Optimizing Resources in Children's Surgical Care: An Update on the American College of Surgeons' Verification Program

Rural General Surgeons' Perspectives Regarding the Provision of Surgical Care to Children

OBJECTIVE

The volume of surgical care provided to children by general surgeons has decreased over time, which disproportionally impacts rural children. This study aimed to understand factors that influence rural general surgeons' decisions regarding provision of surgical care to children.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey of 55 items conducted between February 2023 and March 2024 SETTING: Survey distributed at meetings, ACS communities, social media.

PARTICIPANTS

162 nonpediatric surgery trained general surgeons practicing in rural communities across North America.

RESULTS

Among respondents, median age was 58 years, and 75.9% identified as male and 87.7% as White/Caucasian. While a majority of respondents operated on children, most performed < 20 surgeries per year. Factors reported by surgeons to be most influential regarding their decision to operate on children were personal experience/expertise/training. Availability of a pediatric inpatient unit and proximity to a children's hospital/pediatric surgeons were the next most influential factors. The amount of pediatric surgery exposure during training, feeling this training was adequate, and a greater number of years in practice since completion of training all significantly correlated with comfort in operating on younger patients. The amount of pediatric surgery exposure during training also correlated with the number of surgeries performed per year in children. > 90% of respondents reported that they would have completed additional training in pediatric surgery if it had been available during or after completion of residency. About 3 to 6 months was reported by most respondents as the optimal duration of additional pediatric surgery exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

New training paradigms that increase exposure to pediatric surgery during residency may facilitate rural surgeons' provision of routine surgical care to children and minimize the travel burden currently experienced by rural children who require surgical care.

Impact of Locum Tenens Providers on Delivery of Pediatric Surgical Care

INTRODUCTION

We sought to understand the impact of locum tenens surgeons on pediatric surgical care delivery.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of Children's Hospital Association pediatric surgical practices. Anonymous electronic surveys were used to investigate locum tenens utilization, primary reason for use, limitations on clinical activities, and variations in practice standards or quality. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were performed to evaluate for associations between practice characteristics and locum tenens use.

RESULTS

Of 172 practices, 71% (n = 122) completed the survey. Median hospital size was 203 beds (interquartile range = 130-350). Median number of surgeons per practice was 5 (interquartile range = 3-8). Thirty-seven practices (30%) employed locum tenens at primary (n = 27) or satellite (n = 12) sites. Locum tenens utilization was higher in suburban (odds ratio [OR] = 3.78, P = 0.006) and rural (OR = 4.96, P = 0.041) locations and lower at sites with a level 4 neonatal intensive care unit (OR = 0.35, P = 0.035). Most (51%) used locum tenens ≥ 1 time monthly but < 1 time weekly and for ongoing or interim coverage (87%). In total, 14% of practices reported clinical restrictions for locum tenens surgeons, including limitations on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, neonatal index cases, and operative trauma. Most (76%) practices using locum tenens reported variations in practice standards or quality; all were perceived as negative (57%) or neutral (43%).

CONCLUSIONS

Locum tenens providers are utilized most commonly in suburban and rural sites and hospitals without the highest level of neonatal intensive care. While locum tenens surgeons may help maintain access to pediatric surgical care where gaps exist, there may be a need to improve the quality and reliability of care rendered.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Infants in Texas by Facility Children's Surgery Verification Status

INTRODUCTION

The American College of Surgeons Children's Surgery Verification (CSV) status recognizes hospitals that deliver high-quality pediatric surgical care. Texas has 5 CSV centers in three cities, which may limit equitable access to care. We explored the characteristics and outcomes of infants admitted in Texas as a function of facility CSV status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a state-wide hospital discharge database (2013-2021). All patients <1 y of age were included. Patients transferred to an outside hospital were excluded to avoid double counting. Descriptive statistics and chi-square analysis were performed.

