut Department of Public Health, Healthcare-Associated Infections Antimicrobial Resistance Program, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Meghan Maloney
- Connecticut Department of Public Health, Healthcare-Associated Infections Antimicrobial Resistance Program, Hartford, CT, USA
| | | | - Wolfgang Haas
- Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Nicolas Barros
- Transplant Infectious Diseases and Compromised Host Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Virginia M. Pierce
- Microbiology Laboratory, Pathology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maroya Walters
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lauren Epstein
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jones JM, Sapiano MRP, Savinkina AA, Haass KA, Baker ML, Henry RA, Berger JJ, Basavaraju SV. Slowing decline in blood collection and transfusion in the United States - 2017. Transfusion 2020; 60 Suppl 2:S1-S9. [PMID: 32086817 DOI: 10.1111/trf.15604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Revised: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey (NBCUS) has demonstrated declines in blood collection and transfusion in the United States since 2008, including declines of 11.6% in red blood cell (RBC) collections and 13.9% in RBC transfusions during 2013-2015. This study described the 2017 NBCUS results. METHODS The 2017 NBCUS was distributed to all US blood collection centers, all hospitals performing at least 1000 surgeries annually, and a 40% random sample of hospitals performing 100 to 999 surgeries annually. Weighting and imputation were used to generate national estimates for units of blood and components collected, deferred, distributed, transfused, and outdated. RESULTS Response rates for the 2017 NBCUS were 88% for blood collection centers and 86% for transfusing hospitals. Compared with 2015, the number of RBC units collected during 2017 (12,211,000; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11,680,000-12,742,000) declined by 3.0%, and transfused RBC units (10,654,000, 95% CI, 10,314,000-10,995,000) declined by 6.1%. Distributed platelet (PLT) units (2,560,000; 95% CI, 2,391,000-2,730,000 units) increased by 5.1%, and transfused PLT units (1,937,000, 95% CI, 1,794,000-2,079,000) declined by 2.3%. Distributed plasma units (3,209,000; 95% CI, 2,879,000-3,539,000) declined by 13.6%, and transfused plasma units (2,374,000; 95% CI, 2,262,000-2,487,000) declined by 12.9%. CONCLUSION The 2017 NBCUS suggests a continued but slowing decline in demand for RBCs. The decline in blood collection and use will likely continue. Despite decreasing demand and increasing manufacturing costs of blood products, the US blood industry has met the regular and emergent needs of the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jefferson M Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mathew R P Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alexandra A Savinkina
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.,Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee
| | - Kathryn A Haass
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Richard A Henry
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of HIV/AIDS and infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Washington, DC
| | - James J Berger
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of HIV/AIDS and infectious Disease Policy, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, Washington, DC
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Jones JM, Gurbaxani BM, Asher A, Sansom S, Annambhotla P, Moorman AC, Kamili S, Brooks JT, Basavaraju SV. Quantifying the risk of undetected HIV, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus infection in Public Health Service increased risk donors. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2583-2593. [PMID: 30980600 PMCID: PMC6946117 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
To reduce the risk of HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission through organ transplantation, donors are universally screened for these infections by nucleic acid tests (NAT). Deceased organ donors are classified as "increased risk" if they engaged in specific behaviors during the 12 months before death. We developed a model to estimate the risk of undetected infection for HIV, HBV, and HCV among NAT-negative donors specific to the type and timing of donors' potential risk behavior to guide revisions to the 12-month timeline. Model parameters were estimated, including risk of disease acquisition for increased risk groups, number of virions that multiply to establish infection, virus doubling time, and limit of detection by NAT. Monte Carlo simulation was performed. The risk of undetected infection was <1/1 000 000 for HIV after 14 days, for HBV after 35 days, and for HCV after 7 days from the time of most recent potential exposure to the day of a negative NAT. The period during which reported donor risk behaviors result in an "increased risk" designation can be safely shortened.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jefferson M. Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Brian M. Gurbaxani
