Herpes PCR testing and empiric acyclovir use beyond the neonatal period

Universal versus targeted treatment of neonatal herpes simplex virus among neonates presenting for sepsis evaluations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The American Academy of Pediatrics recently published guidance for the evaluation and management of febrile infants. However, guidance on testing and empiric treatment for neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) remains less standardized and subject to clinical practice variation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent reports reveal that high numbers of infants presenting for sepsis evaluations need to be treated empirically with acyclovir to capture one case of neonatal HSV. Clinical and laboratory risk factors for neonatal HSV identified in the literature can be used for a targeted approach to testing and treating infants for HSV to optimize resource utilization.

SUMMARY

The literature supports a targeted approach to evaluation and empiric acyclovir treatment for neonatal HSV, but additional studies are needed to validate this approach given the rarity of disease.

Clinical and Health System Impact of Biofire Filmarray Meningitis/Encephalitis Routine Testing of CSF in a Pediatric Hospital: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Rapid cartridge-based molecular test panels targeting multiple pathogens are increasingly available, improve pathogen detection and reduce turn-around-time but are more expensive than standard testing. Confirmation that these test panels contribute to improved patient or health service outcomes is required.

METHODS

In March 2021, our pediatric hospital laboratory implemented the BioFire Filmarray™ meningitis/encephalitis (M/E) panel as an additional routine test for all cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples collected from infants <90 days or from any patient in the emergency department. A retrospective chart review was done to ascertain changes in clinical outcomes, antimicrobial prescribing practices, and hospital length of stay, comparing two discrete 6-month periods: preimplementation (March-August 2019) and postimplementation (March-August 2021).

RESULTS

Both pre- and postimplementation groups were similar at baseline, except the preimplementation group had a higher proportion of infants with enterovirus and parechovirus meningitis. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of median length of stay (2.94 vs 3.47 days, p = 0.41), duration of antibiotic treatment (2.0 vs 2.3 days, p = 0.25), need for central venous access (12.9% vs 17%, p = 0.38) or hospital-in-the-home admission (9.4% vs 9%, p = 0.92). A similar proportion of infants received aciclovir (33% vs 31%), however, a reduction in duration was observed (1.36 vs 0.90 days, p = 0.03) in the postimplementation period.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of the Biofire Filmarray™ M/E panel for routine testing of CSF samples reduced the duration of antiviral prescribing but had only a minor impact on antibiotic prescribing practices or health service outcomes in our pediatric hospital. The introduction of new laboratory testing needs to be supported by a comprehensive stewardship program to see optimal outcomes from new testing platforms.

Impact of CSF Meningitis and Encephalitis Panel on Resource Use for Febrile Well-Appearing Infants

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis (ME) panel is associated with decreased resource use for febrile infants. The ME panel has a rapid turnaround time (1-2 hours) and may shorten length of stay (LOS) and antimicrobial use for febrile well-appearing infants.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of febrile well-appearing infants ≤60 days with cerebrospinal fluid culture sent in the emergency department from July 2017 to April 2019. We examined the frequency of ME panel use and its relationship with hospital LOS and initiation and duration of antibiotics and acyclovir. We used nonparametric tests to compare median durations.

RESULTS

The ME panel was performed for 85 (36%) of 237 infants. There was no difference in median hospital LOS for infants with versus without ME panel testing (42 hours, interquartile range [IQR] 36-52 vs 40 hours, IQR: 35-47, P = .09). More than 97% of infants with and without ME panel testing were initiated on antibiotics. Patients with ME panel were more likely to receive acyclovir (33% vs 18%; odds ratio: 2.2, 95%: confidence interval 1.2-4.0). There was no difference in median acyclovir duration with or without ME panel testing (1 hour, IQR: 1-7 vs 4.2 hours, IQR: 1-21, P = .10). When adjusting for potential covariates, these findings persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

ME panel use was not associated with differences in hospital LOS, antibiotic initiation, or acyclovir duration in febrile well-appearing infants. ME panel testing was associated with acyclovir initiation.

