Venous thromboembolism and malignancy

Prostate cancer cell-platelet bidirectional signaling promotes calcium mobilization, invasion and apoptotic resistance via distinct receptor-ligand pairs

Platelets play a crucial role in cancer and thrombosis. However, the receptor-ligand repertoire mediating prostate cancer (PCa) cell-platelet interactions and ensuing consequences have not been fully elucidated. Microvilli emanating from the plasma membrane of PCa cell lines (RC77 T/E, MDA PCa 2b) directly contacted individual platelets and platelet aggregates. PCa cell-platelet interactions were associated with calcium mobilization in platelets, and translocation of P-selectin and integrin α_IIbβ₃ onto the platelet surface. PCa cell-platelet interactions reciprocally promoted PCa cell invasion and apoptotic resistance, and these events were insensitive to androgen receptor blockade by bicalutamide. PCa cells were exceedingly sensitive to activation by platelets in vitro, occurring at a PCa cell:platelet coculture ratio as low as 1:10 (whereas PCa patient blood contains 1:2,000,000 per ml). Conditioned medium from cocultures stimulated PCa cell invasion but not apoptotic resistance nor platelet aggregation. Candidate transmembrane signaling proteins responsible for PCa cell-platelet oncogenic events were identified by RNA-Seq and broadly divided into 4 major categories: (1) integrin-ligand, (2) EPH receptor-ephrin, (3) immune checkpoint receptor-ligand, and (4) miscellaneous receptor-ligand interactions. Based on antibody neutralization and small molecule inhibitor assays, PCa cell-stimulated calcium mobilization in platelets was found to be mediated by a fibronectin1 (FN1)-α_IIbβ₃ signaling axis. Platelet-stimulated PCa cell invasion was facilitated by a CD55-adhesion G protein coupled receptor E5 (ADGRE5) axis, with contribution from platelet cytokines CCL3L1 and IL32. Platelet-stimulated PCa cell apoptotic resistance relied on ephrin-EPH receptor and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-LPA receptor (LPAR) signaling. Of participating signaling partners, FN1 and LPAR3 overexpression was observed in PCa specimens compared to normal prostate, while high expression of CCR1 (CCL3L1 receptor), EPHA1 and LPAR5 in PCa was associated with poor patient survival. These findings emphasize that non-overlapping receptor-ligand pairs participate in oncogenesis and thrombosis, highlighting the complexity of any contemplated clinical intervention strategy.

Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in Ambulatory Solid Organ Malignancy Patients: Experience from a Cancer Research Institute

Cancer-associated deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are exceedingly common in patients with cancer. One-fifth of DVT events occur in patients with cancer and it is the second leading cause of death in patients with cancer after cancer itself. Data on DVT in cancer patients on medical therapy, especially from Indian experiences, are sparse. Here, we present our experience in ambulatory patients with solid organ cancer. The purpose of the study was to study the incidence of DVT in cancer patients on medical therapy and to analyze probable DVT risk factors. This study was a hospital-based single-arm retrospective collection and analysis of hospital records from patients receiving medical therapy on an outpatient and short-stay basis. From January 2016 to February 2017, adult solid organ cancer patients attending the medical oncology outpatient department (OPD), receiving active anticancer treatment, either oral or injectable, were included. The data was retrieved from the medical records department and the department of radiology. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Twenty-nine out of 1190 patients were documented to have developed DVT during the study period. The incidence of DVT in the outpatient settings was 2.4%, and DVT associated with venous access device in situ was seen in 4.05% (20/493) of the patients. Gynecological, breast, and hepatobiliary malignancies comprised most of the cases. Cancer patients are clearly at increased risk for DVT, but this risk is highly variable. It differs between subgroups of cancer patients. Five points Khorana risk model can predict risk for DVT in the ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy; however, the routine use of thromboprophylaxis in all cancer patients is not recommended. High-risk patients especially those with venous access devices need careful evaluation and counseling for prompt reporting and recognition of venous thrombosis.

Prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis

Cancer is a hypercoagulable state with an associated increased risk of venous thromboembolism (vte) that is further amplified in individuals who undergo chemotherapy. Compared with patients having cancer alone or vte alone, patients who develop cancer-associated vte have a significantly poorer prognosis. The risks of recurrent vte despite appropriate anticoagulation therapy and of bleeding are also higher in patients with cancer than in those without. For those reasons, the prevention and appropriate management of cancer-associated thrombosis is of paramount importance. Although low-molecular-weight heparin has been the standard of care for the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis, direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly being adopted as an effective and safe alternative.