RESULTS

We analyzed 3,617,173 admissions, with 211,278 (6%) treated at CSV centers. CSV admissions were less likely to be inborn (46% versus 93%) and more likely to be transfers (16% versus 1%). CSV centers also had sicker patients (32% versus 13% extreme illness severity) with higher mortality rates (1% versus 0%), longer length of stay (9 ± 22 versus 4 ± 9), and higher operative rates (33% versus 20%). However, mortality was lower at CSV centers when matched for illness severity. Proportionately more patients from rural counties (9% versus 4%) and counties along the United States-Mexico border (13% versus 1%), as well as patients of Hispanic ethnicity (39% versus 33%), were treated at non-CSV centers. Meanwhile, proportionately more African Americans (21% versus 11%) were treated at CSV centers.

CONCLUSIONS

CSV centers are associated with improved outcomes among patients with high illness severity. Population differences among patients treated at CSV centers compared to non-CSV centers may represent disparities in access to care and warrant further evaluation.

Does anesthesia duration or number of cases per patient predict safety events?

BACKGROUND

The need for dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia is increasing, with varying needs between patients. Mortality has been found to be a rare event in these patients; however other perioperative events can and do occur. Previous studies have established increased incidence of perioperative events with younger, sicker children, and longer anesthetics, however, no studies to date have evaluated if the incidence of perioperative events is more closely associated with one long anesthetic or multiple anesthetics per patient.

AIMS

To evaluate the association of perioperative events related to single anesthetic duration or number of anesthetics per patient for dental rehabilitation.

METHODS

After Children's Wisconsin Human Research Protection Program determined this quality activity did not meet the definition of human subjects research, we performed an epidemiologic observational evaluation by extracting all dental related cases (dental alone or with oral surgeon vs. dental with other specialties) with an associated general anesthesia encounter from Children's Wisconsin electronic data warehouse from June 1, 2015 to December 31, 2021. These cases occurred at a free-standing children's hospital or associated pediatric-only ambulatory surgery center. The risk of perioperative safety events was analyzed for previously identified risk groups such as American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS), patient age, anesthesia case time with the addition of number of dental cases per patient.

RESULTS

In this study, 8468 procedures were performed on 8082 patients. Of this cohort, 7765 patients underwent one procedure for dental care while 317 patients underwent a total of 703 dental-related procedures, ranging from two to five procedures per patient. Multivariable logistic regression identified increased risk of perioperative events in patients with ASA-PS 3 (n = 1459, rate 1.78%, p value .001, OR 5.7, CI 2.1-15.5) and ASA-PS 4 (n = 86, rate 5.8%, p < .001, OR 17.2, CI 4.4-67.3), anesthesia duration (p < .001, OR 1.46, CI 1.21-1.76), but no increased risk with number of anesthetics per patient (p value .54, OR 0.81, CI 0.4-1.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Limiting dental care under general anesthesia to multiple short cases may decrease the risk of perioperative events when compared to completing all treatment in one long operative session.

Pediatric Anesthesia in the Community

Pediatric anesthesia is a diverse subspecialty practiced at thousands of hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers across the country. Most unusual and high-risk cases are performed in dedicated children's hospitals. However, the majority of cases and practitioners are based in the community. We present a review of demographics in pediatric anesthesia in the United States across 7 years of data from US Anesthesia Partners, a national anesthesia practice, which covers the full range of hospitals and outpatient facilities.

Changing Landscape of Routine Pediatric Surgery for Rural and Urban Children: A Report From the Child Health Evaluation of Surgical Services (CHESS) Group

OBJECTIVE

To describe the changes to routine pediatric surgical care over the past 2 decades for children living in urban and rural environments.

BACKGROUND

A knowledge gaps exists regarding trends in the location where routine pediatric surgical care is provided to children from urban and rural environments over time.