Impact of Implementing the Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel on Duration of Intravenous Acyclovir Treatment

Background

Herpes Simplex Virus-1 is the most common cause of sporadic encephalitis worldwide and requires prompt antiviral treatment. Traditionally, Herpes Simplex Virus-1 (HSV-1) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing is conducted using standalone PCR. The BioFire CSF FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (BioFire ME Panel) was introduced in 2015 at our institution providing an alternative method of HSV-1 CSF testing. This study assesses the impact of the BioFire ME panel on duration of intravenous acyclovir treatment.

Methods

A retrospective review of electronic medical records between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Information on intravenous acyclovir treatment and HSV-1 CSF testing were collected and analyzed. Our descriptive analysis included Mann-Whitney tests, two proportion Z-tests, and logistic regression.

Results

Our CSF HSV-1 negative cohort included 524 BioFire patients (125 pediatric, 399 adult) and 287 standalone PCR patients (115 pediatric, 172 adult). Across both pediatric and adult groups, patients who were tested for HSV-1 with the BioFire ME panel had shorter average (SD) durations of intravenous acyclovir treatment [pediatric: 2.00 (5.71) days; adult: 3.26 (6.59) days] compared to patients tested with standalone PCR [pediatric: 4.83 (8.62) days; adult: 4.93 (8.46) days] (P &lt;0.001). Time from lumbar puncture collection to HSV-1 results was additionally faster on average for the BioFire ME panel than the standalone PCR (P &lt;0.001).

Conclusions

The implementation of the BioFire ME panel shortened CSF HSV-1 PCR result time and intravenous acyclovir duration. The shortened treatment and testing times from the BioFire ME panel implementation may reduce hospital treatment costs and unnecessary use of antiviral treatments.

How do we reduce acyclovir overuse? Impact of FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel tests for pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Few Japanese hospitals can perform in-house cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to screen for herpes simplex virus, leading to patients being administered acyclovir (ACV) for several days. The FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (ME Panel) is a multiplex PCR test that can identify 14 major pathogens within 1 h. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of the ME Panel in children admitted with central nervous system infections in Japan.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, quasi-experimental study. The ME panel was introduced in April 2020. We outsourced the CSF samples to a laboratory during the pre-intervention period (April 2016 to March 2020) and performed the ME panel at our hospital during the post-intervention period (April 2020 to December 2021). Duration and dose of ACV and antibiotic use, length of stay (LOS) in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), and total LOS after testing were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The number of cases in the pre- and post-intervention periods was 67 and 22 cases, respectively. The median duration of ACV decreased significantly from 6 days to 0 day (p < 0.001), and the median dose of ACV use decreased significantly from 14 vials to 0 vial (p < 0.001). No significant differences were noted in the total duration and dose of antibiotic use, LOS in PICU, and the total LOS after testing.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of ME panel may contribute to appropriate ACV use; however, there was no significant change in the duration and dose of antibiotic use or LOS.

Clinical and Financial Impact of a Diagnostic Stewardship Program for Children with Suspected Central Nervous System Infection

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the optimal implementation and clinical and financial impacts of the FilmArray Meningitis Encephalitis Panel (MEP) multiplex polymerase chain reaction testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in children with suspected central nervous system infection.

