1
|
Heidari O, Meyer D, Lowensen K, Patil A, O'Conor KJ, LaRicci J, Hunt D, Bocek AP, Cargill V, Farley JE. Colocating Syringe Services, COVID-19 Vaccination, And Infectious Disease Testing: Baltimore's Experience. Health Aff (Millwood) 2024; 43:883-891. [PMID: 38830163 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
People who inject drugs face many challenges that contribute to poor health outcomes, including drug overdose, HIV, and hepatitis C infections. These conditions require high-quality prevention and treatment services. Syringe services programs are evidence-based harm reduction programs, and they have established track records with people who inject drugs, earning them deep trust within this population. In Baltimore, Maryland, although many syringe support services were limited during the COVID-19 pandemic, the health department's syringe services programs remained operational, allowing for the continuation of harm reduction services, including naloxone distribution. This evaluation describes a collaborative effort to colocate infectious disease testing and COVID-19 vaccination with a syringe services program. Our evaluation demonstrated that colocation of important services with trusted community partners can facilitate engagement and is essential for service uptake. Maintaining adequate and consistent funding for these services is central to program success. Colocation of other services within syringe services programs, such as medications for opioid use disorder, wound care, and infectious disease treatment, would further expand health care access for people who inject drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omeid Heidari
- Omeid Heidari , University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Diane Meyer
- Diane Meyer, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | - Derrick Hunt
- Derrick Hunt, Baltimore City Health Department, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng L, Harris L, Shaw L, Lymon H, Reses H, Bell J, Lu PJ, Gibbs-Scharf L, Chorba T. Social and demographic factors associated with receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine initial booster dose and with interval between primary series completion and initial booster dose uptake among persons aged ≥ 12 years, United States, August 2021-October 2022. Vaccine 2024; 42:2122-2126. [PMID: 38453621 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
COVID-19 booster dose vaccination has been crucial in ensuring protection against COVID-19 including recently predominant Omicron variants. Because vaccines against newer SARS-CoV- 2 variants are likely to be recommended in future, it will be valuable to understand past booster dose uptake among different demographic groups. Using U.S. vaccination data, this study examined intervals between primary series completion and receipt of first booster dose (monovalent or bivalent) during August 2021 - October 2022 among persons ≥12 years of age who had completed a COVID-19 vaccine primary series by October 2021. Sub-populations who were late booster recipients (received a booster dose ≥12 months after the primary series) or received no booster dose included persons <35 years old, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccine primary dose recipients, persons in certain racial and ethnic groups, and persons living in rural and more socially vulnerable areas, and in the South region of the United States; these groups may benefit the most from public health outreach efforts to achieve timely COVID-19 vaccination completion in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Meng
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, USA; Division of Health Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
| | - LaTreace Harris
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, USA; Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Lauren Shaw
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, USA; Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Hoody Lymon
- Division of Health Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Hannah Reses
- Division of Health Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Jeneita Bell
- Division of Health Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Peng-Jun Lu
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Lynn Gibbs-Scharf
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, USA; Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA
| | - Terence Chorba
- CDC COVID-19 Response Team, USA; Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koskan A, Larkey L, Todd M, Kim SW. Protocol for a community-based digital storytelling pilot intervention to reduce Hispanic parents' vaccine hesitancy to immunize their children against COVID-19. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299787. [PMID: 38502659 PMCID: PMC10950256 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 vaccines, currently available to children over six months old, are a powerful method of reducing the risk of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and death. However, vaccination rates among Hispanic children remain suboptimal, primarily due to parental vaccine hesitancy. Health communication researchers have suggested using culturally aligned storytelling to reduce vaccine hesitancy; however, few studies have evaluated this approach for Hispanic parents of unvaccinated children. Working with community health workers, we will engage Hispanic parents who were previously hesitant to vaccinate their child(ren) against COVID-19 but currently support vaccination. We will ask them to share their stories of conversion in COVID-19 vaccine perspectives to help other parents overcome their mistrust of COVID-19 vaccines. We will then assess the feasibility and acceptability of a web-based pilot digital storytelling intervention based on these conversion stories vs. an information-only control among 80 parents and/or legal guardians of children who are not up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccines. We will also examine pre- to post-intervention changes in vaccine perceptions, hesitancy, intentions, and uptake of children's COVID-19 vaccination at two months post-intervention. If our pilot study demonstrates feasibility and acceptability while reducing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and increasing vaccine uptake, we will conduct a full-scale randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of the DST intervention to reduce vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Koskan