[Incidence and impact of venous thrombosis in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of ovarian cancer]

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian cancer is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), which worsens overall survival. The main objective of our study was to calculate the incidence of VTE in our population. We analyzed VTE impact on diagnosis and management of ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, monocentric study in ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer patients, divided into 2 groups (« Presence of VTE » and « Absence of VTE »). A univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with VTE was performed, and we compared delays of management in both groups.

RESULTS

Among 157 patients included in the study, 22.9% presented a VTE, and 52.8% were asymptomatic. The VTE was diagnosed prior to any treatment in 61.1% of patients and revealed the ovarian cancer in 27.8% of cases. In multivariate analysis, tumor size (OR=1.1, 95% CI: 1-2.21, P=0.012), malnutrition (OR=3.79, 95% CI: 1.16-12,4, P=0.028) and Ddimer level above 1.5μg/mL (OR=13.8, 95% CI 1.2-152.8, P=0.02) were significantly associated with VTE. No significant difference was found between the two groups in diagnostic or therapeutic strategy, as well as in delays of management.

CONCLUSION

We report a high incidence of VTE in ovarian cancer, including a lot of asymptomatic events. An early diagnosis with clinical examination and Ddimer level could improve its management and its prognosis.

Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients on Simultaneous and Palliative Care

Simultaneous care represents the ideal integration between early supportive and palliative care in cancer patients under active antineoplastic treatment. Cancer patients require a composite clinical, social and psychological management that can be effective only if care continuity from hospital to home is guaranteed and if such a care takes place early in the course of the disease, combining standard oncology care and palliative care. In these settings, venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a difficult medical challenge, for the requirement of acute treatments and for the strong impact on anticancer therapies that might be delayed or, even, totally discontinued. Moreover, cancer patients not only display high rates of VTE occurrence/recurrence but are also more prone to bleeding and this forces clinicians to optimize treatment strategies, balancing between hemorrhages and thrombus formation. VTE prevention is, therefore, regarded as a double-edged sword. Indeed, while on one hand the appropriate use of antithrombotic agents can reduce VTE occurrence, on the other it significantly increases the bleeding risk, especially in the frail patients who present with multiple co-morbidities and poly-therapy that can interact with anticoagulant drugs. For these reasons, thromboprophylaxis should start while active cancer treatment is ongoing, according to a simultaneous care model in a patient-centered perspective.

Association between the Khorana score and pulmonary embolism risk in patients with advanced stage lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The Khorana score may help physicians to identify patients at high risk of Pulmonary embolism (PE) and decide who is eligible for thromboprophylaxis, however, its role in lung cancer patients remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate association between the Khorana score and risk of PE development among advanced stage lung cancer inpatients treated with chemotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study included 2008-2017 year data of 217 lung cancer inpatients with IIIB and IV clinical stages receiving chemotherapy. The Khorana score was evaluated and patients were divided in two groups: a group of patients with 1 point and a group of patients with 2 or more points of the Khorana score.

RESULTS

The study population included 46 (21.2%) female and 171 (78.8%) male patients whose median age was 62. During median observation period of 308.5 days 26 (11.9%) patients developed PE. Study included 137 patients with 1 point and 80 patients with 2 or more points of the Khorana score. The frequency of PE was 17 (12.4%) among patients with 1 point and 9 (11.3%) among patients with 2 points of the Khorana score. The relative risk of PE for patients with 2 or more points was 0.895 (95% CI = 0.379-2.114), P = 0.800.

CONCLUSION

The Khorana score was not associated with PE development risk among advanced stage lung cancer inpatients treated with chemotherapy.

Long term prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can be fatal if left untreated. Long-term prognosis of acute PE in the 21st century has not been fully reported. We aimed to determine the long-term prognosis of patients hospitalized with acute PE and compare survivalof patients with idiopathic and secondary PE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed a cohort of hospitalized patients with acute PE between 2006 and 2013.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

<18 years, venous embolism of non-pulmonary veins, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and presumptive diagnosis without image confirmation. Only patients with a first PE episode were included. End-point: all-cause mortality. Patients were compared according to PE aetiology: idiopathic, secondary to neoplastic conditions and secondary to non-neoplastic conditions. A Cox-regression analysis was used to study the prognostic impact of PE aetiology.