STUDY DESIGN

A pre-post quasiexperimental cohort study to investigate the impact of implementing MEP using a rapid CSF diagnostic stewardship program was conducted at Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO). MEP was implemented with electronic medical record indication selection to guide testing to children meeting approved use criteria: infants <2 months, immunocompromised, encephalitis, and ≥5 white blood cells/μL of CSF. Positive results were communicated with antimicrobial stewardship real-time decision support. All cases with CSF obtained by lumbar puncture sent to the CHCO microbiology laboratory meeting any of the 4 aforementioned criteria were included with preimplementation controls (2015-2016) compared with postimplementation cases (2017-2018). Primary outcome was time-to-optimal antimicrobials compared using log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Time-to-optimal antimicrobials decreased from 28 hours among 1124 preimplementation controls to 18 hours (P < .0001) among 1127 postimplementation cases (72% with MEP testing conducted). Postimplementation, time-to-positive CSF results was faster (4.8 vs 9.6 hours, P < .0001), intravenous antimicrobial duration was shorter (24 vs 36 hours, P = .004), with infectious neurologic diagnoses more frequently identified (15% vs 10%, P = .03). There were no differences in time-to-effective antimicrobials, hospital admissions, antimicrobial starts, or length of stay. Costs of microbiologic testing increased, but total hospital costs were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of MEP with a rapid central nervous system diagnostic stewardship program improved antimicrobial use with faster results shortening empiric therapy. Routine MEP testing for high-yield indications enables antimicrobial optimization with unchanged overall costs.

Update on Viral Infections Involving the Central Nervous System in Pediatric Patients

Infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are mainly caused by viruses, and these infections can be life-threatening in pediatric patients. Although the prognosis of CNS infections is often favorable, mortality and long-term sequelae can occur. The aims of this narrative review were to describe the specific microbiological and clinical features of the most frequent pathogens and to provide an update on the diagnostic approaches and treatment strategies for viral CNS infections in children. A literature analysis showed that the most common pathogens worldwide are enteroviruses, arboviruses, parechoviruses, and herpesviruses, with variable prevalence rates in different countries. Lumbar puncture (LP) should be performed as soon as possible when CNS infection is suspected, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples should always be sent for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Due to the lack of specific therapies, the management of viral CNS infections is mainly based on supportive care, and empiric treatment against herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection should be started as soon as possible. Some researchers have questioned the role of acyclovir as an empiric antiviral in older children due to the low incidence of HSV infection in this population and observed that HSV encephalitis may be clinically recognizable beyond neonatal age. However, the real benefit-risk ratio of selective approaches is unclear, and further studies are needed to define appropriate indications for empiric acyclovir. Research is needed to find specific therapies for emerging pathogens. Moreover, the appropriate timing of monitoring neurological development, performing neuroimaging evaluations and investigating the effectiveness of rehabilitation during follow-up should be evaluated with long-term studies.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members.As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Evaluation of suspected neonatal herpes simplex virus infection in preterm versus term newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

While national guidelines are available for the evaluation and management of term infants at risk for herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection, such guidelines are lacking for preterm infants. We sought to determine the risk factors and clinical characteristics of preterm vs. term infants who were evaluated and treated empirically for HSV infection in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, medical records of all infants who were admitted to our NICU (2009-2016) and who were evaluated and empirically treated for HSV were reviewed for mothers' and infants' demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory findings.

RESULTS

During the study period 4.2% (103/2,471) of all preterm infants, and 6.0% (112/1,865) of all term infants were evaluated and treated empirically for neonatal HSV. Among all infants who were evaluated and treated for HSV, 5.5% (12/215) had neonatal HSV disease, of whom 83.3% (10/12) were preterm infants. In comparison to term, preterm infants were more likely to be evaluated and treated, if they had a maternal history of HSV [OR 2.51 (95% CI: 1.41-4.48)], prolonged rupture of membranes [2.64 (1.221-5.73)], leukopenia [3.65 (1.94-6.87)] and thrombocytopenia [2.25 (0.85-5.89)]. HSV disease was associated with a higher mortality compared to those without disease [25% (3/12) vs. 4.4% (9/203) respectively; p = <0.05].

CONCLUSION

Preterm infants evaluated and empirically treated for HSV have a higher burden of HSV infection than term infants. HSV should be considered in the management of preterm infant with a maternal history of HSV, prolonged rupture of membranes, and thrombocytopenia.