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Linda Larkey
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Michael Todd
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Sunny Wonsun Kim
- Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Achterbergh RCA, McGovern I, Haag M. Co-Administration of Influenza and COVID-19 Vaccines: Policy Review and Vaccination Coverage Trends in the European Union, UK, US, and Canada between 2019 and 2023. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:216. [PMID: 38400199 PMCID: PMC10891656 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12020216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Recommending co-administration of influenza and COVID-19 vaccines has emerged as a strategy to enhance vaccination coverage. This study describes the policy on co-administration and uptake of influenza and COVID-19 vaccination in Europe, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada between 2019 and 2023. We collected co-administration policy data from governmental websites, national health organizations, and newspapers. Influenza vaccination coverage among persons ≥65 years and COVID-19 vaccination coverage rates among persons ≥60 years or the general population were collected using national databases, the ECDC database, or ourworldindata.org between 2019 and 2023. Descriptive analyses were used. We collected data from 30/32 (94%) countries on vaccination policy in seasons 2021-2022 and 2022-2023, with most countries (25/30 to 30/30) having policies recommending co-administration. For influenza vaccination coverage, we collected data from 29/32 (91%, 2019-2020), 28/32 (88%, 2020-2021), 27/32 (84%, 2021-2022), and 6/32 (19%, 2022-2023) countries. COVID-19 vaccination was collected from 32/32 (2020-2021), 31/32 (97%, 2021-2022), and 24/32 (75%, 2022-2023) countries. Influenza vaccination coverage increased from 2019-2020 to 2021-2022. COVID-19 vaccination coverage was higher among countries with higher influenza vaccination coverage. By 2022-2023, all countries included implemented a policy supporting co-administration. A positive correlation existed between higher influenza vaccination coverage and higher COVID-19 vaccination rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ian McGovern
- Center for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, CSL Seqirus, Waltham, MA 02451, USA;
| | - Mendel Haag
- Center for Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, CSL Seqirus, 1105 BJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Meng L, Bell J, Soe M, Edwards J, Lymon H, Barbre K, Reses H, Patel A, Wong E, Dudeck M, Huynh CV, Rowe T, Dubendris H, Benin A. Comparison of factors associated with seasonal influenza and COVID-19 booster vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel working at acute care hospitals during 2021-2022 influenza season, National Healthcare Safety Network, United States. Prev Med 2024; 179:107852. [PMID: 38211802 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.107852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
The simultaneous circulation of seasonal influenza virus and SARS-CoV-2 variants will likely pose unique challenges to public health during the future influenza seasons. Persons who are undergoing treatment in healthcare facilities may be particularly at risk. It is important for healthcare personnel to protect themselves and patients by receiving vaccines. The purpose of this study is to assess coverage of the seasonal influenza vaccine and COVID-19 monovalent booster among healthcare personnel working at acute care hospitals in the United States during the 2021-22 influenza season and to examine the demographic and facility characteristics associated with coverage. A total of 3260 acute care hospitals with over 7 million healthcare personnel reported vaccination data to National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) during the 2021-22 influenza season. Two separate negative binomial mixed models were developed to explore the factors associated with seasonal influenza coverage and COVID-19 monovalent booster coverage. At the end of the 2021-2022 influenza season, the overall pooled mean seasonal influenza coverage was 80.3%, and the pooled mean COVID-19 booster coverage was 39.5%. Several demographic and facility-level factors, such as employee type, facility ownership, and geographic region, were significantly associated with vaccination against influenza and COVID-19 among healthcare personnel working in acute care hospitals. Our findings highlight the need to increase the uptake of vaccination among healthcare personnel, particularly non-employees, those working in for-profit and non-medical school-affiliated facilities, and those residing in the South.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Meng
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America.