RESULTS

We studied 872 hospitalized acute PE patients. Median age 70 years, 56.9% were women. PE was idiopathic in 376 (43.1%), secondary to a neoplastic condition in 284 (32.6%) and secondary to a condition other than neoplasia in 212 (24.3%). Patients were followed for a median 25 months period and 508 (58.3%) died. Patients with PE attributed to a neoplastic condition had the worst survival. Patients with idiopathic PE had a multivariate-adjusted HR of mortality of 1.46 (1.08-1.99) during the over 2-year follow-up period when compared to those with acute PE attributed to a non-neoplastic condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with idiopathic acute PE have an almost 50% higher death risk in a median 2-year follow-up period than those with acute PE secondary to a condition other than neoplasia.

Quality Appraisal of Guidelines on Cancer-Associated Thrombosis Using AGREE II Instrument and Analysis of Current Status of New Oral Anticoagulants

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) studies have increased in recent years and the quality of guidelines to guide the clinical practice of CAT prevention and treatment becomes crucial. The therapy status of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been established in some thrombotic diseases, but the evidence for CAT remains unconvincing. The aim of this research is to evaluate the quality of CAT guidelines and discuss the role of NOAC in CAT. A search of articles was performed using PubMed/Medline, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and other authoritative websites. Search terms included guideline or guidance, consensuses, cancer, and thrombosis. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool was used to evaluate the qualities of the guidelines. A total of 19 guidelines were screened out and evaluated, of which 8 were recommended, 5 were recommended after revision, and 6 were not recommended. For prevention and treatment of CAT, low-molecular-weight heparin is the most recommended, followed by vitamin K antagonist, unfractionated heparin, fondaparinux, and aspirin. New oral anticoagulant is optional in some cases of CAT treatment. Based on AGREE II assessment tool, the quality of CAT guidelines is inconsistent. Attention should be drawn to the quality of CAT guidelines during clinical practice. The role of NOAC in the treatment of CAT is gradually established but requires more supporting evidence from future clinical trials.

Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer: An Update of Treatment and Prevention in the Era of Newer Anticoagulants

Cancer patients are at major risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), resulting in increased morbidity and economic burden. While a number of theories try to explain its pathophysiology, its risk stratification can be broadly done in cancer-related, treatment–related, and patient-related factors. Studies report the prophylactic use of thrombolytic agents to be safe and effective in decreasing VTE-related mortality/morbidity especially in postoperative cancer patients. Recent data also suggest the prophylactic use of low molecular weight Heparins (LMWHs) and Warfarin to be effective in reducing VTEs related to long-term central venous catheter use. In a double-blind, multicenter trial, a new ultra-LMWH Semuloparin has shown to be efficacious in preventing chemotherapy-associated VTE’s along with other drugs, such as Certoparin and Nadoparin. LMWHs are reported to be very useful in preventing recurrent VTEs in advanced cancers and should be preferred over full dose Warfarin. However, their long-term safety beyond 6 months has not been established yet. Furthermore, this paper discusses the safety and efficacy of different drugs used in the treatment and prevention of recurrent VTEs, including Bemiparin, Semuloparin, oral direct thrombin inhibitors, parenteral and direct oral factor Xa inhibitors.

Rapid Anticoagulation Reversal With Prothrombin Complex Concentrate Before Emergency Brain Tumor Surgery

BACKGROUND

Brain tumors may become symptomatic due to intracranial hypertension and patients may present to emergency departments in life-threatening conditions. Hence, emergency brain tumor surgery has to be considered, but sufficient hemostasis has to be present when initiating surgical procedures. Impaired hemostasis because of oral anticoagulation for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases is encountered in a growing number of patients. Here we present the first case series of anticoagulated patients receiving prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) to rapidly restore hemostasis and facilitate emergency brain tumor surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our institutional database of neurosurgical patients receiving PCC from February 2007 to April 2013 (n=432) and identified 5 patients who received PCC before emergency brain tumor surgery. Clinical characteristics, as well as modalities of PCC administration and parameters of hemostasis were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients had a mean Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9.4 at admission. Mean international normalized ratio was 3.75±1.98 and after administration of PCC (mean, 3260±942 IU), international normalized ratio significantly decreased to 1.19±0.07 (P<0.0001). Emergency brain tumor surgery was initiated within 5.2 hours (range, 0 to 13.5 h) after PCC administration. Diagnostic histopathology revealed metastasis (n=2), meningioma (n=2), and ependymoma (n=1). No hemorrhagic or thromboembolic events occurred and 4 patients had a good neurological outcome at hospital discharge. One patient died on the 14th postoperative day because of respiratory failure following development of pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