Impact of the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel on antimicrobial duration among patients with suspected central nervous system infection

Ten controlled studies evaluated antimicrobial use following implementation of the FilmArray meningitis and encephalitis panel versus usual care. Only one-half of studies identified significant reductions in antibiotic duration, with 8/10 reporting modest reductions for acyclovir. Coupling the FilmArray meningitis and encephalitis panel with interventions by antimicrobial stewardship programs may help enhance its clinical impact.

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020)

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2020 (J-SSCG 2020), a Japanese-specific set of clinical practice guidelines for sepsis and septic shock created as revised from J-SSCG 2016 jointly by the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, was first released in September 2020 and published in February 2021. An English-language version of these guidelines was created based on the contents of the original Japanese-language version. The purpose of this guideline is to assist medical staff in making appropriate decisions to improve the prognosis of patients undergoing treatment for sepsis and septic shock. We aimed to provide high-quality guidelines that are easy to use and understand for specialists, general clinicians, and multidisciplinary medical professionals. J-SSCG 2016 took up new subjects that were not present in SSCG 2016 (e.g., ICU-acquired weakness [ICU-AW], post-intensive care syndrome [PICS], and body temperature management). The J-SSCG 2020 covered a total of 22 areas with four additional new areas (patient- and family-centered care, sepsis treatment system, neuro-intensive treatment, and stress ulcers). A total of 118 important clinical issues (clinical questions, CQs) were extracted regardless of the presence or absence of evidence. These CQs also include those that have been given particular focus within Japan. This is a large-scale guideline covering multiple fields; thus, in addition to the 25 committee members, we had the participation and support of a total of 226 members who are professionals (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, clinical engineers, and pharmacists) and medical workers with a history of sepsis or critical illness. The GRADE method was adopted for making recommendations, and the modified Delphi method was used to determine recommendations by voting from all committee members. As a result, 79 GRADE-based recommendations, 5 Good Practice Statements (GPS), 18 expert consensuses, 27 answers to background questions (BQs), and summaries of definitions and diagnosis of sepsis were created as responses to 118 CQs. We also incorporated visual information for each CQ according to the time course of treatment, and we will also distribute this as an app. The J-SSCG 2020 is expected to be widely used as a useful bedside guideline in the field of sepsis treatment both in Japan and overseas involving multiple disciplines.

Enteroviral and herpes simplex virus central nervous system infections in infants < 90 days old: a Paediatric Investigators' Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada (PICNIC) study

Background

The relative contribution of viruses to central nervous system (CNS) infections in young infants is not clear. For viral CNS infections, there are limited data on features that suggest HSV etiology or on predictors of unfavorable outcome.

Methods

In this cross-sectional retrospective study, seven centers from the Pediatric Investigators Collaborative Network on Infections in Canada identified infants < 90 days of age with CNS infection proven to be due to enterovirus (EV) or herpes simplex virus (HSV) January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2014.

Results

Of 174 CNS infections with a proven etiology, EV accounted for 103 (59%) and HSV for 7 (4%). All HSV cases and 41 (40%) EV cases presented before 21 days of age. Four HSV cases (57%) and 5 EV cases (5%) had seizures. Three (43%) HSV and 23 (23%) EV cases lacked cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis. HSV cases were more likely to require ICU admission (p = 0.010), present with seizures (p = 0.031) and have extra-CNS disease (p < 0.001). Unfavorable outcome occurred in 12 cases (11% of all EV and HSV infections) but was more likely following HSV than EV infection (4 (57%) versus 8 (8%); p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Viruses accounted for approximately two-thirds of proven CNS infections in the first 90 days of life. Empiric therapy for HSV should be considered in suspected CNS infections in the first 21 days even in the absence of CSF pleocytosis unless CSF parameters are suggestive of bacterial meningitis. Neurodevelopmental follow-up should be considered in infants whose course of illness is complicated by seizures.