| | - Jeneita Bell
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Minn Soe
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Edwards
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Hoody Lymon
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Kira Barbre
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America; Goldbelt C6, Chesapeake, VA, United States of America
| | - Hannah Reses
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Avni Patel
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Emily Wong
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Margaret Dudeck
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Cam-Van Huynh
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Theresa Rowe
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| | - Heather Dubendris
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America; Lantana Consulting Group, East Thetford, Vermont, United States of America
| | - Andrea Benin
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Richard SA, Scher AI, Rusiecki J, Byrne C, Berjohn CM, Fries AC, Lalani T, Smith AG, Mody RM, Ganesan A, Huprikar N, Colombo RE, Colombo CJ, Schofield C, Lindholm DA, Mende K, Morris MJ, Jones MU, Flanagan R, Larson DT, Ewers EC, Bazan SE, Saunders D, Maves RC, Livezey J, Maldonado CJ, Edwards MS, Rozman JS, O’Connell RJ, Simons MP, Tribble DR, Agan BK, Burgess TH, Pollett SD. Decreased Self-reported Physical Fitness Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection and the Impact of Vaccine Boosters in a Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad579. [PMID: 38130596 PMCID: PMC10733205 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The long-term effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on physical fitness are unclear, and the impact of vaccination on that relationship is uncertain. Methods We compared survey responses in a 1-year study of US military service members with (n = 1923) and without (n = 1591) a history of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We fit Poisson regression models to estimate the association between history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and fitness impairment, adjusting for time since infection, demographics, and baseline health. Results The participants in this analysis were primarily young adults aged 18-39 years (75%), and 71.5% were male. Participants with a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to report difficulty exercising (38.7% vs 18.4%; P < .01), difficulty performing daily activities (30.4% vs 12.7%; P < .01), and decreased fitness test (FT) scores (42.7% vs 26.2%; P < .01) than those without a history of infection. SARS-CoV-2-infected participants were at higher risk of these outcomes after adjusting for other factors (unvaccinated: exercising: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 3.99; 95% CI, 3.36-4.73; activities: aRR, 5.02; 95% CI, 4.09-6.16; FT affected: aRR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.19-2.98). Among SARS-CoV-2-positive participants, full vaccination before infection was associated with a lower risk of post-COVID-19 fitness impairment (fully vaccinated: exercise: aRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.95; activities: aRR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.91; FT: aRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00; boosted: exercise: aRR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51-0.74; activities: aRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65; FT: aRR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.49-0.70). Conclusions In this study of generally young, healthy military service members, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with lower self-reported fitness and exercise capacity; vaccination and boosting were associated with lower risk of self-reported fitness loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A Richard
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ann I Scher
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer Rusiecki
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Celia Byrne
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Catherine M Berjohn
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Anthony C Fries
- US Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Wright-Patterson, Ohio, USA
| | - Tahaniyat Lalani
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
| | - Alfred G Smith
- Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
| | - Rupal M Mody
- William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, Texas, USA
| | - Anuradha Ganesan
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Nikhil Huprikar
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Rhonda E Colombo
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis McChord, Washington, USA
| | - Christopher J Colombo
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis McChord, Washington, USA
| | | | - David A Lindholm
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Katrin Mende
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Brooke Army Medical Center, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Milissa U Jones
- Department of Pediatrics, Translational Medicine Unit, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Flanagan
- Department of Pediatrics, Translational Medicine Unit, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Derek T Larson
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Alexander T. Augusta Military Medical Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, USA
| | - Evan C Ewers
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Alexander T. Augusta Military Medical Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, USA
| | | | - David Saunders
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan C Maves
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey Livezey
- Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Pharmacology and Medical Toxicology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Margaret Sanchez Edwards
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Julia S Rozman