METHODS

Children (age 0-18) undergoing 7 common surgeries were identified using State Inpatient Databases (SID, 2002-2017). Rural-Urban Commuting Area codes were used to classify patient and hospital zip codes. Multivariable regression models for distance traveled >60 miles and transfer status were used to compare rural and urban populations, adjusting for year, age, sex, race, and insurance status.

RESULTS

Among 143,467 children, 13% lived in rural zip codes. The distance traveled for care increased for both rural and urban children for all procedures but significantly more for the rural cohort (eg, 102% vs 30%, P <0.001, cholecystectomy). Transfers also increased for rural children (eg, transfers for appendectomy increased from 1% in 2002 to 23% in 2017, P <0.001). Factors associated with the need to travel >60 miles included year [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=2.18, 95% CI: 1.94-2.46: 2017 vs 2002], rural residence (aOR=6.55, 95% CI: 6.11-7.01), age less than 5 years (aOR=2.17, 95% CI: 1.92-2.46), and Medicaid insurance (aOR=1.35, 95% CI: 1.26-1.45). Factors associated with transfer included year (aOR=5.77, 95% CI: 5.26-6.33: 2017 vs 2002), rural residence (aOR=1.47, 95% CI: 1.39-1.56), age less than 10 years (aOR=2.34, 95% CI: 2.15-2.54), and Medicaid insurance (aOR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.42-1.46).

CONCLUSION

Rural children, younger age, and those on Medicaid disproportionately traveled greater distances and were more frequently transferred for common pediatric surgical procedures.

Association of Rural Residence With Surgical Outcomes Among Infants at US Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVES

Disparities in pediatric health outcomes are widespread. It is unclear whether rurality negatively impacts outcomes of infants with surgical congenital diseases. This study compared outcomes of rural versus urban infants requiring complex surgical care at children's hospitals in the United States.

METHODS

Rural and urban infants (aged <1 year) receiving surgical care at children's hospitals from 2016 to 2019 for esophageal atresia, gastroschisis, Hirschsprung's disease, anorectal malformation, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia were compared over a 1-year postoperative period using the Pediatric Health Information System. Generalized linear mixed effects models compared outcomes of rural and urban infants.

RESULTS

Among 5732 infants, 20.2% lived in rural areas. Rural infants were more frequently white, lived farther from the hospital, and lived in areas with lower median household income compared with urban infants (all P < .001). Rural infants with anorectal malformation and gastroschisis had lower adjusted hospital days over 1 year; rural infants with esophageal atresia had higher adjusted odds of 30-day hospital readmission. Adjusted mortality, hospital days, and readmissions were otherwise similar between the 2 groups. Outcomes remained similar when comparing urban infants to rural infant subgroups with the longest hospital travel distance (≥60 miles) and lowest median household income (<$35 000).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite longer travel distances and lower financial resources, rural infants with congenital anomalies have similar postoperative outcomes to urban infants when treated at children's hospitals. Future work is needed to examine outcomes for infants treated outside children's hospitals and to determine whether efforts are necessary to increase access to children's hospitals.

The past, present and future of ACS NSQIP-Pediatric: Evolution from a quality registry to a comparative quality performance platform

Quality and process improvement (QI/PI) in children's surgical care require reliable data across the care continuum. Since 2012, the American College of Surgeons' (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-Pediatric) has supported QI/PI by providing participating hospitals with risk-adjusted, comparative data regarding postoperative outcomes for multiple surgical specialties. To advance this goal over the past decade, iterative changes have been introduced to case inclusion and data collection, analysis and reporting. New datasets for specific procedures, such as appendectomy, spinal fusion for scoliosis, vesicoureteral reflux procedures, and tracheostomy in children less than 2 years old, have incorporated additional risk factors and outcomes to enhance the clinical relevance of data, and resource utilization to consider healthcare value. Recently, process measures for urgent surgical diagnoses and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis variables have been developed to promote timely and appropriate care. While a mature program, NSQIP-Pediatric remains dynamic and responsive to meet the needs of the surgical community. Future directions include introduction of variables and analyses to address patient-centered care and healthcare equity.