Impact of FilmArray meningitis encephalitis panel on HSV testing and empiric acyclovir use in children beyond the neonatal period

Following implementation of the FilmArray meningitis and encephalitis panel, which enables rapid syndromic cerebrospinal fluid testing, HSV testing doubled in children >60 days with suspected central nervous system infection at Children's Hospital Colorado. Acyclovir initiation was unchanged, but duration decreased. Diagnostic and antimicrobial stewardship is needed for MEP optimization.

Comparison of antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the implementation of an on-site FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel in an academic tertiary pediatric hospital: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Prompt initiation of empiric therapy is common practice in case of suspected meningitis or encephalitis. However, in children the most common pathogens are viruses that usually do not require and are not covered by the applied anti-infective treatment. Novel multiplex PCR (mPCR) panels provide rapid on-site diagnostic testing for a variety of pathogens. This study compared empiric antibiotic and acyclovir usage before and after the introduction of an on-site FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (FA ME Panel).

METHODS

We retrospectively compared data for empiric antibiotic and acyclovir usage between pediatric patients with suspected central nervous system (CNS) infection receiving mPCR testing and a matched historical control group. Patients were matched by age and suspected CNS infection. We included all patients for whom empiric antibiotics and/or acyclovir were prescribed.

RESULTS

Each study group consisted of 46 patients with 29 (63.0%) infants and 17 (37.0%) older children. A viral pathogen was diagnosed in 5/46 (10.9%) patients in the control group (all enteroviruses) and in 14/46 (30.4%) patients in the mPCR group (enterovirus n = 9; human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) n = 5), (p = 0.038)). Length of Therapy (LoT) and Days of Therapy (DoT) for antibiotics were significantly lower for infants (4.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.038 and 8.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.015, respectively). Acyclovir therapy was significantly shorter for both, infants and older children (3.0 vs. 1.0 day, p < 0.001 for both age groups).

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study suggest that the introduction of a FA ME Panel into clinical routine procedures is associated with a significantly reduced LoT and DoT of empiric anti-infective treatment in children with suspected meningoencephalitis. The largest effect was observed in infants.

Inconsistent Management of Neonatal Herpes Simplex Virus Infections

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of neonatal herpes simplex virus (nHSV) infections is monitored periodically in the Netherlands, yet management and outcome is unknown. Comprehensive national guidelines are lacking. We aim to describe management and outcome in the last decade to explore current diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. We aim to identify possible variability in management of patients with a suspected nHSV infection.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case series of management and outcome of nHSV infections at 2 tertiary care center locations in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

An nHSV infection was diagnosed in 1% (12 of 1348) of patients in whom polymerase chain reaction for HSV was performed. Of the patients with nHSV infection, 3 of 12 died, and 4 of 9 (44%) survivors suffered neurologic sequelae. Neurologic symptoms at presentation were seen in only 2 of 8 patients with nHSV encephalitis. A cerebral spinal fluid analysis was performed in 3 of 6 patients presenting with skin lesions. Only 3 of 6 patients with neurologic symptoms received suppressive therapy. nHSV infection was diagnosed in 8 of 189 (4%) patients who were empirically treated.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of nHSV infection, particularly when presented with skin lesions, is inconsistent. Many infants without a HSV infection are exposed to antiviral medication. There is substantial interhospital variation in diagnostic and therapeutic management of a suspected infection. Comprehensive guidelines need to be developed to standardize management of suspected nHSV infection.

Trends in the incidence, mortality, and cost of neonatal herpes simplex virus hospitalizations in the United States from 2003 to 2014

OBJECTIVE

To examine the temporal trends in the incidence and outcomes of neonatal herpes simplex infections (NHSV) in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). Neonates ≤28 days old with ICD-9 codes for NHSV (054.xx) from 2003 to 2014 were included. Trends in the incidence, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and hospital cost were analyzed using Jonckheere-Terpstra test.