In anticoagulated patients with brain tumors requiring immediate surgery due to life-threatening conditions, administration of PCC rapidly and safely restored hemostasis. PCC administration seems to be an effective option for anticoagulant reversal in this patient cohort. Further observational safety studies (eg, thromboembolic events) are warranted.

Interleukin levels and their potential association with venous thromboembolism and survival in cancer patients

Cytokines have been found to be elevated in cancer patients and have been associated with worse prognosis in single tumour entities. We investigated the association of eight different cytokines with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and prognosis in cancer patients. The Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS), a prospective study, includes patients with newly diagnosed tumour or disease progression. Patients with an overt infection are excluded. Study end-points are VTE, death, loss to follow-up or study completion. Interleukin (IL) serum levels were measured using the xMAP technology developed by Luminex. Among 726 included patients, no associations between IL levels and VTE were found, with the exception of a trend for IL-1β and IL-6 in pancreatic cancer. Elevated levels of IL-6 [as continuous variable per double increase hazard ratio (HR) = 1·07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1·027-1·114, P = 0·001, IL-8 (HR = 1·12, 95% CI = 1·062-1·170, P < 0·001) and IL-11 (HR = 1·37, 95% CI = 1·103-1·709, P = 0·005] were associated with worse survival. In subgroup analyses based on tumour type, colon carcinoma patients, who had higher IL-6 levels, showed a shorter survival (HR = 2·405, 95% CI = 1·252-4·618, P = 0·008). A significant association of elevated IL-10 levels with a decrease in survival (HR = 1·824, 95% CI = 1·098-3·031, P = 0·020) was seen among patients with lung cancer. No correlation between VTE and IL levels was found, but higher IL-6, IL-8 and IL-11 levels were associated with worse survival in cancer patients. Further, elevated IL-6 levels might be a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer and elevated IL-10 levels in lung cancer patients.

Thrombosis in ovarian cancer: a case control study

Background:

Thrombotic events are common in cancer patients and have been associated with an adverse prognosis in large registry-based studies.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort of 417 patients with ovarian cancer treated at a tertiary cancer centre between 2006 and 2009 was studied to identify the incidence and risk factors for thrombotic events and the prognostic impact of thrombosis. Patient outcomes were evaluated against a matched control group without thrombosis.

Results:

Ninety-nine thrombotic events occurred in 90 patients (21.6%) from 8 months before diagnosis to 56 months following diagnosis, peaking in the 4 months following diagnosis. Patients with thrombosis were older (mean 65 vs 61 years, P=0.007), had a worse performance status (PS ⩾2: 29.9% vs 9.5%, P<0.0001) and had a more advanced FIGO stage (FIGO III/IV 75.6% vs 56.9%, P<0.0001) than patients without thrombosis. Shorter overall survival was seen in patients with pulmonary embolism and pelvic/lower limb deep vein thrombosis than without thrombosis (P=0.001). When the control group was matched for stage and PS, no survival difference was seen (P=0.91).

Conclusion:

Ovarian cancer patients with thrombotic events had a shorter survival. However, when matched for prognostic factors (PS and FIGO stage), thrombosis did not impact upon prognosis.

Venous thromboembolism in the patient with cancer: focus on burden of disease and benefits of thromboprophylaxis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. The risk of VTE varies over the natural history of cancer, with the highest risk occurring during hospitalization and after disease recurrence. Patient and disease characteristics are associated with further increased risk of VTE in this setting. Specific factors include cancer type (eg, pancreatic cancer, brain cancer, lymphoma) and the presence of metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. VTE is a significant predictor of increased mortality during the first year among all types and stages of cancer, with metastatic disease reported to be the strongest predictor of mortality. VTE is also associated with early death in ambulatory patients with cancer. These data highlight the need for close monitoring, prompt treatment, and appropriate preventive strategies for VTE in patients with cancer. The American Society of Clinical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have issued guidelines regarding the prophylaxis and treatment of patients with cancer. This review summarizes the impact of VTE on patients with cancer, the effects of VTE on clinical outcomes, the importance of thromboprophylaxis in this population, relevant ongoing clinical trials examining the prevention of VTE, and new pharmacologic treatment options.