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Robert J O’Connell
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Mark P Simons
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - David R Tribble
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Brian K Agan
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Timothy H Burgess
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Simon D Pollett
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ezeh N, Sirek G, Ulysse SN, Williams JN, Chandler MT, Ojikutu BO, York M, Crespo-Bosque M, Jean-Jacques M, Roberson T, Mancera-Cuevas K, Milaeger H, Losina E, Dhand A, Son MB, Ramsey-Goldman R, Feldman CH. Understanding Stakeholders' Perspectives to Increase COVID-19 Vaccine and Booster Uptake Among Black Individuals With Rheumatic Conditions. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2023; 75:2508-2518. [PMID: 37309724 PMCID: PMC10716359 DOI: 10.1002/acr.25172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine and booster uptake persist. This study aimed to obtain perspectives from community and physician stakeholders on COVID-19 vaccine and booster hesitancy and strategies to promote vaccine uptake among Black individuals with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions. METHODS We invited community leaders and physicians in greater Boston and Chicago to participate in semi-structured interviews using a moderator guide developed a priori. Participants were queried about how to best address vaccine hesitancy, strategies to target high-risk populations, and factors to identify future community leaders. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically using Dedoose. RESULTS A total of 8 physicians and 12 community leaders participated in this study between November 2021 and October 2022. Qualitative analyses revealed misinformation/mixed messaging and mistrust, with subthemes including conspiracy theories, concerns regarding vaccine development and function, racism and historical injustices, and general mistrust of health care systems as the top cited reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Participants also shared demographic-specific differences, such as race, ethnicity, age, and gender that influenced the identified themes, with emphasis on COVID-19 vaccine access and apathy. Strategies for community-based vaccine-related information dissemination included personal storytelling with an iterative and empathetic approach, while recognizing the importance of protecting community leader well-being. CONCLUSION To increase vaccine uptake among Black individuals with rheumatic conditions, strategies should acknowledge and respond to racial/ethnic and socioeconomic injustices that engender vaccine hesitancy. Messaging should be compassionate, individually tailored, and recognize heterogeneity in experiences and opinions. Results from these analyses will inform a planned community-based intervention in Boston and Chicago.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nnenna Ezeh
- Department of Dermatology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Greta Sirek
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sciaska N. Ulysse
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jessica N. Williams
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Mia T. Chandler
- The Rheumatology Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bisola O. Ojikutu
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Boston Public Health Commission, Boston, MA
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Michael York
- Department of Rheumatology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Tonya Roberson
- College of Health and Human Services, Governors State University, University Park, IL
| | | | - Holly Milaeger
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Northwestern Medicine/Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Elena Losina
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- The Orthopedic and Arthritis Center for Outcomes Research, Department of Orthopedics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Amar Dhand
- Division of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mary Beth Son
- The Rheumatology Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Northwestern Medicine/Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Candace H. Feldman
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nguyen KH, Levisohn A, McChesney C, Vasudevan L, Bednarczyk RA, Corlin L. Disparities in child and adolescent COVID-19 vaccination coverage and parental intent toward vaccinations for their children and adolescents. Ann Med 2023; 55:2232818. [PMID: 37449878 PMCID: PMC10351440 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2232818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite recommendations for COVID-19 primary series completion and booster doses for children and adolescents, coverage has been less than optimal, particularly in some subpopulations. This study explored disparities in childhood/adolescent COVID-19 vaccination, parental intent to vaccinate their children and adolescents, and reasons for non-vaccination in the US. METHODS Using the U.S. Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey (HPS), we analyzed households with children aged <18 years using data collected from September 14 to November 14, 2022 (n = 44,929). Child and adolescent COVID-19 vaccination coverage (≥1 dose, completed primary series, and booster vaccination) and parental intentions toward vaccination were assessed by sociodemographic characteristics. Factors associated with child and adolescent vaccination coverage were examined using multivariable regression models. Reasons for non-vaccination were assessed overall, by the child's age group and respondent's age group. RESULTS Overall, approximately half (50.1%) of children aged < 18 years were vaccinated against COVID-19 (≥1 dose). Completed primary series vaccination was 44.2% among all children aged <18 years. By age group, completed primary series was 13.2% among children <5 years, 43.9% among children 5-11 years, and 63.3% among adolescents 12-17 years. Booster vaccination among those who completed the primary series was 39.1% among children 5-11 years and 55.3% among adolescents 12-17 years. Vaccination coverage differed by race/ethnicity, educational attainment, household income, region, parental COVID-19 vaccination status, prior COVID-19 diagnosis, child's age group, and parental age group. Parental reluctance was highest for children aged <5 years (46.8%). Main reasons for non-vaccination among reluctant parents were concerns about side effects (53.3%), lack of trust in COVID-19 vaccines (48.7%), and the belief that children do not need a COVID-19 vaccine (38.8%). CONCLUSION Disparities in COVID-19 vaccination coverage among children and adolescents continue to exist. Further efforts are needed to increase COVID-19 primary series and booster vaccination and parental confidence in vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly H. Nguyen
- Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ariella Levisohn
- Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cheyenne McChesney
- Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lavanya Vasudevan
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Robert A. Bednarczyk
- Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Laura Corlin
- Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University School of Engineering, Medford, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alonge OD, Hanson KE, Eggebrecht M, Funk P, Christianson B, Williams CL, Belongia EA, McLean HQ. COVID-19 Booster Dose Reminder/Recall for Adolescents: Findings From a Health-Care System in Wisconsin. J Adolesc Health 2023; 73:953-956. [PMID: 37610391 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.06.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed efficacy of one-time COVID-19 booster reminder/recall for booster eligible adolescents in a health-care system in Wisconsin. METHODS COVID-19 booster eligible patients aged 12-17 years were randomized 1:1 to receive one reminder/recall message from the health-care system using the parent's preferred communication method (intervention) or no reminder/recall (usual care) in May 2022. RESULTS Reminder/recall was sent to 2,146/4,296 (50%) adolescent patients. During the 90-day evaluation period following randomization, booster dose receipt was 2.0 percentage points (CI: 0.3%-3.7%) higher in the intervention (10.0%) versus usual care groups (8.0%). Among patients with ≥1 preventive visit during the evaluation period, uptake was 7.5 percentage points higher in the intervention (16.4%) versus usual care groups (8.9%). DISCUSSION A single COVID-19 booster dose reminder/recall resulted in a small but statistically significant increase in booster dose receipt, though uptake overall was low. Additional strategies are needed to increase uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oluwakemi D Alonge
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology & Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin.
| | - Kayla E Hanson
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology & Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | - Meranda Eggebrecht
- Institute for Quality Innovation & Patient Safety, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | - Penny Funk
- Institute for Quality Innovation & Patient Safety, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | | | - Charnetta L Williams
- Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Edward A Belongia
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology & Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | - Huong Q McLean
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology & Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dauria EF, Clemenzi-Allen A, Nowotny K, Brinkley-Rubinstein L, Williams B, Wurcel A. Increasing availability of COVID-19 vaccine to older adults under community supervision. Int J Prison Health 2022; ahead-of-print:10.1108/IJPH-06-2022-0035. [PMID: 36367307 PMCID: PMC10114607 DOI: 10.1108/ijph-06-2022-0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Vaccinating adults who are involved with the carceral system, particularly those aged 55 or older, is crucial to containing the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA, particularly as variants continue to emerge and spread. In this Viewpoint, the authors discuss the reasons why improving access to COVID-19 vaccine and boosters among community supervised adults, especially the aging population, is critical to mitigating the public health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study concludes by providing recommendations to enhance vaccine and booster uptake in this population, as the pandemic continues. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH This is a Viewpoint paper regarding mitigating the spread of COVID-19 by improving access to vaccine and boosters among community supervised adults, especially the aging population. FINDINGS A key population that has been overlooked in vaccination efforts are older adults involved in the carceral system who are living in the community (i.e. "community supervised" or people on probation or parole). Older adults on probation and parole are at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 transmission and severe disease due to numerous factors at the individual, community, social and structural levels. ORIGINALITY/VALUE Implementation of recommendations presented in this Viewpoint will mitigate COVID-19 risk among a population that has been marginalized and overlooked, yet has been the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily F. Dauria
- University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Angelo Clemenzi-Allen
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kathryn Nowotny
- Department of Sociology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA
| | - Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, Center for Health Equity Research, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Brie Williams
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alysse Wurcel
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|