To Err is human, but what happens when surgeons Err?

BACKGROUND

Physicians involved in adverse events may suffer from second victim syndrome and can experience emotional and physical distress long after the complication occurred. We sought determine the prevalence of second victim syndrome among surgeons at our children's hospital and evaluate any differences in how surgeons respond to adverse events based on their age, position, and gender.

METHODS

An anonymous 19-question questionnaire distributed via institutional emails linking to an anonymous Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) survey. Eligible participants included all surgeons and rotating surgical trainees at our hospital.

RESULTS

Of 64 faculty surgeons eligible to participate, 63 surveys were returned for a 98% completion rate. Ten additional surveys from surgical trainees were completed for a total of 73 participants. Eighty-four percent reported having had difficulty dealing with a poor outcome or unhappy patient/family. Speaking with a colleague was the most common coping strategy, reported by 82%. Fifty-six percent indicated they believed reporting a poor outcome would have negative ramifications for them. Younger surgeons were more likely to suppress their feelings following an adverse event, and trainees were less likely to advise their peers to speak to a superior about the event (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is a high prevalence of second victim syndrome among surgeons at our children's hospital. There exist differences in ways that surgeons respond to adverse events based on age and position. Healthcare institutions should establish formal mechanisms of support to shift the culture towards one where help is actively sought and offered.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Centers of Excellence: If We Build It, Will They Come?

Pediatric surgeons have been pursuing high quality, affordable care or value-based care for over 50 years. One approach to streamlining the clinical care for a complex problem was the development of a center of excellence (COE). The concept of COE focuses on a shared vision of providing high quality care through a multidisciplinary approach. The goal is to improve diagnostic accuracy as well as therapeutic outcomes using focused expertise within a group. COEs are often resource intensive before becoming fiscally viable and therefore require initial support from hospital leadership. This review discusses the key steps to consider before building a COE, strategies to help build one, and how to keep one successful as defined by quality, accessibility, equity, training, and maintaining teams within the group.

Guidance for Structuring a Pediatric Intermediate Care Unit

The purpose of this policy statement is to update the 2004 American Academy of Pediatrics clinical report and provide enhanced guidance for institutions, administrators, and providers in the development and operation of a pediatric intermediate care unit (IMCU). Since 2004, there have been significant advances in pediatric medical, surgical, and critical care that have resulted in an evolution in the acuity and complexity of children potentially requiring IMCU admission. A group of 9 clinical experts in pediatric critical care, hospital medicine, intermediate care, and surgery developed a consensus on priority topics requiring updates, reviewed the relevant evidence, and, through a series of virtual meetings, developed the document. The intended audience of this policy statement is broad and includes pediatric critical care professionals, pediatric hospitalists, pediatric surgeons, other pediatric medical and surgical subspecialists, general pediatricians, nurses, social workers, care coordinators, hospital administrators, health care funders, and policymakers, primarily in resource-rich settings. Key priority topics were delineation of core principles for an IMCU, clarification of target populations, staffing recommendations, and payment.

Association of Operative Volume and Odds of Surgical Complication for Patients Undergoing Repair of Pectus Excavatum at Children's Hospitals

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether procedure-specific provider volume is associated with outcomes for patients undergoing repair of pectus excavatum at tertiary care children's hospitals.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a cohort study of patients undergoing repair of pectus excavatum between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019, at children's hospitals using the Pediatric Health Information System database. The main exposures were the pectus excavatum repair volume quartile of the patient's hospital and the pectus excavatum repair volume category of their surgeon. Our primary outcome was surgical complication, identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes from Pediatric Health Information System. Secondary outcomes included high-cost admission and extended length of stay.