What is the impact of antithrombotic therapy and risk factors on the frequency of thrombovascular events in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving epoetin beta?

PURPOSE, PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the BRAVE study evaluated the impact of baseline risk factors and antithrombotic therapy on the risk of thrombovascular events (TVEs) in patients receiving epoetin compared to patients not receiving epoetin.

RESULTS

Baseline risk factors have a significant impact on TVE risk under epoetin therapy. More than 2 risk factors increased the risk of TVEs in patients receiving epoetin (hazard ratio [HR] 2.89, confidence interval [CI] 1.04-8.02, p value [p]=0.04). In patients on epoetin without antithrombotic therapy, the risk for TVEs was higher (HR 4.11, CI 1.37-12.4, p=0.01) compared to those who received antithrombotics (HR 1.37, CI 0.59-3.18, p=0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis has identified several risk factors which may impact the risk of TVEs under epoetin therapy. These data suggest that antithrombotic therapy may have the potential to reduce the risk of TVEs under epoetin therapy. These findings are hypothesis-generating and need to be confirmed in a prospective, randomised study.

Medical management of patients with brain tumors

The most common medical problems in brain tumor patients include the management of seizures, peritumoral edema, medication side effects, venous thromboembolism (VTE), fatigue and cognitive dysfunction. Despite their importance, there are relatively few studies specifically addressing these issues. There is increasing evidence that brain tumor patients who have not had a seizure do not benefit from prophylactic antiepileptic medications. Patients on corticosteroids are at greater risk of Pneumocystis jerovecii pneumonia and may benefit from prophylactic therapy. There is also growing evidence suggesting that anticoagulation may be more effective than inferior vena cava IVC) filtration devices for treating VTE in brain tumor patients and the risk of hemorrhage with anticoagulation is relatively small. Low-molecular weight heparin may be more effective than coumadin. Medications such as modafinil and methylphenidate have assumed an increasing role in the treatment of fatigue, while donepezil and memantine may be helpful with memory loss.

Abnormal Clotting in Cancer: An Overview of Pathophysiology and Etiology

OBJECTIVE

To help oncology nurses become more cognizant of the increased risk cancer patients have for venous thromboembolism due to such factors as chemotherapy and hypercoagulability stemming from the neoplasm itself.

DATA SOURCES

Primary and tertiary literature and the author's clinical experience.

CONCLUSION

Establishing the optimal treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis in the future will depend in part on a better understanding of clotting aberrations. Oncology nurses must be cognizant of the various risk factors for thrombosis and bleeding and how they relate to cancer treatments and interventions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses are in a unique position to recognize conditions that predispose cancer patients to the development of venous thromboembolism as well as its signs and symptoms. This enhanced understanding will ensure that patients receive appropriate and timely intervention.

Vena cava filters in cancer patients: experience with 50 patients

OBJECTIVE

To study the immediate and late results obtained from the implantation of vena cava filters in cancer patients with deep vein thrombosis concomitant with neoplasia.

METHODS

This was a retrospective evaluation of 50 patients with an association of cancer and deep venous thrombosis who underwent interruption of the inferior vena cava and the insertion of permanent vena cava filters. The indications for the procedure, filter implantation technique, early and late complications related to the operation, and the clinical evolution were evaluated.

RESULTS

The most frequent indication for filter implantation was the contraindication for full anticoagulant treatment (80%). The femoral vein was the preferred access route (86% of the patients). There were no complications related to the surgical procedure. During the follow-up, the following complications were observed: 1 episode of nonfatal pulmonary thromboembolism, 2 cases of occlusion of the inferior vena cava, and 1 case of thrombus retained in the device. Twenty patients (40%) died due to progression of the neoplasm.

CONCLUSIONS

Interruption of the inferior cava vein using an endoluminal filter is a procedure with a low rate of complications. It is a safe and efficient measure for preventing pulmonary embolism in cancer patients who have deep vein thrombosis of the lower limbs.