[Automated measurement of biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction]

Recent perspectives on the early expression immunohistochemical markers in post-mortem recognition of myocardial infarction

Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) refers to the death of heart tissue in the absence ofperfusion. It is one of the top causes of death globally, particularly in middle andhigher-age groups. However, for the pathologist, the post-mortem macroscopic andmicroscopic diagnosis of early AMI remains challenging. In the early acute stage ofAMI, no microscopic visible signs of tissue alterations like necrosis and neutrophilinfiltration can be seen. In such a scenario, immunohistochemistry (IHC) accounts forthe most suitable and safest alternative to study early diagnostic cases by selectivelydetecting changes in the cell population. This systematic review focuses on themultiple causes/changes that lead to the privation of blood flow as well as tissuechanges induced by the absence of perfusion.We performed a systematic review of the last 10-15 years' publications that focused ondetecting immunohistochemical changes that appear in the cell population in case ofacute myocardial infarction. We found around 160 articles on AMI, which we narroweddown to 50 with the use of specific filters such as: "Acute Myocardial Infarction," "Ischemia," "Hypoxia," "Forensic," "Immunohistochemistry, and "Autopsy." The presentreview comprehensively highlights the current knowledge of specific IHC markers usedas gold standards during post-mortem investigation of acute myocardial infarction. Thepresent review comprehensively highlights the current knowledge of specific IHCmarkers used as gold standards during post-mortem investigation of acute myocardialinfarction, and some new potential immunohistochemical markers that can be used inthe early detection of myocardial infarction.

High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is important, but only 20% of emergency admissions for chest pain will actually have an acute myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays may allow rapid rule out of myocardial infarction and avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for the management of adults presenting with acute chest pain, in particular for the early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Sixteen databases were searched up to September 2019. Review methods followed published guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using appropriate risk-of-bias tools. The bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity for meta-analyses involving four or more studies; otherwise, random-effects logistic regression was used. The health economic analysis considered the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years associated with different troponin testing methods. The de novo model consisted of a decision tree and a state-transition cohort model. A lifetime time horizon (of 60 years) was used.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies (123 publications) were included in the review. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test strategies evaluated are defined by the combination of four factors (i.e. assay, number and timing of tests, and threshold concentration), resulting in a large number of possible combinations. Clinical opinion indicated a minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity of 97%. When considering single test strategies, only those using a threshold at or near to the limit of detection for the assay, in a sample taken at presentation, met the minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity criterion. The majority of the multiple test strategies that met this criterion comprised an initial rule-out step, based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels in a sample taken on presentation and a minimum symptom duration, and a second stage for patients not meeting the initial rule-out criteria, based on presentation levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and absolute change after 1, 2 or 3 hours. Two large cluster randomised controlled trials found that implementation of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction reduced length of stay and rate of hospital admission without increasing cardiac events. In the base-case analysis, standard troponin testing was both the most effective and the most costly. Other testing strategies with a sensitivity of 100% (subject to uncertainty) were almost equally effective, resulting in the same life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gain at up to four decimal places. Comparisons based on the next best alternative showed that for willingness-to-pay values below £8455 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Access High Sensitivity Troponin I (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) [(symptoms > 3 hours AND < 4 ng/l at 0 hours) OR (< 5 ng/l AND Δ < 5 ng/l at 0 to 2 hours)] would be cost-effective. For thresholds between £8455 and £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Elecsys® Troponin-T high sensitive (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) (< 12 ng/l at 0 hours AND Δ < 3 ng/l at 0 to 1 hours) would be cost-effective. For a threshold > £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Dimension Vista® High-Sensitivity Troponin I (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) (< 5 ng/l at 0 hours AND Δ < 2 ng/l at 0 to 1 hours) would be cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing may be cost-effective compared with standard troponin testing.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019154716.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.