RESULTS

In total, 7183 patients with an average age of 15.2 years (SD 2.0), 83% male, 74% non-Hispanic White, 68% no comorbidities, 72% private insurance, and 82% from metro areas were analyzed. Compared with the lowest-volume (≤10 cases/year) quartile of hospitals, patients undergoing repair of pectus excavatum at hospitals in the second (>10-18 cases/year), third (>18-26 cases/year), and fourth (>26 cases/year) volume quartiles had decreased odds of complication of OR 0.52 (CI 0.34-0.82), 0.51 (CI 0.33-0.78), and 0.41 (CI 0.27-0.62), respectively. Patients with pectus excavatum who underwent repair by surgeons in the second (>1-5 cases/year), third (>5-10 cases/year), and fourth (>10 cases/year) volume categories had decreased odds of complication of OR 0.91 (CI 0.68-1.20), OR 0.73 (CI 0.51-1.04), and OR 0.55 (CI 0.39-0.76), respectively, compared with the lowest-volume (≤1 case/year) category of surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedure-specific case volume is an important factor when considering providers for elective surgery, even among specialized centers providing comprehensive patient care.

Laparoscopy in the Evaluation of Blunt Abdominal Injury in Level-I and II Pediatric Trauma Centers

Introduction

An American College of Surgeons (ACS) Level-I (L-I) pediatric trauma center demonstrated successful laparoscopy without conversion to laparotomy in ∼65% of trauma cases. Prior reports have demonstrated differences in outcomes based on ACS level of trauma center. We sought to compare laparoscopy use for blunt abdominal trauma at L-I compared to Level-II (L-II) centers.

Methods

The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program was queried (2014-2016) for patients ≤16 years old who underwent any abdominal surgery. Bivariate analyses comparing patients undergoing abdominal surgery at ACS L-I and L-II centers were performed.

Results

970 patients underwent abdominal surgery with 14% using laparoscopy. Level-I centers had an increased rate of laparoscopy (15.6% vs 9.7%, P = .019 ); however they had a lower mean Injury Severity Score (16.2 vs 18.5, P = .002) compared to L-II centers. Level-I and L-II centers had similar length of stay ventilator days, and SSIs (all P > .05).

Conclusion

While use of laparoscopy for pediatric trauma remains low, there was increased use at L-I compared to L-II centers with no difference in LOS or SSIs. Future studies are needed to elucidate which pediatric trauma patients benefit from laparoscopic surgery.

Health Care Policy and Congenital Heart Disease: 2020 Focus on Our 2030 Future

The congenital heart care community faces a myriad of public health issues that act as barriers toward optimum patient outcomes. In this article, we attempt to define advocacy and policy initiatives meant to spotlight and potentially address these challenges. Issues are organized into the following 3 key facets of our community: patient population, health care delivery, and workforce. We discuss the social determinants of health and health care disparities that affect patients in the community that require the attention of policy makers. Furthermore, we highlight the many needs of the growing adults with congenital heart disease and those with comorbidities, highlighting concerns regarding the inequities in access to cardiac care and the need for multidisciplinary care. We also recognize the problems of transparency in outcomes reporting and the promising application of telehealth. Finally, we highlight the training of providers, measures of productivity, diversity in the workforce, and the importance of patient-family centered organizations in advocating for patients. Although all of these issues remain relevant to many subspecialties in medicine, this article attempts to illustrate the unique needs of this population and highlight ways in which to work together to address important opportunities for change in the cardiac care community and beyond. This article provides a framework for policy and advocacy efforts for the next decade.

Pediatric patients with dog bites presenting to US children's hospitals

BACKGROUND

To characterize pediatric dog bite injuries presenting to US children's hospitals and identify factors associated with clinically significant injuries.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter observational study from 26 pediatric hospitals between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2020, including patients ≤ 18 years with dog bites, consolidating together encounters from patients with multiple encounters within 30 days as a single episode of care. We characterized diagnoses and procedures performed in these patients. We used generalized linear mixed models to identify factors associated with a composite outcome that we term clinically significant injuries (defined as admission, operating room charge, sedation, fractures/dislocations, intracranial/eye injury, skin/soft tissue infection, or in-hospital mortality).