RESULTS

NHSV increased from 7.9 to 10 per 100,000 live births from 2003-05 to 2012-14 (P = 0.04). Hospital costs increased from $21,650 to $27,843; P < 0.001). The overall mortality rate and median LOS were 7.9% and 20 days, respectively and there were no significant variations across years during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of NHSV in the United States increased between 2003 and 2014 without a significant change in mortality. NHSV remains a serious health threat and new and effective strategies to prevent NHSV are needed.

Comparison of Herpes Simplex Virus PCR with Culture for Virus Detection in Multisource Surface Swab Specimens from Neonates

The American Academy of Pediatrics currently recommends herpes simplex virus (HSV) culture or PCR for testing of swabs of the conjunctivae, mouth, nasopharynx, and rectum (surface swabs) from neonates. The objectives of this study were to compare the performance and time to results of HSV PCR with those of HSV culture with surface swabs from neonates. Banked multisource surface swab samples that were collected from infants less than or equal to 30 days old from January 2017 to December 2017 and that had previously been cultured for HSV were identified and tested retrospectively by HSV PCR. Surface swab samples from 97 patients were included in the study. Of these 97 patients, 7 (7%) had clinical HSV disease. Of the 7 neonates with HSV disease, 3 (42.9%) had surface swabs positive by culture and 6 (85.7%) had swabs positive by PCR. Limiting the analysis to specimens that were positive only by culture or only by PCR, the specificity for both methods was 100%, but the sensitivity of PCR was 100%, whereas it was 50% for culture. During the study period, 341 HSV cultures and 426 HSV PCRs were performed. The median time from swab collection to reporting of results was 7.6 days (interquartile range [IQR], 7.1 to 7.9 days) for culture and 0.8 days (IQR, 0.6 to 1.0 days) for PCR. HSV PCR of surface swabs from neonates was considerably more rapid and sensitive than HSV culture without yielding false-positive results. Although larger studies are needed to support our findings, strong consideration should be given to utilize PCR instead of culture for the detection of HSV in surface swabs from neonates.

Herpes Simplex Virus Infection in Infants Undergoing Meningitis Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Although neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) is a potentially devastating infection requiring prompt evaluation and treatment, large-scale assessments of the frequency in potentially infected infants have not been performed.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of infants ≤60 days old who had cerebrospinal fluid culture testing performed in 1 of 23 participating North American emergency departments. HSV infection was defined by a positive HSV polymerase chain reaction or viral culture. The primary outcome was the proportion of encounters in which HSV infection was identified. Secondary outcomes included frequency of central nervous system (CNS) and disseminated HSV, and HSV testing and treatment patterns.

RESULTS

Of 26 533 eligible encounters, 112 infants had HSV identified (0.42%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35%-0.51%). Of these, 90 (80.4%) occurred in weeks 1 to 4, 10 (8.9%) in weeks 5 to 6, and 12 (10.7%) in weeks 7 to 9. The median age of HSV-infected infants was 14 days (interquartile range: 9-24 days). HSV infection was more common in 0 to 28-day-old infants compared with 29- to 60-day-old infants (odds ratio 3.9; 95% CI: 2.4-6.2). Sixty-eight (0.26%, 95% CI: 0.21%-0.33%) had CNS or disseminated HSV. The proportion of infants tested for HSV (35%; range 14%-72%) and to whom acyclovir was administered (23%; range 4%-53%) varied widely across sites.

CONCLUSIONS

An HSV infection was uncommon in young infants evaluated for CNS infection, particularly in the second month of life. Evidence-based approaches to the evaluation for HSV in young infants are needed.