- Office of Science and H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alice Asher
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stephanie Sansom
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anne C. Moorman
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Saleem Kamili
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - John T. Brooks
- Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bixler D, Annambholta P, Abara WE, Collier MG, Jones J, Mixson-Hayden T, Basavaraju SV, Ramachandran S, Kamili S, Moorman A. Hepatitis B and C virus infections transmitted through organ transplantation investigated by CDC, United States, 2014-2017. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2570-2582. [PMID: 30861300 PMCID: PMC9112229 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We evaluated clinical outcomes among organ recipients with donor-derived hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections investigated by CDC from 2014 to 2017 in the United States. We characterized new HBV infections in organ recipients if donors tested negative for total anti-HBc, HBsAg and HBV DNA, and new recipient HCV infections if donors tested negative for anti-HCV and HCV RNA. Donor risk behaviors were abstracted from next-of-kin interviews and medical records. During 2014-2017, seven new recipient HBV infections associated with seven donors were identified; six (86%) recipients survived. At last follow-up, all survivors had functioning grafts and five (83%) had started antiviral therapy. Twenty new recipient HCV infections associated with nine donors were identified; 19 (95%) recipients survived. At last follow-up, 18 (95%) survivors had functioning grafts and 14 (74%) had started antiviral treatment. Combining donor next-of kin interviews and medical records, 11/16 (69%) donors had evidence of injection drug use and all met Public Health Service increased risk donor (IRD) criteria. IRD designation led to early diagnosis of recipient infection, and prompt implementation of therapy, likely reducing the risk of graft failure, liver disease, and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danae Bixler
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA
| | - Pallavi Annambholta
- Office of Blood, Organ and Other Tissue Safety, Division of Health care Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Winston E Abara
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA
| | - Melissa G. Collier
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA
| | - Jefferson Jones
- Office of Blood, Organ and Other Tissue Safety, Division of Health care Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Tonya Mixson-Hayden
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Office of Blood, Organ and Other Tissue Safety, Division of Health care Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Sumathi Ramachandran
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA
| | - Saleem Kamili
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA
| | - Anne Moorman
- Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sapiano MRP, Jones JM, Bowman J, Levi ME, Basavaraju SV. Impact of US Public Health Service increased risk deceased donor designation on organ utilization. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2560-2569. [PMID: 30959569 PMCID: PMC6864734 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Under US Public Health Service guidelines, organ donors with risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), or hepatitis C virus (HCV) are categorized as increased risk donors (IRD). Previous studies have suggested that IRD organs are utilized at lower rates than organs from standard risk donors (SRD), but these studies were conducted prior to universal donor nucleic acid test screening. We conducted risk-adjusted analyses to determine the effect of IRD designation on organ utilization using 2010-2017 data (21 626 heart, 101 160 kidney, 52 714 liver, and 16 219 lung recipients in the United States) from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. There was no significant difference (P < .05) between risk-adjusted utilization rates for IRD vs SRD organs for adult hearts and livers and pediatric kidneys, livers, and lungs. Significantly lower utilization was found among IRD adult kidneys, lungs, and pediatric hearts. Analysis of the proportion of transplanted organs recovered from IRD by facility suggests that a subset of facilities contribute to the underutilization of adult IRD kidneys. Along with revised criteria and nomenclature to identify donors with HIV, HBV, or HCV risk factors, educational efforts to standardize informed consent discussions might improve organ utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathew R. P. Sapiano
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jefferson M. Jones
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - James Bowman
- Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Marilyn E. Levi
- Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Sridhar V. Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Novosad SA, Basavaraju SV, Annambhotla P, Mohr M, Halpin AL, Foy L, Chmielewski R, Winchell JM, Benitez AJ, Morrison SS, Johnson T, Crabb DM, Ratliff AE, Waites K, Kuehnert MJ. Mycoplasma hominis Infections Transmitted Through Amniotic Tissue Product. Clin Infect Dis 2019; 65:1152-1158. [PMID: 28575162 DOI: 10.1093/cid/cix507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Mycoplasma hominis is a commensal genitourinary tract organism that can cause infections outside the genitourinary tract. We investigated a cluster of M. hominis surgical site infections in patients who underwent spine surgery, all associated with amniotic tissue linked to a common donor. Methods Laboratory tests of tissue product from the donor, including culture, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and whole-genome sequencing were performed. Use of this amniotic tissue product was reviewed. A multistate investigation to identify additional cases and locate any unused products was conducted. Results Twenty-seven tissue product vials from a donor were distributed to facilities in 7 states; at least 20 vials from this donor were used in 14 patients. Of these, 4 of 14 (29%) developed surgical site infections, including 2 M. hominis infections. Mycoplasma hominis was detected by culture and qPCR in 2 unused vials from the donor. Sequencing indicated >99% similarity between patient and unopened vial isolates. For 5 of 27 (19%) vials, the final disposition could not be confirmed. Conclusions Mycoplasma hominis was transmitted through amniotic tissue from a single donor to 2 recipients. Current routine donor screening and product testing does not detect all potential pathogens. Clinicians should be aware that M. hominis can cause surgical site infections, and may not be detected by routine clinical cultures. The lack of a standardized system to track tissue products in healthcare facilities limits the ability of public health agencies to respond to outbreaks and investigate other adverse events associated with these products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon A Novosad
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, and.,Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sridhar V Basavaraju
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Pallavi Annambhotla
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Alison Laufer Halpin
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Linda Foy
- St Vincent Charity Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Jonas M Winchell
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and
| | - Alvaro J Benitez
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and
| | - Shatavia S Morrison
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and
| | - Taccara Johnson
- Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and
| | | | | | | | - Matthew J Kuehnert
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jones SA, Jones JM, Leung V, Nakashima AK, Oakeson KF, Smith AR, Hunter R, Kim JJ, Cumming M, McHale E, Young PP, Fridey JL, Kelley WE, Stramer SL, Wagner SJ, West FB, Herron R, Snyder E, Hendrickson JE, Peaper DR, Gundlapalli AV, Langelier C, Miller S, Nambiar A, Moayeri M, Kamm J, Moulton-Meissner H, Annambhotla P, Gable P, McAllister GA, Breaker E, Sula E, Halpin AL, Basavaraju SV. Sepsis Attributed to Bacterial Contamination of Platelets Associated with a Potential Common Source - Multiple States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68:519-523. [PMID: 31194723 PMCID: PMC6613552 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6823a2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
During May-October 2018, four patients from three states experienced sepsis after transfusion of apheresis platelets contaminated with Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex (ACBC) and Staphylococcus saprophyticus; one patient died. ACBC isolates from patients' blood, transfused platelet residuals, and two environmental samples were closely related by whole genome sequencing. S. saprophyticus isolates from two patients' blood, three transfused platelet residuals, and one hospital environmental sample formed two whole genome sequencing clusters. This whole genome sequencing analysis indicated a potential common source of bacterial contamination; investigation into the contamination source continues. All platelet donations were collected using apheresis cell separator machines and collection sets from the same manufacturer; two of three collection sets were from the same lot. One implicated platelet unit had been treated with pathogen-inactivation technology, and two had tested negative with a rapid bacterial detection device after negative primary culture. Because platelets are usually stored at room temperature, bacteria in contaminated platelet units can proliferate to clinically relevant levels by the time of transfusion. Clinicians should monitor for sepsis after platelet transfusions even after implementation of bacterial contamination mitigation strategies. Recognizing adverse transfusion reactions and reporting to the platelet supplier and hemovigilance systems is crucial for public health practitioners to detect and prevent sepsis associated with contaminated platelets.
Collapse
|