RESULTS

68,833 episodes were included (median age 6.6 years [interquartile range 3.5-10.4 years], 55.5% male) from 67,781 patients. We identified 16,502 patients (24.0%) with clinically significant injuries, including 6653 (9.7%) admitted, 5080 (7.4%) managed in the operating room, 11,685 (17.0%) requiring sedation, 493 (0.7%) with a skull fracture, 32 (0.0%) with a fracture in the neck or trunk, 389 (0.6%) with a fracture of the upper limb, 51 (0.1%) with a fracture in the lower limb, 15 (0.0%) with dislocations, 66 (0.1%) with an intracranial injury and 164 (0.2%) with an injury to the eyeball, 3708 (5.4%) with skin/soft tissue infections, and 5 (0.0%) with in-hospital mortality. In multivariable analysis, younger age (0-4 years, 5-9 years, and 10-14 years relative to 15-18 years), weekday injuries, and an income in the second and third quartiles (relative to the lowest quartile) had higher odds of clinically significant injuries. Black patients (relative to White), Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, and private insurance status (relative to public insurance) had lower odds of clinically important injuries. When evaluating individual components within the composite outcome, most followed broader trends.

CONCLUSION

Dog bites are an important mechanism of injury encountered in children's hospitals. Using a composite outcome measure, we identified younger, White, non-Hispanic children at higher risk of clinically significant injuries. Findings with respect to race and ethnicity and dog bite injuries warrant further investigation. Results can be used to identify populations for targeted prevention efforts to reduce severe dog bite injuries.

Development of a Standardized Program for the Collaboration of Adult and Children's Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Children's hospitals within larger hospitals (CH/LH) have the specific clinical advantage of easily facilitated collaboration between adult and children's surgeons. These collaborations, which we have termed hybrid surgical offerings (HSOs) are often required for disease processes requiring interventions that fall outside the customary practice of children's surgeons. Formal models to describe or evaluate these practices are lacking.

METHODS

HSOs within a CH/LH were identified. Principles of systems-engineering were used to develop a standardized model (Children's Hybrid Enhanced Surgical Services [CHESS]) to describe and evaluate HSOs. Face validity was established via unstructured interviews of CH leaders and HSO surgeons. Areas for improved system-wide standardization and programmatic development were identified.

RESULTS

HSOs were identified in collaboration with adult bariatric, minimally invasive, advanced endoscopic, endocrine, thoracic, and orthopedic trauma surgical services. The CHESS framework encompassed: 1) quality improvement metrics, 2) credentialing and oversight, 3) transitions of care, 4) pediatric family-centered care, 5) maintenance of the cycle of expertise, 6) continuing medical education, 7) scholarship. While HSOs fulfilled the majority of aforementioned programmatic domains across all six HSO-providing services, areas for improvement included maintaining a cycle of expertise (33%), quality improvement metrics (50%), and pediatric family-centered care (66%).  Additional noted advantages included faster translation of adult innovation to pediatric care and facilitation of emergency interdisciplinary care.

CONCLUSION

Formal evaluation of HSOs is necessary to standardize and improve the quality of children's surgical care. Development of a structured framework such as CHESS addresses gaps in quality oversight and provides a basis for performance improvement, patient safety, and programmatic development.

Pediatric Anesthesia Specialty Societies and Multi-Institutional Collaborations

Pediatric anesthesiology is a subspecialty of anesthesiology that deals with the high-risk pediatric population. The specialty has made significant advancement in large collaborative efforts to study and increase patient safety, including the creation of international societies, a dedicated journal, special committees and interest groups, and multi-institution databases for research and quality improvement. Readily available resources were created to help with the education of future pediatric anesthesiologists as well as continuing medical education. Conclusions: Specialty societies and collaborations in pediatric anesthesia are crucial for continuous improvement in the care of children. They promote research, education, quality improvement, and advocacy at the local, national, and international level.