Neurological Disorders Associated with Human Alphaherpesviruses

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) encephalitis is the most common cause of sporadic fatal encephalitis worldwide, and central nervous system (CNS) involvement is observed in approximately one-third of neonatal HSV infections . In recent years, single-gene inborn errors of innate immunity have been shown to be associated with susceptibility to HSV encephalitis . Temporal lobe abnormalities revealed by magnetic resonance imaging-the most sensitive imaging method for HSV encephalitis-are considered strong evidence for the disease. Detection of HSV DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of HSV encephalitis and neonatal meningoencephalitis. Intravenous acyclovir for 14-21 days is the standard treatment in HSV encephalitis. Neurological outcomes in neonates are improved by intravenous high-dose acyclovir for 21 days followed by oral acyclovir suppressive therapy for 6 months. Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) causes a wide range of CNS manifestations. VZV encephalitis typically occurs after primary infection, and reactivation of VZV may cause encephalitis. On the other hand, VZV infection of cerebral arteries produces vasculopathy, which can manifest as ischemic stroke. Vasculopathy can occur after primary infection or reactivation of VZV. PCR detection of VZV DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid can be used for the diagnosis of encephalitis or vasculopathy. Although there are no controlled treatment trials to assess VZV treatments of encephalitis or vasculopathy, intravenous acyclovir is a common treatment.

Impact of an Institutional Guideline on the Care of Neonates at Risk for Herpes Simplex Virus in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is rare in neonates but carries significant morbidity and mortality in that group. Emergency department (ED) clinicians have little guidance to decide when to test for HSV and give acyclovir. We created an institutional guideline to provide guidance in patients younger than 6 weeks. Our objective was to evaluate whether guideline implementation affected the ED's decision to test for HSV, and ED use of HSV polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) and acyclovir.

METHODS

We reviewed charts for patients 1 year before implementation and 1 year after implementation of our guideline. Inclusion criteria were younger than 60 days, admitted through the ED, symptom onset younger than 6 weeks, and any one of the following criteria: (1) ED blood culture obtained, (2) ED or inpatient HSV PCR obtained, and (3) ED or inpatient acyclovir treatment. Premature patients and transfer patients were excluded. We compared whether the decision to initiate HSV testing, ED use of HSV PCRs, serum alanine aminotransferase, and acyclovir use changed post-guideline implementation.

RESULTS

We reviewed 173 charts pre-implementation and 129 post-implementation. We found a significant decrease in ED testing for HSV among patients who did not meet guideline criteria (P < 0.01). We saw an improvement in the use of alanine aminotransferase among patients who met criteria for testing (P = 0.02), but no change in the use of HSV PCRs or acyclovir use among tested patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline implementation reduced HSV evaluations in low-risk patients, but did not improve test utilization or acyclovir administration among those tested. Additional work is needed to improve guideline utilization.

Persistent Gaps in Appropriate Use of Empiric Acyclovir in Neonates

The use of empiric acyclovir for suspected neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection has been debated for years. To identify the gap in the decision to initiate empiric acyclovir, we performed a retrospective chart review and administered a survey to pediatricians to assess current practices regarding evaluation for possible HSV infection. Seventy infants received empiric acyclovir over a 1-year period; of these, 3 infants (4.3%) had positive HSV testing. Fourteen infants were identified as "high-risk" for HSV infection; of these, 13 infants had incomplete testing. Survey results revealed uncertainty in the decision to initiate acyclovir and in the composition of complete diagnostic testing. This study confirmed the clinical uncertainty in the decision to initiate empiric acyclovir. Using this chart review and survey as a baseline, future efforts will focus on a quality improvement project to reduce empiric acyclovir use in low-risk infants and to ensure complete diagnostic evaluation in high-risk infants.

Impact of a Rapid Herpes Simplex Virus PCR Assay on Duration of Acyclovir Therapy

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates in children. This study assessed the impact of a direct HSV (dHSV) PCR assay on the time to result reporting and the duration of acyclovir therapy for children with signs and symptoms of meningitis and encephalitis. A total of 363 patients with HSV PCR results from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were included in this retrospective analysis, divided into preimplementation and postimplementation groups. For the preimplementation group, CSF testing was performed using a laboratory-developed real-time PCR assay; for the postimplementation group, CSF samples were tested using a direct sample-to-answer assay. All CSF samples were negative for HSV. Over 60% of patients from both groups were prescribed acyclovir. The average HSV PCR test turnaround time for the postimplementation group was reduced by 14.5 h (23.6 h versus 9.1 h; P < 0.001). Furthermore, 79 patients (43.6%) in the postimplementation group had dHSV PCR results reported <4 h after specimen collection. The mean time from specimen collection to acyclovir discontinuation was 17.1 h shorter in the postimplementation group (31.1 h versus 14 h; P < 0.001). The median duration of acyclovir therapy was also significantly reduced in the postimplementation group (29.2 h versus 14.3 h; P = 0.01). Our investigation suggests that implementation of rapid HSV PCR testing can decrease turnaround times and the duration of unnecessary acyclovir therapy.

Virological testing of cerebrospinal fluid in children aged less than 14 years with a suspected central nervous system infection: A retrospective study on 304 consecutive children from January 2012 to May 2015

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to describe the prevalence of HSV DNA, VZV DNA, Enterovirus RNA, Parechovirus RNA, CMV DNA, EBV DNA, adenovirus DNA, HHV-6 DNA, HHV-7 DNA, HHV-8 DNA and Parvovirus B19DNA in children aged less 14 years with a suspected viral infection of the central nervous system in a clinical practice setting.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and May 2015, cerebrospinal fluids from 304 children were tested with an in-house real-time PCR method.

RESULTS

A positive PCR was detected in 64 subjects (21%): the mean number of tests performed in patients who showed a viral infection was 7.5, significantly higher (p = 0.001) with respect to that reported in negative samples (6.4). Enterovirus is the leading virus detected: 12 out of the 37 positive children reported were newborns (85.7% of all the newborns with a positive result). The second most frequently identified virus was HHV-7 (5 positive PCR out of 105 samples tested, 4.8%, if we excluded a child with a concomitant S. pneumoniae isolated), a prevalence significantly higher with respect to VZV (p = 0.02) and to CMV (p = 0.04). HHV-6 was the third most commonly identified aetiology (4.2%). All children were immunocompetent.

SIGNIFICANCE

Only a minority of children had a specific viral aetiology identified: the rate of HHV-7 positivity suggests a routine testing of these viruses within the diagnostic algorithm in immunocompetent paediatric patients. This approach could help to define the clinical role of this herpesvirus.

Potential clinical impact of the film array meningitis encephalitis panel in children with suspected central nervous system infections

The FilmArray Meningitis Encephalitis Panel, a multiplex PCR for testing of cerebrospinal fluid, was compared to conventional diagnostic methods in children with suspected central nervous system infections. The panel had comparable diagnostic yield (96% agreement) and improved time-to-diagnosis by 10.3 hours with potential for more judicious antimicrobial use, particularly acyclovir.

Initial Presentation of Neonatal Herpes Simplex Virus Infection

OBJECTIVE

To inform the decision to test and empirically treat for herpes simplex virus (HSV) by describing the initial clinical presentation and laboratory findings of infants with a confirmed diagnosis of neonatal HSV.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective case series performed at 2 pediatric tertiary care centers. Infants who developed symptoms prior to 42 days of age with laboratory confirmed HSV from 2002 through 2012 were included. We excluded infants <34 weeks gestation, those who developed illness before discharge from their birth hospital, and those who developed symptoms after 42 days of age.

RESULTS

We identified 49 infants with HSV meeting these criteria. Most infants (43/49, 88%) came to medical attention at ≤28 days. Of 49 infants, 22 (45%) had disseminated, 16 (33%) central nervous system, and 10 (20%) skin, eye, mouth HSV disease. Eight infants (16%) had nonspecific presentations without the classic signs of seizure, vesicular rash, or critical illness (intensive care admission). All infants with nonspecific presentation were ≤14 days, had cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of infants with HSV (84%) presented with seizure, vesicular rash, or critical illness. A subset of patients (16%) lacked classic signs at hospitalization; most manifested signs suggestive of HSV within 24 hours. Further studies are needed to validate the risk factors identified in this study including age <14 days and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis at presentation.